Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo - City Manager's ApprovalCITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager FROM: Annie Perez, CPPD, DirectoA Procurement DATE: October 6, 2015 FILE: SUBJECT: Recommendation for Approval to Award Contracts to establish the Miscellaneous Management Advisory Consulting Services Pool REFERENCES: RFQ501331 ENCLOSURES: Recommendation Based on the findings below, Procurement hereby recommends approval for the award of contracts to establish a Miscellaneous Management Advisory Consulting Services Pool (Pool) for the City of Miami pursuant to Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No, 501331. These awards will establish a pool of pre- qualified firms with a diverse range of industry expertise to provide management consulting services in three categories: General Management, Operations, and Finance and Economics. Firms are being recommended for inclusion in the pool based on the evaluation criteria established in the solicitation for participation in future work assignments and/or competitions. Once the pool is established, as the need arises, the City, through a competitive work order process amongst pool members, will select a firm from the pool to provide consulting services in the applicable category. Establishment of a pre -qualified pool provides the City with an expedited selection of firm(s) with the requisite expertise for the required consulting services for non-recurring projects. The term of the Contract is for five (5) years, with two (2), two (2) year options to renew. The funding sources will depend upon the department accessing the pool, and will be identified on a per project basis. The pool is available to any City department or agency. Background On July 27, 2015, the Procurement Department ("Procurement") issued a solicitation under full and open competition to obtain proposals from qualified firms to establish a pool of consultants with generalized and specialty consulting expertise to provide management consulting services to the City. The solicitation was divided into four distinct categories as shown herein. Proposers were able to submit proposals for one or multiple categories and could be awarded for one or multiple categories. On August 6, 2015, eleven (11) proposals were received in response to the Solicitation. The Evaluation Committee (Committee) has completed the review and evaluation of the proposals following the guidelines published in the solicitation. The Committee decided not to hold oral presentations, as the proposals did not require further clarification. Page 2 Memo to Daniel J. Alfonso Award Memo for RFQ501331 Miscellaneous Management Advisory and Consulting Services The final scores are listed below for the firms in alphabetical order, by category, and are as follows: *DNP denotes that the proposer did not propose on the specific category. Price was submitted based on the hourly rates for key personnel performing the services in the applicable category. The proposals included competitive prices that are acceptable as maximum rates for the contracts. The actual rates will be negotiated at the Work Order stage, when a request for services arises, and will not exceed the contractually established ceiling. The Committee determined that firms scoring 70% and above (350 out of the available 500 points for technical) have the necessary qualifications, relevant experience, technical capacity, trained personnel, and project management required in the appropriate category to provide the services to meet the needs of the City. Copies of the composite score sheets for each category are attached. Negotiations will not be held since this is a pool, and all recommended proposers will be offered participation in the Pool. Proposers will be offered the pool contract for signature in accordance with the method of award specified in the solicitation. Due diligence was conducted to determine proposer's responsibility, including verifying corporate status, and that there are no performance or compliance issues. There were no adverse findings related to any of the proposer's responsibility. Due diligence will also be conducted during the work order process Vendors Recommended for Inclusion in the Pool The Committee recommended the following proposers be considered for participation in the Pool. Proposers are listed below in alphabetical order under the applicable category. Proposers Total Technical Score (Maximum 500 for each Category) General Finance and Operations Management Economics 1 AECOM Enterprise Incorporated 400 329 413 2 Bolton Partners, Inc, DNP* 454 DNP 3 CMA Enterprise Incorporated 323 331 386 4 Crowe Horwarth LLP DNP 481 472 5 JRD & Associates, Inc. 413 411 416 6 Management Partners, Incorporated 418 289 339 7 Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc. 415 388 DNP 8 Municipal Business Management, LLC 151 72 151 9 PMG Associates, Inc. 411 414 387 10 RER Consulting Enterprise, LLC 95 45 85 11 S. Davis & Associates, Inc. DNP 328 243 *DNP denotes that the proposer did not propose on the specific category. Price was submitted based on the hourly rates for key personnel performing the services in the applicable category. The proposals included competitive prices that are acceptable as maximum rates for the contracts. The actual rates will be negotiated at the Work Order stage, when a request for services arises, and will not exceed the contractually established ceiling. The Committee determined that firms scoring 70% and above (350 out of the available 500 points for technical) have the necessary qualifications, relevant experience, technical capacity, trained personnel, and project management required in the appropriate category to provide the services to meet the needs of the City. Copies of the composite score sheets for each category are attached. Negotiations will not be held since this is a pool, and all recommended proposers will be offered participation in the Pool. Proposers will be offered the pool contract for signature in accordance with the method of award specified in the solicitation. Due diligence was conducted to determine proposer's responsibility, including verifying corporate status, and that there are no performance or compliance issues. There were no adverse findings related to any of the proposer's responsibility. Due diligence will also be conducted during the work order process Vendors Recommended for Inclusion in the Pool The Committee recommended the following proposers be considered for participation in the Pool. Proposers are listed below in alphabetical order under the applicable category. PR 15194 General Management Finance and Economics Operations 1 1 AECOM Enterprise Incorporated Bolton Partners, Inc. AECOM Enterprise Incorporated 2 JRD & Associates, Inc. Crowe Horwarth LLP CMA Enterprise Incorporated 3 Management Partners, Incorporated JRD & Associates, Inc. Crowe Horwarth LLP 4 Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc. Milian, Swain & Associates, Inc. JRD & Associates, Inc. 5 PMG Associates, Inc. PMG Associates, Inc. PMG Associates, Inc. PR 15194 Page 3 Memo to Daniel J. Alfonso Award Memo for RFQ501331 Miscellaneous Management Advisory and Consulting Services The City may periodically add members to the Pool in any of the categories. The City may also add new categories. The addition of new members or categories will be done through a competitive process, using the evaluation criteria established in the solicitation. The addition of new pool members/categories will be based upon the need determined by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, selection in the Pool does not guarantee work and does not provide for exclusive rights to provide these consulting services to the City. Approved: `" Date: Daniel J. Alf s ,Cit Manager cc: Fernando Casamayor, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Lydia Osborne, CPPO, Assistant Director, Procurement Pablo J. Velez, Assistant City Attorney PR 15194