Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Iris Escarra-Support LettersSubmitted into the p tic record for item (s3 J- on - 101021 Igi City Clerk October 5, 2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Francisco Garcia - Director Planning Department City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Ave, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Mimi Bay Club 501 NE 391h Street, Miami, EL 33137 Dear Mr. Garcia I am a neighbor of the proposed Miami Bay Club project and have resided in my homestead property in Magnolia Park for (14) years. 1 have reviewed the proposed plans for the project and am providing this letter as my 5uppgrt Qr the glo ure of the publicc s to, the bay walk adiaggnt The Miami Say Club project abuts a residential neighborhood which does not currently have and is not required to provide a bay walk The City owned Pallot Park is located immediately south of the project which provides public access to Biscayne Bay. The park provides nearly 500 feet of public waterfront access. A more beneficial addition to the area would be improvements to the park which would create a more user friendly public experience. I am opposed to the small "dead-end" portion of Bay Walk adjacent to Miami Bay Club. Based on current and past challenges in Magnolia Park, I assure you this isolated out of public view portion of a Bay Walk would provide an entry for criminal activity and unlawful fishing pier. The small portion of Bay Walk is completely out of public view from the street and from most of the Park area. Magnolia Park has many isolated areas such as this and the illegal activities tatting place are already more than can be managed by police and watchful residents. Please do not create additional challenging areas for residents and the police to contend with, I may have a very different view on this matter if it were not a "dead-end" isolated piece of Bay Walk and that it actually extended throughout the Upper East Side however that is not likely to be the case in our life time. More likely, the area will be underwater before a Bay Walk will transect the Bay Pointe community. Additionally, Pallot Park directly abuts Miami Bay Club providing plenty of public waterfront access. Moreover, the planned Bay Wally ends south of Magnolia Park due to the (6) lame 1-195 roadway and two vehicular access ramps. 15- 01 D' -Subr' et 1- yrlS (Oy f�_ sgpo'�- L��f&yG Submitted into the public record for ' ern s} on U 1 City Clerk If ever there was just cause for an exception to Miami's Bay Walk requirement, I believe this would be it Sincerely,. l Geoffrey Bash 448 NE 391' Street Miami, FL 33137 Ph: 305.401.9001 Submitted into the public reco rd far i errt(5 P1 on City Clerk September 30, 2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Francisco Garcia Director Planning Department City of Miami 444 SW 2"d Avenue, P Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re; Miami Bay Club 601 NE 39 Street, Miami, FL 33137 Bear Mr. Garcia I am a neighbor of the proposed Miami Bay Club project. 1 have reviewed the proposed plans for the project and am providing this letter as my support for lie closure of the public access to the bay walk. The Miami Bay Club project abuts a residential neighborhood which does not currently have, and is not required to provide, a Tray walk. A City park is located just south of the project which provides public access to Biscayne Bay. The park provides nearly 500 feet of public access to the bay. A more beneficial addition to the area would be improvements to the park, which would create a more active park for the residents. Requiring the Miami Bay Club project to provide public access to a bay walk which terminates at the Bay Point neighborhood provides nothing more than an entry for potential criminal activity within the neighborhood. For this reason, I support the elimination of the public access to the Baywalk at the property. I encourage your support and approval of this project and the closure of the public access to the bay walk. cc: U� -T, W �4[ 8 NL- 3 C) I S�- Submitted into the public record f r i em s) .} on f City Clerk Miami, October 6'h,'015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Francisco Garcia Director Planning Department City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Miami Bay Club 601 NE 39 Street, Miami, FL 33137 Dear Mr. Garcia: I am a neighbor of the proposed Miami Bay Club project. i have reviewed the proposed plans for the project and am providing this letter as my support for the closure of the public access to the bay walk. The Miami Bay Club project abuts a residential neighborhood which does not currently have, and is not required to provide, a bay walk. A City park is located just south of the project which provides public access to Biscayne Bay. The park provides nearly 500 feet of public access to the bay. A more beneficial addition to the area would be improvements to the park, which would create a more active park for the residents. Requiring the Miami Bay Club project to provide public access to a bay walk which terminates at the Bay Point neighborhood provides nothing more than an entry for potential criminal activity within the neighborhood. For this reason, I support the elimination of the public access to the Baywalk at the property. I encourage your support and approval of this project and tiie closure of the public access to the bay walk. Sincerely, Jose duras / President C 'ona Bay Condominium Association 3810 NE 61h Avenue Miami, Florida 33137 Submitted into the public record or item s) V2 , on City Clerk Miami, September 30, 2015 Mr. Francisco Garcia Director Planning .Department City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re. Miami Bay Club 601 NE 39 Street, Miami, FL 33137 Dear Mr. Garcia: I am a neighbor of the proposed Miami Say Club project. I have reviewed the proposed plans for the project and arra providing this letter as my support for the closure of the public access to the bay walk. The Miami Bay Club project abuts a residential neighborhood which does not currently have, and is not required to provide, a bay walk. A City park is located just south of the project which provides public access to Biscayne Bay. The park provides nearly 500 feet of public access to the bay. A more beneficial addition to the area would be improvements to the park, which would create a more active park for the residents. Requiring the Miami Bay Club project to provide public access to a bay walk which terminates at the Bay Point neighborhood provides nothing more than an entry for potential criminal activity within the neighborhood. For this reason, I support the elimination of the public access to the Baywalk at the property. I encourage your support and approval of this project and the closure of the public access to the bay walk,. Sincerely, E. Gamas 1/ 3838 north Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33137 Submitted into the public record ar 'tem s) on City Clerk October 7, 2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. Francisco Garcia Director Planning Department City of Miami 444 SW 2"d Avenue, 3`a Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Re: Miami Bay Club 601 NE 39 Street, NUami, FL 33137 Dear Mr. Garcia I am a neighbor of the aforementioned project and a resident of the Bay Point neighborhood. I have reviewed the proposed plans for the Miami Bay Club project at the above referenced location (the "Project"). Based on the information provided, I fully support the Project as proposed based on the fact that the project represents the nature and character of our neighborhood In addition; I support the elimination of the public access to the Baywalk at the property. Forcing the Project to include a Baywalk will provide minimal public benefit while exposing the Bay Point neighborhood to a rear access paint for criminal activity. Whatever public gain is realized by inclusion of the Baywalk is greatly outweighed by the threat to the health and safety of the Bay Point neighborhood. We encourage your support and approval of this Project and the closure of the public access to the Baywalk. Sincerely, v S&%h-L 5ALAAtom, 17,-? cc; RP 2DWI '? G,H�-S,T ■'� h ick I Ir tir:�a7T:; 0 Q F 1 _ i CITY COMMISSION AGENDA, OCTOBER 8, 2015 PZ -1 BAYWALIC ACCESS CLOSURF SPECIAL APPFARANCF submitted into the public record f r i em( S) on 4 f City Clerk View from 1-195 towards Pallot Park. Please note the park is fenced off from 1-195 with no access. View from 1-195 towards Martel Park. Please note the park is fenced off from 1-195 with no access. View from 1-195 inbetween Sterns Park North and Martel Park to the South. 0� CITY COMMISSION AGENDA, OCTOBER 8, 2015 PZ -1 BAYWALK ACCESS CLOSURE SPECIAL APPEARANCE Submitted into the public record for itc (s) fz A— on Q City Clerk View from 1-195 to Martel Park. View from 1-195 towards Charter Club Condominium. 3