Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFederal Aviation Administration InformationUs. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Adminlstratlon LAW ENF ORCEMENT GUIDANCE FOR SUSPECTED UNAUTHORIZED UAS OPERATIONS IS&Ue There is evidence of a considerable increase in the unauthorized use of small, inexpensive Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) by individuals and organizations, including companies. The FAA retains the responsibility for enforcing Federal Aviation.Regulations, including those applicable to the use of UAS. The agency recognizes though that State and local Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) are often in the best position to deter, detect, immediately investigate,' and.,;as appropriate,z pursue enforcement actions to stop unauthotized or unsafe UAS operations. The information provided below is intended to support the partnership between the PAA and LEAs in addressing these activities. Discussion The general public; a wide variety of organizations,, including private sector (e.g., commercial companies), non-governmental (e.g., volunteer organizations), and governmental entities (e.g., local agencies) continue to demonstrate significant interest in UAS. The benefits offered by this type of aircraft are substantial and the FAA is committed to integrating UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS). This introduction, however, most address important safety and security considerations. The increasing number of cases of unauthorized use of UAS is a serious concern for the FAA and, in terms of safety and security challenges, many of its interagency partners. This document is intended to assist LEAs in understanding the legal framework that serves as the basis for FAA legal enforcement action against UAS operators for unauthorized and/or unsafe UAS operations (Section 1) and to provide guidance regarding therole of'LEM in deterring, detecting, and investigating unauthorized and/or unsafe UAS operations (Section 2). SEMON 1 Basic Legal Mandates The FAA's safety mandate under 49 U.S.C.:§ 401,05 requires it to regulate aircraft operations. conducted in the NAS,3 which include UAS operations, to protect persons and property on the ` At least in terms of initial contact with tho suspected offender. Z Applying any laws falling within the enforcement authority of the LEA imquestion, 3 The iVA3 is "tbe cotntnon network ar U.s. airspace; air navigation facilities, equipment and services„ airports or landing.areas .... included are system cotnponentsshamd.iointly with the rriilitary." see FAA PilotlController Glossary (Apr. 3, 2014), available at- htt ;//ww vfaa, avfair traf0e! blioa "o s medial 4-03.14. df. ground, and to prevent collisions between aircraft and other aircraft or objects. In addition, 49 U,S.C. § 4470 t (a) requires the agencytQ promote safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing, among other things,. regulations and minim um standards for other practices, Methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety In air commerce and national security. 4 A UAS is an Aircraft that Must Cgrably with Safety Requirements A UAS 18 an "aircraft" as defined in the FAA's authorizing statutes and is therefore subject to regulation by the FAA, 49 U.S.C. § 40102(a)(6) defines an "aircraft" as "any contrivance invented, used, or designed. to navigate or fly i I n the air." The FAA's regulations (14 CXX § 1.1) similarly define an "aircraft" as "a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air." Because an unmanned aircraft is a contrivance/device that is invented, used, and designed W fly in the air, it meets the definition of `airoraft." The FAA has promulgated. regulations that apply to the operation of all aircraft, whether manned or unmanned, and irrespective ive of theattitude at which the aircraft is operating, For example, l4 C.F.R. § 91,13 prohibits any person from operating an aircraft in a careless or reckless manner so as to endanger the life, or property of another. Model Aircraft, Operations An important distinction, to, be aware of is whether the UAS is being operated for hobby or recreational purposes or for some other purpose. This distinction is important because there are specific requirements in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law .112-95, (the Act) that pertain to ".Model Aircraft" operations, which are conducted solely for hobby or recreational purposes. While flying model aircraft for hobby or recreational purposes does not require FAA approval, all model aircraft, operators must operate safely and in accordance with, the law. The FAA provides guidance and information to individual UAS operators about how they can operate safely under current regulations and laws. Guidance may be found at: ,hfft).//Nvww,faaigov/Lias/oublications/�Model aircraft operators/. Section 336(c) of the Act defines "Model Aircraft" as an unmanned aircraft that is – (1) Capable of sustained flight in the atmosphere;, (2) Flown within visual line of sight of the person operating the aircraft; and (3) Flown for hobby or recreational purposes,, Each element of this definition must be met for aUAS to be considered a Model Aircraft under the Act, Under Section 336(a) of the Act the FAA is restricted from conducting further rulemaking specific to Model Aircraft as defined in section 336(c) so long as the Model Aircraft operations are conducted in accordance with the requirements of section 33,6(a). Section 336(a) requires that - 4 FAA action oti thew security concerns support and are informed by the national defense, homeland security, and laWonforeement stwutary responsibilities and authorities ofour interagency partners, (1) The aircraft is flown strictly for hobby or recreational use, (2) The aircraft is operated in accordance witha community-based set of safety guidelines and within the programming of a nationwide community-based organization; (3) The aircraft is limited to not more than 55 pounds unless otherwise certified through a design, construction, inspection, flight test, and operational safety program administered by a community-based organization; (4) The aircraft i's operated ina Manner that does not interfere with and gives way to any manned aircraft; and (5) When flown within 5 miles of anairport, the operator of the aircraft provides the airport operator and the airportf, air traffic I ic control tower (When an air traffic facility is located at the airport) with prior notice.of the operation (model aircraft operators flying from a permanent location within 5 miles of an airport should establish a mutually -agreed upon operating procedure with the airport operator and the airport, -air traffic control tower (when an air traffic facility is located at the airport)). Model Aircraft that Operate in a Careless or Reckje,s Manner Section 336(b) of the Act, however, makes clear that the FAA has the authority under its ,exist , in regulations to pursue legal enforcement action Against persons operating Model & p Aircraft when the operations endanger the safety of the NAS, even if they are operating in accordance with section 336(a) and 336(c). So, for example, a Model Aircraft operation conducted in accordance with section 336(a) and (c) may be subject to an enforcement action for violation of 14 C.F,R.. § 91;13 if the, operation is conducted in a.careless or reckless Manner so as to endanger the life or property of another. UAS Operations that are, not Model Aircraft Operations Operations of UAS that are not Model Aircraftoperations as defined in section 336(c) of the Act and conducted in accordance with section 3 3.6, (a) of the Act may only be operated, with specific authorization from the FAA, The FAA currently authorizes non -hobby or recreational. UAS operations through one of three avenues-. (1) The issuance of a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization, generally to a governmental entity operating a public aircraft; (2) The issuance of an airworthiness certificate in conjunction with the issuance of a. Certificate of Waiver or, Authorization; or (3) The issuance of an exemption under part 11 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations that relies on section 333 (Special Rules for Certain. Unmanned AircraftSystems) of the Act for relief from the airworthiness certificate requirement, also in conjunction with the issuance of a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization. It is important to understand that all UAS operations that ate not operated as Model Aircraft, under section 336 of the Act are subject to current and future FAA regulation. At a minimum, any such flights are currently required tinder the FAA's regulations to be operated with an authorized aircraft (certificated or exempted), v with a certificated pilot, and with specific FAA Authorization), ith a valid registration number (" N,number" ),, authorization (Certificate of Waiver or Regardless of the type of UAS operation, the FAA's statutes and the Federal Aviation Regulations prohibit any conduct that endangers individuals and property on the surface, either aircraft, of otherwise endangers the safe operation of other aircraft in the NAS. In addition, States and local ;governments are enacting their own laws regarding the operation of UAS, which may mean that UAS operations may also violate state and local laws specific to UAS operations, as well as broadly applicable laws such, as assault, criminal trespass, or injury to .persons or property. VAS Com liance with Airspace Security Requirements As an aircraft, UAS operations (including those involving Model Aircraft) trust be conducted. in accordance with the airspace -centric security requirements prescribed by the FAA's regulations and various implementation tools used by the FAA, specifically including airspace with special flight rules and Notices to Airt'ncn (NOTAM) that define Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR). It :is important that UAS operators and .LEAs be familiar with the airspace_ restrictions respectively relevant to their operations and their enforcement area of responsibility, Flight restrictions are used to protect; but are not limited to special security events, sensitive operations (e.g., select law enforcement activity, space flight operations,. etc.), and Presidential movement. The most up-to-date last of TFRs is available athttp://tfr,faafaa..aov/tft°2llist.htrni, See Attachment A. for reference resources, s SECTION 2. The hole of.ilraiv Enforcement The FAA promotes voluntary compliance.by educating individual UAS operators about how they can operate safely ander current regulations and laws, The FAA also has a number of enforcement tools available including warning notices, letters of correction, and civil penalties. The. FAA may tape enforcement action against anyone who conducts an -unauthorized UAS operation or operates a UAS in a way that endangers the safety of the national airspace systems. This authority is designed to protect users of the airspace as well as people and property on the ground. However, .as noted above, State and local Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) are often in the best position to deter, detect, immediately investigate,6 and, as appropriate,7 pursue ' Attachment A also includes a NOTAM concerning avoidance (including no loitering) over power ] tants, darns, refineries, industrial complexes, and military facilities, Although not a restriction, this ITR urges aircraft operators to avoid these locations, e At least in terms of initial contact with the suspected offender. 7 Applying anlaws Falling within the enforcement authority of the; LEA in.question._ enforcement actions to stop unauthorized UAS operations. Although the FAA retains the .responsibility for enforcing FAA8regulations, FAA aviation safety inspectors, who are the agency's principal field elements responsible for following up on these unauthorized and/or unsafe activities, will often be unable to immediately travel to the location of an incident. While the FAA must exeroise. caution not to mix. criminal law enforcement with the FAA,$ administrative safety enforcement function, the public interest is best served by oordination and fostering mutual understanding and cooperation between governmental entities with law enforcement responsibilities. Although there are Federal criminal statute's that may be implicated by some UAS operations (see 49 U.S.C. § 44711), most violations of the FAA's regulations may be .addressed through, administrative enforcement measures. As withany other civil or criminal adjudication, successful enforcement will depend on development of a complete and accurate factual report con . temporaneous with the event. Although certainly not an exhaustive list, law enforcement officials, first responders, and others can provide invaluable assistance, to the FAA by taking the actions outlined below: (1) Witness Identification and Interviews. Local law enforcement is in the best position to identify potential witnesses and conduct. initial interviews, documenting. what they observed while the event is still fresh in their minds. In addition, local law enforcement is in an optimum position to secure all, 1, information necessary for our safety inspectors to contact these witnesses in any subsequent FAA. investigation. igation. Administrative proceedings often involve very technical issues; therefore, we expect our own safety inspectors will need to re -interview most witnesses. We are mindful that in many jurisdictions, state law may prohibit the transmission of witness statements to third parties, including the FAA. In those circumstances it is extremely important that the FAA be able to locate and conduct independent interviews of these individuals, (2) Identification of Operators.. Law enforcement is in the best position to contact the suspected operators of the aircraft, an, d any participants or support personnel accompanying the operators. Our challenges in locating violators are marked in that very few of these systems are registered i t red in any federal database and rarely will they . have identifiable markings such as used for conventional manned aircraft. Likewise, 'information on few of the UAS operators will be archived in a pilot data base. Many operators advortiseopenly on the internet. However, in our enforcement proceedings, we bear the burden of proof, and showing who actually is operating the unmanned aircraft is. critical. Therefore, evidentiary thresholds must be met even when using data or video acquired via the internet. Likewise, the purpose for the operation (such as in support of a commercial venture, to further some business interest, or to secure compensation for their services) may become an important element in determining what regulations, if any, may have been violated by the operation. Identification andinterviewof suspected operators early on will help immeasurably to. advance enforcement efforts, (3) Viewing and Recording the Location of the Event. Pictures taken in close proximity to the event are often'lielpful in describing light and weather conditions, any damage or injuries, ies, and the number and density of people on the surface, particularly at public events or in densely populated areas,.During any witness interviews, Use of fixed landmarks that may be depicted on maps, diagrams or photographs immeasurably help in fixing the position of the aircraft, and such .landmarks also should be used as a way to describe lateral distances and altitude above the ground, structures or people (e.g. below the third floor of Building X, below the top of the oak tree located Y, anything that gives reference points for lay witnesses). (4) Identifying Sensitive Locations, Events, or Activities. The FAA maintains a variety of security -driven airspace restrictions around the country to help protect sensitive locations, events, and activities through Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR), ProhibitedAreas, and other mechanisms such as the Washington, DC Flight Restricted Zone (DC FR?'). UAS operations, including Model Aircraft flights, are generally prohibited within those defined volumes of airspace, LEAs should become familiar with the steady-state airspace restrictions active within their area of responsibility, along with as-neoded TFR8, which could be instituted to help protect sensitive events (e.g., major gatherings of elected officials) and activities (e.g., Presidential movements). If there is any question as to whether a TFR has been established in a given location, contact the, nearest air -traffic facility or flight service station for further information or visit http.1/tf'r faa.gov/tf"r2/list.litml for a graphic representation of TFRs locatable by state and effective dates. (5) Notification. Immediate notification of an incident, accident or other suspected violation to one of the FAA Regional Operation Centers (ROC) located around the country is valuable to the timely initiation of the, FAA's investigation, These centers are manned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with, personnel who are trained in how to contact appropriate duty personnel during non -business hours when there has been an incident, accident or other matter that requires timely response by FAA employees. A list of these centers and telephone numbers is included as Attachment .13 to this letter, (6) Evidence Collection. Identifying and preserving any public or private security I I �y systems that may provide photographic or other visual evidence of UAS operations, including video or sfill picture security systems can provide essential evidence to the FAA. Many times these systems do not permanently store information but erase it as the systern recycles at a given interval. Local law enforcement is in the.best position to inquire and make initial requests to identify and preserve this form of evidence or obtain legal process for securing this evidence in the context, of an investigation of a possible violation of state criminal law.. in addition, some UAS may be marked with identification numbers ("N -numbers") signifying FAA registration. The presence or lack of theseldentification numbers maybe significant in an FAA investiaation.—For example, an operator may state that he or she is conducting an approved commercial activity, which usually requires registered aircraft. However, the absence of registration markings on the UAS may indicate that the aircraft is not registered, meaning the operation may not be authorized..: Note. that identification numbers may not be conspicuous from a distance because of the size and non-traditional configuration of sortie UAS. The registered owners of UAS bearing identifications slumbers can be -found by searching for the N -number on the FAA's website: www.faa.gov, Virtually all of the items listed above are already in the tool box: for Iaw enforcement officers, Other investigative :methods also may prove useful; such as consensual examination of the OAS, equipment trailers and the like. However, other law enforcement processes, such as arrest and detention or cion -consensual searches almost always fall outside of the allowable methods to pursue administrative enforcement actions by the FAA unless they are truly a by- product of a state criminal investigation. We do not.mean to discourage use of these methods and procedures where there is an independent basis for them under state or local law, We simply wish to emphasize that work products intended for FAA use generally should involve conventional administrative measures such as witness interviews, "stop and talk" sessions with suspected violators, consensual examination of vehicles and equipment,, and other methods that do not involve court orders or the potential use of force by law enforcement personnel. It is extremely difficult to provide a "one size fits all" guide to cooperative investigation of Unauthorized OAS operationsconsidering the myriad jurisdictions and the associated statutory and constitutional restraints and requirements, State and local officials are always urged to use their governmental unit's legal resources and their own management chain to develop acceptable protocols for dealing with these instances. In some situations, there may be legal bars to the sharing of some information or the use of databases designed for conventional law enforcement. However, with appropriate data collection during first responses and early reporting to the FAA, Federal, State and local agencies will be in the best position to both collect and share, information that nnay be of interest to each jurisdiction. F'AA aviation safety inspectors are adept at coordination with our own legal resources to ensue unauthorized operators are properly accountable for the potential risk they create to both .people and property. In addition, we have specially trained inspectors within the FAA OAS Integrations office who can provide expertise in this area. If you have any questions or your agency would like to pursue advance planning on how to address these situations, please feel free to contact your local FAA Law Enforcernet t Assistance Special Agent or the FAA's :Law Enforcement Assistance program Office at, (202) 267-4641 or (242) 267-9411 Attachment A Excerpts Presidential FDC 44/7607 ZBW RI..AIRSPACE PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND -TEMPORARY Movements FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS. OCTOBER 16, 2014 LOCAL. THIS NOTAM REPLACES NOTAM 4/7600 DUE TO SCHEDULE CHANGE, PURSUANT TO 49 USC 40103(6 THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) CLASSIFIES THE AIRSPACE DEFINED IN THIS NOTAM AS 'NATIONAL DEFENSE AIRSPACE';. PILOTS WHO DO NOT ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES MAY BE INTERCEPTEC DETAINED ANIS INTERVIEWED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT/SECURITY PERSONNEL, ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ACTIONS MAY ALSO BE TAKEN AGAINST A PILOT WHO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OR ANY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR PROCEDURES ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTAM;. A) THE FAA MAY TAKE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, INCLUDING IMPOSING CIVI PENALTIES AND THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AIRMEN CERTIFICATES; OR B) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY PURSUE CRIMINAL CHARGES,: INCLUDING CHARGES UNDER TITLE 49 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 46307; OR C) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY USE DEADLY FORCE AGAINST THE AIRBORNE AIRCRAFT; IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE AIRCRAFT POSE, AN IMMINENT SECURITY THREAT, C. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN THIS TFR, FLIGHT TRAINING, PRACTICE INSTRUMENT APPROACHES, AEROBATIC FLIGHT, GLIDER OPERATIONS,: SEAPLANE OPERATIONS, PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRALIGHT, HANG GLIDING, BALLOON OPERATIONS, AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL.FLIGHT OPERATIONS, BANNER TOWING OPERATIONS SIGHTSEEING OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE TEST FLIGHTS. MOD�L 00 FRZ FDC ©/8326 ZDC PART 1 OF 10 PLIGHT RESTRICTIONS, WASHINGTON, DC, EFFECTIVE 1012010401 UTC UNTIL FURTHER, NOTICE, THIS NOTICE WILL REPLACE NOTAM 0/9477 DUE TO A CHANGE IN RESTRICTIONS, THIS NOTAM AND A NOTAM FOR THE LEESBURG MANEUVERING AREA SUPPLEMENT SUBPART V, 14 CFR PART 93 FOR THE WASHINGTON,' D.C. SPECIAL FLIGHT RULES AREA (DC SFRA). PURSUANT TO 49 USC 40103(B), THE FAA HAS ESTABLISHED. THE DC SFRA AREA AS'NATIONAL DEFENSE AIRSPACE, ANY PERSON WHO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO THE DC SFRA MAY BE INTERCEPTED DETAINED AND INTERVIEWED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT/$EC, URITY PERSONNEL. ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ACTIONS MAY ALSO BE TAKEN ALAI NST A PILOT WHO DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OR ANY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR PROCEDURES ANNOUNCED IN THIS NOTAM: Aj THE FAA. MAY TAKE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION, INCLUDING IMPOSING CIVIL PENALTIES AND THE SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF AIRMEN CERTIFICATES; B) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY PURSUE CRIMINAL CHARGES, INCLUDING CHARGES UNDER TITLE 49 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 46307; C) THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MAY USE DEADLY FORCE AGAINST THE AIRBORNE AIRCRAFT, IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE AIRCRAFT POSE; AN IMMINENT SECURITY THREAT. A. THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED WITHIN THE DC` FRZ; FLIGHT TRAINING; AEROBATIC'FLIGHT, PRACTICE INSTRUMENT APPROACHES,: GLIDER OPERATIONS, PARACHUTE OPERATIONS, ULTRA LIGHT, HANG GLIDING BALLOON OPERATIONS, TETHERED BALLOONS, AGRICULTURE/CROP DUSTING, ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL FLIGHT PRIVATE/CORPORATE YACHT. B. IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THATA PILOT CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR VHF FREQUENCY 121.5 OR UHF FREQUENCY 243,0 FOR EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS WHEN OPERATING AN AIRCRAFT IN THE DC FRZ, EITHER IN AN AIRCRAFT THAT IS SUITABLY EQUIPPED, OR BY USI=: OF PORTABLE EQUIPMENT, Avoidance of Power FDC 410811 SPECIAL NOTICE: THIS IS A RESTATEMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY Plans Etc, (App1jed to all ISSUED ADVISORY NOTICE. IN THE INTEREST OF NATIONAL SECURITYAND Aircraft, including IIAS) TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, PILOTS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO AVOID THE AIRSPACE, ABOVE, OR IN PROXIMITY TO SUCH SITES AS POWER; PLANTS (NUCLEAR, HYDRO -ELECTRIC,, OR COAL), DAMS, REFINERIES, INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES, MILITARY FACILITIES AND OTHER SIMILAR FACILITIES, PILOTS SHOULD NOT CIRCLE A8 TO LOITER IN THE VICINITY OVER THESE -TYPES OF FACILITIES. 10. Select Sporting Events FDC 4/3621 FDC SPECIAL SECURITY NOTICE, SPORTING EVENTS, THIS NOTAM REPLACES FDC NOTAM 9/5151 TO REFLECTA TSA WEBSITE.UPDATI AND ,ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING AIRSPACE WAIVERS. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS IN THIS NOTAM COMPLY WITH STATUTORY MANDATES DETAILED 1N SECTION 352 OF PUBLIC LAW 108-7 AS AMENDED BY SECTION 621 OF PUBLIC LAW 108-199. PURSUANT TO 49 USC 40103(B), THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) CLA881FIES THE AIRSPACE DEFINED IN THIS NOTAM AS'NATIONAL DEFENSE AIRSPACE', ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY OR WILLFULLY VIOLATESTHE RULES PERTAINING TO OPERATIONS IN THIS AIRSPACE MAY BE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES UNDER 49 U8C 46307 PILOTS WHO DO'NOT ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES MAY BE INTERCEPTED, DETAINED AND INTERVIEWED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT/SECURITY PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 99.7, SPECIAL SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS, COMMENCIN( ONE HOUR BEFORE THE SCHEDULED TIME OF THE EVENT UNTIL.ONE HOUF AFTER THE END OF THE EVENT ALL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS; INCLUDING PARACHUTE JUMPING; IIMAINEf}"F'C)2A '' I� i AET ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN A 3 NMR UP TO AND INCLUDING 3000 F AGL OF ANY STADIUM HAVING'A SEATING CAPACITY OF 30,000 OR MORE PEOPLE WHERE EITHER A REGULAR OR POST SEASON MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, OR NCAA DIVISION ONE FOOTBALL GAME I8 OCCURRING, THIS NOTAM ALSO APPLIES TO NASCAR SPRINT CUP, INDY CAR, AND CHAMP SERIES RACES EXCLUDING QUALIFYING AND PRE -RACE EVENTS. FLIGHTS CONDUCTED FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES OF ANY EVENT STADIUM OR VENAE AND BROADCAST COVERAGE FOR THE BROADCAST RIGHTS HOLDER ARE AUTHORIZED WITH AN APPROVED AIRSPACE WAIVER. AN FAA AIRSPACE WAIVER DOES NOT RELIEVE OPERATORS FROM OBTAINING ALL OTHER NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS ANIS COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATIONS. THE RESTRICTIONS DESCRIBED ABOVE DO NOT APPLY TO THOSE AIRCRAFT ALI THORIZED BY AND IN CONTACT WITH ATC FOR OPERATIONAL OR SAFETY OF FLIGHT PURPOSES, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND AIR AMBULANCE FLIGHT OPERATIONS, ALL PREVIOUSLY ISSUED WAIVERS TO FDC NOTAM 9/5151 REMAIN VALID UNTIL THE SPECIFIED END DATE BUT NOT TO EXCEEC 90 DAYS FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS NOTAM, INFORMATION ABOUT AIRSPACE WAIVE RAPPLICAT►ONS AND TSA SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS CAN BE FOUND AT HTTP;/AWWV.TSA.GOV/STAKEHOLDERS/AIRSPACE-WAVERSWO OR BY CALLING TSA AT 571-227-2071, SUBMIT REQUESTS FOR FAAAIRSPACE WAIVERS AT HTTPS:/IWAIVERS,.FAA.GOV' Disney Theme Parks FDC 41XXXX ZZZ SECURITY SPECIAL NOTICE DISNEY WORD THEME PARK ORLANDO FL THIS NOTAM REPLACES.NOTAM 914986 TO REFLECT A TSA WEBSITE UPDATE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING AIRSPACE WAIVERS. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS IN THIS NOTAM COMPLY WITH. STATUTORY MANDATES DETAILED IN SECTION 852 OF PUBLIC LAW 108-7 A AMENDED BY SECTION 521 OF PUBLIC LAW 108-199. PURSUANT TO 49 USC 40103(13), THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) CLASSIFIES THE AIRSPACE DEFINED IN THIS NOTAM AS'NATIONAL DEFENSE AIRSPACE'. AN' PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY OR WILLFULLY VIOLATES THE RULES PERTAINING TO OPERATIONS IN THIS AIRSPACE MAY BE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CRIMINAL PENALTIES UNDER 49 USC 46307. PILOTS WH DO NOT ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES MAY BE INTERCEPTED, DETAINED AND INTERVIEWED BY LAV+! ENFORCEMENT/SECURITY PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 99 7 SPECIAL SECURITY INSTRUCTIONS, I F�����I�TI�ON TO iSCLUD IaAI.. O T Itt F/Rf?OIIIRIT�?WITHII 3000 FTAGL. THE RESTRICTIONS DO NOT APPLY TO THOSE AIRCRAFT AUTHORIZED BY AND INCONTACT WITH ATG FOR OPERATIONAL OR SAFET OF FLIGHT PURPOSES, AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND AIR AMBULANCE FLIGHT OPERATIONS; FLIGHTS CONDUCTED FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES OF ANY DISNEY WORLD EVEN. AND VENUE ARE AUTHORIZED WITH AN APPROVED WAIVER. AN FAA AIRSPACE WAIVER (DOES NOT RELIEVE OPERATORS FROM OBTAINING ALL OTHER NECESSARY AUTHORIZATIONS AND COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL: AVIATION REGULATIONS. ALL PREVIOUSLY ISSUED WAIVERS TO FDO NOTAM 4/4985 REMAIN VALID UNTIL THE SPECIFIED END DATE BUT NOT TO EXCEED 90 DAYS FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS NOTAM. INFORMATION ABOUT AIRSPACE WAIVER APPLICATIONS AND TSA SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS CAN BE FOUND AT HTTP:/MM.TSA.GOV/STAKEHOLDERS/AIRSPACE-WAIVERS-O OR BY CALLING TSA AT 571-227-2071: SUBMIT REQUESTS FOR PAA AIRSPACE WAIVERS AT HTTPS./ VAIVERS.FAA.GOV 12 Attachment B. AK, AZ, CA., CO, HI, ID, IMMIN Western Roc MT, NV, OR, UT, WA 425-227-199.9 2-A1<tM-ROC awfaa,gov and WY .............. R, IA, IL, IN; KS, LA, Central ROC MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, 817-222-5006 9-agw-oocration- NM,. OH., OKI, SD, TX cetiter@faa.gov and W! AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, Souihern ROC 4 04-305-5180 , 2-ASO--ROC@,faago �vy NC, PR, SC, TN and VI Eastern RCDP DC, DE, MD, NJ, NY, 118-553-3100 I-AEA-ROC@faa.gov PA, VA and WV Ne* England CT, MA, ME, NH, RI and ROC VT 404-305-5156 Washington woc I I 202-2673333 I 9-qwamash-woc@fha.,00v I