The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBiscayne_I-395 Tunnel OptionSR 836 /1-395 and SR 5 / US 1 / Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept Evaluation OT . . FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6 October 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Figure 1.A: Compendium of General Concerns 2. Figure 1.B: Supplemental Rendering 3. Evaluation Memorandum a. Potential Utility Impacts b. Potential Operational / Mobility Impacts c. Potential Right of Way Impacts d. Potential Infrastructure Impacts e. Potential Constructability Impacts f. Potential Design / Geometrical Concerns g. Potential 1-395 Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Concerns h. Additional Alternative i. Cost Estimate Summary 4. Figure 2: Geometric Concerns 5. Figure 3: Traffic Circulation and Multimodal Concerns 6. Figure 4: Infrastructure, Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), Aesthetics, and Controversy Potential Concerns 7. Figure 5: Environmental & Utility Concerns 8. Figure 6: Additional Right of Way Impacts Appendix A: Right of Way Cost Estimates Appendix B: Contaminated Soil Disposal Cost Estimate Appendix C: Rendering received on September 3, 2014 Appendix D: 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Tunnel Project Cost Estimate Florida Department of Transportation FDOTT O� .. Detailed Description N M It N w sa rn M rn of General LL LL LL LL LL Impacts Multimodal jPedl Transit! Bicyclist) ZGeometric !L' W z Operational X 0 w MOT/ Constructability Linkage/ Circulation v 2 Parking j` O z Lx FVW W O U � Aesthetic „ X J � Contamination X z Lu z Flooding! \/ x 0 Evacuation zCommunity LLI Cohesion Utilities x tl3 U rzrw x Project Schedule X Lu x pControversy v Potential ,/� Florida Department of Transportation rn ' M� - �ii IL J (0 FDOT ,. Evaluation Memorandum The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 6 Design office was asked to evaluate a conceptual rendering involving depressing a portion of the 1-395 freeway as well as a portion of SR 5/Biscayne Boulevard near downtown Miami provided by Miami -Dade County Commissioner Xavier Suarez (see Figure 1A and 1B). This concept was presented as an alternative option to the current Project Development & Environment (PD&E) study for the 1-395. Below please find our comments; please note that these comments are based only on the conceptual rendering provided. Potential Utility Impacts: Impact to existing Florida Gas Transmission (FGT) west/east lateral line that crosses Biscayne Blvd. just north of NE 15th Street that feeds the Miami Beach Area (See Figure 5). As per the FGT Global Settlement Agreement with the State of Florida and FDOT the relocation of the permitted FGT facility will have to be performed at FDOT's expense and relocated to a suitable location as determined by FGT. One of the requirements for the suitable location is that the gas line has to accommodate an accessible width of 15' on both sides measured from the pipe edge plus 25' of temporary workspace on one of the sides. This entails rerouting the FGT line through an available side street north of NE 17th Terrace to clear the tunnel and then rerouting the line south through N. Bayshore Drive to tap into the existing line prior to its crossing of Biscayne Bay. In addition to the relocation costs and traffic disruptions the FGT line is the sole supplier of TECO Gas Company which supplies gas services to the whole Miami Beach area. Hence, disruption of the FGT line will directly impact gas services to thousands of Miami Beach residents and businesses. Portions of costs associated with the relocation of the FGT line would be part of the overall cost for construction of this concept, but were not estimated as part of this analysis due to lack of information from the utility agency regarding preferred relocation routes at the time this report was developed. 2. Impacts to other underground utilities along Biscayne Blvd. include but are not limited to Miami Dade Water and Sewer and their regional pump station components and connecting lines, AT&T, and Florida Power & Light (FP&L) (See Figure 5). A preliminary "ballpark" estimate for the relocation of the Comcast, FPL, Level 3, Verizon, M DWASD, Teco Peoples Gas, and AT&T utilities along Biscayne Blvd. is approximately $58 Million. It should be noted that these costs, although additional with respect to the total cost of the project, should be borne by the utility agencies/owners if they are within the FDOT right of way by permit. 3. Impacts to overhead facilities in the 1-395 vicinity including FP&L and AT&T Potential Operational/Mobility Impacts: Lock -down of the Biscayne Blvd. and 1-395 "tunnels" during a hurricane event (for purposes of flood protection) will close two major thoroughfares in an already very congested area of coastal Miami -Dade County. These two facilities currently act as evacuation routes for the downtown area of Miami as well as the barrier island of Miami Beach. Closure of these two facilities would force traffic to seek alternate routes to evacuate the area which are not equipped to handle increased traffic in case of an emergency. 2. Loss of public parking, both on -street and public parking lots (See Figure 4). Page 1 of 6 3. The geometric requirements of both tunnels will greatly impact the circulation patterns of 10 bus routes affecting a high number of existing bus stops and inconveniences to many patrons. The "tunnel" along Biscayne Blvd. will force pedestrians to access bus stops along the frontage roads that are proposed at limited locations since the roadway would be underground in a two block area. 4. Impacts to the existing circulation of the Miami Dade Transit bus terminal located at the Biscayne Blvd. and NE 15th Street intersection (See Figure 3). 5. Even though the intent of the "tunnel" concept is to provide a more pedestrian friendly connection, the portion of the roadway that would be depressed along Biscayne Blvd. actually eliminates approximately 14 existing crosswalks across Biscayne Blvd. currently located at signalized intersections and one upcoming mid -block crossing that is to be installed between NE 151h Terrace and NE 16th Street (See Figure 3). It is important to note that an independent connection between the Aarsht Center and Bicentennial Park is not being proposed with this concept as pedestrians would still have to cross surface roadways at the proposed roundabout location. 6. Impacts to the traffic connectivity between Biscayne Blvd. (south of 1-395) and the proposed site for the Resort World Miami Project (See Figure 3). 7. The proposed interruption of NE 13th Street between Bayshore Drive and NE 2nd Avenue would create significant circulation problems and could create gridlock conditions along NE 14th Street east of NE 2nd Avenue (See Figure 3). 8. Impacts to the Biscayne Blvd. northbound access for all land uses between NE 11th Street and NE 9th Street and NE 2nd Avenue and Biscayne Blvd. It will require vehicles in this area to first travel southbound along either NE 2nd Avenue or the Biscayne Blvd. Frontage road to then use NE 8th Street to access the Biscayne Blvd. northbound tunnel (See Figure 3). Potential Right of Way Impacts: 1. Based on the tunnel concept rendering, the proposed depressed typical section of roadway along Biscayne Blvd. was assumed to consist of four (4) 12' lanes, 14' median including 4' inside shoulders, 8' outside shoulders, and 2' concrete U -wall. The frontage roads consist of two (2) 11' lanes, 6' inside shoulder, curb & gutter on the outside, and 6' sidewalk which sums up to a total typical section width of 154'. This section cannot be accommodated within the existing 100' right of way along Biscayne Blvd. north of the 1- 395 without acquiring additional right of way and affecting the existing building structures along the corridor. Approximately 32' of additional right of way will be required on the west side and 22' of additional right of way on the east side (See Figure 6). Nine (9) private parcels will be impacted yielding a total acquisition cost of approximately $81 Million (See Appendix A). 2. At a minimum, the elevated profiles along N. Miami Avenue, NE 1St Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue as a consequence to the 1-395 vertical alignment would have detrimental access and right of way impacts not only along these corridors but also along its intersecting side streets (NE 13th Street, NE 13th Terrace, NE 11th Terrace and NE 11th Street). Approximately 5' of additional right of way will be required along both the west and east sides, respectively (See Figure 6). Fifty (50) parcels will be impacted yielding a total acquisition cost of approximately $44 Million (See Appendix A). Page 2 of 6 Potential Infrastructure Impacts: Impacts to the existing Miami Dade Transit Metro Mover structure (existing pier columns) at the NE 11th Terrace and NE 15th Street intersections with Biscayne Blvd. Service will be temporarily disrupted between the School Board, Adrienne Arsht Center, and Museum Park to the rest of the downtown area (See Figure 2). For reference purposes, the cost for the Miami International Airport People Mover in 2013 was $270 Million for 1.25 miles which equals to $41,000.00 per linear foot. Hence, the approximate reconstruction cost of the impacted downtown people mover segments (Total of approximately 308 Feet) at the NE 11th Terrace and NE 15th Street intersections with Biscayne Blvd will be approximately $13 Million. 2. Impacts to signals throughout the Biscayne Blvd. corridor as well as adjacent parallel roadways. Potential Constructability Impacts: Maintenance of Traffic along Biscayne Blvd. during construction of this concept may require the complete shutdown of the corridor, which in this case would require diverting northbound traffic through NW 61h Street, NE 1St Avenue, NW 141h Street, NE 2nd Avenue, and NE 17th Terrace to continue north along Biscayne Blvd. Biscayne Blvd. southbound traffic will be diverted through NE 171h Terrace, NE 2nd Avenue, and NW 71h Street to continue south on Biscayne Blvd. The corridors to be used for the detours already operate at a high level of capacity and with the addition of the Biscayne Blvd. traffic severe gridlocks would be expected throughout the downtown Miami area for a substantial period of time (See Figure 4). 2. Construction of this project would take a substantial amount of time and would impact several communities in a very dense and urban area with many points of destination nearby. 3. Impact to residents and tourists with the limitation of staging areas, dirt, noise, restrictions in public life, and aesthetics would also be of concern for residents in this area. 4. Impact to businesses and economic sustainability of the area. 5. As per the Contamination Screening Evaluation Report prepared for the 1-395 PD&E, two high risk contamination sites were identified near Biscayne Blvd. The high risk contamination sites are where the Perfect Service Station and the Belcher Oil Company Terminal & Tank Farm used to operate (See Figure 5). The construction of the tunnels will require a very detailed analysis and survey of the contaminated sites; just the study alone and obtaining the corresponding permits may take a couple of years. Based on the most recent information obtained from the environmental agencies' files for the Belcher Oil and Perfect Oil sites, the contamination appears to extend approximately 1,300 feet along the proposed construction corridor for the subject project. It is estimated that the project cost to address the contaminated material will be approximately $27.3 Million (See Appendix B). It is also estimated that it will require approximately 106 days load -out and disposing of this contaminated material (approximately 526,000 tons) to a Class I Landfill. The cost of addressing the contaminated material does not include the construction and operation cost of a required temporary water treatment facility. Page 3 of 6 Potential Design/Geometrical Concerns: The proposed tunnel concept Vertical alignment along 1-395 will exceed the maximum grade requirements and not meet the minimum curve length fora freeway as per the FDOT standards and criteria. The restriction of having to maintain a minimum vertical clearance at the intersecting FEC railroad corridor and the limited distance to the west approach tunnel portals forces the 1-395 profile to exceed the maximum allowable vertical grade. Furthermore, even with a substandard 1-395 profile,N. Miami Avenue, NE 1St Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue would need to be raised to allow the 1-395 tunnel to run underneath them (See Figure 2). 2. The new required N. Miami Avenue profile will interrupt the continuity of NW/NE 141h Street. NW 14th Street is the only east/west facility in the area connecting the Civic Center/Health District west of 1-95 with Biscayne Blvd, therefore maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency response reasons (See Figure 2). 3. It is our understanding that the concept presented involves "raising" the grade elevations to allow the top of the I-395 "tunnel' to be 10 feet above the current grade. This raised area would create grade changes along NE 1St Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue which can lead to deficiencies in stopping sight distance, special structural designs, and roadway vertical alignment concerns along these surface streets. Potential 1-395 PD&E Concerns: 1. 1-395 requires a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that may require an additional five (5) years to complete. The Record of Decision issued on July, 2010 is for a bridge. Both a tunnel and an open cut tunnel were evaluated in PD&E and determined not to be feasible due to impacts to Overtown. The Supplemental EIS would need to mitigate impacts to Overtown for the tunnel to be considered a viable alternative (See Figure 4). Additional Alternative: On September 3, 2014, the Department was provided with an additional artistic rendering depicting a slightly modified layout of the proposed public space which, from a roadway and transportation standpoint, provided some changes from the rendering that was originally reviewed as part of this evaluation memorandum (See Appendix C). A cursory review was performed on this new alternative; the following are some concerns that were observed: • It is unclear from the rendering whether the surface "paths" shown are intended to be for vehicular traffic or pedestrian traffic. • Assuming that they are for pedestrian traffic, circulation patterns for vehicular traffic would be limited given that there would be no surface access for vehicles exiting the Downtown Miami area in the northbound direction to travel in the eastbound direction towards Miami Beach via the MacArthur Causeway. • The roundabout originally proposed as part of the first rendering provided seems to have been replaced by a monument or sculpture; this elimination would limit the circulation pattern of vehicles exiting the Downtown Miami area and force vehicles north onto a network of local streets that may not be able to handle the additional traffic flows. • It is unclear from this image where the exit point for the "tunnel' portion of Biscayne Blvd. would be located; it is assumed that it would be near the same location as that shown in the original rendering provided. Page 4 of 6 In short, more information would be needed regarding the depressed sections of roadways proposed as part of this alternative in order to be able to more accurately evaluate the impacts and costs associated with this concept. It should be noted that because of its artistic nature, this rendering was assumed to be a modified representation of the overall concept being evaluated by this report and in no way an engineering document meant to substitute the original rendering reviewed by FDOT. Cost Estimate Summary: As per the 1-395 PD&E evaluation, the Signature Bridge was selected as the preferred alternative. Total cost for the entire Signature Bridge project was estimated at $600 Million with the Signature Bridge structure alone accounting for $70 Million. A conceptual cost estimate based on the rendering involving depressing a portion of the 1-395 freeway as well as a portion of SR 5/Biscayne Boulevard near downtown Miami provided by Miami -Dade County Commissioner Xavier Suarez was prepared in order to evaluate net change in cost (See Appendix D). The net increase in cost between the 1-395 /Biscayne Boulevard tunnel concept and the 1-395 Signature Bridge Project evaluated the cost of both alternatives within the limits defined by the rendering (See Figure 1.A). A summary of the cost estimate is presented below: Table 1: Cost of 1-395/Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept No. Description Cost Total Construction Cost for 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Boulevard 1 Tunnel Concept including roadway reconstruction of Miami Avenue, $1,322,368,301 NE 1St Avenue, NE 2nd Avenue, and Biscayne Boulevard Frontage Road (As shown in Figure 2). Cost for additional impacts associated with the 1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept • Utility Impacts: $58 Million (costs assumed not to be reimbursable; to be paid for by the utility agency/owner) 2 • Right of Way Acquisition: $125 Million $165,300,000 • Miami Dade Transit Metro Mover Infrastructure Impacts: $13 Million • Contamination Mitigation: $27.3 Million 3 Grand Total $1,487,668,301 *Grand total does not include additional reimbursable costs associated with relocation of the FGT gas line Page 5 of 6 Table 2: Cost of 1-395 Signature Bridge Project within Limits Defined by Rendering No. Description Cost Cost for Signature Bridge Structure, 1-395 Mainline / Ramp 1 Connections, and local roads directly impacted and replaced by $171,518,658 the proposed 1-395 Tunnel concept. Net Increase in cost = (Cost of 1-395/Biscayne Boulevard Tunnel Concept) — (Cost of 1-395 Signature Bridge Project within Limits $1,316,149,643* Defined by Rendering) Based on the cost estimates shown above, the net estimated increase in cost of the 1- 395/Biscayne Boulevard tunnel concept when compared to the 1-395 signature bridge project amounts to a total of $1,316,149,643*. Page 6 of 6 I r, _ • NW 14 Street is the only east -west facility n the area connecting the Civic Center/Health District west of I-95 with Biscayne Boulevard, thus maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency service reasons. The new required Miami Avenue profile will interrupt the continuity of NW1NE 14 Street. �� 95 L 1.. i 395 Y - The higher elevated profiles of several surface street facilities (i.e., NE 13 Street, �,. NE 11 Terrace, North Miami Avenue, NE 1 LEGEND Avenue, NE 2 Avenue, etc.) will result in the need to truncate such facilities as NE 13 Street and NE 14 Street. Thereby creating community cohesion concerns and high controversy potential. 3 The NE 1 Avenue profile would have to be elevated. This higher profile would not only VAIN have detrimental access and right of way r NE 14 ST impacts along NE 1 Avenue but also along li — NE 13 Street, NE 13 Terrace, NE 11 Terrace and NE 11 Street. NE 73 TER dfI�n�fl ,J�t�l. NE 13STp The required profile modification along NE 2 Avenue, NE 11 Terrace and NE 15 Street would require major reconstruction of the Miami -Dade Metromover, a vital Downtown r� transit link. The NE 2 Avenue profile would also have to be elevated (see NE 2AVE PROFILE). This higher profile would not only have detrimental access and right of way impacts along NE 2 Avenue Geometric Concerns I FIGURE 2 Due to flooding potential, both Biscayne Boulevard nd 1-395 tunnels will likely be closed during certain xx 4 hurricane events. These two facilities are vital evacuation routes for Downtown Miami and the barrier islands of Miami Beach and their closure 1 would force traffic diversion to less effective routes. }4. NW 14 Street is the only east -west ' facility in the area connecting the Civic Center/Health District west of i. �`M!" 1-95 with Biscayne Boulevard, thus �. maintaining its connectivity is vital for linkage and emergency service reasons. The new required Miami rlrii Avenue profile will interrupt the MillEiL, continuity of NW/NE 14 Street. • , 41A ,, -- Route from N to WB 1-395 -- Route from t to Resort We L --- Parallel SB n Traffic Circul4 EB 1-395 traffic destined to areas north of downtown would be precluded easy IF access to Biscayne Boulevard as a q connecting link and thus would be forced r to use the local street network, creating additional congestion and inconvenience! LL LL 11 c—Alf, NE m J The proposed interruption of NE f: 13 Street between Bayshore -' Drive and NE 2 Avenue would , 1 create significant circulation problems and would create gridlock conditions along NE 14 Street east of NE 2 Avenue. . ` NE 13 ST The traffic connectivity between Biscayne Boulevard (south of 1-395) and the proposed site for the Resort World Miami project, (a potential future key downtown landmark) is poor at best. It would require for the NB traffic to use the proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel exit at NE 17 Street turn right at NE 17 Terrace and SB along North Bayshore Drive. The NB Biscayne Boulevard traffic destined WB on 1-395 would have to traverse a circuitous (and difficult to sign) route to reach its destination. First the NB service road, then the NE 11 Terrace/Biscayne Boulevard roundabout, WB on NE 11 Terrace, NB on NE 1 Avenue and WB along NE 13 Street before reaching the WB entrance ramp. Traffic Circulation and Multimodal Concerns I FIGURE 3 Ir NE 11 ST Northbound access for all land uses between NE 11 Street and NE 9 Street and NE 2 Avenue and Biscayne Boulevard would be circuitous and would require first to travel southbound' along either NE 2 Avenue or the �^ southbound service road and then northbound at the Biscayne Boulevard NE 8 intersection- --- - - -_ p The traffic connectivity between Biscayne Boulevard (south of 1-395) and the proposed site for the Resort World Miami project, (a potential future key downtown landmark) is poor at best. It would require for the NB traffic to use the proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel exit at NE 17 Street turn right at NE 17 Terrace and SB along North Bayshore Drive. The NB Biscayne Boulevard traffic destined WB on 1-395 would have to traverse a circuitous (and difficult to sign) route to reach its destination. First the NB service road, then the NE 11 Terrace/Biscayne Boulevard roundabout, WB on NE 11 Terrace, NB on NE 1 Avenue and WB along NE 13 Street before reaching the WB entrance ramp. Traffic Circulation and Multimodal Concerns I FIGURE 3 Florida Department of Transportation 44444 t �. _t. i I= o• _ The required elevated profiles along NE 1 Avenue and NE 2 _- Avenue create a visual obstruction across the intended open y I T" space (park) extending between NE 1 Avenue and Bayshore,-,- ,�, Drive. Moreover, the additional cover (mounds) on top of the ,- > 1-395 tunnel footprint will also create a visual barrier partially 1 blocking the view of Bicentennial Park from the Pac. mad AWh• 7, 1 miiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ®— Biscayne Blvd Biscayne SBB detourroute s vd r � _. �C • - .. • . - . MOT along Biscayne Boulevard may require the complete I shutdown of the corridor and would require diverting NB I . • `� Fe,r-.4. '—' traffic through NW 6 Street, NE 1 Avenue, NE 14 Street, , „. -. . -, .... ... NE 2Avenue, and NE 17 Terrace to continue north along Biscayne Boulevard. Biscayne Boulevard SS traffic will .. . - .. be diverted through NE 17 Terrace, NE 2 Avenue, and NW 7 Street to continue south on Biscayne Boulevard. — . Biscayne Blvd ® The corridors to be used for the detours already operate • ., . - , , _. at a high level of capacity and with the addition of the � NB detour route I Biscayne Boulevard traffic severe gridlock conditions 7 would be expected throughout the downtown Miami area for a substantial period of time. - I j Aesthetics - •` ♦ -� _ - _ r Infrastructure 1- MOT & Constmctability '4 Controversy Potential isA �. ],•.' 9 e Ems. t' A. ..ate 111FA - . 74714 7" W The two proposed tunnels would require extensive excavation in high Wr risk contamination areas east of Biscayne Boulevard. This area was NE 1 previously occupied by the Belcher oil terminal and tank farm and the a , ti ti. i. �. ✓ Perfect service station. Detailed survey and analysis might take up to o A W , - three years to complete and the contamination treatment cost up to $27.3 Million. v a W Inv - el hbr & Tank Far r ; — �', ME QUA 1 a 4 Multiple impacts to underground *' utilities along Biscayne Boulevard V A (e.g. —ATT, FP&L, MDWS, TECO, r etc.) would cost approximately $58 r, million. In addition, required cross street profiles associated with the I- 395 tunnel construction would also impact all elevated utilitiese. . — FP&L, ATT, eta). ( g F. - 7 j k The proposed Biscayne Boulevard tunnel roadway od hazard zone AE. However, the will impact all Biscayne Boulevard utilities connecting to the existing Miami -Dade Waterprovision_partially and Sewer regional pump station. poll 11, • Environmental ❑ Utilities �> � � ! �* � � �� g 0.1 Environmental &t Utility Concerns I FIGURE 5 1 1 f ti. `? ,, ` • �- ��it, P �,: NE 17 ST 1f k UA t Ewti z I P1 z t. 'r. — * 1 $81 M estimated R(W cost from NE 14 Street tc NE 17 Terrace NE 15 ST ANEW - - - - .� — !P e $44M estimated RM cost for all three avenues crosslrl 13995 w 395 ' 95 Ira sh 1 t±,,. ,_ Y ,1 � �L= i 1�•--_ -gra w 'it NE 11 5Tr` I - t � uj r al � ;,4 ;: ►; LEGEND ` [; ,.le AIg1�y1�� _ '., T , ,.. •. Jklr. NE 8 ST ITh" i ,_ n tr t ',, _ • I A— Additional Right of Way Impacts I FIGURE 6 1 Appendix A (Right of Way Cost Estimates) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Monday, July 28, 2014 RIGHT-OF-WAY COST ESTIMATE I.S. Number: UNKNOWN District: 6 C.E. Date: 7/23/14 county: MIAMI-DADE From: NE 14 STREET State Road No.: 5 Proj. Name: BISCAYNE TU Alt.: T-1 To: NE17TERR EST. NO. OF PARCELS EST. RELOCATEES Business: 8 Uninproved: 1 Business: 0 Signs: 0 Residential: 0 Govt./TIITF: 0 Residential: 0 Special: 0 TOTAL: 9 TOTAL: 0 R/W SUPPORT COSTS (PHASE 41) 1. Direct Labor Cost (No. of Parcel X $30,000) ................ $270,000 2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels - TIITF X $0.00) ................ $o 3. Line 1 + Line 2 ..... ....... ..... TOTAL PHASE 41 PDC (RD) $270,000 R/W OPS (PHASE 413) 4. Appraisal Fees (State): $740,000 5. Business Damages CPA Fees: $20,000 6. Court Reporter Witness Fees: $45,000 7. Demolition Contracts: $0 8. Move Cost Estimate Fees: $0 9. Attorney Fees (Outside Counsel): $0 10. Title Search: $13,500 11. Hazardous Waste Investigations $0 Other: $0 12. Total (Lines 4thru Other .............. TOTAL PHASE 4B Pat ftA $818,500 RNV LAND COST (PHASE 43) 13. Land Improvement and Severance Damages: $36,153,700 14, Water Retention Area: $0 15. SUBTOTAL (Lines 13 and 14): $36,153,700 (NP) 16. Adm. Sftlmnt. (40% of Line 15) X 80%: $11 69,20 17. Litig. Awards (10% of Line 15) X 45%: $1, , 18. Business Damages 1 x $3,000,000): 0 , 0 19. Owner Appraisal Fees 9 x $41,100): 0 20. Owner CPA Fees 1 x $20,000 2 , 00 21. Def. Att. Fees (Ant. Dep. $54,230,600 x 0). 1, 2,200 22. Oth Cond Csts.(Ant. Dep $54,230,600 x - 5,423,000 23. SUBTOTAL (Lines I ru 22): $43,701,400 (NP) 24. Total (Lines 15 + 23) ,& - TOTATL PHASE 43 PDC (RD) $79,855,100 RELOCATION COSTS (P% Replacement Hou, u.tVr Moving Costs Amount 26. Owner: 28. Residential: $00 27. Tenant: $00 29. Business/Farm: $00 30. Personal Property: $00 31. Total Contract ate TOTAL PHASE 45 PDC (RD) $00 a 32. Relocation Service ost: $00 (Not in Phase Total) RNV UTILITY COSTS (PHASE 46) $00 33. Total Contract Estimate TOTAL PHASE 46 PDC (RDI TOTAL ALL PHASES PDC .. . /, . . $80,988,600 Est. By njM4 i r Date: V Rvwd. .,Date: I / 1;4 Supersed46'EstimatdVat4d: 7 Cost Estimaffb Seq"k1nce Number: Update Number: T Data Input Completion Date: Note: The above estimate provided is not intended to be an appraisal and should not be used as such. This Report is a cost estimate and therefore limited in scope. The work performed is different from the work required to complete an aDDraisal reoort. Riaht of Wav Cost Estimates measure cost and not value. Remarks: THE RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON PRESENT DAY COSTS. DUE TO THE PREL[MANARY STAGE OF THIS ESTIMATE, DEMOLITION COSTS AND POTENTIAL RELOCATION COSTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED. THIS CE ADDRESSES COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRING RW FOR A BISCAYNE TUNNEL PROJECT. THE ACQUISITONS ARE BETWEEN NE 14 ST AND NE 17 TERR AND ARE 22, STRIP TAKES ON THE EAST SIDE AND 32' STRIP TAKES ON THE WEST SIDE OF BISCAYNE BLVD. PARCEL AREAS AND BLDG CIRs ARE SCALED ESTIMATES. (*C/Rs AREAS ARE CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES AND COULD BE MORE DEPENDING ON LOAD BEARING WALL ANALYSIS). WP - NO *C/R = BUILDING CUT AND REFACE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Friday, August 01, 2014 RIGHT-OF-WAY COST ESTIMATE I.S. Number: UNKNOWN District: 6 C.E. Date: 7/31/14 County: MIAMI-DADE From: State Road No.: 5 Proj. Name: 1-395 TUNNEL Alt.: A-1 To: EST. NO. OF PARCELS EST. RELOCATEES Business: 37 Uninproved: 10 Business: 0 Signs: 0 Residential: 1 Govt./T11TF: 2 Residential: 0 Special: 0 TOTAL: 50 TOTAL: 0 RMI SUPPORT COSTS (PHASE 41) 1. Direct Labor Cost (No, of Parcel X $30,000) ................ $1,500,000 2. Indirect Overhead (Parcels - TIITF X $0.00) ...... ......... . $0 3. Line 1 + Line 2 ................... TOTAL PHASE 41 PDC (RD) $1,500,000 RMI OPS (PHASE 413) A. Appraisal Fees (State): $2,430,000 5. Business Damages CPA Fees: $200,000 6. Court Reporter Witness Fees: $170,000 7. Demolition Contracts: $0 8. Move Cost Estimate Fees: $0 9. Attorney Fees (Outside Counsel): $0 10. Title Search: $72,000 11. Hazardous Waste Investigations $0 Other: $0 12. Total (Lines 4 thru Other ... ... .. .. TOTAL PHASE 4B P R $2,872,000 RMI LAND COST (PHASE 43) 13. Land Improvement and Severance Damages: $18,829,000 14. Water Retention Area: 0 15. SUBTOTAL (Lines 13 and 14): $18,829,000 (NP) 16. Adm. Sttlmnt. (40% of Line 15) X 80%: $ 0 17. Litig. Awards (10% of Line 15) X 45%: $ 3 18. Business Damages ( 10 x $72,500 ): 5, 19. Owner Appraisal Fees ( 50 x $24,600 ): 2 0 20. Owner CPA Fees ( 10 x $20,00 0,000 21. Def. Att. Fees (Ant. Dep. $23,154,000 x:). 261,600 22. Oth Cond Csts.(Ant. Dep $23,154,000 x .1 $2,315,400 23. SUBTOTAL (Lines hru 22): $20,604,600 (NP) 24. Total Lines 15 + 23 TOTATL PHASE 43 PDC RD $39,433,600 RIW AQUISITION CONSULTANT 2} 25. Total Contract Estimate TOTAL PHASE 42 PDG (RD) $00 RELOCATION COSTS (PH Replacement Housl A Moving Costs Amount 26. Owner: $00 28. Residential: $00 27. Tenant: $00 29. Business/Farm: $00 30. Personal Property: $00 31. Total Contract Es ate TOTAL PHASE 45 PDC (RD) $00 32. Relocation Service ost: $00 (Not in Phase Total) R/W UTILITY COSTS (PHASE 46) $00 33. Total Contract Estimate TOTAL PHASE 46 PDC (Rnl TOTAL ALL PHASES PDC ... _ .rt(RD1 n $43.805.600 Est. 3y: Date: Rvwd. By: G'6ate: Oil l Vit? Cost Esti ate Se uence Number: I ( Supersedes timate Da - Update Number: Data Input Completion Dat Note: The above estimate provided is not intended to be an appraisal and should not be used as such. This Report is a cost estimate and therefore limited in scope. The work performed is different from the work required to complete an appraisal report. Richt of Wav Cost Estimates measure cost and not value. Remarks: THE RIGHT OF WAY ESTIMATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON PRESENT DAY COSTS. DUE TO THE PRELIMANARY STAGE OF THIS ESTIMATE, DEMOLITION COSTS AND POTENTIAL RELOCATION COSTS ARE NOT ADDRESSED. THIS CE ADDRESSES COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUIRING RW FOR BRIDGES AT NE 1 ST AND 2ND AVENUE AND MIAMI AVENUE OVER A HYPOTHETICAL 1-395 TUNNEL. THE ACQUISITONS ARE STRIP TAKES OF TON BOTH SIDES OF THE AVENUES, AS PER CONCEPTUAL SKETCH PROVIDED. PARCEL AREAS AND BLDG C/Rs ARE SCALED ESTIMATES. ('C/Rs AREAS ARE CONSERVATIVE ESTIMATES AND COULD BE MORE DEPENDING ON LOAD BEARING WALL ANALYSIS). CONFIDENCE LEVEL - LOW DEGREE DUE TO SEVERE TIME RESTRAINTS. WP- NO *C/R = BUILDING CUT AND REFACE Appendix B (Contaminated Soil Disposal Cost Estimate) CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 106 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day: 10 hours Description SUMMARY N E 8th Street to N E 11 th Street: Labor $ 951,582.75 Equipment Construction and Heavy Equipment $ 242,250.00 $ 279,862.50 Expendables $ 25,993.00 Analytical Aftk $ 117,211.50 Transport and Disposal $ 20,215,296.00 Pass-throughs $ 2,550.00 $ 21,834,745.75 btotal NE 14th Street to NE 17th Street: Labor $ 239,949.00 Equipment $ 59,850.00 Construction and Heavy Equipment $ 69,142.50 Expendables $ 6,421.80 Analytical $ 30,744.00 Transport and Disposal $ 5,053,824.00 Pass-throughs $ 630.00 $ 5,460,561.30 4�z Subtotal TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT $ 27,295,307.05 TOTAL REQUESTED AMOUNT J4 w $ 27,295,307.00 1of7 CB8d Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 8th St. to NE 117h St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 85 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Direct Labor Project Management 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 45 45 $ 122.50 $ 5,512.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 170 170 $ 04.75 $ 17,807.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 hour 85 85 $ 90.75 $ 7,713.75 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 85 85 8.75 $ 4,143.75 Health & Safety Plan Preparation 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour1 1 $ 122.50 $ 122.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 04 1 1 .75 $ 104.75 1-8 Certified Industrial Hygienist 1 hour $ 58.00 $ 116.00 1-9 Industrial Hygienist 1 hour 8 $ 58.00 $ 464.00 Project Kick-off Meeting 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 4 4 $ 122.50 $ 490.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 4 $ 104.75 $ 419.00 1-5 Task Manager 1 4 $ 90.75 $ 363.00 1-6 Project Scientist ho 4 4 $ 100.00 $ 400.00 1-7 Staff Scientist r 4 4 $ 90.00 $ 360.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant h 4 4 $ 48.75 $ 195.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 our 4 4 $ 82.00 $ 328.00 1-18 Field Foreman our 4 4 $ 69.25 $ 277.00 1-20 Eq u i pme nt Ope rato r 5 hour 4 20 $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 1-21 Truck Driver hour 4 16 $ 55.00 $ 880.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer 4 hour 4 16 $ 58.00 $ 928.00 Soil Load -out and Dis al Ac s" 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 850 850 $ 90.00 $ 76,500.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 680 680 $ 82.00 $ 55,760.00 1-17 Supervisor ( 1 hour 170 170 $ 123.00 $ 20,910.00 1-18 Field ForebW 1 hour 680 680 $ 69.25 $ 47,090.00 1-18 Field F an ( 1 hour 170 170 $ 104.00 $ 17,680.00 1-20 Equi me or rs) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 55.00 $ 149,600.00 1-20 t UWtor (loaders) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 82.50 $ 56,100.00 1-20 quip t Ope (dozer) 1 hour 680 680 $ 55.00 $ 37,400.00 1-20 u' nt Operator (dozer) (OT) 1 hour 170 170 $ 82.50 $ 14,025.00 1-21 Driver (dump trucks) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 55.00 $ 149,600.00 1-21 Truc ver (dump trucks) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 82.50 $ 56,100.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) 4 hour 680 2720 $ 58.00 $ 157,760.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) (OT) 4 hour 170 680 $ 87.00 $ 59,160.00 Source Removal Report 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 4 4 $ 122.50 $ 490.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 8 8 $ 104.75 $ 838.00 1-6 Project Scientist 1 hour 40 40 $ 100.00 $ 4,000.00 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 60 60 $ 90.00 $ 5,400.00 1-13 Draftsperson 1 hour 20 20 $ 62.50 $ 1,250.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 4 4 $ 48.75 $ 195.00 Direct Labor Total 1 $ 951,582.75 2of7 CBM Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 8th St. to NE 11th St.) Task Description: Soil Load-out and Disposal LOA #, Task #: TBD FDOT Project No.: TBD FDOT Contract #: BDT36 WPCE Date: Revision No.: Work Duration: Work Week: Work Day 7/30/2014 85 days 5 days 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QTY Unit Type Unit QTY Total No. of Units Unit Rate Cost Equipment 2-4 Pick-up Truck 8 day 85 680 $ 75.00 $ 51,000.00 2-5 Truck (dump, 15 CY) 4 day 85 340 $ A550.00 $ 187,000.00 3-15 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA)/ Flame Ionization Detector (FID) 1 day 85 85 $ 50.00 $ 4,250.00 Equipment Total $ 242,250.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment 6-7 Dozer CAT D-6 1 day 85 375.00 $ 31,875.00 6-22 Storage Trailer 1 day $ 17.50 $ 1,487.50 6-28 Wheel Loader, (Cat 966) 4 day 40 $ 725.00 $ 246,500.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment Total $ 279,862.50 Expendables 8-28 Visqueen 4 oll/p ay 340 $ 76.45 $ 25,993.00 Expendables Total $ 25,993.00 Analytical 9-3 Kerosene Analytical Group each 1 610 $ 192.15 $ 117,211.50 Lszol Analytical Total $ 117,211.50 Transport and Dispos 12-4 Transportation & Dis -petr leu1 Contaminated Soil n-haz us) ton 421,152 421,152 $ 48.00 $ 20,215,296.00 Transport g&JMWosaWtaI $ 20,215,296.00 A0 Mg W Pass-t h PANNOW, 4 day 85.00 340.00 $ 7.50 $ 2,550.00 ass- ughs Mal $ 2,550.00 Es ed Total $ 21,834,745.75 IV Legend and Comments Section = Estimated production of 5,000 tons per day and no night or weekend work FID = Flame Ionization Detector No = Number OT = overtime OVA = Organic Vapor Analyzer QTY = Quantity 3of7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.) WPCE Date: 7/30/2014 Task Description: Soil Load-out and Disposal Revision No.: LOA #, Task #: TBD Work Duration: 21 days FDOT Project No.: TBD Work Week: 5 days FDOT Contract #: BDT36 Work Day 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QT, Unit Type Unit QTY of Units Total No. Unit Rate Cost Direct Labor Project Management 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 12 12 $ 122.50 $ 1,470.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 42 42 $ .75 $ 4,399.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 hour 21 21 $ .75 $ 1,905.75 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 21 21 .75 $ 1,023.75 Health & Safety Plan Preparation 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 1 122.50 $ 122.50 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 1 4.75 $ 104.75 1-8 Certified Industrial Hygienist 1 hour 1 1 $ 58.00 $ 58.00 1-9 Industrial Hygienist 1 hour 47%58.00 $ 232.00 Project Kick-off Meeting 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 2 $ 122.50 $ 245.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 2 $ 104.75 $ 209.50 1-5 Task Manager 1 2 $ 90.75 $ 181.50 1-6 Project Scientist 1 ho 2 2 $ 100.00 $ 200.00 1-7 Staff Scientist r 2 2 $ 90.00 $ 180.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant h 2 2 $ 48.75 $ 97.50 1-17 Supervisor our 2 2 $ 82.00 $ 164.00 1-18 Field Foreman 1 our 2 2 $ 69.25 $ 138.50 1-20 Equipment Operator hour 2 10 $ 55.00 $ 550.00 1-21 Truck Driver 4 hour 2 8 $ 55.00 $ 440.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer 4 hour 2 8 $ 58.00 $ 464.00 IV Soil Load-out and ' osal A ties* 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 210 210 $ 90.00 $ 18,900.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 168 168 $ 82.00 $ 13,776.00 1-17 Supervisor 1 hour 42 42 $ 123.00 $ 5,166.00 1-18 Field F an 1 hour 168 168 $ 69.25 $ 11,634.00 1-18 Field remaq 1 hour 4242 $ 104.00 $ 4,368.00 1-20 Equi rator ders) 4 hour 168 672 $ 55.00 $ 36,960.00 1-20 en rator (loaders) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 82.50 $ 13,860.00 1-20 C Equi ent O for (dozer) 1 hour 168 168 $ 55.00 $ 9,240.00 1-20 ent Operator (dozer) (OT) 1 hour 42 42 $ 82.50 $ 3,465.00 1-21 Kckriver (dump trucks) 4 hour 168 672 $ 55.00 $ 36,960.00 1-21 river (dump trucks) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 82.50 $ 13,860.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) 4 hour 168 672 $ 58.00 $ 38,976.00 1-23 Technician/Laborer (flagmen) (OT) 4 hour 42 168 $ 87.00 $ 14,616.00 Source Removal Report 1-2 Contract Manager 1 hour 2 2 $ 122.50 $ 245.00 1-3 Project Manager 1 hour 3 3 $ 104.75 $ 314.25 1-6 Project Scientist 1 hour 20 20 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 1-7 Staff Scientist 1 hour 30 30 $ 90.00 $ 2,700.00 1-13 Draftsperson 1 hour 10 10 $ 62.50 $ 625.00 1-15 Administrative Assistant 1 hour 2 2 $ 48.75 $ 97.50 Direct Labor Total $ 239,949.00 4of7 CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Cost Estimate Worksheet Project Name: Biscayne Tunnel Assessment (NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.) Task Description: Soil Load -out and Disposal LOA #, Task #: TBD FDOT Project No.: TBD FDOT Contract #: BDT36 WPCE Date: Revision No.: Work Duration: Work Week: Work Day 7/30/2014 21 days 5 days 10 hours Item No. Item Description Item QT, Unit Type Unit QTY of Units Total No. Unit Rate Cost Equipment 2-4 Pick-up Truck 8 day 21 168 $ 75.00 $ 12,600.00 2-5 Truck (dump, 15 CY) 4 day 21 84 $ A0.00 $ 46,200.00 3-15 Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA)/ Flame Ionization Detector (FID) 1 day 21 21 $ .00 $ 1,050.00 Equipment Total $ 59,850.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment 6-7 Dozer CAT D-6 1 day 21 5.00 $ 7,875.00 6-22 Storage Trailer 1 day 2 21 $ 17.50 $ 367.50 6-28 Wheel Loader, (Cat 966) 4 day 2 725.00 $ 60,900.00 Construction/Excavation and Heavy Equipment Total $ 69,142.50 Expendables 8-28 IVisqueen 4 ro 21 84 $ 76.45 $ 6,421.80 AL Expendables Total $ 6,421.80 Analytical 9-3 Kerosene Analytical Group each 160 160 $ 192.15 $ 30,744.00 Analytical Total $ 30,744.00 Transport and Dispo 12 4 Transportation & D'sal-p trol1 Contaminated S on -h dons) ton 105,288 105,288 $ 48.00 $ 5,053,824.00 TranspoqjPMWspdWTot $ 5,053,824.00 Pass u liffAL-LAWntal 4 day 21 84 $ 7.50 $ 630.00 Pa rough otal $ 630.00 ated Total $ 5,460,561.30 IV Legend and Comments Section = Estimated production of 5,000 tons per day and no night or weekend work FID = Flame Ionization Detector No = Number OT = overtime OVA = Organic Vapor Analyzer QTY = Quantity 5of7 Biscayne Tunnel Assessment I. Volume of excavation from NW 8th St. to NE 11th St.: W (ft.) D (ft.) L (ft.) V (CF) V (CY) F (Tn/CY) Wt (Tn) 82 80 1284 8,423,040 311,964 1.35 421,152 Legend: CF = Cubic Feet CY = Cubic Yard F = Conversion Factor ft. = Feet D = Depth ft. = Feet L = Length Tn = Ton V = Volume W = Width Wt = Weight II. Volume of excavation from NE 14th St. to NE 17th St.: W (ft.) D (ft.) L (ft.) V (CF) V (CY) ° W (Tn) 82 80 1284 8,423,040 311,964 5 105,288 Legend: % = Percent estimated for disposal CF = Cubic Feet CY = Cubic Yard F = Conversion Factor ft. = Feet D = Depth ft. = Feet L = Length Tn = Ton V = Volume W = Widt Wt= t III. CB&I Field Person Staff Scientist Supervisor Field Foreman 1 Operators 5 Truck Drivers 4 Laborers 4 Total 16 6 of 7 CB&1 Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Biscayne Tunnel Assessment IV. CB&I Construction Equipment Pickup Trucks 8 Dump Trucks 4 OVA 1 Dozer 1 Storage Trailer 1 Loader 4 Port -o -let 4 V. Assumptions: a. Soil to be excavated by the contractor b. Soil to be loaded into dump trucks by the contractor Aftk c. Production estimated at 5,000 tons per day d. No hazardous waste is encountered e. No night or weekend work f. 10 -hour work days; 5 days per week; estimate 106 total days g. Staging area to be provided by the contractor h. Minimum staging area of approximately 3 to 5 acres required i. No dewatering and/or groundwater treatment is included in this cost es,* t to VI. CB&I Scope: a. Provide equipment and personnel to truck the soils to the s \iZe b. Provide equipment and personnel to manage the staging ac. Provide equipment and personnel to load -put and di se pe ntaminated soils d. Provide equipment and personnel to sample andy�n�r the requirements of FAC 62-713 7 of 7 CB&1 Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Appendix C (Rendering Received on September 3, 2014) IQ • Id t v t low j,- 1�+TEW TOWN SQUARE Miami, Florida Appendix D (1-395 Tunnel and Biscayne Tunnel Project Cost Estimate) Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Scheme: Tunnel Section Estimated Construction Cost Conceptual Level 1-395 EAST BOUND ITEM NO. PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY WEST APPROACH SECTION (EB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 SF 15.64 361,284 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 60 TN 4940 296,400 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 25,860 CY 59.89 1,548,755 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CY 940 5,574,200 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 CY 567 802,305 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 60 CY 444640 415-1-8 REINFORCING 1,851,250 LBS 2.6 4 3,250 451-70 TIE DOWNS 140 EA 3253 420 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 SF 12 00 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 CY 32, 550-10-344 FENCING 840 FT 100 84,00 TOTAL ITEM 1 $14,120,354.40 2 EAST APPROACH SECTION (EB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 35,200 S 15.64 550,528 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 4940 395,200 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 0 59.89 1,459,519 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 6,9 CY 940 6,518,900 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 50 CY 567 1,219,050 400-0-11 SIDEWALK CY 444 39,960 415-1-8 REINFORCING 3,750 LBS 2.6 5,963,750 451-70 TIE DOWNS 214 EA 3253 696,142 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION RD 16,000 SF 12 192,000 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPAC 1,625 CY 30 48,750 550-10-344 FENCING 1,280 FT 100 128,000 TOTAL ITEM 2 $17,211,799.30 3 CUT AND COVER S 400-4-5 CON E SLA 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-4 CONC 19,870 CY 940 18,677,800 400-4-11 ET LLS 8,245 CY 567 4,674,915 400-0-11 SIDE KS 201 CY 444 89,244 415-1-8 E RCING 12,048,000 LBS 2.6 31,324,800 400-0-11 IE SEAL 20,530 CY 444 9,115,320 451-70 TIE NS 1,490 EA 3253 4,846,970 125-1 EXCAVATION 157,400 CY 59.89 9,426,686 445-133-2 SHEETING 149,000 SF 14 2,086,000 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 1,340 TN 4940 6,619,600 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 270,200 SF 12 3,242,400 400-0-11 3" MUD SLAB TO PROTECT W.P. 830 CY 444 368,520 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 3,385 CY 30 101,550 125-3 BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 32,505 CY 30 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 3 $110,226,755.00 Sub -Total $141,558,908.70 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\_DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Constructlon Cost_09042014 1 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Estimated Construction Cost €-395 WEST BOUND ITEM NO. PAY ITEM 4 5 6 455-133-2 460-2-15 125-1 400-4-5 400-4-11 400-0-11 415-1-8 451-70 125-3 550-10-344 455-133-2 460-2-15 125-1 400-4-5 400-4-11 400-0-11 415-1-8 451-70 125-3 550-10-344 400-4-5 400-4-4 400-4-11 400-0-11 415-1-8 400-0-11 451-70 125-1 445-133-2 460-2-15 400-0-11 125-3 125-3 DESCRIPTION WEST APPROACH SECTION (WB ROADWAY) Scheme: Tunnel Section Conceptual Level QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 60 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 25,860 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 SIDEWALK 60 REINFORCING 1,851,250 TIE DOWNS 140 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 FENCING 840 EAST APPROACH SECTION (WB ROADWAY) DRIVE SHEET PILES 35,200 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL \6,9 CONCRETE SLAB CONCRETE WALLS SIDEWALK REINFORCING 3,750 TIE DOWNS 214 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION RD 16,000 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPAC 1,625 FENCING 1,280 411!1� CUT AESLA CON 19,870 EXCAVATION SHEETING BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 3" MUD SLAB TO PROTECT W.P. BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 19,870 8,245 201 12,048,000 20,530 1,490 157,400 149,000 1,340 270,200 830 3,385 32,505 SF 15.64 361,284 TN 4940 296,400 CY 59.89 1,548,755 CY 940 5,574,200 CY 567 802,305 CY 4446,640 9,115,320 LBS 2.6 13,250 EA 3253 420 SF 12 000 CY 4940 32, FT 100 84,000 CY 444 TOTAL ITEM 4 CY 30 101,550 15.64 550,528 975,150 4940 395,200 59.89 1,459,519 CY 940 6,518,900 CY 567 1,219,050 CY 444 39,960 LBS 2.6 5,963,750 EA 3253 696,142 SF 12 192,000 CY 30 48,750 FT 100 128,000 $14,120,354.40 TOTAL ITEM 5 $17,211,799.30 CY 940 18,677,800 CY 940 18,677,800 CY 567 4,674,915 CY 444 89,244 LBS 2.6 31,324,800 CY 444 9,115,320 EA 3253 4,846,970 CY 59.89 9,426,686 SF 14 2,086,000 TN 4940 6,619,600 SF 12 3,242,400 CY 444 368,520 CY 30 101,550 CY 30 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 6 $110,226,755.00 Sub -Total $141,558,908.70 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\_DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Constructlon Cost_09042014 2 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Estimated Construction Cost BISCAYNE BLVD. ITEM NO. PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION Scheme: Tunnel Section Conceptual Level QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE PER CATEGORY 7 NORTH APPROACH SECTION (SB ROADWAY) 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 400-4-11 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 23,100 SF 15.64 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS} 60 TN 4940 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 24,370 CY 59.89 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 5,930 CY 940 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 1,415 CY 567 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 60 CY 444 415-1-8 REINFORCING 1,851,250 LBS 2.6 451-70 TIE DOWNS 140 EA 3253 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 10,500 SF 12 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 1,070 CY 30 550-10-344 FENCING 840 FT 100 8 9 SOUTH APPROACH SECTION (NB ROADWAY) 455-133-2 DRIVE SHEET PILES 460-2-15 BRACING (WALES AND STRUTS) 125-1 EXCAVATE AND DISPOSAL 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 400-4-11 CONCRETE WALLS 400-0-11 SIDEWALK 415-1-8 REINFORCING 451-70 TIE DOWNS 522-1 WATERPROOFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 125-3 BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 550-10-344 FENCING 35,200 SF 80 24,370 C 6,935 CY 2,150 2.6 EA 3253 PS F 12 CY 30 FT 100 CUT AND COVER SECTION 400-4-5 CONCRETE SLAB 400-4-4 CONCRETE ROOF 400-4-11 CONCRETE W 400-0-11 SIDEWALKS 415-1-8 REINFOR G 400-0-11 TREMIESEA 451-70 RMUD 125-1 N 445-133-2 460-2-15WALES AND STRUTS) OFING AND PROTECTION BOARD 400-0-11 B TO PROTECT W.P. 125-3BACKFILL BEHIND WALLS AND COMPACT 125-3 BACKFILL ON ROOF AND COMPACT 10 FRONTAGE ROADS 160-4 STABILIZATION 285-709 OPTIONAL BASE GROUP 9 334-1-13 TYPE SP STRUCTURAL COURSE (TLC) (2.S') 337-7-73 FC -9.5 (TLC) (1") (PG 76-22) (ARB) 520-1-10 CURB 8, GUTTER TYPE F 522-1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4") 19,870 CY 19,870 CY 8,245 CY 201 CY 12,048,000 LBS 20,530 CY 1,490 EA 157,400 CY 149,000 SF 1,340 TN 270,200 SF 830 CY 3,385 CY 32,505 CY 940 940 567 444 2.6 444 3253 59.89 14 4940 12 444 30 30 15,980 SY 2.06 15,980 SY 1915 2,198 TN 94.63 880 TN 107.18 5,136 LF 22.03 3,424 SY 39.15 361,284 296,400 1,459,519 5,574,200 802,305 26,640 4,813,250 455,420 126,000 3 -4,000 SW 062,236.60 1,459,519 6,518,900 1,219,050 39,960 5,963,750 696,142 192,000 48,750 128,000 TOTAL ITEM 8 $34,423,598.60 18,677,800 18,677,800 4,674,915 89,244 31,324,800 9,115,320 4,846,970 9,426,686 2,086,000 6,619,600 3,242,400 368,520 101,550 975,150 TOTAL ITEM 9 $220,453,510.00 32,919 306,017 207,997 94,318 113,146 134,050 TOTAL ITEM 10 $1,776,893.24 Sub -Total $284,716,238.44 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\_DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Construction Cost_09042014 3 Project: 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. Tunnel Evaluation Scheme: Tunnel Section Estimated Construction Cost Conceptual Level 1-395 and Biscayne Blvd. - Additional Considerations ITEM PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE NO. PER CATEGORY 11 DEWATERING 60 MONTHS 70,000 4,200,000 TOTAL ITEM 11 4,200,000 12 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING WALLS AND BRIDGES) NE 2nd AVE. I LS 8,000,000 8,000,000 NE 1st AVE. 1 LS 8,000,000 8,000,000 Miami AVE. 1 LS 12,000,000 12,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 12 28,000,000 13 PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS WEARING SURFACE 4,575 IN 100 45 0 TOTAL l3 457,500 14 FINISH WORK WALL. AND CEILING FINISH WORK 360,000 SF 2,880,000 TOTAL ITEM 14 2,88Q000 15 VENTILATION BLDG. {2 EA.} SUMP AND SETTLING BASIN 8, 70 577,500 VEN. BLDG. ABOVE ROADWAY 30,0 SF 90 2700,000 TOTAL ITEM 15 3,277,500 16 ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL 00; ELECTRICAL 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,000 MECHANICAL I LS 10,000,000 10,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 16 15,000,000 17 FLOOD S AND LS 5,000,000 51000,000 TOTAL ITEM 17 5,000,000 18 O F EXISTING STRUCTURES 1 LS 35,000,000 35,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 18 35,000,000 19 DRAINAGE 1 LS 60,000,000 60,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 19 60,000,000 T:\DesignGroup_Manso`DDE_Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_Construction Cost 09042014 4 20 SIGNALIZATION 20 PI 400,000 8,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 20 8,000,000 21 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM 1 LS 5,000,000 5,000,000 TOTAL ITEM 21 5,000,000 SUB -TOTAL $166,815,000 Total 734,649,056 ITS 5% $36,732,453 LIGHTING 5% $36,732,453 SPM 2% $14,692,981 MOT 20% $146,929,811 Mobilization 15% $110,197,358 Contingencies 10% $73,464,906 CEI 8% $58,771,924 Eng/Admin/Legal 15% $110,197,358 Total $1,322,368,301 T:\DesignGroup_Manso\ DDE _Support\Tunnel_Analysis\Tunnel Section_ Construction Cost_ 09042014_ revised_ GP_ comments 2