Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBack-Up DocumentsCFFYOFMIAMI Site Selection and Cost/Benefit Analysis For the New Administrative Facility City of Miami CBRE Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Department of Real Estate and Asset Management ("DREAM") and CBRE have analyzed various sites upon which the new City of Miami administrative building may be located. To help inform the study and ensure the right specialties were represented, CBRE's team included experts in their public - sector, office, valuations and architecture and construction management practice groups. In preparation of this report, DREAM and CBRE compiled a list of City -owned properties potentially available for this project, short-listed the top-ranked sites based on a detailed scoring rubric, then prepared a highest and best use and financial analysis of each. The following summarizes the benefits, challenges, and financial implications associated with the short-listed sites. Importantly, City owned sites were also assigned land value. While the City may not have to purchase the property, there is an opportunity cost associated with the property if chosen as the site for the administrative facility. This opportunity cost is the market value if the parcel were sold and/or redeveloped under a ground lease. Forthat reason, it is important to understand both the land value and associated tax revenue each site could generate if owned and developed to its highest and best use by the private sector. NEXUS SITE Benefits Challenges Centrally located in Downtown Miami Small site/minimal flexibility Delivery timing (most ideal) Potentially higher development cost Vacant Opportunity cost of potential tax revenue Amenity base Familiarity for Employees and Citizens Prominence along 1-95/gateway to City Surrounding public parking Financials Estimated Property Value $19,000,000 Potential City Tax Revenues $8,179,499 Estimated Development Budget $146,926,009 Comments The site's location is ideal for the new administrative building. It is adjacent to the current site and near mass transit, while maintaining the downtown location and remaining one-step removed from traffic in Miami's Central Business District ("CBD"). The site is familiar to employees and visitors, is the only site able to continue use of needed FDOT additional parking, and the only site that would ensure strict developer adherence to continuity of service and expedient timing of delivery. December 2018 Page 1 01w 01 �l City of Miami ��- Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis L — ■_ MARLIN'S SITE Benefits Challenges Proximity to City Hall Subject to agreements for support parking City -owned Traffic congestion/logistic concerns on game days Vacant No public transportation Adjacent to SR -836 Outside of downtown Limited amenities Financials Estimated Property Value $17,500,000 (combined parcels) Potential City Tax Revenues $2,175,488 (combined parcels) Estimated Development Budget $130,897,724 (if built on parcel 1) $123,773,436 (if built on parcel 2) $125,824,368 (if built on parcel 3) Comments The site is not ideal, presenting various limitations, resulting in significant parking, construction, and spatial concerns that would ultimately provide lesser value to the City. The site is comprised of three separate parcels that individually would fail to accommodate the City's density and parking requirements. At least two of the parcels must be combined to accommodate the City's requirements, but this could present other challenges such as delayed timing. The Marlins would have third -party rights in the development process. The site would provide more economic and public benefit to the City as future affordable housing/residential development site. AT&T SITE Benefits Challenges Centrally located in Downtown Miami Small site (limited flexibility) City -owned Limited on-site parking Vacant Traffic congestion Amenity base (adjacent to Miami World Center) Potential cost to acquire adjoining air rights Proximity to County offices Potentially higher development cost Surrounding public parking Timing to relocate Fire Station No. 1 Proximity to major thoroughfares Adjacent to transportation hub (Miami Central) Financials Estimated Property Value $12,000,000 Potential City Tax Revenues $2,122,125 Estimated Development Budget $142,147,093 Comments While this site's CBD location provides major transportation and amenity benefits, it also presents major economic and logistical challenges, including spatial, parking, and traffic, that diminish the City's potential benefit and economic return. December 2018 Page 2 01w 01 �l City of Miami ��- Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis L — ■_ BISCAYNE PARK SITE Benefits Challenges Centrally located in Downtown Miami Traffic congestion City -owned Not centrally located Vacant Limited amenities Cost efficient design possibilities Limited access to major roadways Large site, master plan flexibility Interest from other City Departments Financials Estimated Property Value $50,000,000 (entire site) $8,624,502 (portion of site) Potential City Tax Revenues $3,109,216 (portion of site) Estimated Development Budget $129,844,735 (portion of site) Comments This site presents a rare opportunity to develop adjacent to downtown CBD but falls short due to its limited access. The site is better utilized by the City of Miami's Police Department ("MPD"), in tandem with a sale or long-term lease of the current MPD headquarters, as the centralized location for their new headquarters due to MPD's locational and logistical requirements. The site has the potential to be subdivided and could accommodate multiple uses, including private development and tax generation. MELREESE SITE Benefits Challenges City -owned Limited amenity base Vacant Potential environmental concerns Large site, master plan flexibility FAA height restrictions Adjacent to transportation (Miami Intermodal) Not centrally located Outside of Downtown Timing Soccer complex limitations No net loss policy/cost to replace park space Financials Estimated Property Value $18,000,000 (portion of site) Potential City Tax Revenues $944,328 (portion of site) Estimated Development Budget $142,987,424 (portion of site) Comments This is one of the least beneficial of the short-listed sites, this site presents multiple unknown variables, including the potential for environmental cleanup, its non -CBD location, and its impact on adjacent residents and businesses. This will inevitably result in greater expense, less benefit, and could potentially delay the development beyond what is practical and necessary given the site's other potential development. Based on the results of this analysis, as further detailed below, DREAM and CBRE recommend the Nexus Site as the site for the development of the new administrative facility. December 2018 Page 3 01w 01 x\* M. City of Miami CBRE I - Miami Riverside Center / " " X Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis BACKGROUND In February 2016, CBRE, on behalf of the City of Miami issued a two-part competitive solicitation to (1) sell the current Miami Riverside Center ("MRC") site and (2) construct a replacement City administrative facility. The competitive solicitation offered a few different City -owned parcels as potential sites for the new administrative facility. The sites included a portion of Marlins Park, as well as "Block 45," an SEOPW CRA -owned parcel. Additionally, proposers could offer sites in their control. In August 2016, both parts of the competitive solicitation were awarded to The Adler Group d/b/a Lancelot, L.L.C. ("Lancelot"). Lancelot's proposal offered to build the new facility on any of the following: Marlins Stadium site, "Block 45," or the Link at Douglas Station. Throughout the negotiation and Best and Final Offer process, Lancelot also offered the site immediately adjacent to the current MRC, which they own and control. On July 26, 2018, the City of Miami Commission passed a resolution allowing the disposition and redevelopment of the City -owned MRC property to be placed on the November 2018 ballot. Since the voters have approved the item, the City of Miami now needs to select the new site for its new administrative facility. As a result of the legislation passed at the July 26, 2018 Commission meeting, the City Commission directed DREAM and CBRE to analyze the various properties available for the new location of the City's administrative facility. This report reviews and compares sites which have been considered and recommends the ideal location to develop the new administrative facility. METHODOLOGY The City compiled a list of all City -owned properties greater than two acres to review as potential sites. Thereafter, various properties were removed based on their unfeasibility. This included, for example, deed restrictions limiting the use of the sites, long-term lease agreements, and other aspects of the sites rendering them impracticable for the new City administrative facility. Thereafter, the remaining sites were evaluated and ranked according to the below -listed criteria. Once the ranking was completed, the top six sites were short-listed for further, in-depth evaluation. CBRE reviewed the short-listed properties and prepared the following for each site: (1) a site analysis considering the potential zoning, development opportunities, and corresponding property value; (2) a detailed development budget; and (3) estimated taxes associated with the development of each site. Please note that CBRE prepared this analysis to determine the relative values and costs associated with each of the properties, and that the analysis is subject to change based on the various assumptions regarding property values, anticipated zoning, market interest rates, construction costs, and other fluctuating variables. Using the information and projections provided, a site was ultimately recommended. December 2018 Page 4 Olt 01 x\* M. City of Miami CBRE I - Miami Riverside Center / " " X Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis CRITERIA & SCORING RUBRIC 1. Size: Given the required square footage of the new facility, and assuming no shared parking, the site must be no less than two acres. The motivation for the issuance of a competitive solicitation, for the disposition of the MRC and development of the new administrative facility was due to the City's growing needs and MRC's limited space. The City of Miami engaged Gensler, a global architecture, design, and planning firm, to prepare a space planning study. The Gensler study determined the current spatial and parking needs of the City. The study determined the City requires an, approximate, 287,500 square foot facility. Accordingly, with few exceptions, all sites less than two acres were removed from consideration. 2. Ease of Access: With this category, the site's proximity to major thoroughfares and public transportation is considered. Perhaps the most important role of the new administrative facility is to provide services to City of Miami residents. Being located on a site where residents may easily access is, therefore, a crucial factor in the analysis. 3. Site Preparation Cost: In order to yield a greater return on investment, project -ready sites were given a higher score. Within this context, a project -ready site would be one which required little or no site preparation; demolition of existing structures; utilities installation, etc. Parks, zoned CS, were assigned zero points due to the City's "No Net Loss" policy (i.e., cost to replace park land and to relocate park facilities). 4. Centralized Location: Just as with "Ease of Access," above, the new administration facility's location is highly relevant to City residents. Those seeking access to the City of Miami's administration will require the facility to be in a familiar and centralized location. The MRC is well known for its location in the City's downtown area. Therefore, sites closest to the current location are assigned a higher score to reflect optimal continuity of services. 5. Timing of Building Delivery: Sites which allow for the quickest delivery have been assigned higher scores. Due to the dual nature of the solicitation, a major factor of this analysis is the development timeline for each shortlisted site. Various factors which would affect timing have been reviewed, including but not limited to, relocation of facilities; site control; present zoning and land use; referendum and other charter requirements, etc. Parks were assigned a score of one, in this category, due to the additional time it will take to replace park space and relocate facilities. 6. Zoning/land use changes: Sites which require less change have been assigned greater scoring values. Sites which require changes to zoning and/or land use designations inevitably come with significant delays and other political considerations that would ultimately provide greater complications. Therefore, those sites which require little or no zoning/land use changes have been ranked higher. 7. Current Use: Finally, each short-listed site's current use has been evaluated. In particular, sites which are heavily utilized by members of the public are deemed less desirable. Parks have not been assigned any points, for this category, due to the nature of the use for the benefit of the community. December 2018 Page 5 Olt 01 �l City of Miami ��- Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis L — ■_ Based on the above criteria, the following scoring rubric was created with 0 being the lowest score and 4 being the highest in terms of site relocation functionality and desirability: December 2018 Page 6 0 1 2 3 4 Less than 2 Size 2— 3 acres 3— 4 acres 4— 5 acres 5 +acres acres More than 10 10 minutes or 8 minutes or 5 minutes or 5 minutes or less to min from major less to less to less to Ease of Access highways and thoroughfares highways highways highways walkable to and/or transit and/or transit and/or transit and/or transit transit Site Preparation Very High High Moderate Minimal Undeveloped Cost 20 + minutes 15 — 20 minutes 10- 15 minutes 5 — 10 minutes Less than 5 Centralized from current from current from current from current minutes from location facility facility facility facility current facility Timing of Site available Building Very Long Long Moderate Minimal immediately (5+ years) Delivery (vacant) Extensive Land Zoning/land use Use/Zoning No changes Significant Moderate Minimal changes changes required required Current Use Very high High Moderate Minimal None December 2018 Page 6 City of Miami Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis RANKING CBRE Common Name Size Ease of Access Site Preparation Cost Centralized Location Timing of Delivery Zoning/ Land Use Changes Current Use TOTAL SCORE Nexus Site 0 4 4 4 4 3 4 23 Marlins Stadium Parking 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 22 AT&T Site 0 4 4 3 4 3 4 22 Biscayne Park 4 2 4 2 4 4 0 20 Melreese Golf Course 4 4 3 1 3 0 3 18 Vehicle GSA Service Center 4 4 1 2 1 4 1 17 Link at Douglas Station 0 4 1 1 4 3 4 17 Police Central Station 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 16 Fire Station 5 4 4 0 2 0 4 0 14 Range Park 4 3 0 2 1 4 0 14 Lummus Park 4 4 0 4 1 0 0 13 David T. Kennedy Park 4 4 0 2 1 0 0 11 Theodore Gibson Park 4 3 0 3 1 0 0 11 Williams Park 4 3 0 3 1 0 0 11 Curtis Park 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 10 Dinner Key/Regatta Park 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 10 Douglas Park 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 10 E.G. Sewell Park 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 10 Fern Isle Park 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 10 Grapeland Park 4 4 0 1 1 0 0 10 Moore Park 4 3 0 2 1 0 0 10 Jorge Mas Canosa Park 2 3 0 3 1 0 0 9 Juan Pablo Duarte Park 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 9 Little Haiti Park Project 4 3 0 1 1 0 0 9 Roberto Clemente Park 3 3 0 2 1 0 0 9 Dorsey Park 1 3 0 3 1 0 0 8 Kenneth Myers Park 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 8 Robert King High Park 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 8 Shenandoah Park 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 8 Virrick Park 3 3 0 1 1 0 0 8 West End Park 4 3 0 0 1 0 0 8 Antonio Maceo Park 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 7 Lemon City Park 1 3 0 2 1 0 0 7 Coral Gate Park 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 6 Kinloch Park 2 3 0 0 1 0 0 6 December 2018 Page 7 * t-, *� 01, O a ° City of Miami CBRE Miami Riverside Center Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis SHORT LIST ANALYSIS Based on the above criteria, the top-ranked properties separated for more detailed analysis were the following: Nexus Site The Adler -owned Nexus Site ("Nexus Site") is located at 230 SW 3rd Street, adjacent to the current City of Miami administrative building. The site is approximately 1.6 acres. The new administrative building would use a portion of the 1.6 -acre site and would have shared parking with the new Nexus development contemplated by the Adler Group on the current MRC property. The site is adjacent to 1-95, and contiguous with the current MRC facility. The nearest metro station is the Government Center Station, which is less than half a mile or a 10 -minute walk from the site. The site is zoned T6 -36- B-0 according to the Miami 21 Zoning Code. The Adler Group is the owner of the site, having purchased it with the intent to develop a separate project. Upon the issuance of the OM/RFP and subsequent approvals, they have elected to keep the site vacant until the City decides whether to purchase the site for the new administrative facility. Based on the current zoning and the potential development opportunities on the site, the Nexus site was valued at approximately nineteen million dollars ($19,000,000). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be approximately one hundred and forty-six million nine hundred and twenty-six thousand and nine dollars ($146,926,009). Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately eight million one hundred and seventy-nine thousand four hundred and ninety-nine dollars ($8,179,499) in the event the property is developed to the maximum potential contemplated based on the current zoning and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. The Nexus Site provides the most seamless transition and best timing of delivery because the site is directly adjacent to the current site and is completely vacant. Additionally, the site is centrally located in an area familiar to employees, residents, and visitors of the administrative building. The site also allows the City the continued use of the MPA parking lots under the 1-95 highway. Additionally, there are benefits associated with the adjacency to the new Nexus development, including an increased amenity base. The challenges presented with the site are related to the integrated nature of the development. Particularly, due to the limited size of the site, there is minimal flexibility in the design and requirements to enter into cross access agreements for parking. December 2018 Page 8 CBRE City of Miami Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis Marlin's Stadium Surface Parking The Marlin's Stadium Surface Parking site consists of three parcels located at 1680 NW 5th Street, 1610 NW 6th Street, and 1600 NW 7th Street. The three parcels are adjacent to each other but are separated by roadways. The largest parcel on the south is approximately 2.8 acres, the center parcel is approximately 1 acre, and the northern -most parcel is approximately 1.6 acres, for a total of 5.4 available acres of land. This site is less than five minutes from the Dolphin Expressway (SR 836) but has no major transit options nearby. The property is currently being used for surface parking in support of the Marlin's stadium. There are no structures on the site that would require relocation or demolition. The property is located within 10 minutes west of the current MRC. All three parcels are zoned Civic Institution according to the Miami 21 Zoning Code, which would support an administrative facilit The site is surrounded b T6 -8-O to 4 T I P..1 .a di Y ' y I w��T'�'^ the North, T5 -L to the South, and T3-0 to the West. It is important to note that the property is subject to an agreement between the City and County which provides that the parcels will be available for parking for the baseball stadium. Should the City elect to use the property for the new administrative facility or otherwise convey or lease the property, the agreement would need to be amended to reflect a release of that obligation. Based on the potential rezoning and the potential development opportunities on each of the three sites, the Marlin's site was collectively valued at approximately seventeen million five hundred thousand dollars ($17,500,000). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be approximately one hundred thirty million eight hundred ninety seven and seven hundred and twenty four dollars ($130,897,724) if built on the northern -most parcel, one hundred and twenty-three million seven hundred and seventy-three thousand, four hundred and thirty-six dollars ($123,773,436) if built on the center parcel, and one hundred twenty-five million eight hundred and twenty four thousand and three hundred and sixty-eight dollars ($125,824,368) if built on the southernmost parcel. However, none of the three sites individually could accommodate the City's density and parking requirements, and combining the parcels could present other challenges, such as planning and zoning limitations and delayed timing of delivery. Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately two million one hundred and seventy-five thousand four hundred and eighty-eight dollars ($2,175,488) in the event all three parcels were developed to the maximum potential contemplated based on the potential rezoning and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. December 2018 Page 9 Park (N W. 4 T I P..1 .a di Y ' y I w��T'�'^ the North, T5 -L to the South, and T3-0 to the West. It is important to note that the property is subject to an agreement between the City and County which provides that the parcels will be available for parking for the baseball stadium. Should the City elect to use the property for the new administrative facility or otherwise convey or lease the property, the agreement would need to be amended to reflect a release of that obligation. Based on the potential rezoning and the potential development opportunities on each of the three sites, the Marlin's site was collectively valued at approximately seventeen million five hundred thousand dollars ($17,500,000). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be approximately one hundred thirty million eight hundred ninety seven and seven hundred and twenty four dollars ($130,897,724) if built on the northern -most parcel, one hundred and twenty-three million seven hundred and seventy-three thousand, four hundred and thirty-six dollars ($123,773,436) if built on the center parcel, and one hundred twenty-five million eight hundred and twenty four thousand and three hundred and sixty-eight dollars ($125,824,368) if built on the southernmost parcel. However, none of the three sites individually could accommodate the City's density and parking requirements, and combining the parcels could present other challenges, such as planning and zoning limitations and delayed timing of delivery. Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately two million one hundred and seventy-five thousand four hundred and eighty-eight dollars ($2,175,488) in the event all three parcels were developed to the maximum potential contemplated based on the potential rezoning and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. December 2018 Page 9 VAN (U. I F�� ' City of Miami CBRE ..... . Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis Positive features of the site include the fact that the property is already controlled by the City, is centrally located, and is easily accessible. It is also beneficial that the site contains no major structures to demolish. However, the site presents some significant challenges as well, including the limitations set forth by the current agreement with the County as well as the adjacency to the Marlins stadium, which may provide logistical/traffic concerns during games and delayed timing of delivery. Additional issues with the site include the limited amenities in the area, lack of public transit, and that the property is not located in downtown. December 2018 Page 10 VAN (U. I F�� ' City of Miami CBRE ..... . Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis AT&T Site The AT&T site is made up of two contiguous parcels of irregular shape located at 610 NW 1 Avenue and 53 NW 6 Street. Together the parcels are 0.77 acres in size. Although _ most sites less than 2 acres were removed from consideration, this site in particular presented various benefits which merited consideration. I The property is currently vacant and is being I` , reviewed for re -platting. It is partially zoned T6 -60A-0, and partially not yet zoned. The site is less than 5 minutes from I-95, adjacent to a major transit facility, and less than 10 I minutes North of the current MRC facility. i Based on the current zoning and the potential development opportunities on the site, the AT&T site was valued at approximately twelve million dollars ` ($12,000,000). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be 1 �N e. tr rp Iflrptllltt 1 F!!t'I!''!t!F'►rrFlKIF� 1 Fptlr r'r!!!M PFItFr rrl j q!r!P t!e!l► cltlrPttle �! {�r�r�►rFh��<<ti�F !r T. W approximately one hundred forty-two million one hundred and forty-seven thousand and ninety-three dollars =A-& ($142,147,093). Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately two million one hundred and twenty-two thousand one hundred twenty-five dollars ($2,122,125) in the event the property were to be developed to the maximum potential contemplated and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. Among the greatest benefits of the site, is its central, highly -coveted location within Downtown Miami. The site is adjacent to Miami Central, a major transportation hub consisting of the Brightline, Metromover, Tri -Rail, and Metrorail. The property is also adjacent to the future Miami World Center, which would provide a major amenity base from which employees and visitors alike would benefit. Other positive features of the site include that the City has control of the site, it is vacant and unused, and is near to the current facility and major thoroughfares. Challenges include the site's small size and irregular shape, limiting construction and design efficiencies, and requiring the new administrative building to have a smaller footprint and greater height. Parking would also be challenging and would likely require shared parking agreements with adjacent sites. The City would need to use the entire site and would make efforts to coordinate with adjoining land -owners to expand, where possible; this could include the purchase of air rights prior to design and construction. Additionally, the site was intended to be used as a temporary facility for the Fire Department while Fire Station # 1 is developed. If we are unable to find another site for the temporary facility, this will result in significant delays while the temporary facility is built, the new fire station redeveloped, the temporary facility torn down, and the site prepared for construction. All this would have to occur prior to the development of the new administrative facility on this site. Should an alternative site for the temporary fire station be identified, this timing concern would not be an issue. December 2018 Page 11 CBRE City of Miami Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis Biscayne Park The Biscayne Park site is located at 150 NE 191h Street and consists of approximately 7.3 acres. Although the entire parcel is just over 7 acres, the City would only need to use a portion of the property for the new administrative building. The site is less than 5 minutes from 1-95 and US -1, and 10 -15 minutes North of the current MRCfacility. The nearest metro station is the Adrienne Arsht Center Metromover Station, which is about half a mile or 15 minutes from the site. The site is made up of open recreational space, a parking lot provided to Temple Israel through a Revocable License Agreement, and a 2,000 SF structure which houses a non-profit community organization commonly known as PULSE, which is also subject to a Revocable License Agreement. Although most of the site is used recreationally as open space, it is not dedicated as a Park. The site is zoned Civic Institution according to the Miami 21 Zoning Code, which would support an administrative facility. The site is surrounded by T6-8-0 to the North, D-2 to the West, and T6- 3613-0 to the East. M%_r'.'I Based on the potential rezoning and the potential development opportunities on the site, the entire Biscayne Park site was valued at approximately fifty million dollars ($50,000,000); while the portion required for use was valued at approximately eight million six hundred twenty four thousand five hundred and two dollars ($8,624,502). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be approximately one hundred twenty-nine million eight hundred forty-four thousand seven hundred and thirty-five dollars ($129,844,735) for construction on a portion of the site. Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately three million one hundred and nine thousand two hundred and sixteen dollars ($3,109,216) in the event the property were to be developed to the potential contemplated based on the potential rezoning and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. One of the most notable benefits of this site, is its large size, which would provide the City with greater flexibility in design. Other benefits include that the City has control of the site, it is located in the Edgewater/Wynwood neighborhood, and it is near to the current facility and major thoroughfares. On the other hand, the site also provides some challenges, including nearby traffic congestion, reduction of recreational usage, and limited access. Additionally, other departments and agencies have expressed interest in the use of the site. Given the lack of available contiguous parcels of this size and proximity to Wynwood, this site would also provide the City with an excellent sale or private sector ground lease redevelopment opportunity. December 2018 Page 12 VAN (U. I F�� ' City of Miami CBRE ..... . Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis Melreese Golf Course The Melreese golf Course site is located at 1400 NW 37th Avenue and 1802 NW 37th Avenue. This property is estimated to total approximately 150 acres, although the City would only use a small portion of such land. Currently zoned as Civic Space, the site is presently used as a golf course with a few structures currently used by the Melreese Country Club in connection with a Professional Services Agreement with the City. The site is 15 — 20 minutes from the current MRC facility. The site is adjacent, on the north, to the Miami Intermodal Center which is an intermodal rapid transit, commuter rail, intercity rail, local bus, and intercity bus transportation hub. Miami International Airport is located to the west of the property. To the south and east of the property there are primarily residential properties. Also notable is the City Commission's approval, and subsequent voter approval, of a new soccer stadium complex. The designs are still conceptual and the agreements W1 for such soccer complex are still pending approval by City ^ _+W'2\1 MNNE-71W�W`1Ln E6 -m Commission, but the terms proposed included using only a portion of the land available — the remaining land would be used for open recreational space. Based on the potential rezoning and the potential development opportunities on the site, the portion of land required for use at the Melreese site was valued at approximately eighteen million dollars ($18,000,000). By including the market land value together with anticipated development costs, a preliminary development budget was prepared, and determined to be approximately one hundred forty-two million nine hundred eight seven thousand four hundred twenty- four dollars (142,987,424). Additionally, CBRE calculated the potential tax revenues to the City to be approximately nine hundred forty-four thousand three hundred twenty-eight dollars ($944,328) in the event the portion of the property were developed to the potential contemplated based on the potential rezoning and used for non-governmental purposes. For greater detail, please refer to the appendices included herein. Among the benefits of the property is the large size, which would provide the City with maximum flexibility in design and construction, and the minimal development on the site, which would expedite timing of delivery. Due to its proximity to the Miami Intermodal Center, the property is also ideal for those wishing to use mass transit to commute or visit the site. Access to major highways is also a positive trait, as the site is adjacent to SR -836 and SR -112. The challenges presented with the site include height restrictions imposed by the FAA due to its proximity to the airport, the fact that the site is not centrally located, and the limited amenities provided in the area (note the available amenities are expected to increase with the development of a new soccer complex and supporting retail). Additionally, the design of the new administrative building may be limited by the design and construction plans associated with the soccer complex conceptually approved by voters. The site also may present environmental concerns that may affect December 2018 Page 13 VAN (U. I F�� ' City of Miami CBRE ..... . Miami Riverside Center H ° Replacement Facility Site Selection and Cost / Benefit Analysis timing. Also relevant is the site's current zoning as Civic Space and the resultant requirements that the City provide alternative park/CS space in accordance with the City's "No Net Loss" policy. Further, although the site is City -owned, the property is currently subject to an existing Management Agreement of the Golf Course which is set to expire in 2021. The agreement provides that it may be cancelled without cause subject to a payment to the provider for "the balance of all amounts that would be paid to Provider during the remaining term of this Agreement without any reduction or set-off of any kind." While the applicability of this language may be a question for the Office of the City Attorney, this should nevertheless be considered relevant to the potential cost and time associated with this site. The way in which the site is incorporated into the overall soccer stadium redevelopment is also an unknown and it may take years to have an overall project master plan, which would ultimately delay the construction of a new administrative facility. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above ranking and analysis, the most ideal location for the City's new administrative headquarters is the Nexus site. The Nexus site offers the most seamless and efficient transition for the new administrative building. The location is one that residents and employees have become accustomed to and allows the City to continue providing services just down the street from other City and County services. The location of the site is also ideal for its accessibility to highways, transit, and general ease of access. Although the amount to be financed for the development would be higher than the other sites, the other sites could be sold or leased to offset the cost, thereby allowing the City to retain this ideal location. Considering the value the other sites could provide the City if sold or leased, the total development budget for the Nexus site is not significantly higher than the other sites considered, the challenges presented with the site are minimal, and the benefits are considerable. December 2018 Page 14 E Via J, 41 Hypothetical Site Development A N Ground Level to 81h (Parking) �s PARKING (110 CA__ T RS) 9-10 Level (Parking) ATQ_T CITC. 1L/Ll/LUly AT&T SITE: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 33,368 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: T6 -60A-0 Office (16,500 S.F.) • PROPOSED ZONING: T6 -60A-0. Office (16,500 S.F.) • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 11 / 50% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. • MAX FLOOR RATIO: 33,368 X 11 = 367,048 S.F. • 50% BONUS: 367,048X50% =183,524 S.F. Office (16,500 S.F.) TOTAL S.F. = 550,572 S.F. (REQ. 1,652 Office (16,500 S.F.) CARS) • MAXIMUM BUILDABLE (LOT COVERAGE): 80% (26,694.4 S.F.) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: Office (16,500 S.F.) • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. ' • PARKING CAN YIELD: 750 CARS • PARKING REQ.: 891 CARS • 30% PARKING REDUCTION 624 CARS (PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT) ! SUMMARY: 18 Floors Office @ 16,500 S.F.: 297,000 S.F. OFFICES (297,000 S.F.) i i i i 1111 — 2811 (Office) 10' Office (16,500 S.F.) 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 i o 15 15 I N o 14 13 12 11 Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Office (16,500 S.F.) Parking (55 Cars) 10 9 i 8 7 c 6 c 5 Y `o q y 3 2 1 1 Parking (55 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) Parking (80 Cars) CBRE I HEERY A _ N -- - - -- RETAIL SPACE I 50, 000 S. F. I PARKING (375 CARS) I Ground Level (Retail & Parking) Level 2-8 (Offices & Parking) PUBLIC OFFICE FLOORS PUBLIC AREA 30,000 S.F. AREA ---- ------ Level 9-24 (Offices) BISCAYNE PARK SITE: 12/21/2019 BISCAYNE PARK SITE.: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 318,859 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTIONAL) • PROPOSED ZONING:T6-24B. • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 16140% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. • MAX FLOOR RATIO: 318,859 X 16 = 5,101,744 S.F. • 40% BONUS: 127,543X50% = 127,543 S.F. TOTAL S.F. = 5,229,287 S.F. (MAX BUILDABLE) • MAXIMUM BUILDABLE (LOT COVERAGE): 80% (255,087 S.F.) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. • PARKING CAN YIELD: 3,000 CARS CI I KA RA A DV • RETAIL: 50,000 S.F. N 830,000 S.F. TOTAL: — --------------------------- OFFICE FLOORS I 50,000 S.F. , PARKING I (375 CARS) —_-- Level 2-8 (Offices & Parking) PUBLIC OFFICE FLOORS PUBLIC AREA 30,000 S.F. AREA ---- ------ Level 9-24 (Offices) BISCAYNE PARK SITE: 12/21/2019 BISCAYNE PARK SITE.: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 318,859 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTIONAL) • PROPOSED ZONING:T6-24B. • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 16140% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. • MAX FLOOR RATIO: 318,859 X 16 = 5,101,744 S.F. • 40% BONUS: 127,543X50% = 127,543 S.F. TOTAL S.F. = 5,229,287 S.F. (MAX BUILDABLE) • MAXIMUM BUILDABLE (LOT COVERAGE): 80% (255,087 S.F.) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. • PARKING CAN YIELD: 3,000 CARS CI I KA RA A DV • RETAIL: 50,000 S.F. OFFICE: 830,000 S.F. TOTAL: 880,000 S.F. (REQ. 2,640 CARS) Office (30,000 S.F.) 24 Office (30,000 S.F.) 23 Office (30,000 S.F.) 22 Office (30,000 S.F.) 21 Office (30,000 S.F.) 20 Office (30,000 S.F.) 19 Office (30,000 S.F.) 18 Office (30,000 S.F.) 17 Office (30,000 S.F.) 16 Office (30,000 S.F.) 15 Office (30,000 S.F.) 14 Office (30,000 S.F.) 13 Office (30,000 S.F.) 12 Office (30,000 S.F.) 11 Office (30,000 S.F.) 10 Office (30,000 S.F.) 9 Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Parking (375 Cars) Retail (50,000 S.F.) Parking (375 Cars) 8 7 w 6 U 5 = 4 M a 3 2 1 CBREI HEERY N r j Ground Level (Retail & Parking) I J j OFFICE (FLOORS) !' 110,000 S.F. I I Level 2-5 (Parking) " rl' BONUS FLOORS 30,000 S.F. (120, 000 S.F.) PUBLIC AREA Level 6-8 (Offices) Level 9-12 (with Bonuses) MARLINS BALLPARK SITE 1: 12/19/2019 SITE —1: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 68,900 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTION). • PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE TO:'T6-8'. • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 5125% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. a) MAX FLOOR RATIO: 68,900X 5 = 344,500 S.F. b) 25% BONUS: 344,500X25% = 86,125 S.F. • MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 80% [55,000 S.F.] • MAXIMUM BUILDABLEABOVE 8T" FLOOR: 30,000 S.F. PER LEVEL. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. SUMMARY: CBRE I HEERY RETAIL: 23,100 S.F. OFFICE: 110,000 S.F. BONUS OFFICE: 86,125 S.F. TOTAL: 219,225 S.F. Office (21,531 S.F.) 12 o i Office (21,531 S.F.) Office (21,531 S.F.) 10 i Office (21,531 S.F.) 9 N Office (54,400 S.F. s O o $ o Office (54,400 S.F.) 7 d Parking (125 Cars) 6 5 c Parking (125 Cars) 0 4 Parking (125 Cars) tm 3 Parking (125 Cars) 0 2 a Parking (125 Cars) 1 Retail (23,100 S.F.) Parking (60 Cars) '0 10% CBRE I HEERY A N W I Q a � PARKING V)c (80 CARS) W i Ground Level (Retail & Parking) A N OFFICE (FLOORS) 108,000 S.F. L evel 4-6 (Offices) MARLINS BALLPARK SITE 2: 12/19/2019 Level 2-3 (Parking) SITE - 2: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 45,000 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTION). • PROPOSED ZONING: 75' • FLOOR LOT RATIO: NIA • MAX LOT COVERAGE: 80% (36,000 S.F.) SUMMARY: RETAIL: 5,000 S.F. OFFICE: 108,000 S.F. TOTAL: 113,000 S.F. (REQ. 339 CARS*) *REQUIRES PARKING COVENANT ORAGGREEMENT FOR SHORTAGE TO PARK IN ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE. Bonus Office (36,000 S.F.) 6 Office (36,000 S.F.) 5 _ Office (36,000 S.F.) 4 i c Parking (120 Cars) 3 _ x Parking (120 Cars) - a Parking (80 Cars) Retail (5,Oa7S.F. 1 I CBRE I REEDY RETAIL SPACE 25,000 S.F. ; N PARKING (270 CARS) 10% - uj� Ground Level (Retail & Parking) Level 2-5 (Parking) SITE - 3: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 120,000 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTION). • PROPOSED ZONING: 75' • FLOOR LOT RATIO: NIA • MAX LOT COVERAGE: 80% (96,000 S.F.) • MAX HEIGHT: 5 STORIES SUMMARY: RETAIL: 25,000 S.F. OFFICE: 242,000 S.F. TOTAL: 267,000 S.F. (REQ. 801 CARS) N i Office (96,000 S.F. 5 Office (96,000 S.F. 4 Office (25,000 S.F.) Parking (270 Cars) 3 Office (25,000 S.F.) Parking (270 Cars) 2 Retail (25,000 S.F.) Parking (270 Cars) 1 J 1Q' 10% Level 6-8 (Offices) Level 9-12(with Bonuses) MARLINS BALLPARK SITE 3: 12/19/2019 CBRE I HEERY _ I 1Q N OFFICE SPACE F o I o (24,000 S.F.) o I I PARKING (840 CARS Total) Ground Level (Retail, Parking & Office) I N OFFICE SPACE I (30,000 S.F.) I - I _ PARKING (840 CARS Total) I 0 I � 2-8 Level (Parking) MELREESE SITE: 12/21/2019 JA r .� Entire Site (Proposed Location) MELREESE SITE : [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 2,109,175 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: CI (CIVIC INSTITUTIONAL) • PROPOSED ZONING: T6-8. • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 5125% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. • MAX FLOOR RATIO: 2,109,175 X5 =10,545,875 S.F. • 25% BONUS: 10,545,875X25% =2,636,468 S.F. TOTAL S.F. =13,182,343 S.F. • MAXIMUM BUILDABLE (LOT COVERAGE): 80% (1,687,340 S.F.) PARKING REQUIREMENTS: • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. • PARKING CAN YIELD: 840 CARS • PARKING REQ.: 840 CARS SUMMARY: 8 Floors Office @ 30,000 S.F.: 280,000 S.F. 6 Parking (150 Cars) Parking (150 Cars) c I 5 , 4 o Parking (150 Cars) i 3 Parking (150 Cars) 2 Parking (150 Cars) Parking (150 Cars) 1 Im ■m Retail (6,000 S.F.) Office (30,000 S.F.) 8 i Office (30,000 S.F.) 7 Office (30,000 S.F.) 6 �i Office (30,000 S.F.) 5 0 i oho ` Office (30,000 S.F.) 4N Office (30,000 S.F.) 3 i Office (30,000 S.F.) Z Office (24,000 S.F.) 1 4 CBRE I HEERY A N RETAIL % (20,000 S.F.) 1 PARKING (50 CARS) , Ground Level (Retail & Parking) A------ N-- --- -- --- PARKING (150 CARS) i INK 2-8 Level (Parking) NEXUS SITE: 12/21/2019 NEXUS SITE: [TOTAL LOT SIZE: 68,900 S.F.] • CURRENT ZONING: T6-3613-0. • PROPOSED ZONING: T6-3613-0. • FLOOR LOT RATIO: 22140% ADDITIONAL PUBLIC BENEFIT. • MAX FLOOR RATIO: 68,900 X22 = 1,515,800 S.F. • 40% BONUS: 1,515,800X40% = 606,320 S.F. TOTAL S.F. = 2,122,120 S.F. (REQ. 6,367 CARS) • MAXIMUM BUILDABLE (LOT COVERAGE): 80% (55,120 S.F.) PARKING REQUIREMENTS • 3 CARS PER 1,000 S.F. • PARKING CAN YIELD: 1,100 CARS • PARKING REQ.: 1,050 CARS SUMMARY: 11 Floors Office @ 30,000 S.F.: 330,000 S.F. Office (30,000 S.F.) 19 Office (30,000 S.F.) 18 Office (30,000 S.F.) 17 , Office (30,000 S.F.) 15 Office (30,000 S.F.) 15 N __— _ ---- - - Office (30,000 S.F.) 14 ' iK _ ----- Office (30,000 S.F.) 13 o Office (30,000 S.F.) 12 OFFICE 1 Office (30,000 S.F.) 11 SPACE (30,000 S.F.) I Office (30,000 S.F.) 10 Office (30,000 S.F.) 9 3 Parking (150 Cars) $ Parking (150 Cars) 7 l 0 Parking (150 Cars) 5tm v Parking (150 Cars) 5 Parking (150 Cars) 4 ' \y° Parking (150 Cars) 3 Parking (150 Cars) Z S. Retail (50,000 F.) Parking (50 Cars) 1 9 —19 Level (Office) C B R E I NEER APPENDIX B Preliminary Development Budget Preliminary Development Budget - MRC Replacement Facility All Sites Site Site Size (Square Feet) Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Maximum Development Density (Square Feet) Cost per FAR Land Value (Based on Current Market Comparables) Relocate Existing Occupants (Note 2) Subtotal Construction Cost (Note 1) FFE Box and IT Move Subtotal Soft Costs Per Schedule and Consultants Project Contingency Subtotal Loan Placement @ 1% (Note 3) Marlins 1 Marlins 2 Marlins 3 68,900 45,000 120,000 Cl Cl Cl T6-8 T5 T5 ATT Biscayne Park 33,368 318,859 T6 -60A-0 Cl T6 -60A-0 T6-2413 Melreese Nexus 100,000 68,900 Cl Cl T6-8 T6-3613-0 253,000 113,000 267,000 550,572 5,229,287 280,000 2,122,120 (Note 4) $ 9,600,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 4,900,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 8,624,502 $ 18,000,000 $ 19,000,000 $ 75,930,000 $ 75,930,000 $ 75,930,000 $ 79,726,500 $ 75,930,000 $ 75,930,000 $ 79,726,500 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 6,900,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 83,830,000 $ 83,830,000 $ 83,830,000 $ 87,626,500 $ 83,830,000 $ 83,830,000 $ 87,626,500 $ 16,547,050 $ 16,547,050 $ 16,547,050 $ 17,249,403 $ 16,547,050 $ 16,547,050 $ 17,249,403 $ 11,287,705 $ 11,287,705 $ 11,287,705 $ 11,587,590 $ 11,287,705 $ 11,087,705 $ 12,237,590 $ 121,264,755 $ 114,664,755 $ 116,564,755 $ 128,463,493 $ 120,289,257 $ 132,464,755 $ 136,113,493 Interest During Construction Period (10 QTRS equal draw amount) $ 8,420,321 $ 7,962,034 $ 8,093,965 $ 8,920,184 $ 8,352,585 $ 9,198,021 $ 9,451,381 Grand Total $ 130,897,724 $ 123,773,436 $ 125,824,368 $ 138,668,312 $ 129,844,735 $ 142,987,424 $ 146,926,009 Improved Value (120%) $ 157,077,269 $ 148,528,124 $ 150,989,241 $ 166,401,974 $ 155,813,681 $ 171,584,909 $ 176,311,210 Improved Value (Per Gross Building Square Foot) $ 546.36 $ 516.62 $ 525.18 $ 578.79 $ 541.96 $ 596.82 $ 613.26 Amount to be Financed (Less Imputed Land Value) $ 121,297,724 $ 120,773,436 $ 120,924,368 $ 126,668,312 $ 121,220,233 $ 124,987,424 $ 146,926,009 Notes: 1) Development Budgets for illustrative purposes only. No representation are made to actual cost until such time and site specific design and construction cost estimates received. 2) Anticipated Settlement and Legal Fees for Existing Management Company 3) Loan Placement fees and Carry Costs during construction period 4) Of 318,000 SF of land area for Biscayne Park, only 55,000 SF or 17.25% of total estimate of value of $50,000,000 is needed for City Facility Estimated Interest Cost During Construciton Period MRC Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 137,474,628 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 $ 13,747,463 Cumulative $ 13,747,463 $ 27,494,926 $ 41,242,388 $ 54,989,851 $ 68,737,314 $ 82,484,777 $ 96,232,240 $ 109,979,702 $ 123,727,165 $ 137,474,628 $ 171,843 $ 343,687 $ 515,530 $ 687,373 $ 859,216 $ 1,031,060 $ 1,202,903 $ 1,374,746 $ 1,546,590 $ 1,718,433 $ 9,451,381 ATr Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 129,748,128 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 $ 12,974,813 Cumulative $ 12,974,813 $ 25,949,626 $ 38,924,438 $ 51,899,251 $ 64,874,064 $ 77,848,877 $ 90,823,690 $ 103,798,502 $ 116,773,315 $ 129,748,128 $ 162,185 $ 324,370 $ 486,555 $ 648,741 $ 810,926 $ 973,111 $ 1,135,296 $ 1,297,481 $ 1,459,666 $ 1,621,852 $ 8,920,184 Marlins Site 1 Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 122,477,403 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 $ 12,247,740 Cumulative $ 12,247,740 $ 24,495,481 $ 36,743,221 $ 48,990,961 $ 61,238,701 $ 73,486,442 $ 85,734,182 $ 97,981,922 $ 110,229,662 $ 122,477,403 $ 153,097 $ 306,194 $ 459,290 $ 612,387 $ 765,484 $ 918,581 $ 1,071,677 $ 1,224,774 $ 1,377,871 $ 1,530,968 $ 8,420,321 Marlins Site 2 Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 115,811,403 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 $ 11,581,140 Cumulative $ 11,581,140 $ 23,162,281 $ 34,743,421 $ 46,324,561 $ 57,905,701 $ 69,486,842 $ 81,067,982 $ 92,649,122 $ 104,230,262 $ 115,811,403 $ 144,764 $ 289,529 $ 434,293 $ 579,057 $ 723,821 $ 868,586 $ 1,013,350 $ 1,158,114 $ 1,302,878 $ 1,447,643 $ 7,962,034 Marlins Site 3 Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 117,730,403 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 $ 11,773,040 Cumulative $ 11,773,040 $ 23,546,081 $ 35,319,121 $ 47,092,161 $ 58,865,201 $ 70,638,242 $ 82,411,282 $ 94,184,322 $ 105,957,362 $ 117,730,403 $ 147,163 $ 294,326 $ 441,489 $ 588,652 $ 735,815 $ 882,978 $ 1,030,141 $ 1,177,304 $ 1,324,467 $ 1,471,630 $ 8,093,965 Biscayne Park Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 121,492,149 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 $ 12,149,215 Cumulative $ 12,149,215 $ 24,298,430 $ 36,447,645 $ 48,596,860 $ 60,746,075 $ 72,895,290 $ 85,044,505 $ 97,193,719 $ 109,342,934 $ 121,492,149 $ 151,865 $ 303,730 $ 455,596 $ 607,461 $ 759,326 $ 911,191 $ 1,063,056 $ 1,214,921 $ 1,366,787 $ 1,518,652 $ 8,352,585 Melreese Interest Rate 5% Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 5 Qtr 6 Qtr 7 Qtr 8 Qtr 9 Qtr 10 $ 133,789,403 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 $ 13,378,940 Cumulative $ 13,378,940 $ 26,757,881 $ 40,136,821 $ 53,515,761 $ 66,894,701 $ 80,273,642 $ 93,652,582 $ 107,031,522 $ 120,410,462 $ 133,789,403 $ 167,237 $ 334,474 $ 501,710 $ 668,947 $ 836,184 $ 1,003,421 $ 1,170,657 $ 1,337,894 $ 1,505,131 $ 1,672,368 $ 9,198,021 Notes: Interest cost established for the purposes of developing preliminary development budgets. Actual cost will vary depending upon interest rate and draw schedule. APPENDIX C Site Valuation Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. ' V 2581 Escayn, Blvd MlamiFL 3313] Paz.Pu 01 Mam,NFL]331132 � - blanch rr Sale , D ��0 P�ateBPsrMvk 7Mar argil B i s c a y n e B a y LJ�O�8rk axn. ery 190096 y Blvd FL 33132 ° So.. Mar.noL 1IL1/, ams �� 5a1e3 1753 NE ❑233132 rd 1 AZe 6v«vne Vaneltarf WN,—, n o 0 Venetian Causee+ftY Sar. Marco hlaM Y 7 BP... fic '] r� 1 Preserve a988 - "1�� --1 am-' � - Q MZGArLhuY CBlReh"ay ps -NW 1211rj as io m msl mroa..�. �'- —i PB M nnlel Watson Park T blvW S la t P k- �l fNW 11th St e ]88N Miami Ave Watson NW 11th 6'1 MiamIFL 33136 1a1e2 Perk P18 'VW �p - D sss N Mlami Ave _ waeunba Mi—, FL 33136 paha hlmW St- — : Miami Beach - NIMRc-Ir Ile 3 as _ M m FL 33136 5a1e8 �7R j 500 NE Lst FL33132 � peR Mam e—ee Par n� ���� 'A a� day m"a Pen efMsmiS Liu 7 = O-1 �� �-_. _ A k !� - sea s les a avrront Park Or �XX%999-777 I 151 NE 1,t St nudge hlmd Co n M� 198201 f1 rosotl Urp—t,,endbr� l II - Ilis,esarvedi Si SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - ATT SITE Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price' (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 700 North Miami Avenue Sale Mar -17 T6 -60a O, Urban Core, $45,250,000 $45,250,000 4.71 205,353 $220.35 Miami, FL 33136 Open 2 555 N. Miami Avenue Sale Mar -17 T6-80 O, Urban Core $18,095,000 $18,095,000 0.83 35,992 $502.75 Miami, FL 33132 Transect Zone 3 1753 - 1775 NE 2nd Avenue Sale May -17 T6-24 O, Urban Core, $33,000,000 $33,000,000 1.39 60,375 $546.58 Miami, FL 33132 open 4 1900 Biscayne Boulevard Sale Sep -17 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $18,400,000 $18,400,000 1.01 44,034 $417.86 Miami, FL 33132 Open 5 151 NE 1st Street Sale Nov -17 T6-80 O, Urban Core $9,270,000 $9,270,000 0.34 15,000 $618.00 Miami, FL 33131 Transect Zone 6 2501-2521 Biscayne Sale Feb -18 T6 -36a O, Urban Core, $22,700,000 $22,700,000 1.11 48,351 $469.48 Boulevard Open Miami, FL 33137 7 1801-1851 NE 2nd Avenue Under Jul -18 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $30,000,000 $30,000,000 1.40 61,170 $490.44 Miami, FL 33132 Contract Open 8 500 NE 1 st Avenue Sale Jul -18 T6-80 O, Urban Core, $28,300,000 $35,200,000 1.83 79,848 $440.84 Miami, FL 33132 Open Subj. 610 NW 1 st Avenue & 53 --- --- T6 -60a O, Urban Core, --- --- 0.77 33,368 --- NW 6th Street, Open Miami, Florida t Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE ADJUSTMENT GRID LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Transaction Type Sole Sole Sole Sale Sale Sole Under Contract Transaction Date Mar -17 Mar -17 May -17 Sep -17 Nov -17 Feb -18 !u1-18 Zoning T6 -60a O, Urban T6-80 O, T6-24 O, Urban T6 -36b O, T6-80 O, T6 -36a O, T6 -36b O, 01% Core, Open Urban Core Core, open Urban Core, Urban Core Urban Core, Urban Core, 01Y 01% Transect Zone 01% Open Transect Zone Open Open Actual Sale Price $45,250,000 $18,095,000 $33,000,000 $18AOO,000 $9,270,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 Adjusted Sale Price $45,250,000 $18,095,000 $33,000,000 $18Aoo,000 $9,270,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 Size (Acres) 4.71 0.83 1.39 1.01 0.34 1.11 1.40 Sae (SF) 205,353 35,992 60,375 44,034 15,000 48,351 61,170 Density (UPA) 300 du/ac 438 du/ac 500 du/ac 4,243 du/ac --- --- --- Allowable Units 1,414 Units 362 Units 693 Units 429 Units --- --- --- Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 2,258,883 SF 607,560 SF 966,000 SF 439,765 SF 360,000 SF 483,510 SF ######### Indicated FAR 11.00 16.88 16.00 9.99 24.00 10.00 22.00 Price Per SF $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 Price Per Bldg. Area $20.03 $29.78 $34.16 $41.84 $25.75 $46.95 $22.29 Price Per Unit $32,001 $49,986 $47,619 $42,890 --- --- --- 8 Sale !u1-18 T6-80 O, Urban Core, Open $28,300,000 $35,200,000 1.83 79,848 $440.84 Land Value Price ($ PSF) $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 $440.84 Property Rights Conveyed 01% 0% 0% 01/. 01% 0/ 0% 01% Financing Terms' 01/ 01/ 01/ 01/ 01/ 0% 01% 01% Conditions of Sale 0% 01% 01% 01% 01% 0% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 01% 01Y 0% 01Y 01% 0% 01% 01% Subtotal $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 $440.84 Subject T6 -60a O, Urban Core, Open 0.77 33,368 297,000 SF 8.90 Sae 30% 01/ 0% 01/ -5% 0% 01% 01% Indicated Value: Shape -10% -101% -10% -10% -101% -10% -10% -101% Corner o% 01Y 0% 01Y o% 0% o% 01% Frontage 01% 0% -10% -10% -701% -10% -10% 01% Topography 0% 01/ 01/ 01/ 011. 0% 01% 0% Location 0% 01% 01% 01% 01% 0% 0% 0% Zoning/Density 01% -10% 10% 10% -101% 10% 10% -101% Utilities 01% 0% 0% 01% 01% 01% 0% 01% Highest & Best Use 0% 01/ 01% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% Total Other Adjustments 20% -20% -10% -10% -35% -10% -10% -20% Value Indication PSF of Site $264.42 $402.20 $491.92 $376.07 $401.70 $422.53 $441.40 $352.67 Value Indication PSF of FAR $24.04 $23.83 $30.75 $37.66 $16.74 $42.25 $20.06 --- Absolute Adjustment 40% 20% 30% 30% 35% 30% 3O% 20% ' Adjusted sale price for cash eq.i-I.n y and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - ATT SITE $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $350.00 x 33,368 = $11,678,800 $400.00 x 33,368 = $13,347,200 $ PSF of FAR Proposed FAR Total $38.00 x 297,000 SF = $11,286,000 $42.00 x 297,000 SF = $12,474,000 Indicated Value: $12,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $359.63 Compiled by CBRE Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. am b MRC - eiscayne Park 150 NE 19th 5t 1900 B ""ne Blvd rP MiamI, FL 33132 Miami,FL33132 11Lll 1 - �' TIE 191h t a y n e a y ` ��,( peePdrlc 8 1 s c B El S[ areeaype _ � gvr ser enc �scayne Park Margaret a _gt Cemetery 1t Pace Park _ '(. Sete 6 DID a bfk 31001 N 3332 CC lb 4 �1 3t Mlami FL FL 33132 1753 1]53NE 21,d Pve r Mamie 833132 N VHYletell Dr sr hEx_. am M - enetlan Ceu59waY, 1%taa� n ^ B' LIaM ll L� 1�114Fh $1 ``� Bl6 Gl�dn /' � L� _ /=tet MacArmur Causeway y III n`� / H1H J� Y '"xm.°hs ���pAET� e � ��II �BiceMenn el Perk Watson P �Perk �cerrtenn el erk Watson Perk � K LLL��� Sale 1 e' U a m I� Pee NW NW Pa91h r 1,O M'ami Pve �� Wabon blend Sf Mam; FL 33136 1 Z I� 9 ae NE 91n si m Nw acn A ° opyra ht(l.. d(P� 1198&201211 osvtt 1o11—t andbrpp 11 All r q'ts raservletl� m r k88fi- Itodge 6len�l Hemi Y SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - BISCAYNE PARK Subj. 150 NE 19th Street, --- --- T6 -24b O, Urban Core, --- --- 7.32 318,859 --- Miami, Florida Open 1 Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price 1 (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 700 North Miami Avenue Sale Mar -17 T6 -24b O, Urban Core, $45,250,000 $45,250,000 4.71 205,353 $220.35 Miami, FL 33136 Open 2 459 NE 24th Street Sale Mar -17 T6 -36a L, Urban Core, $21,700,000 $21,700,000 1.99 86,523 $250.80 Miami, FL 33137 Limited 3 1753 - 1775 NE 2nd Avenue Sale May -17 T6-24 O, Urban Core, $33,000,000 $33,000,000 1.39 60,375 $546.58 Miami, FL 33132 open 4 1900 Biscayne Boulevard Sale Sep -17 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $18,400,000 $18,400,000 1.01 44,034 $417.86 Miami, FL 33132 Open 5 2501-2521 Biscayne Sale Feb -18 T6 -36a O, Urban Core, $22,700,000 $22,700,000 1.11 48,351 $469.48 Boulevard Open Miami, FL 33137 6 1801-1851 NE 2nd Avenue Under Jul -18 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $30,000,000 $30,000,000 1.40 61,170 $490.44 Miami, FL 33132 Contract Open Subj. 150 NE 19th Street, --- --- T6 -24b O, Urban Core, --- --- 7.32 318,859 --- Miami, Florida Open 1 Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE Land Value ADJUSTMENT GRID CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - BISCAYNE PARK $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $150.00 x 318,859 = $47,828,850 $165.00 x 318,859 = $52,611,735 Indicated Value: $50,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $156.81 Compiled by CBRE LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 Subject Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Under Contract --- Transaction Date Mar -17 Mar -17 May -17 Sep -17 Feb -18 Jul -18 --- Zoning T6 -24b O, Urban T6 -36a L, T6-24 O, Urban T6 -36b O, T6 -36a O, T6 -36b O, T6 -24b O, Core, Open Urban Core, Core, open Urban Core, Urban Core, Urban Core, Urban Core, Limited Open Open Open Open Actual Sale Price $45,250,000 $21,700,000 $33,000,000 $18,400,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 --- Adjusted Sale Price' $45,250,000 $21,700,000 $33,000,000 $18,400,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 --- Size (Acres) 4.71 1.99 1.39 1.01 1.11 1.40 7.32 Size (SF) 205,353 86,523 60,375 44,034 48,351 61,170 318,859 Density (UPA) 300 du/ac 150 du/ac 500 du/ac 4,243 du/ac --- --- --- Allowable Units 1,414 Units 297 Units 693 Units 429 Units --- --- --- Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 2,258,883 SF 477,626 SF 966,000 SF 439,765 SF 483,510 SF ######### 480,000 SF Indicated FAR 11.00 5.52 16.00 9.99 10.00 22.00 1.51 Price Per SF $220.35 $250.80 $546.58 $417.86 $469.48 $490.44 Price Per Bldg. Area $20.03 $45.43 $34.16 $41.84 $46.95 $22.29 Price Per Unit $32,001 $73,064 $47,619 $42,890 --- --- Price ($ PSF) $220.35 $250.80 $546.58 $417.86 $469.48 $490.44 Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Financing Terms 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Conditions of Sale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Subtotal $220.35 $250.80 $546.58 $417.86 $469.48 $490.44 Size 0% -30% -30% -30% -30% -30% Shape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Corner 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Frontage -25% -10% -25% -25% -25% -25% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Location 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Zoning/Density 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Highest & Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Other Adjustments -25% -40% -55% -55% -55% -55% Value Indication PSF of Site $165.26 $150.48 $245.96 $188.04 $211.27 $220.70 Value Indication PSF of FAR $15.02 $27.26 $15.37 $18.83 $21.13 $10.03 Absolute Adjustment 25% 40% 55% 55% 55% 55% ' Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - BISCAYNE PARK $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $150.00 x 318,859 = $47,828,850 $165.00 x 318,859 = $52,611,735 Indicated Value: $50,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $156.81 Compiled by CBRE Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. Magnolia ° 641 NW 12th Avenue [] NW 33rd 1362 NW 3611 SL Miami, FL 33192 D1, Work Place & T6-8, $2,574,100 $2,574,100 � 0 LJ Miami, FL 33136 Nua t –.. O, Urban Core, Open 953 Pa'ma•lake�'.. NW 27t- - - O asm st NW 25th St �- day 24tH Sale El o " � saw NW N 0 LJ - _ •2 t Rt NW 2Tst St f r T o0 ', Bkcayne Bay Zone, Open GY NW 20th St Margeret Pace Perk 3 , .aBm sem— — s ::: "fns Sale] a R Biscayne Bay Aqua"ic Preserve T6-8 O, Urban Core & �iJ�J nark - St " NW 17th St m - _ m �... L596 Nw North River or r -mi, 4M 0 ElW�-- � DD —ven�� c�� 49,010 $86.21 Miami, FL 33125 �4891er L D ❑�'Gs erl: R 14th St—vt�—Ir'n� AIA Restricted H s Saleltgg1 .. SaleBi NW 71h 51 ❑ Wabon 0 Ialvrd Watson i 836 D 641 NW 12M Ave 111h St Miami, FL 33136 �`m Mlami,R33136 Perk 4 Watson Park ❑ Jul -16 '-'i- Miami m -7]7 II II NV'J 8th St � 'INE Stn St 0.99 43,224 $92.54 .=70 LJ - - P h Blvd 886 /y C Sale 3 M a NW E,th NW Sale2 650 NW 81h St ➢ _ 13 y Front Perk 61 NW 3]th Ave MRC Marlins Site #3 - Miami, FL 33136 ➢ Q M egemer8 TR ktl L# rnNO mNE%d Sale Jun -17 Miami, FL 33125 1690 NW ]th Street NW 3rd St �r m 2nd St �I�n _ St O! 1.20 0 $72.64 NW SI Pon or Miami ? NF' t StSpa Open & T5 L, Urban VV is[ 966 Miamarma °o E°Flamm 0 0 -,W `1,,,kr St T 4,.,froMPark �SE°nbSt o 0 I� ❑ -- SW 3rd St ��2A / �. ➢ sale 6 5t 4. Perks RCM'on wT opnons oY ° Brhkell Sale i 4 6W"IF Ave - 1W 9t ob' Ek " Y 0.48 (j ,Q 5aie9 9" _ Miami, FL31­ 11 99 L2 T o � o a o o 953 90 501 SW 22nd Aver�F� Miami, FL 33135 0 Y JLJI Ll°o L ' LL B Yne m P Y Aquatic e �' oplhgktO.and r t ➢— rl `@ (P)1988}2012M asvff Qorpvratia andNrhs suPNe Ilrpkts reservedW ➢ SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MARLINS SITE #3 Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price' (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 641 NW 12th Avenue Sale Feb -15 D1, Work Place & T6-8, $2,574,100 $2,574,100 0.76 32,945 $78.13 Miami, FL 33136 O, Urban Core, Open 2 650 NW 8th Street Sale Mar -16 T6-8 O, Urban Transect $27,695,000 $27,965,000 8.61 375,098 $74.55 Miami, FL 33136 Zone, Open 3 61 NW 37th Avenue Sale May -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core & $4,225,000 $4,225,000 1.13 49,010 $86.21 Miami, FL 33125 T4 L, General Urban, Restricted 4 501 SW 22nd Avenue Sale Jul -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core $4,000,000 $4,000,000 0.99 43,224 $92.54 Miami, FL 33130 5 1362 NW 36th St Sale Jun -17 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $3,795,000 $3,795,000 1.20 52,245 $72.64 Miami, FL 33142 Open & T5 L, Urban Center, Limited 6 216-228 SW 12th Avenue Sale Aug -17 T5 O, Urban Center, $1,300,000 $1,300,000 0.48 21,000 $61.90 Miami, FL 33130 Open 7 1690 NW North River Drive Sale Feb -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $10,375,000 $10,375,000 2.38 103,540 $100.20 Miami, FL 33125 Open 8 1001 NW 7th Street Sale May -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $26,000,000 $26,000,000 6.31 274,864 $94.59 Miami, FL 33136 Open Subj. 1600 NW 6th Street, --- --- T5 O, Urban Center, --- --- 1.58 68,900 --- Miami, Florida Open ' Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE ADJUSTMENT GRID LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Land Value Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Transaction Date Feb -15 Mar -16 May -16 Jul -16 Jun -17 Aug -17 Feb -18 May -18 Zoning D1, Work Place & T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T5 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8, O, Urban Transect Zone, Core & T4 L, Core Core, Open & Center, Open Core, Open Core, Open Core, Open Open General Urban, T5 L, Urban Restricted Center, Limited Actual Sale Price $2,574,100 $27,695,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $3,795,000 $1,300,000 $10,375,000 $26,000,000 Adjusted Sale Price' $2,574,100 $27,965,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $3,795,000 $1,300,000 $10,375,000 $26,000,000 Size (Acres) 0.76 8.61 1.13 0.99 1.20 0.48 2.38 6.31 Size (SF) 32,945 375,098 49,010 43,224 52,245 21,000 103,540 274,864 Density (UPA) --- --- --- 164 du/ac 108 du/ac 62 du/ac 149 du/ac 1,106 du/ac Allowable Units --- --- --- 163 Units 129 Units 30 Units 355 Units 698 Units Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 78,985 SF --- --- --- --- --- 430,000 SF 698,000 SF Indicated FAR 3.71 --- --- 3.69 --- --- 4.15 2.54 Price Per SF $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $72.64 $61.90 $100.20 $94.59 Price Per Bldg. Area $32.59 --- --- --- --- --- $24.13 $37.25 Price Per Unit --- --- --- $24,540 $29,419 $43,333 $29,225 $37,249 Price ($ PSF) $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $72.64 $61.90 $100.20 $94.59 Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01% 0% 0% Financing Terms ' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Conditions of Sale 0% -30% 0% 0% 01/6 01% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 20% 15% 10% 10% 5% 5% 0% 0% Subtotal $93.76 $60.01 $94.83 $101.79 $76.27 $65.00 $100.20 $94.59 Size -5% 30% 01/ 01% 01/ -5% 5% 10% Shape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01/6 0% 0% Corner 0% 0% 0% 0% o% o% 0% 0% Frontage 01% 0% -101% -10% 0% 10% -25% -25% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01/ 0% 0% Location 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% Zoning/Density -101/6 -101% -5% -10% -5% o% -101% -101% Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Highest & Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0% o% 0% 0% o% Total Other Adjustments -15% 20% -15% -20% -5% 10% -30% -25% Value Indication for Subject $79.69 $72.02 $80.61 $81.44 $72.46 $71.49 $70.14 $70.94 Absolute Adjustment 35% 85% 25% 30% 70% 25% 40% 45% Adjusted sale price for cash equi-lenry and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - MARLINS SITE #3 $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $71.00 $72.00 Indicated Value: Compiled by CBRE x 68,900 x 68,900 (Rounded $ PSF) $4,891,900 $4,960,800 $4,900,000 $71.12 Subject T5 O, Urban Center, Open 1.58 68,900 Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. ° NW 33rdlst� Sale Feb -15 ❑'L A 933 -��2 AIA N W Wabvn ❑ I Klvrd n l 111h St -., FL 33136 4, I Watson Park m ]�\ Lr, 8th St 1L-J❑L] - � NW Ar�porl�l 963 - P�me•aawe NW 27� Bl Port vd 886 M NWsale z C1w e fi50 NW 81h st -. Miami, FL 33136 ➢ m Bay From Park B7 ➢ Q 4Management TR Tro ktl _ N1ft Ztr , St NW 26th St NW 24th1 IutJV 1st SI 968 RE �St n El- t 0o Fla Spo Mlamallna PON of Miemi o -,W Flagler St T ° 4, a,fr-Park aS02nrb St o 0 WWI n 8 Parks RCMlon �� Wh N N �IR 21'SWL2[h Ave Miami,R33130 Key - _ •2 st Rt �1W 3Tst st 9f� o 9sy 4quelic ° c� Preeerve 9T2 0 NW 20th St Gerry = lNtTt=1�9t J�4- _� Curtis _ Park St s - Sale 16901 T6-8 O, Urban Core & $4,225,000 $4,225,000 1.13 49,010 NW 17th St Miami, FL 33125 T4 L, General Urban, — etc 'I uuiatn St s Salel 876 D 641 NW 12th A �` m Mlaml, R 33136 �� sale3 61 NW 37th Ave Miami, FL 33125 zo Miami N a NW MRC Marlins Site k2 _„ 1619 Nw 6m st SW 22nd Ave ni�FL 33135 11 II F-4 Magnolia NW 36th St , FL 33142 IW Nor[h Rver mr . 6 u u Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve FL33t25 4M El LJ El Sale Feb -15 ❑'L A 933 -��2 AIA . Sale 8 7th St Wabvn ❑ I Klvrd n l 111h St -., FL 33136 4, I Watson Park m ]�\ Lr, 8th St 1L-J❑L] - � NW 'INE 6tn St Bl Port vd 886 M NWsale z C1w e fi50 NW 81h st -. Miami, FL 33136 ➢ m Bay From Park B7 ➢ Q 4Management TR Tro ktl NW 3rd St NW 2nd St St aOOr IutJV 1st SI 968 RE �St n El- t 0o Fla Spo Mlamallna PON of Miemi o -,W Flagler St T ° 4, a,fr-Park aS02nrb St o 0 _k sw 3rd sto2 ,A t � n 8 Parks RCMlon � '" 516 51 wT opnonson o Brkkell 21'SWL2[h Ave Miami,R33130 Key ❑d r j, � o C o �asosyne ^^I ❑'� ❑ a o 9sy 4quelic ° c� Preeerve 9T2 0 SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MARLINS SITE #2 Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price t (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 641 NW 12th Avenue Sale Feb -15 D1, Work Place & T6-8, $2,574,100 $2,574,100 0.76 32,945 $78.13 Miami, FL 33136 O, Urban Core, Open 2 650 NW 8th Street Sale Mar -16 T6-8 O, Urban Transect $27,695,000 $27,965,000 8.61 375,098 $74.55 Miami, FL 33136 Zone, Open 3 61 NW 37th Avenue Sale May -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core & $4,225,000 $4,225,000 1.13 49,010 $86.21 Miami, FL 33125 T4 L, General Urban, Restricted 4 501 SW 22nd Avenue Sale Jul -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core $4,000,000 $4,000,000 0.99 43,224 $92.54 Miami, FL 33130 5 1362 NW 36th St Sale Jun -17 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $3,795,000 $3,795,000 1.20 52,245 $72.64 Miami, FL 33142 Open & T5 L, Urban Center, Limited 6 216-228 SW 12th Avenue Sale Aug -17 T5 O, Urban Center, $1,300,000 $1,300,000 0.48 21,000 $61.90 Miami, FL 33130 Open 7 1690 NW North River Drive Sale Feb -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $10,375,000 $10,375,000 2.38 103,540 $100.20 Miami, FL 33125 Open 8 1001 NW 7th Street Sale May -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $26,000,000 $26,000,000 6.31 274,864 $94.59 Miami, FL 33136 Open Subj. 1610 NW 6th Street, --- --- T5 O, Urban Center, --- --- 1.03 45,000 --- Miami, Florida Open t Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE ADJUSTMENT GRID LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Land Value Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Transaction Date Feb -15 Mar -16 May -16 Jul -16 Jun -17 Aug -17 Feb -18 May -18 Zoning D1, Work Place & T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T5 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8, O, Urban Transect Zone, Core & T4 L, Core Core, Open & Center, Open Core, Open Core, Open Core, Open Open General Urban, T5 L, Urban Restricted Center, Limited Actual Sale Price $2,574,100 $27,695,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $3,795,000 $1,300,000 $10,375,000 $26,000,000 Adjusted Sale Price' $2,574,100 $27,965,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $3,795,000 $1,300,000 $10,375,000 $26,000,000 Size (Acres) 0.76 8.61 1.13 0.99 1.20 0.48 2.38 6.31 Size (SF) 32,945 375,098 49,010 43,224 52,245 21,000 103,540 274,864 Density (UPA) --- --- --- 164 du/ac 108 du/ac 62 du/ac 149 du/ac 1,106 du/ac Allowable Units --- --- --- 163 Units 129 Units 30 Units 355 Units 698 Units Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 78,985 SF --- --- --- --- --- 430,000 SF 698,000 SF Indicated FAR 3.71 --- --- 3.69 --- --- 4.15 2.54 Price Per SF $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $72.64 $61.90 $100.20 $94.59 Price Per Bldg. Area $32.59 --- --- --- --- --- $24.13 $37.25 Price Per Unit --- --- --- $24,540 $29,419 $43,333 $29,225 $37,249 Price ($ PSF) $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $72.64 $61.90 $100.20 $94.59 Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01% 0% 0% Financing Terms ' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Conditions of Sale 0% -309% 0% 0% 0/ 01% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 20% 15% 10% 10% 5% 5% 0% 0% Subtotal $93.76 $60.01 $94.83 $101.79 $76.27 $65.00 $100.20 $94.59 Size 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% -5% 5% lo% Shape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Corner -101% 01/ 01/ 01Y 01% 01/ 0% 0% Frontage -101/6 -101% -25% -25% -101% 01% -25% -25% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01/ 0% 0% Location 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% Zoning/Density -101% -10% -5% -10% -5% o% -101% -101% Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Highest & Best Use 0% 0% o% 0% o% 0% 0% o% Total Other Adjustments -30% 10% -30% -35% -15% 0% -30% -25% Value Indication for Subject $65.63 $66.01 $66.38 $66.17 $64.83 $65.00 $70.14 $70.94 Absolute Adjustment 50% 95% 40% 45% 20% 75% 40% 45% Adjusted sale price for cash equi-lenry and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - MARLINS SITE #2 $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $65.00 x 45,000 = $2,925,000 $70.00 x 45,000 = $3,150,000 Indicated Value: $3,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $66.67 Compiled by CBRE Subject T5 O, Urban Center, Open 1.03 45,000 Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MARLINS SITE #1 Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price ' (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 641 NW 12th Avenue Sale Feb -15 D1, Work Place & T6-8, $2,574,100 $2,574,100 0.76 32,945 $78.13 Miami, FL 33136 O, Urban Core, Open 2 650 NW 8th Street Sale Mar -16 T6-8 O, Urban Transect $27,695,000 $27,965,000 8.61 375,098 $74.55 Miami, FL 33136 Zone, Open 3 61 NW 37th Avenue Sale May -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core & $4,225,000 $4,225,000 1.13 49,010 $86.21 Miami, FL 33125 T4 L, General Urban, Restricted 4 501 SW 22nd Avenue Sale Jul -16 T6-8 O, Urban Core $4,000,000 $4,000,000 0.99 43,224 $92.54 Miami, FL 33130 5 1690 NW North River Drive Sale Feb -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $10,375,000 $10,375,000 2.38 103,540 $100.20 Miami, FL 33125 Open 6 1101 W. Flagler Street Sale May -18 T6-12 O, Urban Core, $11,187,500 $11,187,500 2.43 105,869 $105.67 Miami, FL 33130 Open 7 1001 NW 7th Street Sale May -18 T6-8 O, Urban Core, $26,000,000 $26,000,000 6.31 274,864 $94.59 Miami, FL 33136 Open 8 805-861 West Flagler Street Sale May -18 T6-12 O, Urban Core, $8,577,000 $9,077,000 2.20 96,000 $94.55 Miami, FL 33130 Open & T4 -R, General Urban, Restricted Subj. 1680 NW 5Th Street, --- --- T6-8 O, Urban Core, --- --- 2.75 120,000 --- Miami, Florida Open r Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE ADJUSTMENT GRID LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Land Value Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Transaction Date Feb -15 Mar -16 May -16 Jul -16 Feb -18 May -18 May -18 May -18 Zoning Dl, Work Place & T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-8 O, Urban T6-12 O, T6-8 O, Urban T6-12 O, Urban T6-8, O, Urban Transect Zone, Core & T4 L, Core Core, Open Urban Core, Core, Open Core, Open & T4 -R, Core, Open Open General Urban, Open General Urban, Restricted Restricted Actual Sale Price $2,574,100 $27,695,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $10,375,000 $11,187,500 $26,000,000 $8,577,000 Adjusted Sale Price' $2,574,100 $27,965,000 $4,225,000 $4,000,000 $10,375,000 $11,187,500 $26,000,000 $9,077,000 Size (Acres) 0.76 8.61 1.13 0.99 2.38 2.43 6.31 2.20 Size (SF) 32,945 375,098 49,010 43,224 103,540 105,869 274,864 96,000 Density (UPA) --- --- --- 164 du/ac 149 du/ac 150 du/ac 1,106 du/ac --- Allowable Units --- --- --- 163 Units 355 Units 364 Units 698 Units --- Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 78,985 SF --- --- --- 430,000 SF --- 698,000 SF --- Indicated FAR 2.40 --- --- --- 4.15 --- 2.54 --- Price Per SF $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $100.20 $105.67 $94.59 $94.55 Price ($ PSF) $78.13 $74.55 $86.21 $92.54 $100.20 $105.67 $94.59 $94.55 Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01/ 0% 0% Financing Terms' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Conditions of Sale 0% -30% 0% 0% 01% 01% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 20% 15% 101% 101/ 0% 01% 0% 0% Subtotal $93.76 $60.01 $94.83 $101.79 $10020 $105.67 $94.59 $94.55 Size -10% 25% -10% -10% 0% 01% 20% 01/ Shape 0% 0% 0% 0% 01/6 0/ 0% 0% Corner -10% 01% 01/ 01% 0% 01% 01/ 01/ Frontage 01% 01% 0% -101% -25% -10% -30% -10% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% o% 0% 0% Location 0% 0% 0% 0% 0/ 01% 0% 0% Zoning/Density 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% -101/ 0% -101% Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0% 0% Highest & Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01% 0% 0% Total Other Adjustments -20% 25% -101% -20% -25% -20% -101% -20% Value Indication for Subject $75.00 $75.02 $85.35 $81.44 $75.15 $84.54 $85.13 $75.64 Absolute Adjustment 40% 70% 20% 30% 25% 20% 50% 2091 'Adjusted sale price for cash equivalenry and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - MARLINS SITE #1 $ PSF Subject SF Total $75.00 x 120,000 = $9,000,000 $85.00 x 120,000 = $10,200,000 Indicated Value: $9,600,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $80.00 Compiled by CBRE Subject T6-8 O, Urban Core, Open 2.75 120,000 Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MELREESE Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Allowable Price Price Per No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price price' (Acres) (SF) Bldg. Area (SF) FAR Per SF SF (FAR) 1 3090 S. Douglas Road Sale Jun -15 T6-12 O, Urban Core $10,100,000 $10,170,022 1.26 54,886 170,321 3.10 $185.29 SurrTan r Mart) Jr Nlla e Glen PPtl Iberly Lemon Ty eysnore NW EB[n 51 NW EBIn 51 2 Hldlea Sale Heig s quare L'MIe HaR $30,000,000 Sale fi Sale ] 95,868 488,176 5.09 Br wnsaill J to son R av s S Iv 9902 NW 8][h Pve8300 U NW 11"It Miami27 SPnag, as Mlaml, FL 331]8 Miami, FL 33166 3 215 & 251 S. Dixie Highway Sale Oct -16 T6-24 O, Urban Core, $60,250,000 $60,250,000 4.39 191,249 679,758 I,, l $315.03 Loral Blvp Virginia Gertlens Coral Gables, FL 33133 Bales Fila 28]5 NW 42nd Pve Miami, FL 33192 an 2]012 Biscayne Elvd FL 33137 ur Lady IMercy JC Bermu Venderbitt Park = @ �, 2. eme[ery Pad; F L O I U A� $16,600,000 $16,600,000 MelSte 74,700 344,400 NJV Stn _ Int Sweetwater, FL 33174 171F P A ort® _M-i,FL 33125 1 �. 5 J Sale i � � 0 � _ _N✓V 14tH 14th a �A o n Mall Blvd -.-• -.•-..- � _ q 0.68 $34.87 $51.58 838 N!N 6[n 51 _ e]I a 838 Unlimited 3 2 I II xN+3H�'�- `-'Is skhlae _ H V ss - ro o Mio�ni aaa Q ss 6 ]90 SW 109M Pve 33179 FI ler - Mar -18 DMU, Downtown $13,574,500 $13,574,500 2.02 88,166 Swee[weler � 9 lamella west $153.97 $68.06 Doral, FL 33166 � I glans snap Paean Town Perk Estates W slchesrer ° 'IL1 30905Pl,,,I .p' 7 8300 NW 41 at Street Under Jul -18 CPral Gables, FL 33133 3 B' Tamlemi Perk 4.00 174,240 359,637 2.06 $109.91 e71 oral Ga I �Sllver Bl ft EPckell oral sy _ rsity Perk oral Way vmagee Mixed -Use The P-% Esleles ' �Eav Helghrts _ Sale3 2155 Hwy MFL amie FL 33133 Pair ls3k Biscay ne Ba Ter a /yi lymph Ludlam cnnat HelgMeA 1' ee Mlaml apical Perk BI : Rtl � Miem `x 0 � � Dmnee F:ey Cn kt0 antl T'198&20,121.rerosott n Cor orston andNrds su WT c3ry e a � le .All kts,reeedetleJ a _Pr V.'d Nqu E' scayne Bay etic eserve SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MELREESE Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Allowable Price Price Per No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price price' (Acres) (SF) Bldg. Area (SF) FAR Per SF SF (FAR) 1 3090 S. Douglas Road Sale Jun -15 T6-12 O, Urban Core $10,100,000 $10,170,022 1.26 54,886 170,321 3.10 $185.29 $59.71 Coral Gables, FL 33133 2 2701 Biscayne Blvd. Sale May -16 T6 -36-1-&T6-36-0 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 2.20 95,868 488,176 5.09 $312.93 $61.45 Miami, FL 33137 3 215 & 251 S. Dixie Highway Sale Oct -16 T6-24 O, Urban Core, $60,250,000 $60,250,000 4.39 191,249 679,758 3.55 $315.03 $88.63 Coral Gables, FL 33133 open 4 740 SW 109th Avenue Sale Dec -16 UC, University City $16,600,000 $16,600,000 1.71 74,700 344,400 4.61 $222.22 $48.20 Sweetwater, FL 33174 5 2875 NW 42nd Avenue Sale Jul -17 IU -3, Industrial, $2,600,000 $2,600,000 1.71 74,567 50,403 0.68 $34.87 $51.58 Miami, FL 33142 Unlimited Manufacturing District 6 4402 NW 87th Avenue Sale Mar -18 DMU, Downtown $13,574,500 $13,574,500 2.02 88,166 199,454 2.26 $153.97 $68.06 Doral, FL 33166 Mixed -Use 7 8300 NW 41 at Street Under Jul -18 DMU, Downtown $19,150,000 $19,150,000 4.00 174,240 359,637 2.06 $109.91 $53.25 Doral, FL 33166 Contract Mixed -Use Subj. 1400NW 37th Avenue, --- --- CS, Civic Space/Parks --- --- 2.30 100,000 287,000 2.87 --- --- Miami, Florida ' Adi-ted sale price for cash eq.ivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE Land Value ADJUSTMENT GRID Size 0% 0% LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID 0% 0% 0% Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Subject Transaction Type Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale Under Contract --- Transaction Date Jun -15 May -16 Oct -16 Dec -16 Jul -17 Mar -18 Jul -18 --- Zoning T6-12 O, Urban T6 -36-L & T6- T6-24 O, Urban UC, University IU -3, Industrial, DMU, DMU, CS, Civic -30% Core 36-0 Core, open City Unlimited Downtown Downtown Space/Parks 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities Manufacturing Mixed -Use Mixed -Use 0% Actual Sale Price $10,100,000 $30,000,000 $60,250,000 $16,600,000 $2,600,000 $13,574,500 $19,150,000 --- Adjusted Sale Price' $10,170,022 $30,000,000 $60,250,000 $16,600,000 $2,600,000 $13,574,500 $19,150,000 --- Size (Acres) 1.26 2.20 4.39 1.71 1.71 2.02 4.00 2.30 Size (SF) 54,886 95,868 191,249 74,700 74,567 88,166 174,240 100,000 Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 170,321 SF 488,176 SF 679,758 SF 344,400 SF 50,403 SF 199,454 SF 359,637 SF 287,000 SF Indicated FAR 3.10 5.09 3.55 4.61 0.68 2.26 2.06 2.87 Price Per SF $185.29 $312.93 $315.03 $222.22 $34.87 $153.97 $109.91 --- Price Per Bldg. Area $59.71 $61.45 $88.63 $48.20 $51.58 $68.06 $53.25 --- Price ($ PSF) $185.29 $312.93 $315.03 $222.22 $34.87 $153.97 $109.91 Property Rights Conveyed 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Financing Terms' 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Conditions of Sale 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 15% 101% 10% 101/ 5% 0% 0% Subtotal $213.08 $344.22 $346.53 $244.44 $36.61 $153.97 $109.91 Size 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 10% Shape 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% Corner 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Frontage 0% 0% -101/6 0% 0% -10% 0% Topography 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Location -10% -101/6 -30% 20% 0% 0% 0% Zoning/Density 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Utilities 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Highest & Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Total Other Adjustments -10% -10% -30% 20% 10% -10% 10% Value Indication PSF of Site $191.78 $309.80 $242.57 $293.33 $40.27 $138.57 $120.90 Value Indication PSF of FAR $61.80 $60.84 $68.25 $63.62 $59.58 $61.25 $58.58 Absolute Adjustment 25% 20% 60% 30% 15% 10% 10% ' Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - MELREESE $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $140.00 x 100,000 = $14,000,000 $190.00 x 100,000 = $19,000,000 $ PSF of FAR Proposed FAR Total $60.00 x 287,000 SF = $17,220,000 $65.00 x 287,000 SF = $18,655,000 Indicated Value: $18,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $180.00 Compiled by CBRE Land Value Land Value The following map summarizes the comparable data used in the valuation of the subject site. 35th St Mth St fi 1 Biscayne Blvd R3313] M. P k Ovral B i s c a y n e B a y O B Yne Park 5 4 .,8L11�St C mHerY �� 190108 BI d �� 'VC7lriema NE 17 Mia I, FL 33132 b Park n S' I— t 1 5]s33N ID �� ❑ �1 ❑ � venenzn o1 I n � Eznd ave S�nvaa San hs — O -7 Mlam FL 33132 —IL; -b- 4 — z Llmd 'NW 15th ® IT �L TIN( 1411t� a 14th- Ht� Biscayne bay H9ua[IV Preserve933�_ IJ LS �` A°T q°ate 0 12 m 5 � 441 _.. [e Wabvn Llard Y„ -ml�3o a menmal m % NW 11th $t— ,�^^ NW sial �' Penc NWW 11th Sf Watson Perk 1I Its 700 N Mami Ave WNsvn 11th M mi rL 33136 Park rry ) NW 5th SSSN M'aml Ave �Y bJ I N� Mlam, FL 33136 INN! Bth'Ifru+�l I II NW 8th St LJ LIQ 7th St Port H"d 886 N tih„r ❑ O NW- " \` I LA= 1 U.spWo'Y ❑❑ off. R, NW 114c, ❑ — Sale 8 ark 0 935!y ,p 500 NE 1st Ave n[ TP Mam, O ✓G FL 33132 {ISI �Il �� � MR sit 1 n as-kkma Ie Uodg B3q onl Perk bs t ❑L� _ 2305W 3rd St Sales eyfr C—� ❑❑❑ ➢Miami, FL33130 I A c l St Mn, L331 1 151 I FL 3132 yW 1 1 St - SW �Pv iakt0 a(P 19as9�ars 11 olrcomor lw5 nrorm auc.Ma au roma resew d --iSE 3rd Ste _. Subj. 230 SW 3rd Street, --- --- T6 -36b O, Urban Core, --- --- 1.59 69,161 --- Miami, Florida Open ' Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LAND SALES - MRC 1 SITE Transaction Actual Sale Adjusted Sale Size Size Price No. Property Location Type Date Zoning Price Price' (Acres) (SF) Per SF 1 700 North Miami Avenue Sale Mar -17 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $45,250,000 $45,250,000 4.71 205,353 $220.35 Miami, FL 33136 Open 2 555 N. Miami Avenue Sale Mar -17 T6-80 O, Urban Core $18,095,000 $18,095,000 0.83 35,992 $502.75 Miami, FL 33132 Transect Zone 3 1753 - 1775 NE 2nd Avenue Sale May -17 T6-24 O, Urban Core, $33,000,000 $33,000,000 1.39 60,375 $546.58 Miami, FL 33132 open 4 1900 Biscayne Boulevard Sale Sep -17 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $18,400,000 $18,400,000 1.01 44,034 $417.86 Miami, FL 33132 Open 5 151 NE 1st Street Sale Nov -17 T6-80 O, Urban Core $9,270,000 $9,270,000 0.34 15,000 $618.00 Miami, FL 33131 Transect Zone 6 2501-2521 Biscayne Sale Feb -18 T6 -36a O, Urban Core, $22,700,000 $22,700,000 1.11 48,351 $469.48 Boulevard Open Miami, FL 33137 7 1801-1851 NE 2nd Avenue Under Jul -18 T6 -36b O, Urban Core, $30,000,000 $30,000,000 1.40 61,170 $490.44 Miami, FL 33132 Contract Open 8 500 NE 1 st Avenue Sale Jul -18 T6-80 O, Urban Core, $28,300,000 $35,200,000 1.83 79,848 $440.84 Miami, FL 33132 Open Subj. 230 SW 3rd Street, --- --- T6 -36b O, Urban Core, --- --- 1.59 69,161 --- Miami, Florida Open ' Adjusted sale price for cash equivalency and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE ADJUSTMENT GRID LAND SALES ADJUSTMENT GRID Land Value Comparable Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Subject Transaction Type Sole Sole Sole Sale Sale Sole Under Contract Sole Sole Transaction Date Mar -17 Mar -17 May -17 Sep -17 Nov -17 Feb -18 Jul -18 Jul -18 Jul -15 Zoning T6 -60a O, Urban T6-80 O, T6-24 O, Urban T6 -36b O, T6-80 O, T6 -36a O, T6 -36b O, T6-80 O, Urban T6 -36b O, Topography Core, Open Urban Core Core, open Urban Core, Urban Core Urban Core, Urban Core, Core, Open Urban Core, Location 0% Transect Zone -25% Open Transect Zone Open Open 0% Open Actual Sale Price $45,250,000 $18,095,000 $33,000,000 $18AOO,000 $9,270,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 $28,300,000 $14,250,000 Adjusted Sale Price $45,250,000 $18,095,000 $33,000,000 $18Aoo,000 $9,270,000 $22,700,000 $30,000,000 $35,200,000 $14,250,000 Size (Acres) 4.71 0.83 1.39 1.01 0.34 1.11 1.40 1.83 1.59 Sae (SF) 205,353 35,992 60,375 44,034 15,000 48,351 61,170 79,848 69,161 Density (UPA) 300 du/ac 438 du/ac 500 du/ac 4,243 du/ac --- --- --- --- --- Allowable Units 1,414 Units 362 Units 693 Units 429 Units --- --- --- --- --- Allowable Bldg. Area (SF) 2,258,883 SF 607,560 SF 966,000 SF 439,765 SF 360,000 SF 483,510 SF ######### --- 330,000 SF Indicated FAR 11.00 16.88 16.00 9.99 24.00 10.00 22.00 --- 4.77 Price Per SF $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 $440.84 Price Per Bldg. Area $20.03 $29.78 $34.16 $41.84 $25.75 $46.95 $22.29 --- L$20604 43.18 Price Per Unit $32,001 $49,986 $47,619 $42,890 --- --- --- --- --- Price ($ PSF) $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 $440.84 $206.04 Property Rights Conveyed 01% 0% 0% 0% 01% 0/ 0% 01% 01/ Financing Terms' 01% 01/ 01/ 01/ 01/ 0% 0% 01% 01/ Conditions of Sale 0% 01% 01% 01% 01% 0% 0% 0% 0% Market Conditions (Time) 01% 01Y 0% 01Y 01% 0% 01% 01% 20% Subtotal $220.35 $502.75 $546.58 $417.86 $618.00 $469.48 $490.44 $440.84 $247.25 Sae 30% -5% 0% 01/ -101% 0% 01% 01% 01/ Shape -101% -101% -10% -10% -101/ -10% -10% -101% 0% Corner o% 01Y 0% 01Y o% 0% o% 01% 0% Frontage 01% 0% -10% -10% -701% -10% -10% 01% 0% Topography 0% 01Y 01/ 01Y 011. 0% 01% 01% 01/ Location 0% 0% -25% 01% 01% 0% 0% 0% o% Zoning/Density -101% -20% 5% 01Y -20% 0% 01% -20% 0% Utilities 01% 0% 0% 01% 01% 01% 01% 01% 01/ Highest&Best Use 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 01% 01% 0% Total Other Adjustments 10% -35% -40% -20% -50% -20% -20% -30% o% Value Indication PSF of Site $242.39 $326.79 $327.95 $334.29 $309.00 $375.58 $392.35 $308.59 $247.25 Value Indication PSF of FAR $22.04 $19.36 $20.50 $33.47 $12.88 $37.56 $17.83 --- $51.82 Absolute Adjustment 507. 35% 50% 20% 50% 20% 20% 30% ' Adjasted sale price for cash eq.i-I.n y and/or development costs (where applicable) Compiled by CBRE CONCLUSION CONCLUDED LAND VALUE - MRC 1 SITE $ PSF of Site Site SF Total $250.00 x 69,161 = $17,290,250 $300.00 x 69,161 = $20,748,300 Indicated Value: $19,000,000 (Rounded $ PSF) $274.72 Compiled by CBRE APPENDIX D Potential Tax Revenues Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) Marlins # 1 68,900 CI T6-8 253,000 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 253,000 $ 550.00 $ - - $ 139,150,000 - - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 253,000 139,150,000 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 27,830,000 Estimated Assessed Value 0.0320 111,320,000 Miami -Dade School Board: Miami Operating School Board Operating 6.7740 754,082 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 24,490 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 3,562 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 14,193 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 15,407 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 4,909 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 52,020 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 827,831 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 66,068 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 52,109 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 519,519 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 44,528 Library 0.2840 31,615 MRC Property- Total 21.6523 2,410,334 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 827,831 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 66,068 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 893,900 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". 5) Stand alone site does not accommodate existing requirement of city (287,500) and will require modification to comply with Miami 21. Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) Marlins # 2 45,000 CI T5 113,000 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 113,000 $ 525.00 $ - - $ 59,325,000 - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 113,000 59,325,000 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 11,865,000 Estimated Assessed Value 0.0320 47,460,000 Miami -Dade School Board: Miami Operating School Board Operating 6.7740 321,494 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 10,441 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 1,519 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 6,051 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 6,568 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 2,093 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 22,178 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 352,936 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 28,168 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 22,216 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 221,491 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 18,984 Library 0.2840 13,479 MRC Property- Total 21.6523 1,027,618 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 352,936 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 28,168 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 381,104 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". 5) Stand alone site does not accommodate existing requirement of city (287,500) and will require modification to comply with Miami 21. Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) Marlins # 3 120,000 CI T5 267,000 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 267,000 $ 525.00 $ - - $ 140,175,000 - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 267,000 140,175,000 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 28,035,000 Estimated Assessed Value 0.0320 112,140,000 Miami -Dade School Board: Miami Operating School Board Operating 6.7740 759,636 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 24,671 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 3,588 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 14,298 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 15,520 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 4,945 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 52,403 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 833,929 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 66,555 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 52,493 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 523,346 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 44,856 Library 0.2840 31,848 MRC Property- Total 21.6523 2,428,089 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 833,929 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 66,555 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 900,484 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". 5) Stand alone site does not accommodate existing requirement of city (287,500) and will require modification to comply with Miami 21. Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) ATT 33,368 T6 -60A-0 T6 -60A-1 550,572 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 550,572 $ 600.00 $ - - $ - 330,343,200 - - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 550,572 330,343,200 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 66,068,640 Estimated Assessed Value 0.2200 264,274,560 Estimated A. Valorem Taxes (2017 Millage Rates) Miami Operating Description Tax Rate Total Miami -Dade School Board: 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue School Board Operating 6.7740 1,790,196 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 58,140 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 8,457 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 33,695 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 36,576 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 11,655 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 123,496 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 1,965,278 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 156,847 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 123,707 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 1,233,343 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 105,710 Library 0.2840 75,054 MRC Property - Total 21.6523 5,722,152 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 1,965,278 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 156,847 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 2,122,125 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Biscayne 318,859 CI T6-2413 Total Development Potential (Square Feet) 5,229,287 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 880,000 $ 550.00 - $ - - $ 484,000,000 - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 880,000 484,000,000 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 96,800,000 Estimated Assessed Value 0.0320 387,200,000 Miami -Dade School Board: Miami Operating School Board Operating 6.7740 2,622,893 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 85,184 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 12,390 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 49,368 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 53,588 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 17,076 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 180,939 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 2,879,413 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 229,803 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 181,248 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 1,807,024 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 154,880 Library 0.2840 109,965 MRC Property- Total 21.6523 8,383,771 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 2,879,413 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 229,803 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 3,109,216 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". 5) Of the total development potential of 318,000 SF - only 55,000 SF (or 17.25%) is needed for City building. Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) Melreese 100,000 CI T6-8 280,000 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 280,000 $ 525.00 - $ - - $ - 147,000,000 - - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 280,000 147,000,000 Assessed Value Reduction 20% 29,400,000 Estimated Assessed Value 0.2200 117,600,000 Estimated A. Valorem Taxes (2017 Millage Rates) Miami Operating Description Tax Rate Total Miami -Dade School Board: 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue School Board Operating 6.7740 796,622 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 25,872 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 3,763 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 14,994 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 16,276 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 5,186 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 54,954 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 874,532 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 69,796 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 55,049 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 548,827 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 47,040 Library 0.2840 33,398 MRC Property - Total 21.6523 2,546,310 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 874,532 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 69,796 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 944,328 Notes: 1) All estimates for illustrative purposes only. 2) Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. 3) Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. 4) Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value". Estimated Taxes Site Site Size (Square Feet) Zoning by Right Anticipated Zoning Total Development Potential (Square Feet) Nexus 68,900 CI T6 -36B-0 2,122,120 Projected Real Estate Taxes Use GSF Improved Value Office Other 1 Other 2 2,122,120 $ - $ - $ 600.00 1,273,272,000 - - Estimated Assessed Value (Sale Value) 2,122,120 1,273,272,000 Assessed Value Reduction 6.7740 201 254,654,400 Estimated Assessed Value 0.2200 1,018,617,600 Estimated A. Valorem Taxes (2017 Millage Rates) -71 Description Tax Rate Total Miami -Dade School Board: 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue School Board Operating 6.7740 6,900,116 School Board Debt Service 0.2200 224,096 State & Other: Florida Inland Navigation District 0.0320 32,596 South Florida Water Mgmt District 0.1275 129,874 Okeechobee Basin 0.1384 140,977 Everglades Construction Project 0.0441 44,921 Children's Trust Authority 0.4673 476,000 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 7,574,950 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 604,550 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 476,815 Miami -Dade County: County Wide Operating 4.6669 4,753,786 County Wide Debt Service 0.4000 407,447 Library 0.2840 289,287 MRC Property - Total 21.6523 22,055,414 Municipal Governing Board: Miami Operating 7.4365 7,574,950 Miami Debt Service 0.5935 604,550 Miami Miscelalaneous 0.4681 Total City Tax Revenue 8.4981 8,179,499 Notes: All estimates for illustrative purposes only. Actual revenue dependent upon permitted zoning, development potential (size), design for intended use, parking density, and timing. Improved value is an estimate based on prototypical development cost and site conditions. Improved value reduced by 20% for expected "assessed value"