The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication & Supporting Documents0 BGRcow RADELL & FERNANDEZ ZC7NING, LANA lJS1= ANp ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Direct: 305-377-6227 E -Mail: MTapanesCcDQRZoninQLaw.com VIA HAND DELIVERY April 30, 2015 Francisco Garcia, Director Department of Planning & Zoning City of Miami Riverside Center 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 4th Floor Miami, FL 33130-1910 Re: Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP.): Executive Summary Dear Mr. Garcia: This law firm represents CG Miami River, LLC (the "Developer") the owner of the land bound on the north by the Miami River, on the south by SW 7th Street, on the east by SW 2nd Avenue, and on the west by SW 3rd Avenue in the City of Miami (the "City"). See Exhibit A, Properties List. The Developer and the City of Miami serve as co - applicants with respect to the instant application (collectively, the "Applicant"). Prol2erly. CG Miami River, LLC owns approximately 6.2 acres located at 257 SW 7 Street, 233 SW 7 Street, 244 SW 6 Street, 635 SW 3 Avenue, 243 SW 7 Street, 260 SW 6 Street, 242 SW 5 Street, 621 SW 3 Avenue, 224 SW 6 Street, 220 SW 6 Street, 501 SW 3 Avenue, 645 SW 3 Avenue, 252 SW 6 Street, 401 SW 3 Avenue, 253 SW 7 Street, 219 SW 7 Street, and 275 SW 6 Street, as well as three vacant parcels ("CG Parcels"). As previously indicated, these parcels are located within the bounds of the Miami River to the north, SW 7th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW 3rd Avenue to the west. The City owns Jose Marti Park, located immediately northwest of the CG Parcels. Jose Marti Park extends northwest along the Miami River beginning on the north side of SW 3 Avenue and terminating at SW 2 Street. Currently, the northern portion of the CG Parcels contains an entertainment complex; the central portion contains some former warehouse structures; and the southern parcel contains residences, vacant land, and a former automotive or marine_ related structure. These structures contain an assortment of uses including bar/nightclubs (northern portion); a marine supply store/warehouse use (central SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL CENTER • 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 850 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 PHONE. 305.374.5300 • FAX, 305.377.5222 * WWW.SRZONINGLAW.COM Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 2 portion); an abandoned adult "megastore," a print shop, vacant land, and derelict residences (southern portion). These existing uses are all located adjacent to the recently updated Jose Marti Park and Gymnasium and a Publix supermarket to the west, and the SW 2 Avenue Bridge and Storage Mart to the east. The majority of the CG Parcels, with the exception of the two parcels abutting the Miami River, are designated "Restricted Commercial" by the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, 2020 Future Land Use Plan Map ("FLUM"). The two riverfront parcels are designated as "'Industrial" according to the FLUM, while Jose Marti Park is designated "Recreation." The FLUM also designates the CG Parcels as within the Little Havana Density Increase Area (RDIA). Consistent with the land use designations, the CG Parcels are zoned D3 Waterfront Industrial and T6 -36B-0 Urban Core, according to the Miami 21 Zoning Code ("Miami 21"). Jose Marti Park is zoned as CS Civic Space. N 3io - I - r Figure 1. Miami River SAI' Area Proposed Development. Miami 21 contains specific provisions for the Special Area Plan ("SAP") process; a process which allows areas of more than nine (9) abutting acres to be master planned to allow greater integration of public improvements, infrastructure, and design. CG Miami River, along with the City as co -applicant, is requesting approval of an SAP to permit the CG Parcels to be developed in accordance with the proposed SAP design guidelines, regulatory plan, and Chapter 163 Development Agreement. More specifically, this will allow the Developer and the City to integrate the CG Parcels, public rights-of-way, and portions of Jose Marti Park into an SAP for the master -planning, designing, permitting and construction of public benefit improvements ("Miami River SAP"'). See Figure 1. Miami River SAP Area, above. It should be noted that the City of Miami will continue to own all public lands, and that there will be no changes to the underlying land use or zoning as a result of inclusion the City's lands in the SAP. The Miami River SAP will consist of five (5) phases of development, which will include four approximately sixty -story towers, two three-story structures, and an active riverwalk public promenade. The Property will feature commercial, office, residential, and lodging uses, as well as recreational and commercial working waterfront uses. The BERcow RA,DELL e& FERNANDEZ MC>Mi Vc-., LAIVo IJSE ANo ENVIFI CJNM EIV TAL LAvM Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 3 centerpiece of project, however, will be the Miami River, public plazas, public riverwalk promenade, and Jose Marti Park. In total, the project will contain approximately 1,678 residential units, 330 lodging units, 66,541 square feet of office space, 330 hotel rooms, and 176,350 square feet of commercial. As previously indicated, the majority of the Property, is designated Restricted Commercial according to the FLUM. The Restricted Commercial land use designation permits residential density of up to a maximum of 150 dwelling units per acre. However, the Property is also located within the Little Havana Residential Density Increase Area, which permits residential density of up to a maximum of 200 dwelling units per acre, subject to the underlying zoning. A companion land use plan amendment will establish a new Residential Density Increase Area (RDIA) to permit the development of up to 400 dwelling units per acre within the portion of the CG Parcels designated Restricted Commercial land use on the FLUM. Notably, the existing underlying zoning district permits the proposed Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) and greater intensity than is proposed. Further, the proposed residential density increase will be compatible with the permitted densities both to the north and the east of the CG Parcels area, which allow densities of up to 1,000 and 500 dwelling units per acre, and transition to the Little Havana RDIA south of SW 7 Street, a major thoroughfare through the urban core. No changes are proposed to the Industrial and Port of Miami River FLUM designations. Proposed Benefits. The Miami River, Miami River Corridor, surrounding residents of the City, and the community -at -large will all greatly benefit from this project. Benefits can be categorized into three overarching categories: safety, activation, and public access. Safety. Although certain that this area has incredible potential, it is also true that this area is known for containing some unpleasant elements. The Miami River SAP proposal will supplant the existing assortment of questionable uses and transients with a sustainable, mixed-use neighborhood activated by residents, patrons, and visitors. The SAP will introduce coherent street furniture that includes street lighting along the riverwalk promenade from the SW 2 Avenue bridge through Jose Marti Park, and 24 hour uses such as residential and lodging units with the accompanying security. In addition, proposed public benefit improvements to 1-95 and surrounding State and local roads will alleviate the existing background traffic conditions and significantly improve the surrounding transportation corridor. Together, these factors will transform this area into a safe, welcoming neighborhood. Activation. The project's focal point is the community access via the public riverwalk promenade. Each phase is designed to be unique and attractive from any vantage. Further, the Applicant is proposing to activate the riverfront with public access BERCOW RADELL & FLRNAN DE.Z ZONING, L.ANo USE AIVo ENVIFte.]Nr1/IENTAL L -^VV Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 4 boats slips, commercial establishments, restaurants, and public gathering spaces, including an outdoor theater with wall -cast opportunity, roundabouts, and public art. Verdant landscaping including green roofs, cohesive hardscaping and street furniture, and public amenities will create a sense of place that residents, patrons and visitors will flock to, both by land and river. The unique working waterfront vistas will be enjoyed by boaters and pedestrian visitors alike, ultimately creating a new sense of vibrancy along the Miami River Corridor, and in this forgotten area abutting several public resources: Jose Marti Park, the City's Miami Riverside Center, the Miami River, and the SW 2 Avenue Bridge. Public Access. The Applicant is proposing a host of public improvements to the project area and its surroundings that will substantially improve existing conditions. These improvements include expanding existing public amenities and creating a new public riverwalk promenade which extends from the SW 2nd Avenue Bridge through Jose Marti Park. Improvement of existing amenities includes, for example, updating the riverwalk in Jose Marti Park, the renovation of the plaza and pool areas within Jose Marti Park, the extension of existing Miami River Corridor signage, and proposed landscaping (including legacy trees) and hardscaping. New amenities include the creation of streetscapes with pedestrian and cyclist access throughout the Miami River SAP, creation of a children's fountain and play area, and the creation of public gathering spaces along the Miami River. A draft list of proposed public benefits to accompany the Applicant's Chapter 163 Development Agreement has been included in this submittal, The cohesive design of the proposed public amenities and semi-public low-rise structures abutting the Miami River will create a sense of place for residents and visitors alike. Further, the Applicant seeks to encourage access of the project both by land and water. This includes significant improvements to the surrounding transportation infrastructure including 1-95, SW 7 Street, and SW 3 Avenue; the introduction of an additional access way and view corridor to the Miami River, through the center of the CG Parcels, currently referred to as "2.5 Avenue"; and the establishment of an on-site City of Miami Trolley stop. From the Miami River, the Applicant is proposing to permit public mooring access to the permitted slips within the project, which will provide boaters with direct access to the retail, restaurant, and riverwalk amenities immediately adjacent to the Miami River. The Applicant is also proposing a water taxi stop, which will provide residents, patrons and visitors without access to private watercraft an opportunity to access the project from the River and encourage transit from Bayside and Marlins Stadium. The project will become a destination which benefits the City's residents, civically, culturally and economically. Accordingly, we respectfully request the City's favorable review of the Miami River SAP and look forward to continuing to work with the City's administration to realize this public-private partnership that will help transform the City's urban core. BERCOW RADELL & FERNANDEZ ZQNING, i_Anlo IJSE ANo ENVIRpNML�NTAL LAW Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 5 Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to phone me at 305.377.6227. Very truly yours, Melissa Tapanes Llahues Enclosures cc: Ari Pearl Carli Koshal, Esq. BCRCOW RADELL & FERNANDEZ ZONING, t,gND USE ANO ENVIFiOtVMENTAI_ LAW Miami River SAP Team Responses to UDRB Conditions UDRB Conditions for Approval: Miami River SAP 1. City to review Traffic Study and confirm feasibility for the proposed amount of users. 2. The final design proposal incorporating significant historical features of Jose Marti Park shall be brought back to the UDRB. 3. Create a pedestrian plaza at pedestrian bridge on level 9 to enrich public use and improve relationship between the four buildings. 4. Study variation in height among the four towers to achieve a better permeability towards skyline as well as a more interesting design. Miami River SAP Team Responses 1. Traffic Study: City to review Traffic Study and confirm feasibility for the proposed amount of users The Applicant's Traffic Study methodology has been approved by the City, County and FDOT, and the Traffic Study has been submitted to the City, County and FDOT for review and approval. 2. Jose Marti Park: The final design proposal incorporating significant historical features of Jose Marti Park shall be brought back to the UDRB. In accordance with the City of Miami UDRB condition for Miami River SAP approval, CG Miami River shall return to present the final design proposal for enhancements to Jose Marti Park. CG Miami River and their team of design consultants will continue to coordinate with all relevant City of Miami departments and stakeholders including the Miami River Commission and the City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department. The final design of Jose Marti Park will acknowledge the rich cultural heritage of the East Little Havana neighborhood, along with preserved elements of the current park's homage to Jose Marti, as well as offer new spaces that integrate a diverse set of accessible and desirable programming, native and Cuban vegetation, and unique habitats. 3. Pedestrian Plaza 9t" Level: Create a pedestrian plaza at pedestrian bridge on level 9 to enrich public use and improve relationship between the four buildings. Soaring with innovation, CG Miami River proposes an intersecting collection of pedestrian bridges connecting each of the four separate podium decks. Bridges connecting Phase 1 and 5, and the other linking Phase 3 and 4 converge 100' above the intersection of 6t" Street and 2.5 Avenue creating over 6,000 ft2 of flying plaza for residents and visitors to enjoy. That's nearly 1,000 ft2 more space than the previous design bridge configuration. Planters with Florida native or relevant vegetation will focus zones of circulation and provide shade and intrigue throughout the structure. Benches and custom seat walls will allow guests the opportunity to pause, suspended at the nexus of the development's amenity deck. Chance encounters and scheduled meetings alike will occur just as they will on the street corners and cafes below. At the terminus of each bridge, the proposed lush textured vegetation spills out onto each respective terrace and unifies the entire collective podium. In continuation of the balconies below, several oculi will be carved out of the structure and provide unique apertures for viewing the streetscape below. Please refer to Exhibit A, which diagrams the proposed design, program, and circulation of the 9t" Level Plaza for further clarification. 4. Building Heights and Skyline: Study variation in height among the four towers to achieve a better permeability towards skyline as well as a more interesting design. CG Miami River believes the current location and shape of the 4 towers provides a high skyline permeability and wide view corridors. The towers' twisted elliptical shape and the cube's rotated gesture relate directly to their height and provide an open view corridor. In addition, the juxtaposition of the three elliptical towers with the singular cube tower take a cue from the organic form of the Miami River and the Modern and Streamline expressions that have taken root amidst the grid of Miami's urban core. Currently, two of the towers' heights have been lowered in order to comply with the obstacle clearance surface established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Miami -Dade Aviation Department (MDAD). Modifying these relationships further would void the design intent of the towers. FENCE BUST OF JOSE MARTI EXERCISE AREA "SEMBRAR" MEMORIAL WALL NON-FUNCTIONING WATER FEATURE CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA COMMUNITY CENTER 0 4 POOL AREA+ BUILDINGS STUCCO FACADE RIVERWALK ■ EXISTING FEATURES RESTROOMS + CONCESSION STAND (NO PUBLIC ACCESS) 0' 15' 30' 60' MMMr N- SCALE: 1 "=30' PI[oil Vdi1e1 All I7e11'ACANII►[07947-11%Vj 7*1 CUBAN PALM GROVE BUST OF JOSE MARTI \ EXERCISE AREA "SEM B RA R" MEMORIAL WALL CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA NEW FOUNTAINS � I COMMUNITY CENTER n POOL AREA+ BUILDINGS KEYSTONE FACADE GAME AREA RIVERWALK -------- -- --- -� --- - , 6 ^ �` c 3 ■ EXISTING TO REMAIN ■ EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING TO BE IMPROVED ADDITIONAL HISTORICAL/CULTURAL RELEVANCE 4 LAWN RESTROOMS MAHOGANY TREE 15' min 6 0' 15' 30' 60' ....r N� SCALE: 1 "=30' JOSE MARTI PARK PROPOSED AND RETAINED FEATURES I a 0 — — UILDING EDGE BELOW PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION O GATHERING AREA O OCULUS LOCATIONS ® POTENTIALSEATAG AREA 0 PLANTERS LEVEL9 APRIL 3o, 2014 s ® EXHIBIT A ®" B JUNGLES P, II 0 0 — — UILDING EDGE BELOW PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION O GATHERING AREA O OCULUS LOCATIONS ® POTENTIALSEATAG AREA 0 PLANTERS LEVEL9 APRIL 3o, 2014 s ® EXHIBIT A ®" B JUNGLES P, II Miami 21 Excerpt SPECIAL AREA PLANAPPLICATION Please refer to Articles 3.9 of the Miami Code for Special Area Plans information. 1. Project name: Miami River SAP 2. Applicant(s): 3. Subject property address(es) and folio number(s): See Exhibit A 4. One (1) original survey dated within six (6) months from the date of application prepared by a State of Florida registered land surveyor. 5. One (1) original 24x36" plan, signed and sealed by a State of Florida registered architect or engineer showing property boundaries and proposed structure(s), parking, landscaping, etc.; building elevations and dimensions and computations of lot area and building spacing. 6. After Hearing Boards, Public Works, zoning and Planning initial and date the plans, 11x17" copies of the original plan, including the survey, to be incorporated in the Special Area Plan binders. 7. After final City Commission approval, submittal of all documents in "InDesign" software. 8. Current Zoning Referral and Write -Up signed by the Office of Zoning designee. 9. A clear and legible copy of the recorded warranty deed and tax forms of the most current year showing the present owner(s) and legal description of the property to match the legal description on the survey. 10. A clear and legible copy of the subject property address(es) and legal description(s) on a separate sheet, labeled as "Exhibit A", to match with the current survey's legal description. 11. At least two photographs showing the entire property showing land and improvements. 12. Copy of the lobbyist registration processed by the Office of the City Clerk, if applicable. 13. Affidavit of Authority to Act and the Disclosure of Ownership of all owner—and contract purchasers, if applicable ---of the subject property. 14. For all corporations and partnerships indicated: a) Articles of Incorporation; b) Certificate from Tallahassee showing good standing, less than one (1) year old; c) Corporate Resolution or a Power of Attorney signed by the secretary of the Corporation authorizing the person who signed the application to do so; d) Non-profit organizations: A list of Board of Directors less than one (1) year old. 15. Certified list of owners of real estate within 500 feet of the subject property. 16. Original Disclosure of Consideration Provided or Committed for Agreement to Support or Withhold Objection Affidavit. 17. Original Public School Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements form. 18. The subject property(ies) cannot have any open code enforcement/lien violations. Rev. 07-2013 SPECIAL AREA PLANAPPLICATION 19. What is the acreage of the project/property site? 20. What is the purpose of this application/nature of proposed use? Mixed use: commercial, office, residential, and lodging 21. Is the property within the boundaries of a historic site, historic district or archeological zone? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. 22. Is the property within the boundaries of an Environmental Preservation District? Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department on the 3rd Floor for information. No 23. What would be the anticipated duration of the presentation in front of the: a Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board 30 min. and/or ;4 City Commission 30 min. 24. An executed Traffic Sufficiency Letter from the City of Miami's traffic consultant. 25. Maps showing the adopted comprehensive plan and existing zoning designations of the area, 26. General location map showing relation to the site or activity to major streets, schools, existing utilities, shopping areas, important physical features in and adjoining the project. 27. Concept Plan: a) Site plan and relevant information. b) Relationships to surrounding existing and proposed uses and activities, systems and facilities. c) How concept affects existing zoning and adopted comprehensive plan principles and designations; tabulation of any required variances, special permits, rezonings or exemptions. 28. Developmental Impact Study (an application for development approval for a Development of Regional Impact may substitute). 29. Twenty (20) Special Area Plan books—including one original ---containing 8'/x11" copies of the above documents, including this application and any other pertinent documents. 30. One (1) electronic copy of every document included in the book, individually scanned in ".pdf' form. For example: 1) Outside Cover; 2) Inside Cover; 3) Table of Contents; etc. 31. Cost of processing according to Section 62-22 of the Miami City Code': a. Special Area Plan (SAP) per acre $ 5,000.00 b. Advertising (SAP) $ 1,500.00 c. Development Agreement (for City Commission) $ 2,500.00 d. Advertising (Development Agreement) $ 1,500.00 e. School Concurrency Processing $ 150.00 f. Mail notice fee per notice $ 4.50 g. Meeting package mailing fee per package $ 6.00 h. Traffic Study (separate check) $ 6,000.00 *Fees aver $25,000.00, shall be paid in the form of a certified check, cashier's check, or money order. Rev. 07-2013 At i FT WML • Downtown Development of Regional impact fee, Southeast Overtown Paris West Development of Regional Impact fee and Public School Concurrency fee may apply. Please contact the Planning and Zoning Department once development program is finalized. r Signature Address 2,15 Bi scWQ Rn. day r #300 Name Ari Pearl Miami, FL 33137 Telephone (365) 747-6408 E-mail ari.pearl@gmail.com STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing w s ackAiowled ed before me this — — day of V, 20_L(�_, by who is a(n) individuallpartneriagentl oration of individuallpartnershipicorporationHal hte is p as identification and who did (did no j (Stamp) M JEANINERCCRIGUEZNotary Public - State of Florida 4 My Cemm. Expires Jan 14, 2017 �';FOFF�gPP` Commission # EE 836768 .,np+ Rev. 07-2013 �L Ur.,. L:�(_ , a(n) me or who has produced _ AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORITY TO ACCT Before me this day, the undersigned personally appeared Ari Pearl who being by me first deposes and says: 1. That he/she is the owner or the legal representative of the owner, submitting the public hearing application as required by the Code of the City of Miami, Florida, affecting the real property located in the City of Miami, as listed on the foregoing pages. 2. That all owners who he/she represents, if any, have given his/her full and complete permission for him/her to act in his/her behalf for the change or modification of a classification or regulation of zoning as set out in the foregoing petition, IJ including or ❑ not including responses to day to day staff inquires. 3. That the foregoing and following pages are part of this affidavit and contain the current names, mailing addresses, telephone numbers and legal descriptions of the real property of which he/she is the owner or legal representative. 4. That the facts, as represented in the application and documents submitted in conjunction with this affidavit, are true and correct. Further Afi`iant sayeth not. Ari Pearl Applicant(s) Name Appfl t(s) Signature STATE OF FLORIDA — COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing was ackn yledgeq before me this. day of r 20_ by who is a(n) Ind ivlduallpartriodagenticor oration 01. i River LLC a(n) Individual/partnership/corporation. & She is rsonall k to me or who has produced as identification and who did (di no take an oath. (Stamp) —----------- JEpNING RQIJRiGIiEX + . Notary Public - State of Florida My Comm. Expires Jan 14, 2417 '. ''•',' p� Commission # EE 835768 Rev. 07-2013 SIrTature DISCLOSURE OF OWNERSHIP 1. List the owner(s) of the subject property and percentage of ownership. Note: The Miami City Code requires disclosure of all parties having a financial interest, either direct or indirect, with respect to a presentation, request or petition, Accordingly, disclosure of shareholders of corporations, beneficiaries of trusts, and/or any other interested parties, together with their address(es) and proportionate interest are required. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Owner's Name(es) QQ Marno River, LLQ Percentage of Ownership 100% Subject Property Address(es) Attached as Exhibit A 2. List all street address(es) and legal description(s) of any property located within 500 feet of the subject property owned by any and all parties listed in question #1 above. Please supply additional lists, if necessary. Street Address(es): NIA Ari Pearl _ Owner(s) or Attorney Name STATE OF FLORIDA -- COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE Legal Description(s): Owner(s} or Attorney Signature The foregoing was acknowleded before me this day of 20 1< , by — . * Q 2 who is a(n) Indlvldual/partnerdagenUc oration individual/partnership/corporation. he i0 as identification and who did (di (Sta =a{nnv OF ��I JEANINE ROQftIGUEZ Notary P State of Florida My Comm.Com. Expires Jan 14, 2017 Commissian # EE 836768 Rev. 07-2013 1ami Kiver, LL(; a(n) ally kno o me or who has produced an oath, Si nature Miami River SAP List of Addresses and Folios for Entire SAP Area Folio Number Address 102040001090 257 SW 7 ST 102040001110 243 SW 7 ST 102030801070 102040001130 219 SW 7 ST 102040001020 224 SW 6 ST 102030801011 501 SW 3 AVE 102040001120 233 SW 7 ST 102030801010 242 SW 5 ST 102040001010 220 SW 6 ST 102020801180 428 SW 3 AVE 141380490030 401 SW 3 AVE 102040001040 252 SW 6 ST 102000106140 243 SW 4 AVE 141380490090 255 SW SOUTH RIVER DR 102040001060 645 SW 3 AVE 102040001030 244 SW 6 ST 141380490050 330 SW SOUTH RIVER DR 141380490070 353 SW 4 ST 102040001080 621 SW 3 AVE 102040001050 260 SW 6 ST 102030801040 102030801080 141380490010 201 SW 4 AVE 141380490020 315 SW 4 ST 102030801020 275 SW 6 ST 102040001070 635 SW 3 AVE 102040001100 253 SW 7 ST Miami River Disclosure of Interest 201, 220, 224, 244, 252, 260, 261, 269, 275 SW 6 Street; 401 SW 3 Ave; 511, 621, 635, 645 SW 3 Ave; 242 SW 5 Street; 219, 233, 243, 253, 257 SW 7 Street 100% Owner CG Miami River, LLC 100% Owner CG Miami River Mezz, LLC 100% Owner Miami River JV LLC 66.67% MC Miami River LLC Meyer and Joseph Chetrit 2915 Biscayne Blvd, Ste 300 Miami FL 33137 33.33% JDS Miami River LLC Michael Stern 104 Fifth Ave, 9th Flr New York, NY 10011 State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that CG MIAMI RIVER LLC is a Delaware limited liability company authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on June 27, 2014. The document number of this limited liability company is M14000004596. I further certify that said limited liability company has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2014, and Its status is active. I further certify that said limited liability company has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hated and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirtieth day of June, 2014 V^ 04so6t— Secretary of Slee Authentication ID: CU6620907965 To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this IA, and then follow the instructions displayed. https://etile,sunbiz.orgtcertauthver.htmi E W ry C�WET. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Corporations June 30, 2014 CSC EMILY GRAY Qualification documents for CG MIAMI RIVER LLC were filed on June 27, 2014, and assigned document number M14000004596. Please refer to this number whenever corresponding with this office. Your limited liability company is authorized to transact business in Florida as of the file date. To maintain "active" status with the Division of Corporations, an annual report must be filed yearly between January 1st and May 1st beginning in the year following the file date or effective date indicated above, it the annual report is not filed by May 1st, a $400 late fee will be added. A Federal Employer Identification Number (FEI/EIN) will be required when this report is filed. Contact the IRS at 1-800-829-4933 for an SS -4 form or go to www.— irs ov. Please notify this office if the limited liability company address changes. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at the address given below. Karen A Saly Regulatory Specialist II Regulatory/Qualification Section Division of Corporations Letter Number: 014AD0014105 Account number: I20000000195 Amount charged: 125.00 www.sunbiz.org Division of Corporations - P.O. BOX 6327 -Tallahassee, Florida 32314 COVER LETTER TO: Registration Section Dh, ision of Corporations Svlcr. CG MIAMI RIVER LLC Name of Limited Liability Company The enclosed "Application by Foreign Limited Liability Company for Authorization to Transact Business In Florida," Certificate of Existence, and check are submitted to register the above referenced foreign limited liability company to transact business in Florida.. Please return all correspondence concerning this matter to the follotvina OREN LIEBER, ESQ. Name of Person RITTER ZARETSKY LIEBER & JAIME, LLP Firm/Company 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 300 Address MIAMI, FLORIDA 33137 City/State and Zip Code OLIEBER@RZLLAW.COM E-mailnddrrsx (to be used for future annual report notification) For further information concerning this matter, pfesse call: OREN LIEBER at(305 .1372-0933 blame of Contact Person .Area Code Duytime Teiopllone Number AW LING ADDRESS: STREET ADDRESS: Division of Corporations Division of Corporations Registration Section Registration Section P.O. Box 6327 Clifton Building Tallahassee, FL 32314 2661 Executive Center Circle Tallahassee, FL 32361 Enclosed is a check for the following amount: C1 $125.90 Filing Fee l7 $130.00 Filing Fee & Cl $155.06 Fling Fee & El $1.60.00 Filing Fee, Cerdficatc Certificate of Status Certified Copy of Status & Certified Copy APPLICATION By FOREIGN L)7Y TED LL433M TY COMPANY FOR AUTHORIZATION TO TRANSACT 13USI.NESS IN FLORIf3A INCt7Mf'1MYCE1Il3HSE'GIION505.090?,-EORDWSTATUIFS, THEFOLLOWIMGL5SIBAfi=TORE'G DS ,l FOREGNLGI=LUBIL17YCOIPiPAWYOYR4N5'ACTBUSUESSBV= SIA, 0FFT_OR0vL- 1. CG MIAMI RIVER LLC (Name offorergrr Limitcd Llabi fry Company; must inc uda "Luntted Lrabifily Cnmpany," "L.L.C. " or %LC,"1 (]frione unavar'}ablq "teralterpate name adoplcd for the purpose of transuding business in Florida The alternate name must include "Limited Liability Company," "L.LC," or" LLUJ DELAWARE (3unsdlraom under die lace mfivhictt armgn imrlecl liability (FEl number, if applica JeJ company is organ ized ) 4. (pule first trsnsacled business mFo5r,da,dCn11m n-1 bU5,0405F. gr (sm scellons 60,0904 $ m penalty liability) $ 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 r-`- "— (Sucet Address of J'nnrrpaJ Ofice) N ,4 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3006. Miami, Florida 33137 (Mailing Address) f 7. The dame, title or capacity and address of the person(s) who lias/have authority to manage is/are- MEYER CHETRIT, MANAGER CIO OREN LIEBER, ESQ., 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 300 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33137 8. Attached is an ongmal certificate of existence, no more than 90 days old, duly authenticated by the official having custody of records in the junsdiction under the law of which it is organized. (A photocopy is not acceptable. If the certificate is in it foreign language, a translation of the certificate under oath of the translator must be subsiiitted) Signature of an authorized person (in aeeardanee with swron 605-0303, FS., die cxer:attoa of thfs daewacnl eanslntU1n an affinmouan undni the penalties arpenurydta( the faces slarod bemw are true, t asp awarc Thal any false idannabon sahtnrtted to a doeurrua ro the nc uwcnl arstars coaatssutr a thtrd MUm relany m provided for to s.li f 7.155, FS.) OREN LIEBER Typed or printed name of signee CER'T'IFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF REGISTERED AGENT/REGISTERED OFFICE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS CIF SECTION 605.0213 or 606.0902 (1)(d), FLORIDA STATUTES, THE UNDERSIGNED LIMITED LiABIL1TY COMPANY SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT TO DESIGNATE A REGISTERED OFFICE AND REGISTERED AGENT IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. 1. The name of the Limited Liability Company is: CG MIAMI RIVER LLC If unavailable, the alternate to be used in the state of Florida is: �S5 2. The nae and the Florida street address of the registered agent and office are-- L m OREN LIEBER, ESQ. (Name) 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 300 Stree{ Address (P-0, BOX NOT ACCEPTABLE) MIAMI FL 33137 City/stair/Zip Having been nw7red as registered agent and to accept service ofprocessfor the above stated limited liabilio, company at theplace designated in this certificate, I hereb}, accep! the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this ca padm 1 further agree to comply xriilt the p1 ovisions of all statutes relating to theproper and complelepeiformance ofnry dirties, and] am -familiar with and accept the obligations of nn+position as regislered agent as provided, for in Chapter 605, Florida Statutes. (Sivatum) $ I00.00 Filing Fee for Application S 25.00 Designation ofReb stered Agent S 30.00 Certified Copy (optional) 5 5.00 Certificate of Status (optional) - _ -Defaware.. PAGE I 9fie 97irst State Z', JEF=Y W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THR ' STATZ OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "CG NTAUX RIVER IZC" XS DULY FORWD UNDER TWE .LAWS OF THE SPATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD •STANDING AND ZAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO PAR AS TRE RECORDS OF THi-S OFFICE SHOW, AS OF THE LUGHITEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 2014. AND X bO HEHUBX' FURTHER CE. T.TF'Y THAT TUR SAID "CG - bUAW RTvzR LLC" WAS FORMED ON THE EXGH'1zz9TH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 2014. AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE NOT BEEN ASSESSED TO DATE_ 5553768 8300 140853986 Ynu may rdr-Lfy thIs certificate anii.ne 3t caTp.delaNare.,gmv/avthres. shtml 6�zc-�7 Icirtcy W Bullock Secretary Qf$tate AmTEN TION_ 146461$ DATE: 06-18-I4 Defaware- ghe first State I, OEF-PREY W. BULLOCK, SSCRE'TAPLY OF STATE OF THE -STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CKRT,zFY "CG ICAMI RIVER LLC" IS DULY FORMED UNDER TRE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD�STANDING AND HAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS TRE RECORDS OF THIS OFT7CE SHOW, AS OF THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A_D? 2014, AND I DO SEREBY FORT.BER CERTIFY TIMT THE SAID "CG, XTAM RIVER LLC" WAS FORMED ON THE EIGHT-V=H DAY OF ,7aI,TE, A.D. 2014. AND I DO RE'.RESY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT VVE ANNUAL TAXES HAVE NOT BEEN ASSESSED TO DAVE. Y 5553768 8300 140853986 Fta�w��w You may verify tbis cartificata online a* cpFp,Calaxnre,gov/avthvar.dLCm.Y ` Jeffrey W Bullock Secretary of State AUTRENTC TICK: 1464618 DATE: 06-18-14 Defaware PAGE I The First State I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND .CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF "CG MIAMI RIVER LLC", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 2014, AT I:1 6 O'CLOCK P -M. 5553768 8100 140852663 You may verify this certificate online at camp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml Jeffrey W. Bullock, secretary of State AUTHEN "TION: 1463798 DATE: .06-18-14 State of Delawmv Secretary of State Divislon of C ations Deliviexleat .01:37 PM 06/18/2014 F'ZLED 01:16 PM 06/18/2014 SRV 140852663 - 5553768 FILE' CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF CG MIAM RIVER LLC 1. The name of the limited liability company is CG MIAM RIVER'LLC • i 2. The address if its registered office in the State of Delaware is 2711 Centerville Road., ! Suite 400,..in the City of Wilmington 19808, County of New Castle. The name of its registered agent at such address is Corporation Service Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of CG MIAMI RIVER LLC this 18th day of June, 2014. Josfi Graff Organizer Defaware PAGE I' The ,first Sete I,- OFFFREY N. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TRE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY "CG MIAMI RIVER LLC" TS DU%Y FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND IS IN GOOD STANDING AND HAS A LEGAL EXISTENCE SO FAR AS THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE SSOW, AS OF THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF a=, A.D. 2014. AND I DO HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE SAID "CG MXAMi 1?XVBR LLC" WAS FORMED ON THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE, A.D. 2014. AND I DO EEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE ANNJAZ TAXES HAVE NOT BEEN ASSESSED TO DATE. 5553768 8.300 140853986 You may vamify this cart3.ficate online at Corp. delaware.gav/authvvr.orb tml Jeffrcy W oullaNc, Seemary of State AIUTHEN C TION: 14 64 6,18 DATE: 06-18--14 POWER OF ATTORNEY AFFIDAVIT STATE OF E d) g� COUNTY OF being duly sworn and deposed say that I am on the board of directors of CG Miami River, LLC, the entity which owns the real property described in Exhibit A, attached. The CG Miami River, LLC board of directors is aware of the nature and effect of the Special Area Plan Application relative to the subject property, and hereby authorizes Ari Pearl to be our representative before the City of Miami for this application. NAME (and Title, if applicable) SIGNATURE Sworn to and subscribed before me this � day of , 20 K, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by , of CG Miami River LLC who has produced as identification and/or is ersonally know o me and who did/did not take an oath. OTARY P BLIC NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP: My Commission Expires: PRINT NAME E aJEANINE RODRIGUEZ Notary Pu6iir •State Of FlonrMy Comm. Expires Jan 14, 20, r °' Gwnmisslon # EE 836768 preDared by and return to: Armando J. 1311CC10, Jr. Attorney at Law Roig, Tutan, Rosenberg, Ivtstrtincn Stoller, Zumpano and Bellido, LLC Soo Soutlt Dixie Highway Suite 302 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Return to: Oren Lieber, Esq... Ritter, Zaretsky. Lieber and Jaime LLP 2915 Biscayne, Blvd. Suite 300 Miami. Florida 33537 OR Pk 28239 Pss 3248 - 32491 ,2p9s 1 RECORDED 07/22/2014 15:5916 GEED DDC TAX 287731.60 SURTAX 21,548.70 HARVEY RUVINT CLERK 4E COURT, 112AMI--DARE cnufdTY, FLORIDA Parcel Identification plumber: O1-0204-000-1050 Above This Line Cor lkecordinE Trustee's Deed fael rtega ' Deed made this �7�day or July, 2011, between Edy Ortega, 73 $elrantaas r and CGrustee ftile illiami Rive©LLC, This Trustees . Family Trust. whose post office address is 9221 SW 66 Street, Miami, Florida 3 a Delaware limited liability company, whose post office address is 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300. [vliamt, Florida 33137, grantee: (Wherever used lierem the terms granoaonsorand trusts includetrusacsite parties to this Instrument and the heirs. legal representatives, anti assigns of individuals. and lite successors and assigns or corporations, 11 Witnesseth. that said grantor. ror and in considerationdobrth dtgrantc AND OO �f s hereby Q kno ledged. lrid other ead and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand p ) granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantees heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, sstuate, lying and being in Miartti-Dade County. Florida. to -wit: F MIAMI, rding to le An undivided 51.16% or Lots 18, B9 and Papealock l of toe Putblic Recordth. CITY ©afMiamil3ade County Florida. An thereof: as recorded in Plat Boo . Less That portion of Lot 10. Block 40 S of "A.L. KNOWLTON MAP rds of 1v11 according to the Plat Miami ade County. Florida, ge le Public RCCO thereof, as recorded in Plat Booksaid Lot 10. said lline allso being the South right of-vay line or S.W. 6 It bounded by the North line of Street and by the Westtot the Southeast and tangt 10. said ent tone ltile so blast described i Ieing tile East to lines. �vay of S.W. 3rd Avenue and by an are concave ons and Subject to: Taxes for the year 2014 and inulsedo forth herein shallnt years; tserve tosre impose the satme; and ��SQ�1Q11�S 0� C�COC�i� �tavidetl that g 111d pthcr governmental ordinances ' kna MIA' 'All, Parcel Identification Number: 01-0205-000-1Q50 DoubleTime OR BK 29239 PG 3249 L- A S TB'" PAGE Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold. the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in lee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the sante against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantors. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's ]land and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed in t i� DresencE v nt Name: epj�'rr—Edy Orteg , as Trustee o the Rafael _ Ortega Family Trust nt Natne: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of —Y'ILA 2411, by Edy Ortega, as Trustee of the Rafael Ortega Family Trust. She is personally kn lne or provided SSC_ identification. Notary Public Printed Name: j�c.��- N � My Commission Expires: ' BARBARA PICCIONE ,4 fAy COMMISSION 0 EE 185767 EXPIRES: Sttly 9, 20i6 1 fnh Bonded Rau NaM Public Underrdm Trustee's Deed - Page 2 noubleTime' Record and Return to: Oren D. Lieber, Esti. RTE Title Company, Inc. 2915 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED OR Bk 24215 Pss 2626 - 2628; (3pss) RECORDED 07/13/2014 15.16.33 DEED DOC TAX 0.60 SURTAX 0.45 HARVEY RUVINY CLERK OF COURT MIAMI-DADE COUNTYr FLORIDA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that CG Miami River Owner LLC., a Florida limited liability company (the "Grantor"), for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Grantee"), with a principal place of business at 512 Seventh Avenue, I5"' Floor New York 10018, the receipt of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, has GRANTED, BARGAINED, SOLD AND CONVEYED and by these presents does GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL AND CONVEY unto the Grantee, the property (the "Property") described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anyway belonging, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, subject to the matters shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the extent (but no further) that same are valid and subsisting as of the date hereof and affect title to the Property (the "Permitted Encumbrances"), and Grantor does hereby bind itself, its successors and assigns, to warrant and forever defend all and singular title to the Property, subject to the Permitted Encumbrances, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, by, through or under Grantor, but not otherwise. The parties hereto as of the effective date of this deed have prorated all ad valorem taxes and assessments for the Property for the year in which this deed is executed IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this 14 day of July, 2011, to be effective upon delivery. The recording of this deed does not change the beneficial ownership of the property and no documentary stamp tax is owed on this of transfer Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: " �( mjv4i� WI t lf'tyi Witness STATE OF COUNTY OF -).vat n5 } Grantor: CG Miami River Owner LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Print Na e: er Chetrit Title: prized Signatory This instrument was acknowledged before me on July, 2014, by Meyer Chetrit as Authorized Signatory of CG Miami River Owner LLC, a Florida limited liability company, who [ VI is personally known to me or who [ j produced as identification. Notary Public in and for the State of [SEALI Printed Name: tITTERSANCNEZ My commission exPIT00tarY Public. State of New York iso. 01 HU5042516 Qualified In Queens County Commission Expires April 24, 20JL� OR BK 29235 PG 2628 ILAST PAGE EXHIBIT "A" Parcel 1 The South SO feet of the North 100 feet of Lots I 1 and 12 in Block X10 South, Map of Miami, according to the plat thereof. as recorded in Plat Book "B" page 4 1, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, less and except that portion conveyed to the State of Florida in Official records Book 11951 page 3087. Parcel 2 The North 50 feet of Lots I 1 and 12, in Block 40 South, Map of Miami, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" page 41, of the Public records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Parcel 3 The South 50 feet of Lots 1 i and 12, in Block 40 South, Map of Miami, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" page X11, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Prepared by and return to: Armando J. Buceio, Jr. Attorney at Lase Roig, Tutan, Rosenberg, Martinm Stoller, Zumpano and Bellido, LLC 500 South Dixie Highway Suite 302 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Oren Lieber, Esq. Ritter, Zaretsky, Lieber and Jaime LLP 2915 Biscayne, Blvd. Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 OR Bk 29239 Pss 3252 — 3253; (2pss ) RECORDED 07/22/2014 15:59:1L DEED DOC TAX 27.423.40 SURTAX 20Y571.30 HARVEY RUVIN? CLERK OF COURT NIANI—DARE COUNTY? FLORIDA Parcel identification Number: 01-0204-000-1050 [Space Above This Line For Recording DataJ Trustee's Deed. This Trustee's Deed made thisil-t1day of July, 2014. between Edy Ortega, as Trustee of the Edy Ortega Marital Trust. whose post office address is 9221 SW 66 Street, Miami, Florida 33173, grantor. and CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, whose post office address is 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33137, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms granter and grantee tnc€ude all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth. that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee. and grantees heirs and assigns forever, the lallowing described land, situate. lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to -wit: An undivided 48.84% of Lots 8. 9 and 10. Block 40 South, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof.. as recorded in Plat Book "B" . at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Less That portion of Lot 10, Block 40 S or "A.L. KNOWLTON MAP OF MIAMI" according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Made County, Florida, bounded by the North line of said Lot 10, said line also being the South right -or -way line of S.W. 6th Street and by the West line orsaid Lot 10, said line also being the Cast right-of-way of S.W. 3rd Avenue and by an arc concave to the Southeast and tangent to the last described two lines. Subject to: Taxes for the year 2014 and subsequent years; conditions, restrictions, limitations and easements of record, provided that nothing set forth herein shall serve to re -impose the same; and zoning and other governmental ordinances and regulations. Parcel Identification Number: 01-0204-000-100 QoubleTime OR BK 2?23? PG 3253 L -AST PAGE Together with all the tenements. hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized or said land in fee simple: that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land: that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of'all persons claiming by, through or under grantors. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seat the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed apd in tW nresenc of: nt Name: Uo),V, 5t Ed y Orte a, as Trusteetee o�dy 7 , - Ortega Marital Trost ntName• STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this L7 � day of 201 , by Edy Ortega, as Trustee of the Edy Ortega Marital Trust. She is personally know me or provided i S •p identification. N t Publie Printed Name: My Commission Expires: y BAPBARAP€CCiCINE my C01AW58li)N # EE 185761 4K _1= EXPIRES: July 9, 2016 Rf. � Bo3d,ad ihnu NolatY Pu6Gc Undentsilere Tnistee's peed - Page 2 DoubleTimen Prepared by and return to: Armando J. Bucelo, Jr. Attorney at Law Roig, Tutan, Rosenberg, Martinm Stoller, Zumpano and Bellido, LLC 500 South Dixie Highway Suite 302 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Return to: Oren Lieber, Esq. Ritter, Zaretsky, Lieber and Jaime LLP 2915 Biscayne, Blvd. Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 Parcel Identification No. 01-0203-080-1020 [Space Above This Line For Recordinn CFH 2014RO514953 OR Bk 29239 Pss 3256 — 3257; (2pss) RECORDED 07/22/2014 1559=16 DEET} DOG TAX 14040s340l 00 SURTAX 107530.00 HARVEY RUVII'lr CLERK OF COURT MIAMI—DADE COUNTY? FLORIDA Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made thisday o f 1.�6treet, 201 between River Marine Supply, Inc., a Florida corporation whose post office address is 260 SW Miami, FL 33130 of the County of Miami -Dade, State of Florida, grantor*, and CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose post office address is 2915 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33137, grantee*, Witnesseth that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to -wit: Lot 7, Block 38 South, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Subject to taxes for 2014 and subsequent years; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any. and said grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Doubleiirne Signed, sealed and del N Witness Name: State of Florida our S c--. OR 113K 292Z39 Ir. AST PAGE River Marine Supply, Inc., a Florida corporation By: Qtt� 6;iil u Edy Orte, , President (Corporate Seal) PG 3257 County of Miami -Dade The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of t� , 2014 by Edy Ortega, President of River Marine Supply, Inc., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation. 1 /she [__] is personally known to me or [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. 4 [Notary Sea[] Nota is Printed Nae:G--�cc�r.� My Commission Expires: SApSARA PICCIONE gs' MY COMMISSION 0 EE 185767 EXPIRES'- July 9, 2016 Vii:Fyt?° Bonded ThTuHalaNPublicUndsfw*Ols Warraitty Deed (Stalutory Farm) - Page 2 Doubleiime'' Prepared by and return to: Albert D. Rey, Esq. The Law Firm of Albert D. Rey, P.A. 12955 SW 42nd Street Suite 6 Miami, FL 33175 305-597-0440 File Number: 14-+0702 Will Call No.. Above This Linc For Recording Warranty Deed OR 8k 29239 Pss 3259 - 3260; Qpss ) RECORDED 07/22/2014 15:59:16 DEED DOC TAX 19+998,00 SURTAX 14x998.50 HARVEY RUVINx CLERK OF COURT NIANI-DADS COUNTYf FLORIDA This Warranty Deed made this 17th day of July, 2014 between Gilberto Rodriguez and Ramona Rodriguez, husband and wife whose post office address is 1811 SW 4th Avenue, Miami, FL 33129, grantor, and CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose post office address is 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD., STE. 300, Miami, FL 33137, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terns "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns or corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS (510.0©) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida to -wit: EXHIBIT "A" Parcel Identification Number: 01-0204-000-1010 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2013. In Witness Whereof, grantor has Signed, reale edTIt_vexe i ii ettrpipi Witness Name: Witness N Witness Witness Name: State of Florida County of Miami -Dade set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. _90berto Rodriguez / Ramona Rodriguez Th, fnrQonino inatnimvnf ,vac anirnn,vi rriavri I Mfr — th- 17t6 t.v nF 1,0AMA by 1'=;11,.x- T? -A -in - -A t)-- OR BK 292S9 PG �3260 FAST PAGE Exhibit A -HE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE, STATE OF FLORIDA, AND IS 7ESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: .ot 18, in Block 40 South, of CM OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of he Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. knd k portion of Lot 3, in Block 40 South, of CITY OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof. as recorded in Plat Book "B", at 'age 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: iegin at the Southwest corner of Lot 3 of said Block 40 South; thence run North along the West line of said Lot 3 for a listance of 75 feet to a point: thence run East parallel with the South line of said Lot 3 for 35 feet, more or less, to the )ack of a sidewalk as constructed; thence run Southeasterly on a line which makes a defection to the right of 67 degrees l0 minutes with the last described course and approximately along the back of the sidewalk for 35 feet, more or less, to a Joint of curve; thence Southeasterly on the arc of said curve to the left, said curve having a radius of 68 feet and a :entral angle of 5 degrees 16 minutes 02 seconds and approximately along the back of said sidewalk for 6.25 feat to the :ast line of said Lot 3; thence run Southerly along the East line of Lot 3 for 37.27 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 3; hence run Westerly along the South line of Lot 3 for 50.05 feet to the Point of Beginning. This instrument Prepared by: Brian Beit, Esq. Duane Morris LLP Suite 3400 200 South Biscayne Blvd. Miami, FL 33131 Record and return to: Oren Lieber, Esq. Ritter. Zaretsky, Lieber & Jaime LLP 2915 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 CF14 ` 014RO u 144?5S OR Bk 29239 F'ss 3264 — 32677 t4pssl RECORDED 07/22/2014 15n59.16 DEED DRG TAX 91 Y 050.00 SURTAX SSY287.50 HARVEY RUVIH? CLERK OF COURT MIAMI—DADE COUNTY? FLORIDA Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification No.: eilg?O-1167do /�yD� 'Q ' /4) 7Ui /fuo ='l/0 //_� C - /&7,) ----------The Space Above This Line For Recording Office Use Only ---------- SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED is made this day of July, 2014, by 7T11 Street Land LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership and Mahlberg Investment Holdin,as Inc.. Florida corporation (collectively, "Seller"), whose address is 150 SE 211d Avenue, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33131 and CG Miami River LLC. a Delaware limited liability company and/or its assigns ("Purchaser"), whose mailing address is c/o Oren Lieber Esq., 2915 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33137. Sellers, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration paid to Sellers by Purchaser. the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and does hereby grant, bargain. sell and convey, to Purchaser and Purchaser's successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida more particularly described as follows (the "Property"): Lots 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, in Block 40 South, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, TOGETHER WITH all easements, tenements., hereditaments and appurtenances belonging to the Property. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. This conveyance is made subject to: (a) Taxes for the year 2014 and subsequent years; Deed - Page 1 o14 DM2M25708,1 (b) Applicable laws. ordinances. governmental regulations and resolutions, including, but not limited to, all applicable building, zoning. land use and environmental ordinances and regulations; and (c) Conditions. restrictions, covenants, limitations, easements and other matters of record; however, that this instrument shall not operate to reimpose any of same. GRANTOR specially warrants the title to the Property, and will defend it against the lawful claims and demands of all persons claiming by. through or under Grantor, but against none other. [SIGNATURES ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES] Deed - Paae 2 of 4 DM2151i2570S. [ Grantor has duly executed this instrument as of the date first written above. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of Print STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE SELLERS: 7TH Street Land LLLP By: Integra Solutions, LLC, its general partner By: i Name: _...._, hit o Its: frin�2 Dated: ( � � 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / 7 daEly of lol-I lo -I 2014, by Paulo Melo, as Manager of Integra Solutions, LLC, as the general Partner 7` Street Land LLLP. He is ( ) personally known to m or } has produced e�yv,;,,V 5 , C as identification. (NOTARY SEAL) Notary Publi�, Sta e of, Print Name: RM AWN PEREZOtic -Male tai Fiarida Expires Sep 20.2015sion # EE 100603ugh National Notary Assn. Deed - Page 3 of 4 DM2S5025708 l STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE OR BK 2?23? PG 3267 ._AST PAGE Mahlerg Investment Holdings Inc., a Florida corporation By: (3v_ Name: t10 Its: LY Cxg rz- Dated: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before rrte this ?','day of �' / 2014, by He is ( ) personally known o me or (;'has produced as identification. ` v; /r cep fir' (NOTARY SEAL) Yg•�,,�, Notary Public S ate of/Florida Print Name: /}�,..,, I�ytz DAWN PEREZ Notary public - State of Florida '• a My Comm. Expires Sep 20, 2095 a' Commission # EE 100603 " •°f tl`�� Banded Through National Nolary Assn. pq Deed - Page 4 of 4 DM215025708.1 Record and Return to: Oren D. Lieber, Esq. RTE Title Company, Inc. 2915 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 300 Miami, Florida 33137 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED CFH 2014RO514959 OR Bk 29239 Fss 326p — 3270; (3p9s) RECORDED 07/22/2014 15:59:16 DEED DOC TAX 391990.00 SURTAX 29t250.130 HARVEY RUVII•lr CLERK OF COURT MIAMI—DADE COUNTY► FLORIDA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that DOWNBYRIVER MIAMI. INC., a Florida corporation (the "Grantor"), for and in consideration of the suin of' Ten Dollars (SIO.00) and other good and valuable consideration to it in hand paid by CG MIAMI RIVER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Grantee"), whose address is c/o Oren Lieber, Esq., 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300, Miami_ FL 33137, the receipt of which are herebv acknowledged and confessed, has GRANTED. BARGAINED. SOLD AND CONVEYED and by these presents does GRANT, BARGAIN, SELL AND CONVEY unto the Grantee. the property (the "Property") described on Exhibit A, attached Hereto and Hereby made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in anyway belonging, unto Grantee. its successors and assigns, forever. subject to the matters shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the extent (but no further) that same are valid and subsisting as of the date hereof and affect title to the Property (the "Permitted Encumbrances"). and Grantor does hereby bind itself: its successors and assigns, to warrant and forever defend all and singular title to the Property, subject to the Permitted Encumbrances, unto Grantee, its successors and assigns. against every person whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the sarne or any part thereof, by, through or under Grantor, but not otherwise. The parties hereto as of the effective date of this deed have prorated all ad valorem taxes and assessments for the Property for the year in which this deed is executed. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. this instrument is executed this � day of July, 2014.. to be effective upon delivery. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presencg of: Printed Name of Witness STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Downbyriver Miami, Inc., a Florida corporation Print Name: Michael Puhver Title: President Address: 1019 5`r' Street Miami Beach, FL 33139 This instrument was acknowledged before me on July & 20147 by Michael Pulwer as President of Downbyriv r Miami, Inc., a Florida corporation on behalf of the corporation, who f ] is personally known to me or who iV produced as id rrti)ffioNot ry Pan I for [SEAL Y`SOFIATERRAZASthe Stateda hit CONIMISSIO,NVIFF1059% Printed Name: �. a= EXPIRES:ThrUNaNpub Mato 25.2019 My commission expires: SonCedThruHeiaryPub!cUndetwrdC[s •J I EXHIBIT "A" THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF MIAMI- DADE, NATE OF FLORIDA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lots 4 and 5, Block 40 South, CITY OF MIAMI, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B" at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. AND Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 3, Block 40S, A. L. KNOWLTON MAP OF MIAMI, as recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, thence run Southwardly along the Westerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of nine and ninety-seven hundredths (9.97) feet to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described parcel of land; thence continue Southwardly along the Westerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of sixty -Five and one hundredth (65.01) feet to a point, said point being seventy-five (75) feet, more or less, Northerly of the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 3; thence deflecting to the left 90006'05" run along a line seventy-five (75.00) feet, more or less, Northerly of and parallel with the Southerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of thirty-five and fifty-eight hundredths (35.58) feet to a point; thence deflecting to the left 111126'45" run Northwestwardly for a distance of forty-six and fifty-nine hundredths (46.59) feet to a point of curve; thence run Northwestwardly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of fifty (50.00) feet and a central angle of 31132'21" for a distance of twenty- seven and fifty-two hundredths (27.52) feet to the point of intersection with the Westerly line of said Lot 3, said point being the Point of Beginning. LESS, Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 4, Block 40S, A. L. KNOWLTON MAP OF MIAMI, as recorded in Plat Book "B". at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, thence run Eastwardly along the Northerly line of said Lot 4, for a distance of twenty-two and eight hundredths (22.08) feet to a point of curve, said point of curve being the Point of Beginning; thence run Southeastwardly along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of fifty (50.00) feet and a central angle of 36149'09" for a distance of thirty-two and thirteen hundredths (32.13) feet to a point of intersection with the Easterly line of said Lot 4; thence run Northwardly along the Easterly line of said Lot 4, for a distance of nine and ninety-seven hundredths (9.97) feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 4; thence deflecting to the left 89053'06" run Westwardly along the Northerly line of said Lot 4, for a distance of Twenty-seven and ninety-five hundredths (27.95) feet to the Point of Beginning. ALSO KNOWN AS, Commencing at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 3, Block 40S, A. L. KNOWLTON MAP OF MIAMI, as recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, thence run Southwardly along the Westerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of nine and ninety-seven hundredths (9.97) feet to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning of the hereinafter described parcel of land; thence continue OR BK 29239 RG 3270 LAS7 PAGE Southwardly along the Westerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of sixty-five and one hundredth (65.01) feet to a point, said point being seventy-five (75.00) feet, more or less. Northerly of the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 3; thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees 06'05" run along a line seventy-five (75.00) feet, more or less, Northerly of and parallel with the Southerly line of said Lot 3, for a distance of thirty-five and fifty-eight hundredths (35.58) feet to a point; thence deflecting to the left 111 degrees 26'45" run Northwestwardly for a distance of forty-six and fifty-nine hundredths (46.59) feet to a point of curve; thence run Northwestwardly along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of fifty (50.00) feet and a central angle of 31 degrees 32'21" for a distance of twenty-seven and fifty-two hundredths (27.52) feet to the point of intersection with the Westerly line of said Lot 3, said point being the Point of Beginning. Part of Lots 3 and 4, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the SW corner of Lot 4; thence run North 150 feet to a point; thence run East 22.00 feet to a point; thence run Southeasterly approximately 59.65 feet to a point; thence Southeasterly 46.59 feet to a point; thence Westerly 35.56 feet to a point; thence Southerly 75 feet; thence Westerly to the Point of Beginning; and ALL of Lot 5, in Block 40, City of Miami South, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Prepared by and return to: Mark S. Schechner, Esq. Attorney at Lav Mark S. Schechner, P.A. 2121 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Suite 711 Coral Gables, FL 33134 305-446-1621 File Number: Burgess Will Call No.. [Space Above This Line For Recording Data CFN 2014R05145161 OR Bk 29239 Pas :3272 -,3273; s2psstl RECORDED 07/22/2014 15-59.'16 DEED DOC: TAX 156000.00 SURTAX 117rt:t00.00 l- RVEY RUVIhir CLERIC OF COURT IlIANI--DADE COUI.ITYP FLORIDA Special ANarranty Deed This Special Warranty Deed made this.s_ day of July, 2014 between Burgess Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership whose post office address is P.O. Box 236, Homestead, FL 33090, grantor, and CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose post office address is 2913 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33137, grantee: (Whenever used hcrcrn the terms grantor and grantee include all the parties to this instrumcnt and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals. and the successors and assigns of corporations -trusts and tnjseesI Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted. bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to -wit: Commencing at the North corner of Lot 2, Block 38 South in the City of Miami, Florida, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida, running thence East along the South line of Southwest Fifth Street in said City produced East to its intersection with the low water line of the Miami River, running thence Southeasterly meandering the low water line of said River to the point where the East line of Lot 13 of said Block 38 South produced North intersects with said low water line, running thence South to the East corner of Lot 1 of said Block 38 South, running thence Northwesterly along the lot lines of said Lots 1 and of said Block 38 South to the point or place of beginning, also submerged land lying between the above described property and the channel of the Miami River. And Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, in the North portion of Block 38 South, City of Miami, County of Miami - Dade, State of Florida. Parcel Identification No.: 01-0203-080-1010 & 01-0203-080-1011 a/k/a: 511 SW 3r" Avenue and 242 SW 5`' Street, Miami, Florida 33130 Subject to taxes for 2014 and subsequent years; covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, reservations and limitations of record, if any, reference to which shall not operate to reimpose same, and further subject to the rights of tenants in possession. Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantors. Special f f'Qrrarr4, Deed - Page I OR BK 292:39 PG 32-73 LAST PAGE In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: State of Florida Burgess Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership By: Miami River Marine Village, Inc., a Florida corporation General Partner of Burgess Limited Partnership By: / ` Michael F. Chenoweth, President (Corporate Seal) County of Miami -Dade 'The foregoing instrument was sworn to, affirmed and subscribed before me this S day of July, 2014 by Michael F. Chenoweth, as President of Miami River Marine Village, Inc., a Florida corporation/General Partner of Burgess Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership on behalf of the partnershi e is personally [mown to ane or I has produced as identification. [Notary Sear Special 1larranth> Deed - Pane 2 Pu Printed Name: My Commission Fxpires: of}"Y g4r� MARK S. SGHECHNER * MY COMMISSION I fF 107485 EXPIRES: June 27,201B SIM,,; 19mdtdNuSma3NourvWins Prepared by and return to: Mario A. Lamar, Esq. Mario A. Lamar P.A. 3971 SW 8th Street Suite 305 Miami, FL 33134 305-442-4748 File Number: L13189 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] 11111 e 'war, , s OR 9k 29239 Pas 3275 - 3276} (2p9s) RECORDED 07/22/2014 15:59:16 DEET} DDC TAX 47? 520. € 0 SURTAX 35Y640.00 1{ARVEY RUVINi, CLERIC WJE COURT MIAMI-DADE COUNTYv FLORIDA This Special Warranty Deed made this -d day of Q L� , ' 014 between BRICKELL 261 INVESTORS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose post office a� 3211 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 301, Coral Gables, FL 33134, grantor, and CG MIAMI RIVER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose post office address is c/o Ritter Zaretsky & Lieber, LLP, 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300, Miami, FL 33137, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms grantor and grantee include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuais, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/144 DOLLARS ($14.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to -wit: Lot, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block 38, of CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH, according to the Map of Miami -Dade County, Florida, recorded in Plat Book "B", at Page 41 of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Parcel Identification Number: 01-0203-080-1040 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said Land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or lander grantors. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. iDoubleTimeo Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: State of Florida County of Miami -Dade OR BK 29239 PG X276 LWAte,.,'T PAGE BRICKELL 261 INVESTORS, LLC, a Florida limited liability com a By: JoslrlvlVon, Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this &— day of Tc! 2414 by Joseph Milton, Manager of BRICKELL 261 INVESTORS, LLC, a Florida limited liability comp yaf� on behalf of said firm. He [_] is personally known or [X] has produced a driver's license as identification. / A [Notaryp.:,axacF�i'I filLfiDAftiO —TIRES: AsE rinted Name: My Commission Expires: Special Warranty Deed - Page 2 DoubleTime® Prepared by and return to: Mario A. Lamar, Esq. Mario A. Lamar P.A. 3971 SW 8th Street Suite 305 Miami, FL 33134 305-442-4748 Pile Number: L13189 1Space Above This Line For Recording CFH 2014RO514966 OR Flti 29239 Fos 3290 - 3293; (4pss ) RECORDED 07/22/2014 15y59.16 DEED DOC TAX 517430-00 SURTAX 38►b10.00 HARVEY RUVIHY CLEFT: OF COURT MIAMI--DADE COUNTYY FLORIDA This Special Warranty Deed made this A/ day of J.j L _> 2014 between 2ND AVENUE RIVER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company whose post office address is 3211 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Suite 301, Coral Gables, FL 33134, grantor, and CG MIAMI RIVER LLC, a Delaware limited liability company whose post office address is c/o Ritter Zaretsky & Lieber, LLP, 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300, Miami, FL 33137, grantee: (Whenever used herein the terms grantor and grantee include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees) Witnesseth, that said grantor, for and in consideration of the sum TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to said grantor in hand paid by said grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the said grantee, and grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to -wit: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" Parcel Identification Number: 01-0203-080-1070, 1080 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining_ To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever. And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said Iand and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under grantors. In Witness Whereof, grantor has hereunto set grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. DouloleTimeg Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: State of Florida County of Miami -Dade 2ND AVENUE RIVER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited Habil' ompany By: e Joseph Milton, Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this % 1-/ day of ✓ J L % ,��_ by Joseph Milton, Manager of 2ND AVENUE RIVER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liab�mpany, o ehalf of said firm. He Kis personally known or [XI has produced a driver's Iicense as identification. [Notar Sealj: cr�:i;:43E�S;ON E-- 5319.1 [ i—TI SES: JII �.�`� Eur�2^_Tr:FiFla!?t�F31'�',E�•iEr:f��Ti;c�s Pir/inted Name: My Commission Expires: lv �41�5 5pecral Warranty Deed - Page 2 DoubleTlmeo EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL l: LOTS 12, 13, 14 AND 15, IN BLOCK 38 SOUTH, OF MAP OF MIAMI DADE CO., FLA., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B", AT PAGE 41, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS -OUT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 15, BLOCK 38 SOUTH, OF MAP OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLA., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B" AT PAGE 41, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12, BLOCK 38 SOUTH, OF SAID MAP OF MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 12 AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LOTS 13, 14 AND 15 OF SAID BLOCK 38 SOUTH, ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. 6"' STREET NORTH 87051'41" EAST FOR 188.15 FEET" TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 76.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87144'18" WEST FOR 13.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 40.40 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15, THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY SOUTH 68039'25" EAST FOR 78.78 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 25 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CITY OF MIAMI MONUMENT LINE FOR S.W. 2",, AVENUE, ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. 2"l AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 02016'29" EAST FOR 6.82 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 02015'42" EAST FOR 79.84 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFORESAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. 6`" STREET, SOUTH 87°51`41" WEST FOR 57.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND THAT PART OF A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 54 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12, BLOCK 38 SOUTH, OF MAP OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B" AT PAGE 41, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 12 AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LOTS 13, 14, AND 15 OF SAID BLOCK 38 SOUTH, ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. 6' STREET, NORTH 87°5141" EAST FOR 188.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 76.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87044'18" WEST FOR 13.34 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 40.40 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 38.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87049'38" EAST FOR 26.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02010'28" EAST FOR 44.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 871150'00" EAST FOR 43.81 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 25.0 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE 01IR BK 292�39 PG -329Z3 LAST PAGE= CITY OF MIAMI MONUMENT LINE FOR S.W. 2"d AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, SOUTH 02015'29" EAST FOR 23.96 FEET TO A POINT OF THE AFORESAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 15; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY NORTH 68039`25, WEST FOR 76.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. A PORTION OF SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, OF MAP OF MIAMI, DADE CO. FLA., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK "B", AT PAGE 41, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING VACATED BY ORDINANCE 688 FROM NOVEMBER 15, 1926, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12, BLOCK 38 SOUTH, OF MAP OF MIAMI, DADE CO. FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 8705141" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 12 AND ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF LOTS 13, 14 AND 15 OF SAID BLOCK 38 SOUTH, ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF S.W. 6'' STREET, NORTH 87°5141" EAST FOR 188.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 76.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87144'19" WEST FOR 13.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02015'42" WEST 40.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 15 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 02015'42" WEST FOR 45 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH RIVER DRIVE; THENCE MEANDER NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 108 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 13, OF SAID BLOCK 38 SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 02102'03" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF LOT 13, FOR 89 FEET TO THE EAST CORNER OF LOT 1, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13; THENCE SOUTH 6813927" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 14 AND 15 FOR 158.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS DOCUMENT PREPARED BY: EVAN R. MARGIN, ESQ. EVAN R. MARGIN & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 48 E. FLAGLER STREET, PH -I04 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 RECORD AND RETURN TO: Oren Lieber, Esquire Ritter, Zaretsky, Lieber & Jaime, LLP 2915 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 300 Miami, FL 33137 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED CFN 2014R0465517 OR OI: 29213 Pss € 658 - 659; (`2uss) RECORDED 07/€J1112€=€14 1€ :415x5 DEED DOC: TAX 69,000,As_€ SURTAX 51F750.00 l -l€ RVEY RUVIN? CLERK OF COURT MIAMI -DARE COUNTYY FLORIDA This Special Warranty Deed made this a � day of .Tune, 2014, by and between Ocean Drive Clevelander, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Grantor''), whose mailing address is 1455 Ocean Drive, #1502, Miami Beach, FL 33139 and CG Miami River LLC, a Delaware Kited liability company (the "Grantee") whose post office address is 2915 Biscayne Blvd., 4300, Miami, Florida 33137. (Wherever used herein, the terms "Grantor'' and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, trusts and trustees.) Witnesseth, that Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey and confirm unto the Grantee, the real property (the "Property") hereinafter described, and rights and interest in said real property located in Miami -Dade County, Florida, to wit: Lots 1-G through 7-G, inclusive, of RIVERSIDE WATERFRONT, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 72, of the Public Records of Miami -Dade County, Florida. Folio Number: 01-4138.049-0030 Together with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. Subject to ad valorem taxes for the year 2014 which are not due and payable and to conditions, restrictions and easements of record, provided this shall not serve to reimpose same. AND Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and Iawful authority to sell and convey the Property; and that Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to the Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or tinder Grantor but against none other. Page I oft OFA. e.K `2` �1w L aG. 0µS, 5e IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Special Warranty Deed to be executed the day and year first above written. Signed and delivered in our presence: —' r7 0 -f -'e STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE) GRANTOR: OCEAN DRIVE { Florida corpor 'on Anthony J ISLANDER, INC., a President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .26 day of .lune, 2014 by Anthony J. Karpawich as President of Ocean Drive Clevelander, Inc., a Florida corporation, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. Name: NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florid Commission No. - My Commission Expires: Page 2 of 2 „"" •, SANDRA L E ASSURY MY cOMMISSION I FF (16x559 ;= EXPIRES: December21, 2017 l Rr bonded TM NOWYPubrc "OrmderA Name: NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Florid Commission No. - My Commission Expires: Page 2 of 2 City of Miami Public School Concurrent Concurrency Management System Entered Requirements Applicant Fields I Information Application Type Public Hearing Application Sub -Type Large Scale - CRC Review Application Name CG Miami River, LLC Application Phone * 305-377-6227 Application Email * miapanes@brzoninglaw.com Application Address see attached Contact Fields Contact Name * Melissa Tapanes Llahues Contact Phone * 305-377-6227 Contact Email * mtapanes@brzoninglaw.com Local Govt. Name City of Miami Local Govt. Phone 305-416-1404 Local Govt. Email GDGa ci.miami.fl.us Local Govt. App. Number iOFFIClAL use ONLY) f Property Fields I Information Master Folio Number * see attached Additional Folio Number Total Acreage 4.$3 Proposed Land Use/Zoning * High Density Multifamily Residential Single -Family Detached Units 0 Single -Family Attached Units (Duplex) * 0 Multi -Family Units * 1,67$ Total # of Units 1,711 (including suites hotel units) Redevelopment Information (MUSPsi - Re -development applications are for those vacant sites for which a local government has provided vested rights; or for an already improved property which does not have to be re -platted as deemed by the local government. The number of units to be input into the CMS is the net difference between the e)dsting vested number of units and the newly proposed number of units. Example: an existing 20 -unit structure will be torn down for redevelopment. The newly proposed development calls for 40 total units, Locaf government shati input 20 units in the CMS (net difference between the 20 units vested less the newly proposed 4 units). Required Fields for AoDication Melissa Tapanes Llahues, Attorney for CG Miami River, LLC Owner(s)/Attorney/Applicant Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE T oregoing was acknowledged before me this 2-_ by "J".A.X—%-A `b, who is a(n) individual/partner/agenVeorporation of individual/partnership/torpor8 On. He/5 is ersa as identification and who did (did not) take an oai R Notary Public State of FloridaAna HemandexMy Commission FF 218772Expires 04/29/2019 Owner( A Applican tZignature day of or wh)v has Miami River School Concurrency Request Folio Number Address 102030801040 102040001030 244 SW 6 ST 102040001010 220 SW 6 ST 102040001070 635 SW 3 AVE 102040001050 260 SW 6 ST 102040001130 219 SW 7 ST 102030801080 102030801020 275 SW 6 ST 102040001110 243 SW 7 ST 102040001060 645 SW 3 AVE 102040001090 257 SW 7 ST 102040001040 252 SW 6 ST 102040001080 621 SW 3 AVE 102030801011 501 SW 3 AVE 102030801070 102040001120 233 SW 7 ST 102040001100 253 SW 7 ST 102040001020 224 SW 6 ST G1�Y o fi �p P IMEBPI 061i0A Ix �: ' t i L CITY OF MIAMI Print Form Ethics Certificate Officeof the City,Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 250-5360 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION (1) Lobbyist Name: Koshal, Carli Last. Name, First: Name, Middle Initial Business Phone: (305) 374-5300 Business Address 200 South Biscayne Blvd. , Ste. 850, Miami, FL Zip 33131 E -Mail Address ckoshalCbrzoninglaw. com (2) Principal Represented CG Miami River, LLC Principal's Business Address2915 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 300, Miami, FL Zip 33137 (If different from above) (3) Specific issue lobbyist has been retained to lobby (if representing a corporation, partnership or trust, give business address of chief officer, partner, or beneficiary of same, and the names and addresses of all persons holding, directly or indirectly, at least five percent (5%) ownership interest in said corporation, partnership or trust). Land Use, Zoning and Permitting Matters (4) Lobbyists shall state the extent of any business association or financial relationship with any mernber(s) of the City Commission, any member of City staff before whom he/she lobbies or intends to lobby. (If applicable, please explain) N/A Lobbyists shall pay all registration fees ($525.00 annually, plus $105.00 for each principal represented and for each issue a lobbyist has been retained to lobby on behalf of any one principal), and specifically define the issue for which they are employed. The Cleric shall reject any statement which does not detail the issue for which the lobbyist has been employed. e off- "s � , l' .a,,.o '.r s}�i�€.�: # E =. ,.k£ t o „f#�`r"^# <�,r x;`t Yr of !�sn €f.t4 "S course €� ` the Vfi Y' f g .�=x= ua - a �w�e. -w� _ }£i .�$': �.3i3'€��,��sE �.;y L �<�t'a,€-%tai' ��s�.ro�v ,.+ nunis"'on € n € z: #ic.z ?„ Public 1 lls. "j— (1tv (1tof ".Eami <'zlrnfdet°ed no nniwre th'aa' one (1 ) ..ar prior to x I do solemnly swear that all of the foregoing facts are true and correct, and I have read or am familiar with the provisions contained in Sections 2-651 through 2-658 of the City of Miami Code, as amended, including "annual registration, withdrawal, reporting requirements, definitions, examina}tions, penalties for violations and contingency fees." State of Florida, County of Miami -Dade Sworn to and seri ed before me this day of_. bbyist)Signature Notary or Deputy Clerk Note: Annual Registration Fee: Effective through 12/31/2014 E�j� y Public Stale of FloridaHemandex ommission EE075919s 04/29/2015 bbyist)Signature Notary or Deputy Clerk Note: Annual Registration Fee: Effective through 12/31/2014 ova', op 4 N961 ORA T ED F CITY OF MIAMI Print Form. For Office Check# Use Only: Receipt# Ethics Certificate Office of the City Cleric, 3540 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133 Phone: (305) 250-5360 c^' 7 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION (1) Lobbyist Name: Tapane:s Llahues, Melissa Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial Business Phone: (305) 374-5300 Business Address 200 South Biscayne Blvd. , Ste. 850, Miami, FL E -Mail Address mtapanes@brzoninglaw, com (2) Principal Represented CG Miami River, LLC Zip 33131 Principal's Business Address2915 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 300, Miami, FL Zip 33137 (If different from above) (3) Specific issue lobbyist has been retained to lobby (if representing a corporation, partnership or trust, give business address of chief officer, partner, or beneficiary of same, and the names and addresses of all persons holding, directly or indirectly, at least five percent (5%) ownership interest in said corporation, partnership or trust). Land Use, Zoning and Permitting Matters (4) Lobbyists shall state the extent of any business association or financial relationship with any member(s) of the City Commission, any member of City staff before whom he/she lobbies or intends to lobby. (If applicable, please explain) N/A Lobbyists shall pay all registration fees ($525.00 annually, plus $105.00 for each principal represented and for each issue a lobbyist has been retained to lobby on behalf of any one principal), and specifically define the issue for which they are employed. The Clerk shall reject any statement which does not detail the issue for which the lobbyist has been employed. Li1'1dPEJYi!0„� a`4!l also "411,hmif a ertifi. ,dl'(:` of CEaaa'l'?1eifion al �Ctyl. E.t1'°a+.`s ctk€k"a"�:¢;.'; provided by €il€.'' Nil at; III i_ hide Ca)F8a"t.€:.v %. alarnrug. ,,ion to V'Iddcls & It'ubi+E` Trus” Or Cltv of Mia81"rd t :dt ,alM6.d no a t{are ti a n one 0'1 ":ear prior 6) r j„,x'wt'erinc; I do solemnly swear that all of the foregoing facts are true and correct, and I have read or am familiar with the provisions contained in Sections 2-651 through 2-658 of the City of Miami Code, as amended, including "annual registration, withdrawal, reporting requirements, definitions, examinations, penalties for violations and contingency fees." State of Florid ,County of Miami -Dade Sworn to and bs ibed before mepis aq day of 4K ,Py 0;4�, Notary Public State of Pionda Anz Hernandez c� My Commission EE075919 �i�^moo Expiros 04/29/2015 Note: Annual Registration Fee: Effective through 12/31/2014 of ILII .lr�lw OFFICIAL RECEIPT M!). ? . .... ...... $ - -- ----- Date: DoN:Im 6, Received fiotili: j SL AdmI LT J A1,101 c i i Nw W c, Y: 4 - Y, his Rpcoicfl not VALID !Bless dalod, R fillod 11) �:Uld K�rlwt tr/ Of dapa0mont or (JM�,Ikm I I 4— herermn amd unfil GHv has wherAed 0I proc-�ds of any I clhe A, od acs pjw 110 1 wl 05M, C 1 F Ni I I'v'i 41,02 Rev 01A 3 Dist tI on: MOW (',uslomat Cal'sary, RlwIm,o, Pink - Issuing DepantwierO 119,2 BERCOW RADELL & FERNANDEZ OPERAI ING ACCOUNT 20() SO a 1 H BIS7GAYNE H(M R E VARD? ';="f ITE ;15{} DATE AMI, FLOPKA 33111SUNTR MIAMI, ACH Frr 061 IMI 04 April 24, 2015 6,3-215-631 AMOUNT Orw Hundred Five 00/100 $ 105.00 It UUUU 1 19 20 'NO 0 0 2 to 5 2 1.' 1000 ILI 009 796 -us v 11, („pity c)f Marro OFFICIAL RECEIPT / P (X) Dolkwt3 flu,c,�Oki,ecj N6 not vm 11) unlos dab,d I, Y: fiflod in, and signeci by auqhoriZed ro plo-yee of department or clivi` nn in, - I-vaq jqnatod hoimin an'd until the C, I Ih:I lendc"rod as paylncM 11(men), F N IM 402 Rev, 03/o,,'� cum— Distribution; White — gj, - - ----- - --- — . -- - - 1-1 er: C a Ila ry � Fnance , P I Ilk ing Dipar! mont 1192 BERCOW RADELL & FERNANDEZ OPF RATING ACCOUNT DATE� 200 SOU114 �M:�CAYNE BOU EVARD, MIAMI, FR)PIDA 33 13.1 SiUqftUST ACHIRTMIOW104 April 24, 2015 63-215-631 AMOUNT 4 00/100 $ 105.00 000(301k'i2H" B 0 C1 q ',,19 S CITY OFMIAMI ( I DISCLOSURE OF CONSIDERATION PROVIDED OR COMMITTED FOR AGREEMENT TO SUPPORT OR WITHHOLD OBJECTION The City of Miami requires any person or entity requesting approval relief or other action from the City Commission or any of its boards, authorities, agencies, councils or committees, to disclose at the commencement (or continuance) of the hearing(s) on the issue, any consideration provided or committed, directly or on its behalf, to any entity or person for an agreement to support or withhold objection to the requested approval, relief or action. "Consideration" includes any gift, payment, contribution, donation, fee, commission, promise or grant of any money, property, service, credit or financial assistance of any kind or value, whether direct or implied, or any promise or agreement to provide any of the foregoing in the future. Individuals retained or employed by a principal as a lobbyist as defined in Sec. 2-653, and appearing before the City Commission or any of its boards, authorities, agencies, councils or committees solely in the capacity of a lobbyist and not as the applicant, or owners' legal representative are not required to fill out this form. NAME: Ari Pearl (First Name) (Middle) (Last Name) HOME ADDRESS: 2915 Biscayne Blvd, Ste 300 CITY HOME PHONE: EMAIL: Miami Miami, FL 33137 (Address Line 2) STATE: Florida ZIP: 33137 CELL PHONE: BUSSINESS or APPLICANT or ENTITY NAME CG Miami River, LLC FAX: BUSINESS ADDRESS: 2915 Biscayne Blvd, Ste 300 (Address Line 1) Miami, FL 33137 (Address Line 2) 1. Please describe the issue for which you are seeking approval, relief or other action from the City Commission, board, authority, agency, council, or committee. Review and approval related to Future Land Use Map amendment and Special Area Plan for Miami River SAP 2. Has any consideration been provided or committed, directly or on your behalf, to any entity or person for an agreement to support or withhold objection to the requested approval, relief or action? YES 0 NO If your answer to Question 2 is No, do not answer questions 3, 4 & 5 proceed to read and execute the Acknowledgment. If your answer to Question 2 is Yes, please answer questions 3, 4 & 5 and read and execute the Acknowledgement. 3. Please provide the name, address and phone number of the person(s) or entities to whom consideration has been provided or committed. Name Address Phone# a. b. C. * Additional names can be placed on a separate page attached to this form. 4. Please describe the nature of the consideration. 5. Describe what is being requested in exchange for the consideration. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby acknowledge that it is unlawful to employ any device, scheme or artifice to circumvent the disclosure requirements of Ordinance 12918 and such circumvention shall be deemed a violation of the Ordinance; and that in addition to the criminal or civil penalties that may be imposed under the City Code, upon determination by the City Commission that the foregoing disclosure requirement was not fully and timely satisfied the following may occur: 1. the application or order, as applicable, shall be deemed void without further force or effect; and 2. no application from any person or entity for the same issue shall be reviewed or considered by the applicable board(s) until expiration of a period of one year after the nullification of the application or order. PERSON SUBMITTING DISCLOSURE: Signature Ari Pearl Print Name Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of ✓ 20# The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by who has produced as identification and/or is ersonally known me and who didldid not take an oath. STATE OF FLORIDA ' CITY O MY COTJEANINE Nota EXPIRE Notary Public - State of Florida iN1 . JQ My Comm. FYpires Jan 14 2017 OF F� Com—.. - FF 836768 Print Name Enclosure(s Doc. No.:86543 Page 2 -W, �5200039 1� A dOf I lw_ r Ir FVA. - aJ--u No& me NNW I I jMf4 Ilk IL PREPARED RY Kimlev >>> Horn I Kimley>»Horn October 129 2014 Miami River Special Area Plan Site Utility Study Prepared for: CG Florida Properties 3200 Stirling Road Hollywood, Florida Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1221 Brickell Avenue, Suite 400 Miami, Florida 33131 Miami Riverfront Adllpr� TABLE OF CONTENTS SITE UTILITY STUDY SECTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. SITE PLAN LOCATION MAP 4 III. SITE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 4 IV. WATER DISTRIBUTION AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 6 V. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 7 VI. ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (FPL) AND 8 TELEPHONE (AT&T) VII. GAS (TECO) 9 VIII. SOLID WASTE GENERATION 9 IX. APPENDICES 10 Kimley>>> Horn Page 2 of 10 Miami River I. Introduction The Miami River Pro,ie, is a proposed major mixed-use development that will encompass approximately three city blocks and include the enhancement of Jose Marti Park. The new development will comprise approximately 10.00 +/- acres in the Brickell/City of Miami area. The site has the following boundaries: Miami River to the north, SW 2nd Avenue Bridge to the east, Jose Marti Park/SW 3rd Avenue to the west and SW 7th Street to the south (see Figure 1 — Site Location Map). The Miami River Project will include a mix of retail/shopping, office, hotel, entertainment, and residential space. See Table 1 below for the total anticipated site development summary. Table 1 Project Summary Occupancy Units Floor Area (SF) Retail/Restaurant/Shopping 202,000 Center Full Service/Quality 13,340 Restaurant Hotel 292 --------- Residential 1,743 --------- Office --------- 181,400 The project will require permits and approvals from the City of Miami Public Works Department, City of Miami Fire Department, City of Miami Building Department, Miami -Dade County Public Works, Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM), Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FEDP), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), and the Florida Department of Health (FDOH). KimIey->>Horn Page 3of10 II. Site Plan Location Map Fissure 1: Site Plan Location MaP 1. III. Site Drainage and Stormwater Management q� yy r• r PROPOSED SITE PLAN �� A -n A. Existing Private Drainage Systems Based on site observations and available historical information, there are no permit records of an existing onsite stormwater management system that covers the subject parcels of the Miami River Project. A new stormwater management system will be constructed for each parcel to retain the runoff generated by the proposed improvements, as required by code (see below). The existing stormwater management system will likely have to be demolished based on the proposed configuration of the new buildings. B. Proposed Private Drainage System Design Criteria Kimley>>>Horn Page 4 of 10 4 Q U �i U q� yy r• r PROPOSED SITE PLAN �� A -n A. Existing Private Drainage Systems Based on site observations and available historical information, there are no permit records of an existing onsite stormwater management system that covers the subject parcels of the Miami River Project. A new stormwater management system will be constructed for each parcel to retain the runoff generated by the proposed improvements, as required by code (see below). The existing stormwater management system will likely have to be demolished based on the proposed configuration of the new buildings. B. Proposed Private Drainage System Design Criteria Kimley>>>Horn Page 4 of 10 Miami Fiver APO0��_ffi. EW The drainage system for the proposed development will consist of drainage wells and detention structures for both water quantity and water quality purposes, which will facilitate onsite disposal of stormwater runoff. The 25 -year design storm event will be used to design the stormwater management system in accordance with SFWMD criteria, which states that the 25 -year, 72 -hour storm must be contained onsite. Based on preliminary calculations, it is anticipated that 20 drainage wells will be required to serve the Miami River Projec`. These calculations are based on well capacity rates obtained from available records on the FDEP website. The proposed 20 drainage wells should provide sufficient capacity to dispose of the design 25 -year, 72 -hour stormwater runoff generated by the proposed development. Preliminary drainage computations for the project areas are provided in Appendix B — Preliminary Drainage Calculations, which includes the basis for design. The final drainage design for the project shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (DERM) Water Control Section, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), as well as other local, state, and federal regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over the project. C. Floodplain Management The proposed project site grade elevations will be designed to meet floodplain management criteria according to federal, state, Miami -Dade County, and City of Miami standards as follows: The subject property is located in PANEL 314 of 1031 of COMMUNITY MAP PANEL NUMBER 12086C0314L of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). According to the National Flood Insurance program, the property is located within the following flood zones: a) Flood Zone AE, Elevation 9.0' (See Appendix A). The Miami -Dade County Flood Criteria elevation is estimated to be 6.0 ft. NGVD. This will be used to determine proposed minimum site grade elevations. The average October ground water table elevation is estimated to be 2 ft. NGVD. This will be used as the control water elevation for stormwater management calculations (Source: Miami -Dade County Public Works Manual, Volume ll - Design Standard Detail WC 2-2). KimlPage 5 of 10 IV. Water Distribution and Fire Protection Systems A summary of the water mains owned and operated by the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 2 below. The MDWASD Water Atlas is provided in Appendix C for reference. Table 2: Existing Water Mains (Per MDWASD Water Atlas) Location Between Water Main(s) SW 5th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 6" SW 6th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 12" SW 7th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 16" SW 2nd Avenue SW 6th Street and SW 7th Street - SW 3rd Avenue SW 4th Street and SW 8th Street 8" & 42" Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) will likely request water main upgrades along SW 3rd Avenue. Currently, an 8 -inch water main runs along SW 3rd Avenue; per MDWASD criteria, a 12 -inch water main is required along all frontages of all high-density residential and commercial developments. Kimley-Horn anticipates that MDWASD will require the installation of approximately 2,000 LF of 12 -inch water main along SW 3rd Avenue, SW 5th Street, and SW 6th Street. In addition, MDWASD and the City of Miami Fire Department may request additional fire hydrants be placed in the vicinity of the subject project. A final determination of the points of connection and requirements will not be provided by MDWASD until a water and sewer agreement is requested by the Owner. Water service meters would need to purchased by the owner and installed by MDWASD representatives at the Owner's expense. See Appendix C for a copy of the MDWASD Water Atlas sheet for the project area. The Fire Code (NFPA) requires fire hydrants be located no more than 300 feet (drivable distance) from proposed buildings or structures, and there be no more than 300 feet between hydrants along the frontage of a property, as measured along the water main. As such, the City of Miami Fire Department may request additional fire hydrants be placed in the vicinity of the subject project. Additionally, fire hydrants must be located within 150 feet of each proposed building's fire department (Siamese) connection. The fire department connections to serve any proposed structures must also be located at the front of the building in a visible area. Kimley>>>Horn Page 6 of 10 V. Sanitary Sewer Collection System A summary of the sewer mains owned and operated by the Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (MDWASD) in the vicinity of the project are shown in Table 3 below. The MDWASD Sewer Atlas is provided in Appendix C for reference. Table 3 Existing Sewer Mains (Per MDWASD Sewer Atlas) Kimley-Horn anticipates that MDWASD will require upsizing approximately 800 LF of gravity sewer main along SW 5th Street to new 12 -inch piping. However, this cannot be verified until a downstream analysis of the existing gravity lines is completed by MDWASD. A letter of availability and further coordination with MDWASD is recommended to verify the proposed sanitary sewer service connection points and requirements of this project. MDWASD may require upgrades to the existing sanitary sewer system, but this cannot be determined without a request for a water and sewer agreement. MDWASD Pump Station #30-001 at 390 NW North River Drive receives the flows from these mains. As of 06/01/2014, this pump station is projected to have an average operating run time (NAPOT) of 7.86 hours per day, which is 78.60% of its design capacity. Therefore, a new sanitary sewer pump station or upgrades to said pump station will not be required for the proposed development. A final determination regarding the status of the existing transmission system and the need to make improvements will not be known until construction plans are submitted to the Miami -Dade County DERM Wastewater Section and a Sanitary Sewage System Capacity Certification Letter is issued. Please refer to Appendix D for pump station information. Kimley>>> Horn Page 7 of 10 Sewer Location Between Main(s) SW 5th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 10" SW 6th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 30" & 12" SW 7th Street SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 12" SW 2nd Avenue SW 6st Street and SW 7th Street 30" SW 3rd Avenue SW 4th Street and SW 8th Street 12" Kimley-Horn anticipates that MDWASD will require upsizing approximately 800 LF of gravity sewer main along SW 5th Street to new 12 -inch piping. However, this cannot be verified until a downstream analysis of the existing gravity lines is completed by MDWASD. A letter of availability and further coordination with MDWASD is recommended to verify the proposed sanitary sewer service connection points and requirements of this project. MDWASD may require upgrades to the existing sanitary sewer system, but this cannot be determined without a request for a water and sewer agreement. MDWASD Pump Station #30-001 at 390 NW North River Drive receives the flows from these mains. As of 06/01/2014, this pump station is projected to have an average operating run time (NAPOT) of 7.86 hours per day, which is 78.60% of its design capacity. Therefore, a new sanitary sewer pump station or upgrades to said pump station will not be required for the proposed development. A final determination regarding the status of the existing transmission system and the need to make improvements will not be known until construction plans are submitted to the Miami -Dade County DERM Wastewater Section and a Sanitary Sewage System Capacity Certification Letter is issued. Please refer to Appendix D for pump station information. Kimley>>> Horn Page 7 of 10 A request for a letter of Sanitary Sewage Capacity Certification must be submitted to the Miami -Dade County DERM Water and Wastewater Section during the building permitting phase of the project in order to reserve the necessary allocation for the proposed development. Below, in Table 4, are the estimated water and sewer flow generation rates per Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department's schedule of daily rates. Further coordination with MDWASD is recommended. Table 4: Estimated Water and Sewer Flow Generation (Per MDWASD Schedule of Daily Rates) Type of Occupancy Quantity (Units or SF) Usage rate Total Average Daily Flow (GPF) Retail/Restaurant/Shopping Center* 202,000 SF 10 GPD/100 SF 20,200 Full Service Restaurant 13,340 SF 100 GPD/100 SF 13,340 Hotel 292 Units 100 GPD/Unit 29,200 Residential 1,743 Units 150 GPD/Unit 261,450 Office 181,400 SF 5 GPD/100 SF 9,070 Total Anticipated Flow 333,260 * Retail/Shopping Center usage rates assume retail or store use; any full-service restaurant use will have a usage rate of 100GPD/100SF. VI. Electrical Distribution System (FPL) and Telephone (AT&T) Currently, the existing electrical service is provided by Florida Power and Light (FPL). A request for a utility load letter will have to be submitted to FPL to determine if the existing system has the capacity for the additional loads. Any overhead to underground conversions will need to be designed and coordinated through an FPL representative. Further coordination will be necessary to determine the required upgrades to the existing system. Based on a preliminary assessment it can be anticipated that at a minimum, existing overhead power lines will have to be relocated underground, electrical easements will need to be dedicated to FPL, and pad mounted transformers and/or electrical vaults will be required. AT&T currently serves area via underground conduit. The proposed facilities may require upgrades to the existing AT&T communication lines. An easement may be required for additional conduits to serve the proposed build out. It is highly recommended that further coordination with AT&T occur. Kimley>»Horn Page 8 of 10 VII. Gas (TECO) Based on as-builts provided by the gas company an 8 -inch gas main appears to be available for service along SW 3rd Avenue from SW 4th Street to SW 7th Street. The need for gas service has not yet been determined for this project. VIII. Solid Waste Generation Solid waste generated by this project will be collected in standard onsite containers for refuse and recyclables. Regular pick-up services will be provided either by private hauling companies and/or by the City of Miami Solid Waste Department, who will transport the waste to Miami -Dade County's or private disposal and recycling facilities. The volumes of solid waste projected to be generated by the project are shown in Table 5. Table 5 Solid Waste Generation Kimley>»Horn Page 9 of 10 Total Solid Waste Type of Occupancy Quantity Usage rate Generated (Tons/Day) Retail/Shopping Center/Full Service 215,355 SF 5 Ib/1000 SF/day 0.54 Restaurant Hotel 292 Units 1.5 Ib/unit /day 0.22 Residential 1,743 Units 5 Ib/unit/day 4.36 Office 181,394 SF 2 Ib/1000 SF/day 0.18 Total Anticipated Solid Waste Generation 5.30 Kimley>»Horn Page 9 of 10 IX. Appendices AppendixA.................................................................................................. Maps Appendix B......................................................Preliminary Drainage Calculations Appendix C.......................................................................Existing Utility Records Appendix D................................................................... Pump Station Information Kimley>»Horn Page 10 of 10 Kimley>»Horn Appendix D Pump Station Information Kimley>»Horn Sanitary Sewer Pump Stations Database Pump Station Monthly Information Pump Station. 30 - 0001 UNINCORPORATED DADE COUNTY 3W NNV NOWH RIVER DR Station Category_ ET Mor"lurn: or OK Seoi►on -Township -Range-, ❑1 - ❑ . 41 Type: MA C9tin3:F7M Spm&..[ r I H.P-f7] peak Factor4Ws17orrlrieaH IQ NumnerorPumps: a 2.40 TRANSFER 01Q772007 4loralgriurn in pff$c1 since: 511702612 Gwwralcr: M telemetry; LJ ET Clock: 1E I NAPOTjr")i. 7.176 Reserved Flow Rgipdj: 4,439,211D N opeeled Napot fhrap: 7.56 usee.capaelty J%): 78.60 Sin Gross Capacily ggpdp: 22i7MO.Wc1 EZation Pkduc"Dn FaMo . abri Sin Nbl. Cap Car1ifad �9pdp: Q Swan Riot Capacity 1Qpdp! 130.GS6,t&D7 Indicated Flow dgpd;: 39J613.040 1Qf29M13 7.93 54.11! v 8 ANORGE 1VM2013 912&2(113 754 52.77 Y N£UMAR iWn,12013 SiM2013 6.66 55.61 Y 4 AREASR CW4Q013 7J3002413 7.43 52.171 Y $ AiNORGE V.P27.f2a13 6f2V2013 7.14 49.95 y 4 AREASR 071291,2013 51301201$ 7160 53,24 Y 8 ANORGE M26i2013 4rA20i2i 6.96 45.59 Y $ AREAW 05079/2013 313 13 6.59 46.11 Y 8 WILM" D4 724 12 0 1 3 =7*013 9.26 43,43 y 8 AREASR OrNW13 12re%7412 5.60 46.19 Y 8 AREASR 0102$12013 Kimley>>>Horn Kimley-Horn was retained to perform a site utility study and performed only those tasks specifically stated in our scope of services. The Client may use this report as part of its site feasibility assessment, but this report should not be used as the sole basis for the Client's decision making. We endeavored to research site development issues and constraints to the extent practical given the limited scope, budget, and schedule agreed to with the Client. Our assessment is based in large part on information provided to us by others (city staff, DOT staff, Utility Company Representatives, etc.) and therefore is only as accurate and complete as the information provided to us. This report is based on our knowledge as of June 2014. New issues may arise during development because of changes in governmental rules and policy, changed circumstances, or unforeseen conditions. Our assessment is based on the desires of the Client that have been specifically disclosed to us. The Client should do its own due diligence to become comfortable with our findings and to be sure no other significant development issues exist. Kimley>>>Horn From: Ccruz-casasCcbmiamiaov.com To: Adrian. Dabkowski(cbKimlev-horn.com Cc: trod ria uesCabmiamiaov.com Subject: RE: Miami River - Riverwalk SAP Traffic Study Methodology Date: Thursday, June 05, 2014 1:30:32 PM Attachments: imaae001.ioa Mr. Dabkowski, Thanks for submitting the methodology for the proposed Traffic Impact Analysis. We reviewed the Methodology Memo and have the following comments: • Page 2 — the proposed project is located outside of the Downtown DRI, therefore consider reducing the multimodal reduction factor to 10 percent • Page 2 — the proposed project is located outside of the Downtown DRI, therefore consider reducing the pedestrian reduction factor to 10 percent Please feel free to call or email me with any questions. Regards, carlos cruz-casas, p.e. I chief transportation manager capital improvements and transportation program miami riverside center 444 sw 2nd avenue, 8th floor miami, fl 33130 p: 305.416.1092 If: 305.416.1019 e: ccruz-casas(@miamigov.com From: Adrian.Dabkowski@Kimley-horn.com [mailto:Adrian.Dabkowski@Kimley-horn.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 7:08 AM To: Cruz-Casas, Carlos Subject: Miami River - Riverwalk SAP Traffic Study Methodology Good Morning Carlos, Attached is our Miami River — Riverwalk SAP traffic study methodology. Please let me know if the City has any comments. Thanks Adrian u Adrian K. Dabkowski, P.E.(LA), PTOE Kimley-Horn 1 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450, Plantation, FL 33324 Direct: 954-535-5144 1 Main: 954-535-5100 Kimley)»Horn Memorandum To: Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E. City of Miami From: Adrian K. Dabkowski, P.E. L � PTOA Y(> John J. McWilliams, P.E. Date: June 12, 2014 Subject: Miami River — Riverwalk Special Area Plan Traffic Study Methodology The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the traffic study methodology as discussed at our May 14 meeting. The proposed development is generally bounded by the Miami River to the north, NW 7th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW 3rd Avenue to the west. The project consists of the following: • Site 1 Tower 1 is located on the northeast quadrant of SW 3rd Avenue and SW 7th Street. This tower consists of 40,000 square -feet of retail, 227 high-rise residential condominiums, and 180 hotel rooms. • Site 1 Tower 2 is located on the northwest quadrant of SW 2nd Avenue and SW 7th Street. This tower consists of 40,000 square -feet of retail, 232,200 square -feet of office, and 200 high-rise residential condominiums. • Site 2 Tower 1 is located on the northeast quadrant of SW 3rd Avenue and SW 6th Street. This tower consists of 40,000 square -feet of retail, 232,200 square -feet of office, and 220 high-rise residential condominiums. • Site 2 Tower 2 is located on the north side of SW 6th Street west of SW 2nd Avenue. This tower consists of 24,000 square -feet of retail, 133 high-rise residential condominiums, and 178 hotel rooms. Currently, a portion of the site proposed for development is occupied by the following land uses: • 10,871 square -foot bar/nightclub • 9,511 square -feet of warehouse • 11,427 square -feet of general light industrial • 25,310 square -feet of specialty retail • 14 condominium units • 1 single-family detached house A conceptual site plan is included in Attachment A. Study Area The following intersections and roadway segments will be examined as part of the study area: Kimley)»Horn • SW 5th Street and SW 4th Avenue • SW 5th Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 6th Street and SW 4th Avenue • SW 6th Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7th Street and SW 4th Avenue • SW 7th Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7th Street and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 8th Street and SW 4th Avenue • SW 8th Street and 1-95 Northbound Ramp • SW 8th Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 8th Street and SW 2nd Avenue The following corridors were identified for analysis: Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., June 12, 2014, Page 2 • SW 7th Street between SW 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7th Street between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 8th Street between SW 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 8th Street between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 2nd Avenue between SW 8th Street and SW 9th Street Data Collection A.M. (7:30-9:30 A.M.) and P.M. (4:00-6:00 P.M.) peak hour turning movement counts will be conducted at all identified study intersections. 24-hour machine counts will be conducted on all study corridors where Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 24-hour traffic data is not available. All traffic counts will be adjusted to account for seasonality using the appropriate FDOT seasonal factors. Signal timing information will be obtained from Miami -Dade County Public Works and Waste Management Department — Signals and Signs Division. Trip Generation Trip generation calculations for the proposed development were performed using Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation, 91h Edition. The trip generation for the proposed land uses was determined using ITE Land Use Codes 820 (Shopping Center), 710 (General Office Building), 310 (Hotel), 232 (High -Rise Residential Condominium), and 931 (Quality Restaurant). For the existing land uses ITE Land Use Codes 110 (General Light Industrial), 150 (Warehousing), 210 (Single -Family Detached Housing), 230 (Residential Condominium), 826 (Specialty Retail Center), and 925 (Drinking Place were used. Project trips were estimated for the A.M. and P.M. peak hour. Detailed information on the existing land uses in contained in Attachment B. The City of Miami's Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Increment I and II provides multimodal and pedestrian reduction factors to be applied to certain parts of the city. For the Brickell area, an average multimodal reduction of 14.2 percent (14.2%) and an average pedestrian reduction of 15 percent (15.0%) are recommended. It is expected that a portion of visitors and residents of the site as well as employees will utilize transit. Miami -Dade County Transit (MDT) provides bus service several routes in the vicinity of the site, in addition to the Metromover and Metrorail. The City requested that Kim I ey >> H o r n Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., June 12, 2014, Page 3 a multimodal reduction of 10.0 percent (10.0%) and a pedestrian reduction of 10.0 percent (10.0%) be utilized as the project is not located within the City of Miami's DRI. A portion of the trips generated by the development will be captured internally on the site. Internal capture trips were determined based upon values contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004. The expected internal capture rate during the A.M. peak hour is 5.9 percent (5.9%) and 18.0 percent (18.0%) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1.4 persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the local area. Therefore, vehicular trips were reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. The project is expected to generate 860 net new A.M. peak hour vehicular trips (1,204 person -trips) and 1,115 net new P.M. peak hour vehicular trips (1,561 person -trips). Detailed trip generation calculations for the project are presented in Attachment B. Trip Distribution The likely distribution of project traffic will be forecasted for the trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. The trip distribution will be based on a cardinal trip distribution for the project site's traffic analysis zones (TAZs) obtained from the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization's 2035 Cost Feasible Plan travel demand model. The project is located within two (2) TAZs including 566 and 567. Therefore, an average cardinal distribution was developed based on the two (2) TAZs. The average cardinal distribution is provided in Attachment C along with the detailed cardinal distribution. Background Growth Rate/Major Committed Development A background growth rate will be calculated based on historic growth trends at nearby FDOT traffic count stations. Additionally, growth rates based on Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) projected 2005 and 2035 model network volumes will be examined. The higher of the two (2) growth rates will be used in the analysis. Documentation will be provided in the Appendix of the traffic impact study. The City has also identified Brickell CityCentre and Brickell Bayview Center as committed developments to be included in future background conditions. Capacity Analysis Capacity analyses will be conducted for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours at the study intersections. Intersection analyses will be performed using Trafficware's Synchro 8.0 traffic engineering analysis software, which applies Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 and 2010 methodologies. Corridor analyses will be conducted using information from the Miami DRI -II (i.e. person -trip capacity) and the FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook. If intersection or roadway deficiencies are identified, strategies and improvements will be developed as mitigation measures. Capacity analyses will be conducted for three (3) scenarios: existing, build -out without project, and build -out with project. The build -out year will be specified in the analysis. If intersection deficiencies are identified, strategies and improvements will be developed as mitigation measures. Kim I ey >> H o r n Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., June 12, 2014, Page 4 Currently, SW 3rd Avenue between SW 7th Street and SW 6th Street operates as a one-way northbound roadway. A capacity analysis for providing two-way traffic on SW 3rd Avenue between SW 7th Street and SW 6th Street will also be included. The following graphics will be included for the study intersections: 1. Existing conditions 2. Trip distribution 3. Trip assignment 4. Future background conditions (with growth rate and committed development traffic) 5. Future total traffic conditions (with project) Garage Entry Gate Operations Analysis An entry gate analysis will be prepared for parking garages. The entry gate queuing analysis will be prepared for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Entry gate queuing analysis will be conducted consistent with the procedures outlined in Parking Structures — Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Repair, 2000 and 2011. The purpose of this analysis is to determine any future queue storage deficiencies at the entry gates and provide preliminary recommendations for mitigating these deficiencies. Thoroughfare and Vehicle Circulation Diagrams As part of the Special Area Plan submittal, a roadway thoroughfare diagram will be submitted. The diagram will consist of existing and proposed roadway laneage within the study area. A vehicle circulation diagram depicting traffic patterns entering and exiting the site will also be provided as part of the submittal. Transportation Accommodations Section A section in the report will discuss non -passenger vehicle transportation and internal transportation access. Specifically, this section will discuss accommodations for bicycles and identify bicycle parking areas; discuss internal transportation access such as tunnels connecting the below -grade parking garages and discussion of overhead pedestrian bridges connecting the various blocks of development; the proposed City of Miami trolley service stops and locations, and the proposed connection to existing Metromover station. Additionally, area greenways will be examined as well as the connection between the proposed development and the 8th Street Metromover station. Documentation The results of the traffic analysis will be summarized in a report. The report will include supporting documents including signal timings, lane geometry, and software output sheets. The report will also include text and graphics necessary to summarize the assumptions and analysis. Maneuverability Analysis A maneuverability analysis for the site access, parking garage, and loading vehicle access will be performed utilizing AutoTURN software. Deficiencies related to maneuverability, traffic flow, and vehicular conflicts will be documented in a technical memorandum. Kimley)»Horn Carlos Cruz-Casas, P.E., June 12, 2014, Page 5 Methodology Concurrence Please note that if the City does not agree with the proposed traffic impact analysis methodology contained in the previous sections, please respond with specific concerns within two (2) weeks of receipt of this document, so we will have adequate time to prepare the analysis. If we are not notified of concerns by the specified date, it is assumed that the City is in concurrence with the methodology. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\correspondence\06 12 14 traffic study methodologyrev.docx Attachment A MASTER PLAN © The design content material attached is the sole property of Kobi Karp Architecture and Interior Design, Inc. The design material may not be used without the espressed written consent of Kobi Karp Architecture and Interior Design, Inc (KKAID). X W WW.KO6IKARP.COr t Attachment B Property Search Application - Miami -Dade County Page 1 of 1 rOFFICE OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER Summary Report Property Information Folio: Property Address: 01-4138-049-0030 401 SW 3 AVE Owner OCEAN DRIVE CLEVELANDER INC I1455 Mailing Address OCEAN DR UNIT 1502 MIAMI BCH, FL 33139-4141 I Primary Zone 17703 MARINE ACTIVITY RELATED 1 I Primary Land Use 3315 NIGHTCLUB LOUNGE OR BAR: ENTERTAINMENT Beds / Baths / Half 0/0/0 Floors 1 Living Units 0 Actual Area Sq.Ft Living Area Sq.Ft Adjusted Area 10,871 Sq.Ft I Lot Size 139,495 Sq.Ft (Year Built 11940 1 Assessment Information Year 2013 2012 2011 Land Value $2,053,740 $689,868 $884,688 Building Value $411,647 $436,998 $440,859 XF Value $155,756 1 $162,173 $162,173 Market Value $2,621,143 $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Assessed Value $1,417,942 F $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Benefits Information Benefit Type 20132012 2011 Non -Homestead Cap Assessment Reduction $1,203,201 INote: Not all benefits are applicable to all Taxable Values (i.e. County, School Board, City, Regional). Short Legal Description RIVERSIDE WATERFRONTS PB 25-72 LOTS 1 G TO 7 G INC LOT SIZE 39495 SQUARE FEET OR 18491-2307 0299 1 Generated On : 5/15/2014 Taxable Value Information Previous OR Book- County 2013 2012 2011 Exemption Value Sale $0 $0 $0 Taxable Value 1 School Board $1,417,942 $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Exemption Value $600,000 $0 $0 $0 Taxable Value City $2,621,143 $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Exemption Value $0 $0 $0 Taxable Value 1 $1,417,942 $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Regional Exemption Value $0 $0 $0 Taxable Value 1 $1,417,942 $1,289,039 $1,487,720 Sales Information Previous OR Book- PricePa Qualification Description Sale 9e 18491- 2008 and prior year sales; Qual by 02/01/1999 $600,000 2307 exam of deed Qual on DOS, but significant phy 05/01/1996 $450,00017224- 3583 change since time of transfer The Office of the Property Appraiser is continually editing and updating the tax roll. This website may not reflect the most current information on record. The Property Appraiser and Miami -Dade County assumes no liability, see full disclaimer and User Agreement at http://www.miamidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp (hftp://www.miamidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp) Version: 1.0.4 http://www.miamidade.gov/propertysearch/ 5/15/2014 Property Search Application - Miami -Dade County Page 1 of 1 OFFICE OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER Summary Report Property Information Folio: Property Address: Owner 01-0203-080-1011 501 SW 3 AVE BURGESS LTD PARTNERSHIP Mailing Address P O BOX 236 HOMESTEAD, FL 33090 Primary Zone 6600 COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use 4837 WAREHOUSE TERMINAL OR STG :WAREHOUSE OR STORAGE Beds / Baths / Half 0/0/0 Floors 1 Living Units 0 Actual Area 5,902 Sq. Ft Living Area Sq.Ft Adjusted Area 8,275 Sq. Ft 30,000 Sq. Ft Lot Size Year Built 1940 Assessment Information Year 2013 $2,992,500 2012 $1,500,000 2011 $924,000 Land Value Building Value $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 XF Value $0 $0 $0 Market Value $2,993,500 $1,501,000 $925,000 Assessed Value $1,055,510 $959,555 $872,323 Benefits Information Benefit Type 2013 2012 2011 Non -Homestead Assessment $1,937,990 $541,445 Cap Reduction $52,677 Note: Not all benefits are applicable to all Taxable Values (i.e. County, School Board, City, Regional). Short Legal Description CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH PB B-41 LOTS 3 TO 6 INC BILK 38 LOT SIZE 30000 SQ FT OR 18941-4905 0100 5 (2) COC 22566-0408 06 2003 5 Generated On : 5/15/: Taxable Value Information 2013 2012 2 County Exemption Value $0 $0 Taxable Value $1,055,510 $959,555 $872, School Board Exemption Value $0 $0 Taxable Value $2,993,500 $1,501,000 City Exemption Value $0 $0 Taxable Value $1,055,510 $959,555 $872, Regional Exemption Value $0 $0 Taxable Value $1,055,510 $959,555 $872, Sales Information Previous OR Book - Price Qualification Description Sale Page Corrective, tax or QCD; min 01/23/2014 $100 29002-4646 consideration 06/01/2003 $0 22566-0408 Qual by exam of deed 01/01/2000 $0 18941-4905 Qual by exam of deed The Office of the Property Appraiser is continually editing and updating the tax roll. This website may not reflect the most current information on record. The Property Appra and Miami -Dade County assumes no liability, see full disclaimer and User Agreement at http://www.miamidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp (hftp://www.miamidade.gov/info/disclaimer.asp) Version: 1.0.4 http://www.miamidade.gov/propertysearch/ 5/15/2014 4 C httip midade.gav/propertysearchl#/ n bricked miami- Google Maps ", y; Property Search Application..x File Edit View Favorites Tools Help y, Traffic ° Google Maps Bing Maps J Oekek Time 6:)UT Planner ® Concur Expenses ETrafficware M @lackboard E3 Blackboard Learn QYahao! Finance M Gmail V Miami Trolley Stops 4] Online.oL Start Form :sal FOOTTraffic Online Signal Timings Address Owner Name Folio SEARCH: 911 NW 1 St Folio: 01-0203-980-1010 Sol -Undslan: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BLK 38 PB B-41 Pmpe tyAddress 242 SW 5 ST Miami _ FL 33 1 30.2 909 Owner BURGESS LTO PARTNERSHIP )"brig Address P O BOX 236 HOMESTEAD , FL 33090 Primary Zone 7703 MARINE AGTl RELATED Primary Land Use 2719 AUTOMOTIVE OR MARINE' AUTOMOTIVE OR MARINE Beds f Baths l Hatt 0 ( 010 Floors 2 Living Units 0 Actual Area 8,835 Sq.R Living Area Adjusted Area 13,676 Sq.Ft Lot Si- 21,743 Sq Ft Year Built 1925 a I Peale red Online Tools Additional Online Tools Lt Comparable Sales Environmental Considembons ® Glossary '%ilc ttl miamidade.govipmpertys.earch/*/ P !brickell miami- Google Maps I 7% Property Search Application...h File Edit View Favorites Tools Help Traffic , '.'2 Google Maps y_ Bing Maps C Deltek Time Ur Planner m Concur Expenses C Trafficware ® Blackh—el &Z Blackboard Learn 0 Yalxoo! Finance M Gm.ail O Miami Trolley Stops £J Online Joh Start Form D FDOTTraffic Online � Signal Timings Address Owrier Name Folio SEARCH: I l 1, Nw 1 st Folio: 01-9203-930-1020 Sul9-rlwmon: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BILK 39 P6 B-41 Property Address 275 SW 6 ST Mi—i. FL 3 3 9 39-291 0 RVERMARINE SUPPLY ING Mailing Address 260 SW 6 ST' MIAMI, FL 33130-2011 Primary Zone 6600 COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use 4837 WAREHOUSE TERMINAL OR STG WAREH OUSE OR STORAGE Beds f Baths I Half 01910 Floors 2 Living Units 0 Actual Area 3,609 Sq.FI Living Area Adjusted Area &,633 Sq.Fl Lot Sim 7,590 Sq:FI Year Built 1940 0000 Sure In 11LFeatured Online Tools Addlional Online Tools Comparable Sales Environmenta l Considerations 6j 3lossar; miamidade.gcvpropertjsaarchlri .0-1 liaklmlll miami-Google Maps:•2L' Property Search Application... )C File Edit View Favorites Tools Help r, Traffic Google Maps Bing Maps D Oeltek Time r UT Planner m Concur Espeerses W Trafficrvare ® Blackboard M Blackboard Learn 0 Yahoo! Finance H Gmail Q Mia-ni Trolley Stops OD Online Joh Start Form eD FOOT Traffic Online Signal Timings Address Owner Nasse Folio SEARCH_ 111 NW 7 St Folio: 01-0204-000-1050 S.b-Division: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BILK 411`113 B-41 Property Address 260 SW 6 ST Miami . 133139-2911 Owner EDV ORTEGA TRS Mailing Address 92221 SW 66 ST MIAMI , FL 33173 Pnmary Zone 6500 COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use 2719 AUTOMOTIVE OR MARINE : AUTOMOTIVE OR MARINE Beds I Baths I Hall 9 1010 Fioors 1 Living Units 6 Achaal Area 11,485 Sq Ft Living Area Adjusted Area 23,109 Sq Ft Lot Size 22,500 Sq.Ft Year Built 1939 Suite p I Featured Online Tools _10 AddMion al Online Tools Comparable Sales Environmental Considerations Glossary { J d - ml id.dia.g—Wpir.pertysaamch != JO — ! brickell miami- Google Maps I ;fj Property Search Applicaticir Y File Edit View Favorites Tools Help Traffic Google Maps Bing Maps Ueltek Time }UT Planner m Concur Expenses DTrafficware 0Blackboard gr`47 Blackboard Learn QYahoo! Finance MGmall Q. Miami Trolley Stops ;],OnIma Job Start Form C FBOTTraffic Online eDSignal Timings .Address Owner Name Folio L V 0 SEARCH: , 111 Nvv 1 st I Suite • SI07U16'"3594Qr>glrEl< Sub-Divialon: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH HLIi 49 PB 641 Property Address 252 SW 6 ST Miami _ FL 331311-2911 Owner 7 STREET LAND LLLF MAHLBERG INVEST HOLDINGS ING Mailing Address 2828 CORAL WAY 9 303 MIAMI, FL 33145 Pnmary Z.- 6500 COMMEROIAL-LIBERAL Primary Land Use 4132 LIGHT MANUFACTURING : LIGHT MFG & FOO❑ PROCESSING Rod.! Baths r Half 0 10 12 Fioon 1 Living units 0 Actual A— I Area Adjusled Area 2,592 Sq. FI Lot Si. 7,568 Sq.R Year Built 1950 Feali Online Tads V it � midade.gav:preperty.earrn;»i P — mhrickellmiami- Gaogie Maps I Property Search Application...% File Edit View Favorites Tools Help Traffic ? Google Maps Bing Maps DDeltek Time UT Planner m Concur Expenses 0Trafflcware ®Blackboard EM Blackboard Learn ©Yahoo. Finance MGmail Q Miami Trolley Stops D Online Jon Start Form @) FOOT Traffic Online OD Signal Timings Address Owner Name Folio 0000 ^ SEARCH: 111 NW 1 5t e 0 Fnriu: 01002044100-1030 Sur Divisinm CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BILK 4b PH 8-41 Property Address 244 SIN 6 5T Miami _ FL 33130.2911 Owner 7 STREET LAND LLLP MAHLEERG INVEST HOLDINGS INC Mailing Address 150 SE 2ND AVE UNIT 800 MIAMI FL 33131 Primary Z.- 6600 COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use 1111 STORE : RETAI L O UTLET Bed. l Baths l Hatt 01012 Flonra 2 Living Units 0 Actual Area 8,100 Sq FI Living Area Adrysded Area B4O20 Sq.F1 Lot Sixe 7,5110 Sq.FI Yesr Built 1959 Featured Online Tools Lin Addi[ional Online Tools L� Comparable Sales -fi Environmental Considd sh.ns ® Glossary M 1 4 - fil r.. miamidade.govVpropertysearchV#V - Xbrickellmiami- Google Maps aja Property Search Application." File Edit View Favorites Tools Help K, Traffic- 22Google Maps Bing Maps D Beltek Time iEUTPanner M Concur Forpenses 0 Trafficware ®Blackboard IIS Blackboard Learn 0 Yahoo! Finance H Gmail Q Miami Trolley Stops J Online Joh Start Form .EJ FBOTTraffic Online jj) Signal Timings Address Owner Name Folio SEARCH: 111 NW I St Folio: U7 -620¢{)00-1U20 Sul}Bivi.icn: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH SLK 46 PB B-41 Property Add... 224 SW 6 S Miami . FL 93134-2911 Owner COWNBYRIVER MIAMI INC Mailing Address 1019 FIFTH ST MIAMI BEACH , FL 33139-6504 Pdm.ry Z- 6600 COMMERCIAL- LIBERAL Primary Land Use 2914 WHOLESALE OUTLET: WHOLESALE OUTLET Bed.I Baths l Half 610! 0 Floors 1 laving Unit. 0 Actual Area living Area Adjusted Are. 5,725 Sq.FI Lot Siae 16,350 Sq FI Year Built 1975 0000 Suite • Featured Online Tools Lfi Add@iooal C -aline Tools I Comparacle Sales EnVlronmental Considerations Glossary LimUrn httr:i,,.-,,rw.miamuiade.gw/property5earrh/4/ p lbrickedmiami-Google Maps I %fj Property Search Application...x File Edit View Favorites Tools Help y,, Traffic - :el Google Maps !-L Bing Maps D Ueltek Time 2 UT Planner ® Concur Expenses E Trafficware ® Blackboard 10 Blackboard Learn ©Yahoo! Finance M Gmail Q MiamiTro3ey Stops IM Online Joh Start Form FJ EUOTTraffc Online 07Signa€Timings Address Owner Name Folio 0 0 0 SEARCH: ( 111 NW 1 5t Suite 0 Folio: 01-0204-000-1120 SLLh-{ wman: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BLK 46 PB 8d1 Property Address 233 SW 7 ST Miami. FL 331342922 Owner 7 STREET LAND LLLP MAHLBERG INVEST HOLDINGS INC Mailing Address 150 SE 2ND AVE UNIT 800 MIAMI , FL 33131 Primary Z.- 5600 COMMERCIAL -LIBERAL Primary Land Use 0003 MULTIFAMILY 2-9 UNFTS : MULTIFAMILY 3 OR MORE UNITS Bads I Balls r Hatf 61610 Floors 1 Living Units 6 Actual Area Living Area Adjusted Area 3,415 Sq.Fl Lot Size 7,500 S%F1 Year Built 1944 Featured Online Tools -,`i r:: :-,ttl>..,;..,:_miamida de.gov,%prapertysearchF�/ p� o brickell miami - Google Maps `.i r" Property Search Application... File Edit Wiew Favorites Tools Help Traffic .'�' Google Maps Bing Maps eDDeItekTinne UT Planner mConcur Expenses jTrafficware ®Blackboard ®Blackboard Learn pYahoo!Finance M Gmail G) Miami Trolley Stops Online Joh Start Form ) FOOT Traffic Online JSigna€T mgs Address Owner Name Folio SEARCH: ' 11 Nw 1 st Folio: 01-9204D00-1090 Sub -Division: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BLK 40 PB B-41 Properly Add... 257 SW 7 ST Mian® - FL 33139-2915 259 SW 7 ST Owner 7 STREET LAND LLLP MAHLEERG INVEST HOLDINGS Wr Mailing Address 15D SE 2ND AVE UNIT 800 MIAMI. FL 33139 Primary Zane 66DO COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use D02 MULTIFAMILY 2-9 UNITS :2 LIVING UNITS Bede l Baths l Hali 4P210 Floors 1 Living Units 2 AcWal Area 1,020 Sq. Ft Living Area 1,020 Sq.Et Adjusted Area 1,024 Sq. Fl Lot Si. 7,5011 Sq.Ft Year Built 1946 Featured Online Tools 0000 ll midade.gw,'properb/searchlx/ 10-o 9b, ckell miam[-Googlel ;.jg Property Search Application..k File Edit View Favorites Tools Help Traffic, _�I Goegle Maps Bing Maps ;J Deltek Time FJ UT Plarner m Concur Fxpenses 0J Traffic re ® Blackboard 0 Blackboard Learn © Yahoo! Finance H Gmail Q Miami Trolley Stops F_J OnnEiine lob StJ art Form FOOT Traffic Online ] Signal Timings a) A Q Q Address owner Name Folio SEARCH: ill N 1 st SUire D r INFORMATION + 4:.1 •� MaP View a Layers Folio: 01-9204-000-1060 � s Sub-Diaiaian: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BLi( 40 PB B-41 � t , f Property Add- 645 SW 3 AVE Miami - FL 331341-2947 Owner BACHELOR FOODS INC - C70 ERIC BACHELOR Mailing Address 10463 HARRIER ST r P. PLANTATION FL 33324 � 1. Primary Zone 6600 COMMERCIAL-LIBERAL _ F =k Primary Laid Uae 0101 RESIDENTIAL- SINGLE FAMILY 1 UNIT. -- i •l `� Tr Bede l Both.1 Hall 21110 90 Nib �. _ Hoorn 1 . 4 Living Units 1ju I Actual Area 1,155 Sq Ft Li+nng Area 1,402 Sq Ft .._t ddjuated Area 1,441 Sq. FI 1 r'" Lot Size 4,866 Sq: Ft Y Built 1925 Aerial Photography 6llft Featured Online Toots AddOlonal Online Tools Ld Comparable Sales Environmental C ... ideralions Glossary [S Wt http:/'�miamidade.gov/propertysearch)#I JD - brickell miami- Google Maps 'r; Property Search Application..x File Edit View Favorites Tools Help r, TraffiL , �! Google Maps Bing Maps 4]Deltek Time :O� UT Planner ® Concur Expenses D Trafficware ® Blackboard Tal Blackboard Learn Q Yahoo! Finance M Gmail 0 Miami Trolley Stops JE On lineJob Start Farm D FOOT Traffic Online � Signal Timings Address Owner Name FOfio `,/ 0 0 0 A SEARCH: ,,, lam, st Ful Folio: 01-104-000.1070 simoivisi«: l CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH BILK 40 PB 641 I i Property Address 635 SW 3AVE Miami . FL 33130-2907 Owner \. 'n BACHELOR FOODS INC r CIO FRIM BACHELOR Mailing Address 10463 HARRIER ST PLANTATION FL 33324 F Primary Z- 5600 COMMERCIAL- LIBERAL Primary Farad Use 9802 MULTIFAMILY 2-9 UNITS : 2 LIVING UNITS Beds l Bali l Hatt 41210 Floors 2 _.i Lining Unita 2 ga Actual Area F*.. Living Area. Adjusted Area 1 61 Sq. FI 4 Lot Sixe 5,909 Sq.R Year Built 1939 Featured Online Tools Adddion al Online Tools �LA Compara0le Sales EnVlronmantal Gorsdi—lions Glossary JI ! •fi miam idade.govlpropertysearch/t-1 _ I brickell miami- Google Maps I �! Property Search Application.. `-- File Edit View Favorites Tools Help r. Traffic Google Maps k Bing Maps Deltek Time UT Planner mConcur Expenses TraHicware ®Blackboard } Blackboard Learn Yahoo!Finanre i'�GmaFf OMiarn Trolley Staps 6nlinelob Start Farm FQOT Traffic Online 5tgnal Timings Address Owner Name Folio SEARCH: 111 NW 1 St Folio: 01-020"99-1080 Sub -Division: CITY OF MIAMI SOUTH i 49 PB 8-41 Property Address 621 SW 3AVE Miami. FL 33339-2945 Owner BACHELOR FCODS INC 00 ERIC BACHELOR Mailing. Address 10463 HARRIER ST PLANTATION, FL 33324 Primary Z.- 6630 COMMERCIAL - LIBERAL Primary Land Use 0333 MULTIFAMILY 2-9 UNITS : MULTIFAMILY 3 OR MORE UNITS Beds l Baths l Hair ii Floors 2 Living Unita 4 Actual Area Living Area Adjusted Area 2,740 Sq.. FI Lot Size 5,900 Sq.FI Vesr Built 1965 Featured Online Tools Suite 0000 j EXISTING LAND USES AND INTENSITIES Units/Intensity Land Use 10,871 sf Drinking Place 5,902 sf warehouse 8,835 sf general light industrial 3,609 sf warehouse 11,485 sf speciality retail 2,592 sf general light industrial 8,100 sf speciality retail 5,725 sf speciality retail 6 du multi -family 2 du multi -family 1 du single-family 2 du multi -family 4 du multi -family Total 10,871 sf Drinking Place 9,511 sf warehouse 11,427 sf general light industrial 25,310 sf specialty retail 14 du multi -family 1 du single-family Finnigans EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL GROSS MULTIMODAL 15% PEDESTRIAN INTERNAL NET NEW DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TRIPS REDUCTION(') VOLUMES REDUCTIONFACTOR(�) VOLUMES CAPTURE PROJECT TRIPS ITE ITE LITE Percent IC IC Land Use Edition Code Scale nits In Out In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In I Out Total 5 1SE26alty Retail Center 1 9 1 826 25.31 ksf 0% 0% 0 0 0 10.0% 0 0 0 0 10.0% 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 6 Drinking Place 9 925 10.871 ksf 66% 34% 0 0 0 10.0% 0 0 0 0 10.0% 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 ITE Code Equation 110 Y=0.92(X) 150 LN(Y) = 0.55'LN(X)+1.88 210 Y=0.7' X +9.74 230 LN(Y)=0.8'LN(X)+0.26 826 Y=0(X) Existing Vehicle Trips Existing Person -Trips (1.4 persons per vehicle) Notes: (1) Based on average DRI CBD Increment 1 (14.3%) and In (2) Based on DRI Increment 11 Update pedestrian reduction PROPOSED AM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE Code Equation 232 Y=0.29'(X)+28.86 710 LN(Y)=0.8'LN(X)+1.57 DIRECTIONAL GROSS 820 MULTIMODAL 931 Y=0.81 (X) 15% PEDESTRIAN INTERNAL NET NEW ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TRIPS REDUCTION(') VOLUMES REDUCTIONFACTORI2I VOLUMES CAPTURE PROJECT TRIPS ITE ITE ITE Percent IC IC Land Use Edition Code Scale Units In Out In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total High -Rise Residential Condominium/Tow 9 232 800 du 19% 81% 50 211 261 10.0% 26 45 190 235 10.0% 24 41 170 211 5.8% 12 39 160 199 General Office Building 9 710 507.6 ksf 88% 12% 618 84 702 10.0% 70 556 76 632 10.0% 63 501 68 569 1.2% 7 495 67 562 Hotel 9 310 358 room 59% 41 % 112 78 190 10.0% 19 101 70 171 10.0% 17 91 63 154 5.8% 9 86 59 145 ITE Code Equation 232 Y=0.29'(X)+28.86 710 LN(Y)=0.8'LN(X)+1.57 310 Y=0.53(X) 820 LN(Y)=0.61'LN(X)+2.24 931 Y=0.81 (X) Proposed Development) 932 1 471 1 1,403 1 10.0% 1 139 1 840 1 424 1 1,264 1 10.0% 1 127 16%VOF Reduction Proposed Development Vehicle Trips Proposed Development Person -Trips (1.4 persons per vehicle) Notes: (1) Based on average DRI CBD Increment 1 (14.3%) and Increment II (14.1%) (2) Based on DRI Increment II Update pedestrian reduction Net New Vehicle Person -Trips (1.4 persons per ve K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\calcs\Trip Gen\06 11 14 Trip Gen AM.xlsx: PRINT -PEAK HOUR 6/12/2014,8:00 AM NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS ITE MULTI -USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (Source: Chapter 7, ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Enter from External: 122 Exit to External: 222 Demand 0.0% 0 Balanced 1 0 Demandl 0.0% 1 0 3.0% 4 Demand 1 Balanced Land Use B: Office (General Office Bldg 2.0% 1 Demand ITE Land Use Code 710 Size: Category Total I Internal I External External 500 2 498 10 68 5 63 M 568 7 561 Total 100% 1% 997/. Enterfrom External: 498 Exit to External: 63 Land Use A: Residential (High -Rise Cond/Hotel) ITE Land Use Code 232/310 Size: Category Total I Internal External Enter 132 10 122 Exit 233 11 222 Total 365 21 344 1 365 100% 6% 94% Demandl 38.0% 89 Balanced 10 DemandF 9.0% 10 Project Number: Project Name: Scenario: Analysis Period: AM Peak Analyst: 33.0% 44 Demand 1 Balanced 11.0% 1 Demand Demand 38.0% 89 Balanced7i Demand 9.0% 1 Land Use D Demand 1 15.0% 1 75 Demand 4.0% 0 Balancedl 0 0 1 Balanced Demand 22.0% 1 15 1Demand Demand Demandl 33.0% 44 Demand30.0% 4 Balanced Balanced 8 Balanced 4 Demand Demand 11.0% 8 Demand 28.0% 31 28.0% F 3 \ Land Use C: Retail (Sh000inc Center) 3 1 Balanced Demandl 22.0% 1 15 Balanced 4 Demandl 4.0% Enter from External: 94 Exit to External: 1 56� ITE Land Use Code 820 Size: Category Total Internal External Enter 112 18 94 Exit 69 13 56 Total 181 31 150 561 150 100% 17% 83% NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT Category A Land Use B C D Total Enter Exit 122 222 498 56 63 94 8 7 684 386 Total 344 561 150 15 1,070 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 1 365 568 181 24 1,138 5.8% 1.2% 17.1% 37.5% Overall Internal Capture = 30.0% 1 21 IDemand Retail (Quaility Restaurant) ITE Land Use Code 931 Size: Total Internal External 12 4 8 12 5 7 M 24 1 9 15 100% 1 38% 63% Enter from External: Exit to External: 7 ICv2.4 AM rev 06 11 14.xls 6/12/2014 8:45 AM EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DIRECTIONAL GROSS MULTIMODAL 15% PEDESTRIAN INTERNAL NET NEW DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TRIPS REDUCTION(') VOLUMES REDUCTIONFACTOR(�) VOLUMES CAPTURE PROJECT TRIPS ITE ITE LITE Percent IC IC Land Use Edition Code Scale nits In Out In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In I Out Total 5 1SE26alty Retail Center 9 826 25.31 ksf 44% 56% 36 46 82 10.0% 8 32 42 74 10.0% 7 29 38 67 0.0% 0 29 38 67 6 Drinking Place 9 925 10.871 ksf 66% 34% 81 42 123 10.0% 12 73 38 111 10.0% 11 66 34 100 0.0% 0 66 34 100 ITE Code Equation 110 Y=0.97(X) 150 LN(Y)=0.64'LN(X)+1.14 210 LN(Y)= 0.9'LN X +0.51 230 LN(Y) = 0.82'LN(X)+0.32 826 Y=2.4'(X)+21.48 Existing Vehicle Trips Existing Person -Trips (1.4 persons per vehicle) Notes: (1) Based on average DRI CBD Increment 1 (14.3%) and In (2) Based on DRI Increment 11 Update pedestrian reduction PROPOSED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION ITE Code Equation 232 Y=0.34'(X)+15.47 710 Y=1.12'(X)+78.45 DIRECTIONAL GROSS 820 MULTIMODAL 931 Y=7.49(X) 15% PEDESTRIAN INTERNAL NET NEW ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS DISTRIBUTION PROJECT TRIPS REDUCTION(') VOLUMES REDUCTIONFACTORI2I VOLUMES CAPTURE PROJECT TRIPS ITE ITE ITE Percent IC IC Land Use Edition Code Scale Units In Out In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total Percent Trips In Out Total High -Rise Residential Condominium/Tow 9 232 800 du 62% 38% 178 109 287 10.0% 29 160 98 258 10.0% 25 145 88 233 25.1% 58 109 66 175 General Office Building 9 710 507.6 ksf 17% 83% 110 537 647 10.0% 65 99 483 582 10.0% 58 89 435 524 5.3% 28 84 412 496 Hotel 9 310 358 room 51 % 49% 110 105 215 10.0% 21 100 94 194 10.0% 19 90 85 175 25.1% 44 67 64 131 ITE Code Equation 232 Y=0.34'(X)+15.47 710 Y=1.12'(X)+78.45 310 Y=0.6(X) 820 LN(Y)=0.67'LN(X)+3.31 931 Y=7.49(X) Proposed Development) 999 1 1,297 1 2,296 1 10.0% 1 230 1 900 1 1,166 1 2,066 1 10.0% 1 206 16%VOF Reduction Proposed Development Vehicle Trips Proposed Development Person -Trips (1.4 persons per vehicle) Notes: (1) Based on average DRI CBD Increment 1 (14.3%) and Increment II (14.1%) (2) Based on DRI Increment II Update pedestrian reduction Net New Vehicle Person -Trips (1.4 persons per ve K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\calcs\Trip Gen\06 11 14 Trip Gen PM.xlsx: PRINT -PEAK HOUR 6/12/2014,8:43 AM NET NEW PROJECT TRIPS ITE MULTI -USE PROJECT INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEET (Source: Chapter 7, ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004) Enter from External: 176 Exit to External: 129 Demand 0.0% 0 Balanced 1 0 Demandl 0.0% 1 0 2.0% 5 Demand 5 Balanced Land Use B: Office (General Office Bldg 2.0% 9 Demand ITE Land Use Code 710 Size: Category Total I Internal I External External 89 13 76 58 435 15 420 M 524 28 496 Total 100% 5% 957 Enterfrom External: 76 Exit to External: 420 Land Use A: Residential (High -Rise Cond/Hotel) ITE Land Use Code 232/310 Size: Category Total I Internal External Enter 234 58 176 Exit 173 44 129 Total 407 102 305 407 100% 25% 75% Demandl 53.0% 92 Balanced 31 DemandF 9.0% 31 Project Number: Project Name: Scenario: Analysis Period: PM Peak Analyst: 31.0% 73 Demand 8 Balanced 12.0% 8 Demand Demand 53.0% 92 Balanced 13 Demand 9.0% 13 Land Use D Demand 1 31.0% 1 28 Demand 2.0% 3 Balancedl 2 3 1 Balanced Demand 23.0% 1 100 1Demand Demand Demandl 31.0% 73 Demand 20.0% 14 Balanced Balanced 45 Balanced 14 11 Demand Demand 12.0% 45 Demand 20.0% 69 20.0% F 28 \ Land Use C: Retail (Sh000inc Center) 28 1 Balanced Demandl 23.0% 1 100 Balanced7 Demand 2.0% Enter from External: 293 Exit to External: 1 288 ITE Land Use Code 820 Size: Category Total I Internal External Enter 345 52 293 Exit 372 84 288 Total 717 136 581 496 581 100% 19% 81 NET EXTERNAL TRIPS FOR MULTI -USE DEVELOPMENT Category A Land Use B C D Total Enter Exit 176 129 76 288 420 293 98 45 638 887 Total 305 496 581 143 1,525 Single Use Trip Gen Estimate 407 524 717 211 1 1,859 25.1% 5.3% 19.0% 32.2% Overall Internal Capture= 17.97% 20.0% 1 74 IDemand Retail (Quaility Restaurant) ITE Land Use Code 931 Size: Total Internal External 142 44 98 69 24 45 M 211 1 68 143 100% 1 32% 68% Enterfrom External: 1 98 Exit to External: 45 ICv2.4 PM rev 06 11 14.xls 6/12/2014 8:46 AM Attachment C bb8l 566 3266 TRIPS 6 7 6 1 2 8 9 5 44 5,532 PERCENT 13.64 15.91 13.64 2.27 4.55 18.18 20.45 11.36 569 567 3267 TRIPS 92 65 26 17 30 106 101 84 521 5,335 PERCENT 17.66 12.48 4.99 3.26 5.76 20.35 19.39 16.12 bb8l 32b8 IKIPS /bb 433 831 184 3bul 1286 10991 1322 5,532 PERCENT 13.83 7.83 1.5 3.33 6.51 23.25 19.87 23.9 569 3269 TRIPS 695 317 57 58 399 1359 1109 1341 5,335 PERCENT 13.03 5.94 1.07 1.09 7.48 25.47 20.79 25.14 570 3270 TRIPS 469 586 44 89 238 1777 1892 1651 6,746 PERCENT 6.95 8.69 0.65 1.32 3.53 26.34 28.05 24.47 571 3271 TRIPS 1907 995 48 251 675 3330 2954 3568 13,728 PERCENT 13.89 7.25 0.35 1.83 4.92 24.26 21.52 25.99 572 3272 TRIPS 585 265 55 80 183 979 786 922 3,855 PERCENT 15.18 6.87 1.43 2.08 4.75 25.4 20.39 23.92 573 3273 TRIPS 518 359 103 66 176 773 630 702 3,327 PERCENT 15.57 10.79 3.1 1.98 5.29 23.23 18.94 21.1 574 3274 TRIPS 651 516 59 52 170 669 625 686 3,428 PERCENT 18.99 15.05 1.72 1.52 4.96 1932 18.23 20.01 575 3275 TRIPS 616 538 166 80 216 708 676 873 3,873 PERCENT 15.9 13.89 4.29 2.07 5.58 18.28 17.45 22.54 576 3276 TRIPS 910 817 162 95 233 1138 1033 1060 5,448 PERCENT 16.7 15 2.97 1.74 4.28 20.89 18.96 19.46 577 3277 TRIPS 1070 554 106 53 266 1257 796 1157 5,259 PERCENT 20.35 10.53 2.02 1.01 5.06 23.9 15.14 22 578 3278 TRIPS 342 187 12 38 40 363 280 299 1,561 PERCENT 21.91 11.98 0.77 2.43 2.56 23.25 17.94 19.15 579 3279 TRIPS 243 133 10 22 45 299 254 279 1,285 PERCENT 18.91 10.35 0.78 1.71 3.5 23.27 19.77 21.71 580 3280 TRIPS 877 412 29 87 269 1588 13991 1761 6,422 PERCENT 13.66 6.42 0.45 1.35 4.19 24.73 21.78 27.42 581 3281 TRIPS 648 302 39 79 73 947 815 1070 3,973 PERCENT 16.31 7.6 0.98 1.99 1.84 23.84 20.51 26.93 582 3282 TRIPS 557 227 13 33 19 605 425 586 2,465 PERCENT 22.6 9.21 0.53 1.34 0.77 24.54 17.24 23.77 583 3283 TRIPS 1443 484 29 84 65 1133 1162 1190 5,590 PERCENT 25.81 8.66 0.52 1.5 1.16 20.27 20.79 21.29 584 3284 TRIPS 94 0 0 57 435 297 245 2941 1,422 PERCENT 1 6.61 0 0 4.01 30.59 20.89 17.23 20.68 585 3285 TRIPS 1 286 9 0 272 1250 872 1031 9451 4,665 PERCENT 1 6.13 0.19 0 5.83 26.8 18.69 22.1 20.26 A-18 ORIGIN -DESTINATION MATRIX TAZ NNE 556 14 567 18 Average 16 ENE ESE SSE SSW WSW WNW NNW Total 16 14 2 5 18 20 11 100 13 5 3 6 20 19 16 100 15 9 2 6 19 19 14 100 K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-RiverfrontSAP\calcs\TAZ data.xlsx Traffic Impact Analysis for .submittal to the City of Miami Miami River Development Special Area Plan City of Miami, Florida Prepared for: CG Florida Properties, LLC Miami, Florida Prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Kimley>>)Horn ©2014 Kimley-Horn and Associate;, Inc. August 2014 043615000 Zp =' F . 62541 = NQ .�' "a' T OF?� John J. McWilliams, P.E. Florida Registration Number 62541 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 600 North Pine Island Road, Suite 450 Plantation, Florida 33324 CA 4 00000696 Kimley, Hurn Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS 11011 To] 11114 1 DATA COLLECTION...................................................................................................................... 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY....................................................................................... 14 Level of Service Standard.............................................................................................. 14 Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology ................................................. 14 Intersection Level of Service Methodology................................................................... 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS............................................................................. 16 Transportation Corridors.............................................................................................. 16 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.......................................................................... 23 Background Area Growth.............................................................................................. 23 Committed Developments............................................................................................ 24 PROJECTTRAFFIC..................................................................................................................... 26 Existing and Proposed Land Uses.................................................................................. 26 ProjectAccess............................................................................................................... 26 TripGeneration............................................................................................................ 27 Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................. 30 FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC............................................................................................................ 33 FUTURE CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS............................................................................... 35 Future Background Traffic Conditions........................................................................... 35 Future Total Traffic Conditions...................................................................................... 39 TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ................... 46 Bicycle Facility Considerations...................................................................................... 46 City of Miami Biscayne/Brickell Trolley......................................................................... 46 MiamiRiverwalk........................................................................................................... 46 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................ 47 K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - i August 2014 Kirnley>))Horn Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location Map................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2A: Existing Intersection Laneage Configuration............................................................. 7 Figure 213: Proposed Future Intersection Laneage Configuration ............................................... 8 Figure 3A: Miami River Development SAP Delivery Truck Entry Routes ..................................... 9 Figure 313: Miami River Development SAP Delivery Truck Exit Routes ...................................... 10 Figure 3C: Miami River Development SAP Entry Routes........................................................... 11 Figure 3D: Miami River Development SAP Exit Routes............................................................. 12 Figure 4: 2014 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes................................................................... 13 Figure 5: Future Background Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.......................................................... 25 Figure 6: Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution............................................................................ 31 Figure 7: Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment............................................................................ 32 Figure 8: Future Total Peak Hour Traffic Volumes..................................................................... 34 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Data Collection Summary.............................................................................................. 6 Table 2: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds ................................................... 15 Table 3: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes .................................................. 16 Table 4: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 2nd Avenue. 18 Table 5: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 7t" Street.... 19 Table 6: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 8t" Street.... 19 Table 7: Existing A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions ........................ 20 Table 8: Existing P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions ........................ 21 Table 9: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions................................................................. 22 Table 10: Area Growth Determination...................................................................................... 23 Table 11: Proposed Trip Generation......................................................................................... 29 Table 12: Cardinal Trip Distribution.......................................................................................... 30 Table 13: Future Background A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions .... 36 Table 14: Future Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions .... 37 Table 15: Future Background Intersection Conditions.............................................................. 38 Table 16: Future Total A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions ............... 41 Table 17: Future Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions ............... 41 Table 18: Future Total Intersection Conditions......................................................................... 43 Table 19: A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Entry Intensity........................................................ 45 K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - ii August 2014 Kirnley>))Horn LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Conceptual Site Plan Appendix B: Methodology Correspondence Appendix C: Traffic Count Data Appendix D: Miami -Dade Transit Data Appendix E: Existing Conditions Analysis Appendix F: Growth Trend Analyses Appendix G: Vested Development Trip Information Appendix H: Trip Generation Appendix I: Cardinal Trip Distribution Appendix J: Volume Development Worksheets Appendix K: Future Background Conditions Analysis Appendix L: Future Total Conditions Analysis Appendix M: Improvements Appendix N: Gate Entry Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - iii August 2014 Kirnley>Morn INTRODUCTION Traffic Impact Analysis CG Florida Properties, LLC is proposing a mixed-use development that is generally bounded by the Miami River to the north, SW 7t" Street to the south, SW 3rd Avenue to the west, and SW 2nd Avenue to the east. The project is a total of six (6) buildings that will be constructed in five (5) phases and consist of the following: • Phase 1 consists of 55,570 square -feet of retail, 461 high-rise residential condominiums, and 133 hotel rooms. It is located on the northeast quadrant of SW 6t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue. • Phase 2 East consists of 2,900 square -feet of retail, 24,284 square -feet of office, and 3,160 square -feet of restaurant. It is located on the southeast quadrant of SW 5t" Street and the Miami River. • Phase 2 West consists of 3,740 square -feet of retail, 31,650 square -feet of office, and 10,175 square -feet of restaurant. It is located on the northeast quadrant of SW 5t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue. • Phase 3 consists of 57,440 square -feet of retail, 465 high-rise residential condominiums, and 159 hotel rooms. It is located on the northeast quadrant of SW 7t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue. • Phase 4 consists of 23,330 square -feet of retail, 322 high-rise residential condominiums, and 63,650 square -feet of office and is located on the northwest quadrant of SW 6t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue. • Phase 5 consists of 59,040 square -feet of retail, 495 high-rise residential condominiums, and 61,810 square -feet of office and is located on the northwest quadrant of SW 7t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue. A site location map is provided as Figure 1 and a conceptual site plan is provided in Appendix A. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. has completed this traffic impact analysis for submittal to City of Miami. The purpose of the study is to assess the project's impact on the surrounding transportation network and determine if adequate capacity is available to support future demand. This report is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Special Area Plan (SAP) application. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 1 August 2014 Kirnley,)) Horn Traffic Impact Analysis The study's methodology is consistent with the requirements outlined by the City of Miami for traffic impact analyses. This report summarizes the data collection, project trip generation and distribution, and capacity analyses. All methodology correspondence is included in Appendix B. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 2 August 2014 Kirnley>Morn DATA COLLECTION Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic data were collected in the study area for this project. The study area roadway corridors for this project include: • SW 7t" Street between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7t" Street between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 8t" Street between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 8t" Street between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 2nd Avenue between SW 8t" Street and SW 9t" Street The following intersections were examined: • SW 5t" Street and SW 4t"Avenue • SW 5t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 6t" Street and SW 4t"Avenue • SW 6t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7t" Street and SW 4t"Avenue • SW 7t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 7t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue • SW 8t" Street and SW 4t"Avenue • SW 8t" Street and 1-95 Northbound Ramp (West) • SW 8t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue • SW 8t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue Lane configurations for the existing and proposed roadways adjacent to the proposed development are provided in Figures 2A and 2B. The proposed roadway lane configurations include improvements proposed by the project. The project proposes two-way traffic operations on SW 3rd Avenue between SW 6t" Street and SW 7t" Street, which is currently a K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 4 August 2014 Kimsey »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis one -lane northbound only roadway with on -street parking. The project purposes several additional roadway improvements which include: • A northbound -only site access drive aisle (SW 2.5 Avenue) between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue for enhanced access to the site. The drive aisle will serve as a connection from SW 7t" Street to the project, providing an additional access connection. • Re -designating the southbound approach at the intersection of SW 8t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue to consist of one (1) exclusive left -turn and one (1) through lane. The approach currently operates with one (1) through lane and one (1) shared through/left-turn lane. • Providing an additional lane from the 1-95 southbound off -ramp and additional southbound through lane on the SW 4t" Avenue approach at the intersection of SW 4t" Avenue and SW 7t" Street. Roadway circulation diagrams depicting the proposed circulation patterns into and out of the study area are provided in Figures 3A, 313, 3C, and 3D. A.M. peak period (7:30 A.M. to 9:30 A.M.) and P.M. peak period (4:00 PM to 6:00 P.M.) turning movement counts were collected at each intersection under study. Turning movement counts for the A.M. peak period were performed from 7:30 A.M. to 9:30 A.M. based on downtown and business district characteristics of the general area and input from City of Miami Transportation Staff. It was determined that the A.M. peak period tends to occur at a later time period than the traditional 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. peak period in this area. This trend is reflected in the 24-hour continuous roadway counts. The selected A.M. peak period 24-hour volume counts were conducted along the study corridors. The data collection date and corresponding peak season conversion factors are shown in Table 1. Turning movement counts, 24-hour volume counts, and peak season conversion factors are provided in Appendix C. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 5 August 2014 Kimiey »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1: Data Collection Summary Figure 4 presents the A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 6 August 2014 Intersection Date Peak Season Factor SW 5t" Street & SW 4t" Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 5t Street & SW 3r Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 6t" Street & SW 4t" Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 6t" Street & SW 3rd Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 7t Street & SW 4t Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 7t" Street & SW 3rd Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 7t Street & SW 2t Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 8t" Street & SW 4t" Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 NW 8t Street & 1-95 Northbound Ramp 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 8t" Street & SW 3rd Avenue 5/28/2014 1.02 SW 8t" Street & SW 2t" Avenue 1 5/28/2014 1 1.02 11 Figure 4 presents the A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement volumes at the study intersections. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 6 August 2014 Leaend — Study Roadway t • Signalized Intersection 4 -Way Stop Controlled Intersection 4) d ® 2 -Way Stop Controlled Intersection > d • Free -Flowing Intersection N t > Q NOT TO SCALE v � M N + + SW 5th Street 'i+ + + + SW 6th Street 46 d c 6 + hA > m�¢ N O 19, N +J d 1 �`' 41 'r SW 7th Street `r 41 'r hi hii 1444 14 !b ~ ~ j �► SW 8th Street Z y O W � '6 C Q O Q > m > t N pNj N N Figure 2A Existing Laneage Configuration �/ u Kimfey>>)1 Miami River Development SAP oro City of Miami, Florida © 2014 t NOT TO SCALE SW 5th Street Legend — Study Roadway • Signalized Intersection ® 4 -Way Stop Controlled Intersection • 2 -Way Stop Controlled Intersection O 1 -Way Stop Controlled Intersection • Free -Flowing Intersection —r Proposed Laneage ON ME Kimley 0 Horn \© 2014 SW 7th Street 4 1t H SW 8th Street Z O 7 P 3 W 4 � d G Q O 9 m M Z N O! N d d Q a N y Figure 2B Future Laneage Configuration Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida Phase 1 North Driveway M y d > a1 0 N a� Tf\r Q r_ NCO) � y L LY d 1 l d fa °o a o Phase 1 South Driveway t a 3 0 + + SW 6th Street + a A0 i y + + + f a 3 o` L a 1 j - d d Phase 3 North Driveway a1 a1 t f�C y > f�0 M l4 O Lo l4 V% N d W MU) MU) y b a d a 0 Phase 3 South Driveway N o FQ a ii 11 gym ON ME Kimley 0 Horn \© 2014 SW 7th Street 4 1t H SW 8th Street Z O 7 P 3 W 4 � d G Q O 9 m M Z N O! N d d Q a N y Figure 2B Future Laneage Configuration Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida t N NOT TO SCALE L 39 Kimley)))Horn s , , @ 2014 Ingress Routes 0 Pa rki ng G a rage Entry Lil Figure 3A Ingress Routes Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida r9f] NOT TO SCALE #go ? 3L - AP 1 f, 194�— lob L -1 W % ftv Kimley)))Horn - y� �, @ 2014 L7 ' 1 r, r- I- ft 1 r-% Egress Routes 0 Pa rki ng G a rage Exit Figure 3B Egress Routes Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida t N NOT TO SCALE V 39 V q Aw, - r in Kirnley))) Horn ,a @ 2014 I LEGEND Ingress Routes 0 Truck Loading Bays ki I A Figure 3C I Truck Loading Ingress Routes Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida LEGEND Egress Routes - 0 Truck Loading ^' ,•- Bays syr a. It 4 - � r.� L . i ii Figure 3DAlir Truck Loading Egress Routes - . Miami River Development SAP r iL' City of Miami, Florida Kimley>>) Horn �,© 2014 Figure 4 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida Legend — Study Roadway t Study Intersection XX A.M. Peak Hour Traffic 4) (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Q 3N Q NOT TO SCALE M L 66 (81) L 0 (0) 4- 9 (21) 4- 1 (4) 1 `► r 7* (22) SW 5th Street «1 j 4 r 0 + (2) (28) 43 1 + 1 I' (43) 9 (30) 16-0 (1) 4 y ry (35) 49 (33) 23 L 60 (94) �i ry 4- 81 (293) ry r L 0 (3) r 31 (78) SW 6th Street ~ 10 (18) 7 �i T c d > (11) 18 J Q (18) 6 J (34) 22 y 4 (12) 10 y m (21) 59 �m c O N �h 1 L 102 (234) L 247 (195) 4- 920 (1,110) 961 (1,322) i 0- 424 (738) SW 7th Street r 297 (438) 1 j r 118 (133) 602 (490) hi hi T. 1-95 NB R-p (E) _. _. To 1-95 NB R-p(E)00 l�► 14 1 SW 8th Street 14 (216) 274 J 1 (1,321) 1,705 y (1,543) 2,338 y (108) 48 1 (66) 87 (1,000) 1,356 2 (1,354) 2,050 y N (1,000) 1,685 y m Q� (82) 240 (299) 239 0 d W 4 Q F N Q O > Q m N N N Kimley>>) Horn �,© 2014 Figure 4 Existing Peak Hour Traffic Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida Kimsey #Horn Traffic Impact Analysis CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Level of Service Standard Level of service (LOS) is the traffic performance measure generally used in traffic impact analysis. Levels of service range from LOS A (free flow with negligible delays) to LOS F (heavily congested with long delays). The City of Miami has adopted LOS E as its minimum level of service standard in this area. Transportation Corridor Level of Service Methodology Transportation corridor traffic conditions were examined applying the methodology outlined in the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. This methodology considers the person -trip capacity (including transit) for transportation corridors rather than evaluating only the vehicular capacity of a roadway. Level of service analyses were performed to assess the capacity of the transportation corridors evaluated in this study based on a comparison between person -trip volume and person -trip capacity within the corridors. The analyses of person -trip volumes and person -trip capacities account for both passenger vehicle and transit service within the corridors. Table 2 illustrates the level of service thresholds for each study corridor. The corridor level of service thresholds, measured in volume (v) to capacity (c) ratios, were developed from the 2013 version of FDOT's Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Intersection Level of Service Methodolo Level of service analyses were performed for study intersections using Trafficware's SYNCHRO 8 Software, which applies methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 2000/2010 Edition. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 14 August 2014 Table 2: Transportation Corridor Level of Service Thresholds Traffic Impact Analysis Note: (1) Cannot be achieved per Table 7 from FDOT's 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. (2) Based on Class II three -lane state signalized arterial with 1.2 one-way factor. (3) Based on Class II three -lane state signalized arterial with exclusive right lanes (5 percent increase) and 1.2 one-way factor. (4) Based on Class II non -state signalized roadway (10 percent reduction), two-lane undivided with exclusive left turn lanes (5 percent reduction). (5) Based on Class II non -state signalized roadway (10 percent reduction), one -lane undivided with no exclusive turn lanes (20 percent reduction). K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 15 August 2014 SW 7th Street between SW 4th Avenue and 3rd Avenue (2) SW 7th Street between SW 3rd Avenue and 2nd Avenue (2) SW 8th Street between SW 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue (3) SW 8th Street between SW 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue (2) Northbound SW 2nd Avenue(4) Southbound SW 2nd Avenue(5) LOS Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Peak Hour Directional V/C Directional V/C Directional V/C Directional V/C Directional V/C Directional V/C Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Volume Ratio Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds Thresholds A (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) B (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) C 1,404 0.46 1,404 0.46 1,475 0.46 1,404 0.46 624 0.43 267 0.46 D 3,024 0.98 3,024 0.98 3,176 0.98 3,024 0.98 1,394 0.96 540 0.94 3,072 1.00 3,072 1.00 3,226 1.00 3,072 1.00 1,454 1.00 576 1.00 IL LF - >1.00 - >1.00 - >1.00 - >1.00 - >1.00 - >1.00 Note: (1) Cannot be achieved per Table 7 from FDOT's 2013 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. (2) Based on Class II three -lane state signalized arterial with 1.2 one-way factor. (3) Based on Class II three -lane state signalized arterial with exclusive right lanes (5 percent increase) and 1.2 one-way factor. (4) Based on Class II non -state signalized roadway (10 percent reduction), two-lane undivided with exclusive left turn lanes (5 percent reduction). (5) Based on Class II non -state signalized roadway (10 percent reduction), one -lane undivided with no exclusive turn lanes (20 percent reduction). K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 15 August 2014 Kimsey Morn EXISTING CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS Transportation Corridors Vehicular roadway conditions and transit ridership were examined to determine current level of service for the transportation corridors examined in this study. Table 3 presents the unadjusted existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes, peak season conversion factors, and the existing peak season A.M. and P.M. peak hour directional traffic volumes for the study corridors. Corridor count data is included in Appendix C. Table 3: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership and capacity of the Miami - Dade Transit (MDT) bus service operating in the corridors. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 16 August 2014 Peak Peak A.M. P.M. FDOT Peak Roadway Peak Peak Season Season Season Direction A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Segments Hour Hour Adjustment Volumes Volumes Factor Hour Hour 11 H Volumes Volumes SW 7th Street - between SW 4th WB 1,009 1,163 1.02 1,029 1,186 Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 7th Street - between SW 3rd WB 1,253 1,660 1.02 1,278 1,693 Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 4th EB 3,038 2,200 1.02 3,099 2,244 Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 3rd EB 2,010 1,371 1.02 2,050 1,398 Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue - NB 707 588 1.02 721 600 Between SW 8th Street and SW 9th Street SB 524 701 1.02 534 715 Existing transit conditions were examined considering the ridership and capacity of the Miami - Dade Transit (MDT) bus service operating in the corridors. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 16 August 2014 t Six (6) Miami -Dade transit routes presently serve the study area during both the A.M. and the P.M. peak hours. In addition, the study area is served by the Metromover downtown automated people mover and Metrorail heavy rail system. • Route 6 operates with 60 minute headways in the southbound direction. • Route 8 operates with 10 minute headways in both directions. • Route 24 operates with 20 minute headways in the southbound direction. • Route 48 operates with 60 minute headways in the southbound direction. • Route 207/208 operates with 15 minute headways in both directions. • Route B operates with 8 minute headways in the A.M. peak hours and with 15 minute headways in the P.M. peak hours, both in the southbound direction. • Metromover operates with an average headway between 2 and 4 minutes. • Metrorail operates with an average headway between 4 and 5 minutes Metrobus routes on the study corridors utilize buses with capacities of 68 riders. The ridership capacities for the bus routes were calculated for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours using the appropriate headways and capacities. Metrobus route maps are included in Appendix D. Ridership data was obtained from Miami -Dade Transit for the identified transit routes. The data reflects typical ridership on the routes using the most recent ridership information available. Tables 4, 5, and 6 present the existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour ridership on the routes studied; the ridership data obtained from Miami -Dade Transit is included in Appendix D. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 17 August 2014 Kimsey >aHorn Table 4: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 2"d Avenue K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 18 August 2014 Peak Hour Peak Hour Headways Buses per Capacity Directional Peak Hour Transit Route Direction Per Directional Information of Travel A.M. Hour Vehicle Person -Trip Route Ridership (P.M.) A.M. (P.M.) (riders) Capacity A.M. (P.M.) in minutes A.M. (P.M.) Route 6 Southbound 60 1 68 68 5 riders (60) (1) (68) (11 riders) Route 8 Southbound 10 6 68 408 62 riders (10) (6) (408) (52 riders) Route 24 Southbound 20 3 68 204 52 riders (20) (3) (204) (40 riders) Route 48 Southbound 60 1 68 68 9 riders (60) (1) (68) (3 riders) Route 207 Southbound 15 4 68 272 33 riders (15) (4) (272) (65 riders) 15 4 272 18 riders Route 208 Southbound 68 (15) (4) (272) (44 riders) v 8 7 476 117 riders a Route B Southbound 68 iv (15) (4) (272) (31 riders) 2.4 25 1,875 1080 riders Northbound 75 (2.4) (25) (1,875) (948 riders) Metromover 3.2 18 1,350 516 riders Southbound 75 (2.9) (20) (1,500) (1,044 riders) 4.8 12 6,048 2,880 riders Northbound 504 (4.6) (13) (6,552) (2,480 riders) Metrorail 5.0 12 6,048 2,992 riders Southbound 504 (4.7) (12) (6,048) (4,356 riders) 37 7,923 3,960 riders Northbound - - (38) (8,427) (3,428 riders) Total 56 9,166 3,804 riders Southbound - - (55) (9,112) (5,646 riders) K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 18 August 2014 Kimsey #Horn Table 5: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 7t" Street Table 6: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 8th Street Peak Hour Peak Hour Directional Capacity Peak Hour Transit Route Direction Headways Buses per Per Person - Directional Information of Travel A.M. Hour Vehicle Trip Route Ridership (P.M.) A.M. (P.M.) Capacity Information of Travel (riders) A.M. (P.M.) in minutes A.M. (P.M.) A.M. (riders) (P.M.) A.M. (P.M.) in minutes 10 6 A.M. 408 84 riders Route 8 Westbound (P.M.) 68 10 6 (10) (6) 125 riders (408) (108 riders) v N 15 4 272 32 riders Route 207 Westbound (408) 68 v N i� 15 4 (15) (4) 72 riders (272) (80 riders) Eastbound 68 00 (15) (4) 10 (40 riders) 680 116 riders Total Westbound - - cn 10 (10) 197 riders (680) (188 riders) Table 6: Existing A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Miami -Dade Transit Conditions on SW 8th Street In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/c level of service designations outlined in Table 2. Tables 7 and 8 present the existing transportation corridor level of service. As indicated in these tables, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours and operate at adopted levels of service. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 19 August 2014 Peak Hour Peak Hour Directional Capacity Peak Hour Headways Buses per Person - Transit Route Direction Per Directional A.M. Hour Trip Information of Travel Vehicle Route Ridership (P.M.) A.M. (P.M.) Capacity (riders) A.M. (P.M.) in minutes A.M. (P.M.) 10 6 408 125 riders Route 8 Eastbound 68 41 (10) (6) (408) (75 riders) v N 15 4 272 72 riders Route 208 Eastbound 68 00 (15) (4) (272) (40 riders) cn 10 680 197 riders Total Eastbound - - (10) (680) (115 riders) In order to determine person -trip level of service for the study area's transportation corridors, total person -trip volumes (vehicular and transit) were compared to the total person -trip capacities. The person -trip volume to capacity (v/c) ratios were compared to the person -trip v/c level of service designations outlined in Table 2. Tables 7 and 8 present the existing transportation corridor level of service. As indicated in these tables, the transportation corridors have excess person -trip capacity during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours and operate at adopted levels of service. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 19 August 2014 Kimsey>>)Horn Table 7: Existing A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis Principal Roadways Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes A.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership A.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity (Z) A.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity A.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) A.M. PeakA.M. Hour Excess Capacity Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- (1) Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- (1) Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS SW 7th Street - between SW WB 1,029 1,441 116 1,557 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 3,424 0.313 C 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 7th Street - between SW WB 1,278 1,789 116 1,905 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 3,076 0.382 C 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW EB 3,099 4,339 197 4,536 3,226 4,516 680 5,196 660 0.873 D 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW EB 2,050 2,870 197 3,067 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 1,914 0.616 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue NB 721 1,009 3,960 4,969 1,454 2,036 7,923 9,959 4,990 0.499 D - Between SW 8th Street and SW 9th Street SB 534 748 3,804 4,552 576 806 9,166 9,972 5,420 0.456 C (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook and the Miami -Downtown DRI. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 20 August 2014 Kimsey>>)Horn Table 8: Existing P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis Principal Roadways Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes A.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership A.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity (Z) A.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity A.M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) A.M. PeakA.M. Hour Excess Capacity Peak Hour Level of Service Vehicles Person- (1) Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Vehicles Person- (1) Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips Person- Trips V/C Ratio LOS SW 7th Street - between SW WB 1,186 1,660 188 1,848 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 3,133 0.371 C 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 7th Street - between SW WB 1,693 2,370 188 2,558 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 2,423 0.514 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW EB 4th Avenue and 2,244 3,142 115 3,257 3,226 4,516 680 5,196 1,939 0.627 D SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW EB 1,398 1,957 115 2,072 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 2,909 0.416 C 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue NB 600 840 3,428 4,268 1,454 2,036 8,427 10,463 6,195 0.408 C - Between SW 8th Street and SW 9th Street SB 715 1,001 5,646 6,647 576 806 9,112 9,918 3,271 0.670 D (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2009 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook at the Miami -Downtown DRI. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 21 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis A.M. and P.M. peak hour capacity analyses were also performed for the study intersections. Table 9 presents the results of the analyses. All study intersections operate at adopted level of service standards with the exception of the intersection of SW 2nd Avenue and SW 8th Street during the P.M. peak hour, which operates at LOS F. Detailed information from the intersection capacity analysis is included in Appendix E. Table 9: Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions Peak Hour Overall Level Intersection of Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) SW 4th Avenue & SW 5th Street C (B) 15.0 (14.7) (two-way, stop -controlled)(') SW 3rd Avenue & SW 5th Street A (B) 9.6 (11.7) (two-way, stop -controlled)(') SW 4th Avenue & SW 6th Street B (B) 19.5 (19.4) (signalized) SW 3'd Avenue & SW 6th Street A (B) 8.3 (12.0) (all -way, stop -controlled) SW 4th Avenue & SW 7th Street D (D) 51.9 (51.3) (signalized )(2) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 7th Street A (A) 9.5 (9.4) (signalized) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 7th Street B (C) 17.4 (24.6) (signalized) SW 4th Avenue & SW 81h Street B (B) 18.0 (12.4) (signalized) 1-95 Northbound Ramp & 81h Street (free-flow)(3) SW 3'd Avenue & SW 8th Street B (B) 11.9 (12.7) (signalized) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 8th Street E (F) 75.8 (116.5) (signalized) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay is indicated. (2) Intersection cannot be analyzed in HCM 2010; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) Overall intersection LOS is not defined, as intersection operates under free-flow or stop -control conditions. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 22 August 2014 Kimley * Horn FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Traffic Impact Analysis Future background traffic conditions are defined as the expected traffic conditions on the study roadway network in the Year 2019 (corresponding to total build -out of the development) without development of the proposed project. The background traffic volumes are the sum of the existing traffic and additional "background" traffic to account for expected traffic growth in the study area. Background Area Growth Future traffic growth on the transportation network was determined based upon historic growth trends, at nearby FDOT traffic count stations, and a comparison of the 2005 and 2035 traffic volume plots from the Southeast Florida Regional Planning Model (SERPM). Table 10 provides a summary of the analysis. The following FDOT count stations were referenced for this analysis: • FDOT count station no. 2545 located on SW 8th Street, 150 feet west of 1-95 • FDOT count station no. 5095 located on SW 8 n Street, 200 feet west of SW 7th Avenue • FDOT count station no. 5096 located on SW 8 n Street, 200 feet east of SW 7th Avenue As indicated in Table 10, the 5 -year historical trend analysis determined the growth rate to be 2.67 percent (2.67%). The 10 -year historical trend growth rate was determined to be negative 0.09% (-0.09%). Traffic volumes for area roadways obtained from the SERPM plots were used K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 23 August 2014 Table 10: Area Growth Determination SERPM Forecast 5 -year 10 -year Area wide Final Historical Trend Historical Trend Growth Analysis Analysis 2005 2035 Growth Rate Rate SW 8t Street west of -1.00% 1.85% 1-95 SW 8th Street west of 3.97% 0.22% SW 7th Avenue 275,100 383,700 1.32% 2.67% SW 8th Street east of 5.04% -2.33% SW 7th Avenue Average 2.67% -0.09% As indicated in Table 10, the 5 -year historical trend analysis determined the growth rate to be 2.67 percent (2.67%). The 10 -year historical trend growth rate was determined to be negative 0.09% (-0.09%). Traffic volumes for area roadways obtained from the SERPM plots were used K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 23 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis to calculate a linear growth rate. The SERPM growth rate analysis considered a broader area that includes the overall Brickell District. The calculations for the SERPM volumes determined a linear growth rate of 1.32 percent (1.32%). A compound growth rate of 2.67 percent was used in the analysis. Historical traffic count data, SERPM model volume plots and growth trend calculations are included in Appendix F. Committed Developments City of Miami staff was contacted to determine if any projects that have been approved but not yet completed in the vicinity of the project site should be accounted for in this analysis. The City determined that Brickell CityCentre, Brickell CityCentre North 2, and Brickell Bayview Center are committed developments. These developments were included as background conditions. Available information for these developments is included in Appendix G. Figures 5 presents the A.M. and P.M. peak hour background conditions intersection volumes. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 24 August 2014 To 1-95 N8 Ramp (E) �i N 14 To 1-95 N6 Ramp (E) 14 ry 1�► (2,005) 2,354 y (1,760) 2,667 y (123) 55 1 SW 8th Street 1 (246) 313CP } 1 (75) 99 (1,141) 1,547 Z (2,043) 2,746 y N (1,639) 2,331 y 6j (94) 274 (341) 273 Legend — Study Roadway 2 Q Study Intersection Q O XX A.M. Peak Hour Traffic i m Q (XX) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic U U N U) NQ Q NOT TO SCALE � M L 75 (92) L 0 (0) 10 (24)4- 1 (5) r� 1 �► r 8 h t (25) SW 5th Street «I 1 (49) 10 J r 0 h 1 (2) (32) 49 J (34) 18 H ry r N (1) 5-0 (40) 56 (38) 26 L 68 (107) v� 92 (334) L 0 (3) 1 1 4 r 35 (89) SW 6th Street ,% 4- 11 (21) 43)r .I. QN c (z,) 7 J h i d C Q (13) 21 1 (39) 25 y ml (14) 11 y m (24) 67 C 0 at U) C _. _. 4 1 _. _. L 116 (267) L 282 (222) 1,176 (1,565) ry 1,301 (2,091) 1 4- 610 (1,141) SW 7th Street r 418 (784) // 1 1 r 135 (152) 687 (559) hi ht To 1-95 N8 Ramp (E) �i N 14 To 1-95 N6 Ramp (E) 14 ry 1�► (2,005) 2,354 y (1,760) 2,667 y (123) 55 1 SW 8th Street 1 (246) 313CP } 1 (75) 99 (1,141) 1,547 Z (2,043) 2,746 y N (1,639) 2,331 y 6j (94) 274 (341) 273 y W 2 1 4 Q O d Q i m Q U U N U) Figure 5 Future Background Peak Hour Traffic V �le� .�� LJv�.� Miami River Development SAP 1 H City of Miami, Florida \© 2014 / Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic is defined as the vehicle trips expected to be generated by the project, and the distribution and assignment of this traffic over the roadway network. Existing and Proposed Land Uses Currently, a portion of the site proposed for development is occupied by the following land uses: • 10,871 square -foot bar/nightclub • 9,511 square -feet of warehouse • 11,427 square -feet of general light industrial • 25,310 square -feet of specialty retail • 14 condominium units • 1 single-family detached house Trip generation credit was taken for these existing land uses. As previously indicated, the project proposes to develop six (6) buildings that will be constructed in five (5) phases. The development will include 1,743 high-rise residential condominiums, 181,400 square -feet of office, 292 hotel rooms, 202,000 square -feet of retail, and 13,340 square -feet of quality restaurant. Construction is expected to be completed and the project occupied by the year 2019. Prosect Access Access to the site's three (3) parking garages is proposed via six (6) driveways. The following provides a summary of each driveway including the land use that is accessed and type of driveway connection. Please note that drop-off driveways are also provided throughout the development. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 26 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Access from SW 3rd Avenue - North of SW 6t" Street Traffic Impact Analysis 1. Phase #1/2 south driveway: will provide right-out/left-out only access from the porte- cochere and parking garage 2. Phase #1/2 north driveway: will provide right-in/left-in only access to the porte-cochere and parking garage Access from SW 3rd Avenue - North of SW 7t" Street 3. Phase #3 south driveway: will provide right-in/left-in only access to the porte-cochere and parking garage 4. Phase #3 north driveway: will provide right-out/left-out only access from the porte- cochere and parking garage Access from SW 6t" Street 5. Phases #1/2 and #3 driveway: will provide full access serving the parking garages for Phases #1/2 and #3 6. Phase #5 driveway: will provide full access serving the porte-cochere and parking garage Trip Generation Proposed vehicular trip generation for the project was calculated using rates and equations contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 9t" Edition. ITE Land Use Codes 232 (High -Rise Residential Condominiums/Townhouse), 710 (General Office Building), 310 (Hotel), 820 (Shopping Center), and 931 (Quality Restaurant). Project trips were estimated for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. In order to account for the urban environment in which the project site is located, transit (multimodal) reduction and pedestrian reduction factors were applied to the site. It is expected that a portion of visitors and residents of the site as well as employees will utilize transit or walk. Miami -Dade County Transit (MDT) provides bus service several routes in the vicinity of the site, in addition to the Metromover and Metrorail. The multimodal and pedestrian reduction factors were calculated for the site using rates outlined in the City of Miami's Development of Regional Impact (DRI) — Increment I and Increment II, which provides multimodal and pedestrian reduction factors to be applied to certain parts of the City. Typically, K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 27 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis a multimodal reduction of 14.2 percent (14.2%) and a pedestrian reduction of 15.0 percent (15.0%) are used for the Brickell area. However, at the city's request, 10.0 percent (10.0%) was utilized for both the multimodal and pedestrian reductions. A portion of the trips generated by the development will be captured internally on the site. Internal capture trips were determined based upon values contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004. The expected internal capture rate is 5.9 percent (5.9%) during the A.M. peak hour and 15.3 percent (15.3%) during the P.M. peak hour. ITE trip generation assumes a vehicle occupancy rate of 1.2 persons per vehicle; however, the City of Miami has determined that 1.4 persons per vehicle are more appropriate for the local area. Therefore, vehicular trips will be reduced by 16 percent to adjust for these vehicle occupancy assumptions. The project is expected to generate 759 net new A.M. peak hour vehicular trips (1,063 person -trips) and 1,060 net new P.M. peak hour vehicular trips (1,484 person -trips). A summary of the proposed trip generation is provided in Table 11. Detailed trip generation calculations for the project are presented in Appendix H. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 28 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 11: Proposed Trip Generation A.M.(P.M.) Peak Hour Driveway Volume Entering Exiting Future Land Use Scale Net External % Trips % Trips (ITE Code) Trips Existing Development General Light Industrial (110) 11,427 sf 9 88% 8 12% 1 (9) (12%) (1) (88%) (8) Warehousing (150) 9,511 sf 18 79% 14 21% 4 (11) (25%) (3) (75%) (8) Single -Family Detached Housing 1 du 9 25% 3 75% 6 (210) (2) (63%) (1) (37%) (1) Residential 14 du 9 17% 2 83% 7 Condominium/Townhouse (230) (10) (67%) (6) (33%) (4) Specialty Retail Center (826) 25,310 sf 0 0% 0 0% 0 (66) (44%) (29) (56%) (37) Drinking Place (925) 10,871 sf 0 0% 0 0% 0 (99) (66%) (65) (34%) (34) Sub -Total 45 27 18 (197) (105) (92) Proposed Development High -Rise Residential 1,743 du 417 19% 79 81% 338 Condominium/Townhouse (232) (420) (62%) (261) (38%) (159) General Office Building (710) 181,390 sf 241 88% 212 12% 29 (204) (17%) (35) (83%) (169) Hotel (310) 292 rooms 120 59% 70 41% 50 (120) (51%) (62) (49%) (58) Shopping Center (820) 202,020 sf 165 62% 102 38% 63 (660) (48%) (317) (52%) (343) Quality Restaurant (931) 13,335 sf 6 50% 3 50% 3 (54) (67%) (36) (33%) (18) Sub -Total 949 466 483 (1,458) (711) (747) Net New Development Net New Project Trips 904 439 465 (1,261) (606) (655) ITE/Miami vehicular occupancy 145 71 74 adjustment (16% reduction) (201) (97) (104) Net New Vehicle Trips (vehicles per hour) 759 368 391 (1,060) (509) (551) Person -Trip Conversion (1.4 persons per vehicle) 1,063 516 547 (person -trips) (1,484) (713) (771) K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 29 August 2014 Kimley * Horn Traffic Impact Analysis Trip Distribution and Assignment The likely distribution of project traffic was forecasted for the trips expected to be generated by the proposed development. The trip distribution was based on a cardinal trip distribution for the project site's traffic analysis zones (TAZs) obtained from the Miami -Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization's 2035 Cost Feasible Plan travel demand model. The project is located within two (2) TAZs including 556 and 567. Therefore, an average cardinal distribution was developed based on the two (2) TAZs. The average cardinal distribution is shown in Table 12. Detailed cardinal distribution calculations are contained in Appendix I. Table 12: Cardinal Trip Distribution Cardinal Direction Percentage of Trips North -Northeast 16 East -Northeast 15 East -Southeast 9 South -Southeast 2 South -Southwest 6 West -Southwest 19 West -Northwest 19 North -Northwest 14 Total 100 Figures 6 and 7 show the project trip distribution and assignment at the project driveways and adjacent intersections for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The project traffic was then distributed and assigned to the roadway network. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 30 August 2014 t _ d N NOT TO SCALE 3 (5 ) 1 4 r (5°%) SW 5th Street Legend Study Roadway Study Intersection XX% Entering Trip Distribution (XX%) Exiting Trip Distribution 5°% 1 y 90%7 4 Phase 1 North Driveway I 10 d cl i lB d > 00) L (120%) N (a d U =2 Q a Phase 1 South Driveway I A 3 0 IL (D D%) o%) a L (2D%) (D SW 8th Street (1sD%1 (23D%) D%1 P 20% 7 M c a d d Phase 3 North Driveway 00 UP LC tC ` aY aY �m 14 a a a Phase 3 South Driveway I P �O N 1 � 25.0io 210%. r zo D% 1 (3D%) SW 7th Street 1 0 D%) t 1t ,o°�NDDamoir) � 14 14 130% _ 33 (10 D%) J .D%J 1 SW 8th Street aD%) xiD%� (2.M) 3 4 w m a d Q m Q > Z a Q rn y Co Kimley>»Horn \© 2014 Figure 6 Peak Hour Project Trip Distribution Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida i ,o rg Na Aamo)u � 14 14 (ss) 47 (+ea) +z, 1 SW 8th Street (ss) 39 (991 70 1 Z a (+091 n O(2e) 201 Legend 5 _ c 3 w — Study Roadway 9 Q d Study Intersection T t C1 9 Q XX AM Peak Hour Traffic d N N u) y Q00 PM Peak Hour Traffic N Q NOT TO SCALE 3 9 y N J J L ,a (2+) 1 4 r 20 (2 1 (2e) SW 5th Street F 7 (11) 1a t 1 (25) 111 33 z 4 Phase 1 North Driveway c N lB d > �:7 0 � L us (15) H R d v tY Q r ,a, Phase 1 South Driveway d rn 1 a 3 o L w 2n (20 L a +oz (+31 1 4 r r +�' (+a9 (181 SW 6th Street 1 (e31 ! 31 (�) o. rys7) 1iP P m 71 (25) 1a-Pol X77 m (+o+) w m (+o) m O L a+ (p) a d m Phase 3 North Driveway ' f0 >31 lB >31 LC tC c _ dY dY i lB i y fC 14 a a Phase 3 South Driveway t P N O� y 1 a L 9z 127) L 39 , „ (+7) 0 SW 7th Street 'J 1 1021 J t 1t `The traffic volumes atdnveways are total project volumes, while traffic volumes atextemal intersections are net new flips accounting for existing Figure 7 development. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Kimley>» Horn Miami RivertDevelopment SAP Ci of Miami, Florida �-© 2014 47 (+ea) +z, 1 SW 8th Street (ss) 39 (991 70 1 Z a (+091 n O(2e) 201 5 _ c 3 w 9 Q d t C1 9 Q = N N u) y `The traffic volumes atdnveways are total project volumes, while traffic volumes atextemal intersections are net new flips accounting for existing Figure 7 development. Peak Hour Project Trip Assignment Kimley>» Horn Miami RivertDevelopment SAP Ci of Miami, Florida �-© 2014 Kimley * Horn FUTURE TOTAL TRAFFIC Traffic Impact Analysis Total traffic volumes considered in the future year (2019) analysis for this project are the sum of 2019 background traffic volumes and the expected project traffic volumes. Figure 8 presents the total traffic for the study area. Total turning movement volume development worksheets for the study intersections are included in Appendix J. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 33 August 2014 t N NOT TO SCALE J 14 13) r'� (31 SW 5th Street J 14 °'' L a (a) a (15) r 9 (y iz.orl) z (32) a91 1 r SW 8th Street (3m) 35z� I r --------------- r-7 (t zao) 1.611 2 ry 9961 z (59) a 5a a 91 O(941 z9a 3 Oal) 293 Z 4 Phase 1 North Driveway I d C � a1 c clR m a Q � (7 v Z r`n a d a1 N N C L 49 (15) R tY x141 a Phase 1 South Driveway I 3 Z _ Las (135, _mac Lo sl n J 1 14 112 (35z) SW stn Street J 1 4 ro (1m) s-39 ( ) (131 21 (31) ,3 41 1 I P (4 as s (za) 4 (44) y (10) ' i ti 3 rai) 66 H O c L 41 (c+) a d Phase 3 North Driveway _ M � R N0 (Q a1 L C i R 14 a �Q Phase 3 South Driveway I P 0 m Ay J1 ., ry 16— (394) r1,ns (1,55x) iczz (1,156) SW 7th Street J 1 rale yea) (ria) ,1t d � Q� Q � 9 y N L 69 4- Legend Study Roadway ® Study Intersection XX AM Peak Hour Traffic (XX) PM Peak Hour Traffic � 9e , � � 14 ,o��ti9aam9ir, � ro ra xe aamolrl �� 14 W 14 iz.orl) z i16a3) z �, (291) 116� 1 r SW 8th Street (3m) 35z� I r 051 ss 1 (t zao) 1.611 2 ry 9961 z y y (11461 z,aoa y O(941 z9a 3 Oal) 293 Z 9 Q C w m a Q v Z r`n a N 91 N N y `The traffic volumes at driveways are total project volumes, while traffic volu mes at external intersections are net new hips accounting for existing development. NOTE: (1)` Volume removed as site access driveway is proposed to be one-way westbound. Please note this volume is from the existing development that KimleylMorn will be demolished. \© 2014 Figure 8 Future Total Peak Hour Traffic Miami River Development SAP City of Miami, Florida Kimley * Horn FUTURE CONDITIONS CAPACITY ANALYSIS Two separate future conditions peak hour capacity analyses were performed. • A transportation corridor (person - trip) capacity analysis • Intersection capacity analysis was performed at the study intersections Traffic Impact Analysis Future Background Traffic Conditions Tables 13 and 14 present the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2019 A.M. and P.M. peak hour background traffic conditions. As indicated in Tables 13 and 14, the corridors have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at adopted levels of service (LOS E), with the exception of the segment of SW 8t" Street between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue during the A.M. peak hour. Table 15 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis. All intersections are expected to operate at their adopted level of service or better, with the exceptions of the signalized intersections of SW 4t" Avenue at SW 7t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue at SW 8t" Street, which are expected to operate at LOS F during the P.M. peak hour. The intersection of SW 4t" Avenue and SW 7t" Street also operates at LOS F during the A.M. peak hour. Detailed SYNCHRO 8 outputs are included in Appendix K. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 35 August 2014 Kimsey>>)Horn Table 13: Future Background A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis Principal Roadways 2014 Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Growth Rate 2019 Peak Season A.M. Peak Hour Roadway Volumes Committed Development A.M. Peak Hour Transit Ridership 2019 Background A.M. Peak Hour Total Volume (V) Directional Peak Hour Vehicular Capacity iii A.M. Peak Hour Transit Capacity A.M.M. . M. Peak Hour Total Capacity (C) Peak Hour Excess Capacity A.M. Peak Hour Level of Service Brickell CitiCentre Brickell CitiCentre North 2 Brickell Bayview Center Person- Person- Person- Person- Person- Person - Vehicles Trips iii Vehicles Trips iii Vehicles Trips iii Vehicles Trips iii Vehicles Trips iii Person -Trips Vehicles iii Tripst" Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips V/C Ratio LOS SW 7th Street - between SW 4th Avenue and SW WB 1,029 1,441 2.67% 1,174 1,644 69 97 33 46 24 34 116 1,937 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 3,044 0.389 C 3rd Avenue SW 7th Street - between SW 3rd WB Avenue and SW 1,278 1,789 2.67% 1,458 2,041 148 207 33 46 24 34 116 2,444 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 2,537 0.491 D 2nd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 4th Avenue and SW EB 3,099 4,339 2.67% 3,535 4,950 377 528 27 38 5 7 197 5,720 3,226 4,516 680 5,196 -524 1.101 F 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 3rd Avenue and SW EB 2,050 2,870 2.67% 2,339 3,274 377 528 27 38 5 7 197 4,0 44 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 937 0.812 D 2nd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue - NB 721 1,009 2.67%823 1,151 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,960 5,111 2,036 7,923 9,959 4,848 0.513 D between SW 8th Street and SW 9th t576 Street SB 534 748 2.67% 609 853 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,804 4,657 7 8067 9,166 9,972 5,315 0.467 D (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook at the Miami -Downtown DRI. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 36 August 2014 Kimsey »Horn Table 14: Future Background P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook at the Miami -Downtown DRI. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 37 August 2014 2014 Peak Season 2019 Peak Season Committed Development P.M. Peak 2019 Background Directional Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak P.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Hour Transit P.M. Peak Hour Hour Vehicular Hour Transit P.M. Peak Hour Hour Excess P.M. Peak Hour Brickell citicentre Brickell Bayview Principal Roadways Roadw Volumes Growth RoadwayVolumes Brickell citicentre North Center Ridership Total Volume (V) Ca acitylil Capacity Total Capacity Capacity Level of Service Rate (C) Person- Person- Person- Person- Person- Person - Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles "' Vehicles Vehicles "' Person -Trips Person -Trips Vehicles "' Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips V/CRatio LOS Trips"' Trips"' Trips Trips"' Trips Trips SW 7th Street - between SW 4th WB 1,186 1,660 2.67% 1,353 1,894 249 349 47 66 3 4 188 2,501 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 2,480 0.502 D Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 7th Street - betweenSW 3rd WB 11693 2,370 2.67% 1,931 2,704 533 746 47 66 3 4 188 3,708 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 1,273 0.744 D Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 4th EB 2,244 3,142 2.67% 2,560 3,584 369 517 111 155 18 25 115 4,396 3,226 4,516 680 5,196 800 0.846 D Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street - between SW 3rd EB 1,398 1,957 2.67% 1,595 2,233 369 517 111 155 18 25 115 3,045 3,072 4,301 680 4,981 1,936 0.611 D Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue SW 2nd Avenue- NB 600 840 2.67% 684 958 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,428 4,386 1,454 2,036 8,427 10,463 6,077 0.419 c between SW 8th Street and SW 9th Street SB 715 1,001 2.67% 816 1,142 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,646 6,788 576 806 9,112 9,918 3,130 0.684 D (1) Volumes (vehicles) were converted to person -trips using 1.4 person/vehicle occupancy per City of Miami standards. (2) Directional peak hour capacity derived from the 2013 FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook at the Miami -Downtown DRI. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 37 August 2014 Kimsey >>Hnrn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 15: Future Background Intersection Conditions Peak Hour Overall Level of Intersection Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) SW 4th Avenue & SW 5th Street C (C) 17.4 (16.9) (two-way, stop -controlled)(') SW 3rd Avenue & SW 5th Street A (B) 9.6 (12.2) (two-way, stop -controlled)(') SW 4th Avenue & SW 6th Street B (C) 19.7 (20.8) (signalized) SW 3'd Avenue & SW 6th Street A (B) 8.4 (13.6) (all -way, stop -controlled) SW 4th Avenue & SW 7th Street (4) (4) F (F) (4) (4) 94.9 (101.7) (signalized )(2) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 7th Street B (A) 10.1 (9.9) (signalized) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 7th Street C (E) 21.8 (65.8) (signalized) SW 4th Avenue & SW 8th Street D (B) 36.0 (19.0) (signalized) 1-95 Northbound Ramp & SW 8th Street (free-flow)(3) SW 3'd Avenue & SW 8th Street C (D) 33.4 (53.7) (signalized) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 8th Street E (F) 62.2 (91.1) (signalized )(4) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay is indicated. (2) Intersection cannot be analyzed in HCM 2010; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) Overall intersection LOS is not defined, as intersection operates under free-flow or stop -control conditions. (4) Signal timings optimized. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 38 August 2014 Kimsey >> HQrn Traffic Impact Analysis Future Total Traffic Conditions Tables 16 and 17 present the results of the transportation corridor capacity analysis for the 2019 A.M. and P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. As indicated in these tables, all corridors are expected to have sufficient capacity and are expected to operate at adopted levels of service (LOS E or better) with the exception of SW 8t" Street between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue which is expected to operate at LOS F during the A.M. peak hour. The project is expected to assign project traffic equivalent to 5.2 percent of the segment capacity on this segment and adds project traffic equivalent to 4.5 percent to the segment volume. Please note that the project proposes an additional through lane on this segment which will act as a left -turn "drop" lane at the intersection of SW 3rd Avenue. With the proposed improvement, the roadway segment is expected to operate at LOS D during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. A detailed graphic of the improvement is provided in Appendix M. Table 18 presents the results of the intersection capacity analysis for the 2019 A.M. and P.M. peak hour total traffic conditions. All of the intersections are expected to operate at adopted level of service standard or better, with the exception of the signalized intersection of SW 4t" Avenue and SW 7t" Street, which is expected to operate at LOS F during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The project assigns traffic equivalent to 6.1 percent of the overall traffic volume at this intersection during the A.M. peak hour and 7.8 percent during the P.M. peak hour. The project proposes several improvements at this intersection including an auxiliary lane from the 1-95 southbound off -ramp and an additional through lane at the southbound approach of SW 4t" Avenue. With these improvements constructed, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS E during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Detailed SYNCHRO 8 outputs are included in Appendix L. Two (2) alternatives were developed for the subject intersection and are contained in Appendix M. Alternative 1 has a minimum impact on the parking lot beneath 1-95. However, this alternative creates a large intersection footprint. Alternative 2 minimize the intersection footprint by encroaching into the parking lot beneath 1-95. The alternatives will be coordinated with FDOT to determine the feasibility of implementation. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 39 August 2014 Ksmiey > orn Traffic Impact Analysis Additional improvements are proposed by the project to improve site circulation and off-site intersection operation. These improvements include: • Re -designate the southbound approach at the intersection of SW 8t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue with an exclusive left -turn lane and through lane. As a result, the intersection operates at LOS D during the A.M. peak hour and LOS B during the P.M. peak hour. Currently, the southbound approach is marked as a shared through/left-turn lane and through lane. • Convert one-way traffic northbound on SW 3rd Avenue to two-way (northbound/southbound) traffic between SW 7t" Street and SW 6t" Street. 50 percent of traffic from the westbound left -turn movement at the intersection of SW 6t" Street and SW 4t" Avenue was reassigned to the southbound approach at the intersection of SW 7t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue. Please note that approximately six (6) on -street parking spaces along the west side of SW 3rd Avenue will need to be removed in order to accommodate two-way traffic on SW 3rd Avenue. The intersection of SW 7t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue will operate at adopted levels of service with the proposed modification constructed. Detailed analysis calculations are contained in Appendix L and detailed trip assignment and volume development calculations are included in Appendix J. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 40 August 2014 Kimiey >#Horn Table 16: Future Total A.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis Note: (1) Corridor segments with proposed improvements. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 41 August 2014 2019 A.M. Peak Project A.M. 2019A.M. Peak 2019 A.M. Peak 2019 A.M. Peak Project A.M. A.M. Peak Hour Hour Total Peak Hour Peak Hour Hour Total Hour Total Hour Excess Level of Service Principal Roadways Volume Distribution Assignment Volume (V) Capacity (C) Capacity Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips V/C Ratio LOS (Maximum) SW 7th Street- 0% In 0 between SW WB 1,937 1,970 4,981 3,011 0.396 C 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue 6% Out 33 SW 7th Street- 35% In 181 between SW WB 2,444 2,625 4,981 2,356 0.527 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 0% Out 0 SW 8th Street - between SW 33% In 170 4th Avenue and EB 5,720 5,988 6,714 726 0.892 D SW 3rd (1)11 18% Out 98 Avenue 1 11 11 11 SW 8th Street- 0% In 0 between SW EB 4,044 4,235 4,981 746 0.850 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 35% Out 191 SW 2nd Avenue5% N B 5,111 In 26 5,137 9,959 4,822 0.516 D 0% Out 0 - between SW 8th Street and 0% In 0 SW 9th Street SB 4,657 4,684 9,972 5,288 0.470 D 5% Out 27 Note: (1) Corridor segments with proposed improvements. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 41 August 2014 Kimiey >#Horn Table 17: Future Total P.M. Peak Hour Transportation Corridor Segment Conditions Traffic Impact Analysis Note: (1) Corridor segments with proposed improvements. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 42 August 2014 2019 A.M. Peak Project A.M. 2019 A.M. Peak 2019 A.M. Peak 2019 A.M. Peak Project A.M. J A.M. Peak Hour Hour Total Peak Hour Peak Hour Hour Total HourTotal Capacity Hour Excess Level of Service Principal Roadways P Y Volume Distribution Assignment Volume (V) (C) Capacity Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips Person -Trips V/C Ratio LOS (Maximum) SW 7th Street- 0% In 0 between SW WB 2,501 2,547 4,981 2,434 0.511 D 4th Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue 6% Out 46 SW 7th Street- 35% In 250 between SW WB 3,708 3,958 4,981 1,023 0.795 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 0% Out 0 SW 8th Street - between SW 33% In 235 4th Avenue and EB 4,396 4,770 6,714 1,944 0.710 D SW 3rd 18% Out 139 Avenue(1) 11 11 11 11 SW 8th Street- 0% In 0 between SW EB 3,045 3,315 4,981 1,666 0.666 D 3rd Avenue and SW 2nd Avenue 35% Out 270 SW 2nd Avenue5% NB 4,386 In 36 4,422 10,463 6,041 0.423 C - between SW 0% Out 0 8th Street and 0% In 0 SW 9th Street SB 6,788 6,827 9,918 3,091 0.688 D 5% Out 39 Note: (1) Corridor segments with proposed improvements. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 42 August 2014 Traffic Impact Analysis Table 18: Future Total Intersection Conditions Peak Hour Overall Level of Intersection Service A.M. (P.M.) LOS Delay (secs) SW 4th Avenue & SW 5th Street C (D) 23.0 (26.2) (two-way, stop-controlled)(1) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 5th Street B (C) 10.5 (15.1) (two-way, stop -controlled)(') SW 4th Avenue & SW 6th Street B (C) 19.9 (27.4) (signalized) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 6th Street B (E) 12.5 (40.3) (all -way, stop -controlled) F (F) 128.2 (129.1) SW 4th Avenue & SW 7th Street (4) (4) F (F) (4) (4) 127.1 (129.1) (signalized )(2) D(5) (E)(5) 50.4(5) (68.2)(5) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 7th Street B (D) 10.1 (50.2) (signalized) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 7th Street C (E)(4) 23.4 (76.5)(4) (signalized) SW 4th Avenue & SW 8th Street D (C) 42.7 (22.2) (signalized) D(5) (C)(5) 41.8(5) (22.1)(5) 1-95 Northbound Ramp & SW 8th Street (free-flow)(3) SW 3rd Avenue & SW 8th Street D (E) 45.3 (72.6) (signalized) D(5) (D)(5) 39.1(5) (50.8)(5) SW 2nd Avenue & SW 8th Street F (F) 122.3 (171.4) (signalized) D(4) (B)(4) 52.8(4) (18.1)(4) Building 3 North Entry Driveway & SW 3rd Avenue - (free-flow)(3) Building 3 South Exit Driveway & SW 3rd Avenue B (B) 10.1 (12.6) (one-way, stop -controlled) SW 6th Street & Building 2 Driveway A (A) 8.8 (9.2) (one-way, stop -controlled) Building 1 North Exit Driveway & SW rd Avenue B (B) 10.5 (13.0) (one-way, stop -controlled) Building 1 South Entry Driveway & SW 3rd Avenue (free-flow)(3) SW 7th Street & Proposed SW 2.5 Avenue (free-flow)(3) Note: (1) Overall intersection LOS not provided for two-way stop -controlled intersections. The minor street with the greatest amount of delay is indicated. (2) Intersection cannot be analyzed in HCM 2010; therefore HCM 2000 was used. (3) Overall intersection LOS is not defined, as intersection operates under free-flow or stop -control conditions. (4) Signal timings optimized. (5) Intersection with proposed improvements. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 43 August 2014 Kimsey ,#HOrn Traffic Impact Analysis DEVELOPMENT ENTRY GATE ANALYSIS Three (3) entries to the parking garages are provided for the development. To provide for a conservative analysis, each entry gate was assumed to provide one (1) lane and provide resident and guest access utilizing a push-button ticket dispenser to enter the development. The analysis was performed using the methodology outlined in Parking Structures 3rd Edition: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Repair (Anthony P. Chrest, Mary S. Smith, Sam Bhuyan, Mohammad Iqbal, and Donald R. Monahan, 2001) and was utilized to perform a queuing analysis for the entry gates. Based on the trip generation prepared, the development is expected to generate a total of 797 A.M. peak hour driveway trips (391 entering and 406 exiting) and 1,225 P.M. peak hour driveway trips (597 entering and 628 exiting). Volumes at the three (3) entries were determined based on the assignment of trips at each site access driveway. It was assumed that the average service rate per lane for residents and guests would be approximately 400 vehicles per hour (9 seconds per vehicle), based on Parking Structures 3rd Edition: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Repair. In order to estimate the queue length, a traffic intensity ratio was calculated for residents and guests. Traffic intensity is defined as the hourly arrival rate divided by the hourly service rate. The entrance for Phase #1/2 will provide a minimum of one (1) 150 -foot storage lane for use by residents and guests, including the service position. The entrance for Phase #3 will provide a minimum of one (1) 50 -foot storage lane for use by residents and guests, including the service position. The entrance for Phase #5 will provide a minimum of one (1) 50 -foot storage lane for use by residents and guests, including the service position. Results of the analysis are summarized in Table 19 and detailed analyses are included in Appendix N. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 44 August 2014 Ksmiey Morn Traffic Impact Analysis Table 19: A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Entry Intensity Entry Gate Analysis A.M Peak Hour (P.M. Peak Hour) 90th Project Driveway Entering Service Percentile Traffic Queue Volumes Rates Intensities behind (vph) (vph) Service Position Phase #1/2 184 400 0.46 1 vehicle (281) (0.7025) (5 vehicles) 102 0.255 <1 vehicle Phase #3 (155) 400 (0.3875) (1 vehicle) 105 0.2625 <1 vehicle Phase #5 (161) 400 (0.4025) (1 vehicle) The traffic intensity for the resident/guest entry lane was plotted on the single -channel queue curves to determine the queue length behind the service position included in the Appendix N. The 90th percentile queue length for the resident/guest lanes for Phase #1/2 is less than one (1) vehicle behind the service position (push-button) during the A.M. peak hour and one (1) vehicle during the P.M. peak hour. The 90th percentile queue length for the resident/guest lanes for Phase #3 is one (1) vehicle behind the service position (push-button) during the A.M. peak hour and five (5) vehicles during the P.M. peak hour. The 90th percentile queue length for the resident/guest lanes for Phase #5 is less than one (1) vehicle behind the service position (push- button) during the A.M. peak hour and one (1) vehicle during the P.M. peak hour. The site entrances will provide a minimum of one (1) 150 -foot storage lane for Phase #1/2 (including service position), a minimum of one (1) 50 -foot storage lane for Phase #3 (including service position), and a minimum of one (1) 50 -foot storage lane for Phase #5 (including service position) for use by residents and guests. All anticipated queues can be accommodated without queues extending into SW 3rd Avenue. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 45 August 2014 Kbmiey »Horn Traffic Impact Analysis TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES PLAN AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A Transportation Control Measures Plan is proposed to reduce the impacts of the project traffic on the surrounding roadway network. Miami -Dade County provides public transit in close proximity to the project site. In addition, other measures are under consideration to encourage people to use public transportation, use bicycles and walk, use car/vanpools, and find alternatives to the typical workday hours. Examples of these incentives include, but are not limited to: ■ Providing transit information within the site including route schedules and maps ■ Providing convenient and secure areas for bicycles ■ Providing other transit -oriented amenities The applicant intends to make the site bicycle/pedestrian- and transit -friendly and will consider these features for incorporation into the site. Bicycle Facility Considerations The development is contemplating improvements and amenities for bicyclists. These improvements may include bicycle lanes along with short-term and long-term bicycle parking. Specific improvements will be developed. City of Miami Biscayne/Brickell Trolley The Miami River Development SAP is contemplating a transit stop within the development on SW 3rd Avenue to accommodate the City's future trolley grid system extension. This improvement will be coordinated with the City of Miami. Miami Riverwalk The project will extend the Riverwalk from the NW 2nd Avenue Bridge to Jose Marti Park, pool area. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 46 August 2014 Ksmiey Morn Traffic Impact Analysis CONCLUSION This traffic impact study assessed the impacts of the Miami River Development Special Area Plan project on the surrounding transportation network. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the City of Miami requirements, analyzing transportation corridor segments and intersections. Trip generation calculations indicate that the project is expected to generate 759 new vehicular trips and 1,063 person -trips during the A.M. peak hour and 1,060 new vehicular trips and 1,484 person -trips during the PM. peak hour. Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on a cardinal trip distribution obtained from the 2035 Cost Feasible Plan. Transportation corridor segments capacity analyses and intersection capacity analyses were performed for existing conditions and for future conditions with and without project traffic. Results of the analyses demonstrate that the transportation corridors and intersections in the vicinity of the project site operate at adopted levels of service during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, with the exception of the segment of SW 8t" Street between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue during the A.M. peak hour, which operates at LOS F, and the signalized intersection of SW 4t" Avenue and SW 7t" Street during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, which operates at LOS F. Please note that the project proposes an additional through lane for the SW 8t" Street segment between SW 4t" Avenue and SW 3rd Avenue. With the proposed improvement, the roadway segment is expected to operate at LOS D during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The project proposes several improvements at the intersection of SW 4t" Avenue and SW 7t" Street including an auxiliary lane from the 1-95 southbound off -ramp and an additional through lane at the southbound approach of SW 4t" Avenue. With these improvements constructed, the intersection is expected to operate at LOS E during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. It should be noted that the project proposes to re -designate the southbound approach at the intersection of SW 8t" Street and SW 2nd Avenue with an exclusive left -turn lane and through lane. As a result of this improvement the intersection will operate at adopted levels of service during the peak hours. The project also proposes to convert one-way northbound traffic on SW K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 47 August 2014 Ksmiey Morn Traffic Impact Analysis 3rd Avenue to two-way (northbound/southbound) traffic between SW 7t" Street and SW 6t" Street. Please note that approximately six (6) on -street parking spaces along the west side of SW 3rd Avenue will need to be removed in order to accommodate two-way traffic on SW 3rd Avenue. The intersection of SW 7t" Street and SW 3rd Avenue will operate at adopted levels of service with the proposed modification constructed during the peak hours. The project is contemplating a series of improvements including bicycle lanes, short-term and long-term bicycle parking, a transit stop as part of the City's future grid trolley service, and Riverwalk improvements. These improvements will encourage people travel to and from the project to use public transportation as well as promoting bicycling and walking. K:\FTL_TPTO\043615000-Riverfront SAP\Report\Riverwalk TIA 08 05 14.docx Page - 48 August 2014 File Number: 15-00624ap City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Final Action Date: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 3 AND 7 OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACRES (444,696 SQ. / FT.) INCLUSIVE OF CITY -OWNED LAND) FOR THE "MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP)", A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 257 AND 243 SW 7 ST, 243 SW 6 ST, 219 SW 7 ST, 224 SW 6 ST, 501 SW 3 AV, 233 SW 7 ST, 242 SW 5 ST, 220 SW 6 ST, 428 SW 3 AV, 401 SW 3 AV, 252 SW 6 ST, 243 SW 4 AV, 255 SW SOUTH RIVER DR, 645 SW 3 AV, 244 SW 6 ST, 330 SW SOUTH RIVER DR, 353 SW 4 ST, 621 SW 3 AV, 260 SW 6 ST, 261 SW 6 ST, 201 SW 6 ST, 201 SW 4 AV, INCLUDING AN EASTERN PORTION OF JOSE MARTI PARK, MIAMI, FLORIDA; AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED; THE MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP) CONSISTS OF A PHASED PROJECT DIVIDED INTO FIVE (5) PARTS WHICH INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 4,181,087 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: A) APPROXIMATELY 1,678 RESIDENTIAL UNITS; B) APPROXIMATELY 330 LODGING UNITS; C) APPROXIMATELY 66,541 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE; D) APPROXIMATELY 176,350 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES; E) APPROXIMATELY 2,376 PARKING SPACES; F) APPROXIMATELY 17 BOAT SLIPS; G) APPROXIMATELY 35,964 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC SPACE; AND H) APPROXIMATELY 15,175 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE; THE MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP) WILL MODIFY THE TRANSECT ZONE REGULATIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT PARCELS, WHERE A SECTION IS NOT SPECIALLY MODIFIED, THE REGULATION AND RESTRICTION OF MIAMI 21 CODE APPLY; THE SQUARE FOOTAGES ABOVE ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY INCREASE OR DECREASE AT OF TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT BUT SHALL NOT EXCEED 4,181,087 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT; AND SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 35,964 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC SPACE, AND A MINIMUM OF 15,175 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACTAND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. LOCATION: Approximately 257 and 243 SW 7 Street, 243 SW 6 Street, 219 SW 7 Street, 224 SW 6 Street, 501 SW 3 Avenue, 233 SW 7 Street, 242 SW 5 Street, 220 SW 6 Street, 428 SW 3 Avenue, 401 SW 3 Avenue, 252 SW 6 Street, 243 SW 4 Avenue, 255 SW South River Drive, 645 SW 3 Avenue, 244 SW 6 Street, 330 SW South River Drive, 353 SW 4 Street, 621 SW 3 Avenue, 260 SW 6 Street, 261 SW 6 Street, 201 SW 6 Street, 201 SW 4 Avenue, and the eastern portion of Jose Marti Park. The project site is within the bounds of the Miami River to the north, SW 7 Street to the south, SW 2 Avenue to the east and SW City of Miami Page I of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 City of Miami 'elf Legislation �tk'.er PZAB Resolution File Number: 15-00624ap City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Final Action Date: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), APPROVING WITH CONDITIONS, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 3 AND 7 OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, THE REZONING OF CERTAIN PARCELS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACRES (444,696 SQ. / FT.) INCLUSIVE OF CITY -OWNED LAND) FOR THE "MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP)", A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 257 AND 243 SW 7 ST, 243 SW 6 ST, 219 SW 7 ST, 224 SW 6 ST, 501 SW 3 AV, 233 SW 7 ST, 242 SW 5 ST, 220 SW 6 ST, 428 SW 3 AV, 401 SW 3 AV, 252 SW 6 ST, 243 SW 4 AV, 255 SW SOUTH RIVER DR, 645 SW 3 AV, 244 SW 6 ST, 330 SW SOUTH RIVER DR, 353 SW 4 ST, 621 SW 3 AV, 260 SW 6 ST, 261 SW 6 ST, 201 SW 6 ST, 201 SW 4 AV, INCLUDING AN EASTERN PORTION OF JOSE MARTI PARK, MIAMI, FLORIDA; AS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A", ATTACHED AND INCORPORATED; THE MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP) CONSISTS OF A PHASED PROJECT DIVIDED INTO FIVE (5) PARTS WHICH INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 4,181,087 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: A) APPROXIMATELY 1,678 RESIDENTIAL UNITS; B) APPROXIMATELY 330 LODGING UNITS; C) APPROXIMATELY 66,541 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE; D) APPROXIMATELY 176,350 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES; E) APPROXIMATELY 2,376 PARKING SPACES; F) APPROXIMATELY 17 BOAT SLIPS; G) APPROXIMATELY 35,964 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC SPACE; AND H) APPROXIMATELY 15,175 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE; THE MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP) WILL MODIFY THE TRANSECT ZONE REGULATIONS THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE SUBJECT PARCELS, WHERE A SECTION IS NOT SPECIALLY MODIFIED, THE REGULATION AND RESTRICTION OF MIAMI 21 CODE APPLY; THE SQUARE FOOTAGES ABOVE ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY INCREASE OR DECREASE AT OF TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT BUT SHALL NOT EXCEED 4,181,087 SQUARE FEET OF DEVELOPMENT; AND SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF 35,964 SQUARE FEET OF CIVIC SPACE, AND A MINIMUM OF 15,175 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE; MAKING FINDINGS OF FACTAND STATING CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; PROVIDING FOR BINDING EFFECT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. LOCATION: Approximately 257 and 243 SW 7 Street, 243 SW 6 Street, 219 SW 7 Street, 224 SW 6 Street, 501 SW 3 Avenue, 233 SW 7 Street, 242 SW 5 Street, 220 SW 6 Street, 428 SW 3 Avenue, 401 SW 3 Avenue, 252 SW 6 Street, 243 SW 4 Avenue, 255 SW South River Drive, 645 SW 3 Avenue, 244 SW 6 Street, 330 SW South River Drive, 353 SW 4 Street, 621 SW 3 Avenue, 260 SW 6 Street, 261 SW 6 Street, 201 SW 6 Street, 201 SW 4 Avenue, and the eastern portion of Jose Marti Park. The project site is within the bounds of the Miami River to the north, SW 7 Street to the south, SW 2 Avenue to the east and SW City of Miami Page I of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 File Number: 15-00624ap 3 Avenue to the west. The City of Miami owns Jose Marti Park, located adjacent to the applicant's 6.2 acres and northwest of SW 3 Avenue, extending northwest of the Miami River and terminating at SW 2 Street. [Commissioner Frank Carrollo - District 3] APPLICANT(S): Melissa Tapanes Llahues, Esq. on behalf of CG Miami River, LLC. Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager, on behalf of the City of Miami, as co -applicant. FINDING(S): PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: Recommends approval with conditions. See supporting documentation. PURPOSE: This will allow the area to be Master Planned to allow a greater integration of public improvements and infrastructure and greater flexibility as part of the "Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP)." WHEREAS, the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) consists of approximately 10.2 ± acres of selected parcels; as described in Exhibit "A" qualifying as a Special Area Plan ("SAP") as per Article 3, Section 3.9 of the Miami 21 Code, (Zoning Ordinance); and WHEREAS, the aforementioned location for the proposed Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) currently contains underutilized buildings and vacant lots. The entire development will consist of approximately 4,181,087 square feet of development; with A) approximately 1,678 residential units; B) approximately 330 Lodging units; C) approximately 66,541 square feet of office space; D) approximately 176,350 square feet of commercial uses; E) approximately 2,376 parking spaces; F) approximately 17 boat slips; G) approximately 35,964 square feet of Civic Space; and H) approximately 15,175 square feet of open space; and WHEREAS, the proposed Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will facilitate the redevelopment and benefit the area by creating residential units, hotel rooms, and commercial uses as well as civic and open space for the enjoyment of the general public; and WHEREAS, the requested Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will integrate public improvements and infrastructure while providing greater flexibility resulting in a higher quality or specialized building and streetscape design; and WHEREAS, projects such as this are critically important to the economic revitalization and enhancement of the City, in general, and specifically the downtown and Little Havana Miami River area; WHEREAS, the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will create certain recurring and non-recurring financial benefits as well as temporary and permanent jobs; and WHEREAS, the Miami Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board (PZAB), at its meeting on June 3, 2015 following an advertised public hearing, adopted Resolution No** by a vote of **, item No. PZAB 6, recommending ** of the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP); and WHEREAS, the City Commission after careful consideration of the matter deems it advisable and in City of Miami Page 2 of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap ([version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 File Number: 15-00624ap the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its citizens to amend its Zoning Ordinance as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Ordinance are hereby adopted by reference thereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) attached hereto, is approved subject to the conditions specified herein, the Miami 21 Code, and the Zoning Ordinance, of the City of Miami. Section 3. The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) includes lower ranking SAP Permits as set forth in the Regulating Plan of the SAP attached hereto as "Exhibit B" which shall be reviewed for approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning. Section 4. The findings of fact set forth below are made with respect to the subject Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP): a. The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) is consistent with the adopted Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, as amended. b. The City Commission further finds that: (1) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will have a favorable impact on the economy of the City; (2) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will efficiently use public transportation facilities; (3) Any potentially adverse effects of the development will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP); (4) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will efficiently use existing public or civic spaces; (5) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will not negatively impact the environment and natural resources of the City; (6) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will not adversely affect living conditions in the neighborhood; (7) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) will not adversely affect public safety; (8) Based on the record presented and evidence presented, the public welfare will be served by the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP); and (9) Any potentially adverse effects arising from this development not limited to safety and security, fire protection, solid waste, heritage conservation and trees will be mitigated through compliance with the conditions of this Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP). Section 5. The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), inclusive of the, Concept Document Exhibit "C", Executive Summary Exhibit "D" and Regulating Plan Exhibit "B", as approved, shall be binding upon the Applicant and any successors in interest. Section 6. The application for Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), which was submitted on April 28, 2015, and on file with the Hearing Boards Section of the Department of Planning and Zoning, shall be relied upon generally for administrative interpretations and is incorporated by reference. Section 7. The City Manager is directed to instruct the Director of Planning and Zoning to transmit a copy of this Ordinance and attachments to the Applicant upon final approval. City of Miami Page 3 of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 File Number: 15-00624ap Section 8. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are made with respect to the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) as described herein and in documents incorporated hereto. Section 9. The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) is granted and approved. Section 10. In the event that any portion or section of this Ordinance or the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance or SAP which shall remain in full force and effect. Section 11. The provisions for this Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), as approved, shall commence and become operative thirty (30) days after the final adoption of the Ordinance. Section 12. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its final adoption and signature of the Mayor, following any applicable appeal period. CONDITIONS Based on analysis and findings, the Department of Planning and Zoning recommends approval of the "Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP)" with the following conditions: 1) Comply with all applicable building codes, land development regulations, ordinances, and other laws and pay all applicable fees due prior to the issuance of any building permit. 2) Allow the Miami Police Department to conduct a security survey, at the Department's discretion, and to make recommendations concerning security measures and systems; further submit a report to the Department of Planning and Zoning, prior to commencement of construction, demonstrating how the Police Department recommendations, if any, have been incorporated into the SAP security and construction plans, or demonstrate to the Director of Planning and Zoning why such recommendations are impractical. 3) Obtain approval from, or provide a letter from the Department of Fire - Rescue indicating Applicant's coordination with members of the Fire Plan Review Section at the Department of Fire - Rescue in the review of the scope of the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), owner responsibility, building development process and review procedures, as well as specific requirements for fire protection and life safety systems, exiting, vehicular access and water supply 4) Obtain approval from, or provide a letter of assurance from the Department of Solid Waste that the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) has addressed all concerns of said Department prior to the obtaining a building permit. 5) Comply with the Minority Participation and Employment Plan (including a Contractor / Subcontractor Participation Plan) submitted to the City as part of the Application for Development Approval, with the understanding that the Applicant must use its best efforts to follow the provisions of the City 's Minority/Women Business Affairs and Procurement Program as a guide, as applicable. 6) Record the following in the Public Records of Dade County, Florida, prior to the issuance of any building permit: a. Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions providing that the ownership, operation, and City of Miami Page 4 of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 File Number: 15-00624ap maintenance of all common areas and facilities will be by the property owner or a mandatory property owner association in perpetuity; and b. Record in the Public Records a Unity of Title or a covenant in lieu of a Unity of Title, if, applicable, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney's Office. 7) Prior to the issuance of any building permit, provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a recorded copy of the documents mentioned in condition (6) above. 8) Provide the Department of Planning and Zoning with a temporary construction plan that address construction phasing and includes the following elements: a. Temporary construction parking plan, with an enforcement policy; b. Construction noise management plan with an enforcement policy; and c. Maintenance plan for the temporary construction site; said plan shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be enforced during construction activity. All construction activity shall remain in full compliance with the provisions of the submitted construction plan; failure to comply may lead to a suspension or revocation of this Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP). As applicable, the developer, of the approved Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) shall be responsible for securing the City's approval for any change or modification to the approved temporary construction plan. Request for approval of any change or modification to the previously approved temporary construction plan shall be submitted for review and approval no later than two weeks to the implementation of such a requested change or modification. 9) Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), the applicant for the SAP shall provide the Department of Planning and Zoning for review for compliance and further approval: a. Sufficiency Letter from the City of Miami, Office of Transportation; b. Final determination of Public School Concurrency and Capacity Reservation; c. Conservation Assessment Report as portions of the project are located within a High Archeological Probability Zone; and d. Proof of compliance with conditions established by the following department or agencies, specifically: o City and County Public Works Departments o Miami -Dade County Water and Sewer o Miami -Dade County Traffic Engineering Division o Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 10) The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP) includes a Development Review Process which address the build out of the individual Buildings as identified in the Regulation Plan. All development within the SAP shall be submitted for the review and approval by the Director of Planning and Zoning prior to the issuance of any building permit consistent with the requirements of Article 3, Section 3.9.1(g) of the Miami 21 Code and the SAP. 11) Within 90 days of the effective date of this Ordinance, record a certified copy of the Development Agreement specifying that the Development Agreement runs with the land and is binding on the Applicant, its successors, and assigns, jointly or severally. 12) The Applicant, shall comply with the conditions identified in the Ordinance, the Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), and all applicable local, state and federal regulations. City of Miami Page 5 of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 File Number: 15-00624ap THE CITY OF MIAMI SHALL: Establish the operative date of this Development Agreement as being thirty (30) days from the date of its final adoption; the final adoption date shall constitute the commencement of the thirty (30) day period to appeal the provisions of the Development Agreement. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP), as approved, complies with the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan as amended, is consistent with the orderly development and goals of the City of Miami, and complies with local land development regulations pursuant to the Miami 21 Code. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: VICTORIA MENDEZ CITY ATTORNEY City of Miami Page 6 of 6 File Id. 15-00624ap (version: 1) Printed On: 5/27/2015 Exhibit "All SAP Application Area (shaded) L I L Miami River SAP Exhibit A: Legal Description of Properties PAR CFL J_ CmwiwxLri�nitNcNofn'hc merofLot? 111acL-_185nu[loothe CRY 13fMigmi.Flad&%Pceard4x1g1ainPIttiIC&—B",ot Pum 4l . of t)hc P ulplit RccmAs of Mi mm, -fir t?nttnt -. F1m Wx r mming 9mtcc Erik altrtrg the South Une aMpuli mt RM Strml in said City ptad=[t 16a too- Iis-h3I0 r,ctiM wish the TOW vrai)cT Iinc of 11m kwiiarmk RiwrT. ntnnrag ihemim Sotub=sw ly m t&.mng the l rw water Iioe of'=d Rrvm I& thepoint whets the Fit 1 me bf Lot 13 of laud Black 39 South prodwed hlorth iwt Twcts -Mlh =id low wain lim. nuthin a'*mae Sauffi la the East conerOf Lit I af:W fleck 38 Somb,tmining dim= N0rdwmSIcft a1mg 11 iot lima afraid Lac I acrd? afsnid Block-USaud tar the-pmntcrr plocc4fbcgmmng. alio -ubmw,,cdLvO Vngbctw= dic above dmcnibcd propcetymd dwchtm d ofthe Vi¢mi Puvm .104 D Lots 1,?,1.1, ; =4 6, to t6 NarCh-PoKkm orTI oUcL 3B Soullr, Ciiy nf>wiiaarri. Cotmty inFMiant[-DWcd Stutz of lu6dn,mgm4inp to thr Pkoithcrmf Trm&d in Plul &A 'WL. ut Paga41.oflhePuhltokecardsofMituaL-thdeCuunnr.Mad& I'AICCLL 11; P==1 I - Lm ]I. 13, 14 MW 15, in R1txk 39 South, of -MLI -P drWitdtti Dude L'a., FL, =;wnijbg to tl c Flak lhcmi)Fk aS Tuatrdrd 1st PU Bmk- "H". wt Pattc4l. of ihtr Public Rccor& urmiflmt-DmdcCwDc t.Fkml& L;SS.-OT,TT LEGAL D£SCR]P'r]ON; That per 4DrL4nl 15. Bl ock 3 g Svulb, of 41ap of ?41 rni DMq Coin Ly. Flo- urs-ordtog tri 1190 Pla t7KMC a. Trxrdcd 1n Ma Boot "8". at 411, draw Public Rc=rds t+F Mintui-Dads CAmnty. F1 mida, in SeCH im K Towwhrp 54 Bogs, Run�rc4l Fiat, AMORE PikIL1 fCULARLY DESCRTRED AS MU[1 - Commemee = the Santitwesx comer of Lot t� Mock 38 South, oCuid Map ofMiaFni bade Cmmn w, Floridt, 4=wc almg *w Swulb bountfary orsdd L.m r 2 mrd a1tmp the Smith brturidmy 4F Lro 13. 14 and T 5 ofamd Bhxk 36 Snitch, also bctng LhC N"t rly till ofwsy Nwof g W. i>o Strict Nara 1'I I" Fast for 168.15 fact to the Poitat ui"Bcgmnlnjr, dumce hiorth;l':" 15"42" Wcst for 766 fbM tbcm c So mb W74419" 9" West for 13,44 feet; ihomceNmili DrI5'42"Wesi far 4140 face ro Ile NortherlybmmdmyofSaid Lat 15; thenar oiang Said Narthalyl y South iwli972Y' E.,t fat .7�j feat is ttpoirtt err a71ne I&r,? + fm Well ormid parMcl %vith the Cityoftwt wni TnmunbmrW,cfar VAL, Snd lav-mm,nl!wb6n, th4r Wcs=lv right of wiry li= taf S.W. 213d Avmlte, k1mcc a1mg U64 lime $outk "T E.ry4 'Fug# far 6.5: fait tfrntcc i«utltitwtirgk altrng lac 5ttuib U `Yl S4_'" Fytst far 7q -Ha fcrr ra mpa-itit <m the ararcs4dd Saatt> b*undxry afscdd Lot t5, ibmccalmig tw� twimdary. a19nbomr,a-Nmetnmlysigh#ofwuy lint: of&jr. fidb Stft�rt.�atttlt lt7"5I'41" t'Vcslie>d 57-02ieet t�thrPart►tot'l��,tna;n� �T+T� That part crFr pp=0 uF and bc4ig aportamofSccaon 3#1.Tmimbip %allL Rapt 41 Easi.Miarrtl-Ikule Cotuiry, Florida- MOPLE PAXTICULARLY VESCRMtO _A�.S FOLLOW& CozR MrrItx nt the SPLLtllwcst cxmtct of LC* 12. Blaclr..38 Su uth, of Map of Mmmi-Dad¢ Ctatmlly. FlvridL. p4xmding La qrc P1s4 tkimmF, as n= d:d i r PtW R�I nk "W. at p$gr 41. of the pude Re=rds arNTIMIN I-na& County. Flerldo: thxricc 4ctttgtllc South bawtdwy asaid Lot 12 and aten?, the 5muh lbmrsndory of m 13, 14, mad 15 nf"4idd Alm& itis Sod&. 111 o being rl�c Narihmly dg4 ofwrk!r b=nf&W, 46 Street, North 117 5t'41 ' act fnr I Ut05 feed Ovnre Noah D2°1312" Wcst fax 76.95 ftc 0owe Solt+ i;7°44'1$*' 11iei for I3,a4 reel+ tbeme cwtintle Nmtb 02'1542- Wee f0r4DA0 fret to TICNortbwer boimdwy of SudIot l5 and rhe Fria ofScgimim Ih mm North "15'4:* Wm Far 3&29 fect� &znce.Norib 87"4VM' raut6r'd-G1 fm,� A nct Sauth Ir -°1T29" past for44A-fi feet; thmet, North lt7-,woo^ t=ask for43.ti1 fectto a-point<m alive lying 35Afett111c9taf&dpatalkl with the cuy a rminmi i•narraMnm line far S K 2,d Avemmw drew%, along scold litw_ 5atrtli ti" -1 S` V 1= for 219S finer to it poir►tafl7ie afar id Nottllcrli• -bbwdory of Lot 15; thcacculcqr,Said Mortlacd)rboumdwyNmth 6"V25' Mr.2 #1x76.78 feat lolaPoam ofHcgirr mg, PortcT , .q� pO rkm nf$ou01 lifer Drive. of t4 ap ormiami. Dtadt: Co, FU- ai eariltng m Lire Plot tli=f, asTcwrdod irk fiat Book "B'. at Pnpn 41, arnt Public L.'tcatdc C'oemty. Flm,d:� >t mje wed by ariliunn cc 09 Frrnn Novcmbcr 11. 1-M being morn putimIsAy dmm"bed fly fot wc! Co=encc at i he Soufl5wt9I cmmfi orl.or I2? $toast 39 SaHItt, arN&V OrNilimrti Dada Ca- Flan-Ttw= %mth 6?°Sl*41" B= za=iq drrSouth 3ntmd:Ry ofmm d Lot 17 and altmg the So 41tl bogadwy grf L-415 1 ].14 Md 15 Of skid flock 3115oitWi, alaolxtttg dit: Nvrtt=bT ti pt of w L¢ we ar S.W. filb Strcxt, NM!Qt 6705 1-0I" Ease !arc 188.15 free tbcacc Nattb 0Z'15' 2" CVcst far 76-ia'fi. fact; thcom South S'T'44'19" WmI for 13.34 fact lhmm monbt 02"P" 1 V3" Wca 40,40 fecL to a ptnnt an The Nonbar2y bawdry ofs6d Lit 15 uud the paint of 13ega=,1h=& cannt=tdarth nz° r S'42' WcSt Ica` 4.* fm mare orlez. to apoilti cm the Narxlr ]ane orGaid South River Drive: tltiencealong c,id North Iktw for tN t'eetwwre or less. Ip a point on the Norffiviy t7ttmft oa of tb r FzSL lima of l nt 13. nl; sand Bkd.3g South; thmm Sourly i)':` OZO. " Fmt a1aog sa;tl No tbosly citmni on or Lag 1 % rcrr69 ka to Lltc tryst.... ref Lot 1, also bring thr Nurarm,1 cornu of Lm 13, 6rmcc SouOi 6d 77' F,4et almm 411 Nertb line of Lits 14 And 15 fir ]SS iC acct ra the kintarReginrttng- pinCl 3' -Lair ti. 9. 10 nhd 11, in R10cL-19,43f City of`W mrri SEkL6. m=o ding w the Mpp ofM =M DLq&Cumtty.Fki6da.rwnrdcd in P'IxMook "Ir. at ltitt41. of the PubTk Rccmdo of Sri iumi-N& County, Miami River SAP Exhibit A: Legal Description of Properties PARCEL u1- Purccl 1- Lot T.Btmk 32 Souilt, CITY OF 1NtI.4MI, uomrdiugra tlrePlan tbrretal% u�,, rmurded in PlIct Roolk 'R", 41'Palm 11, of T}t►1}l�c}tx�adsoilwiittritf~T3�de County. FIOPAM P"el 1, i"r 9, 9 yard H. LICK ; 44 S4ii(l, CITY OF MU)I M a rd"r-t7 to uthr TUI tlttfeof, as recorded in Plat tmil:'B", trt Fane 41, mf the 17itblic Reami, o[ Mimni- lade t:aaentv.Fkrrida ilk 71e1 porrim of Lnt 10, 6l ocl, 413 Sof 'A. L, KNOWLTON ?,lQV OF KI MT", acPcdiuR W the Plat I 4 as TMXTJCd in ?Lzt $antt'rl3". athge 4J, ofdePublic i mmgsflrMtani-bn&caunty,vorlda,boondcdbyVtNordiHim ofsAdLot la,smdliteraltabungihcSahibri�ht�C-�r.tylknrar S. V. &ffi Suzzandby*wWest1ort:ofs¢1dUt112, lintalsobeimdtaEastH(rhr-6f-wnyliremrSAV-1,d Avenue ibyvnurs*mcgkais#ia 5ouakmzrt and rartgnt to the tan de<=—bod two hm*. PARCEL 1V: Lits4 and 5.131W440 ScittM CITY OFhff"Laccorft to the Plattbcrrai; asmw9ded to PlittAo6k 411", at Papc4l.Ofthc Fn1 l -.rr of Miami -Dade Cbtrrrty. Flonda AND Cbnimmci qg at ince Nortbwrocrly e m cr of Lot 3, 3k ck 406, A- i.._)0*10WLTDN ]4l,+wp OF MW4 as Fvnvdcd m f mi Ro "W. at iPupc 4 i, of the P*lie Rctr la D(Mlami-Dade Canmry. Florida, thenrenm Smffi vandty a1nngt1wiVed&y hncafiitmid Lot.}„farmdizux-cafrunc mtdnar&W wm hmdredibs (4.g n twat is u point+ said point being the lanitet or Beginning OCAW hertmufi«�r dr3erllycJ }�aet oi1�d; �®ce mm�Qe �rnah��rc�ly alae the Wsvtaiylimof:iidLot 3.{oradistanceofsixty-Fracmmdatmrburidrtdth(675+.0#1fortioapvnnl,ruedpamtbaatgwvm1 y-fwe175)rcctmweor te99. M0f1hCdv Of tbt SMW kWMterly tbM r a rIPW Lot 9% >;l == dcflcctiag to the ICR 90" Obib5" nW slca8 � ll� s�ttty-tiv� i75A�1 fai+mvrc or 1�, Mort arty of and pm 41 d vt]tlr the S"ihedy line of 9mid Lot 3. ftfty-c4phLliurjdn2dtk4(15.5 u) tett to 0.pnxal? th=Me daflcctinz to the left 111•'°}M145'Tun No ihwet watdly for aditxaarc of forty-skamd ft fly+-alinehurmkt&k [46.59) fed map&natur ,tlxwerun Northwmmattdlw n1nuit the ore ofu cztm c to the left ba-ving at mdius cril`ri W (50M) RXI dad a a=fro] xo jilt af31'3221 " fcrr a Jistmt=+�t' nty�skCn umd fifty-two hundwz tlm. (_>7 *-1 tot pint af+rrt+ soct n tafdt ilia W=Vr1y timarsMid Lot3�ynidpviotbCin tart PokrGl c+f f3 tnutirrg. Cornmrncin uttiltTlorthwttsttrlycornerort.otd.Slack44$.A.4KNOWLTONMAP OFMIAMT.ughordedM Vlm $oast"R".atNL,r4l.ofilir PublHe RemrdS of Mimr4-D.Dde -C*mly, F7MJ;i, ihrmcc rug Fa,ttviuJly Arms the Nuobcrly line a F&ia Lot d, ror a &.um x artwaety-tyro mid ei egbt bun&vdfs("3-2.02M few to aipaiut afcpnT, sat dp0iM areum being the Point of BqdmWg, tFimmnm 5mAbm%w=rd]yakmg dw 0=or51curryto the Tx.v-ht having a Tnjins of fifty (50.110) fart rad a control an* of3 6149'04' for u Jiatniicc nfehirty=ttirpo2nd f}tiom hLmr lits 112.13) fart 10.m pmnr of inkrmcc�flan mMlb tbc EwwlylintofsaidLot41 tbm= run %. urthat-mVy44 ng the ElLa ray RueorSWLot 4,i$wetdi=raceUrO**Old ninen-srven buttdrrdt3K{9-971 f,=tto the Nanhem0crly ctimm afraid Lot 4-rthcnccdct1=&Fig to khc Tek $9"53W' mn %2wgrLtyaloug dip.-Nvrtberly]iae arsmd � a, fire#disunite ofTweitl��curn acid nina:i7-Awc7attndrrdllrs f'-7.951 rtci In ihtPoint nrr3�¢,st�{v�. Cammcncirtg ua 1hwNPTthwc=rly omLr a r l nt:3, Black 40S, A^ 1, KNC WLTO'd MAP OF MIAIML oatmordcd in tit gook "1#", m PhF 4l, aflhe pobTc RcrDr+ds 8rtafinr 6-V Cmmty. Ftaa d2, dmiacu ria dos wm4y along dm 1Vt:sta]y ]mfr ofsoid Lata. frtr u di tntx crftttnr 1f irk seu+� 111tna1trtdit (9. 71 feet to Lpakit. stall print being Qac Pnini afWfintola ihftbt• hftrhtmftcr d c2cn1rd pmrccl cF1m"cncc resrtttnur-.%mdbwm4y zknT the wcmviy bnc a ruW,4 Loi 3. for a di=nm orsimy -0yr ata d one hundredth (65_n t l fret to a poirt,t- tnid poincbeing wventvA we (75.00) fcc%mote or lcptl, Naramly oiCt C Smd memct;y ctr=-of mzid Leat 3: dupcu dQ0cckTq 1n the left 90 depves 4005'rxm ulattlt a line wucnev-five (7M.DD) feet, marc ar lea. Narthet9y ofmo pmztcl with Qac Sau�]actly 11n e m rsadd Lat 1, for a d muwwr of darty -i" =d ffly- gbl MmdrrdKhs (35.SR} flat io apo= 1hmacideceriti f, las the lrft 111 d egmEs 2&4-rmn Nmthweownr4t} for u di,tmsoc of rarsy-M and rtiiy-mot: hmdrerjlh 9 (46,59) fait 19 xWh nl u F a;etnc- f4cnce tun Nunhweawurdly along the am ALcurt+c #a Stu: left WFIR a tzditts Offifry (5t1.G0) feet and amnTraut angle in r3i * fnr a A ac nit tWMty-ocvctx =dF3 Fzy.MO 13uaedMdt5,127-521 Act 3o the poiot of itt=mi an with dm-' L estorJy line tefisaid Lax 3, said paimbeitt g die Paiw of Rgimninp, Burt n r Luta 3 and J, m orr partiaul ly dzerelsc4 z4 (Wow= Begin 21 the SW taarncT OfLix 4; trace rtua North 154 feet to a pod= -Oim ?e Tun Emmet 2? DQ feet mt pakT, fbmiee ym SCmarhngffly aapprm+dtae y SP -66 fart m u prdatr tbtuee Soutb awrly to xpapaiti tbcttex lti'cs"y 3S.Sb Cost to ^per, 44tcr~ Sot a=ly 75 fact; dwncc Wray to Ch e PojMofl 9ttrting;and ALL or Lot 5.;in Week 40, City orlVinail So uth, a rdft tofhc Plittthm*f.•rsroot dedm MA Book"S".at ft" 4T.bfthc Publk Reoard, cf lulimni-DWc C atmty, Flmi& Miami River SAP Exhibit A: Legal Description of Properties PARCEI- V_ t fi mid 17. in >H1ac1.44 SozIh. C1T V OF h+ilAh,#I. a�car�en� to iheplo� th��fi usresc�dexJ in 8aok '"Px , nt P:��c t1, of the Pmbb, Ruwrds or WmT i-rAW� County, Farm. PARCEL V1- imk&li� 1-ot'i K. in M10-ck40 Sora k of CITY OF M tAMlrt zcror4ibg tothepl= titmat = meardcd in M T3oak "13", of Papc4I.afi1ic Prlliv Ruard, of hrfarul-DmIc Coir ar, FlnrldtL FAVI; A pwan afj% 3, in P'loA- 46 , of Crr5' OF h+[T.WL :r=� is iftC Ftlt thcreaf, uS r=mded in VUt Sant= "1#". Ur FaSc 41.0f0w Public 1ktvcrdsof Miurri-Dade County, 1F7 moreporrlau1aT1y down •d u. failnw-n Ri-gin at tlic S«gfhwr 5t ocr vl�f.aC of said Block 40 South. thco� ram �'� alopg the �l�'es[ lilac n(SR0 Lot 3 fort ft n Ct om feet to a raim thcmx tlacSautb lionof said Lut 3 for 35 fflct.marearfess, io terbaykofuside,wull: +�aoSCt tad: tbrnt7cx�ui gnuiheastcrly an aline which titDkmadefection to iliaAg�it of W dqgr=s 30 axinutri with lbetdt dc9cra 4-,q=c ai�dnpprax�r�ri} u]ortg lhebeck oirthc sYdeiavall fnt34 ELIa,iatafrunm: thmec SQUI�C maty <M 1#ac arcof=x d 4tuve to d alo[4 middcun-chavirrg aigdius of" fret mid awmra] Uglc Dr 5 drgrccs 7 6 mhxft-i {L uccands mid apMwimarclv alorStb-b=k ofiaei4 7!ridmvn1k for 6,25 Fcct to the Entlime afsnld LM31 Thence start SdttsbeyakmSthe Eaitt 11th ofLat 3 itrr37 Tfxn is 1hcSatttheercomernf1-ai 3; diieriacnm Werterly aloin We aflath j#pco{ Fant � for -�5 feet tr} khc 1}outt aiBC�oomEG Pew Lai l(j ihnamgh 7G, lneluslrr, ofRTYL-RSTUE 'WATERFRONTS, wcmzHng to thr Plat thr reef u&=mdW to PLL floot; 25. hpsl;'TZ ofthe Public Re amrdsof.Vimtri-DadcCt ty,JFlorida PARCEL VM7, eurmI The South 50 foes of the N M feel bf 1_.ats It and 12 in B1n&: 40 South, "OF h+f11M. aceia%ft to the plat thmear. m momdod in >E}Tst Book 'B" Fair #l, v for Public 1 acsudS of luliA33u=l7aJr OMMty. Flm-kL Icz =J cwt thatporticnoonukre.red to fti-e Smit afF7rtrida br OMCIu7kceartjtlianlclIQ5t 134M3; 7_ P1 Thr %4m -di 50 foes of Lou% 1 T m d 120n in 131"IL 44 Sows h, MAP, OF h+1 A'AT. uoardft to Ihaplw Chr=r, is recosdcdirk Blur Rnok "A" P4,r41, of the 1rtbHc'r�ord5 aFtdiorn�-Tiede Ccaimly.Flarid� pnrocl:� i The South 50 fest of Lots 1 I nod 1? itr BloL'L 4� 5outb, VATk O %4L& 1 G. avmTJhig to the plat tficel; 4 =u dud lu PL- t Bou'L l" 714Pr 41. a f the Pit151ia Re(ords n r 1+ Iami-Do do Calrnry. T1oAk*, Leas and except therrfrcm the iL)%xwinZpwcxl acmvcyod io the Stabs of Flondu for rand TiZhi-of-way. ata &-smlaed m iNd X0.1 worded m Book 31951.13trgt 3057, :znd f1rffiaTdrrsmba4 -V Begin at der S.W. u mar fsiid Lot 1l; tbvo run N.57"5r1'-'5"T. Ocmgthe Saiabet'ly boundwy of said Lot 11, Cnr ndista o af2A Sh Cert to the thu Narilcxt rmd1m-Ag lanFt5 elemeWsutodiucoft5A*feetodatarsgeittbeuigaP&8T50'?s`W'thttaertrm,Snuthweaietly,WeOC*midNwdMrt'.t*i} a>uxngthtoarof said 67mllffvurvvtoskri� tbroto arc4nualari4cofd915-11w11F6rzLdis=4cof3421fpctto pofrtof ywdapoina ontho Vh'sstcly baimdaty of5dd Lut 11; thence run S_M"15`1.4"I=. olon$ said Wemerry h tmdm.v fcrrn dl=mtel a r*a_96 fat ra dhc Polntof Ber ming. A11 ofold lands sitamte. "R and being in [U imr!&Dn& County. nririd% EXHIBIT B MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN Miami River will be a mixed use development bound on the North by the Miami River, on the South by SW 7 Street, on the East by SW 2nd Avenue, and on the West by SW 3rd Avenue. The project will consist of five (5) phases of development, which will include four sixty -story towers, two three-story structures, and an active public riverwalk ("the Project"). The Project will feature recreational and commercial working waterfront, commercial, office, residential and lodging uses. The Project's focal point is the Miami River and the public riverwalk promenade, which extends from the Property into the City of Miami's Jose Marti Park. Each phase is designed to be unique and attractive from any vantage, however, special treatment is reserved for the Miami River facades. In particular, the developer is proposing to activate the riverfront with public access boats slips, recreational and commercial working waterfront establishments, and public gathering spaces, including an outdoor theater with wall -cast opportunity, roundabouts, and sculptures. Verdant landscaping including green roofs, cohesive hardscaping and street furniture, and public amenities will create a sense of place that residents, patrons and visitors will flock to, both by land and river. The unique working waterfront vistas will be enjoyed by boaters and pedestrians alike, ultimately creating a sense of vibrancy along the Miami River Corridor. Additionally, the developer is proposing a host of public improvements to the Project area, the SAP area and its surrounding environs. These improvements include creating a new public riverwalk promenade that extends from the SW 2nd Avenue Bridge through Jose Marti Park as well as significant improvements to existing public open space areas at both Jose Marti Park and the Miami Riverside Center, across the Miami River. New amenities include the creation of streetscapes with pedestrian and cyclist access throughout the Special Area Plan ("SAP") area, significant improvements to Jose Marti Park, and the creation of public gathering spaces along the Miami River and throughout the Project area. The cohesive design of the proposed public amenities and semi- public low-rise structures abutting the Miami River will create a sense of place for residents and visitors alike. Further, the developer is proposing to encourage access of the project both by land and water. This includes proposed improvements to 1-95, SW 7 Street, and SW 3 Avenue; the introduction of an additional access way to the Miami River, through the center of the developer's property, referred to as 2.5 Avenue; and the establishment of an on-site City of Miami Trolley stop. From the Miami River, the developer is proposing to permit public mooring access to the permitted slips within the project, which will provide boaters with direct access to the retail, restaurant, and riverwalk amenities immediately adjacent to the Miami River. The developer is also proposing a water taxi stop, which will provide residents, patrons and visitors without access to private watercraft an opportunity to access the project from the river and encourage transit from Bayside and Marlins Stadium. The Project will become a destination that benefits the Miami River Corridor and also the City's residents who will enjoy the increased access and vistas to the Miami River. The development goals include: • Activate the riverfront with a beautiful and cohesive riverwalk which pedestrian and cyclist enjoyment, as well as neighborhood connectivity; • Facilitate sustainable redevelopment within the downtown area; • Promote civic, economic, and cultural activities along the Miami River; and • Improve safety within the Riverfront area and its environs through lighting and activation of SAP spaces. Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SPECIAL AREA PLAN: REGULATING PLAN 1.1 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS Buildout: The construction sequence of building components on a particular site. For the Miami River SAP, Phase I consists of construction of the tower on the northwest portion of the SAP, Phase 2 consists of the construction of two three-story structures and an active riverwalk, Phase 3 the construction of a second tower on the southwest portion of the SAP, while Phases 4 and 5 consist of the construction of towers on the northeast and southeast portions of the SAP, respectively. Phases 3, 4, and 5 do not need to occur sequentially. Design Guidelines: Plans, drawings, and diagrams which accompany and illustrate the intent of this Regulating Plan. Maximum Floorplate Envelope: Configuration of the use of floor plates will change dependent upon tenant leasing plan. Certain areas of the floor plates may be leased while others may not be built out leaving additional open air space. The space plan or use of the floor plate envelope may be modified based upon future leasing and use, up to the maximum envelope described in this Regulating Plan. Regulating Plan: Modifications of the underlying Miami 21 Transect Zone regulations for the lots included in this SAP. SAP: The Miami River Special Area Plan specifically described in this Regulating Plan and the accompanying Design Guidelines. SAP Permit: an administrative permit issued by the Planning Director approving a modification to the provisions of this Regulating Plan and/or Miami River SAP Chapter 163 Development Agreement of more than ten percent (10%) or any deviation deemed to be a major modification by the Planning Director. A modification to the development program, Miami River SAP Chapter 163 Development Agreement, or Miami River SAP Public Benefits Bonus Program shall not, in and of itself, be deemed a major modification. SAP Permits must be consistent with the guiding principles of Miami 21. Any application for a SAP Permit must be submitted to the Planning Department and follow the Warrant procedure delineated in Article 7 of Miami 21. Any changes of less the ten percent (10%) or any deviation deemed to be a minor modification by the Planning Director may be administratively approved by the Zoning Administrator without a SAP Permit through a determination or submitted to the Office of Zoning and follow the Waiver procedure delineated in Article 7 of Miami 21. Shared Street: a private right of way designed for shared pedestrian and vehicular uses. Shared streets shall include amenities which emphasize and enhance the pedestrian experience, including attractive landscape elements, hardscape elements, and streetscape features inclusive of traffic calming elements. Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U R B A N D I S T R I C T S C I V I C OUTBUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front b. Secondary Front c. Side d. Rear PRIVATE FRONTAGES a. Common Law b. Porch & Fence c. Terrace or L.C. d. Forecourt e. Stoop f. Shopfront g. Gallery h. Arcade BUILDING HEIGHT Stories a. Principal Building b. Outbuilding c. Benefit Height Abutting T6, T5 & T4 only prohibited prohibited prohibited permitted permitted permitted (T6-36 L, T6-36 0) Mz�permitted permitted ** permitted ** 2 min. 36 max. 00 24 max.** LOT OCCUPATION prohibited a. Lot Area 5,000 sf. min. permitted 10,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 100 ft. min. permitted ** 100 ft. min. c. Lot Coverage 811% ma--** 90% max 85% max.** d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) a.12 or b.22 /40% additional Public Benefit * e. Frontage at front Setback 70% min. None f. Open Space Requirements 10% Lot Area min. 5% Lot Area min. g. Density 150 du/ac* BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front 10 ft. min. 5 ft. min.`* b. Secondary Front 10 ft. min. 5 ft. min.** c. Side 0 ft. min.** 0 ft. min.** d. Rear 0 ft. min.** Oft. min. - OUTBUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front b. Secondary Front c. Side d. Rear PRIVATE FRONTAGES a. Common Law b. Porch & Fence c. Terrace or L.C. d. Forecourt e. Stoop f. Shopfront g. Gallery h. Arcade BUILDING HEIGHT Stories a. Principal Building b. Outbuilding c. Benefit Height Abutting T6, T5 & T4 only prohibited prohibited prohibited permitted permitted permitted (T6-36 L, T6-36 0) Mz�permitted permitted ** permitted ** 2 min. 36 max. 00 24 max.** prohibited prohibited permitted permitted permitted permitted ** permitted ** none 8 max. * Oras modified in Article 4, Diagram 9 of this Regulating Plan * * Note: Refer to Article 5 of th is Regulating Plan for Specific Transect Zone Regulations. *** Note: Bonus shall not be available for T6 properties abutting T3 properties (referto Article 3) 3 Revision 4-30-15 ARTICLE 4. TABLE 3 BUILDING FUNCTION USES: MODIFICATION FOR MIAMI RIVER SAP AREA, T3 T4 T5 SUB -URBAN URBAN GENERAL URBAN CENTER DENSITY (UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE COMMUNITY RESIDENCE ANCILLARY UNIT TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE MULTI FAMILY HOUSING DORMITORY HOME OFFICE LIVE - WORK WORK- LIVE LODGING BED &BREAKFAST INN HOTEL OFFICE OFFICE COMMERCIAL AUTO -RELATED COMMERCIAL ESTAB. ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENT ENTERTAINMENT ESTAB. - ADULT FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SERVICE ESTAB. GENERAL COMMERCIAL MARINE RELATED COMMERCIAL ESTAB. OPEN AIR RETAIL PLACE OF ASSEMBLY RECREATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT CIVIC COMMUNITY FACILITY RECREATIONAL FACILITY RELIGIOUS FACILITY REGIONAL ACTIVITY COMPLEX CIVIL SUPPORT COMMUNITY SUPPORT FACILITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITIES MAJOR FACILITY MARINA PUBLIC PARKING RESCUE MISSION TRANSIT FACILITIES EDUCATIONAL CHILDCARE COLLEGE/ UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LEARNING CENTER MIDDLE / HIGH SCHOOL PRE-SCHOOL RESEARCH FACILITY SPECIAL TRAINING/ VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL AUTO -RELATED INDUSTRIAL ESTBL. MANUFACTURING AND PROCESSING MARINE RELATED INDUSTRIAL ESTBL. PRODUCTS AND SERVICES STORAGE/ DISTRIBUTION FACILITY T6 URBAN CORE D DISTRICTS R Allowed By Right Uses may be further modified by Supplemental Regulations, State Regulations, or other provisions of WAllowed By Warrant: Administrative Process - CRC (Coordinated Review Committee) this Code. See City Code Chapter 4 for regulations related to Alcohol Beverage Service Estab. E Allowed By Exception: Public Hearing - granted by PZAB (Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board) Additional densities in some T6 zones are illustrated in Diagram 9. Boxes with no designation signify Use prohibited. "AZ: Density of IowestAbutting Zone 4 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING D - DISTRICT DENSITY (UPA) � NIA CIVIC Civic Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 5 seats of assembly uses. • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 1,000 sf of exhibition or recreation space, and parking spaces for other Uses as required. • Parking requirement maybe reduced according to the Shared Parking Standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. • Parking ratio may be reduced within'/ mile radius of TOD or within ''% mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%) as of right • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet ^^' ^ T'^^^^^+ ^^^ n by • Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. CIVIL SUPPORT Civil Support Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited bycompliance with: • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 1,000 sf. of Civil Support Use. • Parking requirement maybe reduced according to the Shared Parking Standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. • Minimum of 1 parking space for every 5 seats for assembly uses. • Minimum of 1 parking space forevery 5 slips for marine Uses. • Adult Daycare - Minimum off space perstaff member. • Parking ratio may be reduced within 1/2 mile radius of TOD or within ''% mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%) as of right • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet ^^ ^ T^^^^^^+�� PwOSS oWaive r. • Loading -See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. 6 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING D - DISTRICT DENSITY A) Educational Uses are permissible as listed in Table EDUCATIONAL EDUCATIONONAL 3, limited bycompliance with: • Minimum of 2 parking spaces for every 1,000 sf of educational Use. • Parking requirement maybe reduced according to the Shared Parking Standard, Article 4, Table 5. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. • Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD or within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%) as of right 00 ^pt when 6 to 6 w tki^ Gnn f^^f -; Ta • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet and in Tran^^^f '^n^ ^ by PFGGeGG of Waive r . •Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. INDUSTRIAL Industrial Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited bycompliance with: • Please referto Article6 for additional specific requirements. • Minimum of 1 parking spaces forevery 1,000sfof Industrial Use, except for Commercial Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 10,000 square feet with a minimum of 8 parking spaces. • Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared Parking Standard, Article 4, Table 5, except for Public Storage Facilities. • Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. • Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD or within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%) as of righter • Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet and 'n Tran^^^f '^n^ D by PFOGeSS of Waive . • Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING T6 - URBAN CORE ZONE DENSITY (UPA) I 750 - 7,000 UNITS PER ACRE RESIDENTIAL Residential Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: Minimum of 1.5 parking spaces per Dwelling Unit. Minimum of 1 additional visitor parking space for every 10 Dwelling Units. • Live -work - Work component shall provide parking as required by the non- residential use in addition to parking required for the Dwelling Unit. Adult Family -Care Homes- Minimum 1 space per staff member and 1 space per 4 residents. Community Residence- Minimum of 1 parking space per staff member in addition to the parking required for the principal Dwelling Unit(s). Parking requirement may be reduced according to the shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD or within % mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (301/6), as of righty -prase&& of waiye. e ,.,h en Ta is within 500 feet of Tz In T6-60 & T6-80, parking for residential Uses located within 1,000 feet of a Metrorail or Metromover station shall not be required. Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1000 feet by rocess aiver, xcept when site is within 500 et of T3. pLoading - See Article 4, Table Regulating 5 of this Regulatge Plan. LODGING /` Lodging Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. Minimum of 1 parking space for every 2 lodging units. Minimum of 1 additional visitor parking space for every 15 lodging units. Parking requirement may be reduced according to the shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD orwithin'/a mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%), as of right by-PFasess of W„y8F apt,. when Ta s ate n 500 feet of Tz Parking may be provided ownership or lease offsite within 1,000 feet by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. „ Loading -See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. OFFICE //Fr%/r{`/`//%/%/ Office Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3. * Or as modified in Diagram 9 Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of office use, except in T6-24, T6-36 and T6-48, a minimum of 1 parking space for every 800 square feet of office use shall be provided In T6-60andT6-80,aminimumoflparking spaceforevery 1,000 square feet of office use shall be provided Parking requirement may be reduced according to the shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. Parking ratio may be reduced within % mile radius of TOD orwithin ''/a mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (301/o), as of nghtky-presessef W.,VGF, exGept when Ta s within 500 feet of Tz Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1,000 feet by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. 8 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING T6 - URBAN CORE ZONE DENSITY (UPA) 750 UNITS PER ACRE COMMERCIAL Commercial Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: A maximum area of 55,000 square feet per establishment, except for Public Storage Facilities. Minimum of 3 parking spaces for every 1,000 square feet of commercial use, except for Public Storage Facilities, minimum 1 parking space for every 10,000 square feet with a minimum of 8 parking spaces. Parking requirement may be reduced according to the Shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5, except for Public Storage Facilities. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. Auto -related- Drive-Thru or Drive -In Facilities - SeeArticl a 6. • Parking ratio maybe reduced within % mile radius of TOD or within 1/4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%), as of richt* Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1,000 feet by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Reg ulatinq Plan. CIVIC Civic Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with: Minimum of 1 parking space for every 5 seats of assembly uses. Minimum of 1 parking space for every 1,000 square feet of exhibition or recreation area, and parking spaces for other Uses as required. Parking requirement may be reduced according to the shared parking standard, Article 4, Table 5. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spaces required. Parking ratio may be reduced within Y mile radius of TOD or within 1/4 mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (301/o) by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1,000 feet by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. CIVIL SUPPORT Civil Support Uses are permissible as listed in Table 3, limited by compliance with:. Minimum of 1 parking space for every 1000 square feet of Ci Support Use. Minimum of1 parking space for every 5 seats ofassembly use. Minimum of 1 parking space for every 5 slips of marine use. Adult Daycare - Minimum of 1 space per staff member. Parking requirement may be reduced according to the shared parki standard, Article 4, Table 5. Minimum of 1 Bicycle Rack Space for every 20 vehicular spac required. Parking ratio may be reduced within Y mile radius of TOD or within mile radius of a Transit Corridor by thirty percent (30%) by process Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Parking may be provided by ownership or lease offsite within 1,0 feet by process of Waiver, except when site is within 500 feet of T3. Loading - See Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. * Please refer to Diagram 9 9 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING T6 - URBAN CORE ZONE 10 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ARTICLE 4. TABLE 5 BUILDING FUNCTION: PARKING AND LOADING SHARED PARKING STANDARDS SHARING FACTOR T5, T6, CS, CI -HD & CI Function with Function RESIDENTIALWEIDENTIAL WAY TRAFFIC DOUBLELOADED LODGINGGING 223ft OFFICEICE 223 ft COMMERCIALMERCIAL 12.8 ft 11.8 It 19.3 ft 45 10.8 ft 9.5 ft 18.5 ft OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS ANGLE OF PARKING T5, T6, CS, CI -HD & CI ACCESS AISLE WIDTH DISTRICT ONE WAY ONE WAYTWO TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SINGLE LOADED DOUBLELOADED WAY TRAFFIC DOUBLELOADED 90 223ft 223 ft 223 ft 60 12.8 ft 11.8 It 19.3 ft 45 10.8 ft 9.5 ft 18.5 ft Parallel loft loft 20 ft Standard stall: 8.5 ft x 18 It minimum The shared Parking Standards Table provides the method for calculating shared parking for buildings with more than one Use type. It refers to the parking requirements that appear in Table 4. The parking required for any two Functions on a Lot is calculated by dividing the number of spaces required by the lesser of the two uses by the appropriate factor from this Table and adding the result to the greater use parking requirement. For instance: for a building with a Residential Use requiring 100 spaces and a Commercial Use requir- ing 20 spaces, the 20 spaces divided by the sharing factor of 1.2 would reduce the total requirement to 100 plus 17 spaces. For uses not indicated in this chart on a mixed use lot a sharing factor of 1.1 shall be allowed. Additional sharing is allowed by Warrant • Driveways shall have a minimum of 10 feet of paved width of a one-way drive and 20 feet for a two-way drive for parking area providing 10 or more stalls. • Pedestrian entrances shall be at least 3 feet from stall, driveway or access aisle. • Allowable slopes, paving, and drainage as per Florida Building Code. • Off-street Parking facilities shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 7 feet. Where such a facility is to be used by trucks or loading Uses, the minimum clearance shall be 12 feet Residential and 15 feet Commercial and Industrial. • Ingress vehicular control devices shall be located so as to provide a minimum driveway of 20 feet in length between the Base Building Line and dispenser. • For requirements of parking lots, refer to Article 9 and the City of Miami Off-street Parking Guides and Standards. LOADING BERTH STANDARDS T5, T6, CS, CI -HD & CI DISTRICT NOTES RESIDENTIAL* From 25,000 sf to 500,000 sf Berth Types Berth Size Loading Berths Residential*: 200 sf = 10 ft x 20 ft x 12 ft 420 sf 1 per first 100 units Commercial**: 420 sf = 12 ft x 35 ft x 15 ft 200 sf 1 per each additional 100 units or fraction of 100. Industrial***: 660 sf=12 ft x 55 ft x 15 ft Greater than 500,000 sf " Residential loading berths shall be set back Berth Size Loading Berths a distance equal to their length. 660 sf 1 per first 100 units 200 sf 1 per each additional 100 units or 1 Commercial berth may be substituted by fraction of 100. 2 Residential berths *** 1 Industrial berth may be substituted by 2 LODGING From 25,000 sf to 500,000 sf From 25,000 sf to 500,000 sf Commercial berths. Berth Size Loading Berths Berth Size Loading Berths Industrial berths may be located on in 420 sf 1 per 300 rooms 420 sf 1 per 300 rooms on -street loading areas provided 200 sf 1 per 100 rooms 200 sf 1 per 100 rooms deliveries are made within dedicated Greater than 500,000 sf Greater than 500,000 sf hours of operation: 6am to 11am. Berth Size Loading Berths Berth Size Loading Berths 660 sf 1 per 300 rooms 660 sf 1 per 300 rooms A required Industrial or Commercial loading 200 sf 1 per 100 rooms 200 sf 1 per 100 rooms berth may be substituted by a Commercial or Residential loading berth, by Waiver, if OFFICE From 25,000 sf to 500,000 sf From 25,000 sf to 500,000 sf the size, character, and operation of the COMMERCIAL" Berth Size Loading Berths Area Berth Size Loading Berths Area Use is found to not require the dimensions INDUSTRIAL— 420 sf 1st 25Ksf-50Ksf 420 sf 1st 25Ksf- 50Ksf specified and the required loading berth 420 sf 2nd 50Ksf-100Ksf 420 sf 2nd 50Ksf- 100Ksf dimension could not otherwise be provided according to the regulations of this Code. 420 sf 3rd 100Ksf-250Ksf 420 sf 3rd 100K sf-250K sf 420 sf 4th 250Ksf- 500K sf 420 sf 4th 250K sf - 500K sf Greater than 500,000 sf Greater than 500,000 sf Berth Size Loading Berths Area Berth Size Loading Berths Area 660 sf 1 / 500K sf 660 sf 1 / 500K sf 11 Revision 4-30-15 ARTICLE 4. DIAGRAM 9 RESIDENTIAL DENSITY INCREASE AREAS REFER TO MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN OMNI 500 units/acre SEOPW 300 units/acre CBD 1,000 units/acre RIVER QUADRANT 500 units/acre LITTLE HAVANA 200 units/acre BRICKELL 500 units/acre 12 Revision 4-30-15 a. Principal Front 5 ft. min. MIAMI RIVER SAP: ILLUSTRATION 5.10 WATERFRONT DISTRICT (D-3) BUILDING DISPOSITION c. Side BUILDING PLACEMENT LOT OCCUPATION 0 ft. min. or abutting zone e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 & T6 a. Lot Area 10,000 s.f. min. e94Ild3ry FrOf11_._._._._. ._._._._._._._._� igt i 5 rrdn b. Lot Width 30 ft min. Cane€� i 6' rin. �d a 3rd 0 mek Lao c. Lot Coverage 90% max. - v d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) N/A b. Max. Height e. Frontage at front Setback None Q min. inVurLut �-- i f. Open Space 5% Lot Area min. (Y i 9. Density N/A _ H 191 2nd 31d BUILDING SETBACK layer ager layer a. Principal Front 5 ft. min. b. Secondary Front 5 ft. min. c. Side 0 ft. min. or abutting zone d. Rear 0 ft. min. or abutting zone e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 & T6 0 ft. min. 1'through 61" Story Abutting Side or Rear T4 6 ft. min. 11 through 31 Story 26 ft. min. above 3`°Story Abutting Side or Rear T3 6 ft. min. 11through 2n° Story 26 ft. min. above 31 Story f. Waterfront (supersedes other 50 ft. min. for enclosed structures Setback requirements) 25 ft. min for open terraces, stairs, and balconies BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. permitted d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted 9. Gallery permitted by Special Area Plan h. Arcade permitted by Special Area Plan BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height None b. Max. Height 8 Stories max. c. Max. Benefit Height N/A PARKING PLACEMENT _dryFm_._._._._._ 1st 3 mh i Lam Comer W Umh 2nd&3d LMV-------- P mh. InkwLa[ L._. i i L _ Uri. i HSN � 1a1 2rd ad eyer ker layer RI III DING; HFI(' HT ABUTTING SIDE&REARALLZONESEKCEFrT6,T5,T4&T3 ASIlfTINGSUE & REAR T5&T6 ABUTIlNO 51 DE&REAR T4 ABlE1RlGS®EBREAR73 13 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ILLUSTRATION 5.10 WATERFRONT DISTRICT (D-3) 5.10 WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONES (D3) 5.10.1 Building Disposition (D3) a. Newly platted Lots shall be dimensioned according to Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating Plan. b. Lot coverage by Building shall not exceed that shown in Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating Plan. c. A Building shall be disposed in relation to the boundaries of its Lot according to Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating Plan. d. One or more Buildings may be built on each Lot as shown in Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating e. Setbacks for Buildings shall be as described in the City of Miami Charter, Section 3(mm) and Illustration 5.10 of this SAP Regulating Plan shewn in 4rtisle 4, Table _2 and- iii istrt+e 5.10.2 Building Configuration (D3) a. Development within Private Frontages shall comply with Illustration 5.10. b. Encroachments shall be as follows: At the First Layer, cantilevered Awnings and entry canopies may encroach up to one hundred percent (100%) of the depth of the Setback, except as may be further allowed by Chapter 54 of the City Code; cantilevered balconies, bay windows, and roofs may encroach up to a three (3) feet depth of the Setback, except for Waterfront Setbacks. Waterfront setbacks shall be as described in Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating Plan. Other cantilevered portions of the Building shall maintain the required Setback. At the Second Layer, no encroachments are permitted except that Facade components promoting energy efficiency such as shading and screening devices that are non -accessible may encroach a maximum of three (3) feet. c. Galleries and Arcades shall be a minimum fifteen (15) feet deep and may encroach up to one hundred percent (100%) of the depth of the Setback_, a d may be Fequirod as a part of SpeGial pro, Pi;r Galleries and Arcades s4a44may occupy up to fifty percent (50%) of Waterfront Ssetbacks as shown in the Design Guidelines. d. Except for the Waterfront Frontage, all storage, utility and infrastructure elements including service areas, Loading space, transformers, telephone boxes, garbage cans, dumpsters, condensers, meters, backflow preventers, siamese connections and the like shall be located within the Second or Third Layer and concealed from view from any Frontage or Sidewalk by Streetscreens, and opaque gates. Loading and service entries shall be accessed from Alleys when available. e. Vehicular entries, Loading space and service areas shall be permitted on Principal Frontages. Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 and be allocated as required in Illustration 5.10 of this Regulating Plan. Industrial uses requiring additional Height in D3 may be permitted by Waiver, subject to the Planning Director's agreement that the applicant has demonstrated that the use specifically requires the proposed Height. g. Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be enclosed by parapets of a minimum Height required to conceal mechanical equipment. Other ornamental Building features may extend above the 14 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ILLUSTRATION 5.10 WATERFRONT DISTRICT (D-3) maximum Building Height. Roof decks shall be permitted up to the maximum Height. Trellises may extend above the maximum Height up to eight (8) feet. Extensions above the maximum Height for stair, elevator and mechanical enclosures or ornamental purposes only shall be permitted by process of Waiver. Streetscreens shall be between three and a half (3.5) and eight (8) feet in Height. The Streetscreen may be replaced by a hedge or fence. Streetscreens shall have openings no larger than neces- sary to allow automobile and pedestrian access. Parking, loading, service, utility, and storage areas and uses shall be screened from view of abut- ting zoning districts (other than D1 and D2 Zones), including shade trees spaced a minimum of thirty (30) feet on center. Screening shall not be required along the waterfront. 5.10.3 Building Function & Density (D3) a. Buildings shall conform to the Functions, Densities, and Intensities described in Article 4, Tables 3 and 4 and Illustration 5.1034 of this Regulating Plan. 5.10.4 Parking Standards (D3) a. Vehicular parking shall be required as shown in Article 4, Tables 4 and 5 of this Regulating Plan Article 4, Tables Q and! it and- III ustra+inn 5_10 and or+,,.Io a Required parking may be provided Provided by ownership, through a Covenant in Lieu of Unity of Title, or offsite lease within 1,000 feet of the proposed use. b. On -street parking available along the Frontage Lines that correspond to each Lot shall be counted toward the parking requirement of the Building on the Lot. c. All parking, including open parking areas, covered parking, garages, Loading spaces and service areas shall be masked from the Frontage by a Streetscreen as illustrated in Article 4, Table 8 of Miami 21. Underground parking may extend into the Second and First Layers only if it is fully underground and does not require raising the first -floor elevation of the First and Second Layers above that of the Sidewalk. d. Buildings mixing uses shall provide parking required for each Use. Shared Parking shall be calculated according to Article 4, Table 5 of this �ARRegulating Plan. 5.10.5 Architectural Standards (D3) a. Temporary structures shall be permitted only as per City Code. b. Roof materials should be light-colored, high Albedo or a planted surface. 5.10.6 Landscape Standards (D3) a. The First Layer as shown in Illustration 3.1 Artiele 4, Table 6 -shall be paved and landscaped substantially in accordance with the Streetscaoes as shown on Daaes L-6 throuah L-10 of Book 15 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: ILLUSTRATION 5.10 WATERFRONT DISTRICT (D-3) 2 of this -Regulating Plan to m.a4nh the Di,hlin Crc4pt a as shewp in Utmdo Q Table G b. Unpaved green space shall be a minimum five percent (5%) of the total Lot Area. 5.10.7 Ambient Standards (D3) a. Noise regulations shall be as established in the City Code. b. Average lighting levels measured at the Building Frontage shall not exceed 1.0 fc (foot-candles). c. Lighting of Building and Abutting Open Spaces shall be compatible with street lighting of Abutting public spaces as illustrated in Article 8 of Miami 21. Interior garage lighting fixtures shall not be visible from streets. d. The lighting fixtures of exposed rooftop parking shall be concealed by a parapet wall and shall not be seen from surrounding streets. 16 Revision 4-30-15 BUILDING DISPOSITION LOT OCCUPATION MIAMI RIVER SAP: ILLUSTRATION 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6-3 BUILDING PLACEMENT PARKING PLACEMENT a. Lot Area 5,000 s.f. min. b. Lot Width 100 it min. c. Lot Coverage 0 ft. min., 200 ft. min. above 81" Story -1-8 Stories 850% max. -Above 8t' Story 2049,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Residential & Lodging 30,000 sq. ft. max. Floorplate for Office & Commercial d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) T6 -36a: 12 / 40% additional Public Benefit T6 -36b: 22 / 40% additional Public Benefit e. Frontage at front Setback 70% min. f. Open Space 10% Lot Area min. 9. Density 400150 du/ac max.* BUILDING SETBACK a. Principal Front 10 ft. min., 20 ft. min. above b. Secondary Front 10 ft. min., 20 ft. min. above 8t' Story c. Side 0 ft. min., 200 ft. min. above 81" Story d. Rear 0 ft. min., 230 ft. min. above 8`" Story 2a- - ._.-�- laitii.i 1� i -._._._._._._._._._.i 1� other setback requirements) 9. Gallery permitted by Special Area Plan h. Arcade permitted by Special Area Plan ■�Wir� 21� i 1a orcin, uffk Parch i 25' nti. ! zo mm i ! s �rcn. zo mm r ! ! I aM9 r r i r ! it 2.1 3rd fet 2rkd 3rd LW L*' L*' � � Lex a. Principal Front 10 ft. min., 20 ft. min. above b. Secondary Front 10 ft. min., 20 ft. min. above 8t' Story c. Side 0 ft. min., 200 ft. min. above 81" Story d. Rear 0 ft. min., 230 ft. min. above 8`" Story e. Abutting Side or Rear T5 0 ft. min. 11 through 511 Story 10 ft. min. 61 through 8'" Story 30 ft. min. above 8" Story f. Waterfront (supersedes 50 ft. min. 111 story 25 ft. min. 2nd Story and above other setback requirements) 9. Gallery 8r"story BUILDING HEIGHT BUILDING CONFIGURATION FRONTAGE a. Common Lawn prohibited b. Porch & Fence prohibited c. Terrace or L.C. prohibited d. Forecourt permitted e. Stoop permitted f. Shopfront permitted (T6-36 L and T6-36 0 only) 9. Gallery permitted by Special Area Plan h. Arcade permitted by Special Area Plan BUILDING HEIGHT a. Min. Height 2 Stories b. Max. Height 36 Stories c. Max. Benefit Height 24 Stories Abutting all Transects Zones except T3 * Or as modified in Diagram 9 60 MUTTIM SIDE AFW AlZMED=M T4M Aaur MSCEAWM TS 17 Revision 4-30-15 ■�Wir� MUTTIM SIDE AFW AlZMED=M T4M Aaur MSCEAWM TS 17 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: T6 ZONE REGULATIONS 5.6 URBAN CORE TRANSECT ZONES (T6) 5.6.1 Building Disposition (T6) a. Newly platted Lots shall be dimensioned according to Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan. b. Lot coverage by any Building shall not exceed that shown in Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating c. Buildings shall be disposed in relation to the boundaries of their Lots according to Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan. d. Buildings shall have their principal pedestrian entrances on a Frontage Line or from a courtyard at the Second Layer. e. For the minimum Height, Facades shall be built parallel to the Principal Frontage Line along a minimum of seventy percent (70%) of its length on the Setback Line as shown in Illustration 3.2. In the absence of Building along the remainder of the Frontage Line, a Streetscreen shall be built co -planar with the Fagade to shield parking and service areas. In the case of two (2) or three (3) Principal Frontages meeting at Thoroughfare intersections, the Building corner may recede from the designated Setback up to twenty percent (20%) of the Lot length. f. At the first Story, Facades along a Frontage Line shall have frequent doors and windows; pedes- trian entrances shall occur at a maximum spacing of seventy five (75) feet and vehicular entries shall occur at a minimum spacing of 4yethree and one half (3.5) sixty 1 et �4ess as shown in the Design Guidelines. g. Setbacks for Buildings shall be as shown in Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan. Where the property to be developed abuts a Structure other than a Sign, a Waiver may be granted so the proposed Structure matches the ground level dominant setback of the block and its context. Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor for Lots having one (1) dimension measuring one hundred (100) feet or less may be a minimum of zero (0) feet by Waiver. For T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80, the Frontage Setbacks above the eighth floor shall not be required for a Frontage facing a Civic Space or a Right -of -Way seventy (70) feet or greater in width. At property lines Abutting a lower Transect Zone the Setbacks shall reflect the transition as shown in Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan. h. Above the eighth floor, minimum building spacing sixty (60) feet, except that where the Build- ing abuts T5, the sixty (60) feet required spacing shall be above the fifth floor. For T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 Lots having one dimension one hundred (100) feet or less, side and rear Setbacks above the eighth floor may be reduced to a minimum of twenty (20) Foo+ by VVai) o For T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 above the eighth floor in the Second Layer, at a setback of ten (10) feet, an additional two stories of habitable space may extend a maximum sixty percent (60%) of the length of the street Frontages. For T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 above the eighth floor an additional six feet of non -habitable space may be allowed without additional setback to accommodate depth of swimming pools, landscaping, transfer beams, and other structural and mechanical systems. i. For sites with three hundred and forty (340) feet Frontage length or more, a Ceross-$lock passage shall be provided as follows: If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point more than three hundred and forty (340) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, the Building shall provide a cross -Block Pedestrian Passage. If the Frontage Line of a site is at any point six hundred and 18 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: T6 ZONE REGULATIONS fifty (650) feet from a Thoroughfare intersection, a vehicular GCross-Block passage or Shared Street shall be provided. Such a Ceross-Block Passage may be covered above the first floor by a maximum of fifty percent (50%) 1 t�nn+.,_fi„o PeFGen+ (25 � of its length with Structures connecting Buildings, such as a terrace, pedestrian bridge, vehicular bridge, or enclosed parking. In T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 a Pedestrian Passage may be roofed and shall be lined with frequent doors and windows. A Shared Street shall emphasize the pedestrian experience while at the same time permit access for vehicles operating at low speeds. Vehicular and pedestrian areas shall exist at the same elevation and shall be demarcated by bollards and/or other attractive vehicular excluding design elements. The vehicular drive space shall be one -directional, a minimum of twelve (12) feet in width, and shall be lined by landscape and hardscape elements for pedestrian use and interaction, A Shared Street may be covered above the first floor by a maximum of sixty-five percent (65%) of its length with Structures connecting Buildings, such as terraces, pedestrian bridges, vehicular bridges, or enclosed parking. Maxim, m n+ size ac sheyVp in III is+rte+inn Z 7 may be ORGFeased by F=XGe 1ti9R f9r Uses that curve the n eighherheerd 5.6.2 Building Configuration (T6) a. Development within Private Frontages shall comply with Article 4, Table 6 of Miami 21, and Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan, except that sidewalks shall be no more than six (6) feet wide- Irtisle 4, T�-ah-lcsZ aAd a apd-III +i.,r 5 a �Q. b. Above the eig4�,ninth floor, the Building Floorplate dimensions shall be limited as follows: 1. 15,000 square feet maximum for Residential Uses in T6-8, T6-12 and T6-24 2. 20,000 square feet maximum for Residential Uses in T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80 3. 30,000 square feet maximum for Commercial Uses and for parking 4. 200 feet maximum length for Residential Uses 5. 215 feet maximum length for Commercial Uses c. Encroachments shall be as follows: At the First Layer, cantilevered Awnings and entry canopies may encroach up to one hundred percent (100%) of the depth of the Setback, except as may be further allowed by Chapter 54 of the City Code. Above the first Story, cantilevered balconies, bay windows, and roofs may encroach up to three (3) feet of the depth of the Setback. Architectural elements, screening, decorative fagade components, pedestrian bridges, may encroach the full depth of setback and may encroach over public rights of way above twenty (20) feet. Other cantilevered portions of the Building shall maintain the required Setback. Above the eighth Story, no Encroachments are permitted, except that Facade components promoting energy efficiency such as shading and Screening devices that are non -accessible may encroach a maximum of three (3) feet. d. Galleries and Arcades shall be minimum fifteen (15) feet deep, may encroach one hundred percent (100%) of the depth of the Setback and shall overlap the whole width of the Sidewalk to within two (2) feet of the curb. e. All outdoor storage, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and communications equipment and ap- purtenant enclosures shall be located within the Second or Third Layer and concealed from view from any Frontage or Sidewalk by Liner Buildings, walls, Streetscreens, or opaque gates. These shall not be allowed as Encroachments. 19 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: T6 ZONE REGULATIONS f. Loading and service entries shall be within the Third Layer and shall be accessed from Alleys when available, and otherwise from the Secondary Frontage, except as shown in the Design Guidelines. In accordance with the Design Guidelines^6z, loading shall be permitted on streets along Secondary frontages within clearly demarked loading zones, for use only between 6:00am and 11:00am. Leading spaGes and semoi^Gareasshall be Internal to thee building. Where Lets have E)RIY PFORGipal FFE)Rtages, vehiG611aF entries, Leading DE)Gks and seFVi^o areas shall be permitted en DriRGipal F=Fentage C by Waiver. g. Building Heights shall be measured in Stories and shall conform to Article 4, Table 2 of this SAP Regulating Plan and be allocated as required in Illustration 3_2a-&. First -floor elevation shall be at average Sidewalk grade. A first level Residential Function or Lodging Function should be raised a minimum of two (2) feet and a maximum of three and a half (3.5) feet above average Sidewalk grade. Existing one Story Structures shall be considered conforming and may be enlarged. h. Mechanical equipment on a roof shall be enclosed by parapets of the minimum Height neces- sary to conceal it, and a maximum Height of twenty-five (25) +feet with architectural treatment. Other enclosures for housing stairs, elevators or mechanical equipment or for ornamental Building features may extend up to ten (10) feet above maximum height for T6-8 and T6-12, unless approved by Waiver. There shall be no limitation for ornamental element, stair, elevator or mechanical equipment extensions above maximum Height for T6-24, T6-36, T6-48, T6-60 and T6-80. Roof decks shall be permitted up to the maximum Height. Trellises may extend above the maximum Height up to fourteen (14) feet. All ground floor and roof top utility infrastructure and mechanical equipment shall be concealed from public view. At the building Frontage, all equipment such as backflow preventers, siamese connections, and the like shall be placed within the line of the Facade or behind the Streetscreen. On the roof a screen wall shall conceal all equipment except antennas from lateral view. Exhaust air fans and louvers may be allowed on the Fagade only on the Secondary Frontages above the first floor. Streetscreens or fences shall be between three and a half (3.5) and eight (8) feet in Height and constructed of a material matching the adjacent building Fagade or of masonry, wrought iron or aluminum. The Streetscreen may be replaced by a hedge. Streetscreens shall have openings no larger than necessary to allow automobile and pedestrian access. Streetscreens shall be located coplanar with the Building Facade Line. Streetscreens over three (3) feet high shall be fifty percent (50%) permeable or articulated to avoid blank walls. k. Within the Second and Third Layers, fences and walls shall not exceed a Height of eight (8) feet. I. The ground floor along all Primary Frontages shall contain Habitable Space. 5.6.3 Building Function & Density (T6) a. Buildings in T6 shall conform to the Functions, Densities, and Intensities described in Article 4, Table 3 and 4 and Illustration 5.6 of this Regulating Plan. Certain Functions as shown in Article 4, Table 3 of this Regulating Plan shall require approval by Warrant or Exception. b. The calculation of the FLR shall not apply to that portion of the building that is entirely below base flood elevation. 20 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: T6 ZONE REGULATIONS 5.6.4 Parking Standards (T6) a. Vehicular parking and loading shall be required as shown in Article 4, Tables 4 and 5 of this Regulating Plan. b. On -street parking available along the Frontage Lines that correspond to each Lot shall be counted toward the parking requirement of the Building on the Lot. c. Parking should be accessed by an Alley. Parking shall be accessed from the Secondary Front- age when available. Where Lots have only Principal Frontages, parking may be accessed from the Principal Frontages. d. Primary Frontage. All parking, including drop-off drives and porte-cocheres, open parking areas, covered parking, garages and service areas shall be located within the Third Layer and shall be masked from the Frontage by a Liner Building or Streetscreen as illustrated in Article 4, Table 8 of Miami 21. Parking may extend into the Second Layer above the first (1) Story, by Waiver, if an art or glass treatment, of a design to be approved by the Planning Director, with the recommendation of the Urban Development Review Board, is provided for one hundred (100%) percent of that portion of the Pedestal Fagade. Surface parking may extend into the Second Layer a maximum of twenty five percent (25%) of the length of the Primary Frontage up to a maximum of fifty (50) feet. e. Secondary Frontage. All Parking, open parking areas, covered parking, garages, Loading Spaces and service areas shall be located in the Second Layer and shall be masked from the Frontage by a Liner Building or Streetscreen for a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the length of the front- age or height of the pedestal. Above ground Parking may extend into the Second Layer beyond fifty percent (50%) of the length of the frontage or height of the Pedestal if an art or glass treatment of a design to be approved by the Planning Director is provided for that portion of the pedestal facade. f. Underground parking may extend into the Second and First Layers only if it is fully underground and does not require raising the first -floor elevation of the First and Second Layers above that of the sidewalk. Ramps to underground parking shall be within the Second or Third Layers. g. The vehicular entrance of a parking Lot or garage on a Frontage shall be no wider than thirty (30) feet and the minimum distance between vehicular entrances shall be a minimum of three and a half (3.5) s+,, ) feet. Vehicular entrances must be arranged in a manner respectful of pedestrian conditions and as shown in the Design Guidelines. Pedestrian entrances to all parking Lots and parking structures shall be directly from a Frontage Line. Underground parking structures should be entered by pedestrians directly from a Principal Building. Buildings mixing uses shall provide parking for each Use. Shared Parking shall be calculated according to Article 4, Table 5 of this Regulating Plan. 5.6.5 Architectural Standards (T6) a. Temporary structures such as construction trailers, sales trailers, recreational vehicles and other temporary structures shall be allowed as per City Code and this SAP. 21 Revision 4-30-15 MIAMI RIVER SAP: T6 ZONE REGULATIONS b. The Facades on Retail Frontages shall be detailed as storefronts and glazed with clear glass no less than seventy percent (70%) of the sidewalk -level Story. Security screens shall be seventy percent (70%) open. c. Roof materials should be light-colored, high Albedo or a planted surface and shall comply with Article 3, Section 3.13.2 of Miami 21. d. The Fagade of a parking garage that is not concealed behind a Habitable Liner and all Elevations shall be screened to conceal all internal elements such as plumbing pipes, fans, ducts and light- ing. Ramping should be internalized wherever possible. Exposed spandrels shall be prohibited. The exposed top level of parking structures shall be covered a minimum of sixty percent (60%) with a shade producing structure such as, but not limited to, a vined pergola or retractable canvas shade structure. 5.6.6 Landscape Standards (T6) a. The First Layer as shown in Article 4, Table 8 of Miami 21 shall be paved and landscaped to match the Public Frontage as shown in Article 8 of Miami 21. b. Open Space shall be a minimum ten percent (10%) of the total Lot area. Ten percent (10%) of the Open Space provided in Second or Third Layer shall be landscaped. 5.6.7 Ambient Standards (T6) a. Noise regulations shall be as established in the City Code. b. Average lighting levels measured at the Building Frontage shall not exceed 20 fc (foot-candles). c. Lighting of building and contingent Open Spaces shall be compatible with street lighting of Abut- ting public spaces as illustrated in Article 8 of Miami 21. Interior garage lighting fixtures shall not be visible from streets. d. The lighting fixtures of exposed rooftop parking shall be concealed by a parapet wall and shall not be seen from surrounding streets. 22 Revision 4-30-15 �. MI ---,�AL AREA PLAN SEPVWW Revision 1 - December 19•�� January_ Revision 3 - February 26 April 01 Revision 4 Revision 5 - April1 Ownershin: CG Miami Ri �. O. -- all Big ;. wr •r � .lr. _ ., n.nr+w � .wap - ..seer-— �'^'•.► r-- �• .'rte � .� %—� —,� N ._�"" . n f MIAMI RIVER PROJETEAM CG MIAMI RIVER, LLC 3200 STIRLING ROAD HOLLYWOOD, FL 33021 ASK KOBI KARP KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN 2915 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 200 MIAMI, FL 33137 RW2 ROMAN AND WILLIAMS BUILDINGS AND INTERIORS 324 LAFAYETTE STREET, 6TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10012 Kimley)#Horn jams KIMLEY HORN RAYMOND JUNGLES 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 400 242 SW 5TH STREET MIAMI, FL 33131 MIAMI, FL 33130 KimleyoHorn KIMLEY HORN 1221 BRICKELL AVENUE SUITE 400 kml.",Tll_ Fl 32131 MMk6----. —.,.CCASTAL ENGI srsTSNa COASTAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC 464 SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 BCRCOW RADcLLSFcRNANDcZ n��-cf_aNs � . �.ro �sE Aro EHE aorMErr.� ...w BERCOW RADELL & FERNANDEZ, PA �[ lL 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 850 MIAMI, FL 33131 _y ��" BOOK 2 A SITE D BUILDING ELEVATIONS & SECTION L LANDSCAPE PLANS SURVEY loll PROPOSED - OVERALLSOUTHELEVATION Ll LANDSCAPE PLAN INDEX EY - DEVELOPMENT AND DISTANCE TO TOD A2 SURVEY 20F3 D2 PROPOSED - DARALLEASTELEVATION L2 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Al SURVEY 30F3 -JOSE MARTI PARK 03 PROPOSED- OVERALLWEST ELEVATION L3 TREE SURVEY PLAN A4 LOCATION MAP PROPOSED- OVERALL NORTH ELEVATION LO TREESURAYSUMMARY AS SITE AERIALS D5 PROPOSED ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3&5 LS TREE DISPOSITION PLAN A6 F%ISTINGSITECONDITIONS p6 PROPOSED ENLARGED EAST ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 2&3 L6 TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY A7 EKI5TING5ITECONDITIONS DJ PROPOSED ENARGED WEST ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE I, 2&3 L7 PROPOSED TREE RELOCATION IMAGES Al CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS -PANORAMIC VIEWS D8 PROPOSED ENLARGED NORTH ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE I&5 A OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PAN WITHOUT CANOPY AS CURRENT Sin CONDITIONS -PANORAMIC VIEWS D9 PROPOSEDRIVERWALK PROMENADE ELEVATION L9 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PIAN WITH CANOPY AIO CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS DIO D 3RD AVENUE ELEVATION 2.5 AVENUE ELEVATION uU L MAIN PLAJA ENLARGEMENT NORTH PLAZA ENLARGEMENT All EXISTINGAERIALPLAN AI2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN D12 PROPOSED TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION L32 SOUTH PIMA ENLARGEMENT pLi MATERIAL BOARD L13 SW 2.SAVENUEENLARGEMENT p14 TYPICALTOWERDESIGN L14 2ND LEVEL PIAN B ZONING DIAGRAMS D. SCHEMATICSEGRON AND DETAILS S 3RD LEVEL PIAN Bl SAP ZONING ANALYSIS(PROPOSED) D. D17 SCHEMATICSEM NANDDETAILS FACADE GASS PERCENTAGE CALCULATION L36 LTJ ETH LEVEL PAN NSE MARTI PARK PAN B2 SAPD USE MAP USE 018 30 RENDERING u. JOSE MARTI PARK PAN WITH TREE CANOPY B3 SITE D. 30 RENDERING L39 JOSE MARTI PARK ENARGEMENT B4 PROIER DATA To 3 O3 D. 3D RENDERING L20 JOSE MARTI PARK ENARGEMENT BS PROTECT DATA 20F3 3D RENDERING .1 MIAMI RIVERSIDE CENTER ENARGEMENT B6 PROJECT DATA 30F 3 1 TOD2314 p22 3D RENDERING 122 RIABNVILK DESIGN STANDARDS BB SAP AREA D24 30 RENDERING 11 L24 SRE SERION B -SW JTH STREETIWEST END) B9 FRONTAGE DIAGRAM D25 30 RENDERING L25 SITESECTIONC-SW7THSIREET(EASTEND) B30 LAYERS DIAGRAM D26 30 RENDERING .6 SITESECIR ND-SW3RDAVENUENARSW6THSTREET B11 UGHIT& VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM 812 OPEN AREA&O CDIAGRAM p2> DM 30 RENDERING 3D RENDERING L2] L28 SITE SECTION E -SW 3RDAVENUE NAR SWSTH STREET SITE SERION F -SW 6TH STREET 813 IAADING DIAGPAM-EASEMENT LEVEL D29 3D RENDERING L29 SffESECTIONG-SW25AANUE 814 LOADING DIAGRAM - GROUND LEVEL B35 THNNSITDIAGIR D30 D31 3D RENDERING 3D RENDERING L30 L31 - SITESECTIONHSSE 2.5 ANUE VE 10.5E MARTI PARK SERIONI Blfi TMNSN OIgGRAMS 5 PUBLIC ACCESSPLAN p32 D33 3D RENDERING 3DRENDERING 2 L33JOSE JOSE MARTI PARK SECTIONJ MARTI PARK SECTION 018 PJBUCACCESS PAN D34 D35 3D RENDERING 30 RENDERING A JOSE MARTI PARK SECTION 819 R. O. W. MODIFICATION DIAGRAM D36 30 RENDERING L35 PERSPECVE TIVE OF RIVERWALK AND DELOPMENT 820 LOADING MANEUVRABHUTY Lib PERSPECTIVE OF DEVELOPMENT AT LEAL3 021 LOADING MANEUVRABIUTV L3J PERSPECTIVE OF DEVELOPMENTAT RETAIL LEVEL 822 FIRE STAGING DIAGRAM F PROJECT INFORMATION DIAGRAMS L38 JOSE MARTI PARK PERSPECTIVE AT RIVERWALK 823 PEOESTRIANCIRCULATIONTOSW25AVE. F1 LEED CHECKLIST Lls LA0 TREEANDPANTPAI.ETTE TREE AND PLANT PALETTE 624 ALK SECTIONAL DIAGRAMS 825 FLORIDA STATE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DIAGRAM L41 SITE FURNISHINGS B26 BULKHEAD DESIGN & MARINE DOCKAGE L62 SITE FUHIN HINGS 827 ENDOFEASTETH STREETIMPROVEMENTS L03 INSPIRATION IMAGES 828 CAST OF SW 6[h STREET IMPROVEMENTS -STAIRS LA0 OV ERALLLANDSCAPEPAN B29 MCAD SECTION DIAGRAM L45 L46 OV ERALLANDSCAPEPAN- PHASEI OV ERALLANDSCAPEPAN-PHAS— C PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS L4] Lae OV ERALLANDSCAPEPAN-PHASEIII OV FALL LANDSCAPE PAN -PHASE nB Cl MASTERPLAN .9 LSD OVERALL LANDSCAPE PAN - PHASE 3 OVERALL ANDSCAPE PAN -PHASE C2 FIACALCUATION L51 OVERALL ANDS—PAN-PHASE 5 5 C3 FUR CALCULATION L52 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PAN -2ND LEVEL C4 PROPOSED -BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PAN CS PROPOSED-LEVELOIFLOORPAN 153 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PAN -3RD LEVEL C6 PROPOSED-IEVELO2FLOORPAN L54 LRS OVERALL ANDSCAPE PAN -9TH LEVEL ANDSCAPEDETAILS C] PROPOSED-LEVEL03FLOORPAN SPROPOSED LEVELPAN LE C9 PROPOSED-VELOS-0SF/OOHPAN 110 PROPoSNJ- CALO9FLOO1-14 Ell PROPOSED- LEVEL SO FLOOR PAN C12 PROPOSED - LEVEL II -36 FLOOR PAN C13 PROP05ED-LEVEL 37-58 FLOOR PAN C14 PROPOSED - LEVEL 59-6(1 FLOOR PAN CITY OF MIAMI HEAI'iNO PL4CALYABDB H ^� IRN IS eamN�w - INDEX SITE SURVEY IOF3 SURVEY 2 O 3 -DEVELOPMENT AND DISTANCE TO TOD SURVEY 3 O 3 -JOSE MARTI PARK LOEATION MOP SITE AERIALS XNGSITECONDITIONS E%ISTING SITE CONDITIONS CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS -PANORAMIC VIEWS CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS -PANORAMIC VIEWS CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS E%ISTING AERIAL PLAN PROPOSED SITE PLAN Cl- OF MIAMI EL HEARf:'a BOAPOS Ja�-9.wrvnffi -r �'' +9t V mt �__ ABB-- .. G - MAP OF BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ` - ' E a SHEET 2 OF 3 -- - _ AND SPECIAL PURPOSE SURVEY TO SHOW ®:m .,. _ eB IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO SAID BOUNDARY SURVEY JOSE A DIAZ V714. AG�� MATCH LINE e 7� � � I r9 t m \ i iII I �r � �� II II � e� e ® _ e �� • '� �<� �p - r � 1 N YI X —A W I II I I I � I I s 8 U' I I I • r - ---- - -- / ILI __ -, I I � 'I .....- �' •!t II II __ "tt-'f � a SP �� n; i, I, a , II I II I I - I II I I I II Ib e D -9 - - it—__- I I I I �, • I� I I i I '. I , ' ,. II'I@I'I� * €�`� 3 .. €9�E� � i •I I. I nn� z n i i s I = -_- L - T_-- l__ ___ __. _ �II —� -. ..— >r� Cir(OF nniH�RINZ, BW -- r — -- — — s:w-am �ncEer--•— •_ r awns EwI 1(7 SURVEY 2 OF 3 - DEVELOPMENT AND DISTANCE TO TO -D MAP OF BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY- - _ SHEETZOFI .d... - AND SPECIAL PURPOSE SURVEY TO SHOW s — _ e "° IT, IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO SAID BOUNDARY SURVEY JosE a n�z r.s rcM� Aa S.w—Ld, STUFF 'v� II Ij II i I� € ❑ � Baa a I o a �:ro.r •� � r OT }OPEN 1 a// 9 / 4th —gTkEET- / I Iz � ❑ � cn / .I jam' .❑ o a ,� / I � a a - ---- CRY OF MIAMI HEAFJMG EOARDS Eli > o >8 6ti \ dors ve i i r ui r — — MATCH LME SURVEY 3 OF 3 - JOSE MARTI PARK Jose Marti Self Office 1-95 Gymnasium FPL Latitude storage building NORTHEAST VIEW Self Jose Marti FPL MRC Neo Vertika Latitude storage Gymnasium Publix SOUTHEAST VIEW IXry OF MIAMI - KEAOAHOS - PL.W SITE AERIALS SITE MAP 1 3 r 2 4 CITY OF MIAMI HEARI`t.a OOAHOS ,��pLAly3 7EVIEb IS EXISTING SITE CONDITION'S "- SITE MAP 1 2 3 4 5 CRY OF MIAMI HEARIN3 BOARDS PLAY" VIEW A j5 EXISTING SITE COND'I�Iti1� AERIAL VIEW OF THE SITE CURRENT SITE CONDITIONS PANORAMIC VIEWS s VIEW OF RIVER FROM 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE CRY OF MIAMI VIEW OF RIVER AND BRICKELL FROM 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE HEAPLAN RIH^a BOARDS VOEW mw CURRENT CONDITIONS - PANORAMIC SVIEWSr VIEWS OF THE 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE EAST SIDE /ft jq u J J Lu W Q U SEPlEMBEa 11, 2014 REVISIONS 0 Dec 19,2014 ® 1an.:8, 2015 0 Feb. 26, 2015 11 111.01,2015 & Apr. 30, 2015 Rw-: Kimley»Horn - -- KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE - - HE H [DARDS PLAN CVIEN L5 INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING =s= am Me -a— � f. sos.sn.3iss CURRENT CONDITIONS, --w A-10 441L M c � r r6d,.�' » , ht Ames + _ - SW tSth AVENUE _ •+ 'C`4L)lliylYb I&, . k a rn ��J -rn1 10* ` PHASE 5 4 6 Iy r STORAGE T I BUILDING m 2ND AVEN /.gs O LFRpgss ,l0 I d K a A a �� J a Q } Lu U ` SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 RnnEVISIONS T` u� Dec. 19,-2014 ® Jan. 28, -2015 \ ® Feb. 26,2015 Apr. 01, 2115 `J A Apr. 30, 2715 r � 2 R2 i Kimley>»Horn lawn Ir** KOBI KARR /// ARCHITECTURE C•TY MI INTERIOR DESIGN T RDS FLC 'D.W PI-ANNT AW -D Ra '"`-- www.xoe�x4aacom PROPOSED SITE PLAN A-12 ZONING DIAGRAMS LIGHT & VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM TRANSITBIAGRAMS TRANSITDIAGRAMS PUBLIC ACCESS PLAR PUBLIC ACCESS PLAP R.O.W. MODIFICATH LOADING MANEUVR LOADING MANEUVR BULKHEADDBIGN & MARINE DOCKAGE END OF FAST 6TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAST OF SW 6[h STREET IMPROVEMENTS -STAIR$ MDAD SECDON DIAGRAM CITY OF MIAMI HEAMNG BOARDS PILA'VI EW Nom w MIAMI RIVER 400 UNITS/ACRE 0� ♦� iii~�1�►�1�� - a 5� �� 9� �� '►tr �:■ u:m mii - r Elm UNITS/ACRE J T I d � co cn 'co CD CD CD CD �F 1 ■ CDB 1,000 UNITS/ACRE L— RIVER QUADRANT 500 UNITS/ACRE LITTLE HAVANA 200 UNITS/ACRE ary oP nnlnml 1 HEpA/RTi��I-, ,RANDS IF BRICKELL 500 UNITS/ACRE ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN �` �— P4 ...PLANNING MIAMI RIVER ":-FT----- CURRENT 200 UNITS/ACRE PROPOSED 400 UNITS/ACRE SAP MODIFICATION COMP. PLAN (PROPOSED) AW) B-1 MIAMI RIVER SAP 444,696 sq. ft. 10.2 Acress a a � a Q V a ti U Lu Lu Q U U T1 NATURAL — T3 SUB -URBAN T4 GENERAL URBAN (�+ T5 URBAN CENTER T64` URBAN CORE T6-12' URBAN CORE SEPTEMBER REVISIONS 76-24' URBAN CORE m Dec. 15, 2014 Ian. 2e, 2015 T6.36' URBAN CORE ® ® Feb. 26, 2015 - T6-48' URBAN CORE 11 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 - TB -60' URBAN CORE ® T6-80- URBAN CORE D1 WORK PLACE — D2 INDUSTRIAL D3MARINE Rw - CS CIVIC SPACE/PARKS Kimley*Hom - Cl CIVIC INSTITUTION - CI -HD CMC INSTITUTION - HEALTH DISTRICT JNIR7.CJ R -RESTRICTED L -LIMITED O - OPEN — nWOPR O.B-w4[5 �� KOBI KARP CITY OP h91,^.MI ARCHITECTURE HEARIN3 SOARDS INTERIOR DESIGN PlA:9' EV.^W PLANNINGNG AIA Mll RB e•' '—"�"WWW.NOBIXARP.COM LAND USE MAP B-2 58 Stories Mixed -Use 1,118,694 SF of FLR 460 Residential units 180 Hotel rooms 54,977 SF of Commercial sptce 765 Parking Spaces PHASE 1 58 Stories Mixed -Use 1,118,027 SF of FLR 368 Residential units 150 Hotel rooms r/ hx,728 SF of Commercial spate jarking Spaces SITE DEVELOPMENT *') MIAMI RIVER DATA PHASE 1 & 4 11 OPE4 OPEN E =P.. _P A I l2ltl.l T, 1 111 IPIM DIU, I .11aEl I I'll D I UPT: 4 — ..—.P PP..T- E 1 1 1.1 E PARK- all) P .. U, MR PP. nP.. 41 I P 4. : z RaiP.—I. 1Ewnias .111. IT 10 sicaiEs —1 P IRE. PE I—— E I no I . . . A-1BxB RBI IPR. PA.—I. P —T NP, wRrzaA xxE .1. ...T. TKET RY %Z 1�� MM. —1 — 5T�RYY,� 1;�� ZA IA A 11 P_ T. PP -1 1P. A Illy I I I" U aaRaixs 111RT AlTR-----'p waseLU `T= I 1 .1 IR.NTTAa P "I 7T grl E swsrx Pf T 'E P I I =2TTI. > FE.Ls�T.TIE xorerx P-Pso PP.. Pl wn ILP eRsaxwva, aLLowEo,REo -E. PE I ILla 4 N7 �M,46 4 2 141. , 14 P 4 AR .1 xserr E 1-1-ED— zssrr xowwsEa ea— —,—) SEPTEMBER 11, 2D14 REVISIONS Tl ITUET P"=y '%N 11— .1FT, Dec 19, 2014 Jan. 28, 2015 FPb. 26, 2015 .111 A A Apr. 01, 2015 RwsEa-aoolam r) rornL aoorzxxx es] 7� ns A Apr. 30, 2015 4 14 2 12 Kimley*Horn 2 4 I I 211,4 2 0EU"` L_ arz L— L I " I KOBI KARP CITY OF MIAMI HW.W3 BOARDS F E Ew ARCHITEUURE INTERIOR DESIGN AIPPLANN[NG _R. PROJECT DATA 1 OF 3 B-4 MIAMI RIVER DATA PHASE 2 BUILDING DATAALL PROPOSED PHA5E2 PROPOSE0PNOTESIDEVV'ONS EAST BUILDINGFROM MIAMIAlMEIMM ZONING DESIGNATION 0.3 ST 0.3L0 RFROW OCCUPANCY WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL INOUSTRIAL NNDUSTRIAL LOT AREA 1MODEF 20,709 0.91 136 LOT WIDTH t00tt 040 EAST 271' 3" WEST 150 1" LOT COVERAGE EAASTT 1.2SK IS. E.77 5,212 9871 16089 BUILCINGHEIGHi MAX HEIGHT AS OF RIGHT BSTORIES aSTORIES 33TORIES WEOIRE.UREO P EOPHASE2 RQPOEPROPOSEDPHASE2 NOTESIDEVIA' SIETBACKSEASTBUILD WEST BUILDINGMAM 21 STRUCTURE PRINCIPAL FRONT STORY I -S SFT MIN 10 FTOFT SW 3RDAVENUE STOW6-18 FT MIN. N/A 1NIA STORY 7-e-30 FTMIN. NIA NIA SECONDARY FRONT STOW 1-5 SET MIN 10 FT 1D FT SW 6TH STREET STORY a-18 FT MIN. WV NIA STORY 7-e-30 FT MIN, WA NIA RIVER FRONT 50 FT. MIN FROM BULKHEAD SOFT-LEVELI 50 FT - LEVELI MIAMI RIVER MET -LEVEL- MET - LEVEL 2-3 PARKING PRINCIPAL FRONT STOW 1-5SET MIN NIA WA SECONDARY FROM STOW 1-5 SFT MIN NIA WA SW 6TH STREET RIVER FRONT 50 FT. MIN FROM BULKHEAD WA WA MIAMI RIVER ALLOWED/RE '_ROPOBEOPHASE 2 PROPOSED PHASE2 FR—GE EAST BUILDING TOTAL PROPOSED OFROMMIAMI2ON5 WA WA NIA OPEN E—E MIN. LOTAREA RED3.013 7. 1.575 EASTSUIMING M 63% 71% 66% —BUILDING 1,976 WA WA WA NIA $ ALLQA�=EVSTONOTESIDEVNONS BUIL T O —21 COMMERCIAL LEVEL 1 31 LEVEL 5.960 9,664 11.920 21,7. OFE(MARINE RELATED LEVEL S. 1150 TOTAL BUILDING AREA 10548 13070 23516 FEE9URED REQUIRED OPOSED PHASE 2 PROPOSED 2 PHASE DTESIDEVIA' —WILDING —BUILDING N FROM MAMI21 PARKING CALCULATIONS COMMERCIALRETAIL 3PER 1000 ES4 0 0 ALL PARKING TO BE PROVIDED IN PHASE 1 OFFICE 1PER 600 2 0 0 'WAIVER REQUIRED FOR PARKING 676 PARKING REDUCTIONS 1. MILE FROM 1.(-1 _MS SHARED PARKING REOUC. RETAL(X LODGBE) 26 / 12=23- M =-5 REQUIRED SPACE TOTAL 42 PROVIDED IN PHASE 1 ONSITE PARKING PROVIDED 4 ONSTREET SPACES LOADING OFFICEICOMMERCIAL U)12%35 0 0 (DISTRICT) BIKE RACKS 1 PERM PARKING STALLS 2 2RACKB 2RACK5 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec 19, 2014 8 A, 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Ap, 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 R Kimley»>Hom KOBI KARP CF-Y[OF MIAMI ARCHITECUREHEAP;!a:BQAD 25 IANTERIORDESIGM1eN V3 DNIN�a.a _ z91P naw.. F.aos.s71.3- PROJECT DATA 2 OF 3 B-5 MIAMI RIVER DATA PHASE 3 & 5 PROPOSED PHASE TOTAL NOTES'DEVIATIONS FROM BUILDING DATA WEDIREQUIRED PROPOSED PHASE3 PROPOSE. MIAMI21 20NING 0ESIG.-0. 1F.XFN OPEN OCCUPANCY MIXED USE MIXED USE MIXED USE RESIDENT IAL UNITS LEVEL 11-11 DB FLOORS) E. EN LOTAREA I.N.117.29 PHASES ACRES 1.36 1.32 LOTOMOTH 1008 4004 -2. AVENUE IS A SHARE LEVEL J] -58(M FLOORS) PPASE9 STREET See relala4ng plan LOT COVERAGE PEDESTAL 80% NEN SEX NE.I., 1.1 De 11..eantl 5 B 1.I. PHASES 490] 50.320 48,176 99.696 PHASES 45LEVEL 5560 (2 FLOORS) PHASES PHASE 5 LOT COVERAGE TOWER 13,000 1],4]3 1],4]3 TOTAL SF HEIGHT AS OF RIGHT 363TORIEE MAX BENEFIT HEIGHT 605TORIES 60 STORIES 60 STORIES REgUI!_ AREA HUN TS RECIUI_ PROPOSED PHASE NOTEWEVAPONS FROM PARKING CALCULATIONS SETBACKS ALLOWED I REWIRED PROPOSED PHASE 5 MIAMi21 COMMERCAL RETAIL STRUCTURE OFFICE PER 800 l. P tE FROM TORY 1OFT MIN STORY I-81 STORY I -B 1OFT RESIDENTIAL PER DU 960 EW TM STREET STORY eE0 MET IN STORY 960 20FT STORY 560 MFT RESIDENTAL GUEST I PER 10 LSU Be SE td icEr MIN STORY I-8101 LODGING 2LU 1B0 10 SW 3DR0 AVENUE STORY STOW 950 MFTMIN STORY SBO 2.1 NA LOOGINGGUEST IPER 15 LU 12 STORY to LOFT MIN STORY I-8 LOFT STORY I-81OFT 20018 SECSW TH STREET MEN MO SOFT MIN STOWSSD SOFT STORY SBO MFT PARKING REDUCTIONS1 2 MILE FROM TOD(30%) ¢00.53 SHARED PARKING REDUC. SIDE STORY I -e DELMIN i' STORY12 Off OFFICE: LODGING(17) 60 42 FAST STOP—SOFT MIN N,A STORY 1502CLT FARMIMG PRINCIPALFRONT AFLUCIABSTREATMENTOFPEDESTALFAOAOE: NA 100%OFFROWAGE LENGTH EW ]TH STREET 100%OF FRONTAGE LENGTH SECONDARY FRONT ARCUCIANE TREATMENT FOR 50% OF LENGTH OF TDO%OF LENGTH OF FRONTAGE AND 100%OF LENGTH OF FRONTAGE ANL SW SRO AVENUE FRONTAGE OR HEIGHT OF PEDESTAL HEIGHTOFPEDESTAL NEIGHTOFPEDESTAL SECONDARY FROM ART/GLASS TREATMENT FOR 50% OF LENGTH OF 100%OF LENGTH OF FRONTAGE AND 100% OF LENGTH OF FRONTAGE AND EW 6TH STREET FRONTAGE OR HEIGHT OF PEDESTAL HEIGHTOFPEDEETAL HEIGHTOF PEDESTAL IDE DI NSA 0-T ST PROPOSED PHASE TOTAL NOTESIDEVNTIINS FROM ALLOWED IREQU RE 5 PROPOSED MIANSI PUS40%PUBLIC BENEFIT 3,—'ReS -BE-- 37397 LEVEL 1 42,26542,161 L LE 0,510 LEVE.25 21 AB] LEVEL 341197 LEVEL 43842 LEVEL 4.5 �1 487 17 LEVEL S 43,842 4 L4 LEVEL 6 LEVELBS SS Be LEVEL ] 41512 4'7 LEVELS 4 ,36 12 363 LEVELS 8,148 12,455 LEVEEL 10 14,f 37 LEVEL II -3828 1,200 LEVEL 37'-56.160"22 14,200 340000 553200 BONUS FUR 'FIX -3 1,118,694 114T,t56 2,26SS. "PNeae5 PROPOSED PHAGE TOTAL NOTESIDEVIATIONS FROM FRONTAD R.POSED PHASES PROPOSED MNMI21 PRINCIPAL FROM ]0%OF 400Fi 166 FT 151 FT 316FT SW 7TH STREET SECONDARY FRONT 7D% OF 33— 25]FT NA .7 FT IBS%) SW SRD AVENUE SECONDARY FROM OF .01 169 FT 1.11 338FT(.%) SW 6TH STREET OPEN SPACE 10%OFLOT AREA 23,012 ]% 20% ENSITT 400 UNITS PER ACRE= PHASE 3=4 O'Il ac)= PHASE5=400(132ac)= 52] OU lD SSD 11 =1 DID 0 9D TOTPL 400(2.89ac)=10P Elp 1050 n85� PROPOSEDPHASE TOTAL NOTES—NAT ONE FROM AREAS LLOWEDI REQUIRED LEVELPftOPOBEO PHASES LEVa2TY 5 PROPOSED EL MIAMI21 COMMERCIAL 7 13 19,635 2 17':25 3 I.ASB S 14.UG OOMMERCML 49,150 104,]2] HOTEL(LODGING, 3,19] 2] 9] .2 10 25 10.984 180 .,.I 8 0L 1 OFFICE OFFICE 2812200 217,200 Se 12.280 317XC 634AD) RESIDENTIAL SUBTOTAL 2212,200 288p00 p 12200 268400 536,600 RESIDENTIAL BONUS FUR 0 12 200 D Z 2 12.200 J RESIDENTIAL 585,803 585,6a 1171,200 d Q _ C PROPOSEOPHASE TOTAL NOMESDEVIATIONS FROM C a LEVEL PROPOSED PHAS 3 LEVEL 5 PROPOSED MIAMI21 C Q BASELI BASE. LIFTS Q L j STREET] I z3 a 2j 414 11 n 5 ES 8 LIFTS 116 6 LIFTS 1. LOADING RESIDENTIAL (7)10— (3)10'X. (2)10'X20 (5)10'X20' (1) BERTH REDLCTION QI Lu COMMERCIAU/OFFICE (3j 12X35' (1)12XB (1)12X35 (1)17X55''REQUESTONSTREETLOADINI (3712'%35' (i)BERTH REDUCTION AIAF asmNlNxvG R. LODGINCilHOTEL (3)42'X35' (1)12%95 (1)12X35 (2)17X35' (1)BERTHREDUCTION BIKE RACKS 1 PER. PARKING STALLS 66 35 RACKS 35 NA.. ]U RACKS CQC V U v SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS A Dec. 19, 2014 ® Ja O, 28,2015 A Feb.26,2015 A Apr. 01, 2015 A Apr. 30, 2015 R_ Kimley' Horn JUNGLES KOBI KARP CITY OF MIAMIARCHITECTURE HEA>:=;n ROARDB FLA,'YyT'RE,"a I v=m.=No a 1$ INTERIOR DESIGN AIAF asmNlNxvG R. T�-- 7. A3as.s]3.3n6 PROJECT DATA 3 OF 3 B-6 PROPERTY SIZE: 93,377 SF LOT COVERAGE: (68%) S N 270' SW 3RD AVE. I I �1 I 4 RI 4 -1 II ;I II ,I II o I 270'- " 0 a 5 PROPERTYSIZE: 117,291 SF LOT COVERAGE: 72% TOTAL PROPERTY AREA: 270,887 SF TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 158,705 SF TOTAL LOT AREA PERCENT: 59% 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE 20,709 SF :PROPERTY SIZE :LOT COVERAGE 24% BY DEFINITION OF MIAMI 21, ARTICLE 1 LOT COVERAGE: THE AREA OF THE LOT OCCUPIED BY ALL BUILDINGS, EXCLUDING STRUCTURES SUCH AS DECKS, POOLS, AND TRELLISES. 39,510 SF :PROPERTY SIZE :LOT COVERAGE 15% ,y PROPERTY SIZE LOT COVERAGE KEY PLAN o NOT TO SCALE r 5 10 25 50 loo LOT COVERAGE �� N IRNI m 3 N T JOSE MARTI PARK / / — — SPECIALAREAF GM Area Ona DPmale Nea 8.2e To OI 10.2 acres PUSLIC SENEFIT— (9SB,3EC ef, 19.9 ACRES) CITY OF MIAMI HEARIN3 BOARDS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS > �o��n,�' OY Wb *Riverwalk in Jose Marti Park will be constructed associated with phase I w =w SAP AREA -� 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE J f r\ T JOSE MARTI PARK / / — — SPECIALAREAF GM Area Ona DPmale Nea 8.2e To OI 10.2 acres PUSLIC SENEFIT— (9SB,3EC ef, 19.9 ACRES) CITY OF MIAMI HEARIN3 BOARDS TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS > �o��n,�' OY Wb *Riverwalk in Jose Marti Park will be constructed associated with phase I w =w SAP AREA -� 274'-3" 1 275' SW 3RD AVE. E/ 274'-3" ■■■■■■■■■■.■■■i -- — m I I I ■' ■' W ■l ■ �I I '� al , IP _ ��I,I■■ o ■ I. I ��■ 911 ? �1 g■■0 ��. I � ■i fill '1 f=�■CO w■ I I � 1 �� ■■ I_ �� I I J 10 I I I I ■■ \ LL I —44 — o SW 2.5 AVE. ■� I _- ISI; i■ ■� 1 � �? � � i oil ■ ■ wl I I �� ■■I — EFS a� ■ I"0 ■� ■■ NU ■■ L -J I ■■ 1. 1 \� : . 2ND AVEN PRINCIPAL FRONTAGE: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SECONDARY FRONTAGE: RIVERWALK PRINCIPAL FRONTAGE: No No No No L 101'-4' 141 - PP PSS # / I � Ij i II /i V J�� Ilis KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE �� Ala �,l s 10 2 s so goo FRONTAGE DIAGRAM A.% N � N Q � o f SW 3RD AVE. - i� rF 71 111 A� j Lll 1 / fi / �j41 SW '�- SW 2.5 AVE. 1 �I I 11 I>, 1• �/ �� 1 I �// AVENUE BRIDGE BY DEFINITION OF MIAMI 21, ARTICLE 1 LAYER: A RANGE OF DEPTH OF A LOT WITHIN WHICH CERTAIN ELEMENTS ARE PERMITTED AS REGULATED IN THIS CODE. FIRST LAYER: THE AREA OF A LOT COMPRISED OF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BASE BUILDING LINE AND THE REQUIRED SETBACK INCLUDING THE PRIVATE FRONTAGE. SECOND LAYER: THAT PORTION OF THE LOT BEHIND THE FIRST LAYER WHICH INCLUDES THAT PORTION OF THE BUILDING WHICH EN FRONTS THE THOROUGHFARE. THIRD LAYER: THAT PORTION OF THE LOTTHAT IS NOT WITHIN THE FIRST AND SECOND LAYER AND IS LEAST VISIBLE FROM THE THOROUGHFARE. _-- D31STLAYER ------- D32ND LAYER ------- T6 -361ST LAYER - T6-36 2ND LAYER T6-36 3RD LAYER - — — — — — - 50' FROM WATER'S EDGE (GROUND FLOOR) - — — — — — - 25' FROM WATER'S EDGE (LEVEL 2 AND ABOVE) KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE s io 25 sa ioo LAYERS DIAGRAM �� N I �P �♦ • ______________2 ♦♦ SW 3RD AVE, w �♦ tl• — 7 ♦ ♦ •� / • VIEW CORRIDOR -1169-0 --- nv ♦♦ III, - �. � �. .. I ��.- �--� J � � j ♦♦ • J�� L 1 • • saepe�c / • VIEW CORRIDOR serencK y ■ •• `VIEW CORRIDOR =139'-6" AVENUE BRIDGE BY DEFINITION OF MIAMI 21, ARTICLE 1 VIEW CORRIDOR: AN AXIAL VIEW TERMINATING ON A NATURAL OR HISTORICAL FEATURE. 1 1 ' % OF LENGTH' AVG. LENGTH --------__l______---- L----------- REQUIRED ---------- REQUIRED I 25 428'-7- ---------- ---------- ----------- PROVIDED i 90 1535'-7" I I � I � — — — SAP AREA • • • • • • RIVER FRONTAGE 1714'-6" VIEW CORRIDOR LENGTH DVIEW CORRIDOR DBUILDING FOOTPRINT CITY OF M1AIAMI H�t':.-"ARDS s 20 25 so 100 LIGHT & VIEW CORRIDOR DIAGRAM -) ,�----- 1 do 'rte-----�,y♦♦ 1 3 3 i !1 ♦ 1' f % s r— — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — - SW 3RD AVE— — — — — — PV,F♦I 1 I 1 I I I li 0\0 1 � 1 � i i I j 2ND ""NUE BRIDGE 1 1 1 i BY DEFINITION OF MIAMI 21, ARTICLE 1 OPEN AREA: ANY PARCEL OR AREA OF LAND OR WATER ESSENTIALLY UNIMPROVED BY PERMANENT BUILDINGS AND OPEN TO THE SKY, SUCH SPACE SHALL BE RESERVED FOR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE USE. CIVIC SPACE: A ZONE WITH MAINLY OUTDOOR AREA DEDICATED FOR FUNCTIONING FOR COMMUNITY PURPOSES. OPEN AREA & CIVIC DIAGRAM -� crrr eF m3Armi HEAP""G�A605 Fin a 'rg�W 15 — — — — SAP AREA (10.2 ACRES) _-- CIVIC SPACE (35,694sf 8%)- _. .. OPEN SPACE (15,17&f 3%) 5 10 25 80 100 OPEN AREA & CIVIC DIAGRAM -� LOADING BERTH SIZES 10'X 20 - RESIDENTIAL 12'X 35' -COMMERCIAL 12'X 55'- INDUSTRIAL - 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE rl i I � / V ��J c' cm °F �41AFAI "`A` ° R°S I KEY PLAN v.iFi'Yd NOT TO SCALE s 10 25 so 100 LOADING DIAGRAM - BASEMENT LEVEL -) SW 3RD AVE. -- --- --- ------ I� I I 14 I �I /o I I I N J 4 t L II•. e+ t le ,''� I- ��}J Ill Li I Li - LOADING BERTH SIZES 10'X 20 - RESIDENTIAL 12'X 35' -COMMERCIAL 12'X 55'- INDUSTRIAL - 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE rl i I � / V ��J c' cm °F �41AFAI "`A` ° R°S I KEY PLAN v.iFi'Yd NOT TO SCALE s 10 25 so 100 LOADING DIAGRAM - BASEMENT LEVEL -) SW 3RD AVE. ---- 71 49 .Id I'd SW 2.5 AVE. I rj 41 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE LOADING BERTH SIZES 10'X 20 - RESIDENTIAL 12'X 35'- COMMERCIAL Restricted On -Street loading from 6:00 am to 11:00 am 12'X 55'- INDUSTRIAL Restricted On -Street loading from 6:00 am to 11:00 am VALET DROP OFF "On -street loading - See regulating plan for hours of operation 1z C KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE S %71?0 25 50 loo LOADING DIAGRAM - GROUND LEVEL fk) II a 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE LOADING BERTH SIZES 10'X 20 - RESIDENTIAL 12'X 35'- COMMERCIAL Restricted On -Street loading from 6:00 am to 11:00 am 12'X 55'- INDUSTRIAL Restricted On -Street loading from 6:00 am to 11:00 am VALET DROP OFF "On -street loading - See regulating plan for hours of operation 1z C KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE S %71?0 25 50 loo LOADING DIAGRAM - GROUND LEVEL fk) Tj 7 ti S. fik INBOUND VEHICULAR TRANSIT NOT TO SCALE Of te SW 3rd Avenue .............. 'Afilw I --Z� .;" PFSW,20nd A en e ................ * OUTBOUND VEHICULAR TRANSIT NOT TO SCALE z ut LU LU U SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS 't Dec. 1:, 2014 J` 2 2015 F,b, 2E, 2015 2 All, C1, 1115 A" RW Kimley,>)Horn KOBI KARP SITE BOUNDARY ARCHITECTURE 0 LI NI P V r H � C' -1 T I T N' INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING AIASID NCARB — — — — OUTBOUND VEHICULAR TRANSIT TRANSIT DIAGRAMS AWk) B-15 • • SW 2nd Avenue ` ............ .. ♦ ♦♦ va • • a-�•�7--c s r ■ ■ ■ I • Jilllllenlll .... NE 2ND Avenue SITE BOUNDARY DESIGNATED BICYCLE ROUTE (As per BIKE305 miamidade.gov) — — — — PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTE — — — — THE UNDERLINE NOT TO SCALE F-� t cmo n ^rmi I y a3.. HJn �AfiOS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PROPOSED TROLLEY ROUTE METRORAIL �T ■■■■■■. METRO MOVER ■■■■■■■ METROBUS TRANSIT DIAGRAMS �� Y m`• SW 1..... C r - r .i SW 1st Avenue Ilalna=m �• 1 1 ■ ` �♦ 1 1 ■ 1 1 ■ `s N. Miami Avenue 1 1 ■ ,................... - SITE BOUNDARY DESIGNATED BICYCLE ROUTE (As per BIKE305 miamidade.gov) — — — — PROPOSED BICYCLE ROUTE — — — — THE UNDERLINE NOT TO SCALE F-� t cmo n ^rmi I y a3.. HJn �AfiOS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII PROPOSED TROLLEY ROUTE METRORAIL �T ■■■■■■. METRO MOVER ■■■■■■■ METROBUS TRANSIT DIAGRAMS �� N r • • SW 3RD AVE. • • • • ■ off■ ■ ■' ■ _ -■ ■ ■ t 1 ■_■ ■n ■-3_■ ■A■-1� ■ I7 ■ ■ 0 0■� ■ HOTEL RESIDENTIAL I• J ��' ■ rl / - HOTEL/RESIDENTIAL " DROP OFF I DROP OFF • v� / � LOADING n • SW 2.5 AVE. B o OFFICE}- OFFICE/ � r RESIDENTIAL s o RESIDENTIAL • DROP OFF JFQ� • o DROP OFF •. .I -.._ a,.a sS O & •. o oa V"� • • "" _A �P • . LOADING I; • •, 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE •�•� ; • EXISTING CITI BIKE STATION ■� TO BE RELOCATED • PROPOSED LOCATION OF CITI BIKE STATION PEDESTRIAN • • • • ► ROUTE KEY PLAN NOT TO SCALE ■ ■ ■ ■ BICYCLE ROUTE '. BICYCLE RACK 310 25 so 100 PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN -) 1 1IF -� 1 HOTEL/AESibEgl 711� L 1 HOTEL RESIDENTIAL w DROP OFF I / Wol° �� E �1 DROP OFF 11 i o .�CPO _ i —6 j . 1 I I SW 2.5 AVE. I I RI I I_ aFFIdE/II../01 RES6ENTIAL I 1 I'I OFFICE/ - I al DRC7PQfF 1 1 i RESIDENTIAL DROP OFF / I • !LQ` —RA � ° o i�/ 1•.. •.1 • \QC'\ 1 L _L 1 LOADING VON 1 • �� 1woo 1 v 1 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE 1 II II VEHICULAR VEHICULAR ROUTE 1> VEHICULAR BUILDING ACCESS ------ 01 TROLLEY ROUTE* KETPLAAN TROLLEY STOP* SII .............. NI WATER TAXI ROUTE �CNT/-- `�"66Z s 10 25 so 100 ......; PROPOSED WATER TAXI STOP *PROPOSED FUTURE TROLLEY STOP AND ROUTE PUBLIC ACCESS PLAN SW 3RD AVE. w„ - - -x r— 19 19 i I I a ° __ o o° o s r�a �+ 1 I � •� I �P II I1 - 1I I I I I 1 I I I it o I Gia I I � R.O.W. MODIFICATION LEGEND 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE CITY OF PA11N1 HEAC'1::". COARDS FL:y+ iWill! CURB CUT WITH FLUSH SIDEWALK JW PROPOSED PRIVATE AVENUE (+6'-o-,GVD) wr NEW ON -STREET PARKING EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING -CURB CUT FOR STAND-BY C SLOPED TO MATCH NEW GRADE t_ VALET STATION -.SCALE: 1/32.. = 1.-0„ 8 16 32 64 128 R.O.W. MODIFICATION DIAGRAM -� 0 LOADING BERTH 1 LOADING BERTH 4 I — —_—a grw� — — Fif j I / - , - •almrowei Ij / LOADING BERTH 2 NO WE J J Lu W i /7 LOADING u / LOADING BERTH 3 SEMNIBER 11, 2014 ® Dec. 19, 2014 ® Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30,2015 CITY OF MIAMI HSiDOAR°S C PLA.' CVI'cW I/ LOADING BERTH 5 LOADING MANEUVERABILITY - BASEMENT LEVEL R Kim�pl��ey)y)�H((orn J{JIR'iLJ KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING B-20 MDC FIRE TRUCK TURN RADIUS t � 1 1 IIS �r BUILDING 2', I N MDC FIRE TRUCK TURN RADIUS SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, M15 ® Apr. 01, 2015 8 Apr. 30, 2015 Rw Kimley»)Horn LOADING MANEUVERABILITY B_21 JUNGLES 1 =Irk KOBI KARP CITYOF IUAMI NEAR CCARDS ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN ApPLnANNIN' SIDry Axe ey: mn�s/'/per-�/�. YI� ""—' x9ssBseayne Bo�era�e -- W W.xDel�,xe�DM LOADING MANEUVERABILITY B_21 Z Q a Q H S S Q L N J _ J - SW 3RDAVE. W -------------- - { _ • INEAR DISTANCE =233-T P, w = `� " " • �I:� i �� ♦� LINEAF(DISTANCE =250'-3" i I SW 2.5 AVE �o h �I E 0 0 .fry r` pp I I SEPTEMBER 11, 3014 I I i \ V / v J 1_ �� ftEV1510N5 9� Dec 19,2014 / " 5 • �� aan� ' I / 8 Jan. 28,2015 x i =1' ; / ♦ ® Feb. 26, 2015 UU 9 ♦ % LINEAR DISTANCE ® Apr. 01, 2015 � I 1 � ^'p 'r + ,i, ° �� I ,'♦♦ =295'-6" Apr 30, 2015 1 LINEAR DISTANCE Kimley»>Hom 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE iw [Y 7 - FIRE STAGING CRY OF MIAMI — — — — ALLOWABLE MAX. DISTANCE 450' xEAP."M e PIA"" et V:sw Ew �S KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE 4 { INTERIOR DESIGN WNGG lL_ _ P ala 0.51 10 CagR SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" g 16 1z e4 11e www. BlIC'"P.COM FIRE STAGING DIAGRAM B_22 I--: n 3 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE I- e 3 N / JFQ- W., SEPTEM8ER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec.19,2014 6 Jan 28,2015 ® Feb. 26,2015 ® Apc 01, 2015 8 Ap, 30, 2015 Rw Kimley*Horn ------•--- PEDESTRIAN PATH CITY OF MIAMI 60AR05 HEAR!it3 PLRtia !/ KOBIKARP x+> ARCHITECNRE INTERIOR DESIGN A,aP1AN0NING A66 SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" " — 8 36 32 64 136 www.BoeiBAeemM PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION TO SW 2.5 AVENUE M B_23 I I I SECTIONAL DIAGRAM 1 - THRU BUILDING 6 SECTIONAL DIAGRAM 3 -THRU BUILDING 4 *Pending City Commission approval pursuant to Charter Section 3(mm)(iii) I SECTIONAL DIAGRAM 2 - THRU BLDG. 5 W CW CQ U r SEPTEMBER 11, 2016 REVISIONS / /re � v -^ ® Dec.ls, Zola ,♦ / 8 Jan. 29, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2315 re.. reser/ / A Ap, 01, 2015 8 AD, 30, 2015 KEY PLAN N.T.S. / Kimley>»Horn / C"' OF MIAMI `� HEARIN^ DARDS EUA KOBI KARP ar.,4 .n zP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN ur ... P-NNIN. Ala ASID R0 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" www.RONIu.Rv.coM RIVERWALK SECTIONAL DIAGRAMS B-24 Z a a m m Q c z1 _ Q � , >11 a <I U a ¢ � i g m I I wei irwe� I I U J I SECTIONAL DIAGRAM 2 - THRU BLDG. 5 W CW CQ U r SEPTEMBER 11, 2016 REVISIONS / /re � v -^ ® Dec.ls, Zola ,♦ / 8 Jan. 29, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2315 re.. reser/ / A Ap, 01, 2015 8 AD, 30, 2015 KEY PLAN N.T.S. / Kimley>»Horn / C"' OF MIAMI `� HEARIN^ DARDS EUA KOBI KARP ar.,4 .n zP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN ur ... P-NNIN. Ala ASID R0 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" www.RONIu.Rv.coM RIVERWALK SECTIONAL DIAGRAMS B-24 2 a a h 2 Z c W SW 3RDAVE. I I, . , 1 ♦K i� � i I ( SW 2.5 AVE. II II_ I _ � at 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE NEW SEAWALL+6.5 GVD a�2 of P,wo� FL COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA TOWER OUTLINE cm of mnnmi HEA�1l�.fi ODAADS RLA 4'RW FLORIDA STATE COASTAL HIGH HAZARD DIAGRAM -� U a I NOM ED SXOit1NE LOCAnoN ro BE NEO BY FERMRRNG AGENCIES. SECTION A -A (TYP) SIXE: 1' = 2'-0' IEGIo -S (s moc, mm LEASE) PROPOSED SUP WP NIMBER PROPOSED TMBER DOM PROPOSED BOLRKAO w PROPOSED NWRING PILE E%ISNNG MOORINC PILE (TO R—) tWr- A SCAES INOIGIEO PEMNN ro N0 SIZE ORDON (24.36) SECTION B -B (TYP) —: Y = 2'_0" SECTION C -C (TYP) SOPfE. I— 2-0" EnAcwt. Oxkgcw ¢Qau�ut P_�+i*-rwo mes Cro unn�m Ani-OfloE lcvv*3 Cry OF DAIAMI HEAA0 I PLA^F gGl4iEW ,rl �/I C BULKHEAD DESIGN & MARINE DOCKAGE 'MIR r,Imwwvw --W -Mu-" top J ffm NN — —e — 0 dDZ— 0 My c— o — 4k - - 0 map_ — - � aE4EL - -v` L — O:;e.` & - -0 — Cxm— — 0 MIA.- -� — L0 — —0 — 0 — Ow kn — — — o�w — ——��E�zGVO — omfi- - An &— TMNc - - 0nuc — — —0 01& — C I PHASE 1 PHASE 3 tion department INiDPDI pade PNS PHASE 4 PHASE 5 i -- j z KEY PLAN a N.T.S. ¢ � a Q a u c a U LU LU Q 0 U SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS A D-19, 2014 ® J., 28,2015 ® Feb.26, 2015 ® Apr. 01, 2015 A Ap, 30, 2015 HEf 64AROS crtv eE n.AnB A' PLf bISW �I� K ,� Rw. Kimley*Hom Obstacle clearance surfaces established by the federal aviation administration (FAA) and Miami- Dade Aviation Department (MDAD) KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" AIA ASIo NC— 391 4 8 16 2 64 MDAD SECTION DIAGRAM B_29 C cl 1Z c3 CO CS C6 CJ CB C9 CSO C. C12 C33 C. PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS M16tERPLAN FLR CALCULATION FLR CALNIATION PROPOSED- BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED- LEVELG1 FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED- LEVEL SO FLOOR PIAN PROPOSED- LEVEL 11-36 FLOOR PIAN PROPOSED- LEVEL 3J-58 FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED - LEVEL 59-60 FLOOR PLAN CIN OF MIAMI GUARDS C RED mr9 U' 15 2ND AVENUE /-gs OveRp4ss 6 JOSE MAR PARK -- - a a z r; a I n Q u a U J J �w e W C< u SERTEMRER 11, 2014 REVISIONS ® Dec. 19, 2014 8 Ian. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 \ 8 Ap, 30, 2015 t1 - '"`"f R Kimley»>Horn Y f 1lA�GLFS ,. AK II ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING 11 rs p 41111 F -- � zsrsexame eo�ie.a.a � � rea t3z3z 5 10 25 50 100 IKARRCOM — MASTER PLAN -) C-1 I BASEMENT LEVEL TOTAL FLR: 95,817 SF , 7A --I-- J1 LEVEL 01 TOTAL FLR: 159,074 SF 11 IE r. LEVEL 02 TOTAL FLR: 158,762 SF III III jl I-------------- ------ -------- L 7 LEVEL 03 TOTAL FLR: 145,270 SF LEVEL 04 TOTAL FLR: 146,344 SF CITY or I'l AN HEA CA-s LWI, - I, �; 2d 1 --4% LEVEL 05 TOTAL FLR: 148,725 SF FLR CALCULATION ld.L) tFil ------ ------ Zz- LEVELS 06 TOTAL FLR: 148,711 SF LEVEL 07 TOTAL FLR: 146,380 SF v LEVEL 08 TOTAL FLR: 144,000 SF LEVELS 09 - 10 TOTAL FLR: (54,413 SF + 57,721 SF) 166,547 SF - ----------------- ----- -- - ---------- 16 ------ --- ---- ------------- ------- - ---- --------- :F II I II I ill I LEVELS 10-58 49 LVLS @ 51,676 10 TOTAL FLR: 2,532,124 SF LEVELS 59-60 2 LVLS @ 51,676 TOTAL FLR: 103,352 SF FLR CALCULATION AWk) Phase II Phase II PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III PARKING - - - 156 LOADING 6 Berths - 6 Berths PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES CRY OF MIAMI - — - — IeAIV. DA, HOTEL rLnr' .cvoew - BOH !SERVICES LOADING pl- VERTICAL CIRCULATION hase VLLL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS KEY ELEVATION PARKING N.T.S. OFFICES COMMERCIAL PARKING - BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" s 26 32 11 128 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN Ak) SW 3RD AVE. ------------ ----- — - 1 � � � • I II-- I I I I • ' o Ise 1t II I dl fP� Ig I II i o \ y 7 �I w d4 \ t �i i f Phase II Phase II PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III PARKING - - - 156 LOADING 6 Berths - 6 Berths PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES CRY OF MIAMI - — - — IeAIV. DA, HOTEL rLnr' .cvoew - BOH !SERVICES LOADING pl- VERTICAL CIRCULATION hase VLLL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS KEY ELEVATION PARKING N.T.S. OFFICES COMMERCIAL PARKING - BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" s 26 32 11 128 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN Ak) SW 3RD AVE. �,.. SW 2.5 AVE. I k I - Ix III w «I� �I - jFFIq OFFICE/ "`i" ' MOP I d�NTIAL,IjOP� , F P OFE, ?/ / na I o 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE =A..- ---wl— —7°' o —/ I / I / Iv / I I / RsuD woks InoNs _..+c-!% - A FxwEp A : adaumFNt az �u"vscN'm sw SMEEf I V M0 A uEM1 tt °N SW sn E Phase II S S n t~D N West Bldg. SW 3RD AVE. �,.. SW 2.5 AVE. I k I - Ix III w «I� �I - jFFIq OFFICE/ "`i" ' MOP I d�NTIAL,IjOP� , F P OFE, ?/ / na I o 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE =A..- ---wl— —7°' o —/ I / I / Iv / I I / RsuD woks InoNs _..+c-!% - A FxwEp A : adaumFNt az �u"vscN'm sw SMEEf I V M0 A uEM1 tt °N SW sn E z a _ ¢ ¢ Q C a H J LuLu Q U I - -- SERTEMRFR 31, 2014 REVISIONS m De<.19, 2014 ® JD.. 28, 2015 ® Fee. 26, 2015 �� A mq.,+ N+ Ma2n�ryY l5C.3W'IM6- ® Apr. 01, 2015 44w5h MO {4so ,egry Ee Nau- emwgeD ® qpr, 30, 2015 `Q, ana�emsahs wD `ca+osww"n IN r,f� aw+3T acwny. PROGRAM LEGEND _ C I� BIKE RACK RETAIL /COMMERCIAL 2 KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. Phase II Phase II RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V RETAIL / COMMERCIAL 14,727 SF 4,932 SF 5,960 SF 15,707 SF 8,111 SF 18,093 SF LOADING 1 Berths - - 7 Berths - 4 Berths OFFICES 684 SF 1150 SF AN A z a _ ¢ ¢ Q C a H J LuLu Q U I - -- SERTEMRFR 31, 2014 REVISIONS m De<.19, 2014 ® JD.. 28, 2015 ® Fee. 26, 2015 �� A mq.,+ N+ Ma2n�ryY l5C.3W'IM6- ® Apr. 01, 2015 44w5h MO {4so ,egry Ee Nau- emwgeD ® qpr, 30, 2015 `Q, ana�emsahs wD `ca+osww"n IN r,f� aw+3T acwny. PROGRAM LEGEND _ C I� BIKE RACK RETAIL /COMMERCIAL 2 KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. RESIDENTIAL I \IN AMENITIES Klmley )>HOFII , Nbuc� HOTEL RGN,nsd , H•Av, Po6 � uc R: REs� ' . Afl'RUW+t, M��i pE odiM FM � �1 sn3Nona,o � m nml ,�4� mr�AR/rs<A•.�s z a _ ¢ ¢ Q C a H J LuLu Q U I - -- SERTEMRFR 31, 2014 REVISIONS m De<.19, 2014 ® JD.. 28, 2015 ® Fee. 26, 2015 �� A mq.,+ N+ Ma2n�ryY l5C.3W'IM6- ® Apr. 01, 2015 44w5h MO {4so ,egry Ee Nau- emwgeD ® qpr, 30, 2015 `Q, ana�emsahs wD `ca+osww"n IN r,f� aw+3T acwny. PROGRAM LEGEND _ C I� BIKE RACK RETAIL /COMMERCIAL 2 KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. RESIDENTIAL I \IN AMENITIES Klmley )>HOFII HOTEL riNGO BOH / SERVICES Reu,'.,,':a ecaaos FL,.a LOADING _ — VERTICAL CIRCULATION AN A KOBI KARP O sm•i•,_... .. ,,,,- PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING PARKING 91n MID xue% OFFICES LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN - wwNRDD,RgNP.<DD, SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" 8 16 32 64 IIs — PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN C-5 SW 3RD AVE. �I o IIv l GI ` i q l �. 1 1 II II SW 2.5 AVE. e �I o 0 I PEDI _ rA6PEan— _ CONN 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE Z = H ~ b N 3 3 N N /40 / r4nue4 KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. CONNECTIONS Z Q SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Q Dec. 19, 2014 8 Ian. 2-' 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® 4pr. 01,2015 8 4pr. 30, 2015 PROGRAMLEGEND Phase 11 Phase 11 RETAIL / COMMERCIAL PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V RETAIL / COMMERCIAL 17,947 SF 4,932 SF 5,960 SF 19,635 SF - 17,225 SF OFFICES - 684 SF 1150 SF _ 2,514 sf - PARKING 38 SP _\- VERTICAL CIRCULATION 48 SP 19 (38 Lifts) 41 SP KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. CONNECTIONS Z Q SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Q Dec. 19, 2014 8 Ian. 2-' 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® 4pr. 01,2015 8 4pr. 30, 2015 PROGRAMLEGEND RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Rw Hsu „gib of �e,r.,,w� PwssTan.1 "� aF AMENITIES Kimley ))Horn HOTEL UN M C'TOFBOH /SERVICES � HEAF:I:' [^..AR05 LOADING _\- VERTICAL CIRCULATION KOBI KARP PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS ARCHITECTURE N.i INTERIOR15N.—, OE L� PARKING NG PLrvI Ncran e ® OFFICES LEVEL 02 FLOOR PLAN - H apa. RP.�oH SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" B 16 32 s1 128 — PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) C-6 3 N I. -: N N _ N / N 3 N SW 3RD AVE. PROGRAM LEGEND J% RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL — RESIDENTIAL Rw2 771 AMENITIES ... ..... - Kimley»Horn 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE HOTEL BOH / SERVICES 7 w ort oFr ray LOADING Phase II Phase II VERTICAL CIRCULATION `� PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bld West Bld Phase III Phase IV Phase V 9 9 - - 2�-- RETAIL / COMMERCIAL 9,017 SF - _ 19,635 SF _ 14,432 SF ��—Ute-„-, -�d PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS KOBI KARP ARCHITERURE OFFICES - - - - 2,514 sf - -- --°'- INTERIOR DESIGN PARKING 48 SP 48 SP 24 (48 Lifts) 41 SP PARKING p,pPLANNING 77 KEY ELEVATION OFFICES " N.T.S. 3051533/ LEVEL 03 FLOOR PLAN --� WWW.[Oeiraay.CON SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 816 32 64 128 — PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) C-7 — _ SW 3RD AVE. 3 _ "'0 I � � I 11 I✓ PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL /COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL — ern LEVEL 04 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-D" a 2c 32 s4 128 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE - — - Phase 11 Phase 11 PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V HOTEL 13,197 SF - - 13,197 SF - OFFICES - - - 4,000 sf 6,123 sf PARKING 56 SP _ - - 54 SP 124 (48 Lifts)l 56 SP KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL /COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL — ern LEVEL 04 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-D" a 2c 32 s4 128 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) 1-4 o _ -- - - x � � x z a y i d SW 3RD AVE. a ��------- '"----_—t-- — —_ —�L 7_ --.—�— U a°s° / J w �� I• I i & s 9 i I I I � R �� `/ y-. / � SW 2.5 AVE. r - I �I �\ � - ui � I� rio 1 ti I� °�� I ✓ I SEPTEMBER 11, 1010 I I, Ii I L--- %c �QC� REwsioNs Q Dec. 19, 2014 t 1 j 8 Jal. 28 ,2015 -- ® Fen zs zols ® AP,. 01, 2015 AP, 30, 2,215 L _ - -- PROGRAM LEGEND ""°« RETAIL /COMMERCIAL — C RESIDENTIAL Rw AMENITIES ',,.'��., Kimley>»Horn HOTEL ��r 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE - BOH/SERVICES Wis _ cm OF r I IkmiFIE - ELA aAr L_ LOADING Phase II Phase II VERTICAL CIRCULATION PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V �"' "-'l — _ ,�,tif u" .� PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS 1 KOBI KARP HOTEL 52,788 SF - 52,788 SF - ^� .L _ ARCHITECTURE OFFICES - - - 16,000 sf 24,492 sf 61pnB„,..,,��c�„” - PARKING INTERIOR DESIGN PARKING 22_4_ SP - - 216 SP �6 (192 Lifts_) 224 SP = - - PLANNINGURe ASID OFFICES ap ,a KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. LEVEL 05-08 FLOOR PLAN 816 I2 64 138 �'w"''�BIItNxa.COM SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" — PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN Ak) C_9 S 3 N N PROGRAM LEGEND S 2 RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE Phase II Phase II PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V HOTEL 13,324 SF - - 13,082 SF KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL R1^', IKi1mYley-»Horn PF AMENITIES HOTEL BOH / SERVICES JIJI C77e,r. Hma :: �3 Lc" LOADING VERTICAL CIRCULATION 4RF,7'—W PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS KOBI KARP - - - - ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PARKING PEANNING ATA ns,o .1— OFFICES LEVEL 09 FLOOR PLAN-� w.oa,�AwoN SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" a 16 32 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN C-10 S 2 n � � H � 3 SW 3RD AVE. -- -- ---, ' PROGRAM LEGEND ® RETAIL/COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES HOTEL � II. LOADING M i VERTICAL CIRCULATION 551 19.5 E. I In IA " I 11' 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I HOTEL 13,324 SF RESIDENCE - Phase II Phase II East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V - - 10,984 SF - - 8,400 SF 12,200 SF KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. PARKING OFFICES LEVEL 10 FLOOR PLAN— SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" s 36 32 64 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN M PROGRAM LEGEND ® RETAIL/COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES HOTEL BOH / SERVICES i 'l I�NII l LOADING M i VERTICAL CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS PARKING OFFICES LEVEL 10 FLOOR PLAN— SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" s 36 32 64 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN M 3 N 1 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE _ _ 1e L'rro6sru_neec9- _ 9 I I I -- SW 2.5 AVE.N r E= I� „I �I I I ri a la w� V ,r I — I I ) I I � TaYENeE16tC5�Y I / I Phase II Phase II PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V RESIDENTIAL (PER LEVEL) 12,200 SF - - 12,200 SF 8,400 SF 12,200 SF RESIDENTIAL (26 LEVELS) 1317,200 SF - _ 317,200 SF 218,400 SF 317,200 SF 3 N KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL/ COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES HOTEL CRY OF rmAMl BOH / SERVICES H11.7--DOAHDS „ 2`c LOADING VERTICAL CIRCULATION —. PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SL PARKING It-, OFFICES LEVEL 11-36 FLOOR PLAN — SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" B 16 32 60 Sze PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -) N n 3 SW 3RD AVE. II I II II I II I� Is I� w II II II II ii a � III reacrcPAOPern urve � SW 2.5 AVE. a G I rPn�.�� J — — :I I I II z. - I b o — Jfi I �a k i L—J I H 3 Z PROGRAM LEGEND ® RETAIL / COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL AMENITIES 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE HOTEL BOH/SERVICES CITY QF MEF';." - 3aAR�ARD5 FL " LOADING Phase II Phase II o. - ti - VERTICAL CIRCULATION PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. Wesl Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V RESIDENTIAL (PER LEVEL) 12,200 SF - - 12,200 SF 8,400 SF 12,200 SF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS rc'` s, - -,.-::. ;— RESIDENTIAL (22 LEVELS) 268,400 SF - - 268,400 SF 184,800 SF 268,400 SF PARKING KEY ELEVATION OFFICES N.T.S. LEVEL 37-58 FLOOR PLAN -_ SCALE: 1/32" = V-0" s �6 32 sa 228 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN -� N N N SW 3RD AVE 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE 6 92'-4” III L Phase II Phase It PROGRAM LEGEND Phase I East Bldg. West Bldg. Phase III Phase IV Phase V RESIDENTIAL (PER LEVEL) 12,200 SF - - 12,000 SF 8,400 SF 12,000 SF RESIDENTIAL (22 LEVELS) 24,400 SF - - 24,400 SF 16,800 SF 24,400 SF KEY ELEVATION N.T.S. Q s SEPTEMBIR 11, 20M m REVISIONS ® Dec 19, 2014 B J., za, z0,5 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apr. 01, 2015 8 Ap, 30, 2015 PROGRAM LEGEND RETAIL /COMMERCIAL - RESIDENTIALnt^2 KR AMENITIES .--,-- KimleyoHorn HOTEL .1�M BOH !SERVICES NNM n LOADING I 7t.� VERTICAL CIRCULATION "'"`"°°°✓�'�'/ — PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS KOBIKARP PARKING ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING OFFICES A N g,acn �,b LEVEL 59-60 FLOOR PLAN -.-,3.,,66 SCALE: 1/32•• _ V-0" 116 32 64 12E PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN-� C-14 D o3a BEG D36 BUILDING ELEVATIONS & SECTION PROPOSED -OVERALL WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED-OVERALLNORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED DNIAHGED SOUTi ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3 & S PROPOSED PIIARGED EAST ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER- PHASE 2 &3 PRO POSED ENIARGED WESTELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE I, 2&3 PROPOSED ENLARGED NORTI ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 1 & 5 PROPOSED IYPIGAL BUILDING SECTION TYPICAL TOWER DESIGN SCHEMATIC SECTION AND DETAILS SCHEMATC SECRON AND DETAILS FA(ADEGLASS PERCENTAGECALCUTATION 3D RENDERING 3DRENDERIIIG 3D REN'ER IIIG 3DRENDERIIIG BID RENDER IIIG 3D RENDERING 3DRENDERING 3D RENDERING 3D RENDERING 3DREND ERING 3DRENDERING 3DRENDERIIIG 3D RENDERING BID RENDERING CITY OF NNAMI HEAF`L: C:J�SOARDS La FW'C PHASE 3 F ------7 vv �nwu avv n Ga.�vn� W.� i n a n«. - I-nn4G a a a SCALE: 1/I6" = 1'-0" 4 8 16 32 64 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS F f �z>•N�w I ,�� _ - - I KEY PLAN N.T.S. MIA— =4 ssa<L--Novo � -- Ana —�� — — — — — 01 — — _ "xGw us n,mT II AL28EVEL UGVG 1— �A466'-tPNGw -4 — — V=N— — — — — — — — �a4 Will �B 4 MNGVGG — — Y-�— — — A LEVEL yR vG — F 0 M `.-T- bLE Y saMAP11Gw -j — nnr- T N.- Y ate iokcvI -� — - — — — — YzfisvrvcvG— hLtv[L24— `Y Rze'-to•xcvo — t0•NGw 1NI — OtT� zSEar� xovG 2� 7 Z •Y'z4a iNNGw — � � it�n1 A LEVEL 18 — r-fP1 -A3 N �m� 2GREv10tN J�L tSGVG NA— — Y'tea•s•xcvG ALEVELI4 _ Y � LIhl— 4944 MEAN`— iba' NG Y ss — — — — - 4- - - �h 94 VL NGw 'Y i2Gexovo� CBVG GgpgGEILEVEL1p] tLEVEL lit L, va NGV.d.— y� $c�u'xn LIB L carr oFM!cnn EL Y.'a`F.GVL=W ` {N ]E'a NG G AG4R4GFJLEVELI.S sso NGw LEVEL4s cannGEn EVEL.._ '�44�xcw 4ea•x EL 11 � mL of Hcw Y socuucenav>=LI z � � � vu�� C ��5 ''�fii"'"'"'""" I PHASE 3 F PHASES to IN vv �nwu avv n Ga.�vn� W.� i n a n«. - I-nn4G a a a SCALE: 1/I6" = 1'-0" 4 8 16 32 64 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SNOIIVA313 a3SOdOHd ,,O -,l = AT/T :31VDS Ill t, 3SVHd NVId AH S3SVHd + L S3SVHd -- -- -- --11-- -- -- -- --11-- -- -- I --t-- -- I--�--- -- -- -- -- - - - --� KEY PLAN - —� N.T.S. -- -- -- - II-- ------�+�-- I-- I - -- -- -- --I- --I- - —� -- -- -- -0 -- -- -- -CJI- -- -- -- - II -YY-- I- - —� -- -- -- -�2m- I--- Hill lill-- I- -�-- I- --�-- —� -- -- -- - OWN— o ql- -- I- -�--- _j -- -- -- - JAI- -----�- -- -- -- --ISI- I- -�-- -- -- -- --ISI- -- I--�-- � -- -- -- - JAI- -- I--�-- � -- -- -- --A OWL. I -I- -- --�--- -- -- ---�--�-- -- -- -�6-I- 444 -- -- -- - �I- ----T--JpJw T -- -- -- -JAI- I--�- � OM" -- -- -- Fs- JI- - - ��-- -- -- --�- -I- - - - - - - - J - -�-- -- -- -- - JAIHill-- --�-- I -- -- -- -JA - I -- - - -- —� -- -- -- - -ISI -- - t I J�.6 - - - - - - - $;mow I� � - I--�- •^ ' I- - � I 1 t I I PHASE 2 3 PHASE I PHASE OVERALL WEST ELEVATION SSW 3RD AVENUE -PHASE 1, 2 & 3 _ SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" H 32 64 T,- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS "° I I I — r 11s p 0,,;E x LEVEE I I I I rT — � — — EL. —EL. �aies•xGw — — — — — — — ;� :3I �L 04-0"� — — „�vEEs, LE°EI.— E«Wi— A EL xGw — — -0 '.. 6 00 "° I I I — r 11s p 0,,;E x LEVEE rT — � — — EL. —EL. �aies•xGw — — — — — — — �`E"E LE°EI.— Y.x,pxGw — $,I� L — — �Exr,pxGw — Y L — �k=4 — — —I—I — — -->I - - 0=6 — 0��'�G w 0 x ,m — — �I LLL I__ L — —PHASE 1 z. 0 a,�E„F,E,4• ;oa•xGwGxa I I 'I r r _ — AiEVELox �� Yeaa'xcvo— °�"`— �>3aNGw ve�i aA'xGVE/'ErFL.b -- r VEL.m $ — ewarGiGVEnovam — PHASE 2 — I_— KEY PLAN N.T.S. PHASE4 PHASE OVERALL NORTH ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER — PHASE 1, 2 & 4 i SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" Ll�[ 115 �y v � 4 8 16 32 64 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SOUTH ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3 & 5 SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" Cm OF III %MI =7 PROPOSED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS W OC %W = �— -— —- —- -- -— —— --r a,R.aEA�w � as<•xcw Q I oaxaR EAST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3 �sc-E NlceaYm �.c� of SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" �imR P.fW,s - G� 0 8 16 32 60 z I H F I I � I 1 I I I EAST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 2 a s 16 3z 64 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Z a SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® 1... 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apr. 01, 2015 8 Apr. 30, 2015 R Kimley*Horn i 3 i W Yse'bNCN a SBmxGw � — —1 p4 uaxcm �— I x 1 b cvP Ego, ,_vE,al � I z I H F I I � I 1 I I I EAST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 2 a s 16 3z 64 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Z a SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® 1... 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apr. 01, 2015 8 Apr. 30, 2015 R Kimley*Horn i 3 i JUNGLES CITY OF r '+MI [" E PDS HEAPL '1 KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN -- '— PLANNING AIA A to RcARa EAST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3 o a 16 3z 6a SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" w.RORiRAaP oN PROPOSED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS D-6 I � I x- �_.s m'—' 717 � I 1 I I F- 1 � I N f — 1 N I WEST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 2 a a zs az sa SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Z Q 0 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REV MONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® J— 28, 2015 A Feb. 26, X115 ® Apr. 01, 2D15 ® Apr. 30, 2D15 WEST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 1 a e Is Iz sa SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" ■ • ■ I I IIrM�h1-I • N Kimley»Horn ��j i� ' • ■ .• ;■.■• - I - - � ■ e ■ ■ � N ■ ■ N � ■ ■ ■ e Ei • • '. • ' I N CIN OF HlAMI .......m.......m-.......,.- 1 ■ ■ I 1 .•■ ■ ■ ■ �.. ___ - —.--_. 1 Hu FC'ARRDS IVA - -- sa��= -» . x KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING WEST ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 3 All III R. a s 1s az sa SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" www.aoaxv xe.coM PROPOSED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS D-7 NORTH ENLARGED ELEVATION MIAMI RIVER - PHASE 1 & S SCALE: 1/16" = V -V 9 8 16 31 69 PROPOSED ENLARGED ELEVATIONS Phase 5 Office Phase 4 Art Wall Phase 1 Restaurant 1-95 Tower Retail Taxi stop 13 boat Slips Retail site perimeter +8 NGVD +8 NGVD +6 NGVD +129 NGvo 9th floor Amenity aeck +33 NGvo 1IG Boor Commerolal _ +8 NGVD Ground Floor _ +6_5 NGVD `Tap of Seawall U J J LU W ry CQC 'L V U 0 SE"EMBER 11, 2014 Q Dec. 19, 2014 ® Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 f i rwa k mad RW - Kimley Morn JUNGO a e pDS KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING N.T.S. W W W.KOBII4IBG.<OM1I - PROPOSED RIVERWALK PROMENADE ELEVATION 1/ D_9 Phase 2 Hotel Phase 1 Art Wall Phase 4 Pedestrian Art Wall To he Bridge Phase 3 Hotel KIVerWalK "" "` "" """' -U a 3- IIUUI Promenade Commercial Commercial Drop-off Drop-off Commercial +S NGVD Commercial z J a � a Q w a N 129 NGVD 9[h floor Amenity deck U J J Lu W +33 NGVD i lid floor Commercial � +$ NGVD Ground Floor +6_5 NGVD Q ` Top of Seawall C '^L U r S SE"EMBIR 11, 2024 REVISIOSIONS Dec. 19, 2014 Jan. 28, 2015 T ® Feb. 26, 2015 %] ® Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 «w v o^ � Rw Kimley»Horn JUNGLES CR11 Orr.. Iry KOBI KARP H C ARDG R W ARCHITECTURE r' i INTE RIDR DESIGN PLAANNING A O Y c NCARB -131-00M W.ROBIBAflP.CON N.T.S. - 3rd AVENUE ELEVATION 010 D-10 Z Q Art Wall Art Wall Phase To be approved Pedestrian To be approved Phase Phase Restaurant Bridges Ter ce - L 4L11 I ro 7 I' I �EII IlilllJll; � I 'rlil _I.I�Llucuo _____________________ 6'6�It��I._. Epp lll�fll +129 NGVD J - fll TI II II IIIA - 9th floorAmenity deck J I lijl�i. w _ 11'till�Wll�.Wrl,� id��'1�9 x lif�V��''ii r,Il,�lll�ll'lll'I,III!I�III�II- - - - .:. � _, _ _ _ _ _ _ *33 NGvD Q 2nd floor Commeraal NGVD I Ground Flaor Top of Seawall (� 7th Street 2nd & 3rd floor Ground floor Pedestrian 6th Street Ground floor 2nd & 3rd floor Pedestrian Upper Public Miami Commercial Commercial Bridges Commercial Commercial Bridges Riverwalk Riverwalk River Promenade Promenade +$ NGVD +6 NGVD C rd Avenue jD - I ° - -- -- v � orthP z • .. ,... °. ,. ._ w q....,: i -o - {. f — Ul SEPfEMBER 11, 2014 — i ti IPhase a2 REVISIONS opgaJ ;V I Dec 19, 2014 O an. II _. _ _ _ ® I 2,2015 ' Amenity de A enity deck � �� 13S<�' ® Feb .26,zols Apc 01, 2015 Phase 3 - ley WWA ® Apc 30, 2015 �J Phase 1 °P�/ U Rw / r plaza"' ley lm>H Horn K' \�J M1'J1�Rhase �2 3 ��i Y JYIR7L[J J '�ta�enitydeck Rooftopgaurden (a Phase 5 Phase 4 KOBI KARP SCE WWposSp of ARCHITECTURE FWOL RA+J25H,C5 _. ¢I.pft� INTERIOR DESIGN t'M nra'g0� UU NING AIA ASIo GARB N.T.S. 2.5 AVENUE ELEVATION D-11 7 M.- 7 7 sw 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7' 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 KEY PLAN N.T. S. c" or mlMl HE r --l— lj— NT—ING— LOBB— OMINILM —N. 4- 1 —0—MINIUM SECTION - PHASE 1 SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" 4 8 16 32 64 PROPOSED TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION M�4 M�4 7 L—L. L—L L—L —14 MM.- —EL Ml I WWI SII f 7 M.- 7 7 sw 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7' 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 KEY PLAN N.T. S. c" or mlMl HE r --l— lj— NT—ING— LOBB— OMINILM —N. 4- 1 —0—MINIUM SECTION - PHASE 1 SCALE: 1/16" = V-0" 4 8 16 32 64 PROPOSED TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION i y' IM 1111111 Irl ------------ � 1 Alllllllllllll _ cm imam ---ricimm�i"— PH - � � ... - � •� �� U'IAPI, HOP HIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _ : eel. ■�,. � II ---- ----------- lm�m FROM JI ; ! a � -�I�I�Iiitfli ii ii X1111—Ilii — — ®. am i of Ali h� ..III'' °` 'p "' .".1111111 Illliiil a '��!lG."■ q � _ d � v , l comm ,d �d;�s � iu�ui� �: 0 __ I i I II �,y�f mAi I�j-- 111E Hili Ti Tlf iiiii -- �� I I ,i iiiii i { cownses C71MMOMMF DTL "A" 'U DTL DTL "B" d DT "I", 4 I— ELEVATION SECTION SCHEMATIC SECTION AND DETAILS KEY SCALE: 1/4" : I-0' MIAMI RIVER DISTRICT - DESIGN ADDENDUM PACKAGE SCHEMATIC SECTION AND DETAILS i�ii.eeneurieiii I p� ,�.10111111111iIIII1I...IL"._� °"• ........ iiiiiiiiiiiiMal iiiiiii (% OPEN AREA=OPEN AREA(12,652)/TOTAL FACADE AREA (W,279) = R5% (% OPEN AREA = OPEN AREA (7,530) / TOTAL FACADE AREA (35,840) = 21% (% OPEN AREA=OPEN AREA(325)/TOTAL FACADE AREA (23.3M) (% OPEN AREA=OPEN AREA ('3.391) 1 TOTAL FACADE AREA(22,977) = 1A% = 58% (GLASS COVERED AREA = GLASS AREA (18,034 / TOTAL FACADE AREA 38,279) PEDESTAL - WEST ELEVATION AT SW 3rd AVE N.T.S. Z s a _a a W a Ul U J J ry LLJ C� L CQC V U e.: xCNN SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REV15IONS Q D-19,2014 ® J— 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2015 Ap, 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 CI Rw COVERED AREA GLASS AREA(24,389/ Kimley,))Horn (GLASS TOTAL FACADE AREA 35,640) = 68% (GLASS COVERED AREA=GLASS AREA(20,212L TOTAL FACADE AREA (23,332) (GLASS COVERED AREA GLASS AREA (6,102/ TOTAL FACADE AREA (22,9n) = R7% = 27% JUNGLES PEDESTAL - EAST ELEVATION AT SW 2.5nd AVE PEDESTAL - NORTH ELEVATION AT SW 5th STREET PEDESTAL - SOUTH ELEVATION AT SW 6th STREET :,__.-....j.-.:____ N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. OVERALL CALCULATION `K FACADE AREA = 118,228 SF. KOBI KARP GLASS COVERED AREA = 68,363 88,363 / 118,228 = .58 ARCHITECTURE 58% GLASS FACADE GLASS PERCENTAGE CALCULATION / PHASE - 1 INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING CRY OF I"MAI N.T.S. AIA 111D NCAR8 OPEN AREA HE - AAD9 zs�seuay, a,a GLASS COVERED . FACADE GLASS PERCENTAGE CALCULATION N.T.S. W,NW RDR RARP�DN - FACADE GLASS PERCENTAGE CALCULATION D-17 7111111/11 ■■• � � �,� r �. - iunIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I�I J��Illlh° I rill �� 1 IIINIM 1- .. �nnpul�Yllluuu�u ,� � A i, +I�I •III �r -�.� Ali 1 I YehY�e�- �L�n�n... ,IIn�F�� r.31 .n ��1� '1 I Illm�ll�'m��i II ip10 ,s I :Il�illll M ! II I a -* _ — 40-4 1 ...... , iY,�l ill �- - _. a. � Il I. � � ml I; Y ICllllllllln. _ � ��fl� �o�i� I� 1, �1� - ILII - �I' _ — _ _ unl Irt � � '>■�,.'.- z a, l CIFY 07 ptLM1PAI Hep.::,..... [^ANDS FLS N 1— �. `YIMII 3D RENDERINGS -AERIAL VIEW A s HIMl��_ MEN fill PROO 1 010. FA (l �A.:: .«fin citit��:' 4{ 4 � i• +/ `+^,. ;` der.:. ii` j '� ^ �5v � _ f - —'•�!` � a� "�` %. • A ' '� - i.?. -i. � } ?t \. - s 4 F} it _ :..✓��!""^��. jP{� w' S' .. _ � � urs„ � � : � �� •'F _- c' r� �y w Oyu s _ _ r rS�.•yc^-- �p y - _tel �_ nlfll� �lob .xf , AM-----®Asaw i ;„� Lal■■■�� ■ ■11i � .: ��IIII,IIIIIIIii�111� � II1II'` _ �- I -� .■■.1111'1.J1■18��i1y� 1' t J01�- ..uo■ . ■oou.. �, iIii � ,� � �� Ij i � "K ��• .... A _ -_ . _ . •�....■ ■■ �� :191 II I _.. ~ -sem -! �y,pMUM- — n - � 01M' f L_ R\ Ard .16 d y , own CIT 17 Prl�- -AROS FL rn 3D RENDERINGS - VIEW FROM MIAMI RIVER 3D RENDERINGS - VIEW FROM MIAMI RIVER T� lial del" I1111111111IIIIIIII I - IIS jIC�II !l1111lI!l�II�IIII'I��Illllu �I�lilillllllll l u i"11�1��1!.VIIIl�!!!!!!!!11t111lllllliii�� , •' u�ww•^x. a �' r w T. i rT. _ _ iflrl • ll t OM. iI�Iim MIAMI.: II�I�I.es�glVl 64 azloot, S�'n•'?x: �, oY 4 Y _ I �� I�I 'y �., a.-#. 3D RENDERINGS - VIEW FROM 7TH ST. AND 2ND AVE. emmmwmf 1 ,r r7l r' 4 � E o 15 R y I ti I y r� • x.d � dl �I � ad � ��l "1 �'i'� + . � , �� rT ��Y1 �'� r es \: j�"` • `�^� >: �34 T �,� MIMI t do OP Sri r s 7', alL�rs �l7 li, . r.�., �I �, , 2,�.C•, d.�� Yh .` .7 rye. � � .ate. �"& i I�:. �. �i •i, �l 1 �Y'3'1 I ,5' •� 'A :'J � .7., t f �^ V7tic 4 « ��' f t:� ,: <. #^ '.� � 6 ✓•i�' .. `'641 (7.f�.rY�e•�.I�yd�``/tg�l "rl s.�sA,,rrr� ,ndtr �w yu t .^ *d� _ C YP _ I Plittif'' , 7 ss- : v'' %r R ":i� + F+` •1 t ><�+ ' �A r a � i6 it l}`,}•�! 1 - eta.♦ Y tN'r �1r�4tis1 %�is 5��:. -' ..*.� a: •T Y 'r Y��'.s b'.:5 i � + to ih '1.• � � iN '. � � ,1 � t,,�L� y.l '."f Y � � ,e ..a>��'' R 'lP i7i 1 t e 9' '�"^ r za c �t .�. r '� 'ILS i � _,•'`<,�;' _ R ar"j{ ;1 ' I A� t e t #r'4 ltlY1fL4 s YYY 1 � , 11 Fw 5 m MAI a 1 a I a \ �C~�ir ddikgs w Y – c kq Y_ I he design content material attached Is the sale property of Kobl Karp Architecture and Interior Design, Inc_ The design material may not be aced with—t the expressed written consent of Kobl Karp Architec-ure and Intend gn• Inc (KKAID). W W W.KOBIKARP.CO. illIll �" 14F Iri " 1100 11 III�IIa t ` s 1,4 IIAL _� --- t , a a%l,,_ �lllllll �✓�� t k iwll : RFs.__ —INA F -'7\177 _ - �r, �f.sP litNON\ + t rl' "'��I°"► s• lit IIS t INOlow11� � I � � Vii` �� _�1• � J ,;� , �: � � �� . i� rc . � -� �i �. � i � s � •�, � .nom �,�:. � � yf% Am I TAW Z pp xl _ N ` r • R , 1 a� y t. t, r'pop .r r r JR5• or r^+arm 3D RENDERINGS - MIAMI RIVER ELEVATION PROJECT INFORMATION DIAGRAMS SEED CHECKLIST C[; Y NE. [: O.flDS LEED-BD +C Version 2009 Registered Project Checklist AIldia lits Water Use Reduction ° Use highedciency fixtures, waterless annals, and ocwpant senmm to reduce potable v water use Iry 20%. then inclutllnd inroad r z o Water Effident z Reducepolablewaler use for landsnpieg by 50%using edci,nt irrigation teclniques, Landscaping, d...Itt I ted plants and/or raptured raI—. z Cliedd lion Activity Develop erasion & sesimentalion control plan for most. a ,las. a v j Pollution Prevention p Prevent lass&mil by atenT,ater run off orw,no erasion z o Water Use Reducgon z Use hlgheff ieney fixtures, watert annals, and emaganl senmm b reduce potable water use by 30%. (Not indudm imoador Prevent sedimentation of stomtsewem or di streams nnllt4inn of mw air wid dust mMrle voose , Redumpdable water useby35%. Performance Ch site Nat is not: Prime farmland, UHevdopect and elevation 5 ft. above FEMA t o Site Selection , 100 yr flood,_h,d id -bled as habitat torted or state endangered spect Undeveloped t the enject,detudes an add.on w Q-, more Na12 t nni existing Within, optimize Energy andwithin 50 ftwete, body tlab,ad by Ne clean Water Ad, Public NhWurd. t o Development Density Choose a previously developed site n e mmmundy with aminimum densry of 60,000 s o and Community a SF/Acre ore, n 1/2 mile ef lO besic services and a home tial neighborhood with an 1 c Material Reusespecial, Connectivityere Brmvntudd danaiN of lO units deracn Build on a registered brownfielc. Defined as a bin -,field by a local, state, «federal 1 ° Redevelopment ° govammaut agency, or tlowmauad as eehaminated(by means of an ASTM E1903-97 Phase It Envi—d ental Site Alenan em or a lural volunbry cleanup proamr a ° A&edeative a Select site within 12 mile of a I'ght rail or subway OR within 1/4 mile of a bus stip used by ] o Trane -dation. Public A&eedune 2 «more bus Imme es (asured fmn a main buildino enlmnw Comidalel or Institutional Pru,d Provide sewn bicycle racks f«5%in the bulltling 1 p Teareporaagon, `yd, t users&sh—erleN ing tedlities for 0.5%M FTE .—pante. U bu'Itl'gm@Itha[h been extruded tarveslH«recoveres and manufzdur.d tM1 500 le f th p eau rte ft, a edemum of 10%of the bu ldirm material cods. Slemge & Changing Residential Pmecta: Provide covered dotage fee Ite,ele,fer 15% If building ocwpanta. Afteal tie Provide ondlead Parking for low-emlNng and fuel elfieent athe. for 1% If the total I Tmspode len, Lew -a v hide perking. OR _ m Eitting and Fuel EffideM Alternative Instal altematha fact heade, ane ,, for 3%of the total erid, parkin mood Size pui net to exceed local zoning requirements and pd feted earhanei pal for s e TransporfatmnP lug 5% tall ranking -al ORP E fe1. than 3%M FTE Building Pa is and Enhanced le.iukhtCapadty Prete red park g b P far l%of pace ORP e o n park R R denial: ° Bill Development P u d ped thh 50% f[M1e fie (nt dngbltlgf olp' Qor20% a o Protect or Restore H bila fie re Ih ti dapti tali 1 ° 5'te Develo pman4 P dh g led er spa 1 es local . g aqs by 25%. OR Ab there are 1 he Ideal reqs. for open space, —, I vagedued open spam equal to bldg Imtpnnt. OR a c Maximire Open Space Where inning drdinane lei l bin ne rei for open space, provide 20%°x, spars. starmwa[er Design Exist I1pemms-50%: Prevented development peak discharge rate and quanta, from ° Quantity -1 exce Hing the Predevelopment for the 1 and 2 yr 24hr design storm ' .IA,m°arvidua .is>50%: Decrease volume M the 2 v, —r runoff by 25h mrw Staabign, r Des Ole BMP, In —191 of the annual raiMall. Remove 110% If the, TSS Imd based on ° Quality Ctrol Control existing h ibdng rapeds, ORThed, exists infierformce ld peanmolted data ' deelealeatino—.,an-wiNthe cntm: P Heat Island Ellett Non Use hgh dAe,Ince paving matuNih, an open grid payment system and/or Pit f � Reef shade for 50%ofthe site's M1alsaapa, OR Place a minimum It50%d poking spaces undercover t 0 Heat Island Effect Roof , solely a high reflectance roofing Tetanal 11175% efthe mof surtace, OR 50%green r« OR combination v Smoke (ETS)Contnol Int. Light reduce input power df nonemergency int. luminabes ll a direct line of sigh by> Lght Pollution Reduction 1 50%11 p.-5am.ORM,,th,we eldingbrabansnbanceof�10%.Ext Light L° Monttoang areas only req br safety and embd. Must not exceed ASHRAE Stareal90.1-200]. Water Use Reduction ° Use highedciency fixtures, waterless annals, and ocwpant senmm to reduce potable v water use Iry 20%. then inclutllnd inroad r z o Water Effident z Reducepolablewaler use for landsnpieg by 50%using edci,nt irrigation teclniques, Landscaping, d...Itt I ted plants and/or raptured raI—. z 2 Meet above AND Innovative Wastewater Um he potable water br lande,l in[ Re.. puable water use for sewage conveyance by 50%dmughtheuseMwater- a ° Temnolo9bs mnsarvinglHures or recyGes gmYwa[er. OR Treat 50%of wastewater x-sik fo tertiary tendals Treated water must be infiltrated or used on— z o Water Use Reducgon z Use hlgheff ieney fixtures, watert annals, and emaganl senmm b reduce potable water use by 30%. (Not indudm imoador t , Redumpdable water useby35%. Performance Reduce potable water use by 40%. o z I Owner b design and install Educational display, highaghgng the advantages If building + Slorege&Collectiond v j c Fundamental Building eyatems Cedgrete anindep8ntl8M C,,A to verily Nat all energy-related ay,temsare metaled, 0 calibrated and perbrm a«vrding be Ne desgn. Develop OPR, BOD, Commissioning Pen % Commisaionin° Midmum Energy and mmplele CommiedoninO Remrb lt cent, aremttven'r a Performance a gtul ohiglpe—anuml glazng, high. HVAC syle . HVAC energy v �/% o CFC Retluc[ion in unite andllahoedu,ntea buildinobaed- a D. rid use chlorofluoronrbon CFC -based refiigeraMs t the enject,detudes an add.on w Q-, more Na12 t nni existing Within, optimize Energy 12% ReducOonin the building energy eeat based on ASHRAE 90.1. Use enemy effidenI t o Pertormance lighting, high perneeanel glands, high efflclency HVAC systema HVAC a ,Wdemverr units and lith oer(ormartce buildino ervdov 14%Rudi in Me new building enwgycast 1 Rel 15% of the site mnslluetioNde—Iftn waste by weight or volume. Retluttian in Me new bulltling enemyms[ , 18%Retluttian In the new bulltling energycast 20%Reduttian in the new bulltling enemytast 1 c Material Reusespecial, items such as doyators cannot be inducted. Ind,d, malmals pens Nndy I In Ne new building an drywst 24%Retluttian in the new building energycp 26% Retluttian inthe new hulltling energycast installed in the prged. Fumiture may be includes if it is inducted mndaladdy. t n the new bulltling energy cast 30%Re l_ an in the new building a—temst 1 32%Retluttian in the new bulltling eneegycost , 34% Retluttian in the new building ii—1 cast , 36%Re in the new bulldingenergycost n thhewbuo 3408%ReduI. eeenerg Use matenals w/ reryded cement Inst mnwmer + 1rz of pr ananer recycled content %Rub Ilul %tlh b ddIbu,nggyccto 06%Redutt egaosssttt 4%Red. b litldn: neg Redii,bau in the new Will energycost ] o Renewable Energy , Irstallsyetemsbnpbm solar,wind, waleror geothermal energybproduce elMndy cr INet heatinn, cooling or water heating enemy oansumotion by 1' Id mate' cool 2o% f N ""'I" 3%rerewabe energy P-1 ad U bu'Itl'gm@Itha[h been extruded tarveslH«recoveres and manufzdur.d tM1 500 le f th p eau rte ft, a edemum of 10%of the bu ldirm material cods. — li 5% rerxswabe energy pmvitlad wlhn 50) miles of thero dote icraln mum d20%of the halal m P ,a lig mabnelda ]% reN,eathe anergy provided I Use rapidly ren tle building materials for 3.5% of the total value of all building materials. 9% retevlatle energy provided c Caddied Wood �. I Feel Stawalship Council's principles & arteria Fumiture may be Included ifs is ineludetl mnaisteM, 11%reneweble energy pi ad 13%renewael energy provided Enhanced Designabanindepanent CxA tomviewdesigndoamen(sbef«e50%CD,badtcheck z ° Commissioning z 100%CD, review mnbador submidels,eyeems mamal, training, and very opeation w n 10 mcnths after substantial mmdlefil a o Enhadces Refrigerant a DO net use reftgemnta OR sled rebigerant, that minimize or tla rid ... deub be of Management deplete, a c Ideasurement& Verfrca[on a Develop, nea,urementantl varfintil plan for bull anem rgy neureptien. lratell meters on all mubmeM and 19M15ne panel Provide a 2 yr mntmd with a Greene Energy producer fon least 35% of the buiking's Green PowerelII z then, «ce5 be a°as III by the Building Owners and Managers hm renewa Aaandamnn Stand.nik v ° Minimum IAD Meat the minimum-uienm n1adf Sae.N,1throuyh?of ASHRAE Sbedal62.1-200%, ° Ventitatim be,AeNptablelndd,ahr Qualiy(,,d, � Performance ntabNwiNouNdd,ndhd).ANDMaat Mmheninllyandror Nabrelly VeMllaled Space reauiremenla Ii-iranneu." cco Toba Na smdtirg inside bMg 8 wAhin 25 ft of bldg enMes OR ProM1ibit smoking in bldg except In v Smoke (ETS)Contnol t dedgnated smoking areas designed te coraure ntain, ptaand! remove ETS from the bldg, mokin Nin 25ftolenNes. Redcenfiel&H m s g tin ospRslly Pr jeds have add req. outdatr.h Delivery Install mo nW systems bensure v«Nld-maintain, design min. reqs. Equipment la 1 0 Monttoang alarm when akfiow or CO2 vary by, IM feed design talu by BAS alarm I,the beg operator «aH bm ldg eemete AND Mast mnd/or eth. anabmve Ay ntilated space reqs. Mach. Ventilated Spaces: Inaease be=ading+one ventilation udder air rates all I, Increases Veedbtion —p.spaces>3(X,... ethe min. rates required by ASHRAESbnd«d62.1-200]. Nat Ventilates Spaces: Design for omtpied spaces to -at (DIME) Construction IAO Develop and implement an IAQ management plan. DuTig mneuedon, peeect tlmtw«k c ..:..� Management Plan, ted ire—eNa deteaais from water and dull AND protect air handling equipment bang Duan° Conetrudier Construction IAODevelop used dunna construction and implement an an IAQ mannardent plan, r c Management Plan, , Flush Out poor he occupancy or with mupancy. Before Cmup Testing. PN, be omuoancv Low EmNtng Materala Antawa5 Se I to and Seale lP' ust ounply th SOM Coad A' Chunky I c Amesives & Sealants f ManagamaM Oath (SCAQMD) R 11169. Vdabl 0-9 mmpou d (VOC) limits, Mandeedat Ult et B-5, tl ndmeMtl 1 fJ ary],2005. Low-EmdlI, Materials Pa ntalmei A d on Ne int Mth beg must m ply. Arch. Iaainta/mati g Gram Seal t c Paints and COatinga I shared GS 11,Anti-mnosive paints limitof 250 gIL-Green Seal StarMard GG03,Clear wood finishes, limits -South Dealt Air Orality Management Didnd Rule 1113, Low-Emdting Mata Nils, Carpet meet, Carpet and Rug Insulae', Green Label Rus. Cumion meets CRI Girvan 1 c bi,en g Systems t Label. Adhes re me eta VOD limit ef 50 glL Hal Amnn3 must be FlmrSc°re. III— flniaha5 reee6 SCAQMD Rule 1113 The setting adhesives meets SCAQMD Rule 1168 Low -Emitting Materials, Use particle tool, MDF, plywmtl and dmr cores that contain m added urea- , c - Composite WOH and , formaldehyde. Laminating adhesives used b fabnele on-site arts slop -applied m'et not F.arii Pmeucta inn din .it urea-brmddehvde realm Indent Chae b 8 Contra entry of polefanfa into bldg,. & voss h1hanelti°n of res. omtpies areas: Pollutant Spence 1 Pedeadant entryway syslemQ he A Img. Exhaust ine, a glealkheminl areas, Control Provitle alklesirg doors&tack -to deck auditions or Ni ceflhg leatell nee air filNI mad, I MERV 13 COnb'nment br dsmel of hazardous liqu E wastes. o Controllfl 1 pep;dp'ndW.1l gtd ng eIdl for s 90% of the ee,delial, Pr idalghing systems ".- of 3rstems ❑uhf rip c NI, ber share maidw tent. -ocpent spacesI, mate s adjusm 1 ° Con[ro8abddytf the bldg occupants AND pmvitle mmrert 1 Protide ftr Systems TM1ermd NdimmfortceuNnt>eek, controls br shared malt occupant spaces o Thermal Comfod , Prov de comfortable thermal N- meets ASHRAE Slandant SS2004 o Thermal .mwith'm6-18 1 Acheve EQ]la�dagre.ndudathe,mlcoml,urveyofbuld'ngtech, ie Verificefim mmthe If ocwpancy. Provide bsr CIdeedve AGim if over 20% he dialbak. I ° Daylight &Viewer 1 Computer Simulations, of Presenptive Odculatim, or Measurement, or Combination Daylight demonstrate>]5% regularly occupied spans ani required daylight,huminance levels 1 o Daylight&Viawa, Views , Achieve atlirad line IfsigM b the oubmr environment via vision glazing fer bulldirg omupadib in 90%M all rmdady mmpiH area: o z I Owner b design and install Educational display, highaghgng the advantages If building + Slorege&Collectiond Prowde an acrossible area orareasllal br Ne mllemOneH atomge M endaiialsfor ° % Recyclable, /- °—Ilingbr Ne entire bulltling.Mutant, must imdude at a mirimum paper nmugated ,b d°lass. olaun. and meNle Building Reuse Maintan t Reuse 55%oftheaziati,,1uding sbell(excludirg w dheedi Amrs and tint. _ Innovagon in Deaiyn -Green Reuse75%of Ne eziding btildirg sM1ell (exdu0irg wineaws), Amm and roof t t Reuse 95%of Ne exialirg bulldirg -1 (exdudirg windows), floors and roof Maintain lneeaor Non Reuse 50% eftlte existing Buddinglnlare, Norvsbudural elements. NOT APPLICABLE t c SWctual Elements t the enject,detudes an add.on w Q-, more Na12 t nni existing Within, Canetruction Waste Recycle and/or salvage nonhaerdoa crostruction and to—IAmn debns. Develop and t c Management implement a construction write management plan. Reei 50%ofth, site snmmmVdaidi waste by weight «velum t 1 Rel 15% of the site mnslluetioNde—Iftn waste by weight or volume. Use salvaged, refurbished or reused materials for 5%of the bldg material mod. MEP and 1 c Material Reusespecial, items such as doyators cannot be inducted. Ind,d, malmals pens Nndy installed in the prged. Fumiture may be includes if it is inducted mndaladdy. t , Use le liteq refurbishes or reused leaden ils fer 10%ofth, bdg netend mate. Use matenals w/ reryded cement Inst mnwmer + 1rz of pr ananer recycled content c Recycled Content I 110% efthe building minternal desk. Fumiture may be imludec rf it is i,Guded crosslently 1 Use matedals w( reryded mutant, Inst consumer + 1/2 Of p ---,recycles content Id mate' cool 2o% f N ""'I" a t --,- - Regional Materials U bu'Itl'gm@Itha[h been extruded tarveslH«recoveres and manufzdur.d tM1 500 le f th p eau rte ft, a edemum of 10%of the bu ldirm material cods. — li F ih, a mai lebunduded if t'11 Gutletl condsfenr Use b , d ng mater els that have been -el harvested «recovered and ne nufec ,d wlhn 50) miles of thero dote icraln mum d20%of the halal m P ,a lig mabnelda a c Rapidly Renewable Matedals I Use rapidly ren tle building materials for 3.5% of the total value of all building materials. Use min. 50% (based on cod) wooddased material, & pro ea that are certified with c Caddied Wood �. I Feel Stawalship Council's principles & arteria Fumiture may be Included ifs is ineludetl mnaisteM, �� the_, _, Innovedon In Dedgn I Owner b design and install Educational display, highaghgng the advantages If building _ Green Education and omuoyin9 LEED certiged buildings 1 InnovationN De sign 'Green I Demonstrate lhatthe Jarilmal Company has been omlradetllo exewlea Green Cleaning Cle,aning Program as per USGBC equrements. _ Innovagon in Deaiyn -Green 1 Demonstrate that Ne Pesl Manage ,eu Cwnpeny bas been wntleRd W exewte an Pest C.—Inegdeed Pesl Management Protean as per USGBC requirementsbo. Innovation in Deai9rs ellgibla br RBglenal Prony Credits cR lnbeenated Paid , Inst Wta integrated pest management pmts. Management TBD , LEED'^ACcra bed a a.: Pmfaaeiorel 1 A[leasll pnndpal paldpaM of the pmied lead shall bee LEED Awretlites Profe,eional an Use higheRiden ixMres, land urinal,, and occupant bums, te reduce potable 1 _ Regional Prloriy: WeMr Use Reduction 1 water use by 30%. (Net indutltrg kngation) Y - Regional Pill , Building Reuse Maintain Existing Walls, Flmrs, and Roof c Regional Priority: " felTitle ne point is awartlm roc gam Regronal Pre dy deammved' mt , he more than 4 «W , identified as Reglmal Pn,ntycredits may be earned. Proledsoutside tihetU.S. are not eligible for Regional Pri.dy credits. gtona dY: n.�. Re I Prior Una point Is awarded M InRegronal Prnrey tread—,a- no more Nan 4 ted , itlentifiH as RaOierul Priority I— may be Barnes. Prolectsoutaide tithe U.S. are not Spsdfio The ellgibla br RBglenal Prony Credits H(rt� f Asl '°az`'Tl TARSI ___ LEED CHECKLIST U J J uj W cokf L C_QC /L V U SEPTEMBER 31, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 8 Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2M5 Apr. 01, 2015 8 Ap, 30, 2015 Rw Kimlep Horn LANDSCAPE PLAN INDEX JUNGLES a �K KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE CITY f!F f"" .P01 HER=•; F.;,AHOS .-W INTERIOR DESIGN At: AIA w51P A— '�^"�+�— WWW31NaIKPna.COM L-1 LANDSCAPE PLAN INDEX 1` Transecl2ons: D-3 Lot Area 61.243 sf Acres 1.4 LANDSCAPE LEGEND IxEoaNniiox Repeiaeo ro eE v[xNnu[nr�v nrrixao To R�nxs REQUIRED/ PROVIDED Transect Zone: T6 -36-B-0 Lot Area 210.622 of Acres 4.83 OPEN SPACE REQUIRED/ PROVIDED Lot Area= 61.2 s.tx 10 %= 812 s.f. ALLOMU A. Square feet of required Open Space, as indicated on site plant. 21,062 sf 21 062 sf B. _ Lot Area =210.622 af. x 10 %=21 062 s.f. C. Square feet of parking lot open space required byArtide 9, as indicated onsite plan: Number of parking spaces 0 x 10 s.fper parking space= D. Total square feet of landscaped open space required: A+B= wN AREA CALcu °TION A. Square feet of landscaped open space required by Miami2l: B. Maximum lawn area (sad) permitted = 20 % x21 062 s.f. If— A. Number of trees required per net lot acre, less existing number of" as meeting minimum requirements= 22 treesx 4.83 netlotacres – number of existing trees= B. % Palms allowed: Number of trees Provided x 30%= C. % Natives required: Number of trees provided x 30%= D. %Drought tolerant and low, maintenance: Number of trees provided x 20% _ E. Street Trees(maximum average spacing of 30'o,): 2.179 linear feet along street / 30 = % Palms permitted to count towards street trees cn 1:1 basis x 30%: SHRuas A. Number of shrubs required: Number of trees required x 10= B. % Native shrubs required: Number of shrubs provided x 30%= C. % Drought tolerant and low, maintenance required. Number of shrubs provided x 21 N/A N/A 21.082 sf 21 062 sf 21 062 sf 21,062 sf 4212 sf 4,212 sf 106 106 32 32 32 32 2_ 21 (5 LANDSCAPE LEGEND --- - .1 rrxEeTOP.xa Transecl2ons: D-3 Lot Area 61.243 sf Acres 1.4 OPex SvacE REQUIRED/ PROVIDED AU—. A. Square feet of required On Space, as indicated on site Ian: 6.124 sf 6,1249 Lot Area= 61.2 s.tx 10 %= 812 s.f. N/A N/A B. Square feet of parking lot open space required by Article 9, as indicated on site plan: Number of parking spaces Ox 10 s f. per parking space= 6.124 sf 6.124 sf C. Total square feel of landscaped open space required: AFB= L°wx Avvs�Cp� yl� A. Square feet of landscaped open space required by Miami2l: 6.124 sf 6.124 sf B. Maximum lawn area (sod) permitted = Q_-/. x 6 124sf 1,224 sf 1,224 sf s.f. TREES A. Number of trees required per net lot acre, less existing number of trees meeting minimum requirements = 22 treesx 1.4 netlotacres–number es= ofecatingtre 31 31 B. %Palms allowed: Number oftrees provided x 30%= 10 10 C. % Natives required: Number of trees provided x 30%= 10 10 D. % Drought tolerant and low maintenance: 6 6 Number of trees provided x 20%= E. Street Trees (maximum average spacing of 30'o.0.): 9 11 273 linear feet along street 130= % Palms permitted to count towards street trees on 1:1 basis x 30%: 73 78 SBRUM A. Numberof shrubs required: Number ofthen required x 10= 310 +/-310 1.030 +/-1.030 B, % Native shrubs required: Number of shrubs provided x 30%= 93 +/-93 309 +/-309 C.%Dmughltoleranlandlowmainlenanmmquimd: Number of shrubs provided x 20%= 62 +/-62 206 +-206 C n r nn H RDS F -\J LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CT m C� m• �1 m dYy r d J w., II LY m' III I`Y _m 1 III Y rLO 1 - - I i I I III 'I � II I I I I I I A I I I I III I EIIB__i r. I'I }_ I. __- I Iii I�} — Y - — -- --a- 1 ----- r A L ----J F yYll Y� A IY N I III < I I Y 9Y I I III j P Y I L-4=- I A I I ,A I I aZ I $ Y4 yJO —� 1 SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 DIC, 19,2014 8 Jan- 28 2015 6 Feb. 26, 2015 Apr01, 2015 6 Apr. 30, 2015 TREE SURVEY PLAN Rw Kimley»>Horn KOBI KARP C h �f.il NDS o` Fw < IJ ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN P-NNIG AIA RB ON NORTH ., y�e��f`i��•r—t _�,=j, L zsz a.e � r.3os.sz3.sz66 Bz.__�Yk r www NOB RaRRCOM L-3 TREE SURVEY PLAN --------------- SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 RE MONS D-1:,2014 Jan. 2 2015 Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01,2 15 Apr. 30, 2015 W a Kimley>)>Horn Sir KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE I CI r NI N! INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING x-5 L-5 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN Cocos nucifera, Coconut Palm Syagrus romanzoffiana, Queen Palm Archontophoenix alexandrae, Alexander Palm Bursera simaruba, Gumbo Limbo Sabal palmetto, Sabal Palm Delonix regia, Royal Poinciana Roystonea regia, Royal Palm torr eF n;ir.nni PROPOSED TREE RELOCATION IMAGES PHASE LAWN JOSE MARTI PARK r EXISTING POOL MIAMI RIVER 7SE I RIVERWALK JOSiE�ARTI ------------ ------ --- 3RD AVENUE ------------ ------- NORTH PLAZA ENLARGEMENT IE ------------- 2.5 AVE ENLARGEMENT /-------MAIN ZA ENLARGEMENT 2 HA 5 RIVERWA ------- SOUTH PLAZA ENLARGEMENT I------------- oiry of - , s UND -:V,wz� OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITHOUT CANOPY 2.5 AVE ENLARGEMENT— CTl CO. AMI n c >nlaos OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH CANOPY ce I CANOPY TREES, TYP • RAMP SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Dec. 11,2014 8 Jzn 28, 201s ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apt. 01, 2015 ® Apr 30, 2015 L-1 1 NORTH PLAZA ENLARGEMENT `.. z LEGACY TREE ; a _ rc CUST AT -WALL/ a0 t Y BE Q u0 STEPS U !'S' PUBLIC RIVERWALuL T' v 0NE1 CD A. is A r F + PLANTER, TYSEFTEMBER 21, 201 P �•� _ ,' '{ - `syyyry ..hj. j 4 2 REVISIONS Dec 19, 2014 Ja, 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 APc 01, 2015 ` � � ,�' 2 � :. �• ® APr. 30, 2015 Rw KimleyoHorn JUNGLES MIAMI RIVER �yy KOBI KARP / ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 1�� ROS RAs oNlrvu. W 91A ap ` % -l�—�q I�_— www.Koeimaa.com L-12 SOUTH PLAZA ENLARGEMENT SW 2.5 AVENUE ENLARGEMENT SEfRfMRER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Dec. 19, 2014 8 Ian. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 4pr.01, 2015 6 4pr. 30, 2015 Rw Kimley»>Hom DUB KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE s---��u•vry INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING 0' 15' 30' K, -� O Ain ASio aro P.COw L-14 2ND LEVEL PLAN STAIR EGRESS -FROM- a LEVEL 2 TO -LEVEL 3 a a acs • TRELLIS WITH BUILT-IN c� BENCH _Q as RAISED PLANTERS, ^� TYPICAL d f y` 4F u r � r � _ I •� FOUNTAIN AND I 11 I • a;k e. < r w • I _ II I PLANTED AREA (NATIVE t o t; a a r I i t I a TROPICALS), TYP. � I I EVENT GATHERING SPACE Q �•.o „b,, • -, _ PLANTED AREA (NATIVE TROPICALS), TYP. aJ EVEN GATHERING SPACE SEPTEMBER � REVISIONS � m Dec. 19 -014 1 t Jan. 28, 2015 Feb.2015 ® APr O1,l, 2015 Apr. 30,2015 I l Rw Kimley»Horn RAISED PLANTER AND PLANTED AREA (NATIVE TROPICALS), TYP. a R=c aos KOBI KARP —y_ — ARCHITECTURE INTERIORDESIGN .... .:...:i...... PLANNING 0' 15' 30 60' zsi a,e itn'R.COm L-15 3RD LEVEL PLAN RAISED PLANTERS, TRELLIS STRUCTURE WITH SWIMMING POOL TYPICAL PLANTING O o -� 0 a s acsoaa+el Z Q PLUNGE POOL ` SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 — REVISIONS O �� j 6 )' © Dec, 19, 2014 eb. 26, 2015 Apr. Ol, 2015 AP, 30, 2015 cl 444i -- G` SWIMMING POOL � _ 4Q, R 2 I \w .....,.... Kimley»)Horn SPORTS/BOCCE BALL COURT LAWN / GATHERING SPACE imo a cry r r an,.a.s..=.•� .% KOBI KARP icy V/ -r ARCHITECTURE � INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING 0' Aslo 15' 30' 60' zsi w L-16 9TH LEVEL PLAN 3 SW 4TH AVE HANDICAP + SECURITY PARKING CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA JOSE MARTI MEMORIALWALL NEW OVERHEAD TRELLIS STRUCTURE RENOVATED SWIMMING POOL + DECK RELOCATED POOL PUMP HOUSE GAME AREA RIVERWALK CUBAN PALM COLLECTION z a w s� �as N as Q w0 a¢ LAWN - OPEN GATHERING/ - PLAY PLANNING AIA ASID NLRB isv .a f,.ess.3aaa U NEW WALKWAYS WITH J J INTEGRAL COLORED PAVING PATTERN j Q U RIVERWALK SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS /i m Dec. 19, 2014 ® lan. 28, 2015 A Feb 26,2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 Rw Kimley>»Horn a KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 0 15' 3333-�60' O N SCALE: I"=3O' PLANNING AIA ASID NLRB isv .a f,.ess.3aaa L-17 JOSE MARTI PARK PLAN HANDICAP + SECURITY PARKING CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA JOSE MARTI MEMORIAL WALL NEW OVERHEAD TRELLIS STRUCTURE RENOVATED SWIMMING POOL +DECK RELOCATED POOL PUMP HOUSE GAME AREA RIVERWALK CUBAN PALM COLLECTION 0:12 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Dec. 19, 2014 8 J— 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 4p, 01, 2015 8 4p, 30, 2015 R Kimley>»Hom Z Q My OFARDE.. 611�.aovn P``N, d a -_ KOBI KARP � as as sv Q uH 0' 15' 30' 60' O � N SCALE: I"=30' 14— 91R S.3os.s�3.3�ss W W W.KOBIIURP.roM1I LAWN - OPEN GATHERING/ end PLAY U NEW WALKWAYS WITH J — INTEGRAL COLORED PAVING PATTERN Lu > Q QD U 0:12 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Dec. 19, 2014 8 J— 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 4p, 01, 2015 8 4p, 30, 2015 R Kimley>»Hom SAM My OFARDE.. 611�.aovn P``N, — SK -_ KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE sv INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING P=ING 0' 15' 30' 60' O � N SCALE: I"=30' 14— 91R S.3os.s�3.3�ss W W W.KOBIIURP.roM1I JOSE MARTI PARK PLAN WITH TREE CANOPY ENLARGEMENT KEY FITNESS AREA RETAINING WALL AND BENCH AT EXISTING MAHOGANY SPECIMEN INTERACTIVE FOUNTAIN FEATURE U Lu Lu Q U `V SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 p Dea 19, 2014 8 lan_ 28,2015 ® 'eb. 26,2015 © 4p,. 01, 2015 8 4p, 30, 20n 3' SAFETY ZONE W� WCUSTOM BENCH AND RIVER VIEW TERRACE Kimley*Horn EXISTING BULKHEAD JUNGLES IS --.�irfLL - --. � KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 0 ].5-'i5' 30' O PLANNING 91^ 1111 NIIRI L-19 JOSE MARTI PARK ENLARGEMENT ENLARGEMENT KEY z a 6 W H as — — Q V� C C H� a U J J LL RELOCATED PUMP -HOUSE Q CD U GAME AREA (CHESS/DOMINOES) RIVERWALK SEPTEMBER 31, 2014 REV 510 S GATHERING AREA 0 EDc 19, 2014 6 Ja, 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2015 Zj Apr. 01,2015 ® Apr. 30,2015 EXISTING BULKHEAD Rw Kimley*Born JUNGLES � a q afI KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE 0' 7.5' 1515-30' N O INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING AIA ASID NCARB xvv a.a L-20 JOSE MARTI PARK ENLARGEMENT KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING AIA 111D N111 L-21 MIAMI RIVERSIDE CENTER ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL KIOSK SIGN SMALL DIRECTIONAL/ INFORMATION SIGN PEDESTRIAN DIRECTIONAL SIGN Typical Riverwalk Section I s I 's � t5'-te' I 3'-a• I m... Pin»e` c..z.... Typical Riverwalk Plan cGr: c=rt^:n^i rt r an' RIVERWALK DESIGN STANDARDS L SW 3RD AVE � _ I _ 1 A J L� W �W y W O 3RD LEVEL TERRACE WITH ROOF GARDEN PHASE 2 BUILDING PLAN 50' SETBACK MIN O PLANTER/ > w PLANTER/ :TRANSITION: CIRCULATION ZONE/ " a TERRACE ;PASSIVE ZONE; ZONE PUBLIC RIVERWALK w "' 6' MIN. X MIN. X MIN. 16' MIN. ; 1'+ 0 z I 1 I I W Iz I� Ir IW Id ----------------------------- 0 1� 1 1 1 1 i i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 PLANTING 1 1 BEYOND a a w � as Q a a C_ VO G h � a J C� Q U SEPTEMBER - REVISIONS m Dec.19,2014 ® Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 A Ap, 30, 2015 R Kimley*Horn 25' SETBACK MIN. MIAMI RIVER 4. FROM FACEOF BULKHEAD — TERRACE PLANTER CRY CP c^.UMI HFA:" PLANNING AIA ASID N-1 ai re I 2ND LEJEL TERRA E RIVERWALK 1Sir LEVEL TERRACE i PLANTED,,. `SEATING O PLANTER/ > w PLANTER/ :TRANSITION: CIRCULATION ZONE/ " a TERRACE ;PASSIVE ZONE; ZONE PUBLIC RIVERWALK w "' 6' MIN. X MIN. X MIN. 16' MIN. ; 1'+ 0 z I 1 I I W Iz I� Ir IW Id ----------------------------- 0 1� 1 1 1 1 i i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 PLANTING 1 1 BEYOND a a w � as Q a a C_ VO G h � a J C� Q U SEPTEMBER - REVISIONS m Dec.19,2014 ® Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 A Ap, 30, 2015 R Kimley*Horn MIAMI RIVER - KOBI KAP.P ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN CRY CP c^.UMI HFA:" PLANNING AIA ASID N-1 ai re .ws.sAs.s'�z� --KA—.. SITE SECTION A L-23 RIVERWALK i_ SW 30 AVE PLAN SW 7TH STREET EXISTING z l7 Y l7z _ z Q Z ; z' EXISTING TRAFFIC LANES ~ "3' SIDEWALK, N.LC.! I1' LANE 11' LANE i V LANE z Z. H ;. i ENTRY TERRACE SW 7TH ST. N.LC BLDG. SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 01 �eC. 19, X014 8 Jan. 28,1015 A Feb 2b, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 8 A,r. 30,2015 Rw KimleyoHorn MG0 a KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN I-ANNING 0' 2' 4' 8' AIA xe _ zsys eisayne eoolwa.a AI ZI col wwN�B SITE SECTION B L-24 - SW 7TH STREET (WEST END) L SV�-MAVE r"I"m �Ul (9 1-95 beyond NA.0 SW 7TH STREET 0 EXISTING TRAFFIC LANES 6- MIN. S, ENTRY TERRACE : ....... 11' LANE 11' LANE 11' LANE d SIDEWALK_ !STEPS_: 6' MIN. --------------- ----------------- -------------------- ------ ---------- ......... _ --------- SW "N ST. NA.0 PLAN PHASE 4 BUILDING -0 r. SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REV SIONS Dec 1:,2 14 J— 29, '2015 A Feb 26,2015 A Apr. 01 2015 A Apr. 30,2015 Rw2 E Kimley*liom KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE I NTERIOR DESIGN 2' PLANNIt" 8 AIA W—RIKA—OM SITE SECTION C L-25 SW 7TH STREET (EAST END) 3: SW 3RD STREET STREFrsCAPE ON -STREET EXISTING PLANTING SIDEWALK; PARKING TRAFFIC LANE 4' MIN. 6' MIN. 8, 13' LANE -------------- --------- ---------------------------------------- SW 3RD STREET EXISTING S7REE7SCAPE TRAFFIC LANE PLANTING SIDEWALK STEPS: ENTRY TERRACE 13'LANE4'MIN. VMIN. 3' : VMIN. ........ I -------------- ---------- -------------------------- PLAN TERRACE SE—NIB— REVISIONS E—NIBRE ISIONS Dec 19, 2014 J- 28,2015 A Feb 26, 2015 A Ap, 01,2015 A Apr 30,2015 RW Kimley)))Hom jUNGLES BLDG. KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 0• 2• 8 PLANNING R. WWW.MBIR W.COM SITE SECTION D L-26 SW 3RD AVENUE NEAR SW 6TH STREET sv ON -STREET EZTI`Nr- 4 � z 9 � i ON -STREET ENTRY : SIDEWALK PARKING TRAFFIC LANE TRAFFIC LANE PARKING c Q RAMP TERRACE 6 6'MIN. 8' Il' LANE 11' LANE 8' Vi MIN. ....... l ............................................................... -------------- ---------------------------- PLAN -E SITE SECTION E SA 3RD AVENUE NEAR SW 5TH STREET ' SW 3RD AVE r�5 W'I �'' [ ��W'' �n• •rte BLDG. PLAN STREESCAPE SW 6TH STREET SW 6TH STREET STREESCAPE STREESCAPE ENTRY SIDEWALK PLANTING TRAFFIC LANE TRAFFIC LANE PLANTING SIDEWALK PLANTING TERRACE 6' MIN. 10' MIN. 11' LANE 11' LANE 10' MIN. 6' MIN. 12' MIN. 10' MIN. a a a W cc J as Q as c— �O a U J J Lu Lu C� L CQC /L V U T- SEPTEMBER - REV610NS ® Dec. 19,:014 8 Ja, 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26,2015 ® Apr. 01,2015 ® Apr. 30,2015 Rw Kimley>»Horn MIGO 7 0' 2' KOBIKARP d' 8INTERIOR DESIGN _ AIAPLANpNI NrnRe 30 573 1 - SITE SECTION F L-28 SW 6TH STREET SW 3RD AV€ WI• i — I L 1 f0 PLAN BLDG. SIDEWALK 7 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REV IONS Q Dec. 19,2014 8 Jan. 2$ 2015 ® Feb. 26,2015 A Ap, 01,2015 A Apr. 30,2015 Rw Kimley»>Horn a 1.11 KARI INTERIOR DESIGN PLHNNING pIA ASID LB BIBPRF.CDrt� SITE SECTION G L-29 SW 2.5 AVENUE SW 3RD A E .. fel SIDEWALK b' MIN. BLDG. SIDEWALK PLAN STREETSCAPE PLANTING 8' MIN. ---------------------- SW 2.5 AVENUE TRAFNC LANE T2' MAX. ------------------------ STREETSCAPE PLANTING SIDEWALK 3'MIN.CMIN. E2 JG 2 z a a a SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS © Dec. 19, 2014 8 J. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 ® Apr. 01,2015 ® Apr. 30,2015 Rw Kimley>»Horn JUNGLES a KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 91APLANRNI rvcnR a SITE SECTION H L-30 SW 2.5 AVENUE STREET TREES ; LEGACY TREE (BEYOND) PALMS ; PLANTER i SW 4TH AVE ¢ Z H W Z ~ o EXISTING o Z TRAFFIC LANES OPEN LAWN AREA g PLANTING RIVERWALK RIVER F [.--,ARDS JOSE MARTI PARK SECTION I ;STREET TREES i 1 I 1 w z I W 1 U 1 I I I I I LEGACY TREE NATIVE PLANTINGS ; SHADE TREES I ff 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I ; I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 .; st- 1 +z j0 a -z SW 4TH AVE z ag �Z wyw EXISTING Z WU WQ al iQ a I Orc RIVER �w W Od TRAFFIC LANESd -----------------U PLANTING j EXCERCISE AREA SEATING PLANTING INTERACTIVE FOUNTAIN PLAZA PLANTING WALK oe" JOSE MARTI PARK SECTION J STREET TREES LEGACY TREE EXISTING SPECIMEN MAHOGANY TREE , , , SHADED TERRACE W/ j SIDEWALK + TRELLIS AND JOSE MARTI SIDEWALK + NEW TRELLIS STRUCTURE I CIRCULATION PLANTING MONUMENT WALL j PLAY AREA j PLANTER WALLS / SEATING AREA CIRCULATION `---------------------------- '------------------ ao^ Gg JOSE MARTI PARK SECTION K PEDESTRIAN ROAD PLANTING Z r Z RIVER C ', ______PLANTING________ WALK a RIVER SHIPPING CHANNEL f Y)4 - JOSE MARTI PARK SECTION L _... � 4 _ �$�\\\.,ate, _ ".• w - �\t E � �'b4` ,• � $sem .�' e� l _ : _ 06" e _ u I Y � Mr g : _ 06" e _ u KL Jai . , _t ., r _ . , � _. 'qg/ •,�. I i vt MUL �y 9 EwPe■14vkl1� p��•■ `�Y 1 j .y /•4i4q Ink;„'til f�i► . �,,. � �II��I■®�� •oil NINON �r I Ilu II .I � � ■� � _ �� Y !Y 1pin pe -r > SII � w - r Y/•,t�P�•al'. i .vii \ � `,�• � 1 pp y= 4��1 Fa•� 'd l +;gyp, i lZ ua �► fJul I W-W%fp`� - 3f Olt 1 v s•� we ' r rt, a Al 04 vA x ' �, Y ��. e ins � •.! _\ 1�.: - - .. - �'i 1t I �j � TA: t .. � � :'moi:;. - •� �s `:Z 'r 1t sd Y/ +� v � I is Pedestrian Lights e -v ^- rr.rni SITE FURNISHINGS Bike Racks Bollard Lights Ab -- Pedestrian Lights Trash Receptacle Z Q a Q s, � aQ Q as uO nMc a C) J Lu EL MIR . CQ /L�IIQ� U 1EPTFM8ER 11, 2014 REVISIONS ® Jec. 19, 2014 A Ian. 28, 2015 ® =& 2E, 2015 p Fpr.01, 2015 ® Fpr. 30, 2015 RW Kimley>»Horn JUMB KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN LANNING Q 'IP So L-42 SITE FURNISHINGS CS'V Or MI MI � c ggos INSPIRATION IMAGES I I I PHASE 2 . I if ! \ \ I e \ V\ PHASE% 2, \ I \ J I I 'ASE 4 �1 -------------------- li 11 PHASE 3 PHASE 5 1 - / L --- ------A OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN �a Es ga r a� E�,s ON F R—Al-, P P E wN6 e1. ILANI LIT "AITITI- �'Na De�MF E°RP 6EreiCNE ANT 9CREG NC E5�5Ha IM eaouONr ro rue arrs°�i'ra+ or n+e urownYe —IT— Rcu recr ANY ANY s�sn_T. N s:e aNO,O� 1-1 ;S'eRIaL NOsw� aFrRwvao nue 1.=' A ,e o" aN s z�aE�E arSE aEF�E P�Nr a� �N :«,:-T- — F -O —ST �O�a,ON OF Fahr —AL � s"E«� R, TO anaO 3 AIL e, snNO uN"eRO"" N s ro OR e O NO6 Re", RID _� _r oew ° R weEe N� s e eO _NTATIV, aNO rNE"°aNPE aR rEOr. s. nIe corvrRacroR sNau eeaR au cows OF —TINO OF was, anervoneNrs, ETC.- rNe aseOO�arEO N�TM rNe wO� aNO iNe�uOeo �ePe"FUnONs. IAN. �e nr�rr's "O O OE rO Fes. seNran e N NR .NOOaCEFO.R oa s LL Of IYF— TAE SITE kILL BE _ �ozac veRecEw sTsoz soo�Nr _ro nNronaarT aAPu°sr"aNSPLaarioN `waujon'c Rs RaN so'- TO OV— "a NF LAR P�"�"woswswaorv0 "Rican"' BY AN IN OOK o v�Ervo uerz sisr`nn wNr ru "TON Ten wusN AOewnre CII OF MIMI-11 NORTH woms�rnv'PnlmSe'Wfcsctlrar�w�bWrEm.is YEf - E AFS I PF � ,1 °. rF POIm ,T FLAN ;� W,(I„IS N OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN �a Es ga r a� E�,s ON F R—Al-, P P E wN6 e1. ILANI LIT "AITITI- �'Na De�MF E°RP 6EreiCNE ANT 9CREG NC E5�5Ha IM eaouONr ro rue arrs°�i'ra+ or n+e urownYe —IT— Rcu recr ANY ANY s�sn_T. N s:e aNO,O� 1-1 ;S'eRIaL NOsw� aFrRwvao nue 1.=' A ,e o" aN s z�aE�E arSE aEF�E P�Nr a� �N :«,:-T- — F -O —ST �O�a,ON OF Fahr —AL � s"E«� R, TO anaO 3 AIL e, snNO uN"eRO"" N s ro OR e O NO6 Re", RID _� _r oew ° R weEe N� s e eO _NTATIV, aNO rNE"°aNPE aR rEOr. s. nIe corvrRacroR sNau eeaR au cows OF —TINO OF was, anervoneNrs, ETC.- rNe aseOO�arEO N�TM rNe wO� aNO iNe�uOeo �ePe"FUnONs. IAN. �e nr�rr's "O O OE rO Fes. seNran e N NR .NOOaCEFO.R oa s LL Of TAE SITE kILL BE _ �ozac veRecEw sTsoz soo�Nr _ro nNronaarT aAPu°sr"aNSPLaarioN `waujon'c Rs RaN so'- TO OV— "a NF LAR P�"�"woswswaorv0 "Rican"' BY AN IN OOK o v�Ervo uerz sisr`nn wNr ru "TON Ten wusN AOewnre CII OF MIMI-11 NORTH ��l OI{ASfS YEf - E AFS I FLAN ;� W,(I„IS N OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN 75, 7 STREET `P !Lo I I7 1 -A rm: PmpaxeP 69.912No SF Acrm. Li REd11Rm PRP/IDm oPa SPACE A' ear. • P w en il.w � �, m 5,al.ae m ,Ira vim, s ro s ro sc B sap+ wi eP P�"'ia..vm >om reylrm M A111 a, m WAT wn T . T-1 .a,=, rv«i� Ime.�v,a .vm . +avl..e. A.B• 5,a ,a sP A:4:='r«�ttFfta:, al: Ire _3 M et umMr or mat rq trees (D) ^ M trma�Prov see x Sox - 0. � �r�N �xn�a,r t�rmeslz= sox. x Po$4mtwm�tm�to� cw rt muvd, a�treei elms m�) em e 3rdErc rert Tree R-- T Tree R�-1— ENrSfrnL I00I30 - street rmyFM Nxnbv % alrvbeapeee xx30S . c w tiw oi�ube wmidedmal�afmava r,w SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS © Dec. 19,2014 ® Jan. 28,2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30,2G15 I1EW T'�' NOT (yu+,nE wi*Mnl . M��D�wD,.��N o• M,�E �. 1�1 CI GNCPf iPEE DbA Kimley»>Hom PfE C :".RPS / Tmed,�a �. e—M. mEm mm tr�lc/alo aPe<I I.nlmmo uuosaTDav PNM Dar °v1ti rmmm w whll FI>�eo rwt1 KOBJ KARP ARCHITECTURE PNM oye R'pW�P" m INTERIOR DESIGN NG AIAP A5 DNI N. 211 d 1.3o5.5]33/s6 � PoIPm' PRgatonm Ynmul Pm, uMww FAS/1 P.1uscolY WmT uka�I lmorcm6i�� ,ua M. �raa�Gvnrrvq 1 / v brcVm firma nax B,Y � / s Im, mv.ma �nme,R�v�� Ai vnme ro ANm®e�ila� rm: PmpaxeP 69.912No SF Acrm. Li REd11Rm PRP/IDm oPa SPACE A' ear. • P w en il.w � �, m 5,al.ae m ,Ira vim, s ro s ro sc B sap+ wi eP P�"'ia..vm >om reylrm M A111 a, m WAT wn T . T-1 .a,=, rv«i� Ime.�v,a .vm . +avl..e. A.B• 5,a ,a sP A:4:='r«�ttFfta:, al: Ire _3 M et umMr or mat rq trees (D) ^ M trma�Prov see x Sox - 0. � �r�N �xn�a,r t�rmeslz= sox. x Po$4mtwm�tm�to� cw rt muvd, a�treei elms m�) em e 3rdErc rert Tree R-- T Tree R�-1— ENrSfrnL I00I30 - street rmyFM Nxnbv % alrvbeapeee xx30S . c w tiw oi�ube wmidedmal�afmava r,w SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS © Dec. 19,2014 ® Jan. 28,2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30,2G15 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-45 PHASE I1EW T'�' NOT (yu+,nE wi*Mnl z WT6os cc,�oN rwo 02O5.MRa vultv.,tt n�nva.Es 1�1 Kimley»>Hom PfE C :".RPS I — _ KOBJ KARP ARCHITECTURE NOR H INTERIOR DESIGN NG AIAP A5 DNI N. 211 d 1.3o5.5]33/s6 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-45 PHASE s� 6�1 -1, T" �r �` ejf TREE T \Y dA 1 lct orcin Fropw.dP 8,2135E PemL4 _ �` im6t�rery M� 66t�w nd toted w si4 pie i pq �� gF 6 Save fest of Pruni lint opvi spw rmyrad M —1. 9, o N/A Sf WA 'AH feet d ImHaceped open spec racy rN. PSB- S, L24 SF 6,12. 6F N ARFA UtNtATroN 6 rm�`i mmw. laun �`d R� eV� �'WrcJ W nen 21 02 (eW)wmrttd .6>1w6, 21 •f ,22.N A Nvnbw of trm mylrM Cs rct Iet mrtin6 mrenum raprenePe of mlMethp tree gyp) of frm Si G Pat4n�rm M2�N�im�ler of G�"wn�Pw Gd 30L . 9 —lift N� of rims Frw4W . 26 - 6 6 6. .... fmml.w., we.eae ePe=ne of Zoe<) Pdmsrgrmktad 'o oavM1 4avds e4wt 4aee m .I bWe re AV. Tress Trine Rey,ree Revs rM s s ANvnwe of .l.vb. ,.pytrm. Nvn vols ei drab P'w302� CN :vlermt v4 low ekrbe rvN rad br ei eFrube proritlW r 20Y- b? �' �AET""'oNON ♦ ♦ �iL uNoERPr�T ANP \ �` AeANu�"i-r � � \ ♦ �PaoPeRrT �m6 UUcielieRT \ 5th STREET �y c4 F Z L0 pGmmd a uw weal e/ m,zroyuz erc ��-ay�P1w� drmma,ve ale cyPree. , -mm�an°1as's�enwn Reek so.tlP,a.;'t�oa<, oev..,'c°s.N me - l.®Ew2mwfR,. w., �. F wwd. T=, Palmw`- Irnov rM a'.a vNt1 win p ma P mI�Po TetPa Pem , ran%ab ��lfab IEfNN6R�6,tNLL,,6 w.2 uwmya�aRw /c—Gv�xdl/PF.— A11.1 alcnrlAi. zw era f riv rcrvaw Sremz�ivdz Z a a SEPTEMB— REVISIONS m Dec. 19,2014 8 J6n. 28,2015 ® Feb 26, 2015 'P'"' 2015 A Apr. w, 2015 Ncw Tatsss v �ra=a«�Ti�a wlrH.,.1A i � 1A'Z VrEas p'G Jqu v t 6 u1Y rY TWA+ratFS Kimley>»Hom ly HF f -+1p0S / zoN6 Tr 1 P- P n^� wS lc PROP tp EO��G. 9�1C — V KO ARCHITECTURE \ ` —ITT INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING AIAA510 NCARB f 3os,,,aaP.�om OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-46 PHASE 2i ------�-�.� -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TURF, 7Y -P. _ a a SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 Dec. 19, 2014 8 Jan. 28,2015 ®Feb. 26,2015 ®P, 01,:015 8 Apr. 30,:015 ...I rrPv Khle�y�'Morn I ,,S i o -i -s hia— y) 2e1� '— - - -. KORI KARP nnnCRAM�p�IC er;•U,c w F p ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PNNING a LAASIC CARR r.saLsisat.6 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-47 PHASE 2ii ,eExcx �oumx 3rd STREET 4th STREET 2 a a a � as Q as w0 aaC U J J ry Lu ry C CQC 'L V U 7 SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS n�n Dec.19, 2014 idl Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Ap, 01, 2015 Apr. 30, 2015 \ \` 1 I I JOSE MARTI PARK \ TaeE. 2 F Kimley»>Horn 1 MIAMI RIVER r C1T1'. OF PMEal NEC E .+RDs �r ��a �IR7LLJ KOBIKARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN \\ �Il��i� _PLANNING NG So taae ;I X� TURF, TYP. wwxc scutes sn nss OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-48 PHASE 2iii Q. amF�raR.,.FF ary:, OD,Fop,REe orlo .0Tei W"iel.v.l� `lai"alllw eos Nar.ar.d i ca.alp �w rani aw;m r m�L;mM u/�Burexr� mmrvub M;� I,_ m„ vdmtyimi/iopsyllvn boiliw�ea m vF:nlm OuRucv+;a£ arl 9� ier Fia /vFkwtlavm all - 1111 CTttani Oslmlba �- uloepmmvuu Oryx OwwV Pa �.ie �somlgm rva. �a TvvrPalT m'si CPoacMafFrFUmot�i,m FwriEa'TIMCF ^olm Im�Tma-ivaarmMta pwN oryp Irw 1« talipx p � i �vvrom... �iliara � lF.nmcueupNNs D.x u.4ekryma9nrvM mr:oly i..aaae i°'"li FarcwhaVr / --di. wllelb A4rva II A4wematsawa a �a �aWv / suel �mv�tl E;.rn rm' A— - Allonotla app. Brnnail �iPev �'n .vesa � suNRu v. 7th STREET i u _ _ Arm: E—a m,ca_4etAe.a• SA DPFN SPACE IDED A. A.�sa �t e�.aylrm Do., suss, o. I,dlmtd m .Its Nm: B a'— s aca sr spwa•past d �Iq io�t �5,,BR1�a1� N/A .ae a Art;al. 9, m le,e.w.e apace .per r.ylrtl: A,o- a,— sP A gyve kMAol 1vMTacyee ym .para rey;ree by nlvn; Di= IDX le. Wt ellav+GaN � dt ren � �ixm�� trra (D) � D. P,a„Nt N � _( t..aaa vwMadv xw10i - c Tra.it:em"ia�m�.ne vAm thata.ai)i er. I. DD'i30' - 7 5tr«tt Crena � T T Ru by d aNaka .x,ylyd. Nm.bar d trace .aylme a ID xY0 9. N>reM blvvtmtl lI: Nunber^�aMuba grmwidae x 30X .• e� x har d eMubs prwlese x tat• r'mp 5e x5X SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® Jan. 28,2015 Feb. 26,2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 Wm Kimley»>Hom CITY OF MIAMI H MDG 4�+eL ry CRsaarm� � /f SK r .I INTERIOR DESIGN ANNING AIA SNGID RR —.=X.1-11 p. Sos.naKARv.<ORI OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN • �a PHASE 3 Lu z Lu04 _ _ Arm: E—a m,ca_4etAe.a• SA DPFN SPACE IDED A. A.�sa �t e�.aylrm Do., suss, o. I,dlmtd m .Its Nm: B a'— s aca sr spwa•past d �Iq io�t �5,,BR1�a1� N/A .ae a Art;al. 9, m le,e.w.e apace .per r.ylrtl: A,o- a,— sP A gyve kMAol 1vMTacyee ym .para rey;ree by nlvn; Di= IDX le. Wt ellav+GaN � dt ren � �ixm�� trra (D) � D. P,a„Nt N � _( t..aaa vwMadv xw10i - c Tra.it:em"ia�m�.ne vAm thata.ai)i er. I. DD'i30' - 7 5tr«tt Crena � T T Ru by d aNaka .x,ylyd. Nm.bar d trace .aylme a ID xY0 9. N>reM blvvtmtl lI: Nunber^�aMuba grmwidae x 30X .• e� x har d eMubs prwlese x tat• r'mp 5e x5X SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS m Dec. 19, 2014 ® Jan. 28,2015 Feb. 26,2015 Apr. 01, 2015 ® Apr. 30, 2015 Wm Kimley»>Hom CITY OF MIAMI H MDG 4�+eL ry CRsaarm� � /f SK KOBI KARP ARCHITERURE NORTH 11-1 IN 1. INTERIOR DESIGN ANNING AIA SNGID RR —.=X.1-11 p. Sos.naKARv.<ORI OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-49 PHASE 3 r � ,a��UroN INE --� o -- M ri �lwmY te+io0m�d.�pn >Mn�ng eros Yrv��Pi�o ��. xv ou ab. ef°e—rub caovMi,um er®i,�enee yo O ��„ , ,etie� T��,o ,7 �. u�mmmmrx.N orou Y ,ane � 1 —111 1 .,. �am— o� ew-1/ii,aa7 �ea �,m s era�me,n.va. ng vcnotr a nervosa �asPA� Nu n T�IZ:l : L. —I. Ti. TREEB A . N� .w.:•red pe. net ,ot �ier mletbq nunber ai M1vee rslm'm�.niM�bt�zrae B. Porno mwuudNun vee, <. N�xi� iaoyi�` Nmbr� x Sox - M , Nunba of .Iry pwided " 1M- � 94 t3, SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS © Dee. 19, 2014 8 Jan. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 n�n Apr. 01, 2015 J] Apr. 30, 2015 R Kimlep Horn OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-50 PHASE 4 JUM ES CITY OF Nrrnp(I RDA, KIRI KARP ARCHITECTURE IN FET 2Al ERIOR DESIGN LA PNNING A510 NCAflOM—C OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-50 PHASE 4 0- - I tcCATION O rTvsae iPTaxae im etat cF.r� ,RatYsm6 Cyf �. 6�m _TZ Tk= 6 b N�o�,awYwN, 6bD N . F�,m TN,�N Po^m°�i� rove Y� I o Te mmPam , �„Yob �b� � tBwIB6,�FNa6 .,. DF6N BPA 6 A. a'�^m f� IX�re4'M� 6� fmatl m e 5,663 SF 5f s.l. IM B. 5mve feet o! pvtiq �bt opsi .ee+ osmlreE M Muds 9, m WA A C. Total egva fest IX l—pw F A. 6Rm'e trot IXei btlecmetl epm epms rerylr4 by �'Iieni ]I. Iol imvn lam vm (mi) pwrnNld - 3°6 a 6,663 e.i. ym w F A. Nunbr N trr rayNatl Por rwt bt me, We aietirq nunbr IX 4r B pf 5 C. Nolivm oegired �Nunbr of Vwe gwided x 30i . 6 6 D. CromM bleomt ail bw mWrrtumw. Nunbv IX Gam pwWed w 3°f - 4 4 6 row (mm n6IX 66o.c.). Po Itt� b� : murmCa sxtrmma f.RerylrW I.I amis 136- _ bwIo.17C *11 --�-7T7 I,�---T—= J75TREE7 A�. T 5,P �,�` �., \ W Y-1 ,, ��.�.. �„V w •DIY '�q' . 'III Q ILI C •. E 7'h sREE— • rsxCxtarw,xw uew -raiz N r f6n«n��D tNr�N clw OF MIAMI r Roy _W S t,LNF�) fir.—_. _ am 66Am11° SCAIE IN fEE! WW.N 81"AP.com OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-51 PHASE 5 U J J oe Lu1 <Coe CQC 'L V U moco� erec,ua va. se=��eva SEPTEMB- R 11, 2024 tcFePpli.ie ivy REVISIONS aem nm rza m,.e iobiun ror�L.n m Dec. 19, 2014 8 Jan. 28, 2015 O` Feb. 26, 2015 nd cli m� � Apr. 11, 2015 ® AP,. 30, 2015 nra m _ rv_. iI�Q�wn avao„=o api d�atoFum KimlepMorn „ Pam b "Qa jUNGL6 a 1, -1, d V SK SK MtcFa Gmu K081 KARP _,moo ma=,a,— ARCHITECTURE /( INTERIOR PLANNING ASID NcARR Fl 1-1 3,3766 - RvtOni OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-52 2nd Level � v 0 wwec napme r eee er ansa. l.ef wayw w�arpdm Wn&�.®emutramane pn. e. scu. tam rrero a am�,� �a+�ree M oma e, u U J LLJ C� L U E R11, 2019 �.m RISION REVISIONS ® Dec. 19, 2014 m 8 Jan, 28, 2015 _ PoM Feb. 26, 2015 s iia Rer,Poom APr. 01, 2015 area P m ia'rm�,y�eta ..brx� sera APr. 30, 2015 `I' �JI� m'I` ,vxrz sau voL.e �a ud,myac smee Po>m p,noiia Kimley>»Horn iwm KOBI KARP ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING x.sr NGlrte v4, = �Y OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-53 3rd Level 000 am:wopmea t e: ea Ery sr a�rec.zra �se�uennna� urease 'sp�ninaiwna mein pmn: e.Sryen 9�✓Hanna MewneP�n tnounm Mande s.0 w�sq .raalww•e enawepaapm snnre°ouae. n.e= a�uantea�aN�p°eao°en e°am.re°une M r4ee. z�:,°x . wmrrm irnr ana IwaJ pamnne - mw . ae., m at. P�a�.z�xa Z a OG»o ar� rwnnmv / 5wietw:a molio°mi e.=id. duke. SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 REVISIONS Dx.19, 2014 ® J. 28, 2015 ® Feb. 26, 2015 Ap, 01, 2015 d. �m Apr. 30, 2015 rnw Mx - °°°° Kimley*Horn �aem P JK veroo-e �er.ve. KOBI KARP - R . ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN 6 iatl FL �/ �y PLANNING q 'J AI sp a.e OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L-54 91h Level 0 PLANTER AT RAILING HEIGHT ON BALCONY Scale: NTS H MATERIAL w HARDSCAPE PAVING FINISH MATERIAL STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SUB PUNTERORAIN PERFORATED PIPE CUT AT REQUIRED LENGTH SLOPE TO DRAIN PUNTING SOIL FILTER FABRIC WATERPROOF MEMBRANE CONCRETE SLAB iUB BI LEVEL DRAIN WOOD TO COVER INTERSTTTIAL SPACE PLANTER FLUSH WITH BALCONY FINISHED GRADE �_ J Scale: NTS O:P.' OF I'L".MI HEA HOB / Al��L!_ I ANlrlC('APF F)FTA 11 Q Exhibit ISD" Miami River SAP: Executive Summary BGRCOW RADELL & FERNAN DEZ ZONINQ, LANC7 USE ANC> ENVIRC>"MEtVTAL LAW Direct: 305-377-6227 E -Mail: MTaOanes@BRZoninoLaw.com VIA HAND DELIVERY April 30, 2015 Francisco Garcia, Director Department of Planning & Zoning City of Miami Riverside Center 444 SW 2,1a Avenue, 401 Floor Miami, FL 33130-1910 Re; Miami River Special Area Plan (SAP)• Executive Sununary Dear Mr. Garcia; This law firm represents CG Miami River, LLC (the "Developer") the owner of the land bound on the north by the Miami River, on the south by SW 7th Street, on the east by SW 2nd Avenue, and on the west by SW 3rd Avenue in the City of Miarni (the "City"). See Exhibit A, Properties List. The Developer and the City of Miami serve as co - applicants with respect to the instant application (collectively, the "Applicant"). Property, CG Miami River, LLC owns approximately 6.2 acres located at 257 SW 7 Street, 233 SW 7 Street, 244 SW 6 Street, 635 SW 3 Avenue, 243 SW 7 Street, 260 SW 6 Street, 242 SW 5 Street, 621 SW 3 Avenue, 224 SW 6 Street, 220 SW 6 Street, 501 SW 3 Avenue, 645 SW 3 Avenue, 252 SW 6 Street, 401 SW 3 Avenue, 253 SW 7 Street, 219 SW 7 Street, and 275 SW 6 Street, as well as three vacant parcels ("CG Parcels"). As previously indicated, these parcels are located within the bounds of the Miami River to the north, SW 7th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW 3rd Avenue to the west. The City owns Jose Marti Park, located immediately northwest of the CG Parcels, Jose Marti Park extends northwest along the Miami River beginning on the north side of SW 3 Avenue and terminating at SW 2 Street. Currently, the northern potion of the CG Parcels contains an entertainment complex; the central portion contains some former warehouse structures; and the southern parcel contains residences, vacant land, and a former automotive or marine - related structure. These structures contain an assortment of uses including bar/nightclubs (northern portion); a marine supply store/warehouse use (central SOUTHEAST FINANCIAL CENTER • 200 SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, SUITE 850 • MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 PHONE. 305.374.5300 • FAX. 905.377.8222 • WWW.BRZONINOLAW.COM Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 2 portion); an abandoned adult "megastore," a print shop, vacant land, and derelict residences (southern portion). These existing uses are all located adjacent to the recently updated Jose Marti Park and Gymnasium and a Publix supermarket to the west, and the SW 2 Avenue Bridge and Storage Mart to the east. The majority of the CG Parcels, with the exception of the two parcels abutting the Miami River, are designated "Restricted Commercial" by the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, 2020 Future Land Use Plan Map ("FLUM"). The two riverfront parcels are designated as "Industrial" according to the FLUM, while Jose Marti Park is designated "Recreation." The FLUM also designates the CG Parcels as within the Little Havana Density Increase Area (RDIA). Consistent with the land use designations, the CG Parcels are zoned D3 Waterfront Industrial and T6 -36B-0 Urban Core, according to the Miami 21 Zoning Code ("Miami 21 "). Jose Marti Park is zoned as CS Civic Space. "= Itth Figure 1. Miami River SAP Area Proposed Development, Miami 21 contains specific provisions for the Special Area Plan ("SAP") process; a process which allows areas of more than nine (9) abutting acres to be master planned to allow greater integration of public improvements, infrastructure, and design. CG Miami River, along with the City as co -applicant, is requesting approval of an SAP to permit the CG Parcels to be developed in accordance with the proposed SAP design guidelines, regulatory plan, and Chapter 163 Development Agreement. More specifically, this will allow the Developer and the City to integrate the CG Parcels, public rights-of-way, and portions of Jose Marti Park into an SAP for the master -planning, designing, permitting and construction of public benefit improvements ("Miami River SAP"). See Figure 1. Miami River SAP Area, above. It should be noted that the City of Miami will continue to own all public lands, and that there will be no changes to the underlying land use or zoning as a result of inclusion the City's lands in the SAP. The Miami River SAP will consist of five (5) phases of development, which will include four approximately sixty -story towers, two three-story structures, and an active riverwalk public promenade. The Property will feature commercial, office, residential, and lodging uses, as well as recreational and commercial working waterfront uses. The BF-Rcow RADELL & FMNAN DEZ ZCONINM, LANG USE ANO MNV1Fq1C1NKAer4-r^L t -^W Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 3 centerpiece of project, however, will be the Miami River, public plazas, public riverwalk promenade, and Jose Marti Park. In total, the project will contain approximately 1,678 residential units, 330 lodging units, 66,541 square feet of office space, 330 hotel rooms, and 176,350 square feet of commercial. As previously indicated, the majority of the Property, is designated Restricted Commercial according to the FLUM. The Restricted Commercial land use designation permits residential density of up to a maximum of 150 dwelling units per acre. However, the Property is also located within the Little Havana Residential Density Increase Area, which permits residential density of up to a maximum of 200 dwelling units per acre, subject to the underlying zoning. A companion land use plan amendment will establish a new Residential Density Increase Area (RDIA) to permit the development of up to 400 dwelling units per acre within the portion of the CG Parcels designated Restricted Commercial land use on the FLUM. Notably, the existing underlying zoning district permits the proposed Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) and greater intensity than is proposed. Further, the proposed residential density increase will be compatible with the permitted densities both to the north and the east of the CG Parcels area, which allow densities of up to 1,000 and 500 dwelling units per acre, and transition to the Little Havana RDIA south of SW 7 Street, a major thoroughfare through the urban core. No changes are proposed to the Industrial and Port of Miami River FLUM designations. Proposed Benefits. The Miami River, Miami River Corridor, surrounding residents of the City, and the community -at -large will all greatly benefit from this project. Benefits can be categorized into three overarching categories: safety, activation, and public access. Safety. Although certain that this area has incredible potential, it is also true that this area is known for containing some unpleasant elements. The Miami River SAP proposal will supplant the existing assortment of questionable uses and transients with a sustainable, mixed-use neighborhood activated by residents, patrons, and visitors. The SAP will introduce coherent street furniture that includes street lighting along the riverwalk promenade from the SW 2 Avenue bridge through Jose Marti Park, and 24 hour uses such as residential and lodging units with the accompanying security. In addition, proposed public benefit improvements to I-95 and surrounding State and local roads will alleviate the existing background traffic conditions and significantly improve the surrounding transportation corridor. Together, these factors will transform this area into a safe, welcoming neighborhood. Activation. The project's focal point is the community access via the public riverwalk promenade. Each phase is designed to be unique and attractive from any vantage. Further, the Applicant is proposing to activate the riverfront with public access BERCOW RADELL & F ERNAN DEZ .ZONING. LANG USE ANO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 4 boats slips, commercial establishments, restaurants, and public gathering spaces, including an outdoor theater with wall -cast opportunity, roundabouts, and public art. Verdant landscaping including green roofs, cohesive hardscaping and street furniture, and public amenities will create a sense of place that residents, patrons and visitors will flock to, both by land and river. The unique working waterfront vistas will be enjoyed by boaters and pedestrian visitors alike, ultimately creating a new sense of vibrancy along the Miami River Corridor, and in this forgotten area abutting several public resources: Jose Marti Park, the City's Miami Riverside Center, the Miami River, and the SW 2 Avenue Bridge. Public Access. The Applicant is proposing a host of public improvements to the project area and its surroundings that will substantially improve existing conditions. These improvements include expanding existing public amenities and creating a new public riverwalk promenade which extends from the SW 2nd Avenue Bridge through Jose Marti Park. Improvement of existing amenities includes, for example, updating the riverwalk in Jose Marti Park, the renovation of the plaza and pool areas within Jose Marti Park, the extension of existing Miami River Corridor signage, and proposed landscaping (including legacy trees) and hardscaping. New amenities include the creation of streetscapes with pedestrian and cyclist access throughout the Miami River SAP, creation of a children's fountain and play area, and the creation of public gathering spaces along the Miami River. A draft list of proposed public benefits to accompany the Applicant's Chapter 163 Development Agreement has been included in this submittal. The cohesive design of the proposed public amenities and semi-public low-rise structures abutting the Miami River will create a sense of place for residents and visitors alike. Further, the Applicant seeks to encourage access of the project both by land and water. This includes significant improvements to the surrounding transportation infrastructure including I-95, SW 7 Street, and SW 3 Avenue; the introduction of an additional access way and view corridor to the Miami River, through the center of the CG Parcels, currently referred to as "2.5 Avenue"; and the establishment of an on-site City of Miami Trolley stop. From the Miami River, the Applicant is proposing to permit public mooring access to the permitted slips within the project, which will provide boaters with direct access to the retail, restaurant, and riverwalk amenities immediately adjacent to the Miami River. The Applicant is also proposing a water taxi stop, which will provide residents, patrons and visitors without access to private watercraft an opportunity to access the project from the River and encourage transit from Bayside and Marlins Stadium. The project will become a destination which benefits the City's residents, civically, culturally and economically. Accordingly, we respectfully request the City's favorable review of the Miami River SAP and look forward to continuing to work with the City's administration to realize this public-private partnership that will help transform the City's urban core. BCRCOW RADELL & FERNAN DEZ 20NIN43. LANG USE AMC, ENVIRONMENTAL 1 -AW Mr. Francisco Garcia April 30, 2015 Page 5 Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to phone me at 305.377.6227. Very truly yours, Melissa Tapanes Llahues Enclosures cc: Ari Pearl Carli Koshal, Esq. BF-Rcow RADELL & FERNANDEZ XONl"Cb, LANG USE ANO IENVIRCONMEN-rAL LAW Miami River SAP Team Responses to UDRB Conditions UDRB Conditions for Approval: Miami River SAP 1. City to review Traffic Study and confirm feasibility for the proposed amount of users. 2. The final design proposal incorporating significant historical features of Jose Marti Park shall be brought back to the UDRB. 3. Create a pedestrian plaza at pedestrian bridge on level 9 to enrich public use and improve relationship between the four buildings. 4. Study variation in height among the four towers to achieve a better permeability towards skyline as well as a more interesting design. Miami River SAP Team Responses 1. Traffic Study: City to review Traffic Study and confirm feasibility for the proposed amount of users The Applicant's Traffic Study methodology has been approved by the City, County and FDOT, and the Traffic Study has been submitted to the City, County and FDOT for review and approval. 2. Jose Marti Park: The final design proposal incorporating significant historical features of Jose Marti Park shall be brought back to the UDRB. In accordance with the City of Miami UDRB condition for Miami River SAP approval, CG Miami River shall return to present the final design proposal for enhancements to Jose Marti Park. CG Miami River and their team of design consultants will continue to coordinate with all relevant City of Miami departments and stakeholders including the Miami River Commission and the City of Miami Parks and Recreation Department. The final design of Jose Marti Park will acknowledge the rich cultural heritage of the East Little Havana neighborhood, along with preserved elements of the current park's homage to Jose Marti, as well as offer new spaces that integrate a diverse set of accessible and desirable programming, native and Cuban vegetation, and unique habitats. 3. Pedestrian Plaza 9th Level: Create a pedestrian plaza at pedestrian bridge on level 9 to enrich public use and improve relationship between the four buildings. Soaring with innovation, CG Miami River proposes an intersecting collection of pedestrian bridges connecting each of the four separate podium decks. Bridges connecting Phase 1 and 5, and the other linking Phase 3 and 4 converge 100' above the intersection of 6th Street and 2.5 Avenue creating over 6,000 ft2 of flying plaza for residents and visitors to enjoy. That's nearly 1,000 ft2 more space than the previous design bridge configuration. Planters with Florida native or relevant vegetation will focus zones of circulation and provide shade and intrigue throughout the structure. Benches and custom seat walls will allow guests the opportunity to pause, suspended at the nexus of the development's amenity deck. Chance encounters and scheduled meetings alike will occur just as they will on the street corners and cafes below. At the terminus of each bridge, the proposed lush textured vegetation spills out onto each respective terrace and unifies the entire collective podium. In continuation of the balconies below, several oculi will be carved out of the structure and provide unique apertures for viewing the streetscape below. Please refer to Exhibit A, which diagrams the proposed design, program, and circulation of the 9th Level Plaza for further clarification. 4. Building Heights and Skyline: Study variation in height among the four towers to achieve a better permeability towards skyline as well as a more interesting design. CG Miami River believes the current location and shape of the 4 towers provides a high skyline permeability and wide view corridors. The towers' twisted elliptical shape and the cube's rotated gesture relate directly to their height and provide an open view corridor. In addition, the juxtaposition of the three elliptical towers with the singular cube tower take a cue from the organic form of the Miami River and the Modern and Streamline expressions that have taken root amidst the grid of Miami's urban core. Currently, two of the towers' heights have been lowered in order to comply with the obstacle clearance surface established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Miami -Dade Aviation Department (MDAD). Modifying these relationships further would void the design intent of the towers. FENCE BUST OF JOSE MARTI EXERCISE AREA "SEMBRAR" MEMORIAL WALL NON-FUNCTIONING WATER FEATURE CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA COMMUNITY CENTER - 0 4 POOL AREA + BUILDINGS STUCCO FACADE RIVERWALK EXISTING FEATURES 3 2[ i 4 LAWN LOGGIA RESTROOMS + CONCESSION STAND (NO PUBLIC ACCESS) 0' IS' 30' ' `i N - SCALE V=. JOSE MARTI PARK EXISTING FEATURES - -- - - --------------------- - - - - - -r _ ____4- ------------------------------------------- -- -- -------------------------- -- - I - - - CUBAN PALM GROVE 6 f BUST OF JOSE MARTI EXERCISE AREA i LAWN •'SEMBRAR•' ( - MEMORIAL WALL 2 —, I C ( '-�� `` J• RESTROOMS 1 {, CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA \ _` MAHOGANY Tj NEW FOUNTAINS I , •I \ { \ TREE r-, COMMUNITY CENTER —♦ I POOL AREA + BUILDINGS r j --- - - - - - ` 15' min KEYSTONE FACADE —i GAME AREA RIVERWALK r_ IL EXISTING TO REMAIN ■ EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING TO BE IMPROVED rE. ADDITIONAL HISTORICAUCULTURAL RELEVANCE ,� v b I" o• Is x• w' N— SCALE:1•'=W' JOSE MARTI PARK PROPOSED AND RETAINED FEATURES Im s 54 IiI WEBB.= cz Z:j GRTHBNMGNIEA DCLF M LOCATKM PUrENTIALSEATMAqEA MWERS LEVEL 9 APM x 2D14 0 Ll EXHIBIT A IV' 14" 14 14 RI% ■ mbwkllm I Miami 21 Excerpt