HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Dept. of Planning and Zoning-EAR Amendments to MCNPCITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
FROM: Daniel J. Alfon
City Manager.
Submitted into the public,
reco�tj,
L Lo
onCity Clerk
DATE: October 21, 2016
SUBJECT: October 27, 2016 City Commission Agenda
REFERENCES: PZ.20 (File ID I034)
ENCLOSURES:
The Department of Planning and Zoning respectfully requests the following item be included into the
public record as part of the October 27, 2016 City Commission meeting agenda:
PZ.20: A copy of the Department of Planning and Zoning's "Discussion / Analysis" of the Evaluation and
Appraisal Review (EAR) Amendments to the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
(MCNP), as provided to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board on September 7, 2016.
C: Victoria Mendez, City Attorney
Nzeribe Ihekwaba, Chief of Operations and Assistant City Manager
Francisco J. Garcia, Department of PIanning and Zoning Director
Anna Medina, Agenda Coordinator
PZ17-001
CD
�U
CD
_71
P.-
Fl 4
Submitted into the public{
record or i m(s, 1'
``�" "! �.'' on i City Clerk
..
:,t Ixs:s> rlii a tib City of Miami
]J 51
o
Planning and Zoning Department
. Community Planning Division
Discussion I Analysis
Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) Amendments
To The
City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP)
File Id: 16-00746
Applicant(s): Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133
Location: Citywide
Request
The City requests approval of amendments to its Comprehensive Plan (MCNP) to reflect
changes to State Statutory Requirements since the last time the Plan was updated, and an update
to the Plan based on changes to local conditions.
History 1 Process
On February 9, 1989, the City of Miami adopted, by Ordinance 10544, the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan (MCNP), in accordance with a Florida Statutes 163 mandate. This document
is the guide to the City's existing and future development.
On November 13, 2008, the City adopted amendments based on the recommendations contained
in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report of 2005, except for the Port of Miami River Sub Element,
which was later adopted in July of 2010, by a Stipulated Settlement Agreement.
Effective June 2, 2011, local governments were no longer required to submit Evaluation and
Appraisal Reports to the State, Department of Economic Opportunity, DEO.
Subsequently, pursuant to Rule Chapter 73C-49, FAC, and FS 163.3191, at least every seven
years, or on or before November 1, 2015, the City was required to notify by letter to the State
Land Planning Agency, DEO, whether the need existed to amend it comprehensive plan to reflect
changes in state requirements and changes in local conditions since the last EAR in 2005; If the
City determined amendments were necessary, pursuant to Rule Chapter 73C-49, FAC, it would
prepare and transmit the proposed amendments to the State Land Planning Agency, DEO, within
one year of such determination, or by November 1, 2016, If the City failed to timely submit a
notification letter or proposed amendments within one year of notification to the State Land
Planning Agency, DEO, the City will not be able to amend its comprehensive plan until it complies
with state requirements.
record f�itell(s)
onCity Clerk
On November 1, 2015, the City notified by letter The State Land Planning Agency, DEO, the need
to amend its comprehensive plan to reflect changes in state requirements and changes in local
conditions since the last EAR in 2005 (See Exhibit B); Thus, the City is required to submit
proposed amendments to the State Land Planning Agency, DEO, by November 1, 2016;
Between, November 1, 2015, and November 2016, The City updated its Comprehensive Plan to
reflect changes in Statutory Requirements. In addition, in order to update the Plan to reflect
changes in local conditions, City Departments provided comments and recommendations for
change. Furthermore, The City held public meetings between March 2016, and May 2016, in each
of the City Commission Districts to request from stakeholders and community residents their
inputs for updating the comprehensive plan. The City held a public workshops June 1, 2016, and
July 6#h, 2016, with the Local Planning Agency, (the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, PZAB),
for their inputs for updating the comprehensive plan.
Following the City Commission approval on first reading, City Staff will transmit EAR proposed
amendments to the State Land Planning Agency, DEC, and other requesting agencies. The
MCNP amendments will be reviewed through the State Coordinated Review Amendment process,
as required by FS 163.3184. This process generally includes the following:
1. Development of comprehensive plan text amendments.
2. Review and approval by the City's Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board and the City
Commission of the proposed amendments in order to transmit to reviewing agencies;
3. Transmittal to the State Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review by state
agencies and other requesting agencies.
4. The State Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) issues objections,
recommendations, and comments (ORCs) report within 60 days of receipt of the
completed document.
5. After comments within the ORCs Report are addressed, EAR amendments are brought
back to the City Commission for adoption within 180 days of receipt of the ORCs Report,
6. Adopted amendments are transmitted to DEO for verification that the amendments are
compliant with Florida Statutes.
Discussion
The City's Comprehensive Plan, MCNP, is the City's policy document for existing and future
development. It is broad and general in nature and provides a decision making framework. The
MCNP evaluates how the City will meet the needs of existing and future residents, visitors, and
development. The MCNP provides a "master plan", that the City of Miami considers when making
development decisions.
The Plan is a policy document that guides decisions through a series of Goals, Objectives and
Policies. The MCNP's, Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) reflect the City's vision for its
existing and future development. Generally the GOPs state the following:
Page 2 of 13
Submitted into the public �S
record or it rn{s) I 1. lo
on 10�, City Clerk
• Goals - long-term end toward which programs or activities are ultimately directed;
• Objectives - ways in which programs and activities are conducted to achieve an identified
goal; and
• Policies - specific, measurable, intermediate end that is achievable and marks progress
toward the goal and Objectives;
Given that growth and change can affect every aspect of the City, it is imperative that.the MCNP
address aspects of the community's future. The MCNP addresses the City condition as a whole,
through various elements. The MCNP consists of 14 elements, which contains goals, objectives
and policies that become the guiding principles for the implementation of the plan.
The elements within the City's MCNP are:
• Future Land Use,
• Housing;
• Sanitary and Storm Sewers;
• Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge;
• Potable Water;
• Solid Waste Collection;
• Transportation;
• Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities;
• Parks, Recreation and Open Space;
• Coastal Management;
• Natural Resource Conservation;
• Education;
• Capital Improvements; and
• Intergovernmental Coordination.
Implementation of a Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
With the MCNP in place, the community, including potential residents and developers, has
advance knowledge of the intentions of the City. The MCNP, however, is not an implementing
document. Implementation of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) takes place
though various other tools and documents such as:
• Subdivision Regulations- Chapter 55 of the City Code of Ordinances
• Land Development Regulations - Miami 21
• Design Standards, Development and Preservation Strategies - Master Plans (Parks and
Public Space, Coconut Grove Waterfront, Virginia Key, etc.)
• Detailed Housing Plans and Implementation Programs - Consolidated Pian (Department
of Community Development, HUD & State funding)
• Building Code - Official Florida State Code and National Building Standards
• Historic Preservation Regulations - Miami City Code Chapter 23
Page 3 of 13
Submitted into the public(j�
record t'r ite
on City CIerk
The above documents are ways of implementing the MCNP and guiding future development. The
City of Miami can use these tools to prevent unwanted development and its undesirable side
effects. For example, the City's Code (Miami 21) states the following:
2.9.1 Title and Purpose
a. This Code shall be known as the Miami 21Code of the City of Miami, Florida. This
Code is declared to be in accord with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan as
required by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act, Section 163.3969 et
seq., Florida Statutes (the "Comprehensive Plan"). A primary purpose of this Code is to
implement the Comprehensive Plan.
Updating the Comprehensive Plan
While there are opportunities to revise the MCNP, these revisions often occur as the result of
outside development applications. Principally, however, The City of Miami amends its
comprehensive plans, if necessary, based on the results of the Evaluation and Appraisal Review
(EAR). An Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) and Amendments process allows the City to
take an all-encompassing look at how well the MCNP is functioning, and how it may be enhanced
to address specific community issues. This EAR process provides an opportunity to assess the
MCNP to ensure it reflects the City's vision for its future and to measure the work accomplished
in other efforts. In order to be effective, the MCNP must be flexible and adaptable to changing
conditions and concerns.
Through this process, City Staff does the following:
■ Develops policies and recommendations based on research of best practices in
comprehensive planning and current issues.
■ Updates policies guided by input from community stakeholders and evidence based
research from other communities.
■ Evaluates and updates deadlines for follow-up work to be completed..
Currently, pursuant to section 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes, the City of Miami is required to
review its comprehensive Plan, (MCNP), to ensure it conforms to state statutes and responds to
changes in local and regional conditions.
The changes included in the City's EAR based amendments are based on an analysis of state
statutory requirements, as well as, changes in local conditions. Amendments are broken out into
three categories:
• State Statute Requirements Evaluation Amendments;
• Department Staff Recommendation Amendments; and
• Public, stakeholder, community inputs Amendments.
State Statute Requirements:
"Exhibit C", attached, is aRcomposite listing of the State Statute Requirement changes that
were implemented by State legislation over the years. The last EAR document adopted in
2005, evaluated these changes over the years through 2002. This latest update continues the
evaluation process from 2003 through 2015.
Page 4 of 13
emitted into the public
recordor it m(s) h-1 LL
on City Clerk
The evaluation identifies the stated changes with their Chapter 163 citations, on a yearly basis.
Notations are made as to where updates have already been made or whether they are
necessary, or not. Not all regulatory changes are applicable to the City of Miami, others are
merely procedural on the state level and do not require local action. If changes are needed,
the appropriate Element locations are identified.
Within the Legislation and Exhibit A, the necessary updates needed because of statutory
requirements are identified. Changes are color coded in BLUE and identified through strikeout
and underline. Appropriate dates and numbers are noted after the change.
Specific Statutory Requirements addressed in this amended MCNP are listed below. For ID
purposes, eg (2004/4), the first number is the YEAR of the Statutory Requirement followed by
the specific number. Additionally provided is the State Requirement, followed by the location
of the amended/updated Policies within the MCNP. Detailed analysis and evaluation is
presented in Exhibit C
Generally stated, and illustrated in Exhibit C, many of the required statutory changes were
already covered by existing MCNP Policies. Some policies, however, did need updating, and
are presented below. Other statutory changes were not relevant to the City. They pertained
to aspects already covered in updates to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, or were pertinent to
geographical areas, and jurisdictions outside the City of Miami. An additional impact to the
evaluation was the fact that many required statutory changes in early years were removed,
stricken out, or deleted in later years. As a result, these policies did not require an update,
• (2004!4): Provides for certain accessory dwelling units to apply towards satisfying the
affordable housing component of the housing element in a local government's
comprehensive plan. (See Policy HO -1.1.10.; Policy HO -1.1.15.)
• (200512): Required the comprehensive plan to include a 5 year schedule of capital
improvements. Outside funding (funding from a developer, other government or funding
pursuant to referendum) of these capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of
a development agreement or inter -local agreement. (See Policy CI -1.1.1. & Appendix
CI -1)
• (200512)Requires the future land use element to be based upon the availability of water
supplies (in addition to public water facilities). (See Policy LU -1.7.8.)
• (200516) If local government has established transportation exceptions, the guidelines for
implementing the exceptions must be "consistent with and support a comprehensive
strategy, and promote the purpose of the exceptions." Exception areas must include
mobility strategies, such as alternate modes of transportation, supported by data and
analysis. The Florida Department of Transportation must be consulted prior to designating
a transportation concurrency exception area. Transportation concurrency exception areas
existing prior to July 1, 2005 must meet these requirements by July 1, 2006, or when the
evaluation and appraisal based amendments are adopted, whichever occurs last. (See
NEW Policy TR -1.1.1. & NEW Policy TR -2.5.5.)
Page 5 of 13
BMW C=TF MW
Submitted irttri the pubrrc
record rite
on � U ICity Clerk
• (200616),"Recognizes="extremelytow=income persons" as another income groups whose
housing needs might be addressed by -accessory dwelling units and defines such persons
consistent with section 420.0004(8), Florida Statutes. Chapter 2006-69, Laws of Florida
(See Goal HO -1; Policy HO -1.1.10.; Policy H0A.1.12.)
• (200616) Assigns to the Division of Emergency Management the responsibility of ensuring
the preparation of updated regional hurricane evacuation plans. Chapter 200668, Laws
of Florida. (See Policy CM -4.1.11.)
® (200617) Changes the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area to be the area below
the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH model,
Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida (See CM -4.1.2.)
• (2006114) Creates a new section related to electric distribution substations; establishes
criteria addressing land use compatibility of substations; requires local governments to
permit substations in all future land use map categories (except preservation, conservation
or historic preservation); establishes compatibility standards to be used if a local
government has not established such standards; establishes procedures for the review of
applications for the location of a new substation; allows local governments to enact
reasonable setback and landscape buffer standards for substations. Chapter 2006-268,
Laws of Florida. (See "Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map")
• (2006116) Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; created by Chapter
2006-69, section 27, Laws of Florida, Establishes a special, expedited adoption process
for any plan amendment that implements a pilot program project. (See Policy HO -1.1.13.)
(2006117) Affordable housing land donation density incentive bonus; created by Chapter
2006-69, section 28, Laws of Florida. Allows a density bonus for land donated to a local
government to provide affordable housing; requires adoption of a plan amendment for any
such land; such amendment may be adopted as a small-scale amendment; such
amendment is exempt from the twice per year limitation on the frequency of plan
amendment adoptions, (See Policy HO -1,1.14.)
• (200712) Revises the citation to the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transportation
Improvement Program and long-range transportation plan, Chapter 2007-196, Laws of
Florida. (See NEW Policy TR -2.4.6.; Policy IC -2.1.10.)
• (200712) Revises the housing element requirements to ensure adequate sites for
affordable workforce housing within certain .counties. Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida.
(See Goal HO -1 & Policy HO -1.1.1.)
• (200718) Extends the duration of a development agreement from 10 to 20 years. Chapter
2007-204, Laws of Florida. (See Policy CI -1,2.8.)
• (2007110) If a property owner contributes right-of-way and expands a state transportation
facility, such contribution may be applied as a credit against any future transportation
concurrency requirement. Chapter 2007-196, Laws of Fiorida. (See NEW Policy TR -
1.6.6.; -Policy CI=1.3.1.)
Page 6 of 13
, -omitted into the public �.
rccord for it m(s)
on City Clerk
• (200811) The future land use plan must discourage urban sprawl. Chapter 2008 191, Laws
of Florida. (See Goal LU -1; Policy LU -1.1.7.; Policy LU -1.3.5.; "Interpretation of the
-2020 Future Land Use Map")
• (200814) The traffic circulation element must include transportation strategies to address
reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. (See NEW
Objective TR -1.2; NEW Policy TR -1.2.3)
• (200815) The conservation element must include factors that affect energy conservation.
Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. (See Goal NR -1; Objective NR -1.5.; Policy NR -
1.5.1.; Policy NR -1.5.2.; Policy NR -1.5.3.)
• (200818) Local governments within a Metropolitan Planning Organization area must revise
their transportation elements to include strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida (See NEW Objective TR -1.2.; NEW Policy TR -1.2.3.;
NEW Policy TR -2.1.8.)
• (200914) Requires the future land use element to include by June 30, 2012, criteria that
will be used to achieve compatibility of lands near public use airports. (See Policy LU -
1.1.16.; Objective PA -2.1.)
• (200916) Requires the intergovernmental coordination element to include a mandatory
(rather than voluntary) dispute resolution process and requires use of the process
prescribed in section 186.509, Florida Statutes, for this purpose. Chapter 2009 96, section
3, Laws of Florida. (See Policy IC -3.1.1.)
• (200917) Requires the intergovernmental coordination element to provide for inter -local
agreements pursuant to section 333.03(1)(b), Florida Statutes, between adjacent local
governments regarding airport zoning regulations. Chapter 2009 85, section 3, Laws of
Florida. (See Policy IC -3.1.2.)
• (201115) Modifies the intent of the legislature with respect to how comprehensive plans
and amendments affect property rights. (See Goal LU -4; Objective LU -4.1.; Policy LU -
4.1.1.; Policy LU -4.1.2.)
• (201116) Expresses legislative intent to recognize and protect agriculture, tourism and
military presence as being the state's traditional economic base. (See Goal LU -1)
• (201117) Expresses legislative intent to not require local government plans that have been
found to be in compliance to adopt amendments implementing the new statutory
requirements until the evaluation and appraisal period provided in s. 163.3191 (See Policy
LU -1.7.3.)
• (2011132) Establishes definition for "transit -oriented development." (See NEW Policy TR -
2.7.6; Policy IC -2.1.28.)
Page 7 of 13
Submitted into the7aLIL
record f r ite (s)
on `� City Clerk
• (2011143); Modified to include significant portions of repealed 9J 5.001 and 9J-5.005
Florida Administrative Code with respect to Principles, guidelines, standards and
strategies to be set forth in required and optional elements of the comprehensive pian and
requirements for basing these elements on relevant, appropriate and professionally
accepted data,(See Policy LU -1.2,3., EDU -MONITORING AND EVALUATION
PROGRAM)
• (2011144) Deletes financial feasibility requirements, (See Policy Objective CI -1.2.; CI -
1.2.1.; CI -CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM)
(2011/45) Modifies provisions for preparing the capital improvements element to require
the schedule to cover a 5,year period and identify whether projects are either funded or
unfunded and given a level of priority for funding. Deletes requirements for financial
feasibility, (See Policy CI -1.1.1. & Objective CI -1.2. & Policy CI -1.2.1.; Appendix CI -1))
• (2011160) Modifies requirements for the future land use element "to accommodate at least
the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections of the
University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research for at least a 10 -year
planning period unless otherwise limited." (See "Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land
Use Map")
• (2011162) Establishes requirements for the future land use element and map series,
including with slight revisions the primary indicators that a plan or plan amendment does
not discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl that were in repealed Rule 9J-5.006,
F.A,C.. (See Goal LU -1; Policy LU-1.1.7.;Policy LU-1.3,5.;"Interpretation of the 2020
Future Land Use Map"; Appendix LU -1)
• (2011/53) Modifies requirements for the transportation element to include significant
portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.019, F.A.C., addressing circulation of recreational traffic,
including bicycle facilities, exercise trails, riding facilities and airport master plans. (See
NEW Policy TR -2.9.1.)
• (2011165.) Modifies requirements for the intergovernmental coordination element to
include portions of'repealed Rule 9J-5.015, F.A.C, including coordinating and addressing
impacts on adjacent municipalities and coordinating the establishment of level of service
standards.(See Policy CI -1.2.9,; Policy IC -2.1.29.)
• (2011166) Deletes provisions for airport master plans., (See OLD Policy TR -1.9.1.)
• (2011169) Deletes provisions for additional plan elements, or portions or phases thereof,
including an economic development element. (See Policy LU -1.7.6.)
(2011174) Deletes requirements related to the submittal of comments from the Office of
Educational Facilities on the inter -local agreement, challenges to the state land planning
agency notice of intent and other review process requirements. (See Policy EDU -1.1.5.)
Page a of 13
mnlitted into the public
record i'or i C111 S)
on "r City Clerk
• (2011/76) Modifies concurrency requirements to include portions of repealed Rule 9J-
5.0055, F.A.C., which relate to achieving and maintaining adopted levels of service for a
5 -year period, and providing for rescission of any optional concurrency provisions by plan
amendment, which is not subject to state review. (See Policy CI -1.1.1.; Policy CI -1.2.2.;
Appendix CIA)
• (2011178) Deletes requirement that parks and recreation facilities to serve new
development are in place or under actual construction no later than one year after
issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.(See Policy CI -1.2.2.b))
• (2011179) Deletes provisions addressing governmental entities and establishment of
binding level of service standards with respect to limiting the authority of any agency to
recommend or make objections, recommendations, comments or determinations during
reviews conducted under s .163.3184 (See Policy CI -1.2.7.)
• (2011180) Deletes concurrency provisions specifically related to public transit facilities and
urban infill and redevelopment areas. (See Appendix TR -1)
• (2011181) Establishes concurrency provisions for transportation facilities, which include
portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.0055, F.A.C. Sets forth requirements with respect to
adopted level of service standards, including use of professionally accepted studies to
evaluate levels of service, achieving and maintaining adopted levels of service standards,
and including the projects needed to accomplish this in 5 -year schedule of capital
improvements. Requires coordination with adjacent local governments and setting forth
the method to be used in calculating proportionate -share contribution. Defines the term
"transportation deficiency." (See Appendix TR -1; Appendix CI -1)
• (2011185) Modifies school concurrency provisions to remove requirement for financial
feasibility and to require that facilities necessary to meet adopted levels of service during
a 5 -year period are meet adopted levels of service during a 5 -year period are identified
and consistent with the school board's educational facilities plan. (See Policy CI -1.2.1.)
• (20111107) Revises the duration of a development agreement from 20 years to 30 years,
unless it is extended by mutual consent, and deletes reference to s. 163.3187 and
s.163.3189 regarding compliance determination by state land planning agency. (See
Policy CI -1.2.8.)
• (2012110) Changes the "preparation of the periodic reports" to "the periodic evaluation and
appraisal of the comprehensive plan". (See Policy LU -1.7.2.)
• (2012116) Changes the requirement that future land use map amendments be based on
an analysis of the minimum amount of land needed as determined by the local
government, to instead be based on an analysis of the minimum amount of land needed
to achieve the requirements of the statute. (See Policy LU -1.7.8.; "Interpretation of the
2020 Future Land Use Map")
Page 9 o€13
Submitted into the public
reca��itiqr(s � y -
onCity Cleric
• (201319) Adds "development agreement" in the listed land use development permits for
which an applicant may satisfy transportation concurrency requirements of the local
comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency management system and
section 380.06 when, applicable. (See Policy CI -1.2.4.; Policy Cl- CONCURRENCY
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM)
(2013110) Adds language allowing a local government to accept contributions from
multiple applicants for a planned improvement if it maintains contributions in a separate
account designated for that purpose. (See Policy C1 -1.2.2.c)
• (2013112). Clarifies that a local government is not required to approve a development that,
for reasons other than transportation impacts, is not qualified for approval pursuant to the
applicable local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. (See Cl -
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM)
• (2013/13)
1)Sets forth new provisions for any local government that elects to repeal
transportation concurrency.
2) Encourages adoption of alternative mobility funding system that uses one or
more of the tools and techniques identified in subsection (f).
3) Clarifies that any alternative mobility funding system adopted may not be used
to deny, time or phase an application for site plan approval, plat approval, final
subdivision approval, building permits, or the functional equivalent of such
approvals provided that the developer agrees to pay for the development's
identified transportation impacts via the funding mechanism implemented by the
local government. States that the revenue from the funding mechanism used in the
alternative system must be used to implement the needs of the local government's
plan which serves as the basis for the fee imposed.
4) Requires a mobility fee-based funding system to comply with the dual rational
nexus test applicable to impact fees. An alternative system that is not mobility fee-
based shall not be applied in a manner that imposes upon new development any
responsibility for funding an existing transportation deficiency as defined in
subsection (h).(See NEW Policy TR -2.1.7.; NEW Policy TR -2.2.4.; NEW Policy
TR -2.2.5.)
• (2013117) Setting forth provisions for a local manufacturing development program and
master development approval for manufacturers, allows a local government to adopt an
ordinance establishing a local manufacturing development program ... (See Policy LU -
1.3.15.)
• (24141.7) Requires that local governments must adopt, amend, and enforce land
development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan
within one year after submission of the comprehensive plan or amended comprehensive
plan pursuant to section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (evaluation and appraisal process),
instead of section 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes (requirement that each local government
maintain a comprehensive plan). (See Policy L,U-1.7.4.)
Page 10 of 13
Submitted into the public, -
record f' r ite (s) � _
on ? � City Clerlc
• (2015/1); Adds requirements for the redevelopment component of the Coastal
Management Element to: 1) Reduce the flood risk in coastal areas that result from
high tide events, storm surge, flash floods, stormwater runoff, and the related
impacts of sea level rise. 2) Remove coastal real property from FEMA flood zone
designations. 3) Be consistent with or more stringent than the flood resistant
construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and federal flood plain
management regulations. 4) Require construction seaward of the coastal
construction control line to be consistent with chapter 161, Florida Statutes. 5)
Encourage local governments to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program
Community Rating System to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their
residents. (See Objective CM -1.2.; Policy CM -1.2.1.; Policy CM -1.2.2.; Policy CM -
1.2.3.; Policy CM -1.3.3.)
• (201513) 2)The local government must cooperate with any local government or utility
provider that provides service within its jurisdiction (3) The local government must keep
the element up to date in accordance with section 163.3191 (evaluation and appraisal)
.(See Policy LU -1.7.3.; Policy IC -1.1.13.)
Department Staff Recommendations:
City Department's staff reviewed the current MCNP document in order to update it based on
changes in local conditions. These updates are illustrated in Exhibit A of the Legislation, and
are color coded in RED and identified through strikeout and underline.
Deadlines were addressed by reassessing policy, recommendations, relevance and
feasibility. Particular attention was made to the MCNP policy requirement to update the
Transportation Element as well as the supporting Data and Analysis. These updates are found
in the Transportation Element through highlighted strike out and underlines in Exhibit A along
with the updated Appendix TR -1.
The Capital Improvement Schedule per Florida Statutes Ch. 163.3177 was also reviewed and
updated to reflect changes in local conditions. This schedule identifies projects on a yearly
basis over a five year period needed to maintain adequate Levels of Service, LOS. The LOSs
are identified in the Capital Improvement Element, Please see Appendix CI -1 of the MCNP
updated in Exhibit A.
Additionally, the Future Land Use Map, FLUM, was also updated in Appendix LU -1, as well
as maps in Appendix EDU -1.
Public, Stakeholder, Community Outreach:
The City held public meeting in each of the City's Commission Districts to obtain comments
and understand important issues of concern to the city residents. The City updates the MCNP,
to promote and incorporate the public's feedback from our outreach meetings in order to
provide the most up-to-date document for Miami's residents, neighbors, and the development
community.
At recent meetings concerns arose that pertained to the following topics and are reflected
below and in the attached analysis, Exhibit D.
Page 11 of 13
Community Priorities
April and May 2016
D1
Green and Open Space
Mobility
Infrastructure
Culture & Arts
Code Enforcement
Climate Change
Housing
Economic
Development
Submitted into the public �j
record f r ite (. ) i 2, 10
On 1 City Clerk
02 D3 D4 D5 TOTAL.
4
9
10
11
12
46
3
33
16
14
16
82
4.
19
10
11
13
57
0
7
6
1
8
22
1
8
3
13
10
35
3
14
6
4
12
39
2
14
12
4
4
36
1
8
8
3
11
31
EAR COMMUNITY PRIORITIES BOARD DATA
April and May 2016
90 _.
80
70
60
50 _..
40
3Q
20 -
OQe �4 fob � P kotGe � a� a� °�y ®c0
�t
* EAR Priorities 2016 D1 A7 EAR Priorities 2416 D2 IN EAR Priorities 2016 D3
* EAR Priorities 2016 D4 NEAR Priorities 2016 D5 A EAR Priorities 2016 TOTAL
Staff will continue to conduct outreach meetings through 2017.
These topics are currently mentioned throughout the MCNP document
Page 12 of 13
Submitted into the public
record f r ite I(s)
on 1 � City Clerk
Measureable Policies:
To ensure the effectiveness of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the GOps include required tasks
that have dates/deadlines, or time frame intervals, for completion. These tasks are measurable
indicators that when achieved, are indications of the success, or failure, of the Comprehensive
Plan. These dates have been updated as appropriate. Exhibit E identifies, by Element and
responsible Departments, these policies with their target dates for compliance.
Staff Recommendations:
The City requests approval of amendments to its Comprehensive Plan (MCNP) to reflect
changes to State Statutory Requirements since the last time the Plan was updated, and update
the Plan based on changes to local conditions.
Page 13 or 13