Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-27-16 CC FR ExhibitEXHIBIT A MCNP Amendments Notation: Within Exhibit A, the updates are necessary because of: • State Statutory Change Requirements • Changes in Local Conditions Updates are color coded and identified through strikeout and underline. State Statutory Updates are presented in Blue text. Appropriate legislative year and numbers are noted in bold text after the change, in parentheses. Local Conditions Updates are reflective of City Department and Community inputs and are presented in Red text. Volume 1 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES City of Miami Planning Department 444 SW 2nd Avenue • Miami, FL 33130 September 2016 The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989 and has been amended by the City Commission through 4eta"eF 22, 294 Volume 1 MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN GOALS OBJECTIVES POLICIES TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES.......................................................................................... V FUTURELAND USE........................................................................................................................ 1 URBAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.................•................................................................................... 16 The Downtown Miami Master Plan........................................................................................... 17 REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTERS................................................................................................................ 17 Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center.................................................................................. 18 Health District Regional Activity Center........................................................................................ 19 INTERPRETATION OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN MAP................................................................ 21 CONSERVATION................................................................................................................................... 21 PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION............................................................................................................ 22 COMMERCIAL RECREATION.................................................................................................................... 22 MARINEFACILITIES............................................................................................................................... 22 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL................................................................................................................. 22 DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL........................................................................................................................... 23 LOW DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL................................................................................................ 23 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL............................................................................................ 24 HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL................................................................................................ 24 Little Havana Target Area........................................................................................................... 24 Southeast Overtown/Park West................................................................................................... 24 Brickell, Omni, and River Quadrant........................................................................................... 24 LOW DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL................................................................................................. 25 MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL............................................................................................ 25 MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES ................................................. 25 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL.................................................................................................................... 26 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD)...................................................................................................... 26 GENERAL COMMERCIAL........................................................................................................................ 27 INDUSTRIAL......................................................................................................................................... 27 LIGHTINDUSTRIAL(LI).......................................................................................................................... 28 CORRESPONDENCE TABLE — ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN................................................................ 29 HOUSING......................................................................................................................................... 30 SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS............................................................................................ 38 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE............................................................................. 43 POTABLEWATER............................................................................................................................... 45 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION.................................................................................................... 48 TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................................................. 51 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ii Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES.................................................................................... 83 PORTOF MIAMI.................................................................................................................................... 83 MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT............................................................................................................. 84 PORTOF MIAMI RIVER...............................................................................................................•........... 85 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE............................................................................. 90 COASTAL MANAGEMENT.................................................................................................................102 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION...........................................................................................111 EDUCATION................................................................................................................................. 117 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS..................................................................................................... 126 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION..........................................................................................135 APPENDICES Appendix LU -1 2020 Future Land Use Map Urban Central Business District Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center Residential Density Increase Areas Edgewater Intensity Increase Area Health/Civic Center District Wellfield Protection Area Wetlands Map General Soils Map Appendix PW -1 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update - September 10, 2015 Appendix TR -1 Existing and Future Transportation Map Series and analytical assumption used to determine the existing and projected levels of services for roadways, bicycles and pedestrian facilities. Appendix PA -1 Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Table — July 22, 2010 Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Property Map -- July 22, 2010 Appendix CM -1 Floodplains Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Appendix EDU -1 Public school and ancillary facility locations Appendix CI -1 Capital Improvements Program and Multi -Year Capital Plan Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 LIST OF AMENDING ORDINANCES The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan was adopted in 1989 and substantially amended in 1991 in response to Florida Department of Community Affairs review comments. The ordinance adopting the Comprehensive Plan, including subsequent text amendments (only), are as follows: Ordinance Date of Adoption Description of Ordinance 10544 February 9, 1989 Adopted the MCNP 1989-2000 with modifications that supersedes the MCNP (September 1985) and Addendum, provided support documents are not adopted with the plan. 10700 January 11, 1990 Amended the definition of the Land Use Element to refine the definitions o Residential, Office and Industrial; amended the Housing Element Objective 1.3 and Policy 1.3.4 and deleted Policy 1.3.5 pertaining to community- based residential facilities, adult congregate living facilities, family homes and family group and group homes; and corrected a scrivener's error. 10701 January 11, 1990 Amended the Drainage Sub -Element, Policy No. 2.1.3, specifying which storm sewers in the city will be designed for a 1 -in -5 year event and establishing a specific LOS standard for the remainder of the storm sewers; Coastal Management Sub -Element, Policy 4.1.2, defining and designating the Coastal High -Hazard Area within the city; and adopted consistent LOS standards in both the Drainage Sub -Element and Policy No. 1.2.3 (d) of the CIP Element. 10832 January 24, 1991 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Interpretation of Future Land Use Maps; Housing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection; Transportation; Ports, Aviation & Related Facilities; Parks, Recreation & Open Space; Coastal Management; Natural Resource Conservation; and Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental Coordination elements. 10833 January 24, 1991 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Map Plan by changing land use designations that affect approximately 5 -percent of the total land area o he City. 11207 December 1, 1994 Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, and museums within historic districts/structures within single family, duplex and medium density multi -family residential areas. 11242 March 27, 1995 Allowed small-scale, limited commercial uses as accessory uses within medium, density multi -family areas. 11496 May 22, 1997 Allowed professional offices, tourist & guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges within historic districts/structures within single family, duplex and medium density multi -family residential areas; density and intensity restricted to the structure(s). Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Ordinance Date of Adoption Description of Ordinance 11779 March 23, 1999 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection; and Parks, Recreation & Open Space elements according to 1995 EAR -based recommendations. 11781 March 23, 1999 Amended the Interpretation of Future Land Use Map to conditionally include residential uses to the general commercial land use designation. 11782 March 23, 1999 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map to add "Restricted Parks and Recreation" and "Marine Facilities" land use classifications. 11864 November 16, 1999 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Element to adopt the designation of an "urban infill" area to meet State requirements regarding school siting and co -location. 11961 September 14, 2000 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use Element, Policy LU -1.1.11, to exclude Virginia Key, Watson Island, and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay having a "conservation" land use and zoning classification from the Urban Infill Area. 12332 February 27, 2003 Amended the Transportation Element of the MCNP in accordance with recommendations of the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report; revisions o the "Report of Sufficiency Issues with Responses by the City of Miami" in response to the Florida Department of Community Affairs; affirmation of he designation of an "urban infill' area adopted by Ordinance 11864; and in accordance with the designation of an "urban streets" category of public thoroughfares. 12333 February 27, 2003 Amended the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Element of the MCNP to include specific goals associated with a new park in Little Haiti. 12346 March 27, 2003 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map to add a "Light Industrial" land use classification. 12442 November 25, 2003 Rescinded Ordinance Nos. 12332, 12333 and 12346; updated the Transportation Element, added policies associated with a new park in Little Haiti, and added the "Light Industrial" land use classification. 12445 November 25, 2003 Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to include the designation of "Regional Activity Centers" within the City of Miami. 12446 November 25, 2003 Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the Buena Vista Regional Activity Center, and amended the Future Land Use Map to designate the Florida East Coast (FEC) Buena Vista Yard as a Regional Activity Center. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Ordinance Date of Adoption Description of Ordinance 12536 May 6, 2004 Amended the Intergovernmental Coordination Element of the MCNP in accordance to recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report; amended the Future Land Use Element by deleting an objective and policies related to Intergovernmental Coordination by transferring them into the Intergovernmental Coordination Element. 12635 December 4, 2004 Amended the Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation and Capital Improvements elements of the MCNP in accordance to recommendations from the 1995 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. 12741 November 3, 2005 Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP and the Future Land Use Map to designate the Downtown Miami Master Plan an Urban Central Business District. 12786 March 23, 2006 Amends certain policies of the Future Land Use, Housing, Parks Recreation & Open Space, Coastal Management and Capital Improvements elements of the MCNP to incorporate language necessary o implement the Miami 21 project. 12966 January 24, 2008 Adding a new Educational Element and amending and adding certain policies to the Capital Improvement and Intergovernmental element of the MCNP to incorporate language necessary to implement Public School Concurrency. 13043 November 13, 2008 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Housing; Sanitary and Storm Sewers; Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge; Potable Water; Solid Waste Collection, Transportation, Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities, Parks, Recreation & Open Space, Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements; and Intergovernmental Coordination elements according to 2005 EAR -based recommendations. 13049 January 29, 2009 Amended the MCNP by incorporating the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element and 2008 — 2009, Five (5) year Schedule of Capital Improvements. 13115 October 22, 2009 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map section, to remove, modify and incorporate new land use categories, as well as to adjust the density and intensity provisions within the land use categories to implement the Miami 21 project. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan vii Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 13144 February 25, 2010 Amended the Future Land Use Element of the MCNP to designate the Health District Regional Activity Center, and amended the 2020 Future Land Use Map to designate the Health District as a Regional Activity Center. 13157 April 22, 2010 Amending the MCNP Natural Ground Water, Potable Water, Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental Coordination elements to incorporate a 20 -year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. 13043 July 22, 2010 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use; Ports, Aviation and Related Facilities Port of Miami River Sub -element; and Coastal Management Element according to the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between the Intervenor "The Miami River Marine Group Inc.", The Department o Community Affairs and the City of Miami. 13356 January 10, 2013 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map; Parks, Recreation & Open Space, and Capital Improvements elements, in order to revise the Level Of Service standard for Parks, Recreation and Open Space for concurrency purposes. 13416 October 24, 2013 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to establish the Park West Residential Density Increase Area Overlay permitting up to 500 dwelling units per acre. 13550 September 10, 2015 Amended the MCNP Future Land Use, Potable Water, Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation, Capital Improvements and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements to incorporate a 20 -year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update. 13567 October 22, 2015 Amended the MCNP Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map to establish the Miami River Residential Density Increase Area Overlay permitting up to 400 dwelling units per acre. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan viii Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 FUTURE LAND USE Goal LU -1: Maintain a land use pattern that (1) protects and enhances the quality of life in the City's neighborhoods through community planning; (2) fosters redevelopment and revitalization of blighted or declining areas; (3) promotes and facilitates economic development and diversification, and the growth of job opportunities and workforce development (201116) in the city, (4) fosters the growth and development of downtown Miami inclusive of Brickell Avenue as a regional center of domestic and international commerce, culture and entertainment, (5) promotes the efficient use of land and minimizes land use conflicts while protecting and preserving residential sections within neighborhoods; (6) protects and conserves the city's significant natural and coastal resources; ane -(7) protects the integrity and quality of the City's existing neighborhoods by insuring public notice, input and appellant rights regarding changes in existing zoning and land use regulations—(8) discourages the proliferation of urban sprawl, per Section 163.3177(6)(a)9 Florida Statutes (hereinafter abbreviated as "Fla. Stat, or "F.S.") (200811 & 2011152). and (9) recognizes and protects agricultural, tourism and military presence as being the state's traditional economic base. (201116) Objective LU -1.1: Ensure that land and development regulations are consistent with fostering a high quality of life in all areas, including the timely provision of public facilities that meet or exceed the minimum level of service (LOS) standards adopted in the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. Policy LU -1.1.1: Development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use be contingent upon the availability of public facilities that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in the CIE, specifically sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities. The public services and facilities provided to meet concurrency requirements &ha4 will be consistent with the Capital Improvements Element, or guaranteed in an enforceable agreement. The public services and facilities will include public schools when the Miami -Dade County School Board and local governments in the county implement school concurrency pursuant to paragraph Section 163.31777/1 F.S. Policy LU -1.1.2: The City's Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies, will (1) continuously monitor land development activities to ensure compliance with the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix LU -1 of the MCNP including FLUM, Wellfield Protection Area, Wetlands and General Soils maps as amended from time to time) and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use element of the MCNP; (2) monitor all proposed amendments to land development regulations to ensure consistency with the MCNP and will forward its recommendation on such amendments to the Planning Advisory Zoning, and Appeals Board and to the City Commission; (3) continuously monitor the current and projected LOS standards provided by public facilities; and (4) will perform Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 1 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 the required concurrency review of proposed development, as required by Florida Statutes and administrative rules. Policy LU -1.1.3: The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or natural or man-made amenities; (3) transportation policies that divide or fragment established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public open space, environment, and ecology. Strategies to further protect existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements will be incorporated into the City's land development regulations. Policy LU -1.1.4: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its neighborhoods through the implementation of code enforcement strategies and initiatives with the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood environmental conditions. Policy LU -1.1.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies, twill annually monitor steps taken to fulfill the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the MCNP and biennially report the status of the GOPs to the Planning Advisory Zoning, and Appeals Board and City Commission, including, but not limited to, improving measurability of objectives. Policy LU -1.1.6: The City's street and storm sewer improvement projects will provide curb and gutter, and street landscaping, unless deemed to be physically or economically infeasible. Policy LU -1.1.7: Land development regulations and policies discourage urban sprawl by allowing (200811) (2011152) w4l­-a�for the development and redevelopment of well-designed mixed-use neighborhoods that provide for the full range of residential, office, live/work spaces, neighborhood retail, and community facilities in a walkable area and that are amenable to a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles, automobiles, and mass transit. Policy LU -1.1.8: The City's Planning Department will be responsible for coordinating the City's land development regulations and policies with those of Miami -Dade County and abutting adja%Rt municipalities, and in particular: with respect to impacts to infrastructure, contiguous development with regard to physical height and mass transitions, and public open space. Policy LU -1.1.9: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West Flagami area of the city (as shown on Figure 111.1 of Volume II — Data and Analysis of the MCNP, dated September 1, 1988) as necessary to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Policy AR -1.2.1.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy LU -1.1.10: The City's land development regulations will encourage high density residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and Metromover stations. (See Transportation Policy TR--r2-TR-2.1.3. and Housing Policy HO -1.1.9.) . Policy LU -1.1.11: The City hereby adopts designation of the City, excluding Virginia Key, Watson Island and the uninhabited islands of Biscayne Bay, that have a land use and zoning classification of Conservation, as an Urban Infill Area pursuant to Miami - Dade County's designation of an Urban Infill Area lying generally east of the Palmetto Expressway and including all of the City of Miami. Within this area, the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity S49 will be emphasized with the goals of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods and the viability of commercial areas. Priority will be given to infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, redevelopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalization and the development of projects that promote public transportation (See Policy TR -1.1.1.). Maintenance of transportation levels of service within this designated Urban Infill Transportation Concurrency Exception Area ; &ha4 will be in accordance with the adopted Transportation Corridors level of service standards and the City of Miami Person Trip Methodology as set forth in Objective TR - 1.7. and related Policies Dn"Gies TD_1 1 2 and 1.1.3 -of the Transportation Element of the MCNP as well as Appendix TR -1. Policy LU -1.1.12: In order to encourage the development and maintenance of educational facilities in the City of Miami, the City's Land Use policies permit schools in all land use classifications except Conservation, Public Parks and Recreation, and Industrial. During pre -development program planning and site selection activities, the City coordinate with Miami -Dade Public Schools and continue to seek, where feasible and mutually acceptable, to co -locate schools with other facilities such as parks, libraries, Neighborhood Enhancement Team ("NET") Offices, and community centers to the extent possible. Policy LU -1.1.13: The City sha4 will review and evaluate the areas designated Urban Infill Area (UTA) and/or Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) within two years of the adoption of +h; p9liGy the 2016 EAR amendments to determine, but not limited to, the following: the appropriateness of the areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; the benefits and/or disadvantages resulting from the inclusion (or exclusion) of these areas within the UTA and/or the TCEA; the strategies to support mobility and alternative modes of transportation within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; and the strategies to address urban design and network connectivity to improve mobility within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA. Policy LU -1.1.14: Improve facility and program accessibility through implementation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Policy LU -1.1.15: [Reservedl Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy LU -1.1.16: The City of Miami, through its Land Development Regulations, will coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to Miami International Airport with the transportation related activity which occurs within that facility to ensure compatible and complimentary land uses and activities. Through such Land Development Regulations, the City will mitigate negative impacts to neighborhoods that might result from airport activities, while protecting the airport's economic function, operation, and potential improvements. (See Objective PA -2.1) (200914) Policy LU -1.1.17: The City will integrate the existing and planned multi -modal transportation systems with existing and future developments. (See Objective TR -2.1) Policy LU -1.1.18: The City will work with the County and public transportation providers to help Integrate innovative technologies to improve the transportation network. (See Objective TR -2.10: and IC -2.1.31.) (PZAB Recommendation) Policy LU -1.1.19: The City will encourage the incorporation of transit facilities within private development to integrate access to alternative modes with direct access and synergies within new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of transit stations and public common areas of private developments. (See Policy TR- 2.1.4.) Objective LU -1.2: Promote, facilitate, and catalyze the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted, declining or threatened residential, commercial and industrial areas through a variety of public, private, and public-private redevelopment initiatives and revitalization programs including, where appropriate, historic designations. Policy LU -1.2.1: The City defines blighted neighborhoods as areas characterized by the prevalence of older structures with major deficiencies and deterioration, high residential vacancies, widespread abandonment of property, litter and poor maintenance of real property. Declining neighborhoods are defined as areas characterized by the prevalence of structures having minor deficiencies, a general need for improvements in real property, significant declines in real property values, high vacancy rates in commercial structures and increasing difficulty in obtaining insurance. Neighborhoods threatened with decline are defined as areas characterized by significant but infrequent property maintenance neglect, an aging housing stock, declining property values, general exodus of traditional residents and influx of lower income households. Policy LU -1.2.2: The City's land development policies will be consistent with affordable housing objectives and policies adopted in the Housing Element of the MCNP. Policy LU -1.2.3: The City's priorities in implementing, facilitation, and encouraging redevelopment and revitalization projects &ha4 will be determined on an area specific basis in accordance with the adopted Consolidated Plan, Fiscal Years 2094 2099 2014-2018, adopted redevelopment plans, specific neighborhood and area plans, the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 4 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan, and the land development regulations, as appropriate and as incorporated in the MCNP by reference in accordance with P 9i 5995Section. 163.31770) F.S. (2011/43) Policy LU -1.2.4: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding Community Redevelopment Districts and will continue to implement plans for the Omni and Southeast Overtown/Park West as Community Redevelopment Districts. Policy LU -1.2.5: The City will continue to develop information programs on the availability of redevelopment opportunities within the city. Policy LU -1.2.6: The City's NET Office will engage the community through the following: 1. Identifying dilapidated properties with assistance of Code Compliance that devalue residential homes and business; 2. Conducting community outreach efforts regarding the availability of viable redevelopment opportunities within the city : Objective LU -1.3: The City will continue to encourage commercial, office and industrial development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas; increase the utilization and enhance the physical character and appearance of existing buildings; encourage the development of well-designed, mixed-use neighborhoods that provide for a variety of uses within a walkable area in accordance with neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives; and concentrate new commercial and industrial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can meet or exceed the minimum standards for Level of Service (LOS) adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE). Policy LU -1.3.1: The City will continue to provide incentives for semf;ers+al ror eyelepmeRt and new construction in designated Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ) identified in the City's Consolidated Plan, the EmpoweFmeRt Zee, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas. Naew construction &ha4 will be conducted in accordance with neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives. c,,nh iHG8HtiVGG may be n#eFed thrn,igh funds, and Ether FedevelepmeRt xcistaRG8 PFE)gromc Policy LU -1.3.2: The City will continue to encourage the expansion of existing buildings and new construction through the private sector by assisting in making available commercial loan funds for rehabilitation and small business loans and seed moneys, particularly to local minority businesses and encouraging the maximum participation, especially through public/private partnerships, of financial institutions, Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 5 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 chambers of commerce, the Beacon Council, other business organizations, property owners and residents of the areas. Priority areas include, but are not limited to, designated Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ), the EmpGwermeRt ZGRe the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas. Policy LU -1.3.3: Pursuant to Section G4.163.3177(6)(a), the City &ha4 will maintain regulatory incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of recreational and commercial Working Waterfronts as defined in Section G4.342.07,F.S., particularly in the `Port of Miami River" Sub element to guide future development within the Miami River Corridor. Policy LU -1.3.4: The City will continue to work with the Miami -Dade County School Board to ensure the expansion of educational facilities in areas that are easily accessible by public transit and facilitate the expansion of job training/job placement programs offered to youths (full time and summer terms) and low-income persons. Policy LU -1.3.5: The City will continue to discourage urban sprawl by promoting (200811) (2011152) prethrough its land development regulations, the creation of high intensity activity centers which may be characterized by mixed-use and specialty center development. Such activity centers will be in accordance with the Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan and neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives. Policy LU -1.3.6: The City will continue to encourage a diversification in the mix of industrial and commercial activities and tenants through strategic and comprehensive marketing and promotion efforts so that the designated Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ), the EmpGwermeHt ZGHe, the Enterprise Zone, the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, and other targeted areas are buffered from national and international cycles. Policy LU -1.3.7: The City will continue to use the i Enterprise Zone, EmpewermeRt ZeRe, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment Area strategies to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment opportunities. (Policy PA -3.3.10) Policy LU -1.3.8: The City will work with and partner with entities that foster or develop Mob placements to assist the City's existing and future residents, water dependent and water related businesses and uses along the Miami River, in achieving economic self-sufficiency utilizing government resources as necessary, and as funding permits, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies to help support direct iob placements rd'FeGt +r@ming PFE)gr@me and E#eF teGhninall -,_6; 6+@_r. o to sbippe4 minority and semi -skilled residents of the city including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 6 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Section S#-. 342.07, F.S. (Policy PA -3.3.11). Job placement objective is to achieve a minimum of 300 individuals monthly reported regularly to the funding source, CareerSource of South Florida. Policy LU -1.3.9: The City will continue to concentrate Community Development efforts in small geographic areas that have special opportunities and/or potential for redevelopment consistent with implementation of eM@11 @F a a^ti^r r,lar,G Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ) that have the support of neighborhood residents and business owners. Policy LU -1.3.10: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its neighborhoods through the implementation of ongoing and new neighborhood improvements, code enforcement and NET strategies and initiatives; and will adopt and enforce performance standards appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical condition and appearance of commercial and industrial areas in the city by July 2909-2020. The City will eR on onni iol basis, what has boon onnnmplished t fi ilfill tho rorri iiromor is of this PnlisY Policy LU -1.3.11: The City's land use regulations will provide incentives for the inclusion of day care facilities near major employment centers. Policy LU -1.3.12: The City's land use regulations will permit neighborhood -based health care facilities. Policy LU -1.3.13: [Reserved] Policy LU -1.3.14: The City will continue to enforce urban design guidelines for public and private projects which &ha4 wil: be consistent with neighborhood character, history, and function, and sha4 will be in accordance with the neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives. Policy LU -1.3.15: The City will continue to encourage a development pattern that enhances existing neighborhoods by developing a balanced mix of uses including areas for employment, shopping, housing, and recreation in close proximity to each other. Policy LU -1.3.16: The City may adopt an ordinance establishing a local manufacturing development program through which the City may grant a master development permit/ approval for the development or expansion of sites that are, or are proposed to be, operated by manufacturers at specified locations within the City's geographic boundaries in accordinace with Section 163.3252 F.S. (2013/17) Objective LU -1.4: Continue the growth of Downtown Miami, expand its role as a center of domestic and international commerce, further its development as a regional center Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 for the performing arts and other cultural and entertainment activities and develop an urban residential base. Policy LU -1.4.1: [Reserved]. Policy LU -1.4.2: The City will continue to investigate and, where appropriate, create management districts, funded by special assessments to provide extra services and special events needed to attract visitors and residents to the retail core, and other special retail shopping areas in downtown. Policy LU -1.4.3: The City will continue to promote an active pedestrian sidewalk environment along the ground floor frontage of buildings on "pedestrian streets" through land development regulations. Policy LU -1.4.4: [Reserved] Policy LU -1.4.5: [Reserved] Policy LU -1.4.6: [Reserved] Policy LU -1.4.7: The City will continue to enforce regulations within Downtown to ensure that retail signage is of high quality and consistent with the design and development objectives for Downtown. Policy LU -1.4.8: The City will continue to enforce land development regulations as necessary in order to encourage rehabilitation and sensitive, adaptive reuse of historic properties and older structures in downtown, and to exempt rehabilitation oroiootc from development of Regional Imoaot (DRI) mitigation fooc Policy LU -1.4.9: The City will continue to promote rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of vacant, abandoned, and underutilized spaces and provide incentives for rehabilitation of older buildings in Downtown ­I'I-'.,,. Policy LU -1.4.10: The City will continue to develop modifications to existing regulations with the intent of providing greater flexibility in the design and implementation of mixed-use developments within the general Downtown area and particularly along the Miami River up to and including 5t" Street consistent with the Port or Miami River Sub -Element. Policy LU -1.4.11: The City will continue to streamline the development application for development approvals to simplify and standardize the process, while ensuring that the regulatory intent of the approvals is maintained. Policy LU -1.4.12: The City will continue to implement the Downtown DRI development orders for downtown and Southeast Overtown/Park West, and seek approval for future increments of development in a timely manner. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective LU -1.5: Land development regulations will protect the city's unique natural and coastal resources, its neighborhoods, and its historic and cultural heritage. Policy LU -1.5.1: Development orders in the city will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies contained in the Natural Resource Conservation and Coastal Management elements of the MCNP. Policy LU -1.5.2: Land use regulations and development policies will be consistent with the intent and purpose of Miami -Dade County's Waterfront Charter Amendment, Shoreline Development Review Ordinance, rules of the Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve Management Area, and other appropriate requirements regarding waterfront access and management. Policy LU -1.5.3: Notice of application for special permits or other such administrative land use or zoning permits provided for in the future, be provided to any NET registered homeowners associations or neighborhood associations thirty days prior to issuance of the special permit or such administrative land use or zoning permits provided for in the future zoning and land use regulations and promptly after issuance of the decision with explanation of appeal procedures allowing sufficient time for such appeals. Policy LU -1.5.4: Notice of application requiring public hearings &4a4 will be provided to any NET registered homeowner and neighborhood associations and to owners within a certain number of feet as provided for in the City code. Policy LU -1.5.5: The City's NET Office will be utilized to help the dissemination of information to residents when the City is seeking community input on potential redevelopment concepts or future usages of Land. Objective LU -1.6: Regulate the development or redevelopment of real property within the city to ensure consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy LU -1.6.1: The City hereby adopts the 2020 Future Land Use Map, referenced and contained in Appendix LU -1 of the MCNP. The "Interpretation of the r Future Land Use Map" section of this element, which follows these land use goals, objectives and policies, establishes the activities and facilities allowed within each land use category appearing on the adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map, and the City's land development regulations &ha4 will be consistent with the 2020 Future Land Use Map. Policy LU -1.6.2: [Reserved] Policy LU -1.6.3: The City's Planning Department s49 will review all proposals to amend the City's Zoning Ordinance and any other land development regulations, and &ha4 will report as to the consistency between any proposed amendment and the MCNP, to the Planning Ady+sei:y Zoning, and Appeals Board, the City's "local planning Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 9 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 agency," which will then forward its recommendation to the City Commission for approval and adoption. Policy LU -1.6.4: Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the Planning Department, efal will require a level of service (LOS) review and a finding from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment will not result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards described in Policy CI -1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any element of the MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning considerations, the Planning and Zoning Department will forward a recommended action on said amendment to the Planning Advisery Zoning, and Appeals Board, which will then forward its recommendation to the City Commission. Policy LU -1.6.5: The City may continue to use special district designations as a land development regulation instrument for the purpose of accomplishing specific development objectives in particular areas of the city. Policy LU -1.6.6: The City will continue to enforce signage regulations to ensure the quality of life in the city's neighborhoods. Policy LU -1.6.7: The City will provide adequate opportunity for public comment regarding zoning changes and variances within neighborhoods. Policy LU -1.6.8: The City's land development regulations and policies will encourage and/or require, as set forth in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space element of this plan the provision of open space in development projects in both residential and commercial areas. Policy LU -1.6.9: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of new development on existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements. Policy LU -1.6.10: The City's land development regulations and policies will allow for the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and vehicle parking and will provide access by a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, bicycles, automobiles, and transit. Policy LU -1.6.11: The City's land development regulations and policies will insure that areas designated conservation are protected from development other than that which promotes its passive appreciation. Policy LU -1.6.12: The City's land development regulations will direct recreational activities to areas of the city where facilities and services are available. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 10 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective LU-1.7: Ensure that the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan is updated as needed to meet changing conditions and, improve its effectiveness and success. Policy LU-1.7.1: Update the MCNP by January 209-920, to include a detailed list of definition of terms used by the MCNP with e#e tw 1.in8ShOWiRg G99FdiRatinn Policy LU -1.7.4: The City will amend its Land Development Regulations as necessary within one year of an EAR amendments process to maintain consistency with its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Section 163.3191, F.S, (201417) Policy LU -1.7.5: By December 2020, the City will explore formulating new economic licv LU -1.7.6: The Citv will seek communitv r)lanni requirements of the Communitv Plannina Act. addressina critical local r)lannina issues. Funding may include developing a comprehensive plan economic development element. future goals. licv LU -1.7.8: Amendments to the Citv's Future Land Use Mar). (FLUM) will needed to achieve the requirements as elaborated in Section 163.3177 F.S. (200512 & Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 11 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy LU -1.7.9: The City's Planning and Zoning Department will work with the City's NET Office regarding community outreach efforts.This includes organizing meetings and using NET communication tools (email lists, media/radio appearances and social media). Objective LU -1.8: The location, design and management practices of development and redevelopment in the City sW will ensure the protection of natural resources and systems by recognizing, and sensitively responding to constraints posed by climate change and sea level rise. Policy LU -1.8.1: The City X44 will assist Miami -Dade County in their analysis on climate change and its impacts on the built environment addressing development standards and regulations related to investments in infrastructure, development/redevelopment and public facilities in hazard prone areas including areas vulnerable to sea level rise, tidal flooding and other impacts of climate change. Recommendations from the analysis sha4 will address appropriate changes to land use designations and zoning of impacted properties, and development standards, among other relevant considerations. Policy LU -1.8.2: The City r.,r , ,, make the practice of adapting the built environment to the impacts of climate change and sea level rise, an integral component of all planning processes, including but not limited to comprehensive planning, infrastructure planning, building and life safety codes, emergency management and development regulations, stormwater management, and water resources management. Policy LU -1.8.3: The City eha4 will actively participate in the Southeastern Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and collaborate to increase regional climate change resiliency by sharing technical expertise, assessing regional vulnerabilities, advancing agreed upon mitigation and adaptation strategies and developing joint state and federal legislation policies and programs. Policy LU -1.8.4: The City &ha4 will work with Miami -Dade County to determine the feasibility of designating areas in the City as Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3177(6)(g)(10), Florida Statute, and designate Adaptation Action Areas as provided by Section 163.3164(1), Florida Statute, in order to determine those areas vulnerable to coastal storm surge and sea level rise impacts for the purpose of developing policies for adaptation and enhance the funding potential of infrastructure adaptation projects. Policy LU -1.8.5: The City &4x44—will work with Miami -Dade County to support the implementation of climate related policies, through education, advocacy and incentive programs such as public outreach, including workshops and a website with relevant information. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 12 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Goal LU -2: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification, evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Coastal Management Goal CM -5.) Objective LU -2.1: Maintain, update, and amplify the Miami Register of Historic Places, whiGh identifi^� .end evaluates the Gity's histeFi airnolhnp FeseuFGes, Q GOntinue to increase the number of ewe designated properties. Continue to survev orooerties and identifv areas of the Citv that are eliaible for historic designation.the Miami -Dade a County Hist (See Coastal Management Objective CM -5.1.). Policy LU -2.1.1: The City will continue to identify potential historic districts and conduct additional historic surveys to identify eligible historic resources. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.1.1.) Policy LU -2.1.2: The City will continue to maintain and update the nmmp„+nri�n,+ database of all relevant information for all sites in the Miami Register of Historic Places Dade G96IRty HIF49FIG SUF Th+se listing of City sites, will be made available on the Citv's Web Site. will shew, in +hrne�nnnrine SII nrnnino of hist i— . . (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.1.2.) Objective LU -2.2: Protect archaeological resources within the city from destruction and loss. Policy LU -2.2.1: The City will pursue the designation of significant archaeological zones under the Historic Preservation Chapter of the City Code. Policy LU -2.2.2: The City will continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Archaeologist in monitoring building activities near archeological sites. Policy LU -2.2.3: The City will require, as part of the building permit application, pursuant to state law, that the City of Miami aFGhaeelegist Preservation Officer be notified of construction schedules in significant historical e- or archaeological zones and where potentially significant historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during construction, permit state and local archaeological officials the opportunity of surveying and excavating the site. Policy LU -2.2.4: The City swill edea enforce state laws "nom for failure to report the discovery of any significant archaeological site features during construction. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 13 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective LU -2.3: Encourage the preservation of all historic, architectural, and archaeological resources that have major significance to the city by continuing to increase the number of nationally an4 locally designated sites for the period 2008- 2M 2016 - 2021. Policy LU -2.3.1: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.1.4.) Policy LU -2.3.2: The City had designated 67- 129 historic sites and #+ve 11 historic districts pursuant to the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code. An additional sites (or groups of multiple sites) and sx three districts have been identified as potentially worthy of designation. The City will seek to increase its locally designated historic resources by 2941-G 2021. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.1.3.) Objective LU -2.4: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved, rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (See Coastal Management Objective CM -5.2.) Policy LU -2.4.1: The City will encourage the conservation, rehabilitation, restoration and adaptive reuse of historic and architecturally significant housing resources through low interest housing rehabilitation loans that may be offered by City agencies. Policy LU -2.4.2: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for the treatment of historic properties. To participate in incentives eligible historic ewe structures must meet these standards. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.2.1.) Policy LU -2.4.3: The City currently owns 44% seventeen historic sites and other potential archaeological sites. If it is deemed in the public benefit for the City to transfer title of City properties of historic, architectural or archaeological significance, such transfers will include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such properties. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.2.2.) Policy LU -2.4.4: The City will continue to work with other local governments that have title to properties of major historic or architectural significance to ensure the conservation, preservation and adaptive and sensitive reuse of such properties. Objective LU -2.5: Increase public awareness of the historical, architectural, archaeological resources and cultural heritage of the city, and public policy and programs to protect and preserve this heritage, through public information and education programs. Policy LU -2.5.1: The City will continue to develop a series of publications relating to historic preservation in general and the city's historic resources in particular. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 14 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy LU -2.5.2: The City will maiRtaiR participate in a44 the state's historic marker program for designated properties and other key areas, and will publish same. Policy LU -2.5.3: [Reserved] Policy LU -2.5.4: The City will continue to provide information on the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. (See Coastal Management Policy CM - 5.1.5.) Goal LU -3: Encourage urban redevelopment in identified Urban Infill Areas and Urban Redevelopment Areas. Objective LU -3-1: Promptly review and act on petitions for land use plan amendments and rezoning of property in Urban Infill Areas or Urban Redevelopment Areas to facilitate redevelopment. Policy LU -3.1.1: Continue review of existing zoning regulations to determine if they provide adequate flexibility to promote redevelopment with a mix of uses in Urban Infill Areas or Urban Redevelopment Areas and, if not, revise said existing zoning regulations or adopt new zoning regulations to promote redevelopment. Policy LU -3.1.2: Create Regional Activity Centers, (RAC), if appropriate in Urban Infill Areas and Urban Redevelopment Areas to facilitate mixed-use development, encourage mass transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, provide public open space and parks as required in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space element of this plan, provide incentives for quality development, and give definition to the urban form. The permitted uses and density and intensity of uses within a RAC &ha4 will be governed by the underlying future land use map designations of the subject property, except as otherwise limited by the designation of the RAC in the comprehensive plan. A designated RAC shall will routinely provide service to, or be regularly used by, a significant number of citizens of more than one county; contain adequate existing public facilities as defined in Rule 9i 5, F. Section 163.3164 F.S., or committed public facilities, as identified in the Capital Improvements Element of the City's comprehensive plan; and shalt will be proximate and accessible to interstate or major arterial roadways. Policy LU -3.1.3: Designate the Downtown Miami Master Plan area an Urban Central Business District in order to increase the Development of Regional Impact threshold for development within those portions of downtown Miami that are not already in the DRI area. Policy LU -3.1.4: Applicants of Large Scale developoments and re -developments, incorporating nine (9) acres or greater, will work with the City regarding the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 15 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 establishment of public safety facilities, including, but not limited to Police, Fire - Rescue, and NET Offices. (See policy PR -1.1.7; Policy PR -5.3.8.) Objective 3-2: [Reserved] Policy LU -3.2.1: [Reserved] Policy LU -3.2.2: [Reserved] Goal LU -4: The City recognizes and respects judicially acknowledged or constitutionally protected private property rights pursuant to Section 163.3161(10) F.S. (201115) Objective LU -4.1 All rules, ordinances, regulations, comprehensive plans and amendments, and programs will be developed, promulgated, implemented, and applied with sensitivity for private property rights and not be unduly restrictive. Policy LU -4-1.1: Property owners will be free from actions by others which would harm their property or which would constitute an inordinate burden on property rights as those terms are defined in Section 70.001(3)(e) and (f) F.S.. Policy LU -4.1.2: Full and just compensation or other appropriate relief must be provided to any property owner for a governmental action that is determined to be an invalid exercise of the police power which constitutes a taking, as provided by law. Any such relief must ultimately be determined in a judicial action. (201115) Urban Central Business District An Urban Central Business District (UCBD) identifies the single urban core area within the City of Miami. The UCBD &ha4 will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, swill contain mass transit service as defined in Ghapter 9i 5P.A.(; Sections 163.3164 and 163.3177 F.S.., and sha4 will contain high intensity, high density multi -use development to include: retail; professional and governmental office uses; cultural, recreational and entertainment facilities; high density residential; hotels and motels; and appropriate industrial activities. In accordance with Chapter 28-24.014(10) (a), F.A.C., the guidelines and standards of development, a designated Urban Central Business District within the City of Miami swill: 1. Increase the threshold for residential, hotel, motel, office, or retail development by fifty -percent (50%); 2. Increase the threshold for applicable multi -use guidelines and standards by one - hundred percent (100%), provided that one land use of the multi -use development is residential and the residential development amounts to not less than thirty-five percent (35%) of the City of Miami's applicable residential threshold; and Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 16 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 3. Increase the threshold for resort or convention hotel development by one hundred - fifty percent (150%). The following area has been designated an Urban Central Business District (UCBD) on the City of Miami Future Land Use Map (FLUM) within Appendix LU -1: The Downtown Miami Master Plan The Downtown Miami Master Plan was adopted by the Miami City Commission by Resolution Number 89-990 on October 26, 1989. The Downtown Miami Master Plan contains approximately 1, 354 acres and is bounded on the north by: Northwest 20th Street on the north; Biscayne Bay, including Brickell Key (Claughton Island), on the east; Southwest 15th Road on the south; and Interstate 95, the Miami River, Northwest 5th Street, Interstate 395 and the Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way on the west (see the Future Land Use Map within Appendix LU -1 for exact boundaries). Permitted Uses: Permitted uses within the Urban Central Business District &ha4 will be those of the underlying land use classification within the current Downtown Miami Master Plan, which includes: Central Business District; Major Institutional Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities; Office; Restricted Commercial; General Commercial; Industrial; Recreation; High -Density Multifamily Residential; and Medium -Density Multifamily Residential (see descriptions in Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map). The following minimum and maximum development thresholds E# apply: The following numerical guidelines and standards &49 will be applied within the City of Miami's Urban Central Business District according to Section Chapter 28-24.014(11), F.S.: 1. A development that is at or below eighty -percent (80%) of all numerical thresholds &ha4 will not be required to undergo development -of -regional -impact review. 2. A development that is between eighty -percent (80%) and one -hundred (100%) percent of a numerical threshold be presumed to not require development of regional impact review. 3. A development that is at one -hundred percent (100%) or between one -hundred percent (100%) and one -hundred twenty percent (120%) of a numerical threshold &ha4 will be presumed to require development -of -regional -impact review. 4. A development that is at or above one -hundred twenty percent (120%) of any numerical threshold std will be required to undergo development -of -regional - impact review. Regional Activity Centers Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 17 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Regional Activity Center (RAC). A Regional Activity Center designation is intended to encourage and promote large-scale development and redevelopment as well as small parcel infill development and redevelopment that facilitates a balanced mix of land uses by providing maximum flexibility for development and redevelopment activities. In accordance with Chapter 28-24.014(10)(c)2, F.A.C., a Regional Activity Center in the City of Miami &ha4 will be a compact, high intensity, high density multi -use area designated as appropriate for intensive growth as an urban infill or urban redevelopment area by the City and may include: residential use; commercial; office; cultural and community facilities; recreational and entertainment facilities; hotels or motels; transportation facilities; utilities; and appropriate industrial activities. The major purposes of this designation are to facilitate mixed-use development, encourage mass transit, reduce the need for automobile travel, provide incentives for quality development and give definition to the urban form. For an area to qualify as a Regional Activity Center, the following criteria must be met: The type of land uses permitted within each Regional Activity Center and the density of residential uses &ha4 will be specified herein and within the City of Miami 2020 Future Land Use Map. 2. Regional Activity Centers shall vvinclude mixed land uses of regional significance. 3. Regional Activity Centers &4a4—will consist of active pedestrian environments through high quality design of public spaces and buildings that create an appropriate human scale at street level and provide for connectivity of places through the creation of a system of pedestrian linkages. 4. Each Regional Activity Center &ha4 will be a defined geographical area of no less than 20 acres and &ha4 will be delineated on the City of Miami 2020 Future Land Use Map. 5. Regional Activity Centers &ha4 will be proximate and accessible to interstate or major arterial roadways. The following area has been designated Regional Activity Center within the City of Miami 2020 Future Land Use Map: Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center The Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center is designated to be a Chapter 380 Regional Activity Center and, subject to amendment of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as a regional development district (a geographic area specifically designated as highly suitable for increased threshold intensity) for the purpose of increasing DRI thresholds. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 18 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 General Location: South of Northeast 36th Street, North of Northeast 29th Street, East of North Miami Avenue and West of the Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC) right-of-way; excluding certain properties located along Northeast 29th Street. (See Future Land Use Map within Appendix LU -1 for exact boundaries). Permitted Uses: Permitted uses &ha4 will be as for the underlying land use classification; however, the following minimum and maximum development thresholds &ha4 will apply: Residential: 2,000 units minimum / 4,500 units maximum Commercial: 500,000 s.f. minimum / 1,200,000 s.f. maximum Office: 80,000 s.f. minimum / 100,000 s.f. maximum Compatibility: The City &ha4 will develop and implement design standards to address compatibility of development within the Buena Vista Regional Activity Center with the surrounding area, which design standards should further the following concepts: ■ New streets and avenues should connect to the existing street grid. ■ Sidewalks, as principal pedestrian throughways, should be designed to create a comfortable outdoor public space to accommodate a range of active and passive pedestrian activities. ■ Buildings should have ground floor uses that activate the street and relate new development to surrounding areas. ■ The context and scale of new development should be reflected in new building design, including the setting back of upper floors in order to accommodate height while maintaining human scale at the pedestrian level. Health District Regional Activity Center The Health District Regional Activity Center is hereby designated to be a Regional Activity Center pursuant to , Chapter 3801 Florida Statutes, and, subject to amendment by the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida by the South Florida Regional Planning Council, as a regional development district (a geographic area specifically designated as highly suitable for increased threshold intensity) for the purpose of increasing DRI thresholds. General Location: Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 19 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 South of NW 20th Street, North of State Road 836, East of NW 17th Avenue, and West of Interstate 95. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses : - be as for the underlying land use classification; whether uses . be required to undergo additional regional review be governed by the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes and Chapter 28, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), as such may be amended from time to time, pursuant to the designation of the Health District as a Regional Activity Center. The following maximum thresholds sha4 will apply: (1) Maximum thresholds &ha4 will be consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C., as such may be amended from time to time. Residential: Maximum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C. Commercial: Maximum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C. Office: Maximum square feet consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C. Hotel: Maximum units consistent with Rule 28-24.014, F.A.C. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 20 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map The 2020 Future Land Use Map (contained in Appendix LU -1 of the MCNP as amended from time to time) is a planning instrument designed to guide the future development and distribution of land uses within the city in a manner that is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP). The amount of land designated for future planned uses will provide a balance of uses that foster vibrant, viable communities and economic development opportunities and address outdated development patterns, such as antiquated subdivisions. As elaborated in Section 163.3177 F.S, the element will accommodate at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10 -year planning period unless otherwise limited under Section 380.05 F.S., (2011150) Amendments to the City's FLUM will be also be based on analyses as elaborated in Section 163.3177 F.S. (2012116) The future land use element and any amendment to the future land use element and map will discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl. (200811 & 2011152) Note that electric distribution substations are allowed in all future land use map cateaories pursuant to Citv Land Develooment Reaulations in accordance with Section 163.3208 F.S.. The 2020 Future Land Use Map is a generalized map that does not depict areas of less than 2 acres. The Planning Director is responsible for making all determinations of concurrency as defined in state statutes, and will also interpret the map based on all applicable state laws and administrative regulations and on the consistency between the proposed change or changes and the goals, objectives and policies expressed in the MCNP. The Planning Director will also determine whether or not proposed zoning changes require an amendment to the comprehensive plan. Land development regulations and policies are to be consistent with the 2020 Future Land Use Map. The land development regulations further define and describe all requirements applicable to zoning categories contained under each land use designation, permitting the treatment of new development according to the particular conditions existing in different areas, and always consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the MCNP, and specifically with the Land Use Element and its Future Land Use Map. The land use designations are general designations that may include more than one zoning category. All activities and uses within each designation are compatible with each other by virtue of their scale, intensity and character, or by additional conditions required by the land development regulations, more specifically by the City Zoning Ordinance, which describes and regulates development within zoning districts in order to achieve more definite goals and objectives. The land use designations that appear in the 2020 Future Land Use Map are arranged following the "pyramid concept" of cumulative inclusion, whereby subsequent categories are inclusive of those listed previously except as otherwise noted. These designations, and the uses allowed in them, are defined as follows: Conservation: This land use designation is restricted to environmentally sensitive areas that are to be left in an essentially natural state. Only activities that reinforce this character are Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 21 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 allowed. Public access to these areas, including off-street parking, may be limited when unregulated access may present a threat to wildlife and plant life within such areas. Public Parks and Recreation: The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve open space and green spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere with the preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park. This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and cultural uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See related Policy PR -2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses &#a4 will be permitted including but not limited to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds, canoe trails and launches, small concession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools, athletic fields, cultural facilities, marine and marina facilities and other facilities supporting passive and active recreational and cultural uses. Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for commercial photography &#a4 will be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only when it is determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger significant environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.] Commercial Recreation: This land use designation only allows privately -owned recreation uses open to the public or to private groups. Marine Facilities: This land use designation is intended to apply to waterfront properties which are primarily public properties and intended to be developed and utilized in a manner which will facilitate public access to waterfront activities. Permissible uses within this designation include marine and marina facilities, marine stadiums, waterfront specialty centers (including restaurants, cafes and retailing), recreational activities including water theme parks, cultural, educational and entertainment facilities and accessory hotel accommodations with maximum FAR limitations between the range of 0.65 to 1.72 and a maximum density of 130 hotel units per acre; the higher FAR may be approved only upon demonstration and finding that the application of the higher limitations will not adversely affect access. Permanent living facilities are not permitted within this classification. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.] Nonresidential floor area is the sum of areas for nonresidential use on all floors of buildings, measured from the outside faces of the exterior walls, including interior and exterior halls, lobbies, enclosed porches and balconies used for nonresidential uses. Not countable as nonresidential floor area are: (a) Parking and loading areas within buildings; (b) Open terraces, patios, atriums or balconies; or (c) Stairways, elevator shafts, mechanical rooms. Single Family Residential: Areas designated as "Single Family Residential" allow single family structures of one dwelling unit each to a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 22 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Supporting services such as foster homes and family day care homes for children and/or adults; and community based residential facilities2 (6 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within single family residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within single family residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses &4a.4 --will be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). Duplex Residential: Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) also will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within duplex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses &4a.4 --will be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). Low Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Low Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 36 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Supporting services such as community-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations. Permissible uses within low density multifamily residential areas also include commercial activities that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building 2 A "Community based residential facility" provides room (with or without board), resident services, and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility functions as a single housekeeping unity. This category includes adult congregate living facilities, facilities for physically disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled persons, for non dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent children, as licensed by the Florida Department of Health, and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities, including halfway houses, as licensed or approved by an authorized regulatory agency. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 23 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 or building complex, small scale limited commercial uses as accessory uses; and places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory post -secondary educational facilities; all of which are subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within low density multifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses sha4 will be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). Medium Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Supporting services such as community-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; community-based residential facilities (15-50 clients) and day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations. Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also include commercial activities that are intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building or building complex, small scale limited commercial uses as accessory uses, subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses, places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and accessory post -secondary educational facilities. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within medium density multifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses ch�will be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). High Density Multifamily Residential: Areas designated as "High Density Multifamily Residential" allow residential structures to a maximum density of 150 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Higher densities may be allowed as shown for these specially -designated areas: Little Havana Target Area 200 units per acre Southeast Overtown 300 units per acre Miami River 400 units per acre Brickell, Omni, Park West and River Quadrant 500 units per acre Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 24 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Supporting services such as offices and commercial services and other accessory activities that are clearly incidental to principal uses are permitted; community-based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant to applicable state law; community-based residential facilities (15+ clients), places of worship, primary and secondary schools, and day care centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable locations. Low Density Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Low Density Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Low Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Low Density Restricted Commercial' allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 3.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Medium Density Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted Commercial' allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities: Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed up to a maximum density equivalent Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 25 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or if applicable the least intense abutting/adjacent residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting conditions. Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities allow nonresidential uses to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Health / Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Restricted Commercial: Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation of existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use; clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 17.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. All such uses and mixes of uses swill be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that supports nonresidential uses within the inside perimeter of the outside walls of the building including hallways, stairs, closets, thickness of walls, columns and other features, and parking and loading areas, and excluding only open air corridors, porches, balconies and roof areas. Central Business District (CBD): The area designated as "Central Business District (CBD) is intended to apply to the central commercial, financial and office core of the metropolitan region, and allows all activities included in the "Restricted Commercial," and "Major Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 26 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" designations. Residential facilities (except for rescue missions) alone or in combination with other uses are allowable to a maximum density of 1,000 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Also permitted is a mix of uses ranging from high density multifamily residential to high intensity office uses with retail uses on the lower floors of structures. Intensity of uses within the CBD land use designation are generally higher than those allowed in other areas of the city. Areas designated as CBD allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 40 times the net lot area of the subject property. General Commercial: Areas designated as "General Commercial" allow all activities included in the "Restricted Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading facilities; and benefit from close proximity to industrial areas. These commercial activities include retailing of second hand items, automotive repair services, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, heavy equipment sales and service, building material sales and storage, wholesaling, warehousing, distribution and transport related services, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses described above. Multifamily residential structures of a density equal to High Density Multifamily Residential, are allowed subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "General Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "General Commercial" in the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. All such uses and mixes of uses sha4 will be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Industrial: The areas designated as "Industrial" allow manufacturing, assembly and storage activities. The "Industrial" designation generally includes activities that would otherwise generate excessive amounts of noise, smoke, fumes, illumination, traffic, hazardous wastes, or negative visual impact unless properly controlled. Stockyards, rendering works, smelting and refining plants and similar activities are excluded. Residential uses are not permitted in the "Industrial" designation, except for rescue missions, and live-aboards in commercial marinas. Areas designated as "Industrial" allow a maximum Areas designated as "Industrial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Furthermore, all such uses be subject to the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 27 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Light Industrial (LI): The primary intent of this land use classification is to allow mixed use development within this land use classification, and further, to facilitate the ability of developing a mixed occupancy within a unit in which more than one type of use is provided under Live/Work or Work/Live zoning districts of the City's land development regulations. Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow all activities included in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading facilities; and benefit from close proximity to general commercial areas. These commercial activities (beyond those permitted in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General Commercial" designations) include retailing of second hand items, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses described above. This category also allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients. This land use category sha4 will not permit storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution of explosive, flammable or otherwise hazardous materials; scrap yards; and health clinics. The hazard level of an activity sha4 will be one of the determining factors as to whether that activity ; be permissible within a Light Industrial district; the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations &#a44 -will prohibit high-level hazard activities within live/work developments. Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow residential uses to a maximum density of 36 dwelling units per acre, and the nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 10.0 times the net lot area of the subject property Affordable housing developments that are certified by the City as having a complete application for development as of the effective date of the proposed Land Development Regulations &#a4 will be permitted with densities up to 150 dwelling units per acre but must obtain all building permits by December 17, 2012, at which time any rights herein to building permits s49 will expire. All such uses and mixes of uses sha4 will be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 28 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Correspondence Table — Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 29 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Miami 21 October 2009 MCNP Dwelling Units Per Transect Transect Zone Future Land Use Acre Max. T3 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 9 du/ac R, L SUB -URBAN T3 DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 18 du/ac 0 T4 36 du/ac R LOW DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL GENERAL URBAN T4 L,0 36 du/ac LOW DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL T5 65 du/ac R URBAN CENTER MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL T5 L,0 65 du/ac MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL T6-(8 — 48) R HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL URBAN CORE 150 du/ac T6-(8 — 48) L, 0 RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL, GENERAL COMMERCIAL D1 WORK PLACE 36 du/ac LIGHT INDUSTRIAL D2 INDUSTRIAL N/A INDUSTRIAL D3 MARINE INDUSTRIAL N/A T6-80 URBAN CORE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 1000 du/ac R,L,O CI CIVIC INSTIUTIONAL MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, 150 du/ac TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES CIVIC INSTITUTION — CI -HD MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC FACILITIES, 150 du/ac HEALTH DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITIES N/A CIVIC SPACE/PARKS PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION CS N/A COMMERCIAL RECREATION T1 NATURAL CONSERVATION N/A Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 29 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 HOUSING Goal HO -1: Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing, including workforce housing (2007/2), for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) and the elderly, described as persons 62 years of age and older pursuant to Section 420.0004(8) F.S. (2006/5), by alleviating shortages of extremely low, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing, rehabilitating older homes, maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods in order to meet the needs of all income groups. Objective HO -1.1: Provide and/or encourage a local regulatory, investment, and neighborhood environment that will assist the private sector in increasing the stock of affordable housing including workforce housing (2007/2) for all income levels, including extremely low-, very low-, low-, and_moderate-income (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida), within the City by at least 10 percent by December 204825. Policy HO -1.1.1: The City Code, (Chapter 13. Sec. 13-5) defines affordable housing as owner -occupied and/or rental housing with a purchase cost, value, or monthly rental, as applicable, equal to or less than the amounts established by the applicable standards as determined by the City's Department of Community and Economic Development in relation to the affordable housing and workforce housing impact fee deferral Droaram.(medeF to IRGE)MG) hni IGIR I in aGGE)F daRG8 With Oho GLIFF PeyelepmeRt (HUD). Workforce housing is defined as housing for those individuals whose income is between 80 to 140% of the area median income. The City continues to promote equal access to housing opportunities. The City, with other governmental agencies and non-profit organizations, will educate the public regarding fair housing and refer fair housing concerns to the appropriate enforcement agency. Policy HO -1.1.2: Continue and expand the City's current affordable housing programs and continue its participation in federal housing programs Policy HO -1.1.3: The City will continue to develop comprehensive neighborhood redevelopment plans and programs that encourage private developers to build new, or rehabilitate old, residential structures and ensure that public investments are coordinated with private sector developments to increase the overall attractiveness of redeveloping neighborhoods. Policy HO -1.1.4: Tax Increment Financing districts, which are designated by Miami - Dade County, as a mechanism for financing public improvements in residential areas and stimulating neighborhood revitalization, will continue to be used. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 30 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy HO -1.1.5: The City will continue to enforce, and where necessary strengthen those sections of the land development regulations that are intended to preserve and enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods and to buffer such neighborhoods from incompatible uses through the implementation and enforcement of transition and buffering standards. Policy HO -1.1.6: The City will continue to encourage the designation, restoration, and adaptive and sensitive reuse of historic or architecturally significant housing through zoning and other incentives deemed appropriate. Policy HO -1.1.7: The City will continue to control, through restrictions in the City's land development regulations, large scale and/or intensive commercial and industrial land development which may negatively impact any residential neighborhood and will provide appropriate transitions between high-rise and low-rise residential developments. Policy HO -1.1.8: Through the land development regulations, the City will protect existing viable neighborhoods in those areas suitable for housing and, where appropriate, enhance them in a manner compatible with their existing character. Policy HO -1.1.9: The City's land development regulations will encourage high-density residential development and redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and Metromover stations. (See Land Use Policy LU -1.1.10 and Transportation Policy TR - 4 -5-.2—.2.1.3.) Policy HO -1.1.10: The City report annually the extent to which the housing recommendations set forth in the adopted City of Miami Consolidated Plan (as they may be amended from time to time) are being realized including those relating to: 1) The preservation of affordable rental housing through the rehabilitation of existing rental stock and the encouragement of new rental housing construction, with a focus on serving the needs of &i4a4 families and single person households, such as the elderly described as persons 62 years of age and older pursuant to Section 420.0004(8) F.S. (200615), and person with HIV/AIDS; 2) Assistance to residents to achieve homeownership by seeking to increase the inventory of affordably priced units through new construction and or existing home purchases via the continuation of the First-time Homebuyer Program GFea#+eR E)f a P FGhaGG Rehab pFegF,m by providing second mortgage, down payment and closing cost assistance to first-time homebuyers; and 3) Stimulation of affordable housing development through the implementation of policy with respect to: a. the creation of a land acquisition program for Infill b. identification of additional funding for affordable housing Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 31 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 c. the continued provision of Affordable Housing incentives d. the provision of generating job placement opportunities by traiRiRg4orksheps to developers and contractors on City programs and regulations e. streamlining of the RFP process and the provision of multi-year funding f. Increasing the capacity of non-profit housing providers. fl Policy HO -1.1.11: [Reserved] Policv HO -1.1.12: The Citv, throuah its NET Offices, will assist the communitv bv: 1. Hosting informational meetings to educate the public in connection with a) fair housing standards and regulations as it pertains to Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and b) the City's Land Development Regulations; 2. Serving as a referral to the appropriate enforcement agencies with regards to fair housing issues; 3. Disseminating information that relates to new rental housing construction for elderly described as persons 62 years of age and older pursuant to Section 420.0004(8) F.S. (200615), and low income residents thru partnerships with area construction developers and project managers; 4. Providing information to City Departments through daily community outreach regarding vacant, blighted, unsafe structures and reporting them. Policy HO -1.1.13: Where appropriate the City will consider The Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program to provide affordable rental and home ownership community workforce housing for essential services personnel affected by the high cost of housing, using regulatory incentives and state and local funds to promote local public-private partnerships and leverage government and private resources pursuant to Section 420.5095 F.S, (2006116) Policy HO -1.1.14: The City may provide density bonus incentives pursuant to Section 420.615 F.S. to any landowner who voluntarily donates fee simple interest in real Property to the local government for the purpose of assisting the local government in providing affordable housing. Donated real property must be determined by the City to be appropriate for use as affordable housing and must be subject to deed restrictions to ensure that the property will be used for affordable housing. (2006117) Policy HO -1.1.16: By July 1, 2019, and every 3 years therafter, the City will prepare an inventory list of all real property within its jurisdiction to which it holds fee simple title Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 32 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 that is appropriate for use as affordable housing, pursuant to Section 166.0451 F.S. Following the public hearing, the City will adopt a resolution that includes an inventory list of such property, pursuant to Section 166.0451 F.S. Policy HO -1.1.17: The City will continue to look for and implement, as may be needed, incentives to promote mixed -income housing developments. Objective HO -1.2: Conserve the present stock of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) within the City and reduce the number of substandard units through rehabilitation, reduce the number of unsafe structures through demolition or rehabilitation, and insure the preservation of historically significant housing through identification and designation. Policy HO -1.2.1: The City defines extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate - income levels g (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) in accordance with the current standards and regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the State of Florida. Policy HO -1.2.2: The City will continue to, and when necessary expand housing programs for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households heus'Rg pFegFams with the intent of preventing a net loss of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) units within the City. Policy HO -1.2.3: The City's housing programs will aide in the provision of +fie #sr a diverse range of housing types in all areas of the City, including housing that is affordable to extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) Policy HO -1.2.4: The City will continue to assist non-profit, community-based organizations in the development and provision of housing for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income heusiRg households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) PF }ests to augment the public sector provision of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing. This assistance will include, but not be limited to, technical assistance, marketing and financial planning assistance, and the provision of public improvements, such as street improvements, curbing, landscaping and public open spaces, proper drainage and street lighting. Policy HO -1.2.5: The City defines substandard housing as any residential unit that lacks either complete kitchen or plumbing facilities, does not satisfy health and safety codes, or detracts from the physical appearance of neighborhoods in the City's Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 33 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 definition of substandard housing as compliant with the State's definition of substandard housing in Section --&-.420.0004( ), F.S. Policy HO -1.2.6: With the intent of preserving and enhancing neighborhood character, the City will utilize code enforcement to prevent the illegal conversion of single-family residences into multifamily units. Policy HO -1.2.7: The City will continue to enforce and implement neighborhood specific design and development standards that may be developed as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives to strengthen those sections of the Zoning Ordinance that are intended to preserve and enhance the general appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods. Policy HO -1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts in areas where significant concentrations of substandard units are likely to exist. The City, through its Community and Economic Development Department, will implement programs to assist extremely low-, very low-, and low-, and medeFate income households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) in rehabilitating their units and annually report on the status/progress of these programs. Owners of substandard units will be required to make needed repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property will be required to be secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard. Policy HO -1.2.9: The City, through its code enforcement efforts, will monitor conditions and if necessary formally request that Miami -Dade County maintain an acceptable quality of public housing within the City. Policy HO -1.2.10: The City will, through its building code enforcement, demolish all structures determined to be structurally unsafe. Policy HO -1.2.11: Historically significant housing in the City will be identified and subject to Chapter 23 and other appropriate sections of the City's Code and Zoning Ordinance. Objective HO -1.3: Facilitate the private and public sector provision of housing in non- isolated residential areas for community-based residential facilities and foster care facilities (including those funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services). Policy HO -1.3.1: The City will permit the operation of community residences and similar homes/facilities, including assisted living facilities, community support facilities, adult family care homes, group homes, and foster care facilities "nn FaG i t o6 iori Ps-, subject to restrictions reflected in the City Zoning Ordinance, in all residential areas at the residential densities for which those areas are zoned. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 34 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy HO -1.3.2: By December 2020, The City's land development regulations will be reviewed and amended where warranted, to prevent over concentrations of p hemeSf9Gt21-6a�e faemilimties , Rd Adult Geeer egare�.irer(AG LPs) community residences and similar homes/facilities in any area of the City. Policy HO -1.3.3: [Reserved] Policy HO -1.3.4: [Reserved] Objective HO -1.4: The City will continue to participate in the local Continuum of Care's C( oC) a--Kegmenat effort to pFevide adequate shelteii: feF homeless end chronic homelessness by December, 2017. Policy HO -1.4.1: The City will continue to participate as a member in the, a!E)Rg with Miami -Dade County Homeless Trust (the local CoC), inclusive of Broward County, along with other t4a major municipalities of the tri -County areaFeg+ei:i, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and the State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services will paqiGipat& in the developmeRt execution of an approved coordinated plan to address the nr hl�of homelessness in Miami Dade County moi. See plan: http://www.homelesstrust.org/library/2014-homeless-plan.pdf Policy HO -1.4.2: [Reserved] Policy HO -1.4.3: The City will assist in providing, when necessary, temporary emergency shelter facilities to serve homeless families and children. Policy HO -1.4.4: The City's land development regulations will permit temporary crisis intervention facilities and short-term transitional facilities (aimed at assisting the homeless to become self-supporting members of society) to be located proximate to areas where social assistance and economic opportunities are available. Policy HO -1.4.5: The City will continue and expand its efforts to acquire and administer federal and state financial aid for homeless assistance. Efforts will also include seeking funding from Miami -Dade County, the Homeless Trust, and Miami Coalition for the Homeless to aid in homeless assistance. Policy HO -1.4.6: By December 2020, the City will provide regulations for, and permit the siting of, homeless shelters within its land development regulations and take appropriate measures to prevent a net loss of shelter capacity. teR year elan designed to eRd hreeie hemelessRess by werk'Rg toward a mere Objective HO -1.5: Provide assistance to displaced occupants where public redevelopment programs require relocation. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 35 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy HO -1.5.1: The City will attempt to minimize the involuntary and permanent displacement of residents as a result of federally assisted projects. The City's federally funded programs are operated under a Residential Anti - Displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan (RARAP) as required by applicable Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") regulations. The types and levels of assistance the City will make available to displaced persons are contained in the City's relocation plan. A copy of this plan is available for review upon request at the Dept. of Community & Economic Development. The City will provide relocation assistance to each low- to moderate- income household displaced by the demolition of housing or by the conversion of a low- to moderate- income dwelling to another use as a direct result of assisted activities. Objective HO -1.6: [Reserved] Policy HO -1.6.1: [Reserved] Goal HO -2: Achieve a livable city center with a variety of urban housing types for persons of all income levels in a walkable, mixed-use, urban environment. Objective HO -2.1: Design and create pedestrian friendly environments and neighborhoods with varied housing prototypes and amenities catering to persons of diverse social, economic and cultural backgrounds, with a variety of urban housing types for persons of all income levels including those of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income and workforce househ" nn (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) provided in a walkable, mixed-use, urban environment. Policy HO -2.1.1: Through the land development regulations, the City will continue to protect and enhance existing neighborhoods in downtown. Policy HO -2.1.2: The City will continue to revise residential zoning district regulations to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary housing types and mixed-use developments with the application of new higher density zoning in accordance with neighborhood specific design and development standards that might be adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land development regulations and other neighborhood planning initiatives. Policy HO -2.1.3: The City will continue to assure that necessary support services, institutions and amenities are available to existing neighborhoods. The City, through its NET Offices will continue to serve as a contact within the homeowners associations in Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 36 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 assisting and providing information about current services for its residents and neighboring communities. Policy HO -2.1.4: The City will continue to promote development of new, high quality, dense urban neighborhoods along the Miami River Policy HO -2.1.5: The City will continue to encourage adaptive reuse of commercial space for residential use by working to eliminate unnecessary residential requirements in the Zoning Ordinance that inhibit reasonable adaptive reuse. Policy HO -2.1.6: The City will continue to target available governmental housing assistance programs and funds to assist with development of affordable housing in existing viable neighborhoods and publicly designated redevelopment districts W446 Policy HO -2.1.7: Working together with private developers, the City will continue to apply for Urban Development Action Grants (UDAG's), Housing Development Action Grants (HGODAG's), and other potential grant programs in the Southeast Overtown/Park West, Lummus Park, River Quadrant and West Brickell areas, where housing can be developed as a part of mixed-use projects. Policy HO -2.1.9: [Reserved] - Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 37 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS Goal SS -1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance, timely provision and efficient operation of a centralized wastewater treatment and ancillary sewerage system. Objective SS -1.1: All residences and businesses within the City that have been approved are served by sanitary sewers, and the City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to replace and repair aging segments of the system as required, and on the extension of, or increase in the capacity of, treatment facilities to meet future needs. Policy SS -1.1.41: Although the City has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade County's wastewater treatment programs, the City sha4 will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, continue to support, and cooperate with, Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (M-DWASD) actions to repair and replace aping segments of the system, extend the sewage system to all approved areas of the City and to expand the capacities of its wastewater treatment facilities as expressed in that Department's Wastewater Facilities Master Plan, dated April 2008, as may be amended from time to time. Objective SS -1.2: Ensure that the practice of wastewater management is consistent with the protection and preservation of natural resources. Policy SS -1.2.1: Although the City has no authority with respect to Miami -Dade County's wastewater treatment programs, the City I through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, support and encourage M-DWASD to continue to adhere to its current policies of: no discharge of wastewater to surface fresh waters; advanced waste treatment at all "package" treatment plants that are granted variances from "no discharge" requirements; secondary treatment prior to discharge from ocean outfalls; secondary treatment, proven design, local operating experience and compliance with all regulatory agency requirements prior to discharge from injection wells; and secondary or higher levels of treatment, as required by regulations, prior to discharge to shallow groundwater to ensure no negative impact on the ability of the receiving waters to meet Federal Drinking Water Standards. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 38 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy SS -1.2.32: The City will use its authority under local codes and ordinances to cooperate with Miami -Dade County, Department of Environmental Resources Management. DERM, to identify and eliminate any sites where there may be illegal connections of sanitary sewers to the storm sewer system. Policy SS -1.2.43: The City will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, negotiate with M-DWASD to seek cooperative agreements to ensure that the operation of the Central District wastewater treatment facility on Virginia Key does not degrade the natural environment or limit the public's access to recreational opportunities on the island. Objective SS -1.3: The City's land development regulations will ensure that approval of development or redevelopment will not occur until there exists adequate wastewater transmission capacity to serve that development. Policy SS -1.3.21: All improvements for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of the sanitary sewer transmission network sha�-will be compatible with the level of service standard adopted in DnliGY 1.3.1 by M-DWASD and DERM. Policy SS -1.3. Since the sanitary sewer network is an interconnected Countywide system, the departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with M-DWASD to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity. Objective SS -1.4: The City's sanitary sewer collection system is a valuable and costly element of the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient manner. Policy SS -1.4.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system that sanitary sewer and storm sewers sha4 will be in place to serve new development or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -2.5.1.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 39 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Goal SS -2: Provide adequate stormwater drainage to reasonably protect against flooding in areas of intensive use and occupation, while preventing degradation of quality in receiving waters. Objective SS -2.1: In accordance with the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, updated in and subsequent updates, the City will address the most critical drainage problems. The City's goals for retrofitting subcatchment areas within the City will meet or exceed the five-year frequency, 24-hour duration standard while utilizing water quality design criteria. The City will confer with local agencies, namely the Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) when retrofitting City projects to incorporate design criteria and best management practices (BMPs). Policy SS -2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 446 2012 updated Storm Drainage Master Plan and subsequent updates as the long-range policy guideline for improving its storm drainage management system, and will update the estimated cost of implementing that Plan through the annual updates to the City's Capital Improvements Program included in the Capital Improvements element of the MCNP. The City will rank the projects specified in the 499& 2012 updarted Storm Drainage Master Plan, with priority given to addressing the most critical problem areas within the City, and implement those projects supported by a financing plan according to the provisions of Chapter 18, Article VIII of the City Code, entitled "Storm Water Utility System." The 1986 plan will be was updated by in 2012 with measurable Goals and Objectives. The plan will be reported and reviewed annually and at time of EAR. Policy SS -2.1.2: The City will continue to monitor progress on all storm sewer -related capital improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement implementation procedures. Policy SS -2.1.3: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system that sanitary sewer and storm sewers sha4 will be in place to serve new development or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. Issuance of any development permit sha4 will require compliance with a minimum drainage level of service standard of a e%44 -five-year storm event while incorporating water quality considerations. Objective SS -2.2: The practice of stormwater management within the City will be designed to reduce pollutant -loading rates to surface waters. Policy SS -2.2.1: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil, and minimize pollutant discharges. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 40 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -1.1.2 and Coastal Management Policy CM -1.1.2.) Policy SS -2.2.2: In order to reduce the level of contaminants carried into Biscayne Bay via the Miami and Little rivers, the Solid Waste Department should be is encouraged to increase the frequency and extent of street sweeping. (See Solid Waste Policy SW -1.3.3.) Policy SS -2.2.3: The City will continue to seek cooperative agreements and funding support from Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order to protect the quality of its surface waters and reduce pollutant loadings into the Miami River, its tributaries, the Little River, and directly into Biscayne Bay. Policy SS -2.2.4: The City require that "best management practices" be used in the design and construction of stormwater management systems to minimize pollutant load eventually discharged to natural drainage systems, as well as to regulate the volume and timing of storm water delivered to natural systems. Policy SS -2.2.5: The City will continue to enforce Florida Building Code requirements for the on-site retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.2.) Policy SS -2.2.6: The City will consider the inclusion of stormwater quality control structures in any new projects for major road improvements and commercial parking areas. Objective SS -2.3: As the City implements the storm water management improvements specified in the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan as updated in 2012, it will ensure that stormwater management contributes to the conservation of ground water as a future potable water supply. Policy SS -2.3.1: In its stormwater management practices, the City will promote infiltration of storm water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater intrusion, where such infiltration is deemed to be feasible and cost efficient, and is not likely to represent an environmental hazard. Objective SS -2.4: All areas of the City are now served by storm drainage facilities, and the City will continue to coordinate the replacement, repair, extension, and capacity increases of the system consistent with development and redevelopment needs. Policy SS -2.4.1: Through enforcement of its Storm Water Utility System as provided in Chapter -5-3-.-5 18 of the City Code, the City will use its authority "to construct, reconstruct, improve, and extend stormwater utility system and to issue revenue bonds and other debts if needed to finance in whole or part the cost of such system and to Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 41 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 establish just and equitable rates, fees, and charges for the services and facilities provided by the system." Objective SS -2.5: The City's storm drainage system is a valuable and costly element of the urban infrastructure, and its use is to be maximized in the most efficient manner to serve this fully developed community. Policy SS -2.5.1: The City will use its land development regulations to ensure that development and redevelopment is consistent with the capacity of the storm drainage system. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -1.4.1.) Objective SS -2.6: The City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System discharges to the surface waters of the United States. These discharges are regulated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The City &W will meet the requirements of the permit when operating its drainage facilities. Policy SS -2.6.1: The City will comply with the conditions in its NPDES permit. Policy SS -2.6.2: The operation of the City's drainage system to meet NPDES requirements &ha4 will meet the following criteria: The Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) &ha4 will be consistent with stormwater management program elements as defined in the NPDES permit. ■ Stormwater projects and activities &ha4 will be consistent with the current local, state and federal regulations at the time of implementation. ■ Stormwater capital improvement and operation and maintenance projects sha4 will be implementable. Policy SS -2.6.3: The City will, through its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, enforce and educate all construction sites and operators of such construction sites, for compliance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) requirements and the Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 42 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE Goal AR -1: Protect the functions of the natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within the City. Objective AR -1.1: Ensure that stormwater management practices contribute to conservation of groundwater as a future potable water supply. Policy AR -1.1.1: As the City implements the projects identified in its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan and subsequent updates, it will promote the infiltration of storm water to surficial or artesian aquifers to prevent further saltwater intrusion, where such infiltration is deemed to be feasible, not to represent an environmental hazard, and to be cost efficient. Policy AR -1.1.2: The City will coordinate with and support local, state and federal agencies to achieve regional aquifer recharge protection objectives, including those pertaining to the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. Policy AR -1.1.3: The City will continue to support the South Florida Water Management District efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the City to prevent against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.3.) Objective AR -1.2: The City will use its land use and development regulations to ensure that land uses for areas within the City deemed to be aquifer recharge areas by the South Florida Water Management District, maintain adequate recharge for the aquifer. Policy AR -1.2.1: The City will maintain low to moderate density uses in the West Flagami area of the City (as shown on Figure 111.1 of the Data and Analysis, dated September 1, 1988, as necessary to protect the secondary aquifer recharge area. (See Land Use Policy LU -1.1.9.) Policy AR -1.2.2: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to implement the County management plan that identifies potential areas of water withdrawals, potential sources of contamination, the impact of potential withdrawals to other legal users, and the development of practices that will maintain this aquifer as a viable water supply source. Policy AR -1.2.3: In accordance with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and Objective PW -1.3, and its related policies, the City's coordination with Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 43 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 MDWASD� &ha4 will develop alternative water supply sources to supplement withdrawals from the Biscayne Aquifer. Such sources may include withdrawals from the Floridan Aquifer, implementation of water conservation methods, and development of reclaimed and wastewater reuse strategies. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 44 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 POTABLE WATER Goal PW -1: Ensure that all residents and workers within the City have adequate access to safe drinking water through the efficient operation of centralized, County operated potable water treatment facilities and ancillary potable water transmission system. Objective PW -1.1: Land development regulations will ensure that approval of development or redevelopment will not be granted unless and until there exists adequate potable water transmission capacity to serve that development. Policy PW -1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, Countywide system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.4.) Objective PW -1.2: The City e# will coordinate with the MDWASD to ensure adequate levels of safe potable water are available to meet the needs of the City. (See Natural Resource Conservation Objective NR -2.1.) Policy PW -1.2.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system that potable water facilities &ha4 will be in place to serve new development or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent in compliance with level of service standards for transmission capacity of 92.05 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.5 and Capital Improvements Policy CI -1.2.3.) Policy PW -1.2.2: Pursuant to Section 373.709 and Ghapte Section 163.3177(6)(c); F.S., the City adopted an updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (contained in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP) for a 20 -year planning period (2014-2033) that is consistent with the current Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SRWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's work plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.7.) Policy PW -1.2.3: The City will cooperate and participate to the fullest extent possible with Miami -Dade County to maintain procedures and programs to monitor levels of service of each water supply, water treatment and wastewater treatment facility for use by agencies that issue development orders or permits. Such procedures may include the establishment of water and wastewater allocation processes to assure that adequate water supply, and water and wastewater transmission and treatment Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 45 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 capacity is available prior to issuance of development orders or permits pursuant to Chapter Section 163.3180(2)(x), F.S. Policy PW -1.2.4: The City will continue to coordinate through the Planners Technical Committee and Miami -Dade County to utilize, expand and pursue the development of new potable water wellfields and alternative water supplies to meet the City's existing and future water supply needs. Such coordination efforts will include the transmittal of information for large scale future land use changes, population and demand projections, water supply needs, implementation of alternative water supply projects, establishment of level of service standards, and servicing of newly annexed areas. Policy PW -1.2.5: In the development of its future potable water supplies, the City s will, to the maximum extent feasible, utilize methods which preserve the integrity of the Biscayne Aquifer, protect the quality of surface water and related ecosystems, considered compatible with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan, and comply with that land use and environmental protection policies of the City MCNP, the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida, and the State Comprehensive Plan. Objective PW -1.3: The City sW will coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan to identify and develop those water supply projects necessary to meet the City's projected water demands for a 20 -year period. Policy PW -1.3.1: The City's adopted Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work Plan), dated September 2015, is incorporated as follows in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP. This document is designed to: assess current and projected potable water demands; evaluate the sources and capacities of available water supplies; and identify those water supply projects, using all available technologies, necessary to meet the City's water demands for a 20 -year period. The Work Plan sha4 will remain consistent with projects as listed in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan sha4 will address climate change and sea level rise that may impact the potable water infrastructure and sources. The potable water supply facilities necessary to satisfy projected water demands for the City of Miami during the 2014-2033 period are shown in Appendix A of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Appendix PW -1). Policy PW -1.3.2: The City &41 will be consistent with the current approved version of South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan and the current adopted County's Water Supply Facilities Work Plan in developing and updating its 20 -Year Work Plan. Policy PW -1.3.3: The City eha4 will support Miami -Dade County efforts to consider areas that will be impacted by sea level rise when building, expanding or planning for new facilities such as water treatment plants, Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 46 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PW -1.3.4: The City shall will take all necessary steps to ensure that all future development sha4 will comply with the landscape standards in Sections 18-A and 18-B of Miami -Dade County Code. (See related Policies NR -2.1.8 and NR -2.1.9) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 47 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Goal SW -1: Ensure a clean, healthy urban environment through the proper maintenance, timely provision and efficient operation of an integrated solid waste disposal and ancillary solid waste collection system. Objective SW -1.1: The City will continue to provide solid waste collection services to City residents and businesses in a manner that ensures public health and safety, and a clean urban environment. Policy SW -1.1.1: The City will ensure, through its concurrency management system, that solid waste capacity &ha4 will be in place to serve new development and/or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent in compliance with a level of service standard of seven (7) lbs. per person per day, which is equivalent to 1.28 tons per person per year. Policy SW -1.1.2: Commercial structures and high density residential areas will continue to be served by either the City's Solid Waste Department or by private sector providers of solid waste collection services under the City's Commercial Waste Hauling Franchise System. The City will require levels of service to be complied with by private haulers operating within the City's boundaries, and will enforce all City regulations regarding the disposal and collection of solid waste and recycling. Policy SW -1.1.3: The City s4a4- will maintain solid waste collection equipment as required to serve the public needs according to the service standard adopted in Policy SW -1.1.1. Policy SW -1.1.4: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure compliance with its "Garbage and +rash Other Solid Waste Ordinance," Chapter 22 of the Municipal Code. Policy SW -1.1.5: Land development regulations will be consistent with the provision of solid waste collection services in accordance with the adopted level of service. Policy SW -1.1.6: In the allocation of funds for the provision of solid waste recycling services, first priority will be given to those improvements and programs that are necessary to protect the health, safety and the integrity of the environment, and meet federal, state and local legal and regulatory requirements. Second priority in the allocation of funds will be assigned to improvements that are necessary to meet existing deficiencies in capacity or service, or required to replace or repair needed equipment, while third priority will be assigned to those projects that increase the extent of services. Policy SW -1.1.7: The City &ha4 will, through enforcement of its powers to regulate solid waste collection services, require promoters of major public events to reimburse Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 48 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 the City for extraordinary trash and garbage collection services required as a result of such events. Objective SW -1.2: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer and disposal, it will continue to support Miami -Dade County efforts intended to ensure that transfer stations and disposal sites are sufficient to meet the needs of City residents according to the service standards adopted in Policy 1.1.1. Policy SW -1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Planning, through the City's Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, ch�will request the Miami -Dade County Department of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to biennially update estimates of system demand and capacity. Policy SW -1.2.2: The City &ha4 will support Miami -Dade County's policy to implement the County's Solid Waste Disposal and Resources Recovery Management Plan. Policy SW -1.2.3: The City will continue to explore the development of resource recovery and cogeneration activities and, subject to concurrence by Miami -Dade County, consider the implementation of programs and procedures that decentralize solid waste disposal and reduce the volume of solid waste that is disposed of at County landfills. Policy SW -1.2.4: The City will work with, and support, the County's efforts to identify generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper collection and disposal of hazardous waste. Its departments will support the County's program to enforce all non -household producers of hazardous waste in identifying waste and disposing of it according to EPA, State, and local standards. The City will support Miami -Dade County's development of a hazardous waste temporary storage and transfer facility in a non -populated area. In coordination with Miami -Dade County, the City will work to meet the Region's objective to reduce the incidence of improper hazardous materials and waste handling and disposal. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -1.1.8.) Policy SW -1.2.5: The City &ha4 will, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, encourage the County to utilize "amnesty days" to encourage small volume, non-commercial producers of hazardous waste to safely dispose of such waste, and to develop a permanent system for households, small business and other low volume generators to safely dispose of hazardous wastes. Objective SW -1.3: It s4a_4 will be the City's policy that solid waste collection procedures s4M will be conducted in a manner that will reduce the quantity of litter, trash and abandoned personal property on Gity Street&the public right-of-way. Policy SW -1.3.1: The City will continue to actively support and implement neighborhood clean-up and beautification efforts through public awareness and information programs. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 49 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy SW -1.3.2: The City &ha4 will, through enforcement of those provisions of the City Code that protect and enhance the appearance of neighborhoods, ensure that streets and yards remain clean and a##as#+ve aesthetically sound. Where the City Code falls short of the provisions necessary to accomplish this, revisions &ha4 will be proposed to the City Commission. Policy SW -1.3.3: The S4� Department of Solid Waste should be 8RG96IFaged t9 i�r [�1A ase stFeet eepiRg front ll, o,.�o� will continue to mitigate in order to reduce [pollution to surface waters via storm water runoff and to reduce or eliminate litter in areas where significant problems may exist through continuous, effective day and night mechanized street sweeping. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -2.2.2.) Objective SW -1.4: Although the City has no authority governing solid waste transfer and disposal, it will continue to support and cooperate with Miami -Dade County efforts to encourage the recycling of solid waste materials and reduce the volume of waste set aside for collection and disposal. Policy SW -1.4.1: The City swill, through its publicity programs and mechanisms, encourage the use of recyclable packaging materials and source reduction efforts. Policy SW -1.4.2: The City &ha4 will evaluate the development of reuse and/or recycling programs for used tires, waste oils and similar recyclable materials, as well as, vegetative materials, and make recommendations for applicable additions or amendments to City procedures governing the disposal of these materials. Policy SW -1.4.3: The City &ha4 will, through its publicity programs and mechanisms, encourage residents to reduce the volume of yard and tree trimmings set aside for disposal by promoting the use of composting, such as mulching, backyard composting, grasscycling, and food scrap composting. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 50 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 TRANSPORTATION I, • J • r • r r • r • r r • • r I I . r wpm. r Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 51 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 ► 1 I I a• • 11 • I I A llinwsi id i 1I t1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 Un • • • Ak 1 -111-115 AQ 1 • 1 1111 Mlmlllmlil!li� Pip Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 52 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 11� 11 11 r 1 I R 01 • 11 • 11 �� 1 1 I • • r I.S 1 CiiIJ' 1 I • I Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 53 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 .. ■ 1 I • . r D. If ■ �..=.::����:.�.._..,:.:•.R:n,j:.z- Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 54 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 I 1 I 1 I • . r D. If ■ �..=.::����:.�.._..,:.:•.R:n,j:.z- Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 54 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 i ■ ■ 11 ■ 1 I ■ • .i ■: Unfrarnil fa I • 1 I 1 I 1 I ■�IN 1 &. I ■ IN AIR-41'AIN AiMaaAki / • . r 1 1 IN 11 ■ �. 1l ■ 1 . ■ ■ ■ 1 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 55 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 um"■ -.....,...,..e. .. .d. i , i Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 56 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 I I Ds litit TDA I t Y rf Orn V1 &11w YMIMI.Y.MII YIwIPIM�W+. �..�. .'..'�' I I Ds litit TDA I t Y 1l IN Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 57 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 • . . r Of Im 11 -IJ - TTI -Ill. r 11 ■ i . r IwII-III Twill r Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 58 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 1 I • • r Oil �. 11 ■ 1 1 a Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 59 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 I�b1:T.�R!-T�9..IR,t�l-�t:�:Al:11t'.�1:T�[S7GlrTtd:11:��:�T1S17 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 60 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 1,■• .. ■ ■. 1, ■ • . i Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 61 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 .� _. WIN- _ 1 1 11 ■ _ ■- ■ 11 ■ 11 ■ • . i Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 61 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 1f:Tl�f Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 62 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 .. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 62 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 GOAL TR -1: MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE AND COST EFFICIENT CIRCULATION NETWORK THAT PROVIDES TRANSPORTATION FOR ALL PERSONS WHILE REDUCING BOTH THE DEPENDENCY ON AUTOMOBILES AND OVERALL ROADWAY CONGESTION Objective TR -1.1: Encourage sustainable growth and development that aims to improve mobility, reduce congestion, and supports the overall growth strategy of the City. Policy TR -1.1.1: As an Urban Infill Area (UTA) and/or a Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA), per Miami -Dade County, Laws and Regulations, and illustrated in the Appendix TR -1, Map TR -14.1, of the Data and Analysis, the City will encourage the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity with the goal of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods, supporting economic development, and the viability of commercial areas. Infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, redevelopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalization, and development projects that promote public transportation will be heavily encouraged. (See Policy LU - 1.1.11.) (2005/6) Policy TR -1.1.2: The City will provide, and coordinate with other agencies, sufficient multimodal transportation facilities and services to promote and accommodate the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 63 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 City's growth strategy by linking centers of activity with effective transportation options, thereby improving accessibility. Policy TR -1.1.3: Through application of the provisions of its land development regulations, the City will encourage residential development near large employment centers in order to minimize commutes within the City and investigate opportunities for mixed-use developments. Policy TR -1.1.4: The City will implement growth strategies that encourage infill and redevelopment in order to take advantage of the multimodal transportation options available, thereby reducing the dependency on automobiles for new developments. Policy TR -1.1.5: The City will encourage new development to be structured to reinforce a pattern of neighborhoods and urban centers by focusing growth along transit corridors and around transit nodes and centers. Policy TR -1.1.6: The City will design and promote transportation facilities that are consistent with adjacent land uses, preserve natural features, protect historic and cultural resources, and enhance community appearance and vibrancy. Policy TR -1.1.7: The City will approve developments that minimize impacts to and help retain the City's natural infrastructure and visual character derived from its unique location and climate, including topography, landscape, and coastline. Objective TR -1.2: Encourage the development of an efficient transportation network that minimizes greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, and reduces the demand for parking. (2008/4 & 2008/8) Policy TR -1.2.1: The City will continue to actively pursue the development of public and private peripheral parking garages near the expressways and arterial entrances to downtown. Policy TR -1.2.2: The City will continue to support the County's efforts to increase reliance on parking at satellite park-and-ride lots such as outlying Metrorail stations and express bus stops to reduce vehicle miles traveled downtown and promote the use of alternative travel modes. Policy TR -1.2.3: The City will encourage that all roadway and transportation projects use a context -sensitive approach to minimize impacts to neighborhoods by conserving energy resources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and limiting air pollution. Priority for funding should be given to projects which support safety, reductions in Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 64 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 greenhouse gas emissions, roadway congestion, and encourage multi-modalism. (200814 & 200818) Policy TR -1.2.4: The City will provide reduced, shared or alleviated parking requirements within the Land Development Regulations for developments located within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover station (as illustrated in Appendix TR -1, Map 14.2, titled Centers and Transit Corridors. Specific measures to accommodate this policy include: A.The number of parking spaces required for new development and redevelopment within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover stations will be reduced while limiting the maximum number of allowable parking spaces. B. New surface parking lots are discouraged to achieve the ultimate objective of reduced parking as a primary use within a 1/4 mile of transit corridors or 1/2 mile from Metrorail stations or Metromover stations. Policy TR -1.2.5: The City will update the map on an annual basis to be scheduled by the City of Miami depicting the location of existing and planned future major parking facilities (200 or more parking spots), which will also be available for public use through the City of Miami website. Map TR -3 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section of this element illustrates the existing parking facilities (200 or more parking spots) within the City. Policy TR -1.2.6: The City will manage the downtown parking supply through enforcement of minimum and maximum on-site parking limitations, as provided for in Section 14-182. Policy TR -1.2.7: The City requires implementation of "Transportation Control Measures" such as those identified in 14-184 and 14-182 of the City Code, including future updates and expansion of recommended measures. The City encourages developments to be innovative in proposing Transportation Control Measures that balance the objective of reducing congestion and increasing person throughput with the need to promote economic arowth, to facilitate local traffic circulation, and to encourage public transportation use. (See Policy TR -1.5.2.) Policy TR -1.2.8: By the end of 2016, the City will develop a citywide transportation master plan that prioritizes projects based on the needs to improve mobility, reduce congestion, promote public transit, and support economic development and will be updated concurrently with future updates to the Transportation Element of the MCNP. (See Policy TR -2.1.8.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 65 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective TR -1.3: Address the impact of new developments or redevelopment on existing right-of-way and transportation infrastructure prior to approving new development or redevelopment to ensure sustainable growth patterns. Policy TR -1.3.1: The City will maintain, enforce, and where necessary revise, the minimum right-of-way requirements established in its City Code to ensure the continuity and effectiveness of the thoroughfare network to support sustainable growth and economic development. Policy TR -1.3.2: The City will continue to maintain a comprehensive public rights-of- way improvements program to identify infrastructure needs especially along major commercial corridors and other areas within the City's jurisdiction that have high levels of pedestrian activity. Policy TR -1.3.3: The City will require a generalized Traffic Statement documenting the trip generation and site access for developments and redevelopments that generate a minimum of 20 new peak hour trips. A detailed Traffic and Neighborhood Impact Analysis will be required for developments and redevelopments that generate more than 20 new peak hour trips. Determination of the number of new peak hour trips projected to result from the development will be calculated according to the latest version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The detailed Traffic and Neighborhood Impact Analysis will require the applicant coordinate with the City to review and approve methodology prior to conducting any detailed traffic impact analysis. Advance review of methodology proposed is recommended to ensure the analysis addresses special circumstances and characteristics of each unique development such as parking, valet operations, and queuing analysis. The City reserves the right to make changes to the proposed methodology for the detailed Traffic and Neighborhood Impact Analysis or require additional analysis on a case by case basis. By December 2017, the City will formalize submittal procedures in a manual to provide guidance to applicants in preparing for advance reviews of methodologies to be used in their analyses. (See Policy TR -2.7.3. and CI -1.2.3.f.) The City will require the implementation of transportation control measures for all new developments or redevelopment, including an implementation plan and schedule to enforce provision of such measures to mitigate traffic impacts identified in the traffic analysis, Objective TR -1.4: Implement neighborhood traffic management and traffic calming programs to protect and enhance the character of the city's residential neighborhoods and neighborhood commercial corridors through coordination with the Future Land Use Map, Land Development Regulations, and adopted Neighborhood plans and recommendations. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 66 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -1.4.1: The City will seek cooperative inter -local agreements, ILA, as necessary, with Miami -Dade County and with the FDOT to ensure that the County and State's transportation improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on City residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined neighborhoods, and do not result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic. (See Policy IC -3,1,3,) Policy TR -1.4.2: As streets undergo major repairs or renovation, the City will seek to eliminate dirt shoulders and provide curbing, gutters, sidewalks, crosswalks, and bicycle facilities to improve the physical appearance, mobility, and quality of the City's neighborhoods and districts. Policy TR -1.4.3: The City will continue to respond to neighborhood traffic concerns by developing and implementing neighborhood traffic calming measures using standard traffic flow modification procedures in place by Miami -Dade County and FDOT to evaluate traffic calming proposals. Neighborhood traffic calming measures may include but are not limited to traffic circles, median modifications, mid -block raised medians, chicanes, diagonal diverters, raised crosswalks, curb extensions, on -street parking, road closures, reduced lane widths, streetscape improvements, bicycle boulevards, and inclusion of bicycle facilities. Policy TR -1.4.4: In an effort to better identify problems and select proper traffic calming solutions in residential neighborhoods to reduce traffic speeds and cut - through traffic, the City will encourage and promote more citizen and stakeholder involvement to build support for neighborhood traffic calming plans. Objective TR -1.5: Implement and monitor Transportation Control Measures in coordination with other public agencies and private developers to reduce the dependency on automobiles and roadway congestion. Policy TR -1.5.1: The City will support the County's efforts to increase the efficiency and safety of the existing thoroughfare network by improving and coordinating signal timing, providing and promoting more transportation choices, and encouraging staggered work schedules. Policy TR -1.5.2: The City will require all new developments to implement transportation control measures in an effort to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic by increasing auto occupancy and transit ridership. These measures can include, but not be limited to, parking management and ridesharing programs to promote carpooling, vanpooling, car sharing and use of hybrid or electric vehicles, transit discount and fare subsidy programs, transit fare tax incentive programs, car charging stations, flexible work hours, compressed work weeks, telecommuting Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 67 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 programs, the construction of on-site transit shelters, transit amenities, transit stops, transit drop-off locations or pull-out bays, bicycle storage facilities, bicycle share programs, and park-and-ride lots. (See Policy TR -1.2.7.) Policy TR -1.5.3: The City will continue to utilize and coordinate with FDOT's South Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation demand management strategies for all future and existing employers with more than 50 employees. The City will lead by example in developing transportation demand management strategies for City employees. (See Policy IC -2.1.4.) Policy TR -1.5.4: The City will continue to encourage large employers such as the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Health District/Civic Center stakeholders, and other local facility operators to participate in transportation management initiatives and strategies to help increase transit ridership and decrease the demand for surface parking in an effort to improve accessibility, traffic circulation, and reduce parking problems. Policy TR -1.5.5: The City will require new large-scale developments defined as all projects that exceed 200,000 total square feet and/or a minimum of 199 total dwelling units to adopt and enforce measures that will reduce the generation of new single - occupant passenger car trips in areas of high-density development, and encourage the use of high -occupant vehicles, including public transit, for home-based work trips. Policy TR -1.5.6: The City will, pursuant to Chapter 163 of the State Statute, apply credit against future transportation concurrency requirements for property owners based on the property owner's contribution of right-of-way that expands a state transportation facility as set forth in a legally binding agreement with the City. (2007/10) Objective TR -1.6: All arterial and collector roadways within the City's boundaries will operate at the acceptable levels of service (LOS) established by the agency responsible for maintenance. Policy TR -1.6.1: Within its jurisdiction, the City has adopted FDOT's minimum LOS standards for Florida Intrastate Highway System (FINS) roadways, which state: 1.6.1.1: Limited access FIHS highways will operate at LOS D or better. Roadways with exclusive through lanes may operate at LOS E. 1.6.1.2: Controlled access FIHS highways will operate at LOS E or better. 1.6.1.3: Where FDOT has determined that a FIHS roadwav is constrained or backlogged, such roadways operating below the foregoing minimums must be managed so as not to cause significant deterioration, which is defined as an Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 68 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 average annual daily traffic increase in two-way traffic volume of 10 percent or more, or a 10 percent or greater reduction in operating speed for the peak direction in the 100th highest hour. Policy TR -1.6.2: The City will continue to monitor these LOS (as illustrated in Map TR - 8 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section) to ensure that all roadways within the City do not deteriorate by recommending and implementing the transportation control measures. Objective TR -1.7: Utilize the person -trip methodology when evaluating new downtown developments and redevelopment's impact on the local roadway level of service. Policy TR -1.7.1: The City's updated Person -Trip LOS will be implemented in Centers (as depicted on Map TR -14.2 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section). The Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be applied to areas within the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III (DDRI III), which generally feature frequent transit service (defined as roadway segments with cumulative transit headways of 10 minutes or less) and access to bicycle facilities. Policy TR -1.7.2: The City will utilize a tiered LOS analysis when reviewing traffic impacts for new developments whereby the Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be applied within areas identified as a Center while the traditional automobile LOS methodology will be applied to all other areas within the City. Both methodologies are then expressed as a ratio corresponding to letter grades LOS A through LOS F based on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the same manner as used by the traditional LOS methodology. Both the Person -Trip LOS and traditional automobile LOS may, at the discretion of the City, require the analysis of traffic impacts during periods traditionally defined as non -peak. (See CI -1.2.3.f.) Policy TR -1.7.3: When calculating person -trip volumes for the existing conditions, projected conditions without the development, and projected conditions with the development, the Person -Trip LOS will use roadway average annual daily traffic (AADT), an assumed automobile occupancy rate of 1.4 people per automobile (as defined in Transportation Corridors: Meetinq the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami — September 1990), a combined trip reduction rate that reflects pedestrian and bicycle mode split (based on recent U.S. Census American Community Survey data or locally -specific travel surveys), and existing transit ridership. When calculating the person -trip capacities, the Person -Trip LOS will) use existing roadway capacity adjusted by an occupancy rate of 1.4 and existing transit capacity data. (See Appendix TR -1, the data inventory and analysis chapter of the Transportation Element for a more detailed description of the Person -Trip LOS methodology and the volume -to - capacity formula). Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 69 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -1.7.4: Issuance of development orders for new development or significant expansion of existing development will be contingent upon compliance with a LOS E (100 percent of capacity) standard within centers, transit corridors, and all other areas. (See CI -1.2.3.f.) Policy TR -1.7.5: The City will continue to monitor, and will update by December 2018, the Person -Trip Methodology and designation of transit corridors (as illustrated in Map TR -14.2 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section). This update will include adjustment for modal splits and improvements or changes to existing transit services and bicycle facilities to better identify, describe, measure, and evaluate the multimodal transit corridors, facilities and terminals. Future updates will also consider changes in existing and future land use, population density, economic activity, housing, business type and quality, and neighborhood plans. As a component of this effort, the City will assess how the Person -Trip Methodology could be enhanced to identify projected transit needs and programming on a route -by -route basis in coordination with the MPO and Miami -Dade County. GOAL TR -2: PROVIDE A BALANCED, ACCESSIBLE, SAFE, AND SUSTAINABLE MULTI- MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM LINKING HIGHWAYS, TRANSIT, GREENWAYS, BIKEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS INTO A SEAMLESS NETWORK Objective TR -2.1: Integrate the existing and planned multi -modal transportation system with existing and future developments. Policy TR -2.1.1: The City will regularly coordinate information provided in the Transportation Element with the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use element (See Policy LU 1.1.11), including coordination with the land use maps, population densities, housing, employment patterns, projected development and redevelopment, urban infill, and other similar characteristics of land use that have an impact on transportation. Policy TR -2.1.2: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium transit projects identified in the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within the City limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives to help direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit services. (See Policy IC -2.1.5.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 70 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.1.3: The City will encourage increased density of development within walking distance of transit corridors and Metrorail stations (as referenced in Policy LU - 1.1.10. and HO -1.1.9). Policy TR -2.1.4: The City will ensure a strong interface between (re)developments and the public transportation system by establishing design guidelines that emphasize improved connectivity between transit facilities and (re)developments such as: A. Encouraging development of a wide variety of residential and non-residential land -uses and activities in nodes around rapid transit stations to produce short trips, minimize transfers, attract transit ridership, and promote transit oaerational and financial efficiencies. The particular uses that are aaaroved in a given station area should respect the character of the nearby neighborhood, strive to serve the needs of the neighborhood, and promote balance in the range of existing and planned land uses along the subject transit line. B. Accommodate new development around rapid transit stations that is well designed, conducive to both pedestrian and transit use, and architecturally attractive. C. In recognition that many transit riders begin and end their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian accommodations will include, as appropriate, continuous sidewalks to the transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting streets, buildings oriented to the street or other pedestrian paths, parking lots predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings, primary building entrances as close to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot, shade trees, awnings and other weather protection for pedestrians. On all arterial and collector streets served by public transit new non-residential buildings and substantial alterations to existina non-residential buildinas, and residential buildings wherever practical will provide at least one full-time building entrance that is recognizable and accessible from the street and is comparably as close to the street and/or transit stop as it is to the primary parking lot. D. New residential and non-residential developments, subdivisions and replats will provide for buildings that front the transit street, or provide streets or pedestrian connections that intersect with the transit street in close proximity to transit stops not more than 700 feet apart. E. New residential and non-residential developments, subdivisions, and replats will provide for bicycle and pedestrian connections that intersect with the transit street in close proximity to transit stops. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 71 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 F. Redevelopment of property within one-half mile of existing and planned transit stations and bus routes will not cause an increase in walking distance from nearby areas to the transit services and will, wherever practical, be done in a manner that reduces walking distances and is comfortable and attractive to pedestrians. G. Land uses that are not conducive to public transit ridership such as car dealerships, car -oriented food establishments, and container yards should not be permitted to locate or expand within one-quarter mile of a rapid transit station. H. Increase the density of development within walking distance of rapid transit stations in a manner appropriate to the particular setting of each transit station and existing abutting residential neighborhoods are to be protected and preserved. I. Encourage incorporation of transit stations within private development to integrate access to alternative modes with direct access and synergies within new mixed use developments. This includes the co -location of transit stations and public common areas of private developments.. (See Policy LU -1.1.19.) Policy TR -2.1.5: The City will encourage the utilization of Road/Mobility Impact Fees on arterials/collectors, transit projects and bicycle lanes within the City, and will include said projects in the LRTP. (See Policy TR -2.2.5.) (2013113) Policy TR -2.1.6: The City will respect the character of existing neighborhoods when establishing design guidelines for connectivity and transit infrastructure that are incorporated into future development/redevelopment programs. Policy TR -2.1.7: The City will encourage Miami -Dade Transit to prioritize its transit facility and service improvements along identified transit corridors and adjacent to Metrorail stations. Policy TR -2.1.8: The Transportation Element will be updated, at a minimum, every five years and will utilize a long range planning horizon of a minimum of 20 years in order to achieve the maximum consistency with the MPO's LRTP. (200818) Objective TR -2.2: Promote and encourage a balanced multimodal transportation system that provides a variety of connected transportation options to improve mobility and accessibility for residents and visitors of all ages. Policy TR -2.2.1: The City will continue to foster the development of bicycle and Pedestrian friendly neighborhoods and commercial centers that enhance the environment, improve public health, and overall quality of life. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 72 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.2.2: The City will use its land development regulations to designate space in the public right-of-way to accommodate alternative travel modes, including transit, Pedestrians, bicycles, and shared transportation options consistent with the Miami - Dade County Complete Streets Manual. Policy TR -2.2.3: The City will continue to support the trolley system (as illustrated in Map TR -5.2 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section) that provides feeder services and first-mile/last-mile connections to regional, premium transit options such as Metrorail, Metromover, and Tri -Rail. Policy TR -2.2.4: The City will seek to improve mobility by funding the cost of studies, plans, programs, and physical improvements identified in its Capital Improvement plans utilizing funds provided through the People's Transportation Plan, the Transportation Trust Fund, and other funds collected with the sole purpose of improving the transportation network. (2013113) Policy TR -2.2.5: By December 2020, the City will seek to study and determine the feasibility of establishing a mobility impact fee that would be collected to fund or supplement the cost of transportation system improvements including expansion of the Miami Trolley, complete streets improvements, enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, water taxi services, Light Rail/Streetcar plans, and other transportation improvements identified in future plans. (See Policy TR -2.1.5.) (2013113) Policy TR -2.2.6: The City will encourage Miami -Dade County to support cooperation with private transportation network providers in the enhanced delivery of public transportation services. Policy TR -2.2.7: The City will support Miami -Dade County's plans for the provision of water taxi services along Biscayne Bay and the Miami River at a minimum. Policy TR -2.2.8: The City will regularly monitor transportation trends on an annual basis using indicators such as transit ridership,'obs/housing balance, mode split, and motor vehicle registrations. Policy TR -2.2.9: The City will consider the income, age, ability, and vehicle ownership patterns of populations throughout the city when developing transportation systems and facilities improvements so that all residents, especially those most in need, have access to a wide range of affordable travel options. Policy TR -2.2.10: The City will continue to seek funding opportunities to implement the planned Light Rail that connects downtown to Midtown and support the regional effort for connections to the City of Miami Beach. The alignment for this Beach Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 73 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Connection service is illustrated in Map TR -23 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section. Policy TR -2.2.11: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to implement resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical evacuation routes (illustrated in Maps TR -15 and TR -11 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy IC -2.1.6.) Policy TR -2.2.12: The City will encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface and water transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront (See Policy PA-3.2.1.and Policy IC -2.1.30.) Objective TR -2.3: Continue to support, promote, and implement Complete Streets improvements along City roadways consistent with adjacent land use and context. Policy TR -2.3.1: By December 2020, the City will develop a balanced streetscape design program that accommodates all roadway users and pays special attention to non -vehicular modes by focusing on landscaping treatments, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and the construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along city streets. These improvements will be coordinated with major repairs, roadway resurfacing, and other renovations when possible. Policy TR -2.3.2: The City will prioritize the implementation of Complete Streets improvements for roadways that lead to transit nodes, are within transit corridors, or connect to bicycle/pedestrian paths (i.e. - Miami River Greenway, Baywalk, Underline, Overtown Greenway) to improve roadway safety, reduce conflicts among transportation modes, and to better connect surrounding developments and neighborhoods. These improvements will be implemented with all appropriate phases of roadway projects and will include enhanced transit infrastructure and amenities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, landscaping, streetscaping, and traffic calming. Policy TR -2.3.3: The City will prioritize bicycle facilities that are protected as a means of providing safe bicycle facilities for cyclists of all ages and abilities. Objective TR -2.4: The City will seek opportunities to improve access to transit and improve regional mobility by coordinating with other local transportation agencies, plans, and initiatives. Policy TR -2.4.1: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's SMART Plan, which specifically aims to provide premium transit service along roadways in the City including Biscayne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See Policy IC -2.1.7.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 74 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.4.2: To improve regional mobility, the City will regularly coordinate with, but not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami River Commission, the Miami International Airport and other public agencies to ensure that future improvements to the transportation network within the City from these agencies' are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of Miami's MCNP. (See Policy IC -2.1.8.) Policy TR -2.4.3: The City will improve transportation connections to urban centers from all neighborhoods, particularly by providing a variety of affordable travel options (pedestrian, transit, and bicycle facilities) and by being attentive to the needs of vulnerable and historically marginalized populations. Policy TR -2.4.4: The City will improve connections to transit by prioritizing sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure investments adjacent to transit routes, bus stops, and transit stations that also improve safety and comfort for transit users. These infrastructure investments should include, but are not limited to, bike racks, exclusive protected bike lanes, street furnishings, street trees, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and wayfinding signage. Policy TR -2.4.5: The City will continue to coordinate with SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade County, and other local agencies to support and develop plans to implement the FEC Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See Policy IC -2.1.9.) Policy TR -2.4.6: The City will coordinate its transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP update. (See Policy IC -2.1.10.) (200712) Policy TR -2.4.7: The City will require all new (re)development in existing and planned transit corridors to be well designed and conducive to pedestrian and transit use. In recognition that many transit riders begin and end their trips as pedestrians, pedestrian accommodations will be made that include, as appropriate, continuous sidewalks to the transit station, small blocks and closely intersecting streets, buildings that front the street or other pedestrian paths, parking lots predominantly to the rear and sides of buildings, primary building entrances as close to the street or transit stop as to the parking lot, shade trees, awnings and other weather protection for pedestrians. Policy TR -2.4.8: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to promote public transit and shared transportation services by educating and informing the public of these services via app -based technologies, informative websites, and other means of communication to increase transit ridership. (See Policy IC -2.11.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 75 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.4.9: The City will publish an annual list compiling the programmed transit - related improvements from MDT's Transit Development Plan (TDP) and the MPO's LRTP and TIP that are within the City and will include this information on the City's website. Policy TR -2.4.10: The City will regularly coordinate with other agencies to market and promote the use of multimodal transportation options using social media, educational opportunities, and any other form of public outreach. (See Policy IC -2.1.12.) Objective TR -2.5: Develop and expand the public transit system within the City as part of its multi -modal transportation network to improve the efficiency, reliability, and overall level of service for public transit. Policy TR -2.5.1: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve the east -west transit services within the City to alleviate traffic congestion. See Policv IC -2.1.13. Policy TR -2.5.2: The City will support provisions for transit passenger amenities that enhance convenience such as real-time bus arrival information, shelters, clear route signage, adequate pedestrian -scaled lighting, and pre -boarding fare payment systems. These improvements will be prioritized within transit corridors and near Metrorail stations. Policy TR -2.5.3: The City will require that transit facilities, such as turn -out bays, transit priority signals, high -occupancy vehicle lanes, bus -only lanes, and transit shelter locations, be included in roadway design proposals, as appropriate, especially for proposals within transit corridors or in close to proximity to transit stations. Policy TR -2.5.4: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to address the transit needs consistent with transit planning guidelines while considering population growth trends within the City and the metropolitan area. (See Policy IC - 2.1,14,) Policy TR -2.5.5: The City will coordinate annually with Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus transit system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy IC -2.1.27.)(2005/6) Objective TR -2.6: Design, promote, and maintain an efficient and interconnected roadway system that accommodates pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as part of its multi -modal transportation network. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 76 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.6.1: The City will encourage Miami -Dade County and FDOT to include improved connections between all modes of transportation, with emphasis on connections to non -motorized modes, as they are implementing transportation enhancements within City boundaries. Policy TR -2.6.2: The City, in coordination with FDOT, Miami -Dade County and the MPO, will continue to develop and encourage more bicycle paths, protected bicycle lanes, bicycle boulevards, cycle tracks, and sharrows throughout the City to expand the bicycle network and connect any gaps while promoting alternative travel modes. The City will also promote the implementation of enhanced bicycle amenities such as bicycle racks, lockers and bicycle wayfinding signage that helps to encourage more bicycle use. Map TR -6 (within Appendix TR -1) illustrates the existing bicycle facilities in the City. (See Policy IC -2.1.15.) Policy TR -2.6.3: The City will in coordination with Miami -Dade Transit and FDOT develop, prioritize, and implement sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure improvements that are adjacent to transit routes/corridors and transit stations in order to improve connectivity between transit and other non -motorized modes of transportation while promoting the use of alternative travel modes. (See Policy IC -2.1.16.) Objective TR -2.7: Encourage transit -supportive development patterns that promote walkable, mixed use neighborhoods that help to increase transit ridership, reduce automobile trips, and provide increased mobility for all people. Policy TR -2.7.1: The City will preclude land uses within 1/2 mile of a transit corridors, Metrorail stations, and Metromover stations that are not conducive to public transit ridership such as car dealerships, car -oriented food establishments, and container yards. Conversely, the City will support the expanded development and design of a transit system that helps shape the desired land use patterns. Policy TR -2.7.2: The City will regularly coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve the efficiency of its public transit system by supporting transit -oriented development policies and promoting the use of alternative travel modes within the City. (See Policy IC -2,1,17,) Policy TR -2.7.3: The City will conduct appropriate land use and zoning analysis of the areas surrounding each transit station area and transit corridor in order to determine whether appropriate land use and zoning changes should be implemented that foster transit -oriented development (as defined by Section 163.3164 F.S.) while protecting the adjacent neighborhoods from incompatible development. Such land use and zoning changes will include minimum and maximum density and intensity standards at the time of implementation. The City will consider the height, density, intensity, use Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 77 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 and scale of new developments when determining the compatibility with existing neighborhoods. (See Policy TR -1.3.3.) Policy TR -2.7.4: The City will require site and building design for new developments within a half mile of a Metrorail station or transit corridor to be coordinated with public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Requirements may include, but not be limited to, pedestrian crossings, access to transit stations, access to transit vehicles, transit vehicle access to buildings, transfer centers, shelters, sidewalks, dedicated bicycle lanes and shared -use paths, bicycle racks, and wayfinding signage. Policy TR -2.7.5: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will continue to control the mix, type, density and design of activity centers and growth corridors that promote and facilitate walking, bicycling and the use of public transportation. Policy TR -2.7.6: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to promote the transit - oriented development (TOD) policies found in the Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) to support the TCEA as defined in Section 163.3164 (46) FS, (2011132), as well as illustrated in Appendix TR -1, Map 14.2, titled Centers and Transit Corridors. (See Policy IC -2.1.28.) Objective TR -2.8: Enhance safety and minimize conflicts between all modes of transportation through engineering, education, and enforcement best practices. Policy TR -2.8.1: The City will promote the multimodal transportation initiatives and recommendations from the adopted Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan that aim to rebalance downtown roadways toward transit, pedestrians, and cyclists as well as enhancing safety and walkability through the implementation of a Pedestrian Priority Zone including design elements such as the following: • Clear, unobstructed pedestrian paths on all sidewalks • Perpendicular curb ramps at all intersections • Crosswalks at all intersections • Automatic countdown timers with more crossing time at all traffic controlled intersections • Appropriate lane widths for driving lanes, turning lanes, and sharrow lanes • Sidewalk bulbouts where feasible at all street intersections with curb radii not exceeding 15 feet • Mid -block lighting • Shade tree canopy on all sidewalks that consider width of passage, adjacent building canopies, overhangs, or other architectural devices that provide shade • Travel speeds and turning movement design as appropriate to intersection Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 78 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 • Seating areas at transit stops Policy TR -2.8.2: Through coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, the City will continue to support the monitoring of "high crash" locations on city streets and identify design improvements that may alleviate hazardous conditions, especially to pedestrians and bicyclists. The City will utilize safety as an evaluation criterion when improvements are prioritized and incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Element. Policy TR -2.8.3: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system for pedestrian access by adhering to design standards and procedures which comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Policy TR -2.8.4: The City will continue to provide a properly designed and safe system for controlling vehicular accessibility to major thoroughfares by adhering to the adopted design standards and procedures applicable to the agency with jurisdiction over the roadway facility, which at a minimum addresses: • Adequate storage and turning bays; • Spacing and design of median openings and curb cuts; • Provision of service roads along major thoroughfares, where applicable; • Driveway access and spacing; and • Traffic operations, including the provision of turning bays and bus bays for bus transit. Policy TR -2.8.5: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will ensure that blocks are easily walkable to maximize pedestrian and bicycle access to the transit station areas and beyond. Policy TR -2.8.6: To improve pedestrian mobility, for all new/(re)development, provide pedestrian access for building frontages in accordance with Land Development Regulations. Policy TR -2.8.7: Through its Land Development Regulations, the City will, where appropriate, designate primary and secondary streets so that most buildings are oriented to primary streets to create superior pedestrian environments while service functions such as parking and loading can be accommodated along secondary streets. Policy TR -2.8.8: By December 2020, the City will develop a modal hierarchy for all street classifications within the City that prioritizes the use by pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. This modal hierarchy will be used to determine the types of Complete Streets accommodations that will be provided within each street classification. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 79 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective TR -2.9: Provide a safe and effective bikeway/sidewalk greenwav network that advances healthy lifestyles, improves quality of life, better links origins and destinations, and provides alternative mode choices to automobile trips. Policy TR -2.9.1: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Underline, the Ludlam Trail, and other `preen corridors', which aim to improve the local bicycle network with enhanced amenities that encourage a more active, healthy lifestyle and the use of alternative modes of transportation. (2011153) Policy TR -2.9.2: The City will continue to support the implementation of the Riverwalk and Baywalk initiatives, whose goal is to improve access to Biscayne Bay and the Miami River, by coordinating with the development community to obtain easements along the Miami River and Biscayne Bay to connect any gaps in the Riverwalk and Baywalk alignments. Policy TR -2.9.3: The City will work with the MPO to develop a comprehensive active transportation plan for Miami that integrates bicycle, pedestrian, and greenway components by conducting a network gap analysis and developing a list of prioritized projects based on objective criteria. These criteria should include road classification; Proximity to transit stops and park-and-ride lots; proximity to schools, parks, or other public facilities; proximity to activity centers and transit corridors; consideration of high - crash locations; potential to connect gaps in existing sidewalk, greenwav, and other non -motorized transportation network. (See Policy IC -2.1.18.) Policy TR -2.9.4: The City will require that sidewalks and other essential non - motorized amenities and facilities be included in development plans prior to receiving approval from the City. Policy TR -2.9.5: The City will prioritize enhancements of pedestrian and bicycle circulation, access, and safety in the downtown, near activity centers, along transit corridors, near schools, libraries, and parks. Policy TR -2.9.6: The City will require that pedestrian mobility be included in Maintenance -of -Traffic (MOT) reviews. Policy TR -2.9.7: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County and FDOT to design the City's thoroughfares strategically to disperse and reduce the length of automobile trips and to encourage walking and bicycling. (See Policy IC -2.1.19.) Policy TR -2.9.8: The City will encourage the provision of bicycle support facilities, such as secured bicycle racks, personal lockers and showers for new and existing office developments and employment centers to encourage bicycling as an alternative mode for work commutes. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 80 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.9.9: The City will include the expansion and continuity of the bicycle network in capital projects city-wide with a focused emphasis on areas within transit corridors in an effort to reduce the reliance on automobiles and encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. Policy TR -2.9.10: The City will remove barriers that prevent the connection of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, which include but are not limited to railroad corridors, inadequate roadway conditions, physical obstructions and unsafe conditions to crossing the Miami River, and other physical and psychological barriers. The City will work to connect the gaps in the existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities as illustrated in Maps TR -6 and TR -7, within Appendix TR -1. Policy TR -2.9.11: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy IC -2.1.20.) Policy TR -2.9.12: The City will work to improve its status as a bicycle -friendly city as defined by the League of American Bicyclists. Objective TR -2.10: Integrate innovative technologies to improve the transportation network. Policy TR -2.10.1: Through the use and integration of cell phone and app -based technologies and in coordination with other public and private agencies, the City will seek to provide real-time travel information to roadway users regarding City services such as parking availability, trolley arrival information, traffic congestion updates, and other transportation related information. The City will aim to build on the individual efforts of universities, the commercial shared -ride sector, commercial data aggregators to generate improved real-time information for public consumption. Policy TR -2.10.2: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, leverage technology to provide user-friendly trip planning services that include all transportation modes. (See Policy IC -2.1.21.) Policy TR -2.10.3: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, promote and share all existing transportation -related data, sources, and tools to the public in an effort to create an open and user-friendly data repository that could be used for analysis and future private or public technology development that aims to improve the efficiency of the transportation network. (See Policy IC -2.1.22.) Policy TR -2.10.4: The City will encourage the use and proliferation of electric vehicles for City fleet vehicles and personal automobile, and will promote electric vehicle recharge stations in parking garages, park and ride lots, surface parking lots, and strategic on -street parking locations. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 81 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy TR -2.10.5: The City will seek opportunities to further the implementation of automated and connected vehicle communications technology for City fleet vehicles and personal automobiles to address congestion and safety issues. Policy TR -2.10.6: In coordination with Miami -Dade County, FDOT, and other public agencies, the City will facilitate the development and maintenance of real-time traffic and traveler data that helps monitor the overall transportation system and evaluate its performance. This information should be made available to the public and should be delivered to users in a familiar way that promotes data sharing, thus benefiting the wider community. (See Policy IC -2.1.23.) Objective TR -2.11: Regularly update necessary data to improve the transportation network's mobility, safety, and accessibility. Policy TR -2.11.1: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, regularly collect necessary data for better estimating vehicle occupancy rates and means of travel pursuant to updating the person -trip methodology as required. (See Policy IC -2.1.24.) Policy TR -2.11.2: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, Periodically collect bicycle and pedestrian count data throughout the City to better understand and analyze the use and demand of the non -motorized transportation network and to develop and implement improvement projects based on needs. (See Policy IC -2.1.25.) Policy TR -2.11.3: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, identify any transit service adjustments and improvements to the bicycle network as to maintain an updated understanding of the existing transit corridors for the interpretation and implementation of the person -trip LOS methodology. (See Policy IC - 2.1,26,) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 82 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES Port of Miami Goal PA -1: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Port of Miami is compatible with and furthers the physical development of Miami's greater downtown area while mitigating negative impacts to neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic function, operation, and potential improvements. Objective PA -1.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to the Port of Miami with the transportation related activity which occurs within the port to ensure compatibility and complementary land uses and activities while mitigating negative impacts to neighborhoods, yet protecting the Port's economic function, operation, and potential improvements. Policy PA -1.1.1: The City of Miami sol will, through its land development regulations, encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the port development goals of Miami -Dade County and the Port of Miami. Policy PA -1.1.2: The City &ha4 will, through its land development regulations, encourage the availability of an adequate amount of commercial and industrial land to complement planned expansions of port activity, and will establish a "free trade zone" within adequate proximity to the Port of Miami. Policy PA -1.1.3: All surface transportation improvements providing access to the Port must be compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City of Miami as related to the development of the greater downtown area, and such improvements will be financed with an appropriate share of County, state and federal funds. Policy PA-1.1.4The Port &49 will prepare guidelines that will serve as design criteria for the construction, renovation and landscaping of its facilities and such guidelines must comply with all City of Miami Code requirements. Policy PA -1.1.5: The City &ha4 will, through its land development regulations, cooperate with Miami -Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to mitigate adverse structural and non-structural impacts from the Port of Miami upon adjacent natural resources and land uses. Policy PA -1.1.6: The City &ha4 will, through its land development regulations, cooperate with Miami -Dade County and its Port of Miami operation to protect and conserve natural resources. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 83 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Miami International Airport Goal PA -2: Ensure that the development and expansion of Miami -Dade County's Miami International Airport is compatible with and furthers the physical development of the City of Miami. Objective PA -2.1: The City of Miami, through its land development regulations, coordinate land use in areas of the city adjacent to Miami International Airport with the transportation related activity which occurs within that facility to ensure compatible and complimentary land uses and activities. Through such land development regulations, the City will mitigate negative impacts to neighborhoods that might result from airport activities, while protecting the airport's economic function, operation, and potential improvements. See LU -1.1.16) (200914 Policy PA -2.1.1: The City of Miami through its land development regulations, encourage facility improvement which will further both the land development, coastal management and conservation goals and objectives of the City of Miami and the development goals of Miami -Dade County and Miami International Airport. Policy PA -2.1.2: All surface transportation improvements providing access to Miami International Airport and impacting upon transportation within the City of Miami must be compatible with the needs, goals and objectives of the City and such improvements will be financed with the appropriate share of County, state and federal funds. Policy PA -2.1.3: The City sal will, through its land development regulations, ensure that zoning within the city protects existing aviation flight paths. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 84 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Port of Miami River' Sub -Element Goal PA -3: The Port of Miami River shag will be encouraged to continue operation as a valued and economically viable component of the City's maritime industrial base. Objective PA -3.1: (PLANNING AND ZONING). The City sW will protect the Port of Miami River from encroachment by non water -dependent or non water -related land uses, and sW will regulate the Port of Miami River's expansion and redevelopment in coordination with applicable future land use and coastal management goals, objectives, policies (See Policy LU -1.3.3 and Goal CM -3). Policy PA -3.1.1: The City &4a4 will maintain a Working Waterfront Table of Properties to guide future development within the Miami River Corridor. The Table sha4 will clearly depict the location and description of all properties of recreational and commercial working waterfront uses on the River, as defined in (h -.Section 342.07 F.S. (hereinafter referenced as the "Working Waterfront"). The Table &ha4 will classify working waterfront properties into Categories "A" and "B". The Table &4a4 will be incorporated as supporting data and analysis within Appendix PA -1. Policy PA -3.1.2 Category A: The City may adopt a comprehensive plan future land use map (FLUM) amendment for properties designated "Industrial" on the FLUM, along the Miami River only if the proposed amendment complies with this sub -element. The future land use designation for any of the properties identified "Industrial" therein may be amended only through the large-scale comprehensive plan amendment process. Applications for such amendments demonstrate that either of the following conditions exists: The Development — redevelopment as industrial is not economically feasible based on a market and site analysis using a professionally acceptable methodology that has been peer reviewed; or 2. The Proposal includes an equivalent transfer or expansion of industrially designated property offsite to another location on the Miami River within the City of Miami. Policy PA -3.1.3 Category B: All Category "B" properties �, maintain a working waterfront use. Additionally, the City &ha4 will require that any residential development with a density greater than duplex residential or any mixed use development include Working Waterfront use component per G#.Section 342.07, F.S. or other amenities that is accessible to the public which promotes the enjoyment of the Miami River 1 The 'Port of Miami River" is a shallow draft riverine port consisting of independent, privately -owned small shipping companies, fisheries, vessel repair facilities marinas and other Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront uses, as defined in Section 04.342.07, F.S., located along the banks of the Miami River and its tributaries and canals where Working Waterfront uses are located. The Port of Miami River is not a deepwater port as defined in S;4Section. 403.021(9), F.S. The Port of Miami River extends from the salinity dam in unincorporated Miami -Dade County to Biscayne Bay in the City of Miami, as identified in Appendix PA -1. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 85 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 unless prohibited by the Miami -Dade Department of Environmental Resource Management-(DERM). Policy PA -3.1.4: The City &ha4 will encourage the establishment and maintenance of Working Waterfront uses along the banks of the Miami River, and to discourage encroachment by incompatible uses. Policy PA -3.1.5: The City encourage the development and expansion of the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront consistent with the future land use, coastal management and conservation elements of the City's comprehensive plan. Policy PA -3.1.6: The City &ha4 will encourage only those developments, rezoning, and land use amendments in the vicinity of the Working Waterfront lands designated "Industrial" on the adopted future land use map that are compatible and suitable with the existing "Industrial" use of property. Policy PA -3.1.7: The City &ha4 will, through its land development regulations, adopt and enforce appropriate setbacks and buffering requirements for Non -Working Waterfront properties along the Miami River in order to protect the existing Working Waterfront use from encroachment of incompatible and unsuitable uses. Policy PA -3.1.8: There swill be no net loss of recreational wet -slips along the Miami River. Policy PA -3.1.9: The City &ha4 will require from new residential development and redevelopment located along the Miami River a recorded covenant acknowledging and accepting the presence of the existing Working Waterfront 24-hour operations as permitted. Policy PA -3.1.10: In its commitment to support the Port of Miami River, the City of Miami &ha4 will continue its support of the dredging of the River. Policy PA -3.1.11: The City of Miami &ha4 will facilitate and expedite municipal permitting for water -dependent, water -related, commercial, industrial and recreational working waterfronts along the Miami River by expediting the application process for such uses. Objective PA -3.2: (TRANSPORTATION). The City s4A will encourage with appropriate agencies the coordination of surface transportation access to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront with the traffic and mass transit system shown on the traffic circulation map series. Policy PA -3.2.1: The City -s#g will through the T-PaHspertatlerl Element of the o9moreheHeiV8 pl@R, encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface and water transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront (See Obj8Gti„e TD 1 O Dnlin„ TD � � See Policy .TR -2.2.12. and Policy IC -2.1.30.). Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 86 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective PA -3.3: (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & COORDINATION). The City SW will coordinate its Port of Miami River Working Waterfront planning activities with the multiple regulators and stakeholders who have an interest in the Miami River. Policy PA -3.3.1: Give the Miami River's multi jurisdictional and regulatory nature, the City &haF-will coordinate with: The United States Army Corp of Engineers regarding the dredging, navigation, and commerce on the Miami River; and The United States Coast Guard regarding security and safety on the Miami River; and The Miami -Dade County Planning Department to evaluate the interdependence and effectiveness of the County's Port of Miami River sub -element in its comprehensive plan with that of that of the City's; and The Miami -Dade County's Department of Environmental Resource Management and the Manatee Protection Plan Committee regarding the protection of manatees and establishment of new wet and dry marine slips on or near the Miami River; and The Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser to ensure that all Port of Miami River Working Waterfront properties are assessed by the "current use" pursuant to Section 4, Article VII of the Florida constitution and S.193.704, Fla. Stat. Policy PA -3.3.2: The City X44 will remain an active member of the Miami River Commission, as established by G4Section 163.06, F.S. and -S#a4 will continue to request and consider from the Miami River Commission written recommendations related to policy, planning, development and other River issues within the scope established by the Florida Legislature. Policy PA -3.3.3: WithiR 18 meHths of adeptiaH of this pelley, By December 2020, the City sha4 will consider approving a joint planning agreement with the Miami River Commission and Miami -Dade County to revise and adopt the "Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic plan for the Miami River. Policy PA -3.3.4: With r throe ye_@Fs of the -,dent eR of this By December 2020, the City along with Miami River stakeholders, property owners and businesses s#a4 will consider submitting an application to the Florida Department of Gemm„n t„ nff-, r� Economic Opportunity, Waterfronts Florida Partnership Program, for assistance in protecting and promoting the Miami River traditional Working Waterfront. Policy PA -3.3.5: The City s#a4 will coordinate with Miami River stakeholders, property owners and businesses to prepare reasonable Working Waterfront code compliance and enforcement policies to eliminate unsafe, abandoned, and blighted conditions along the river banks. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 87 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PA -3.3.6: The City of Miami s#g will provide technical assistance to Working Waterfront businesses along the Miami River. Policy PA -3.3.7: The City &ha4 wili work to improve the economic vitality of the Miami River in cooperation with other concerned public and governmental agencies and organizations. (See Miami -Dade County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan, Port of Miami River Sub -element Policy PMR -1C) Policy PA -3.3.8: The City will work with property owners along the Miami River to secure Enterprise Zone tax incentives to businesses for creation of jobs and revitalization. Such incentives consist of the following and are based on availability: a. Enterprise Zone Incentives 1. Jobs Tax Credit 2. Business Equipment Sales Tax Refund 3. Building Materials Sales Tax Refund 4. Property Tax Credit 5. Community Contribution Tax Credit Program Policy PA -3.3.9: The City will continue to use Brownfield edevelopment Area strategies to stimulate economic revitalization to Working Waterfronts. Such incentives consist of the following and are based on availability: a. Financial Incentives i. 35% Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credits ii. $2500 Brownfields Bonus Refund iii. Low-interest loans iv. Sales Tax Credit on Building Materials V. Up to 5 years of State Loan Guarantees of Loan Loss Reserves vi. Site -Specific Activities Grant, and National Brownfields Assessment, Revolving Loan Fund, Cleanup Grants, and HUD Brownfield Economic Development Loans b. Regulatory Benefits i. Risk Based Corrective Action ii. Cleanup Liability Protection iii. Review of Voluntary Cleanup Projects at FDEP Conducted Separately From Enforcement Mandated Cleanups by Responsible Parties iv. Expedited Review and Response to Technical Reports and Correspondence V. CERCLA Site Clearance Issued by EPA, and vi. Lender Liability Protection to the extend allowed by applicable laws Policy PA -3.3.10: The City will continue to use the City's Enterprise Zone, Empowerment Zone, Commercial Business Corridors, and Brownfield Redevelopment Area strategies to stimulate economic revitalization, and encourage employment opportunities within the Port of Miami River. (Policy LU -1.3.7.). Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 88 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PA -3.3.11: The City will foster or develop and implement job training, vocational, and educational programs to assist the City's existing and future residents, and water dependent and water related businesses along the Miami River, in achieving economic self-sufficiency, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies to direct training programs and other technical assistance to support minority and semi -skilled residents of the City including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by G#Sectior 342.07, F.S. (Policy LU -1.3.8.) Policy PA -3.3.12: The City, through its Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, e#a4 will support and coordinate with other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the River to support and enhance the Miami River's economic importance and viability. The functions of the Miami River s#a4 will be consistent with the future goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, particularly with respect to the unique characteristics of the Miami River's location and its economic position and functioning within the local maritime industry. Objective PA -3.4: (MONITORING & EFFECTIVENESS). The City s4a_4 will monitor track the effectiveness of its goals, objectives, and policies designated to preserve and promote the Port of Miami River as a valued and economically viable component of the City's maritime industrial base. Policy PA -3.4.1: City staff &ha4 will prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on the status of the Planning and Zoning, Economic Development and Coordination, and Transportation Objectives and Policies contained in this Sub - element, which be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. Policy PA -3.4.2: City staff prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on the loss or gain of recreational and commercial Working Waterfront lands and uses, which a49 will ,be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 89 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Goal PR -1: Provide sufficient opportunities for active and passive recreation to all City residents based on access to parks, recreation and open space, per capita park funding, and regular surveys of residents on park and recreation needs. Objective PR -1.1: The City s4" will work to achieve a medium-term objective of providing a park within a ten minute walk of every resident. Policy PR -1.1.1: The City will establish a new hierarchy for the City park system to reflect Miami's urban condition, as described in the Miami Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan dated May 2007 and adopted by the City Commission. The hierarchy will have the following elements: Regional Parks — A park typically greater than 30 acres in size with a variety of park landscapes, facilities and programs for city residents, regional visitors, and tourists, or any park serving as a tourist destination of historical, cultural or architectural significance.2 Citywide parks: o Destination parks — four types: conservation, waterfront one acre or more, sports complex and aquatic, specialty (unique programs) o Community parks - parks not less than one-half acre that include active recreation facilities o Linear parks — greenways and trails Neighborhood parks — all remaining parks under one acre that do not fit in other categories Policy PR -1.1.2: The City will focus on park land acquisition according to the following four equal priorities that emerged from community preferences during the 2007 Parks Master Plan process: land with water views and/or water access; land for "walk -to" parks, including neighborhood parks, in underserved areas of the City identified in Citywide and NET -area maps in the 2007 Parks Master Plan and any subsequent updates to these maps; land to expand destination and community parks; land for expansion or creation of linear park segments. Information on target priorities and target areas for new parks will be disseminated to all relevant City departments to enhance the potential for parkland acquisition in conjunction with infrastructure and other projects. Ideally, new parks should be at least one-half acre in size, but smaller areas may be suitable, depending on the surroundings and proposed uses. Policy PR -1.1.3: The City will provide areas for safe, passive use in all parks, including those in active recreational use parks. The passive areas will include usable green space with plantings, shade and seating. 1.1.3.1: By December 2020, t -The City,will evaluate thFE)Ugh its land development regulations, to determine the need toil designate a zoning category for parks separate from Civic Space, and amend as necessary. That category will permit a variety of areas for passive and/or greater intensity of recreational use opportunities in parks and open spaces. 2 Source: Recreation and Park Department Management Information System Division — data dictionary as of 6/21/04. City of San Francisco, California. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 90 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -1.1.4: The City of Miami's Level of Service for Parks, Recreation and Open Space is to provide a municipally -owned park within a ten-minute barrier -free walk to park entrances by 72% of the city's population as measured by GIS pedestrian network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free distance on a safe pedestrian route. Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a sidewalk or designated pedestrian route that may include crossing streets but does not encounter barriers such as walls or highway embankments that impede passage. Safe pedestrian routes include those that may include crossing of streets with speed limits of up to 40 mph. Every three years, the City will develop and update a map that shows which residential areas fall within the ten-minute walk buffer for City -owned parks, and which do not. This map will then be overlaid on a population map showing the most current U.S. Census population data available in order to calculate if at least 72% of the city's population lives within the ten-minute walk buffer. 1.1.4.1: Every three years, when the City updates the Parks and Recreation Level of Service Map for parks owned by the City of Miami, the City will also perform a study based on the national model established by the Trust for Public Land ParkScoreTM system. The study will include the following: 1) creation and updating of a GIS layer that includes all park and recreation land open to the public in the City of Miami, including linear parks, whether or not the land is owned by the City; 2) creation of maps that show a ten-minute barrier -free walk for all parks (regardless of ownership and including linear parks), and similarly, for parks of at least '/2 acre in size and parks of at least 1 acre in size; 3) identification of median park size (regardless of ownership); 4) identification of the percentage of all city acres that are parks (regardless of ownership); 4) the number of playgrounds per 10,000 residents; and 5) the total spending (both operational and capital) on parks and recreation per resident over the preceding three fiscal years. The purpose of this study is to provide the City with analysis to support decision- making on acquisition of park land and on park and recreation services, as well as to compare the city's park resources with other cities. Policy PR -1.1.5: By December 2020, tThe City will review and enact provisions and create a plan to remedy deficiencies for residents who do not have access to a park within a ten minute, barrier -free walk, including financing for acquisition to remedy deficiencies. Policy PR -1.1.6: The City of Miami will work towards providing a park of approximately one acre or more within a ten-minute, barrier -free walk to park entrances for 66% of the city's population. Objective PR -1.2: Provide sufficient per capita funds for the parks system to support the parks, recreation and open space standards expected by the public, as indicated in surveys and other responses to public outreach, for resources and programs that benefit the community. The City will strive to meet and exceed a benchmark level annual of spending, for operations and capital improvements combined, of $100 per capita in 2007 dollars, within fiscal limits and based on identified needs. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 91 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -1.2.1: The City will establish the cost of providing park and recreation programs and services, identify which core park and recreation services are to be offered according to criteria related to level of benefits to individuals and the community as a whole, identify which services and programs should be free, and formulate how a fee structure should be set for other services and programs. Policy PR -1.2.2: The City will develop annual parks and recreation budgets that explain the rationale behind the program, operational and maintenance standards that the City intends to meet; the costs of meeting those standards; and the per capita budget in comparison with similar cities, including cities in Florida. Policy PR -1.2.3: The City will allocate program revenues generated by the Parks and Recreation Department to the department's budget. Policy PR -1.2.4: The City will work to identify and create a dedicated funding source for the park system. Policy PR -1.2.5: The City will seek grants and other funding for new resources, including land, activities, and programs. Some of these funds may come from nonprofit partnership groups that may be formed, such as a potential Miami Parks Foundation. Objective PR -1.3: Pursue expanded and new opportunities identified in the 2007 Parks Master Plan (and any subsequent updates) to share park, recreation and open space resources with the school district, the housing authority, churches, nonprofit organizations, transportation agencies and other groups that may be able to share land and programs with the City Parks and Recreation Department. Policy PR -1.3.1: The City will establish communication with and liaisons to agencies and groups that have existing and potential recreation and open space resources in order to pursue access to these resources by City residents. Policy PR -1.3.2: The City will evaluate current costs, benefits and procedures for sharing resources and programming and will develop policies and procedures that will maximize benefits for City residents. Objective PR -1.4: Expand existing and create new greenways and trails to meet resident needs. Policy PR -1.4.1: The City will continue to work with transit agencies to coordinate the park system and pedestrian connections with opportunities to improve and expand the Metro -Path Trail. Policy PR -1.4.2: The City will continue to work with transportation agencies to implement the Commodore Trail improvements and the Flagler Trail (FEC Corridor Greenway). Policy PR -1.4.3: The City will continue to work to implement the Overtown Greenway plan to link the Miami River through Overtown to Downtown. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 92 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -1.4.4: The City will work with Miami -Dade County and other groups to ensure that greenway, trail and park systems within the City are effectively linked to proposed regional trails such as the Venetian Connector, the Unity Trail, the Perimeter Trail, the Ludlum Trail, and the East-West Trail. The City will continue to advocate for funding of trails identified in the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization 20-3G40 Long -Range Transportation Plan. Policy PR -1.4.5: The City will designate as scenic transportation corridors those segments of roadways that have significant vegetative features, and will encourage the development of bicycle and pedestrian paths along such corridors, where appropriate. Future land development regulations will encourage the provision of sufficient land areas for uses that are compatible with and encourage the flow of bicycle and pedestrian traffic along these corridors. Objective PR -1.5: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an equitable, proportiona -- share of the cost of public open space and recreational facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards. Policy PR -1.5.1: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to meet expanded demand for Citywide parks, neighborhood parks, and recreational programs resulting from new residential development, including, but not limited to, impact fees, Zoning Ordinance intensity bonuses and contributions in lieu of land that will be used to provide new park and recreation resources to serve new development. The City will review these fees annually in accordance with recreation and open space needs and revise them as necessary to reflect increases in the cost of providing public open space and recreational facilities to meet its adopted Level of Service for parks, recreation and open space. Policy PR -1.5.2: The City will continue to work with developers of mixed use and nonresidential projects to ensure the creation of appropriate public spaces. Policy PR -1.5.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help fund open space and recreational facilities projects whose public benefits tend to be localized to specific geographic sub areas of the City. Goal PR -2: Preserve and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities. Objective PR -2.1: Protect existing park land. Policy PR -2.1.1: The City has a no -net -loss policy for public park land and, December 2020, will adopt procedures to this effect for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as described in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. These will allow only recreation and cultural facilities to be built on park land, will limit building footprint on any such land, will require that conversion of park land for any other purposes be subject to public procedures, and replace the converted park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation value in terms of usefulness and location. Policy PR -2.1.2: The City will continue to define and protect conservation areas in the zoning code, as well as other parks and recreation areas. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 93 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -2.1.3: By December 2020, tThe City will amend the zoning code to limit the amount of total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre or more to no more than 25% of the park land area. Buildings and parking surfaces will continue to be limited to recreational and cultural uses and accessory elements that serve park and recreation goals. Any request to expand this percentage will require a special permit (warrant) and public hearings with residents within a half - mile area surrounding the park. Objective PR -2.2: Maintain and enhance existing parks and recreation facilities. Policy PR -2.2.1: The City will provide appropriate staffing, services, equipment, and maintenance at all parks. Criteria for appropriateness will include park category (Citywide or neighborhood), recreation programs, demand for passive and active spaces and activities, sizes, and facilities. Policy PR -2.2.2: The City will maintain and staff as many public swimming pools to be open all year round as possible given funding constraints and will strive to identify new funding sources to expand access to year-round swimming. Policy PR -2.2.3: The City, through the Parks and Recreation Department, will continue to develop and implement maintenance level of service standards, identify associated costs, and address funding those costs, including replacement programs for equipment and vehicles, before adding more assignments. Policy PR -2.2.4: The Parks and Recreation Department will maintain and Fegularly annually update the Inventory and Evaluation of City -Owned Parks that was prepared for the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. Goal PR -3: Increase public access to all parks, recreation, facilities and open spaces including waterfront areas and the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay. Objective PR -3.1: Enhance public access by pedestrians and bicyclists to parks and recreation sites Policy PR -3.1.1: The City will continue to implement sidewalk and shade tree planting programs along public roadways that connect to parks and other community destinations. The improvements will be targeted to pedestrian routes that provide a 10 minute walk to a park to the greatest number of persons. Tree planting programs will be implemented in accordance with the 2007 City of Miami Tree Master Plan. Policy PR -3.1.2: The City through the Parks and Recreation Department will work with neighborhood groups to identify the ten-minute pedestrian routes within a half - mile radius of parks that are appropriate for improvements to sidewalks, lighting, street trees, crosswalks and pedestrian count -down signals, and signage, as described in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Plan. Policy PR -3.1.3: Bicycle parking facilities such as bike racks sha4 will be provided in existing and future park projects. Objective PR -3.2: Enhance the public's visual and physical access to waterfront areas. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 94 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR73.2.1: The City will continue to work to complete the Baywalk, encompassing as much of the Biscayne Bay waterfront as possible, and to complete the Riverwalk and the Miami River Greenway. Policy PR -3.2.2: All City -owned waterfront property, including the Miami River shorelines, will provide for public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline. 3.2.2.1: The City will continue to promote creation of pocket parks at waterfront locations, such as "PlayStreets" created on dead-end streets, in order to enhance public access to waterfronts. Policy PR -3.2.3: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -2.1.7.) Policy PR -3.2.4: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promotion of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land development regulations will require non -water dependent or related development and/or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River shorelines. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -2.1.1.) Policy PR -3.2.5: The City will continue to expand launch areas for personal kayaks/canoes, kayak/canoe rentals and other boating programs at parks on Biscayne Bay, the Miami River and the South Fork of the Miami River. Policy PR -3.2.6: By December 2020, tThe City will pursue creation of water shuttles or water taxis that will expand public access to the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay off the Upper Eastside and the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove. Policy PR -3.2.7: The City will work with other organizations and agencies to identify public recreational opportunities, including boating, on the smaller waterways in the City, such as Wagner Creek, the Little River, and the canals. Policy PR -3.2.8: All renovations and improvements to City parks and recreational facilities will be designed to enhance rather than obstruct waterfront views. Policy PR -3.2.9: The City will increase public recreational opportunities on Virginia Key through implementation of the Virginia Key Master Plan and will introduce land use designations and/or zoning, as appropriate, to permit use of previously disturbed land areas on Virginia Key for amenities and uses that support passive and active park recreation at suitable locations on Virginia Key. Policy PR -3.2.10: The City &ha4 will continue to ensure that park and recreational lands open to the public are included in redevelopment projects for Watson Island and will monitor the project after construction to ensure continued public access without any requirements for the public to make purchases or any other barriers to open public use. Policy PR -3.2.11: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and Related Laws, and more specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment, all new development and redevelopment along the downtown waterfront is required to provide a waterfront setback, and those developments that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 95 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Coastal Management Policy CM -2.1.8.) The City will monitor these areas to ensure continued public access, as required. Objective PR -3.3: Park and recreational facilities will be accessible to handicapped persons and provide opportunities for special needs groups. Policy PR -3.3.1: All renovations, expansions, and development of park and recreation facilities will be designed in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements, including handicapped parking spaces, ramps, handrails, pathways and other accessibility improvements to be appropriately located with respect to recreational facilities. Policy PR -3.3.2: Designs for renovations, expansions, and developments of park and recreation facilities will be evaluated to ensure that there are sufficient facilities within the service area to provide for the recreation, education, and safety needs of preschool age children, the elderly, persons with disabilities and other special needs groups. Goal PR -4: Enhance the quality of recreational and educational opportunities for all age groups, persons with disabilities, and other special needs groups. Objective PR -4.1: Continue to improve the quality and diversity of recreational programs offered at destination and community parks, and neighborhood parks where such programs may be offered. Policy PR -4.1.1: The City will use participant evaluation surveys, at the completion of recreational programs to evaluate program success, online public opinion surveys at least once every three years, and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to identify needed and desired programs. Policy PR -4.1.2: The City will increase staff and hours of operation where necessary and fiscally feasible, provide professional development opportunities for park and recreation staff, and encourage staff to be certified by the Florida Recreation and Parks Association. Policy PR -4.1.3: The City will continue to provide interpretive displays, educational programs, wildlife observation locations, and picnic areas in parks and open spaces for outdoor recreation activities. Policy PR -4.1.4: The City will continue to coordinate with nonprofit providers of social services to the elderly, youth, and other special needs groups, so as to permit such providers to use public park facilities for meeting the recreational and educational needs of these groups. Policy PR -4.1.5: The City, through its NET Offices, will serve as a resource for information regarding recreational and educational opportunities for all age groups, persons with disabilities, and other special needs groups. Goal PR -5: Improve management and operations in the park and recreation system. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 96 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective PR -5.1: Increase the efficiency of park operations, while improving the quality of recreation services and strengthening the financial support of the parks and recreation service system. Policy PR -5.1.1: The vision and mission of the Parks and Recreation Department will be revised to include the protection of green spaces and natural areas in addition to the existing focus on recreational and cultural activities. Policy PR -5.1.2: The City's operating budget and the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) will give priority to the quality of programs in, and the physical condition of, existing park facilities and to meeting existing deficiencies, before constructing new facilities for parks and recreation. This policy does not preclude the use of impact fees or other funds to purchase additional land to be held in inventory for new parks in underserved neighborhoods. Policy PR -5.1.3: A projection and analysis of operational and maintenance costs associated with all park and recreation related capital projects which exceed $50,000, with their anticipated funding sources, will be required and made publicly available prior to the decision to appropriate public funds for capital improvements. Policy PR -5.1.4: The City will continue to implement innovative management and maintenance alternatives designed to minimize operating and maintenance costs while not reducing the extent and quality of programs or adversely affecting the physical condition of park facilities. This will be done through establishment of core services according to level of benefit to the community, identifying costs and potential revenues, improving management accountability, establishing preventive maintenance and replacement programs, establishing formal policies and systems for working with groups that sponsor programs that use City facilities, and strengthening support services. Policy PR -5.1.5: The City will continue to assign staff time to develop and manage a network of volunteer "friends" groups for individual parks. Policy PR -5.1.6: The City will continue to develop and implement public/private partnerships to contribute to the maintenance and enhancement of parks, recreational facilities, and public spaces, while ensuring that public spaces remain freely open to the public. Policy PR -5.1.7: By December 2020, tThe City will explore the eRGe6rage creation of a Citywide Miami Parks Foundation by non-governmental groups and individuals to serve as a nonprofit partner to focus attention on the park system, raise money to help support maintenance, enhance and expand parks and recreational programs, attract volunteers, and broaden the constituency for the park system. Objective PR -5.2: Create institutions and procedures to ensure resident and community consultation in the development of system wide policies and planning for park and recreation program improvements. Policy PR -5.2.1: The City will continue to work with a permanent Parks and Recreation Advisory Board made up of residents who are park users, program participants, and representatives of groups with special relevant expertise. The Board's responsibilities will include advising elected officials and staff on implementation of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan and any adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 97 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 subsequent updates to that Plan. The Board will be supported by staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, and will report annually to the Mayor and City Commission on progress in implementing the Master Plan, including financial reports, holding at least one public hearing on the draft report before submitting it to the Mayor and Commission. The Board will also review and advise on capital plans and designs based on the Master Plan and advise the Commission on any proposals to expend more than $50,000 to acquire new park land, to diminish or convert existing park land, to accept donated land for parks, or to sell City land that may be suitable for parks. The City will periodically review and refine the mission and charge of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in order to ensure maximum opportunities for public involvement and effectiveness in addressing parks and recreation needs. Proposed changes to the mission and charge of the Board will not be implemented until after a public hearing by the appropriate public board. Policy PR -5.2.2: The City will survey City residents to monitor preferences, needs and satisfaction with the park system on a regular basis, at a minimum through evaluations of all programs by program participants to evaluate program success, online surveys every three years, and scientific surveys every ten years (starting from the Parks Master Plan survey of 2006). Policy PR -5.2.3: The City will develop regular procedures to provide opportunities for park user and neighborhood consultation in the planning and design of park and recreation facilities improvements and new parks and programs. Policy PR -5.2.4: The City will develop a full update on the Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan at least once every ten years, to coincide with a scientific survey of residents' park and recreation needs. Policy PR -5.2.5: The Parks and Recreation annual Capital Improvement Plan will be provided to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for their review and comment. The Board may request presentations on park projects, on a project by project basis, and have 60 days to review and provide comments and recommendations. Objective PR -5.3: Continue to increase public safety and security within City parks. Policy PR -5.3.1: The City will continue to equip all parks with adequate energy efficient night lighting as parks are updated with improvements and will continue to use remote computer scheduling of lighting in order to advance energy efficiency in the park system. Policy PR -5.3.2: Citywide and neighborhood parks will increase their hours of operation and enhance their programs, whenever feasible, so as to encourage a greater public presence in the parks. Policy PR -5.3.3: The City's Police Department will continue to work with neighborhood residents to create and support community crime watch groups to assist in park safety and crime prevention. Policy PR -5.3.4: The City will continue regular, uniformed police patrols and presence in and around Citywide and neighborhood parks. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 98 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -5.3.5: In all parks with active recreation the City will maintain an adequate number of trained staff based on standards recognized by professional organizations such as the Florida Recreation and Park Association or the National Recreation and Park Association, and on a regular basis will conduct safety inspections of equipment and structural facilities. Policy PR -5.3.6: The City will disseminate information to the public on proper safety procedures that are to be followed while using park facilities. Policy PR -5.3.7: When parks are being renovated or designed, the City will evaluate the park's safety, consulting with park users, neighborhood residents, and the police whether high fences, gates, or other obtrusive security measures remain necessary. includina. but not limited to Police. Fire -Rescue. and NET Service facilities with Goal PR -6: Develop and enhance the quality of parks and open spaces within the City's downtown and other neighborhoods in a manner that meets the Level of Service standard and addresses the needs of City residents, workers and visitors, and strengthens the City's economic development. Objective PR -6.1: Implement the NET Area Visions in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan, using the NET Area Implementation Tasks and Park Opportunities section of the Plan as a guide to enhancing and expanding Citywide and neighborhood parks, recreational facilities and programs. Policy PR -6.1.1: The City will annually review implementation sections of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan to include implementation actions in developing an annual work plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation facilities and programs. Policy PR -6.1.2: The City will work to implement the specific master plans that include parks and recreation facilities, such as the Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan, the Museum Park Master Plan, and the Virginia Key Master Plan, and create pedestrian and water linkages among Fern Isle Park, Sewell Park, the recently acquired Police Benevolent Association property, and Curtis Park to create a Miami "Central Park." As depicted in the Waterfront Master Plan and programmed in the CIE, the City will provide a continuous network of public parks and major attractions along the downtown waterfront. Policy PR -6.1.3: The City will continue to redevelop Lummus Park in the Riverside District to provide an activity/program center for history, riverfront activities and recreational facilities for visitors and City residents. Policy PR -6.1.4: By December 2020, tThe City will consider the createion of a specialty "Fishermen's Wharf' cafe district and marine services center in the Riverside District along N.W. North River Drive on the Miami River. Objective PR -6.2: Improve and enhance public spaces and linkages in the City. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 99 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy PR -6.2.1: The City will continue to encourage development of urban street promenade linkages with widened sidewalks, high quality materials, shade trees, landscaping, lighting, graphics and furnishings. Policy PR -6.2.2: The City will continue to work toward improving landscaping and pedestrian -oriented amenities along major boulevards, including Biscayne Boulevard, Brickell Avenue, and North 1st Avenue, and other major transportation corridors, to create distinctive images and unifying elements between downtown districts. Policy PR -6.2.3: The City will continue to work towards enhancement of public spaces (entrances, plazas, lobbies, courtyards and atriums) and gateways through artwork. The City will use, whenever appropriate, the "Art in Public Places" allocation in public facility construction budgets as well as the assistance of the County Arts Council staff, the expertise of other Boards/ Councils, aR4 The City will encourage private organizations to construct civic monuments at gateway locations. Goal PR -7: Develop public parks and open spaces that are aesthetically appealing and enhance the character and image of the City. Objective PR -7.1: Improve the aesthetic qualities of parks and recreation facilities. Policy PR -7.1.1: The City will use the design principles in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan as a basic framework for the design and redesign of parks and park improvements, and prepare more specific design guidelines as needed. Policy PR -7.1.2: The Parks and Recreation Department will continue to have landscape architects on staff who have knowledge of best practices in park and recreation facility design and will be employed to design park improvements, and to review and monitor park design projects, when designers are retained on contract. Goal PR -8: Encourage the development of high quality cultural arts facilities and programs within the City. Objective PR -8.1: Continue to develop and support cultural districts, facilities and programs. Policy PR -8.1.1: The City will continue to support development of a downtown cultural arts district as described in the proposed Downtown Master Plan, through land development regulations and other strategies. Policy PR -8.1.2: The City will support cultural and heritage programs and facilities in selected areas of the City such as, but not restricted to, Overtown, the Design District, and Little Havana, including small performing arts venues, heritage trails, street fairs, and similar programs, through land development regulations and other strategies. Goal PR -9: Establish sustainable and green practices in park design, maintenance, building, planting and energy efficiency. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 100 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective PR -9.1: Protect and restore native plant communities, where feasible and appropriate, and provide educational programs and interpretive signage about South Florida environments. Policy PR -9.1.1: The City will continue its program of native plant protection and restoration and elimination of exotic plants at Simpson Park and the Virginia Key nature area; expand this program to the conservation area at Wainwright Park; restore native vegetation in woodland, shoreline and streamfront edges of parks, where appropriate; establish, where appropriate, native plantings that require limited water and fertilizer in parks; and establish native plantings in public road, rail, drainage and utility corridors that are not suitable for pedestrian and recreation access. Policy PR -9.1.2: The City will continue to establish and maintain coastal hammock exhibit plantings as part of environmental education programs and exhibits in community parks. Policy PR -9.1.3: The City will continue to promote the planting and preservation of native species by property owners in the City through educational materials and programs. Through its NET Offices the City will assist and participate in tree planting events to promote preservation of the environment and provide educational materials for the public. Objective PR -9.2: Introduce sustainable and energy-efficient materials and methods in park maintenance and operations. Policy PR -9.2.1: The City will employ life -cycle costing to evaluate costs of new park structures and make efforts to incorporate energy- and water -efficient methods and materials, in new and renovated park structures including the use of green roofs, solar panels, and other innovative approaches. Policy PR -9.2.2: The City will implement best management practices such as water conservation, integrated pest management, water conservation, elimination of toxic chemicals, and similar sustainable practices. Policy PR -9.2.3: The City will implement to all pesticide and herbicide methods of application for all sodded areas compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 101 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 COASTAL MANAGEMENT Goal CM -1: Maintain, protect, and enhance the quality of life and appearance of Miami's Coastal Zone including the preservation of natural resources as well as the enhancement of the built environment. Objective CM -1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems including wetlands and beach/dune systems within Virginia Key and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries; and improve water quality within the Miami River, its tributaries, and the Little River. Policy CM -1.1.1: As a precondition to the development or redevelopment of Virginia Key, a comprehensive assessment will be made of environmental hazards that are the result of past disposal activities at the Virginia Key landfill and other relevant environmental concerns. Such assessment will be made in cooperation with appropriate County, State and Federal environmental agencies, and an action plan to reduce or eliminate any hazards will be formulated. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -1.1.1.) Policy CM -1.1.2: The City will retrofit the number of storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -1.1.2 and Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -2.2.1.) Policy CM -1.1.3: [Reserved] Policy CM -1.1.4: The City will encourage the reduction in point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay through coordination with the Miami River Commission, Miami -Dade County DERM, the South Florida Water Management District, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and any other appropriate state and federal agencies in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay. Policy CM -1.1.5: Within the Coastal Zone, or along the Miami and Little Rivers, no land uses which represent a likely and significant source of pollution to surface waters will be permitted, unless measures which substantially eliminate the threat of contamination are implemented as conditions for approval of development or redevelopment. Policy CM -1.1.6: The City will adhere to Miami -Dade County DERM standards and require DERM approvals in its permitting procedures to ensure that all fuel storage facilities in the Coastal Zone or near major canals do not pose a significant threat to water quality. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 102 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -1.1.7: The City will regulate development on Virginia Key and the intermittent wetland areas of the coast of Coconut Grove to ensure that there will be no net loss of functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degraded or disrupted; that when non-native vegetation is removed, it will be replaced with native species; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be protected. Priority will be given to water dependent land uses, and to development that enhances the natural environment and ensures adequate physical public access to Virginia Key. Policy CM -1.1.8: Because of its unique character and environmental significance, all development on Virginia Key will be in conformance with the 1987 Virginia Key Master Plan and/or any subsequent plans for Virginia Key that have been or might be adopted by the City and, if necessary, the preparation of an updated plan. Policy CM -1.1.9: Site development criteria will ensure that development or redevelopment within the Coastal Zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access to the City's natural resources. Policy CM -1.1.10: [Resei:�ed�The City will continue to follow and enforce the Florida Building Code, which establishes construction standards that minimize the impacts of man-made structures on beach and dune systems. Policy CM -1.1.11: All City owned property within the Coastal Zone that may be identified as areas of significant or unique natural resources will be designated as Environmental Preservation Districts, and the City will also consider designating private properties within the coastal with significant or unique natural resources as Environmental Preservation Districts. Policy CM -1.1.12: The City will continue to implement and enforce that all new and renovated marinas meet marina siting requirements and receive appropriate county, state, and federal approvals in the land development regulations. Policy CM -1.1.13: The City will continue to work with the appropriate agencies to support provisions of the committee that prevent new development and redevelopment along the shorelines from directly discharging storm water runoff into surface waters and to get support for state and county funding for any infrastructure improvements deemed necessary to support development of Virginia Key and Watson Island. Policy CM -1.1.14: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in fostering the protection of coastal wildlife and wildlife habitat through the protection of nesting areas, the establishment of wildlife corridors, the protection of travel corridors, and the promotion of public awareness of wildlife resources. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 103 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -1.1.15: The City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County in the implementation of any antidegradation targets developed to protect Outstanding Florida Waters and Outstanding National Resources Waters of Biscayne Bay. Objective CM -1.2: The City will continue to follow and enforce the Florida Building Code, which establishes construction standards that minimize the impacts of man- made structures on beaGh and dune syst within the Coastal areas of the City to reduce the flood risk that result from high tide events, storm surge, storm surge, flash floods, storm water runoff, and other related impacts of sea level rise. (201511); Policy CM -1.2.1: The City will increase inspection and code enforcement efforts for coastal area construction to ensure the proper standards are met to remove coastal real property from FEMA flood zone designations (201511). Policy CM -1.2.2: The City will be consistent with or more stringent than the flood resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and the federal flood plain management regulations (2015 1) Policy CM -1.2.3: Construction seaward of the coastal construction control line will be consistent with Chapter 161, of the Florida Statutes (201511) Objective CM -1.3: In order to enhance the built environment of the coastal area, redevelop and revitalize blighted, declining, or threatened coastal areas. Policy CM -1.3.1: The City will continue to adhere to its established policies regarding the designation of Community Redevelopment Districts in appropriate coastal areas of the city. Policy CM -1.3.2: Through increased citywide code enforcement of coastal areas with deteriorated conditions the City will report any structures in severe condition to the unsafe structures board to either force improvements or facilitate the demolition of the structure. Policy CM -1.3.3: The City will participate in the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for city residents. (201511) Objective CM -1.4: Ensure that land development regulations and policies for the Coastal Zone are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards and those needed to maintain or enhance the quality of life within the Coastal Zone of the city. (See Capital Improvements Objective CI -1.2.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 104 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -1.4.1: The Coastal Zone of the City will adhere to the level of service standards as adopted and amended in the Capital Improvements Element, and more specifically Policy CI -1.2.3 of that element. Policy CM -1.4.2: Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and refined by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, &ha4 will be taken into consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and development of infrastructure and public facilities in the City. (See related policy CI -1.2.6) Goal CM -2: Improve public awareness, appreciation, and use of Miami's coastal resources by preserving water -dependent and water -related uses, ensuring adequate public access to such uses, and minimizing user conflicts. Objective CM -2.1: Wherever feasible, increase, physical and visual public access to Biscayne Bay, the Miami River, the City's shorelines, and publicly -owned islands. Policy CM -2.1.1: Where appropriate and in the interest of public safety and promotion of outdoor recreation opportunities on environmentally sensitive areas, future land development regulations will require non -water dependent or related development or redevelopment to maintain public access to the coastal and Miami River shorelines. (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR -3.2.4) Policy CM -2.1.2: Where appropriate, City owned waterfront property, including the Miami River shorelines, &ha4 will provide for public open spaces that allow similar access to County owned public open spaces that provide access to the shoreline where appropriate. Policy CM -2.1.3: The City will continue development of the river walk and bay walk along City owned property as funds become available and will continue to require development of the bay walk and river walk along private property through its land development regulations. Policy CM -2.1.4: The City &ha4 will continue to implement design guidelines along the baywalk and riverwalk in accordance with the Miami River Greenway Action Plan and other adopted plans as appropriate. Policy CM -2.1.5: [Reserved] Policy CM -2.1.6: The City will incorporate provisions for public physical and/or visual access to the shoreline in its waterfront zoning regulations (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR- 3.2.3.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 105 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -2.1.7: As specified in the City of Miami Charter and related laws, and more specifically the Waterfront Charter Amendment and Ordinance Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami all new development and redevelopment along the downtown waterfront is required to provide a waterfront setback, and those developments within Special Districts (SDs) that require publicly accessible shoreline walkways, will design them in conformance with the "Baywalk/Riverwalk Design Standards." (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR- 3.2.11.) Policy CM -2.1.8: The City will continue to work toward increased physical public access to Virginia Key and Watson Island by pursuing appropriate development and redevelopment as directed by the Virginia Key and Watson Island master plans. Policy CM -2.1.9: The City will ensure that development regulations are not altered so as to prohibit water dependent facilities or uses such as swimming, boating, and fishing and will encourage and support such facilities and uses. Objective CM -2.2: [Reserved] Policy CM -2.2.1: [Reserved] Policy CM -2.2.2: [Reserved] Goal CM -3: Pursuant to Section 163.3178(2)(8), F.S., The City shag will maintain strategies that will be used to preserve and adequate supply of land for recreational and commercial Working Waterfront uses defined in £hSection. 342.07, F.S.3 Objective CM -3.1: The City sha4 will strive to allow no net loss of acreage devoted to recreational and commercial Working Waterfront uses in the coastal area of the City of Miami. Policy CM -3.1.1: The comprehensive plan and land development regulations will encourage water -dependent uses along the shoreline, and strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and commercial Working Waterfronts as defined in Section 342.07, F.S., particularly on the Miami River. (See Goal PA -3 and Policy LU - 1.3.3). Goal CM -4: Ensure public safety and the protection of property within the Coastal Zone from the threat of hurricanes. Objective CM -4.1: Minimize the potential for loss of human life and the destruction of property from hurricanes. 3 Additional strategies to preserve and encourage recreational and commercial Working Waterfront uses are contained in the Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities element, 'Port of Miami River" Sub -element. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 106 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -4.1.1: Enforce building code standards that protect against the destruction of structures by hurricane winds. aP4 tidal swells, and storm surge. Policy CM -4.1.2: Continue to direct population away from the Coastal High Hazard Area, which is defined as the areas below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line, as established by a Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model pursuant to Section 163.3178(2)(h) F.S. (200617), as depicted on the CHHA map in Appendix CM -1. (See map following Appendix CM -1.) Policy CM -4.1.3: The City s4a-k-wi continue to implement measures for the protection of City owned historic properties from destruction in the event of a major storm, and plans for each site's restoration in the event of destruction or major damage will remain in effect. Policy CM -4.1.4: Immediately subsequent to the event of a major storm, the adequacy of existing building standards and the appropriateness of land uses and development regulations in the Coastal High Hazard Area will be reviewed, and all modifications to standards, zoning or land use policies required to reduce future risk of loss of life and property damage will be adopted prior to the approval of long term, post disaster redevelopment plans. Policy CM -4.1.5: Each proposed future land use map change within the Coastal High Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a hurricane. Policy CM -4.1.6: [Reserved] Policy CM -4.1.7: The City will incorporate into its Comprehensive Plan any relevant recommendations of interagency hazard mitigation reports as they become available. Policy CM -4.1.8: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies to adopt plans and policies that protect public and private property and human lives from the effects of natural disasters. Policy CM -4.1.9: The City will work in cooperation with regional and state agencies in the preparation of advance plans for the safe evacuation of coastal residents. Policy CM -4.1.10: The City will adhere to its "EM8Fg8RGY GpeFat ens Plan fnr G „ I aef e in WaF aR d N -a Fal EMKgGRGies" and "The EGFgGRGY PFE)G d Fes aR al Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, Hurricane Plan, and Debris Management Plan" for immediate repair and cleanup actions needed to protect public health and safety. The City will update these manuals on an annual basis. Policy CM -4.1.11: The City will work with the Division of Emergency Management whose responsibility it is to ensure the preparation of updated regional hurricane evacuation plans. (200616) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 107 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective CM -4.2: The City will adhere to and cooperate with the County in executing evacuation procedures as well as annually update information and procedural brochures for the public; these brochures will contain information on evacuation procedures and routes, and will be distributed to city residents at local businesses and government agencies. Policy CM -4.2.1: The City's fire and police departments will continue to work with Miami -Dade County and regional emergency agencies to update and revise, as needed coordinated peacetime emergency and evacuation plans. Policy CM -4.2.2: The City will annually update and distribute an informational brochure to establish public awareness and information programs that educate as to the need for evacuation, and indicate evacuation routes and procedures. This Information will be available at the City's NET Offices. Policy CM -4.2.3: The City will follow the County in providing appropriate evacuation route markers within City boundaries as part of a Countywide coordinated program. Objective CM -4.3: Minimize the potential for loss of human life and destruction of property from hurricanes in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Policy CM -4.3.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard area will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Capital Improvements Policy CI -1.4.1.) Policy CM -4.3.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the Coastal High Hazard Area intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public health and safety from storm damage. (See Capital Improvements Policy CI -1.4.2.) Policy CM -4.3.3: Each proposed future land use map change to a residential land use category within the Coastal High Hazard area of the city will require an analysis of its potential impact on evacuation times and shelter needs in the event of a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Policy CM -4.3.4: Proposed future land use map changes to a residential land use category within the Coastal High Hazard Area &ha4 will only be approved if one of the following standards is met: A no greater than 16 hour level of service for out of county hurricane evacuation is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale; Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 108 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 A no greater than 12 hour evacuation time to shelter is maintained for a category 5 storm event as measured on the Saffir-Simpson scale and shelter space reasonably expected to accommodate the residents of the development contemplated by the proposed comprehensive plan amendment is available; or Appropriate mitigation is provided that will satisfy the provisions of subparagraph a. or subparagraph b. Appropriate mitigation &ha4 will include, without limitation, payment of money, that will be used towards mitigation ro'ect s ,contribution of land, and construction of hurricane shelters and transportation facilities. Required mitigation s4a4-will not exceed the amount required for the development to accommodate impacts reasonably attributable to development. The City and applicant for the plan amendment &ha4 will enter into a binding agreement to memorialize the mitigation plan. Policy CM -4.3.5: The City &4a4 -will consider the use of undeveloped land in the Coastal High Hazard Area for public or private recreational uses and open space. Policy CM -4.3.6: The City will prohibit the construction of new mobile home parks in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Goal CM -5: Preserve and protect the heritage of the City of Miami through the identification, evaluation, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, restoration and public awareness of Miami's historic, architectural and archaeological resources. (See Land Use Goal LU -2.) Objective CM -5.1: Maintain, update and "'tee amplify the Miami Register of Historic Places, to increase the number of eligible designated properties. Continue to survev orooerties and identifv areas of the Citv that are eliaible for historic designation. and evaluetes the-Gi# eferOG, aFGhEtee eel^giGal FesGUFGes. (See Land Use Objective LU -2.1.) Policy CM -5.1.1: The City will continue conduct further surveys of contributing and Policy LU -2.1.1.) o identify potential historic districts and noncontributing buildings. (See Land Use Policy CM -5.1.2: The City will continue to maintain a computerized database of all relevant information for all sites i„the Miami _Dago r9 Rty H FtOF'G cdesignated sites in the Miami Register of Historic Places.. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.1.2.) Policy CM -5.1.3: The City has designated numerous historic sites and historic districts pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Miami City Code. The City will continue to designate sites and districts as appropriate and warranted. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.3.2.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 109 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CM -5.1.4: The City will continue to review nominations to the National Register of Historic Places through the Certified Local Government Program. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.3.1.) Policy CM -5.1.5: The City will continue to include information on the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.5.4). Objective CM -5.2: Increase the number of historic structures that have been preserved, rehabilitated or restored, according to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (See Land Use Objective LU -2.4.) Policy CM -5.2.1: The City will continue to utilize the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as the minimum standards for preservation of historic properties. To receive public financial support from the City, designated privately owned structures must meet these standards. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.4.2.) Policy CM -5.2.2: The City currently owns historic sites and other potential archaeological sites. If it is deemed in the public interest for the City to transfer title of City properties of historic, architectural, or archaeological significance, such transfer will include restrictive covenants to ensure the protection and preservation of such properties. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.4.3.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 110 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION Goal NR -1: Maintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural and man made environment and amenities (200815) ~^`�^rc�vrirces within the context of the city's urban environment. Objective NR -1.1: Preserve and protect the existing natural systems within Virginia Key, the Dinner Key spoil islands, and those portions of Biscayne Bay that lie within the City's boundaries. Policy NR -1.1.1: The City &ha4 will continue to take actions to protect and restore the natural environment of Virginia Key in cooperation with appropriate County, State and Federal environmental agencies. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -1.1.1.) Policy NR -1.1.2: The City will continue retrofitting the number of storm water outfalls that discharge into the Miami River and its tributaries, the Little River and directly into Biscayne Bay in accordance with water quality improvement programs and adopted plans. If positive drainage systems to these water bodies are deemed to be the only feasible method of maintaining adequate storm drainage, then these storm sewers will be designed and constructed to retain grease and oil and minimize pollutant discharges. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy 2.2.1 and Coastal Management Policy CM -1.1.2.) Policy NR -1.1.3: [Reserved] Policy NR -1.1.4: The City will continue to participate in the State funded SWIM program for funding support in order to reduce point and non -point sources of pollution into Biscayne Bay. Policy NR -1.1.5: Regulate development on Virginia Key to ensure that there will be no net loss of functional wetlands; that beaches and dune systems on the island will not be degraded or disrupted; and that wildlife habitats and native species of fauna and flora will be protected. Policy NR -1.1.6: Through land development regulations, ensure that development or redevelopment within the Coastal Zone will not adversely affect the natural environment or lead to a net loss of public access or public use of public owned property (consistent with protection of natural systems) to the city's natural resources. Policy NR -1.1.7: The City will increase code enforcement to prevent illegal disposal of hazardous waste into the city's natural resources such as the Miami River and Biscayne Bay, and will encourage Miami -Dade County to approve and post signs warning against illegal disposal. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 111 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy NR -1.1.8: The City will work with, and support the County's efforts to identify generators of hazardous waste, and to develop and enforce procedures for the proper collection and disposal of hazardous waste. The City will support Miami -Dade County's development of a hazardous waste temporary storage facility in a non -populated area. (See Solid Waste Collection Policy SW -1.2.4.) Objective NR -1.2: Improve the water quality of, and ensure health safety within, the Miami River, its tributaries and the Little River. Policy NR -1.2.1: The City will continue to work with the Biscayne Bay Management Plan Committee and with the appropriate agencies in order to encourage and support Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management in the monitoring of contaminants within these water bodies and to ensure that the City is kept adequately informed of environmental conditions. Policy NR -1.2.2: Continue to implement the Biscayne Bay Management Plan and other relevant plans in order to reduce the level of contaminants in these water bodies and improve the water quality within them. Policy NR -1.2.3: Participate in state and federally funded programs to remove abandoned and repair leaking underground fuel storage tanks on City owned properties. Policy NR -1.2.4: The City of Miami will continue to cooperate with the Miami River Commission, which has been granted broad powers over environmental and other issues related to the Miami River by state statute. Among the issues to be addressed by the commission are those related to acceptable water quality standards for the Miami River and its tributaries. The City of Miami will cooperate with the Miami River Commission in establishing such standards and, to the extent feasible, achieving them. Objective NR -1.3: Maintain and enhance the status of native species of fauna and flora. Policy NR -1.3.1: Continue and, where necessary, expand the use of scenic corridor and Environmental Preservation District designation. Policy NR -1.3.2: Identify City -owned land with significant native vegetative features or wildlife habitats, and designate those areas as Environmental Preservation Districts. Policy NR -1.3.3: Continue designating private properties with significant or unique resources as Environmental Preservation Districts. Policy NR -1.3.4: Review development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features, wildlife or marine life, and establish regulations that reduce or mitigate such impacts. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 112 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy NR -1.3.5: Through the development review and approval process, ensure that off-site mitigation for disruption or degradation of significant natural resources occurs in an orderly and sound manner, so as to maximize benefits to the overall natural system. Policy NR -1.3.6: Through the development review process, deny the use of intrusive exotic plant species, require the removal of existing prohibited species, encourage the use of native plant species, and those species that do not require the excessive use of fertilizers, excessive watering, are not prone to insect infestation or disease, and do not have invasive root systems. Policy NR -1.3.7: Permit applications for all boating facilities located on city shorelines &ha4 will be evaluated in the context of their cumulative impact on manatees and marine resources. Policy NR -1.3.8: Slow or idle speed zones &ha4 will be adopted in areas frequented by manatees and enforcement of speed zones will be improved. Policy NR -1.3.9: To the extent that there are wetlands on the Resources of Regional Significance, State Save Our Rivers, or Dade County Environmentally Endangered Lands acquisition lists within the City of Miami, consideration will be given to public acquisition and management of such properties when such actions are feasible. Objective NR -1.4: Maintain, protect and enhance the City's tree canopy and significant trees. Policy NR -1.4.1: The City will continue to protect the tree canopy and significant trees through the Tree Protection Ordinance. Policy NR -1.4.2: The City will work with public and private partners to achieve the 2007 Tree Master Plan goal of 30% tree canopy coverage citywide by December 2020. Policy NR -1.4.3: The City will develop an ordinance describing criteria for designation of City of Miami Historic Trees, procedures for nomination of a Miami Historic Tree, and procedures for official designation and signage identifying Miami Historic Trees. Policy NR -1.4.4: The City will work with public and private partners to coordinate Community Education Workshops to increase knowledge regarding the importance of trees and an urban tree canopy, as well as how to maintain, protect and restore existing trees within the City of Miami. Policy NR -1.4.5: By December 2020, the City will create an "Urban Canopy Program" for developers incentivizing local developers to contribute positively and effectively to the City's Tree Master Plan efforts. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 113 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Obiectivel NR -1.5: Maintain, preserve, enhance and restore Energy Conservation. 200815 Policy NR -1.5.1: The City will consider urban design, water and energy conservation and wildlife habitat when designing sites and selecting landscape material for all public projects. (200815) Policy NR -1.5.2: The City will facilitate contiguous urban development, infill, redevelopment of substandard or underdeveloped urban areas, moderate to high intensity activity centers, mass transit supportive development, and mixed-use protects to promote energy conservation. (200815) Policy NR -1.5.3: City of Miami will promote energy conservation by encouraging builders, remodelers, homeowners and homebuyers to implement Florida Green Building Coalition green home or other acceptable environmental standards and by encouraging site planners and land developers to implement Florida Green Building Coalition development standards. (200815) Goal NR -2: Maintain an adequate and safe supply of water for the city residents. Objective NR -2.1: Ensure adequate levels of safe potable water are available to meet the needs of the city. (See Potable Water Objective PW -1.2.) Policy NR -2.1.1: In periods of regional water shortage, the City will support the South Florida Water Management District's policies and regulations regarding water conservation. Policy NR -2.1.2: The City will continue to enforce Florida Building Code requirements for the on-site retention of the first inch of storm water runoff. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -2.2.5.) Policy NR -2.1.3: The City will continue to support the South Florida Water Management District efforts to monitor the water levels at the salinity control structures within the city to prevent against further saltwater intrusion and protect the aquifer recharge areas and cones of influence of wellfields from contamination. (See Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Policy AR -1.1.3.) Policy NR -2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, countywide system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 114 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Potable Water Policy PW -1.1.1.) Policy NR -2.1.5: Ensure potable water supplies meet the established level of service standards for transmission capacity as set in the Capital Improvements Element. (See Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.1 and Capital Improvements Policy CI -1.2.3.) Policy NR -2.1.6: [Reserved] Policy NR -2.1.7: The City adopted an Updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (contained in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP) for a 20 -year planning period, from 2014 to 2033, that is consistent with the current South Florida Water Management District Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Updates approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan (See Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.2.) Policy NR -2.1.8: The City will continue to practice water conservations measures (i.e. new residential and commercial development will be required to install high efficiency plumbing fixtures and appliances) that are enforced through Chapter 8 — Building Code and 32 — Water and Sewer Regulations, of the Miami Dade County Code of Ordinances, updated September 2, 2008. Policy NR -2.1.9: The City will continue to implement the same or more stringent water conservation measures as provided through Chapter 8 — Building Code (updated September 2, 2008), Chapter 32 — Water and Sewer Regulations (updated September 2, 2008), and Chapter 18A and 18B — Landscape Ordinance (updated May 5, 2009), of the Miami -Dade County Code of Ordinances. Goal NR -3: Attain and maintain a degree of air quality that is safe and to meet all attainment standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for the city as a whole. Objective NR -3.1: Improve the monitoring of air quality within areas perceived to have the highest potential for air quality problems. Policy NR -3.1.1: The City &h@4 will continue working with County, State and federal environmental agencies to ensure that the number of air quality monitoring stations maintained by these agencies are sufficient to ensure accurate ongoing monitoring of air quality standards. Objective NR -3.2: Prevent the degradation of ambient air quality within the city. Policy NR -3.2.1: Establish vehicular transportation patterns that reduce the concentration of pollutants in areas known to have ambient air quality problems. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 115 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy NR -3.2.2: The City of Miami continues to support the provision of efficient transit and paratransit services that serve existing and future trip generators and attractors, the provision of safe and convenient transit passenger transfer terminal facilities, and the accommodation of the special needs of the City of Miami's population. Therefore, the City of Miami will support Miami -Dade County in the provision of these essential transit services. (See Transportation Objective 1.5) Policy NR -3.2.3: The City will work with the Miami -Dade County transportation planning agencies to continue to increase the quality of transit services within the city. Policy NR -3.2.4: The City will work with the appropriate federal, state, regional, and county agencies to ensure that owners of buildings and facilities with unacceptable levels of asbestos (according to EPA and State Standards) in ambient air test remove, treat and seal asbestos -containing materials as long as this action will not cause further degradation to the air quality. Policy NR -3.2.5: The City will monitor developers to ensure that they appropriately treat exposed construction areas by means such as mulching, spraying or grass coverings, to minimize air pollution. Policy NR -3.2.6: The City will reduce human exposure to air pollution by taking into consideration climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies from the recommendations of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with all applicable regulations. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 116 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 EDUCATION GOAL EDU -1: DEVELOP, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF PUBLIC EDUCATION BY MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY AND OTHER APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, WHICH WILL STRIVE TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO THE CITIZENRY OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Objective EDU -1.1: Work towards the reduction of the overcrowding which currently exists in the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, while striving to attain an optimum level of service pursuant to Objective EDU -1.2. Provide additional solutions to overcrowding so that citywide enrollment in Miami -Dade County's public schools will meet state requirements for class size by September 1 2010. Policy EDU -1.1.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to continue to provide new student stations through the Capital Outlay program, in so far as funding is available. Policy EDU -1.1.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to develop ar,d 'mplemeRt altemative compact educational facilities, such as primary learning centers, or early childhood centers, which can be constructed on small parcels of land or within high rise buildings in urban areas and relieve overcrowding at elementary schools, in so far as funding and rules permit. The City will assist the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to identify vacant parcels that can be utilized for such construction and obtain community input. Policy EDU -1.1.3: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to provide public school facilities to the students in the City, which operate at optimum capacity, in so far as funding available. Operational alternatives may be developed and implemented, where appropriate, which mitigate the impacts of overcrowding while maintaining the instructional integrity of the educational program. Policy EDU -1.1.4: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to maintain and/or improve the established level of service (LOS), for Public Educational Facilities, as established for the purposes of school concurrency. Policy EDU -1.1.5: The Miami -Dade County School Board (School Board) comments &ha4 will be sought and considered on comprehensive plan amendments and other land use and zoning decisions which could impact the school district 'H nrdor to be GGRSISJt8Ht With the terR�S f th® State mandated IRterinnal gFE?em®nt p irs rant to BDITJrTI, Continue 1913.33 and 163 `2'1777 Clnrida gtati iter (2011/74) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 117 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy EDU -1.1.6: Capital improvement programming by the Miami -Dade Public Schools should be based on future enrollment projections and demographic shifts and targeted to enhance the effectiveness of the learning environment. The future enrollment projections should utilize student population projections based on information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating conferences pursuant to Section 216.136, Florida Statutes, where available, as modified by the School Board based on development data and agreement with the City of Miami, the State Office of Educational Facilities and the State SMART Schools Clearinghouse. The School Board may request adjustment to the estimating conferences' projections to reflect actual enrollment and development trends. In formulating such a request, the School Board will coordinate with the City regarding development trends and future population projections. Policy EDU -1.1.7: The City will through the Staff Working Group of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility coordinate with Miami -Dade County Public Schools, and applicable Cities to review any the Education Element and school enrollment projections. Objective EDU -1.2: The City of Miami sW will coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school facilities4 consistent with the adopted level of service standards for public school concurrency, to ensure the inclusion of those projects necessary to address existing deficiencies in the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements, and meet future needs based upon achieving and maintaining the adopted level of service standards throughout the planning period. Policy EDU -1.2.1: Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard for all Miami -Dade County public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS Standard, &hail will be applicable in each public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance boundary established by the Miami - Dade County Public Schools. Policy EDU -1.2.2: It is the goal of Miami -Dade County Public Schools and The City of Miami for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired 100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami -Dade County Public Schools should continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution2. 4 Level of Service standards for public school facilities to those traditional educational facilities, owned and operated by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, that are required to serve the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. Level of Service standards do not apply to charter schools. However, the capacity of both charter and magnet schools will be credited against the impact of development. No credit against the impact of development s4;a44 will be given for either magnet or charter schools if their district wide enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH Capacity Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 118 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 ■ ■ - Will ■ �t�:T�tJ �- Policy EDU -1.2.3: In the event the adopted LOS standard of a CSA cannot be met as a result of a proposed development's impact, the development may proceed provided at least one of the following conditions is met: 1.2.3.1: The development's impact can be shifted to one or more adjacent CSAs that have available capacity located, either in whole or in part, within the same Geographic Areas (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, or Southeast, see Figures 1A, 2A and 3C within Appendix EDU -1) as the proposed development; or 1.2.3.2: The development's impact is mitigated, proportionate to the demand for public schools it created, through a combination of one or more proportionate share mitigation options as defined in Section 163.3180 (13)(e)1, Florida Statutes. The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement, through mechanisms that include, one or more of the following: contribution of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility; or, the creation of a mitigation bank based on the construction of a permanent public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. The proportionate share mitigation agreement is subject to approval by Miami -Dade County School Board and Miami -Dade County Board of County Commission and must be identified in the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. 1.2.3.3: The development's impacts are phased to occur when sufficient capacity will be available. If none of the above conditions is met, the development s19 will not be approved. Policy EDU -1.2.4: Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) &ha4 will be delineated to: 1) maximize capacity utilization of the facility, 2) limit maximum travel times and reduce transportation costs, 3) acknowledge the effects of court -approved desegregation plans, 4) achieve socio-economic, racial, cultural and diversity objectives, and 5) achieve other relevant objectives as determined by the School Board's policy on maximization of capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by the School Board to achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the CSAs be considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place each year no later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning. Policy EDU -1.2.5: The City through the implementation of the concurrency management system and Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program for educational facilities, sha4 will ensure that existing deficiencies are addressed and Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 119 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 the capacity of schools is sufficient to support residential development at the adopted level of service (LOS) standards throughout the planning period in the 5 -year schedule of capital improvements. Policy EDU -1.2.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. Objective EDU -1.3: Obtain suitable sites for the development and expansion of public education facilities Policy EDU -1.3.1: In the selection of sites for future educational facility development, the City encourages the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to consider whether a school is in close proximity to residential areas and is in a location that would provide a logical focal point for community activities. Policy EDU -1.3.2: Where possible, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools should seek sites which are adjacent to existing or planned public recreation areas, community centers, libraries, or other compatible civic uses for the purpose of encouraging joint use facilities or the creation of logical focal points for community activity. Policy EDU -1.3.3: The City acknowledges and concurs that, when selecting a site, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools will consider if the site meets the minimum size criteria as recommended by the State Department of Education or as determined to be necessary for an effective educational environment. Policy EDU -1.3.4: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools should review the adequacy and proximity of other public facilities and services necessary to the site such as roadway access, transportation, fire flow and portable water, sanitary sewers, drainage, solid waste, police and fire services, and means by which to assure safe access to schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization.- Policy EDU -1.3.5: When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility the Miami Dade County Public Schools should consider whether the present and projected surrounding land uses are compatible with the operation of an educational facility. Policy EDU -1.3.6: The City &ha4 will encourage and cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their effort for public school siting reviews to help accomplish the objectives and policies of this element and other elements of the MCNP. The City sha4 will cooperate with the Public Schools to establish provisions for a scoping or pre - application meeting as part of the educational facilities review process, if determined to be warranted. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 120 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy EDU -1.3.7: The City will continue to cooperate with Miami -Dade County Public Schools in utilizing Miami -Dade County Public Schools as emergency shelters during county emergencies. Objective EDU -1.4: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools, in conjunction with the City of Miami and other appropriate agencies, will strive to improve security and safety for students and staff. Policy EDU -1.4.1: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the incidence of violence, weapons and vandalism on school campuses. Encourage the design of facilities, which do not encourage criminal behavior and provide clear sight lines from the street. Policy EDU -1.4.2: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to develop and/or implement programs and policies designed to reduce the number of incidents related to hazardous conditions as reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the fire marshal, the State Department of Education (DOE), and other appropriate sources. Policy EDU -1.4.3: Continue to cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to provide for the availability of alternative programs for at -risk students at appropriate public educational facilities. Policy EDU -1.4.4: Coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools and municipalities to provide for pedestrian and traffic safety in the area of schools, and signalization for educational facilities. Policy EDU -1.4.5: Coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of School Police and other law enforcement agencies, where appropriate, to improve and provide for a secure learning environment in the public schools and their vicinity. Policy EDU -1.4.6: Sensitivity and priority will be given to safe routes to schools for children. Objective EDU -1.5: Continue to develop programs and opportunities to bring the schools and community closer together. Policy EDU -1.5.1: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to provide "full service" schools, parent resource centers, adult and community schools and programs as appropriate. Policy EDU -1.5.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to continue to provide opportunities for community and business leaders to serve on committees and task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision of public educational facilities. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 121 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy EDU -1.5.3: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to continue to work with the development industry to encourage partnerships in the provision of sites and educational facilities including early childhood centers. Policy EDU -1.5.4: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools through agreement with appropriate agencies to increase medical, psychological, and social services for children and their families as appropriate. Objective EDU -1.6: Miami -Dade County Public Schools will continue to enhance effectiveness of the learning environment. Policy EDU -1.6.1: Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue the design and construction of educational facilities which create the perception of feeling welcome, secure and positive about the students' school environment and experiences. Policy EDU -1.6.2: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encouraged to continue to design and construct facilities which better provide student access to technology designed to improve learning, such as updated media centers and science laboratories. Policy EDU -1.6.3: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools is encourage, to continue to improve existing educational facilities, in so far as funding is available, through renovation and expansion to better accommodate increasing enrollment, new educational programs and other activities, both curricular and extra -curricular. Objective EDU -1.7: The School Board, the City, and other appropriate jurisdictions sW will establish and implement mechanism for ongoing coordination and communication, to ensure the adequate provision of public educational facilities. Policy EDU -1.7.1: The City &ha4 will coordinate and cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, the State, municipalities and other appropriate agencies to develop or modify rules and regulations in order to simplify and expedite proposed new educational facility developments and renovations. Policy EDU -1.7.2: The location of future educational facilities should occur where capacity of other public facilities and services is available to accommodate the infrastructure needs of the educational facility. Policy EDU -1.7.3: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools should coordinate school capital improvement plans with the planned capital improvement projects of other County and municipal agencies. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 122 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy EDU -1.7.4: The City sha4 will cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to ensure that they are not obligated to pay for off-site infrastructure in excess of their fair share of the costs. Policy EDU -1.7.5: f RESERVEDI ow the Ed lGatieRal merit and the Gi i will e�4cvv--m�caavarrvrtu���-rcr'rrarr�-mc�� ameH dmeRts, if RGGGs ap Policy EDU -1.7.6: The City &ha4 will seek to coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in formalizing criteria for appropriate sharing of responsibility for required off-site facility improvements attributable to construction of new public schools or expansion of existing ones. Policy EDU -1.7.7: The City &ha4 will coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools and Miami -Dade County to eliminate infrastructure deficiencies surrounding existing school sites. Policy EDU -1.7.8: The City and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools &ha4 will coordinate efforts to ensure the availability of adequate sites for the required educational facilities. Policy EDU -1.7.9: The City and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools &ha4 will coordinate the appropriate roles and responsibilities of affected governmental jurisdictions in ensuring the timely, orderly and efficient provision of adequate educational facilities. Policy EDU -1.7.10: The City will work with Miami -Dade County ; ' account for the infrastructure needs of new, planned or expanded educational facilities when formulation and implementing its own capital improvement plans. MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM In order to enable the preparation of the periodic Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) as required by Section 163.3191, {F -S.}, and Rule 9i 5 0053 P.A.G. (2011143), this section will outline the procedures for the monitoring and evaluating of the Element and its implementation. Monitoring Requirements The primary mechanism to monitor progress in achieving the objectives and policies in this Element is the collection and update of appropriate baseline data. Further, as required by Section 1013.31 F.S., the State Requirements for Educational Facilities, at least once every five (5) years the School Board sha4 will arrange for an educational plant survey to be conducted. This plant survey describes the current educational plants and the estimated capital outlay needs resulting from a systematic study of present education and ancillary plants. This study also addresses the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 123 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 future needs, including long range planning, to provide an appropriate education program and services for each student based on projected capital outlay FTE's (COFTE) approved or authorized for use by the Department of Education. This plaRt swp�ey will 'RG'ude data FegaFd'Rg existiRg faGilities and a five (5) Y8aF PF9j849H 9f studeRt populatieR. The writteR FepE)q from this 661 y Shall IRG1 ide the felle i , The information obtained from the educational plant survey will be used to generally monitor the progress of the objectives and policies contained in the Educational Element and will provide specific indicators for Objective EDU -1.1 and Objective EDU -1.4. The enforcement or adoption of interlocal agreements s49 will be explored as a means to help implement components of the Educational Element, and to coordinate the efficient provision of public educational facilities. The performance of any agreements related to objectives of this element will be monitored as they are set in place. Objective EDU -1.1 policies relating to the maintenance and improvement of specific level of service for public educational facilities, as specified in the Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance, &ha4 will be reviewed annually. Each year, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools will compare the official enrollment of the school system with the number of student stations available to determine the current operating LOS. Objective EDU -1.2 will be measured through an annual review of the latest adopted Miami - Dade County Public Schools Facility Work Program in order to determine if the adopted concurrency level of service standard (including the Interim LOS standards) is being achieved. The number of development orders approved, those disapproved and those that have achieved LOS standards through mitigation options will also be reviewed. Objective EDU -1.3 will be monitored through the annual inventory and assessment by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools of School Board owned property. The number of new sites &ha4 will be reported annually and in the full review period reported in the EAR. Objective EDU -1.4 will be monitored through the review and analysis of the statistics relating to school safety, as compiled annually, by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 124 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Division of Police. A review and analysis of new and existing reactive and proactive safety and crime prevention programs will also be conducted on an annual basis. Objective EDU -1.5 &ha4 will be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting and reviewing the progress and number of new and existing community oriented programs, including an enrollment analysis, by age and ethnicity, of adult, community and vocational programs. Objective EDU -1.6 &ha4 will be monitored by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools by reporting the number of educational facility enhancements such as media centers, art/music suite, and science laboratories. Objective EDU -1.7 will be addressed by implementing and tracking the development of appropriate mechanisms, including interlocal agreements and coordination efforts, which serve to expedite the provision or enhancement of public educational facilities. Monitoring methods may be added or deleted as circumstances and criteria evolve. Any significant modifications to the monitoring process will be dealt with, as appropriate, through the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan amendment process. Evaluation Available data regarding the various public educational facilities will be used to assess progress on specific objectives. In order to evaluate the level of service being provided, student capacity totals will be reviewed in comparison to student enrollment to determine the status of the current level of service being provided. Similarly, performance in terms of achieving other objectives can also be analyzed by tracking the number of completed capital projects, as well as the development and implementation of other programs associated with each objective. Results of these calculations and measures will be analyzed and changing circumstances and opportunities will be considered. Any actions, changes or modifications to the Goal, Objectives, and Policies will be explained in accordance with the results of this process of continued monitoring and evaluation. Any necessary changes will be made through the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan amendment process. Future Conditions Maps ( E)HGiGt8Ht With con+inn 1633177/17\ (g) Pinrda Statutes, Maps showing existing and future conditions are included in the element. A map series (Figures 1A, ''R and 3(; through 1D within Appendix EDU -1) indicate the public school and ancillary facility locations anticipated by as December 31, 20916. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 125 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Goal Cl -1: Adhere to sound fiscal management policies that ensure the timely provision of public capital facilities required to maintain existing public infrastructure, that meet the need for public facilities resulting from future development and redevelopment, and that enable the provision of public capital facilities that enhance the quality of life within the city. Objective CI -1.1: The Capital Improvements Element of the Comprehensive Plan will provide for the sound fiscal planning of capital facility needs and assess the financial capacity of the City to undertake capital improvement projects. Policy CI -1.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the city will be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment. The capital improvements schedule will cover a 5 -year period and identify whether projects are either funded or unfunded and given a level of priority for funding. Outside funding (funding from a developer, other government or funding pursuant to referendum) of these capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of a development agreement or interlocal agreement. (200512; 2011145; 2011176). Policy CI -1.1.2: All capital expenditures in excess of $5,000 per distinct project must appear within the CIE and CIP, with the exception of expenditures required to meet public emergencies or unforeseeable contractual obligations. Policy CI -1.1.3: The City will adopt a Capital Budget that corresponds to the first year of the CIE and CIP. Policy CI -1.1.4: As capital projects are incorporated into the CIE and CIP, consideration will be given to the elimination of public hazards, the elimination of shortfalls between the adopted level of service (LOS) standards and the existing capacity of public facilities; the impact of proposed capital projects on the capital and operating budgets of the City; the fiscal capacity of the City to meet future capital spending needs; the economic and social benefits to be generated by proposed projects; the environmental impacts of proposed projects; the public facility requirements of new development or redevelopment; consistency between proposed capital projects and the goals and objectives set forth in the various elements of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan; and the coordination between proposed City projects and those projects and programs of federal, state, and county agencies and the South Florida Water Management District and Miami -Dade County Public Schools. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 126 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CI -1.1.5: In the appropriation of capital funds priority will be given to the maintenance, repair and replacement of existing public capital facilities. Policy CI -1.1.6: All bond authorizations must be in conformance with the capital facilities needs, programs and expenditure requirements as expressed within the City's Capital Improvement Element. Policy CI -1.1.7: The City will continue to seek the advice of qualified counsel to ensure the proper timing of debt issuance and efficient management of its capital financing resources. Policy CI -1.1.8: Debt issuance timing, size, and amortization schedules will be planned and executed to maintain a level repayment and minimize fluctuations in the ad valorem tax rate. Policy CI -1.1.9: Competitive sale will be utilized whenever possible to assure that the City obtains the most competitive interest rate in the municipal markets. Policy CI -1.1.10: The City will maintain its long standing policy of avoiding the issuance of short term financing in the form of Bond Anticipation Notes, and Revenue Anticipation Notes, unless there is a compelling need or extraordinary circumstance for such interim financing. Policy CI -1.1.11: The ratio of net direct general obligation debt as a percentage of the assessed valuation of taxable property will not exceed 25% of the Charter -mandated limit of 15% of the assessed valuation, or 3.75% of assessed valuation. Policy CI -1.1.12: Total debt service payments as a percentage of the Combined General Fund, Enterprise Fund, and Debt Service Fund expenditures sha4 will not exceed 15%. Policy CI -1.1.13: To the greatest extent possible, capital projects financed through the issuance of general obligation bonds &49 will have an expected useful life commensurate with the period of the financing. Policy CI -1.1.14: Direct net general obligation and special obligation debt &ha4 will be maintained at below $a ;988 2,000 per capita. Policy CI -1.1.15: The City will seek to attain a bond rating of investment grade to ensure that its citizens benefit from the lowest possible interest rates on its bonds. Policy CI -1.1.16: The City will assist where possible Miami -Dade County Public Schools and Miami Dade County in providing school concurrency related capital improvements and seeking to expand the funding sources available to meet those requirements. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 127 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Objective CI -1.2: Ensure through the City's land development regulations that development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use &W will be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, adequate water supply, parks and recreation, Schools and transportation facilities, and that land use Fnan ohanges maintain the flnanAlal feasibility of the II GNP. (2011144 & 20111185) (See Coastal Management Objective CM -1.4 or Educational Objective EDU -1.2.) (2011/44 : 20 -dl Policy CI -1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use will be contingent upon the ability of existing or programmed public facilities to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard for the public facilities listed in Policy CI -1.2.3. for a 5 -year period (2011176). The public facilities to serve the new development or redevelopment &ha4 will be in place and available to serve new development as follows: a) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, potable water facilities and adequate water supply s49 will be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The concurrency requirement for sanitary sewer may be met through the use of onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems approved by the Department of Health. Prior to approval of a building permit or its functional equivalent, the city &ha4 will consult with the Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to determine whether the adequate water supplies to serve the new development will be available no later than the anticipated date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. Furthermore, MDWASD &ha4 will be responsible for monitoring the availability of water supplies for all water users of MDWASD and for implementing a system that links water supplies to the permitting of new development. W 1 Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 128 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 c) Transportation facilities &ha4 will be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no later than three (3) years after the issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation, consistent with the provisions of Objective TR -1.7 & related Policies and Policy TR -1.3.3 DnkG � If the funds in the CIE are insufficient to fully fund the transportation facility improvement required, the City may enter into a binding proportionate -share agreement sufficient to mitigate the impacts by paying for one or more improvements which will significantly benefit the impacted transportation system, which improvements sha4 will be adopted into the 5 year capital improvements schedule at the next annual CIE update. The City may also accept contributions from multiple applicants for a planned improvement if it maintains contributions in a separate account (2013110) d) Storm -sewer. Issuance of any development permit &4a4 will require compliance with the stormwater level of service standard. Policy 0-1.2.3: Acceptable Level of Service Standards for public facilities in the City of Miami are: a) Recreation and Open Space — Provide a municipally -owned park within a ten- minute barrier -free walk to park entrances by 72% of the city's population as measured by GIS pedestrian network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be defined as a one-half mile, barrier -free distance on a safe pedestrian route. Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a sidewalk or designated pedestrian route that may include crossing streets but does not encounter barriers such as walls or highway embankments that impede passage. Safe pedestrian routes include those that may include crossing of streets with speed limits of up to 40 mph. (See Parks, Recreation and Open Space Policy PR -1.1.4.). b) Potable Water Transmission Capacity — 92.05 gallons/ resident/ day. (See Potable Water Policy PW -1.2.1 and Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.5.). c) Sanitary Sewer Transmission Capacity — 141 gallons/ resident/day. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -1.3.1.) d) Storm Sewer Capacity — One -in -five-year storm event. (See Sanitary and Storm Sewers Policy SS -2.1.3.) e) Solid Waste Collection Capacity — 1.28 tons/resident/year. (See Solid Waste Collection Policy SW -1.1.1.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 129 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Element of the IVIGNP. The City will utilize a tiered LOS analysis when reviewing traffic impacts for new developments whereby the Person -Trip LOS methodology will only be applied within areas identified as a Center (as depicted on Map TR -14.2 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis) while the traditional automobile LOS methodology will be applied to all other areas within the City. Both methodologies are then expressed as a ratio corresponding to letter grades LOS A through LOS F based on the volume -to -capacity ratio in the same manner as used by the traditional LOS methodology. Issuance of development orders for new development or significant expansion of existing development will be contingent upon compliance with a LOS E (100 percent of capacity) standard within centers, transit corridors, and all other areas. The City will require a generalized Traffic Statement documenting the trip generation and site access for developments and redevelopments that generate a minimum of 20 new peak hour trips. A detailed Traffic and Neighborhood Impact Analysis will be required for developments and redevelopments that generate more than 20 new peak hour trips. Determination of the number of new peak hour trips projected to result from the development will be calculated according to the latest version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. (See Policy TR -1.3.3. and Objective TR -1.7. & related Policies for additional information). The City has adopted FDOT's minimum LOS standards for Florida Intrastate Highway System (FINS) roadways. (See Objective TR -1.6.) g) Miami -Dade Public Schools - Beginning January 1, 2008, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard for all Miami -Dade County public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard sha4 will be applicable in each Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 130 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance boundary established by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools. h) Adequate Water Supply -- As determined by the Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department. Policy CI -1.2.4: The latest point in the application process for determination of concurrency sha4 will be prior to the approval of an application for development order or permit that contains a specific plan for development, including the densities and intensities of development. Concurrency will be determined by the Planning Department during the review of a Ma eF Use SPGG'al Permit large scale development project (projects that exceed 200,000 square feet and/or 199 dwelling units or similar consideration), land use/ rezoning changes, Development Agreements (2013/9) , and special permits and exceptions pursuant to the City's land development regulations. Policy CI -1.2.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies, &ha4 will be responsible for monitoring and ensuring adherence of the issuance of development orders to the adopted level of service standards, the schedule of capital improvements and the availability of public facility capacity. Policy CI -1.2.6: Rise in sea level projected by the federal government, and refined by the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, &ha4 will be taken into consideration in all future decisions regarding the design, location, and development of infrastructure and public facilities in the City to meet or exceed adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standards. (See related policy CM -1.4.2) Policy CI -1.2.7: Governmental entities that are not responsible for providing, financing, operating, or regulating public facilities needed to serve development may not establish binding level -of -service standards on governmental entities that do bear those responsibilities.(2011/79) Policy CI -1.2.8: The duration of a Development Agreement may not exceed 30 years, unless it is extended by mutual consent of the governing body and the developer, subject to a public hearing in accordance with Section 163.3225 F.S. No Development Agreement will be effective or be implemented by a local government unless the local government's comprehensive plan and plan amendments implementing or related to the agreement are in compliance with Section 163.3184 F.S. (2007/8 & 2011/107) Policy CI -1.2.9: The City will coordinate and address impacts on adjacent municipalities when it pertains to the establishment of level of service standards. (See IC -2.1.29) (2011/65) Objective CI -1.3: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an equitable, proportiona - share of the cost of public facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 131 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy CI -1.3.1: The City will continue to use developer contributions, including development impact fees, to help fund the cost of public facilities needed to serve new development or redevelopment. If a property owner contributes right-of-way and expands a state transportation facility, and such construction or expansion improves traffic flow, capacity, or safety, such contribution may be applied as a credit against any future transportation concurrency requirement. Section 339.282 F.S. (2007110) Policy CI -1.3.2: The City will periodically revise all fees related to the impact of new development and redevelopment to reflect increases in the cost of providing public capital facilities. Policy CI -1.3.3: The City will consider the use of special assessment districts to help fund capital projects whose public benefits tend to be localized to specific geographic sub areas of the city. Policy CI -1.3.4: The City will take appropriate measures to ensure that increased property values resulting from new development and redevelopment are accurately reflected on the County Tax Assessor's property tax rolls in a timely manner. Policy CI -1.3.5: The City will work with the Miami Dade County and the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to identify appropriate funding mechanisms in order to assure the fiscal resources to maintain acceptable levels of service. Policy CI -1.3.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. Objective CI -1.4: Ensure that public capital expenditure within the Coastal Zone does not encourage private development that is subject to significant risk of storm damage. (See Coastal Management Objective CM -4.3.) Policy CI -1.4.1: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal high hazard area will be limited to those required to eliminate existing LOS deficiencies, maintain adopted LOS standards in non -high hazard areas, improve hurricane evacuation time, or reduce the threat to public health and safety from storm events. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -4.3.1.) Policy CI -1.4.2: Public expenditures for capital facilities in the coastal zone intended to further the goals and objectives of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan will be limited to those projects that do not measurably increase the risk to public health and safety from storm damage. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -4.3.2.) Objective CI -1.5: The City's Capital Improvements Program and Schedule is adopted as follows in Appendix CI -1 of the MCNP. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 132 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Concurrency refers to a provision of Florida law that requires certain public facilities and services to be available when the impact of land development occurs. They must be available "current with" the impact of development. Paraphrasing Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, each county and municipality must incorporate specific and detailed provisions which &4a4 will provide that public facilities and services meet or exceed the Levels of Service (LOS) standards established in the Plan's Capital Improvements Element and are available when needed for the development, or that the development orders or permits are conditioned on the availability of these public facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development. Levels of Service (LOS) are measures that determine the capacity of the public facility per unit of demand. Local governments are required to adopt LOS standards for the following services: Recreation and Open Space Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Solid Waste Traffic Circulation Educational/ Public School Facilities The Levels of Service for each element are adopted by the local government in its Comprehensive Plan and approved by the state. Consequently, if any of the facilities or services are not available, or are deficient in their LOS, development cannot take place until they are provided at the required level, and "concurrent with" the impact of the development. In addition, the City is not required to approve a development that, for reasons other than transportation impacts, is not qualified for approval pursuant to the applicable local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. (2013/12) Because the City of Miami is a fully developed city, its adopted 2020 Future Land Use Map is designed so that the land use densities and intensities shown on it are supported by appropriate infrastructure that will meet the cities adopted LOS standards. Moreover, Miami's zoning regulations have been made consistent with its adopted 2020 Future Land Use Maps required by Florida's Growth Management Laws. Therefore, development or redevelopment that does not exceed allowable zoned uses and intensities will not require concurrency review as a condition of issuance, because it is generally supported by adequate infrastructure. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 133 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 If a development permit being requested requires a Land Use/ Zoning change, Development Agreement (201319), or a Major Use Sp8G'al Permit considered a large scale rp o ect or similar consideration, a concurrency review will be required. Impacts of the proposed development on the required LOS standards will be calculated, and a determination made as to whether the required infrastructure capacity will be available concurrent with the impact of development. Planning Department will consult departments of PW, SW, Parks & Recreation, Transportation, and others as appropriate for input to the LOS impact evaluation. An affirmative principal concurrency determination will be required before a prospective developer can obtain a subsequent development order. Public School Facilities: Necessary public school facilities must be in place or under actual construction within three years after of final issuances of final subdivision of site plan approval, or the functional equivalent. The City in coordination with the Miami -Dade County Public School by ordinance, include proportionate share mitigation methodologies and options for public school facilities in its concurrency management program and Interlocal Local Agreement for Public Facility Planning between Miami -Dade County Public Schools, Miami -Dade County and the Cities in Miami -Dade County, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. The intent of these options is to provide for the mitigation of residential development impacts on public school facilities, guaranteed by a legal binding agreement, through mechanisms that include, one or more of the following: contribution of land; the construction, expansion, or payment for land acquisition or construction of a permanent public school facility; or, the creation of a mitigation bank based on the construction of a permanent public school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Capital improvements associated with the construction of educational facilities are the responsibility of the Miami -Dade County Public School. TE) address fiRaRG'al feasibirrrrT lity (2011144), the Miami -Dade County Public School Facilities Work Program dated --September `s for educational facilities will be incorporated by reference in the CIE. The City &ha4 will coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, to annually update its Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5 -year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard, including interim standards, will continue to be achieved and maintained. The City, through its annual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule, will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. The City and the Miami -Dade County Public School will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the MCNP Amendment process and during updates to the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 134 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Goal IC -1: Increase effectiveness and efficiency in the delivery of government services through the appropriate coordination of local government actions. Objective IC -1.1: To establish formal procedures for coordinating City planning and operating functions that are directly related to the City's comprehensive plan with the Miami -Dade County School Board, Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Authority Department, Miami -Dade County Public Works Department, Solid Waste Division, Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resource Management (DERM), the Seaport Department (Port of Miami), Aviation Department (Miami International Airport), the Miami -Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, the Miami -Dade County Shoreline Development Review Committee, Miami -Dade Transit, the South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, the South Florida Regional Planning Council, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Transportation, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, the Division of Historical Resources, Department of State, adjacent local governments, and any other state, local or federal agency whose cooperation is required to accomplish the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan. Policy IC -1.1.1: By December 20825, establish by interlocal or other agreement with appropriate jurisdictions joint processes for collaborative decision making on countywide or multi -agency issues including, but not limited to, the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency and the siting of facilities with countywide significance, including locally unwanted land uses. Policy IC -1.1.2: The City will continue implementation activities associated with the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami -Dade County, effective PebFwapy December 20, 2007, including, but not limited to, coordinating City, County, and School Board plans based upon consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment; participating in decision-making, through floating membership on the School Board's School Site Planning and Construction Committee, regarding potential sites for new schools and proposals for significant renovation, the location of relocatables or additions to existing buildings, and potential closure of existing schools; and collaborating to identify options aimed to provide the capacity to accommodate anticipated student enrollment demand associated with increases in residential development potential. Policy IC -1.1.3: [Reserved] Policy IC -1.1.4: The City will continue to seek membership on the Biscayne Bay Management Committee, the principal coordinating body for Biscayne Bay, as a means of expressing its policies pertaining to Biscayne Bay. Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 135 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy IC -1.1.5: The City &ha4 will maintain its membership and involvement with committees and groups addressing the environmental healthy and water quality of Biscayne Bay. Policy IC -1.1.6: The city will coordinate with county, state and local governments, districts and agencies to create partnerships to share open spaces and recreational facilities and promote enhancement and expansion of parks, recreational facilities and programs, greenways, trails and similar resources for use by Miami residents. Policy IC -1.1.7: The City will continue to implement the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) Permit addressing the requirements for compliance with the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for pollutants entering city bound water bodies and ultimate Biscayne Bay. Policy IC -1.1.8: The City &ha4 will coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) to accommodate its water supply and management planning and permitting process, the City's adopted population projections, spatial characteristics of the MCNP Land Use Plan map, and policies of the MCNP Land Use, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge and Coastal Management Elements. It is further City policy to accommodate future population and economic growth by utilizing the range of alternative water supply technologies outlined under MCNP Potable Water Element Objective PW -1.2, including sources from expanded and/or new Florida Aquifer wellfields, Floridian Aquifer storage and recover (ASR) techniques, water conservation methods, water reclamation, water and wastewater reuse and other advanced technologies. Policy IC -1.1.9: In its development of future potable water supplies and the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan as outlined in Objective PW -1.3, the City &ha4 will consider, and be compatible, with the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. Policy IC -1.1.10: The City of Miami sha4 will coordinate with Miami -Dade County WASD by requiring applications to be reviewed by MDWASD during the site plan review process prior to approving a Building Permit, in order to determine whether adequate water supplies will be available to serve the development by the anticipated issuance date of the certificate of occupancy for properties located within the City of Miami. The City will monitor proposed amendments to the Miami -Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan as they relate to water supply planning and sea level rise in the City of Miami and provide input as necessary. Policy IC -1.1.11: The City &ha4 will participate in the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact and &ha4 will coordinate with other agencies, local municipalities, and the private sector to develop initiatives and goals to address climate change mitigation and adaptation. Climate related goals that support regional Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 136 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 climate change objectives be integrated into the City's Comprehensive Plan as appropriate. Policy IC -1.1.12. All City departmental master plans and strategic business plans s will include and prioritize climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climate change related amendments &ha4 will be recommended through the next feasible, regularly scheduled amendment process or departmental master plan update for each respective planning document. a) Each City department sha4 will consider extending planning horizons as appropriate to adequately address (i.e. 30, 50, 75 -year plans) the projected long- term climate change impacts into resource allocation recommendations. a) All new departmental climate change policies and programs &ha4 will be monitored for effectiveness. Policy IC -1.1.13: The City will cooperate with any local government or utility provider that provides service within its jurisdiction. (201513) Goal IC -2: Promote orderly and appropriate regional land development and transportation policies through consultations with Miami -Dade County, adjacent counties, the region, and locally impacted municipalities. Objective IC -2.1: To further and strengthen existing and potential planning coordination mechanisms to ensure that consideration is given to both the impacts of land development and transportation policies within Miami on areas outside the City's jurisdiction and the impacts of land development outside the City's boundaries on the City of Miami. Policy IC -2.1.1: The City will continue its active participation in the Miami -Dade Planners' Technical Committee (PTC) for the purpose of addressing common concerns and sharing resources toward solving planning problems, water supply needs and coordinate water use and sea level rise issues as needed with particular emphasis on examining State of Florida planning requirements in the context of Miami - Dade County's unique governmental structure to more effectively coordinate local planning efforts. Policy IC -2.1.2: Working through the Planners' Technical Committee, the City will share copies of its comprehensive plan and plan amendments as well as information regarding scheduled comprehensive planning -related public hearings for the benefit of adjacent and other interested jurisdictions, and will encourage other participating jurisdictions to provide this information as well. Policy IC -2.1.3: The City will support the South Florida Regional Planning Council in developing informal coordination mechanisms such as regional issue study groups that coordinate land development and transportation policies among local Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 137 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 governments; and to establish mediation mechanisms to resolve potential regional conflicts. (See Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC -3.1.1.) Policy IC -2.1.4: The City will continue to utilize and coordinate with FDOT's South Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) program to establish and implement transportation demand management strategies for all future and existing employers with more than 50 employees. The City will lead by example in developing transportation demand management strategies for City employees. (See Policy TR -1.5.3.) Policy IC -2.1.5: The City will assist Miami -Dade County in developing the premium transit projects identified in the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) within the City limits. The City will utilize land development regulations and other incentives to help direct development where it will best support existing and planned transit services. (See Policy TR -2.1.2.) Policy IC -2.1.6: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County to implement resiliency policies to mitigate and protect vulnerable roadways and critical evacuation routes (illustrated in Maps TR -15 and TR -11 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section respectively) within the City. (See Policy TR -2.2.11.) Policy IC -2.1.7: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County's SMART Plan, which specifically aims to provide premium transit service along roadways in the City including Biscayne Boulevard and West Flagler Street. (See TR- 2.4.1.) Policy IC -2.1.8 To improve regional mobility, the City will regularly coordinate with, but not limited to, Miami -Dade County, FDOT, MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA), the Port of Miami, the Miami River Commission, the Miami International Airport and other public agencies to ensure that future improvements to the transportation network within the City from these agencies' are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of Miami's MCNP. (See Policy TR -2.4.2.) Policy IC -2.1.9: The City will continue to coordinate with SFRTA, FDOT, Miami -Dade County, and other local agencies to support and develop plans to implement the FEC Coastal Link Commuter Rail. (See TR -2.4.5.) Policy IC -2.1.10: The City will coordinate its transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP update. (See TR -2.4.6.) (200712) Policy IC -2.1.11: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to promote public transit and shared transportation services by educating and informing the public of these services via app -based technologies, informative websites, and other means of communication to increase transit ridership. (See TR -2.4.8.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 138 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy IC -2.1.12: The City will regularly coordinate with other agencies to market and promote the use of multimodal transportation options using social media, educational opportunities, and any other form of public outreach. (See Policy TR -2.4.10) Policy IC -2.1.13: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve the east -west transit services within the City to alleviate traffic congestion. (See TR -2.5.1.) Policy IC -2.1.14: The City will continue to coordinate with Miami -Dade County to address the transit needs consistent with transit planning guidelines while considering population growth trends within the City. (See TR -2.5.4.) Policy IC -2.1.15: The City, in coordination with FDOT, Miami -Dade County and the MPO, will continue to develop and encourage more bicycle paths, protected bicycle lanes, bicycle boulevards, cycle tracks, and sharrows throughout the City to expand the bicycle network and connect any gaps while promoting alternative travel modes. The City will also promote the implementation of enhanced bicycle amenities such as bicycle racks and lockers that help to encourage more bicycle use. Map TR-6(within Appendix TR -1) illustrates the existing bicycle facilities in the City. (See Policy TR - 2.6.2.) Policy IC -2.1.16: The City will in coordination with Miami -Dade Transit and FDOT develop, prioritize, and implement sidewalk and bicycle infrastructure improvements that are adjacent to transit routes/corridors and transit stations in order to improve connectivity between transit and other non -motorized modes of transportation while promoting the use of alternative travel modes. (See TR -2.6.3.) Policy IC -2.1.17: The City will regularly coordinate with Miami -Dade County to improve the efficiency of its public transit system by supporting transit -oriented development policies and promoting the use of alternative travel modes within the City. (See TR- 2.7.2.) Policy IC -2.1.18.: The City will work with the MPO to develop a comprehensive active transportation plan for Miami that integrates bicycle, pedestrian, and greenway components by conducting a network gap analysis and developing a list of prioritized projects based on objective criteria. These criteria should include road classification; Proximity to transit stops and park-and-ride lots; proximity to schools, parks, or other public facilities; proximity to activity centers and transit corridors; consideration of high - crash locations; potential to connect gaps in existing sidewalk, greenway, and other non -motorized transportation network. (See policy TR -2.9.3) Policy IC -2.1.19.: The City will coordinate with Miami -Dade County and FDOT to design the City's thoroughfares strategically to disperse and reduce the length of automobile trips and to encourage walking and bicycling. (See Policy TR -2.9.7.) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 139 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 Policy IC -2.1.20: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy TR -2.9.11.) Policy IC -2.1.21: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, leverage technology to provide user-friendly trip planning services that include all transportation modes. (See TR -2.10.2.) Policy IC -2.1.22: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, promote and share all existing transportation -related data, sources, and tools to the public in an effort to create an open and user-friendly data repository that could be used for analysis and future private or public technology development that aims to improve the efficiency of the transportation network. (See TR -2.10.3.) Policy IC -2.1.23: In coordination with Miami -Dade County, FDOT, and other public agencies, the City will facilitate the development and maintenance of real-time traffic and traveler data that helps monitor the overall transportation system and evaluate its performance. This information should be made available to the public and should be delivered to users in a familiar way that promotes data sharing, thus benefiting the wider community. (See TR -2.10.6.) Policy IC -2.1.24: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, regularly collect necessary data for better estimating vehicle occupancy rates and means of travel pursuant to updating the person -trip methodology as required. (See TR -2.11.1.) Policy IC -2.1.25: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, Periodically collect bicycle and pedestrian count data throughout the City to better understand the use and demand of the non -motorized transportation network and to develop and implement improvement projects based on needs. (See TR -2.11.2.) Policy IC -2.1.26: The City will, in coordination with Miami -Dade County and FDOT, identify any transit service adjustments and improvements to the bicycle network as to maintain an updated understanding of the existing transit corridors for the interpretation and implementation of the person -trip LOS methodology. (See TR - 2.11.3.) Policy IC -2.1.27: The City will annually coordinate with Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus transit system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy TR -2.5.5.): (200516) Policy IC -2.1.28: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to promote the transit - oriented development (TOD) policies found in the Miami -Dade County's CDMP to support the TCEA as defined in Section 163.3164 (46) F.S. (2011132), as well as Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 140 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 illustrated in Appendix TR -1, Map 14.2., titled Centers and Transit Corridors. (See Policy TR -2.7.6.): Policy IC -2.1429: [nese wd]—The City will coordinate and address im Policy IC -2.1.30: The City will encourage the coordination of the intermodal surface and water transportation access service to the Port of Miami River Working Waterfront (See Policy PA-3.2.1.and Policy TR -2.2.12.) Policy IC -2.1.31: The City will work with the County and public transportation providers to help Integrate innovative technologies to improve the transportation network. (See Objective TR -2.10 and LU -1.1.18.) (PZAB Recommendation) Objective IC -2.2: [Reserved] Policy IC -2.2.1: [Reserved] Goal IC -3: Contribute to an atmosphere of cooperation among local governments within Miami -Dade County. Objective IC -3.1: Maximize the use of informal, cooperative agreements as mechanisms for intergovernmental conflict resolution within Miami -Dade County and minimize the use of litigation. Policy IC -3.1.1: The City will exhaust all efforts to solve intergovernmental conflicts arising from adoption and implementation of comprehensive plans through informal mechanisms, including but not limited to working through the Miami -Dade Planners' Technical Committee or utilizing the Miami -Dade County League of Cities and the South Florida Regional Planning Council's mediation process pursuant to s. 186.509 20( 091J.,, before seeking remedies through the judicial system, provided that efforts at informal resolution do not prevent the City from seeking legal remedies, or jeopardize the City's ability to prevail in any legal action. (See Intergovernmental Coordination Policy IC -2.1.3.) Policy IC -3.1.2: By interlocal agreement, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 163.3177(6)(h)l.c.and 333.03(1)(b) F.S., the City will adopt, administer, and enforce airport zoning regulations applicable to the airport hazard area. (200917) Policy IC -3.1.3: The City will seek cooperative Inter -local agreements, ILA, as necessary, with Miami -Dade County and with the FDOT to ensure that the County and State's transportation improvements are designed to minimize the intrusion of commuter traffic on City residential streets, do not sever or fragment well-defined neighborhoods, and do not result in major disruption to pedestrian traffic. (See TR - 1.4,1,) Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan 141 Goals Objectives Policies September 2016 APPENDIX LU -1 Updated Future Land Use Map (PLUM) MICLEME NN' III Eli= WE M.- E Wi., -1111 � ina■ '� APPENDIX TR -1 Updated Transportation Data Inventory and Analysis City of Miami Master Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Data Inventory and Analysis August 2016 August 2016 Final Draft Page II -1 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT DATA INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS The City of Miami's transportation network consists of local city roads, roads maintained by Miami -Dade County, and state roads maintained by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Many of these roads are served by a regional transit system provided by Miami -Dade Transit and by the City of Miami's Trolley system. Most of these roads feature sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities, while only some roads feature bicycle facilities. Local governments that have all or part of their jurisdiction included within the urbanized area of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) are required to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan with a Transportation Element consistent with the provisions of Section 163.3177 of the Florida Statutes. The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a multimodal transportation system that places emphasis on transportation mode choice within the City of Miami, particularly non -automobile. The objective of the Transportation Element Data Inventory and Analysis is to describe and analyze transportation resources within the City of Miami, project future conditions and prepare a foundation for the formulation of goals, objectives, policies and implementation programs. Data has been analyzed and portrayed in text and graphic formats including a series of transportation maps. In this analysis, the City's Comprehensive Plan horizon year is 2040. The Transportation Element Data Inventory and Analysis includes: • An analysis of the existing transportation systems, including the ability of transportation facilities and services to serve existing land uses • Growth trends and travel patterns, including relationships between land use and transportation systems; • Projected transportation system levels of service; • An analysis of local and state transportation programs; • Maintenance of adopted level of service standards; and • Land use policy implications of transportation management programs necessary to promote public transportation. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS AND CONCEPTS CLASSIFICATION OF MAJOR THOROUGHFARES Major thoroughfares are categorized into functional classification groups according to the character of service. The four functional classification groups for urban areas are principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors and local streets. The extent and degree of access control is a significant factor in defining the functional classification of a roadway. Regulated limitation of access is necessary on arterials to enhance their primary function of mobility, while the primary function of local streets is to provide access. Functional classifications for major thoroughfares August 2016 Final Draft Page II -2 are defined in A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2011). Principal Arterials: serves the major centers of activity and the highest volume traffic corridors of urbanized areas. Principal arterials typically serve longer distance trips. Although principal arterials constitute a small percentage of the total roadway network, they carry a high proportion of total urban traffic. The principal arterial system also carries most of the trips entering and leaving the urban area. Service on principal arterials is normally continuous with relatively high traffic volumes, long average trip lengths and high operating speeds. Service to abutting land is typically subordinate to the provision of travel service and major traffic movements. Typical principal arterials include interstates, freeways and other limited access facilities. Minor Arterials: The minor arterial system interconnects and supports the principal arterial system. It accommodates trips of moderate lengths at a lower level of mobility than provided on principal arterials. Minor arterials provide continuity among communities and may also carry local bus routes. Ideally, minor arterials do not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. The spacing of minor arterials is typically not much greater than one mile in most urbanized areas. Collectors: The collector street system provides vehicular access to and mobility within residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the arterial system in that it penetrates neighborhoods and distributes trips from arterials to their ultimate destinations. Conversely, collectors also transition vehicular traffic from local streets onto the arterial system. The collector street system may carry local bus routes. Service on collectors has relatively moderate traffic volumes, average trip lengths and average operating speeds. Local Streets: The local street system comprises all roadways not in one of the higher systems. It provides direct access to abutting land uses and connections to the higher order systems. It offers the lowest level of vehicular mobility and usually contains no bus routes. Service to through traffic is often discouraged on local streets. Service on local streets has relatively low average traffic volumes, short average trip length or minimal through traffic movements and high land access for abutting property. LEVEL OF SERVICE Level of Service (LOS) standards were determined for various modes of transportation within the Miami urbanized area for both existing and future conditions. Automobile LOS thresholds were derived from the 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook. The person -trip LOS methodology used in the previous update (2004) of the Transportation Element only included automobiles and transit. Because of the emphasis placed on providing an efficient multi -modal transportation system, a new person -trip LOS methodology was developed for this update which considers bicycle and pedestrian trips along with the automobile and transit trips. Additionally, a preliminary bicycle suitability analysis was conducted to determine the transportation network's suitability for bicyclists within the City of Miami. LOS standards for automobiles and person -trips, as well as the bicycle suitability analysis are further discussed below. Automobile Level of Service: The Traffic Engineering Handbook (Institute of Transportation Engineers 7th Edition) defines automobile LOS for roadways as: August 2016 Final Draft Page II -3 "A qualitative measure that characterizes operational conditions within a traffic stream and perception of these conditions by motorists and passengers. The descriptions of individual levels of service characterize these conditions in terms of factors such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions and comfort and convenience. " The automobile LOS definition can be further simplified as the ratio of traffic volume to roadway capacity (V/C). The six (6) different LOS are described below: • LOS A — This LOS represents and ideal condition of primarily free-flow traffic operations at average travel speeds. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream and delays at intersections are minimal. • LOS B —This LOS represents reasonably stable, unimpeded traffic flow at average travel speeds. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and stopped delays are not bothersome. • LOS C —Traffic flow is stable but drivers are becoming restricted in their choice of speeds and ability to maneuver. This service level is often selected as being an appropriate criterion for roadway design purposes. • LOS D — Most motorists would consider this LOS unsatisfactory, as traffic flow is unstable. Driving speeds are tolerable for short periods but are subject to sudden variance. Time delays do occur due to high volumes of traffic. The ability to maneuver and choose speed is severely restricted. • LOS E — Traffic flow is unstable as speeds and flow rates vary. Traffic flow has either stopped or is maintained at a low speed. There is little independence in selection of speeds or ability to maneuver. Driving comfort is low and accident potential is high due to limited space between vehicles and rapidly changing speeds. The roadway may act as a storage area resulting from downstream congestion. Generally, a facility at Level of Service E is operating at or above capacity. • LOS F — Traffic flow has generally come to a stopped condition, but will have slight inconsistent movement. No independence in selection of speeds or ability to maneuver exists at this level of service. Driving comfort is low and accident potential is high due to limited space between vehicles and rapidly changing speeds. The roadway is congested. Generally, a facility at Level of Service F is operating above capacity. The generalized AADT tables from the 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook were used to assess the City of Miami's roadways existing and future LOS. Within urbanized areas, LOS 'A' is not attainable based on these tables and LOS 'B' is only attainable on uninterrupted flow facilities. The generalized LOS tables from the FDOT handbook and a more detailed description of the methodology used for this analysis are included in the Analysis of Existing Transportation section of this document. The traditional automobile -based methodology will be applied to all non -center areas within the City. Person -trip Level of Service: The City of Miami, through its Transportation Element, has adopted a progressive method for measuring the LOS for roadways — measuring LOS by person - August 2016 Final Draft Page II -4 trips rather than the traditional approach of only analyzing automobiles. As a part of updating the Transportation Element, the person -trip methodology is slightly modified to include bicycle and pedestrian trips in the context of the Centers and Transit Corridors framework. Areas within the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III (DDRI III) are identified as Centers, which generally feature frequent transit service (defined as roadway segments with cumulative transit headways of 10 minutes or less) and access to bicycle facilities. Areas within the City that feature frequent transit service are identified as Transit Corridors. Only roadways within the Center areas (as illustrated in Map TR -14.2) use the person -trip methodology for analyzing LOS. All other areas of the City including Transit Corridors will continue to use the traditional automobile LOS methodology when reviewing traffic impacts for new developments. The person -trip methodology establishes a broader definition for LOS by including person trips along with vehicle trips. The calculated person -trip LOS ultimately yields letter grades A through F, similar to the traditional automobile -based methodology, to denote utilization of a roadway by all modes as a percent of a total multimodal capacity. The person -trip approach takes into account that dense, urban areas provide many options for personal mobility. The goal is to encourage new development in these areas with high levels of transit availability and other mobility options, such as enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, in order to reduce the dependency on automobiles while reducing traffic congestion. As a community develops and becomes more mature, its land uses are able to support more alternative modes of transportation. Planning for all of these modes is integral for fully developing a healthy and vibrant community from a quality of life and economic perspective. When calculating the person -trip LOS, capacities are enhanced by adding existing transit capacities, which are based on physical dimensions and frequency of transit service, to the automobile capacity of the roadway. Assumed future bicycle and pedestrian trips are then incorporated into the capacity of the roadway by applying a trip reduction factor to the volume side of the equation. Assuming that some of the new development's trips will be either internally captured or completed using the bicycle or pedestrian network, a reduction rate is applied to the volume of the roadway. A person -trip LOS is then computed using the volume of the roadway with reduction rates for estimated bicycle and pedestrian trips divided by the enhanced vehicle/transit capacity of the roadway to yield a new letter grade. VIC Level of Service Level of Service Person -Trip to Capacity Volume Ratio 0.01-0.60 0.61-0.70 :0 D 0.81-0.90 00 Source: City ofMiami, Transportation Corridors: Meeting the Challenge of Growth Management in Miami August 2016 Final Draft Page II -5 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES The following series of maps represent existing conditions for the transportation network on a multi -modal basis. The network includes the roadway system, public transit system and bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City of Miami. Map TR -1: Major Thoroughfares by Number of lanes (2016) identifies the number of through lanes in each direction for the major thoroughfares within the City. Map TR -2: Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification (2016) identifies the local, collector, arterial, expressway, and interstate facilities within the City. The functional classification system indicates the role of each thoroughfare in meeting current travel demands, assists in defining land use relationships, and typically reveals the jurisdiction responsible for maintenance. Map TR -3: Limited Access Facilities, Significant Parking Facilities (2016) identifies the limited access facilities that are within the City of Miami such as Interstate 95, Interstate 195 (SR 112 Airport Expressway), and Interstate 395 (SR 836 Dolphin Expressway). Existing parking garages with over 1,000 parking spots, existing parking garages with 200-1,000 parking spots, surface parking lots with over 200 parking spots, and Miami -Dade Transit (MDT) park-and-ride lots were identified. Significant parking facility information was obtained from the Miami Parking Authority and the Complete Consulting Services Group and included among others: • Miami -Dade Community College parking facilities • Miami Marlins Stadium parking garages • The Health District parking facilities Map TR -4.1: Major Trip Generators (2016) illustrates the major trip generators in Miami by identifying the density of residential areas within the City. Densities were categorized as census blocks with more than 10 units per acre, 5-10 units per acre, less than 5 units per acre, and census blocks with no housing units. Areas with higher densities tend to produce more trips. Map TR -4.2: Major Trip Attractors (2016) identifies the location of the major trip attractors in Miami including the Adrienne Arsht Center, American Airlines Arena, Barnacle Historic State Park, Bayfront Park, Bayside Marketplace, CocoWalk, Government Center, James L. Knight International Center, Magic City Casino, multiple Miami -Dade College campuses, Miami Convention Center, Miami -Dade County Auditorium, Miami Marlins Stadium, Perez Art Museum of Miami, and the Vizcaya Museum. Public parks, public libraries, hospitals, MDT park-and-ride lots, the Little Havana and Wynwood neighborhoods, and the area of the Development of Regional Impact Increment III were also included. Map TR -5.1: Existing MDT MetroBus Service (2016) illustrates the existing MDT MetroBus service within the City of Miami. Currently, 57 Metrobus routes operate within the City, covering an extensive area. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -6 Map TR -5.2: Existing Metrorail, Metromover, and City of Miami Trolleys (2016) illustrates the existing MDT MetroRail and MetroMover services within the City of Miami. The City of Miami's Trolley routes are also illustrated, which include three (3) newly implemented trolley routes and three (3) potential future trolley routes. A total of ten (10) trolley routes are currently Map TR -6: Existing Bicycle Facilities (2016) identifies existing bicycle facilities located within the City of Miami, which include paved paths, bike lanes, paved shoulders, sharrows, as well as Citi Bike rental stations and bicycle racks. Several bicycle facilities were identified in the City. Map TR -7: Existing Pedestrian Facilities (2016) delineates the presence of a sidewalk along roadways within the City. Most of the roadways regardless of classification offer sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Map TR -8.0: Existing Vehicular Peak -Hour Levels of Service (LOS) on Major Thoroughfares (2014) illustrates existing vehicular peak -hour LOS calculated for major roadways with the City of Miami. Peak hour volumes were calculated based on the most up-to-date AADT and K -factor (peak) data provided by FDOT. LOS was calculated based on the FDOT 2012 Quality/Level of Service Handbook's Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Level of Service tables. Map TR -10: Freight/Passenger Rail Facilities (2016) illustrates the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad rail corridor within the City of Miami, the CSX rail corridor along the western portion of Miami near the Miami International Airport, MDT's MetroRail and MetroMover facilities, and South Florida Regional Transportation Authority's (SFRTA) Tri -Rail facilities. Map TR -11: Hurricane Evacuation Routes (2016) identifies designated local and regional evacuation routes within the City of Miami in the event of an impending storm. Major evacuation routes within Miami include Biscayne Boulevard (US 1/SR 5), Kennedy Causeway (SR 934), Julia Tuttle Causeway (1-195/SR 112), MacArthur Causeway (1-395/SR 836), SW 8t" Street (US 41/SR 90), and Interstate 95. The graphic also includes the City's evacuation areas provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Map TR -12.1: Existing Seaport and Airport Facilities (2016) illustrates the limits of the Port of Miami, the Port of Miami River facilities, Miami International Airport, and the Miami Seaplane Base. The only existing Free Trade Zone within the City of Miami — the Port of Miami — is also illustrated. Map TR -12.2: Miami -Dade County Manatee Protection Areas (2016) illustrates the protected waterways with enforced idle speeds and no wake zones in Biscayne Bay and the Miami River. These zones are established by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conversation Commission. Map TR -13: Intermodal Centers and Access to such Facilities (2016) illustrates the intermodal centers in and within close proximity to the City of Miami including Miami International Airport, the Port of Miami, Downtown Bus Terminal, Omni Bus Terminal, and the August 2016 Final Draft Page II -7 Miami Intermodal Center (MIC). In addition, MDT's MetroMover and MetroRail facilities are shown along with SFRTA's Tri -Rail facilities. Map TR -14.1: Transportation Concurrency Exemption Areas Boundary (2016) illustrates the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) boundary, which includes the entire City of Miami. TCEAs were established in the State's growth management legislation to reduce the adverse impact transportation concurrency may have on potential urban infill development and redevelopment within the city. Map TR -14.2: Centers and Transit Corridors (2016) illustrates the centers and transit corridors within City of Miami. Transit corridors, based on the definition of City Ordinance 13114, are areas within a quarter mile from a thoroughfare that are served by one or more transit routes with cumulative headways of ten (10) minutes or better Monday thru Friday between the hours of 7am and 7pm. Areas within a half mile around Metrorail stations are also considered transit corridors. Centers are defined as areas within the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III. This DDRI/Center area provides frequent transit service similar to Transit Corridors and also features bike facilities (bike lane, paved path, or shared -use path). These areas will be used when applying the person -trip methodology and providing parking reductions for new developments in the City. New developments within center areas will use the person -trip LOS methodology when determining their impacts, while all other areas of the City (including Transit Corridors) will require a traditional traffic impact study to assess impacts on adjacent roadways and identification of required improvements for mitigating impacts. New developments within either the centers or transit corridor area designations that are not within a T3 zone will be eligible for parking reductions up to 50 percent. Map TR -15: Roadway Vulnerability Rating (2016) illustrates the vulnerability of roadways within the City of Miami based on analysis from the 2012 Regional Climate Action Plan conducted by the Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami -Dade Counties MPOs. This analysis takes into consideration flood inundation and sea level rise associated with future climate change projections. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -8 Map TR - f ® Major Thoroughfares by Number ` NE 67 ST of Lanes in each Direction (2016) _ ---rte NW 14 ST f NW 79 ST r D L ¢ - z z_ m NW 71 ST NW 11 ST w H N mNW 10 ST z z z z z z NW 62 ST < -m— NW 54 ST n NW 6 $T m m m z O .Q NW 5 ST z ml - OeFF� mz z} Y 6 DC1 O NW 46 ST `L i 3Y< '10 112 y f n l m l j D n •NW'36 ST - � m �_71� _- W ELAGLER ST -W- SW 1. STI ` v Pi II SW 1ST �.. NW 28I T 1 i z d oFeet D �� NW 20 ST < - o z000 < / /-�- _ m ® w 17- --- I 4 I ■ ■ l\ 836 S� NW 14 ST �' \ hR��FR pR hIWi4 :T�) / ■ \ �:mmr,. z:. NW 12 ST r.bx �! % Lr�� z /� ■I 5 ST 826 41 W FLAGLER ST ■ �_ _ ■ SW1ST ■ ■ 1 SW7ST ...... • ■DOWNTOWN ' N v- > � MIAMI N SWSST • -- (See area eniaryemem) N ST N � � I �g Y o D 'i D < < < �!1�P' m m m < D m m m m ��P• / O SW 24 ST r m - m SW 22 ST O Legend \� 1 Lane ,m m m SW 40 ST 2 Lanes R0S 3 Lanes GRAND AVE { 4 Lanes m �a 5 Lanes N City of Miami SW 64 ST m 0 2 ( ~. Miles _li,;l NW 17 -1 o vz,0Fe 00 Map TR - 2 NW 12 ST m ®P6 ii IW FLAGLER ST �N I SW 8 ST D � N z Legend m W 24 ST Local -Urban 5o— Major Collector - Urban Minor Arterial - Urban n cl Other Principal Arterial - Urban m m ^� Principal Arterial Freeway and Expressway - Urban Principal Arterial Interstate - Urban Highway City of Miami SW 64 ST �bIQQ I � NW 28 ST �4— i= �R N NW 20 ST m �NW■. ....... .. ■ NW 14 ST ",:�VkRoR NW 14 ■ ■ z ■ o r NW 7 ST _ ■ • ,N ■/ 5ST ■ E _ ■ — sw+sT ST.-- • .. • • DOWNTOWN � MIAMI f f PJ0 SW 18 ST <`p D m m m m �,,P V m m SW 22 ST _ \ e I e- �� 2 SW 40 ST e9c� F� C,s �Cy GRAND AVE m 0 2 Miles NE 87 ST — ® Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification (2016) IT NW 79ST Z NW 71 ST _ m m � o _ 1ST z � NW 82 ST a t J Q 6 'ST' D m G¢F > < Fch < < m NW 54 ST n _ m m q� m 112 m NW 46S 3 v NW 12 ST m ®P6 ii IW FLAGLER ST �N I SW 8 ST D � N z Legend m W 24 ST Local -Urban 5o— Major Collector - Urban Minor Arterial - Urban n cl Other Principal Arterial - Urban m m ^� Principal Arterial Freeway and Expressway - Urban Principal Arterial Interstate - Urban Highway City of Miami SW 64 ST �bIQQ I � NW 28 ST �4— i= �R N NW 20 ST m �NW■. ....... .. ■ NW 14 ST ",:�VkRoR NW 14 ■ ■ z ■ o r NW 7 ST _ ■ • ,N ■/ 5ST ■ E _ ■ — sw+sT ST.-- • .. • • DOWNTOWN � MIAMI f f PJ0 SW 18 ST <`p D m m m m �,,P V m m SW 22 ST _ \ e I e- �� 2 SW 40 ST e9c� F� C,s �Cy GRAND AVE m 0 2 Miles Man TR - 3 NE87 ST Limited Access ed Facilities and _ -- � r Significant Parkin Facilities 2016 g 9 C ) N NW 14 ST 7s ST C 2 - NW 71 ST Z z A N W 11 I O NW 10 ST z z z NW 62 sT y < m m m. i0 z Z f N m m ' -4 Ir A V N J N NW 6 ST m I ��C,S, m m m NW 54 ST m m Raj p NW 5 ST z �.Q 3 m•@� N \FR z N W 46 ST 3 3 6 O 3 < 0QO 112 c < D m Q Q m M W'FCAGLERST O _ SE 1ST GO tiR�` SW 1 ST y'I7�, . • N O FiPb NW 28 ST z - I Q R z v Fee[ y G •D NW 20 ST. n m d 0 2.000 M ''Q—y��� 8"J —�NWN � WW 14■T •■ i NW 14 STFq Oq � 112237 G.[)x ■ z NW T ST ■ 5 ST 826 W FLAG LER 57 SW9 ST ■ ■ ■ ■ SW -7 ST � DOWNTOWN Nm SW 8 ST �SeeAa.�ea emar9emeni� a v -- --- •D m > Legend e SW 24 S7 rn m SW 22 ST y a N o o as ❑ MDT Park and Ride Lots Parking Garages m gPyy e ll (1000+ parking spots) M m SW 40 ST c �sy 0 Parking Garages 0 (200-1000 parking spots) GRAND AVE 12 Surface Parking Lots N Limited Access Facilities N City of Miami SW 64 ST `m 0 2 Miles Man TR — 4.1 WFLAV LCrt a;"`y,.'... SE �'ST o I SW1ST F,�o NW 28 ST � r N lo MEN vFeel y a �,00a m -.. ..` -_ NW 20 ST m '. isms, .-�. - '\ \19����\►,��� ��fi ■ ��� 836 �F OI _R Nw 54 T- NW 14 ST R o NW 12 ST gcbx ■ ■ ■ z O J 1\\\ NW 7 ST ■- ■ � - IIYII�1���� 826 W FLAGLER=.ST gyy 1ST ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ • .. • SW -7 ST _ DOWNTOWN r, �.N. SW 8 ST MIAMI Isee a.ea emargemenry WFLAV LCrt a;"`y,.'... SE �'ST o I SW1ST F,�o NW 28 ST � r N vFeel y a �,00a m -.. ..` -_ NW 20 ST m '. .-�. - '\ .■ 836 �F OI _R Nw 54 T- NW 14 ST R o NW 12 ST gcbx ■ ■ ■ z O J NW 7 ST ■- ■ � - 826 W FLAGLER=.ST gyy 1ST ■. ■ ■ ■ ■ • .. • SW -7 ST _ DOWNTOWN r, �.N. SW 8 ST MIAMI Isee a.ea emargemenry - M m m N Z N N sW 16 ST N N ��PJti C y P O m y D m m m m. m m m m SW 22 ST SW 24 ST d C+ Legend m m SW 40 ST 6P e9c� F�cs No housing units Less than 5 units/acre�y GRAND AVE 5 10 Q - units/acre More than 10 units/acre N City of Miami0 SW 64 ST m 2 Miles Man TR — 4.2 24 ST _ NE 87 ST_ � Legend Major Trip Attractors (2096) — — Adrienne Arsht CenterLibrary © — _ 1 P American Airlines Arena gp Magic City Casino NW 9'ST NW 20 ST •m� rn z m Q Barnacle Historic State Park L MDC Medical Campus m NW 71'STZ Z m < L r © z � N N O rGRAND AVE i Z Z z z NW 62 ST - ? ■ p NW 12 ST y �, m m _ `, ■ J O V N ^� Highway • p a y < m NW 54 ST Miles 5 ST m m m m W FLAGGLER ST 3a�I �''I ■ A�cH mSW NW 46 ST :%_ 3 I V 24 ST _ <gP NW 28 ST Z Legend a ti Adrienne Arsht CenterLibrary © © Shops at Midtown Miami _ 1 P American Airlines Arena gp Magic City Casino 1/ NW 20 ST •m� �e9 c Q Barnacle Historic State Park L MDC Medical Campus m - N }} wNN7 R� �_ OJW t4 T '■ :, �' Wynwood Neighborhood © �6 NW 14 ST ■ ^��. rGRAND AVE i II Coco Walk/ rcox�- - ? ■ p NW 12 ST y �, IIIII Government Center(DRI * Miami Marlins Stadium _ `, ■ J © Hospital p Park and Ride Lots ^� Highway NW 7 ST ■ V �e7.. a James L. Knight Inter. Center i Perez Art Museum of Miami City of Miami m Miles 5 ST 826 W FLAGGLER ST SW%1.ST �''I ■ mSW 8 ST SWe7 ST rn DOWNTOWN - MIAMI N � (See area enlargement) m m SW 16 ST m m D m mm *�Pa m W m m SW 22 ST 9 24 ST _ Legend a ti Adrienne Arsht CenterLibrary © © Shops at Midtown Miami _ 1 P American Airlines Arena gp Magic City Casino Vizcaya Museum SW 40 ST 6P �e9 c Q Barnacle Historic State Park L MDC Medical Campus Little Havana Neighborhood r?�{� - SFR Bayfront Park 12 MDC Wolfson Campus Bayside Marketplace �' Wynwood Neighborhood © OS 1 Miami Convention Center dr Public Parks rGRAND AVE i II Coco Walk/ Downtown Development Mayfair in the Grove Ac Miami -Dade County Auditorium /, of Regional Impacts y �, IIIII Government Center(DRI * Miami Marlins Stadium - Increment III) `L a• �Q? © Hospital p Park and Ride Lots ^� Highway < O 2 James L. Knight Inter. Center i Perez Art Museum of Miami City of Miami m Miles Man TR — 5.1 �GD a Existing MDT Metrobus Service (2016) NW 14 ST - NW 79 ST—;;.11_ IP W z i W 71 ST -® JNW11ST w •1 e NW 1057 _ z z'z z NW 62 ST n i N m m � l•7J m NW 54 ST 111 40,x-,� 4fiSNW 6 ST VI NW 5 ST z I e z iaQ .. � t m � _ bx■•t•NW`36'�ST� m W FL'AGLER ST SE 1 ST G i - SW i�1ST \\_ NW 28 ST z Rpt fi— I� N vFeet y� NW 20 ST G 0 2,000 m _ m N 836 NWi4ST wNR7lEq�__Nytl1a T Nw 12 sr ------_---- �r,bx /if ■ NW 7 ST ■- IAI W FLAGLIER ST ■ SW 1ST ■ — --I n 1 _SW_7 ST ■ SW ST _ V� w � N 0 to m N N • SW 16 ST n IMT m m m SW 22 ST m .yam SW 24 S 44 0 SW 32 ST s m •�' �. _t9�'O�i Legend MDT Metrobus Route City of Miami SW 64 NE 87 ST C�EJ z- m m N O m � Q 6 o, B 3 D I 3 d m \,� J:� o ■ z ■ � o ■ �,l�n>. J 5 ST n T.10DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) h V CF tie CS 0 2 Miles Man TR — 5.2 Map TR -6 ■..■.� Q �' ��i IN�`��.■ '� ' I�■■ -a P son it��� 395 �11�■ ��1�� PIN I;p___.�,,,5 - �' �� 11��� ,�� Tye • fr �PI M 395 Paved P Bike Lane Paved Shoulder� ■ SharrowsCiti rr� Bike Bicycle-- = _ _ Legend Sidewalk (2 sides) Sidewalk (1 side) City of Miami Map TR -7 Existing Pedestrian Facilities (2016)1- 9 2016) 95 INN ,M■■N—W � N � C NW 46 NE 87 ST ! 09 fl { W m < N � C m I 0 m . � 6 •• rllllll���=� F.�7�� • ■�auu��ll�Is!C7�lmluuuill?illl!II:.----, 1111 ulu�uuAy�l�wiiiu e►�_n: � -. - - 395 1111111I�}�--�-±�c]l/■C�_-9,0=-...._=>A- _,�-111.=_= __i�11===111�ID�t==__=':ria=-`- IIII':C7:::� •-- -- :•�:::_ -r"' 111111111 1111111°�1 IYfl�t++•'�"NIL-111__- -1111--��nnE�:�all ' 111:,�III7C---�.�; �-.�- _ , ,IIIIIII_-"=■���- UE B -flll��hrrnmmuu =� WRITN Man TR — 8 NE 87 ST - ® Existing Vehicular Peak -Hour Levels of C Service (LOS) for Major Thoroughfares (2014) y� _ NW 14 ST i z� � m d z NW 71 ST C £ N N O -.NW 11 z rn NW 10 ST z z z z D c rn M -4 y N y D Dir D D D D < NW 54 ST 8 ST m - F6cy m m OQ. 3s Fp NW 4fi`ST O > 3 Y� 90 112 > m < �m - < � rsbxl NW`365T - m �.. W FLAGLER ST SE 1ST -L N SW 1 ST �� O R �`F,P NW 28 ST z i NW 20 ST m_ 836 yW14ST ��IV NW 14 s•� ■ NW 12 ST rsox - t_,. _ ■ i ■ p ■ J NW 7 ST •- r a ■ { 5 S 826 W FLAGLER ST SW 1ST ■ ■ m m ^SW_7 ST .... MIAMI _SW 8 ST _ _—_ _ (See arm enlargement) G < y y y m�m f N i p�' SW 16 IT A p N > D ,dJ m m D M m '^ �p� Legend m SW 24 ST 03 m m SW 22 IT m S� Vehicular LevelN of Service (LOS) B m m m SW 40 ST C D �FRCS� GRAND AVE J� E r AVE F n+ City of MiamiSW 64 ST m 2 Miles v Fe 0 2000. 826 1 I T m Im N Legend e Mixed Users m CSX ^� FEC MetroRail 0 MetroRail Stations i /%/ MetroMover o MetroMover Stations Tri -Rail ® Tri -Rail Stations =City of Miami 7-71 Man TR - 9 fl I Freight I Passenger Rail Facilities (2016) --a� I 1 1 1 I I I I NW as NW 2B 14 ST In= 7 ST SWIST ■ SW_7 ST ■ N m N N � SW 16 ST a m m m m m SW 22 ST 5 O GRAND N A N m j t f: i I } -■ i \ O ■ Z ■ \ O ■ J � a �I ■ � 5 ST DOWNTOWN 7 MIAMI (See area enlargement) O d �F 2e 9c �F RC, 1% Y NW74lST W rn Z N ❑ Z pz z NW 62 ST D N a Q m M m N J N O < m m NW 54 ST z Om 3 I- NW 46 ST 3 b NW 2B 14 ST In= 7 ST SWIST ■ SW_7 ST ■ N m N N � SW 16 ST a m m m m m SW 22 ST 5 O GRAND N A N m j t f: i I } -■ i \ O ■ Z ■ \ O ■ J � a �I ■ � 5 ST DOWNTOWN 7 MIAMI (See area enlargement) O d �F 2e 9c �F RC, 1% Y Man TR - 10 _T71 Nane Evacuation Zones and Routes (2111761) N OFeet D _ tr NW 20 Si m 2.000 • q , .r, � 395 � � . ■ . X95; �3 - - ' f� �1--"�� � �'% � 836 NW 14 ST W14. _ ■ NW 12 ST razbx - _ ■ Z O NW7ST ■--- a ■ mat O MEN 826 i � f � r N OFeet D _ tr NW 20 Si m 2.000 Nq��FROR 836 NW 14 ST W14. _ ■ NW 12 ST razbx - _ ■ Z O NW7ST ■--- a ■ ? ■ _ 5 ST 826 i W FLp,GLIER ST ■ SW 1ST ■ - ' •DOWNTOWN �''7 m N y SW_7 ST ■ • N SW 8 ST i Isee area eniargemenq INs. M 1111�,'�m N :G T�1 N N rL �L pJ�G e Legend m rn m SW 22 ST 9 SW 24 ST �6 Hurricane Evacuation Route Category 0 Evacuation Areadf N O Category 1 Evacuation Area Sw a0 ST dr Category 2 Evacuation Area �Cy Category 3 Evacuation Area GRAND AVE , Category 4 Evacuation Area � dr Category 5 Evacuation Area City of Miami SW 64 ST rn 0 2 Miles NW 74 ST -7 NW 58 ST z M M NW 36 ST -7 NW 25 S' Legend e dF Port of Miami `m m Miami International Airport Port of Miami River ddl Miami Seaplane Base Free Trade Zone City of Miami SW 64 W7: Man TR - 11.1 Airport / Seaport Facilities (2016) NE 87 ST NW 79'ST > z M NW 71 ST z N N S f z z z Z z NW 62 ST < m m , f—� m ,. p N v N V N 8 D D a NW 54 ST n m m m m m 3 7 NW 46 ST 6 W FLAGLER ST SW 8 ST D v Z NW 2657 NSI NW 26 ST C N N N n SW 16 ST N N N � 'm m SW 22 ST m 10 2 Miles Man TR — 11.2 80°14'0"W 80°13'0"W 80°12'0"W 80111101W 801101011W 80°g10"W 601810"W 80°7'0"W 80°610"W 6SC-22A25(1)(a)5. Slow Speedd AAII Year Zone Type Legend 68C-22.025(1)(.)16. All Yearocawy er°= GBC-22.025(1)(g)1. No No Entry Nov 15 -Apr 30 _ Slow Speed Harabo Island _ CW channel 30 MPH An Y­ 'rkr'3'to'5' & Mrkr'T I!, N Idle Speed May 1 - Nov 14 ozo)9pg1u�9. o of Broad Cswy Brdr, ir No Entry Nov 15 -Apr 30 i „_ a t;T AST ­%l T® �2.025(l)(a)16. Slow Speed May 1 -Nov 14 '� SWw a Speed May l-Nov 14 m� m ® Idle Speed All Year m� 1 Indian + ,�F Creek � sac-zz.oz5(1)(a)6. ® Slaw Speed All Year s-ze 6 000 Village slow speed All Year As described, waters of Buser Biscayne Bay & Indian Crk, ® Slow Speed Nov 15 -Apr 30 - ,ta m ; ;.' _ Sof Broad Csw CL to N of JFK Csw, �mg CL, 30 MPH May 1 - Nov 14 68C-22.025(1)(a)6.d '2',,' except as dsgn Slow Speed Nov 15 -Apr 30 ® Slow Speed All Year z 35 MPH May 1 -Nov 14 68C-22.025(1)(b)3. ICW channel j � f ouo rf ® 30 MPH All Year Slow Speed Nov 15-Apr 30 - 91 Beyne Y B"`ay"0POint ® 35 MPH All Year 30 MPH May 1 - Nov 14 Mrkr'21' [o Private Mrkr'2' r' 1 11.111.111. OBC•2z.azsdl)(n)t. X21, Isle of Normandy Normandy Slow Speed Nov15 -Apr 30 N 68C-22.025(111a118. 35 MPH Ma 1 -Nov 14 Slow Speed All Yea r Nva A - �1 68C-22p.ed1 `1 Y Slow Speed AIt Year 1 r Waters of Biscayne Bay, 0 0.5 1 - 3' 2 _ r) Indian Crk, & Surprise Lake. m°1Lfttle Rive,. - John F Kennedys „'tt Sof JFK Cswy Br dg, to Julia Tuttle Cswy CL, - n T yeth 81 Causeway except as dsgn Miles 9 p� lis®Gr =pP.02E49)V C7,w Cu�60 VyJmn iIJ- all J® e.ue daidna / This map shows ONLY the 68c-22.W25(1)(c)3.j� FWC Manatee Idle Speed May 1 -Nov 14 I Protection Zones. 68C-22.125(1)(c)3. There may also be other Idle 5 eetl All Year Little River 68C•22.025(1)(g)2. 20° a rtrcr' 68C-22.025(1)(f)1. 35 MPH All Y­ Local/State/Federal Zones.-_ .31° 30 Melo MPH All Year /East channel a o Boaters are advised to abide 68C•22.025(t)(a118. c " by the regulations as posted d Al V Slows ee I ear Icw & Voo• buffer on E sitle m Gr on the water. 68C-22.025(1 Slow Speed All Sur rise, CONFIGURATION OF FWC ZONES ACCURATE AS OF JANUARY 2015 6BC-22.025(1)(b�. u 68C•22.025(11(b)1. MeloylEaN 'CWchannel Sbw Speed 15 •A�tr 30 3n MPH May 1 Nov- Nov a E Slow 30 chhannel Speed Nov i5 -Apr MPH Ma 1 -Nov 14 30 an 3 Atlantic Ocean Miami - Cswy Bridge centerline Cswy rid ecenterline 68C-22.025 1 a 8. 200' Miami I 1 Slow Spee I ear � Beach _ — - Waters of Biscayne Bay &S .... I Lk, S of Julla Julia Tuttle Causeway 68C-22.025(1 h 2. Slow 5 aed Nov15 -A r 30 P P Tuttle Cswy CL to N of 35 MPH Ma 1 -Nov 14 'l Venetian Cswy Brdg CL, except as dsgn 68C-22.025(7)(8)2. 200' er )Yeas - -- _ 30 MPH Meloy/East All Year channel Sunset Sunset Lake Slow Speed A(II 1 Isla MIAMI-DADE COUNTY a FWC MANATEE PROTECTION AREAS For description of zone boundaries: See 68C-22.025 F.A.0 for State Manatee Protection Zones • p er- -- `11 68C.22.025(1)Ib18 12 I`fta � 68C-22.025(l)(912. ICW channel p Ilai 30 MPH All Year ow Speed Nov 15-Anr: 8 au May 1 - Nov t g Jf00um m bac-22 0251 8. I' 0100' N M Vena, au r ; e aef ()la) centerline FI Sunut ke 4 Slow Speed All Year Biscayne.s O Wafers or Biscayne - I Be � Bay S sunset Lk, s of was U Julia Tuttle Cswy CL nelir 1tys � to Nof Venetian Cswy as C4 except as dsgn Ve .�yy Q 68C-22.025(11(.)9. Miami Beaoh watemo B s Icaym sav (includes main mMd arty Ryer �- chnl of lCw�Coll ns Ny Canal, 8lntlan Cdc,S "�' or Venet an Lswy CL to N arMxArthur Cswy \ � CL except as Gsgn a b mh V .ra 4Mryo 68C-22025(1)(.)22. Slow Speed All Year X n 68C-22025111(1)2. 68C 22. t: n, 66C 22.0251. 35 MPH All Year Idle Spcow . I" g r Slspeer: ericke11 Isllantlhfenc ' Poing ---- ��o� 68C-22.025(1)(9)3. 68C-22.025(1)(aVear 11. Fish \ 30 MPH All Year 68C.22025(l 0018All)". Island Slow Speed Year Slow Speed ICW 8 100 buffer on E s de ryr 68L- 22.025(111 Mororboats Pro1dhlb'[etl Biscayne AIIYeW M n400 5E Bay shore of Fl6her I51.nd 68C-22.02511)(.)12. 1000'Slow peed Buller es ., 'Norris 68C-22.025( eodd A11(ll')14Yaar All VY.,r SW f SU Rd 'i Clo ur Sw Sp roseege Batter Drain Rickenbacker Gawy a'a� axedyl,s Canal xc-loo / oe 4ej Virginia I'll Key q. & EM'y A�9 sev Baa Zone Type Legend Bear Cur No Entry All Year SBC-22 02,9=B 25S9aulrer Motorboats Prohibi[edAll Yeartoo0slow A0 Year. h..01 s main ma® Idle Speed All Year rked channel or ICW ® Slow Speed All Year Slow Speed Nov 15 -Apr 30 30 MPH May 1 - Nov 14 ® Slow Speed Nov 15 -Apr 30 35 MPH May 1 - Nov 14 30 MPH All Year Biscayne "' 35 MPH All Year Biscayne �;g Bay „ N .s o as 1 68C-22.025(1)(.)15. 1000 slow speea Boner Miles All Year. This map shows ONLY the FWC Manatee Protection Zones. There may also be other Local/State/Federal Zones. Boaters are advised to abide by the regulations as posted on the water. Cape CONFIGURATION OF FWC ZONES Florida ACCURATE AS OF JANUARY 2015 ° MIAMI-DADE COUNTY For description of zone boundaries: FWC MANATEE PROTECTION AREAS See 68C-22.025 F.A.0 for State Manalee Prolenbon Zones Man TR - 12 Ni 87 ST e Intermodal Terminals and Access to Facilities (2016) d - !I w NW 7e sr 0D o `z A O NW 71 ST O � N O " D Q Oz z NW 62 ST > rn N N NW 54 $T m m m m z cyoe m O 3 es / / 'Qn i� NW 46 ST 3 b SW 1 ST NW 28 ST I` Z v oFeet y 0 2.000 m o OJ NW 20 ST pm 1 0 �w/VRiyFROR \_- 836 Nw 1asT NW 14■T NW 12'ST ,,,by O ■ '� z 0 r NW 7 ST_ ■ 0 0 ■ I 5 ST IER ST ■ O 09 0 � ■ "` / -- 826 W FLAG SW1$T ■ o ■DOWNTOWN SW_7 ST ■ • I� N N r $W 8 ST N p�0 MIAMI Isee a.ea emar9ementl D M m rm N 61 N v M y m D m m 5 m SW 24 ST 0 SW 22 ST O Legend 1 p s F 2 df Port of Miami /v MetroRail SW 40 $T FR Miami International Airport o MetroRail Stations o C, Miami Intermodal Center /I./ MetroMover GRAND AVEC, * Y Q Downtown Bus Terminal MetroMover Stations Ps'� ar Q Omni Bus Terminal Tri -Rail City of Miami o o Tri -Rail Stations m 0 2 Miles Man TR — 13.1 NE 87 ST OTransportation Concurrency Exception Areas (2016 i 1 1 I NW 7957 2,000 ■ Y 8U NW 12 ST 826I • W FLAG LER ST i m$W 857 N V D N � T T_ rm N M N Z A D O IM m �\ RW 24 ST i f f SW 3257 � m N Legend e Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas City of Miami 46 o s I/ f V AND AVE , ■ O Q • 5 ST ■ . ■ DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) 1 RSC �F �F �y 0 2 Miles Man TR — 13.2 ■, a Centers and Transit Corridors (2016) NE 87 ST 1 s Nw a r��� 79 NW ST n� > NW 26 ST � m Z NW 71 ST z 2 m < 6 < NW 10 ST M z z z z z NW 62 ST < m m Q � m OF -1 N NW 205T 0 NW 6 ST m D D D > < NW 54 ST FF < < < < rn `" m z W \�HR,�SR I NW 14 "' iCy m 3 NW 5 ST 1. -■1= J� N NW 14511 �e��H FE3� NW 46 ST ; b "�{ F NW 26 ST � ii t O N OF -1 NW 205T 836 W \�HR,�SR I NW 14 NW 14511 N W 12 ST NW7ST O a SST 826 W'FLAGLER ST SW 1 5T \ • F 'SW SW 7 ST DOWNTOWN MIAMI y N 8 ST Isee a.ea emargemenry N G. s N GAA1 z Z N N N `< SW 16 ST Vi m m m �" m SW 22 3T 5 SW 24 ST o rn 1 �7 �iC+ SW 32 ST S,rO�kO� m m m SW 40 ST F Legend 41 Centers- 'LPhid-, —it Mkes, arMpeCesMans GRANS L Ir Transit Corridor" .2, p W,.W, t—d, .,f wdestfi— it 1/2 mile buffer around 0 2 O Metrorail Stations SW 64 ST m Miles Map TR — 14 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AUTOMOBILE LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY Level of service evaluations for all major roadways within the City were performed using average traffic count information provided by the Florida Department of Transportation. Traffic volumes were converted to peak -hour volumes using K -factors published by FDOT. Automobile level of service was determined by comparing the reported 2014 peak -hour traffic volumes on each of the major roadway's segments to the maximum service capacity listed for that specific facility type and cross section in the 2012 Quality/Level of Service Handbook (Table 4-4) published by the FDOT, which can be seen below. Generalized Peak Hour Two -Way Volumes for Florida's TABLE 4 Urbanized Areas' INTERRUPTED FLOW FACILITIE1 .W I MEMO [CJ►�� II F'Il �I Il91 Class H (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Class I (40 mph or higher posted speed limit) Lanes 'Median B C D E 2 UndiNided * 1.510 1.600 4 Divided * 3.420 3.580 6 Divided * 5,250 5.390 8 Divided * 7.090 7,210 *# Class H (35 mph or slower posted speed limit) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undi,,ided * 660 1.330 1,410 4 Di4ided * 1,310 2.920 3,040 6 Divided * 2;090 4500 4,590 8 Divided * 2.880 6.060 6,130 Non -State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter cmtespanding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Cine -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two -directional volumes m this table by 0.6 Source: 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook Non -State Signalized Roadways -10% FREEWAYS B Median & Turn Lane Adjustments Lanes B Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% — — — Yes +5% Cine -Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two -directional volumes m this table by 0.6 Source: 2012 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering +1,800 + 5% L1VL\TERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS B C Lanes B C D E 4 4,120 5,540 6.700 7.190 6 6,130 8,370 10.060 11.100 8 8.230 11,100 13,390 15,010 10 10.330 14,040 16.840 18,930 12 14,450 18,880 22,030 22,860 Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Lanes Ramp Present in Both Directions Metering +1,800 + 5% L1VL\TERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undbided 770 1.530 2.170 2.990 4 Divided 3.300 4.660 5.900 6.530 6 Dizided 4.950 6.990 8.840 9.790 Uninterrupted Floss Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes +5%n Multi Undivided Yes -5%u Multi Undivided No -25% August 2016 Final Draft Page II -10 PERSON -TRIP LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATION METHODOLOGY With this update to the City of Miami's Transportation Element, the person -trip methodology has been updated to include additional transit service and bicycle and pedestrian accommodations. This new method will only be utilized in identified Center areas according to the Centers and Transit Corridors map (Map TR -14.2) for the purpose of new development or redevelopment impact review on transportation facilities. Similar to the traditional LOS methodology, each roadway within a Center area uses a volume -to -capacity ratio to determine the LOS. In this methodology, roadway capacity includes both automobile and public transit modes and volume is reduced if there are existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. To evaluate the traffic impact of a new development or redevelopment, LOS is evaluated for the existing condition, the projected future condition without the new development, and the projected future condition (opening year) with the new development. The volume of the roadway is calculated to take into account automobiles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Roadway Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is calculated using existing AADT from traffic counts, projected AADT without the new development, and projected AADT plus new trips associated with the development based on the most recent version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. For Centers, the volume of automobile trips is converted to person trips by multiplying the automobile occupancy rate of 1.4 persons per vehicle trip by the volume of automobiles. The previous update to the Transportation Element assumed an automobile occupancy rate of 1.4 for this conversion, and because no new data collection has been conducted to reassess this factor, it remains the occupancy rate to be used for this update. Once this is computed, the demand and usage of the bicycle and pedestrian network should be accommodated. Because detailed data collection is required to accurately measure bicycle and pedestrian levels of demand, trips using these two modes are not added to total number of person trips estimated. Instead, the person -trip methodology applies a specific automobile trip reduction rate similar to the reduction rates given to new developments within the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Increment III. Therefore, to compute person trip level of service, roadways within the Center areas will receive a trip reduction based on recent U.S. Census American Community Survey data or locally -specific travel surveys to reflect the share of new trips that are assumed to either be internally captured or accommodated through the bicycle or pedestrian network. This trip reduction is applied to the volume estimated previously (automobile volume*1.4 occupancy rate). This newly computed person -trip volume that includes the trip reduction rates for the bicycle and pedestrian trips is then summed with the transit ridership, which is simply based on the latest weekday ridership numbers provided by Miami -Dade Transit. Roadway capacity is based on FDOT standards adjusted for vehicle occupancy of 1.4 persons per vehicle. The capacity of transit used for the person -trip LOS methodology is based on the frequency of service and the seating/person capacity of the transit vehicles. Transit capacity for August 2016 Final Draft Page II -11 Metrobus is based on the available seats and standing room of the 40 foot buses used by Miami - Dade Transit. These buses offer 38 seats and enough room for 21 additional standees for a total of 59 passengers possible per bus. Transit capacity for the Metrorail is calculated based on six - car trains, with each car accommodating 164 possible passengers. Each six car train -set has a carrying capacity of up to 984 passengers. Transit capacity for the Metromover has not changed since the 2003 Transportation Element of the MCNP defined each car as being able of holding up to 96 passengers. The transit and vehicular capacities are combined to determine the denominator (total capacity) of the volume -to -capacity ratio used for the person -trip methodology. Person -trip volumes are then divided by the person -trip capacity to calculate the LOS and the associated letter grade according to the LOS table provided earlier. Again, this methodology will only be applied to roadways within areas designated as a Center (Map TR -14.2). All other areas within the City outside of the identified Centers area will use the traditional automobile LOS methodology. The example equations below illustrate the volume -to -capacity ratio used for computing the person -trip LOS for three comparable conditions: 1. Existing Level of Service; 2. Projected Level of Service without the Proposed Project, and 3. Projected Level of Service with the Proposed Project The resulting comparison will provide the basis for determining the need for and extent of mitigation for traffic and congestion impacts associated with the projected future condition with the proposed new development or redevelopment. 1. Existing LOS = [AX1.4XC]+D (E x 1.4) + F Where traffic volumes represent peak hour being analyzed: A = Existing Roadway Traffic Volume C = Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Reduction Factor D = Existing Transit Ridership E = Existing Roadway Capacity F = Existing Transit Capacity August 2016 Final Draft Page II -12 2. Projected LOS without Proposed Project [(A+B)x1.4xC]+D (E x 1.4) + F Where traffic volumes represent peak hour being analyzed: A= Projected Roadway Traffic Volume B = Committed Developments C = Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Reduction Factor D = Transit Ridership E = Roadway Capacity F = Transit Capacity 3. Projected LOS with Proposed Project [(A+B+C)x1.4xD]+E (Fx1.4)+G Where traffic volumes represent peak hour being analyzed: A = Projected Roadway Traffic Volume without New Development B = Committed Developments C = Development -Generated Vehicle Trips D = Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Reduction Factor E =Transit Ridership F = Roadway Capacity G = Transit Capacity The applicant may consider any Future Transportation Projects in the above equations with and without the project. This variable does not apply to existing conditions. Project must be funded and included in a Transportation Improvements Plan that is approved by the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization. Projects may be any public project sponsored by the Florida Department of Transportation, Miami -Dade Expressway Authority, Florida's Turnpike, the City of Miami and Miami - Dade Department of Transportation and Public Works. Roadway capacities may reach 100% of their capacity, including allowances for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle trips as described above. Roadway capacities may reach 100% of their capacity, including allowances for transit, pedestrian, and bicycle trips as described above. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -13 EXISTING MODAL SPLIT According to journey -to -work data collected in the 2010 Census, single occupant automobile trips account for 69.2 percent of all work trips to -and -from -work reported by residents in the City of Miami. Carpools account for 9.4 percent, public transportation including bus or trolley account for 11.4 percent, walking for 4.5 percent, and 'other means' including bicycle and motorcycle account for 2.1 percent. In addition, approximately 3.3 percent of the residents in Miami report working at home. The City of Miami has a higher percentage of work trips using public transportation and walking than Miami -Dade County as a whole (4.5% compared to 2.3% and 2.1% compared to 1.9% respectively). EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSIT FACILITIES AND ROUTES The City of Miami has several transit options within its limits. Miami -Dade Transit provides Metromover, Metrorail, and Metrobus transit services while the City of Miami provides trolley services. These transit options are further described below. Metrorail: is a 25 -mile dual track, elevated rapid transit system that provides service to Miami International Airport (MIA) and runs from Kendall through South Miami, Coral Gables, and downtown Miami; to the Civic Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital area; and to Brownsville, Liberty City, Hialeah, and Medley in northwest Miami -Dade, with connections to Broward and Palm Beach counties at the Tri-Rail/Metrorail transfer station. The Metrorail has two lines — Orange and Green. The Green Line train provides service between the Palmetto Station to the Dadeland South Station. The Orange Line train provides service between the Miami International Airport Station and the Dadeland South Station. Both lines serve all the stations between Dadeland South and Earlington Heights. The system currently uses 136 train cars with a normal capacity of 164 passengers per car. There are typically eight cars per train during peak hour operations and six cars per train during off- peak periods, or a capacity of 1,312 people per train during the peak periods. The 23 accessible Metrorail stations are about one mile apart, providing easy access for bus riders, pedestrians, and passengers who are dropped off and picked up. Eleven of these 23 stations are within the City of Miami and include Douglas Road, Coconut Grove, Vizcaya, Brickell, Government Center, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre, Culmer, Civic Center, Santa Clara, Allapattah, and Earlington Heights. Metrorail operates from 5:00am to 12:48am, seven days a week. For stations served by both the Orange and Green Lines, trains arrive every five minutes during weekday rush hours, every eight minutes at midday, and every 15-30 minutes after Bpm. For stations served by the Green Line only, trains arrive every ten minutes during weekday rush hours, everyfifteen minutes at midday, and every 30-35 minutes after Bpm. For stations served by both the Orange and Green Lines, weekend service runs every fifteen minutes from 5:00am to 12:48am. For stations served by the Green Line only, weekend service runs every thirty minutes from 5:00am to 12:48am. Metromover: Metromover is a 4.4 -mile electrically -powered, fully automated people mover system that provides free service to downtown Miami from Omni to Brickell and connects with August 2016 Final Draft Page II -14 Metrorail at Government Center and Brickell stations and with Metrobus at various locations throughout downtown. Major destinations of the Metromover system include the American Airlines Arena, Bayside Market Place, Miami -Dade College, the Brickell business district, and the Miami -Dade County School Board. Each car is designed to carry 88 standing and eight seated passengers. In FY 2015, the Metromover system carried nearly 10 million people with a monthly ridership average of 828,000 riders. Metromover is made up of three loops - downtown inner loop, Omni loop, and Brickell loop. All three loops provide service from 5am to midnight seven days a week. Trains arrive frequently. Metrobus: Fifty-five Metrobus routes serve the City of Miami including Routes 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ,16, 17, 21, 22, 24, 27, 32, 33, 36, 37, 40, 42, 46, 48, 51, 54, 57, 62, 73, 77, 79, 93, 95, 101, 102, 103, 110, 112, 113, 119, 120, 136, 150, 195, 196, 202, 207, 208, 211, 238, 246, 249, 277, 297, 338, and 500. The fifty-five routes directly serving Miami are illustrated in Map TR -5.1 and described below: • Route 2 provides service to the Mall at 163 Street, Jackson North, Miami Avenue, Horace Mann Middle School, NW 2 Avenue, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail station, MDC Wolfson Campus, Downtown Bus Terminal, Government Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30-35 minutes during the weeknight, 20-40 minutes on Saturday and 30 minutes on Sunday. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,805 passengers per weekday and 83,549 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 3 provides service to the Mall at 163 Street, Jackson North, Miami Avenue, Horace Mann Middle School, NW 2 Avenue, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail station, MDC Wolfson Campus, Downtown Bus Terminal, Government Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum. Headways are maintained at 18 minutes throughout the weekday until about 8:00, when headways are increased to 30 minutes. After midnight, headways are 60 minutes. Weekend headways start at 30 minutes and decrease to 15 minutes after 8:OOam. After 9:OOpm, headways are increased to 30 minutes and then 60 minutes after midnight. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 7,349 passengers per weekday and 220,951 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 6 provides service to Bird Road, Coconut Grove Metrorail station, Douglas Road (37 Avenue), NW 14 Street, Little Havana, Brickell Metrorail/Metromover Station, Downtown Miami, Miami Avenue Metromover Station, NW 29 Street. Headways are maintained at 60 minutes throughout the weekday and weekend. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 800 passengers per weekday and 22,762 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 7 provides service to Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, City of Sweetwater, Dolphin Mall, Miami International Mall, Fontainebleau Blvd., Mall of the Americas, Downtown Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, Miami Art Museum, MDC Wolfson Campus, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 20-30 minutes during the weeknight, 20 minutes during the day on weekends, and 30-35 minutes weekend nights. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that August 2016 Final Draft Page II -15 approximately 4,242 passengers per weekday and 114,259 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 8 provides service to Florida International University Bus Terminal, FIU South Campus, SW 8 Street west of SW 82 Ave., Coral Way west of 82 Ave (Rt. 8), Westchester Shopping Center (Rt. 8), Little Havana, Calle Ocho, Brickell Metrorail Station, MDC Wolfson Campus. Headways are maintained at 10 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, and 15-30 minutes on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 7,172 passengers per weekday and 187,876 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 9 provides service to City of Aventura, Aventura Mall, the Mall at 163rd Street, City of North Miami Beach, City of North Miami, NE 2 Avenue, City of Miami Shores, Govt. Center Metrorail station, Stephen P. Clark Center, Downtown Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, and Miami Art Museum. Headways are maintained at 12 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 25-30 minutes during the weeknight, and 30 minutes on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 6,573 passengers per weekday and 175,553 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 10 provides service to Skylake Mall, The Mall at 163rd Street, City of North Miami Beach, City of North Miami, NE 2 Avenue, Omni Metromover Station/Bus Terminal. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes during the weekdays, 30 minutes during most of the weekend, and 60 minute headways on weekend evenings. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,667 passengers per weekday and 76,055 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 11 provides service to Florida International University South Campus, FIU Bus Terminal, W. Flagler Street, Mall of the Americas, Little Havana, Downtown Miami, Government Center Metrorail station, Stephen P. Clark Center, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, and Miami Art Museum. Headways are maintained at 8 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 20 minutes during the weeknight, 15 minutes during the day on weekends, and 60 minute headways after 10:00pm on weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 10,952 passengers per weekday and 308,554 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 12 provides service to the Northside Metrorail station, Northside Shopping Center, Liberty City, NW/SW 12 Avenue, Allapattah Metrorail station, Civic Center Metrorail Station, Civic Center, VA Hospital, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital and Clinics, Vizcaya Metrorail station, Mercy Hospital, and Coconut Grove. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekday and are increased to 65 minutes after 7:00pm. Headways are maintained at 40 minutes during the weekend until after 6:00pm where headways are increased to 60 minutes. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,261 passengers per weekday and 71,735 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 16 provides service to the City of North Miami Beach, The Mall at 163rd Street, NE 6 Avenue, City of North Miami, City of Biscayne Park, City of Miami Shores, City of EI Portal, Biscayne Boulevard, and Omni Bus Terminal. Headways are maintained at 20 August 2016 Final Draft Page II -16 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 25-30 minutes during the weeknight, and 25-30 minutes on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,784 passengers per weekday and 77,327 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 17 provides service to Rolling Oaks, Carol City, City of Opa-locks via NW 22 Avenue, North Miami, West Little River, Model City, Earlington Heights Metrorail station, Allapattah, Little Havana, and the Vizcaya Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30-60 minutes during the weeknight, 30 minutes during most of the day on weekends, and 60 minutes during the weekend nights. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 4,849 passengers per weekday and 129,737 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 21 provides service to the Northside Shopping Center, Northside Metrorail Station, Allapattah Metrorail Station, Santa Clara Metrorail Station, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospitals and Clinics, Overtown, Downtown Bus Terminal, Stephen P. Clark Center, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, and Miami Art Museum. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekdays until after 8:O0pm when headways increase to 60 minutes. During the day on weekends headways are maintained at 40 minutes until 6:OOpm when headways are increased to 60 minutes. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,257 passengers per weekday and 49,662 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 22 provides service to the City of North Miami Beach, The Mall at 163rd Street, Golden Glades Park & Ride, NW 22 Avenue, Earlington Heights Metrorail station, clinics, Coconut Grove Metrorail station, and the Sunshine State Industrial Park (No service to Industrial Park on weekends or weekdays after 9pm). Headways are maintained at 15-20 minutes during the weekday, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 30 minutes throughout most of the weekends, and 60 minutes weekend nights. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 5,044 passengers per weekday and 134,053 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 24 provides service to SW 152 Avenue during Rush Hour, SW 137 Court/Coral Way, Florida International University Park Campus, FIU Bus Terminal, West Dade Regional Library, Westchester Shopping Center, City of Coral Gables, Vizcaya Metrorail station, and the Brickell Metrorail station. Coral Way Limited: Limited stop service from Ponce de Leon to Brickell Metrorail Station, Monday through Saturday. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 30 minutes throughout most of the weekends, and 60 minutes weekend nights after 8:OOpm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,416 passengers per weekday and 66,844 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 27 provides service to the Calder Casino & Race Track, Sun Life Stadium, Carol City, NW 27 Avenue, Miami Dade College North Campus (weekdays/Saturdays; no overnight trips), Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Metrorail station (no overnight trips), Brownsville Metrorail station (no overnight trips), and the Coconut Grove Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 15-20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 15-25 minutes throughout most of the weekend, and 60 minute headways after midnight all week. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that August 2016 Final Draft Page II -17 approximately 9,058 passengers per weekday and 247,752 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 32 provides service to the Landmark Learning Center, Carol City, St. Thomas University, Florida Memorial College, City of Opa-locka, Opa-locka Tri -Rail station, NW 32 Avenue, Miami Dade College North Campus (weekdays/Saturdays), Northside Metrorail station, Northside Shopping Center, Santa Clara Metrorail Station, Omni Bus Terminal, and N. Bayshore Drive. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekday and increase to 60 minutes after 9:30pm. Headways are maintained at 40 minutes throughout most of the weekend and increase to 60 minutes after 8:30pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,117 passengers per weekday and 80,264 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 33 provides service to NW 106 Street/South River Drive, Lehigh Industrial Park, City of Hialeah Gardens City Hall, City of Hialeah, Westland Mall, West/East 49 Street (NW 103 Street), NW/NE 95 Street, North Shore Hospital, and Miami Shores Village. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekday and increase to 50-60 minutes after 7:30pm. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekend and increase to 60 minutes after 6:30pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,033 passengers per weekday and 54,005 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 36 provides service to Dolphin Mall, Miami International Mall, Miami Dade College West Campus. Doral Center (36A), City of Miami Springs (36), Miami Springs High School (select trips), NW/NE 36 Street, Allapattah Metrorail station, Biscayne Boulevard, NE 36 Street and 4 Avenue. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 35-40 minutes during the weeknight, and 30-40 minutes on weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,987 passengers per weekday and 78,967 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 37 provides service to the City of Hialeah, Dept. of Children & Families, Hialeah Metrorail station, Tri -Rail Airport station, Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, Douglas Road (SW 37 Avenue), Douglas Road Metrorail station, City of South Miami via Sunset Drive, Cocoplum Circle, and the South Miami Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekday and increase to 60 minutes after 8:30pm. Headways are maintained at 35 minutes throughout most of the weekend and increase to 60 minutes after 6:30pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 4,010 passengers per weekday and 111,932 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 40 provides service to 152 Avenue & SW 56 Street, SW 132 Avenue/18 Street (no weekend service), Bird Road, and the Douglas Road Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, and 60-65 minutes during the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,314 passengers per weekday and 57,786 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 42 provides service to Miami Springs, City of Opa-locka City Hall, Opa-locka Tri -Rail Station, City of Hialeah, East 8 Avenue (LeJeune Road), Amtrak Passenger Terminal, Tri - August 2016 Final Draft Page II -18 Rail Metrorail station, Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, City of Coral Gables and the Douglas Road Metrorail station. (No weekend service) Headways are maintained at 30 minutes throughout most of the weekday and increase to 60 minutes after 8:OOpm. Headways are maintained at 40 minutes throughout most of the weekend and increase to 60 minutes after 8:OOpm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,347 passengers perweekday and 36,164 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 46 (Liberty City Connection) provides service to the Caleb Center, Brownsville Metrorail station, NW 54 Street, NW 37 Avenue, NW 46 Street, NW 10 Avenue, Winn Dixie, Belafonte Tacolcy Center, Miami Northwestern High School, MDC Entrepreneurial Center. Headways are maintained at 60 minutes from 6:30am to 8:30am and from 2:50pm to 6:50pm weekdays only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 45 passengers per weekday and 982 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 48 provides service to the Brickell Avenue Business District, Brickell Metrorail station, Mercy Hospital, Douglas Road Metrorail station, Coconut Grove, City of Coral Gables, University Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 60 minutes from 6:44am to 6:42pm weekdays only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 280 passengers per weekday and 6,154 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 51 (Flagler MAX) provides service to SW 137 Ave/Coral Way, West Miami -Dade, West Flagler St., Downtown Bus Terminal, Govt. Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum, and the Miami Art Museum. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour and 30 minutes during the weekday off-peak. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,455 passengers per weekday and 76,000 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 54 provides service to Miami Gardens Drive & NW 87th Avenue (weekdays only), City of Hialeah, Westland Mall, Hialeah Metrorail station, Department of Children and Families, Brownsville Metrorail station, and Biscayne Boulevard/NE 58 Street. Headways are maintained at 30 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30-40 minutes during the weeknight, and 30 minutes for most of the weekend except after 8:OOpm when headways are increased to 60 minutes. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,545 passengers per weekday and 95,425 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 57 provides service to the Tri -Rail Airport Station, Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, South Miami Metrorail station, Red Road (NW/SW 57 Avenue), Busway at SW 152 Street, SW 152 Street Park & Ride Lot, and Jackson South Hospital. Weekday headways are maintained at 60 minutes from 6:30am to 5:40pm. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 525 passengers per weekday and 11,550 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 62 provides service to Biscayne, City of Hialeah, East 9 Street (NW 62 Street), Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Metrorail Station, Biscayne Boulevard, City of Miami Beach via Julia Tuttle Causeway (rush hours only), Collins Avenue, Omni Bus Terminal, and NE 14 Street/North Bayshore Drive. Headways are maintained at 12 minutes during the August 2016 Final Draft Page II -19 weekday rush hour, 30-40 minutes during the weeknight, and 20-30 on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,434 passengers per weekday and 91,677 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 73 provides service to Miami Gardens Dr. & NW 73 Ave Park & Ride Lot, Town of Miami Lakes, Hialeah, Palmetto Metrorail Station, Milam Dairy Road (NW 72 Avenue), US Postal Annex, Dadeland Mall, and the Dadeland South Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 30-35 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 55-60 minutes during the weeknight, and 60-70 minutes on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,685 passengers per weekday and 67,919 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 77 provides service to NW 199 Street/NW 2 Avenue (SR 441), Golden Glades Park & Ride Lot, NW 7 Avenue, Liberty City, Culmer Metrorail station, Government Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, Miami Art Museum, and the Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal. Headways are maintained at 8 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 15 minutes for most of the weekend, and 60 minutes for weekend nights after 8:00pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 10,202 passengers per weekday and 269,070 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 79 provides service to the Northside Metrorail Station, NW 79 St., 79th Street Causeway, North Bay Island, Normandy Isle, Miami Beach, Collins Ave., Harding Ave., and 73 St. Headways are maintained at 20-25 minutes during the weekday rush hour. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 657 passengers per weekday and 14,457 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 93 (Biscayne MAX) provides service to Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami Art Museum, Government Center Metrorail station, Biscayne Boulevard, Omni Bus Terminal, EI Portal Village, City of North Miami, City of North Miami Beach, City of Aventura, and Aventura Mall. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour and 20-30 minutes during the off-peak. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 4,141 passengers per weekday and 91,093 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 95 (Express) provides service to Golden Glades Park & Ride Lot, Civic Center, Veterans Hospital, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Norwood, Earlington Heights Metrorail station, Downtown Miami, and Brickell. Headways are maintained at 10 minutes during the weekday rush hour. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,270 passengers per weekday and 49,938 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 101 (A) provides service to NE 17 Terrace/Biscayne Boulevard, Omni Bus Terminal, City of Miami Beach via Venetian Causeway, Lincoln Road, and South Beach. Rush hour headways are maintained at 35 minutes throughout the week. Rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 78 passengers per weekday and 2,049 monthly passengers access this route. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -20 • Route 102 (B) provides service to the Brickell Metrorail station, Brickell Business District, Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami Seaquarium, Crandon Park, Village of Key Biscayne, and Cape Florida State Park. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the off-peak and 60 minutes after 9:00pm. Weekend headways are maintained at 30 minutes until after 9:00pm when headways are increased to 60 minutes. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,840 passengers per weekday and 49,520 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 103 (C) provides service to Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum of South Florida, Miami Art Museum, Government Center Metrorail station, Omni Metromover Station/Bus Terminal, City of Miami Beach via MacArthur Causeway, South Beach, Washington Ave., Lincoln Rd., Collins Ave., 41 St., Alton Rd., and Mt. Sinai Hospital. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30-35 minutes during the weeknight, and 60 minutes after 10:00pm. Weekend headways are maintained at 20 minutes most of day until the headways are increased to 60 minutes after 10:00pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,638 passengers per weekday and 103,880 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 110 (J) provides service to Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, NW 36 St., Allapattah Metrorail station, and the City of Miami Beach. Weekday headways are maintained at 20 minutes throughout the day until after 8:00pm when headways are increased to 60 minutes. Weekend headways are maintained at 30 minutes until being increased to 60 minutes after 7:00pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 3,020 passengers per weekday and 84,665 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 112 (L) provides service to the Lincoln Road Mall, Miami Beach Convention Center, Miami Beach Senior High School, 41 St/Indian Creek Dr., JFK Causeway, Northside Metrorail station, Amtrak Terminal, and the Hialeah Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 12 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, and 60 minutes after midnight. Weekend headways are maintained at 15 minutes throughout the day on weekends and increases to 30 minutes in the evenings and 60 minutes after midnight. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 9,395 passengers per weekday and 270,042 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 113 (NI) provides service to NW 21 Street & 19 Avenue via 17 Avenue, NW 19 Ave/20 St., Civic Center Metrorail station, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial hospitals and clinics, Cedars Medical Center, VA Hospital, Omni Metromover Station/Bus Terminal, MacArthur Causeway, City of Miami Beach, South Beach, Lincoln Rd., Collins Ave/41 St., and Mt. Sinai Hospital. Headways are maintained at 45 minutes during the weekday rush hour and 60 minutes during weeknights and weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,055 passengers per weekday and 27,933 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 119 (S) provides service to Downtown (Miami) Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami Art Museum, Government Center Metrorail station, Omni Bus Terminal, MacArthur Causeway, City of Miami Beach, South Beach, Lincoln Road, Collins August 2016 Final Draft Page II -21 Avenue, 192 Street Causeway, City of Aventura, and Aventura Mall. Headways are maintained at 12 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 20-25 minutes during the weeknight, and 60 minutes after midnight. Weekend headways are maintained at 15-25 for most of the day until headways are increased to 60 minutes after midnight. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 11,684 passengers per weekday and 341,151 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 120 (South Beach MAX) provides service to Downtown Bus Terminal, Main Library, Historical Museum, Miami Art Museum, Govt. Center Metrorail station, Miami Dade College Wolfson Campus, Omni Bus Terminal, MacArthur Causeway, City of Miami Beach, Collins Avenue, Town of Surfside, City of Bal Harbour, Haulover Park Marina, and Aventura Mall. Headways are maintained at 12 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 15 minutes throughout most of the day on the weekends, and 30 minutes during the evenings on the weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 7,518 passengers per weekday and 210,284 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 136 provides service to SW 147 Ave., SW 120 St., SW 117 Ave., SW 107 Ave., SW 136 St., The Falls, SW 128 St., The Busway, Dadeland South Metrorail station, Douglas Road Station, Cocoplum Plaza, and the Village of Pinecrest. Weekday rush hour headways are maintained at 60 minutes. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 321 passengers per weekday and 7,071 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 150 (Miami Beach Airport Flyer) provides service to Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, 41st Street, Alton Rd., Collins Ave., Lincoln Rd., and Washington Ave. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30 minutes during the weeknight, 20 minutes throughout most of the weekend until headways are increased to 30 minutes after 9:40pm. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,940 passengers per weekday and 59,659 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 195 (Dade-Broward Express: Broward Blvd) provides southbound A.M. service from Broward Blvd (Ft. Lauderdale Tri -Rail Station) to Downtown Miami and northbound P.M. from Downtown Miami to Broward Blvd. (Ft. Lauderdale Tri -Rail Station). Another 195 provides service to/from Broward Blvd to/from the Civic Center in Miami. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 615 passengers per weekday and 13,536 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 196 (Dade-Broward Express: Sheridan St) provides southbound A.M. service from Sheridan St. (Sheridan St. Tri -Rail Station) to Downtown Miami and northbound P.M. from Downtown Miami to Sheridan St. (Sheridan St. Tri -Rail Station). Another 195 provides service to/from Sheridan St. to/from the Civic Center in Miami. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 519 passengers per weekday and 11,424 monthly passengers access this route. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -22 • Route 202 (Little Haiti Connector) provides service to NE 36 Street, Miami Design Center, NE 2 Avenue, Sabal Palm, Douglas Gardens, Edison Middle School, Village Carver, N. Miami Avenue and NW 83 Street. Weekday headways are maintained at 45-60 minutes while weekend headways are 60 minutes. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 237 passengers per weekday and 6,246 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 207 (Little Havana Circulator: 7' St) provides (clockwise) service via SW 7 St to SW 25 Ave., Beacom Blvd., SW 1 St., NW 2 Ave., Government Center Metrorail station, Downtown Miami, SW 2 Ave., SW 7 St., and the Brickell station. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 20 minutes during the off-peak and evenings, and 20 minutes on weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,816 passengers per weekday and 39,951 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 208 (Little Havana Circulator: 8' St) provides service (counter -clockwise) via W Flagler St. to SW 27 Ave., SW 8 St., SW/NW 2 Ave., Government Center Metrorail station, Downtown Miami, W. Flagler St., City of Miami Police Substation, Beacom Blvd., and the Brickell station. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 20 minutes during the off-peak and evenings, and 20 minutes on weekends. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,062 passengers per weekday and 45,364 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 211 (Overtown Circulator) provides service to the Culmer Metrorail station, NW 5th Ave./5th St., US Post Office, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail station, Culmer Neighborhood Center, NW 5th Ave./19 St., and NW 3rd Ave./20 St.. Weekday headways are maintained at 45 minutes. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 119 passengers per weekday and 2,623 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 238 (East/West Connector) provides service to the Dolphin Mall, passes by Miami International Mall, NW 72 Ave./25 St., Airport Corporate Center, Airport Cargo City, NW 65 Ave./Blue Lagoon Dr., Airport Hilton Hotel, and the Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 40 minutes during the weekday rush hour and 60 minutes during the off-peak. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 531 passengers per weekday and 11,676 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 246 (Night Owl) provides service to the Mall at 163 Street, Jackson North, Miami Avenue, Horace Mann Middle School, NW 2 Avenue, Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Metrorail station, MDC Wolfson Campus, Downtown Bus Terminal, Government Center Metrorail station, Main Library, Historical Museum. Headways are maintained at 20 minutes during the weekday rush hour, 30-35 minutes during the weeknight, 20-40 minutes on Saturday and 30 minutes on Sunday. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 100 passengers per weekday and 3,234 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 249 (Coconut Creek Circulator) provides service to the Mall at 163rd Street, Downtown Miami, Government Center Metrorail station, Overtown, Civic Center August 2016 Final Draft Page II -23 Metrorail station, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospitals and clinics, and the Allapattah Metrorail station. Headways are maintained at 60 minutes every day of the week. Service only provided from midnight to 5:00am every day. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 1,304 passengers per weekday and 34,951 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 277 (7t' Avenue MAX) provides service to Downtown Miami, Government Center Metrorail station, Culmer Metrorail station, NW 7 Ave., Lindsey Hopkins, Edison Center, North Miami, Biscayne Gardens, and the Golden Glades Park & Ride Lot. Headways are maintained at 24 minutes. Weekday rush hour service only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 932 passengers per weekday and 20,507 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 297 (27' Avenue MAX) provides service to NW 27 Avenue, Miami International Airport (MIA) Metrorail station, Martin Luther King Jr. Metrorail station, Brownsville Transit Village, Brownsville Metrorail station, Miami Dade College North, City of Opa- locka, City of Miami Gardens, Dolphin Stadium, NW 27 Avenue/211 Street (northbound and southbound), and NW 37 Avenue/211 Street. Headways are maintained at 15 minutes during the weekday rush hour and 30 minutes during the off-peak. No weekend service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 2,010 passengers per weekday and 44,228 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 338 (Weekend Express) provides service to Dolphin Mall and Miami International Airport. Weekend headways are maintained at 60 minutes from 11:25am to 7:27pm. No weekday service. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 224 passengers per Saturday, 227 passengers per Sunday, and 2,050 monthly passengers access this route. • Route 500 provides service to Metrorail stations from Dadeland South to Government Center stations. Headways are maintained at 60 minutes every day and service is provided from 12:30am to 5:00am only. MDT ridership data from October 2015 shows that approximately 66 passengers per weekday and 2,100 monthly passengers access this route. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -24 City of Miami Trolley: Ten Trolley routes operate throughout the City of Miami and include: • Allapattah Route: provides service from the Omni Bus Terminal along NW 20 Street to the Allapattah Neighborhood stopping at the Santa Clara Metrorail Station and along the Health District. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 7:00pm. • Overtown Route: provides service within the Overtown and Health District neighborhoods, stopping at the Culmer Metrorail Station. Service is provided Monday through Friday 6:30am to 7:00pm. • Stadium Route: provides seasonal service (April through September) within the Little Havana and Health District neighborhoods, stopping at the Miami Marlins Stadium and various medical offices and centers. Service is provided Mondaythrough Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm. • Health District Route: provides service within the Health District neighborhoods, stopping at various medical office and centers. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm. • Biscayne Route: provides service between the Brickell Metrorail Station and the Midtown neighborhood along Biscayne Boulevard, stopping at the Omni Transit Terminal and Bayfront Park. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm and Sundays from 8:00am to 8:00pm. • Brickell Route: provides service between the Brickell Metrorail Station and Mercy Hospital along Brickell Avenue and Bayshore Drive. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm and Sundays from 8:00am to 8:00pm. • Coral Way Route: provides service between the Port of Miami and downtown Coral Gables at Ponce de Leon Boulevard and Coral Way Drive, stopping in downtown Miami as well as the Brickell and Vizcaya Metrorail Stations. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm and Sundays from 8:00am to 8:00pm. • Coconut Grove Route: provides service between Mercy Hospital and downtown Coconut Grove along Bayshore Drive, stopping at the Douglas Road Metrorail Station and the Cocowalk Shopping Center. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm and Sundays from 8:00am to 8:00pm. • Little Havana Route: provides service between the Brickell Metrorail Station and the Magic City Casino traveling along W Flagler and SW 8t" Streets. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm and Sundays from 8:00am to 8:00pm. • Wynwood Route: provides service between the Omni Transit Terminal and downtown Wynwood along NW 2nd Avenue. Service is provided Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 11:00pm August 2016 Final Draft Page II -25 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS The City of Miami had a 2014 population of 430,332 as reported by the US Census, which constitutes approximately 16.16% of the total 2014 Miami -Dade County population. Among its residents, 70% consider themselves Hispanic or Latino, 19.2% consider themselves Black or African American, 11.9% consider themselves White, 1.3% consider themselves other races, and 2.7% consider themselves more than one race. The average household size is 2.67 persons per household and the average family size is 3.59 persons per family. Furthermore, median age for residents of Miami is 39.1 years and the median household income is $30,858. The 2010 Census Data indicates a healthy urban setting made up of a diverse racial mix of people living within low to middle income brackets. TRANSPORTATION DISADVANTAGED The transportation disadvantaged include individuals who, because of physical or mental disability, income status or age, are unable to transport themselves or purchase individual transportation. As a result, these individuals are dependent upon others to obtain access to health care, employment, education, shopping, social or other life-sustaining activities. Currently, Miami -Dade County offers transportation services to the transportation disadvantaged through the County's Community Action and Human Services Department. The Community Action and Human Services Department has a transportation unit that offers reliable, on -demand transportation to disadvantaged citizens. This program benefits approximately 2% of those who are unable to commute to work using private transportation. Moreover, it assists approximately 4% of families living in poverty. According to the 2010 US Census Data, approximately 31,730 or 20.8% of the 152,525 occupied households in the City of Miami are without a vehicle. The Census also stated that 33,212 persons or 18.1% of the total working population that does not work at home use public transportation (bus, trolley, streetcar, subway, railroad or taxi), walked, or used a bicycle as their means of transportation to work. Based on the above information, a significant portion of the population within the City of Miami would be considered transportation disadvantaged. It appears that the existing public transportation system provides this segment of the population access to transportation for work, shopping and other activities; however, the City continues to monitor the local needs of the transportation disadvantaged to assure that adequate service is always provided. August 2016 Final Draft Page II -26 EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS AND ATTRACTORS The City of Miami has many major trip generators and attractors within its limits. The major trip generators consist primarily of high density residential areas with densities greater than ten units per acre. These areas are scattered throughout the city with clusters of higher density census blocks in Little Havana, near Blue Lagoon, Brickell, Edgewater, and in Coconut Grove. The major trip attractors are divided into five categories as listed below: Hospitals: Metropolitan Hospital of Miami VA Medical Center University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Mercy General Hospital Culture and Education Facilities: Perez Art Museum of Miami Adrienne Arsht Center Miami Main Library and 11 other libraries Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Miami -Dade Cultural Center James L. Knight International Center Miami -Dade Community College Wolfson Campus Miami -Dade Community College Medical Center Campus Miami Youth Museum Virginia Key Park EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Sports and Leisure Facilities: American Airlines Arena Miami Civic Center Miami Marlins Stadium Magic City Casino Miami Convention Center Watson Park/Watson Island (Parrot Jungle) Dade County Amphitheater Bayfront Park Virginia Key Park Barnacle Historic State Park 87 other City parks Retail and Commercial Facilities: Bayside Marketplace Cocowalk / Mayfair in the Grove Shops at Midtown Miami Government and other Public Facilities: City Hall Miami Government Center MDT Park -and -Ride lots (6) The availability of pedestrian facilities and amenities plays an important role in encouraging the use of non -automobile modes of travel. Benefits associated with walking include the ability to ease traffic congestion, personal health/recreation and reduced need for automobile parking facilities. In order to be considered a realistic transportation option, however, existing conditions need to be favorable for pedestrian use. The existing pedestrian network within Miami is excellent (see Map TR -7). The majority of streets within the residential neighborhoods have sidewalks on both sides. EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES The availability of bicycle facilities plays an important role in encouraging the use of non - automobile modes of travel. Benefits associated with biking include the ability to ease traffic congestion, personal health/recreation, and reduced need for automobile parking facilities. In August 2016 Final Draft Page II -27 order to be considered a realistic transportation, however, existing conditions need to be favorable for bicycle use. Existing information maintained by Miami -Dade County and the City of Miami show the existing bicycle facilities within the City of Miami which include paved paths, bike lanes, paved shoulders, sharrows, Citi Bike stations, and bicycle racks (Map TR -6). A bicycle suitability analysis was completed for the major thoroughfares and downtown streets for the City of Miami to identify roadways more suitable for bicyclists based on standard criteria. The analysis used roadway volumes, lane configuration, posted speed limits, and existing facilities to identify suitable roadways for bicyclists. Many downtown roadways were considered suitable for bicyclists while other major thoroughfares such as W Flagler St, SW 27 Ave, and SW 37 Ave were considered not suitable. AVAILABILITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND SERVICE TO SERVE EXISTING LAND USES Miami contains approximately 36.5 square miles of land (or 23,365 acres) and 19.95 square miles of water. Residential land uses account for 50.4 percent of the total acreage. The next largest existing land use categories are public/semi-public and retail/office, which total an estimated 14.4 percent and 11.1 percent of the total land use respectively. Vacant land (residential and non-residential cumulatively) accounts for approximately 11.3 percent of the City of Miami's total acreage as well. Results from the level of service analysis demonstrate poor traffic conditions on the arterial network within Miami, which can be seen in Maps TR -8.1 and TR -8.2. These facilities play a primary role in the countywide traffic circulation system and carry a high percentage of through trips. The remaining roadways within Miami primarily provide access to adjacent land uses and the arterial roadways mentioned above. However, as congestion worsens on the arterial roadways, cut -through traffic may increase on collector roadways thereby degrading their level of service. In addition to roadway facilities, the existing land uses are served by transit and pedestrian/sidewalk facilities. Maps TR -5.1, TR -5.2, and TR -7 illustrate the transit and pedestrian/sidewalk facilities that serve Miami. ADEQUACY OF EXISTING EVACUATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Miami -Dade County's Adopted Comprehensive Development Master Plan identifies the designated local and regional transportation facilities critical to the evacuation of the coastal population. The evacuation network within Miami consists of Biscayne Boulevard (US 1/SR 5), Kennedy Causeway (SR 934), Julia Tuttle Causeway (I- 195/SR 112), Venetian Causeway, MacArthur Causeway (1-395/A1A/US 41/SR 836), Rickenbacker Causeway, NE 83rd Street, Crandon Boulevard, Stn Street, South Dixie Highway, and Interstate 95. According to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, portions of the City of Miami are within the five evacuation zones. For Miami -Dade County in 2015, in -county clearance times for the base scenarios range from 15 hours for the evacuation Level A scenario to 87 hours for August 2016 Final Draft Page II -28 evacuation Level E scenario. The base scenarios were developed to estimate a series of worst case scenarios with Level E being the scenario with the most damage. These scenarios assume 100 percent of the vulnerable population evacuates and includes impacts from counties outside of the RPC area. These scenarios are generally designed for growth management purposes, in order to ensure that all residents that choose to evacuate during an event are able to do so. The Planning Council's current hurricane evacuation model shows that the evacuation time for the areas east of Miami would be approximately 20 hours under current (2015) development conditions for the evacuation Level A scenario. EXISTING INTERMODAL FACILITIES An intermodal center is any connection point between two or more transportation modes. Possible modes include automobile, bus, rail, bicycle, and pedestrian, among others. An intermodal center typically includes a set of amenities or infrastructure provided to make the transfer between or among modes of transportation as direct, convenient, pleasant, and safe as possible. Characteristics of intermodal facilities typically include accessibility to pedestrians and transfers, location near an activity center, at least one mode is usually a public transportation mode, and usually includes various user amenities such as shelters, seating, and retail activities. At its simplest definition, an intermodal center could include all bus stops, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities including bike paths and bike racks. Miami -Dade Transit Metrobus routes offer a network of bus coverage within the City of Miami, generally becoming denser approaching the Downtown activity centers such as the Miami -Dade County Government Center, Downtown Bus Terminal, and Omni Bus Terminal. Sidewalks are provided along most streets within the City of Miami. Sidewalks in the vicinity of bus stops are vital for increasing accessibility to public transit. Bicycle lane coverage is not as extensive within the City as sidewalk coverage. Existing intermodal locations within the City of Miami were identified and are depicted in Map TR -13. These intermodal facilities include the following: • Miami International Airport • Port of Miami • Downtown Bus Terminal • Omni Bus Terminal • Miami Intermodal Center • Douglas Road Metrorail Station • Coconut Grove Metrorail Station • Vizcaya Metrorail Station • Brickell Metrorail Station August 2016 Final Draft Page II -29 • Government Center Metrorail Station • Historic Overtown/Lyric Theatre Station • Culmer Metrorail Station • Civic Center Metrorail Station • Santa Clara Metrorail Station • Allapattah Metrorail Station • Earlington Heights Metrorail Station • Twenty-one Metromover Stations FUTURE TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIES The following series of maps represent the future conditions (2040) for the transportation network on a multi -modal basis. This includes the roadway system, public transit system and bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the City of Miami. Map TR -15: Major Thoroughfares by Number of Lanes (2040) illustrates the major thoroughfares in Miami by the number of through lanes for each facility anticipated in 2040. Map TR -16: Limited Access Facilities, Significant Parking Facilities (2040) delineates the limited and controlled access facilities in Miami to the year 2040, as well as the locations of proposed significant parking facilities (facilities with more than 200 parking spaces). Map TR -17: Future Major Trip Generators (2040) based on demographic projections from the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM), illustrates the major trip generators in Miami by identifying the higher density residential areas — ten dwelling units per acre or greater. Map TR -18: Future Metrobus Transit Facilities (2040) along with the existing Miami -Dade Transit MetroBus routes, this map indicates the programmed transit routes (funded and unfunded) between 2015 and 2024 from MDT's Transit Development Plan (TDP). Two future transit centers are also illustrated — the Downtown Intermodal Center and the NW 7t" Avenue Transit Village. Map TR -19: Future Bicycle Facilities (2040) identifies the existing bicycle facilities along with programmed bicycle facility improvements that are in the design or construction phase of implementation, which include bike lanes and sharrows. This information was provided by the City of Miami Bicycle Coordinator. Map TR -20: Future Pedestrian Facilities (2040) delineates the presence of a sidewalk along roadways within the City. Most of the roadways regardless of classification offer sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Map TR -21.1: Future A.M. Vehicular Peak Hour Levels of Service (LOS) on Major Thoroughfares (2040) illustrates future A.M. vehicle peak -hour levels of service for major roadways within the City with anticipated build -out of the existing land use pattern plus the potential development in the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III based on the Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM). Map TR -21.2: Future P.M. Vehicular Peak Hour Levels of Service (LOS) on Major Thoroughfares (2040) illustrates future P.M. vehicle peak -hour levels of service for major roadways within the City with anticipated build -out of the existing land use pattern plus the potential development in the Downtown Development of Regional Impact Increment III based August 2016 Final Draft Page III -2 Map TR -22: Future Intermodal Centers and Access to such Facilities (2040) illustrates the existing intermodal centers in the City of Miami including Miami International Airport, the Port of Miami, Omni Bus Terminal, Miami Intermodal Center (MIC), MDT's MetroMover and MetroRail facilities, as well as the future All Aboard Florida and Tri -Rail extension from the future Downtown Intermodal Terminal. Map TR -23: Future Beach Connection (Baylink), City of Miami Streetcar, and Water Taxi (2040) illustrates the proposed Baylink connection to the City of Miami Beach from downtown Miami, the proposed City of Miami streetcar that circulates from the Midtown/Design District area to downtown Miami, and the proposed water taxi service that will provide service between downtown Miami and Haulover Beach. August 2016 Final Draft Page III -3 Man TR - 15 Wolin all, well �`t1����� ,'•L�■��• 395' �"�■ �� _ 1 `Ca■�.� �i \95� ���I�t W iLAG�cn - f SW 7 ST � NW 28 9T �- R Z N O 2.0 y NW 20 ST m 0 2 000 m /'yam- _ 836 •/ NW 14 ST FRQa NW 14•T •■ �'�J-.. NW 12 ST r,bN ■ O e ■ Z NW 7 ST 826 _ W FLAGLER ST ■' — ■ �. SW LIST ■ N y / SW_75T ■ ■MAMNTOWN SW 8 ST see a,ea emargeinent) N J H � N •Z N.,� SW 16 ST V N i3 'b Pym, O y 6 a G'- D m m m \a`' h m m m m m SW 22 ST m `•+� V Legend e SW 245T 0 1 Lane 2 LanesPy tie m m m SW 40 ST /$ 9c�F'f' 3 Lanes C's 4 Lanes �y GRAND AVE 5 Lanes 6 Lanes N �P 2 City Of Miami sw 64 ST m - Miles Man TR - 16 ■i►���■■n■� I t I� ■■■..--Limited W FLAGLER ST I SW 8 ST Access Facilities and < <m N m m � N � Z N `L N 4II 1 � gW 16 ST N ; - n N Ism 1�0 0■■ �rn� E�r 395 - 19 ■��I��iii��l 0 �1 ❑ MDT Park and Ride Lots CO m CA I Parking Garages < < m ST 2 (1000+ parking spots) m m SW 40 Parking Garages 0 (200-1000 parking spots) GRANDAVE s 12 Surface Parking Lots Limited Access Facilities PPIPMP P 42h ,,�6 H I BZ6, I t I� W FLAGLER ST I SW 8 ST � < <m N m m � N � Z N `L N 4II 1 � gW 16 ST N ; - n N ( s M D SW 24 ST C m m SW 22 ST m Legend 0 ❑ MDT Park and Ride Lots CO m CA I Parking Garages < < m ST 2 (1000+ parking spots) m m SW 40 Parking Garages 0 (200-1000 parking spots) GRANDAVE s 12 Surface Parking Lots Limited Access Facilities City of Miami sW 64 ST a `m L �— o ■ v �' z r - 5I ST ■ DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) 0 O �rF v� �F Rc s� Man TR - 17 e Major Trip Generators (2040 ) 487= 0 NW 14 ST NW 7TST D j _ z NW 71 ST ,LZ m Z i N < NW'11 ST w f N o NW 10 ST z NW 62 ST > O z z z > <m---. z z > < < < < NW 54 ST ,,!rm NW 6 ST m @c9 m m m m m 3 p NW 5 ST z c c@F z 3 O� 3 NF�0 NW 46 5T S q '94 112 n a Z m m m Nm W`36 ST m � W FLpGLER S7 gE`1' ST � C 1 ST NR'`k NW 29 ST z z OP o v 2 Oct) < NW 20 ST m b 2,000 m �� ��K'NR, Uq ■ ■ 83J NW 14 ST LF/$ NW 14 T - ■ NW 12 ST rcbx _ ■ \-"' z0 ■ J NW7ST ■- - �� a ■ 5 ST N 826 S W FLAGLER ST gyy 1 fr ■- F ■DOWNTOWN fh � W 7 ST � � MIAMI mSW a ST Isee area eniargemenq w � N < N M mm i m a a SW 16 ST N' N f 9P,3 M > m m "' m m m SW 22 ST SW 24 ST v � � rn DI j �SaG��o� R�cir� N Legend e m m m SW 40 ST 9P @9c�P No housing units Rcs� Less than 5 units/acre GRANOAVE 5 - 10 units/acre t �2 More than 10 units/acre N 0 City of Miami SW 64 ST m 2 Miles Man TR - 18 1 ,ws"ice - �` 11 i S 1 — r,,,bx -� �■�11■■ ■■■■�Future MDT Metrobus Service (2040) _ _ .i■� ■■■lis=Iloilo NW7ST ■ ■-� ■ 82(7 y W FLAGLIER ST _ SW 1IST ■ y y -■-I���i ■ i 7 SW_ST • N m SW 8 ST Y m � f° y 0 y y y N y M z ME `e SW 16 ST 1 ,ws"ice - �` 11 i S 1 Legend e I�V All existing Metrobus Routes = City of Miami pe' RE Future Transit Routes i PS�e Unfunded Funded SW 40 ST 9 V 1-195 Express Bus /V SW 8 Street EBS Blvd Bo Civic r ss Beoward NW 7 Avenue EBS �� 27 Avenue BRT ^/ 195 SC Express Sheridan ^� NW 7 Street EBS 295 Express Bus St to Civic Center GRAND AVE J� ^� NW 79 Street EBS g Biscayne EBS Douglas Road EBS y 2 Flagler Street EBS �P Future Transit Centers Downtown Intermodal Terminal NW 7th Avenue Transit Village m I d ■ ■ ■ 'DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) 0 O �F tie 0 �ST r,,,bx -� ■ NW _ _ NW7ST ■-� ■ 82(7 y W FLAGLIER ST _ SW 1IST ■ y y y ■ i 7 SW_ST • N m SW 8 ST Y m � f° y 0 y y y N y M z p `e SW 16 ST < m rn m m SW 22 ST 9. Legend e I�V All existing Metrobus Routes = City of Miami pe' RE Future Transit Routes i PS�e Unfunded Funded SW 40 ST 9 V 1-195 Express Bus /V SW 8 Street EBS Blvd Bo Civic r ss Beoward NW 7 Avenue EBS �� 27 Avenue BRT ^/ 195 SC Express Sheridan ^� NW 7 Street EBS 295 Express Bus St to Civic Center GRAND AVE J� ^� NW 79 Street EBS g Biscayne EBS Douglas Road EBS y 2 Flagler Street EBS �P Future Transit Centers Downtown Intermodal Terminal NW 7th Avenue Transit Village m I d ■ ■ ■ 'DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) 0 O �F tie 0 Map TR -19 NE67 ST -- � ® Future Bicycle Facilities (2040) �I NVY 14 ST NW 79'ST 0 Z NW 7t ST Z Z m M w < • � � NW Ii S n DN NW 10 ST z z m z NW 62 ST y m m 1 m m •1 D � N O¢ n FFpy J N �Y N • G NW 54 ST - ^� M NW 6 ST m m m m m 3 p NW 5 ST z Op 3 N 06F Fqo • z NW 46 S r • a 3 b • 3 '90 1112 < m • m m VN W'FLAG1-ER51 SE 1 T N SW 1 ST m o • i z N v F -t NW 20 ST m •• 0 2000. m • 836 Nw1aST Nwa'T Oq ■ ■ NW 12 ST 1,1 DX •_ ■ ■ /.. O - - NW 7 ST �. j- I • ■ ■ : 5 ST 826 W FLAGLER ST • • • SW7ST m to m `L SW.7 ST ■ • • DOWNTOWN • SW 8 STCn _ MIAMI Isee area eniar9emenil y _w m m 1m y X SW�16 m• f PJE ST Legend e = D ° N � � y m m■ m m h Future Bike Lanes M w Sw24ST o m m SW 12S 5 : 1 • Future Sharrows ^� Existing Paved Path N D) • �_ �Fti Existing Bike Lane `m m "� Pys�o sw 40 sT ^� Existing Paved Shoulder cs4 ••• Y wExistingSharrows GRANO AVE • Existing Citi Bike Station f �P • Existing Bicycle Rack 6 N City Of Miami SW 64 ST m O 2 Miles Map TR - 20 87 ST Future a estrlan Facilities ties (2040 -- ,D r. ` NW 79 -ST z 1111111. --- F_- �_� NW 77 ST M �� z A C� � ■ -.NW y� N N m z z 62+57 N w m D D D < m m m m= NW 5457 �@ z z a n h/ NW 46ST ,1111 ,•, /im ` �_ 1111111. --- F_- �_� ����� �� �� � 1 1111--�� C� � ■ 6A N - --- '. ,1111 —��:•— �1�i11III��INJN+vil�IlunlllillEe111.11�1i1Ga111 1111111111 ....•�1 1 ■ VI N.��^ 395 1111111111111 1 .11 _rjJ-Ilr'- ��411': -r :--��.� ^-!� . ® r111111111111111�1'-111=--. 11!�111111111111111119�1 �[� _,�_-•• =1111"=+I111•�:��u -■JIII-�III:C-_-_`_ v •� � -�n■�i. jr�.••_-�_:�==-_- nor_ /IIIV,J i=uumu=__°���= �Illlglejj=�---- _- _ - -- j-: - r�liL-�r�� -- 1Y.■::.^-�,�I -nnnlrtimmn •'G NUM •, �II1111..11-11►���� L V/luunlun�n'•Q � N ■■ `•, Legend HE ._City ,;. � � Man TR - 21.1 e Future A.M. Vehicular Peak- ----- NE 87 ST y 0,I i Hour Levels of Service (LOS) I 14 ST I for Major Thoroughfares (2040) NW 7esT _I - m li— Z NW 71ST I z NW 11 ST w z D NW10ST NW 62 ST -� D Q 2 z z 2 D < m m � f w :E N f -. - < m l n NW 54 ST -m SIN 65 m = Fch, m m m m m ; �a NW 5 ST z �eF z z 3 N F.90 NW 46 ST c > b q4 II2 y m C m - ietoc. NW- 36 ST m W W'F,LAGL'ER"ST E 1ST . o y SW 1 ST N R�VFPo Nw 28 ST z I 1 -Z R d vFee t 0p NW 20 ST u D 21000 836 NW 14 STS ROR NW14�T01- I K � ■ z NW 12 ST .,.ox! __� -��( ■ ._ ■ O NW 7 ST ■ ■ J ■ i ■ 826 5 ST W FLAGLER ST SW 1ST ■ ■ SW -7, ST ■... r �. • •DOWNTOWN MIAMI N SW 8 ST �— I / (See area emar9emeni� N V H M m^' AD SW 16 a D5� G v < a < m m �`Pa� Legend e m m C3m m Sw 22 ST " SW 24 ST Vehicular Level�- of Service (LOS) m P B m m m SW 40 ST D GRAND AVE � � E City of Miami W64 Miles 0 F, 0 2,000 ST Legend e Vehicular Level of Service (LOS) B C D F O City of Miami Man TR - 21.2 ® Future P.M. Vehicular Peak - Hour Levels of Service (LOS) for Maior Thorouahfares (2040 46 NW 71 IST I z l Z N O � NW 62 ST y < m m m Q r , 6 NW 54 ST i 3 2 � D 2 3 h I 'yR/`FRI�NW 26 ST _I 1 oR 1 t INW 20 ST 836 NW 14 NK NR/�fR 1 MW i. I •rte a! ` �oR ■ I ■ z raox ■ o NW7ST ■- a ■ • �i ��a 5 ST W FLAGLER ST ■ SW1ST ■ L• DOWNTOWN —W7 ST • AM SW 6 ST MII I / Isee a.ea eniar9emenil N D a SW 16 ST M D m m `. m y�\P� V m m SW 22 ST SW 24 ST � N J, 0FE° R / M SW 40 ST 6 e9 FR CS GRAI�NDD,AVE N 64 ST m 0 2 � Miles Map TR - 22 Map TR - 23 e Proposed Beach Connection (Baylink), Water Taxi and Streetcar Service NW 79'ti �{' "W WXPMfMEM =rum Mmmm® ST Legend e Proposed Beach Connection (Baylink) ^� Proposed Streetcar Alignment Proposed Water Taxi to Haulover Beach m All existing and future Metrobus Routes Future Transit Centers Downtown Intermodal Terminal NW 7th Avenue Transit Village City of Miami SW 64 NW 28 NW 20 AVE�� `V• ?STto Haulover Beach 6 • it p K � \ Q • ■ �� l 5ST ■ .■DOWN TOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) Oh V 2e 9c, CS 10 2 Miles NW 7 ST W FLAG IER ST SW8ST N Q rn N SW 16 ST y N N N iu O D D < < m D < D < m m m to m _ m SW 22S AVE�� `V• ?STto Haulover Beach 6 • it p K � \ Q • ■ �� l 5ST ■ .■DOWN TOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) Oh V 2e 9c, CS 10 2 Miles ANALYSIS OF FUTURE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Automobile travel continues to be the easiest and most convenient mode of travel for residents within the City of Miami. However, increasing congestion and limited right-of-way along area roadways, coupled with public transportation improvements targeted by Miami -Dade Transit, have induced higher public transportation usage for Miami residents as compared to the rest of Southeast Florida. Assuming this trend continues, the degrees of freedom and speed of travel found in the automobile may lower over time and therefore make public transportation and other alternative modes of transportation more attractive to residents in Miami for travel to -and -from -work. Miami is in the process of producing and analyzing a land use scenario that assumes additional development targeted in the Downtown Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Increment III. The Downtown DRI Increment III is an urban redevelopment program for three general areas in Downtown Miami; Omni, Central Business District, and Brickell (see Map TR -4.2). The areas within the DRI are mostly built -out, but the DRI identifies key redevelopment projects within the Downtown area that are considered as part of the DRI Increment III. The land use program assumed for Increment III includes 534,600 square feet of office, 712,800 square feet of retail, 630 hotel rooms, 5,346 residential units, and 250,000 square feet of industrial use. The proposed buildout of Increment III is scheduled for 2024. The mix of land uses proposed in the Downtown DRI Increment III coupled with the proximity to quality public transit service will help make public transit an integral component of any development program proposed in downtown. The linkage between transit -oriented land uses and public transit systems already in place, or under development, will provide infrastructure that could help relieve anticipated roadway congestion. Congestion benefits would extend beyond the proposed DRI as fewer people would commute to downtown from outlying areas by automobile. Information for the DRI was incorporated into the approved Southeast Regional Planning Model (SERPM) for the Year 2040. The SERPM model has been adopted by FDOT as the traffic forecasting model for Miami - Dade County and is used to forecast the traffic impacts from additional growth anticipated in the City of Miami. Further analysis, refinement and continuous coordination of this data with the MPO and Miami - Dade County will be necessary as the DRI process moves forward. Future traffic volumes for major thoroughfares in Miami were developed through the Year 2040 using the SERPM model, which were used to analyze the future Level of Service (LOS). Traffic forecasting models are only approximations of actual traffic behavior. As such, they can provide order of magnitude projections rather than accurate traffic volumes. These 2040 traffic volumes were then multiplied by a FDOT-provided W factor to compute peak hour volumes for the AM and PM periods. These volumes were then compared to the FDOT Q/LOS tables to determine the LOS letter grade. As seen in Maps TR -21.1 and TR -21.2, there are many roadways within the City of Miami that are projected to operate at LOS F during the AM and PM peak periods. In general most of the roadways analyzed for 2040 exhibit a deterioration in LOS. Volumes consistently rise while capacity is limited. This clearly points to a need to develop alternative modes of transportation. Officials in Miami will have to consider policy decisions and/or target capital improvements to address some of these deficiencies. Anticipating an increased demand on roadways already constrained by available right-of-way, the City of Miami will proactively look at densities, diversities, and design issues related to adjacent land uses and their potential to promote non -automobile modes of travel. August 2016 Final Draft Page III -5 Simply changing the way the City measures its transportation system will not solve the congestion challenges that Miami will continue to face. Traditionally, congestion issues are addressed with either supply-side or demand-side strategies. Supply-side strategies include tactics such as building more roads to increase capacity while demand-side strategies include tactics such as encouraging more ride -sharing among commuters. Potential strategies and policies that Miami is considering or already utilizing to manage and/or reduce traffic congestion include: • A focused effort to better pair land use policies and development strategies with the transportation networks by concentrating future development within the existing urban core. • Implementation of transportation control measures for all new developments and redevelopment such as parking management strategies; ridesharing, car sharing, and bike sharing programs; carpooling and vanpooling programs; electric car charging stations; flexible work hours and telecommuting opportunities; enhanced transit amenities; enhanced bicycle amenities such as bicycle storage areas, inclusion of showers in new developments to help encourage bicycling, and expanded bicycle facilities; and park-and-ride lots. • Active coordination with Miami -Dade Transit and Miami -Dade County to implement major transit improvements similar to those being proposed as a part of the SMART Plan. • Active coordination with Miami -Dade County, the MPO, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority and other stakeholders to implement the FEC Coastal Link Commuter Rail, All Aboard Florida, and other premium transit options that improve access and mobility to the City • Working with South Florida Commuter Services (SFCS) to increase the use of alternative modes of transportation by offering commuter programs to South Florida employers and their employees. These programs include carpooling services, vanpooling services, emergency ride home services, transit discount programs, employer tax benefits assistance, and others. Upon completion of the 2016 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) process, the City of Miami will develop a new Miami Transportation Master (MTMP) Plan which will identify, describe, measure, and evaluate the multimodal transportation corridors, facilities, and terminals in the City of Miami. The MTMP will recommend measures to enhance vehicular and mass transit operations, provide for greater pedestrian access and amenity, and offer incentives for use of alternative transportation modes. The Plan will recommend transportation -related improvements that will complement neighborhood development, redevelopment, and conservation by considering Miami's land use, population density, economic activity, and housing patterns. It is anticipated that the MTMP will be completed by the end of 2016. The City of Miami supports the plans of other entities and agencies that focus on the provision of a multimodal transportation system to meet the needs of deficient corridors. The City will continue to coordinate with other local agencies to address the transportation challenges facing the City. The following multimodal recommendations were developed by the implementation plans of other State, Regional, and County agencies and are within the boundaries of the City of Miami: August 2016 Final Draft Page III -6 Miami -Dade County MPO Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for FY 2016 to 2020 There are several FDOT projects within the City of Miami that are included in the TIP, most of which include general maintenance of pavement and bridges, intersection improvements, and bicycle facility improvements. The table below lists all of the projects included in the TIP within the jurisdiction of the City of Miami. Overtown Greenway along NW 11 St FDOT from NW 7 Ave to east of NW 12 Ave Bike Path/Trail SR 836 Westbound FDOT Bridge #870371 Bridge Painting Port of Miami Bridge FDOT Port of Miami Bridge Repair Metromover Station Access Improvements FDOT (7) Metromover Station Sidewalk NW 12 Avenue Bridge over Miami River FDOT Bridge #871005 Bridge Repair Downtown Distributor at 1-95 N B FDOT to SR 970 EB Bridge #870472 Bridge Painting NW 12 Avenue FDOT from SW 22 Street to NW 8Terrace Landscaping Brickell Avenue over Miami River FDOT Bridge #870759 Bridge Painting Brickell Station Park and Recreation FDOT Brickell Metrorail Station Bike Path/Trail Bike Path along NW 17 St FDOT from NW 7Ave to NW 9Ave Bike Path/Trail Miami Women's Club Baywalk FDOT along the Bay Bike Path/Trail Shoreline and Roadway Protection FDOT Rickenbacker Causeway Road/Slope Protection 1-95 FDOT from SR 836to Broward County Line PD&E/EMO Study SR -836/1-95 Interchange Ramps FDOT from NW 17 Ave to 1-95 Interchange Improvement 1-95 Southbound Ramp FDOT to westbound SR -836 Interchange Improvement SR -836/1-395 FDOT from west of 1-95 to MacArthur Causeway Bridge Replacement and add lanes SW 1st Street Bridge FDOT Bridge #870660 Bridge Replacement SW 7th and 8th Streets FDOT at SW 3 and 4Avenues Intersection Improvement 1-95 FDOT from US -1 to south of SR -836 PD&E/EMO Study SW 7th and 8th Streets FDOT from Brickell Ave to SW 27 Ave PD&E/EMO Study NE 79 Street FDOT from west of 1-95 to SR -934 PD&E/EMO Study 1-95 FDOT from south of SR-836to Broward County Line PD&E/EMO Study 1-95 FDOT from NW 8 St to NW 79 St Rigid Pavement Reconstruction NE/NW54Street FDOT from east of NW 7 Ave to Biscayne Blvd Resurfacing NE 36 Street FDOT from N Miami Ave to N E 5 Ave Resurfacing NW 12 Avenue FDOT from NW 15 St to NW 20 St Resurfacing W Flagler Street FDOT from NW 14Ave to NW 2nd Ave Flexible Pavement Reconstruction NW8Avenue FDOT from SW8SttoNW3St Resurfacing SW 1 Street FDOT from SW 17 Ave to SW 6Ave Flexible Pavement Reconstruction NW/SW 12 Avenue FDOT from SW 13 St to NW 15 St Resurfacing SE2Avenue FDOT from SE2SttoSE4St Resurfacing Biscayne Boulevard FDOT from SE 3 Ave to SE 3 St Resurfacing Bricke I I Ave n ue FDOT from SE5Stto SE 3Ave Resurfacing South Miami Avenue FDOT from SW 10 St to SW 9 St Road Reconstruction NW 54Street FDOT from NW 6Ave to NW 1Ave Intersection Improvement 1-195 Frontage Rd FDOT along SR -112 New road construction Biscayne Boulevard FDOT from NW 32Stto NE38St Intersection Improvement NW 36 Street FDOT at NW 27 Avenue Intersection Improvement NW 27 Avenue FDOT at NW 17 Street Intersection Improvement NW 27 Avenue FDOT at NW7Street Intersection Improvement NW 27 Avenue FDOT from SW 10 St to NW 1 St Intersection Improvement SW 8Street FDOT from SW 39 Ave to SW 33 Ave Intersection Improvement NW/SW42Avenue FDOT from SW 2 St to NW 11 St Intersection Improvement SW 8Street FDOT at SW 67 Ave Intersection Improvement County PublicMultiple Safe Routes to School Schools Pedestrian Safety Improvements Works August 2016 Final Draft Page III -7 Miami -Dade County MPO Lone -Ranee Transportation Plan (LRTP) Projects The LRTP includes all projects that are planned to be implemented before 2040, which includes funded and unfunded projects. The funded projects are organized into four categories or priorities. Projects within Priority I are the projects that are also included in the TIP, because they are to be implemented within the next five years. Projects in Priority 11 are to be implemented between 2021 and 2025. Projects in Priority III are to be implemented between 2026 and 2030. And projects in Priority IV are to be implemented between 2031 and 2040. The table below lists the funded projects in Priorities 11 — IV that are within the boundaries of the City of Miami. Douglas Road Corridor Enhanced Bus MDT II from US -1 to the MIC Incremental improvements on PTP corridor 1-95 Ramp Reconstruction FDOT II from 1-95 to E 2nd Ave and to S Miami Ave Ramp reconstruction/reconfiguration NW 20 Street FDOT II from 1-95 to NW 27 Ave Roadway Infrastructure Improvements NW 7Avenue Enhanced Bus MDT III from downtown Miami to Golden Glades InlPremium limited stop transitservice 1-195 Ramps FDOT III from 1-195 to NW 36 and 38 Streets Ramp reconstruction/reconfiguration US-1/13iscayne Boulevard FDOT III at Port Boulevard expand SB leftturn lane fortrucks N Miami Ave FDOT IV from NW 14Stto City of Miami limits Roadway Improvements NW 14 Street FDOT IV from Civic Center to US -1 Widen to 3lanes and resurface NW 79 St/NW 81St/NW 82 St FDOT IV from NW 13 Ct to Biscayne Bay Capacity Improvements US -1 FDOT IV at SW 27 Avenue Grade separation of US -1 over SW 27 Ave Miami Downtown Transportation Master Plan (MDTMP) The MDTMP was undertaken to establish a framework for transportation system improvements through the year 2020. The target area is bounded by 1-95 to the west, Biscayne Bay to the east, 1-195 to the north and SE 26th Road to the south. The plan emphasizes the importance of promoting a transit system that improves regional connectivity while providing uncomplicated and non -problematic access to downtown Miami. The plan also stresses the importance of enhanced connectivityto neighborhoods, parks, and open spaces. The MDTMP recommends goals and policies to address the City's transportation challenges, such as: o Implement a new Miami Bicycle Master Plan to create a signature bicycle network throughout the City of Miami o Promote a unique, progressive, and vibrant Downtown through a balanced transportation system, preservation of neighborhoods, protection of the environment, and the improvement of the community's overall quality of life o Expand Metrorail, new streetcar services, water taxi service, and other transit -oriented projects to change Miami into a transit driven city o Design roadways to calm automobile traffic and improve bicycle and pedestrian safety o Implement the Miami Streetcar project o Expand Metromover to close the Brickell and Omni loops o Actively promote greater connectivity between Downtown Miami and the City of Miami Beach through the implementation of Baylink, bus rapid transit, and water taxis o Support the plans for the FEC Coastal Link Commuter Service being proposed by the SFRTA August 2016 Final Draft Page III -8 MDT's Transit Development Plan (TDP) Improvements scheduled in the City of Miami (2015) The TDP is updated periodically to include improvements to the County's transit service which includes joint development opportunities, adjustments/improvements to existing transit services, new transit services, and also the unfunded needs of the transit system. The projects programmed and scheduled for funding within the next five years are also included in the TIP. Project within the City of Miami are listed below: • Joint Developments o NW 7th Avenue Transit Village — is a funded joint development project that will feature an enhanced transit facility within an active, mixed-use development including space for housing, community serving activities, and retail space. The transit village will include 25 park- and-ride spaces and four bus bays. The project is located at NW 62nd Street and NW 7th Avenue. • Park & Rides o NW 7th Avenue Transit Village — will feature 25 park-and-ride spaces. • Committed Transit o Flagler Enhanced Bus Service — this route will provide premium limited -stop transit service along Flagler Street from Downtown Miami to the proposed Panther Station (Florida International University's Modesto A. Maidique Campus — MMC). This service will connect the new Marlins Ballpark along NW 7th Street as well as serve the Government Center Metrorail Station, Miami -Dade College Wolfson Campus, American Airlines Arena, the Metropolitan Hospital, the Magic City Casino and Mall of the Americas. In addition, this route will serve Florida International University's Engineering Campus. Service headways will be 10 minutes during the AM/PM peak hour and 20 minutes during the mid-day. Revenue service is anticipated to begin in 2021 using 10 new 60 -foot alternative fuel buses. o Biscayne Enhanced Bus Service — this route will provide premium limited -stop transit service along Biscayne Boulevard/US-1 from Downtown Miami to Aventura Mall. This route provides service to the Adrienne Arsht Performing Arts Center, and a direct connection to Little Haiti, Miami Shores, North Miami and North Miami Beach. Service headways will be 15 minutes during the AM and PM peak -hours and 30 minutes during the mid-day. Revenue service is anticipated to begin in 2016 using 10 new 60 -foot alternative fuel buses. The bus purchase component is considered Phase I for this corridor. The Miami -Dade MPO in cooperation with MDT developed a detailed plan for the staged implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) along Biscayne Boulevard. This EBS route will feature robust stations, Wi-Fi, real-time "Where is the Bus?" arrival times via the internet or on web -enabled mobile devices, real-time "Next Bus" arrival information via electronic signs, Transit Signal Priority (TSP), and Park -and -Rides. Phase II for the Biscayne Enhanced Bus Service project will feature 10 minute service headways during the AM/PM peak -hour and 20 minutes during the mid-day using an additional five (5) new 60 -foot alternative fuel buses. Phase II is expected to be completed by 2021. • New Bus Routes o Route 195 (Civic) — this route will provide express commuter transit service from Broward County (Broward Boulevard and Sheridan Street) to the Civic Center Metrorail Station via 1-95 during the AM and PM peak periods. Service headways will be 30 minutes. Revenue service began in April 2015 August 2016 Final Draft Page III -9 • Transit Hubs o Downtown Intermodal Terminal — is a privately funded intermodal center that will accommodate various transportation modes including MDT Metrobus, Metrorail, and Metromover as well as the All Aboard Florida and Tri -Rail commuter trains. • Service Improvements o Route 95 — add five minutes of northbound PM running time between SE 8th Street/Brickell Avenue and Dade County Courthouse and start trips earlier o Route 120—add an additional weekday northbound trip to Aventura Mall departing from the Omni Transit Terminal at approximately 7:30am. o Route 150— improve headway from 30 minutes to 20 minutes seven days a week • Unfunded Needs o Brickell Stotion Transit Center (SW 11th Street and SW 1stAvenue) —this project will upgrade the transit center site to improve bus and passenger access as well as upgrade area drainage, lighting, signage, shelters, and other station area amenities o Civic Center Transit Center (NW 15th Street and NW 12th Avenue) — this project will upgrade the transit center site to improve bus and passenger access as well as upgrade area drainage, lighting, signage, shelters, and other station area amenities o Little River Park -and -Ride — located at NE 79th Street and Biscayne Boulevard This element was developed in concert with the other elements of the Miami Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Future Land Use Element, to ensure internal consistency within the Comprehensive Plan. As noted throughout this document, the analysis of the future transportation system for Miami was based upon the vision of the City as expressed within the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. August 2016 Final Draft Page III -10 APPENDIX CI -1 Updated Capital Improvement Schedule FY 2015-16 ADOPTED CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN Purpose of the Capital Improvement Plan The Multi -Year Capital Plan (the Capital Improvement Plan or CIP) is an official statement of public policy regarding short-range and long-range planning, design, construction, and capital purchasing of the City of Miami's assets and facilities. A capital improvement is defined as a capital or "in-kind "expenditure of $5,000 or more, resulting in the acquisition, improvement or addition to fixed assets in the form of land, buildings or improvements (more or less permanent in character) and, durable equipment with a life expectancy of at least three years. The Capital Budget and Multi -years Capital Plan is a proposed funding schedule for six years, updated annually to add new projects, re-evaluate project priorities and revise recommendations, with the first year of the plan being the Capital Budget. The Capital Budget The City's Capital Budget is distinct from the Operating Budget. The Capital Budget authorizes capital expenditures for longer scale projects and purchases, while the Operating Budget authorizes the expenditure of funds for such things as employee salaries and the purchase of goods and services. Capital projects can have an impact on the operating budget through additional costs, revenues or cost savings. Legal Authority The Legal requirements for preparing the City's Capital Plan are set forth in the Florida Statutes and the City of Miami Code. A capital improvement programming process to support the comprehensive plan is required by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, more particularly, Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes (2012). Further, the Financial Integrity Ordinance, Chapter 18 of the Code of the City of Miami requires the development and approval of a multi-year capital plan and delineates specific requirements for inclusion. CIP Development Process The FY 2015-16 Multi -Year Capital Plan is an update to the FY 2014-15 Multi -Year Capital Plan which was approved by the City Commission on September 9t", 2015, via Resolution No. 14-0322. The new FY 2015-16 Plan contains the same fund and program framework and project priorities as the prior Plan, but incorporates allocations for funding sources becoming available in FY 2015-16. The primary focus of the Office of Capital Improvements and Transportation Program (CITP), since the approval of the previous Plan, has been the continued management of ongoing projects, and initiation of previously approved projects. The goals and objectives of the plan are as follows: Provide excellent recreational, educational and cultural programs, restore, maintain and beautify residential and urban infrastructure systems for future growth, provide excellent public safety, and improve business service delivery processes. FY 2015-16 ADOPTED CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN Prioritization Criteria The City uses a hierarchy of criteria to determine how projects are considered for funding on yearly basis. Projects with the highest rankings or projects meeting more than one criterion are given priority funding and implementation. The criterion used is listed as follows: Life/Safety —These projects are normally related to structural issues at City facilities and demand immediate attention. They are considered "emergency' projects as they are not always planned -for or funded. Legal Requirements — These projects are funded based on the need to comply with legally -mandated requirements set forth by federal, state, and local governments. These types of projects may be required as a result of binding settlements with other governmental agencies to meet current codes, ordinances, or health and safety issues. An example of these projects is a federal mandate to comply with Americans with Disabilities requirements either citywide or at a particular park or facility. Essential Improvements — These types of projects demand funding for improvements necessary to the functioning and/or preservation of facilities or infrastructure. This criterion measures the extent to which a facility or infrastructure has deteriorated and needs improvements relative to the overall condition of similar structures. Bridge repairs, stormwater infrastructure improvements and repairs, and roadway construction highlights a variety of Public -Works -related projects that would fall under this criterion. The majority of Street Bonds — funded projects would fall under this category as the preservation and improvements of the existing infrastructure is the overwhelming goal. Facility roof replacements, repairing of structural damage, and fire station renovations and replacement are also examples of essential facility improvements. Quality of Life Improvements — Projects of this type improve the overall quality of life for the City residents. Projects such as these would include traffic calming, streetscapes, fountains, parks, neighborhood and entry signs, and landscaping. Efficiency Improvements—This criterion measures those projects that when completed will increase efficiency or result in overall cost savings to the city. Such projects may benefit a greater number of people or more efficiently and effectively provide and support the defined functional requirements of the intended use. Projects such as these include renovation of offices, layout or workspace within a building, planning or zoning department where a smoother and more fluid processing of plans equates to time savings and increased customer service. Revenue Producing — These projects when completed would generate additional revenues to the City. Projects of this nature show an overall return on investments, and should be measured on the risk involved. This criterion measures the number of people who will benefit from the project, both directly and indirectly, and the associated costs versus revenues generated. Elements considered in the rating include the project type and overall community needs. Such a project might include a new park with a community center and water park. FY 2015-16 ADOPTED CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN Service Improvements —These types of projects demonstrate an increased delivery capability when completed. This criterion measures the number of people served and the benefit derived from a project. Replacements and renewals, which bring facilities up to acceptable standards and expand capacity, such as a marina expansion and renovation are illustrations of these types of projects. Service/Space Expansion —These are projects which result in expansion of space to serve the needs of the community. Such projects, typically parks or public facilities, would include renovations, additions, expansions or new construction of recreation centers, fire stations, police facilities, theatres and convention centers. Capital Plan Framework The 2015-2016 Multi -Year Capital Plan is structured into eleven (11) distinct funds or programs, some with subcategories. With the exception of the Funding Type by Job report, all reports in the Plan follow this program framework. The programs are listed and described below. • Community Redevelopment Area (CRA): The acquisition or construction of major capital facilities and infrastructure for community redevelopment in the defined CRA area. • General Government Projects: This program consists of capital improvements, including computers and communications, to municipal buildings and operations facilities. • Public Safety: The acquisition of equipment or construction of major facilities that support the operations of the Police and Fire -Rescue Departments. • Disaster Recovery: This fund is utilized to account for revenue received from the federal government, insurance, and other agencies resulting from declared disasters. • Public Facilities: The Public Facilities program includes improvements to public use facilities such as stadiums, auditoriums and marinas. • Parks and Recreation: This program accounts for the acquisition, rehabilitation or construction of capital facilities for recreational activities in over 100 parks throughout the City. • Streets and Sidewalks: The capital projects in the Streets and Sidewalks program provide reconstruction, major maintenance and beautification to Miami's street system. • Mass Transit: This program accounts for the acquisition of equipment or construction of capital facilities that support the maintenance and operation of public transportation systems. • Sanitary Sewers: This program includes projects that will improve the City's existing sanitary sewer system. • Storm Sewers: The Storm Sewer program accounts for projects that result in improved drainage and stormwater management throughout the City of Miami. • Solid Waste: This program includes projects for the acquisition of equipment or construction of facilities for the collection and removal of solid waste. FY 2015-16 ADOPTED CAPITAL BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN Major Projects Some examples of major projects include: • Hadley Park New Youth Center • Miami Police Department Helipad and Roof Replacement Program • Coral Way Net Office Remodeling, Community Center • Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan Regatta Park Development • East Flagami Roadway Improvements • Traffic Calming Circle at SW 2nd Street and SW 401h Avenue • Wagner Creek/Seybold Canal Dredging Program Overview The total value of the six-year plan is $607.05 million, representing 881 projects (315 active and 566 future) throughout the various programs. The adjacent chart shows that the Streets and Sidewalks program accounts for the largest portion of the total Capital Plan funding at $166.73 million or 27.46%. The Parks and Recreation program, the second largest, accounts for $157.18 million or 25.89% of the overall Plan value. The General Government program, the third largest, accounts for $106.39 million or 17.53% of the overall Plan value. 1=2! 1.409 Program Overview •CRA Projects............ ....... 7,593,000 *Sanitary Sewers .............. 4,138,900 *General Government.. 106,388,500 •Streets and Sidewalks...166,725,700 *Disaster Recovery.... ....... 1,301,700 •Mass Transit .....................4,069,500 ®Public Safety .............._.40,590,700 Storm Sewers...58,357,300 •RealLstate€rAsst Mgmt..52,191,700 *Solid Waste. .... .8,515,500 • Parks and Recreation.... 157,176,900 TOTAL: 607,049, 400 — iG Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 331 -Parks and Recreation Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $1,411,811.95 $1,411,811.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $246,105.69 $246,105.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $20,413,213.95 $20,413,213.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction 130,778,349.28 109,537,349.28 $21,251,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment $1,087,101.80 $1,087,101.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $954,754.73 $954,754.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $260,307.00 $260,307.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $2,015,271.87 $2,015,271.87 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 157,176,916.27 135,925,916.27 $21,251,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 000004 CRA Operating Budget $9,943,000.00 $9,943,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 co 000008 CRA - FIND Grant $1,143,000.00 $1,143,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356006-1 Environmental Remediation Bond $9,255,800.00 $9,255,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367001 Impact Fees $14,195.00 $14,195.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367011 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 $52,852,591.17 $41,556,591.17 $11,296,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 373002 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 2008 & $49,472.00 $49,472.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382001 Contribution From General Fund $50,777.90 $50,777.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and $16,924,549.48 $6,969,549.48 $9,955,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382009 Contribution from General Fund SSL $3,127,584.17 $3,127,584.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-1 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) $795,146.95 $795,146.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-2 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) $3,371,339.37 $3,371,339.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) $13,991,360.32 $13,991,360.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-8 2002 Homeland Defense Series I Interest $1,106,958.15 $1,106,958.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888920 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 $671,050.00 $671,050.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888947 MDC Building Better Communities GOB $19,800,000.00 $19,800,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888951 Other Public & Private Contributions $666,513.00 $666,513.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888956 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF $424,999.97 $424,999.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888960 Sunshine State Financing Commission $192,412.94 $192,412.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888961 Sunshine State Financing Commission $15,306,289.95 $15,306,289.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888962 The Children's Trust $260,000.00 $260,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888963 Proceeds from Conveyance of Easement $648,533.79 $648,533.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888964 County CDT $5,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888965 Bayfront Park Management Trust $309,000.00 $309,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active & Future CIP Projects Only FUND: 331 -Parks and Recreation Fund Fund Total No. Name Funding 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Funding by Cost Component & Sources Prior Current Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 888973 TVM Production Basic Use Fee $314,255.24 $314,255.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888977 DRI Fees Air Quality $313,129.12 $313,129.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888978 DRI Fees Administration $444,957.75 $444,957.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888985 Department Of Off Street Parking $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 157,176,916.27 135,925,916.27 $21,251,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 14 Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $5,389,010.88 $1,192,805.88 $4,196,205.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $14,398,253.50 $13,595,103.50 $0.00 $401,575.00 $401,575.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction 135,396,851.79 113,467,552.63 $5,078,895.00 $4,533,804.16 $5,616,600.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 Equipment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $6,977,743.00 $4,531,723.00 $2,209,800.00 $118,110.00 $118,110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $343,750.55 $343,750.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $4,220,135.42 $3,983,915.42 $0.00 $118,110.00 $118,110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 166,725,745.14 137,114,850.98 $11,484,900.00 $5,171,599.16 $6,254,395.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 000002 Special Revenue Operating Budget $411,622.47 $411,622.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 OD 356001 Local Option Gas Tax $544,629.35 $544,629.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 W 356002 Local Option Gas Tax 2009 and Future $3,718,652.13 $3,234,352.13 $484,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356003 Parking Surcharge $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 $14,694,776.38 $14,694,776.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-2 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 $34,978,461.90 $34,978,461.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356006-1 Environmental Remediation Bond $213,000.00 $213,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356007 Parking Surcharge 2007 $17,563,710.56 $9,753,910.56 $2,209,800.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $0.00 360001 Stormwater Utility Fund $100,413.14 $100,413.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 360003 Stormwater Utility Fund (FY07 and Future) $2,980.57 $2,980.57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367001 Impact Fees $177,891.86 $177,891.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382001 Contribution From General Fund $124,009.28 $124,009.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and $4,474,023.35 $4,474,023.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382009 Contribution from General Fund SSL $6,381,292.54 $6,381,292.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-1 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) $1,051,226.66 $1,051,226.66 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) $2,635,015.84 $2,635,015.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888902 Community Development Block Grant $1,145,097.08 $1,145,097.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888913 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program $4,514,879.00 $4,514,879.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888920 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 $570,000.00 $570,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888924 DRI Fees Transportation $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888930 Transit Half -Cent Surtax $1,818,691.65 $1,818,691.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888931 Transit Half -Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) $41,513,608.99 $26,161,509.83 $5,680,500.00 $2,771,599.16 $3,000,000.00 $1,700,000.00 $2,200,000.00 $0.00 888938 Miami -Dade County Grant/Contribution $10,757,056.00 $7,902,661.00 $0.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,854,395.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 co 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Active &Future CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Fund Fund Total Prior Current No. Name Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 888947 MDC Building Better Communities GOB $10,837,573.46 $10,837,573.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888951 Other Public & Private Contributions $771,544.65 $771,544.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888953 Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Org $73,000.00 $73,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888956 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF $3,660,046.00 $549,746.00 $3,110,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888957 Downtown Development Agency $187,500.00 $187,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888978 DRI Fees Administration $255,042.28 $255,042.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888988 DEO-Department of Economic Opportunity $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 166,725,745.14 137,114,850.98 $11,484,900.00 $5,171,599.16 $6,254,395.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 co Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 343 -Mass Transit Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $729,123.00 $729,123.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction $468,402.19 $318,402.19 $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment $2,871,999.63 $2,871,999.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $4,069,524.82 $3,919,524.82 $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 888917 FDOT Other $1,899,150.63 $1,899,150.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 co 888930 Transit Half -Cent Surtax $81,200.29 $81,200.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888931 Transit Half -Cent Surtax (FY07and Future) $2,089,173.90 $1,939,173.90 $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $4,069,524.82 $3,919,524.82 $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 351 -Sanitary Sewers Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $1,540.00 $1,540.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $65,203.00 $65,203.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction $3,971,173.76 $3,971,173.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $82,495.96 $82,495.96 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $18,516.00 $18,516.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $4,138,928.72 $4,138,928.72 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 355001 1988 Sanitary Sewer Bonds $3,745,843.44 $3,745,843.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 OD 371100 Series 1995 Sanitary Sewer Bonds $393,085.28 $393,085.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 rn Total $4,138,928.72 $4,138,928.72 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 352 -Storm Sewers Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $261,381.18 $261,381.18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $5,525,500.47 $5,525,500.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction $49,166,380.93 $41,379,380.93 $2,100,000.00 $4,078,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment $170,000.00 $170,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $1,011,355.94 $1,011,355.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $2,222,712.58 $2,222,712.58 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $58,357,331.10 $50,570,331.10 $2,100,000.00 $4,078,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 000001 General Fund Operating Budget $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 OD 000002 Special Revenue Operating Budget $290,400.00 $290,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 V 356001 Local Option Gas Tax $1,200,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 $4,770,047.24 $4,770,047.24 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-2 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 $2,445,633.36 $2,445,633.36 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356007 Parking Surcharge 2007 $1,618,452.08 $1,618,452.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 360001 Stormwater Utility Fund $7,624,769.37 $7,624,769.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 360003 Stormwater Utility Fund (FY07 and Future) $16,084,452.17 $11,891,452.17 $975,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367001 Impact Fees $712,087.88 $712,087.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and $1,580,000.00 $455,000.00 $1,125,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 383001 CIP Misc. Revenue $46,357.55 $46,357.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-2 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) $1,439.73 $1,439.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) $1,013,343.11 $1,013,343.11 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 399001 1976 & 78 Storm Sewer G O Bond $617,481.00 $617,481.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888909 FL Dept of Environmental Protection (FDEP) $700,000.00 $700,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888920 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 $2,700,000.00 $2,700,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888925 FEMA Recovery Assistance $173,200.00 $173,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888926 Prior Year Fund Balance $91,565.00 $91,565.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888930 Transit Half -Cent Surtax $1,699,976.52 $1,699,976.52 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888931 Transit Half -Cent Surtax (FY07 and Future) $3,533,682.01 $3,533,682.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888938 Miami -Dade County Grant/Contribution $204,444.08 $204,444.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888947 MDC Building Better Communities GOB $11,190,000.00 $8,721,000.00 $0.00 $2,469,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active & Future CIP Projects Only 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 352 -Storm Sewers Total $58,357,331.10 $50,570,331.10 $2,100,000.00 $4,078,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: 353 -Solid Waste Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction $285,001.00 $285,001.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Equipment $8,051,827.21 $5,331,027.21 $2,720,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $178,700.00 $178,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $8,515,528.21 $5,794,728.21 $2,720,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and $8,495,504.15 $5,774,704.15 $2,720,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 co 385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) $20,024.06 $20,024.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $8,515,528.21 $5,794,728.21 $2,720,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active &Future 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan CIP Projects Only Funding by Cost Component & Sources FUND: Totals Total Prior Current Phase Funding Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 Management $13,589,515.51 $9,393,310.51 $4,196,205.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Land Acquisition $246,105.69 $246,105.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Planning $257,325.63 $257,325.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $67,551,342.95 $66,548,192.95 $200,000.00 $401,575.00 $401,575.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction 410,612,835.32 338,464,536.16 $49,610,895.00 $8,611,804.16 $7,225,600.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 Equipment $90,575,162.35 $84,757,362.35 $5,817,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Administration $11,103,859.23 $8,607,839.23 $2,259,800.00 $118,110.00 $118,110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other $3,643,925.54 $3,643,925.54 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Engineering $9,469,421.98 $9,233,201.98 $0.00 $118,110.00 $118,110.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 607,049,494.20 521,151,800.04 $62,084,700.00 $9,249,599.16 $7,863,395.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 Fund No. Fund Name Total Funding Prior Years Current 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 000000 Non-CIP Funding $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 000001 General Fund Operating Budget $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 000002 Special Revenue Operating Budget $702,022.47 $702,022.47 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 000003 Special Rev. Hurricane Acct. $79,092.00 $79,092.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 000004 CRA Operating Budget $17,489,500.00 $17,489,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 000008 CRA - FIND Grant $1,143,000.00 $1,143,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 355001 1988 Sanitary Sewer Bonds $3,745,843.44 $3,745,843.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356001 Local Option Gas Tax $3,744,630.35 $3,744,630.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356002 Local Option Gas Tax 2009 and Future $3,718,652.13 $3,234,352.13 $484,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356003 Parking Surcharge $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356004-2 Parking Revenue Bonds - Taxable Series $2,202,825.98 $2,202,825.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-1 Streets Bond Program - Series 1 $19,464,823.62 $19,464,823.62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356005-2 Streets Bond Program - Series 2 $37,424,095.26 $37,424,095.62 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356006-1 Environmental Remediation Bond $9,994,300.00 $9,994,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 356007 Parking Surcharge 2007 $19,182,162.64 $11,372,362.64 $2,209,800.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $1,400,000.00 $0.00 356008 Marine Stadium Financing Bond $16,000,000.00 $16,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 360001 Stormwater Utility Fund $7,725,182.51 $7,725,182.51 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 360003 Stormwater Utility Fund (FY07 and Future) $16,090,175.16 $11,897,175.16 $975,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $1,609,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367001 Impact Fees $1,622,361.61 $1,622,361.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 367011 Impact Fees - Ord 12750 $67,780,775.12 $53,297,775.12 $14,483,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 369100 1991 Fire Bonds $46,477.39 $46,477.39 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 371100 Series 1995 Sanitary Sewer Bonds $393,085.28 $393,085.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 373002 Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond 2008 & $49,472.00 $49,472.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Active &Future CIP Projects Only FUND: Totals Fund Fund No. Name Total Funding 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Funding by Cost Component & Sources Prior Current Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 375001 Fire Assessment Fee $4,501,710.44 $4,501,710.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 375002 Fire Assessment Fee (FY07) $1,256,173.03 $1,256,173.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382001 Contribution From General Fund $19,518,791.37 $19,518,791.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382007 Contribution From General Fund 2003 $7,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382008 Contribution From General Fund 2007 and 106,263,759.72 $72,596,159.72 $33,517,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 382009 Contribution from General Fund SSL $12,079,202.82 $12,079,202.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 383001 CIP Misc. Revenue $46,357.55 $46,357.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 383004 Miami CDT $3,785,619.33 $3,785,619.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 383005 CIP Miscellaneous Revenue $161,836.89 $161,836.89 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-1 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 1) $2,941,751.61 $2,941,751.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-2 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 2) $9,824,067.19 $9,824,067.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-3 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds (Series 3) $27,245,012.85 $27,245,012.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-8 2002 Homeland Defense Series 1 Interest $1,106,959.15 $1,106,959.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 385200-9 2002 Homeland Defense Bonds Interest $485,212.93 $485,212.93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 399001 1976 & 78 Storm Sewer G O Bond $617,481.00 $617,481.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888902 Community Development Block Grant $1,145,097.08 $1,145,097.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888909 FL Dept of Environmental Protection (FDEP) $720,583.75 $720,583.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888913 FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program $4,514,879.00 $4,514,879.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888917 FDOT Other $1,899,150.63 $1,899,150.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888920 FIND Waterways Assistance Program FY07 $5,256,700.00 $5,256,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888923 Contribution From Special Revenue $1,559,021.86 $1,559,021.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888924 DRI Fees Transportation $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888925 FEMA Recovery Assistance $173,200.00 $173,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888926 Prior Year Fund Balance $91,565.00 $91,565.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888930 Transit Half -Cent Surtax $3,599,868.46 $3,599,868.46 $116,895.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888931 Transit Half -Cent Surtax (FY07and Future) $47,136,464.90 $31,634,365.74 $5,830,500.00 $2,771,599.16 $3,000,000.00 $1,700,000.00 $2,200,000.00 $0.00 888937 Urban Areas Security Initiative Grant $69,842.00 $69,842.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888938 Miami -Dade County Grant/Contribution $10,974,739.08 $8,120,344.08 $0.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,854,395.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888939 FEMA Federal Assistance to Firefighters $656,466.00 $656,466.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888947 MDC Building Better Communities GOB $42,077,573.46 $39,608,573.46 $0.00 $2,469,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888948 School Board of Miami -Dade County - Grant $850,854.32 $850,854.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888951 Other Public & Private Contributions $4,691,057.65 $4,691,057.65 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888953 Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Org $73,000.00 $73,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888955 MSEA Contribution to Capital $34,139.91 $34,139.91 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888956 Contribution from Special Revenue - SRF $10,831,588.32 $6,397,088.32 $4,434,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888957 Downtown Development Agency $187,500.00 $187,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888960 Sunshine State Financing Commission $192,412.94 $192,412.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888961 Sunshine State Financing Commission $15,406,162.02 $15,406,162.02 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund No. Active &Future CIP Projects Only FUND: Totals Fund Name Total Funding 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Plan Funding by Cost Component & Sources Prior Current Years 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 888962 The Children's Trust $260,000.00 $260,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888963 Proceeds from Conveyance of Easement $1,502,044.46 $1,502,044.46 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888964 County CDT $5,000,000.00 $5,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888965 Bayfront Park Management Trust $309,000.00 $309,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888966 Sunshine State Financing Commission $12,273,575.04 $12,273,575.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888969 Subrogation Auto Claim Revenues $971,490.17 $971,490.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888972 Rickenbacker Marina Rental Revenue $137,601.00 $137,601.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888973 TVM Production Basic Use Fee $760,030.73 $760,030.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888977 DRI Fees Air Quality $313,129.12 $313,129.12 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888978 DRI Fees Administration $700,000.03 $700,000.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888979 Marlins Garage Structural Settlement $128,016.61 $128,016.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888980 Surplus Goods & Fixed Assets Sales $661,457.03 $661,457.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888981 Florida Boating Improvement Program $56,893.00 $56,893.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888982 FEMA Tree Funding $1,301,720.00 $1,301,720.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888983 FDEP Invasive Species at Marine Stadium $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888984 State of Florida Department of Health $238,000.00 $238,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N 888985 Department Of Off Street Parking $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 888988 DEO-Department of Economic Opportunity $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 899999 Florida Dept. Of State Division of Historical $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 607,049,494.20 521,151,800.04 $62,051,595.85 $9,249,599.16 $7,863,395.00 $3,100,000.00 $3,600,000.00 $0.00 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future 6,770 Future B -30365J Building Department Beckham Hall Fire Damage Repair 1 B-30666 General Services Damaged Vehicle Replacement / Repairs Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Administration 8 -Future Funded 0 Total Fund CIP Projects Only Future 8 -Future B-30753 Net Little Havana NET Office - Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 B-30754 Capital Improvement Program Code Compliance S.O.S. Building - Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 Active Admin Funded 0 56,500 B-30994 Public Facilities minus 1,2,3,4,5 B-40604 Capital Improvement Program Total Cost Total Funded 0 Admin Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 301 -CRA projects Former Shamrock Gas Station Environmental 5 5,792 Admin Remediation Project 8 -Future B-40963 Communications B-30394 Community Redevelopment North 14 St. Multi Media Entertainment 2 6,000,000 6,000,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Agency District Streetscape CRA 92-686001 Law (City Attorney) Attorney Office Reconfiguration 9th Floor 1,2,3,4,5 MRC B-30731 Community Redevelopment Miami Women's Club Baywalk Project - CRA 2 93,000 93,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Agency 92-686001 1,2,3,4,5 B-70141 General Services Police Vehicle Acquisition (Ford Explorers) - 1,2,3,4,5 Administration B-40169 Community Redevelopment 300 NW 11 Street Community Center - CRA 5 2,293,250 1,500,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -793,250 Agency 92-689001 B-40184 Community Redevelopment Miami Entertainment Complex Studio (MEC) 2 75,000 0 Active 5 -Construction UnFunded -75,000 Agency D2 -CRA Project 92-686001 301 -CRA projects 311 -General Government 6,770 Future B -30365J Building Department Beckham Hall Fire Damage Repair 1 B-30666 General Services Damaged Vehicle Replacement / Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 19,400 Administration 8 -Future Funded 0 w 26,100 Future 8 -Future B-30753 Net Little Havana NET Office - Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 B-30754 Capital Improvement Program Code Compliance S.O.S. Building - Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 Active Admin Funded 0 56,500 B-30994 Public Facilities City of Miami Impact Fee Study - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 B-40604 Capital Improvement Program Remediation of Virginia Key Composting 2 Funded 0 Admin Facility Future B-40605 Capital Improvement Program Remediation of Former Star Gas Station 5 Future Admin Funded 0 310,000 B-40642 Capital Improvement Program Former Shamrock Gas Station Environmental 5 5,792 Admin Remediation Project 8 -Future B-40963 Communications Office of Communications - Robotics Cameras 1,2,3,4,5 B-40968 Communications Office of Communications - LED Lights for 1,2,3,4,5 Future 8 -Future City Hall Chambers - Citywide B-50764 Law (City Attorney) Attorney Office Reconfiguration 9th Floor 1,2,3,4,5 MRC B-50765 General Services Communication Warehouse Impact Rollup 1,2,3,4,5 Administration Doors B-50767 Information Technology Citywide Net Office Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 B-70141 General Services Police Vehicle Acquisition (Ford Explorers) - 1,2,3,4,5 Administration FY2015 8,461,250 7,593,000 -868,250 6,770 6,770 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 1,632,947 1,632,947 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 19,400 19,400 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 26,100 26,100 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 65,490 65,490 Active 1 -Study Funded 0 10,000 10,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 56,500 56,500 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 79,100 79,100 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 20,000 20,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 310,000 310,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 5,792 5,792 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 1,067,000 1,067,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 311 -General Government B-70142 General Services Police Vehicle Acquisition for 48 New police 1,2,3,4,5 1,440,000 1,440,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration officers (35 + 13 new hires) - FY2015 B-70322 General Services GSA Carpet Replacement at the MRC Facility 1,2,3,4,5 598,044 598,044 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration - Citywide B-70323 General Services GSA Communications Division - Back up 1,2,3,4,5 42,000 42,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration Batteries for Communications Systems B-70324 General Services GSA MRC Building - UPS System - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 7,000 7,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70325 General Services GSA Fleet Facility Fuel Station Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70330 General Services Re -grouping and polishing of all MRC Granite 1,2,3,4,5 70,000 70,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Administration and Bathrooms B-70332 General Services MRC Facility - Repair of HVAC VAV Boxes 1,2,3,4,5 300,000 300,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70334 General Services City Hall Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 350,000 350,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Administration B-70338 General Services Heavy Equipment Enhancemements 1,2,3,4,5 1,124,392 1,124,392 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Administration B-70340 General Services GSA 40 Year Recertification and Repair Work 1,2,3,4,5 21,500 21,500 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration for Property Maintenance Building - Citywide B-70341 General Services GSA - LED Lights for MRC Garage -Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70342 General Services MRC Hardening - D2 2 20,900 20,900 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70344 General Services GSA Administration - AC Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 43,000 43,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70415 General Services MRC Security System Hardening - UASI 2 69,842 69,842 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Administration Funded 18-180028 / 10th Floor 18-180022 B-70969 Information Technology IT - Financial Management Upgrade Module 1,2,3,4,5 500,000 500,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B-70970 Information Technology IT Modernization - Replace Capital 1,2,3,4,5 1,114,200 1,114,200 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Improvement and Transportation Program Management Software B-70971 Information Technology IT - Increase Bandwidth 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 25,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70972 Information Technology IT - VPN Infrastructure 1,2,3,4,5 15,000 15,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 311 -General Government B-70973 Information Technology IT - MRC/City Hall Switch 1,2,3,4,5 85,000 85,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70974 Information Technology IT - City Hall VOIP Phones 1,2,3,4,5 65,000 65,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70975 Information Technology IT - Training Room Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 10,000 10,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70976 Information Technology IT - MRC 10th Floor Conference Room 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Improvements. B-70977 Law (City Attorney) City Attorney Pro Law Upgrade 1,2,3,4,5 17,000 17,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70978 Information Technology City Clerk - Electronic Campaign Reporting 1,2,3,4,5 10,000 10,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 System B-70979 Purchasing Point of Sale System 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70981 Information Technology Operations Network Backbone Upgrade -CW 1,2,3,4,5 117,000 117,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70982 Information Technology Microsoft SQL Cluster Upgrade -CW 1,2,3,4,5 70,000 70,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70983 Information Technology Security Data Clasification-CW 1,2,3,4,5 315,000 315,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70984 Information Technology Security Information and Event Management 1,2,3,4,5 240,000 240,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 (SIEM)-CW B-70985 Information Technology Information Technology Service Management 1,2,3,4,5 150,000 150,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 System -CW B-70986 Information Technology Share Point Migration 1,2,3,4,5 15,000 15,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70987 Information Technology Self Service Password Management 1,2,3,4,5 11,000 11,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 System -CW B-70988 Information Technology Storage Area Network (SAN) -CW 1,2,3,4,5 180,000 180,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -74205B General Services GSA Fleet Maintenance Garage Expansion 1 1,900,927 1,900,927 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Administration B-74218 General Services MRC Security Upgrades and Enhancements 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B -74219C General Services Property Maintenance Bobcats & Trailer 1,2,3,4,5 59,750 59,750 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-74220 General Services Police Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 27,491,737 27,491,737 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Administration B -74220B General Services Police Vehicle Acquisition - FY2014 1,2,3,4,5 4,368,921 4,368,921 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B -74614A Information Technology Building Department Electronic Plans Review 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 (EPR) - Phase 1 B -74617A Information Technology Enterprise Integration CW 1,2,3,4,5 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 311 -General Government B-30551 Public Works Public Works Maintenance Yard 1,2,3,4,5 4,719,387 1,318,795 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -3,400,592 B -30551A Public Works 20 St Maintenance Yard Operations Facilities 1,2,3,4,5 19,602,000 14,887,460 Active 1 -Study Partially Funded -4,714,539 B -30865G Capital Improvement Program Environmental Remediation - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 3,542,342 2,972,846 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -569,496 Admin B-40962 Communications Office of Communications - Upgrade Systems 1,2,3,4,5 40,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -10,000 to Media Equipment B-70965 Information Technology Hyperion Financial Management Application 1,2,3,4,5 430,000 350,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -80,000 B-70967 Information Technology IT - Cloud Data Service - Data Storage 1,2,3,4,5 220,000 10,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -210,000 B-70968 Information Technology IT - Replacement: City Clerk Systems 1,2,3,4,5 660,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -585,000 B-74200 General Services GSA General Fleet Replacement - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 5,230,504 4,806,504 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -424,000 Administration B -74205C General Services GSA Truck Wash Pit 1,2,3,4,5 596,012 106,110 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -489,901 Administration rn B-74217 General Services MRC - Glass Window System 1,2,3,4,5 500,000 169,094 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -330,906 Administration B -74219B General Services Property Maintenance Security Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 18,249 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -6,750 Administration B-74606 Information Technology Upgrade PC Software & Hardware 1,2,3,4,5 7,174,921 2,920,682 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -4,254,238 B-74609 Information Technology ERP Integration System 1,2,3,4,5 25,474,457 24,403,110 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -1,071,347 B-74614 Information Technology Land Management System 1,2,3,4,5 7,913,018 6,239,224 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -1,673,793 B-74617 Information Technology IT Modernization 1,2,3,4,5 4,100,000 2,800,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -1,300,000 B -30365C General Services City Property Building Maintenance 1,2,3,4,5 700,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -700,000 Administration B -30365Q Parks and Recreation Coral Way Community Center Playground 3 500,000 0 Active 3 -Design UnFunded -500,000 Oracle Project 91-03275 B-40001 Public Works New Public Works Operations Facilities 1,2,3,4,5 1,875,500 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,875,500 B-40002 Public Works Public Works Fleet and Heavy Machinery 1,2,3,4,5 499,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -499,000 Replacement FY2014 B-40007 Public Works PW - Heavy Machinery Replacement - 1,2,3,4,5 95,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -95,000 FY2015 B-40008 Public Works PW Heavy Equipment and Machinery 1,2,3,4,5 650,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -650,000 Replacement - FY2016 B-40009 Public Works PW Updrage Operations Division Equipment - 1,2,3,4,5 300,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -300,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 311 -General Government FY2017 B-40151 Public Works PW Vehicle & Equipment Acquisition - 1,2,3,4,5 17,500 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -17,500 Mowing Section B-40152 Public Works PW Vehicle Replacement - Tree Trimming 1,2,3,4,5 90,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -90,000 Section B-40153 Public Works PW Vehicle Replacement - Storm Section 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40154 Public Works PW Vehicle Replacement - Roadway Section 1,2,3,4,5 232,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -232,000 B-40155 Public Works Public Works Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 B-40609 Capital Improvement Program City of Miami Property at Watson Island 2 105,700 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -105,700 Admin Environmental Remediation Project B-40616 Capital Improvement Program Former Coleman Gas Station -Environmental 5 635,000 0 Active 3 -Design UnFunded -635,000 Admin Remediation Project B-40960 Communications City Hall Studio Area - A/C Unit Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 51,632 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -51,632 V B-40961 Communications Office of Communications - Fleet Upgrade 1,2,3,4,5 144,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -144,000 B-40964 Communications Office of Communications - Large Format 1,2,3,4,5 90,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -90,000 Video Cameras Replacement B-40965 Communications Office of Communications - Studio Cameras 1,2,3,4,5 18,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -18,000 B -50568A Capital Improvement Program Tree Acquisition - D4 4 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin B-70108 General Services Purchase of a video transmission server 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 Administration B-70320 General Services City of Miami Fleet Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 1,700,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,700,000 Administration B-70321 General Services City of Miami Fleet Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 1,750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,750,000 Administration (Trucks) B-70326 General Services GSA Communications Division - Impact 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 Administration Windows and Hurricane Grade Electric Garage Doors B-70327 General Services GSA Mechanics Shop - Light Fleet Aligment & 1,2,3,4,5 65,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -65,000 Administration Lift Mechanism for vehicles up to 3,500 pounds B-70328 General Services Fuel Pump Replacements 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -200,000 Administration B-70329 General Services Roof Repairs at the GSA Communications 1,2,3,4,5 60,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -60,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future 1,2,3,4,5 Fire Rescue Training Center Remediation Project 2 Fire Station No. 6 Office Building - Structural 5 Analysis Active Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling 1 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Firefighting Equipment and Gear 1,2,3,4,5 General Firefighting & EMS Equipment Total Fund CIP Projects Only 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 650,000 650,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 78,791 78,791 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 500,000 500,000 Future minus Funded 0 Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 311 -General Government Administration Warehouse and USAR Warehouse B-70331 General Services Heavy Fleet Tow Truck 1,2,3,4,5 250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -250,000 Administration B-70333 General Services Bucket Truck for the Electrical Division at 1,2,3,4,5 162,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -162,000 Administration GSA B-70335 General Services Replacement of Fire Panel at MRC Facility 1,2,3,4,5 340,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -340,000 Administration B-70336 General Services Roof Repair at the MRC Facility 1,2,3,4,5 350,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -350,000 Administration B-70346 General Services City Hall Emergency A/C Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 40,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -40,000 Administration B-70956 Information Technology MRC Telecommunications Infrastructure 1,2,3,4,5 455,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -455,000 Replacement co B-70957 Information Technology eGovernment/Web Services City View 1,2,3,4,5 2,464,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -2,464,000 Replacement B-70958 Information Technology eGoverment/Web Services iBuild Miami 1,2,3,4,5 480,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -480,000 Phases II and III B-70959 Information Technology eGovernment Services Platform 1,2,3,4,5 1,480,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,480,000 B-70960 Information Technology CIP Document Mgmt & Data Consolidation 1,2,3,4,5 380,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -380,000 B-70961 Information Technology Audit Compliance 1,2,3,4,5 22,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -22,000 B-70962 Information Technology Server Virtualization 1,2,3,4,5 98,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -98,000 B-70963 Information Technology Business Continuity Systems Consolidation 1,2,3,4,5 56,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -56,000 B-70964 Information Technology City Wide Personal Computer Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 1,560,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,560,000 (20%) 312 -Public Safety B -30505C Fire Rescue B-40606 CIP Admin B -70102A Fire Rescue B-70104 B-70105 B-70106 B -70106A Fire Rescue Fire Rescue Fire Rescue Fire Rescue 311 -General Government Hazard Mitigation Projects -CW 1,2,3,4,5 Fire Rescue Training Center Remediation Project 2 Fire Station No. 6 Office Building - Structural 5 Analysis Active Fire Station No. 10 Restroom Remodeling 1 Refurbishing of Existing Apparatus 1,2,3,4,5 Firefighting Equipment and Gear 1,2,3,4,5 General Firefighting & EMS Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 143,684,289 106,388,392 -37,295,897 500,000 500,000 Active 1 -Study Funded 0 446,400 446,400 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 74,619 74,619 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 553,509 553,509 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 650,000 650,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 78,791 78,791 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 312 -Public Safety B-70112 Police Police Headquarters Interview rooms sound 1,2,3,4,5 55,000 55,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 proofing - Oracle 19-690002 B-70118 Police Police Central Station Parking Garage 1,2,3,4,5 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70119 Police Police Headquarters Presure Clean/Seal/Paint 1,2,3,4,5 275,000 275,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Exterior B-70120 Police Carpeting and Flooring - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 467,500 467,500 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70126 Police Grapeland Heights Electrical Panel - Police 1,2,3,4,5 350,000 350,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Dept. B-70137 Police New CCTV Video Wall at MPD Headquarters 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 25,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-70139 General Services Police - 2014 COPS Grant 1,2,3,4,5 600,000 600,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Administration B-70143 Police Renovate Headquarters front Lobby and 1,2,3,4,5 225,000 225,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 entrance -Police department B-701 80A Police Police - Mobile Data Computers 1,2,3,4,5 800,000 800,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-701 80B Police Police - Premier One Records Upgrade 1,2,3,4,5 119,200 119,200 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70181 Capital Improvement Program Fire Station #I4 -Final Furnishing and 4 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Equipment B-70242 Fire Rescue Fire Department - FY2012 "Emergency 1,2,3,4,5 317,333 317,333 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Medical Services (EMS)" B-70243 Fire Rescue Fire Station Generators Capital Needs FY2014 1,2,3,4,5 278,000 278,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 B-70411 Fire Rescue Fire Rescue Personal Protective Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 820,580 820,580 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-70718 Fire Rescue Fire Facilities Generators (North & South) 1,2,3,4,5 1,200,000 1,200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70966 Police Police - Kronos System Upgrade 1,2,3,4,5 137,000 137,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-72802 Fire Rescue Fire Stations & Other Fire Facilities 1,2,3,4,5 3,917,805 3,917,805 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B-72803 Fire Rescue Fire Station Equipment and Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 932,682 932,682 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Replacement B -72810A Fire Rescue New Fire Rescue Apparatus (North & South) 1,2,3,4,5 4,548,837 4,548,837 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -72810B Fire Rescue Purchase of 4 Fire Vehicles FYI 1,2,3,4,5 1,040,000 1,040,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -72810C Fire Rescue Replace existing Fire Apparatus 600,000 600,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-72813 Fire Rescue Defense and Security Equipment Acquisition 1,2,3,4,5 4,729,479 4,729,479 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B -72910C Police The College of Policing - Water Intrusion - D2 2 19,300 19,300 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-72914 Police Police Headquarters Building A/C Renovations 1,2,3,4,5 44,900 44,900 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 312 -Public Safety B -72915A Police Police Headquarters Helipad and Roof 1,2,3,4,5 1,657,118 1,657,118 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Replacement B -30373A Police Police Department Property Unit Outdoor 1,2,3,4,5 1,069,644 1,049,644 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -20,000 Storage B -60453A Fire Rescue Fire Station #13 2 5,084,496 4,840,388 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -244,107 B-60454 Fire Rescue Fire Station #14 (New) 4 6,916,509 341,057 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -6,575,452 B-70040 Fire Rescue Shenandoah Fire Station - D4 4 1,000,000 900,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -100,000 B-70113 Police Police Headquarters 5th Floor Interior 1,2,3,4,5 504,546 350,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -154,546 Renovations B-70128 Police Forensic Lab Expansion - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 1,200,000 644,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -556,000 B-70136 Police Police Headquarters Record Unit Exterior 1,2,3,4,5 496,458 395,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -101,458 Walls Replacement B-70180 Police Police Upgrade of CAD, LRMS, OMDC And 1,2,3,4,5 3,600,000 1,751,886 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -1,848,113 0 o Support Applications to Premier One CAD and Record System B-70241 Fire Rescue Fire Facilities Equipment / Apparatus FYI 1,2,3,4,5 2,290,500 1,770,500 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -520,000 B-72804 Fire Rescue Phone and Radio Equipment Upgrades 1,2,3,4,5 1,209,200 351,200 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -858,000 B-72808 Fire Rescue Light Fleet Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 1,649,658 1,095,658 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -554,000 B-72809 Fire Rescue Large Firefighting Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 660,316 388,316 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -272,000 B-70044 Police Police Marine Patrol Facility 1,2,3,4,5 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 B-70114 Police Fire Pump Electrical Rewiring - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 35,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -35,000 B-70115 Police Domestic Water Pump - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 65,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -65,000 B-70116 Police Police Headquarter Elevators Renovation & 1,2,3,4,5 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 Repairs B-70117 Police I-95 Lighting Project - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 85,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -85,000 B-70121 Police Police Headquarter & South District Storm 1,2,3,4,5 425,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -425,000 Drains and Parking Lot Asphalt B-70122 Police South District Police Sub Station Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 175,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -175,000 B-70123 Police Security System for Central/Headquarter - 1,2,3,4,5 85,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -85,000 Police Dept. B-70124 Police Police South District Air Conditioning Diffuser 1,2,3,4,5 275,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -275,000 B-70125 Police North and South Police Stations Landscaping 1,2,3,4,5 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 B-70127 Police Police Headquarter Building Emergency 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 312 -Public Safety Generator Shed Replacement B-70129 Police College of Police Auditorium Lighting 1,2,3,4,5 15,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -15,000 B-70130 Police College of Police Lobby Lighting 1,2,3,4,5 20,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -20,000 B-70131 Police Mounted Stables Stall Repairs - Police Dept. 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-70132 Police Police South District Exterior Lighting 1,2,3,4,5 35,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -35,000 B-70133 Police Security System for Police South District 1,2,3,4,5 70,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -70,000 Substation B-70134 Police Replacement of 400 Desktop Computers- 1,2,3,4,5 324,172 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -324,172 Police Dept. B-70135 Police Replacement of Sauna Water Heating System - 1,2,3,4,5 15,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -15,000 Police Dept. B-70214 Fire Rescue Fire Stations Computer Aided Dispatch System 1,2,3,4,5 2,400,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -2,400,000 o B-70215 Fire Rescue Uniform Fire Station Data Closets x12 1,2,3,4,5 48,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -48,000 B-70216 Fire Rescue Fire Station and AO PC Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 70,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -70,000 B-70217 Fire Rescue New Citywide Fire Stations Digital Radio 1,2,3,4,5 5,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,000,000 System B-70218 Fire Rescue Citywide Fire Station Replace out of Warranty 1,2,3,4,5 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 Mobile Data B-70219 Fire Rescue Citywide Warranty and Outdated Fire Station 1,2,3,4,5 105,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -105,000 Computers and Monitors B-70220 Fire Rescue Citywide Bunker Gear (Fire Station) 1,2,3,4,5 274,800 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -274,800 B-70221 Fire Rescue Fire Stations Warranty Lifepak/EKG Units 1,2,3,4,5 946,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -946,000 B-70222 Fire Rescue Rebuilding Fire Station #1 2 9,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -9,000,000 B-70223 Fire Rescue Rebuilding Fire Station #10 1 6,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -6,000,000 B-70224 Fire Rescue Fire and Rescue Training Center 2 17,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -17,000,000 (Renovate/Rebuild) B-70225 Fire Rescue Fire Station #15 (Fire Boat) 2 10,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -10,000,000 B-70226 Fire Rescue Citywide Fire Station Pumpers 1,2,3,4,5 1,960,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,960,000 B-70227 Fire Rescue Fire Rescue 1,2,3,4,5 4,320,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -4,320,000 B-70228 Fire Rescue Apparatus Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 950,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -950,000 B-70229 Fire Rescue Replace Fireboat 1 1,250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,250,000 B-70230 Fire Rescue Fire Station Training Facility 1,2,3,4,5 750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -750,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future B-30611 T Capital Improvement Program D 1 FEMA Tree Funded Projects 1 8 -Future Admin B -30613T Capital Improvement Program D3 FEMA Tree Funded Projects - NO 3 Future Admin TRANSFERS or TRANSACTIONS Funded 0 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Capital Improvement Program D4 - FEMA Tree Funded Projects 4 8 -Future Admin Total Fund CIP Projects Only Admin B -30624T Capital Improvement Program Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace - D5 5 100,000 Admin Tree Funded Component B -30630T Capital Improvement Program Palm Grove Road Improvements - Tree 5 70,000 Admin Component D2 B -30687T Capital Improvement Program Coconut Grove Business Improvement District 2 Funded 0 Admin D2 Tree Component B -30724T Capital Improvement Program NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement 1 minus Admin Project - D 1 Tree Component 60,000 60,000 Active Total Cost Total Funded 0 Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 312 -Public Safety B-70231 Fire Rescue Expand Comunication/Alarm Office Facility 1,2,3,4,5 500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -500,000 w/PD (Fire Station) B-70232 Fire Rescue Facility Budget Requests (Fire) 1,2,3,4,5 1,750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,750,000 B-70233 Fire Rescue Fire Station Equipment/Furniture 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -200,000 B-70234 Fire Rescue Fire Station Hurricane Hardening 1,2,3,4,5 384,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -384,000 B-70235 Fire Rescue Fire Station Light Fleet Vehicle Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 630,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -630,000 B-70236 Fire Rescue Fire Station Hardening/Security 1,2,3,4,5 935,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -935,000 B-70237 Fire Rescue Fire Station #5 Renovation 1 800,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -800,000 B-70238 Fire Rescue Fire Training Props 2 350,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -350,000 B-70239 Fire Rescue Fire Station Flat Panels 24" 1,2,3,4,5 3,500 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -3,500 B-70240 Fire Rescue Fire Station Paperless Inspection System (i.e. 1,2,3,4,5 80,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -80,000 MobileEyes software) o B-70417 Police Satellite Communications Antenna Installation 2 20,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -20,000 B-72811 Fire Rescue Replace Existing Fire Engines 1,2,3,4,5 3,035,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -3,035,000 312 -Public Safety 313 -Disaster Recovery B-30611 T Capital Improvement Program D 1 FEMA Tree Funded Projects 1 8 -Future Admin B -30613T Capital Improvement Program D3 FEMA Tree Funded Projects - NO 3 Future Admin TRANSFERS or TRANSACTIONS Funded 0 ALLOWED B -30614T Capital Improvement Program D4 - FEMA Tree Funded Projects 4 8 -Future Admin B -30615T Capital Improvement Program D5 FEMA Tree Funded Component 5 Future Admin B -30624T Capital Improvement Program Overtown Greenway @ NW 11 Terrace - D5 5 100,000 Admin Tree Funded Component B -30630T Capital Improvement Program Palm Grove Road Improvements - Tree 5 70,000 Admin Component D2 B -30687T Capital Improvement Program Coconut Grove Business Improvement District 2 Funded 0 Admin D2 Tree Component B -30724T Capital Improvement Program NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement 1 3 -Design Admin Project - D 1 Tree Component 123,329,856 40,590,706 -82,739,149 169,930 169,930 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 255,930 255,930 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 315,930 315,930 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 119,930 119,930 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 100,000 100,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 70,000 70,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 100,000 100,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 60,000 60,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future 736,242 Active Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Public Facilities Total Fund CIP Projects Only B-30501 B Public Facilities Manuel Artime Dimmer Rack System 1,2,3,4,5 minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 313 -Disaster Recovery B -30558A Public Facilities B -30727T Capital Improvement Program NW 18th Avenue Roadway Improvement 1 60,000 60,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Project - D 1 Tree Component 2 o B -40457T Capital Improvement Program Kinloch Park Building Addition -D1 1 50,000 50,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin 65,303 Active 313 -Disaster Recovery 325 -Public Facilities 736,242 Active B -30501A Public Facilities Manuel Artime Miscellaneous Project - D3 3 B-30501 B Public Facilities Manuel Artime Dimmer Rack System 1,2,3,4,5 B-30501 C Public Facilities Manuel Artime Window Replacement 970 2 75,000 75,000 Building - PF 8 -Future B -30558A Public Facilities Manuel Artime repairs 900 building -D3 3 B -30688A Capital Improvement Program Munroe Marine Stadium Restorattion-D2 2 o Admin 5 -Construction Funded 0 w 65,303 Active 5 -Construction B-30706 Public Facilities Miscellaneous Repairs 10% Set Aside 2 B-40354 Public Facilities Tower Theater Improvements - D3 3 B-40668 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Park Development 2 B-40720 Public Facilities A/C Repairs. CW 1,2,3,4,5 B-40721 Public Facilities Epoxy Flooring upgrades. CW 1,2,3,4,5 B-60464 Public Facilities New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building 2 B -70010A Public Facilities MiaMarina PIER/Electrical upgrades, 41,167 Future 8 -Future Engineering & Feasibility Study 41,167 B-70011 Public Facilities Clean Vessel Act 2013 - PF 2 B-70012 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina Sewage Pump -Out 2 Funded 0 50,000 Improvements Future B-70029 Public Facilities Little Haiti Cultural Center miscellaneous 5 Future 8 -Future repairs 225,000 B-70038 Public Facilities Manuel Artime Structural Assessment - D3 3 B-70039 Public Facilities Miamimarina Ticket Surcharge Revenues PF 8 -Future B-70041 Public Facilities Little Haiti Cultural Center Roof -D5 5 B-70144 Police Recertification of the Police Headquarter 1,2,3,4,5 Building -CW B-70414 Public Facilities James L. Knight Center / Hyatt- Fire Alarm 2 1,301,720 1,301,720 0 736,242 736,242 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 106,653 106,653 Active 1 -Study Funded 0 580,591 580,591 Active 1 -Study Funded 0 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 3,270,207 3,270,207 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 65,303 65,303 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 23,634,300 23,634,300 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 4,553,083 4,553,083 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 150,000 150,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 41,167 41,167 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 41,167 41,167 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 33,000 33,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 487,900 487,900 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 225,000 225,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 351,876 351,876 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 325 -Public Facilities System Replacement B -70414A Public Facilities Hyatt Repairs (Fire Safety, Roof Repair, & Air 2 750,000 750,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Handler) - D2 B -73503A Public Facilities James L. Knight Center Parking Garage 1,2,3,4,5 1,436,600 1,436,600 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Improvements B -30182A Public Facilities Coconut Grove Waterfront Master Plan 2 60,000,000 1,319,286 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -58,680,714 Implementation - Phase I B-30531 Capital Improvement Program Dorsey Memorial Library Restoration 2 1,038,100 250,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -788,100 Admin B-30602 Public Facilities Seminole Dinghy Dock Expansion 2 60,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -30,000 B-30688 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Restoration 2 37,792,604 508,513 Active I -Study Partially Funded -37,284,090 B-30689 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Bulkhead Replacement 2 2,094,393 1,891,603 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -202,789 B-30735 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina Dinghy Dock - D2 2 384,165 328,070 Active 4 -Bid Partially Funded -56,095 0 B-33514 Public Facilities Marine Stadium Marina Improvements 2 1,315,550 255,646 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -1,059,904 B-70010 Public Facilities Miamarina Pier 5 Canopies - PF 2 485,932 435,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -50,932 B-70100 Public Facilities Gusman Hall Improvements / Repairs 2 10,000,000 2,494,240 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -7,505,759 B-75001 Public Facilities Watson Island Infrastructure 2 647,190 129,028 Active 4 -Bid Partially Funded -518,162 B -30648A Capital Improvement Program City Department Buildout at Marlins Garage 1,2,3,4,5 6,512,221 6,512,221 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-35000 Public Facilities Watson Island Public Park Improvements 2 2,600,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -2,600,000 B-35003 Public Facilities Allapattah Community Elderly Center 1 287,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -287,000 B-70013 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina Pilings - phase 5 2 250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -250,000 B-70014 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina Replace Pumpout System 2 1,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,500,000 Plumbing/Connections B-70015 Public Facilities Dinner Key Marina CCTV Security System 2 250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -250,000 B-70016 Public Facilities Miamarina Pilings -Phase 5 2 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 B-70017 Public Facilities Miamarina CCTV Security System 2 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-70018 Public Facilities Miamarina Replace Marina Truck 2 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 B-70019 Public Facilities Marina Stadium Marina Replace Marina 2 40,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -40,000 Truck B-70020 Public Facilities Dinner Key Mooring Faciliy Replace Customer 2 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 Shuttle Vessel City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future B -30088A Parks and Recreation Cost Estimates versus Available Funding 200,000 200,000 Active Total Fund CIP Projects Only equipment -D 1 B -30134A Parks and Recreation Bryan Park Community Building - D4 4 1,202,128 1,202,128 Active minus Funded 0 B -30134B Parks and Recreation Bryan Park. Furniture, fixture, equipment. D-4 Total Cost Total 100,000 100,000 Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 325 -Public Facilities B-70021 Public Facilities Manuel Artime Theater Fire Alarm/Asbestos 3 300,000 0 Active 7 -On -Hold UnFunded -300,000 Removal B-70022 Public Facilities Manuel Artime Theater Waterproof Exterior 3 100,000 0 Active 1 -Study UnFunded -100,000 Repairs B-70024 Public Facilities 970 Office Building Air Handler Replacement 3 250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -250,000 B-70025 Public Facilities Plaza/parking Lot Sand Removal 3 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 B-70026 Public Facilities Caribbean Marketplace Replace Garage Doors 5 21,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -21,000 B-70027 Public Facilities Caribbean Marketplace Exterior Lighting 5 11,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -11,000 B-70028 Public Facilities Caribbean Marketplace Snack Bar Station 5 28,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -28,000 B-70030 Public Facilities Little Haiti Cultural Center Reseal Courtyard 5 8,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -8,000 Bricks B-70031 Public Facilities Little Haiti Cultural Center Additional 5 6,600 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -6,600 Security Cameras 0 B-70032 Public Facilities Miami Convention Center/James L Knight 2 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 Center Exterior Flooring Replacement B-70033 Public Facilities Miami Convention center/James L Knight 2 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 Center Mold Remediation B-70034 Public Facilities Miami Convention Center/James L Knight 2 37,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -37,000 Center Theater - Line set Cable and Motor Replacement B-70035 Public Facilities G4 Parking Garage Concrete Spall And Crack 2 74,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -74,000 Repairs B-70036 Public Facilities G4 Parking Garage Barrier Cable Repairs 2 27,400 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,400 B-70037 Public Facilities G4 Parking Garage Pipe Repairs to Ground 2 10,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -10,000 Floor Lobby B70029 Public Facilities Little Haiti Cultural center carpet -D5 5 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 325 -Public Facilities 164,743,248 52,191,701 -112,551,547 331 -Parks and Recreation B -30088A Parks and Recreation Antonio Maceo Park, furniture, fixture 1 200,000 200,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 equipment -D 1 B -30134A Parks and Recreation Bryan Park Community Building - D4 4 1,202,128 1,202,128 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 B -30134B Parks and Recreation Bryan Park. Furniture, fixture, equipment. D-4 4 100,000 100,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B -30160A Parks and Recreation Grounds Maintenance Equipment. CW 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B -30160B Parks and Recreation City Wide replacement equipment. CW 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -30160C Parks and Recreation 4500 Toro Lawnmover for Marine Stadium. 60,000 60,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -30160D Parks and Recreation Truck for Marine Stadium Flex Park 20,000 20,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -30182B Parks and Recreation Regatta Park Development 2 6,602,689 6,602,689 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B -30184B Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Northpoint Park Design and 2 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 enhancements. D2 B -30305B Parks and Recreation Gibson Park New Construction (Partially 5 12,739,581 12,739,581 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Funded by CRA 92-689001) B-30508 Virginia Key Park Trust Virginia Key Beach Park Museum 2 20,527,127 20,527,127 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 B -30525A Parks and Recreation VirrickPark. Furniture, fixture, equipment. D-2 2 50,000 50,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B -30538D Capital Improvement Program Museum Park - DRI Fees Administration 1,2,3,4,5 444,957 444,957 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin o B -30538E Capital Improvement Program Museum Park - DRI Air Quality 1,2,3,4,5 313,129 313,129 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 rn Admin B -30541E Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park, Path to Floating Dock - 2 28,946 28,946 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Mangrove Trimming B-30541 F Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Equipment and site 1,2,3,4,5 425,000 425,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Improvements (GF) - Various Parks B -30685C Parks and Recreation 1814 Brickell Avenue Park Shade Structures - 2 125,000 125,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 D2 B-30690 Parks and Recreation West End Park New Community Building 4 2,833,521 2,833,521 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B-30984 Parks and Recreation Athalie Range Park HVAC Replacement - D5 5 200,000 200,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B -35808B Parks and Recreation Curtis Park furniture, fixture, equipment. 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -35812D Parks and Recreation Duarte Park Building Renovation, Splash Park 1 42,590 42,590 Active I -Study Funded 0 (Lighting) B-35838 Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park Restroom Building 2 1,222,033 1,222,033 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Improvements B-35861 B Parks and Recreation Maximo Gomez / Domino Park Restroom 3 308,000 308,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Improvements - D3 B -35873A Parks and Recreation Belafonte Tacolcy Roof -D5 5 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -35883A Parks and Recreation Hadley Park New Youth Center D5 5 7,876,807 7,876,807 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B-35887 Parks and Recreation Moore Park New Construction 5 8,083,877 8,083,877 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B -35895A Parks and Recreation Recreation Master Plan. CW 1,2,3,4,5 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40173 Bayfront Park Management Bayfront Park Electrical Repairs 2 309,000 309,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Trust B -40355A Parks and Recreation Broadway & SW 1 st Avenue - New Park 3 1,500,000 1,500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -40355B Parks and Recreation Jose Marti Park Improvements 3 2,850,000 2,850,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B -40454A Public Facilities Spring Garden Park Seawall and Kayak 1,2,3,4,5 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -40454B Public Facilities Baywood Park Seawall 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 25,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -40454C Public Facilities Alice Wainwright Park Seawall and Baywalk 1,2,3,4,5 62,500 62,500 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40456 Parks and Recreation Antonio Maceo Community Building Addition 1 2,417,178 2,417,178 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 -D1 B-40470 Parks and Recreation Bell Meade Park Improvements 2 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40475 Parks and Recreation Coral Gate Park Access Control 4 20,000 20,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40476 Parks and Recreation Coral Gate Park Baseball Field 4 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 o B-40482 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Playground 1 200,000 200,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B-40487 Parks and Recreation Domino Park Shade Structure 3 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40495 Parks and Recreation Eaton Park Daycare Improvements 5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40505 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Pool Locker rooms improvement 5 120,000 120,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40509 Parks and Recreation Legion Park HVAC (heating, ventilation, and 2 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 air conditioning) Replace B-40510 Parks and Recreation Legion Park Improvements 2 400,000 400,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40511 Parks and Recreation Legion Park Restrooms 2 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40513 Parks and Recreation Lemon City Park Daycare Playground 5 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40514 Parks and Recreation Lemon City Park Improvements 5 40,000 40,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -40516A Parks and Recreation Little Haiti locker rooms furniture, fixture, 5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 equipment. D5 B-40519 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Freedom Garden Park 5 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40521 Parks and Recreation Little River Pocket Park Playground 5 50,000 50,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40522 Parks and Recreation Lummus Park Playground 5 125,000 125,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40523 Parks and Recreation Manatee Bend Park 2 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40528 Parks and Recreation Melrose Park Playground 5 125,000 125,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40530 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Rowing Center Park Building 2 350,000 350,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40534 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Tennis Center Building 2 1,400,000 1,400,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-40538 Parks and Recreation North Bay Vista Park Playground 5 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40542 Parks and Recreation Pallot Park Seawall 2 300,000 300,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40562 Parks and Recreation Shedavia Jenkins Parks Lighting 1,5 175,000 175,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 B -40573A Parks and Recreation Grapeland Water Park general maintenance.D1 1 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40581 Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Community Center - D2 2 2,500,000 2,500,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 B -40581A Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Community Center 2 2,200,000 2,200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Improvement -D2 B-40582 Parks and Recreation Simpson Park New Deck - D2 2 92,500 92,500 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-40583 Parks and Recreation Jose Marti A/C Condensor - D3 3 32,800 32,800 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-40585 Parks and Recreation Legion Park - Replace entire Roof System - D2 2 350,000 350,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40586 Parks and Recreation Virrick Park - Replace AC Unit in Gym - D2 2 84,500 84,500 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40590 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park - Replacement of all Rooftop 5 31,000 31,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Units (6) - D5 B-40591 Parks and Recreation African Square Park - Replacement of one AC 5 5,000 5,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 co Unit - D5 B-40593 Parks and Recreation Dorsey Park Community Center - D2 2 353,545 353,545 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 B-40595 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park - Resurface and repair pools 5 275,000 275,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40598 Parks and Recreation GreenLink / Underline Project - 10 mile Park 2 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40599 Capital Improvement Program Duarte Park Vita Course -D1 1 150,000 150,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-40600 Capital Improvement Program Curtis Park Expansion and Improvements 1 1,200,000 1,200,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin B -40600A Parks and Recreation Curtis Park capacity improvement. D1 1 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40601 Capital Improvement Program Remediation of Fern Isle Park 1 10,000 10,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40602 Capital Improvement Program Remediation of Jose Marti 3 6,000 6,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-40607 Capital Improvement Program Grapeland Park Envorinmental Remediation 1 51,300 51,300 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Project B-40608 Capital Improvement Program Melreese Golf Club Course Environmental 1 200,000 200,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Remediation Project B-40610 Capital Improvement Program Curtis Park Environmental Remediation 1 4,138,200 4,138,200 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Project B-40612 Capital Improvement Program Southside Park Environmental Remediation 3 1,001,900 1,001,900 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40611 Capital Improvement Program Billy Rolle Park Environmental Remediation 2 233,500 233,500 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Project B-40613 Capital Improvement Program Douglas Park Environmental Remediation 2 3,630,900 3,630,900 Active 4 -Bid Funded 0 Admin Project -D2 B-40622 Capital Improvement Program Southside Park Expansion and Improvements 3 1,500,000 1,500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-40669 Parks and Recreation Structural Assessment Pools - Citywide 1,2,3,4,5 25,000 25,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40708 Parks and Recreation Plaza dela Cubanidad 3 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40709 Parks and Recreation City Wide Bathrooms repair. CW 1,2,3,4,5 300,000 300,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40710 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 1,2,3,4,5 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Mayor B-40711 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 D1 B-40712 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 2 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 D2 B-40714 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 4 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 D4 B-40715 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 5 2,500,000 2,500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 D5 B-40716 Parks and Recreation Parks security Improvement. CW 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40717 Parks and Recreation Southside Park recreation Center floor. D3 3 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-40718 Parks and Recreation Southside Park. D3 3 150,000 150,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-50301 Capital Improvement Program Riverside Park Safety Lighting (SW 7th 3 35,000 35,000 Active 1 -Study Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-50302 Capital Improvement Program Grove Park Fence (NW 16th Ave & NW South 3 40,000 40,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin River Dr) - D3 B-50568 Parks and Recreation Land Adquisition Park -D4 4 2,800,000 2,800,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -75807A Parks and Recreation Kinloch Park Furniture, fixture, equipment -D1 1 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-75883 Parks and Recreation Peacock Park Site Improvements 2 995,123 995,123 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B -75909A Parks and Recreation Riverside Park. D3 3 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -75936A Parks and Recreation West End park. Furniture,fixture, 4 150,000 150,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 equipment -D4 B -75955A Parks and Recreation Gibson Park, furniture, fixture, equipment 5 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-75957 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Irrigation/Landscaping 5 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B -75959A Parks and Recreation Hadley Park furniture, fixture, Equipment -D5 5 200,000 200,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-75973 Parks and Recreation Oakland Grove Park Playground Equipment 5 30,000 30,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B -78502A Capital Improvement Program Museum of Science - Development in 1,2,3,4,5 2,000,000 2,000,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Bicentennial Park - Phase 2 B-30174 Virginia Key Park Trust Virginia Key Beach Park Historic Restoration 2 20,868,195 1,480,737 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -19,387,457 Phase 2 B-30374 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Rowing Center Improvements - 2 1,327,022 616,513 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -710,509 P&R Project B-30538 Parks and Recreation Museum Park - Partially Funded by CRA 1,2,3,4,5 17,920,368 17,202,692 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -717,675 92-686001 B-30541 D Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Equipments & Site 1,2,3,4,5 2,258,110 2,256,247 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -1,863 Improvements FYI 2 B-30721 Parks and Recreation Spoil Island E Restoration and Floating Dock 2 445,573 396,928 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -48,645 o B-30777 Parks and Recreation Coral Gate Mini Park - D4 4 200,633 200,600 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -33 B-30800 Parks and Recreation Fern Isle / PBA Park Improvements Project - 1 1,558,560 1,556,781 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -1,779 D1 B-30801 Parks and Recreation Manatee Bend Park Shoreline Improvements - 2 777,639 752,639 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -25,000 D2 B-30802 Parks and Recreation Pallot Park Shoreline Improvements - D2 2 1,688,395 80,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -1,608,395 B -30825A Parks and Recreation Biscayne Bay Spoil Island E Picnic Tables, 2 126,000 8,250 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -117,750 Benches & Umbrellas - D2 B -30825B Parks and Recreation Biscayne Bay Spoil Island E Public Trail - D2 2 126,000 8,250 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -117,750 B-30882 Parks and Recreation African Square Park - Splash Park - D5 5 748,458 670,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -78,458 B-30887 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Soccer Field Bathroom - D5 5 462,814 462,814 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -0 B-35806 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park New Pool Facility and Boat Ramp 1 2,367,210 1,774,266 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -592,944 Improvement B-35904 Parks and Recreation Neighborhood Parks Improv. Contingencies - 1,2,3,4,5 1,272,223 771,223 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -501,000 ADA Modifications B -40355C Parks and Recreation D3 Lighting Safety & Parks Improvements 3 2,237,000 2,227,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -10,000 B-40454 Public Facilities Citywide Park Expansion - Impact Fees 1,2,3,4,5 1,981,000 647,920 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -1,333,080 B-40457 Parks and Recreation Kinloch Park Building Addition (Sandra 1 2,145,402 2,057,955 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -87,446 DeLucca New Senior Center)- D 1 B-40496 Parks and Recreation Eaton Park Improvements 5 1,500,000 300,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -1,200,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40507 Parks and Recreation Citywide - Land Acquisition Park 1,2,3,4,5 15,000,000 4,346,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -10,654,000 B-40516 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Soccer Park 5 1,685,000 920,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -765,000 B-40529 Parks and Recreation Merrie Christmas Park Improvements 2 600,000 588,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -12,000 B-40532 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Floating Dock 2 70,000 50,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -20,000 B-40547 Parks and Recreation Citywide Parks Playground Replacements 1,2,3,4,5 1,500,000 550,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -950,000 B-40563 Parks and Recreation Shenandoah Park Pool Renovation 4 3,400,000 2,400,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -1,000,000 B-40566 Parks and Recreation Spring Garden Point Park Historic Building 5 1,250,000 804,059 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -445,940 B-40571 Parks and Recreation Virrick Park New Pool Facility - D2 2 3,000,000 2,712,701 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -287,298 B-40584 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Kayak Launch - D2 2 2,812,687 500,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -2,312,687 B-40594 Parks and Recreation Belafonte Tacolcy - Roofrepair and 5 328,934 250,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -78,934 extermination services B-40713 Parks and Recreation Parks, Streets, and Lighting Improvements - 1,2,3,4,5 1,200,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -200,000 D3 B-40355 Parks and Recreation Land Addquisition Park -D3 3 4,337,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -4,337,000 B-40455 Parks and Recreation Citywide Capital Improvements Projects 1,2,3,4,5 0 0 Active 3 -Design UnFunded 0 B-40458 Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Building AC Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 600,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -600,000 B-40459 Parks and Recreation African Square Park Playground 5 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 B-40460 Parks and Recreation African Square Park Restroom & Building 5 750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -750,000 Renovation B-40461 Parks and Recreation Allapattah Mini Park Access Control 1 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 B-40462 Parks and Recreation Allapattah Mini Park Court 1 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 B-40464 Parks and Recreation Bay of Pigs Park Playground 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40465 Parks and Recreation Baywood Park Seawall Repair 5 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 B-40466 Parks and Recreation Baywood Park Site Development 5 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 B-40467 Parks and Recreation Belafonte Tacolcy Park - Basketball Courts 5 35,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -35,000 Fencing B-40468 Parks and Recreation Belafonte Tacolcy Park - Basketball Courts 5 40,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -40,000 Resurfacing B-40469 Parks and Recreation Belafonte Tacolcy Park entire facility 5 5,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,000,000 reconstruction B-40471 Parks and Recreation Biscayne Heights Park (Shorecrest Park) 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 Improvements City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40472 Parks and Recreation Biscayne Park Soccer Facility 2 2,250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -2,250,000 B-40473 Parks and Recreation Bryan Park Tennis Court 4 45,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -45,000 B-40474 Parks and Recreation Kirk Munroe Tennis Park 2 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 B-40477 Parks and Recreation Crestwood Park Basketball Courts Resurfacing 5 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 B-40478 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Access Control (Fencing) 1 225,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -225,000 B-40479 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Access Control (Roll up doors) 1 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 B-40480 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Basketball and Tennis Courts 1 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 Resurfacing B-40481 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Parking Lot 1 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 B-40483 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Restrooms Renovation 1 200,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -200,000 B-40484 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park Stadium Restrooms Improvements 1 1,250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,250,000 B-40485 Parks and Recreation Domino Park Building 3 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 N B-40488 Parks and Recreation Dorsey Park Ballfield 2 45,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -45,000 B-40489 Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Irrigation System 2 40,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -40,000 B-40490 Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Lighting 2 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 B-40491 Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Playground 2 130,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -130,000 B-40492 Parks and Recreation Duarte Park Basketball and Tennis Courts 1 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 Resurfacing B-40493 Parks and Recreation Duarte Park Lighting 1 175,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -175,000 B-40494 Parks and Recreation Duarte Park Playground 1 120,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -120,000 B-40497 Parks and Recreation Fort Dallas Park (Lummus Park Historic 5 750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -750,000 District) Demolition B-40498 Parks and Recreation Gibson Park Stadium 5 850,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -850,000 B-40499 Parks and Recreation Grapeland Park Picnic Shelter 1 850,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -850,000 B-40500 Parks and Recreation Grove Mini Park Playground 2 65,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -65,000 B-40501 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Ballfield 5 80,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -80,000 B-40502 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Bleachers 5 600,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -600,000 B-40503 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Football Field 5 1,750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,750,000 B-40504 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Parking Lot 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40506 Parks and Recreation Hadley Park Pool Improvement 5 280,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -280,000 B-40508 Parks and Recreation Legion Park Boat Ramp 2 450,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -450,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40512 Parks and Recreation Lemon City Park Daycare Parking Lot 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40515 Parks and Recreation Lemon City park Walkways 5 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 B-40517 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Soccer Park Stadium Bleacher 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 Modification B-40518 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Soccer Park Stadium Repairs 5 160,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -160,000 B-40520 Parks and Recreation Little River Commerce Park Building 5 500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -500,000 B-40524 Parks and Recreation Marti Pool Park Locker -rooms Renovation 3 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40525 Parks and Recreation Marti Pool Park Pool Improvements 3 110,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -110,000 B-40526 Parks and Recreation Marti Pool Park Pump Improvement 3 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40531 Parks and Recreation Moore Park Tennis Court Improvement 5 380,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -380,000 B-40533 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Boat Ramp Improvements 2 380,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -380,000 B-40535 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Court Renovations 2 500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -500,000 w B-40536 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Walkways and ADA 2 250,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -250,000 Compliance B-40537 Parks and Recreation Morningside Pool Park Pool Facility 2 1,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,000,000 Improvements B-40539 Parks and Recreation Oakland Grove Mini Park 5 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 B-40540 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Beach Park Access Control 1,2,3,4,5 35,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -35,000 B-40541 Parks and Recreation Operation Yard Park Trailers 1,2,3,4,5 225,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -225,000 B-40543 Parks and Recreation PBA / Fern Isle Redevelopment 1 4,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -4,500,000 B-40544 Parks and Recreation Peacock Park Building Renovation 2 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 B-40545 Parks and Recreation Peacock Park Playground 2 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 B-40546 Parks and Recreation Pine Heights Park Playground 1 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40548 Parks and Recreation Pullman Mini Park Playground Replacement 5 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40549 Parks and Recreation Rainbow Village Park Playground 5 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40550 Parks and Recreation Athalie Range Park Playground 5 120,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -120,000 B-40551 Parks and Recreation Athalie Range Park Restroom Renovation 5 80,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -80,000 B-40552 Parks and Recreation Athalie Range Park Pool Heater 5 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40553 Parks and Recreation Reeves Park Basketball Court 5 35,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -35,000 B-40554 Parks and Recreation Reeves Park Playground 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40555 Parks and Recreation Reeves Park Sidewalks & Walkways 5 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation B-40556 Parks and Recreation Reeves Park Volleyball Court 5 25,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -25,000 B-40557 Parks and Recreation Riverside Park Restroom Renovation 3 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40558 Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Buildings Roof Repairs 1,2,3,4,5 350,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -350,000 B-40559 Parks and Recreation Sewell Park kayak Launch 1 225,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -225,000 B-40560 Parks and Recreation Sewell Park Parking Lot 1 60,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -60,000 B-40561 Parks and Recreation Sewell Park Playground 1 75,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -75,000 B-40564 Parks and Recreation Simpson Park Building Roof Replacement 2 65,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -65,000 B-40565 Parks and Recreation Southside Park Field 3 1,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,500,000 B-40567 Parks and Recreation Spring Garden Point Park 5 150,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -150,000 B-40568 Parks and Recreation Citywide Park Buildings Termite Control 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -200,000 B-40569 Parks and Recreation Town Park Playground 5 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 B-40570 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Beach Park Restrooms 2 750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -750,000 Replacement B-40572 Parks and Recreation Alice Wainwright Park Restrooms 2 350,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -350,000 B-40573 Parks and Recreation Grapeland Water Park Renovations 1 750,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -750,000 B-40574 Parks and Recreation West Buena Vista Park Building Restrooms 5 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 improvements B-40575 Parks and Recreation West Buena Vista Park Courts 5 50,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -50,000 B-40576 Parks and Recreation West Buena Vista Park Playground 5 120,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -120,000 B-40577 Parks and Recreation Williams Park Playground 5 175,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -175,000 B-40578 Parks and Recreation Williams Park Pool Improvement 5 175,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -175,000 B-40579 Parks and Recreation Williams Park Sport Field Lights 5 350,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -350,000 B-40580 General Services Jose Marti Roof Repair - GSA 3 26,100 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -26,100 Administration B-40587 Public Facilities Curtis Park Turf (Baseball) - D1 1 1,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,500,000 B-40588 Parks and Recreation Douglas Park Turf - D2 2 1,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,500,000 B-40589 Public Facilities Peacock Park Turf - D2 2 1,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,500,000 B-40592 Parks and Recreation Parks - Replace/Repair AC Units due to 1,2,3,4,5 551,500 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -551,500 Vandalism and Age - Citywide B-40675 Parks and Recreation Structural Shoreup of Shenandoah Park Pool - 4 100,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -100,000 D4 B-40679 Parks and Recreation Brickell / Brickell Bay Drive Linear Park 2 3,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -3,000,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 331 -Parks and Recreation 245,922,165 157,176,916 -88,745,249 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B -30008A Capital Improvement Program Grove Park Road Improvements - D3 3 383,821 383,821 Active 4 -Bid Funded 0 Admin B-30178 Capital Improvement Program Design District/FEC 5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B -30345A Capital Improvement Program Calle Ocho Gateway Sign - D3 3 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30346 Transportation & Transit Traffic Study Reviews - Oracle Project 1,2,3,4,5 411,622 411,622 Active I -Study Funded 0 35-110007 B-30403 Capital Improvement Program Roadway Improvement - D5 5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30404 Capital Improvement Program South Miami Court, SW 27th Road and SW 2 240,000 240,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin 28th Road Roadway Improvements - D2 B-30406 Capital Improvement Program Rights of way Improvements in Allapatah - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30414 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Circle at SW 31 Ave and SW 12 St - 4 514,789 514,789 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin D4 B-30432 Capital Improvement Program D2 - Reconstruction of Roadway identified as 2 2,551,463 2,551,463 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin "Very Poor" by PW B-30433 Capital Improvement Program D3 - Reconstruction of Roadway identified as 3 4,082,712 4,082,712 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin "Very Poor" by PW B-30435 Capital Improvement Program D5 - Reconstruction of Roadway identified as 5 4,617,037 4,617,037 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin "Very Poor" by PW B-30436 Capital Improvement Program DI Swale Improvements 1 475,000 475,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30437 Capital Improvement Program Replacement of the existing vine along the US 1 2 336,000 336,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin 22 Ave to Museum of Science -D2 B-30438 Capital Improvement Program Repair & Maintenance of Cuban Memorial 3 95,000 95,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Boulevard -D3 B-30439 Capital Improvement Program Replace lighting-Sw I st bewteen 4th Ave to 3,4 130,000 130,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin 24th Ave -D3 &D4 B-30441 Capital Improvement Program Restore landscaping, mulch and replace dead 5 75,000 75,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin trees. NE 82nd Street -D5 B-30442 Capital Improvement Program Landscaping enhancements maintenance to 5 350,000 350,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Admin 79th Street Causeway medians & embankments -D5 B-30443 Capital Improvement Program Belle Meade Island Decorative lighting 5 250,000 250,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin installation -D5 B-30444 Capital Improvement Program Repainting, refurbishing marker signs -CW 1,2,3,4,5 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30445 Capital Improvement Program Miscellaneous Decorative Lighting 1,2,3,4,5 500,000 500,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin installation -CW B-30446 Capital Improvement Program Bonded Rubber Aggregate planters for traffic 1,2,3,4,5 20,000 20,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin circles -CW B-30447 Capital Improvement Program Synthetic, turfblock- CW 1,2,3,4,5 20,000 20,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B -30447A Capital Improvement Program Syntetic Turfblock installation -CW 1,2,3,4,5 22,000 22,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin rn B-30448 Capital Improvement Program Electronic right -of Way permit processing 1,2,3,4,5 400,000 400,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin (IPW) B-30540 Capital Improvement Program Little River Industrial Park 5 2,000,000 2,000,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-30606 Capital Improvement Program DWNTWN Beautification Project Phase I 1,2,3,4,5 12,953,764 12,953,764 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B -30606D Capital Improvement Program DWNTWN Beautification - Design Phase 1,2,3,4,5 339,551 339,551 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B -30606L Capital Improvement Program DWNTWN Beautification 1,2,3,4,5 2,172,567 2,172,567 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin (Lighting)-D1,D2,D3,D4,D5 B-30613 Capital Improvement Program District 3 - Miscellaneous Roadway 3 3,002,644 3,002,644 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Improvements B-30621 Capital Improvement Program Center Grove Street Improvements 2 1,991,568 1,991,568 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-30628 Capital Improvement Program Bird Avenue Road Improvement 2 2,160,505 2,160,505 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B -30630A Capital Improvement Program NE 71 Street (NE 4th Ct. to Biscyane Blvd) 5 376,177 376,177 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30631 Capital Improvement Program Miami River Greenway from Miami Circle 2 1,221,625 1,221,625 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Greenway to South Miami Avenue City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B -30645F Transportation & Transit Miami Regional Intermodal Plan 1,2,3,4,5 48,000 48,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 B -30645G Capital Improvement Program Little Havana Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan 1,2,3,4,5 52,000 52,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 Admin B -30662D Capital Improvement Program US -1 Median Closures at Bridgeport and SW 2 440,576 440,576 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin 30 Ct - D2 B-30716 Capital Improvement Program Tigertail Resurfacing - D2 2 711,257 711,257 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-30718 Capital Improvement Program I-95 South Miami Terminal Street 2 930,748 930,748 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Improvements - D2 B-30724 Capital Improvement Program NW 33rd Street Roadway Improvement 1 5,068,863 5,068,863 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Project Phase I - D I B-30732 Capital Improvement Program NW 9th Street Roadway Improvement Project 1 756,247 756,247 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin - D I B-30749 Capital Improvement Program Citrus Grove Roadway Improvements 3 356,791 356,791 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-30751 Capital Improvement Program SW 23 Street btw 16 and 17 Ave for M&R - 3 86,202 86,202 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin D3 B-30755 Capital Improvement Program Golden Pines Neighborhood Rdwy (SW 33rd 163,000 163,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin Court & SW 29th Terrace) B-30770 Capital Improvement Program SW 22nd Avenue Medians - US I to Coral 4 68,855 68,855 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin Way - D4 B-30773 Capital Improvement Program Martin Luther King (MLK) Blvd / I-95 Area 5 100,000 100,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin Improvements - Murrals B-30788 Capital Improvement Program NW 16 Ave and 14 Ter and NW 16 Ave and 1 57,618 57,618 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin 15 St - DI B-30789 Capital Improvement Program NW 20th Street from 12th Avenue to 17th 1 410,753 410,753 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Avenue (Milling & Resurfacing) B-30792 Capital Improvement Program NW 16 Street Roadway Reconstruction - D1 1 308,000 308,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30804 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming at SW 19th Avenue and SW 4 419,647 419,647 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin 14th Terrace - D4 CDBG 91-03367 B-30833 Capital Improvement Program SW I st Ave between SW 15th and SW 7th 1,2,3,4,5 1,143,812 1,143,812 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Street B-30836 Capital Improvement Program South Grove Phase 3 Roadway and Drainage 2 1,744,593 1,744,593 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Admin Improvements - D2 B -30836A Capital Improvement Program Poinciana Roadway Improvements 330,000 330,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30837 Capital Improvement Program South Miami Avenue - SE 6th and 5th Street 2 771,544 771,544 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Traffic Modifications - D2 B-30842 Capital Improvement Program Coacoochee Ave/Micanopy Ave Minor 2 71,000 71,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Roadway Improvements - D2 B-30874 Capital Improvement Program Brickell Ave -SE 15 Road to SE 8 Street -D2 2 1,500,000 1,500,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30884 Capital Improvement Program NW 62 Street West of I-95 Roadway 5 175,000 175,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Improvements - D5 B-30891 Capital Improvement Program Buena Vista One -Way Street Conversion and 5 250,000 250,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin Signage - D5 B-30894 Capital Improvement Program Little Haiti Right of Way Improvements - D5 5 500,000 500,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30896 Capital Improvement Program Phase I: NW 29th Street (NW 7 Ave to NW 2 5 597,219 597,219 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin Ave) - D5 B-30898 Capital Improvement Program NW 43 St from NW 10 Ave to NW 11 Ave- 5 115,236 115,236 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin D5 B-30900 Capital Improvement Program NW 40 St from NW 10 Ave to NW 12 Ave - 5 129,641 129,641 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin D5 B-30906 Capital Improvement Program NW 3 Avenue Pedestrian Improvements - D5 5 124,551 124,551 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-30940 Capital Improvement Program Downtown Miami Bicycle and Pedestrian 2 287,500 287,500 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Mobility Improvement Project B-30941 Capital Improvement Program Downtown Miami Signage and Wayfinding 2 1,150,000 1,150,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin System B-30965 Capital Improvement Program Coral Gate Speed Humps - D4 4 163,845 163,845 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30967 Capital Improvement Program SW 16th Terrace from SW 21 Ave to SW 22 4 206,386 206,386 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Ave - D4 B-30972 Capital Improvement Program SW 64 Court Roadway & Drainage 4 132,522 132,522 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Improvements (from SW 6 St to SW 8 St) - D4 B-30975 Capital Improvement Program Swale Restoration @ NW 2 Street between 34 4 28,809 28,809 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Admin Ave & 35 Ave - D4 B-30976 Capital Improvement Program SW 2 St from 53 Ave to 54 Ave - D4 4 54,000 54,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30979 Capital Improvement Program SW 21 st St. & 24th Ave Roadway 4 140,000 140,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 Admin Improvement - D4 B-30980 Capital Improvement Program Liberty Square T -Turnarounds - D5 5 250,000 250,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B-30990 Capital Improvement Program Roadway Improvements 1,2,3,4,5 361,000 361,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30993 Capital Improvement Program SW/NW 17th Avenue Traffic Corridor Study - 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 200,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 Admin Citywide B-30998 Public Works Citywide Sidewalk Repair Project - PW 1,2,3,4,5 169,615 169,615 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-31206 Capital Improvement Program SE 3rd Street Widening 2 2,044,987 2,044,987 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B -31206A Capital Improvement Program SE 3rd St Widening (flea Dupont Plaza) - DRI 2 1,500,000 1,500,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin Transportation B -31206B Capital Improvement Program SE 3rd Street Widening - DRI Administration 2 100,000 100,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B -39910K Capital Improvement Program Bayside Historic Sign - D2 2 33,000 33,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B-39911 Capital Improvement Program Venetian Causeway Improvements 2 3,196,465 3,196,465 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40168 Public Works South Bayshore Drive from Aviation Avenue 2 100,000 100,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 to Kirk Avenue - D2 PW B-40312 Capital Improvement Program SW 22nd Tern & SW 13th Ave Road 3 376,211 376,211 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Improvements - D3 B-40314 Capital Improvement Program NW 18th Place Road Improvements - D3 3 814,611 814,611 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40326 Capital Improvement Program The Roads Roadway Improvements - D3 3 366,601 366,601 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40327 Capital Improvement Program Shenandoah Roadway Improvements - D3 3 31,160 31,160 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40328 Capital Improvement Program NW 13 Ave (From NW 4 St to NW 5 St) - D3 3 118,780 118,780 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-40329 Capital Improvement Program NW 13 Ave and NW 5 St (SE corner) - D3 3 14,237 14,237 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-40330 Capital Improvement Program SW 2 Street (FRom SW 19 Ave to SW 20 3 184,915 184,915 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Ave) - D3 B-40331 Capital Improvement Program SW 5 Street (SW 22 Ave to Beacom Blvd.) - 3 356,010 356,010 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin D3 B-40332 Capital Improvement Program SW 7th Avenue - 80' Northeast of SW 23rd 3 75,434 75,434 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Road - D3 B-40333 Capital Improvement Program SW 7th Avenue and SW 24 Road - D3 3 58,000 58,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-40334 Capital Improvement Program SW 9 Avenue (from SW 26th Street to SW 3 236,000 236,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin 28th Road) - D3 B-40338 Capital Improvement Program SW 22 Road (From SW 7th Ave to SW 9th 3 393,963 393,963 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 o Admin Ave) - D3 B-40339 Capital Improvement Program SW 23 Road (SW 3rd to SW 5th Ave) - D3 3 466,175 466,175 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-40340 Capital Improvement Program SW 26 Road (from SW 3rd Avenue to SW 5th 3 431,834 431,834 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-40341 Capital Improvement Program SW 26 Road (from SW 5th Avenue to SW 7th 3 154,270 154,270 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-40342 Capital Improvement Program SW 27 Road (from SW 4th Avenue to SW 5th 3 188,000 188,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-40343 Capital Improvement Program SW 27 Road (from SW 5th Avenue to SW 7th 3 229,800 229,800 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-40344 Capital Improvement Program SW 27 Road (from SW 7th Avenue to SW 9th 3 138,000 138,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin Avenue) - D3 B-40348 Capital Improvement Program NW 2nd St from NW 15 Ave to 1542 NW 2nd 3 14,067 14,067 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin St - D3 B-40349 Capital Improvement Program NW 9 Street NW 15 Ave to NW 17 Ave -D3 3 20,449 20,449 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B-40351 Capital Improvement Program SW 2nd Street from 15-16 Ave -D3 3 48,000 48,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-40352 Capital Improvement Program SW 2 Street from 16-17 Ave- D3 3 43,000 43,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-40614 Capital Improvement Program St. Gaudens Road Environmental Remediation 2 213,000 213,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin Project B-40639 Capital Improvement Program Remediation of Right of Way at 5520 NW 4 5 68,300 68,300 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Avenue B -40672G Capital Improvement Program Flagami Traffic Calming - D4 4 590,000 590,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin B -40695L Capital Improvement Program Miami River Greenway Segment G and 3 150,000 150,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Segment E2 Decorative Lighting B -40704A Capital Improvement Program SW 32 Avenue Improvements Additional 2,4 1,752,327 1,752,327 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Services B -43114B Public Works Public Works Miscellaneous Sidewalk 1,2,3,4,5 1,034,146 1,034,146 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Replacement B-50100 Capital Improvement Program NW 10th Ave (from 20th St to 35 Th St) D-1 1 226,250 226,250 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 ry Admin B-50102 Capital Improvement Program NW 16 Street West of NW 14th Avenue -D1 1 44,000 44,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-50103 Capital Improvement Program NW I Oth Avenue and 33 Street- D 1 1 44,000 44,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-50105 Capital Improvement Program NW 12th Street from NW 21 st Avenue to NW 1 184,150 184,150 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin 22nd Avenue - D I B-50108 Capital Improvement Program NW 19th Terrace between 21 & 22 Ave 165,000 165,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-50109 Capital Improvement Program NW 24 Street East of NW 7 Ave 125,000 125,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-50110 Capital Improvement Program NW 18 Terrace East of 27 Ave 200,000 200,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-50203 Capital Improvement Program Morningside Right of Way Closure -D2 2 229,009 229,009 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 Admin B-50400 Capital Improvement Program SW 4 Street (from 68 Ave to 70 Ave) -D4 4 88,000 88,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-50404 Capital Improvement Program Shenandoah Area Roadway Project - D4 4 3,573,493 3,573,493 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin B-50406 Capital Improvement Program Corner of SW 52 Avenue & West Flagler 4 230,000 230,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Street -D4 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-50407 Capital Improvement Program SW 22 Terr from SW 27 Ave to SW 37 Ave - 4 250,000 250,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin D4 B -50407A Capital Improvement Program SW 22 Terr from SW 32 Ave to SW 37 Ave - 4 250,000 250,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin D4 B-50900 Capital Improvement Program NW 2nd Ave from NW 38 Street to NW 54 5 1,300,000 1,300,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Street B-50901 Capital Improvement Program NW 5 Avenue from NW 46 Street to NW 54 5 400,000 400,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Street B-70245 Transportation & Transit Transportation Program Support Services- 1,2,3,4,5 1,532,957 1,532,957 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Transportation B -70245D Transportation & Transit Transportation PSS - Transportation DRI Fees 1,2,3,4,5 155,042 155,042 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Administration B-71210 Capital Improvement Program Downtown Street Conversions 2,5 50,000 50,000 Active I -Study Funded 0 ry Admin N B -73102B Capital Improvement Program Citywide Streets Milling and Resurfacing - CIP 1,2,3,4,5 9,038,594 9,038,594 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Parking Surcharge B -73102C Public Works Citywide Street Milling and Resurfacing - PW 1,2,3,4,5 649,064 649,064 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Reso 13-0467 B -73102D Capital Improvement Program Citywide Street Milling and Resurfacing - 1,2,3,4,5 794,200 794,200 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin CITP Local Gas Tax B -78500B Capital Improvement Program Buena Vista East Roadway, Drainage, Signage 5 1,865,530 1,865,530 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Admin and Lighting Improvements B -78509B Capital Improvement Program Calle Ocho Lighting & Street Improvements - 3 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin D3 B-78513 Capital Improvement Program NE 2 Avenue / Design District - D2 & D5 2,5 2,000,000 2,000,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B -30167D Capital Improvement Program Shenandoah Roadway Improvements -D4 4 1,550,000 1,549,681 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -318 Admin B -30168A Capital Improvement Program Silver Bluff Traffic Calming Priority 3 - D4 4 703,544 663,544 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -40,000 Admin B-30413 Capital Improvement Program FY2014 - D3 Roadway, drainage and 3 100,000 90,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -10,000 Admin sidewalks repairs B-30416 Public Works NW 34 Ave over Comfort Canal - Bridge 1 178,700 28,700 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -150,000 876417 - PW - D I /Citywide City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30431 Capital Improvement Program DI -Reconstruction of Roadway identified as 1 4,114,165 2,908,682 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -1,205,482 Admin "Very Poor" by PW B-30434 Capital Improvement Program D4 - Reconstruction of Roadway identified as 4 3,822,769 3,594,368 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -228,400 Admin "Very Poor" by PW B-30440 Capital Improvement Program Replanting of existing empty planters alone 3,4 373,000 337,300 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -35,700 Admin SW 8 St between 4th & 27 Ave -D3 & D4 B-30518 Capital Improvement Program Northwest 14th Street Streetscape Project - CIP 5 2,617,649 439,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -2,178,649 Admin Funded B -30606N Capital Improvement Program DWNTWN Beautification - 1,2,3,4,5 6,461,794 6,284,794 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -177,000 Admin North-DI,D2,D3,D4,D5 B-30614 Capital Improvement Program District 4 - Miscellaneous Roadway 4 66,820 20,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -46,820 Admin Improvements B-30624 Capital Improvement Program Overtown Greenway @ NW I I Terrace 5 4,082,046 3,464,033 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -618,012 ry Admin w B-30630 Capital Improvement Program Palm Grove Road Improvements 5 4,174,623 3,461,980 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -712,642 Admin B-30643 Parks and Recreation Lummus Park Landing Project - Street 5 2,605,245 1,938,535 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -666,710 Project -D5 B-30646 Capital Improvement Program South Bayshore Drive Roadway and Drainage 2 9,042,045 6,704,395 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -2,337,650 Admin Improvements B-30658 Capital Improvement Program District 2 Traffic Calming Devices 2 300,000 270,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -30,000 Admin B-30687 Capital Improvement Program Coconut Grove Business Improvement District 2 4,317,033 4,315,101 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -1,932 Admin - Street Improvements B-30695 Capital Improvement Program SW 19th Tern Imp. -Partial CDBG 91-02889 - 4 537,191 446,408 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -90,782 Admin D4 B-30723 Capital Improvement Program NW 24th Avenue Roadway Improvement 1 3,695,411 1,144,234 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -2,551,177 Admin Project - D I B-30736 Capital Improvement Program Phase II: NW 33rd Street Roadway 1 2,375,000 1,598,661 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -776,338 Admin Improvement - D I B-30737 Capital Improvement Program South Bayshore Lane/Fairview Street (East & 2 680,864 550,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -130,864 Admin West) -D2 B-30771 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming SW 6th Street Project - D4 4 324,670 212,838 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -111,831 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future CIP Projects Only Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30774 Capital Improvement Program West Flagler Area Improvements - D4 - Oracle 4 1,583,622 1,583,562 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -59 Admin CDBG Project 91-03102 B-30781 Capital Improvement Program NW I I Street from 27 to 37 Avenue Area 1 939,493 557,523 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -381,969 Admin Roadway Improvements - D I B-30784 Capital Improvement Program Health District Riverwalk 1 961,000 200,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -761,000 Admin B-30827 Capital Improvement Program South Grove Phase I Roadway and Drainage 2 286,830 270,678 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -16,151 Admin Improvements - D2 B-30835 Capital Improvement Program South Grove Phase 2 Roadway and Drainage 2 492,000 260,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -232,000 Admin Improvements - D2 B-30840 Capital Improvement Program Brickell Bay Drive - D2 2 258,500 250,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -8,500 Admin B-30902 Capital Improvement Program Phase I: Little River (N); NE 82 St (S); N 5 625,287 90,508 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -534,778 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 B-30904 Capital Improvement Program NW 70 Street Area Roadway & Minor 5 2,052,550 100,510 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -1,952,040 Admin Drainage Improvements - D5 B-30909 Capital Improvement Program Coral Way Median (SW 37th Ave to 17th 3,4 699,750 170,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -529,750 Admin Ave) - D3 & D4 B-30960 Capital Improvement Program La Pastorita Traffic Calming and misc. 4 542,644 372,644 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -170,000 Admin improvements - D4 B-30961 Capital Improvement Program East Flagami Roadway Improvements - SW 4 422,264 422,264 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -0 Admin 2nd Street and SW 4th Street - D4 B-30964 Capital Improvement Program Modification of Speed Humps on SW I I St. 4 57,712 29,723 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -27,988 Admin between SW 30 Ave and SW 31 Ct. - D4 B-30966 Capital Improvement Program SW 5 St between 27 ave and 28 ave street 4 288,090 228,090 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -60,000 Admin improvement - D4 B-30969 Capital Improvement Program SW 30th Court (SW 12th Street and SW 13th 4 178,477 43,214 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -135,263 Admin Street) - D4 B-30971 Capital Improvement Program SW 5th Street between 42 Ave and 43 Ave 4 190,106 7,857 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -182,249 Admin Improvement - D4 B-40325 Capital Improvement Program Beacom Phase II - D3 3 1,500,000 1,400,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -100,000 Admin B-40346 Capital Improvement Program SW 24th Road between I st and 2nd Ave -D3 3 185,180 168,583 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -16,596 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-40347 Capital Improvement Program Grove Park Road Improvements Phase II -D3 3 3,863,190 3,863,189 Active 4 -Bid Partially Funded -0 Admin B-40350 Capital Improvement Program SW I Street from 28-29 Road -D3 3 143,635 139,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -4,635 Admin B -40672D Capital Improvement Program Flagami Traffic Calming Phase IV - D4 4 1,327,613 1,198,014 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -129,599 Admin B-50104 Capital Improvement Program NW 13th Street from NW 35th Avenue to NW 1 433,868 117,510 Active 2 -Pre -Design Partially Funded -316,358 Admin 37th Avenue - D I B-50106 Capital Improvement Program NW 24th Street from NW 6th Avenue to NW 1 197,998 42,100 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -155,898 Admin 7th Avenue - D I B-50204 Capital Improvement Program SW 27 St from SW 27 Ave to SW 29 PL -D2 2 769,553 100,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -669,553 Admin CDBG 91-03368 B-50401 Capital Improvement Program NW Flagler Terrace from NW 34 Ave to NW 4 264,000 107,882 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -156,117 ry Admin 40 Ave -D4 B-50402 Capital Improvement Program SW 18 Street W/O SW 22 -D4 4 100,000 45,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -55,000 Admin B-50403 Capital Improvement Program SW I I Terrace Sidewalk Construction -D4 4 30,000 15,314 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -14,685 Admin B-50405 Capital Improvement Program SW 71 st Avenue from 4th Street to 8th Street - 4 606,830 600,000 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -6,830 Admin D4 B -73102A Capital Improvement Program Citywide Streets Milling & Resurfacing - CIP 1,2,3,4,5 6,449,390 269,953 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -6,179,437 Admin Transit B-78508 Capital Improvement Program NE 2 Avenue Improvements 2,5 20,166,607 9,438,494 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -10,728,113 Admin B -78509A Capital Improvement Program Calle Ocho Improvements 3 778,372 508,139 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -270,232 Admin B-30402 Capital Improvement Program Intersection NW 15 Street & 28 Avenue - D1 1 459,233 0 Active 3 -Design UnFunded -459,233 Admin B-30411 Capital Improvement Program FY2014 - D I Roadway, drainage and 1 100,000 0 Active 2 -Pre -Design UnFunded -100,000 Admin sidewalks repairs B-30415 Capital Improvement Program FY2014 - D5 Roadway, drainage and 5 196,625 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -196,625 Admin sidewalks repairs B-30520 Capital Improvement Program Hainsworth Village Street Improvement 2 1,062,500 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,062,500 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30611 Capital Improvement Program District I - Miscellaneous Roadway 1 77,160 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -77,160 Admin Improvements B-30612 Capital Improvement Program District 2 - Miscellaneous Roadway 2 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin Improvements B-30615 Capital Improvement Program District 5 - Miscellaneous Roadway 5 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin Improvements B-30794 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices NW I I St and NW 1 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin 34 Ave B-30796 Capital Improvement Program NW 34 Ave Bridge over Comfort Canal 1 1,119,600 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,119,600 Admin (Bridge 876417) B-30797 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Safty(Rectangular Rapid Flashing 1 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Beacons) DI B-30805 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvement at NW 34 St 1 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 ry Admin -DI rn B-30806 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 24 1 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin Ave B-30807 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 22 1 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin Ct B-30808 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at 1 69,475 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -69,475 Admin intersection of NW 38 St and NW 12 Ave B-30809 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at NW 23 1 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ct B-30810 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at NW 18 1 97,265 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -97,265 Admin Terrace B-30811 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at NW 4 St 1 208,425 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -208,425 Admin B-30812 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at SW 19 1 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Ave B-30813 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at Brickell 1 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Place B-30814 Capital Improvement Program Health District Wayfinding Signs 1 111,160 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -111,160 Admin B-30843 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices at D4 2 486,325 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -486,325 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30844 Capital Improvement Program S. Miami Ave Roadway Improvements 2 1,425,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,425,000 Admin B-30845 Capital Improvement Program Parcel B - Baywalk Gap 2 41,685 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -41,685 Admin B-30847 Capital Improvement Program Brickell Bay Park Way 2 699,750 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -699,750 Admin B-30848 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Sally (Rectangular Rapid Flashing 2 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Beacons) D2 B-30849 Capital Improvement Program NE 17th Ter & N. Bayshore Dr. intersection 2 55,580 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -55,580 Admin improvements B-30850 Capital Improvement Program Matheson Avenue Milling and Resurfacing 2 277,900 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -277,900 Admin B-30851 Capital Improvement Program Steer and Drainage Improvements South 2 20,842 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -20,842 ry Admin Miami Ave. V B-30852 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 31 2 34,737 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -34,737 Admin Place B-30853 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements NE 6 Ct 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin and NE 77 St B-30854 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NE 45 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin St B-30855 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 24 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Terrace B-30856 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Braganza 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin St B-30857 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Shore 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Drive S B-30858 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainge Improvements at Nethia 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Drive B-30859 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Espaniola Drive B-30860 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Matilda 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin St B-30861 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at S 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Bayshore Lane City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30862 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements D2 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Multiple locations B-30863 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Crawford 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ave B-30864 Capital Improvement Program Street Draniage Improvements at Barborossa 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ave B-30867 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Mayfair 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Drive B-30868 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 39 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ave B-30869 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NE 34 St 2 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin B-30870 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Shipping 2 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 ry Admin Ave co B-30871 Capital Improvement Program Belle Meade Island Bridge 2 1,425,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,425,000 Admin B-30872 Capital Improvement Program N. Miami Ave Roadway Improvements 2 1,824,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,824,000 Admin B-30873 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Belle 2 41,685 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -41,685 Admin Meade Guardhouse B -30896A Capital Improvement Program Phase II: NW 29 St (NW 7 Ave to NW 2 Ave) 5 597,219 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -597,219 Admin -D5 B-30897 Capital Improvement Program NW 41 St from NW 7 Ave to NW 12 Ave - 5 475,349 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -475,349 Admin D5 B-30899 Capital Improvement Program NW 10 Ave from NW 40 St & NW 8 Ave 5 280,888 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -280,888 Admin from NW 46 St to NW 43 St - D5 B-30901 Capital Improvement Program Phase I: NE 78 St (N); NE 75 St (S); N Miami 5 526,967 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -526,967 Admin Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 B -30901A Capital Improvement Program Phase II: NE 78 St (N); NE 75 St (S); N 5 532,967 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -532,967 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 B-30901 B Capital Improvement Program Phase III: NE 78 St (N); NE 75 St (S); N 5 532,967 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -532,967 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 B -30902A Capital Improvement Program Phase II: Little River (N); NE 82 St (S); N 5 625,287 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -625,287 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B -30902B Capital Improvement Program Phase III: Little River (N); NE 82 St (S); N 5 625,287 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -625,287 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE 2 Ave (E) - D5 B-30903 Capital Improvement Program Phase I: NE 82 St (N); NE 79 St (S); N Miami 5 504,158 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -504,158 Admin Ave (W); NE I Ave (E) - D5 B -30903A Capital Improvement Program Phase II: NE 82 St (N); NE 79 St (S); N 5 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin Miami Ave (W); NE I Ave (E) - D5 B-30907 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrain Sally (Retangular Rapid Flashing 3 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Beacon ) D3 B-30908 Capital Improvement Program Intersection enhancement SW 13th St/SW 3rd 3 55,580 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -55,580 Admin Ave/Sw 15th Rd and SW 13th St and SW 2nd Ave B-30911 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 13 3 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ave - D3 B-30912 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvement at SW 22 Rd 3 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin - D3 B-30913 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvement at SW 27 Rd 3 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin -D3 B-30914 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at SW 26 3 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Rd -D3 B-30915 Capital Improvement Program SW 32nd Ave Roadway Improvements -D3 3 416,850 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -416,850 Admin B-30916 Capital Improvement Program SW 3rd Ave Bicycle lane improvement -D3 3 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin B-30917 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices Intersection of SW 10 3 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin St and SW 5 Ave B-30918 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Device at 157 SW 30 Rd 3 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin B-30968 Capital Improvement Program SW 12th St (SW 30th Ave and SW 30th Place) 4 36,102 0 Active 7 -On -Hold UnFunded -36,102 Admin - D4 B-30970 Capital Improvement Program SW 20 Street (SW 31 Ave to SW 32 Ave) - D4 4 56,178 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -56,178 Admin B-30974 Capital Improvement Program Coral Gate Speed Humps - Phase II - D4 4 108,034 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -108,034 Admin B-30977 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Circle on SW 23 Ave and SW 26 Street 4 221,672 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -221,672 Admin - D4 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-30978 Capital Improvement Program Roadway and Drainage improvements @ SW 4 51,065 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -51,065 Admin 4 St between 53 Ave & 54 Ave - D4 B-40003 Public Works PW Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Contract 1,2,3,4,5 7,435,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -7,435,000 M-0096 (Fyl4-FY18) B-40005 Public Works PW Citywide Pavement Resurfacing Contract 1,2,3,4,5 6,912,761 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -6,912,761 M0098 (FYI4-18) B-40010 Public Works NW 14th Avenue and NW 17th Street 1 354,734 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -354,734 Improvements -DI B-40167 Public Works Crystal View Court - Restriction of Vehicular 2 5,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,000 Access - D2 B-40345 Capital Improvement Program Beacom Blvd - Flagler to SW 7 Street - D3 3 2,436,776 0 Active 7 -On -Hold UnFunded -2,436,776 Admin B -50104T Capital Improvement Program NW 13th Street from NW 35 Avenue to NW 1 26,000 0 Active 2 -Pre -Design UnFunded -26,000 oAdmin 37th Avenue - Tree Component -D I B-50111 Capital Improvement Program NW 19th Avenue Sidewalk Improvements -D1 1 30,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -30,000 Admin B-50409 Capital Improvement Program SW 30th Court from W Flalger Street to SW 4 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin I st St -D4 B-50411 Capital Improvement Program NW 34 Avenue between NW 2 Terrace and 4 130,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -130,000 Admin NW 3 Street B-50501 Capital Improvement Program Coral Gate entrance Sign -D4 4 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin B-50502 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices D4 at SW 19 Ave and 4 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin SW 14 St -D4 B-50503 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices at SW 25 Ave -D4 4 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin B-50504 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Device at SW 68 Ave -D4 4 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin B-50505 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Device at Intersection of SW 4 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin 32 Ave and SW 5 St -D4 B-50507 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Device at SW 36 Avenue and 4 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin SW I I Street -D4 B-50511 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Safety (Rectangular Rapid Flashing 4 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Beacons) -D4 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-50512 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 45 4 111,160 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -111,160 Admin Avenue -D4 B-50513 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 24 4 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin Terrace and 24 St -d4 B-50514 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at 4 69,475 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -69,475 Admin intersection of SW 4 St and SW 69 Ave -D4 B-50515 Capital Improvement Program Sidewalk Improvements at SW 24 ST- D4 4 69,475 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -69,475 Admin B-50516 Capital Improvement Program Sidewalk Improvements at NW 59 CT -D4 4 69,475 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -69,475 Admin B-50517 Capital Improvement Program Street an Drainage Improvements at 34 Ave 4 41,685 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -41,685 Admin and Flagler -D4 B-50518 Capital Improvement Program SW 32nd Ave Roadway Improvements -D4 4 699,750 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -699,750 w Admin B-50519 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 5 4 277,900 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -277,900 Admin Street -D4 B-50520 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 7 St 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin -D4 B-50521 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvement at SW 29 4 416,850 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -416,850 Admin Street -D4 B-50533 Capital Improvement Program Flagami Area Bicycle Boulevard Treatments - 4 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin D4 B-50602 Capital Improvement Program NW 5th & NW 6th St Roadway 2,5 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Improvements -D5,D2 B-50603 Capital Improvement Program Wynwood Roadway Improvements -D2, D5 2,5 839,700 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -839,700 Admin B-50762 Capital Improvement Program Bicycle Rack Improvements -D All 1,2,3,4,5 69,475 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -69,475 Admin B-50763 Capital Improvement Program Bicycle Wayfinding -DAll 1,2,3,4,5 111,160 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -111,160 Admin B-50812 Capital Improvement Program Traffic Calming Devices at Intersection of NW 5 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin 56 Atreet and NW 10 Ave - D5 B-50813 Capital Improvement Program Overtown Greenway - D5 5 277,900 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -277,900 Admin City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future 800,000 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 1,2,3,4,5 318,402 1,2,3,4,5 2,921,124 Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 341 -Streets & Sidewalks B-50814 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Safety (Rectangular rapid flashing 5 138,950 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -138,950 Admin Beacons) D5 B-50815 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvement at Miami 5 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Court -D5 B-50816 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 7 5 166,740 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -166,740 Admin Ave- D5 B-50817 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at Belle 5 208,425 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -208,425 Admin Meade Island Drive -D5 B-50818 Capital Improvement Program NW 14 Street Improvements -D5 5 291,795 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -291,795 Admin B-50819 Capital Improvement Program N. Federal Highway Roadway Improvements 5 699,750 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -699,750 Admin -D5 B-50820 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NE 1 5 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 w Admin Place -D5 N B-50821 Capital Improvement Program NW 29th Street Roadway Improvements -D5 5 573,090 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -573,090 Admin B-50822 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 16 5 166,740 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -166,740 Admin St -D5 B-50823 Capital Improvement Program NW 17th St Bike Striping -D5 5 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin 343 -Mass Transit B-70246 Transportation & Transit B -70246A Transportation & Transit B-70247 Transportation & Transit B-70715 Transportation & Transit 341 -Streets & Sidewalks Transportation Program Support Services - Transit Professional Beach Corridor Transit Connection Study - Citywide Citywide Mass Transit Studies City of Miami Trolley Program - Capital Acquisition 343 -Mass Transit 246,997,793 166,725,745 1,2,3,4,5 800,000 1,2,3,4,5 30,000 1,2,3,4,5 318,402 1,2,3,4,5 2,921,124 4,069,526 800,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design 30,000 Active 8 -Future 318,402 Active 2 -Pre -Design 2,921,122 Active 3 -Design 4,069,524 -80,272,047 Funded 0 Funded 0 Funded 0 Partially Funded -2 -2 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 351 -Sanitary Sewers B-30134AS Parks and Recreation Bryan Park New Tennis/Community Center 4 50,000 50,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Funded 0 D4 - Sanitary Sewer Component B-303745 Parks and Recreation Virginia Key Rowing Center Improvements - 2 100,000 100,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Funded 0 Sanitary Sewer Component B-306905 Parks and Recreation West End Park New Community Building - 4 100,000 100,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Sanitary Sewer B-308395 Parks and Recreation Morningside Park Sanitary Sewer Replacement 2 239,004 239,004 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 - D2 B-308875 Parks and Recreation Little Haiti Soccer Field Bathroom - Sanitary 5 452,185 452,185 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Sewer Component - D5 B-358065 Parks and Recreation Curtis Park New Pool Facility and Boat Ramp 1 1,563,524 1,563,524 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 D1 -Sanitary Sewer Component B-358385 Parks and Recreation Kennedy Park Restroom Building 2 145,933 145,933 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 wImprovements D2 - Sanitary Sewer Component B-35883AS Capital Improvement Program Hadley Park New Youth Center D5 - Sanitary 5 200,000 200,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Sewer Component B-604645 Public Facilities New Dinner Key Marina Dockmaster Building 2 690,000 690,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 D2 - Sanitary Sewer Component B-700405 Capital Improvement Program Fire Station 14 City Share per Development 4 100,000 100,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin Agreement B-306805 Capital Improvement Program Rockerman Canal Improvements - D2 2 225,121 154,080 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -71,040 Admin B-35853AS Parks and Recreation Virrick Park New Pool Facility - Sanitary 2 363,381 323,164 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -40,216 Sewer Componemt - D2 B-358875 Parks and Recreation Moore Park New Construction D5 - Sanitary 5 500,000 Sewer Component B-400045 Public Works Momingside Drainage Improvement Project 2 0 D2 -PW 21,035 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -478,964 0 Active 4 -Bid (JOC) UnFunded 0 351 -Sanitary Sewers 4,729,151 4,138,928 -590,222 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 352 -Storm Sewers B-30011 Capital Improvement Program Englewood Road and Storm Sewer 4 8,785,812 8,785,812 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin Improvements - Phase III - D4 B-30262 Public Works Citywide Storm Sewer Repair Project 1,2,3,4,5 7,822,561 7,822,561 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 B -30262A Capital Improvement Program City Wide Storm Sewer Repair.CW 1,2,3,4,5 975,000 975,000 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 Admin B-30622 Capital Improvement Program Center Street Drainage Improvements - D2 2 105,000 105,000 Active 2 -Pre -Design Funded 0 Admin B-30637 Capital Improvement Program Mary Brickell Village Drainage 1,2,3,4,5 3,723,442 3,723,442 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 Admin Improvements-DI,D2,D3,D4,D5 B-30776 Capital Improvement Program Silver Bluff Drainage Improvements - D4 4 2,022,234 2,022,234 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B-30992 Public Works Riverview and Lawrence Pump Stations - D3 3 1,824,095 1,824,095 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-40271 Solid Waste Solid Waste Sweeper 1,2,3,4,5 170,000 170,000 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 w B-50654 Public Works Overtown Stormwater Pump Station Upgrades 5 851,797 851,797 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B-50672 Capital Improvement Program Belle Meade Storm Sewer Project, Ph 2 2 12,301,058 12,301,058 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin B -50706A Capital Improvement Program Roadway, Drainage and Traffic Improvements 1,4 1,275,038 1,275,038 Active 5 -Construction Funded 0 Admin - D I & D4 - Partially Funded CDBG D4 91-03102 B-30008 Capital Improvement Program Grove Park Road and Storm Sewers 3 12,819,059 5,059,000 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -7,760,059 Admin Improvement - D3 B-30412 Capital Improvement Program Trapp Avenue Drainage Improvements - D2 2 133,490 90,000 Active 5 -Const. (JOC) Partially Funded -43,490 Admin B-30421 Capital Improvement Program DI - StromwaterProjects 1 1,198,000 560,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -638,000 Admin B-30422 Capital Improvement Program D2 - Stormwater Projects 2 1,198,000 560,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -638,000 Admin B-30423 Capital Improvement Program D3 - Stormwater Projects 3 1,198,000 560,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -638,000 Admin B-30424 Capital Improvement Program D4 - Stormwater Projects 4 1,198,000 560,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -638,000 Admin B-30425 Capital Improvement Program D5 - Stormwater Projects 5 1,078,000 560,000 Future 8 -Future Partially Funded -518,000 Admin B -30637A Capital Improvement Program South Miami Avenue Drainage Improvements 2 806,500 204,444 Active 7 -On -Hold Partially Funded -602,055 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 352 -Storm Sewers Admin - MDC B-30700 Capital Improvement Program Citywide - FDEP Drainage Wells Compliance 1,2,3,4,5 2,240,934 1,972,934 Active 4 -Bid Partially Funded -268,000 Admin B-30985 Capital Improvement Program Design District Roadway and Stormwater 5 1,500,000 500,000 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -1,000,000 Admin Improvement - D5 B-40004 Public Works Morningside Drainage Improvement Project 2 6,260,000 101,410 Active 4 -Bid (JOC) Partially Funded -6,158,589 D2 -PW B-50643 Capital Improvement Program Wagner Creek / Seybold Canal Dredging 1,5 23,353,488 7,773,503 Active 3 -Design Partially Funded -15,579,984 Admin B-30007 Capital Improvement Program Auburn Storm Sewer Phase III 4 7,049,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -7,049,000 Admin B-30009 Capital Improvement Program Lawnview Storm Sewer 3 5,719,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,719,000 Admin B-30012 Capital Improvement Program Auburn Storm Sewer Ph. I & II 4 5,320,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,320,000 Admin B-30013 Capital Improvement Program Reid Acres Storm Sewers 5 5,719,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,719,000 Admin B-30015 Capital Improvement Program Little River Storm Sewers Ph. II 5 3,990,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -3,990,000 Admin B-30016 Capital Improvement Program Liberty Storm Sewers 5 5,586,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,586,000 Admin B-30017 Capital Improvement Program Fairway Storm Sewers 5 5,586,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -5,586,000 Admin B-30018 Capital Improvement Program NW 71 St. Main Trunk Storm Sewer 5 9,975,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -9,975,000 Admin B-30216 Capital Improvement Program Avalon Storm Sewer - Phase III 2,4 4,500,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -4,500,000 Admin B-30795 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 11 1 347,375 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -347,375 Admin St and NW 32 Ave B-30798 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements NW 32 1 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin Place B-30799 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvement at NW 35 1 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin Ave B-30846 Capital Improvement Program Bayhomes Drive Drainage Improvements 2 1,425,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,425,000 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 352 -Storm Sewers Admin B-40006 Public Works Mechanical Upgrades to Riverview and 3 125,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -125,000 Lawrence Pump Stations - D3 - PW B-50410 Capital Improvement Program SW 19th Street and SW 22 Avenue 4 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 Admin Improvements -D4 B-50508 Capital Improvement Program Auger Hole Remediation at SW 23 Terrace 4 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin -D4 B-50509 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage improvements at 17 Ave 4 208,425 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -208,425 Admin -D4 B-50510 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 19 4 27,790 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -27,790 Admin St -D4 B-50522 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 19th 4 416,850 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -416,850 Admin Street - D4 rn B-50523 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements ay SW 68 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Avenue - D4 B-50524 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 18 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Street - D4 B-50525 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 25 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Avenue - D4 B-50526 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 45 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Avenue - D4 B-50527 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 4 3 208,425 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -208,425 Admin Street - D3 B-50528 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 49 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Avenue - D4 B-50529 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NE 6 Ct 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin - D4 B-50530 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 30 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ct - D4 B-50531 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at NW 58 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Ct - D4 B-50532 Capital Improvement Program Street and Drainage Improvements at SW 5 4 83,370 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -83,370 Admin Street - D4 352 -Storm Sewers 149,876,075 58,357,331 -91,518,744 City Of Miami - Capital Improvement Program Active & Future Cost Estimates versus Available Funding Total Fund CIP Projects Only minus Total Cost Total Fund Total Cost B -No. Client Project Dist. Estimate (S) Funds (S) Status Phase Status Estimate (S) 353 -Solid Waste B-40274 Solid Waste Solid Waste Equipment Acquisition 1,2,3,4,5 3,530,668 3,530,668 Future 8 -Future Funded 0 B-70479 Solid Waste Remodeling of Solid Waste Work Area 1,2,3,4,5 285,000 285,000 Active 3 -Design Funded 0 B -73202C Solid Waste Solid Waste Collection Equipment 1,2,3,4,5 4,809,428 4,699,859 Active 5 -Construction Partially Funded -109,568 B -40274A Solid Waste Solid Waste - Tractors for Pilot Program 1,2,3,4,5 0 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded 0 B-70476 Solid Waste Solid Waste Building Reinforcement for 1,2,3,4,5 1,000,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -1,000,000 Hurricane B-70477 Solid Waste Solid Waste Mini -Dump Renovation 1,2,3,4,5 200,000 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -200,000 B-70478 Solid Waste Solid Waste Fleet Replacement 1,2,3,4,5 24,311,800 0 Future 8 -Future UnFunded -24,311,800 353 -Solid Waste 34,136,896 8,515,528 -25,621,368 Grand Total 1,127,251,974 607,049,494 -520,202,480 APPENDIX EDU -7 Updated Educational Facilities Maps Proposed, Existing, and Ancillary Educational Facilities Located in the Northwest Area - 2015-2020 NW 2157'I -I 9T LAWTON CHILES MS Q � 9a b ` SPANISH JOELLAC LAKE ES GOOD ES n COUNTRY Y CLUBMS AMERICANSHS PALM SPRINGS NORTH ES Y MIAMIMI MI LAKES GRAHAM LAKES MS E CATIONAL CENTER .ATION A TECHNI CAL COLLEGE IR MIAMI LAKES SR 836 EXT PLC "T"I MARJORY W STONEMAN DOUGLASES A PAI VSPORTATION MARJORY BEL TER STONEMAN �E TRALWEST DOUG LASES A 5 I ISOURCE: MIAMI-DADE PLC"H"IBOB DR. ROBER NA B GRAHAM EDUCATION CENTER MIAMI LAKES BINGRAM E NG ES EXPY BARBAGOLEM N Y eK-8 CENTER Y Y �� Legend S � �G NEW K-80 I ALEAH-MIAMI 00 SWEETWATERES HADLEY ES G EMIN EES EWF a�Tj HIALEAH * NORTH TWIN REGION CA R1 P MEE ESNIEW BA GARDENSES PALM LAKES ES A`U LAKES ES CA, MAINTENANCE 'Yp CENTERI&2 TER pp PLC A ERNESTR Y <K4CE Y N LEAH GRAHAM K-8 GA NS ES CENTER TWIN LAKES ES JOHN H SC EE A PALM TRANSPORTATION NW 1 9TH ST HIALEAH WESTHIALEAH DENSSHS `GARDENSES SPRINGS ES LAKEVIEW ES JOSE RP JOHN Y HIALEAH MS HENRY ES Y LEAH BEN MASTS -2 �. DUPUIS ES AMELIA NATHANIEL TRAZ REEVES ES EARHARTES GARDE MS SHEPPARD ES POWELL FO MALL A Y `ACADE MAMILAM YA K-8 CENTER PALM `NORTH STADIU * SPRINGSMS REGION VANE PLC "V-1 N OFFICE MIAMI PARK ES BLANTONES SHEPPA ES Y O TRA PORTATION HIALEAH SHS .} WILLIAM H TURNER CENTER RTHWEST w F, PENORTH TECHNICAL ARTS SHS yr NORTH Y WESTL� 4 ND MIAMI MEADOWLANE ES HIALEAH ES TI NCE CENTER EDUCATION CENTER * CENTRAL Y a WALLA HIALEAH SHS Y SHS REGION W RONALDW. it MAINTENANCE W IEW K-80 RCENTER FLAMINGOES S SHS * MAEM WALTERS ES Y W �`i--1�' MADISON MS MACKIWEST * A LAKE ES Y BROADMOOR ES � (' RIVER K-8 CENT RE LAKE ES DR. ROLANDO HENRY H JAMESH FILER MS LILLIEC ESPINOSA BRIGHT ES EVANSK-8 K-8 CENTER NEW K -BO J.W. CENTER , A JOHNSONMAMES MARTIN L KING PLC X, H BRIGHTES LIBERTY W THE 588 ROE CITY ES MODELSACA MY AOORSEY F SPRIN W ES OF EXCELLE CE A CHNICAL A POINCIANA OLLEGE I� GENIA EUGENIA MIAMI HIALEAH ES PARK ES CHARLESIR + * RINGS B SOUTH TRANSPORTATION DREW K-8 S A `K-8 CENTER HIALEAH ES CENTERNORTHEAST CENTER MI A CORP ACA MY NORTH JOHN I SPRINGS FLORA HEIGHTS A GENORIA S. LORAH PARK ES CO PLEX SCHALIOLINDA ES A �' EARLI GTON OAF A + CENTERS HEIGH SES EC', BROWN LL MS ' Y KELSEY MIAMI �� MDCPS POLICE GENERAL EGION A PHARRES SPRINGS MSp, INVESTIGATIONS AINTENANCEI DISTRICT `(J UNIT ,ENTER4 SR 112 OFFICE! ATT ANCE _ BE — CHARTER SCHOOL SERVIC MELR TER NW 36TH ST Y JUVENILE N4 GEORGE JUSTICE ITS ANNEX cG BAKERAVIATION TECHNICAL COLLEGE WAREHOUSE Y ICENTER W SR 836 EXT PLC "T"I MARJORY W STONEMAN DOUGLASES A PAI VSPORTATION MARJORY BEL TER STONEMAN �E TRALWEST DOUG LASES A 5 I ISOURCE: MIAMI-DADE 1395 EXPY SA 836 ?AMP CHARLESR - - �� Legend HADLEY ES RUBEN A DARIO MS A A Elementary PLC "A"/ A CHARLES K-8 Center SWEETWATERES HADLEY ES G EMIN EES EWF Y STIRRUP ES SIN cIkk . Middle Senior High N + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility C SchoolOpenings Highways 0 0.5 1 2 Northwest Area Miles Proposed, Existing, and Ancillary Educational Facilities Located in the Southeast Area - 2015-2020 �'� MIAMI 5¢ KILLIAN WILLIAMH. SHS LEHMAN E it y LEEWOOD W PHYLLIS K8 CENTER AL K-8 Center JESSE J. — C-"MILMILLERREl ES N1`1EDY v MCCRARY, vVi NE SOUTHWOOD MS MARTIN K8 MIAMI JR ES CENTER WALLACE- A NORTHWESTERN MORNINGSIDE A DR. HENRY E ETHELFROB SHS NA CROWDER K-SACADEMY BECK ORDIRICHMOND RUS OF THE ARTS PRIMARY L RNING CENTER MO ES Q EC EDISON PARK r Fx F HDL E.E.y + �. K-8CENTER %CH@THO A W A.A. EDISON PINES ES BEL-AIRE ES ORCHA 0 MIAMI EDUCATION ENTER N EDISON SHS 1 A * CUTLER BAY MSPLC "E"IDR CUTLER RIDGE ES z VILLA S , MDCPS MUS M CPS Fp NT POLICE CENTER L'OU ERITURE ES A GULFSTREAM ES SHADOW AFWN ES LILY A TORY CUTLER *BAY SHS F THE ARTS <C EORGIA 1%0 A JONES_ERS MS LENORA pJHITECTURE IAM/ SEA BRAYNON MS SS MITH S S PINE VILLA ES J CKSON SR ]]2 SR 112 JD * 1199 _ SANTA \\ 16TH ST MAYA DIEGO MS CLA A GELOU ES 1 A ES 1 AT YOUNG MEN'S COM STOCK ES ENEIDA MAS AS PREPARATORY MY ' q LDUNACADE Z L HARTNE ES PAULLLDUNBAR K -B CENTER W aQ LINDSEY HOPKINS 1 CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL COLLEGE T 1 ECC tSORTH �, T C PHIL IS 1 SRR 16 PLWHEATL Y i & SEAS SR 836 EXT e, $,,836^<.3p8Wf8 E`;n} ••D"/KENS GTON BOOKER WASHING TONSHSCOM AMY CHAP FREDERICK A HOU S DOUGLASSES _\ ) _ CITRUS KINLOCH KENSINGTON CITRUS GROVE ES YOUNG MATERI LS HENRY PARK MS PARKES GROVEMS WOMEN'S LAWENFORCEM ENT C AjZZ\ RC CONT L FLAGLER ES SfE ACADEMY OFFICERS MEM ORIAL HIGH MIAMI SHS �y CEN A A + AOA MERRI STORES AND NLOCH RIVERSIDE ES FOOD TRITI DKIISTRIBUTION AUBURNDALE ES + �K-&CENTER PARK ES E R COMPLEX A FAIRLAWN E S A EiN1f1D OR CARLOSJ $�N 8TH ST FLAG IES TRANSPORTATK EGION O THSIDE ES y ~'l CENTER PREPARATORY A ORAL PARKES OFFICEIWAR OUSE A CENTRALEAST ACADEMY MS CAMPUS CORAL WAY �COIRAL * SYLVANIA S NANDOAMS CENTER e ECEN RG ORS A HEIGHTS ES 4K-8 K-8 CORAL GABLES44 CORAL PARK SHS WES MS TERRACE ES PREPAY RIC4NE ROCKWAYES �IEAMI ARAATORY SILVER BLUFF ES ACR CSWj. 8 NYANES ENGLISH A MARITIME&SCIENCE ROCKWAY MSt CENTER A TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY EME SONES GABLES OLYMPIA y SHS HEIGHTS ES DAVID ROYAL PALM ES A FAIRCHILD ES GEORGE COCONUT WASHINGTON GROVE ES A A CARL ES A TROPICAL ES SOUTHWEST NRYVER HEWEST SOUTH LABORATOS.RY H y( MIAMI SHS TUCKER ES RIVIERA MS 4 BLUE LAKES MIAMI SHS S HOOL TUCKER ES /SCR W CYPRESS K8 CENTER .GEORGE K8 CENTER Pre -K DEE .'WASHINGTON JRE LEE PONCE OE CARVER MS 'J ENTER ENTER Po H 4 Intervention Y 5 TH MIAMI EDUCATION LEONJR� '.E Q q SNAPPER LADES MS K CENTER ,� CENTER IN NATIONALSTU O Q CREEK ES y � SOO UTH IIPT�R/ MIAMIMS + EPARATORY ACADEMYEMY �] RUTH OWENS KRUSE SUNSETES LUDLAM y & BRUCIE BALL y EDUCATIONAL CENTERS SUNSET SR 878 3R �g TERRA ENV/ NMENTAL+ * PARK ES p KE CENTER RESEAR INSTITUTE Y SOUI I REGION OFFIC ANNE KENDALEE y C �'� MIAMI 5¢ KILLIAN WILLIAMH. SHS LEHMAN E it y KEN D K8 R PINECRESTES A SIH ST MIAMI N PALMETTO A ROS PALMETTO ES A * PALMETTO MS HOWARD DRIVE ES y RICHMOND+ CORAL HEIGHTS MS's* REEF SHG LEEWOOD GLORIA FLOYD ES K8 CENTER AL K-8 Center FRANK CRAWFORD SOUTHWOOD MS MARTIN K8 DOROTHY M CENTER WALLACE- A COPE CENTER KEN D K8 R PINECRESTES A SIH ST MIAMI N PALMETTO A ROS PALMETTO ES A * PALMETTO MS HOWARD DRIVE ES y RICHMOND+ CORAL HEIGHTS MS's* REEF SHG CORAL REEF ES y COLONIAL BIOTECH Elementary DRIVE ES @ RICHMOND HEIGHTS K-8 Center A 9-12 HIGH SCHOOL SOUTHWOOD MS * Senior High PINE LAKE ES Other Educational Facility A A A DR. HENRY E ETHELFROB PERRINE ACADEMY BECK ORDIRICHMOND RUS OF THE ARTS PRIMARY L RNING CENTER MO ES A WHISPERING PINES ES BEL-AIRE ES A A * CUTLER BAY MSPLC "E"IDR CUTLER RIDGE ES A EDWARD L WHIGHAM ES A GULFSTREAM ES AR URANDP SCONSER LILY A TORY CUTLER *BAY SHS F THE ARTS A DR EDWARD WHIGHAM ES PINE VILLA ES m COCONUT A PALM K-8 ACADEMY 4 Date Saved: 8/9/2016 0 0.5 1 2 ® Miles SOURCE: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 2016 Legend A Elementary K-8 Center Middle * Senior High + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility C) SchoolOpenings — Highways Southeast Area Proposed, Existing, and Ancillary Educational Facilities Located in the Southwest Area - 2015-2020 WESLEY MATTHEES MIAMIARTS JOEHALLES A NEW K5 STUDIO 6-12 AT A ZORA NEALE 'STUDIO GLAZER t HURSTDN ES • up INRTHOMAS M G HOLMES GRE ENG LACE S TECHNOLOGY t. BRADDOCK INFORMATION y VILL GE SHS COMPUTER CENTER GRE NE it EEC#81CR. LA AR ETHELKOGER ROYAL MANUELC LOUIS BECKHAM ES GREEN ES BARREIRO ES CURRY MS (25 A y AL R. MANUELC BENTTREEES JOHN A BARREIRO ES •JANE S FERGUSON SHS * ROBERTS HOWANDD K-8 CENTER MCMILLAN MS PLC"N" BOWMAN MIAMI DOOLINIASHE • ASHEIDOOLIN SUNSET SHS K-BACADEMY K-BACADEMY yt y DANTEB KENDALE WINSTON FASCELLES LAKES ES • PARK K -S A y CENTER FELIX OLIVER PLC VARELA HOOVERES K-8 O"U"IOLIVER SHS A CLAUDE CALUSA ES HOOVER ES * PEPPER ES y CHRISTINA AL y VON M EVE ES A BSE A D E N KI DRGILBERT HAMMOCKSMS ARVIDA MS •C NTER L PORTER ES PLC"O"IDR A& GILBERTL PORTERES Sg NORMA JORGE MAS BUTLER CANOSA MS 1A A4 ES BOS SAND ES BIE JACKDAVIO REGION GOROON ES A PLC JACK M NTENANCE JACK DAVID A GORDON ES A TER5 PLC '7'/ TRANSPORTATION CENTER TRANSPORTATION CENTER JACK DAVID A ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES SOUTHWEST GORDON ES 4 ATION ICLE E ROBERTMORGAN HERBERTA EDUCATIONAL AMMONSMS CENTER ROBERTMORGAN �} VUG EDUCATIONAL CENTER AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SOUT y HEIG CARIBBEA K-8 CENT •GE REDLAND ES y REDLAND MS 6 REGION MAINTENANCE TRANSPORTATIONCENTER REDLAND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REGION MAINTENANCE CENTERS SOUTH DADESHS SOUTH DADE MS AVOCADO ES A REDONDO ES y MA STS * HOMES HOMESTEAD MS SOI N. + TE( WEST N 4KI HOMESTEAD E C I K-8 CENTER CE J • A LAURA C SAUNDERS ES FLORIDA CITY ES A 6 SW 344 TH ST WPALM DR 6 A TRANSPORTAT CENTER SOUTH Date Saved: 8/9/2016 Y sR Cg 1.25 2.5 Miles SOUTH AIR BASE K-8 CENTER FORINTERNAMORAL SOURCE: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, 1A A4 ES EDUCATKIN MANDARIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 2016 y �J LAKES K -S ACADEMY 4 LEISURE CITY K-8 CENTER IRVIN AND BEAT ICE PESKOE • •K-8 C INTER / CAMPBELL / DRIVE K-8 ,CENTER )E .COLLEGE TERFORINTERNATIONAL R EDUCATION:A CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATE SCHOOL GATEWAY ENVIRONMENTAL K -B LEARNING CENTER 4 HOMESTEAD SHS it Legend A Elementary • K-8 Center Middle * Senior High + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility O SchoolOpenings Highways Southwest Area Proposed, Existing, and Ancillary Educational Facilities Located in the Northeast Area - 2015-2020 DAVIDWYCHE MIAMI NORLAND MS Z vV JRES GARDENSES �, Y A NORLAND ES A BARBARA BRENTWOOD ES OW x A HAW INS ES A Z HIBISCUSES �' USES RMANS. A CRESTVIEW ES PARKWAYES A iC ELCUPISU! CAROL CITY MS �, y_ A (a • I LES BEACH 3 LAKE * CAROL �0� PARK ES EW K -S JS ES LAKE CITY SHS V " STEVENS MS d A MYRTLEf GERTRUDEK PARKVIEW ES PLC NORTH GROVE K-8 ,tY1 PALM ES C"IGREYNOLOS GLADE ES CENTER A 1 PALM ES SLNv"Y CAROL CITY ES • + C,c PARK ES A A PARISLES KWAY SCOTTLAKE ES P A NNIIANII BEND EDUCATIONAL NORTH MIAMI COMPLEX iE * BEACH SHS BEACH GOLDEN JOHN F E 7 63RD ST BEV R 926E\T JAN MANN GLADESES q KENNEDY MS FULFORD ES OPPORTUNITY A BUNCHE SCHOOL PARK ES OAK GROVE ES NMORTH ALONZO AND TRACY TRANSPORTATION - IAMI MOURNINGSHS + CENTERNORTHA NORTH DADEM a, A STADIUM BISCAYNE BAY CAMPUS NORTH DADS CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGES RAINBOW • DAVID LAWRENCE i MRK ES BISCAYNE JR. K-8 CENTER W $g9 GARDENSES LENMN MIAMI ES K-8 CENTER A NATURAL THOMAS • BRIDGE ES JEFFERSON MS A O U ARCH CREEK ES BEN JAMINL NORTH MIAMI MS FRANKLIN H G� K-8 CENTER /*NORT IAMISHS �G • ¢ W BRYAN ES AliJ�� Y NE 123RD ST 'I,,CS]�. 2 A 96TH 5 ✓ DAVID LAW ENCE RUTAK.R AO -BAY NNi 7 9TH ST AL GRATGNY ES JRK-8CENTER • HARBOR K-SCENTER HUBERTO PLC SOUTH CAMPUS • SIBLEY K-8 p CENTER '\070 .5 1 2 Miles SOURCE: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 2016 �tF c Legend A Elementary • K-8 Center Middle * Senior High + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility O School Openings Highways Northeast Area Date Saved: 8/5/2016 m HORACE MANN MS 7395 MIAMI SHORESES A 0 VENETIAN BISCAYNE ES A I TREASURE ISLAND ES NAUTILUS MS W 44 H ST W41 ST ORT CHES s * IAMi B BEACC H SHS $ti FIENBERG-FISHER FIEBERG-FISHER ADULTS COMMUNITY KA CENTER EDUCATION CENTER +• �Tx sT SOUTH POINTE ES G Q AVENTURA DRMICHAEL NW 275TH ST K -SCE TER NORTH ROBK EDUCATION CATION ANOOVERMS MADIE IVES -VIRGINIAABOONE HIGHLAND OAKS ES COUNTY K- CENTER a,� COMMUNITYES A DR. FREDERICA S. WILSONISKYWAY ES CENTER • + HIGHLAND V OAKS MS �TIyLIn� NORW00D ES W T,fl MIAMI Q �V7Y CHARLES A NORLAND SHS q DAVIDWYCHE MIAMI NORLAND MS Z vV JRES GARDENSES �, Y A NORLAND ES A BARBARA BRENTWOOD ES OW x A HAW INS ES A Z HIBISCUSES �' USES RMANS. A CRESTVIEW ES PARKWAYES A iC ELCUPISU! CAROL CITY MS �, y_ A (a • I LES BEACH 3 LAKE * CAROL �0� PARK ES EW K -S JS ES LAKE CITY SHS V " STEVENS MS d A MYRTLEf GERTRUDEK PARKVIEW ES PLC NORTH GROVE K-8 ,tY1 PALM ES C"IGREYNOLOS GLADE ES CENTER A 1 PALM ES SLNv"Y CAROL CITY ES • + C,c PARK ES A A PARISLES KWAY SCOTTLAKE ES P A NNIIANII BEND EDUCATIONAL NORTH MIAMI COMPLEX iE * BEACH SHS BEACH GOLDEN JOHN F E 7 63RD ST BEV R 926E\T JAN MANN GLADESES q KENNEDY MS FULFORD ES OPPORTUNITY A BUNCHE SCHOOL PARK ES OAK GROVE ES NMORTH ALONZO AND TRACY TRANSPORTATION - IAMI MOURNINGSHS + CENTERNORTHA NORTH DADEM a, A STADIUM BISCAYNE BAY CAMPUS NORTH DADS CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGES RAINBOW • DAVID LAWRENCE i MRK ES BISCAYNE JR. K-8 CENTER W $g9 GARDENSES LENMN MIAMI ES K-8 CENTER A NATURAL THOMAS • BRIDGE ES JEFFERSON MS A O U ARCH CREEK ES BEN JAMINL NORTH MIAMI MS FRANKLIN H G� K-8 CENTER /*NORT IAMISHS �G • ¢ W BRYAN ES AliJ�� Y NE 123RD ST 'I,,CS]�. 2 A 96TH 5 ✓ DAVID LAW ENCE RUTAK.R AO -BAY NNi 7 9TH ST AL GRATGNY ES JRK-8CENTER • HARBOR K-SCENTER HUBERTO PLC SOUTH CAMPUS • SIBLEY K-8 p CENTER '\070 .5 1 2 Miles SOURCE: MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 2016 �tF c Legend A Elementary • K-8 Center Middle * Senior High + Other Educational Facility ■ Ancillary Facility O School Openings Highways Northeast Area Date Saved: 8/5/2016 m HORACE MANN MS 7395 MIAMI SHORESES A 0 VENETIAN BISCAYNE ES A I TREASURE ISLAND ES NAUTILUS MS W 44 H ST W41 ST ORT CHES s * IAMi B BEACC H SHS $ti FIENBERG-FISHER FIEBERG-FISHER ADULTS COMMUNITY KA CENTER EDUCATION CENTER +• �Tx sT SOUTH POINTE ES G Q Notification Letter and DEO Response C1�Y 4�'ZI j4T 4, ' DANIEL ]. ALFONSO * �R=.�, ��<<,• * City Manager November 1, 2015 ` o R k Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Caldwell Building 107 East Madison Street — MSC 160 Tallahassee, FL 32399-4120 Re: 2015 City of Miami Evaluation and Appraisal Determination Letter for Comprehensive Plan Amendments Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with the requirements of F.S. Chapter 163.3191, and the "Evaluation and Appraisal Notification Schedule 2012-2018", the City of Miami has evaluated its Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) and has determined that amendments shall be necessary in order to be consistent with and reflect changes in state requirements since the last time the comprehensive plan was updated. The City understands that the necessary amendments must be prepared and transmitted to the State land Planning Agency, via the State Coordinated Review Process, within one year of this determination, which is November 1, 2016. Thank you for your attention and assistance through this process. Should you have any questions, please contact Ms. Mireidy Fernandez at (305)416-1445 or by e-mail at mirfernandez@miamigov.com. Sincerely, Francisco J. Garcia, Director City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department FJG:mf PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor 1 Miami, Florida 331301 Phone: (305) 416-1400 Fax (305) 416-2156 Mailing Address: P.0, Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 November 2, 2015 Mr. Francisco J. Garcia, Director City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department 444 S.W. 2r'd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 1�5, RE: Miami Evaluation and Appraisal Notification Letter N Dear Mr. Garcia, This is to acknowledge receipt of your Evaluation and Appraisal Notification Letter which was due on November 1, 2015, and received" by the Department on October 30, 2015. Please note that your proposed comprehensive plan amendments based on your Evaluation and Appraisal should be transmitted to the Department by November 1, 2016, within one year of your notification, pursuant to Section 163.3191(2), Florida Statutes. The amendments are subject to the State Coordinated Review Process as outlined in Section 163.3184(4), Florida Statues. Mr, James Stansbury of the Department's staff is available to assist and provide technical guidance to your questions concerning the contents of the Evaluation and Appraisal based comprehensive plan amendments and may be reached at (850) 717-8512. If you have any questions concerning the processing of the Evaluation and Appraisal based amendments, please contact Mr. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator, at (850) 717-8483. Sincerely, D. Ray Eubanks Plan Processing Administrator DRE/me F oli& Dcl:arttner.)t; of P'c°onotnic Opportunity C;tildwell Buildirig 1 107 F, Madi..,,mn ytrect ; l.'al'ki,taai s e., VL 32.399 866.E A.23z45 ( 850-245.7105 j 850.921.3223 Fax w�vw tltF�tslt4c>l�h,c>i,� I w��!ut.t�z��,ttt�. toii��,`l,I 1)l: () � �s��u�e.fzc�c>vciolc c, c�nt(1;,�17,L,CJ t 31 r �V ��I '�+ ItlF�e/ i&lilo �4 November 1, 2015 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Plan Processing Administrator Florida Department of Economic Opportunity DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RECEIVED IDUMNu of Community Planning i� Caldwell Building Div. of CommunIty Development 107 East Madison Street — MSC 160 Dept, of Economic opportunity Tallahassee, FL 32399-4120 Re: 2015 City of Miami Evaluation and Appraisal Determination Letter for Comprehensive Plan Amendments Dear Mr. Eubanks: In accordance with the requirements of F.S. Chapter 163.3191, and the "Evaluation and Appraisal Notification Schedule 2012-2018", the City of Miami has evaluated its Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) and has determined that amendments shall be necessary in order to be consistent with and reflect changes in state requirements since the last time the comprehensive pian was updated. The City understands that the necessary amendments must be prepared and transmitted to the State land Planning Agency, via the State Coordinated Review Process, within one year of this determination, which'is November 1, 2016. Thank you for your attention and assistance through this process. Should you have any questions, please contact Ms. Mireidy Fernandez at (305)4.16-1445 or by e-mail at mirfernandezODmiamieov.com. Sincerely, w, ,.,francisco J. Ga cia, Director City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department FJG:mf PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 444 S.W. 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor / Miami, Florida 33130/ Phone: (305) 416-9400 Fax (305) 416-2156 Mailing Address; P.O. Box 330708 Miami, Florida 33233-0708 EXHIBIT C Consistency with Statutory Changes to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes EXHIBIT B Consistency with Statutory Changes to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2003: [Ch. 03-1, ss. 14-15; ch. 03-162, s. 1; ch. 03-261, s. 158; ch. 03-286, s. 61, Laws of Florida.] 1 Creates the Agricultural Lands and Practices Act. 163.3162 [NEW] (2): Provides legislative findings and purpose with respect to agricultural activities and duplicative regulation. Procedural (3): Defines the terms "farm," "farm operation," and "farm product' for purposes of the act. (4): Prohibits a county from adopting any ordinance, resolution, regulation, rule, or policy to prohibit or otherwise limit a bona fide farm operation on land that is classified as agricultural land. (4)(a): Provides that the act does not limit the powers of a county under certain circumstances. (4)(b): Clarifies that a farm operation may not expand its operations under certain circumstances. (4)(c): Provides that the act does not limit the powers of certain counties. (4)(d): Provides that certain county ordinances are not deemed to be a duplication of regulation. 2 Changes "State Comptroller" references to "Chief Financial Officer." 163.3167(6) Procedural 3 Provides for certain airports to abandon DRI orders. 163.3177(6)(k) Throughout s.163.3177, F.S., citations for Ch. 235, F.S., are 163.31776 Procedural changed to cite the appropriate section of Ch. 1013, F.S. 5 Throughout x.163.31777, F.S., citations for Ch. 235, F.S., are 163.31777 Procedural changed to cite the appropriate section of Ch. 1013, F.S. Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element s 2004: [Ch. 04-5, s. 11; ch. 04-37, s. 1; ch. 04-230, ss. 1-4; ch. 04-372, ss. 2-5; ch. 04-381, ss. 1-2; ch. 04-384, s. 2, Laws of Florida.) 1 (10): Amended to conform to the repeal of the Florida High- Speed Rail Transportation Act, and the creation of the Florida 163.3167 (10)Procedural High -Speed Rail Authority Act. (13)Appendix PW -1 Water (13): Created to require local governments to identify adequate water supply sources to meet future demand for the es- Supply Facilities Work ablished planning period. Plan Update Sept. 2015 (14): Created to limit the effect of judicial determinations issued subsequent to certain development orders pursuant to adopted land development regulations. (14)Procedural 2 (1): Provides legislative findings on the compatibility of development with military installations. Creates 163.3175 (2): Provides for the exchange of information relating to proposed land use decisions between counties and local govern- ments and military installations. I(3): Provides for responsive comments by the commanding officer or his/her designee. (4): Provides for the county or affected local government to take such comments into consideration. �C (5): Requires the representative of the military installation to be an ex -officio, nonvoting member of the county's or local government's land planning or zoning board. (6): Encourages the commanding officer to provide information on community planning assistance grants. 3 (6)(a): Changed to require local governments to amend the future land use element by June 30, 2006 to include criteria to 163.3177 achieve compatibility with military installations. Changed to encourage rural land stewardship area designation as an overlay on the future land use map. (6)(c): Extended the deadline adoption of the water supply facilities work plan amendment until December 1, 2006; provid- (6c)Appendix PW - d for updating the work plan every five years; and exempts such amendment from the limitation on frequency of adoption 1 Sept 2015 f amendments. (10)(I): Provides for the coordination by the state land planning agency and the Department of Defense on compatibility issues for military installations. (11)(d)1.: Requires DCA, in cooperation with other specified state agencies, to provide assistance to local governments in �C implementing provisions relating to rural land stewardship areas. (11)(d)2.: Provides for multi -county rural land stewardship areas. Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2004: [Ch. 04-5, s. 11; ch. 04-37, s. 1; ch. 04-230, ss. 1-4; ch. 04-372, ss. 2-5; ch. 04-381, ss. 1-2; ch. 04-384, s. 2, Laws of Florida.) 1)(d)3.-4: Revises requirements, including the acreage threshold for designating a rural land stewardship area. 1163.3164(32) 1 1Procedural (11)(d)6.j.: Provides that transferable rural land use credits maybe assigned at different ratios according to the natural Procedural resource or other beneficial use characteristics of the land. (11)(e): Provides legislative findings regarding mixed-use, high- density urban infill and redevelopment projects; requires Procedural DCA to provide technical assistance to local governments. (11)(f): Provides legislative findings regarding a program for the transfer of development rights and urban infill and rede- elopment; requires DCA to provide technical assistance to Procedural local governments. 4 y(1): Provides legislative findings with respect to the shortage of affordable rentals in the state. Creates 163.31771 (2): Provides definitions. I I 1(2)Procedural (3): Authorizes local governments to permit accessory dwelling units in areas zoned for single family resi- dential use based upon certain findings. �UL iami 21 LDR (4) An application for a building permit to construct an accessory dwelling unit must include an affidavit from the applicant, which attests that the unit will be rented at an affordable rate to a very- low-income, low-income, or moderate -income person or persons. ral (5): Provides for certain accessory dwelling units to apply towards satisfying the affordable housing com- (5)Policy HO- Housing Element ponent of the housing element in a local government's comprehensive plan. 1.1.10 (6): Requires the DCA to report to the Legislature. 5 mends the definition of "in compliance" to add language referring to the Wekiva Parkway and Protec- 163.3184(1)(b) on Act. 6 1)(m): Created to provide that amendments to address criteria or compatibility of land uses adjacent to or 163.3187 in close proximity to military installations do not count toward the limitation on frequency of amending comprehensive plans. (1)(n): Created to provide that amendments to establish or implement a rural land stewardship area do not count toward the limitation on frequency of amending comprehensive plans 7 Created to provide that evaluation and appraisal reports 4 163.3191(2)(n) I * uirement ad in 2010 ral Chapter 163, Addressed Amendment Needed Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. N/A* F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2005: [Chapter 2005 157, sections 1, 2 and 15, Chapter 2005 290, and Chapter 2005 291, sections 10 12, Laws of Florida] 1Added the definition of "financial feasibility." 163.3164(32) Procedural Definition of "Financial Feasi- bility" removed in 2011 2 (2): Required comprehensive plans to be "financially" rather than "economically" feasible. 163.3177 (2)"Financial Fea- sibility" removed in 2011 (3)(a)5.: Required the comprehensive plan to include a 5 year schedule of capital improvements. Outside funding (funding (3a5)DA or ILA (3a5)Capital Improvement from a developer, other government or funding pursuant to referendum) of these capital improvements must be guaran- removed in 2011 Element (5 Year Sched- eed in the form of a development agreement or interlocal agreement. ule) (3)(a)6.b.1.: Required a plan amendment for the annual update of the schedule of capital improvements. Deleted a provi- (3a6b1) ion allowing updates and change in the date of construction to be accomplished by ordinance. Requirement Re- moved in 2011 (3a6c) Requirement Re- (3)(a)6.c.: Added oversight and penalty provision for failure to adhere to this section's capital improvements requirements. moved in 2011 (3a6d) Requirement Re- (3)(a)6.d.: Required a long term capital improvement schedule if the local government has adopted a long term concur- moved in 2011 rency management system. (6a)Procedural (6)(a): Deleted date (October 1, 1999) by which school sitting requirements must be adopted. Not Included (6a)CI-1.2.2; CI - (6)(a): Requires the future land use element to be based upon the availability of water supplies (in addition to public water 1.2.3;; PW1.2.1 (6a) Future Land Use facilities). Appendix PW -1 Element * (6a)Requirement (6)(a): Add requirement that future land use element of coastal counties must encourage the preservation of working wa- removed in 2011 erfronts, as defined in section 342.07, Florida Statutes. (6)(c): Required the potable water element to be updated within 18 months of an updated regional water supply plan to Potable Water incorporate the alternative water supply projects and traditional water supply projects and conservation and reuse select- Element d by the local government to meet its projected water supply needs. The ten year water supply work plan must include Appendix PW -1 public, private and regional water supply facilities, including development of alternative water supplies. Such amend- updated 2015 ments do not count toward the limitation on the frequency of adoption of amendments. 5 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2005: [Chapter 2005 157, sections 1, 2 and 15, Chapter 2005 290, and Chapter 2005 291, sections 10 12, Laws of Florida] 2 (6)(e): Added waterways to resources addressed by the recreation and open space element. (6e)PR-3.2.7. (6)(h)1.: The intergovernmental coordination element must address coordination with regional water supply authorities. (61h1)IC-1.1.9. (11)(d)4.c.: Required rural land stewardship areas to address affordable housing. (11)(d)5.: Required a listed species survey be performed on rural land stewardship receiving area. If any listed species resent, must ensure adequate provisions to protect them. (11)(d)6.: Must enact an ordinance establishing a methodology for creation, conveyance, and use of stewardship credits within a rural land stewardship area. (11)(d)6.j.: Revised to allow open space and agricultural land to be just as important as environmentally sensitive land when assigning stewardship credits. (12)See Education (12): Must adopt public school facilities element. Element; (12) Requirement re- moved in 2011 (12)(a) and (b): A waiver from providing this element will be allowed under certain circumstances. (12ab)Education Element Adopted. (12)(g): Expanded list of items to be to include collocation, location of schools proximate to residential areas, and use of (12g)EDU-1.3.1; schools as emergency shelters. EDU-1.3.7 (12)(h): Required local governments to provide maps depicting the general location of new schools and school improve- (12h)See Appen- ments within future conditions maps. dix EDU-1 (12i)Procedural; (12)(i): Required the state land planning agency to establish a schedule for adoption of the public school facilities element. Education Ele- ment Adopted; (12j)Requirement (12)(j): Established penalty for failure to adopt a public school facility element. Removed in 2011 (13)Encouraged,not (13): (New section) Encourages local governments to develop a "community vision" that provides for sustainable growth, required; Re- recognizes its fiscal constraints, and protects its natural resources. quirement re- moved in 2011 (14): (New section) Encourages local governments to develop an "urban service boundary" that ensures the area is (14)Encouraged, erved (or will be served) with adequate public facilities and services over the next 10 years. See section 163.3184(17). not required; Re- quirement re- moved in 2011 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2005: [Chapter 2005 157, sections 1, 2 and 15, Chapter 2005 290, and Chapter 2005 291, sections 10 12, Laws of Florida] 3 Section 163.31776 is repealed 163.31776 Education Ele- ment Adopted (2): Required the public schools interlocal agreement (if applicable) to address requirements for school concurrency. The 163.31777 (2) See School pt out provision at the end of subsection (2) is deleted. ILA (5): Required Palm Beach County to identify, as part of its evaluation and appraisal report, changes needed in its public school element necessary to conform to the new 2005 public school facilities element requirements. (7): Provided that a county exempted from public school facilities element shall undergo re-evaluation as part of its eval tion and appraisal report to determine if it continues to meet the exemption criteria 5 (2)(g): Expands requirement of coastal element to include strategies that will be used to preserve recreational and com- 163.3178 PA-3.1.1; PA- mercial working waterfronts, as defined in section 342.07, Florida Statutes. 3.1.4; CM-3 6 (1)(a): Added "schools" as a required concurrency item. 163.3180 (1)(a) requirement removed in 2011 CI-1.2.3.g) (2)(a): Required consultation with water supplier prior to issuing building permit to ensure "adequate water supplies" to (2)(a) CI-1.2.2.a) serve new development will be available by the date of issuance of a certificate of occupancy. (2)(c): Required all transportation facilities to be in place or under construction within 3 years (rather than 5 years) after (2)(c) requirement approval of building permit. removed in 2011; CI-1.2.2.c) (4)(c): The concurrency requirement, except as it relates to transportation and public schools, may be waived in urban infill and redevelopment areas. The waiver shall be adopted as a plan amendment. A local government may grant a concurrency exception pursuant to subsection (5) for transportation facilities located within an urban infill and redevelop- requirement removed in remov ment area. 2011;See LU- 1.1.1;LU-1.1.11 (5)(d): Required guidelines for granting concurrency exceptions to be included in the comprehensive plan. (5)(d) Req ui rement (5)(e) — (g): If local government has established transportation exceptions, the guidelines for implementing the exceptions removed in 2009 must be 'consistent with and support a comprehensive strategy, and promote the purpose of the exceptions." Exception reas must include mobility strategies, such as alternate modes of transportation, supported by data and analysis. The (5)(e)-(g)TR-1.1.1; Florida Department of Transportation must be consulted prior to designating a transportation concurrency exception area. LU-1.1.11. Transportation Element Transportation concurrency exception areas existing prior to July 1, 2005 must meet these requirements by July 1, 2006, r when the evaluation and appraisal based amendments are adopted, whichever occurs last. (6): Required local government to maintain records to determine whether 110 percent de minimis transportation impact (6)Requirement hreshold is reached. A summary of these records must be submitted with the annual capital improvements element up- removed in 2011 ate. Exceeding the 110 percent threshold dissolves the de minimis exceptions. (7): Required consultation with the Department of Transportation prior to designating a transportation concurrency man- (7)Requirement gement area (to promote infill development) to ensure adequate level of service standards are in place. The local gov- removed in 2011. rnment and the Florida Department of Transportation should work together to mitigate any impacts to the Strategic Inter- modal System. (9)(a): Allowed adoption of a long term concurrency management system for schools. (9)(a)Requirement removed in 2011 Chapter 163, Addressed Amendment Needed Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. N/A* F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2005: [Chapter 2005 157, sections 1, 2 and 15, Chapter 2005 290, and Chapter 2005 291, sections 10 12, Laws of Florida] 6 (9)(c): (New section) Allowed local governments to issue approvals to commence construction notwithstanding section 163.3180 (9)(c)Requirement 163.3180 in areas subject to a long term concurrency management system. (9)(d): (New section) Required evaluation in removed in 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Repot of progress in improving levels of service coordination element. (10): Added requirement that level of service coordination element standard for roadway facilities on the Strategic Inter- (10)Requirement modal System must be consistent with Florida Department of Transportation standards. Standards must consider compat- removed in 2011 ibility with adjacent jurisdictions. (13)Requirement (13): Required school concurrency (not optional). removed in 2011 (13c1)EDU-1.2.1. (13)(c)1: Requires school concurrency after five years to be applied on a "less than districtwide basis" (i.e., by using I-1.2.3 Require- school attendance zones, etc.). ment removed in 2011. (13)(c)2: Eliminated exemption from plan amendment adoption limitation for changes to service area boundaries. (13c2)Procedural; 1-1.2.3; ILA (13)(c)3.: No application for development approval may be denied if a less than districtwide measurement of school con- (13c3)See School currency is used; however the development impacts must to shifted to contiguous service areas with school capacity. ILA EDU-1.2.1. (13e)See School ILA (13)(e): Allowed school concurrency to be satisfied if a developer executes a legally binding commitment to provide miti- EDU-1.2.3. ation proportionate to the demand. CI-PublicSchool Facilities (13e1)See School (13)(e)1: Enumerated mitigation options for achieving proportionate share mitigation. ILA EDU-1.2.3. FlPublic School 7 (17): (New section) If local government has adopted a community vision and urban service boundary, state and regional 163.3184 [New] Requirement re- gency review is eliminated for plan amendments affecting property within the urban service boundary. Such amend- moved in 2011 ments are exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments. g (1)(c)1.f.: Allowed approval of residential land use as a small-scale development amendment when the proposed density 163.3187 (100 is equal to or less than the existing future land use category. Under certain circumstances, affordable housing units are Requirement re- xempt from this limitation. * moved in 2011 (1)(c)4.: (New provision) If the small-scale development amendment involves a rural area of critical economic concern, a 0-acre limit applies. (1)(o): (New provision) An amendment to a rural area of critical economic concern may be approved without regard to the Istatutory limit on comprehensive plan amendments. Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2005: [Chapter 2005 157, sections 1, 2 and 15, Chapter 2005 290, and Chapter 2005 291, sections 10 12, Laws of Florida] 9 (2)(k): Required local governments that do not have either a school interlocal agreement or a public school facilities ele-163.3191 (2k)Requirement ment, to determine in the Evaluation and Appraisal Report whether the local government continues to meet the exemption removed in 2011 riteria in section 163.3177(12). (2)(I): The Evaluation and Appraisal Report must determine whether the local government has been successful in identify- iment ng alternative water supply projects, including conservation and reuse, needed to meet projected demand. Also, the Report must identify the degree to which the local government has implemented its 10 -year water supply work plan. removed in 201 2011 remov (2)(0): (New provision) The Evaluation and Appraisal Report must evaluate whether any Multimodal Transportation Dis- (2o)Requirement rict has achieved the purpose for which it was created. removed in 2011 (2)(p): (New provision) The Evaluation and Appraisal Report must assess methodology for impacts on transportation facil- (2p)equirement ities. removed in 2011 (10): The Evaluation and Appraisal Report -based amendment must be adopted within a single amendment cycle. Failure (10)Requirement o adopt within this cycle results in penalties. Once updated, the comprehensive plan must be submitted to the state land removed in 2011 planning agency. 10 (10) New section designating Freeport as a certified community. 163.3246 [New] (11) New section exempting proposed DRIs within Freeport from review under section 380.06, Florida Statutes, unless review is requested by the local government. 10 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2006 [Chapters 2006 68, 2006 69, 2006 220, 2006 252, 2006 255, and 2006 268, Laws of Florida] 1 Establishes plan amendment procedures for agricultural enclaves as defined in section 163.3164(33), Florida Statutes. 163.3162(5) [New] Chapter 2006-255, Laws of Florida. 2 Defines agricultural enclave. Chapter 2006-255, Laws of Florida. 163.3164(33) [New 3 (6)(g)2.: Adds new paragraph encouraging local governments with a coastal management element to adopt recreational 163.3177(6)(g)2. M-1.1.5;;CM- urface water use policies; such adoption amendment is exempt from the twice per year limitation on the frequency of [New] 1.1.13;NR-1.3.7; plan amendment adoptions. Chapter 2006-220, Laws of Florida NR -1.3.8 Manatee Protection; CM -3 Working Water Front ;Removed in 2011 Allows the effect of a proposed receiving area to be considered when projecting the 25 -year or greater population with a 163.3177(11)(d)6 rural land stewardship area. Chapter 2006-220, Laws of Florida. 5 Recognizes "extremely -low-income persons" as another income groups whose housing needs might be addressed by 163.31771(1), (2) Goal HO -1 Housing Element accessory dwelling units and defines such persons consistent with section 420.0004(8), Florida Statutes. Chapter 2006- nd (4) 9, Laws of Florida. 6 8,ssigns to the Division of Emergency Management the responsibility of ensuring the preparation of updated regional 163.3178(2)(d) M-4.1.9 Coastal Management hurricane evacuation plans. Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida. -M-4.2 Element 7 Changes the definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area to be the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge 163.3178(2)(h) Policy CM -4.1.2 Coastal Management line as established by the SLOSH model. Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida Element g adds a new section allowing a local government to comprehensively with the requirement that its comprehensive plan 163.3178(9)(a) M-4.1.2 direct population concentrations away from the Coastal High Hazard Area and maintains or reduces hurricane evacuation [New] "M-4.3.4 Imes by maintaining an adopted level of service standard for out -of -county hurricane evacuation for a category 5 storm, Dy maintaining a 12 -hour hurricane evacuation time or by providing mitigation that satisfies these two requirements. Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida. g 4,dds a new section establishing a level of service for out -of -county hurricane evacuation of no greater than 16 hours for a 163.3178(9)(b) M-4.3.4 category 5 storm for any local government that wishes to follow the process in section 163.3178(9)(a) but has not estab- [New] lished such a level of service by July 1, 2008. Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida. 10 Requires local governments to amend their Future Land Use Map and coastal management element to include the new 163.3178(2)(c) M-4.1.2 definition of the Coastal High Hazard Area, and to depict the Coastal High Hazard Area on the Map by July 1, 2008. ppendix LU -1 Chapter 2006-68, Laws of Florida. 11 Allows the sanitary sewer concurrency requirement to be met by onsite sewage treatment and disposal systems approved 163.3180(2)(a) I -1.2.2(a) by the Department of Health. Chapter 2006-252, Laws of Florida. 10 11 Chapter 163, Addressed Amendment Needed Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. N/A* F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2006 [Chapters 2006 68, 2006 69, 2006 220, 2006 252, 2006 255, and 2006 268, Laws of Florida] 12 Changes section 380.0651(3)(i) to section 380.0651(3)(h) as the citation for the standards a multiuse development of 163.3180(12)(a) Requirement re - re ional impact must meet or exceed. Chapter 2006-220, Laws of Florida. moved in 2011 13 Deletes use of extended use agreement as part of the definition of small scale amendment. Chapter 2006-69, Laws of 163.3187(1)(c)1.f Statute deleted in Florida. 2011 14 Creates a new section related to electric distribution substations; establishes criteria addressing land use compatibility of 163.3208 [New] Future Land Use Element ubstations; requires local governments to permit substations in all future land use map categories (except preservation, Interpretation of the 2020 onservation or historic preservation); establishes compatibility standards to be used if a local government has not estab- Future Land Use Map lished such standards; establishes procedures for the review of applications for the location of a new substation; allows local governments to enact reasonable setback and landscape buffer standards for substations. Chapter 2006-268, Laws f Florida 15 Creates a new section preventing a local government from requiring for a permit or other approval vegetation mainte- 163.3209 [New] Procedural LDR & Landscape Ordi- nance and tree pruning or trimming within an established electric transmission and distribution line right-of-way. Chapter nance 006-268, Laws of Florida. 16 Community Workforce Housing Innovation Pilot Program; created by Chapter 2006-69, section 27, Laws of Florida. Es- New Housing Element ablishes a special, expedited adoption process for any plan amendment that implements a pilot program project 420.5095 17 Affordable housing land donation density incentive bonus; created by Chapter 2006-69, section 28, Laws of Florida. Al- New Housing Element lows a density bonus for land donated to a local government to provide affordable housing; requires adoption of a plan 420.615 amendment for any such land; such amendment may be adopted as a small-scale amendment; such amendment is ex- empt from the twice per year limitation on the frequency of plan amendment adoptions. 11 Chapter 163, Addressed Amendment Needed Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. N/A* F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2007: [Chapters 2007 196, 2007 198, and 2007 204, Laws of Florida] 1 (26) Expands the definition of "urban redevelopment" to include a community redevelopment area. Chapter 2007-204,163.3164 Procedural Laws of Florida. Definition of (32) Revises the definition of "financial feasibility" to clarify that the plan is financially feasible for transportation and "Financial Feasi- chools if level of service standards are achieved and maintained by the end of the planning period even if in a particular bility' removed in year such standards are not achieved; deletes the provision that level of service standards need not be maintained if the 2011 proportionate fair share process in sections 163.3180(12) and (16), Florida Statutes, is used. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. 2 (2) Clarifies that financial feasibility is determined using a five-year period (except in the case of long-term transportation 163.3177 (2) Requirement r school concurrency management, in which case a 10 or 15 -year period applies). Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. removed in 2011 tion (3)(a)6 Transportation (3)(a)6. Revises the citation to the Metropolitan Planning Organization's Transportation Improvement Program and long- - Element; Intergovernmen- range transportation plan. Chapter 2007-196, Laws of Florida. tal al Coordination Element (3)(b)1. Requires an annual update to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to be submitted by December 1, (3)(b)1. Procedur- 008 and yearly thereafter. If this date is missed, no amendments are allowed until the update is adopted. Chapter 2007 I — Penalties 04, Laws of Florida. removed in 2011. (3)(c) Deletes the requirement that the state land planning agency must notify the Administration Commission if an annual update to the capital improvements element is found not in compliance (retained is the requirement that notification must (3)(c) Procedural - ake place is the annual update is not adopted). Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. Section deleted in 011 (3)(e) Provides that a comprehensive plan as revised by an amendment to the future land use map is financially feasible i it is supported by (1) a condition in a development order for a development of regional impact or binding agreement that addresses proportionate share mitigation consistent with section 163.3180(12), Florida Statutes, or (2) a binding agree- (3)(e) Deleted in ment addressing proportionate fair -share mitigation consistent with section 163.3180(16)(f), Florida Statutes, and the 2011 property is located in an urban infill, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, urban infill and redevelopment or urban service area. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. (6)(f)1.d. Revises the housing element requirements to ensure adequate sites for affordable workforce housing within (6)(f11.d. Housing Element certain counties. Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida. (6)h. and i. Requires certain counties to adopt a plan for ensuring affordable workforce housing by July 1, 2008 and pro- (6)(Q1.h.& I. Delet- ides a penalty if this date is missed. Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida. d in 2008 3 (4)(b) Expands transportation concurrency exceptions to include airport facilities. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. 163.3180 (4)(b) Removed in 011 (5)(b)5 Adds specifically designated urban service areas to the list of transportation concurrency exception areas. Chap- (5)(b)5 Removed ter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. in 2011 (5)(f) Requires consultation with the state land planning agency regarding mitigation of impacts on Strategic Intermodal (5)(f) Procedural - System facilities prior to establishing a concurrency exception area. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. Removed in 2011 (12) and (12)(a) Deletes the requirement that the comprehensive plan must authorize a development of regional impact (12) & (12)(a) Re - to satisfy concurrency under certain conditions. Also, deletes the requirement that the development of regional impact moved in 2011 must include a residential component to satisfy concurrency under the conditions listed. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Flori- da. (12)(d) Clarifies that any proportionate -share mitigation by development of regional impact, Florida Quality Development (12)(d) Removed and specific area plan implementing an optional sector plan is not responsible for reducing or eliminating backlogs. Chap- in 2011 ter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. 12 13 Chapter 163, Addressed Amendment Needed Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. N/A* F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2007: [Chapters 2007 196, 2007 198, and 2007 204, Laws of Florida] 3 (13)(e)4. A development precluded from commencing because of school concurrency may nevertheless commence if 163.3180 (13)(e)4 Removed certain conditions are met. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. in 2011 (16)(c)&(f) Re- (16)(c) and (f) Allows proportionate fair -share mitigation to be directed to one or more specific transportation improve- moved in 2011 ment. Clarifies that such mitigation is not to be used to address backlogs. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. (17) Allows an exempt from concurrency for certain workforce housing developed consistent with section 380.061(9) and (17) Removed in ection 380.0651(3). Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida. 2011 Ilows a local government to establish a transportation concurrency backlog authority to address deficiencies where exist -163.3182 [New] Removed in 2011 ing traffic volume exceeds the adopted level of service standard. Defines the powers of the authority to include tax incre- ment financing and requires the preparation of transportation concurrency backlog plans. Chapters 2007-196 and 2007- 198, Laws of Florida. 5 Nlows plan amendments that address certain housing requirements to be expedited under certain circumstances. Chap- 163.3184(19) Removed in 2011 ter 2007-198, Laws of Florida. [New] 6 Exempts any plan amendment that is consistent with the local housing incentive strategy consistent with section 420.9076163.3187(1)(p) Removed in 2011 from the twice per year limitation on the frequency of adoption of plan amendments. Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida. [New] Add an amendment to integrate a port master plan into the coastal management element as an exemption to the prohibi- 163.3191(14) Removed in 2011 ion in sections 163.3191(10). Chapters 2007-196 and 2007-204, Laws of Florida. [New] 8 Extends the duration of a development agreement from 10 to 20 years. Chapter 2007--204, Laws of Florida. 163.3229 Duration of DA Capital Improvements extended to 30 Element ears in 2011 9 Establishes an alternative state review process pilot program in Jacksonville/Duval, Miami, Tampa, Hialeah, Pinellas and 163.32465 [New] 163.32465 was Broward to encourage urban infill and redevelopment. Chapter 2007-204, Laws of Florida. See 163.32466 Repealed in 2011 Per 163.32466 subject to local referendum Pro- cedural 10 If a property owner contributes right-of-way and expands a state transportation facility, such contribution may be applied 339.282 [New] I-1.3.1 Transportation Element s a credit against any future transportation concurrency requirement. Chapter 2007-196, Laws of Florida. Capital Improvement Ele- ment 11 Establishes an expedited plan amendment adoption process for amendments that implement the Community Workforce 20.5095(9) Procedural Housing Innovation Pilot Program and exempts such amendments from the twice per year limitation on the frequency of doption of plan amendments. Chapter 2007-198, Laws of Florida Specifics s covered under 163.3184 13 14 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2008: [Chapters 2008-191 and 2008-227, Laws of Florida j 1 The future land use plan must discourage urban sprawl. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. 163.3177(6)(a) Future Land Use Element 2 The future land use plan must be based upon energy efficient land use patterns accounting for existing 163.3177(6)(a) Requirement re - and future energy electric power generation and transmission systems. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Flori- moved in 2011 da 3 The future land use plan must be based upon greenhouse gas reduction strategies. Chapter 2008 191, 163.3177(6)(a) Policy NR -3.2.6: Laws of Florida. Requirement re- moved in 2011 The traffic circulation element must include transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse 163.3177(6)(b) Policy NR -3.2.6: Transportation element as emissions. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. Requirement re- moved in 2011 5 The conservation element must include factors that affect energy conservation. Chapter 2008 191, Laws 163.3177(6)(d) Natural Resource Conser- of Florida ation Element 6 The future land use map series must depict energy conservation. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. 163.3177(6)(d) Requirement re- moved in 2011 7 The housing element must include standards, plans and principles to be followed in energy efficiency in 163.3177(6)(1) Requirement re - he design and construction of new housing and in the use of renewable energy resources. Chapter 2008 1.h.and i. moved in 2011 191, Laws of Florida. 8 Local governments within a Metropolitan Planning Organization area must revise their transportation 163.3177(6)0) Requirement re- Transportation element elements to include strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Chapter 2008 191, Laws of Florida. moved in 2011 9 Various changes were made in the State Comprehensive Plan that address low carbon Chapter 187, Flori- Procedural a Statutes emitting electric power plants. See Section 5 of Chapter 2008 227, Laws of Florida. 14 15 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2009: [Chapters 2009-85 and 2009-96-Laws of Florida] 1 Changes "Existing Urban service area" to "urban service area" and revises the definition of such an area. 163.3164(29) Procedural. Loca- Chapter 2009-96, section 2, Laws of Florida. ion changed to number (50) in 011 2 Section 163.3164(34) Adds definition of "Dense urban land area." Chapter 2009 96, section 2, Laws of 163.3164(34) Requirement Florida. Removed in 2011 3 Postpones from December 1, 2008 to December 1, 2011, the need for the annual update to the capital 163.3177(3)(b)1. Requirement Re- improvements element to be financially feasible. Chapter 2009 -96, section 3, Laws of Florida. moved in 2011 Requires the future land use element to include by June 30, 2012, criteria that will be used to achieve 163.3177(6)(a) Objective PA-2.1 Future Land Use Ele- compatibility of lands near public use airports. For military installations, the date is changed from June ment; Ports, Aviation, 30, 2006, to June 30, 2012. Section 3, Chapter 2009 85, Laws of Florida and Related Facilities 5 Requires the intergovernmental coordination element to recognize airport master plans. Chapter 2009 163.3177(6)(h) Requirement 85, section 3, Laws of Florida. 1•b removed in 2011. 6 Requires the intergovernmental coordination element to include a mandatory (rather than voluntary) 163.3177(6)(h) 3oal IC-3: Objec- Intergovernmental Co- dispute resolution process and requires use of the process prescribed in section 186.509, Florida Statutes, 1•c• ive IC-3.1: Policy ordination Element IC-3.1.1: or this purpose. Chapter 2009 96, section 3, Laws of Florida. 7 Requires the intergovernmental coordination element to provide for interlocal agreements pursuant to 163.3177(6)(h) Intergovernmental Co- section 333.03(1)(b), Florida Statutes, between adjacent local governments regarding airport zoning regu- 1•d• ordination Element lations. Chapter 2009 85, section 3, Laws of Florida. 8 Defines "rural agricultural industrial center" and provides for their expansion though the plan amendment 163.3177(15)(a) process. Chapter 2009 154, section 1, Laws of Florida. [New] 9 Allows a municipality that is not a dense urban land area to amend its comprehensive plan to designate 163.3180(5)(b)2 certain areas as transportation concurrency exception areas. Chapter 2009 96, section 4, Laws of Florida. 10 Allows a county that is not a dense urban land area to amend its comprehensive plan to designate certain 163.3180(5)(b)3. areas as transportation concurrency exception areas. Chapter 2009 96, section 4, Laws of Florida. 11 Requires local governments with state identified transportation concurrency exception areas to adopt 163.3180(5)(b)4. Requirement Re- land use and transportation strategies to support and fund mobility within such areas. Chapter 2009 96, moved in 2011 Policy LU-1.1.11: section 4, Laws of Florida. ®olicy LU-1.1.13 15 16 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2009: [Chapters 2009-85 and 2009 -96 -Laws of Florida] 12 Except in transportation concurrency exception areas, local governments must adopt the level of service 163.3180(10) Requirement Re- established by the Department of Transportation for roadway facilities on the Strategic Intermodal Sys- moved in 2011. em. Chapter 2009 96, section 4, Laws of Florida. 13 Defines a backlogged transportation facility to be one on which the adopted level of service is exceeded 163.3180(12)(b) Requirement Re- by existing trips, plus additional projected background trips. Chapter 2009 85, section 5, Laws of Florida & ( 16 i)(�) moved in 2011. 16 17 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2010 : [Chapters 2010 5, 2010 33, 2010 70, 2010 102, 2010 182, 2010 205, and 2010 209, Laws of Florida ] 1 Deletes section 163.31771(6), Florida Statutes (obsolete language that addressed an accessory dwelling 163.31771(6) unit repot); no sustentative comprehensive planning requirement impact. Section 16, Chapter 2010 5, Laws of Florida 2 Chapter 2010 102, Laws of Florida, makes several minor changes which do not affect sustentative com- Chapter 2010- , prehensive planning requirements: 102, Laws of Section 163.2526, Florida Statutes: repealed; Florida Section 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes: obsolete language deleted Section 163.3177(6)(h), Florida Statutes: minor wording changes; Section 163.3177(10)(k), Florida Statutes: minor wording changes; Section 163.3178(6), Florida Statutes: obsolete language deleted; Section 163.2511(1), Florida Statutes: minor wording changes; Section 163.2514, Florida Statutes: minor wording changes; Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes: minor wording changes 3 Chapter 2010 205, Laws of Florida, makes several minor wording changes Chapter 163, Part ll, Florida Chapter 2010 - Statutes, which do not affect sustentative comprehensive planning requirements: 205, Laws of Section 163.3167(13), Florida Statutes Florida Section 163.3177(4)(x), Florida Statutes Section 163.3177(6)(c), (d) and (h), Florida Statutes Section 163.3191(2)(1), Florida Statutes Chapter 2010-209, Laws of Florida, makes a minor wording change in section 163.2523, Florida Statutes, Chapter 2010 which does not affect substantive comprehensive planning requirements. 209, Laws of Florida 5 Deleted the phrase "SMART Schools Clearinghouse". Chapter 2010 70, section 11, Laws Section of Florida. 163.31777(1)(a) and (3)(a) 6 Revises section 163.3175, Florida Statutes, to list the 14 military installations and 43 local governments Section affected by special coordination and communication requirements. Section 1, Chapter 2010 182, Laws of 163.3175(2) Florida. 7 Revises section 163.3'77(6)(a), Florida Statutes, to specify that the 43 local governments listed in section Section 163.3175(2), Florida Statutes, must consider the factors listed in section 163.3175(5), Florida Statutes, 163.3177(6)(a) when considering the compatibility of land uses proximate to military installations. Chapter 2010 182, 8 Revised section 163.3180(4)(b), Florida Statutes, to define hangars for the assembly, manufacture, Section * Requirement re - maintenance maintenance or storage of aircraft as public transit facilities. Chapter 2010-33, section 1, Laws of Florida. moved in 2011 17 18 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 1 Deletes the exemption for plan amendments to designate an urban infill and redevelopment area from 163.2517(4) Policy LU -1.1.11 he twice per year amendment limitation of s.163.3187. 2 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.3161(1) Procedural "Community Planning Act." 3 Expresses the purpose of the act, changing "control" future development to "manage" future develop- 163.3161(2) Procedural ment "consistent with the proper role of local government." States the intent of the act is to focus the state role in managing growth to protect the functions of im- 1633161(3) Procedural portant state resources and facilities. [New] 5 Modifies the intent of the legislature with respect to how comprehensive plans and amendments affect 163.3161(10) Future Land Use Ele- property rights. ment 6 Expresses legislative intent to recognize and protect agriculture, tourism and military presence as being 163.3161(11) Goal LU -1 Future Land Use Ele- he state's traditional economic base. [New] ment 7 Expresses legislative intent to not require local government plans that have been found to be in compli- 163.3161(12) Future Land Use Ele- ance to adopt amendments implementing the new statutory requirements until the evaluation and ap- [New] ment praisal period provided in s. 163.3191 8 Modifies the provisions for agricultural lands and practices to state that a plan amendment for an agricul- 163.3162(4) ural enclave is presumed not to be urban sprawl as defined in 163.3164. 9 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.3164 Procedural "Community Planning Act" and sets forth new and modified definitions, many of which were included in repealed Rule 9J-5.003, F.A.C. 10 Establishes definition for "adaptation action area." 163.3164(1) [New] Procedural 11 Establishes definition for "affordable housing" [same meaning as in x.420.0004(3)]. 163.3164(3) [previously in Rule J-5] 12 Establishes definition for "antiquated subdivision." 163.3164(5) [New] 13 Establishes definition for "capital improvement." 163.3164(7) [previously in Rule J-5] 18 19 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 14 Establishes definition for "compatibility." 163.3164(9) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5 15 Establishes definition for "deepwater ports." 163.3164(11) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5 16 Establishes definition for "density." 163.3164(12) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 17 Establishes definition for "floodprone areas 163.3164(18) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 18 Establishes definition for "goal." 163.3164(19) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 19 Establishes definition for "intensity." 163.3164(22) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 20 Establishes definition for "internal trip capture." 163.3164(23) Procedural [New] 21 Establishes definition for "level of service." 163.3164(28) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 22 Deletes definition for "financial feasibility." 163.3164(32) Procedural [Deleted] 23 Establishes definition for "new town." 163.3164(32) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 24 Establishes definition for "objective." 163.3164(33) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 25 Deletes definition for "dense urban land areas." 163.3164(34) Procedural [Deleted] 26 Establishes definition for "policy." 163.3164(36) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 19 20 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 27 Deletes health systems and spoil disposal sites for maintenance dredging located in intracoastal waterways (except sites 163.3164(38) Procedural caned by ports) from the definition of "public facilities." 28 Changes definition of "regional planning agency" to "the council created pursuant to chapter 186." 163.3164(40) Procedural 29 Establishes definition for "seasonal population." 163.3164(41) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 30 Changes definition of "optional sector plan" to "sector plan" and clarifies the purpose of a sector plan. 163.3164(42) Procedural The term includes an optional sector plan that was adopted before the effective date of the act. 31 Establishes definition for "suitability." 163.3164(45) Procedural [previously in Rule J-5] 32 Establishes definition for "transit-oriented development." 163.3164(46) Procedural Transportation Element [New] Intergovernmental Coordination Element 33 Clarifies the definition of "urban service area" to delete the term "built-up" and to include any areas iden- 163.3164(50) Procedural fied in the comprehensive plan as urban service areas, regardless of local government limitation. 34 Establishes new definition for "urban sprawl." 163.3164(51) Procedural [replaces definition previously in 9J-5] 35 Modifies requirements for maintaining comprehensive plan, deleting the reference to s. 1633184 and the 163.3167(2) Procedural requirement that proposed plan amendments be submitted to the state land planning agency. 36 Deletes provisions for regional planning agency adoption of plan amendments for elements and amend- 163.3167(3) and Procedural ments not prepared by a local government (6) [Deleted] 37 Deletes provisions for local government challenge of costs associated with preparing a comprehensive 163.3167(7) plan and related state land planning agency action. [Deleted] 38 Deletes provisions for encouraging each local government to articulate a vision of its future physical ap- 163.3167(11) pearance and qualities of its community. [Deleted 20 21 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 39 Establishes provisions for "planning innovations and technical assistance" and clarifies the roles of the state land planning 163.3168(1) — (4) Procedural agency and all other appropriate state and regional agencies in the process. Requires, upon request by the local govern- [New] ment, the state land planning agency to coordinate multi -agency assistance on plan amendments that may adversely impact important state resources or facilities. Requires the state land planning agency to provide on its website guidance n the submittal and adoption of comprehensive plans, amendments and land development regulations, prohibiting such guidance from being adopted by rule and exempting such guidance from s. 120.54(1)(a). 0 Modifies areas of authority under this act with respect to joint agreements and intergovernmental coordi-163.3171(4) LU -1.1.1; SS - nation between cities and counties and planning in advance of jurisdictional changes 1.2.4; SS -1.2.3.; S-2.2.3; TR - 1.4.1; EDU — Monitoring Re- quirements; PA - 32.3.3; CM - .3.4; EDU - 1.1.5; EDU - 1.1.6; EDU - 1.1.7; EDU -1.2.3; EDU -1.7; IC - 1.1.1. IC -3.1; Concurrency Management Program 1 Modifies military base compatibility provisions to not require that commanding officer comments, under- 163.3175(5)(4) and lying studies and reports be binding on the local government. Requires the affected local government to (6) be sensitive to private property rights and not be unduly restrictive on those rights in considering the comments provided by the commanding officer or designee. 2 Modified to require that any local government comprehensive plan that has been amended to address 163.3175(9) p military compatibility requirements after 2004 and was found in compliance be deemed in compliance until the local government conducts its evaluation and appraisal review pursuant to s.163.3191 and deter- mines that amendments are necessary. 3 Modified to include significant portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.001 and 9J-5.005, F.A.C., with respect to the 163.3177(1) Future Land Use Element principles, guidelines, standards and strategies to be set forth in required and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and requirements for basing these elements on relevant, appropriate and profes- sionally accepted data 21 22 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 4 Deletes financial feasibility requirements. 163.3177(2) Capital Improvement Element 5 Modifies provisions for preparing the capital improvements element to require the schedule to cover a 5- 163.3177(3)(a)4 Policy CI -1.2.2.c) Capital Improvement year period and identify whether projects are either funded or unfunded and given a level of priority for Element; Appendix CI -1 unding. Deletes requirements for financial feasibility. 6 Modifies requirements for local government annual review of capital improvements element to no longer 163.3177(3)(b) Procedural require transmittal of the adopted amendment to the state land planning agency and deletes provisions related to sanctions by the Administration Commission, adoption of long-term concurrency management - systems and financial feasibility 7 Modifies planning period requirements, allowing additional planning periods for specific components, 163.3177(5)(a) Procedural elements, land use amendments, or projects as part of the planning process. 8 Modifies requirements for the future land use element to include guidance from repealed Rule 9J-5.006, 163.3177(6)(a) FLUM; Interpre- F.A.C., relative to general range of density or intensity of uses for gross land area and establishing a long ation of the term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 2020 Future Land Use map 9 Modifies the standards on which future land use plan and plan amendments are based to include: perma- 163.3177(6)(a)2 Goal CM -1 nent and seasonal population, compatibility, the need to modify land uses and development patterns and 3 Obj. EDU -1.2; within antiquated subdivisions, preservation of waterfronts, location of schools proximate to urban resi- Interpretation o dential areas, and other considerations taken from repealed Rule 9J-5.006, F.A.C. he 2020 Future Land Use Map 50 Modifies requirements for the future land use element "to accommodate at least the minimum amount 163.3177(6)(a)4 Interpretation of the of land required to accommodate the medium projections of the University of Florida's Bureau of Eco- 2020 Future Land Use nomic and Business Research for at least a 10 -year planning period unless otherwise limited." Map 51 Establishes requirements for analyzing future land use map amendments using portions of repealed Rule 163.3177(6)(a)8 Goal LU -1 9J-5.006, F.A.C. [New] 52 Establishes requirements for the future land use element and map series, including with slight revisions 163.3177(6)(a)9 Future Land Use Ele- he primary indicators that a plan or plan amendment does not discourage the proliferation of urban nd 10 [New] ment sprawl that were in repealed Rule 9J-5.006, F.A.C. Appendix LU -1 22 23 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 53 Modifies requirements for the transportation element to include significant portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.019, F.A.C., 163.3177(6)(b) PR -1.4.4.; IC- Transportation Element addressing circulation of recreational traffic, including bicycle facilities, exercise trails, riding facilities and airport master 1.1.6. tans. 54 Modifies requirements for the general sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, and natural 163.3177(6)(c) PW -1; Water groundwater aquifer recharge element to include guidance from portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.011, Supply Facilities F.A.C., and deletes requirements for including a topographic map depicting any areas adopted by a waterork Plan Up - management district as prime groundwater recharge areas and addressing areas served by septic tanks. date 2015 55 Modifies potable water supply planning requirements to remove the provision that states that 163.3177(6)(c)3 Procedural "amendments to incorporate the work plan do not count toward the limitation on the frequency of adop- tion of amendments to the comprehensive plan." 56 Modifies requirements for the conservation element to include portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.013, F.A.C., 163.3177(6)(d)1 Goal NR -1; -2;-3 o list the natural resources to be identified, analyzed and protected and toward which conservation prin- and 2 [New] ciples, guidelines and standards are to be directed. 57 Modifies requirements for analyzing current and projected water sources for a 10 -year period to include 163.3177(6)(d)3 PW-1;Water consideration of demands for industrial, agricultural and potable water use and the quality and quantity Supply Facilities of water available to meet these demands and the existing levels of conservation, use and protection and Work Plan Up - policies of the regional water management district. date 2015 58 Clarifies requirements for the housing element to include guidelines, standards and strategies based on 163.3177(6)(f)1 Requirement an inventory taken from the latest decennial United States Census or more recent and 2 removed in 2012 estimates and various other considerations listed in repealed Rule 9J-5.010, F.A.C. 59 Deletes requirement for an affordable housing needs assessment conducted by the state land planning 163.3177(6)(f)2 No Impact [Deleted] agency. 60 Based on repealed Rule 9J-5.010, F.A.C., sets forth new requirements for the creation and preservation of 163.3177(6)(f)3 Obj. HO -1.1.; affordable housing, elimination of substandard housing conditions, providing for adequate sites and distri-[New] Obj. HO -1.2 button for a range of incomes and types and including programs for partnering, streamlined permitting, quality of housing, neighborhood stabilization and improving historically significant housing. 61 Modifies the objectives of the coastal management element andincludes anew requirement for preserv- 163.3177(6)(g) Goal CM -5 ing historic and archaeological resources. 62 Deletes provisions for local government adoption of recreational surface water use policies. 163.3177(6)(g)2 No Impact [Deleted] 23 24 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 63 Sets forth an option for the local government to develop an adaptation action area designation for low-lying coastal zones 163.3177(6)(g)10 Policy LU -1.8.4 experiencing coastal flooding due to extreme high tides and storm surge and are vulnerable to the impacts of rising sea [New] level. 64 Deletes requirement for intergovernmental coordination element to provide for recognition of campus 163.3177(6)(h)1.b No Impact master plans and airport master plans. [Deleted] 65 Modifies requirements for the intergovernmental coordination element to include portions of repealed 163.3177(6)(h)3.a Goal IC -1;-2;-3 Capital Improvement Rule 9J-5.015, F.A.C, including coordinating and addressing impacts on adjacent municipalities and coordi- and b [New] Element; Intergovern- nating the establishment of level of service standards. mental Coordination element 66 Deletes requirements in intergovernmental coordination element for fostering coordination between 163.3177(6)(h)3 Policy IC -1.1.2. special districts and local general purpose governments, submittal of public facilities report, execution of and 4 [Deleted] (optional) interlocal agreement with district school board, the county and nonexempt municipalities, and submittal of reports to the Florida Department of Community Affairs by counties with populations greater than 100,000. 67 Deletes provisions for optional elements of the comprehensive plan, transportation and traffic circulation, 163.3177(6)(i), (j), No Impact airport compatibility and other requirements related to transportation corridors and reduction of green- (k) [Deleted] house gas emissions specific to local governments within an urbanized area. 68 Deletes provisions for airport master plans 163.3177(6)(k) Policy TR- Transportation Element [Deleted] 1.9.1.;To be de- leted 69 Deletes provisions for additional plan elements, or portions or phases thereof, including an economic de- 163.3177(7)(a) -(I) LU -1.7.5. Future Land Use ele- elopment element. [Deleted] ment 70 See prior table entries for description of deleted provisions. 163.3177(8)-(14) No Impact [Deleted] 71 See Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida. 163.3177(15)(a) Requirement Now: 163.3177(7) Removed in (a) 2011 72 Modifies provisions for processing plan amendments for land located within a rural agricultural industrial 163.3177(7)(c)2 center to presume that these amendments are not urban sprawl as defined in s. 163.3164 and shall be considered within 90 days after any review required by the state land planning agency if required by s. 163.3184. 24 25 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 73 Deletes requirements for public schools interlocal agreements with respect to submittal of the agreements to the state 163.31777(1)(b)- No Impact land planning agency based on an established schedule and other requirements involving the state land planning agency (d) and (2) related to waivers and exemptions. 74 Deletes requirements related to the submittal of comments from the Office of Educational Facilities on 163.31777(3)(a)-(c) Policy EDU- Education Element he interlocal agreement, challenges to the state land planning agency notice of intent and other review and (4)-(7) [Deleted] 1.1.5. to be process requirements. modified 75 Deletes parks and recreation, schools and transportation from the list of public facilities and services sub- 163.3180(1) Policy CI-1.2.2 .ect to the concurrency requirement on a statewide basis. &CI-1.2.3 76 Modifies concurrency requirements to include portions of repealed Rule 9J-5.0055, F.A.C., which relate to 163.3180 (1)(a) Capital Improvement achieving and maintaining adopted levels of service for a 5-year period, and providing for rescission of any and (b) [New] Element; Appendix CI-1 optional concurrency provisions by plan amendment, which is not subject to state review. 77 Deletes requirement that professionally accepted techniques be used for measuring levels of service for 163.3180(1)(b) No Impact automobiles, bicycles, pedestrians, transit and trucks. [Deleted] 78 Deletes requirement that parks and recreation facilities to serve new development are in place or under 163.3180(2)(b) and Capital Improvements actual construction no later than one year after issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional (c) [Deleted] Element equivalent. 79 Deletes provisions addressing governmental entities and establishment of binding level of service stand- 163.3180(3) Capital Improvement ards with respect to limiting the authority of any agency to recommend or make objections, recommen- Element dations, comments or determinations during reviews conducted under s .163.3184 80 Deletes concurrency provisions specifically related to public transit facilities and urban infill and redevel- 163.3180(4)(b) andPolicy CI-1.2.3 Appendix TR-1 (c) [Deleted] opment areas. 81 Establishes concurrency provisions for transportation facilities, which include portions of repealed Rule 9.1 163.3180(5)(a)-(h) Policy CI-1.2.2.c) Appendix TR-1; Appen- 5.0055, F.A.C. Sets forth requirements with respect to adopted level of service standards, including use [New] Appendix TR-1 dix CI-1; of professionally accepted studies to evaluate levels of service, achieving and maintaining adopted levels "Transportation of service standards, and including the projects needed to accomplish this in 5-year schedule of capital deficiency' Pro- improvements. Requires coordination with adjacent local governments and setting forth the method to edural be used in calculating proportionate-share contribution. Defines the term "transportation deficiency." 82 See prior table entries for description of deleted provisions. 163.3180(6)-(13) No Impact [Deleted] 25 26 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 83 Sets forth concurrency provisions for public education, setting forth provisions for those local govern- 163.3180(6)(a) Inter -Local ments that apply concurrency to public education. If a county and one or more municipalities that repre- [New] Agreement sent at least 80 percent of the total conuntywide population have adopted school concurrency, the failure Policy EDU-1.2.1 of one or more municipalities to adopt the concurrency and enter into the interlocal agreement does not Policy Cl- preclude implementation of school concurrency within jurisdictions of the school district that have opted 1.2.313olicy o implement concurrency. 84 Modifies school concurrency provisions to clarify that adoption and application of school concurrency is 163.3180(6)(1)1 CI-1.2.2; Policy optional. and 2 CI-1.2.3; Concur- rency Manage- ment Program 85 Modifies school concurrency provisions to remove requirement for financial feasibility and to require that 163.3180(d) Obj.EDU-1.2; Capital Improvement facilities necessary to meet adopted levels of service during a 5-year period are meet adopted levels of Now: 163.3180(g) Obj CI-1.2 Element service during a 5-year period are identified and consistent with the school board's educational facilities CI/Concurrency plan. Management// Public School Facilities 86 Modifies school concurrency provisions to allow a landowner to proceed with development of a specific 163.3180(h)1.a, b Interlocal parcel of land proceed with development of a specific parcel of land notwithstanding a failure of the de- and c [New]Agreement elopment to satisfy school concurrency if certain factors are shown to exist, including adequate facilities Miami-Dade are provided for in the capital improvements element and school board's educational facilities plan, County Public demonstration that facilities needs can be reasonably provided, and the local government and school chools Facilities board have provided a means by which proportionate share is assessed. ork Program Obj. CI-1.3 87 See prior table entries for description of deleted provisions 163.3180(14)-(17) No Impact [Deleted] 88 Changes "transportation concurrency backlogs" to "transportation deficiencies" and makes related clarifi- 163.3182 [Revised] Procedural cations. 89 Changes "creation of transportation concurrency backlog authorities" to "creation of transportation de- 163.3182(2) Procedural elopment authorities" and makes related clarifications. [Revised] 90 Changes "powers of a transportation concurrency backlog authority" to "powers of a transportation de- 163.3182(4) Procedural elopment authority" and makes related clarifications. [Revised] 26 27 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 91 Modifies the definition of "in compliance" to include a reference to s. 163.3248 and delete the ref- 163.3184(1)(b) oceaurai erence to now repealed chapter 9J- 5, F.A.C. [Revised] 92 Provides a list of the "reviewing agencies." 163.3184(1)(c) Procedural [New] 93 Sets forth the "expedited" and "coordinated" review processes. 163.3184(2) [New] Procedural 94 Sets forth requirements for adopting and processing plan amendments according to the 163.3184(3) and Procedural "expedited" and "coordinated" review processes, the scope of the comments to be provided by (4) [New] review agencies, responsibilities of the state land planning agency with respect to its various lev- els of review and coordination with other state agencies and public hearings. 95 Sets forth requirements for administrative challenges to plans and plan amendments, compliance 163.3184(5)-(7) Procedural agreements and mediation and expeditious resolution. [New] 96 Modifies provisions to enable the administration commission to specify sanctions to which the 163.3184(11) Procedural local government will be subject if it elects to make a plan amendment effective notwithstanding a Now: 163.3184(8) etermination of noncompliance. 97 Modifies provisions for public hearings to state there is no prohibition or limitation on the authority 163.3184(15) Procedural of local governments to require a person requesting an amendment to pay some or all of the cost Now: 163.3184(11) of the public notice. 98 Establishes provisions for concurrent zoning, requiring a local government, at the request of an 163.3184(12) Procedural applicant, to consider an application for zoning changes that would be required to properly enact [New] any proposed plan amendment and making the approved zoning changes contingent upon the comprehensive plan or amendment becoming effective. 99 Revises provisions to require that no proposed local government comprehensive plan or plan 163.3184(13) amendment that is applicable to a designated area of critical state concern shall be effective until [New] a final order is issued finding the plan or amendment to be in compliance as defined in paragraph (1)(b). 27 28 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 100 Modifies provisions to address the process for adoption of small- scale comprehensive plan 163.3187(1)(x)-(fl Procedural amendments, deleting several exceptions. Plan amendments are no longer limited to two times Now: 163.3187(1) per calendar year and text changes that relate directly to and are adopted simultaneously with (a)-(d) mall scale FLUM amendments are permissible. 101 Modifies the public notice requirements for small scale plan amendments, addressing petitions, 163.3187(1) Procedural prohibiting the state land planning agency from intervening and requiring that consideration be .a&b;3,4 and (e)-(q) iven to the plan amendment as a whole and whether it furthers the intent of this part in all chal- Now: 163.31E7(2)- lenges. (5) 102 ee prior table entries for description of deleted provisions. 163.3189 No Impact Now: Repealed 103 Modifies provisions for evaluation and appraisal of comprehensive plan. Maintains the requirement for 163.3191(1)-(14) Procedural local government evaluation of plan to occur at least once every 7 years. The local government is required Now: 163.3191(1)- 0 determine if amendments are necessary to reflect changes in state requirements (only) since the last (5) update and to notify the state land planning agency by letter as to its determination. If needed, these amendments are to be prepared and transmitted within 1 year of this determination for review pursuant 0 163.3184 (i.e., State Coordinated Review). Local governments are encouraged to comprehensively eval- uate and as necessary update plans to reflect changes in local conditions. If a local government fails to comprehensively evaluate and as necessary update plans to submit its notification letter to the state land planning agency or fails to update its plan to reflect changes in state requirements, then the local govern- ment is prohibited from amending its plan until it complies with these requirements. The state land plan- ning agency may not adopt rules to implement this section, other than procedural rules or a schedule indicating when local governments must comply with these requirements. 104 Deletes the reference to s. 163.3187(1) and provisions regarding the frequency of adoption of 163.3217(2) Procedural plan amendments as they relate to adoption of a municipal overlay. 105 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.3220(3) Procedural "Community Planning Act." 106 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.3221(2)&(11) Procedural "Community Planning Act." 107 Revises the duration of a development agreement from 20 years to 30 years, unless it is extended by mu- 163.3229 Capital Improvements ual consent, and deletes reference to s. 163.3187 and s.163.3189 regarding compliance determination by Element state land planning agency. 28 29 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 108 Modifies provisions for periodic review of a development agreement to delete requirements for annual 163.3235 Proceaurai review conducted during years 6 through 10, incorporation of the review into a written report and the state land planning agency adoption of rules regarding the contents of the report. 109 Deletes requirements that a copy of the recorded development agreement be submitted to the state land 163.3239 Procedural planning agency within 14 days after the agreement is recorded and for the effectiveness of the agree- ment based on receipt by the state land planning agency. 110 Changes "Optional Sector Plans" to "Sector Plans" and clarifies the intent to promote and encourage long -163.3245(1) term planning for conservation, development and agriculture on a landscape scale and protection of re- ionally significant resources, including regionally significant water courses and wildlife corridors. Revises regionally significant water courses and wildlife corridors. Revises the amount of geographic area intend- ed for sector plans from at least 5,000 acres to at least 15,000 acres and protection of public facilities. 111 Deletes provisions for the state land planning agency entering into an agreement to authorize preparation 163.3245(2) of an optional sector plan, and consideration of the state comprehensive and strategic regional policy plans, and clarifies the process for scoping meetings and joint planning agreements. 112 Modifies the provisions for two levels of sector planning, clarifying the requirements for the long term 163.3245(3) master plan and detailed specific area plan. These plans may be based upon a planning period longer than timeframe on which the local comprehensive plan is based and are not required to demonstrate need. The state land planning agency is required to consult with certain other agencies as part of its review of he plans. 113 Requires consistency with any long-range transportation plan and regional water supply plans, including 163.3245(4) [New] See Appendix consideration of water supply availability and consumptive use permitting. PW -1; Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Up- date 2015 114 Requires the detailed specific area plan to establish a buildout date until which the approved develop- 163.3245(5)(d) ment is not subject to downzoning, unit density reduction or intensity reduction, with certain exceptions. [New] 115 Establishes provisions for master development approval, pursuant to s. 380.06(21), for the entire planning 163.3245(6) [New] area in order to establish a buildout date and describes the level of detail appropriate for review of the application. 116 Establishes provisions for a developer within an area subject to a long-term master plan or detailed spe- 163.3245(7) [New] cific area plan to enter into a development agreement. 29 30 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 117 Establishes provisions for landowner withdrawal of consent to the master plan relative to pro- 163.3245(8) [New] posed and adopted amendments. 118 Allows the right to continue, after adoption of a long-term master plan or a detailed specific area plan, 163.3245(9) [New] existing agricultural or silvicultural uses or other natural resource-based operations or establishment of similar new uses that are consistent with plans approved pursuant to this section. 119 Allows the state land planning agency to enter into an agreement with a local government that on or be- 163.3245(10) ore July 1, 2011 adopted a large -area comprehensive plan amendment consisting of at least 15,000 acres [New] based on certain requirements. 120 Addresses a detailed specific area plan to implement a conceptual long-term buildout overlay found in 163.3245(11) compliance before July 1, 2011. [New] 121 Provides for a landowner or developer that has received approval of a master DRI development order to 163.3245(12) implement this order by filing application(s) to approve the detailed specific area plan. [New] 122 Modifies provisions in the local government comprehensive planning certification program to allow small 163.3246(9)(a) scale development amendments to follow the process in s. 163.3187. 123 Deletes provisions in the local government comprehensive planning certification program that address 163.3246(12) he failure to adopt a timely evaluation and appraisal report and failure to adopt an timely evaluation and appraisal report and failure to adopt an evaluation and appraisal report found to be sufficient. 124 Deletes the requirement that the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability pre- 163.3246(14) pare a report evaluating the certification program. [Deleted] 125 See prior table entries for description of repealed provisions. 163.32465 Now: No Impact Repealed 126 Establishes provisions for Rural Land Stewardship Areas, which were provided for as part of the innovative 163.3248 [New] and flexible planning and development strategies in now repealed s. 163.3177(11). 127 Sets forth the intent of Rural Land Stewardship Areas 163.3248(1) [New] 128 Establishes a process upon which local governments may adopt a future land use overlay, which may not 163.3248(2) [New] require a demonstration of need based on population projections or any other factors. 30 31 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2011: [Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida] 129 Sets forth six broad principles of rural sustainability that rural land stewardship areas are to further. 163.3248(3) [New] 130 Provides for agency assistance and participation to local governments or property owners in development 163.3248(4) [New] of a plan for rural land stewardship area. 131 Requires that a rural land stewardship area not be less than 10,000 acres, is located outside of municipali- 163.3248(5) [New] es and established urban service areas and is designated by plan amendment by each local government with jurisdiction. 132 Requires the plan amendment(s) designating a rural land stewardship area to be reviewed pursuant to s. 163.3248(5)(a) -(d) 163.3184 and to meet certain requirements involving criteria for designating receiving areas, the applica- [New] on of innovative planning and development strategies, a process for implementing these strategies and a mix of densities and intensities that would not be characterized as urban sprawl. 133 Requires a receiving area to be designated only pursuant to procedures established in the local govern- 163.3248(6) [New] ment's land development regulations. If approval of the designation by a county board of county commis- sioners is required, it is to be made by resolution with a simple majority vote. A listed species survey must be performed and coordinated with appropriate agencies if listed species occur on the re- ceiving area development site. Protective measures must be based on the rural land stewardship area as a whole. 134ets forth requirements for establishing a rural land stewardship overlay zoning district and methodology 163.3248(7) [New] or the creation, conveyance, and use of transferrable rural land use/stewardship credits. 135 Sets forth limitations for creating, assigning and transferring stewardship credits based on underlying per- 163.3248(8)(a) -(k) miffed uses, densities and intensities, and considerations for assigning credits based on the value and [New] location of land and environmental resources. 136 Provides for incentives to owners of land within rural land stewardship sending areas, in addition to use 163.3248(9)(a) -(e) or conveyance of credits, to enter into rural land stewardship agreements. [New] 137 Expresses the intent of the section as an overlay of land use options that provide economic and regulatory 163.3248(10) incentives for landowners outside of established and planned urban service landowners areas. [New] 138 Expresses the intent of the Legislature that the rural land stewardship area in Collier County be recog- 163.3248(11) nized as a statutory rural land stewardship area and be afforded the incentives in this section. [New] 139 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.360(2)(a) Procedural "Community Planning Act." 140 Changes "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act" to 163.516(3)(a) Procedural "Community Planning Act." 31 32 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2012 [Chapters 2012-5, 2012-75, 2012-83, 2012-90, 2012-96 and 2012-99 Laws of Florida] 1 Rewords the definition of "farm" to the same meaning provided in s. 823.14 163.3162(2)(x) Procedural 2 Rewords the definition of farm operation to the same meaning provided in s. 823.14 163.3162(2)(b) Procedural 3 Adds a definition of "governmental entity," which has the same meaning provided in s.164.1031. The 163.3162(2)(d) rocedural term does not include a water control district or a special district created to manage water. Changes "county" to "governmental entity" 163.3162(3)(b) Procedural 5 Changes "county" to "governmental entity" 163.3162(3)(c) Procedural 6 Changes "county" to "governmental entity" 163.3162(3)(c)3. Procedural 7 Changes "county" to "governmental entity" 163.3162(3)(c)3.(i) Procedural 8 dds provisions related to agricultural enclaves 63.3162 Note 9 Provides that any local government charter provision that was in effect as of June 1, 2011 for an initiative 163.3167(8) Procedural or referendum process for development orders or comprehensive plan amendments may be retained and implemented 10 Changes the "preparation of the periodic reports" to "the periodic evaluation and appraisal of the com- 163.3174(4)(b) EDU- Future Land Use Ele- prehensive plan" MONITORING ment EVALUA- �ND ION PROGRAM 11 Adds "advisory" to define the commanding officer's comments on the impact of proposed changes on 163.3175(5) military bases, and requires the comments to be based on appropriate data and analysis which must be provided to the local government with the comments 12 Requires local governments to consider the commanding officer's comments in the same manner as com- 163.3175(5)(d) ments from other reviewing agencies, and deletes the language that states the comments are not bind- ing. 13 Adds language requiring the local government to consider the accompanying data and analysis provided 163.3175(6) by the commanding officer, in addition to the comments, and adds language stating that consideration shall be based on how the change relates to the strategic mission of the base, public safety and the eco- nomic vitality of the base while respecting private property rights 32 33 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2012 [Chapters 2012-5, 2012-75, 2012-83, 2012-90, 2012-96 and 2012-99 Laws of Florida] 14 Changes the "University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research" to the "Office of Eco- 163.3177(1)(fl3. Procedural nomic and Demographic Research" and adds language stating that population projections must, at a mini- mum, reflect each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county popula- tion growth 15 Changes the "University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research" to the "Office of Eco- 163.3177(6)(a)4. Procedural nomic and Demographic Research" 16 Changes the requirement that future land use map amendments be based on an analysis of the minimum 163.3177(6)(a)8.c. Future Land Use Ele- amount of land needed as determined by the local government, to instead be based on ment an analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the requirements of the statute 17 Deletes the requirement that the housing element be based in part on an inventory taken from the latest 163.3177(6)(fl2. Housing Ele- Census ment - Not In - luded 18 Moves the exemptions from having a public school interlocal agreement from s. 163.3180(6)(i) to 163.31777(3) Procedural x.163.31777(3) 19 Adds language requiring each local government exempt from having a public school interlocal agreement 163.31777(4) �e o assess at the time of evaluation and appraisal if the local government still meets the requirements for exemptions described in s. 163.31777(3). Each local government that is exempt must comply with the interlocal agreement provisions within one year of a new school within the municipality being proposed in he 5 -year district facilities work program 20 Replaces "Department of Community Affairs" with "state land planning agency" and changes the Ian- 163.3178(3) Procedural uage that stated intermodal transportation facilities "shall" not be designated as developments of re- gional impact to "may" not be designated as developments of regional impact. 21 Deletes the provision that the Coastal Resources Interagency Management Committee shall identify in- 163.3178(6) Procedural centives to encourage local governments to adopt siting plans and uniform criteria and standards to be used by local governments to implement state goals related to marina siting 22 Adds language stating that an amendment that rescinds concurrency shall be processed under the expe- 163.3180(1)(a) Procedural dited state review process, and is not required to be transmitted to reviewing agencies for comment, ex- cept for agencies that have requested transmittal, and for municipal amendments, it must be transmitted o the county. A copy of the adopted amendment shall be transmitted to the state land agency. If the amendment rescinds transportation or school concurrency, the adopted amendment must also be sent to he Department of Transportation or Department of Education, respectively. 33 34 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2012 [Chapters 2012-5, 2012-75, 2012-83, 2012-90, 2012-96 and 2012-99 Laws of Florida] 23 Provides general rewording. Adds language to clarify that the choice of one or more municipality to not 163.3180(6)(a) Procedural adopt school concurrency does not preclude implementation of school concurrency does not preclude implementation of school concurrency within other jurisdictions of the school district. 24 Moved to s. 163.31777(3) 163.3180(6)(i) Procedural 25 Adds developments that are proposed under s. 380.06(24)(x) to the list of amendments that must follow 163.3184(2)(c) Procedural he state coordinated review process. 26 Added the word "working" to clarify the number of days a local government has to transmit an amend- 163.3184(3)(b)1. Procedural ment 27 Changed the time limit for the reviewing agencies' transmittal to 30 days "after" instead of "from" the 163.3184(3)(b)2. Procedural date the amendment was received 28 Added the word "working" to clarify the number of days a local government has to transmit an amend- 163.3184(3)(c)2. Procedural ment 29 Changes the time limit a local government has to transmit an amendment from "immediately following" 163.3184(4)(b) Procedural he first public hearing to " within 10 working days after" the first public hearing 30 Added the word "working" to clarify the number of days a local government has to transmit an amend- 163.3184(4)(e)2. Procedural ment 31 Corrects the citation related to plan amendment package completeness from (3)(c)3. To (4)(e)3. 163.3184(5)(b) Procedural 32 Changes the time limit by which the Administration Commission must enter into a final order from 45 163.3184(5)(4) Procedural days after the receipt of the recommended order to the time period specified in s. 120.569. 33 Changes the time limit for the state land planning agency to submit a not in compliance recommended 163.3184(5)(e)1. Procedural order to the Administration Commission from no later than 30 days after the receipt of the recommended order to the time period provided in s. 120.569 34 Changes the time limit by which the state land planning agency must enter into an in compliance final 163.3184(5)(e)2. Procedural order from 30 days after the receipt of the recommended order to the time period provided in s. 120.569 34 35 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2012 [Chapters 2012-5, 2012-75, 2012-83, 2012-90, 2012-96 and 2012-99 Laws of Florida] 35 Changes the time period by which the state land planning agency must issue a cumulative notice of intent 163.3184(6)(fl Procedural from "upon receipt of a plan or plan amendment adopted pursuant to a compliance agreement" to "within 20 days after receiving a complete plan or plan amendment adopted pursuant to a compliance agreement" 36 Changes the statutory reference for the Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant pro- 163.3184(8)(b)1.a. Procedural ram 37 Changes "subsection" to "section" 163.3184(12) Procedural 38 Changes "in accordance with" to "pursuant to" and adds (4) to the 163.3184 citation. 163.3191(3) Procedural 39 Replaces "Department of Community Affairs" with "state land planning agency" and "this" Act to "the 163.3204 Procedural Community Planning Act" 0 Changes the citation that refers to the sanctions that can be the sole issue before the Administration 163.3213(6) Procedural Commission when land development regulations are inconsistent with the comprehensive plan from s. 163.3184(11)(a) or (b) to s. 163.3184(8)(a) or (b)1. or 2. 1 Changes the definition of state land planning agency to refer to the Department of Economic Opportunity Procedural instead of the Department of Community Affairs 2 Deletes the reference to s. 163.3177(11) 163.3245(1) Procedural 3 Deletes the requirement that the department provide an annual status report to the legislature regarding 163.3245(7) Procedural every optional sector plan. 4 Adds "or her" to "his consent to the master plan" 163.3245(9) Procedural 5 Replaces "Department of Community Affairs" with "state land planning agency" 163.3246(1) Procedural 6 Replaces "Secretary of Community Affairs" with "executive director of the state land planning agency" 163.3247(5)(a) Procedural 7 Replaces "Department of Community Affairs" with "state land planning agency" 163.3247(5)(b) Procedural 8 Removes the word "county" from "board of commissioners" 163.3248(6) Procedural 35 36 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 1 Re -numbers section 163.3162(3)(b)- (j) as 163.3162(3)©-(k) in order to accommodate new section Section 163.2136 Procedural 163.3162(3)(b) — see item 4 below. (3)(c) -(k) [re- numbered] 2 Amends the definition of "governmental entity" in the provisions for agricultural lands and practices, clari-Section 163.3162 Procedural ing that in addition to not including a water control district established under chapter 298 or a special (2)(d) district created by special act for water management purposes, the term does not include a water man- agement district 3 Replaces "county" with "governmental entity." Section 163.3162 Procedural (3)(a) Prohibits a governmental entity from charging a fee on a specific agricultural activity of a bona fide farm Section 163.3162 (3)(b) [New] operation on land classified as agricultural land pursuant to section 193.461, if such agricultural activity is regulated through implemented best management practices, interim measures, or regulations adopted as rules under chapter 120 by the Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, or a water management district as part of a statewide or regional program; or if such agricultural activity is expressly regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture, the United tates Army Corps of Engineers, or the United States Environmental Protection Agency. 5 Clarifies the provisions for growth management that an initiative or referendum process in regard to any Section 163.3167 Procedural (8)(a) [New] development order is prohibited. Removes language that allowed an initiative or referendum process by a local government charter in effect as of June 1, 2011 to be retained and implemented. 6 Clarifies that an initiative or referendum process in regard to any local comprehensive plan amendment Section 163.3167 See Deleted (8)(b) [New] or map amendment is prohibited, except for those amendments that affect more than five parcels of land Provision- 2014 if it is expressly authorized by specific language in a local government charter that was lawful and in effect No. 1 & 2 on June 1, 2011. A general local government charter provision for an initiative or referendum process is not sufficient 7 States the intent of the Legislature is to prohibit any initiative and referendum in regard to any develop- Section 163.3167 See Deleted (8)(c) [New] ment order, and prohibit any initiative and referendum in regard to any local comprehensive plan or map Provision- 2014 amendment except as specifically and narrowly permitted in paragraph (b). States these prohibitions are No. 1 & 2 remedial in nature and apply retroactively to any initiative or referendum process commenced after June 1, 2011, clarifying that any such initiative or referendum process that has been commenced or completed hereafter is null and void and of no legal force and effect. 8 Revises and adds requirements for local governments that continue to implement a transportation con- Section 163.3180 Procedural currency system, whether in the form adopted into the comprehensive plan before the effective date of (5)(h)1 [New] he Community Planning Act, Chapter 2011-139, Laws of Florida, or as subsequently modified. 36 37 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 9 Adds "development agreement" in the listed land use development permits for which an applicant may Section 163.3180 Capital Improvements satisfy transportation concurrency requirements of the local comprehensive plan, the local government's (5)(h)1.c [New] Element- Concurrency concurrency management system and section 380.06 when applicable, if conditions in subsequent sec- Management Program ons are met. 10 Adds language allowing a local government to accept contributions from multiple applicants for a planned Section 163.3180 Capital Improvements improvement if it maintains contributions in a separate account designated for that purpose. (5)(h)1.c.11 [New] Element - 11 Modifies language to require local governments that continue to implement a transportation concurrency Section 163.3180 Obj CI -1.3 Policy system to „ provide the basis upon which the landowners will be assessed a proportionate share of the (5)(h)1.d [New] CI -1.3.1. -CI - cost addressing the transportation impacts resulting from a proposed development". 1.3.6. 12 Clarifies that a local government is not required to approve a development that, for reasons other than Section 163.3180 Capital Improvements transportation impacts, is not qualified for approval pursuant to the applicable local comprehensive plan (5)(h)3 [New] Element- Concurrency and land development regulations. Management Program 13 1)Sets forth new provisions for any local government that elects to repeal transportation concurrency. Section 163.3180 Transportation Element 2) Encourages adoption of alternative mobility funding system that uses one or more of the tools and (5)(i) [New] Policy LU - techniques identified in subsection (f). 1.1.13.; 3) Clarifies that any alternative mobility funding system adopted may not be used to deny, time or phase an application for site plan approval, plat approval, final subdivision approval, building permits, or the Policy CI -1.2.2. unctional equivalent of such approvals provided that the developer agrees to pay for the development's (c); identified transportation impacts via the funding mechanism implemented by the local government. States that the revenue from the funding mechanism used in the alternative system must be used to im- plement the needs of the local government's plan which serves as the basis for the fee imposed. Requires a mobility fee-based funding system to comply with the dual rational nexus test applicable to impact fees. An alternative system that is not mobility fee-based shall not be applied in a manner that imposes upon new development any responsibility for funding an existing transportation deficiency as defined in subsection (h). 14 Changes numerous references in the provisions for the local government comprehensive planning certifi- Section 163.3246 Procedural cation program from "department" to "state land planning agency." (1) a (7), (9)(a), (1 (1)2) and (13) 15 Creates short title for sections 163.325-163.3253 as the "Manufacturing Competitiveness Act." Section 163.325 Procedural [New] 37 38 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 16 Creates six definitions as used in the provisions for manufacturing development in sections 163.3251- Section 163.3251 Procedural 163.3253: (1)—(6) [New] (1) "Department" means Department of Economic Opportunity; (2) "Local government development approval" means a local land development permit, order, or other approval issued by a local government, or a modification of such permit, order, or approval, which is required for a manufacturer to physically locate or expand and includes, but is not limited to, the review and approval of a master development plan required under section 163.3252(2)(c). (3) "Local manufacturing development program" means a program enacted by a local government for approval of master development plans under section 163.3252. (4) "Manufacturer" means a business that is classified in Sectors 31-33 of the National American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and is located, or intends to locate, within the geographic boundaries of an area designated by a local government as provided under section 163.3252. (5) "Participating agency" means: (a) The Department of Environmental Protection, (b) The Department of Transportation, (c) The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, when acting pursuant to statu- tory authority granted by the Legislature and (d) Water management districts. (6) "State development approval" means a state or regional permit or other approval issued by a partici- pating agency, or a modification of such permit or approval, which must be obtained before the de- velopment or expansion of a manufacturer's site, and includes, but is not limited to, those specified in section 163.3253(1). 17 Setting forth provisions for a local manufacturing development program and master development approv-Section 163.3252 Future Land Use Ele- al for manufacturers, allows a local government to adopt an ordinance establishing a local manufacturing [New] ment development program through which the local government may grant master development approval for he development or expansion of sites that are, or are proposed to be, operated by manufacturers at specified locations within the local government's geographic boundaries. 18 1)Requires a local government that elects to establish a local manufacturing development program to Section 163.3252 Procedural submit a copy of the ordinance establishing the program to DEO within 20 days after the ordinance is en- (1)(a) and (b) [New] acted. 2) A local government ordinance adopted before the effective date of this act establishes a local manufac- turing development program if it satisfies the minimum criteria established in subsection (3) and if the local government submits a copy of the ordinance to DEO on or before September 1, 2013. 19 Requires DEO to develop a model ordinance to guide local governments that intend to establish a local Section 163.3252 Procedural manufacturing development program by December 1, 2013. Requires the model ordinance, which need (2)[New] not be adopted by a local government, to include the elements set forth in sections 163.3252(2)(a)-(k). 20 Requires the model ordinance to include procedures for a manufacturer to apply for a master develop- Section 163.3252 Procedural ment plan and procedures for a local government to review and approve a master development plan. (2)(a) [New] 38 39 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 21 Requires the model ordinance to identify those areas within the local government's jurisdiction which are Section 163.3252 Procedural subject to the program. (2)(b) [New] 22 Requires the model ordinance to include the minimum elements for a master development plan, includ- Section 163.3252 Procedural ing but not limited to: (2)(c)1-4 [New] (1) A site map (2) A list proposing the site's land uses (3) The maximum square footage, floor area ratio, and building heights for future development on the site, specifying with particularity those features and facilities for which the local government will re- quire the establishment of maximum dimensions, and (4) Development conditions 23 Requires the model ordinance to include a list of development impacts, if applicable to the proposed site, Section 163.3252 Procedural (2)(d)1-11 [New] which the local government will require to be addressed in a master development plan, including but not limited to: (1) Drainage (2) Wastewater (3) Potable water (4) Solid waste (5) Onsite and offsite natural resources (6) Preservation of historic and archeological resources (7) Offsite infrastructure (8) Public services (9) Compatibility with adjacent offsite land uses (10) Vehicular and pedestrian entrance to and exit from the site, and (11) Offsite transportation impacts 24 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision vesting any existing development rights authorized Section 163.3252 Procedural by the local government before the approval of a master development plan, if requested by the manufac- (2)(e) [New] u re r. 25 Requires the model ordinance to include whether an expiration date is required for a master develop- Section 163.3252 Procedural ment plan and, if required, a provision stating that the expiration date may not be earlier than 10 years (2)(t) [New] after the plan's adoption. 39 40 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 26 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision limiting the circumstances that require an amend- Section 163.3252 Procedural ment to an approved master development plan to: (1) Enactment of state law or local ordinance address- (2)(g)1 and 2 [New] ing an immediate and direct threat to the public safety that requires an amendment to the master devel- opment order, and (2) Any revision to the master development plan initiated by the manufacturer. 27 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision stating the scope of review for any amendment to a Section 163.3252 Procedural master development plan is limited to the amendment and does not subject any other provision of the (2)(h) [New] approved master development plan to further review. 28 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision stating that, during the term of a master develop- Section 163.3252 Procedural ment plan, the local government may not require additional local development approvals for those devel- (2)(i) [New] opment impacts listed in paragraph (d) that are addressed in the master development plan, other than approval of a building permit to ensure compliance with the state building code and any other applicable state- mandated life and safety code. 29 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision stating that, before commencing construction or site Section 163.3252 Procedural development work, the manufacturer must submit a certification, signed by a licensed architect, engineer, (2)0) [New] or landscape architect, attesting that such work complies with the master development plan. 30 Requires the model ordinance to include a provision establishing the form that will be used by the local Section 163.3252 Procedural government to certify that a manufacturer is eligible to participate in the local manufacturing develop - (2)(k) [New] ment program adopted by that jurisdiction. 31 Requires a local manufacturing development program ordinance to as a minimum be consistent with sub- Section 163.3252 Procedural section (2) and establish procedures for (a) Reviewing an application from a manufacturer for approval of 3adNew a master development plan, (b) Approving a master development plan, which may include conditions that address development impacts anticipated during the life of the development, (c) Developing the site in a manner consistent with the master development plan without requiring additional local development approvals other than building permits and (d) Certifying that a manufacturer is eligible to participate in he local manufacturing development program. 32 1) Prohibits a local government that establishes a local manufacturing development program from abol- Section 163.3252 Procedural ishing the program until it has been in effect for at least 24 months. (4)(a) and (b)1 and 2 [New] 2) Sets forth provisions for a local government's repealing its local manufacturing development program ordinance, stating that (1) Any application for a master development plan which is submitted to the local government before the effective date of the repeal is vested and remains subject to the local manufactur- ing development program ordinance in effect when the application was submitted; and (2) The manufac- turer that submitted the application is entitled to participate in the manufacturing development coordi- nated approval process established in section 163.3253. 40 41 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 33 Creates provisions for a coordinated manufacturing development approval process, requiring DEO to co- Section 163.3253 Procedural ordinate the manufacturing development approval process with participating agencies, as set forth in this [New] section, for manufacturers that are developing or expanding in a local government that has a local manu- facturing development program. 34 Requires the approval process to include collaboration and coordination among, and simultaneous review Section 163.3253 Procedural by, the participating agencies of applications for: (a) Wetland or environmental resource permits, (b) Sur- 1aLiNew ace water management permits, (c) Stormwater permits, (d) Consumptive water use permits (e) Wastewater permits, (f) Air emission permits, (g) Permits relating to listed species, (h) Highway or road - ay access permits and (i) Any other state development approval within the scope of a participating agency's authority. 35 Requires a manufacturer to file its application for state development approval with DEO and each partici- Section 163.3253 Procedural paling agency with proof that its development or expansion is located in a local government that has a (2)(a) and (b) [New] local manufacturing development program. If a local government repeals its local manufacturing develop- ment program ordinance, a manufacturer developing or expanding in that jurisdiction remains entitled to participate in the process if the manufacturer submitted its application for a local government develop- ment approval before the effective date of repeal. 36 1)Requires DEO to convene a meeting with one or more participating agencies if a manufacturer requests Section 163.3253 Procedural one at any time during the process and that the participating agencies attend. (3)(a) [New] 2) Allows DEO to participate as necessary to accomplish the purposes set forth in section 20.60(4)(f), does not require the department to mediate between the participating agencies and the manufacturer. 37 Prohibits DEO from being a party to any proceeding initiated under sections 120.569 and 120.57 that re- Section 163.3253 Procedural lates to approval or disapproval of an application for state development approval processed under this (3)(b) [New] section. 38 Prohibits DEO's participation in a coordinated manufacturing development approval process under this Section 163.3253 Procedural section from having any effect on its approval or disapproval of any application for economic develop - (3)(c) [New] ment incentives sought under section 288.061 or another incentive requiring DEO approval. 39 1)Requires if a participating agency determines an application is incomplete that the participating agency Section 163.3253 Procedural notifies the applicant and DEO in writing of the additional information necessary to complete the applica- (4)(a) [New] on. 2) Requires, unless the deadline is waived in writing by the manufacturer, a participating agency to pro- vide a request for additional information to the manufacturer and DEO within 20 days after the date the application is filed with the participating agency. 41 42 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 0 If the participating agency does not request additional information within the 20 -day period, the partici- Section 163.3253 Procedural pating agency may not subsequently deny the application based on the manufacturer's failure to provide (4)(b) [New] additional information. 1 Within 10 days after the manufacturer's response to the request for additional information, a partici- Section 163.3253 Procedural (4)(c) [New] paling agency may make a second request for additional information for the sole purpose of obtaining clarification of the manufacturer's response. 2 Requires, unless the deadline is waived in writing by the manufacturer, each participating agency to take Section 163.3253 Procedural final agency action on a state development approval within its authority within 60 days after a complete (5)(a) [New] application is filed. The 60 -day period is tolled by the initiation of a proceeding under sections 120.569 and 120.57. 3 Requires a participating agency to notify DEO if the agency intends to deny a manufacturers application Section 163.3253 Procedural and, unless waived in writing by the manufacturer, the department shall timely convene an informal (5)(b) [New] meeting to facilitate a resolution. 4 Unless waived in writing by the manufacturer, if a participating agency does not approve or deny an appli- Section 163.3253 Procedural cation within the 60 -day period, within the time allowed by a federally delegated permitting program, or, (5)(c) [New] if a proceeding is initiated under sections 120.569 and 120.57, within 45 days after a recommended order is submitted to the agency and the parties, the state development approval within the authority of the participating agency is deemed approved. A manufacturer seeking to claim approval by default under this subsection shall notify, in writing, the clerks of both the participating agency and DEO of that intent. A manufacturer may not take action based upon the default approval until such notice is received by both agency clerks. 5 Allows the manufacturer at any time after a proceeding is initiated under sections 120.569 and 120.57 to Section 163.3253 Procedural (5)(d) [New] demand expeditious resolution by serving notice on an administrative law judge and all other parties to he proceeding. The administrative law judge is required to set the matter for final hearing no more than 30 days after receipt of such notice. After the final hearing is set, a continuance may not be granted with- out the written agreement of all parties. 6 Provides that subsections (4) and (5) do not apply to permit applications governed by federally delegated Section 163.3253 Procedural or approved permitting programs to the extent that subsections (4) and (5) impose timeframes or other (6) [New] requirements that are prohibited by or inconsistent with such federally delegated or approved permitting programs. 7 Allows the state land planning agency to adopt rules to administer section 163.3253. Section 163.3253 Procedural (7) [New] 42 43 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2013 [Chapters 2013-15, 2013-78, 2013-115, 2013-213, 2013-224 and 2013-239, Laws of Florida] 8 Revises the definitions to replace a reference to section 165.031(5) in the definition of "public body" to Section 163.340(2) Procedural section 165.031(7). 9 Repeals section 4 of Chapter 2012-75, Laws of Florida, which had established an alternate method for Note to Section certain landowners to apply to DEO for an agricultural enclave designation. The right to apply for ag en- 163.3162 (2012 version of statute) clave designation under the alternate method expired on January 1, 2013. 43 44 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2014 [Chapters 2014-93, 2014-178, 2014-218, Laws of Florida] 1 Deletes the provision that an initiative or referendum in regards to a comprehensive plan amendment or 163.3167(8)(b) Procedural map amendment is only allowed if it affects more than five parcels of land. 2 Deletes the provision that an initiative or referendum in regards to a comprehensive plan amendment or 163.3167(8)(c) Procedural map amendment is only allowed if it affects more than five parcels of land. 3 Changes "rural areas of critical economic concern" to "rural areas of opportunity" 163.3177(7)(a)2. Procedural Changes "rural area of critical economic concern" to "rural area of opportunity" 163.3177(7)(a)3.b Procedural 5 Provides general re -wording and changes "rural area of critical economic concern" to 163.3177(7)(e) Procedural "rural area of opportunity" 6 Changes "rural area of critical economic concern" to "rural area of opportunity" 163.3187(3) Procedural 7 Requires that local governments must adopt, amend, and enforce land development regulations that are 163.3202(1) Future Land Use Ele- consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan within one year after submission of the compre- ment hensive plan or amended comprehensive plan pursuant to section 163.3191, Florida Statutes (evaluation and appraisal process), instead of section 163.3167(2), Florida Statutes (requirement that each local gov- ernment maintain a comprehensive plan). 8 Provides legislative intent related to the importance of fuel terminals. 163.3206(1) [New] Procedural 9 Provides a definition of fuel with cross references 163.3206(2)(a)1.-9. Procedural [New] 10 Provides a definition of fuel terminal 163.3206(2)(b) Procedural [New] 11 Provides that after July 1, 2014, a local government may not amend its comprehensive plan, land use 163.3206(3) [New] map, zoning districts, or land use regulations to conflict with a fuel terminal's classification as a permitted and allowable use, including an amendment that causes a fuel terminal to be a nonconforming use, struc- ture, or development. 44 45 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2014 [Chapters 2014-93, 2014-178, 2014-218, Laws of Florida] 12 Provides that if a fuel terminal is damaged or destroyed due to a natural disaster or other catastrophe, a 163.3206(4) [New] local government must allow the timely repair of the fuel terminal to its capacity before the natural disas- ter or catastrophe. 13 Provides that the section does not limit the authority of a local government to adopt, implement, modify, 163.3206(5) [New] and enforce applicable state and federal requirements for fuel terminals, including safety and building standards. Local authority may not conflict with federal or state safety and security requirements. 14 Changes "rural area of critical economic concern" to "rural area of opportunity" 163.3246(10) Procedural 45 46 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2015 [Chapter 2015-30, Sections 1-6, Laws of Florida, Effective May 15, 2015; Chapter 2015-69, Section 1, Laws of Florida, Effective July 1, 2015] 1 Adds requirements for the redevelopment component of the Coastal Management Element to: 163.3178 Coastal WSFWPU 2015 Coastal Management 1) Reduce the flood risk in coastal areas that result from high tide events, storm surge, flash Management Ele- ment Objective LU -1.8 Element floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea level rise. and related Remove coastal real property from FEMA flood zone designations. Policies; Objec- Be consistent with or more stringent than the flood resistant construction requirements in the tive CM -1.2., Florida Building Code and federal flood plain management regulations. Objective CM- Require construction seaward of the coastal construction control line to be consistent with 1.3., Objective chapter 161, Florida Statutes. CM -1.4. and Encourage local governments to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program Communi- related Policies; ty Rating System to achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their residents. Policy CM -1.4.2. 2 Deletes obsolete provisions establishing 2012 deadlines for a local government to adopt plan 163.3175(9) Com- amendments related to military base compatibility. patibility of Devel- pment with Mili- ary Installations 3 1) Provides that a local government that does not own, operate, or maintain its own water supply facili- 163.3177(6)(c)4 WSFWPU 2015 Future Land Use Ele- ties and is served by a public water utility with a permitted allocation of greater than 300 million gal- Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drain- Appendix PW -1. ment; Ions per day is not required to amend its comprehensive plan in response to an updated regional wa- age, Potable Wa- ter, Natural Intergovernmental Co - ter supply plan or maintain a work plan if the local government's usage of water is less than 1 percent Ground Water ordination Element of the public water utility's total permitted allocation. Aquafer Recharge 2) The local government must cooperate with any local government or utility provider that provides Element service within its jurisdiction. 3) The local government must keep the element up to date in accordance with section 163.3191 (evaluation and appraisal). The list of plan amendments subject to the coordinated state review process is expanded to include plan 163.3184(2) Com- Procedural amendments that propose an amendment to an adopted sector plan and plan amendments that propose prehensive Plan/ Plan Amendment a development that qualifies as a development of regional impact pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Procedures Statutes. 46 47 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, F.S. Citations N/A* Addressed (Where/How) Amendment Needed By Element 2015 [Chapter 2015-30, Sections 1-6, Laws of Florida, Effective May 15, 2015; Chapter 2015-69, Section 1, Laws of Florida, Effective July 1, 2015] 5 1) For both the long term master plan and detailed specific area plans, provisions in the Community 163.3245 Sector Procedural Planning Act that are inconsistent with or are superseded by the planning standards in sections Plans 163.3245(3)(a) and (b) do not apply. 2) Conservation easements may be based on digital orthophotography that meets certain criteria. 3) A conservation easement may include a provision for the grantor to substitute other land that meets certain criteria by recording an amendment to the conservation easement; substitution re- quires the consent of the grantee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld (sections 163.3245(3) (b)7. and 9.). 4) An applicant for a detailed specific area plan must transmit a copy of the application to reviewing agencies, which must provide written comments to the local government within 30 days after the applicant transmits the application (section 163.3245(3)(f)). 5) Authorizes the Department of Environmental Protection, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Com- mission, or the water management district to accept a conservation easement provided for a detailed specific area plan as mitigation under chapters 373 and 379 and section 373.414, Florida Statutes (section 163.3245(3) (h)). 6) Clarifies that adoption of a long term master plan or a detailed specific area plan does not limit the right to establish new agricultural or silvicultural uses in the sector plan or detailed specific area plan area (section 163.3245(9)). 7) An applicant with an approved master development order may request that the water manage- ment district issue a consumptive use permit for the same time period as the approved master devel- opment order (section 163.3245(13)). 8) The more specific provisions of this section supersede the generally applicable provisions of this chapter which otherwise would apply. 9) This section does not preclude a local government from requiring data and analysis beyond the minimum criteria established by this section (section 163.3245(15)). 47 48 Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. Chapter 163, N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed F.S. Citations (Where/How) By Element 2015 [Chapter 2015-30, Sections 1-6, Laws of Florida, Effective May 15, 2015; Chapter 2015-69, Section 1, Laws of Florida, Effective July 1, 2015] 6 1) Deletes requirements for notice to and coordination by regional planning councils in connection with 163.3246(11) and developments of regional impact within a certified local government. (14) Local Govern- ment Comprehen- Creates a connected city corridor plan amendment pilot program. sive Planning Expresses legislative intent to encourage growth of high technology industry and innovation through Certification Pro - a locally controlled comprehensive plan amendment process. ram— Connected - City Corridor Pilot Establishes Pasco County as a pilot community for connected city corridor plan amendments for a Program period of 10 years. Requires the state land planning agency to issue a written notice of certification to Pasco County by July 15, 2015 that includes the geographic boundary of the connected city corridor and a requirement for annual or biennial monitoring reports. Provides that the notice of certification is subject to challenge under section 120.569. Establishes criteria for connected city corridor plan amendments. Provides that except for site specific access management requirements, development in the certifica- tion area is deemed to satisfy concurrency if the County adopts a long term transportation network plan and financial feasibility plan. Provides an exemption from development of regional impact review. 10) Requires that the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability provide a report and recommendations for implementing a statewide program to the Governor, President of the Sen- ate, and Speaker of the House by December 1, 2024. 7 Deletes regional planning councils as entities that provide assistance and participate in developing a plan 163.3248(4) Rural or the rural land stewardship area. Land Stewardships 48 EXHIBIT D Outreach o hj City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department ti eesne saario � i, Community Planning Division p R t During the month of April, 2016, the City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department conducted a series of public meetings and sought feedback from the public related to the seven- year update to the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, the Evaluation & Appraisal Review. Below is the entire collection of comments received from the public and concerned stakeholders: Transportation -Increased reliability of public transit -Need improvement on express lane safety Hazard -Complete streets -Bike lanes and safer environment -Continual sidewalks -safer for ped, especially at night -Support two way traffic in calle ocho and SW 7 ST -Bike lanes -Protected bike lanes -Residential/commercial zoning and single family home/neighborhoods -Bolster Miami 21 and CH 23 -Have PZAB recommendations become binding (sp. Hearing process for appeals. -Need to improve customer services training for Public Work Inspectors -Bike Paths -Improve transit options! -TRANSIT -Mas viviendas para personas de la 3 edad -Traffic: 1) Coordination with FDOT; 2) state roads and their modification -LHLH-Little Havana on the Move -Train lines- East - West 836 and north corridor Development -No more building or condos -Need more schools for high density areas -Keep our community neighborhoods intact -Need more affordable developer in our area that help the community not their pockets our commissioner pocket. -*Control density* in order to be able to provide services. -Density is not being addressed in terms of LOS -Development impact fees, where is are the fees going? Not seeing benefits from those -Concurrency: 1) Fire LOS , School LOS, Parks LOS; 2) we do not have the infrastructure to support the development coming on-line -Neighborhood Preservation - limiting density/Up zonings -Studying the management of the impact fees -The neighborhood are not getting to be involved in these agreements -voices not being heard -Protection against density Evaluation & Appraisal Review- Public Comments Page 1 of 4 Infrastructure -Replace trees with root systems that are surface grown and destroys sidewalks -More tree trimming for lights, etc. -Sidewalk in area -54 to 59 street NE 2 to 5 Avenue -Green infrastructure to protect against storm surge and sea level rise -Repair sidewalks and streets -Replace crumbling curbs in neighborhoods -Very important to make our City a world class city. The investment is needed in every aspect --from bus benches to roads to sidewalks --more vegetation -Sidewalk and Drainage improvement -Sidewalk need to be repair for safety. -Lights are out in the street for month. -Crossway Path or traffic light in SW 6 ST, 7 ST, and 8 ST. -Customer Services training for Public Works Inspector who abuse their power. -Sepford en la 1st SW y 2D AVE. Muy largo el espacio desde la 22 AVE hasta la 17 Ave. -Street with curbs, street without curbs and site walks Services -Work with residents and owners to solve issue on illegal dumping in Little Havana -Tourist on 8th Street require more attention, bus parking, public services (restrooms), etc. -ARTS improvement $$. -EDUCATION i.e. senior programs, etc. -More after school free programs for teen and adults -Improve services for police in the Little Havana Park. Check the small cafeteria that became bar at night. -Drug situation with bike rider. -NET OFFICE: For Little Havana. Notice of an excellent job should be given to the administrator and staff under his direction. -Recycling pickups to match solid waste pickups. -NO MORE TRASH PILESM -Insufficient fire resource for such a large area. -Code enforcement training for the code enforcement board members -Water and sewer services need improvement in 6ST, 5 ST, by SW 5 Ave. -Informing people better- marketing information to citizens -Website to tell us, list of events: 1) train improvements; 2) impact fees what's happened to them; 3)rail update -Improve our website to disseminate information -Would like to see more outreach in churches, radio to bring out Haitian community Parks & Recreation and Open Space -Repurpose walking trail at Jose Marti Park into a rubber mulch walking trail (like Kennedy Park). -We need more green space. -Design and Build Iconic Parks -Need more Grant for Community event -MORE GREEN -less concrete in public parks! -Even smaller cities have much better, greener public spaces -Better appreciation of waterfront/public access, park space/restaurants Evaluation & Appraisal Review — Public Comments Page 2 of 4 -more green spaces and street art and landscaping that is cared for properly -Require developers to provide connected green space i.e. linear park, walking path, that *cross* "boundaries." -More green areas, parks and recreation needed. -More tree planting in residential and on right-of-way -More parks and beaches that allow dogs. -Pet waste stations or trash cans -Need more flexibility to do event for our community without any suggestion from our commissioner. -Dog parks -Plant more trees -Create natural habitats -More and interconnected -We need more dog -friendly parks -Cleaner Riverwalk -Fix lights across MRC Riverwalk -Reduce speed limits near parks to ease pedestrian access. -Control the homeless under the bridges near to parks -Follow City of Miami Education compact and enter into JUA for city to use school yards as parks. -City to purchase abandoned lots of properties with city fines to make mini -parks. -Clean and Restore all parks closed because of toxic infill -Miami Riverwalk needs to be accessible to all -Park access not achieved -Not unilateral access for school board: 1) Palm Beach County School yards to playgrounds; 2) pocket parks -Policy regarding parks expanding versus new parks needs to be identified -Contaminated park at 37th Avenue closed for 3 years -Received via email: Given that the comments of Miami residents of the last two EAR of the Miami Comprehensive Plans have resulted in a Parks Master Plan goal of adding 25 neighborhood parks, a goal which would make a park available for every resident to walk to within ten minutes; Given that since 2000 thru 2015 developers have paid the City of Miami over 50 million dollars in impact fees for parks; (I am open to this figure being corrected if the city finds it inaccurate) Given that the 80% of the park land in the city of Miami lies in District two while the four land locked districts of Miami are so void of parks that Miami ranks the second worse high density city in the entire US in terms of park space per resident; Given that park impact fees are generally spent in the districts where growth occurs; Given that the Mayor and Commission can use general capital improvement funds to construct parks in the land lock districts; Given, to the best of my knowledge, the Mayor and Commission have made little or no progress since 2000 toward creating any new parks in the four land lock districts other than Manatee Bend Park which was created in District Two but now lies in District Five which is predominantly land locked and park deficient and two parks in park plentiful District Two; Evaluation & Appraisal Review— Public Comments Page 3 of 4 Given that the City of Miami has been going thru a golden age of growth with record impact fee collection but have made little or no progress toward the Parks Master Plan neighborhood parks goal; Given there are studies showing parks attract economic growth as well as increased health benefits and interaction of people of varied social, ethnic and economic backgrounds, the above being some of the reasons developers show parks in their brochures; Given there are studies that show if children do not have a chance to play in nature by themselves they most likely will not develop respect for nature; Given that parks of all types will always need constituents to protect them from those who have no respect for parks; Because of the above growth, financial ability but also lack of political will to meet the goals of the Park Master Plan, I request the Mayor and Commission adopt a goal of adding one new neighborhood park in each of the four land locked park deficient districts every year until 25 new neighborhood or larger parks have been added to Miami. Further, I request that the Parks Advisory Board and Planning Board be tasked with keeping a monthly record of progress in creating 25 new parks and that Mayor Regalado and succeeding mayors be required to report verbally and in writing in their state of the city addresses each year exactly the progress toward creating the 25 new parks. Environmental Resources, Water Quality, Aquifer Recharge -Water quality -VERY IMPORTANT! -Address sea level rise impact to infrastructure and parks -green infrastructure-e.g. mangroves to protect water quality of Biscayne Bay -Protection of our coastal area. -Plant more trees to (down-arrow) stormwater runoff. -Desalination Plant needs to be pursued -Very important is flooding is an issue in your area. -Managing for increased storm surge, flooding and sea level rise, protecting the water quality in Biscayne Bay. -Incentives for solar power. -Solar power incentives Housing -Affordable, energy efficient housing -*Affordable*/*Workforce* housing. We *have* to drive to work in the City because we are priced out! -Low income -Extremely low income housing as single family housing -Encourage public-private partnerships to develop a determined number of attainable affordable housing units. -Limits on % rent increases. Currently can be increase by any rate at end of lease. Prevents large turnout of low/medium income tenants. -More low income housing. -Affordable energy -offer low income home owners. Evaluation & Appraisal Review — Public Comments Page 4 of 4 r -- Syed. rr \ 1 ��ei. .� n� • City of Miami K til0 Planning and Zoning Department Community Planning Division Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) and Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) Comprehensive Planning Comprehensive planning is a process that determines community goals and visions in terms of community development. The outcome of this wide -range planning effort is the Comprehensive Pian, which dictates public policy in relation to transportation, utilities, land use, recreation, and housing, among others. Comprehensive plans serve as the foundation for all land use decisions. Florida Statute 163, required that City of Miami adopt a comprehensive plan and land development regulations to implement the plan. The City of Miami has complied with this state mandate and created the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP), which was adopted as Ordinance 10544 on February 9, 1989, The MCNP guides the City's existing and future development. Characteristics of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan The MCNP is broad and general in nature and provides a decision making framework for land use, future development and infrastructure improvements. Additionally, since the MCNP can address issues years in the future, the plan does not map a highly specific path. Instead, the MCNP guides the way towards achieving goals, objectives and policies. The MCNP provides a "master plan" of sorts, that the City of Miami considers when making development decisions. The MCNP must be functionally all-encompassing. Given that growth and change can affect every aspect of the City, it is imperative that the MCNP address many aspects of our community's future; and addresses the City as a whole through its various elements. Similar to chapters in a book, the MCNP consists of 14 elements, which contains goals, objectives and policy's (GOP's), guiding principles for the implementation of the plan. It's helpful to understand how they function. Goals - long-term end toward which programs or activities are ultimately directed; Objectives - specific, measurable, intermediate end that is achievable and marks progress toward the goal; and Policies - ways in which programs and activities are conducted to achieve an identified goal. The elements within the MCNP are: Future Land Use, Housing, Sanitary and Storm Sewers, Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge, Potable Water, Solid Waste Collection, Transportation, Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilities, Parks, Recreation and Open Space, Coastal Management, Natural Resource Conservation, Education, Capital Improvements, and Intergovernmental Coordination. Implementation of a Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan With the MCNP in place, our community, including potential residents and developers have advance knowledge of the intentions of the City. However, implementation of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP) takes place though the following tools: Subdivision Regulations- Chapter 55 of the City Code of Ordinances Land Development Regulations - Miami 21 Design Standards, Development and Preservation Strategies - Master Plans (Parks and Public Space, Coconut Grove Waterfront, Virginia Key, etc.) Detailed Housing Pians and Implementation Programs - Consolidated Plan (Department of Community Development, HUD & State funding) Building Code - Official Florida State Code and National Building Standards Historic Preservation Regulations - Miami City Code Chapter 23 The above methods are among a few ways of implementing the MCNP and guiding future development. The City of Miami can use these tools to prevent unwanted development and its undesirable side effects. For example, the City's Code (Miami 21) states the following: 2. 1.1 Title and Purpose a. This Code shall be known as the Miami 21 Code of the City of Miami, Florida. This Code is declared to be in accord with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, as required by the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act Section 963.3161 et seq., Florida Statutes (the "Comprehensive Plan'). A primary purpose of this Code is to implement the Comprehensive Plan. b. It is further the purpose of the Miami 21 Code to promote the public health, safety, morals, convenience, comfort, amenities, prosperity, and general welfare of the City and to provide a wholesome, serviceable, and attractive community, including without limitation protection of the environment; conservation of land, energy and natural resources; improved mobility; more efficient use of public funds; greater health benefits of a pedestrian environment' historic preservation; provision of recreational and open spaces; reduction of sprawl; and improvement of the built environment and human habitat. c. To further the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of this Code, the City is divided into Transect Zones ("T -Zones") of such number, characteristics, area, common unity of purpose, adaptability, or use as will accomplish the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code. Page 2 of 6 MCNP and EAR Workshop Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR) of the MCNP — Process Overview: The MCNP is the City's policy framework for existing and future development. The MCNP's, Elements goals, objectives, and policies reflect the City's vision for its existing and future development. The MCNP also evaluates how the City will meet the needs of existing and future residents, visitors, and development. Pursuant to section 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes, the City of Miami is required to review MCNP to ensure it conforms to state statutes and responds to changes in local and regional conditions. The City of Miami will amend its comprehensive plans based on the results of the Evaluation and Appraisal Review (EAR). The components that are included in the City's EAR based amendments are divided into three categories: state statute requirements, public input, and staff recommendations. The EAR is a State mandated assessment of the MCNP is to ensure that all current State statutory requirements are met. In addition to the State requirements, the EAR process provides an opportunity to assess the MCNP to ensure it reflects the City's vision for its future and to measure the work accomplished in other efforts. In order to be effective, the MCNP must be flexible and adaptable to changing conditions and concerns. Through the EAR process, the City will update the MCNP in two phases. Phase I includes preparation of the EAR of the City's current MCNP to comply with Florida statutes and to complete an update to the appendices and maps. In Part Il, the City will update MCNP, to promote and incorporate the goals, objectives, and policies provided by the public's feedback in our outreach meetings. The City's goal is to provide the most up-to-date document for Miami's residents, neighbors, and the development community. Changes to the Florida State Statutes: ■ Changes to the Florida State Statutes since 2005 will be addressed in the MCNP amendments. ■ These changes are prepared and reviewed by the Community Planning Division staff ■ Not all regulatory changes are applicable to the City of Miami, others are merely procedural on the state level and do not require local action. ■ Most changes require revisions to the goals, objectives, and policies within the MCNP. Community Input: Multiple public meetings were held to obtain input about important issues facing the City; this input will be taken into consideration in the updates to the MCNP. The input obtained from these meetings will steer new policies and the updating of existing ogles. Staff will also incorporate public input into policy recommendations based on planning analysis. Page 3 of 6 MCNP and EAR Workshop Staff has conducted the first of a series of meetings with the public in April and May 2016. Outreach meetings were held in each Commission District. Major issues identified in the outreach meeting are below: Community Priorities April and May 2016 Green and Open Space Mobility Infrastructure Culture & Arts Code Enforcement Climate Change Housing Economic Development D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 TOTAL 4 9 10 11 12 46 3 33 16 14 16 82 4 19 10 11 13 57 0 7 6 1 8 22 1 8 3 13 10 35 3 14 6 4 12 39 2 14 12 4 4 36 1 8 8 3 11 31 EAR COMMUNITY PRIORITIES BOARD DATA April and May 2016 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 .■Oily _11111.61 NO -111111 _x_111 _111m,.II _11 J -on- 11 EAR Priorities 2016 D1 ■ EAR Priorities 2016 D2 a EAR Priorities 2016 D3 EAR Priorities 2016 D4 ■ EAR Priorities 2016 D5 ■ EAR Priorities 2016 TOTAL Staff will continue to conduct outreach meetings through continue through 2017. Page 4 of 6 MONP and EAR Workshop Staff Recommendations and EAR Process: While there are other opportunities to revise the MCNP, these revisions often occur as the result of outside development applications. The EAR process allows the City to take an all- encompassing look at how well the MCNP is functioning, and how it may be enhanced to address specific community issues. Planning staff will develop policies and recommendations based on research of best practices in comprehensive planning and current issues. Updates to comprehensive plan policies will be guided by input from community stakeholders and evidence based research from other communities. Many components of the comprehensive plan have deadlines for follow-up work to be completed. These deadlines will be addressed by reassessing policy, recommendation relevance and feasibility. The MCNP amendments will travel through the State Coordinated Review Amendment process, which includes: ■ Development of comprehensive plan text amendments. ■ Review and approval by the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board and the Miami City Commission. ■ Transmittal to the state Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) for review by state agencies. • Department of Economic Opportunity {DEO} issues objections, recommendations, and comments (ORCs) report. = After comments within the ORCs report are addressed, EAR amendments are brought back to the Miami City Commission for adoption. ■ Adopted amendments are transmitted to DEO for verification that the amendments are compliant with Florida Statutes. As major issues are identified, they must evaluated from the perspective of the current MCNP and its implementation. The successes of the MCNP should be recognized and recommendations for changes to portions that have not been successful are crafted. This process ensures that City of Miami's Comprehensive Plan remains an effective foundation for growth management. Based on this EAR comments for the MCNP, staff will make suggestions and revisions to better address community objectives, changing conditions/trends affecting the community and changes in state requirements. JYE 5-20-2016 Page 5 of B MCNP and FAR Workshop Page B of B MCNP and EAR Workshop 1511 84 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EAR PRIORITIES DATA April /May 2016 1 11.11 1,,, ll t' till i -11 .- 11-- 1 Green and Open Spate Mobility Infrastructure Culture & Arts Code Enforcement Climate Change Housing Economic Development EAR Priorities 2015 D1 0 EAR Priorities 2015 02 s EAR Priorities 2015 D3 =3 EAR Priorities 2015 D4 a EAR Priorities 2015 D5 a EAR Priorities 2015 TOTAL EAR Priorities per Public Meetings April/May 2016 Green and Open Space Mobility Infrastructure Culture & Arts Cade Enforcement Climate Change Housing Economic Development Total of 111 people signed into the meetings. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 TOTAL 4 9 10 11 12 46 3 33 16 14 16 82 4 19 10 11 13 57 0 7 6 1 8 22 1 8 3 13 10 35 3 14 6 4 12 39 2 14 12 4 4 36 1 8 8 3 11 31 Green and Open Space MofsfEity Infrastructure Culture & Arts Code Enforcement CVrnate Change HoWng s ! t0 P6 • ! •. V. • • Ss 9 ba • -j40 0A i 0 0 0 4r 40 to Economic Developmerrt tow ase. • At EXHIBIT E Measureable Policies 2016 MCNP EAR UPDATE — MEASUREABLE INDICATOR POLICIES FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Policy LU -1.1.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of various City departments and agencies annually monitor steps taken to fulfill the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the MCNP and biennially report the status of the GOPs to the Planning Adv+seFy Zoning, and Appeals Board and City Commission, including, but not limited to, improving measurability of objectives. Policy LU -1.1.13: The City s1ha4 will review and evaluate the areas designated Urban Infill Area (UTA) and/or Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) within two years of the adoption of +h; p9liGy the 2016 EAR amendments to determine, but not limited to, the following: the appropriateness of the areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; the benefits and/or disadvantages resulting from the inclusion (or exclusion) of these areas within the UTA and/or the TCEA; the strategies to support mobility and alternative modes of transportation within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; and the strategies to address urban design and network connectivity to improve mobility within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA. Policy LU -1.2.6: The City's NET Office will engage the community through the following: 1. Identifying dilapidated properties with assistance of Code Compliance that devalue residential homes and business; 2. Conducting community outreach efforts regarding the availability of viable redevelopment opportunities within the city : Policy LU -1.3.8: The City will work with and partner with entities that foster or develop job placements apd to assist the City's existing and future residents, water dependent and water related businesses and uses along the Miami River, in achieving economic self- sufficiency utilizing government resources as necessary, and as funding permits, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies to help support direct job placements d F8Gt tFa n my pFE)gF ,ms and ether tGGhr Gal ass stall 8, to minority and semi -skilled residents of the city including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by Section S�-. 342.07, F.S. (Policy PA -3.3.11). Job placement objective is to achieve a minimum of 300 individuals monthly reported regularly to the funding source, CareerSource of South Florida. Policy LU -1.3.10: The City will continue to aggressively address code violations in its neighborhoods through the implementation of ongoing and new neighborhood improvements, and code enforcement and NET strategies and initiatives; and will adopt and enforce performance standards appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical condition and appearance of commercial and industrial areas in the city by July4i 2020. Policy LU -1.5.3: Notice of application for special permits or other such administrative land use or zoning permits provided for in the future, s19 will be provided to any NET registered homeowners associations or neighborhood associations thirty days prior to issuance of the special permit or such administrative land use or zoning permits provided for in the future zoning and land use regulations and promptly after issuance of the decision with explanation of appeal procedures allowing sufficient time for such appeals. Policy LU -1.5.4: Notice of application requiring public hearings s19 will be provided to any NET registered homeowner and neighborhood associations and to owners within a certain number of feet as provided for in the City code. Policy LU -1.7.1: Update the MCNP by January 209920, to include a detailed list of definition of terms used by the MCNP stakeholders. Policy LU -1.7.4: The City will amend its land development regulations as necessary within one year of an EAR amendments process to maintain consistency with its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, (201417) Policv LU -1.7.5: By December 2020, the Citv will explore formulatina new economic development aoals, usinesses orina new marKets Tor economic or Policy LU -1.7.7: By December 2020, the City ,will identify, as part of its Comprehensive Plan, MCNP, significant neighborhoods within the City, and generate profiles of each, highlighting neighborhood unique identities, characteristics, and their future goals. Objective LU -2.3: Encourage the preservation of all historic, architectural, and archaeological resources that have major significance to the city by continuing to increase the number of locally designated sites for the period 2008-2013 2016 - 2021. Policy LU -2.3.2: The City had designated 6;129 historic sites and #ve 11 historic districts pursuant to the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code. An additional sites (or groups of multiple sites) and s4 three districts have been identified as potentially worthy of designation. The City will seek to increase its locally designated historic resources by 241-9 2021. (See Coastal Management Policy CM -5.1.3.) HOUSING ELEMENT Objective HO -1.1: Provide and/or encourage a local regulatory, investment, and neighborhood environment that will assist the private sector in increasing the stock of affordable housing including workforce housing (2007/2) for all income levels, including extremely low-, very low-, low-, and -moderate -income (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida), within the City by at least 10 percent by December 204025. Policy HO -1.1.10: The City report annually the extent to which the housing recommendations set forth in the adopted City of Miami Consolidated Plan (as they may be amended from time to time) are being realized: Policy HO -1.1.16: By July 1, 2019, and every 3 years thereafter, the City will prepare an inventory list of all real Property within its jurisdiction to which it holds fee simple title that is appropriate for use as affordable housing, pursuant to Chapter 166.0451 F.S. Following the public hearing, the City will adopt a resolution that includes an inventory list of such property, pursuant to Chapter 166.0451 F.S. Policy HO -1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts in areas where significant concentrations of substandard units are likely to exist. The City will implement programs to assist extremely low-, very low-, , low-, agd-�income households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) in rehabilitating their units. and annually report on the status/progress of these programs. Owners of substandard units will be required to make needed repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property will be required to be secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard. Policy HO -1.3.2: By December 2020, the City's land development regulations will be reviewed and amended where warranted, to prevent over concentrations of gFeup hOM86 f9Gter Gore fonili+ies and Ault GeRgrerro+e I iyiRg PaGilit'86 ( (l CG) community residences and similar homes/facilities in any area of the City. Objective HO -1.4: The City will continue to participate in the local Continuum of Care's (CoQ a-Keg+eaat effort to e adequate heiterfeFtRe hemelesa end chronic homelessness by December, 2017. Policy HO -1.4.6: By December 2020, t -The City will provide regulations for, and permit the siting of, homeless shelters within its land development regulations and take appropriate measures to prevent a net loss of shelter capacity. SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS ELEMENT Policy SS -1.3.= ': Since the sanitary sewer network is an interconnected Countywide system, the departments of Public Works and Planning will cooperate with M-DWASD to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity. Policy SS -2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan and subsequent updates as the long-range policy guideline for improving its storm drainage management system, and will update the estimated cost of implementing that Plan through the annual updates to the City's Capital Improvements Program included in the Capital Improvements element of the MCNP. The City will rank the projects specified in the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, with priority given to addressing the most critical problem areas within the City, and implement those projects supported by a financing plan according to the provisions of Chapter 18, Article VIII of the City Code, entitled "Storm Water Utility System." The 1986 plan will be was updated by 2919 in 2012 with measurable Goals and Objectives. The plan will be reported and reviewed annually and at time of EAR. Policy SS -2.1.2: The City will continue to monitor progress on all storm sewer -related capital improvement projects on an annual basis as part of its capital improvement implementation procedures. POTABLE WATER ELEMENT Policy PW -1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, Countywide system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.4.) Policy PW -1.2.2: Pursuant to Chapter 373.709 and Chapter 163.3177(6)(c)", F.S., the City adopted an updated Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (contained in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP) for a 20 -year planning period (2014-2033) that is consistent with the current Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SRWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's work plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.7.) Policy PW -1.3.1: The City's adopted Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Update (Work Plan), dated September 2015, is incorporated as follows in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP. This document is designed to: assess current and projected potable water demands; evaluate the sources and capacities of available water supplies; and identify those water supply projects, using all available technologies, necessary to meet the City's water demands for a 20 -year period. The Work Plan remain consistent with projects as listed in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan s4g will address climate change and sea level rise that may impact the potable water infrastructure and sources. The potable water supply facilities necessary to satisfy projected water demands for the City of Miami during the 2014-2033 period are shown in Appendix A of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Appendix PW -1). SOLID WASTE Policy SW -1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Planning, through the City's Intergovernmental Coordination Policies, &ha4 will request the Miami -Dade County Department of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to biennially update estimates of system demand and capacity. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy TR -1.2.5: The City will update the map on an annual basis to be scheduled by the City of Miami depicting the location of existing and planned future major parking facilities (200 or more parking spots), which will also be available for public use through the City of Miami website. Map TR -3 within Appendix TR -1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section of this element illustrates the existing parking facilities (200 or more parking spots) within the City. Policy TR -1.2.8: By the end of 2016, the City will develop a citywide transportation master plan that prioritizes projects based on the needs to improve mobility, reduce congestion, promote public transit, and support economic development and will be updated concurrently with future updates to the Transportation Element of the MCNP. (See Policy TR -2.1.8.) Policy TR -2.1.8: The Transportation Element will be updated, at a minimum, every five years and will utilize a long range planning horizon of a minimum of 20 years in order to achieve the maximum consistency with the MPO's LRTP. Policy TR -2.2.5: By December 2020, the City will seek to study and determine the feasibility of establishing a mobility impact fee that would be collected to fund or supplement the cost of transportation system improvements including expansion of the Miami Trolley, complete streets improvements, enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, water taxi services, Light Rail/Streetcar plans, and other transportation improvements identified in future plans. (See Policy TR -2.1.5.) (2013113) Policy TR -2.2.8: The City will regularly monitor transportation trends on an annual basis using indicators such as transit ridership,'obs/housing balance, mode split, and motor vehicle registrations. Policy TR -2.3.1: By December 2020, the City will develop a balanced streetscape design program that accommodates all roadway users and pays special attention to non -vehicular modes by focusing on landscaping treatments, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and the construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along city streets. These improvements will be coordinated with major repairs, roadway resurfacing, and other renovations when possible. Policy TR -2.4.6: The City will coordinate its transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP update. (See Policy IC -2.1.10) (200712) Policy TR -2.4.9: The City will publish an annual list compiling the programmed transit -related improvements from MDT's TDP and the MPO's LRTP and TIP that are within the City and will include this information on the City's website. Policy TR -2.5.5: The City will annually coordinate with Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus transit system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy IC -2.1.27.) (200516) Policy TR -2.8.8: By December 2020, the City will develop a modal hierarchy for all street classifications within the City that prioritizes the use by pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. This modal hierarchy will be used to determine the types of Complete Streets accommodations that will be provided within each street classification. Policy TR -2.9.11: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy IC -2.1.20.) PORTS, AVIATION AND RELATED FACILITIES Port of Miami River' Sub -Element Policy PA -3.3.3: ' , , By December 2020 the City s19 will consider approving a joint planning agreement with the Miami River Commission and Miami -Dade County to revise and adopt the "Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic plan for the Miami River. 1 The 'Port of Miami River" is a shallow draft riverine port consisting of independent, privately -owned small shipping companies, fisheries, vessel repair facilities marinas and other Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront uses, as defined in Ch. 342.07, F.S., located along the banks of the Miami River and its tributaries and canals where Working Waterfront uses are located. The Port of Miami River is not a deepwater port as defined in Ch. 403.021(9), F.S. The Port of Miami River extends from the salinity dam in unincorporated Miami -Dade County to Biscayne Bay in the City of Miami, as identified in Appendix PA -1. Policy PA -3.3.4: VVithin throe years of the adoption of this By December 2020, the City along with Miami River stakeholders, property owners and businesses sha4 will consider submitting an application to the Florida Department of Community Affairs Economic Opportunity, Waterfronts Florida Partnership Program, for assistance in protecting and promoting the Miami River traditional Working Waterfront. Policy PA -3.4.1: City staff &ha4 will prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on the status of the Planning and Zoning, Economic Development and Coordination, and Transportation Objectives and Policies contained in this Sub -element, which &ha4 will be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. Policy PA -3.4.2: City staff prepare, or cause to be prepared, an annual report on the loss or gain of recreational and commercial Working Waterfront lands and uses, which s19 will be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Policy PR -1.1.3.1: By December 2020, tThe City,will evaluate 4 its land development regulations, to determine the need toil designate a zoning category for parks separate from Civic Space, and amend as necessary. That category will permit a variety of areas for passive and/or greater intensity of recreational use opportunities in parks and open spaces. Policy PR -1.1.4: The City of Miami's Level of Service for Parks, Recreation and Open Space is to provide a municipally -owned park within a ten-minute barrier -free walk to park entrances by 72% of the city's population as measured by GIS pedestrian network analysis. A ten-minute walk will be defined as a one-half mile, barrier - free distance on a safe pedestrian route. Barrier -free means a continuous walk on a sidewalk or designated pedestrian route that may include crossing streets but does not encounter barriers such as walls or highway embankments that impede passage. Safe pedestrian routes include those that may include crossing of streets with speed limits of up to 40 mph. Every three years, the City will develop and update a map that shows which residential areas fall within the ten- minute walk buffer for City -owned parks, and which do not. This map will then be overlaid on a population map showing the most current U.S. Census population data available in order to calculate if at least 72% of the city's population lives within the ten-minute walk buffer. Policy PR -1.1.4.1: Every three years, when the City updates the Parks and Recreation Level of Service Map for parks owned by the City of Miami, the City will also perform a study based on the national model established by the Trust for Public Land ParkScoreTM system. The study will include the following: 1) creation and updating of a GIS layer that includes all park and recreation land open to the public in the City of Miami, including linear parks, whether or not the land is owned by the City; 2) creation of maps that show a ten- minute barrier -free walk for all parks (regardless of ownership and including linear parks), and similarly, for parks of at least 1/2 acre in size and parks of at least 1 acre in size; 3) identification of median park size (regardless of ownership); 4) identification of the percentage of all city acres that are parks (regardless of ownership); 4) the number of playgrounds per 10,000 residents; and 5) the total spending (both operational and capital) on parks and recreation per resident over the preceding three fiscal years. The purpose of this study is to provide the City with analysis to support decision-making on acquisition of park land and on park and recreation services, as well as to compare the city's park resources with other cities. Policy PR -1.1.5: By December 2020, tThe City will review and enact provisions and create a plan to remedy deficiencies for residents who do not have access to a park within a ten minute, barrier -free walk, including financing for acquisition to remedy deficiencies. Policy PR -1.2.2: The City will develop annual parks and recreation budgets that explain the rationale behind the program, operational and maintenance standards that the City intends to meet; the costs of meeting those standards; and the per capita budget in comparison with similar cities, including cities in Florida. Policy PR -1.5.1: The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to meet expanded demand for Citywide parks, neighborhood parks, and recreational programs resulting from new residential development, including, but not limited to, impact fees, Zoning Ordinance intensity bonuses and contributions in lieu of land that will be used to provide new park and recreation resources to serve new development. The City will review these fees annually in accordance with recreation and open space needs and revise them as necessary to reflect increases in the cost of providing public open space and recreational facilities to meet its adopted Level of Service for parks, recreation and open space. Policy PR -2.1.1: The City has a no -net -loss policy for public park land and, by December 2020, will adopt procedures to this effect for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as described in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. These will allow only recreation and cultural facilities to be built on park land, will limit building footprint on any such land, will require that conversion of park land for any other purposes be subject to public procedures, and replace the converted park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation value in terms of usefulness and location. Policy PR -2.1.3: By December 2020, the City will amend the zoning code to limit the amount of total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre or more to no more than 25% of the park land area. Buildings and parking surfaces will continue to be limited to recreational and cultural uses and accessory elements that serve park and recreation goals. Any request to expand this percentage will require a special permit (warrant) and public hearings with residents within a half -mile area surrounding the park. Policy PR -2.2.2: The City will maintain and staff as many public swimming pools to be open all year round as possible given funding constraints and will strive to identify new funding sources to expand access to year-round swimming. Policy PR -2.2.4: The Parks and Recreation Department will maintain and FegbilaFly annually update the Inventory and Evaluation of City -Owned Parks that was prepared for the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. Policy PR -3.2.6: By December 2020, t -The City will pursue creation of water shuttles or water taxis that will expand public access to the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay off the Upper Eastside and the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove. Policy PR -4.1.1: The City will use participant evaluation surveys, at the completion of recreational programs to evaluate program success, online public opinion surveys at least once every three years, and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to identify needed and desired programs Policy PR -5.1.7: By December 2020, t he City will explore the eHGeuFag8 creation of a Citywide Miami Parks Foundation by non-governmental groups and individuals to serve as a nonprofit partner to focus attention on the park system, raise money to help support maintenance, enhance and expand parks and recreational programs, attract volunteers, and broaden the constituency for the park system. Policy PR -5.2.1: The City will continue to work with a permanent Parks and Recreation Advisory Board made up of residents who are park users, program participants, and representatives of groups with special relevant expertise. The Board's responsibilities will include advising elected officials and staff on implementation of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan and any adopted subsequent updates to that Plan. The Board will be supported by staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, and will report annually to the Mayor and City Commission on progress in implementing the Master Plan, including financial reports, holding at least one public hearing on the draft report before submitting it to the Mayor and Commission. The Board will also review and advise on capital plans and designs based on the Master Plan and advise the Commission on any proposals to expend more than $50,000 to acquire new park land, to diminish or convert existing park land, to accept donated land for parks, or to sell City land that may be suitable for parks. The City will periodically review and refine the mission and charge of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board in order to ensure maximum opportunities for public involvement and effectiveness in addressing parks and recreation needs. Proposed changes to the mission and charge of the Board will not be implemented until after a public hearing by the appropriate public board. Policy PR -5.2.2: The City will survey City residents to monitor preferences, needs and satisfaction with the park system on a regular basis, at a minimum through evaluations of all programs by program participants to evaluate program success, online surveys every three years, and scientific surveys every ten years (starting from the Parks Master Plan survey of 2006). Policy PR -5.2.4: The City will develop a full update on the Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan at least once every ten years, to coincide with a scientific survey of residents' park and recreation needs. Policy PR -5.2.5: The Parks and Recreation annual Capital Improvement Plan will be provided to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for their review and comment. The Board may request presentations on park projects, on a project by project basis, and have 60 days to review and provide comments and recommendations Policy PR -6.1.1: The City will annually review implementation sections of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan to include implementation actions in developing an annual work plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation facilities and programs Policy PR -6.1.4: By December 2020, tThe City will consider the createion of a specialty "Fishermen's Wharf' cafe district and marine services center in the Riverside District along N.W. North River Drive on the Miami River. Policy PR -8.1.3: The City, through its NET Offices, will conduct community outreach to obtain input on cultural/historical programming suggestions in order to develop quality cultural and heritage programs Policy PR -9.1.3: The City will continue to promote the planting and preservation of native species by property owners in the Citv throuah educational materials and programs. Through its NET Offices the City will assist and participate in tree planting events to promote preservation of the environment and provide educational materials for the public. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Policy CM -4.1.10: The City will adhere to its "EMBFgonnY ( pKatinnc DlaR fnr givil DefeRse in VVaF anal Natural EMege e"anti EM8Fg8RG�O d es MaR al Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, Hurricane Plan, and Debris Management Plan" for immediate repair and cleanup actions needed to protect public health and safety. The City will update these manuals on an annual basis. Objective CM -4.2: The City will adhere to and cooperate with the County in executing evacuation procedures as well as annually update information and procedural brochures for the public; these brochures will contain information on evacuation procedures and routes, and will be distributed to city residents at local businesses and government agencies. Policy CM -4.2.2: The City will annually update and distribute an informational brochure to establish public awareness and information programs that educate as to the need for evacuation, and indicate evacuation routes and procedures. This Information will be available at the City's NET Offices. Policy CM -5.1.5: The City will continue to include information on the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage for inclusion in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. (See Land Use Policy LU -2.5.4). NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION ELEMENT Policy NR -1.4.2: The City will work with public and private partners to achieve the 2007 Tree Master Plan goal of 30% tree canopy coverage citywide by December, 2020. Policy NR -1.4.5: By December 2020, the City will create an "Urban Canopy Program" for developers incentivizing local developers to contribute positively and effectively to the City's Tree Master Plan efforts. Policy NR -2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an interconnected, countywide system, the City will cooperate with Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Potable Water Policy PW -1.1.1.) EDUCATION ELEMENT Policy ED1.11-1.2.2: It is the goal of Miami -Dade County Public Schools and The City of Miami for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the desired 100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami -Dade County Public Schools should continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution2. Policy EDU -1.2.4: Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) r be delineated to: 1) maximize capacity utilization of the facility, 2) limit maximum travel times and reduce transportation costs, 3) acknowledge the effects of court - approved desegregation plans, 4) achieve socio-economic, racial, cultural and diversity objectives, and 5) achieve other relevant objectives as determined by the School Board's policy on maximization of capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by the School Board to achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the CSAs swill be considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place each year no later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning. Policy EDU -1.2.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. Policy EDU -1.3.1: In the selection of sites for future educational facility development, the City encourages the Miami -Dade County Public Schools to consider whether a school is in close proximity to residential areas and is in a location that would provide a logical focal point for community activities. Policy EDU -1.5.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to continue to provide opportunities for community and business leaders to serve on committees and task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision of public educational facilities. MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROGRAM Objective EDU -1.1 policies relating to the maintenance and improvement of specific level of service for public educational facilities, as specified in the Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance, be reviewed annually. Each year, the Miami -Dade County Public Schools will compare the official enrollment of the school system with the number of student stations available to determine the current operating LOS. Objective EDU -1.2 will be measured through an annual review of the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facility Work Program in order to determine if the adopted concurrency level of service standard (including the Interim LOS standards) is being achieved. The number of development orders approved, those disapproved and those that have achieved LOS standards through mitigation options will also be reviewed. Objective EDU -1.3 will be monitored through the annual inventory and assessment by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools of School Board owned property. The number of new sites &ha4 will be reported annually and in the full review period reported in the EAR. Objective EDU -1.4 will be monitored through the review and analysis of the statistics relating to school safety, as compiled annually, by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of Police. A review and analysis of new and existing reactive and proactive safety and crime prevention programs will also be conducted on an annual basis. EDU Monitoring Requirements The primary mechanism to monitor progress in achieving the objectives and policies in this Element is the collection and update of appropriate baseline data. Further, as required by FS 1013.31, the State Requirements for Educational Facilities, at least once every five (5) years the School Board &41 will arrange for an educational plant survey to be conducted. This plant survey describes the current educational plants and the estimated capital outlay needs resulting from a systematic study of present education and ancillary plants. This study also addresses the future needs, including long range planning, to provide an appropriate education program and services for each student based on projected capital outlay FTE's (COFTE) approved or authorized for use by the Department of Education. Future Conditions Maps ( 9H6iGt8Ht With 9GGti9H 163.3177(12) (g) PiE)r da StatbitE_11 Maps showing existing and future conditions are included in the element. A map series (Figures 1A, ''Rand o through 1D within Appendix EDU -1) indicate the public school and ancillary facility locations anticipated by a& December 31, 209,;16. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 0-1.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the city will be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment. The capital improvements schedule will cover a 5 -year period and identify whether projects are either funded or unfunded and given a level of priority for funding. Outside funding (funding from a developer, other government or funding pursuant to referendum) of these capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of a development agreement or interlocal agreement. (200512) & (2011145) & (2011176). Policy CI -1.1.3: The City will annually adopt a Capital Budget that corresponds to the first year of the CIE and CIP. Policy CI -1.2.2: All development orders authorizing changes in permitted land uses for new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use will be contingent upon the ability of existing or programmed public facilities to continue to provide service at or above the adopted LOS standard for the public facilities listed in Policy CI -1.2.3. for a 5 -year period (2011176. The public facilities to serve the new development or redevelopment s19 will be in place and available to serve new development as follows: c) Transportation facilities aha4 will be in place and available to serve new development or redevelopment no later than three (3) years after the issuance of a building permit or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation, consistent with the provisions of Objective TR -1.7 & related Policies and Policy TR -1.3.3 P4im,.TD 1 If the funds in the CIE are insufficient to fully fund the transportation facility improvement required, the City may enter into a binding proportionate -share agreement sufficient to mitigate the impacts by paying for one or more improvements which will significantly benefit the impacted transportation system, which improvements sf9 will be adopted into the 5 year capital improvements schedule at the next annual CIE update. The City may also accept contributions from multiple applicants for a planned improvement if it maintains contributions in a separate account (2013110) Policy CI -1.3.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The City shall will coordinate with the Miami -Dade County Public Schools, to annually update its Facilities Work Program to include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5 -year and long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted level of service standard, including interim standards, will continue to be achieved and maintained. The City, through its annual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule, will incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. The City and the Miami -Dade County Public School will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the MCNP Amendment process and during updates to the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Policy IC -1.1.1: By December 20825, establish by interlocal or other faFinal agreement with appropriate jurisdictions joint processes for collaborative decision making on countywide or multi -agency issues including, but not limited to, the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency and the siting of facilities with countywide significance, including locally unwanted land uses. Policy IC -2.1.10: The City will coordinate its transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP update. (See TR -2.4.6.) (200712) Policy IC -2.1.20: The City will, in coordination with the MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy TR -2.9.11.) Policy IC -2.1.27: The City will annually coordinate with Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus transit system, including new service and the expansion of neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy TR -2.5.5.): (200516) FLORIDA STATUTES Chapter 166.0451 FS: (1) By July 1, 2007, and every 3 years thereafter, each municipality shall prepare an inventory list of all real property within its jurisdiction to which the municipality holds fee simple title that is appropriate for use as affordable housing. 8/23/2016 Tasks Element Task Departments Completion Policy Date Intergovernmental Annual update to the MPO's Five CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy IC -2.1.10: The City will coordinate its transportation Coordination Year Transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five - Improvement Program (TIP) and Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP their LRTP update update. (See TR -2.4.6.)(2007/2) Intergovernmental Update the Bicycle Master Plan CIP/T December -22 NEW Policy IC -2.1.20: The City will, in coordination with the Coordination every five years MPO, FDOT, and Miami -Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy TR -2.9.11.) Intergovernmental Annually coordinate with Miami- CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy IC -2.1.27: The City will annually coordinate with Coordination Dade County on improving the Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus efficiency of its public bus transit transit system, including new service and the expansion of system, neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy TR -2.5.5.): (2005/6) Transportation By the end of 2016, develop a CIP/T December -16 NEW Policy TR -1.2.8: By the end of 2016, the City will develop a citywide transportation master citywide transportation master plan that prioritizes projects plan based on the needs to improve mobility, reduce congestion, promote public transit, and support economic development and will be updated concurrently with future updates to the Transportation Element of the MCNP. (See Policy TR -2.1.8.) Transportation By December 2020, the City will CIP/T December -20 NEW Policy TR -2.2.5: By December 2020, the City will seek to seek to study and determine the study and determine the feasibility of establishing a mobility feasibility of establishing a impact fee that would be collected to fund or supplement the mobility impact fee cost of transportation system improvements including expansion ofthe Miami Trolley, complete streets improvements, enhanced bicycle and pedestrian facilities, water taxi services, Light Rail/Streetcar plans, and other transportation improvements identified in future plans. (See Policy TR -2.1.5.) (2013/13) Transportation Monitor transportation trends CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy TR -2.2.8: The City will regularly monitor on an annual basis transportation trends on an annual basis using indicators such as transit ridership, jobs/housing balance, mode split, and motor vehicle registrations. Transportation By December 2020, develop a CIP/T December -20 NEW Policy TR -2.3.1: By December 2020, the City will develop a balanced streetscape design balanced streetscape design program that accommodates all program roadway users and pays special attention to non -vehicular modes by focusing on landscaping treatments, pedestrian -scaled lighting, and the construction of sidewalks and bicycle paths along city streets. These improvements will be coordinated with major repairs, roadway resurfacing, and other renovations when possible. Transportation Annual update to the MPO's Five CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy TR -2.4.6: The City will coordinate its transportation Year Transportation planning activities with the annual update to the MPO's Five - Improvement Program (TIP) and Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and their LRTP their LRTP update update. (See Policy IC -2.1.10) (2007/2) Transportation Publish an annual list compiling CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy TR -2.4.9: The City will publish an annual list the programmed transit -related compiling the programmed transit -related improvements from improvements from MDT's TDP MDT's TDP and the MPO's LRTP and TIP that are within the City and the MPO's LRTP and TIP that and will include this information on the City's website. are within the City and will include this information on the City's website. Transportation Annually coordinate with Miami- CIP/T December -18 NEW Policy TR -2.5.5: The City will annually coordinate with Dade County on improving the Miami -Dade County on improving the efficiency of its public bus efficiency of its public bus transit transit system, including new service and the expansion of system, neighborhood -based local circulator services to promote alternative travel modes within the TCEA. (See Policy IC -2.1.27.) (2005/6) Transportation By December 2020, develop a CIP/T December-20 NEW Policy TR-2.8.8: By December 2020, the City will develop a modal hierarchy for all street modal hierarchy for all street classifications within the City that classifications within the City prioritizes the use by pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. This modal hierarchy will be used to determine the types of Complete Streets accommodations that will be provided within each street classification. Transportation Update the Bicycle Master Plan CIP/T December-22 NEW Policy TR-2.9.11: The City will, incoordination with the everyfiveyears MPO, FDOT, and Miami-Dade County, update the Bicycle Master Plan every five years to ensure consistency with the LRTP. (See Policy IC-2.1.20.) Land Use Review and evaluate the areas CIP/T; Planning June-19 Policy LU-1.1.13: The City will review and evaluatethe areas designated Urban Infill Area designated Urban Infill Area (UTA) and/or Transportation (UTA) and/or Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) within two years of the Concurrency Exception Area adoption of the 2016 EAR Amendments to determine, but not (TCEA). limited to, the following: the appropriateness of the areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; the benefits and/or disadvantages resulting from the inclusion (or exclusion) of these areas within the UTA and/or the TCEA; the strategies to support mobility and alternative modes of transportation within those areas included in the UTA and/or the TCEA; and the strategies to address urban design and network connectivity to improve mobility within those areas included in the UTAand/or the TCEA. Parks, Recreation Creation of water shuttles or CIP/T; Planning December-20 Policy PR-3.2.6: By December 2020, the City will pursue creation and Open Space water taxis that will expand of water shuttles or water taxis that will expand public access to public access to the Picnic the Picnic Islands in Biscayne Bay off the Upper Eastside and the Islands in Biscayne Bay off the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove. Upper Eastside and the Dinner Key islands off Coconut Grove. Transportation The Transportation Element will CIP/T; Planning December-21 NEW Policy TR-2.1.8: The Transportation Element will be be updated, at a minimum, updated, at a minimum, every five years and will utilize a long every five years range planning horizon of a minimum of 20 years in order to achieve the maximum consistency with the MPO's LRTP. Capital CIE and CIP will be revised on an CIP; Management and September-18 Policy CI4.1.1: The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) and the Improvements annual basis to reflect changes Budget; Planning Capital Improvement Program (CIP) represent the means by which the capital facilities needs of the city will be addressed, and both the CIE and CIP will be revised on an annual basis to reflect changes in the economic, social and public fiscal environment. The capital improvements schedule will cover a 5- year period and identify whether projects are either funded or unfunded and given a level of priority for funding. Outside funding (funding from a developer, other government or funding pursuantto referendum) ofthese capital improvements must be guaranteed in the form of a development agreement or interlocal agreement. (2005/2) & (2011/45) & (2011/76). Capital Update 5 year capital CIP; Management and September-18 Policy CI-1.2.2:.... If the funds in the CIE are insufficient to fully Improvements improvements schedule Budget; Planning fund the transportation facility improvement required, the City may enter into a binding proportionate-share agreement sufficient to mitigate the impacts by paying for one or more improvements which will significantly benefit the impacted transportation system, which improvements will be adopted into the 5 year capital improvements schedule at the next annual CIE update.... Transportation Update map on an annual basis CIP; MPA; Planning December-18 NEW PolicvTR-1.2.5: The City will updatethe map on an annual depicting the location of existing basis to be scheduled by the City of Miami depicting the location and planned future major of existing and planned future major parking facilities (200 or parking facilities more parking spots), which will also be available for public use through the City of Miami website. Map TR-3 within Appendix TR-1, the Data Inventory and Analysis section of this element illustrates the existing parking facilities (200 or more parking spots) within the City. Land Use Adopt and enforce performance Code Compliance; NET July -20 Policy LU -1.3.10: The City will continue to aggressively address standards for code violations. code violations in its neighborhoods through the implementation of ongoing and new neighborhood improvements, and code enforcement and NET strategies and initiatives; and will adopt and enforce performance standards appropriate to preserve and enhance the physical condition and appearance of commercial and industrial areas in the city by July 2020. The City will report on an annual basis, what has been accomplished to fulfill the requirements of this policy. Housing Report annually the extent to Community and September -18 Policy HO -1.1.10: The City will report annually the extent to which the housing Economic Development which the housing recommendations set forth in the adopted recommendations set forth in City of Miami Consolidated Plan (as they may be amended from the adopted City of Miami time to time) are being realized including those relating to:...... Consolidated Plan are being realized Housing By July 1, 2019, prepare an Community and July -19 Policy HO -1.1.16: By July 1, 2019, and every 3 years thereafter, inventory list of all real property Economic Development the City will prepare an inventory list of all real property within within its jurisdiction to which it its jurisdiction to which it holds fee simple title that is holds fee simple title that is appropriate for use as affordable housing, pursuant to Chapter appropriate for use as affordable 166.0451 F.S. Following the public hearing, the City will adopt a housing. the City will adopt a resolution that includes an inventory list of such property, resolution that includes an pursuant to Chapter 166.0451 F.S. inventory list of such property, pursuant to Chapter 166.0451 F.S. Housing Increasing the stock of Community and December -25 Obiective HO -1.1: Provide and/or encourage a local regulatory, affordable housing, including Economic Development investment, and neighborhood environment that will assist the workforce housing, for all private sector in increasing the stock of affordable housing, income levels by at least 10% by including workforce housing, for all income levels, including very December 2025 low-, low-, and moderate—income (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida), within the City by at least 10 percent by December 2025. Florida Statute Adopt a policy for the City of Community and July -19 F.S. 166.0451... By July 1, 2007, and every 3 years therafter, each Miami to prepare an inventory Economic municipality will prepare an inventory list of all real property list of all affordable housing sites Development; Asset within its jurisdiction to which the municipality holds fee simple every three years per F.S. Management title that is appropriate for use as a affordable housing. 166.0451. See Policy HO -1.1.16. Housing Implement programs to assist Community and September -18 Policy HO -1.2.8: The City will increase code enforcement efforts very low, low, and moderate- Economic in areas where significant concentrations of substandard units income household and annually Development; Code are likely to exist. The City will implement programs to assist report on the status/progress of Compliance extremely low-, very low -,and low- income households (in these programs. Department accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) in rehabilitating their units. and annually report on the status/progress of these programs. Owners of substandard units will be required to make needed repairs in a timely manner and vacant or abandoned property will be required to be secured so as not to represent a public health or safety hazard. Coastal Update Comprehensive Fire Rescue/Emergency September -18 Policy CM -4.1.10: The City will adhere to its Comprehensive Management Emergency Management Plan, Management Emergency Management Plan, Hurricane Plan, and Debris Hurricane Plan, and Debris Management Plan" for immediate repair and cleanup actions Management Plan needed to protect public health and safety. The City will update these manuals on an annual basis. Coastal Update information and Fire Rescue/Emergency June -18 Objective CM -4.2: The City will adhere to and cooperate with Management procedural brochures Management; MDC the County in executing evacuation procedures as well as annually update information and procedural brochures for the public; these brochures will contain information on evacuation procedures and routes, and will be distributed to city residents at local businesses and government agencies. Coastal Update and distribute Fire Rescue/Emergency June -18 Policv CM -4.2.2: The City will annually update and distribute an Management information brochures Management; NET informational brochureto establish public awareness and information programs that educate as to the need for evacuation, and indicate evacuation routes and procedures. This information will be available at the City's NET Offices Land Use Foster or develop job Grants Administration N/A Policy LU -1.3.8: The City will work with and partner with entities placements to assist the City's that foster or develop job placements to assist the City's existing existing and future residents. and future residents, water dependent and water related businesses and uses along the Miami River, in achieving economic self-sufficiency utilizing government resources as necessary, and as funding permits, and will continue to work with appropriate State and County agencies to help support directjob placements, to minority and semi -skilled residents of the city including, without limitation, their involvement in recreational and commercial working waterfronts along the Miami River as defined by Section. 342.07, F.S. (Policy PA - 3.3.11). Job placement objective is to achieve a minimum of 300 individuals monthly reported regularly to the funding source, CareerSource of South Florida. Capital Adopt a Capital Budget Management and September -18 Policy CI4.1.3: The City will annually adopt a Capital Budget that Improvements Budget corresponds to the first year of the CIE and CIP. Capital Evaluate LOS Standards MDCPS September -18 EgUa CI4.3.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Improvements Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. Educatiion At least once every five (5) years MDCPS October -22 EDU Monitoring Requirements: The primary mechanism to the School Board will arrange for monitor progress in achieving the objectives and policies in this an educational plant survey Element is the collection and update of appropriate baseline data. Further, as required by FS 1013.31, the State Requirements for Educational Facilities, at least once every five (5) years the School Board will arrange for an educational plant survey to be conducted. This plant survey describes the current educational plants and the estimated capital outlay needs resulting from a systematic study of present education and ancillary plants. This study also addresses the future needs, including long range planning, to provide an appropriate education program and services for each student based on projected capital outlay FTE's (COFTE) approved or authorized for use by the Department of Education. Educatiion Policies relating to the MDCPS October -18 Obiective EDU -1.1 policies relating to the maintenance and maintenance and improvement improvement of specific level of service for public educational of specific level of service for facilities, as specified in the Educational Facilities Impact Fee public educational facilities, as Ordinance, will be reviewed annually. Each year, the Miami - specified in the Educational Dade County Public Schools will compare the official enrollment Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance, of the school system with the number of student stations will be reviewed annually available to determine the current operating LOS. Educatiion An annual review of the latest MDCPS October -18 Objective EDU-1.2will be measured through an annual review adopted Miami -Dade County of the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facility Public Schools Facility Work Work Program in order to determine if the adopted concurrency Program in order to determine if level of service standard (including the Interim LOS standards) is the adopted concurrency level of being achieved. The number of development orders approved, service standard (including the those disapproved and those that have achieved LOS standards Interim LOS standards) is being through mitigation options will also be reviewed. achieved Educatiion Review and analysis ofthe MDCPS October -18 Objective EDU-1.4will be monitored through the review and statistics relating to school analysis of the statistics relating to school safety, as compiled safety, as compiled annually, by annually, by the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Division of the Miami -Dade County Public Police. A review and analysis of new and existing reactive and Schools Division of Police. A proactive safety and crime prevention programs will also be review and analysis of new and conducted on an annual basis. existing reactive and proactive safety and crime prevention programs will also be conducted on an annual basis Educatiion Goal of Miami -Dade County MDCPS January -18 Policy EDU -1.2.2: It is the goal of Miami -Dade County Public Public Schools and The City of Schools and The City of Miami for all public school facilities to Miami for all public school achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable facilities to achieve 100% Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To help achieve the utilization of Permanent FISH desired 100% utilization of Permanent FISH by 2018, Miami - Dade County Public Schools should continue to decrease the number of relocatable classrooms over time. Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH capacity should, to the extent possible, no longer utilize relocatable classrooms, except as an operational solution2. Capital MDCPS to update its Facilities MDCPS; CoM September -18 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM- Public School Improvements Work Program; The City, through Management & Budget Facilities:The City will coordinate with the Miami -Dade County its annual update to the Capital Public Schools, to annually update its Facilities Work Program to Improvements Schedule, will include existing and anticipated facilities for both the 5 -year and incorporate by reference the long-term planning periods, and to ensure that the adopted latest adopted Miami -Dade level of service standard, including interim standards, will County Public Schools Facilities continue to be achieved and maintained. The City, through its Work Program for educational annual update to the Capital Improvements Schedule, will facilities. incorporate by reference the latest adopted Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program for educational facilities. The City and the Miami -Dade County Public School will coordinate their planning efforts prior to and during the MCNP Amendment process and during updates to the Miami -Dade County Public Schools Facilities Work Program. Educatiion The City's NET Office will MDCPS; CoM NET N/A Policy EDU -1.3.1: In the selection of sites for future educational conduct community outreach facility development, the City encourages the Miami -Dade efforts to provide information to County Public Schools to consider whether a school is in close the residents and obtain proximity to residential areas and is in a location that would residental feedback for the City provide a logical focal point for community activities. The City's to forward to the Miami -Dade NET Office will conduct community outreach efforts to provide County Public Schools. information to the residents and obtain residental feedback for the City to forward to the Miami -Dade County Public Schools. Educatiion Provide opportunities for MDCPS; CoM NET N/A Policy EDU -1.5.2: Cooperate with the Miami -Dade County Public community and business leaders Schools in their efforts to continue to provide opportunities for to serve on committees and task community and business leaders to serve on committees and forces task forces, which relate to the development of improved provision of public educational facilities. The publication/promotion of such opportunities will be available through the City's NET Offices. Educatiion An annual inventory and MDCPS; CoM Planning October -18 Obiective EDU -1.3: will be monitored through the annual assessment by the Miami -Dade inventory and assessment by the Miami -Dade County Public County Public Schools of School Schools of School Board owned property. The number of new Board owned property. The sites will be reported annually and in the full review period number of new sites will be reported in the EAR. reported annually and in the full review period reported in the EAR. Educatiion Potential amendments to the MDCPS; CoM Planning October -18 Policy EDU -1.2.4: Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) will be Concurrency Service Area (CSA) delineated to: 1) maximize capacity utilization of the facility, 2) will be considered annually at limit maximum travel times and reduce transportation costs, 3) the Staff Working Group acknowledge the effects of court -approved desegregation plans, meeting to take place each year 4) achieve socio-economic, racial, cultural and diversity no later than April 30 or October objectives, and 5) achieve other relevant objectives as 31 determined by the School Board's policy on maximization of capacity. Periodic adjustments to the boundary or area of a CSA may be made by the School Board to achieve the above stated factors. Other potential amendments to the CSAs will be considered annually at the Staff Working Group meeting to take place each year no later than April 30 or October 31, consistent with Section 9 of the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning. Educatiion Miami -Dade County Public MDCPS; CoM Planning October -18 Policy EDU -1.2.6: The Miami -Dade County Public Schools Schools Facilities Work Program Facilities Work Program will be evaluated on an annual basis to will be evaluated on an annual ensure that the level of service standards will continue to be basis achieved and maintained throughout the planning period. Educatiion A map series (Figures 1A through MDCPS; CoM Planning October -16 Future Conditions Maps: Maps showing existing and future 1D within Appendix EDU -1) conditions are included in the element. A map series (Figures 1A, indicate the public school and through 1D within Appendix EDU -1) indicate the public school ancillary facility locations and ancillary facility locations anticipated by as December 31, anticipated by December 31, 2016. 2016. Coastal Include information on the City's NET N/A Policy CM -5.1.5: The City will continue to include information on Management historic, architectural and the City's historic, architectural and cultural heritage for cultural heritage inclusion in public information, economic development promotion and tourism materials. (See Land Use Policy LU - 2.5.4.) This Information will be available at the City's NET Offices. The NET Offices may also coordinate community forums to seek community input on potential redevelopment concepts or future usages. Housing End chronic homelessness by NET December -17 Objective HO -1.4: The City will continue to participate in the December, 2017 local Continuum of Care's (CoC) effort to end chronic homelessness by December, 2017. Land Use NET Office will engage the NET N/A Policy LU -1.2.6: The City's NET Office will engage the community community on the best and on the best and most desired outcomes through the following:l. most desired outcomesl. Identifying dilapidated properties with assistance of Code Identifying 2. Conducting Compliance that devalue residential homes and business;2. community outreach Conducting community outreach efforts regarding the effortsdilapidatedproperties availability of viable redevelopment opportunities within the city Parks, Recreation Conduct community outreach to NET N/A Policy PR -8.1.3: The City, through its NET Offices, will conduct and Open Space obtain input on community outreach to obtain input on cultural/historical cultural/historical programming programming suggestions in orderto develop quality cultural and heritage programs Parks, Recreation Promote the planting and NET N/A Policy PR -9.1.3: The City will continue to promote the planting and Open Space preservation of native species and preservation of native species by property owners in the City through educational materials and programs. Through its NET Offices the City will assist and participate in tree planting events to promote preservation of the environment and provide educational materials for the public. Parks, Recreation Perform a study based on the Park; Planning December -20 Policy PR -1.1.4.1: Every three years, when the City updates the and Open Space national model established by Parks and Recreation Level of Service Map for parks owned by the Trust for Public Land the City of Miami, the City will also perform a study based on the ParkScoreT" system. national model established by the Trust for Public Land ParkScoreT" system..... Parks, Recreation Review and enact provisions and Park; Planning December -20 Policy PR -1.1.5: By December 2020, the City will review and and Open Space create a plan to remedy enact provisions and create a plan to remedy deficiencies for deficiencies for residents who do residents who do not have access to a park within a ten minute, not have access to a park within barrier -free walk, including financing for acquisition to remedy a ten minute, barrier -free walk, deficiencies. including financing for acquisition to remedy deficiencies Parks, Recreation Develop annual parks and Parks September -18 Policy PR -1.2.2: The City will develop annual parks and and Open Space recreation budgets recreation budgets that explain the rationale behind the program, operational and maintenance standards that the City intends to meet; the costs of meeting those standards; and the per capita budget in comparison with similar cities, including cities in Florida. Parks, Recreation Maintain and staff as many Parks N/A Policy PR -2.2.2: The City will maintain and staff as many public and Open Space public swimming pools to be swimming pools to be open all year round as possible given open all year round as possible. funding constraints and will strive to identify new funding sources to expand access to year-round swimming. Parks, Recreation Annually update the Inventory Parks September -18 Policy PR -2.2.4: The Parks and Recreation Department will and Open Space and Evaluation of City -Owned maintain and annually update the Inventory and Evaluation of Parks that was prepared for the City -Owned Parks that was prepared for the 2007 Parks and 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Public Spaces Master Plan. Master Plan Parks, Recreation Use participant evaluation Parks December -20 Policy PR -4.1.1: The City will use participant evaluation surveys, and Open Space surveys, at the completion of at the completion of recreational programs to evaluate program recreational programs to success, online public opinion surveys at least once every three evaluate program success, years, and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to online public opinion surveys at identify needed and desired programs. least once every three years and scientific surveys at least once every seven years to identify needed and desired programs Parks, Recreation Create a Citywide Miami Parks Parks December -20 Policy PR -5.1.7: By December 2020, the City will explore the and Open Space Foundation creation of a Citywide Miami Parks Foundation by non- governmental groups and individuals to serve as a nonprofit partner to focus attention on the park system, raise money to help support maintenance, enhance and expand parks and recreational programs, attract volunteers, and broaden the constituency for the park system. Parks, Recreation Update to the Parks and Public Parks December -17 Policy PR -5.2.4: The City will develop a full update on the Parks and Open Space Spaces Master Plan and Public Spaces Master Plan at least once every ten years, to coincide with a scientific survey of residents' park and recreation needs. Parks, Recreation The Parks and Recreation annual Parks September -18 Policy PR -5.2.5: The Parks and Recreation annual Capital and Open Space Capital Improvement Plan will be Improvement Plan will be provided to the Parks and Recreation provided to the Parks and Advisory Board for their review and comment. The Board may Recreation Advisory Board for request presentations on park projects, on a project by project their review and comment basis, and have 60 days to review and provide comments and recommendations Parks, Recreation Annually review implementation Parks September -18 Policy PR -6.1.1: The City will annually review implementation and Open Space sections of the 2007 Parks and sections of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan to Public Spaces Master Plan to include implementation actions in developing an annual work include implementation actions plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation in developing an annual work facilities and programs plan and capital improvements plan for parks and recreation facilities and programs Parks, Recreation Online survey of City residents to Parks; NET December -18 Policy PR -5.2.2: The City, through its NET Offices, will survey and Open Space monitor preferences, needs and City residents to monitor preferences, needs and satisfaction satisfaction with the park with the park system on a regular basis, at a minimum through system. evaluations of all programs by program participants to evaluate program success, online surveys every three years, and scientific surveys every seven years (starting from the Parks Master Plan survey of 2006). Parks, Recreation Reviewfees annually in Parks; Planning September -18 Policy PR -1.5.1: The City's land development regulations will and Open Space accordance with recreation and establish mechanisms to meet expanded demand for Citywide open space needs and revise parks, neighborhood parks, and recreational programs resulting them as necessary to reflect from new residential development, including, but not limited to, increases in the cost of providing impact fees, Zoning Ordinance intensity bonuses and public open space and contributions in lieu of land that will be used to provide new recreational facilities to meet its park and recreation resources to serve new development. The adopted Level of Service for City will review these fees annually in accordance with parks, recreation and open recreation and open space needs and revise them as necessary space. to reflect increases in the cost of providing public open space and recreational facilities to meet its adopted Level of Service for parks, recreation and open space. Parks, Recreation Report annually to the Mayor Parks; PRAB September -18 Policy PR -5.2.1: The City will continue to work with a permanent and Open Space and City Commission on Parks and Recreation Advisory Board made up of residents who progress in implementing the are park users, program participants, and representatives of Master Plan, groups with special relevant expertise. The Board's responsibilities will include advising elected officials and staff on implementation of the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan and any adopted subsequent updates to that Plan. The Board will be supported by staff from the Parks and Recreation Department, and will report annually to the Mayor and City Commission on progress in implementing the Master Plan, including financial reports, holding at least one public hearing on the draft report before submitting it to the Mayor and Commission. Land Use Detailed list of definition of Planning January -20 Policy LU -1.7.1: Update the MCNP by January 2020, to include a terms used by the MCNP. detailed list of definition of terms used by the MCNP. Land Use Identify significant Planning December -20 Policy LU4.7.7: By December 2020, the City will identify, as part neighborhoods within the City, of its Comprehensive Plan, MCNP, significant neighborhoods and generate profiles of each, within the City, and generate profiles of each, highlighting highlighting neighborhood neighborhood unique identities, characteristics, and their future unique identities, characteristics, goals. and their future goals. Parks, Recreation Consider the createion of a Planning December -20 Policy PR -6.1.4: By December 2020, The City will consider the and Open Space specialty "Fishermen's Wharf' createion of a specialty "Fishermen's Wharf' cafe district and cafe district and marine services marine services center in the Riverside District along N.W. North center in the Riverside District River Drive on the Miami River. along N.W. North River Drive on the Miami River Port of Miami River Consider approving a joint Planning December -20 Policy PA -3.3.3: By December 2020, the City will consider planning agreement with the approving a joint planning agreement with the Miami River Miami River Commission and Commission and Miami -Dade County to revise and adopt the Miami -Dade County to revise "Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic plan for and adopt the "Miami River the Miami River. Corridor Urban Infill Plan" as the strategic plan for the Miami 1. Port of Miami River Consider to submit application Planning December -20 Policy PA -3.3.4: By December 2020, the City along with Miami for Waterfronts Florida River stakeholders, property owners and businesses will Partnership Program consider submitting an application to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, Waterfronts Florida Partnership Program, for assistance in protecting and promoting the Miami River traditional Working Waterfront. Port of Miami River Prepare annual status report of Planning December -18 Policy PA -3.4.1: City staff will prepare, or cause to be prepared, Policies within Miami River Sub- an annual report on the status ofthe Planning and Zoning, element. Economic Development and Coordination, and Transportation Objectives and Policies contained in this Sub -element, which will be presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. Port of Miami River Prepare annual loss or gain Planning December -18 Policy PA -3.4.2: City staff will prepare, or cause to be prepared, report of recreational and an annual report on the loss or gain of recreational and commercial working waterfront commercial Working Waterfront lands and uses, which will be lands. presented to the City Commission at a dully noticed public hearing. Land Use Biennially report status of Planning September -18 Policy LU -1.1.5: The Planning Department, with the assistance of MCNP's GOP's to PZAB & various City departments and agencies, will annually monitor Commission. steps taken to fulfill the Goals, Objectives, and Policies (GOPs) of the MCNP and biennially report the status of the GOPs to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board and City Commission, including, but not limited to, improving measurability of objectives. Land Use Submit letter to DEO identifying Planning November -22 Policy LU4.7.3: At a minimum, every seven years, pursuant to whether the need exists to Rule Chapter 73C-49, Florida Administrative Code, beginning in amend its Comprehensive Plan, November 1, 2015, the City will determine whether the need MCNP, to reflect changes in exists to amend its Comprehensive Plan, MCNP, to reflect state requirements since the last changes in state requirements since the last Evaluation and Evaluation and Appraisal Review Appraisal Review (EAR) and changes to local conditions. If the (EAR) and changes to local City determines amendments are necessary, within one year conditions. from this determination, the City will prepare and transmit proposed amendments to the state land planning agency. Failure to timely submit a notification letter or proposed amendments will prevent the City from amending its comprehensive plan until it complies with these requirements. (2014/7) Housing Review and amend land Planning & Zoning December -20 Policy HO -1.3.2: By December 2020, the City's land development development regulations to regulations will be reviewed and amended where warranted, to prevent over concentrations of prevent over concentrations of community residences and community residences. similar homes/fqacilities in any area of the City. Housing Update Land Development Planning & Zoning; NET December -20 Policy HO -1.4.6: By December 2020, the City will provide Regulations to permit the sitings regulations for, and permit the siting of, homeless shelters of homeless sheltrs to prevent a within its land development regulations and take appropriate net loss of homeless shelter measures to prevent a net loss of shelter capacity. capacity Natural Resource Achieve the 2007 Tree Master Planning- December -20 Policy NR -1.4.2: The City will work with public and private Conservation Plan goal of 30% tree canopy Environmental partners to achieve the 2007 Tree Master Plan goal of 30% tree coverage citywide. Resources canopy coverage citywide by December, 2020. Natural Resource Create an "Urban Canopy Planning- December -20 :Policy NR -1.4.5: By December 2020, the Citywill create an Conservation Program" for developers Environmental "Urban Canopy Program" for developers incentivizing local Resources developers to contribute positively and effectively to the City's Tree Master Plan efforts. Parks, Recreation Develop and update a map that Planning/Parks December -20 Policy PR -1.1.4: Every three years, the City will develop and and Open Space shows which residential areas update a map that shows which residential areas fall within the fall within the ten-minute walk ten-minute walk buffer for City -owned parks, and which do not. buffer for City -owned parks, and This map will then be overlaid on a population map showing the which do not. most current U.S. Census population data available in order to calculate if at least 72% of the city's population lives within the ten-minute walk buffer. Land Use Explore formulating new Planning; Community December -20 Policy UJI43.5: By December 2020, the City will explore economic development goals, and Economic formulating new economic development goals, objectives and objectives and policies within an Development; policies within an Economic Development Element of its Economic Development Element Economic Initiatives Comprehensive Plan, MCNP, to support businesses, job growth, of its Comprehensive Plan, and exploring new markets for economic vitality. (2011 EAR MCNP, to support businesses, Major Issues) (2011/69) job growth, and exploring new markets for economic vitality Intergovernmental Establish by interlocal or other Planning; Law December -25 Policy IC -1.1.1: By December 2025, establish by interlocal or Coordination agreement with appropriate Department other agreement with appropriate jurisdictions joint processes jurisdictions joint processes for for collaborative decision making on countywide or multi -agency collaborative decision making on issues including, but not limited to, the location and extension of countywide or multi -agency public facilities subject to concurrency and the siting of facilities issues with countywide significance, including locally unwanted land uses. Potable Water Update a Potable Water Supply Planning; PW September -20 Policy PW -1.2.2: Pursuantto Chapter 373.709 and Chapter Facilities Work Plan for a 20 -year 163.3177(6)(c)3, F.S., the City adopted an updated Water Supply planning period that reflects Facilities Work Plan (contained in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP) coordination with the South for a 20 -year planning period (2014-2033) that is consistent with Florida Water Management the current Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan Update District (SFWMD) approved by the South Florida Water Management District (SRWMD) and the current adopted County Water Supply Facilities Work Plan. The City's Work Plan and the County's Work Plan are incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's work plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. (See Natural Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.7.) Potable Water The Work Plan will be updated, Planning; PW September -20 Policy PW -1.3.1: The City's adopted Water Supply Facilities at a minimum, every 5 years and Work Plan Update (Work Plan), dated September 2015, is within 18 months after the incorporated as follows in Appendix PW -1 of the MCNP. This South Florida Water document is designed to: assess current and projected potable Management District's approval water demands; evaluate the sources and capacities of available of an updated Lower East Coast water supplies; and identify those water supply projects, using Regional Water Supply Plan. all available technologies, necessary to meet the City's water demands for a 20 -year period. The Work Plan will remain consistent with projects as listed in the South Florida Water Management District's Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan will be updated, at a minimum, every 5 years and within 18 months after the South Florida Water Management District's approval of an updated Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan. The Work Plan will address climate change and sea level rise that may impact the potable water infrastructure and sources. The potable water supply facilities necessary to satisfy projected water demands for the City of Miami during the 2014-2033 period are shown in Appendix A of the Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (Appendix PW -1). Land Use Notice of application for special Planning -Hearing N/A Policy LU -1.5.3: Notice of application for special permits or such permits provided to any NET Boards administrative land use or zoning permits provided for in the registered homeowners future, will be provided to any NET registered homeowners associations or neighborhood associations or neighborhood associations thirty days prior to associations thirty days prior to issuance of the special permit or such other administrative land issuance of the special permit or use or zoning permits provided for in the future land use such administrative land use or regulations and after issuance of the decision with explanation zoning permits. of appeal procedures allowing sufficient time for such appeals. Land Use Notice of application requiring Planning -Hearing N/A Policy LU -1.5.4: Notice of application requiring public hearings public hearings will be provided Boards will be provided to any NET registered homeowner and to any NET registered neighborhood associations and to owners within a certain homeowner and neighborhood number of feet as provided for in the City code. associations and to owners within a certain number of feet Land Use Increase the number of locally Planning -Historic December -21 Objective LU -2.3: Encourage the preservation of all historic, historic designated sites. Preservation architectural, and archaeological resources that have major significance to the city by continuing to increase the number of locally designated sites for the period 2016-2021. Land Use Increase locally designated Planning -Historic December -21 Policy LU -2.3.2: The City had designated 129 historic sites and 11 historic resources. Preservation historic districts pursuant to the Historic Preservation Article of the City Code. An additional 10 sites (or groups of multiple sites) and three districts have been identified as potentially worthy of designation. The City will seek to increase its locally designated historic resources by 2021. (See Coastal Management Policy CM - 5.1.3.) Land Use Review and amend its land Planning -Zoning September -18 Policy LU -1.7.4: The City will amend its land development development regulations to regulations as necessary within one year of an EAR amendments maintain consistency with its process to maintain consistency with its Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan pursuant to section 163.3191, Florida Statutes, (2014/7) Parks, Recreation Adopt no -net -loss procedures Planning -Zoning December -20 Policy PR -2.1.1: The City has a no -net -loss policy for public park and Open Space for park land in the City Zoning land and, by December 2020, will adopt procedures to this effect Ordinances for park land in the City Zoning Ordinances, as described in the 2007 Parks and Public Spaces Master Plan. These will allow only recreation and cultural facilities to be built on park land, will limit building footprint on any such land, will require that conversion of park land for any other purposes be subject to public procedures, and replace the converted park land with land similar in park, recreation or conservation value in terms of usefulness and location. Parks, Recreation Evaluate land development Planning -Zoning; Parks December -20 Policy PR -1.1.3.1: By December 2020, the City will evaluate its and Open Space regulations, to determine the land development regulations, to determine the need to need to designate a zoning designate a zoning category for parks separate from Civic Space, category for parks separate from and amend as necessary. That category will permit a variety of Civic Space, and amend as areas for passive and/or greater intensity of recreational use necessary opportunities in parks and open spaces. Parks, Recreation Amend the zoning code to limit Planning -Zoning; Parks December -20 Policy PR -2.1.3: By December 2020, the City will amend the and Open Space the amount oftotal building zoning code to limit the amount oftotal building footprints and footprints and impervious impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre or parking area surfaces in parks of more to no more than 25%ofthe park land area. Buildings and one (1) acre or more to no more parking surfaces will continue to be limited to recreational and than 25%of the park land area cultural uses and accessory elements that serve park and recreation goals. Any request to expand this percentage will require a special permit (warrant) and public hearings with residents within a half -mile area surrounding the park. Natural Resource Work with MDCWASD to jointly PW December -19 Policy NR -2.1.4: Since the potable water network is an Conservation develop methodologies and interconnected, countywide system, the City will cooperate with procedures for biannually Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) updating estimates of system to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually demand and capacity, and updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure ensure that sufficient capacity to that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See serve development exists Potable Water Policy PW -1.1.1.) Potable Water With MDCWASD, jointly develop PW December -19 Policy PW -1.1.1: Since the potable water network is an methodologies and procedures interconnected, Countywide system, the City will cooperate with for biannually updating Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) estimates of system demand and to jointly develop methodologies and procedures for biannually capacity, and ensure that updating estimates of system demand and capacity, and ensure sufficient capacity to serve that sufficient capacity to serve development exists. (See Natural development exists Resource Conservation Policy NR -2.1.4.) Sanitary and Storm Work with MDCWASD to jointly PW December -19 Policy SS -1.3.2: Since the sanitary sewer network is an Sewers develop methodologies and interconnected Countywide system, the departments of Public procedures for biannually Works and Planning will cooperate with M-DWASD to jointly updating estimates of system develop methodologies and procedures for biannually updating demand and capacity. estimates of system demand and capacity Sanitary and Storm 1986 Storm Drainage Master PW; CIP December -18 Policy SS -2.1.1: The City will adhere to its 1986 Storm Drainage Sewers Plan Update will be reported and Master Plan and subsequent updates as the long-range policy reviewed annually guidelinefor improving its storm drainage management system, and will update the estimated cost of implementing that Plan through the annual updates to the City's Capital Improvements Program included in the Capital Improvements element of the MCNP. The City will rank the projects specified in the 1986 Storm Drainage Master Plan, with priority given to addressing the most critical problem areas within the City, and implement those projects supported by a financing plan according to the provisions of Chapter 18, Article VIII of the City Code, entitled "Storm Water Utility System." The 1986 plan was updated in 2012 with measurable Goals and Objectives. The plan will be reported and reviewed annually and at time of EAR. Sanitary and Storm Monitor progress on all storm PW; CIP December -18 Policy SS -2.1.2: The City will continue to monitor progress on all Sewers sewer -related capital storm sewer -related capital improvement projects on an annual improvement projects on an basis as part of its capital improvement implementation annual basis procedures. Solid Waste Jointly with MDC Department of SW; Planning December -19 Policy SW -1.2.1: The City's departments of Solid Waste and Solid Waste, develop Planning, through the City's Intergovernmental Coordination methodologies and procedures Policies, will request the Miami -Dade County Department of to biennially update estimates of Solid Waste to jointly develop methodologies and procedures to system demand and capacity biennially update estimates of system demand and capacity.