Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Al Dotson-RFP No. 12-14-077 with Addendumss p_, 01. tp CITY OF MIAMI r't DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE * a,► {{, AND ASSET MANAGEMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 12-14-077 LEASE OF CITY -OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR MARINAS/RESTAURANT/SHIP'S STORE USES LOCATED AT VIRGINIA KEY MIAMI FLORIDA ISSUE DATE: JUNE 15, 2015 PROPOSAL DUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 Submitted into the public art elements/features, parking, open spaces, expanded baywalk and signage. (7) Required Redevelopment: (a) Marina Redevelopment: The Proposer must include a detailed redevelopment plan for the individual marina/boatyard, restaurant and ship's store components of the Property. The successful Proposer shall include the following improvements to maximize boating access and transient dockage participation reflecting concepts in the Master Plan and all applicable government regulations and agencies: i) Reconstruct the two (2) marinas to provide for best utilization of available space for dry rack storage, dockage and/or other uses. ii) Construct a new, multi -story dock master's office, consolidating the dock master's facility in both marinas. iii) Design, refurbish or reconstruct the marina pavement to meet applicable design criteria for appropriate vehicles and loads to result from the proposed marina use in visually appealing manner. iv) Construct and install approximately 300 additional wetslips and renovate the bulkhead alongside these wetslips, subject to all applicable rules and regulations. v) Maintain the existing 648 dry racks on-site and 190 existing wetslips during the Lease Term. vi) Provide an 11 foot wide baywalk in accordance with the Virginia Key Master Plan. vii) Plan, design, permit and construct a public boat ramp and floating dock, which shall be to the northwest of Miami Marine Stadium, and shall comply with the Virginia Key Master Plan. The successful Proposer must maintain the dock/bulkhead wall in good condition and repair for the duration of the Lease. The successful Proposer is encouraged to contact the State of Florida Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund ("TIITF") should it wish to secure additional submerged lands for dockage. Proposer shall bear all costs or payments to the State in association with state approval process. Failure to pay and/or renew the lease, if applicable, of any additional submerged lands Subm30 itted into the public � recmmt on . City Clerk under the control of TIITF shall result in a default of the entire Lease. (b) Restaurant Redevelopment/Renovations: Major renovations to the restaurant are at the option of the successful Proposer, however, the Proposer must ensure that the restaurant facility is in full compliance with all current and applicable local, state and federal code requirements including all applicable ADA requirements. The successful Proposer shall maintain the restaurant in good condition and repair for the duration of the Lease. Proposer will construct and operate the Project at the Proposer's own risk without benefit of financial guarantees from the City. However, the City has an obligation to its residents to ensure that the Project is completed, or failing that, that the Project not be abandoned after commencement. Accordingly, the Proposer shall describe the terms and conditions it proposes to ensure construction and operation of the Project. (c) Public Boat Ramp The public boat ramp and permitted floating dock shall be located on the northwest side of Miami Marine Stadium and the successful Proposer will be required to provide the following services: ■ Planning, Civil, Surveying, Demolition, Landscape and Architectural Design Services ■ Construction Administration services to include construction bid documents, construction monitoring, special inspections and assist with construction close-out. (8) Proposed Renovation/Redevelopment Schedule: Proposers shall include renovation/redevelopment schedules for the leasehold improvements which take into account the commencement dates required by the City and delineates the renovation or redevelopment of each component. The City will require the proposed renovations/ redevelopment/reconstruction to have obtained all required permits and commenced construction within eighteen (18) months from the Lease Effective Date. All physical improvements for all project components must be completed within twenty-four (24) months from execution of the Lease by both parties, unless the successful Proposer applies for and receives a waiver from the City. If modifications are proposed, the successful Proposer shall submit a full set of plans to apply for applicable building permits and any other applicable approvals within 180 calendar days of the Lease Effective Date, and construction must be complete within one year of the permit approval date. City will use its best efforts to provide alternative locations which are reasonably contiguous for the continuing operation of the facility during renovation or redevelopment of facilities. The successful Proposer will be able to reasonably use existing on-site parking and parking at a proposed parking 31 Submitted into the public record fpr ite (s) on ALWIL. City Clerk AL"ft a T :..a _ _ � � - � rte- .-.. ___ - - : d'a�sis�sw► -- :��� CITY OF MIAMI DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE * +*:oaf �eutr AND ASSET MANAGEMENT � — REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) NO. 12-14-077 LEASE OF CITY—OWNED WATERFRONT PROPERTY FOR MARINAS/RESTAURANT/SHIP'S STORE USES LOCATED AT VIRGINIA KEY MIAMI FLORIDA ISSUE DATE: JUNE 15, 2015 PROPOSAL DUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 Submitted into the public-- record for itenits) Submitted into the public record .f r ite s) — l I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY on City Clerk Location 3301, 3605, 3501, 3311, & 3511 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, shown respectively as Parcels 1, 2, and 3 on the survey shown in Exhibit A, which shall be included by way of addendum. Project Opportunity To plan, redesign, renovate or redevelop, lease, manage and operate a mixed-use waterfront facility including, but not limited to, two marinas, a boatyard, dock master's office, ship's store, dry storage, wetslip docks, and at least one restaurant ("Project"). Required Uses Marina/boat yard with dry rack storage, new dock master's office, ship's store, fuel stations; and wetslip dockage facilities and a restaurant ("Required Uses"). Public Boat Ramp The successful Proposer shall be required to plan, design, permit and construct a public boat ramp and floating dock on the Property to the northwest of Miami Marine Stadium as an additional component of the Virginia Key Master Plan. Marina Restrictions Vessels moored at wetslips shall be limited in size as per applicable regulatory requirements. Marina shall provide for a minimum of 648 dry storage racks. Marina shall maintain the existing 190 wetslips and build approximately 300 additional wetslips. The size and number of any and all additional wetslips shall be subject to all applicable rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, zoning, permitting, aquatic preserve limitations, and other regulatory requirements. The successful Proposer shall allow the NMMA boat show event ("Boat Show") access and use of the Property annually during the seven (7) days of the Boat Show, inclusive of President's Day weekend. The successful Proposer shall also accommodate the Boat Show during the three (3) week set up period and the two (2) week tear down period for a total not to exceed six (6) weeks. This restriction shall be coterminous with the Lease. The successful Proposer shall enter into a cross - access agreement with Specialty Restaurants Corporation d/b/a Rusty Pelican Restaurant ("Rusty Pelican"), allowing Rusty Pelican, their agents, Submitted into the public t recor f r ite s) — on 7, City Clerk (7) elements/features, parking, open spaces, expanded baywalk and signage. Required Redevelopment: (a) Marina Redevelopment: The Proposer must include a detailed redevelopment plan for the individual marina/boatyard, restaurant and ship's store components of the Property. The successful Proposer shall include the following improvements to maximize boating access and transient dockage participation reflecting concepts in the Master Plan and all applicable government regulations and agencies: i) Reconstruct the two (2) marinas to provide for best utilization of available space for dry rack storage, dockage and/or other uses. ii) Construct a new, multi -story dock master's office, consolidating the dock master's facility in both marinas. iii) Design, refurbish or reconstruct the marina pavement to meet applicable design criteria for appropriate vehicles and loads to result from the proposed marina use in visually appealing manner. iv) Construct and install approximately 300 additional wetslips and renovate the bulkhead alongside these wetslips, subject to all applicable rules and regulations. v) Maintain the existing 648 dry racks on-site and 190 existing wetslips during the Lease Term. vi) Provide an 11 foot wide baywalk in accordance with the Virginia Key Master Plan. vii) Plan, design, permit and construct a public boat ramp and floating dock, which shall be to the northwest of Miami Marine Stadium, and shall comply with the Virginia Key Master Plan. The successful Proposer must maintain the dock/bulkhead wall in good condition and repair for the duration of the Lease. The successful Proposer is encouraged to contact the State of Florida Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund ("TIITF") should it wish to secure additional submerged lands for dockage. Proposer shall bear all costs or payments to the State in association with state approval process. Failure to pay and/or renew the lease, if applicable, of any additional submerged lands 30 Submitted into the public (� record f ite s) Nix-, x, 1 � of ffliami on City Clerk July 1, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum II, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum II" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions will be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda until the proposal due date, September 28, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions and Answers • RFP Revisions Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements may result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE ( Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. snalding&cbre. com Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Project Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 i lorenzonmiami aov. com Submitted into the public r recor r item(s) k (IT t Of ( tanit on City Clerk V-�, DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager ADDENDUM H REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 12-14-077 For Lease of Virginia Key Marina City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Question 1: Is Marine Stadium Marina currently operated by the City of Miami? Answer 1: Yes. Marine Stadium Marina is currently operated by the City of Miami ("City"). The City will cease operation of the Marina once the Selected Proposer executes the Lease and begins the process for construction. Question 2: Is there a copy of the current lease with Rickenbacker Marina Inc. available? Answer 2: Yes. The Rickenbacker Marina Inc. Lease Agreement is available for review at the Department of Real Estate and Asset Management for the City at the Miami Riverside Center, 444 SW 2"d Avenue, Suite 325, Miami, Florida 33130. To make an appointment to view the referenced documents, you may contact the City of Miami Project Designee specified above. Question 3: Has any of the permitting been started for the approximately 300 additional wet slips to be constructed? Answer 3: No. The Selected Proposer will be required to comply with all permitting requirements and approval requirements once they have determined the location of the additional wet slips to be constructed. Question 4: What is the current depth of water for the anticipated location for the approximately 300 additional wet slips to be constructed? Answer 4: There is no anticipated location for the additional boat slips as this will be determined at the Selected Proposer's discretion, subject to the restrictions set forth in the RFP, the Virginia Key Master Plan (included as Exhibit E), and all other applicable restrictions, rules, and regulations. There is a depth of four (4) feet at the seawall at Marina Stadium Marina at mean low water. Question 5: Are there any conceptual plans that have been completed for the approximately 300 additional wet slips to be constructed? If so can we obtain a copy? Answer 5: No conceptual plans have been completed for the additional wet slips to be constructed. The Selected Proposer shall have the discretion to design the area subject to the restrictions set forth in the RFP, the Virginia Key Master Plan (included as Exhibit E), and all other applicable restrictions, rules, and regulations. Submitted into the public 4N -am - record f r ite s) t T on City Clerk August 6, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum VIII, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum VIII" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions will be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda until the proposal due date, September 28, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements may result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. spaldin g&cbre. com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Proiect Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 jlorenzo nm amiaov.com Submitted into the publics on: f rite s)_ VS-aT ttjj of ffliami on City Clerk DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager assurances that the litigation will not extend the term of the lease; however, the same is not currently anticipated. Question 19: The RFP requires the proposers to provide approximately 300 additional wet slips. Given that the current configuration of the existing 190 wet slips occupies substantially all of the submerged lands within the RFP Property how will the City address the fact that there is insufficient submerged land area to accommodate the RFP required additional wet slips? As the Property falls within the Biscayne Bay Aquatic preserve it requires that any use to be "in the public interest" and only the upland riparian owner can apply for or hold a submerged land lease from the TIFF. Will the City apply for be the tenant and hold any submerged land lease reasonably necessary to accommodate the required additional wet slips? Answer 19: It is intended that the Selected Proposer build approximately 300 additional wet slips. The additional number of slips is an approximation intended to maximize the number of slips, which will vary and will be subject to restrictions imposed by the RFP, building, zoning, and any and all other City, County, State, and Federal limitations and regulations, as applicable. The City will not permit the selected proposer to include additional submerged lands because such would be a material change to the land offered by the RFP. Question 20: Is there a current submerged land lease for any portion of the RFP Property and if so is it in good standing and what is its current expiration date? Please provide a copy. Answer 20: There is currently no submerged land lease for any portion of the property included in the RFP. The submerged lands included in the RFP are owned by the City of Miami as per State Deed 18030, recorded in Miami Dade County Official Records Book 1325, Page 248. Submitted into the public �(� r (� record f r ite s )1% ':,T T laf ffiT � on City Clerk October 22, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum XVIII, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum XVIII" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions must be provided prior to the deadline for questions on November 11, 2015 pursuant to revised Section II A. of the RFP and shall be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda. Proposals shall be due by 2:00 PM on December 14, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers • RFP Revisions Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE { Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements may result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE ( Marina. Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. spalding@cbre.com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Project Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, Yd Floor Miami, FL 33130 ilorenzo@,miamigov.com Submitted into the public - record f r ite (s City r! -A- tLJ JJf �Tami on�k AT Ci Clerk DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager Question 9: "If one proposer fills the available leasehold but proposes only 100 additional slips, will that proposal be considered responsive and the same as one with approximately 300 slips?" Answer 9: Proposals must provide for the construction and, installation of approximately 300 additional wet slips, subject to all compliance with applicable approvals, rules and regulations. However, the number of slips is an approximation, and in the event a proposer provides for only 100 additional slips, the proposal shall not automatically be deemed unresponsive. Nevertheless, please keep in mind that the Selection Committee shall consider within its evaluation the following relevant criteria: Improved efficiencies of marina operation and site utilization (including maximization of slips), and highest projected return to the City. Question 10: "If one proposal provides 150 additional slips and another provides 250 additional slips, will they both be deemed responsive? Answer 10: Please see Answer 9 above. Question 11: "Does the City have a minimum or maximum size vessel requirement for the approximately 300 wet slips?" Answer 11: Vessel size requirements shall be limited per applicable regulatory requirements including zoning, permitting, aquatic preserve limitations, etc. Question 12: "When will the City include as part of the RFP property additional: City -owned submerged land to the north of the current property" Answer 12: Please see Answer 3 on Addendum XV, providing, in part, that the survey of the lease area shall be revised to include additional submerged land. The City is in the process of obtaining the survey revision and currently anticipates receipt of the newly revised survey within approximately two (2) weeks. As soon as the final revised survey is available, it shall be posted as an Addendum to the subject RFP. Question 13: "Can the City provide a diagram of the additional submerged lands area for the approximately 300 wet slips required in the programming outline in the RFP as discussed at October 2, 2015 Pre -Proposal Submission Conference?" Answer 13: A sketch of the additional submerged lands shall be available for review as soon as the final revised survey is available. Please see Answer 12 above for additional information. 4 Submitted into the public e— record f ite (s _ (11itu laf ffliami on City Clerk August 6, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum VIII, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum VIII" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions will be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda until the proposal due date, September 28, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements may result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. Malding@cbre.com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Project Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 ilorenzo&miamigov.com Submitted into the public 0t r record ite s) I %UT of on 17.7, 1A City Clerk DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager Question 7: Likewise, and even worse, Marine Related Commercial Establishment includes boat repairs and boat servicing, however, Marine Related Industrial Establishment is defined to include "All work on vessels which exceed eight (8) feet in width; all vessel paint and body work, and major engine work or overhaul, shall be considered marine—related industrial activity....". Marine Related Industrial Establishments are prohibited in the CS Zone. Every boat stored or moored in the RFP mandated facilities will exceed 8 feet in width. Therefore the RFP required boat repairs and servicing for what will be more than 1000 boats will be prohibited and a Special Exception cannot grant a prohibited use. The RFP mandated facilities cannot be built or function if boat repairs and boat servicing are prohibited. Answer 7: Please see Answer 1 above. Question 8: Miami2l regulates height based on stories, which is measured from finished floor to finished floor. How will height be measured for this RFP project given that the facility that is developed will consist of boat racks and unfinished floors? Further, there are no apparent regulatory height or story limitations for the Property. What is the number of stories that are permitted? Answer 8: Please see Answer I above. Please also note that the Virginia Key Master Plan, which should be used as a guiding tool, provides a maximum height of 65 feet, which is the indicated height of the Marine Stadium. Question 9: The Virginia Key Master Plan ("VKMP") was passed by Resolution of the City Commission solely as a "guiding tool for development of the Key" not as a regulating plan. (See Resolution No. 10-0331 passed July 22, 2010). What is the status of the VKM.P for this RFP? Will it be used as a "guiding tool" as stated in the adopting resolution or is it expected to carry more weight in this process and the review and approval of the mandated RFP improvements? Answer 9: The Virginia Key Master Plan will serve as a guiding tool, and not as a mandatory requirement. However, please keep in mind that the Evaluation Criteria specified in Section IX of the RFP provides that all proposals shall be evaluated, in part, by their "compatibility and enhancement of Master Plan features." Question 10: The Miami Marine Stadium is designated as an historic site. Does the Historic designation of the Marine Stadium affect any portion of the RFP Property? If so will a Certificate of Appropriateness be required for all or any portion of the RFP improvements? Does the designation include the Stadium water basin and if so where is the boundary of the designation in the water basin? Is any portion of the Bayside Hut restaurant property affected by the Historic designation? Answer 10: The historic designation of Miami Marine Stadium, also known as Ralph Munroe Marine Stadium applies to the stadium itself as well as to the submerged lands in the basin. Resolution No. Submitted into the public record fo ite ) Ofitla of ffliamlt on City Clerk DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager HEPB-2008-56 specifically provides that "[t]he designation shall include the footprint of the stadium itself; the entire aquatic basin area measuring some 6,000 feet by 1,400 feet stretching from Biscayne Bay to the marine stadium; and an area that includes the land one hundred (100) feet to the north, south, and east of the stadium's footprint as that area includes the location of the original fountain and ticket booths; and that the boundaries established by the 100 foot buffer on the east and west of the stadium be extended forward to the Rickenbacker Causeway, thus creating a rectangle from the stadium to the roadway." The Virginia Key Master Plan presentation adopted by the City Commission on July 22, 2010, and available at http://www.miamigov.com/planning/docs/plans/vk/VaKpyPresentationJuly222010.pdf, also provides an illustration of the historically designated portion on page 35. The historic designation does not extend past the above-described area. The Selected Proposer shall comply with the requirements and protections required as a result of the historical designation to the portions of the RFP property, where applicable, including obtaining any and all required Certificates of Appropriateness from the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. Question 11: Will the City consider initiating an application amending Miami2l to create an Special Area Plan for the RFP Property to create regulations that are tailored to and will allow to required RFP uses and improvements so that boat storage, boat repairs and boat servicing of vessels that exceed 8 feet in width are Allowed as of Right? Likewise, will the city consider utilizing such a SAP amendment to clarify and confirm what the applicable zoning regulations are so that a RFP response can be designed with some confidence that it can be approved, permitted and built without undue risk of challenge by an unsuccessful bidder, the Village of Key Biscayne or some third party individual? Note that the RFP requires improvements that will far exceed 50% of the value of the current improvements thereby likely eliminating any "grandfathered" status that might exist for the existing non -conforming improvements and uses. As the Marine Stadium and boat show have amply demonstrated there is no lack of parties that may be interested in stopping the redevelopment of this important property. What is the timing of enacting such code amendments? Answer 11: Please see Answer I above. Please also note that the Selected Proposer will be required to submit the application and pay for any and all fees, impositions, etc. that are or may be required for the application and process. If practicable in the opinion of the City, and at the City's sole and absolute discretion, the City may be a co -applicant as owner of the property. The specific details of the applicable zoning regulations cannot be conclusively determined at this time since the Selected Proposer may elect to apply for an amendment, exception, development permit, and/or Special Area Plan. The Special Area Plan would require that a Lease and Development Agreement be approved and executed in order to begin the application process. The same cannot be executed until after the Selected Proposer has obtained referendum approval. Question 12: There is Declaration of Restrictions, executed February 15, 1989 and recorded on April 3, 1989 in Official Records Book 140.54, page 1333 of the Records, made by the City to assure the County that the subject land will be developed (i) substantially in accordance with the plans prepared by Jimenez & Camero, Architects, entitled "Virginia Key Marina" dated December 22, 1988, and (ii) according to the City of Miami Virginia Key Master Plan (June, 1987) for use as a Submitted into the public record fo on s) — Q ` Oft of ffllamt on ICity Clerk October 9, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum XV, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum XV" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions must be provided prior to the deadline for questions on November 11, 2015 pursuant to revised Section 11 A. of the RFP and shall be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda. Proposals shall be due by 2:00 PM on December 14, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers • RFP Revisions Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements may result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. spalding_&cbre. com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Proiect Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, Yd Floor Miami, FL 33130 jlorenzo(g,miamigov.com Submitted into the public record, f r ite ) _ (111-tia of ffliami on LJ, City Cleric DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager ADDENDUM XV REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 12-14-077 For Lease of Virginia Key Marina City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Question 1: "Can the proposal include uses that are not allowed as of right under the Miami 21 Zoning Code but are allowed by Warrant or Exception?" Answer 1: Yes, proposals may include those uses that are allowed by warrant or exception under the Miami 21 Zoning Code so long as the proposal clearly identifies the method by which the proposer intends to obtain approval for the proposed use. In other words, if the proposed use would be allowed by exception, the proposal must, for instance, clearly state that the use would be subject to approval through the exception process and indicate the amount of time, investment, and other relevant information concerning the intended process for obtaining such approval; similarly, if the proposed use would only be allowed by the implementation of a Special Area Plan ("SAP"), the proposal must clearly state that the use would be subject to approval through the SAP process and indicate the amount of time, investment, and other relevant information concerning the intended process for obtaining the approval. Question 2: "In the event that the selected proposer elects to obtain subtenants for the operation of retail space, will the City consider a percentage rent structure for retail spaces that is based on sublease income as opposed to Gross Revenues of the subtenants)?" Answer 2: Yes, the City will consider a percentage rent structure for retail spaces based on a percentage of sublease income. Please see Addendum V, which contains revisions to RFP Section VI (f)(12)(e) regarding percentage rent of restaurant income. Question 3: "If the successful proposer is not able to secure approval from regulatory agencies for the additional space needed to accommodate the number of slips projected in the RFP, will the City adjust the base rent to account for the resulting adverse impact on Gross Revenues?" Answer 3: The base rent of two million one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($2,150,000) is a minimum that may not be reduced. Please be advised that the survey of the subject Lease area shall be revised to include additional submerged land within the basin. The dimensions of the area to be included, which were mentioned during the second Pre -Proposal Submission Conference, were based on incorrect information, and the exact amount of submerged land to be included has not yet been determined. Nevertheless, the correct addition of submerged land offered by this RFP will be included within the revised survey as soon as it is available. The selected proposer shall be required to comply with all applicable restrictions and stipulations, and must obtain all required permits and approvals, including, if necessary, approval from the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board. 2 Submitted into the public (-,\. recor f rite , � ttia of �Kiami on W, City Clerk DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager The minimum base rent shall also be revised to include an additional amount based upon the inclusion of submerged land that will be utilized by the selected proposer. In the event the applicable regulatory agencies do not approve the inclusion of some or all of the submerged lands, the minimum base rent shall be revised accordingly based on the reduced square footage available. Question 4: "The RFP requires that each proposer submit a background check. It is our understanding that the provision requires a background check of the entity and all its members, including both natural and legal persons. Is this interpretation correct?" Answer 4: Yes, the background check submitted by proposers must provide background and credit checks of both natural and legal persons. Question 5: "The RFP requires each proposer to provide at least a three-year financial history. How should this be approached if the proposal is submitted through a newly formed entity?" Answer 5: If the proposer is a newly formed entity, the proposal should provide the three year financial history of each of the members of the newly formed entity. Question 6: "If rent payment commences upon the execution of the lease, the successful proposer will likely incur prohibitive losses during the initial years of the term. The City has indicated a willingness to consider a rent abatement period that would equitably share this risk between the City and the successful proposer. However, the City has not defined the extent of the rent abatement period. Without concrete assurances regarding the rent abatement period, it is difficult to analyze the investment opportunity. As a result, those bidders that propose only minimal changes to the current operations will be rewarded, while those anticipating to make larger investments and contemplating wholesale changes, will assume significantly more risk. We would respectfully request that the City consider providing for a specific rent abatement period tied to the amount of the investment committed to by the successful proposer." Answer 6: Payment of base rent shall commence upon execution of the lease, and the amount of base rent shall not be abated during that time. Notwithstanding the above, Proposers may provide alternatives within their proposals indicating different plans to defer payment during the construction period ("Construction Rent"). Please also see RFP revisions below. One suggested scenario would be that the Construction Rent would be adjusted in the following manner: fifty percent (50%) of the base rent would be due on a monthly basis; the remaining fifty percent (50%) would be deferred, and would become due and payable upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, but in no event would payment of the remaining Construction Rent commence later than five (5) years from execution of the lease. The City may elect to extend the deadline to commence payment of the remaining Construction Rent; however, in that event, the Selected Proposer shall be required to pay a compounded interest rate of five percent (5%) of the remaining Construction Rent due for every year that payment has not commenced. Submitted into the public C 10 recordite ( e (1-11of ffliami on0 City Clerk Y� November 10, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum XIX, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum XIX" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions must be provided prior to the deadline for questions on November 11, 2015 pursuant to revised Section II A. of the RFP and shall be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda. Proposals shall be due by 2:00 PM on December 14, 2015. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements will result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. Malding@cbre.com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Project Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 i lorenzogmiamiaov. com Submitted into the public record f rite i(s) (11-1t T-aMt T- on City Clerk VV-- C DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager ADDENDUM XIX REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 12-14-077 For Lease of Virginia Key Marina City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Question 1: "If a Proposer includes a plan for the dry storage of jet skis in its response to the RFP, can the proposer treat jet skis differently than boats for purposes of calculating parking contribution? Jet skis generate less revenue than boats and will likely have less of a parking impact than boats. As such, will the City consider providing a lower parking calculation for jet skis?" Answer 1: Currently, under the Miami 21 Code, a marina is considered a Civil Support use. As such, the parking requirements for marine uses is a minimum of one parking space for every five slips. The Miami 21 Code does not make a distinction between jet skis or other types of watercraft. However, certain jet skis and other watererafts may call for a lower parking calculation in light of their smaller size, lesser parking impact, etc. This is merely a possibility and cannot be guaranteed. For purposes of providing an estimated required parking calculation, Proposers should incorporate the best industry standards for the storage and applicable parking of jet skis and similar watercrafts. Question 2: "In Addendum XVIII, the City indicated that, based on the addition of certain submerged lands, a revised appraisal will be undertaken that may result in an update to the valuetrent of the leasehold interest. Although we understand the need for an additional appraisal, will the City consider the fact that the city added the submerged land only because such additional land was necessary to permit the proposers to meet the initial requirement set forth in the RFP to provide 300 wet slips? If the original appraisal was based on the assumption that the proposer could, in fact, construct and derive revenue from 300 wet slips, then the additional submerged land should not result in an increase in the value/rent payable by the proposer. The additional land will not result in more revenue to the proposer than originally anticipated by the RFP, and therefore, should not increase the minimum rent payable by the proposers." Answer 2: While the new appraised value may or may not require an additional amount due for base rent, Section 29-B of the City of Miami Charter provides, in relevant part, that the City may not favorably consider a lease of City -owned property unless the guaranteed return is at least equal to fair market value. In order to ensure full compliance with the City of Miami Charter and Code, the City shall obtain a revised appraisal, which shall take into account the newly revised survey of the Lease Area. Question 3: "I have a question relative to Addendum XVIII Q12 Page 4 where it says the city is going to publish a revised survey in approx two weeks (6 weeks ago) relative to the additional 800' to the north of the project that may be used for the wet slips as the presently proposed new area on the Master Plan is too small. When can we expect this to be posted?" 2 Submitted into the public record to, ite (s �tiij of fflia i on City Cleric y DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager Answer 3: The survey and legal description of the submerged land to be included within the RFP Lease Area has been provided and shall be available as Addendum XX. Please also note that Addendum XVIII was issued on October 22, 2015. Question 4: "Will the new appraisal be distributed to proposers this week?" Answer 4: The City currently anticipates that the new appraisals will be available in approximately three (3) weeks since the appraisal must take into account the amount of submerged land that shall be included in the RFP Lease area. In the event the appraisals are not ready within a reasonable time, the City may extend the submission deadline at the City's sole and absolute discretion. Please also see Answer 2 above. 3 Submitted into theublic record fite s) p o onCity clerk $ i ffl-am- (17�( November 25, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum XXI, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum XXI" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions must be provided prior to the deadline for questions on January 4, 2016 pursuant to revised Section II A. of the RFP and shall be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda. Proposals shall be due by 2:00 PM on February 1, 2016. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers • RFP Revisions Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements will result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. spaldingkcbre. com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Project Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, Yd Floor Miami, FL 33130 i lorenzogmiami gov. c om Submitted into the public rec:�OM- onCity Clerk (111-ttv .af91-a i DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager 0", 01 ! ADDENDUM XXI REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 12-14-077 For Lease of Virginia Key Marina City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Question 1: "If we were to fabricate floating concrete docks for the marina is it possible that we might be granted permission to construct those in the new parking lot of the stadium, adjacent to the marina? The intent would be to use part of the parking area for this work between boat shows. Protection would be given to the area being used and returned to its original condition following the work. If you cannot give me an answer can you tell me who we should ask?" Answer 1: The floating concrete docks shall not be constructed on the new parking lot of the stadium. Question 2: "Will there be a further extension of the submittal time due to the fact that key information is still required to be able to properly assemble the RFP" Answer 2: The submittal date for the RFP shall be extended to Monday, February 1, 2016. The deadline for questions shall be extended to Monday, January 4, 2016. Please also see RFP revisions below. Question 3: "Will the City remove or modify the requirement that the execution of the Lease occur before the referendum to allow for clarification of some of the below issues before the referendum?" Answer 3: Please see Answer 8 in Addendum XVIII published on October 22, 2015, which indicates in relevant part that the Lease may be executed by the Selected Proposer either before or after the referendum. In either event, the Lease will not be valid unless and until approved by referendum as this is a City Charter requirement. Question 4: "In addendum XIX dated November 10, 2015, it was stated that a new appraisal will be available in approximately three (3) weeks; does that mean the expected date of release of the appraisal is December 1, 2015 at the earliest?" Answer 4: Due to unforeseen circumstances, the new appraisal is actually estimated to become available Wednesday, December 16, 2015. Please also note that the deadline for submittal has been extended to February 1, 2016. Question .5: "It is possible that based on the amount of vessels moored in the water based on the new survey will be substantially less than the 300 originally suggested and consideration has to be given in that regard so as to not make any submission not qualify?" Answer 5: The survey of the additional submerged lands has been revised to increase the amount of submerged land to be included in the RFP Lease Area. The revised submerged land survey shall be posted Submitted into the public , recordite 4 s _ on U 7 City Clerk 0111-tv of ffliami DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager as Addendum XXII together with this Addendum. Please also be advised that the total submerged Iand within the RFP Lease Area includes both the submerged land in the revised survey (Addendum X) as well as the submerged land in the revised submerged land survey (Addendum XXII). Question 6: "What base rent will be paid during the time that the project is going through the permitting process and is under construction?" Answer 6: As mentioned in previous addenda, the project will be allowed in specified phases. Please also see Answer 6 in Addendum XV issued on October 9, 2015, which provides, in relevant part, that base rent shall be payable upon execution of the Lease, and that the Successful Proposer may propose deferral of the base rent during construction ("Construction Rent"), subject to certain limitations. In no event will the City accept a proposed Construction Rent deferral greater than sixty percent (60%) of the base rent, nor shall the City accept a proposed deferral of Construction Rent for a term greater than five (5) years. Proposer should provide a proposed repayment plan for the repayment of the deferred rent upon substantial completion of the project. Question 7: "What will be the effect of a recent charter amendment that requires a new RFP if permits are not issued in four (4) years, if, as it relates to this RFP, permits for the additional wet slips are not issued in four (4) years despite good faith efforts by all parties?" Answer 7: Section 29-B of the City of Miami Charter was amended to provide, in relevant part, that "[a]ny lease for the development of improvements of city -owned property which has been approved by voter referendum shall require additional voter referendum approval for a development on City -owned property where the developer has not obtained the necessary building permits within four (4) years of the effective date of the lease. Such section shall not be applicable when the delay in the performance of any obligation is as a result of force maieure, or litigation that questions the validity of the vote, or the City Commission action to place the question for referendum, then the performance of such obligation shall be extended by the length of the delay." The aforementioned language refers only to an additional referendum, and does not itself require a new Request for Proposals ("RFP") or other competitive solicitation process. Therefore, in the event permits are not issued within four years of the effective date of the Lease, the Selected Proposer shall be required to obtain an additional voter referendum approval. Please note that the RFP allows for the development of the property to be conducted in phases; and correspondingly, for the Lease to become effective in phases. If your question pertains to another charter amendment, please clearly specify which provision would require a new competitive solicitation so that your concern may be appropriately addressed. Question 8: "Will the City allow a phased development such that the additional wet slip component would be a separate part of the RFP and scheduled to commence no later than 24 months from the effective date of the master RFP?" Submitted into the public, - record foxite (s) �s .. City Clerktt4H-am- ont DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager Answer 8: The development of the project may be conducted in phases. Please also see the various revisions to the RFP indicated in Addendum XV issued on October 9, 2015. Question 9: "Will there be one large parking component to include the Rusty Pelicans 220 spaces, to which they will contribute $4 million? Or, can a separate garage be built for 220 spaces for which Rusty Pelican will contribute $4 million and MPA will contribute the rest?" Answer 9: The City currently only contemplates that one parking facility shall be built on City -owned property, which will be open to the members of the public on a first-come first-served basis. Question 10: "To be clear, the rusty pelican lease calls for them to have the use of the garage closest to then, not on a first come first serve basis as previously stated on your addendums. So if two separate garages are built, what happens then?" Answer 10: Please see Answer 9 above. Additionally, pursuant to the state deed conveying the property to the City, all improvements on the lands conveyed must be for a public purpose. This would include municipal parking. Question 11: "Sections 29-B and 3(f)(iii) of the City Charter specifically says that the sale or lease of property cannot be favorably considered by the City Commission unless there is a return to the City of fair market value under such proposed sale or lease. The Charter also requires two independent appraisals on the contract (lease) that result in a fair return to the City. Thus, A for example, the appraisal on the RFP is for .50,000 square feet of rental space, but the winning proposal is for 80,000 square feet, then the appraised value of the winning proposer's lease (contract) will be higher and will not be acceptable. As the appraisal provisions are written and referenced in Addenda XVIII and XIX, the Charter is being changed without a vote of the electorate. Please revise the RFP to reflect the prior language regarding the Charter so as to avoid any future delay or adverse actions." Answer 11: Neither the subject RFP, nor any competitive solicitation issued by the City, could amend the City Charter or Code. The Charter and Code shall continue to govern the RFP and the ultimate lease agreement, including the requirement that there must be a return to the City of fair market value as determined by two independent appraisers. The City is currently procuring appraisals based on the updated and maximum square footage of the site. In no event may the City accept a proposal that provides for the lease of land greater than that already contemplated by the RFP. In order to prevent further confusion or delay, please see the RFP revisions below. Question 12: "What is the base elevation height that will be used to measure the building height on the RFP site?" Submitted into the public record rite (s) ETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION on i City C LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of submerged land located on Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 East, Miami—Dade County, Florida; more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most Northerly corner of Parcel 3; thence N45'44'40"W along the Northeasterly line of Rusty Pelican Parcel, a distance of 1026.66 feet to the most Northerly corner of Rusty Pelican Parcel,- thence N44'15 20"E, a distance of 250.00 feet, thence 545'44'40"E along a line 250.00 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with the Northeasterly line of Rusty Pelican Parcel, a distance of 665.41 feet; thence N44'1520" E, a distance of 250.00 feet; thence 54544'40"E along a line 500,00 feet Northeasterly of and parallel with the Northeasterly line of said Rusty Pelican Parcel and the Northeasterly line of said Parcel 3, a distance of 1705.14 feet; thence S44'15'20"W, a distance of 547.25 feet to a point in the Northeasterly line of Parcel 3; thence the following four (4) courses along the Northeasterly line of said Parcel J; thence N77747'06"W, a distance of 49.56 feet; thence N45 4359"W, a distance of 615,45 feet; thence N10'44'40"W, a distance of 302.36 feet; thence N45 44'40"W, a distance of 439.75 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 1,154,157 Square Feet or 26.50 Acres, more or less, by calculations, J. BONFILL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida Certificate of Authorization Number LB3398 7100 Southwest 99th Avenue, Suite 104 Miami, Florida 33173 Phone: 305.598.8383 Project: 15-0129 Job: 15-0426 Sketch & Legal NOTICE: Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. LEGAL DESCRIPTION -THIS IS NOT A SURVEY - NOTICE: Not complete without all Pages. Page 2 of 5 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION "SUBMERGED LAND", 3301, 3605, 3501, 331 t, 3511 Rickenbacker Causeway, Key Bisenyne, Miami -Dade County, Florida Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 East Date: November 5th, 2015 S ord,fgr itefi?(s) _ City Clerk SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION BISCAYNE BAY 4 J. BONFILL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida Certificate of Authorization Number LB3398 7100 Southwest 99th Avenue, Suite 104 Miami, Florida 33173 Phone: 305.598.8383 Project: 15-0120 Job: 15.0426 Sketch & Legal NOTICE: Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of o Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. LOCATION SKETCH NOT TO SCALE -THIS IS NOT A SURVEY - NOTICE: Not complete without all Pages. Page 1 of 5 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION "SUBMERGED LAND", 3301, 3605, 3501, 331 I, 351 1 RickenbockerCauseway, Key Biscayne, Miami -Dade County, Florida Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 East Date: November 5th. 2015 Submitted into the a� City Clerk SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 545'44'40"E 666.41- z >. u NORTHEASTERLY LINE K O J J OF RUSTY PELICAN - o z wa � PARCEL � o a- zum W_ LEGEND P.O.B. Point of Beginning P.O.T. Point of Termination P.O.C. Point of Commence P.B. Plot Book PG. Page R/W Right—of—Way SKETCH -THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARYSURVEY- BISCAYNE BAY S45'44'40'E 1705.14' SUBMERGED LAND 440-44 4V W 7 VZO.00 P.O.B. MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF RUSTY PELICAN PARCEL PARCEL 3 NOT A PART PARCEL I SEC. Section TWP, Township ROE. Range C/L Centerline COR Corner GRAPHIC SCALE 0' 100' 200' SCALE: 1 "= 200' NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF--, PARCEL 3 .LID (O W t.IJ l0"W 439.75 17 PARCEL 3 PPA=R17 W _—] ACCESS ROAD) W Z J 2 U PARCH, 11 H < N45'44'40"W OF BASIS �K4it� Y BEARINGS NOTICE: Not complete without ak Pages. Page 3of5 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION "SUBMERGED LAND 3301, 3605, 3501, 3311, 3511 RickenbackerCtiuseway, Key Biscayne, Miami -Dade County, Florida Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 F,nst Dove: November 5th. 2015 SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION BISCAYNE' I3AY 1A' Submitted into the pu on 54 ■ 1____ •---•--'_-_'.— LEGEND P.0.B. Point of Beginning P.O.T. Point of Termination P.O.C. Point of Commence P.B. Plat Book PG, Page R/W Right—of —Way SKETCH -THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARYSURVEY- RICKENBACKHR CAUSEWAY N45.44'40') (CRANDON BOULEVARD)"ASIS OF BEARINGS SEC. Section TWP. Township RGE. Range C/L Centerline COR Corner GRAPHIC SCALE 0' 100' 200' SCALE: 1 "= 200' C/L_7 City Clerk NOTICE: Not complete without all Pages. Page 4 of 5 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION "SUBMERGED LAND", 3301, 360.5, 3501, 3311, 3511 RickenbackerCauseway, Key Biscayne, Miami -Dade County. Florida Section 17, Township 54 South, Range 42 East hate: November 5th. 2015 Submitted into the public record fir ite (s) on y creW SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOURCES OF DATA: The Legal Description of the Subject Parcels of Land was generated from information provided by the client. In addition, the following sources of data were used to the extent required to complete this document in a defensible manner. That is to say: —North arrow and Bearings refer to on assumed value of N45'44'40"W along the centerline of Rickenbacker Causeway, Miomi—Dade County, Florida. Said line is considered well—stablished and monumented. CLIENT INFORMATION: This Sketch and Legal Description was prepared at the insistence of: City of Miami LIMITATIONS: Since no other information other than what is cited in the Sources of Data was furnished, the Client is hereby advised that there may legal restrictions on the subject property that are not shown on the Sketch that may be found in the Public Records of Miami—Dade County, or any other public and private entities as their jurisdictions may appear, The Surveyor makes no representation as to ownership or possession of the Subject Property by any entity or individual who may appear in public records. This document does not represent a field boundary survey of the described property, or any part or parcel thereof. This sketch is an accurate graphic depiction of the legal description to which it is attached as per client's request. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify: That this "Sketch and Legal Description," was prepared un -der my direction and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Further, that said Sketch meets the intent of the "Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in the State of Florida", pursuant to Rule 5J-17 of the Florida Administrative Code and its implementing Rule, Chapter 472.027 of the Florida Statutes. J. BONFILL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Florida Certificate of Authorization Number LB3398 7100 Southwest 99th Avenue, Suite 104 Miami, Florida 33173 Phone: 305.598.8383 By. — — — — — — — /` Oria Jannet Suarez, P.S.M. Professional Surveyor and Mapper No. 6781 State of Florida November 5th, 2015 Project: 15-0129 Job: 15-0426 Sketch & Legal NOTICE: Not valid without the signature and original raised seal of a Florida Licensed Surveyor and Mapper. Additions or deletions to Survey Maps and Reports by other than the signing party are prohibited without the written consent of the signing party. This document consists of multiple Exhibits and Sheets. Each Sheet as incorporated therein shall not be considered full, valid and complete unless attached to the others. This Notice is required by Rule 5J-17 of the Florida Administrative Code. SURVEYOR'S NOTES -THIS IS NOT A SURVEY - NOTICE: Not complete without all Pages. Page 5 of 5 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION "SUBMERGED LAND", 3301, 3605, 3501, 3311, 3511 Rickenbacker Causeway, Key Biscayne, Mianii-Dade County, Florida Section 17. Township 54 South, Range 42 East Date: November 5th, 2015 Submitted into the public r, record f r ite T(s) on City Clerk H13L;AYNIS HAY Submitted into the public record(1rite s) 5 a .. l U City Clerk �t# ffl-am- on— T I December 21, 2015 DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager RE: Addendum XXV, Request for Proposals ("RFP") No. 12-14-077 for Lease of Virginia Key Marina, City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses. Attention Registered Proposers: This mailing is "Addendum XXIV" and becomes an official addendum to the RFP document. All future questions must be provided prior to the deadline for questions on January 4, 2016 pursuant to revised Section II A. of the RFP and shall be answered in this same manner and forwarded as Addenda. Proposals shall be due by 2:00 PM on February 1, 2016. Enclosed please find the following items: • RFP Questions & Answers • RFP Revisions Any written questions received will be answered within fifteen (15) days of their receipt. When sending correspondence, please address the original to CBRE I Marina Services, the City's broker for this project, with a copy to the attention of the project designee at the City of Miami. Failure to follow these requirements will result in your question not being answered or replied to. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to write: Broker Jason Spalding CBRE I Marina Services 200 East Las Blvd, Suite 1620 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Jason. spaldina@cbre.com cc: Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk Proi_ect Designee Jacqueline Lorenzo City of Miami Real Estate & Asset Management 444 SW 2nd Avenue, Yd Floor Miami, FL 33130 ilorenzo(a,,miamiaov. com Submitted into the public G� recordf r ite (s) _ �J on City Clerk 'ITT-tv Jaf ffllamt DANIEL J. ALFONSO City Manager ADDENDUM XXV REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 12-14-077 For Lease of Virginia Key Marina City -owned Waterfront Property for Marinas/Restaurant/Ship's Store Uses Question 1: "The table of contents sets forth two sections - Section XI (Development Entity) and Section XIV (Management Transition Schedule) - for which there is no corresponding discussion in the RFP. What information, if any, is the City looking for from each Proposer with respect to both sections?" Answer 1: Section XI (Development Entity) of the Proposal must have information concerning the entity that will conduct and/or manage the development on the property. This information shall include the Development Team Experience Form (or a reference to the Development Team Experience Form within Section XVI. Request RFP Response Forms) and any other relevant information concerning the development entity that would allow the Review Committees and Selection Committees to determine the qualifications, experience, and capacity of the entity selected by the Proposer to develop the property. Section XIV (Management Transition Schedule) of the Proposal must provide information concerning the anticipated schedule to obtain any management companies or sub -lessees to operate certain components of the project; including, but not limited to, the anticipated date of sublease execution with a restaurateur(s) to manage and operate any and all restaurants on the site. In the event Proposer shall not obtain any management company or sublessee to operate any component of the project, the same must be stated within this Section. RFP Revisions: The following revision has been made to the RFP document as indicated below. Added text is underlined and deleted text is stricken. The following section of the Executive Summary has been changed as follows: Parcel Size Approximately -53.49 acres, including upland and submerged land property. The submerged land is estimated to be approximately 43 acres 17 aeres. Interested Proposers must independently verify this information.