Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLegislation SUB Memo from City ManagerCITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: Daniel J. Alfonso �i City Manager % DATE: November 8, 2017 SUBJECT: November 16,,20 i 7 City Commission Meeting Agenda — PZ.3 (File 2508) REFERENCES: ENCLOSURES: pages 240-301 The City Commission meeting agenda published online and hard copies were distributed to you yesterday, Tuesday, November 7, 2017. The agenda item published online in its completeness yet the printed copies were missing pages 240-301. Attached are copies of page numbers 240-301, which belong at the end of item PZ.3. With these physical copies. your printed materials for PZ.3 mirror the electronic materials published online. Also, attached is a copy of the updated resolution to the item that will substitute the resolution that published online and printed in your packets. The resolution has been updated so the property address shown in the resolution is identical to the property address shown on the property postings, and the address shown in the certified mail notices mailed to the abutting property owners. C: Victoria Mendez, City Attorney Nzeribe lhekwaba, Chief of Operations and Assistant ity Onager Francisco J. Garcia, Planning Department Director Anna Medina, Agenda Coordinator Plan 18-003 2s-09,U4'ElAoll SLb ffW_ma_-Rroyicj-� OmW PZ.3 CITY COMMISSION FACT SHEET File ID: (ID # 2508) Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION APPROVING/DENYING THE APPEAL OF WARRANT NO. 2017-0004 ISSUED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4, TABLE 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED ("MIAMI 21 CODE"), TO ALLOW A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED WITHIN A D3 ("WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE AND PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6, SECTION 6,3.2 OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE TO ALLOW AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA INCLUDING A WAIVER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7, SECTION 7.2.8(B) OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE TO ALLOW THE ADAPTIVE USE TO A RESTAURANT USE IN A D3 ("WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125,127 A/K/A 129, AND 131 NORTHWEST SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, LOCATION: 125,127 a/k/a 129, and 131 NW South River Drive [Commissioner Frank Carollo - District 31 APPELLANT(S): W. Tucker Gibbs, Esquire, on behalf of Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc., abutting property owner APPLICANT(S): River Ari Building LLC PURPOSE: Appealing a PZAB decision FINDING(S): PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Recommended denial of the appeal PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD: Denied the appeal on May 17, 2017, by a vote of 9-2. iti(S fl} J $„ Resolution File Number: 2508 City of Miami Legislation City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www rniamigov.com Final Action Date: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION APP ROVINGIDENYING THE APPEAL OF WARRANT NO. 2017-0004 ISSUED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4, TABLE 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED ("MIAMI 21 CODE"), TO ALLOW A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT LOCATED WITHIN A D3 ("WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE AND PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6, SECTION 5,3,2 OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE TO ALLOW AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA INCLUDING A WAIVER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7, SECTION 7.2.8(B) OF THE MIAMI 21 CODE TO ALLOW THE ADAPTIVE USE TO A RESTAURANT USE IN A D3 ('WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125,127 A/K/A 129, AND 131 NORTHWEST SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on April 7, 2017, the Department of Planning approved Warrant No. 2017- 0004 pursuant to Article 4, Table 3 of Ordinance No. 13114, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended ("Miami 21 Code"), to allow a Food Service Establishment Use, pursuant to Article 6, Section 6.3.2 of the Miami21 Code, to allow an Outdoor Dining Area in a Food Service Establishment,. and further issued a Waiver pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.2.8(b) of the Miami 21 Code, to allow an adaptive use of a building located in a D3 ("Waterfront Industrial") Transect Zone for the properties at 125, 127 a/k/a 120, and 131 Northwest South River Drive, Miami, 'Florida, with conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2017, W. Tucker Gibbs, Esquire, on behalf of Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc. ("Appellant"), filed an appeal with the Office of Hearing Boards of Warrant No. 2017-0004; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2017, the Miami Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board ("PZAB") considered the testimony and the evidence presented, after due notice and an opportunity to be heard was afforded to ail members of the public, and adopted Resolution No. PZAB-R-17-033, by a vote of nine to two (9-2), and found there was substantial evidence in the record to deny the appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 2017, the Appellant filed an appeal of the PZAB's decision to the City Commission with the Office of Hearing Boards; and WHEREAS, the Appellant claims that the proposed Food Service Establishment Use falls to meet the requirements set forth in the provisions of the Port of Miami River Element of the City of Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"); and WHEREAS, the Appellant claims that the proposed Food Service Establishment Use is not an accessory use to the proposed yacht club and lounge with yacht sales and rentals; and WHEREAS, the proposed use does/does not fulfill the intent of the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan for the East Little Havana neighborhood; and opportunity to be heard has been afforded to all parties and members of the public, there is substantial evidence in the record to grant/deny the appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004 is granted/denied. Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption.' APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: f "ttoortey 7114-2017 i ria �dez, ty118:201.7 ' If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten (10) calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission. PAGES 240-301 I V r L --c KarIvac 7016 2140 0000 <k,58 6751 'See Bever f i i ! �.s.�- �� z 7 _>> + kr. IrlF fir'- �r 30V.1 C+a{o14Fiam! Panning and ening !Department, Hearing Boards SE 701b2140 0000 7658 6751 Oda SW and Avenue. 3rd F"oor Miami, Florida 331 3X t'p wwnr+.rnia ni�c aar'-"-PTear-"-boarJsi RETURN SERVICE RFOUESTM HEAR1NC NCT10E-A.__ T _ !7 -- Esq !r s Esc: -a ..%..7 a7,+^ ^L Aye 33131 V r L --c KarIvac 7016 2140 0000 <k,58 6751 Gon r or of State of Florida Mr. Rick Scott Uk'sigtee: Ms Patricia Harm Chir of Nflami-Dark. DekTaatkm Representative Jose Felix Diaz Designee: Rep, David Richareson Chair of GotmIng Board of Sonat Florida Water Nfanagenuw ilhbict Mr. Daniel O'Keefe Desipee- ifs Sandy aatchelcr ,4[i;tmi-Dade State AttornLy Ms ka:herine Fernand:`: -Rundle Designex, Mr. Gary Winston Ntsayor of Miarni-Ovule Cour" Mayor Carlos Gift encz De;igncr' Mr. Frank Balzebm Mayer of Miami Mayer Tarn:" Rzvrt'.aclo City of Miami Cuatut &&mer Conitni&;aoner Frenk Cam -1h) miund-Dade Cmmty Commisskmer C's3tttntissioner Brunn Barreiro Designee: % M ar lenc Avalo Chair sof Miami River Nfark* Grwip Nt.% Bruce 13, -,awn Designee- Sit. R:L;Minn Dtkbin Chair of ;4iarile Cotrocil Mr. Ed Swakon Ce:;agixx: Mn Phil E-vcnn_Mr.i Emcuc we Director of Do nro%n DewekM awAt .tudm ty M& Alyce Robertson Dersawce. V--. Erre Ric) Chair of £:renter Miami C'humNer of Commerm Mr. Barry John+senDesignw. Ms. !y andy 4eigborttsxW Rcpn- -ntxfivr ,ponirded by City of Miurd Convnir isin Dr. Fir c t NI:Irf in NeigbTrtwovi tictnr_7cnw6,r #ptnabt ed by Miwni-DiWe Comn sko 5V1;. Saw I idc Repmsentaftvefrom Favinamm-utal or CMc 0rpniradw .Aptxoiuted by torr Gowenaor Mr. Horasao Sloan Anirre Nlewbm of LarW AptmPin("t br the Governor Mr. Jay Carmichael Member at large Appointed by N,Uan i -Dade CsttsnttWort Ms. Sara Btbun Dcsitfner Mr. Duber Lazarciu Member at Lame Appniated bm- City of Miarw Cort mk%ion Mr. MaautY maguez Monona Director Mr. Brett Biixau n Ij Miami RiverCommission City of Miami Commission 3504 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 do Robtxt King lfigh 1407 INVY 7& Street, Suite D 'NGami, Florida 33t?S Office (305) f> W4)!5.a ema d. tnismkivera bd6wrh.net WWW.MiaMirirefctxtur6W0n.0,, October 26, 2017 �- r l 0 C Re: iyiRC Advisory Recommendations Re PZ 13, RE.7 and DI.4 Dear City Commissioners: PZ -13 (Appeal of Warrant) - During a public meeting held on January 23, 2017, the Miami River Commission (MRC} considered this Warrant application, which was subsequently approved by the City of Miami, The MRC's subject adopted public meeting minutes state in part: "Ms Sandy O'Neil made a motion for the NIRC to adapt the MRC Cuban Infill Subcommittee Chairman Jiro :t+turley and MRC Gro enw'ays Subcommittee Chairman Ernie 110artin's suggestion for tl�e INIRC to recommend approval of the updated subject warrant proposal with the fallowing conditions: I) site demonstrates continued marine use 2) site demonstrates public Riverwalk per approved plans and letter of intent 3) conduct seawall inspection and improvements if needed The motion failed by a vote of 6-5. MRC Chairman � gau' 're asked if anyone wanted to make another motion for consideration, and no other motions were made." Therefore, the MRC did not recommend this project as proposed. RE.7 (Accepting ST Funding for Stormwater Master Plan) — While this specific agenda item "accepting $1,125,000 from FDEP for design and creation of the City of Miami's Stormwater Master Plait" hasn't been considered by the MRC, it further advances implementation of the MRC's adopted Miami River Basin Water Quality Improvement Plan and the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan. k + . �(IQ ]Lis�a�s' � �. City of Miami Zoning Application Page I of 1 Iwo the public.-, cwcicrk operty Informatiow 2 Living Units. .:ityAddrm. 1( 129 NWSCUTH RIVER DR runty Address 129 NFfV S RIVER OR 2 256 Sq Ft L Mawng Address 92 SW 3 ST CU 6 i 700 MIAMI. FL 3� 30 E _iJsMo alf le hs, C1010 �!,cors 2 Living Units. Assessment Information: ,GtLal Area 2. -mr,g Area 2 256 Sq Ft Adjusted Area 2 242 S.; R fJ Lot Siz i 700 ,eat n. Description: Descriptio$9 f_:4'At S.11* 22.6 Code WAMI SCI174 PS 3-4f N1 2 Areas of 5 ecflc 6;s--ign—ab ory IE 7CLL CE SC PRCP BES A' Section: Descirsp4on-­ Enac"M'�11': .;F WL Or 1-013 BLK 5 PS 9-4' I regal t_ I R.M'P- GF S qlVF-R .^.Y T.- Special Area Planning- 3 El Y I $a aGF T E 70 THE %1,,' M Nore C-for,,;emert Fioca Zore AE E 9- !evanorl,_ 4305; 329-4770 Flood Zone Description. SPEvJAL FLOOD H.42ARD AREAS jk:n%' Frew-" Na YES L5�- (-- - � �-\ 5 L- �Cvf k - C.�� J '-) � Jt4v�1 1, https:,"/'maps.mi,amigc),,,,corm`miamizonin I g!printp g-.,htm?id=0102000�1130&map=,"_ags- 10,,26/2017 CITY OF MIAIX SOUTH Assessment Information: s'—'6 �co 'CC $45660 Miami 21 Zoninq(Currerttti: .1A1 Existing Land Use Zone= DeSCrSfTtrrSn---Enactment. .01 Wa11'1 LU V)awr-:�nt wdusinal Ce5:vc! n. Description: Descriptio$9 f_:4'At S.11* 22.6 Code Sales Information: Areas of 5 ecflc 6;s--ign—ab ory lm.e�isne non-noxicus INDUSTRIAL— Section: Descirsp4on-­ Enac"M'�11': so T Future Land Use ±or-Lnt Q 511 NoeFLU Sane CiR Description: Description: Code: Homestead Information: Special Area Planning- 1r.cLstrraJfndt stria rear 20'7 2016 20wt5 Section:Description: Enactment: Nore IF District Information: SP SC C-ty Commissioner sec�-Iv Hsinestead sr Sri SC Established Setbacks: 3 4'Cly Afternate Asses: Ccnnm�ssicner Frirk Caf'�Jjo T211 Nw SQi'jTH RLVER DR Ell Noce_ Historic Enyir mental Former 11000(Not Vafidi- MET Nzrr.e L[7TL;-! HAVANA ion - Zone: Description: —Enactment: NET Nicne (305i 36046-:0 - - __ - __ ___ —r- ------ T Y P tag Present: 5D-4 cads E�formlrarl 3 15.,-eric jra!15p No Former Overlay Districts: �v �S�Loricsites. section: Description: Erintment. 1Crde Enformrnprt FRANCISCO ',ajr^ln MARCOS - - __ - Arct, Zares No Nore C-for,,;emert Fioca Zore AE E 9- !evanorl,_ 4305; 329-4770 Flood Zone Description. SPEvJAL FLOOD H.42ARD AREAS jk:n%' Frew-" Na YES L5�- (-- - � �-\ 5 L- �Cvf k - C.�� J '-) � Jt4v�1 1, https:,"/'maps.mi,amigc),,,,corm`miamizonin I g!printp g-.,htm?id=0102000�1130&map=,"_ags- 10,,26/2017 copy of the correspondence as provided by Hearing Boards is attached and referred to as Exhibit E. At the July 27, 2017, Cite Commission ineetino, Tucker Gibbs and Iris Escarra appeared on the continuance of the appeal, with Tucker Gibbs requesting September 2$, 2017, and. Iris Escarra requesting September 14, 2017. At the July 27, 2017. City Commission meeting Iris Escarra stated on the record that the item should be continued to the September 14, 2017, meeting and that this is "an economic hardship for [Tasal River Arts] to have been carrying this property through this appeal process, and it's already been six (6) months." However, the City Commission continued the hearing on the appeal to the September 28, 2017, City Commission meeting. The relevant minutes from the: July 27, 2017, City Commission meeting are attached as Exhibit F. At the September 28, 2017, City Commission meeting, the item was again continued, at the request of District 3 Commissioner Carollo, to the October 12, 2017, City Commission meeting. The October 12, 2017, Cite Commission meeting was adjourned prior to the hearing of ane' items on the Plarining and Zoning Agenda dile to lack of quortim. The appeal has now been scheduled for the October 26, 2017, City Commission meeting. It has been more than sir (6) months since the Warrant was issued, with no resolution to the appeal. APPELLANT'S ORTECTION TO OCTOBER 25, 2017, HEARING In an email to Olga Zamora dated October 18. 2017, Tucker Gibbs objected to the scheduling of the appeal on the. October 26, 20177 City Commission agenda, alleging that the City Clerk and City Attorney confirmed that the appeal wotild be set for November lb, 2017, at the conclusion of the October 12, 2017, City Commission meeting. Tucker Gibbs claims that his client is not available for the October 26. '1017, City Commission meeting. Tucker Gibbs email confiims he rLcelved City's notice of hearinc, for the October 26, 2017, hearing date. A copy of Tucker Gibbs' email is attached as Exhibit G., CITY CODE AND MIAMI 21 SECTIONS REGARDING WARRANT APPEALS Section 7.1.1.5(i) of Miami 21, attached as Exhibit H. specifically states that appeals from the Planning and Zoning Appeals Board to the City Commission in connection with a Warrant application `shall be specially set for the first available City Commission hearing that is at least fifteen (15) days after the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board hearing." (emphasis added). This provision is intended to protect an appellee's rights by ensuring the speedy resolution and adjudication of pending appeals. Five (5) months have passed since the appeal was originally denied by the Planning, zoning and Appeals Board. By not setting the appeal to the October 26th meeting, in contravention of Section 7.1.1.5(1) of ikliami 21, the City will continue; to unduly prejudice the appellee who has been ready to present his defense since May. 7 Greenberg i raurig- P.A.? Attorneys at Law 1 333 Avenue of the ,Americas i Sure 4400 t Miami. r'_ 33131-3238 [Tel 335-:79.05W j Fax 3^SS73 ;'1' � � .v.v;rEaw-tam Accordingly, Tucker Gibbs' objection to the scheduling of the appeal before the October 26, 2017, City Commission is without merit and should be denied. We appreciate your time and consideration of this matter at the October 26, 20 17, Cite Commission meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Iris Escarra cc: Rafael Suarez Rivas, Senior Assi-stant Cita Attorney, City Attorney's Office W. Tucker Gibbs (via Itand Delivery at Hearing) City Commissioners (via Hand Delivery) y 4 Greenberg Traurig- P -A.' Arr;arneys ar Law 1 333 Avenue of the Americas i Suite 4400 ] Miami. FL 33131.3?38 1 Tel X5 57905,:0 [ Fax 305.57 9.071 r ; � :•.,L.;r`,,x u�>> FINAL DECISION File No. 17-CO04 - Green erg iraurig,. €,'A,. 333 S7 2m Avenue, Miami, FL lViarni, FL 33131. Fforp.:'Francisco J.: Garcia, Director i• .Planning &-Zosling.lfp'artment PLE4SFzTAFCE NOTICE THi0.TA FfNAL,DEGISION HAS BEEN REACHED ON THE FOLLOWING MATTER: —Title. trio: ,Fcod"SerVice Establishment & Outdoor Dining (liver Arts Building) `Address: 725,127 and 131 NW S. River Dr., Little Havana NET Final Decision: 0 Approval ✓Q Approval with condition Denial Prepared by: Luiz Mcentini, Planner 1 305-4188-1408 Amanda Smith, Planner[ 305-41E-1433 FfNDiNGS AND CONDITIONS The subject proposal has been reviewed for the foilow;Mg: 1- A Warrant pursuant to Article 4 Table 3 of the Miami 21 Cade, as adopted, the Zoning Ordinance of the City sof Miami, Florida. This Section states that Food Service Establishments located wtNn a D3 Transect Zona shall be processed by Warrant. 2- A Warrant pursuant to Article 6, Section 6.3.2, of the Miami 21 Code, as adopted, dieZoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida. This Section states explicitly that a Warrant shall be required for outdoor divine areas and the display and sale of items frons vending carts. 3- A Waiver, pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.2.8(b), of the Miami 21 Code, as adopted, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami. Florida, to allow the Adaptive Reuse to a restaurant use in a D3 Transect Zone. Pursuant to Section 7.1.3.4 of the above-cited Zoning Ordinance, the Planning & Zoning Department has made referrals to the following Departments and Boards • Office of Zoning, Planning & Zoning Department • Miami River Commission • Miami River Commission Urban Inf3il & Greenways -Subcommittee • NET— Little Havana Their comments and recommendations have been duly considered and are reflected in this final decision. In reviewing this application, pursuant to Section 7.1.2.4 (d) of the Zoning Ordinance, the following findings have been made: F,J I �_ b tecord On File No. 17-DO04 The previous Certificates of Use (CU) for properties included in the application were for general commercial with CU property classes for machinery manufacture, boat/pleasure craft sales, canning/preserving of fish/seafood, and general business office as Weil as CUs for Industrial - manufacturing & processing with a CU property class of printing/pubfishing allied industrial. The property is not currently being utilized for any use, water -dependent or otherwise. The application proposes uses that are similar in nature to the previous uses on site while also adding an assessors water dependent use which will further the economic viability of the Property and the surrounding area. Based on the above findings and the considered advice of the officers and agencies consulted on this mst<es, staff recommends approval with conditions of the subject proposal pursuant to Section 7.1.1.2 of the Zoning Ordinance and based on review of a Warrant pursuant to Article 4 Table 3, a Warrant pursuant to Article 6, Sectlon 6.3.2, and a Waiver, pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.2.8(b) with the follomx ng limitations: CONDITIONS: I. The proposed outdoor dining shall be in accordance with the pians entified 'River Arts Complex - Warrant Submittal' as prepared by Serenblurn Busch Architecture, Inc. consisting of 15 pages dated September 2, 2016, 2. Offsite parkfng shall be provided to accommodate proposed valet service. Validation of sufficient offsite parlcng shall be provided and approved by the Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee prior to the issuance of a building permit for this site. 3. To assure that a water dependent use is achieved, tri Class I and Ma.&Ps Operating P rwa s shall be approved p for to tha,issuance cfa bull ' " for this site. ' 4. Appilcant shall malrtwn comptanc a with'the Lower''Uver"dasign develvpnvnt ragulatiocs of both the Miami River Greenway Action Plan and the Miami River Greenway Regulatory Design Standards throughout all phases of the project, to be consumed by ttse Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee prior to the issuers of a building permit for this site. 5. The proposed application is located within a high probability Archaeological Conservation Area, if deemed necessary by the Historic Preservation Officer, any worts creating ground disturbance shall require a Certificate to Dig. 6. Brick pavers over critical root zone of trees are not permitted. Provide a Tree Protection plan prepared by a State of Florida Licensed Arbonst to show how Installation may be executed without damage to the root system of existing trees. ' 7. Provide a Landscape Plan prepared by a State of Florida Licensed Landscape Architect in - accordance with Article 9 of the Miami 21 Code, 8. The applicant shall comply with the public art requirements, pursuant to Section 2-11.15 entitled *Art in Public Places' of the Miami Dade County (MDC) Code of Ordinances and 41 the (MDC) Art in Public Places (APP) procedures numbered: 358- 9. Signage shall be reviewed under a separate permit application and is not a part of this Warrant submittal or approval. bw is; i E� ok DECISION File No. 17-4 ,w CLE 4 TABLE 12 (a is is subject to conditions. '*N appllt pie t th tme, subject to review and approval. I R C a 0 P _09ATf0 N wFagadesto APPlicabillty Compilarm xt taking into NIA - existing urban .ign Facades to NIA acknowledge all Frontages. (3) For modificationsof nonconforming Structures. NIA See Article 7, Section 7.2 for specific regulations (4) Create transitions in Height and mass with NIA - Abutting properties and Transect Zones. II BUILDING CONFIGURATION. AoglicabilitY Compliance (t) Articulate the Building Fagade vertically and NIA - horizontally in intervals appropriate to the existing Neighborhood and Transect Zone. (2) Articulate the Building Fagade at street level to NIA - recognize pedestrian continuity and interest, and at upper Weis to recognize long views of Buildings (3) Use architectural styles and details (such as roof NIA - lines and fenestration), colors and materials derivative from surrounding area. (4) Design Fagades that respond primarily to human NIA - scale. (5) Promote pedestrian interaction. NIA (6) Design all walls as active Fagades, with doors NIA and windows; w en not possible, embellish walls with architectural design treatment. (7) Provide usable Open Space that allows for visible Yes Yes and convenient pedestrian access from the public sidewalk. (S) Building sitas should locate service elements, NIA such as trash dumpsters, utility meters, loading docks, backflow preventers, siamese connections and electrical, plumbing, mechanical and File No, 17-QO4 Neighborhood. (2) Provide functional and aesthetic signage - identifying Building addresses at the entrance(s). VI 1) AM B I ENT STANDARDS: Aoolirahilit*{ Compliance (t) Provide lighting appropriate to the. Building and NIA landscape design in a manner that coordinates with signage acid street lighting. (2) Orient outdoor lighting to minimize glare to the PIA - public realm and adiecent properties. (3) Protect residential areas from excessive noise, Yes Yes{ fumes, oders, commercial vehicle intrusion, traffic conflicts and the spillover effect of light. W. TUCKER GIBBS, P.A. ATFORNEY AT LAW April 19, 2017 Olga Zamora Hearing Boards Office City of Miami 444 S.W. Second Avenue, Miami, Florida 33130 P.O. BOX 1050 COCO..NUr GROVE R 33133 MEPHONE (305) 443-8486 FACSL%XLE (305) 418.-0773 kuCh:iat;iU 3,1d Floo_„ a VIA FAND DELIVERY Rs: A peal of Warrant E1o. 2017-0004 to allow a food service establishment and outdoor dining within the D3 Transact. Zone, and an associated waiver at 125, 127 and 131 N.W. South River Drive. Dear Ms. Zamora: I represent Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc. ("Biscayne `lowing") which owns and operates 24-hour towing and salvage facilities at 151 N.V1. South Ricer Drive adjacent to the referenced property ("subject property"). My client objects to and hereby appeals Warrant No. 201.7-- 0004 issu d on April 7, 2017. (Exhibit "A"'). That warrant would allow (1) a road service establisrunent within the D3 Transect Zone, (2) outdoor dining areas and display and sale of items from vending carts and (3) a waiver "to a1'ow the adaptive reuse to a restaurant" at 125, 127 and 13.1. N.W. Scath River Drive. This proposed food service establishment is contrary to the following provisions of the Port of the Miami River Element of the City of Miami Co.raprehensive Plan: L 1. Objective PA 3.1 which requires that the Port of the Miami River be protected from encroachment by non - water dependent and non -water related uses. The proposed food service establishment is not water dependent nor is it water related. 2. Policy PA 3.1.4 which requires the city to encourage and maintain working waterfront uses within the Port of the Miami River Working Waterfront. The proposed Page I of 3 L 1 t The requested waiver to allow an adaptive reuse of a Structure for a restaurant, use is not only inconsistent with the comprehensive plan as set out above, but it is also inconsistent with the guiding principles of the Miami. 21 Code. Furthermore, the waiver presents no facts that show practical difficulties caused by the Miami 21 regulations that would be resolved by the approval of the requested waiver. Therefore, the waiver serves merely to circumvent specific provisions of the Miami 21 Zoning Code. Furthermore, the approval of the waiver is contrary to the essential requirements of the .lawn because the apparent standards that are applied in the evaluation of the waiver are vague and undefined and allow virtually unfettered discretion by the decision -maker in its approval. For all the forgoing reasons the Biscayne Towing & Salvage, l Inc,, through this letter, appeals the issuance of Warrant No. 2017-0004, to ,permit food service establishment with outdoor seating and a related waiver .for the property at 125, 227 and 4 131 N.W. South River Drive, Miami, Florida. Please note that appellant Biscayne Towing & Salvage, inc. ( reserves its right to supplement this letter with briefs and/or memoranda prior to the planning zoning and appeals board cosideration of this appeal. Sincerely, i l W. Tucker uibbs cc; Biscayne, TDwing & Salvage, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Fide ID: 2216 City of ;Miami PZAB Resolution Enactment Number: PZAB-R•17.033 cit�/ hall 3500 Pan American Drive Mlarni, FL 33133 ,~w MIam,gov,com Fina! Action Date: 5;1712017 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNfNG, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD DENYING THE APPEAL OF WARRANT NO, 2017-0004 ISSUED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 4, TABLE 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF M1AMI, FLORIDA ("MIAMI 21" ), TO ALLOW A FOOL? SERVICE ESTABLIS HIMENT LOC ATE❑ WITHIN A 03 ("WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE; PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6, SECTION 6.3.2 OF MIAMI 21, TO ALLOW AN OUTDOOR DINING AREA ALIO THE DISPLAY AND SALE OF ITEMS FROM VENDING CARTS; AND A WAIVER PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7, SECTION 7.2.5(B) OF MIAMI 21, TO ALLOW THE ADAPTIVE USE TO A RESTAURANT USE IN A 033 ("WATERFRONT INDUSTRIAL") TRANSECT ZONE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 125, '127, AND 131 NORTHWEST SOUTH RIVER DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE. (SATE. WHEREAS, on Aprii 7, 2017, the Department of Planning and Zoning approved Warrant No. 2017•COC4 pursuant to A bole 4, 'fable 3 of Ordirance No. 13114, as amended, the Zoning Ordrance of the City of Miami, Florida ("Miarni 21 Cede'), to allow a Food Service Establishment Use; pursuant to Article 6, Section 6.3.2 of Miami 21, to allow an Outdoor Dining Araa in a Food Service Establishment; and a Waiver pursuant to Article 7, Section 7.2.8(b) of Mianni 21, to allow ar adaptive use cf a t;uildi,ng located in a D3 ('101aterfron; Industrial") Transect Zone for the properties at 125, 127, and 131 Northwest Soutth River Drive with conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 10, 2017, W. Tucker Gibbs, Esquire, on behalf of Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc. ("Appellant') filed an appeal with the Office of Hearirg Beards of Warrant No. 2017-0004: and WHEREAS, the ,Appellant claimed that the proposed Food Service Establishment Use failed to meet the requirements set forth in the provisions of the Port of l0arni River Element of the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan ("MCNP"); and V/IH :REGIS, the Appellant claimed that the proposed Food Service Establishment Use is not an accessorrf use to the proposed yacht club and lounge with yacht sales and rentals; and WHEREAS, the proposal does fulfi!i the intent of the Miami River Corridor Urban Infill Plan for the East Little Havana neighborhood; and 'A'HEREAS, approval of Warrant No. 2017-0004 does serve to meet the intent of the IvICINP's fart of Miami River Sub -Element that emphasizas the economic development of the Miami River through job creation and employment opportunities; and Page 1 of 3 File 2216 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA. Section 1, The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004, with conditions, is denied. Section. 3, Th!:s Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption, APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS THIS DECISION IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED WITHIN 15 DAYS WITH THE OFFICE OF HEARING BOARDS. Francisco Garcia, Director Planni€ q and ,Zoning Department STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF MIAMI -RADE ) Execution Dite Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority. Clerk of the Office of Hearing Boards of the City of Miami, Florida, and acknowledges that helshe executed the foregoing Resolution. SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME. ___TKS i ' DAY CIF 'i 2017, Print Notary dame Personally known or Produced I.D. Notary Put; c State of Florida My Commission Expires: Type and number of I. D,prodUC'ed Did take an cath � f or Did not take an oath 3 OF 3 file 2216 m.. rN� �i; 3iL'!tq Gt7H ZALEZ � hSY'«"'afdddSSICY4 G8515ad r']4PrRE3 Y�vsmSer �crdaa'im�,vvtsry:�ybg��"�'+ier! W. TUCKER GrBBS, P.A. ATTOI NEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 1050 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 T-ELUHONF (305) 448-3436 FACSLMILE (305),P[8-0773 [tc s kt� r'tgi 15Us.Com May 30, 2017 Olga Zamora Hearing Boards Office City of Miami 444 S.W. Second Avenue, 3rd -Floor Miami, Florida 33130 VIA HAkID DELIVERY W�P,��iLC i1i' '± Re: Appeal of PZAB Resolution 1.7-033 Dawying Appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004 for Property at 125, 137 and. 131 N.W. South River Drive. - Dear Ms. Zamora: I represent Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc, ("Biscayne Towing") which owns and operates 24 -dour towing and salvage facilities at 151 N.W. South River Drive adjacent to the referenced property ("subject prt)perty") . My client filed ita appeal of Warrant No. 2017-033 on April 19, 2C17. The Planning Zoning and Appeals Board {`PZAB") heard the matter and denied the appeal on May 17, 2017. Biscayne Towing hereby appeals Planning Zoning and Appeals Beard Resolution 17-033 (Exhibit "A") that denied my client's appeal. of Warrant No. 2017-0004. (Exhibit "S"). That warrant would allD-vi (1) a food service establishment within the D3 Trani: ct Zor-e, (2) outdoor dining areas and display and, sale of iter:ts from vending carts and (3) a waiver "to allow the adaptive reuse to a restaurant" at 125, 127 and 131 South River Drive. The PZA3's denial of the appeal would permit a food service establishment is contrary to the following provisions of the Port of the Mian_ fiver Element of the City of Miami Comprehensive Plan: 1. Objective PA 3.1 which requires that the Port, of the Miami River by protected from encroachment by non- i =Nater dependent and non -water related uses. The Page 1 of 3 compliant with the Miami 21 Code because it fails to implement the comprehensive plan and it is contrary to the sequential intensity of transects that is one of the fundamental principles of the Miami 21 Code. The PZRB denial of the appeal and approval of the requested waiver to allow an ad,,ptive reuse of a structure for a restaurant use is not only inconsistent with the comprehensive plan as set out above, but it is also inconsistent, with the quid ng principles of the Ilia: i 21 Code. Furthermore, the waiver presents `io facts that show practical difficulties caused by the Miami 2i regulations that would be resolved by the approval of the requasred waiver. Therefore, the waiver serves merely to circur►vent specific provisions of the Miami 21 Zoning Code. Furthermore, the approval of the waiver is contrary to the essential requiretents of the law because the apparent standards that are applied in the evaluation of the ;waiver are vague and undefined and allow virtually unfettered discretion by the decision -maker in its approval. For all the forgoing reasons the Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc,, through this letter, appeals the PZAB denial of the appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004, to permit food service establishment with outdoor seating and a related waiver for the property at 125, 127 and 131 N.H. South River Drive, Miami, Florida. Please note that appellant Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc. reserves its right to supplement this letter prior to the punning zoning and appeals board consideration of this appeal. Sir_cerely, W, W. Tuccpr G bs cc: Biscayne Towing & Salvage, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Dombrowski, Brian A. {Assoc -tylia -RE} From- Zamora, Olga <07amora@miamigov.com> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 3:38 PM To: Escarra, [ris (Shad-Mia-LDZ-RE); Tucker W Gibbs Cc: Dombrowski, Brian A. (Assoc -Mia -RE); Rodriguez, Marisol (Para-folia-LDZ-RE); Gonzalez, Luciana L.; Garcia, Francisco; Eturrey, Jessica Subject: RE: Appeal On June 28, 2017, Mr. Gibbs requested his appeal to be scheduled for September 28, 2017 because his client was going to be out of town on July 27, 2417. On the week of July 10, 2417, Hearing Boards mailed notices for this item to be heard as part of the meeting scheduled for July 27, 2017. The mistake was caught on the afternoon of Friday, July 14, 2017 - too late to stop the advertisement in The Miami Herald. l notified Mr. Gibbs and requested that he make his initial request of the City Commission since notices and advertisement had already been processed for July 27, 2017 as opposed to the September 28, 2017 he had requested. Olga Zamora, Chief Planning and Zoning Department, Hearing Boards Division Direct Line - 305,416.2037 Visit us at: https://urldefense.oroofpoint.co;3;/v2Lurl?u=http-3a www.miamigov.com hearing- 5Fboards &d-Dov#GaQ&c=2s'2mvbfYOUoSK,<1, On,,II,!�rF�N4Ai]{YLe3da4HJ2oTu8G3.4QB3A,/Irkly,Rr3i5xoXQ2_SWmN'e&m- F1QmTNw ciRbgQppYCtJ�J-OlglJQwfaml,/ms`(d4�i3X hes&s-L I6dL4nO3 kMOKGmll�i. fDc93,IoaiZ3 [lzfivF afvlEO&e= -----Original Message ---- From: Escarral@Qtla,,v.corn mailto:Escarra �nt!a%.a com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 3:32 PM To: Zamora, Olga; Tucker W Gibbs Cc: dombrowskib2gtlavv.com; rodriguezmsegtlaw_com; Gonzalez, Luciana L. Subject: Re: Appeal 1 Olga, Tucker has advised that the cause of the delay in the hearing because of a notice issue. Based on the below, I was under the impression that Mr. Gibbs requested. Could you please advise? Thanks Iris 2 .. ... .... Olga Zamora, Chief Planning and Zoning Department, Hearing Boards Division Direct Line - 305.416.2037 Visit us at: htt s: /urldefense. roof oint.comZv21ur[?u=htt -3A www.miamigov.com hearin - 5Fboard7 &d=DwIGaQ&c=2s2mvbfYOUoSKk16 €]I9wg&r=1VE173oxrovJPKb7MbOcBm2s- zwr81 ZYd aD16 gS&m-Naz IFPGSB4DZvfiTZDxt f56Frxf56YCld+,v6KEKg &s=gge$zCPSpPJimUl4 RCetxGfoz3CTsDk Pa-4vCykphc&z= <htt s-1 urldefense. roof oint.corn v2 url'u=htt -3A w,-vir 'arni ov.corn hearin 5Fboards &d=DwiMFAg&c=2s2mvbfYOUo5Kkl6 019�vg&r=�JKvHc5i54ZiitQiJZkk !--kzU3rGTxf1 sBrBrQGsV4&m=YP8h AXcl}Ns eKi EAG.. Ya95-H-d!TVQKi'JvFL3-oEe4s&s=A6%j)/S231 I-iCt )3 ,,vtv;'137as Pa7S-TPWN wULrnEudYw&e=> If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at nstrnaster�t'a,+r.rom, and do not use or disseminate such information. m w City Commission Meering Minutss July 27, 2417 Chair Hardemon: Yeah. well, let's go (UNINTELLIGIBLE). l4fr. Garcia: This would be 6 and 9 Chair Hardemon; So that's 8 and 9 Chair Hardemon: Okav 20:' Afr- Garcia: Yes. sir; 2-6. Oh. sari,•. Item P7-20 is also being requesred for a deferral I believe rite applicant is here- Irfs Escarra. /E Good afier1rr. on- Ids Fac.arr a :i":113 r?f iees at ]_ 3 Southearrt 2r7d AVC -r tie- l reprCsetr( the J,!Vel,)PLfr oftr e site We received un approz al in .{pril- doe tt-ent befiore ifre PZ Roar.l in .tfr ride �i.erG scheduled here today_ it Gibbs reprerenrs the arfY.U(trrt %I h o has rts6'eLl fist a Jelf&,•raf, and we're oka'v +lith flat, J- e rral However- we are asking jor a Sepf,,mNr 14 --first meeting in September date, and ,4fr- Gibbs has a d.Vj'rent data. Tucker Gibbs: Well, I; ust want to clarify something. f was - Vice Chair Russell Which item, please? Mr, Gabbs: This is item 20. Chair Hardemon: 20 Mr Gibbs: I'm renr'e•senting 13iscgvne 1 -owing. who is the neighbor. N e filed the gt3,r at but wv ask lip- the d�jferr,tl. This is ar error made h.' the 0P.- in. City of.iliami Page 186 Printed on 09.13: 20 17 Commissioner Caroilo: That's 8 and 9. indefinite deferral. with a direction to our Administration to do a comprehensive study in that area to verb what zoning that whole area should be - Chair Hardemon: Then we have 14 and 15. What was the dates an those? Mr. Garcia: That would be the Citi: Attorneys Office request -- Mr. Min, Right; to October, please: the October PZ meeting. Chau Hardemon: 0&,,,. Mr. Hannon: That'll be October 2.5- Chair Hardemon: PZ I6.' Wr- Garcia: That would be for the firsr meeting of the month of September, please. Chair Hardemon: I$: 18'' Mr, Garcia- Lir. I'm sorC•- Item 14. Item 18 is the Coconut Grove Playhouse appeal. If representatives are here. Pd love to hear from them; otherwise. I have noted that October 26 is the desired date. by default, sir, because I do have it an m> nares, as submitted by the applicants, October 26, please. Chair Hardemon., October 26? Mr- Garcia.- Yes. Chair Hardemon: Okav 20:' Afr- Garcia: Yes. sir; 2-6. Oh. sari,•. Item P7-20 is also being requesred for a deferral I believe rite applicant is here- Irfs Escarra. /E Good afier1rr. on- Ids Fac.arr a :i":113 r?f iees at ]_ 3 Southearrt 2r7d AVC -r tie- l reprCsetr( the J,!Vel,)PLfr oftr e site We received un approz al in .{pril- doe tt-ent befiore ifre PZ Roar.l in .tfr ride �i.erG scheduled here today_ it Gibbs reprerenrs the arfY.U(trrt %I h o has rts6'eLl fist a Jelf&,•raf, and we're oka'v +lith flat, J- e rral However- we are asking jor a Sepf,,mNr 14 --first meeting in September date, and ,4fr- Gibbs has a d.Vj'rent data. Tucker Gibbs: Well, I; ust want to clarify something. f was - Vice Chair Russell Which item, please? Mr, Gabbs: This is item 20. Chair Hardemon: 20 Mr Gibbs: I'm renr'e•senting 13iscgvne 1 -owing. who is the neighbor. N e filed the gt3,r at but wv ask lip- the d�jferr,tl. This is ar error made h.' the 0P.- in. City of.iliami Page 186 Printed on 09.13: 20 17 City Commission MeetEnv Minutes Chair Hardetnon: -- projjered.' Commissioner Suar•e:: Whar was -- 12 and 15. whar was rhat tri' .t•!r. Garcia: September 25. Chair Hardenron: r111 right. All -- Ms_ Lscar•ra: ff l trtrrv, clar�7catfon on the one -- ort PZ20. Chair flardemon: 281h, .its. Cscarra: 28th oj•Septernhet, Chair Hardeifiofi: The --So as l understated for item --is it 4 ural -5 or d and 7' .qtr. Hannon: -t and ,7. Jury 27, 2017 Chari• Hart lemOn: 4 anel5 1 So npicaliv. when Ive re haying ,L+rocedterai n,olions. we don't alis;t anv discussion fotn the pubfic or ant•o■re, ever -- 1 mean. are vote a part airtile applicant, or -- Jefvev Basic: Chairman flarderno+a, ,!-I may address You -- anti rnv neighbor TieTF are, h, the Zoning Corte. qualit�ed tette--venurs- In the past. we have been aM, to speak. Today. you are granting the seventh C owmission level deferral for this item that lews part the neighborhood in distress, in uncertninry ,tot• the past eight vears. :lft,Y we please treake aur fmr-raid-a-hal'=ntitnae present. Won to yo it Chair flartLamon: That tneans that you won't be making your four•-and-a-half- minrtte presentation later' AP. Brash: I m son y' Chair Hardelnon. You won't be rntak ng } near _lour -and -a -hall presenra -- nunatte presentation later? II you present toot ti, are you re?ling me you won't present the ne-rt tinge this is being heard? .lir. Bash. We have hvo rcquesis Rant you. atter we have a lot ofinfartration for• you rhat I thank would be important tri you. as guarelians of ourcutnmunity, the Cott mission -- Chair flardenton: -u, but -- Air. Brash: -- here and our tan, dollars Chari Hardemon: -- understand me. Citderstancd s,hrt I'm .saying to vou. Right now. were moving to continue this to another derv. which means xe won't be rna,king a decision about this. lou want to present L orrr frarrr-arlci-a-hall tuinerre presentation lodes -V. What Pitt infiorming you of is this: Tj avoir do it tach?, l won't let you do it the next tune this is tip So when were making our deciaion about this, the fact -- whal oer aid o r the record is ill be ort the record, bur yore won't be rtta'titeg this presentation again. AIr. Bash: I'm petfectlu fine with that and -- Tice Chair Russell: Mr. Chairman. City of Miarrti rage ms Printed ort g{,t is 10117 Dombrowski, Brian A. (Assoc -Mia -RE) Subject: RE: CC Oct. 12 PZ.6 - Appeal of Warrant 2017-0004 From: W. Tucker Gibbs fmailto:tuckerdvAgibbs,comi Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2017 7:00 AM To: Zamora, Olga Cc: Garcia, Francisco; Escarra, Iris {Shad-Mia-LDZ-RE}; Min, Barnaby; Mendez, Victoria; City of Miami City Clerk's Office; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael; Gonzalez, Luciana L.; Ellis, Jacqueline; Gonzalez, Silvia; Agenda Office -DI; Hannon, Todd; 'Ewan, Nicole, Legislative Division Subject: RE: CC Oct. 12 PZ.6 - Appeal of Warrant 2D17-0004 Hello Ms, Zamora, I object to the rescheduling of this matter after the city clerk and city attorney (immediately after the adjournment of the October 12, 2017 city commission meeting) confirmed that my appeal was set for November 16, 2017 pursuant to the city code. My client is not available for the October 26, 2017 meeting. He is available for the November 16 meeting. am concerned that opposing counsel has directed the scheduling of the hearing of my appeal without my involvement and agreement. I explained to her that my client was not available on October 26 yet she sought and obtained this new date from the city. And the city agreed without consulting me and my client. I immediately telephoned you upon receipt of your email, and left you a message. I have received no response. Please calf me immediately to discuss this matter. I will be available by telephone up to 12 norm today and look forward to speaking with you. Sincerely, Tucker Gibbs W. Tucker Gibs W. Tucker Gibbs, RA, Attorney at Laos P.O, Box 1050 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 NOTICE: This e-mail is from the law office of W. Tucker Gibbs and is intended solely for the use of the individuaf(s) to whorl itis addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e- mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co -counsel or retained expert of the Office of W. Tucker Gibbs, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality. From: Zamora, Olga mailto:OZamora miamigov.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:15 PM To: W. Tucker Gibbs <t_Uc_k_er _wtgibbs.com> Cc: Garcia, Francisco <fg3rcia @miami ov.com>; Escarral@gtlaw.com; Min, Barnaby <bmin�Zmiamigov.ccm>; Mendez, Victoria <VNIendez@(niamigov.com>; City of Miami City Clerk's Office <Clerks@miamigov.coma; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael <Rsuarez-RivasPmiami ov.corn>; Gonzalez, Luciana L. <I1ffnz3lez�'Mrniamic,,ov-comp; Ellis, Jacqueline Iris V. Escarra Shareholder Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 1 333 S. E. 2nd Avenue i Miami, FL .33131 Tel 305.579.0737 1 Fax 305.461,5737 Escarral@gtiaw.com I &Nw.gt1aw.coM EGreenbergTraung l From: Mir}, Barnaby [maiPto:bmin'alrniami ov.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 3:50 PM To: Escarra, Iris (Shld-Mia-P-DZ-RE); Mendez, Victoria; City of Miami City Clerk's Office; Zamora, Olga Cc: Garcia, Francisco Subject: RE: CC Oct. 12 PZ.6 - Appeal of Warrant 2017-0044 Ms, Escarra, While I appreciate your citation to Section 7.]..1.5(i) of Miami 21 and the emphasis you added to the word "specially", I believe you neglected to add the emphasis correctly. The emphasis should be placed on "first available City Commission meeting." The Office of Hearing Boards is responsible for scheduling the matters and I believe that item was properly scheduled on the first available City Commission meeting. As to the remaining arguments you raise with respect to Section 2-33 of the City Code, I am sure the Administration will comply with any reasonable requests that do not violate the law. Barnaby L. Min Deputy City Attorney City of Miami Office, of the City Attorney Telephone: (305) 16-1833 Facsimile: (305} 416-181)1 Disclairner' This electronic mail os intended only for the indivsdual or entity named w=.thin the message. This elect.onic mail may contain legally pr,.gie ed and confidential informat!on. If you properly received this electronic mail as a client or retained expert. please :Fold it in ronnffercr, to protect t€:e attor nt1- cii:rt or tvt5rkproduct prim ? ;. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another perscil or party. that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-ti:arnt pnvileg?. If the reader of this message is =. the intended recpient, or the agent responsLble to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby rwtified that any review, dissemination, dist--ibution. or copying of th_s communication is pr suited by the sender and to do so may constitute- a violation of the E-lectronic Corn=mcat:ons Pn:,acy Am 18 L.S.C. Section Z51)-21521. I; this CcMill, rica`lcia was received in error, we apologize for the intrusion. Please no fv Eos in= reply e•niad and delete ire original message. Nothing in this electronic mail s€call, in and of itself. create an attorney- :fient relationship with the sender. tinder Flurida law e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not %vane your e-mail addr oss-eleased in re<:pnrse to a public records request, do nut send ole+_u-cnic mail to fl:is entity, Instead. contact this office by phone or in writing. Please Conside=r the emironnicni before Priming this elcetronic ma:], "~ From. EscarraI gtlaw.com [mailto:Escarral@gtla v.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 3:30 PM To: Mendez, Victoria <V lender^miami,ov.com>; City of Miami City Clerk's Office `Clerks@miair.i,ov.com> Cc: Garcia, 1 ranciscof, arcia:�d)miami,oy.comp; Min, Barnaby <bmin@miamigov.ccm> Subject: CC Oct. 12 PZ.6 - AppeaI of Warrant 2017-0004 Ms. City Attorney and Mr. City Clerk: At the October 12, 2017, City Commission meeting, the Chairman concluded the agenda for a lack of quorum at approximately 2:45 pm with multiple unheard items, including PZ.6, the appeal of Warrant No. 2017-0004. Miami 21 requires the appeal of the Warrant to be specially set at the next City Commission hearing, October 26, 2017. SGreenbergTraurig Ifou. are not an intended recipient of confidential and prig i y leued information in this email, please delete it, notifi- us immediately at po st master it -, Jaw. co m, and do not use or disseminate such information. A MIAMI 21 ARTICLE 7. PROCEDURES AND NONCONFORMITIES AS ADOPTED - MAY 2017 ning, Zoning and Appeals Board as agent or attorney for any other person. e. All city departments and employees shall, under the direction of city manager and upon request and within a reasonable time, furnish to the Planning Department such available records or in- formation as may be required in the work of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. The city manager shaft assign a member of the Public Works Department, Planning Department, Zoning Office, Neighborhood Enhancement Team, the Code Enforcement Department and Fire -Rescue Department, or their successors, to attend public hearings of the Board and to advise the board when necessary, and to furnish information, reports and recommendations upon request of the board. The city attorney shall attend public hearings of the board to advise the board when nec- essary and to furnish information, reports and recommendations upon request of the board. f. The Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board or representatives of the Planning Department may, in the performance of official duties, enter upon lands and make examinations or surveys in the same manner as other authorized city agents or employees and shall have other powers as are required for the performance of official functions in carrying out the purposes and responsibilities of the board. 7.1.1.5 City Commission The City Commission, in addition to its duties and obligations under the City Charter, the City Code, and other applicable lata, shall have the following duties specifically in regard to the Miami 21 Code: a. To approve, deny or approve with conditions applications for developments of regional impact pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, b. To consider and act upon proposed amendments, including rezoning, to the Miami 21 Code, after consideration of the recommendation by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. c. To consider and act upon proposed Special Area Plans, after consideration of the recommenda- tion by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. d. To consider and act upon proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan which relate to the Miami 21 Code, after consideration of the recommendation by the Planning, Zoning and appeals Board. e. To hear appeals of the ruling of the Planning. Zoning and Appeals Board on the appeal of a zoning interpretation, Certificate of Use denial or revocation, planning determination of Use, Warrant, Variance or Exception. f. To consider and adopt ordinances, regulations and other proposals as it deems appropriate for promoting orderly development within the areas of the city that are regulated by the Miami 21 Code. g. To establish a schedule of fees and charges for the applications made pursuant to the Miami 21 Code. h. To appoint members to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, asset forward in this Miami 21 VI1.14 Miami, FL Code of Ordinances page 2 of 5 (4) Any member of the public shall be entitled to be scheduled on the agenda of a regular meeting of the city commission for presentation of information and material to be considered by the commission within the scope of the jurisdiction of the city commission after the city manager has communicated with the member of the public and reviewed or investigated the member's issue, unless otherwise directed by the mayor or a member- of the city commission. If the city manager is able to resolve or remedy the concerns of the member of the public, the member of the public may eiect to withdraw the request to appear before the city commission. If the matter is not or cannot be resolved or remedied by the city manager, then, at the will of the member of the public, the request for appearance shall be scheduled on the next available agenda and the city manager shall submit a report in the agenda packet detailing actions taken to resolve or remedy the matter and administrative recommendations. (5) The total number of items that may be scheduled on a regular city commission agenda shall not exceed 60 items. (5) The lunch recess shall begin: a. At 12:00 noon; or b. At the conclusion of deliberations of the agenda item being considered at 12:00 noon; or C. At the conclusion of statements made by the person who has been recognized to address the commission immediately prior to 12:00 noon; or d. At any time deemed appropriate by the city commission. (7) The city commission meetings, shall adjourn: a. At the conclusion of deliberation of the agenda item being considered at 10:00 p.m„ unless the time is extended by unanimous agreement of the members of the city commission then present, or b. At the conclusion of the regularly scheduled agenda, whichever occurs first. This rule does not apply to city commission meetings required for annual budget hearings. about:blank 10/25/20 17 Miami, FL Code of Ordinances Pa -e 4 of 5 supported by memorandum setting forth the rules of action by the city commission, shall be filed three days before the meeting and given to the mayor and each member of the city commission, (h) All ordinances shall be read by title only prior to passage. All resolutions shall be briefly described upon a printed agenda, which agenda shall be furnished to the mayor and members of the city commission at least five full business days before each regular city commission meeting, (i} finless further time to spew is granted by the presiding officer the city commission, any person addressing the commission shall limit his or her address to two minutes. (jg Unless impractical to do so, all portions of the agenda shall be scheduled to be heard at 9:00 a.m. on the date of the city commission meeting. The agenda portion entitled "consent agenda" shall be scheduled among the Initial items for commission consideration. Consent agenda items that are removed from the agenda prior to city commission consideration shall automatically be scheduled as a regular agenda item at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the city commission, unless, by an unanimous vote of all commissioners present, the city commission considers such consent item as a regular item at the same meeting, (t) Any scheduled agenda item not considered prior to the adjournment of the first regular monthly city commission meeting shall be perfunctorily regarded as a continued item and scheduled on the next immediate month's first regular city commission agenda. Any scheduled agenda item not considered prior to the adjournment of the second regular monthly city commission meeting shall be perfunctorily regarded as a continued item and scheduled on the next immediate month's second regular city commission agenda. {l} Special meetings. Nothing in this section shall prohibit either the mayor, or the commissioner designated as the presiding officer of the city commission, or three city commissioners, upon the written notice delivered to the city clerk, from calling special meetings at any time set by the city clerk, provided that reasonable advance notice of same is given to the mayor, each member of the commission, city manager, city attorney and the public. No business shall be conducted or a vote taken at a special city commission meeting on business other than the subject(s) for which the special meeting is called, (m)- Any commissioner who so desires may be a signatory on city proclamations. (n) about:biarik- 10/25/2017 City of Jacksonville Y. Huffman, 764 So.2d 695 (2000) 25 Fla. t-. Wee kiy D 139 Planning Committee. The circuit court grantad the Petition for grit of certiorari filed by the Huffrlans, Greenland and Salvatore, finding that the City had failed to afford then procedural clue process and had departed from the essential requirements of law. based upon inadequate notice. We qua,h the petition for the following reasons. First. the court ,found that Greenland and Salvatore were denied procedural due process. because they learned of the hearing set before the Land Use and Zoning Committee "only by accident, too close to the hearing date to actually prepare," and thus were not provided notice pursuant to section 307.204(h) of the Jacksonville Historic Preservation and Protection Ordinance. On the contrary, the complainants never claimed that Greenland and Salvatore did not receive adequate notice of the hearin . In fact, Greenland and Sal4atorz receiNod actual written notice 19 days before the hearing, as they had expressly stated in their petition for writ of certiorari. Second, the court found that the Huffinans were denied procedural due process, because they did not learn of the hearing before the Lard Use and Zoning Committee at all. The complainants. however. never asserted this as error in their petition, and, indeed, they appeared at such hearing*. They expressly stated in their petition for writ of certiorari that the Huffinans learned of the hearing five days before it took place. ~ U1 Third. the court found that the complainants were denied procedural due process, because they were not provided the requisite notice of the initial public l earing before the Historic Presorvation Commission, This finding alone. hovre%er, could not provide [lie sole basis for quashing the decision of the City Council, because the complainants were provided a full opportunity to present their objections ill their appeal of the Commission's decision in a hearing before the Lard. G'se and Zoning Committee. which was conducted de novo. U2 Fourth, the court found that the City Council's act of granting a Certificate of Approval to the proposed project departed from the essential requirements of law. because the City did not comply with the notice provision of section 301.204. Section 307.304 establishes the notice requirements for appeals before the Land Use and Zoning Committee, so presumably the court was referring to notice before the Committee hearing. The court. however, made no additional findines as to whether the complainants were prejudiced by the inadequate notice. Although strict compliance with swiliory notice requirements is mandatory, a contesting party's right to assert a defect in such notice may be waived if the party appeared at the hearing and was able to fully and adequately. *69i present his or her objections. The def rise of waiver will be denied only ii' the party was unable to fuliy prepare for and present objections at the hearing or was otherwise prejudiced by the defective notice. See Maller v. Clav Coram, Tonin-, Corr m'at 22 So.2d ]» Fla. Ist DC.1969); Schumacher v. Town of Af iter 643 So.2d S Fla, 4th DCA 1994. The lower court's only statements rgardin4 prejudice were: in the two findings discussed above. that Greenland and Salvatore were unable to adequately prepare for the Lancs Use and Zoning Comnlitt,-e 17earillg because they had received notice "by accident, too close to the hearing slate," and that the Huffmans "did not learn of the hearing at all," As stated, the complainants did riot make zither assertion in their petition far writ ofeertiorari. Fifth, the circuit court rejected elle corlplainants` claim that the City Council's act of granting the Certificate of Approval was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. The court found that the complainants had ad Putted. and the record showed, that the Land Case and Zoning Committee had considered the documents they had subinitted at the hearing, and that the information contained in these documents fairly represented their objections to the building applicatiau. The court concluded [flat it was not permitted in a certiorari procceding to reweigll the evidence.. The court's finding that tate documents submitted -'fairly represented their objections to the project" renders the entire order internally inconsistent. If the e`idence before the Lancs Use atld Zoning Committee during the de novo hearing fully apprised. the Committee of the complainants' objections to tle project, and provided competent, substantial evidence for the Certificate of Approval, then it was inconsistent for the lower court to conclude as well that [Ile complainants did not have sufficient notice of the Marin; in %shish to prepare and present evidence. y We reject the: City's remaining issues. We GRANT the City's petition for writ of certiorari, QUASH the circuit court's order, and REMAND for the court to reconsider the complainants' petition for writ of certiorari below. r�i y court. however, made no additional findines as to whether the complainants were prejudiced by the inadequate notice. Although strict compliance with swiliory notice requirements is mandatory, a contesting party's right to assert a defect in such notice may be waived if the party appeared at the hearing and was able to fully and adequately. *69i present his or her objections. The def rise of waiver will be denied only ii' the party was unable to fuliy prepare for and present objections at the hearing or was otherwise prejudiced by the defective notice. See Maller v. Clav Coram, Tonin-, Corr m'at 22 So.2d ]» Fla. Ist DC.1969); Schumacher v. Town of Af iter 643 So.2d S Fla, 4th DCA 1994. The lower court's only statements rgardin4 prejudice were: in the two findings discussed above. that Greenland and Salvatore were unable to adequately prepare for the Lancs Use and Zoning Comnlitt,-e 17earillg because they had received notice "by accident, too close to the hearing slate," and that the Huffmans "did not learn of the hearing at all," As stated, the complainants did riot make zither assertion in their petition far writ ofeertiorari. Fifth, the circuit court rejected elle corlplainants` claim that the City Council's act of granting the Certificate of Approval was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. The court found that the complainants had ad Putted. and the record showed, that the Land Case and Zoning Committee had considered the documents they had subinitted at the hearing, and that the information contained in these documents fairly represented their objections to the building applicatiau. The court concluded [flat it was not permitted in a certiorari procceding to reweigll the evidence.. The court's finding that tate documents submitted -'fairly represented their objections to the project" renders the entire order internally inconsistent. If the e`idence before the Lancs Use atld Zoning Committee during the de novo hearing fully apprised. the Committee of the complainants' objections to tle project, and provided competent, substantial evidence for the Certificate of Approval, then it was inconsistent for the lower court to conclude as well that [Ile complainants did not have sufficient notice of the Marin; in %shish to prepare and present evidence. y We reject the: City's remaining issues. We GRANT the City's petition for writ of certiorari, QUASH the circuit court's order, and REMAND for the court to reconsider the complainants' petition for writ of certiorari below. Schumacher v. Town of Jupiter, 643 So.2d 8 (1994) 19 Fla, L. Weekly D1779 upheld. We see no need to repeat the analysis here. See also Corn -v. Gets of'Lauderdale Lakes. 997 F.2d 1'')69 f 1 I th Cir. 1993 , cert. denied. al 1 L S- 1018. 114 S.Q. 141it}, I28 T—Ed.?d x3119941 jJ 131 Oil the notice issue, appellant clain.s error in the trial court's Finding that he waived the notice requirements by his extensive knowledge of and actual a'_tendance and participation in the relevant proceedings. The general rule is that, while strict compliance with statutory notice requirements is mandatary and jurisdictional, a contesting landowner may waive the right. or be estopped, to assert a defect in the notice if that landowner appeared at the hearing and was ably to fully and adequately present an,,., objections to the ordinance. ;Ifalley v. Clay County Z,,4Lg CorrrrO!, 225 So.3d 555, 557 (Fla. lst DCA 19691. If, however, the notice is so lacking that the landowner was unable to fully prepare for tete hearing to voice an objection. or where the landowner can otherwise .. -- .. • _ � � Vis, demonstrate prejudice. then courts will refuse to find a waiver or estoppel. lel. Here, as in Nfalle'v. the record reflects that appellant. through counsel. had substantial and continuous knowledge of the pending proceedings and did appear at the final hearing on the proposed ordinance and express his objections. As in Ualr`ey we find no error in the trial court's holding that appellant waived any claimed defects in the notice and was estopped from asserting such defects as a basis for invalidating the ordinance. y ANSTEAD. GLICKSTEI4 and STONE, JJ., concur. All Citations 613 So. 2d 3, 19 Fla- l.._ Weekly D 1779 End of Document �t' 2017 Thomson Reuters- No claim to original U.S. Govemment lftfks