Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Exhibit A-SUB
THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. 18325 Exhibit A -SUB THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • Providing the highest quality and best possible bicycle facility given the right-of- way width • Focus on local streets with existing or proposed traffic calming provided • Connecting on local streets that have signals at arterials/collectors • Creating initial grid by providing a quality facility • Reinforcing grid and provide additional connectivity • First- last- mile connectivity to transit • Quality and secure bicycle parking at transit facilities • High ridership locations (over 150 daily boardings and alightings) Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Network Determination • Right-of-way considerations • 50-foot ROW Context Sensitive • Local Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Boulevard • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 33' o Assumes any reconstruction would require 6' sidewalks • 50'- 33' = 17' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 0' remaining • One -Way Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Lanes or Protected Bike Lanes • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 5' sidewalk + 5'sidewalk = 30' • 50'- 30' = 20' — 7.5' on -street parking — 7.5' on -street -parking = 5' bike lane gi oe,.r... . r a . u.,. w..w.v .... u....... tiro-• ,e. r,i. •• f"t- .wili 50-foot ROW Two Way Tratltic ■ i eom.. e,,.... tee. 9,..... it I 50-foot ROW One -Way Traffic Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Belton THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Network Determination • Right-of-way considerations • • 60-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 27' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 10' remaining • Therefore, 5' bike lanes + 5' bike lanes 70-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 37' remaining • 8'6" + 8'6" on -street parking = 16' remaining • Therefore, 8' + 8' one-way protected bicycle lanes or 11' two-way protected bicycle lanes To --foot ROW One-way protected bicycle lanes Kimley>» Horn Expect More. Experience Better. THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Network Determination • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods • Providing connectivity to activity centers • Schools, Parks, grocery stores • On -street parking/vehicles parking in bicycle lanes • Recommend protected bicycle lanes • Do not remove on -street parking for bicycle lanes as vehicle will still park in the bike lanes QN5FT • Pedestrian Priority Zone • Little Havana • (Miami River to the north, SW 8th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW 22nd Avenue to the west) • Prioritize pedestrians and access to transit over other modes • Maintaining clear sidewalk width for pedestrian travel, aligning curb ramps with sidewalks, requiring crosswalk at all intersections, increasing pedestrian crossing times beyond the minimum, reducing travel lane widths, providing shade for sidewalks, reducing speed limits, and eliminating right -turn -on -red in dense pedestrian corridors Kimley>>>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad soil Se NW 12th Sr Hialeah 5ourh Side Conol THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. West Little River I9341 NW 79rh St lx ' Luh r l Sly W Miami SSprinfl$ Mi wrti International Airport Blue Logo Jr? I ( I t 4 �lagler 4 et I k I Q 1 MTh St 1 r] 0 (}r --I r r L — p — p.L— L7 ti. 1 I I �I is � r 6t Bicycle Network Recommendations rrctected Bkyrfe Lanes — — 5hared•Use Path Suffered 6kycle Lanes Bkyrle Lane, Bicycle Boulevard 0 PrepoSetl Bicycle Parking 0 nigh a srap rranvt Srops Reposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary rs pi 1 Coral Gable,. 1 r mrT 1 OJ Dodge IV°rod North Bay Village Virgrnio Key Crandon Park Noufifus IA1AI Miami Beach Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. ICI AIL Bi Rd Malaga Ave Coral Gables Hardee Rd a; w0 Ponce de Leon Blvd Carat Gables Industrial 6C - Ave �yrd'y/ford Ave ——1'+95111•0 0111eTA7E P 11 Pra6o Blvd ISW46t1 .5t — — 1 SW 27ths SW 2Sth St I —L 1 Ic I a. 1 _ —I— - T a' ,r—4)97 1 1 N 1 W 1 I Frr Ave f F16rirka Ave 1 'William Ave 1 Charles Ave t 1 .I I r ---tarkilwe----1 I 1 Harrk FJAve e llama tIe Hist ME State Park Hinter Ky. PI [MC Islands Park Bicycle Network Recommendations — — PMletted Bye Lanrs — — Steered -Ur Path — — BeNerel BKyde Lae — — Bicycle Lanes Bicycle oeuierara O Proposed 64yde Parking 0 High Ripgrghip TronV Stops Proposeq NyIghhnrhnoa Traff[ GpIrning ereas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad kW 1 Bicycle Network Recommendations Protected Bicycle Lanes Shard-IJse Pam Buffered B,cyde lams Brcyde Lanes Bkyde Boulevard D Proposed Bicycle Parking o High Relerslaci Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Tra1Fc Calming Areas E isting(Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary N i rr x St 972 I c �1 1 SW 241d St SW 3rd St 11 sw 4tliSt —T 7- I Z 1 NW Ist St I NW 9stSt 1 1 1 1 c n W F f St 1 G 1 ~'' I 1 i * I 1 1 s idiomd' rk 1 1837 S 4th St 51M 2ndst a I I 1 1 ▪ un. 4 TIP ,r1-4-- .. al N t ¢4. 1- I I I- - -- I Sw1a 1 1 1 Sw I 1 sW1 1 11 _ _ _ 1_ _.i§W-a�thr'S ----�- y Sw, SW 14th St I sw 1 �Ah Ter SW1Sth St 1 i_ r -dotb st s —1 ham.--s I SW 22nd Ter 1 W 25th Ter ---15Hr eh At--- 1 sw 27th St SW 28th St f 1 I 4 1 N sw 18th St A - — --I----- n 1 5W 21st Ter SW 2.. d Ter L -s 2srd9t-•-11 sW 2Qth St ae SW 2 St 1 Ter I h St I - -!--SW140,.Srt1 St 1 - -1----- I ~ 1---- — 1 t i Y 1 !- 1 r � ti i G i SW SW i f THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Sr NM 1st St - —p — }_--- SW 2n SW Sri w cae..a Q 0 L,-0---ti-0-,i3"---[3 — 1 m SW 90, 5t f f 1 r sw aot st 1 SW 14th Sty SW E1�rh Ter Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad Bicycle Network Recommendations — Protected Bicycle Lan. — Shared -use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bryde- Lanea Bicycle Boulevard O Proposed Boo/de Parking © High Kdaehip Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities ExistingfPlanned Greenways City of Miami Boundary 5WW 7th Riekenboe Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Bicycle Network Recommendations Protected Bice& Lanes — — Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicn Lanes - -- B,c t$e Lanes BiC4C1e Boulevard 0 Froi osed Bicycle Parking O H. RiOa'Sht7 Trarcit 51015 Pr( .,eti 116ghhorhoo1 Traffic calming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A A A SW Sth St 5w 16th St SW 17th St SW 170 Ter lotal rn n 1" J ieicgagler S s ! I — L .syy.41h 3t SW 12th St Q0Pi'in ExpY E Loke foonew NV.7th'St e r / 1 3 I f 0t I > _ Ivto I I I Nw 2nd it I I ` t 1 I I N) I 1 fl I I I I I 1 I I R I I I 1 u,1 1 if._, I ¢ I I 11.��. :. i:1St - - -`..L—h-s`--I- -1 Swstt 5t 1 I ," y rn n a 1 n I c 1 SyY S th St sw Sth Tr 1 m v 1 ro c 1 I I I I 1 P• n, 1 1 I 1 SW 7th St I I r. I I 1 I I O 1 SW 16tn 51 West Miami SW ltth St SW 17th St SW Kith St ici qr ) A11una7 15 puruip Jai Ven etra Fyn Soma a A. Obispo /we THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad Bicycle Network Recommendations Pnxected Bicycle Lanes — — Shared -Use Path Buffered BKycre Lanes BILK* Lanes B'wyetie Boulevard 0 PrePOSed Bicycle Parking O 1. h RWe-Ship TraRaft Stops Bremer tk:ghtxundod Traffic Calming Area. Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary it YW Srnit— •'�i--- z �,�--- 4-_-t ---.� — 1 » a 1 I I I I I I I _,It 1 1 s�,.,,,"ilr5 -. — I ^Sw Sth S t — I Sw nth St t Sw Sth St SW Sth Tkr I I [MI I I 1 I 50r 7th St I t I I — _. I oHi a lea Bhoe Logoon International links Melreese I NW 19t?t ter I NW 19th St I NW 18th Ter I i< NW 18th St OQIhV1are-Park - 1 G - - 44wrr?dr5e I l• i t 1 / , 1 INW151hSt i 1 f INw 14th Ter I 1 1 0 NWIFtth 5t— —'.--1"— I NW t2th Si I 11 °0 1 1 I TiI l Q z I 2 �. 0 I i_ NW7IhSY z rWrhSthlSt --- I A.rt I r-- n 1 r_- I 1 L. 1 1 a ` 1 la Q 1 �` Z Y * ti r---1 T 7 a_� � I t 1 a z I R NW 1st sY 1 I 1 r 1 1 I Sw 2trd St 1 Sw3rd5t 11 I rd SY i t I< is 1Li I 1 I w SW5thSt I L SwSYhTer rr— p —�—s 1 4 r:va! e¢ ; Q w m / R 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 Venetia AVE [ al sw 1 dth St Men ores ricse ; , I 1 I i I � l THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad Bicycle Network Recommendations +^ Prztcrt, d Biuydr Lanus — �- Shared -Use Path •• — Bufrered Biuydr Lanes - — BiCyde Lanes Bicy[fe Baulevard • Provosed BOO* Parking O Hqn RW0-shiP Tran91 StOOS rmstased tfelghborhood TrafCc Calming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned C,,reenwdys City of Miami Boundary Hialea 0 19131 Igen1 Inter rake JAV puia N M 1 No/ 19th Ter I 1 NW 19th St I i NW'1ath TerI NW 1 gth St 0- — — t — — 4NftTt19r91- xi 1 NW 15th St 1 International NW 144-11 ref I Links metreese NW IF4th 9t L. why 43Lf NLN .. -1 _ L _-+rwaS - gt- ,a v - I I z t NW 34th St i 1 z ITN.,:w., rjjr++Ay000ggq— 1335t 5m1 Park Nv+' i NW 30th St i m 1 — — NW-24 NN201hft 1 4 NwtkattT s4—..—' NW th St 1 iNW2rth St NW 2 Ith St 0 1 1 - - - GYM te4irlt 5fi � • I a I 1NW2I ( St 1 Delaware Park 1 4) '1 * l O 1 F €_G } NV: 1 21, St g53 1 I NW 91h Sr F $ I ir I NIA, 9th Sty 1 ICS i , NW ath St I Av 7(h St z ar 1 —w``i' — -- 0 c 1 i i— — — NW Sth St INtdrlirtSPark Z NW Stri' 1 w @ i 1 a. I 1 5 z l c ¢. I 1 — i z z 1 ° r -- r_ --• a- I rr, t<r ,,, O.,. ILL I HI — �• tiV1 7r� 3t k — — 1 I i,r . ks - 1 1 1 1 1 l w 1sr St I I ' r° I i • NW 1st 5t 1 1 N W t st 5, 1 1� 1f 1 O 1 C? -, r3t,. I fac.l W' F' St 1 d r _� �' —, 15_....-0- -e: -. e_, .- 44W- NW 21 st Ter - 1 NW 1}att+- NW 47th St 1 r 1 NW 22nd St n 9. n rr—go--` latk • '- — — — Merr O Hos *NI 1 ill S 16I THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad r .e 0 I 'J w 1 I 135199 41 i 9 W Mth Strn I I _I f .1 -. - th. +avii-3.er — — — L I W-32, ; i S . i . _ - 1- n-- 4.. NW31st St I 1 m f q Y I Pinewood Park NW 2gth Ter R r`a I - ,N -2 I r-1-- - "--1 I .__,---1---11 1 I wl�i9tFr5t - - L T _i- - acI 1 I NW 2Ptt1 St J 1 I t i I 1 f -_-- • .. ` NW 22nti SS I I I L— —— I NW 2IStTar I — I NW AlSt St I TCW 21 st St t aw 5th St r I • "Marlins Park 1 I N 1st 5t � p 1 NW Sth St �kW 2nd Sr NW 1st St • CO G G 0 ri I I970I —i F I 1 n I I 1 — Baysi d€ -apt r2 Bicycle Nehvork Recommendations - �Protected Bicycle Lanes - - shawl -use Path - - Bulfere[1 BKyde Lanes - - Bwede Lanes - BKyaie Beuievara V PmpQsed BKyele Parking 1 nrgn egerse p Transit Stops Proposed Neighberhood Traffic [aiming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A Hialea O f Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Bicycle Network Recommendations - - P%ceded Biryde Lanes - - Shared -use Path • - Buffered Birydc Lanes — -- Boric Lanes Bir rle Boulevard O Proposed Bkyde Parking O High R d* Trangt Slaps Bnagosed tleighborhood Tree [aIfl nrr Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenway+s City of Miami Boundary ,wns'vil le 0 NW4BhSt i1W 2D th Ave p N > r `L.W74th St NW 73rt St 1`S4'1 1Gtn St +� G9th 5t NW 6G1n t , k It SS 1 NW 5 7th St Floral Park 1 � I NW 130th St NW Atli St Nw 4TIth Ter NW 4th St 1 I 1 NW 411rd St NW42nd Stl L--1 NW 41st St Earl in gton - Heights Metro - - Rail Station .- - Marn ILuther king 6 d i,N4O 62 } 1 1 1 NW 54[h Ter 1 I 1 1 1 4ters, trrsv — — Ir 1 I NWSSthTir -----I I- Nry ti5Sth-St- - tt ",Iode1 Cities 1 NW 54th St N W 54th I T Trail 1 -I r 1 r , - --10042, d-m- INWSISt st I NW 72nd St I z 1 NWr67thSt I � NW.6th St NW6 th Stis II ----- - €13eu+ st - - - i # NW 6prd 5t z • 1 fit I entl PUZZ MN L. -Nor 4,,fN.5t NW 34th St any NW 51st fer 1 NW 45th St NW 44th St NW 43rd St N 49ah NNi4Sth St lyyyl47th Ter NA1 47th 5 NW 4 Pt St I t NVI-S3e t- I 2 rn Link to Map: https://maps.kimley- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/i ndex.html?id =d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. NW 74th St NW 73rr 5t NW 72nd St - 14N.,'4ed.St— 1 1 4 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I NW 671t1 St 1 I I NW 6 ih St I 1 NW 6 th St 1 t1t�r NW spyri St z (Pk 12 T 1 5am Ter 4etrx-- 1 5ihr51— 4 _ 1 z 1- Po Y I 1- 1 MS 54thi;t 01 1 - --kiw-52rid sr - 1 I IW STst St I 1 N 1 1 1 1 r— La 44th Sr 1 2 N{N48th s1 1 r1Ter `' T NW 47th St a iW 45th St NW 441h 51 NW 43rc1 St NW Airth St t 0 3I fir 34111 51 =r r 1— oar/ f+ehk- 0 NE 74th St NE 73rd St NE 72n d St NE 70th St ytl Bicycle Network Recommendations - - ProEected Beyde Lanes - - Share 1'Use Path - Buffered Bide Lanes B-icyde Lanes - Birydc Boulteard O Pnaposod Bkeric Parking O High Rdrrship Transit Stops PrppaseYd Neihhhwhuod Traffic Celmirg An::r. Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A Link to Map: https://maps.kimleV- horn.com/portal/apps/webapp viewer/index.html?id=d230b3 b536b4430288ccb8769d6648 ad THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes - Shared -use Path Buffered Bryde Lanes Bryde Lanes Bryde Boulevard O Proposed Biryde Parking O High Rideravp Transrc Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing/Planned Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary any LUZ1 MN 1 any 4)01 MN z NW 74th St NW 73rt St N'N 72nd St sa r?frat-st— NW 67th St 1`` NW bib St NW 6 to St t"St — — - NW Bprd St z S NW 54thlat NW 83rd St L c NE 95th St NE 94th St NE 93rd St NE g2nd St NE gist St NE78 S 2 co A T NE Bath St NE 86th St NE 84th 5t NE 83rd St n. �•.—NIE e9sr9r--.2-- 1,E '7th St 1 I iL ram^ r NE 74th St - I NE 73Yd 5t y I n t 2 NE 72nd St Belle Weide fsl'nnd 4 Lan Narhe, Manna THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Prioritization Proposer oicycle improvements were prioritized based on the network determination framework. Specific triter;a was developed to evaluate each proposed improvement. and prioritize every improvement. The criteria ►iced to evaluate proposed improvements is contained in the foitowing list: eVo Safety elb Population k5t Employment dt, Income dti Destinations-Landmarks/,Activity Centers d, Destinations- Schools gip First- last -mile transit connectivity elt Bicycle network connectivity Atm Public Engagement db City of Miami Capital Improvement/Utility Project Schedule Considerations Miami -Dade County Utility Projects Schedule Considerations d Bicycle Facility Type A points system was developed for each criterion. An improvement can obtain a maximum of 110 points. The next matrix provides a sumrnary of the points that can be obtained by an improvement for each criterion. THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Prioritization Criteria Measure Miami Bike Master Plan Prioritization Data Source Criteria Calculation ax PM Paint Scale Crash data Signal Four Analytics, University of Florida Number of bicycle crashes in the last five years within 200 foot Lifer "- `-:oiSafety al0 crashes 20 fits 8-9crashes17 pts 6-7 crashes 14 pia 5 crashes 12 pts 4 crashes 10 pts 3 crashes S pia 2 crashes 6 pis l crash 4 pts 0 crash 0 pts Population Population Census Tract 2019 CensusPopulatiorn Data Highestpopulatipn category along project oomidor (lines 10 9482.000001-18709000000 10 pts G520.000001- 9482.000000 7 pts 4837.000001 - 6520.000000 5 pts 3029.000001- 4837.000000 3 pts 0.000000 - 3029.000000 0 pts Employment EmploymertCensusTract 2019Cons. Employment Data Highest employment category along projectcorridor (line) 10 4889.000001-8878.000000 10 pts 3198000001- 4889.000000 7 pts 21941700001- 3198.000000 5 pts 1214000001- 2144.000000 3 pts 0.000000-1214.000000 0 pts Income _ Intone Census Tract 2019 Census Income Data La vest income category. along project corridor (ine) 10 0.0170000 - 681.000000 10 pts G81.000001 - 1472.000000 7 pis 1472.000001 - 2704.000000 5 pts 2104_000001 - 3059.000000 - 3 pts 3059.000001 - 5808.000000 0 pia 6,s _ Destinations- Landmarks Activity centers (Landmarks. CourRy Parks, Municipal Parks) Distance to an activity center 6 On project _or -der < y; mile from corridor 3pts =tl.- - mile from comdor 1 pts Destinations- Schools Schools Distance to a school 6 On,proiect corridor 6 prs a V. mile from corridor 3 pts =: ,i, mile from corridor 1 pts Fuse- last - mile transit con nect&ity High Ridership Bus St 4 P "'F's High Ridership MSC Bus Stops 4 P Ps Distance to a high ridership transit stop 9 P P 6 On r. rojeet corridor 6 Pt'' . VA mile from corridor 3pts 'F mile from corridor 1 pts Bicycle Network Connectivity ty 'Gap closure" Existing Bicycle Facilities and Existing Facilities r lines in GIS Project (gray ) 1 Connections to existing bicycle facility at one or multiple int. n P P° 10 Connects to x1 existing facilities at multiple !orations 10 pts Connects tonne facility at one location 5 pts Public Engagement Public comments Online Public Engagement Map link https:fjmaps. kimley-ham.tongiportallappsMebappuiewerfindec. htinin 9$77e4e2 41f44566af599`54b2c3687c Gets points if comment falls �proj�t�m�r 12 Comment on corridor 12 pts Capital Improvement/ Utility Project Sc hedule Cimsideratians. Utility projects Miami Capital improvements Projects GIS Website: https:Jfmiamigis.maps.arcgiscomfapps1lvehappviewerj index.hlanl?id=9be6G952F0684747b46F212647d30c97 Street with an upcoming project only from 01 too 03 (Planning through i 9 9 Design) 5 Pn 3jee[could he implemented through CIP t 9 Pf91 5 �` Utility Project Schedule Considerations Utility prpjecrs Miami Dade Utility Coordination GIS Website: https:jJ sweb.miamidad viMDCItili ination 'g' ° f 'O° f Street with an upcoming utility project Only consider Potential Collab,8ridge. Roadway and Paving 5 Projectaould he implemented through a utility project 9 �Y 5 Prs Type Bicycle Facility Type com Bicycle Network Recommendations layer in GGS project Prioritizing more protected and separated facilities 10 Protected Bicycle Lanes 10 fits Shared -Use Path Buffered Blcyc le Lanes 5 fits Bicypee Lanes 3. fits Bicycle Boulevard 1 pts Total Possible Points 110 19 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. 1 Protected Bicycle Lanes Cit -Wide Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW/NW 19th Avenue NW 3rd Street US-1 Protected Bicycle Lanes 76 NW 2nd Avenue NW 71st Street NW 58th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 N Federal Highway NE 54th Street NE 36th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 NW 2nd Avenue NW 57th Street NW 38th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes _ 67 SW 25th Road SW 9th Avenue SW 1st Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 66 NW 1st Place NW 21 st Street NW 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 63 NW 71st Street NW 12th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 59 5E1st Avenue SE 1st Street Se 45h Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NW l lth Street NW 23rd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NW 39th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 District 1 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 11th Street NW 23rd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Protected 8icycle Lanes 55 NW 39th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 23rd Street NW 19th Avenue NW 22nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 43 SW 63rd Court Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NW 35th Avenue NW 20th Street NW 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 35 NW 3rd Street NW 57th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Protected Bicycle Lanes 31 District 2 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total N Federal Highway NE 54th Street NE 36th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 SE 1st Avenue SE 1st Street Se 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NE 2nd Avenue NE i7th Street NE 17th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 NE 17th Street NE 2nd Avenue N Miami Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NE 4th Avenue NE 24th Street NE 22nd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 26 Facility To District 3 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SWINW l9th Avenue NW 3rd Street U5-1 Protected Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 25th Road SW 9th Avenue SW 1st Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 66 SW 16th Avenue SW let Street SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 49 NW 29th Avenue NW 15th Street NW 7th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 SW 7th Avenue NW 4th Street SW 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 Facility To District 4 From 8icycle Recommendation Type Total SW/NW 19th Avenue NW 3rd Street US-1 Protected Bicycle Lanes 75 NW 39th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 29th Avenue NW 15th Street NW 7th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 NW 3rd Street NW 32nd Avenue NW 37th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 SW 63rd Court Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NW 3rd Street NW 57th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Protected Bicycle Lanes 31 SW 49th Avenue SW 4th Street SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 27 Facility To District 5 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 2nd Avenue NW 71st Street NW 58th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 N Federal Highway NE S4th Street NE 36th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 NW 2nd Avenue NW 57th Street NW 38th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 1st Place NW 21 st Street NW 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 63 NW 39th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 5th Court NW 67th Street NW 62nd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 71st Street NE 4th Avenue 1-95 Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 NW 40th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 18th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 6th Avenue NW 47th Street NW 40th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 20 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Shared Use Path City -Wide Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Biscayne Boulevard NE 87th Street NE 6th Street Shared -Use Path 96 Rickenhacker Causeway City of Miami Limits S Miami Avenue Shared -Use Path. 83 SW 13th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 3rd Avenue Shared -Use Path 78 Commodore Trail Rickenhacker Causeway N Prospect Drive Shared -Use Path 77 SW 6th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 72 NW 12th Avenue NW 37th Street NW 14th Street Shared -Use Path 69 SW 19th Street SW 17th Avenue SW 22nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street SE 6th Street Shared -Use Path 62 Brickell Bay Drive SE 14th Street S€15th Road Shared -Use Path 57 Ludlam Trail N of W Fiagler Street SW 8th Street Shared -Use Path 55 District 1 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 12th Avenue NW 37th Street NW 14th Street Shared -Use Path 69 District 2 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Biscayne Boulevard NE 37th Street NE 6th Street Shared -Use Path. I 96 Rirkenhacker Causeway City of Miami Limits 5 Miami Avenue Shared -Use Path 83 Commodore Trail Rickenhacker Causeway N Prospect Drive Shared -Use Path 77 SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street SE 6th Street Shared -Use Path 62 Brickell Bay Drive SE 14th Street SE 15th Road Shared -Use Path 57 NE 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard Ne 2nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 NE 23rd Street NE 4th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Shared•Use Path 33 NE22nd Street Biscayne Boulevard NE 2ntl Avenue Shared -Use Path 27 NE 4th Avenue NE 23rd Terrace NE 23rd Street Shared -Use Path 23 District 3 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 13th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 3rd Avenue Shared -Use Path 78 Corn modoreTrell Rickenbacker Causeway N Prospect Drive Shared -Use Path 77 SW fith Street SW 5th Avenue Soy 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 72 SW 19th Street SW 12th Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 SW 17th Street SW 12th Avenue SW 21 st Avenue Shared -Use Path 34 SW 7th Avenue SW 11th Street SW 12ih Avenue/ SW 29th Road Shared -Use Path 30 District 4 Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Facility To From SW 19th Street SW 12th Avenue SW 22nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street SE 6th Street Shared -Use Path 62 Ludlam Trail N of W Flagler Street SW 8th Street Shared -Use Path 55 SW 6th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 35th Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 NW 350 Court NW 11 th Street NW 7th Street Shared -Use Path 41 SW 17th Street 5W 12th Avenue SW 21 st Avenue Shared -Use Path 34 District 5 Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Facility To From Biscayne Boulevard NE 87th Street NE 6th Street Shared -Use Path 46 SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street 5E 6th Street Shared -Use Path 62 NW 3rd Avenue NW 29th Avenue NW 25th Street Shared -Use Path 52 NW 6th Avenue NW 35th Street NW 21st Terrace Shared -Use Path 50 NW 1st Avenue NW 29th Street NW 250 Street Shared -Use Path 48 NW 12th Avenue NW 62nd Street NW 67th Street Shared -Use Path 42 NE 4th Avenue NE 50th Street NE 42nd Street Shared -Use Path 34 21 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Buffered Bicycle Lanes Facility To Cit -Wide From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 46th Street NW 2nd Avenue NW 17th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 53 SW 23rd Street SW 27th Avenue SW 37th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 47 NW 28th Street NW 8th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 46 Rickenbacker Causeway City of Miami Limits S Miami Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes District 1 Facility NW 28th Street To NW 8th Avenue From NW t7th Avenue Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Buffered Bicycle Lanes 46 District 2 Facility Rickenbacker Causeway To City of Miami Limits From S Miami Avenue Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Buffered Bicycle Lanes District 3 Facility None To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total District 4 Facility SW 23rd Street To SW 27th Avenue From SW 37thAvenue Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Buffered Bicycle Lanes 47 Facility NW 46th Street To NW 2nd Avenue District 5 From NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Buffrred'SiCyele Lanes 53 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Bicycle Lanes Ci -Wide Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 1st Street SW South River Drive SW 17th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 84 NW 79th Street Bayshore Drive NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 80 NE 11th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 16th Avenue SW 8th Street S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 8th Street SW 5th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 37th Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 65 NW 5th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 64 Facility To District 9 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 17th Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 9th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 29th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 18th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 46 NW 32nd Street NW 7th Avenue NW 18th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 46 NW 14th Street NW 23rd Avenue NW 36th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 43 Tamiami Canal Road NW 7th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 40 NW 35th Avenue NW 7th Street W Flag ler Street Bicycle Lanes 39 SW 62nd Avenue Tamiami Canal Read SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 23rd Avenue NW 38th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 25th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle Lanes 37 Facility To District 5 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 79th Street Bayshore Drive NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 80 NE1lth Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 76 NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 65 NW 5th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 64 NE 29th Street east of NE 4th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lanes 61 NW 5th Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 59 NE 4th Avenue NE 71st Street NE 62nd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 53 NW 17th Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 9th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 2nd Avenue NW 79th Street NW 71st Street Bicycle Lanes 49 NW Sth Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 49 NW 71st Street 1-95 NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 41 NE 4th Avenue NE60th Street NW54th Street Bicycle Lanes 35 NE81st Street NE 4th Place Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 27 NW 14th Avenue NW71stStreet NW67th Street -Bicycle Lanes 26 Facility To District 2 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 11th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 37th Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes e5 S Bayshore Drive SW 32nd Road Halissee Street Bicycle Lanes 61 NE 29th Street east of NE 4th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lanes 61 8rickell Bay Drive SE 8th Street SE 12th Street Bicycle Lanes 60 NE 1st Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 Bicycle Lanes 60 NE 15th Street Venetian Causeway Herald Plaza Bicycle Lanes 59 N Miami Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 Bicycle Lanes 58 SW 12th Street Brickell Plaza SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Lanes 58 SW 10th Street 5 Miami Avenue SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Lanes 52 SE 15th Road 8rickell Bay Drive 8rickell Avenue Bicycle Lanes 51 SW 22nd Avenue S Dixie Highway Overbrook Street Bicycle Lanes 48 Herald Plaza NE 14th Street NE 15th Street Bicycle Lanes 39 District 3 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 1st Street SW South River Drive SW 24th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 84 SW 16th Avenue SW 8th Street S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 8th Street SW 5th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 S Bayshore Drive SW 32nd Road Halissee Street Bicycle Lanes 61 SW 21st Road SW 11th Street SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Lanes 39 District 4 Facility To From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 8th Street SW Sth Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 32nd Avenue SW 11th Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 57 Tamiami Canal Road NW 7th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 40 SW 62nd Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 Coral Gate Drive SW 21st Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 36 SW 66th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 30 SW 4th Street SW 60th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Lanes 29 SW 21st Street SW 32nd Avenue Coral Gate Drive Bicycle Lanes 21 23 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Bicycle Boulevard Faculty To City 1Nide From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 2nd Street Biscayne Boulevard N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street Bl sceyne Boulevard NW North Bever Drive Bicycle Boulevard 79 NW 32nd Street F Coast Avenue MW 23rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 2nd Avenue NW 11 th Terrace NW 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard 64 NE Bth Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 62 SW 11th Street SW 1st Court SW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 3rd Street NW South River Drive NW 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 69 NW 10th Avenue NW 71st Street NW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 2nd Avenue NW 3rd Street SW Tot Street Bicycle Boulevard 58 SW 19th Street SW 22nd Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 63 Facility To District 1 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 32nd Street E Coast Avenue MW 23rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 10th Avenue NW 71st Street NW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 68 NW I l th Street NW 27th Avenue NW 33rd Avenue Blcycle Boulevard 48 NW 35th Street NW 12th Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 46 NW 171h Street NW 2991 Avenue NW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 45 NW 28th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 SW 60th Avenue NW 7th Street SW Bth Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 NW 33rd Avenue NW 11th Street SW Sth Street Bicycle Boulevard i 35 Facility To Dlslrlrt 2 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Tnh,l NE 2nd Street Biscayne Boulevard N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard NW North. River Drive Bicycle Boulevard 70 NE Sth Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard NW] st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard _ 60 SW 17th Avenue 5 Dixie Highway 5 Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard 57 Alatka Street 5 Dixie Highway 5 Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard 55 SE 3rd Street 5 Biscayne Boulevard SE 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 54 NE27thStreet NE5th Ave nue NMiemlAvenue BicycleBoulev,rrd 50 Facility To Distrit 3 From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW l lth Street SW 1st [curt 5W 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard :62 NW 3rd Street NW South River Drive NW 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 66 5W 17th Avenue 5 Dixie Highway 5 Bayshore ➢rive Bicycle Boulevard 57 SW 4th Street SW 4211 Avenue SW 31st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 54 5W 5th Avenue W Hagler Street 5W 11 th Street Bicycle Boulevard 51 SW 23rd Avenue NW 4th Street SW 16th Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 SW 23rd Street SW 32nd Road SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 51 SW tOth Street SW 1st Ceurt SW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 5O NW 16th Avenue NW 7th Street SW 1st Street Bicycle Boulevard 49 Facility To Dict'ict 4 From Bicycle RecommendatianType Total SW 23rd Avenue NW 4th Street SW 16th Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 SW 23rd Avenue SW 16th Street SW 27th Street Bicycle Boulevard 46 SW 19th Street SW 22nd Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 63 SW 23rd Street SW 32nd Rand 5W 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 51 SW 13th Street SW 10th Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 48 SW 32nd Avenue 5 Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 46 SW 26th Street SW 22nd Avenue SW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 43 5W 36th Avenue SW 27th Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Boulevard 43 SW 10th Street SW 16th Avenue 5W 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 SW 60th Avenue We/ 7th Street 5W Sth Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 SW 29th Avenue W Flagier Street SW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 38 NW 33rd Avenue NW 11th Street SW Sth Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 35 Facility To District y From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 2nd Street Biscayne Boulevard le Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard NW North River Drive Bicycle Boulevard 70 NW 32nd Street B Coast Avenue NW 23rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 2nd Avenue NW l lthTerrace NW 3rd Street Bicyde Boulevard 64 NE Bth Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard rig NW 10th Avenue NW 7lst Street NW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 1st street Biscayne Boulevard NW 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 2nd Avenue NW 3rd Street SW 1st Street i Bicycle Boulevard 58 NW 75th Street NE 3rd Place NW Bth Avenue Bicycle Bordevard 53 NW 14th Avenue NW 67th Street MW 50th Street Bicycle Boulevard 51 THIS DOCUMENT IS A SUBSTITUTION TO ORIGINAL. BACKUP ORIGINAL CAN BE SEEN AT END OF THIS DOCUMENT. Thank you for your participation SUBSTITUTED Preparec for: Preparec By: Kimley>»Horn Expect More. Experience Better. SUBSTITUTED anip nf Contents Introduction 4 Literature Review 6 Community Outreach 26 Best Practices and Policy Review 30 Bicycle Network Analysis 60 Project Implementation Plan 82 Conclusion 94 Appendix A �� r 111111.1.11.10111M �w:lr a T Community Outreach Appendix B 1 Detailed Bicyc1.:J Network Analysis __4011111111111iiiiiiiNINISk roduction SUBSTITUTED Vision The City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan is an update to the City's 2009 Bicycle Master Plan. The goal of this plan is to meet today's multimodal transportation challenges and opportunities. This updated plan focuses on developing cost feasible bicycle improvements, with the goal of implementation over the next 20 years in both local Capital Planning as well as for the County's Long -Range Transportation Plan. The bicycle improvements were prioritized in a top-10 manner by improvement type city wide and by Commission district. This effort also identifies policy and facility types to be updated. The policy also provides input on Transportation Control Measures or Transportation Demand Management that promote bicycle mode share within the City. The study will review access to transit as a first mile, last mile and end of trip services. Further it will identify network connectivity gaps and opportunities to develop a safe, equitable, and accessible bicycle network. The objective of this effort is to modernize the City's bicycle facilities toolbox wi - a focus on improving access and availability of trails and protected bicycle lan= _ his effortalso reviews City of Miami Resilience and Public Workstypical section .rbicycle lanes and provide options for low stress bicycle boulevards, trails, d protected bicycle lanes. The study also focuses on the possibility of Miami a : 15 Minute City, where everyday life amenities and functions are located with . -minute area. r mierature het... inf Existing Planning Guidance Previous bicycle planning initiatives and projects in the City of Miami were used to identify existing bicycle infrastructure. Understanding the current bicycle network along with prior recommendations helped form the bicycle network improvements outlined in this plan. The following documents were reviewed as part of this effort. A summary of each document is included in this section. cab 2009 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan cab Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan cab The Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan cab The Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan cab The Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan cab 2045 Miami Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan cab The Wynwood Streetscape Master Plan cab The 1-395 Heritage Trail cab TPO SMART Trails Master Plan cab TPO Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan cab Biscayne Green cab TPO FlaglerTrail Master Plan d1b City of Miami Traffic Mana ment Master Plan cab City of Miami Scoote Ilot Data < b The Underline cab Commod• Trail cab Plan • SUBSTITUTED MiniBicycle Master Plan Sri 1 lie, of ' 6sf.'• shed • L0 BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN j MASTER PLAN FLAGLE TRAIL NORTHEAST NON•MOTORIZED NETWORK MASTER PLAN City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan (2009) The 2009 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan was created with the goal of transforming Miami into a bicycle friendly city through the designation of primary bicycle routes and a commitment to providing adequate infrastructure, education, and safety related to biking. At the time the plan was finalized, the bike network in Miami only consisted of 17.12 miles of Bicycle lanes and Shared Use Paths/Greenways. The plan proposed a significant increase to more than 280 miles of new or improved bikeways consisting of Bicycle Routes, Shared Use Lane Markings (Sharrows), Bicycle Lanes, Shared Use Paths/Greenways, Bicycle Boulevards, Neighborhood Connections, and Scenic View Routes. The Miami Bicycle Master Plan was broken out into four implementation phases and recommends bikeway projects for the next 1, 5, 10, and 20 years (2010, 2015, 2020, and 2030). For each phase, propos projects are categorized by the different bicycle facility types wi the proposed location, length, and specific improvements inclu• in the description. In total, 213 bikeway projects are proposed i e plan. The maps on the following page display the 2030 Bicycle ► work Plan and includes projects from all implementation phases - d all bikeway types. A summary of proposed projects for eac► .ikeway type is listed to the right: Bicycle Routes Projects: 19 Miles: 64.75 Percentage of Bic Network: 23% Sharrow Lane M . ings Pr•'-cts: 50 Miles: 62.58 Percentage of Bicycle Network: 23% Bicycle Lanes: Projects: 57 Miles: 55.75 Percentage of Bicycle Network: 20% Shared Use ' . hs/Greenways: Projects: 23 Miles: 29.08 Percentage of Bicycle Network: 11% Bicycle Boulevards: » Projects: 50 » Miles: 62.06 » Percentage of Bicycle Network: 21% Neighborhoods Connections: Projects: 7 Miles: 2.29 Percentage of Bicycle Network: 1% Scenic View Routes: Projects: 7 Miles: 1.92 iami Bicycle Master Plan Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mo ��By ITUTED Plan (2011) The 2011 Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan prepared for the Miami Downtown Development Authority (DD Area recommends projects to help implement the DDA's goals related to bicycle and pedestrian mobility. These goals include creg great streets and community spaces, elevating corridors to grand boulevards, and taking advantage of the prominent waterfron the area. The plan also places importance on improving multimodal access to public transportation. The plan presents several bicycle improvement projects including enhancements to the Miami River Greenway, additional dedicated bicycle routes, and new high density bicycle parking stations. Figure :BIKE •;erC-reeinwimprovements !"� .• riot — l 1�.. { �'"_:_'�;' Le e.. DDA Rcundorles „ate Miami River Grernwby Improvements mar Access to Miami River Greertway lm praweme nts Fienre 34: Cin- Frepxredf and !WO Bicycle 3f aster Plan Cit..- Iliamibn The Street Plans Cody borause. September:409 ;I il' Se IA LEGEND Bicycle Route Steered Use Lane Marking Bicycle Lone Bicycle boulevard Shared Use Peth!Greenway Scenic Yew Routes Neighborhood Connections city Limits Park Public School Private School Metrorail MettereVbr DDA Eoandary -110 Literature Review 9 Health District Mobility Plan (2012) The primary objective of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan was intended to make the Health District a better place for calking and bicycling. Being the second largest employment area in Miami -Dade County, the Health District is already well suited for p- onal vehicular traffic and transit but does not provide adequate or convenient transportation for pedestrians or bicyclists. The plan was established through three separate analysis phases that were ultimately compiled for a list of reco endations. These analyses included: An existing literature review, public outreach, and field observations of existing conditions. Literature reviewed consisted of 13 different data sources, studies, and plans. Public outreach had two parts; an online survey (roughly 953 responses) and an area staolders meeting (28 of44 representatives attended). Existing conditions monitored included 8 Major Roadway Segments, journey to ork data, metro transit data and pedestrian/ bicyclist counts. The overall goal of the Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan was • recommend implementation of several different projects to improve the modality of pedestrian and bicycle transit. In total, 5 categori= - of non -engineering improvement guidelines were created, and fifteen (15) engineering projects were proposed. Funding to be provide • o several of the projects based upon approval. .a.. t; - u.ia.wow..n.,m eitade and hd.,...a. i - Patantial Shtert,,MBityck Parkin( lotatian: —NN.'-217TM NW 14FML NwnBiMs: ".n..nna .etnn.15MM,.nn"t,"1.At.1,1-,[alien 10 ami Bicycle Master Plan Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestri Mobility Plan SUBSTITUTE The primary objective of the Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan is to improve the walkability and bike- ity of the Overtown and Wynwood areas and further support the City of Miami's commitment to bicycle and pedestrian mobility, comp - e streets, placemaking, and access to public transit. Several existing conditions related to transportation mobility and community mobility in the area wer- nalyzed including bicycle LOS and pedestrian LOS calculations, bike/ped counts, traffic crash data, and public survey results. Improvem- s to the bicycle and pedestrian network were then developed based on the material listed above, which indicated target areas for improv ents and which treatments would be most effective in enhancing bike/ped mobility. Area -wide recommendations suggested in the plan applytomultiple locations throughoutthestudy area and aim to provide a more comprehensive bicycle network through the addition of bicycle amenities and new routes. Site -specific improvements target areas in the bicycle network that have safety or connectivity issues and intend to address these problems by implementing improvements that will eliminate a barrier to mobility at exact locations. Recommended improvements to the bicycl network are shown in the table to the right, a - g with a map of the existing and planned ' ycle/ pedestrian facilities. Tadle 10: Recommended Iniproven] s 1— - walks 5!'eueli.s T,alFr Calm nq a. Cush Extons 5, Cud: Re'nos 6. Pedestrian 54-- 1.2.4,,•. 7. Brvcle Lanes 8, ContaHo.nv Bike 9. B:re Faxes 10. Sha-ed ar ln•qs Shennws;. 11. Bc•,clirc 12. N ' .00•htwd Slow Zone 13. su Re Cl,VReStlpinq B.s Stup Impmvernerrr, 3. Erna r_ae&ee•. Spate 16. B..cycle-Friendly Business D5t ivs 17. Pedesban St..eTreatrnerrts 5r,I-SPECIFIC IMPPWEMEN[S 18. Bicycle-Friertiy Raiboad Crossing 19, Ruch Style Tunnel at FEC 20. NW It Avenue Nar,Motorized Con necdon 21. NW St, Stet Cycle Track 22. NW 1. Aven. B'cyrle Bouleveir,. 23. NW 5" Place/NW 21. Ter. ace Bicycle Bau'kva•d _ .. NW 5tn Ave.,e Rom Diet .with Bike Lanes 23. NW 29t-, Steet Road Diet wth Bike Lanes 26. N Miami Avenue Road Diet wth Bike Lanes 27. NW 3•d CourtlN W 3rd Avers., Road Diet nit;, Bike Lames 28. One-Wa Par Pilot Program 29. Edu_a::o- Improvement 30. Er.ceuragen,tnt L'n pnvernents 31. Enfo cement ImP'oveme't 32. Eoeluation a•IS Meni[onng OVERTOWN/WYNWOOD BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY PLAN FIGURE 2: EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES K▪ ey ▪ -»Horn - Existing Bike Lanes Existing Paved Paths - Existing creenwars - Existing Sharrows Future Bike Lanes Future Greenways Future Sharrows • Bus Stops - Bus Routes /a/ Mahar Roads ONer Roads ▪ Parks fj water Q Study Area d Mia mi-Dade County Biscayne Say oz os 1Mllee Literature Review 11 Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian I�u; ;��y E Plan The primary objective of the Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan is to develop and recommend project at will improve the walkability and bike -ability of the Little Havana area in the City of Miami. With limited bicycle facilities in the Lit avana neighborhood, recommendations focus on increasing the number of non -motorized trips, improving the safety and conditio- for bicyclists, and making the Little Havana neighborhood a more desirable place to live, work, and visit. Key goals of the mobility plan ' clude: Exploring opportunities for improving the separation between bicyclists and motor vehicles on wider streets, creating a sup • ', tive environment for walking and bicycling as primary means of transportation in this area, rebalance roadways towards non -motorize • ansportation, support the initiative for integrated bus/bike lanes in major corridors, and identifying a network of neighborhood greenwa hat focus on connectivity while providing a low -stress bicycle facility network. The Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan analyzes prior data, studies, and plans to build upon the current non -motorized mobility network in the Little Havana area. Through the available GIS data, a bicycle level of service (BLOS) analysis was conducted for the major roadways which resulted in a BLOS E or worse for approximately 75% of the major roadways analyzed in the study area. These results directly correlate with the lack of bicycle facilities infrastructure within the study area. Bicycle mobility recommendations developed •r the study area is based on the literature iew, transportation mobility analysis, field ob vations, survey results and public meeting ' ponses. All improvements are focused on upporting and prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists within the Little Havana Area. Multi . I Mobility Study �ttle H©.ono . e.Pe_ese�an Moeily Ran Multimodal Mobility Study Lille Havana Figure fi. Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities Legend . Loall Road-, , rma urna-ciax creme, INdan sPal Atter 12 iami Bicycle Master Plan 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan SUBSTITUTE The primary focus of the 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan is on the daily commuter trip and aims that will safely connect the largest number of people to their daily destinations. From the analysis, the 2045 Miam Master Plan assesses opportunities to cultivate a non -motorized network that reinforces bicyclists and ped the accessibility to a greater transit network such as the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit (SMART) PI Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) collaborates with the SMART Plan to build upon a multimod transit corridors and nine (9) Bus Express Rapid Transit (BERT) corridors to the Project Developme The 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan reflects on other state agency and municipal plans such as area plans and corridor studies which enhance mobility an connectivity of residents and visitors to formulate recommendations and improve is which are consistent with the vision of City of Miami. These visions and goals = brace maximizing mobility choices system wide, increasing the safety and sec ity of the transportation system for all users, support economic vitality, protec and preserve the environment and quality of life, energy conservation, enhance - - integration and connectivity of the system amongst all modes of travel for the ben- t of people, optimize sound investment strategies for system improvement and op. - ations, and improve the existing transportation system. 112 ncentivize projects ade Bicycle Pedestrian rians, as well as improves transit hubs and stations. The ision which advances six (6) rapid nd Environment phase. al ofglneat-BB5Cd Existing /� Levelolfed5tr cork '' ®3 - - 2 -- Urban Deuelepment Boundary • 5rnAnT/BEAT law 0 2-mile Hub Radius S...c.- UDC, EDOTca. MJI et E%IS1MG BCVCLE NE1IN 0111< SEGMENT LEVEL Of TRAFFIC 51BE55 MAp EXISTING BICYCLE NETWORK SEGMENT LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS A sagment-hasad analysis, with spot checks for in- erea®nn conditions of the among non-rnotorimd transportation network was poi -fawned . Figure 81 identifies%di ties Inducing high or low amounts of stress for cyclists using the ostabllshed LTS clitoris. Must %dlhies that rated LTS 4 ars either mixed traffic facilities or conventional four (4) foot hike lanes. The two (2) pnrnry facmrs that caused bike lanes to generate high stress ars posted speed and "bike lane much" (distaarn between a perked car and a cyclist) which increases thn chance of bong "clawed." Literature Review 13 Wynwood Streetscape Master Plan SUBSTITUTE The Wynwood streetscape master plan was developed to establish appropriate conditions to promote pedestrian and throughout Wynwood District. This plan intends to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the creation of pedestrian that will encourage the use of non -motorized travel along with improving the pedestrian/cyclist experience through str Wynwood District continues to transition from an Industrial District into a diverse, active, and mixed -use neighborh to balance viable development and a safe pedestrian and bicyclist environment. Therefore, the Wynwood str standards to improve and refine current conditions throughout the Wynwood Neighborhood. To accomplish been discussed as an approach to connectWynwood and the surrounding neighborhood through a networ the implementation of bike racks, sharrow markings, and protected bike paths. The proposed Wynwo are displayed in the illustrations below. Jr-- _ N• + f• 11! (( (( BIKE DIRECTION BIKE LANE SHARROWS ON. ALL OTHER STREETS H A ist activity cycling routes scape features. As d, there are challenges tscape guidelines will set se goals, Wynwood Walks has pathways. This pathway includes icycle network and streetscape plan NLV NM SI Nk 2B.ST NW 28.ST L. NWT^ TERP.b10E NW 21.31. NW NPR XW£"ST NW MST NWffi•ST NW2O1HST bi WOONERFS LINEAR PARKWAYS STREET -END PARKS j PLAY STREETS) BICYCLE CORRIDORS EDGE PARKS WELLNESS HEM 14 iami Bicycle Master Plan 1-395 Heritage Trail SUBSTITUTE The 1-395 Heritage Trail is envisioned as a legacy project which includes community enhancements below 1-395 connecting Hist• c Overtown to Miami's waterfront while improving highway capacities to upgrade mobility and safety. The four focal points of this • •ject are on the community, safety, mobility, and maintainability. With the creation of the Fountain Signature Bridge, 55 acres of urba pace will provide a trail from Over town to Biscayne Boulevard for the community to walk, exercise, and bike. This design focuses on re • nding to the need of a better connection for divided communities while improving livability, health, and sustainability. Complete Streets and traffic calming measures are an essential component of this project to promote p- •estrians and bicyclists. With three (3) zones, each will have specific traffic calming measures responding to pedestrian and cyclist safety gnificantenhancements include a high emphasis on crosswalks, complete street solutions, and traffic calming measures to reduce vehic . r speeds at critical pedestrian and bicycle crossing locations. Zone 1 will include 28,800 square feet oftraffic calming measures/shared s -ets and 18 planters along NW 14th Street and adjacent streets. Zone 2 will consist of 20 planters along N Miami Avenue and NE 1st Stre: hile producing a shared use bridge crossing the FEC Railroad which will provide direct east -west access for pedestrians and cyclists. fr •ditionally, the parking space that currently occupies zone 2 will be moved to the outsides of the trail to increase open space by 250% a - •rovide continuity of the Heritage trail. Lastly, Zone 3 will include 4,620 square feet of traffic calming measures and 12 planters along N nd Avenue. Across all zones of the project, sidewalks will be raised to provide safer pedestrian and bicyclists crossing, slower vehicular avel speeds, highly visible crossings (LED enhanced), pavement lighting for the heritage trail, 211 bollards, and 6 bicycle racks fitting icycles each. These enhancements are consistent with the goal of focusing on safety, community, mobility, and maintainability. The c• eptual design ofthe 1-395 Heritage Trail is displayed below. Mummy . aft:e.‘t: r wow 011116.4444. .c. :. , ...0 , x...10„..:,c,T„4-iitiyitia. Literature Review 15 SMART Trails Master Plan (2019) SUBSTITUTE SMART (Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit) Trails Master Plan is an overall comprehensive plan which was meant t• dvance six (6) rapid transit corridors and a network of Bus Express Rapid Transit (BERT) service to implement mass transit • ' ejects in Miami Dade County. SMART Trails Master Plan identifies potential first -last -mile (FLM) connections between SMART Plan corridors a e regional non -motorized trail system. Additionally, it assesses FLM Non -motorized connections and SMART stations. Projected costs the improvements included in the SMART Trails Master Plan are included in the table below. The study area, consisting of primarytransp• ation corridors and the Greenways Master Plan network, are also displayed below. r • SMARTTrails Master Plan 0 SMARTTraiIs Connections • SHOtRTPLIWJ SNMRTTRkILS t7ONNECI1ONS TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROIECTCOST RANK WTTNOIJT ROW MTH ROW Beach Corridor Kendall Corridor Bleibaai A, Atlantic Greenrayto Beach Corridor 2 $2,152,000 B. _uilar. Traillo Dadeland North Metrwal Stationi L4derlineMendall Corder — Rode A 14 11,633,040 B. _udlam Trail to Dadeland North Meiwrai StaticNLadedcredGendall Candor— Route B 3 $58B,D00 C. Snapper Creek Tito Kendall Corridor D. Knrne Trail to Kendall Corridor E. Miami River Greemey to Menorah — Route A E. Miami River Greemay to Mehorail—Hale B F. 4iarr,i Rker .aknett il.4 G. SW 38th Avenue to Douglas Metrorai6 rrrekar.• H. Rd enkacker Carry :c Jnderline'bimaya Metrical —RodeA R. Riokenkarker Cswy aJnelerlheNaca}'a Metrmai—Rorie B L Lucian TrailQ EastCando 14 $572,000 $1,257,075 23 $594,D30 7 $1,519,020 $6,747,194 f344,080 967.000 26 $423 7 $625,D00 1722,D30 14 S8un J. Kiry Roe70 East-lM=_st Corridor 24 East-West Corridor 4. Central West Bash Linear Pak to Dophh Park&Ridde L Tumpke Trail da Dolphin P&R — Route A L Tumpke Trail to Dddrin P&R — Route B IL Leiroae Link to Northeast C©rndor 7 Northeast Corridor N. Baywalk Path to Northeast Corndor North Corridor O. 5n ke CreekTraiI to Northeast Corridor P. 5rrake Creek Trak to North Corridor -Route A P. Snake Creek Trai to North Corridor -Route B 0. Briar Bay Linear Park to Sodh 6adeT South Dade iransitway7 South Corridor R. Roberta Huller Park Trail w So Tri-Rail ?SPairy $62,176,895 $64,153,236 7 $3,7 ON 1352,D00 $192,D00 $5,535,E20 s6,&95,080 516,440,521 3 1206,73E 7 $I,799,000 22 116206,862 14 1044,433 4 $26D,D00 S. Pnnerwr Trail to South Dade Tr.., -.'South Bak Trail 24 T. Gold Coast Trail Da Golden v Tri-Rail Station See nniecf Oeamip6onh 7 $14,411,030 Total Cost MIPfll44 .K VT Kendall nCrorr Corridor rash 1NastCorrkdor INNS I, FM Beach Corridor Legend BERT Corridors Beach Corridor e E003.Weet Corridor /r44 / Kendall Corridor ^/ North Corridor ^se Northeast Corridor South cede Treneltwsy Graarwaya Master Plan Areas of Study Snapshot proposed SMART Trail connections to population areas and useful destinations 14 miles of new active transportation faoklies 6 shared -use path bridges million in SMART Trails investment TPi Mom ,. Cr,riselcm 16 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTE TPO Protected Bike Lanes Demonstrati r i The Miami -Dade TPO Protected Bike Lanes Demonstration Plan focuses on coordinating and developing a Protected Bike Lanes Demonstration Plan for Miami -Dade County. As the US Census classifies the Miami metro area as the 8th most populated region in the United States, residents, businesses, and local government are exploring solutions to increase multi - modal connectivity and accessibility across the region. However, majority of the Miami -Dade population does not consider traditional on -road bike lane infrastructures as a safe and practical commuting option. To respond to the doubts of bicyclist safety, this plan has proposed a feasible solution, protected bike lanes (PBLs). Protected bike lanes are exclusive bicycle facilities which are physically separated from automobiles to provide enhanced safety. The goal of this plan is to recommend segments in which protected bike lanes will improve mobility, enhance safet boost health, economic vitality, and provide a cleaner environment. PBLs have gained tra .n throughout the United States to promote non -motorized transportation and this pla . udies several cities at various stages of implementation. This demonstration plan also I. s to gain credibility for their recommendations by analyzing the PBL design guides crea d by National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), American Associatio' •f State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and The Federal HighwayAdmin', rations (FHWA). The primary objective of the Miami -Dade TPO Protected Bike identify segments which connect to the SMART plan and tran ratios (V/C), low Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT), ex way, and existing on -street parking. Through the a (Miami Avenue, NE 1st Avenue, NW 5th Street, and NW 6th Street) and SW 211th Street were identified as suitable locations to implement PBLs based off the criteria discussed above. Locat' of the recommendatiare displayed to the ri es Demonstration Plan is to , possess low Volume to Capacity ng bike facilities, sufficient right-of- ysis of 25 segments, Downtown Miami Pro - ed Bike Lanes North / South Do own Corridor 1st Ave & Miami Ave Alai Om a ka mvirNer 20111.111 Existing Bike Facilities .s,sr..Hqure 1.11.1199111 57, tf l Legend Onnxed reas supporting TrailtGreenway Connectivity Aventura Area Opa Locke Area Hialeah Area Mani! Beach Area Downtown AM -am i Area Dadeland Area West Kendall Area Cutler Bay Area Literature Review 17 Biscayne Green SUBSTITUTE Biscayne Green is focused on renovating and repurposing Biscayne Boulevard (US-1) to embrace pedestrian safety and c• nectivity in Downtown Miami. This project on Biscayne Boulevard extends from SE 1st Street to NE 6th Street spanning nearly 0.5 miles i► ength (see map below). As the roadway is owned and maintained by FDOT District Six, this concept plan remains consistent with FDOT's ' a ntext classification while calming traffic, improving bicycle and pedestrian safety, establishing east -west connectivity within Downto Miami and waterfront amenities, creation of open space and greenways, and replacing median parking with pedestrian and bicycle frie► a y features. Through the analysis conducted in the Biscayne Boulevard Lane Elimination Study, it was found that bi les/pedestrians account for 7% of total traffic in the AM and 13% of traffic in the PM within the Biscayne Boulevard corridor. Howev- there are minimal bicycle facilities to promote the use and safety of non -motorized travel. Within the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor, th are no bicycle lanes present and only two existing bicycle racks located under Bayfront Park Metromover station and on a sidewalk betw- n NE 5th Street and NE 6th Street. To respond to the lack of bicycle facilities within the study area, the preferred build alternative plac a high emphasis on bicyclists and pedestrians by proposing micromobility lanes and bicycle signals. Micromobility lanes in either dir7 ion on Biscayne Boulevard would provide bicyclists with a separated lane from traffic with on -street parking and concrete separator -rving as barriers. Bicycle signals have been proposed at 16 intersections along the suggested micromobility lanes between NE 1st street and NE Sth Street Table 3-6: Link Level Bicycle Level of Ser Direction, BiscayneBicycle Boulevard , AM Peak Hour -Southbound with the goal of minimizing conflicts and providing Year2340 hoaderay link B - ElrycN Bicycle Bi0Vtli. Bicrt It 61tylle safety at signalized intersections between vehicles, Munn, Boulevard LOS Savo IOS MBE LOS Score LOS Grade MS Score pedestrians, and cyclists. This preferred buildFiagSE IN "�",E„ "`°'" c ;;; L ;;; alternative will create a safer and enhanced non- NE SOS.. r el c 3.19 3.11 O C.GE NE34451' ONE 3rd5Ng01 C 317 330 cp -3.03 motorized network for pedestrians and bicyclists NE - - to NE AO Woe c 921 323 al 4.00 a 4th Street la MERE Sheet G 32@ 31e A: 2.96 throughout the Biscayne Boulevard Corridor. LOS NE Elh Street la NE 6th Skeet C 341 3.44 'O 3.66 calculations for the different build scenarios . a - NoEIBBB SE 10911-W to NE6M Sink provided to the right. 3.2S 321 0 0.44 Table 3-7: Link Level Bicycle Level of Service, PM Peak Hour - Northbound Direction, Biscayne Boulevard Roadway look aisrayue Boulevard Vote 201, Eats ng Car.. es Year 2040 No •uild AllematNe Prelerted Budd ANereal4e SE 1a5heelb Fla91er 5heel @ 169 @ 3.66 @ 123 Miter Street la NE 131 Street O 4.19 4.19 @ 1.16 NE 10 Stroll to NE 3MSIr.O O 3.63 @ 3.69 @ -1.91 NE 0451nn ea NE 3rd51ne1 O 3.94 O 341 -203 NE311%me 1e NE411159.en O 3.W @ 341 O -197 NE. Stnn to NE SM Street @ 399 @ L61 -336 N9 51M1 Siegel In NE 6M Shgel O 7.53 @ 44' 3.3'1 CONNIBOS SE 1st Weal lo NE dth Spat LEGEND • • • 51udy Area r E Corridor Limits Sdet dull a 199209 4W 909 18 + iami Bicycle Master Plan TPO Flagler Trail Master Plan The Flagler Trail Network Master Plan is seen as a response to the need for alternative forms of transportation and increased connectivity between facilities. The master plan proposes non - motorized connections through a network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities along the northeast corridor which has been identified as the "highest priority" among the six rapid transit corridors in the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit Plan (SMART Plan). The northeast corridor is approximately 14.5 miles in length and two (2) miles in width, traveling through seven (7) municipalities: City of Miami, El Portal, Miami Shoes, Biscayne Park, North Miami, North Miami Beach, and Aventura. The analysis of previous plans, roadway characteristics, bicycle networks, transit systems, and crash rates provided insight to the essential connections needed throughout the northeast corridor. The master plan also examines sociocultural factors, transportation costs in the region, commu y destinations, environmental conditions, alternate routes, and network context to deter e the key components of Flagler Trail. With the development of existing and future projects e Flagler Trail Northeast Corridor Non -Motorized Network can create a user-friendly bicycl- etwork. Through this plan, three (3) goals were identified in the development of - ernative alignments: Provide a north -south spine for non -motorized trips, provide connect'- s to the transit stations within the Northeast corridor, and avoid crossing the FEC railroad ' •W. The three (3) alternate corridors are classified as East, West, and Middle. Among e considered alternatives, the Alternative Middle was proposed for implementation due t. e length, speed limit, low average annual daily traffic, existing bicycle facilities, and conne ity to the Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs) identified in Miami -Dade County. To pr- ote and enhance the user-friendly bicycle network, bicycle lanes, pavement markings and gnages, and bicycle parking facilities were all proposed to be included in the Flagler Trail N= ork. The maps to the right display existi and funded bicycle faciltiies (top) and the connectivity of the proposed Flagler Trail alignm= to a larger economic and transportation network (bottom). SUBSTITUTE nay From 7991 Leeeeh.ageta. 39 3 stweet Eze.6ae Wry. E. my F..Y+vbe.: &.xn; 1vse:'9.-9, ;OW9 K. :. s ery E3e Lane: .99(. i. ., 63: :ry+ u'C.rY. F. s9 .v.3, C .`°.E Cs WPCs A Literature Review 19 City of Miami Traffic Management Master Plan SUBSTITUTE The Traffic Management Process was developed to assist the City to prioritize improvements along congested corridor within the City that require traffic calming. The traffic management process serves as a screening measure for resi staff -identified transportation concerns using a tiered approach. The tiered approach allows the various com examined and analyzed to identify appropriate improvements. The increasing population in the City of Miami is accelerating the need to improve existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities including creating additional multimodal options for residents, the workforce, visitors, and tourists to enhance mobility in the City of Miami. Many trips in the City of Miami are made in single occupant vehicles (SOV). Bicycle facilities are an important component to creating a shared right-of- way and alleviating congestion on the roadway by reducing SOV traffic. Additionally, an increase in micromobility options provides cost-effective methods to build capacity in a transportation system by expanding participation of residents in alternative modes of transportation. The City of Miami Traffic Management Master Plan prioritizing locations that show a significant need for in areas where improvements are feasible and ther way, and in areas that would assist in creatin bicycle facility network. The table to the right was pulled fro of Intelligent Transportation elements. ecommends ycle facilities or sufficient right -of - completely connected the plan and details the application tems among multiple transportation Monitoring Traffic Co ork Zone Management Information Dissemination nd to identify areas t/stakeholder and City ents of the roadway to be sous, Video image Detection, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) ameras to monitor traffic on corridors and at key intersections in real-time. Traffic signals, pedestrian -activated crosswalks, transit signal priority, remote TMC operation of signals. emergency vehicle preemption, school flashers. and adaptive signal control to support the movement of traffic on the ar erial network. Portable traffic control devices (CCTV, dynamic message signs [UMSZ}, queue detection and warning system. DMS, in -vehicle systems, websites, mobile applications, or other information dissemination services to provide real-time information about road conditions. incidents or closures. BikefPedestriani Applications Bicycle detection at intersections, bicycle application for signal detection, and Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon crossings_ Parking Management Data collection and/or parking information dissemination related to parking availability. access, or restrictions. Central Systems Arterial traffic management software, processing data to measure effectiveness for operations, regional systems (e.g., SunGuidec'softwarel and other system types that collect., store or use data to support operational situational or planning decision for the transportation network. J 20 iami Bicycle Master Plan City of Miami Scooter Pilot Data SUBSTITUTE The Populus Scooter Data was analyzed to understand the use of scooters throughout the City of Miami. Due to Covid-19, data as individuals were primarily at home and not utilizing shared -use scooters. However, regardless of time or condition possess the largest number of trips throughout the City of Miami. With data analyzed between February 6th, 2019 2021, Brickell Avenue had nearly 90,635 trips of the 1,361,566 total trips. The demand and use of scooters have incre percent (1,016,458 total trips) of those trips have occurred between, January 1st, 2021, and September 25th, 20 representation of daily trips made by scooter in the Brickell neighborhood of Miami. The top 10 corridors fo listed below: 1. Brickell Avenue 2. Southeast 2nd Avenue 3. Brickell Avenue Bridge 4. South Miami Avenue 5. Southeast 5th Street 6. Biscayne Boulevard 7. Southeast 4th Street 8. Southeast 8th Street 9. Northeast 2nd Avenue 10. Southeast 7th Street '/ MOBILITY MANAGER - Routes Map Pates • FZE h. ]J' Noirdes Sap La.2un De. last Precessed. September 29. 2021 TalalTriy1. L.351,566 Rentable Trips: 1.254.1326192B%I Tap 10 Streets Urea Name BriOen/we..' l primary wptheen 2.4 Averde; pdm®ry Bleed Avenue Bridge)primary South Wend Avenue I secoMery BlttereBoulevar6I mare 5th Street l reyIdendel Sru[heaet BthStreet I primary Southeast 7th Street I primary NaxeheasC Ld Avxmre I xsondary TIIes d.06a 72.699 66.666 664a4 62691 59,294 55.761 52296 SW SLh': sW7re SW fih Et E. SW Iat St 5Q49rSt SYY3ad5! sE aa1 be skewed rickell Avenue September 28th, ed significantly as75.2 he image below is a visual ared-use scooters in 2021 is ra POPULUSSI SdBPTION ENDS IN 36AYS EC ? DAILY TRIPSIAVG) 0 Mapho»GOpenSEser.E.6 Imploue bus mar Literature Review 21 The Underline The Underline aims to transform the land below Miami Metrorail into a 10-mile urban trail, linear park, and public art destination b The project focuses on well-connected transit, promoting a healthy lifestyle, and serving as a gateway to the surrounding co enforcing the core value of building as an off -road, dedicated bicycle and pedestrian facility. The Underline will span from Miami River to the south end near Dadeland South Metrorail Station serving as the primary bicycle and pedestrian c network of existing and proposed trails. Through this plan, three (3) objectives were identified in the development Separate cyclists and pedestrians, establish clear paths at stations, and encourage alternative modes of travel t signed routes, shared lane marking, on -street bike lanes, on -street buffered bike lanes, separated bike Ian all be incorporated to achieve the goals and visions of this project. Since the completion of the master plan, the Underline has made significant progress. Thus f completed. In the northern terminus, Brickell Backyard (Phase 1) extends half a mile from biking and walking paths, flex basketball and soccer courts, an outdoor gym, nature an Station (Phase 2) is currently under construction and will span 2.14 miles from SW is the largest of the three (3) phases and extends seven (7) miles from SW 19 ability to accommodate varying levels of use remains as the focus through modal corridor, the Underline places an emphasis on promoting altern Metrorail. The images below detail the intended facility users (left), construction phasing of the project (right). SIME fDN .� runaoxw. weaterncreianway •b1 iecusukee L Snapper Creek Trail k vane Trail fratiih bade Trail Mack Or Trail Ludlum Trail ear 2025. unities while north end of the nection in a regional paths and intersections: ars. Bicycle facilities such as and MPATH off street trails will , phase one (1) of three (3) phases has been e Miami River to SW 7th Street featuring urban utterfly gardens, and open spaces to relax. Viscaya th Street to SW 19th Avenue. Lastly, Miami (Phase 3) Avenue to Dadeland South Metro Rail Station. Safety and e construction and implementation of all phases. As a multi - modes of transportation and attracting new users to the Miami location of the project at a city-wide level (middle), and the intended Aflame Trail Venetian Lb* Trail ill .• The Underline Ricteabacker Trail tsar Trail Biscayne Trail A & E re Trail Proposed — Complete G two. rear inner 22 mi Bicycle Master Plan Commodore Trail SUBSTITUTED The Commodore Trail is viewed as an essential piece of Miami -Dade County's trail system. The trail connects the Rickenback= rail near Alice Wainwright Park to the Old Cutler Trail at Cartagena Circle. The five (5) mile trail segment connects pedestrians and lists to three (3) major multi -use trails, three (3) Metrorail stations, 10 public parks, 11 public and private schools, and more than 11 hi ric locations. The vision for Commodore trail is to be a multi -use urban pathway which improves the connectivity, safety, health, and ecomic development of the adjacent communities. 3 major multi -use trails (Rickenbacker, Underline, Old Cutler) 3 Metrorail stations (Vizcaya, Coconut Grove, Douglas) 10 public parks (Wainwright, Steele, Kennedy, Regatta, Myers, Peacock, Kirk Munroe Te Barnacle, Sunrise Harbor, Ingraham) 11+ historic locations (Vizcaya, Miami City Hall, Woman's Club of Coconut Grov Brown House, Coconut Grove Playhouse, Plymouth Church, El jardin, Kamp• g, Marjorie Stoneman Douglas House, and more) 11 public and private schools (LaSalle, Randsom Everglades, St. St Frances S. Tucker Elementary, Plymouth Preschool, St. Hugh C Carrollton School, Vanguard) s Center, arnacle, Mariah ens, Coconut Grove Elementary, olic School, Chabad of Miami, Commodore Trail Route 1 On•Street dike Lane - Paved Rath ... Adjacent Path Rack Sidewalk • Point of 'angst — Shnrcd Road * PROMOOMS *WOW. r.. i.r.+...i...... i•.. .n ... nee DUI to mmodare Trail Segment of Route t Length 5.0 Miles Literature Review 23 Plan Z SUBSTITUTED Spanning from Brickell to Key Biscayne, Plan Z focuses redesigning the Rickenbacker Causeway in an effort to remove the cla ication of Miami as one of the most dangerous cities to walk or bike in the country. In a response to recurring deaths of cyclists on t -. ' ickenbacker Causeway, Plan Z merges the idea of design and concept with the need for increased safety and connectivity through the of Miami. As the Rickenbacker Causeway is one of the most popular bicycling routes in America, no physical division between cars any .ikes is present. This 12-mile redesign provides 30-foot-wide trails to create safe and complete separation between runners, cyclists, s ers, and drivers. Plan Z's goal is to minimize cycling risks while addressing concerns for a safer environment. The folling values and benef were outlined on the official website for the Plan Z project: Mobility: Resiliency: Safety: Peace of mind for drivers as traffic will stream along the Roadway ane new Bear Cut Bridge will be elevated in Rickenbacker Causeway. There will be no change in the respons- . Sea -Level Rise. number of vehicle lanes or speed limit. Connectivi Plan Z forms part of the Miami Loop and connects to the Complete separation between cuclists, skaers, and drivers Underline without crossing or impeding traffic Access Points Play by the Bay: Improved for runners, cyclists and pedestrians as th ain Plan Z proposes a new 20-acre waterfront park and beach entry to the Rickenbacker. on Virginia Key. A generous 30-foot wide trail, more than twice as wide as other bike and pedestrian lanes around the world 24 mi Bicycle Master Plan Page intentiona eft blank SUBSTITUTED Literature Review 1 25 ;•"'S.v.nak: 7:Pt Talk 41 C mrlluility Outreach Community Outreach Community outreach was held throughout the development of the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan. This included participation in public events, publicly available surveys focused on bicycle comfortability, concerns, and travel patterns, regularly occurring Study Advisory Committee meetings, meetings with local cyclist groups, and an interactive online bicycle feedback map powered by ArcGIS. Below is a list of outreach events and meetings, summaries and documentation of the entire public outreach process are provided in Appendix A. cab October 29, 2021, Destinations Between Public Outreach Event November 18, 2021, Study Advisory Committee Meeting ,January 18, 2022, Miami -Dade County Department of Transportation and Public Works Meeting (same presentation as Study Advisory Committee Meeting, not included in the following pages) eft February 1, 2022, Friends of the Underline Meeting February 1, 2022, Plan Z Design Team Meeting cab February 25, 2022, Commodore Trail Design Team M- ' ing ca March 4, 2022, Friends of the Commodore Trail eeting cnb March 16, 2022, City Administration Meet cab March 30, 2022, Study Advisory Co ittee Meeting cab May 10, 2022, Bicycle and Pede• rian Advisory Committee Meeting SUBSTITUTED A website for the project was created and is hosted by the City https://www.miamigov.com/Transportation-Roadways/Bikes/Bike-Master Plan. The website contains a survey, interactive map, and project documentation. The publiclyavailable survey identified keyfactors contributing to commuting patterns and bicycle facility preferences among cycli including: Primary purpose of bicycle trip Favorite locations to ride Concerns while biking Areas of improvement Availability of bicycle parking Over700 people completed the online survey. The figures below display some of the key resul - rom the survey. How can the City of Miami bicycle network be improved? Answers Count Percentage Protected bike lanes 508 73.94% Path connectivity 115 16.74% Other 56 8.15% Bicycle storage/parking 8 1.16% Z When riding Answers my bike in the City, I'm Count most concerned ".ith: Perc- . ge Safety 602 :7.63% Connectivity 48 6.99% Other 22 3.2% Weather 14 2.04% Answers I primarily ride my Co bicycle: Percentage For pleasure/as a hobby 413 60.12% For multiple uses 153 22.27% To commute to work 9.02% To conduct errands 44 6.4% To the bus/train st. .n 10 1.46% ddrear deice' I primarily ride my bicycle: T mnnnuse teeter re condom errands ID Forple1ur iaabay When riding my bike in the City, I'm most concerned with: iD to the CWeir ewe., ale::rea Wean dnv aE+ How can the City of Miami bicycle network be improved? My favorite place to ride my bike in Miami ie 'eth cenna:ie-e/ r1 PeiPreIEMriqd bike:.ri:rs Ain3rlu Orn:p7Npurkng dlhnr Do you feel more of She City's resources should be used to improve bicycle infrastructure? 28 ami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED The interactive map was developed as an outlet for members ofthe public and stakeholders to provide recommendations and feedback on th types of bicycle facilities they would like to see implemented throughout the City of Miami (see screenshots of interactive map below). e interactive map allowed users to create corridor specific recommendations by selecting the following bicycle facility types: Separated Bike Lane Buffered/Protected Bike Lane Shared -Use Path Conventional Bike Lane Other (Please Specify) After selecting a facility type, users drew a segment at the location where they would like to see the facility i ► .lemented. The location specific recommendation allowed users to place points at locations throughout the city and identified the follo Bike Parking Needed Bike Share Station Needed Traffic Signal Needed See instructions below to add comments and recommendations to the map. Corridor Speslne R•CormmenMellon nM.l ,..toot....cc, a c.o..otta Location sprCPne Reaammendetlan jpolnll r Wars Mrr..Ya•.s. n.+y Tatarro+na.m - la O • G Difficult to cross Street/Intersection Signage or Markings Needed Mid -Block Crossing/Median N- ded 7 ..turll8 cyc6. Fterer pi.n- Polk. E gegemmavx 8 , 11 ca..n1 w..,re ir6e....,ere, g concerns: Barrier or Restricted Access Public Restroom Facilities Needed ........ Q© EYS WOOS Gb® = °- a The responses from the on ' e survey and interactive map were heavily factored into the network determination process of the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan up• e and influenced the locations of proposed facilities based on gaps identified in the bicycle network and the type of bicycle facility base• . n safety concerns, comfortability level, and location -based needs of the public. Link to the Bi e Master Plan Public Engagement map: https://tinyurl.com/BMPEngage Community Outreach 29 Ik\A rj _ nt� SUBSTITUTED t Practices and Policy Review _ SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Facility Types This section provides a description of bicycle facility types included in the proposed bicycle network analysis and typical road sections within the City of Miami where bicycle facilities will be implemented. Bicycling related best practices are included in this sectio ' nd should be referenced as a resource when determining elements that can improve accessibility, efficiency, and safety among cyclists Bicycle facilities are perceived differently by cyclists in terms of safety and comfort. The cyclist experience on diff based on traffic volumes, posted speeds, and surrounding land uses. The type of facility implemented on a road characteristics to ensure the highest level ofefficiencyand safetyforcyclists. Acorridor-specific evaluation network proposed in A corridor -specific evaluation of land use and roadway characteristics guided th was a primary factor in determining which roadways are proposed to include bicycle facilities, and t on a specific roadway. Lane repurposing was also a major technique used while determining th on -street bicycle facilities are feasible for implementation through lane repurposing efforts traffic to then repurpose for other modes of transportation including bicycling and for sizes appropriate to the roadway and land -use context and can also help lower vehic feet and/or center turn lanes, the excess space can be repurposed to support of nt bicycle facilities varies y should be dictated by these ese elements guided the bicycle icycle network analysis process and ype of bicycle facility to be implemented icycle Network Recommendations, as many ese efforts use general -travel lanes of vehicular of micro -mobility. Lane widths can be restored to rspeeds. For example, ifa road has lanes wider than 12 r modes of transportation such as bicycle lanes. Within a strategic network, decisions must be made to determine the '..rrect bicycle facility designated at each corridor with the goal of striving a balance between the needs and desires of the public an• e feasibility of implementation. Detailing the many types of bicycle facilities and best practices is fundamental to the success of any .' ycle mobility plan, as it ensures an understanding as to where and why c ain facilities are appropriate for implementation. The following pages include summaries of the typ of bicycle facilities proposed for implementation by this plan. SUBSTITUTED On -Roadway Facilities Many bicycle facilities are placed on the roadway, either sharing space with motor vehicles along travel lanes or on a portion of the reet designated by signage and/or pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use of bicyclists. On -roadway bicycle facilities reco ended in this plan include: (AD Bicycle Boulevards are facilities designed to give bicycle travel priority through the use of signage, pavement marki -.s, and with traffic calming treatments that discourage trips by vehicles and are best fit on low speed, low traffic volume roadways perceived as safer and more pleasant than routes along busy roadways because of low traffic volumes and the ability to cycle on a wide roadway. These facilities are planned to provide direct access to destinations and are primarily located on local roadways that have posted speed limits less than 30 mph, daily traffic volumes less than 3,000 vehicles per day (low traffic volumes), provide minimal delay to bicyclists crossing minor streets, and offer safe and convenient crossings at major streets. Note that all residential streets in the City of Miami have a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Street design elements to include with bicycle boulevards include: Signage and wayfinding elements for bicyclists and drivers along the ro Speed management techniques to reinforce the priority of bicycl- ravel along these corridors include posted speed signs of 25 mph or le- , speed tables, stop signs for cross streets, and marked crosswalks, hing beacons, or crossing signals at busy intersections A critical element is to implement green color markings similar to what City of Miami Beach has used as part of their slow street's initiative. The green color marki have a distinctive on motorists bicyclist to be more promine in shared road conditions Bicycle Boulevard Pavement Marking Source: Kabircares.org icycle Boulevards are Example of signage and pavement markings for Bicycle Boulevards Bicycle Boulevard Pavement Markings Source: Nacto.org 32 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Buffered Bicycle Lanes separate bicycle travel lanes from vehicular travel lanes by two (2) solid -white pavement markings creating buffer between both modes of transportation. The interior of the buffer may use different paving materials to further emphasiz- e separation of the bicycle lane from vehicle travel lanes or parking spaces. Benefits of buffered bicycle lanes include additional sp es for passing and obstacle avoidance without entering vehicle travel lanes. Awareness of cyclists is also improved, as the bicycle e is more prevalent with the presence of a painted buffer. This treatment is typically best fit on roadways with high travel speeds d high travel volumes due to the protective abilities of the buffer. Streets with extra travel lanes wide travel lanes or wide on-stre parking that can be reduced or repurposed are most feasible for implementing buffered bicycle lanes. Special treatments should stops to manage the interaction between cyclists and pedestrians. Buffered bicycle lanes are typically seven (7) feet wide- providing a four (4) foot through travel lane, and a three (3) foot buffer to allow passenger loading and prevent door collisions when adjacent on -street parking is present. cnb Bicycle Lanes provide exclusive space for bicyclists next to vehicle travel lanes. These typically lead to the most predictable form of bicycle travel which can increase safety based on the predictable movements and designated area of the bicycle lanes. Bicycle lanes are most effective at improving comfortability and safety amo bicyclists on roadways with less than 3,000 vehicles per day and posted speed MPH or less. For roadways with higher traffic volumes and speeds, bicycle es are ideal when right-of-way restricts the implementation of more protec d facilities. Dedicated bike lanes are typically five (5) feet wide adjacent to on- eet parking or a guiderail, and three (3) feet when on -street parking is not pr- -nt. Bicycle Lanes on South Miami Avenue, Miami considered at transit Buffered Bicycle Lane, SE 1st Street Bicycle Lane on W Flagler Street, west of NW 19th Avenue Best Practices and Policy Review 33 SUBSTITUTED Separated Facilities Bicycle lanes may also be designed with some degree of physical separation from motor vehicle lanes. Nationwide studies indicate tha ese types of facilities are the most attractive to less experienced riders and to potential riders who are concerned about the safety risks o . icycling in urban settings. Types of separated bicycle facilities recommended in this plan include: cab Protected Bicycle Lanes are facilities located within or directly adjacent to the roadway physically separated from motor vehicle traffic with a vertical element. There are many different ways in which to create a protected bicycle lane, but the primary defining feature is that there is dedicated space for cyclists separate from motor vehicle travel and parking lanes. Protection of the bicycle lanes is typically provided by a curb, "armadillos", bollards, parked cars, or landscaping installments. The specific fitting of the treatment depends on the land -use and roadway context and available right-of-way but are typically optimized when located next to the edge of roadway and continued for long distances. When applicable, this location allows the lanes to gain additional protection from on -street parking and existin landscape installations such as stormwater retention basins. Conflicts betw parked vehicles such as double-parking or "dooring" caused by the careless. ,-ning of car doors are minimized, along with vehicle -involved collisions. Streets with wide sections, extra travel lanes, and wide travel lanes • ide on -street parking that can be reduced or repurposed are most feasib or implementing protected bicycle lanes. On high traffic volume, high speed roadways protected bicycle lanes provide the greatest form of protection from motorists. Special treatments should be considered at transit stops to manage the interaction between cyclis and pedestrians. Two-way protectebicycle lanes allow for . -directional travel on o facility. These facilities • uire mitigation for Two -Way Protected Bicycle Lane Protected Bicycle Lane using Curbs Protected Bicycle Lane using "armadillos" 34 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Shared -Use Path at Crossing conflicts at intersection, including dedicated bicycle signals- see Intersection Treatments section for additional mitigation methods Two-way protected bicycle lanes are best fit in highly urban environments where it is easier to provide bicycle facilties only on streets, particularly if those streets are one-way to vehicles. One-way protected bicycle lanes are typically eight (8) feet and protected bicycle lanes are typically 11 feet. sp is o-way cab Raised Separated Bicycle Lanes - A version of separated bicycle lanes, raised separated bicycle lanes use grade se• . ation either at sidewalk grade or an intermediate grade to give the cyclist further separation from vehicle and roadway activitie hese facilities are also ideal for supporting micro -mobility devices, as it creates separation between pedestrian traffic and fast -traveling devices. Dockless parking can be placed adjacent to the lane, which provides accessibility and ease when beginning or completing micro -mobility trips. Note that this treatment was not included as part of the bicycle network improvements but should be explored as an alternative option where protected bicycle lanes are recommended. eft Shared -Use Paths are facilities separated from vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and offer more flexibility for implementation as these facilities are no joined to the roadway. Shared use paths are used by pedestrians, runners, bicycl scooters, and other forms of micro -mobility. As shared use paths serve pede ians, they must comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. • support inter -city connectivity, shared -use paths recommended in this plare near or linked to other existing or proposed bicycle facilities. This facili is most feasible in areas with a large amount of undeveloped or unused land near a roadway, as the space provides opportunities to be converted into a wide path for multiple users. These paths are usually 10 feetwide but can be 8 feet wide in constrained conditions for short distances. 1 Raised Separated Bicycle Lane Shared -Use Path: M-Path Best Practices and Policy Review 35 SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Parking Considerations Supplying safe and secure bicycle parking throughout the City of Miami is a critical component to increasing ridership an. .uilding a comprehensive bicycle network. Bicycle parking is most effective when placed in concentrated areas of economic and social . ivity that are easily accessible by bicyclists or pedestrians. A few examples include Bayfront Marketplace/FTX Arena, Mary Brickell Villag ackson Memorial Health Complex, or Wynwood Walls, transit stops (including MetroMover and MetroRail), parks, grocery stores, and . se residential areas. The amount of bicycle parking should be tailored to the number of daily trips a particular location is estimated . receive- a large activity generator such as FTX Arena needs much more dedicated bicycle parking facilities than a local grocery store. The type of bicycle parking facility will depend on the surrounding land use context and restrictions oft needs to be clearly visible to help cyclists easily locate parking locations as they approach the des bright paint can all be implemented to increase the visibility of bicycle parking facilities. Short U, post & ring, or bike corral are most effective at locations where the destination is two hours. The primary advantage of short-term bicycle parking is convenience, as it destination in highly accessible and visible areas. Long-term parking facilities such as bike lockers or bike shelters that provide increased protection against damage and theftare ideal at locations where the street. In any setting, bicycle parking ation. Signage, pavement markings, and rm bicycle facilities such as an the inverted in ded to produce quick trips, typically less than n often be located directly at the entrance of the destination is likely to keep users at the location for longer than two VE TED ` hours. Unauthorized access is largely reduced at long-term parking facilities, but additional measures can still be taken to reduce t possibility of damage or theft. Natural access control relies on doors, fences, shru• -, and other physical elements to separate a bicycle park'-. facility from the general public. Access control can be a eyed in individual dwellings or commercial establishments b e use of locks, doors and window barriers. However, beyond - ivate property onto public or semi-public spaces, the applicatiof access control needs more attention. Properly located en nces, exits, fencing, landscaping and lighting can subtly dir- t both foot and vehicular traffic in ways that decreases ch. - es of theft or damage to bicycles. Access control is more dif It on streets and areas that are entirely open to public e. Techniques for controlling access in these ocp ST & Rik: CORRAL Short -Term Bicycle Parking Facilities BIKE LOCKERS 5HELTEREtaSECURE ENCLOSURE Long -Term Bicycle Parking Facilities 36 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED circumstances include nonphysical or `psychological' barriers such as signs, paving textures, nature strips or anything that announces th integrity and uniqueness of an area. Because any strategy that creates access control is also likely to impede movement, careful consider on should be given to access control strategies. Such strategies may limitthe opportunity for crimes but should not hinder the mobility of - 'clists. The following guidelines should be used when determining the location and design of bicycle parking: Bicycle Parking Location (321D As close to destination and activity generators as possible. eft Near high natural surveillance area and high trafficked areas. (321D Separate from pedestrian areas to avoid accidental damage to bikes and maintain a clear, uno (321D Bicycle parking should be equally accessible as vehicle parking for residential developme• s. (321D Near the entrances of major public venues such as hospitals, schools, business distrs, and recreational/leisure facilities. Bicycle Parking Design (321D Ability to secure both wheels and frame of bicycle cb A canopy/roof should be provided over long-term parking to prov protection from weather conditions and to attract usage. (321D Ensure compatibility with various locks and bicycle frames s• • at retail stores. (321D Install highly visible signage, so the facility can be seen om a distance. Information such as conditions of use, applicable charges, or whether the facilities are for public or private use s Management and Maintenance (321D High quality, attractive facilities, which e well maintained promote a sense of safety and security eP1D Provide easy to use equipment, w effortless operation (avoiding lifting or awkward maneuvering) to encourage usage. Instructions should be provided if any spe equipment is necessary. (321D Highly utilized facilities . - well managed and kept clean. Abandoned bicycles should be removed within a specified period to avoid the appearance of negle ructed path for other modes of travel. uld also be displayed at the parking location. Best Practices and Policy Review 37 PLACEMENT The following minimum spacing requirements apply to some common installations of xtures like inverted-U or post -and -ring racks that park one bicycle roughly centered on each side of the rack. Recommended clearances are given first, with minimums in parentheses where appropriate. In areas with tight clearances, consider wheelwell-secure racks (page 6), which can be placed closer to walls and constrain the bicycle footprint more reliably than inverted-U and post -and -ring racks. The footprint of a typical bicycle is approximately 6' x 2'. Cargo bikes and bikes with trailers can extend to 10' or longer. CROSSWALK 48" (36" MIN) (24" MIN) 1 48" (36" MIN) 96" (72" MIN) I(236"—, 4"MIN) 16' MIN 60" (48" MIN) (72" MIN) 0101 ,-120"RECOMMENDED—. 1/A LI. Sidewalk racks adjacent to on -street auto parking should be placed between parking stalls to avoid conflicts with opening car doors. CROSSWALK. 24" MIN When installing sidewalk racks, maintain the pedestrian through zone. Racks shou be placed in line with existing sidewal obstructions to maintain a clear I travel for all sidewalk users. RECOMMENDED 60"—> 72"—. /4111 48 —> f i 24" (36" PREFERRED WHEN ADJACENT TO AUTO PARKING) Bicycle Parking Locations Source: apbp.org SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Locker Facility Bicycle Parking Pavement Markings 38 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Secure Bicycle Parking at Transit Facilities Secure bicycle parking at transit stations is essential to make first- last- mile transit connectivity viable and reliable. Secure bicycle . ing consists of short-term parking that needs to be convenient and easy to use as well as long-term parking that needs to be secure and • eltered. Typically, if a bicyclist is parking for two (2) or more hours they will prefer security and shelter above the convenience and ease - short-term parking. Types of bicycle parking include bicycle racks (short-term parking), lockers (short-term and long-term parkinnd lids (short- term and long-term) parking. for bicycles needs to be between the bicycle network Provide secure bicycle parking (bicy racks, lockers, and lids). The bicycle parking needs to follow Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) where bicycl arking is under Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) monitor, well -lit area, cordoned -off from the rest of the transit facility with one-win and one-way out, and next to a building structure. There are four (4) principles to CPTED including: cab Surveillance: people are seen and can be seen cab Access Management: users are passively directed to a specific place, while restrict'•. non -users cab Territorial: ownership of an area is defined by clear boundaries cab Facility Quality: well maintained and high -quality environments attract -rs and aid surveillance. Additionally, there are three (3) ways in which the physical environmen ay be managed in order to reduce the opportunity for crime: cab Natural: Inclusive of basic security through defined borders . d windows for surveillance cnb Organized: formal, manned security cab Mechanical: use of CCTV, locks, and lighting It is recommended to place designated bicycle king areas in locations where natural surveillance is achievable- preferably near activity generators and areas of frequent pedestrian . ivity. Transit stations are ideal locations for esignated bicycle parking infrastructure due to the station's ability to link multiple modes of travel and increase trip length for micro-m.. ity users. Due to the limited use of transit stations outside of peak commute times, additional measures must be implemented to impr- ie the security of bicycle parking. Bicycle parking areas around transit station should be regularly patrolled and suspicious activity should - reported by the security patrol to deter theft and damage. Additionally, security at these stations can ask for the identification of indivi..als entering the designated bicycle parking areas. Additionally, emergency phones should be well signed and lit near bicycle parking. A ansit stations with high incidences of bicycle theft, providing more secure long-term bicycle parking is recommended. Best Practices and Policy Review 39 SUBSTITUTED Maintenance of transit facilities is also a major determinant as to how effective the location will be at providing secure bicycle parking, and ho comfortable cyclists will feel using the station as a intermodal hub. Clean transit facilities with comfortable and adequate lighting, welco g site access, and visible surveillance are highly desirable among multimodal users and are likely to increase the amount of community p• -sence at that facility. Another extension of the concept is that social cohesion and a general sense of security can be reinforced through the --velopment of the identity and image of a community. This approach can improve not only the image of the population has of itself, and domain, but also the projection of that image to others. With clear spatial definitions such as the subdivision of space into different de• es of public/ semi-public/ private areas and the raising of standards and expectations, the level of social estrangement would decline. ► . intenance and management need to be considered at the design stage, as the selection of materials and finishes will impact the types o aintenance regimes that can be sustained over time. Landscape design, trash disposal locations, and restroom placement are a few ele• -nts that must be evaluated for their long-term effectiveness and influence on access and safety. Secure Bike Parking used by Miami -Dade Transit Source: bikelid.com 40 mi Bicycle Master Plan Intersection Treatments Intersecting roadways whether signalized or unsignalized create a significant conflict area for bicycle facilities regardless of the type of bicycle facility. Treatments need to be provided for the various types of intersections including unsignalized limited access intersection crossing, unsignalized full access intersection crossing, and signalized full access intersection crossing. Unsignalized limited access intersection crossings consist of a right -turn only from the minor street to the major street. The major street will also have a right -turn only onto the minor street and may also have a left -turn only as well. This access treatment results in using the center median (peanut) on the major street as a median refuge island for bicycle movements. A portion of the raised center median is removed to accommodate bicycles through the median, while prohibiting vehicles. The preferred width of median refuge islands is a minimum of 10 feet. However, the minimum width can be as narrow as 6 feet wide. SUBSTITUTED Example of Unsignalized Limited Access Approach on NW 3rd Street at NW 27th Avenue Note that median refuge islands are not the preferred treatment at high volu ' - arterials as this could present safety issues for bicyclists. At crossings with high volume arterials it is preferred to have bicycle facilitie .n at signalized control. So'.rce: Small Town and Rural Design Guide.com Best Practices and Policy Review 41 For crossing unsignalized full access intersections, pavement markings are provided across the intersection to indicate the path of cyclists. These markings provide a clear path and boundary between bicyclists and through or turning vehicles in the adjacent lane. Several variations of pavement markings can be implemented to raise bicycle -crossing awareness, including: Shared -Lane Markings Markings with Dotted Lines Markings with Dotted Lines and Chevrons Markings with Dotted Lines and Shared -Lane Markings Markings with Elephant's Feet Markings with Dotted Lines or Elephant's Feet and Green -Painted Lanes Unsignalized Full Access Approach on NW 3rd Street at NW 57th Avenue Increasing the prominence of on -street bicycle markings help reinforce the priorit through bicyclist movement over turning vehicles and reduces perceived conflicts between cyclists and motorists through more pred' able placement of cyclists at the intersection. Note that to implement green color crossing markings one of two criteria needs to be sa ied including the following: 1. History of three (3) or more vehicle/bicycle crashes at or adjace o the traffic conflict area over the most recent three-year period. 2. Observed and documented conflicts between vehicles and • ycles for a minimum of two (2) separate data collection periods, conducted on different days in one (1) month include o - 1) weekday and weekend period during peak bicycle travel times. Each observation period should be for a minimum of two hours. Markings with • ted Lines Sourc-• 'acto.org Markings with Elephant's Feet Source: Nacto.org Markings with Dotted Lines and Shared -Lane Markings Source: Nacto.org d 1 Markings with Dotted Lines and Green -Painted Lanes Source: Nacto.org 42 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Signalized intersection crossings require bike boxes. Bike boxes are a designated area on an intersection approach in advance of the stop bar pavement marking (see photo below). This provides bicyclists with a safe and visible way to get motorist attention and alert them of the bicyclist during a red signal phase. Note that this treatment requires "No Turn on Red" operation to prevent vehicles from crossing the bike box where exclusive right -turn lanes are not provided. Bike boxes can be extended across multiple travel lanes to facilitate bicycle left -turn positioning. Two -stage turn queue allows bicyclists to make a left -turn at a multi -lane signalized intersection from a curb bicycle facility (right side) or a right -turn from a center bicycle facility (left side). This treatment creates safe making left -turn movements that reduces conflicts with vehicles and provides a formal queuing area for bicyclists making a two -stage turn (see photo below). The turning operation consists of the following: 1. Cyclist enters the intersection straight ahead of the dedicated crosswalk path 2. Cyclist waits in a queue box on the far side of the intersection at the cross- eet approach that currently has a red signal phase. 3. When the cross street green signal phase is illuminated the bicyclist • •ceeds. Bicyclists need to receive two (2) separate green signal indications t• urn- one for the through street, followed by one for the cross street. bir Signalized Full Access Approach on NW 10th Avenue at NW 54th Street Two -stage turn queue boxes may also be used at unsignaliz- . intersections to simplify turns from a dedicated bicycle lane. Locations where a bicycle boulevard passes through an intersection is especially appropriate application of this technique, due to its - .ility to increase the prominence of a bicycle facility without a de•' ated lane in a high - conflict environment. At midblock crossing lo•. ions, a two -stage turn queue box may be used to orient bicyclist •roperly for safe crossings. Multiple positions are available for euing boxes, depending on intersection configuration. II1K wow Bike Box Source: Nacto.org Two -stage Turn Queue Source: Nacto.org Best Practices and Policy Review 43 SUBSTITUTED , Complete Streets Miami -Dade County developed the Miami -Dade Complete Streets Design Guidelines (2016) document to establish stand. '.s for the configuration of public streets based on street typologies. The Complete Streets Guidelines provide a variety of elemethat can be incorporated in a roadway to balance the trips for all modes of transportation and create more inclusive environmen or bicyclists and pedestrians. The Complete Streets Guidelines provide transportation demand management strategies that can be i . emented by the City of Miami. The Miami -Dade Complete Streets Design Guidelines aims to promote sustainability, health, and safety of right-of-way of public streets to accommodate all modes of travel (i.e., transit, bicycle, and walking). as public health, equity, and safety through contextual design and planning. The Complete Streets that can be referenced when future roadway modifications are proposed. Complete Streets t and roadway characteristics and also considers the intended users of the roadway such as transit. Assigning the proper typology to a street can help guide what design and pia characteristics are used for classifying streets with Complete Streets typologies: eft eft eft eft eft Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Number of through travel lanes Target speed for motorized vehicles Presence of on -street parking Average block length Flow of traffic (two-way/one-way) ?-- aeppl.e who live in neighborhoods with sidewalks on roads re 479i more likely to be active at least 30 minutes per day. If 100,000 car trips were replaced by bike trips once a month. It would carbon dioxl emrssion. 3.76 communities est in transit generates SL in etonamlc returns. f- L 1 ' 1 1 e community by repurposing the plete Streets provide benefits such ncept serves as a public entity resource ogies categorize streets based on land use estrians, vehicles, freight, micro -mobility, and ng options are best for the roadway. The following 69.700 is the average annual. savings from choosing to ride transit instead of driving alone, Honing With higher Walk Scams se0 far bctw¢an S4,000 and S.31 p00 more. rtIncreased pedeel an Street activity MI5 aS a WI -policing,, letnrring crvminat behavior. Benefits of Complete Streets Infographic increased physical activity promotes better grades. school attendance. and classroom behavior, Pedestrian street activity increases support of local businesses. expands employment opportunities. and promotes reinvestment into lee local economy. 44 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED These factors help determine intended function of the road and which amenities are applicable. For example, a low volume roadway in residential area will have considerably different pedestrian needs compared to a low volume roadway in the Downtown area. The pedes an needs provided in the graphic below show the minimum widths of the different off-street zones for each Complete Street typology. e off- street zones include: A.) Frontage Zone: occupies the space between the front of a building or yard and should be maximized to provide spac- or cafe seating, green elements, and gathering, but not at the expense of reducing the Pedestrian Zone below the recommended imum widths. (AD Pedestrian Zone: should be kept clear of obstructions; should be as straight as is feasible; should provide a• • uate width, particularly in high pedestrian volume areas. Shared -use paths capable of simultaneously supporting pedestrians - d micro -mobility are ideally located in the pedestrian zone. eft Furnishing Zone: should be maximized to provide as great a buffer as possible between traffic an •edestrians, this can be accomplished with bike lanes or street parking where there is not sufficient room for a large furnishing zon ' here on -street parking is provided, curb extensions or other elements can be used to calm traffic and provide extra space for fur re and greenscaping. Pedestrian Through Zone (min. 6 ft) Zone (min. 2 ft) Non -Motorized Travel Zones Furnishing ''y Enhancement \ '` Zone (min. 5 ft) Best Practices and Policy Review 45 SUBSTITUTED The categories of the Complete Streets typology include Thoroughfares, Feeder Roads, Civic Streets, Neighborhood Streets, and Servic Ways. The following sections illustrate each category and identify key characteristics of the roadways. Thoroughfares (TH) support the movement of large volumes of people and accommodate longer trips. They contain the widest t-of-way and provide connectivity between barriers such as freeways connecting cities and districts. Key characteristics ofThoroughf es include: cab Raised medians cab Sidewalks possibly separated from traveled way cab Regional truck routes cab Regional and local transit service Examples of thoroughfare roads in the City of Miami include: SW 8th Street/SR 90/US-41 NW 27th Avenue/SR 9 SW 42nd Avenue/SR 953 1 Feeder Roads (FR) create access between an urban center and su .unding neighborhoods. Some multimodal facilities begin to be incorporated into the street. Key characteristics of Feeder Roads include: cnb Potential medians cab Regional and local transit activity cab Local truck routes eft Bicycle lanes Examples of a feede oads in the City of Miami include: rth Miami Avenue NW 2nd Avenue NW 17th Avenue 46 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Civic Streets (CS) create environments capable of supporting economic and social activity, while also providing access to businesses an commercial destinations through a variety of transportation modes. Civic Streets should balance the needs of people who live and work a the street as well as the needs of commuters. Key characteristics of Civic Streets include: cnb Local transit service cab Exclusive or shared bicycle lane cab Zones for local deliveries only cab Multimodal facilities cab Bicycle parking stations Examples of a civic streets in the City of Miami include: o NW 41st Street 0 SE 1st Street i mrry a g Neighborhood Streets (NS) typically serve local trips and have low ffic volumes and speeds compared to the other street typologies. Neighborhood Streets provide access to parks, schools, or institu '.nal facilities including local retail. Key characteristics of Neighborhood Streets include: cab Shared or dedicated bicycle facilities cab A pedestrian sidewalk cab Minimal pavement markings on the roadway cab Landscape buffers Examples of a neighbo ood streets in the City of Miami include: 0 Vir nia Street 0 Brickell Bay Drive 0 NE 69th Street Best Practices and Policy Review 47 SUBSTITUTED A Service Way (SW) provides connections between residential streets. Service Ways provide access for loading, delivery operations, an driveway access for activities such as garbage pick-up and utility work. Figure 12 shows a profile example of a Service Way. Throughou e City of Miami, some of these roadways have been repurposed to accommodate bicycle travel by adding lane markings and improving p• -ment conditions. Key characteristics of Service Ways include: cab One (1) lane total cab Narrow right-of-way eft Residential driveway access cab No sidewalks Example of Service Way between NW 43rd Street and NW 44th Street in Miami 48 mi Bicycle Master Plan FDOT Context Classification SUBSTITUTED FDOT's Context Classification provides guidelines consisting of eight (8) categories that account for adjacent land uses, roadway . nnectivity characteristics, and socioeconomic characteristics. FDOT developed the context classification criteria out of a need to b= er define the context of state -maintained roadways beyond urban and rural classifications and to incorporate multimodal needs into th fisting functional classification system. The FDOT Context Classification system identifies the general characteristics of the surrou g area, the current roadway connections, and traffic patterns, to determine roadway standards. Establishing who uses the roadwa d for what purpose will specify the opportunities and guidelines of an identified roadway. Using the FDOT Context Classifications as a design guide will help inform decision -makers of the mult odal elements and roadway features most needed to create an environment capable of supporting the typical roadway users and lan..ses surrounding the roadway. Common features informed by the context classification type include the number of lanes, sidewalk width - nd transportation facility types such as bike lanes, bus shelters, or parking. For example, a roadway classified as a C6-Urban Core roadw- ypically needs large sidewalks and bicycle lanes to accommodate large quantities of bicyclists and pedestrians. In addition, this area wo : experience greater use of the transit system than other roadways, meaning that large bus shelters are ideal to implement. The figure below shows the differences between each classification, and the f• owing table details typical conditions and development patterns expected in each classification environment. C1- C2- C2T- C3R- C3C- C4- C5- i C6- Natur, Rural '' Rural ---' Suburban' " Suburban `"�' Urban '' Urban Urban Town Residential Commercial General Center Core Best Practices and Policy Review 49 SUBSTITUTED FDOT Context Classifications C6- Urban Core C5- Urban Center C4- Urban General C3C- Suburban Commercial C3R- Suburban Reside.itial Description Areas of the highest densities and building heights that include a mix of uses built up to the roadway. Typically designated as regional centers and destinations. Parking typically located in the rear or a parking garage. Mix of uses set within small blocks with a well-connected roadway network. Typically concentrated around a few blocks and identified as part of a civic or economic center of a community or city. Mix of uses set within small blocks with a well-connected roadway network. Activities and uses less concentrated and likely to extend long distances throughou a corridor. Residential neighborhoods typically located behind fronting u Mostly non-residentia building footprints within large bl sparse roa es with large d large parking lots s and a disconnected or y network. Mostly residential uses within large blocks and a disconnected or sparse roadway network. Minimal or no interaction between uses and the roadway. Typical Features Building Height: >4 floors Setback Distance: <10 ft. Block Length: <660 ft. Block Perimeter: <2,500 ft. Building Height: 1-5 floors Setback Distance: <20 f Block Length: <50 Block Perimet 2,500 ft. B •ing Height: 1-3 floors etback Distance: <75 ft. Block Length: <500 ft. Block Perimeter: <3,000 ft. Building Height: 1 floor (retail uses), 1-4 floors (office uses) Setback Distance: >75 ft. Block Length: >660 ft. Block Perimeter: >3,000 ft. Building Height: 1-2 floors Setback Distance: 20-75 ft. Block Length: N/A Block Perimeter: N/A Land Uses Retail, Office, Institutional or Multi- ily Resi. - ial Retail, Office, Institutional, Single/Multi-Family Residential, or Light Industrial Neighborhood - Scale Retail, Office, Institutional, or Single/Multi-Family Residential Retail, Office, Institutional, Multi - Family Residential, or Industrial Primarily Single/ Multi -Family Residential 50 mi Bicycle Master Plan FDOT Context Classifications C2T- Rural Town C2- Rural C1- Natural Description Small concentrations of developed areas immediately surrounded by rural and natural areas, includes many historic towns. Sparsely settled lands - may include agricultural land, grassland, woodland, and wetlands. Lands preserved in a natural or wilderness condition, including lands unsuitable for settlement due to natural conditions. SUBSTITUTED , Land Uses Retail, Office, Single/Multi- Family Residenti Institutional Industria Agricultural or Single -Family Residential Conservation Land, Open Space, or Park Typical Features Building Height: 1-2 floors Setback Distance: <20 ft. Block Length: <500 ft. Block Perimeter: <3,000 ft. Building Height: 1-2 floors Setback Distance: Inconsistent Block Length: N/A Block Perimeter: N/A Building Heig , /A Setback ' ance: N/A Bloc ength: N/A ck Perimeter: N/A Best Practices and Policy Review 51 SUBSTITUTED , Policy Strategies The City's Traffic Management Plan established multimodal transportation policy guidance for future policy related to Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Transportation Control Measures (TCM), and mobility strategies. Understanding the trends in multimodal transportation policy and mobility strategies can guide future City of Miami policy with the overarching goal of reduced commute times and decreased congestion. Additionally, TDM/ TCM address how and when people need to travel. TDM/TCM strategies include elements that improve transportation system efficiency by reducing single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips to improve, enhance, and encourage multimodal options such as carpooling, micromobility (bicycles, scooters. skateboards, etc.), public transit, and walking. These strategies can identify cost-effective methods to build capacity in a transportation system by increasing the participation of residents in modes of transportation other than a vehicle. These strategies can be implemented as part of the land development process for specific sites and by the City of Miami. The figure to the right illustrates the types of TDM/TCM implementation and the strategies recommended for h. Mobility Fee The City of Miami does not currently incorporate a m capital improvement projects and can be used to i trips and encourage more trips completed thro Multimodal Trasportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobilit" Fe :s Complete Streets TD► I/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies o• y fee for developments. Establishing a mobility fee system would increase funds for .rove existing infrastructure and create new transportation facilities to decrease SOV micromobility or walking. The City of Miami Beach's Transportat' Master Plan provides an example of implementing a mobility fee to fund mobility improvements identified in the plan. The Transpo ation Master Plan identifies developments as funding mechanisms to support capital expenses and transportation facilities located ' the City of Miami Beach. Funds can further be invested in initiatives that can help decrease SOV trips and encourage residents to e alternative modes of transportation. The mobility fee schedule was established by reviewing existing land development patterns a , the City's business tax categories. The fee associated with each land use was calculated based on considering the net external trips ba . on ITE Trip Generation rates, the average trip length per trip purpose derived from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) d. •ase specifically for Miami Beach, and mode split and vehicle occupancy rates from the Miami Beach Transportation Plan. 52 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED , New Development Transportation Deman Management (TDM) Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Strategies New developments should propose a TDM/TCM plan to reduce the impacts of the project traffic on the surrou►.ing roadway network and reduce the reliance on SOV trips and promote multimodal transportation. In addition, other measures sh► d be under consideration to encourage the use of public transportation, bicycling, walking, and identifying alternatives to typical wor .y hours. Private developers should consider incorporating best practices strategies and methods such as e following: cab Creation of an Employee Transportation Coordinator position to run the Transportati. ontrol Measures (TCM) programs. eft Subsidized transit passes for employees ePb Provide secure short-term and long-term bicycle parking (bicycle racks, lo► ers, and lids) cab Provide bicycle facilities on adjacent roadway network cab Providing a Citibike station or bike rentals cab Wide hallways to accommodate bicycles eft Elevators that can accommodate bikes cab Bike workroom or shop cab Bike washing stations c Bike drop-off/valet service AD Secure bicycle parking/bicycle cab Projects located along s ed use/multi-use paths need to provide direct connectivity to those facilities. To further encourage m modal transportation, it is recommended that the City of Miami adopt an ordinance that requires development and redevelopment prof- s located adjacent to multi-use/shared use paths such as but not limited to the Miami River Greenway/Baywalk, Flagler Trail, Commodor rail, Underline, M-Path, and Plan Z provide direct pedestrian and/or bicycle connectivity to those facilities. Best Practices and Policy Review 53 SUBSTITUTED , US Census Journey to Work Data A guiding standard throughout the network determination process was the dedication to providing equitable and reliable bic - e facilities throughout the City of Miami. The Bicycle Network proposed in this plan focused heavily on providing facilities in areas of population, low income, low vehicle ownership, and close access to transit. Population, Employment, and Income data was compiled frthe U.S. Census Bureau atthe block level and was analyzed to determine areas most in need ofmultimodal facilities- which are typically a as of high population, high employment, and low income. Below is a snapshot of key Census characteristics in the City of Miami Total Population M 439,890 Poverty Rate n Household Income $44,268 IA� Mean Travel Time to Work 21.5% 28.6 minutes 54 mi Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED , Replica Replica is a publicly available data set that uses US Census, land use regulations, aggregate mobile location, credit transactidata, and real estate transaction data. Additionally, Replica data evaluates all trips that enter and exit the City of Miami. It is expected t a portion of residents and guests will choose to walk, bike, or use public transit to and from the proposed development. It includes d . non-commercial travel by all modes, including characteristics of the people traveling, their household, and their vehicles. This source provide useful travel behavior data to incorporate to the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan to ensure transportation networks are accur ely planned. Miami, FL ,owl Mode Split Trip volume in this geography: typical weekday Week of Aug 23, 2021 to the week of Feb 28, 2022 1_0m 750k 500k 250k 0 Feb 28, 2022 Private Auto Transit Auto Passenger Other C . ge Data 4 Selections 880k 58k 200k 5.8k Ale a' Sep 2021 Oct 2021 Nov 2021 Dec 2021 Jan 2022 Feb 2022 Mar 2022 Private Auto i Transit Auto Passenger other Best Practices and Policy Review 55 NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide provides resources and case studies state -of -the -practice solutions aimed at creating complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists. This document of Miami Bicycle Master Plan while determining the feasibility of different bicycle facility types on roadways throughout t best practices for separated bike lanes (also known as cycle tracks) as well as neighborhood greenways was also taken standards and best practices for intersection treatments, bicycle signals, and bikeway signs and markings should the implementation process, as each street will present their own challenges and opportunities. Project for Public Spaces owcasing ided the City city. Direction on m the guide. Design further analyzed during The Project for Public Spaces (PPS) is a non-profit planning, design, and educatio- . organization that advocates for the creation of lively public spaces as a tool to build strong communities. It offers resources and ca studies to advance the placemaking movement. The PPS have completed projects in more than 3,500 communities in over 50 countri- and all 50 U.S. As such, it is a reliable source for best practices, information, and resources on placemaking. The initiative promotes grea - reets as the backbone of successful communities, redefining them as spaces that connect people to where they need to go, while enha - g and supporting the destinations they serve. WHAT MAKES A GREAT PLACE? st P :oitcr:oR PUBLVC IMINSPACES 56 mi Bicycle Master Plan Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach This report was developed in response to interest for improving mobility choices and community character through wa . ble communities. It provides guidance to ensure the users, community and other key factors are considered when planning and d- .ning walkable urban thoroughfares. The report also presents strategies for effective network planning for walkable areas and streetsid .esign guidelines. General principles and considerations regarding bicycle lanes specifically cited. This report will provide guidance for t► - City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan to accommodate all users and make decisions based on achieving system -wide transportation capaci using a multimodal network. Dense Urban Environ • t at Brickell City Centre Walkable Urban Thoroughfare in Miami Design District Best Practices and Policy Review 57 Concepts to Increase Bicycle Safety an Bike Safe Bicycling is not a simple mode of transportation that can be adopted instantaneously. The complexity of factors thcan influence the amount of bicycling that an individual does can vary widely. Educational campaigns and initiatives, such as providin..dult bicycle training, can have a cultural impact in normalizing the activity and fostering best practices. BikeSafe is a University of Miami KiDZ Neuroscience Center initiative to focus on bicycle safety for childre- .ges 10 to 14. BikeSafe's missions are to prevent pediatric bicyclists hit -by -car through education, promote physical activity, and advocfor safer cycling environments. BikeSafe curriculum is made available in Physical Eduction class at Miami -Dade County middle • ools and consists of four (4) off -bike lessons and an optional on -bike lesson. The program has been adopted by Miami -Dade County Par - and Recreation's spring and summer camps. The curriculum consists of a three-hour program that features both on and off -bike lesso . nd gives kids the opportunity for hands-on practice with the bike safety fundamentals. Bicycle Friendly Businesses The League of American Bicyclists is the nation's oldest bicycle adv. .cy organization in the America. The areas in which the focus on ar- .eople, places, and policy. Their Bicycle Friendly Business (BFB) Progr operates under the idea that bikes are good for businesses, em.. ees, and the community. Businesses that are deemed to be bicycle f ' -ndly based on the four criteria of engineering, education, encourage t, and evaluation and planning, are recognized through their awards stem. Businesses can be given Bronze, Silver, Gold, and Platinum awa s. By encouraging businesses to be bicycle friendly they hope to i urn encourage individuals and communities to strengthen bicycle u and awareness. Being designated as a BFB allows for national recogni '.n as a leader in wellness, sustainability, and corporate responsibility. r ople Places Policy THE BICYCLE FRIENDLY AMERICA' PROGRAM is all about Places Our HFA program provides recognition and guidance for states, com enmities, universities and businesses to showcase and enhance their bicycle friendliness_ The program provides a practical blueprint, hands-on assistance, and resources to ]tells make Places better for bicycling THE BICYCLE FRIENDLY BUSINESS PROGRAM;,baSedan mu belief that bikes are good Ictr businesses, employees, and the community. BFHs" are recognized for their efforts through an award system based on four essential &eine its to being bicycle friendly Engineering. Education, Encourage- ment and Evaluation 8 Planning, BFBs BY THE NUMBERS (SPRING 20161 x OF STATES 4' 41C r7rTH 13F8 Source: Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization 58 mi Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle friendly businesses lead to a variety of improvements throughout the community, including: cab Increased morale and quality of life cab Greater sense of community cab Enhanced health and wellness through a culture of physical activity cab Catalyze a more alert active productive workforce cab Showcase social responsibility, a commitment to sustainability and reduced environmental footprint cab Reduced transportation spending by companies, individuals and communities cab Decreased reliance on the vehicle to complete routine trips Fifteen -Minute Cities Afifteen-minute city is one in which everyone living in thatcity has access to essential urban services within a 15-minute walk or bike. The 15-Minute City Project has goal to help access focused urban transformation that are ambitious, in sive, measurable, and effectively implemented. This goal can be achieved by several methods include the followi cab Providing first- and last- mile connectivity to Metro - er, Metrorail, and Express transit facilities cab Provided bicycle facilities in a grid network in the neighborhoods The City of Miami has implemented City Or infill and density in areas where a five - the rider to a transit station. ance 13114 in order to promote urban to bicycle ride (3/4 of a mile radius) gets PaR AMOUNT. \\ STATION KAMPUNG TUNKU 1DlemPm care Sim 1t 't�.'mi irons 77 „^' r 15 t�rhY �1 ltuna adfd 6ifUnefdli +' Sa a. atea$bni`. i!stegivbiKities Iatu I:: Source: www.l5minutecity.com Best Practices and Policy Review 59 11'1\1111111111111 ycle Network Analysis SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Determination Existing and proposed bicycle facilities outlined in the plans and studies from the Literature Review process, along with a G maintained by the City of Miami containing existing facilities, formed a baseline bicycle network within the City of Miami t identify network gaps and facility needs. Analyzing the existing bicycle network also helped determine the suitability of e high -stress roadways. As a result, many existing bicycle boulevards and conventional bike lanes are recommended for determining the less -protected bicycle facilities were unfit for the high vehicle speed and volume roadways they we on providing feasible bicycle facility recommendations that considered right-of-way constraints and surround' ensured that each proposed bicycle facility can fit within the existing street widths with minimal disrup expected that lane repurposing and/or resurfacing efforts will be needed to implement some of the bic Detailed sections and notes are provided in Appendix B. shapefile was used to ting facilities on cllity upgrades after ocated on. An emphasis land and roadway context to the roadway network. It is facilities proposed in this section. A process was developed for formulating a vision to develop the future City of Miami bic ' network. The process included the following considerations: cab Creating a grid throughout the City » » Focus on local streets with existing or proposed traffic calming tr- ments Utilize local streets that have signals and median separators - arterials/collectors for safe and dedicated bike/ped crossings Prioritize roadways that are easily navigable to increas- .ccessibility and create continuous East-West & North -South connections Recognize opportunities to connect existing and cab First- last- mile connectivity to transit posed bicycle facilities to create a comprehensive grid system Implement quality and secure bicy parking at transit facilities Locate bicycle facilities near h' . transit ridership locations (over 100 daily boardings and alighting's) cab Right-of-way considerati » Ensure the roa y can fit the recommended bicycle facility within the existing right-of-way while maintaining most on -street elements (p ing, travel lanes, medians, etc.) AD Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods Concentrate bicycle facilities near activity centers, schools, parks, and grocery stores » Provide quality bicycle facilities near low-income communities that connect to major destinations and high employ -nt centers Meet the demand for multimodal travel by supplying a sufficient amount of bicycle facilities in areas of high p. lation density Repurposing on -street parking Evaluate the demand and usage of on -street parking to determine if the space can be converted to a dedicated bicycle facility Identify alternative parking solutions so that the bicycle facilities are a success when on -street parking is removed to accommodate bicycle facilities Provide protected bicycle facilities to prevent vehicles from parking in th dedicated bicycle space AD Consideration of regional connectivity and access d---' . Little Havana Pedestrian Priority Zone (Miami River to the • • rth, SW 8th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and S 2nd Avenue to the west) Prioritize pedestrians and access to transi over other modes Pedestrian priority zone principle• nclude maintaining appropriate clear . dewalk width for pedestrian travel, alig g curb ramps with sidewalks, requir'-. crosswalk at all intersections, incr=, ing pedestrian crossing times beyond t► minimum, reducing travel lane widths •roviding shade for sidewalks, reducing peed limits, and eliminating right- tur •n-red in dense pedestrian corridors Protected Bicycle Facility near Multiple Transit Stations Pedestrians ( Bicycle Miami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Typical Sections The following typical sections are provided to illustrate implementation tactics based on the bicycle network recommenda ' ns presented in this chapter. Multiple right-of-way widths are presented that represent the existing widths on roadways where cle facilities are recommended. 50-foot ROW Two -Way Local Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bicycle Boulevard 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 33' 50'- 33' = 17' remaining 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 0' remaining, no opportunity for dedicated bicycle improvement. Bicycle Bou volume local streets BB ■ M ■ E t I o ax' Sidewalk ax Parking lane 10' Bike Boulevard 10' Bike Boulevard ar Parking lane and appropriate on low -speed, low- 8K' Sidewalk BM • 50-foot ROW Two -Way Traffic Bicycle Network Analysis 63 e 50-foot ROW One -Way Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bicycle Lanes 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 5' sidewalk + 5' sidewalk = 30' .. 50'- 30' = 20' - 7.5' on -street parking - 7.5' on -street -parking = 5' bike lane It is preferred to locate the bike lane adjacent to the sidewalk. In locations where utility poles are a. cent to the sidewalk on -street parking will need to be located adjacent to the sidewalk to prevent uti conflicts. SUBSTITUTED l 5' 714' Sidewalk Parking lane f,1 e lane AM. 10' 7K' 5' Drive lane Parking lane Sidewalk r it 5' 5' 7Y,' 10' 10' 754' 5' Sidewalk Parking lane Drive lane Drive lane Parking lane Sidewalk ■. 50-foot ROW One -Way Traffic 50-foot ROW One -Way Traffic 64 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED NM i!e » 60-foot ROW 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 27' remaining 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 10' remaining Therefore, 5' bike lanes + 5' bike lanes • f;l 4K' 5' an' 1n. 10' Sidewalk }a•kind lane pane lane Parking lane Sidewalk 60-foot ROW Bicycle Lanes protected by on -street parking (preferred) AIM ■ ■ ■ ■ 60-foot ROW er.' ,a io s er, 635Bicycle Lanes between on -street parking and travel lanes. Use where utility poles are located against sidewalk Bicycle Network Analysis I 65 Sidewalk Parking cane Snve lane Drive lane Parking Lane Sidewalk SUBSTITUTED Ii » 65-foot ROW (Ex: NW 46th Street) 34' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 7' sidewalk + 7' sidewalk = 31' remaining 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 14' remaining Therefore, 7' buffered bike lane + 7' buffered bike lane Sidewalk 1' 4' 3' 6S' 10' Parking lane Orive lane 10' Delve lane 4' ax' Parking lane 1° 6' Sidewalk ■ ■ ■ ■ •1 ■1 65-foot ROW (NW 46th Street) 66 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED 65-foot ROW (Ex: North Federal Highway) 37' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 8.5' sidewalk + 8.5' sidewalk = 28' remaining 8'6" on -street parking = 19.5' remaining Therefore, 11' two-way protected bike lanes OR 7' buffered bike lane + 7' buffered bike la - IMMO 311' 4• 4' 3 S'S 10' 10' SW Sidewalk par are Drive lane Driae lane Parking Lane El■ 311' 5' Sidewalk 1�1 65-foot ROW (North Federal Highway) Bicycle Network Analysis 67 » 70-foot ROW MI III NM SUBSTITUTED 33' = 10' travel Zane+10'travel lane+6'6" sidewalk+6'6"sidewalk = 37' remaining 8'6" on -street parking +8'6" on -street parking = 16' remaining Therefore, 8' + 8' one-way protected bicycle lanes OR 11' two-way protected bicycle lanes 11 p15' 4Y' Sidewalk 3' Sidewalk BK' 10' 10BY; 3' 4' 4' Parking lane Drive Ian: Drive lane Parking lane icy 4' 3' B Y' Parking lane . • 10' Drive lane 10' Drive lane 1 BY' 3' Parking lane a 4K' Sidewalk Sidewalk 70-foot ROW Two-way protected bicycle lanes ARM Eno .. 111 1'11- ICE Ma 70-foot ROW One-way protected bicycle lanes 68 mini Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle Parking Located near Storefront in Miami orhood Road, Ideal for Bicycle Boulevard SUBSTITUTED Shared -Use Path with Pavement Markings Old Cutler Trail • • Comportamiento en los Senderos eld to pedestrians el peso a los person. p right and pass on left tempura la de,&h yadaame le tome. pounce yourself ou stop, get off the trail een--enes salon del renders, yerca y all trail signs ra sodas las uncles del uMem Old Cutler Trail Route 1 A! R lege ErEr, m'eep the trail clean _ e8 th B `Lane °dA- ^ ace°tPay. P°,a , aMenga el untlero Ilmpio dewalx a v°int of imerer� p animals under control —SM1aetleoatlnlr • ""°°°'°'°`"" go sm ammalg naio control Old Cutler Trail Segment of Route 1 Bike Trail Signage Bicycle Network Analysis 69 SUBSTITUTED Proposed Bicycle Facility Types and Location The following maps represent the updated bicycle network for the City of Miami. The existing bicycle facilities data shown in - maps are derived from a review that identified existing and proposed projects documented in previous bicycle -related plans and s • ies (full list in Literature Review section) along with an "Existing Facilities" GIS shapefile from the City of Miami's Department of ilience and Public Works. Satellite imagery and site visits helped confirm projects identified in the GIS data and Literature Review proce till exist or have been implemented since being proposed. Projects proposed in previous bicycle -related plans and studies that have - been implemented were not included in the Existing Bicycle Facilities layer but were analyzed for their inclusion in the updated bicyc - etwork. The following maps display the locations of proposed bicycle facilities throughout the City of Miami. Proposed bicycle parkin. .cations are also displayed on the maps. Improved connectivity is evident on the maps, as many bicycle facilities link at multiple locations xpanding the network and providing new routes to popular destinations or areas of high population and employment. Additionally, ma .'cycle facilities are proposed near high ridership transit stops to create more multimodal hubs throughout the city and increase mobil' 1 for non -motorized users. Segment Totals by Facility Type: (321D Bicycle Boulevard: 152 segments enD Bicycle Lanes: 44 segments c b Buffered Bicycle Lanes: 3 segments c Protected Bicycle Lanes: 27 segments c Shared -Use Path: 24 segments Link to the online Ci A detailed list of f Miami Proposed Bicycle Network map: https://tinyurl.com/MiamiBMP cycle network recommendations and improvements within the City of Miami is provided in Appendix B. 70 iami Bicycle Master Plan Seth St Hialeah Doral Doral Golf Course NW 36th St Miami International Airport z 5 -i 969 '.2th st T 836 . �,1, 1 W i-t h St NW 7th St I0 • I i } r ,—`"--0-4 a 4t� ▪ - 4�� � i � 19681 d9 IS* '^ r 1 1 - --+.. r.,-- #-1-14--I- 1 _ -1-T-T .. 1 1 1 1 1 I .. 1 i Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes — — Shared -Use Path - Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard O Proposed Bicycle Parking O High Ridership Transit Stops Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Green City of Miami B. dary South Miami — - - o aau r ll Ccayne eav Aquatic Pie eryr- SUBSTITUTED ami Beach Virginia Key Park Crandon Park Bicycle NetworkAnalysis 71 Bird Rd -d Rd 5W 27th St SW 28th St Coral Gables I 1 Oak Ave Indu=-trial 1 Fro Ave # Florida Ave 'William Ave 1 Charles Ave J SW 27th 55 The Bar Hist• e State Dinner Key Picnic Islands Park SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard © Proposed Bicycle Parking Q High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A 72 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED NW 1st St 1 m 1 NW Flagrer Ter 1 ! 1 [968i t yrSt 1 SW2ndTer ., .-- e ro aodpuZbMS S W t2nd St SW 3rd St SW 4th3St o, — -- -yor• C�hSt i ] W VJ ,..4.. ? the ti Bicycle Network Recommendations — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard • Proposed Bicycle Parking G High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A 0 Hialea Sout Almeria Ave art 1 • I SW22ndTe 5 3rd Ter SW 24th St 5W 24th Ter 5W 25th St SW 25th Ter SW Sr 00 SW12nd St G 0 Park •` 0 ltilewiid 1 1837 St 4th St 1 0 1 I, 1 SW 3rd St e 1 1 i I- SW 27th St 5W 25th St w N 1 N r. 1. .M., N 9411 #6.5t-,* t rD N 1 D 1 m L 1_ SW 14th St SW 15W St 1_ G 0 G rib41 1 1 5W 10t 5tIMO 1 1 SW 11 h Ter 1 SW 12 SW 1 'th St SW1 thSt 5hena doafl 1 SW 16th Ter sw 17th5t� SW 18tn St 1 SW 19th ler 1 N SW 2`stSt 1 SW 21stTer n' Silver Bluff ,At 2;, rt 0 Estates SW 24th 5t The Pines SW 27tn St 0 1 ` 5W 2/4th St SW 25th St SW 26tr' 1 3 � 1 5W 21 :t St 1 1 1 1 PyL 0 Bicycle Network Analysis I 73 SW 2n St 1 Id Park 1 v `V4th 5t - - SW 3r� St g 1 n; C — —_s S — j D tn ;» < D m v, SW hth St os o, 1 o o * a M Y 3 s— --, 10. I al s ...... —1 i—b— 1—C•'-`-8--, 1 1 1 1 SW 90 St 1 SW 1Ot' St 1 1 1 SW 1Oth S ir ---ii L--t--1 "We ch?C—i 1 Sw1ltnTer \ 01 1 SW 1 !th St 1 SW 12th St �i ♦ 1 e f — — 0' — — — — — 5iva 3ti.hitr — ♦ \ 1 sw1'thSt ��iNI 1 5hena doaY e° \ 'tom 141 1 / \♦ s✓ S , \ Tp `,9 1 _—� = • \ c5,p 0, � 1 1 I 1 e` 1 01 SW21tSt 1 1 i 1 1 1 1I 1 1 1 I — --io•i Pe Hobie Island Bey riitiyhts 1 ♦• oi SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard Q Proposed Bicycle Parking 0 High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways N City of Miami Boundary 74 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED h Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Boulevard • Proposed Bicycle Parking e High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A V 7 7th St z nona Park m SW 12th St any yap( MS Nw 7th St NW 7th St Lake Mahar • 1 / 0 0 or / an , I a a D -, < ) `u 1 o I Alameda SW 16th St aAH pa£9 MS o. Officer Carlos Blue Lagoon Dr Lake Joanne uteiy,'I!e Rcl Blue Lagoon Lake pNW 7t � 1 V St r < < n n �� , m m 1 I I NWI2nd St i t, u a 1 SW 5th St 1 1 I SW 17tn St 0 0 G rr a tu 3 tn Venetia Ave I 5W 6th sw 7t11 St Sorolla Ave Obispo Ave Bicycle Network Analysis 75 Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard • Proposed Bicycle Parking 0 High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A ^^�hz Lake Hialeaf� O Sout"1-71 M ar Mi Blue Lagoon Lake z s_- CD 836 a'v PUZb / 1 953 I953I International Links Miami 0 NW 12th St NW 19th lei NW 19th Si SUBSTITUTED Delaware Pa w w _ _ Ce NW 15th St 19 I i z 1 I 1 I I I t T 2r,... N�7thSt�NW7chstIr__Z r__i'tllid'61+1___ 1 z I �` I ( ` s z z 1 z z z I� z D z z ®��— z i I 'z `� m w w `< `< Z (1�—___. r'I`}ktlrr��i�." V��__—_�—.tv'�V�9F. � _a'____ *�__ tl am vi• � a rt c CDNW 1st St i 1 968 W Flagio St 0, �I 1 SW 2nd Ter 1 _ea--1... —bw-sta*5,--1•—� II W 1 p 1 1, � 1 ___— — r_Di__5MJ•4t1� 3 1 1 SW 5th Ter ` SW 6th St$ St 1 Venetia Ave 968 SWtnd St SW 3rd 5t SW athlSt 1 a v 1 r • Swn 76 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Boulevard 0 Proposed Bicycle Parking Q High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A aAV pUni N 953 iy N! 71 5, St NW 14th St 0 Hialea Sout ar ti Mi NW 19th NW 19th St 1 z 1 t } Delaware Park International u., —�— _1---0 Links Miaml. — — 1 ...... — — — 1 I 1 ➢ - i 1 NW 16th St ro 1 I I z i ' I ' L--.t—r}M/ ]e+,5J s --1 ..... 1 1 s 1 NW 34th St I >a z t * NW 33rd St If N1/31st5 Nl(30th5 N4 r 29th S NW 26th Si NW 24 h St Q- .!.L. n NW 12th St 0 L — — — r4444011.4t— L 1-1 z 0 NW 9th 54 1 7th st p z 1 v 1 r--- ' tD 3 < Z D 41. w `� t r-- 1 v !—------ r -----® g w, y co t 1 < sa. W _, _ 1.0--• 1 �._ v3.asr I 4.7 1 m - I " 1 1• NW 1st St 1 Pin ad Park NW 22nd St 1 NW21stTer z t NW 21st St n r, A NW37thSt 1 �-- 1---r-----t NW 9th St NW 7th St 1836( z 0 1 W N VI z T N W Sth St NW 1st St NW 6th St NW 4te St NW 2`' 0 0 z D z 933 NW NN Bicycle Network Analysis 77 1f A Pinewood Park NW 2`thSt NW 2tstier NW 21stSt 18361 NW 22nd St — Alb NW 5th St St 1NW 34th St NW 21th Ter 1 1 -- Oft gin NW Jth St NW 4th and 417L MN 933 wood Perk 0 Jackson Memorial Hospital NW 5th St 0 NW 2nd St ^ NW 1st St 2 z 1 1 1 1 1 1 t- -1-- --1--® 1 1 a-- --8 4ilk �— -4\141 4fltdrt- 1 — — NW 7th St — — .+w.541 - — — t- - laa 1 NE 21tth St NE 25th St k .2a„pS z 1 udo n SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — Bicycle Boulevard ® Proposed Bicycle P High Ridershi. .nsit Stops Propos neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Exist icycle Facilities isting/Planned Greenways N City of Miami Boundary Hialeal 0 L Sout MI Fr edom ower b etro .ve C C 1 Mri O 0 <N.<;n� 0 ,OO -- 0 1886 Miami Children s Museum Charter School 0 78 iami Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle Network Recommendations — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard • Proposed Bicycle Parking e High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary hergln5 NW 46th St NW 41s ,1W 62nd St Och St NW 74th St NW 76th St NW 74th St NW 73r NW 72nd SE NW 70th St 1 1 NW .9th Ter 1 1 NW 69t'h St 1 1 Z 1 NW .8th Ter ( o co I NW 67th t A )- NW 6tth St 1 f° NW 65th St 1 NW 6Kth St 1 1 0 0 NW 62nd St NW S5t', Te Ws:t'.,5L NW 5Rth Ter NW 57tt St t t'.A' S . ,r, � t -z °' 1 NW 4 Sth St 3 r D 1 rho NW 4. th Te m 1 NW t NW 46th 1 1 1 NW 45th St 1 1 NW 44th St NW 41Srd 5t AI apattah 1 NW 43rd St 1 NW 42nd 5t ` NW 41st St Ea hi s M t L......1 ^L — Fla�tf�4W 41 st Heights Metro Rail Station .1.00391er90 r NW 38th t NW 37th t NW 5' th Ter 0 1 7 INW 5lstSt St 9A 1 SUBSTITUTED Edison Cutter b 1 hAN .3rd1 -----Qr 1 1 �1 1 uni XI 1 -o! 1 NNj 49th St 1-7,— _ E 3 NI 48th St _ t D NW147thTer > ?l V z fD NVJ 47th St r° � 1 S` m 00 z 0 Bicycle Network Analysis 79 NW 76th St NW 74th St NW73r1St NW 7Znd St z NVI 49th St NI 48th St N WI47th Ter NVi 47th St NW 45th St NW 43rd St NW 38th NW 37th 1 layshore NIL Ism NE 74th NE 73rd NE 72nc NE 70th St PoSay Ln SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard O Proposed Bicycle ' ing O High Rider . Transit Stops Pro. - -d Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Ex i g Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary 80 iami Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Boulevard Q Proposed Bicycle Parking O High Ridership Transit Stops Proposed Neighborhood Traffic Calming Areas Existing Bicycle Facilities Existing/Planned Greenways City of Miami Boundary A NW 77th St NW 76th St NW 74th St -- NW 73r 9 St i NW 72nd St ----=_r----- 1 _ 1 NW 67thit NW 6tth St NW ath St �t ---NW61rdS' jNW 62nd St d Square 1 ; 141, ro i]Hialeafl M ri ar ti Mi g 0 G NW 77th St 1 NW 62n 9A T 1 Bison Ceiter 1 NE 94th St NE 93rd St NE 92nd St NE 91st St NE 90tn St NE 89th St NE 88th St NE 87th St NE 86th St City vz rn 7' D ro V N 83"d 3 4MID rm. 4WD mni INE 177th Sz Belle EII6t1St Meade ;NE 75th St Island r 1 NE 74th St I NE 73rd St —I z m 0I 10 NE 6'th St / / / / Wyshore z NE 72nd St NE 70th St P a\,` Bay Lin SUBSTITUTED Pelican Harbor Marina Bicycle Network Analysis 81 P eject Implementatiull lIdI' SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Facility Prioritization Specific criteria were developed with a focus on prioritizing the implementation of bicycle facilities in areas of high population and - ployment, frequent bicycle -involved crashes, low -incomes, and connections to additional bicycle facilities and high -ridership transit ops. The list of themes used to evaluate proposed bicycle facilities is provided below, and a comprehensive breakdown of the prioritiza '•n criteria with the associated scoring scales and data sources is presented in the Miami Bike Master Plan Prioritization Criteria table on - -ge 90. eft Safety (# of Bicycle Crashes) cab Population Density cnb Employment Density eft Income cab Destinations-Landmarks/Activity Centers/Parks cab Destinations- Schools cab First- Last -Mile Transit Connectivity cnb Bicycle Network Connectivity cab Public Engagement en!) City of Miami Capital Improvement/Utility Project Sc ule Considerations cab Miami -Dade County Utility Projects Schedule Co ' iderations eft Bicycle Facility Type Proposed bicycle improvements were priori -d based on the total score the segment received using the Miami Bike Master Plan Prioritization Criteria. A higher prioritization score 1 cates that the proposed bicycle facility should be implemented sooner, as it indicates greater potential of improving accessibility, s -ty, equity, and connectivity to the larger bicycle network. In the following tables, the proposed bicycle improvements are ranked by the' otal prioritization score for each Bicycle Facility Type at the City -Wide Level along with their rank within each of the five Commission 1' ricts within the City of Miami. In the following tabl and City-wide. S provided in A the top 10 scoring segments are shown when applicable for each bicycle facility type in each Commission District ific information pertaining to implementation methods and roadway characteristics of each proposed bicycle facility is endix B. A full list of ranked projects, undivided by bicycle facility type, is also provided in Appendix B. Criteria Measure Miami Bike Master Plan Prioritization Data Source Criteria Calculation Points vvvv ■ ■ ■ v ■ M Point Scale v Safety Crash data Signal Four Analytics, University of Florida Number of bicycle crashes in the last five years within 200 foot buffer 20 > 10 crashes 20 pts 8-9 crashe 17 lots 6-7 cra s 14 lots 5 c _ es 12 lots rashes 10 lots crashes 8 lots 2 crashes 6 lots 1 crash 4 pts 0 crash 0 its Population Population Census Tract 2019 Census Population Data Highest population category along project corridor (line) r 9482.0 18709.0 10 pts 6520.0 - 9482.0 7 pts 4837.0- 6520.0 5 pts 3029.0 - 4837.0 3 pts 0.0 - 3029.0 0 pts Employment Employment Census Tract 2019 Census Employment Data Highest employment categor along project corridor (lint 10 4889.0 8878.0 10 pts 3198.0 - 4889.0 7 pts 2194.0 - 3198.0 5 pts 1214.0 - 2194.0 3 pts 0.0-1214.0 0 pts Income Income Census Tract 2019 Census Income Data Lowest i e category along prof- orridor (line) 10 0.0 - 681.0 10 pts 681.0 -1472.0 7 lots 1472.0 - 2104.0 5 lots 2104.0 - 3059.0 3 lots 3059.0 - 5808.0 0 lots Destinations- Landmarks Activity centers (Landmarks, County Parks, Municipal Parks) Distance to an activity center 6 On project corridor 6 lots < 1/4 mile from corridor 3 lots < 1/2 mile from corridor 1 lots Destinations- Schools Schools Distance to a school 6 On project corridor 6 lots < 1/4 mile from corridor 3 lots < 1/2 mile from corridor 1 lots First- last- mile transit connectivity High Ridership Bus Stops High Ridership MSC Bu - ops Distance to a high ridership transit stop 6 On project corridor 6 pts < 1/4 mile from corridor 3 pts < 1/2 mile from corridor 1 pts Bicycle Network Connectivity Gap closure Existing Bic - Facilities and Existing Facilitie .. ray lines) in GIS Project Connections to existing bicycle facility at one or multiple points 10 Connects to >1 existing facilities at multiple locations 10 pts Connects to one facility atone location 5 pts Public Engagement Public comments 0' - e Public Engagement Map Link: https://maps. imley-horn.com/portal/apps/webappviewer/index. html?id=9877e4e2441f4456baf59954b2c3687c Gets points if public submitted comment falls on project corridor 12 Comment on corridor 12 pts Capital Improvement/ Utility Project Schedule Considerations Utility projects Miami Capital Improvements Projects GIS Website: hops://miamigis.maps.arcgis.com/apes/webappviewer/ index.html?id=9be66952f0684747b46f212647d30c97 Street with an upcoming project; only from 01 to 03 (Planning through Design) 5 Project could be implemented through a CIP project 5 pts Utility Project Schedule Considerations Utility pros is Miami Dade Utility Coordination GIS Website: https:// gisweb.miamidadegov/iMDCUtilityCoordination/ Street with an upcoming utility project Only consider Potential Collab,Bridge, Roadway, and Paving 5 Project could be implemented through a utility project 5 pts Type Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Network Recommendations layer in GIS project Prioritizing more protected and separated facilities 10 Protected Bicycle Lanes 10 pts Shared Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes 5 pts Bicycle Lanes 3 lots Bicycle Boulevard 1 pts Total Possible Points 110 84iami Bicycle Master Plan Protected Bicycle Lanes SUBSTITUTED fr Cit -Wide Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW/NW 19th Avenue US-1 NW 3rd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 76 NW 2nd Avenue NW 58th Street NW 71st Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 N Federdal Highway NE 36th Street NE 54th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes NW 2nd Avenue NW 38th Street NW 57th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 67 SW 25th Road SW 1st Avenue SW 9th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 66 NW 1st Place NW 14th Street NW 21st Street Protected Bicycle Lane 63 NW 71st Street NW 17th Avenue NW 12th Avenue Protected Bicycle es 59 SE 1st Avenue Se 4th Street SE 1st Street Protected Bi e Lanes 55 NW 11th Street NW 27th Avenue NW 23rd Avenue Protecteicycle Lanes 55 NW 39th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 10th Avenue Pro - ed Bicycle Lanes 54 Facility From District 1 To cle Recommendation Type Total NW 11th Street NW 27th Avenue NW 23rd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NW 39th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 10th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 29th Avenue NW 7th Street NW 15th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 NW 23rd Street NW 22nd Avenue NW 19th Av-' .e Protected Bicycle Lanes 43 SW 63rd Court SW 8th Street Tamia anal Road Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NW 36th Avenue NW 14 Street N ' Ith Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 35 NW 3rd Street Tamiami Canal Road 1 57th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 31 Facility Fro ' District 2 To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SE 1st Avenue SE 4th Str- SE 1st Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NE 2nd Avenue NE 17- treet NE 17th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 NE 17th Street ► e iami Avenue NE 2nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NE 4th Avenue NE 22nd Street NE 24th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 26 Develop Project Implementation Phasing Plan 85 SUBSTITUTED Protected Bicycle Lanes (cont.) District 3 Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW/NW 19th Avenue US-1 NW 3rd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 25th Road SW 1st Avenue SW 9th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 66 SW 16th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 1st Street Protected Bicycle Lanes NW 29th Avenue NW 7th Street NW 15th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 SW 7th Avenue SW 4th Street NW 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 NW 3rd Street NW 37th Avenue NW 32nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lane 37 Facility From District 4 To Bicycle Reco endation Type Total SW/NW 19th Avenue US-1 NW 3rd Street Prote• -d Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 23rd Avenue SW 27th Street SW 16th Street P ected Bicycle Lanes 46 NW 3rd Street NW 37th Avenue NW 32nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 SW 63rd Court SW 8th Street Tamiami Canal Road Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 NW 3rd Street Tamiami Canal Road NW 57th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 31 SW 49th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 27 Facility From Distri Lt 5 To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 2nd Avenue NW 58th Street N stStreet Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 N Federdal Highway NE 36th Street 1 54th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 71 NW 2nd Avenue NW 38th Street NW 57th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 1st Place NW 14th Street NW 21st Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 63 SE 1st Avenue SE 4th Stree SE 1st Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NW 39th Street NW 17th ' enue NW 10th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 5th Court NW nd Street NW 67th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 52 NW71stStreet •5 NE4thAvenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 NW 40th Street NW 18th Avenue NW 10th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 6th Avenue NW 40th Street NW 47th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 37 86 iami Bicycle Master Plan Shared -Used Paths SUBSTITUTED fr City -Wide Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Biscayne Boulevard NE 6th Street NE 87th Street Shared -Use Path 96 Plan Z Shared -Use Path 83 SW 13th Avenue SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street Shared -Use Path Commodore Trail N Prospect Drive Rickenbacker Causeway Shared -Use Path 77 SW 6th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 5th Avenue Shared -Use Path 72 NW 12th Avenue NW 14th Street NW 37th Street Shared -Use Path 69 SW 19th Street SW 32nd Avenue SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use P. 63 SE 1st Avenue SE 6th Street SE 3rd Street Shared-U 'ath 62 Brickell Bay Drive SE 15th Road SE 14th Street Shar ,- se Path 57 Ludlam Trail SW 8th Street N of W Flagler Street .red -Use Path 55 Facility From District 1 To cle Recommendation Type Total NW 12th Avenue NW 14th Street NW 37th Street Shared -Use Path 69 NW 35th Court NW 7th Street NW 11th Street Shared -Use Path 41 Facility From District 2 o Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Biscayne Boulevard NE 6th Street NE 8 Street Shared -Use Path 96 Plan Z Shared -Use Path 83 Commodore Trail N Prospect Drive Rickenbacker Causeway Shared -Use Path 77 SE 1st Avenue SE 6th Street SE 3rd Street Shared -Use Path 62 Brickell Bay Drive SE 15th Road SE 14th Street Shared -Use Path 57 NE 17th Street Ne 2nd Av- e Biscayne Boulevard Shared -Use Path 45 NE 23rd Street Bisca - Boulevard NE 4th Avenue Shared -Use Path 33 NE 22nd Street ' nd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Shared -Use Path 27 NE 4th Avenue NE 23rd Street NE 23rd Terrace Shared -Use Path 23 Develop Project Implementation Phasing Plan 87 SUBSTITUTED Shared -Used Paths (cont.) District 3 Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 13th Avenue SW 3rd Avenue SW 8th Street Shared -Use Path 78 Commodore Trail N Prospect Drive Rickenbacker Causeway Shared -Use Path 77 SW 6th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 5th Avenue Shared -Use Path SW 19th Street SW 32nd Avenue SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 SW 6th Avenue SW 35th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 SW 17th Street SW 21stAvenue SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path 34 SW 7th Avenue SW 12th Avenue SW 11th Street Shared -Use P 30 Facility From District 4 To Bicycle Re- •mmendation Type Total SW 19th Street SW 32nd Avenue SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 Ludlam Trail SW 8th Street N of W Flagler Street Shared -Use Path 55 SW 6th Avenue SW 35th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 SW 17th Street SW 21st Avenue SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path 34 Facility From District r, • Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Biscayne Boulevard NE 6th Street NE 87t reet Shared -Use Path 96 NW 3rd Avenue NW 25th Street N •th Avenue Shared -Use Path 52 NW 6th Avenue NW 21stTerrace IW 35th Street Shared -Use Path 50 NW 1st Avenue NW 25th Street NW 29th Street Shared -Use Path 48 NW 12th Avenue NW 67th Street NW 62nd Street Shared -Use Path 42 NE 4th Avenue NE 42nd Str_ NE 50th Street Shared -Use Path 34 NE 4th Avenue NE 50t reet NE 54th Street Shared -Use Path 29 88 iami Bicycle Master Plan SUBSTITUTED Facility From Buffered Bicycle Lanes Cit -Wide To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 46th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 2nd Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 53 SW 23rd Street SW 37th Aven ue SW 27th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 47 NW 28th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 8th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes Facility From District 1 To Bicycle Recommendation •e Total NW 28th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 8th Avenue Buffered Bicycle La 46 District 2 Facility From Bicycle Reco endation Type Total None District 3 Facility From cycle Recommendation Type Total None Facility District From Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 23rd Street SW 37th Avenue SW 27 venue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 47 District 5 Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NW 46th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 2nd Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 53 Develop Project Implementation Phasing Plan 89 SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Lanes City -Wide Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 1st Street SW 24th Avenue SW South River Drive Bicycle Lanes 84 NW 79th Street NW 7th Avenue Bayshore Drive Bicycle Lanes 80 NE 11th Street NW 3rd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 7 SW 16th Avenue S Dixie Highway SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 8th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 5th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 37th Avenue Grand Avenue S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 70 NE 29th Street NW 7th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 S Miami Avenue SW 10th Street SW 9th Street Bicycle La 67 NW 10th Street NW 3rd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicy anes 65 NW 5th Avenue NW 22nd Street NW 36th Street ' ycle Lanes 64 Facility From District 1 To B' cle Recommendation Type Total NE 29th Street NW 7th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 6th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 59 NW 17th Street NW 9th Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 5th Avenue NW 7th Avenue NW 3rd Ave - Bicycle Lanes 49 NE 29th Street NW 18th Avenue NW 7th enue Bicycle Lanes 46 NW 14th Street NW 36th Avenue N rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 43 Tamiami Canal Road W Flagler Street , 7th Street Bicycle Lanes 40 SW 62nd Avenue SW 8th Street Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 23rd Avenue NW 28th Street NW 38th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 25th Avenue NW 28th Str-- NW 36th Street Bicycle Lanes 37 Facility From District 2 To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 11th Street NW 3rd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 37th Avenue Grand Avenue S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 70 S Miami Avenue SW 10th Street SW 9th Street Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 10th S - et NW 3rd Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 65 S Bays -.re Drive Halissee Street SW 32nd Road Bicycle Lanes 61 N - •th Street N Miami Avenue east of NE 4th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 61 S Miami Avenue SW 15th Road SW 14th Terrace Bicycle Lanes 61 Brickell Bay Drive SE 12th Street SE 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 60 NE 15th Street Herald Plaza Venetian Causeway Bicycle Lanes 59 SE 15th Road Brickell Avenue Brickell Bay Drive Bicycle Lanes 51 90 iami Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle Lanes (cont.) SUBSTITUTED fr District 3 Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 1st Street SW 24th Avenue SW South River Drive Bicycle Lanes 84 SW 16th Avenue S Dixie Highway SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 70 SW 8th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 5th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 7 S Bayshore Drive Halissee Street SW 32nd Road Bicycle Lanes 61 SW 22nd Avenue Overbrook Street S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 48 SW 21st Road SW 1st Avenue SW 11th Street Bicycle Lanes 39 Facility From District 4 To Bicycle Recom dation Type Total SW 37th Avenue Grand Avenue S Dixie Highway Bi e Lanes 70 SW 32nd Avenue SW 22nd Street SW 11th Street :icycle Lanes 57 Tamiami Canal Road W Flagler Street NW 7th Street Bicycle Lanes 40 NW 35th Avenue W Flagler Street NW 7th Street Bicycle Lanes 39 SW 62nd Avenue SW 8th Street Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Lanes 38 Coral Gate Drive SW 22nd Street SW 21stStreet Bicycle Lanes 36 SW 66th Avenue SW 8th Street Tamiami Canal Ro - Bicycle Lanes 30 SW 4th Street Tamiami Canal Road SW 60th Ave- .e Bicycle Lanes 29 SW 21st Street Coral Gate Drive SW 32n. -venue Bicycle Lanes 21 District 5 Bicycle Recommendation Type Total Facility From To NW 79th Street NW 7th Avenue Bayshore Drive Bicycle Lanes 80 NE 11th Street NW 3rd Avenu- Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 76 NE 29th Street NW 7th Av e N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 NW 10th Street NW 3 venue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Lanes 65 NW 5th Avenue 2nd Street NW 36th Street Bicycle Lanes 64 NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue east of NE 4th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 61 NE 1st Avenue 1-395 NE 17th Street Bicycle Lanes 60 NW 6th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 59 N Miami Av e 1-395 NE 17th Street Bicycle Lanes 58 NE 4t enue NE 62nd Avenue NE 71st Street Bicycle Lanes 53 Develop Project Implementation Phasing Plan 91 SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Boulevards City -Wide Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 2nd Street N Miami Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street NW North River Drive Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 70 NW 32nd Street NW 23rd Avenue E CoastAvenue Bicycle Boulevard 6 NW 2nd Avenue NW 3rd Street NW 11th Terrace Bicycle Boulevard 64 NE 8th Street NW 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 62 SW 11th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 1st Court Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 3rd Street NW 22nd Avenue NW South River Drive Bicycle Boulevar 60 NW 10th Avenue NW 20th Street NW 71st Street Bicycle Boul rd 60 NW 1st Street NW 1st Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle ulevard 60 NW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Street NW 3rd Street Bi e Boulevard 58 Facility From District 1 To B' cle Recommendation Type Total NE 3rd Street NW North River Drive Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 70 NW 32nd Street NW 23rd Avenue E CoastAvenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NE 8th Street NW 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevar- Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 10th Avenue NW 20th Street NW 71st Stre- Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 11th Street NW 33rd Avenue NW 27t enue Bicycle Boulevard 48 NW 35th Street NW 27th Avenue NW th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 46 NW 17th Street NW 37th Avenue 29th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 45 NW 28th Street NW 27th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 SW 60th Avenue SW 8th Street NW 7th Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 NW 33rd Avenue SW 5th Aven NW 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard 35 Facility From District 2 To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 2nd Street N Miami Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street NW North River Drive Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 70 NE 8th Street NW 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 1stStr- NW 1st Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 60 SW 12 treet SW 1st Avenue Brickell Plaza Bicycle Boulevard 58 S th Avenue S Bayshore Drive S Dixie Highway Bicycle Boulevard 57 Alatka Street S Bayshore Drive S Dixie Highway Bicycle Boulevard 55 SE 3rd Street SE 1st Avenue S Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 54 SW 10th Street SW 1st Avenue S Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 52 NE 27th Street N Miami Avenue NE 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 52 iami Bicycle Master Plan Bicycle Boulevards (cont.) SUBSTITUTED J/ District 3 Facility From To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total SW 11th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 1st Court Bicycle Boulevard 62 NW 3rd Street NW 22nd Avenue NW South River Drive Bicycle Boulevard 60 SW 17th Avenue S Bayshore Drive S Dixie Highway Bicycle Boulevard 5 Alatka Street S Bayshore Drive S Dixie Highway Bicycle Boulevard 55 SW 4th Street SW 31stAvenue SW 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 54 SW 5th Avenue SW 11th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 SW 23rd Avenue SW 16th Street NW 4th Street Bicycle Boulevar 52 SW 23rd Street SW 27th Avenue SW 32nd Road Bicycle Boul rd 51 SW 10th Street SW 3rd Avenue SW 1st Court Bicycle ulevard 50 NW 16th Avenue SW 1st Street NW 7th Street Bi e Boulevard 49 Facility From District 4 To B' cle Recommendation Type Total SW 23rd Avenue SW 16th Street NW 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 SW 23rd Street SW 27th Avenue SW 32nd Road Bicycle Boulevard 51 SW 13th Street SW 32nd Avenue SW 10th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 48 SW 32nd Avenue Grand Avenue S Dixie High Bicycle Boulevard 46 SW 26th Street SW 37th Avenue SW 22n. -venue Bicycle Boulevard 43 SW 36th Avenue SW 22nd Street SW h Street Bicycle Boulevard 43 SW 10th Street SW 27th Avenue : # 16th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 SW 60th Avenue SW 8th Street NW 7th Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 SW 29th Avenue SW 20th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard 38 NW 33rd Avenue SW 5th Aven NW 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard 35 Facility From District 5 To Bicycle Recommendation Type Total NE 2nd Street N Miami Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 71 NE 3rd Street NW North River Drive Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 70 NW 32nd Stree NW 23rd Avenue E CoastAvenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 2nd Ave e NW 3rd Street NW 11th Terrace Bicycle Boulevard 64 NE 8t reet NW 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 62 N Oth Avenue NW 20th Street NW 71stStreet Bicycle Boulevard 60 W 1st Street NW 1st Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 2nd Avenue SW 1st Street NW 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard 58 NW 75th Street NW 8th Avenue NE 3rd Place Bicycle Boulevard 53 NW 14th Avenue NW 50th Street NW 67th Street Bicycle Boulevard 51 Develop Project Implementation Phasing Plan 93 SUBSTITUTED Summary Detailed context -based analysis created a connected, comprehensive, and sensible bicycle network. Evaluating local condition - to identify activity generators and land use characteristics ensured that proposed bicycle facilities were located in practical location .nd addressed gaps in the existing network. The proposed bicycle network, best practices, and policy initiatives offer direction that shape the future bicycle network in the City of Miami. Proposed bicycle facilities designated as high -priorities have the greatest cha - of improving bicycle accessibility, connectivity, and efficiency and should be among the first facilities implemented. Providing a comprehensive bicycle infrastructure plan is the first step to creating a multimodal environme hat is bike -friendly and promotes ridership. However, the plan is just one part of the multimodal planning process and the City needs • embrace a multifaceted approach in order to implement a truly multimodal transportation system. Policy Support Policy support and programming e champion of multimodal transpo bicycle drop-off/valet, bicycl of -trip facilities is an esse promote better effec bicycling as first - travel pattern Ir' d Programming urages new development projects to implement multimodal improvements and where the City is a tion by incorporating multimodal amenities such as providing secure bicycle parking, repair stations, ash stations, and/or showers for riders to their existing facilities. A directed focus on support or end - al part of a bicycling network. Transit stops should be given focused consideration as these facilities tend to ness of a multimodal ecosystem. Strategies such as increasing security for parked bicycles can also encourage last- mile connectivity for multimodal trips. Bikeshare programs have also been found to have long term impacts in en placed near transit stations, mobility hubs, or by existing bicycle infrastructure. Educational Programs Bicycling is not a simple mode of transportation that can be adopted instantaneously. The complexity of factors that can influence the amount of bicycling that an individual does can vary widely. Educational campaigns and initiatives, such as providing adult bicycle training, can have a cultural impact in normalizing the activity and fostering best practices. Educational programs are a commonly used tool to promote safer conditions for all roadway users, including bicyclists. While these programs are most effective when targeted to specific groups, it is important that the message be generalized to reach as many people as possible. This can often be achieved by engaging with stakeholders through community groups, business associations, homeowners associations, and health institutions. School -based initiatives such as University of Miami's BikeSafe, Safe Routes to Schools, bicycle proficiency programs, bicycling events, school travel planning, and information resources have also been found to be highly effective. slikAILA I SUBSTITUTED !/ 4i1P 96 iami Bicycle Master Plan I SUBSTITUTED fr Marketing and Public Campaign Efforts Targeted marketing directed at individuals can have a consistent and positive impact on bicycling behavior. Therefore, promot' . the City's efforts to enhance bicycling is an important element of the implementation plan. Some strategies to be considered include: (321D Developing consistent signage and wayfinding with a strong brand identity specific to the Miami Bicycle Networ eft Partner with bike/walk and health coalitions and bike shops; reach workers through advocates and employe ePID Mass or social media campaigns and community -wide promotional activities have been found to posit - y contribute to increased bicycling rates, provided they are combined with improved infrastructure cab Adopting an open and iterative approach to bicycle planning can allow for rapid implementa correction along the way. Pilot projects (tactical or "pop-up" urbanism) offer a unique o and generally at a low cost. Data can be collected before and after implementation to implementation. The proposed bicycle infrastructure improvements promote thi lists for implementation citywide and by commission district. c eft Adopt pilot projects with the assistance of Miami -Dade County and Flori The challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic also prese strategy. People -friendly streets are a proven best practice crisis. With transportation options reduced as traffic volum unique opportunity for the advancement of pedestrian public space to complete essential trips and healthy to hospitals and other essential services, or that essential workers and others to bike safely w , continuous feedback, and course rtunity to test improvements temporarily velop informed decision -making for long-term proach as improvements are prioritized in top-10 epartment of Transportation d an opportunity for pilot programs as a response and recovery e first -line mobility response for local agencies during the COVID-19 and transit ridership rates decrease, uncrowded streets present a bicycle friendly projects that offer people a new way to interact with the tivities right now. This plan prioritizes projects on streets that provide access nnect routes to parks and other open spaces with the intent of providing space for e adhering to physical distance guidelines. an Conclusion 1 97 SUBSTITUTED F LOO K+ 00 A pp mmunity Outreach dix A �� a.i,;r�;c`. SUBSTITUTED De (nations Between P • I is Outreach Event October 29, 2021 SUBSTITUTED Desti A Join us as we chat • • out the places we love to find ourselves within Miami and help u-xplore better traveling experiences for everyone! OCTOBER PARTN M ROM?7PM at Government Center 111 NW First Street tJHealth BIKE o3O5 UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HEALTH SYSTEMCn.nm.rn. TP Miami -Dade Transportation Planning Organization FDO1 ter- . MIAMIDDA DONINTIMT/ REVEL T. ' The Underline I SUBSTITUTED SUBSTITUTED I SUBSTITUTED ro i o .d it ESE u° E Study Advisory • mmittee Meeting November 18, 2021 SUBSTITUTED City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan Study Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting Summary Thursday, November 18, 2021, 2021 110 a.m. Microsoft Teams Staff: Florida Department of Transportation Tiffany Gehrke City of Miami Collin Worth Alyssa Farina David Snow Kimley-Horn Adrian Dabkowski Stewart Robertson Sage Killion Transit Alliance Miami Grace Perdomo, Transit Alliance Stiers Law Eli Stiers, Stiers Law Infinite Source Communications Monica Diaz Purpose of the presentation: The project team made a pr sentation to the Study Advisory Committee (SAC) to introduce the project and discuss key elements ' fated to the scope and timeline of the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan. The meeting provided an •portunity for the project team to field comments, questions, and other considerations from ose present. Questions/Com r ents: • Mr. C. in Worth asked how the project team was approaching FDOT context classification as an opp tunity for better bicycle facilities. o Ms. Tiffany Gehrke interjected and summarized the Department's target and operational speed classifications. She noted that reducing the speed of vehicular traffic would protect cyclists, even though the Department is shifting towards protected bike lanes as a superior safety alternative. SUBSTITUTED • Ms. Gehrke noted that target speeds go beyond posted speeds, as the metric looks at both operating and design speeds. o Mr. Dabkowski summarized key studies conducted by the City of Miami in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of target speeds. • Mr. Worth stated that traffic calming and preventing cut -through traffic was a major conce his division heard from cyclists. He asked if there were any best practices that should be incorporated to discourage cut -through traffic to encourage safe and convenient acce o Ms. Gehrke stated that the question would be best answered by Miami-D. -e County. • Ms. Grace Perdomo commented that her organization was focused on severa ritical issues. She stated her group was focused on the micro -mobility network in down n Miami and how to advance legislative policies focused on bicycle safety. She mentioned iteria for funding adjacent to the Build Back Better package at the federal level. She as d if she could send the project team's survey in the Transit Alliance newsletter. • Ms. Alyssa Farina asked what was included as a bike network o Mr. Sage Killion walked through the team's analysi , noting that the network included bicycle lanes, protected street facilities, share r.:ds, greenways, signage, and neighborhood connectivity. • Ms. Gehrke commented that it was important took into where shared roads are placed in relation to real -world situations in addition t' criteria. o Mr. Stewart Robertson stated tha e team approaches share roads as a tool for bicycle routing on low -stress networks ather than as a fallback mechanism. He stated shared lane would be used as a rou ' g mechanism in the plan developed by the team. • Ms. Farina recommended that e team update the map to show a distinction between shared lanes and other bicycle infra ucture. • Ms. Gehrke suggested at the team look at neighborhood streets that have traffic calming in order to create safe nnections across major thoroughfares. • Mr. Eli Stiers in oduced himself and stated he the Bicycle Master Plan could be a great way to connect diff ent multimodal projects in the city and could catalyze a shift in mobility. • Mr. Da d Snow stated it would be crucial to understand what modifications may be needed to zoni code and development policy to ensure future development is paying into the success of t plan. o Mr. Dabkowski thanked Mr. Snow for his suggestion and stated those suggestions would be incorporated into the plan. SUBSTITUTED • Mr. Robertson commented that target speed was an exciting development being incorporated into the FDM and stated that it has the ability to enhance bicycle safety along state roadway systems. He noted the framework could even be helpful for local governments. o Mr. Adrian Dabkowski noted that the City of Miami has a 25 mile per hour speed limit on all local/residential roads. • Mr. Stiers asked if the primary focus of the committee was to focus on improving the e ing Bicycle Master Plan, or to look at alternative methods of implementation. He stressehe importance of changing zoning requirements in the success of previous projects, i uding the Miami River Greenway. o Mr. Robertson agreed with the comment from Mr. Stiers. • Mr. Stiers asked for a copy of the presentation. • Ms. Gehrke stressed that compromises would have to be made, and at the master plan would have to almost operate in tandem with the parking plan for the Ci of Miami to be successful. • Mr. Worth stated that he wanted a serious look at the feasibil' of the FEC corridor as a dedicated off -road path for cyclists. He emphasized the importance of a safe and low -stress bicycle facility, and the importance of connecting such p. s to rail stations and other city transit. o Ms. Gehrke stressed that it would be impor t to look at other routes in addition to the FEC corridor. • Mr. Worth commented that he would like to e safe and convenient facilities as a general goal. • Ms. Gehrke stated that maximizing the cro-mobility options of streets closed with bollards and other barriers could be an essenti part of the plan. • Mr. Stiers asked how removed t process was from the politics of the City of Miami. He discussed the FEC corridor and e rails -to -trails concept and suggested that the team aim high while keeping in mind easier fts like protected bike lanes. o Mr. Worth comm- ed that there were three locations were rail -trail was currently being recomme-.ed. • Ms. Gehrke stated at one major concern for rail companies was additional crossings, as they would entail mor maintenance. She noted that the companies would like trail crossings to be adjacent to an xisting roadway crossing, not a standalone trail crossing. She stressed the concerns of .bility. • Ms. Geke commented about coordination with high schools. She stated that schoolboards coul. onnect information and serve as a conduit for public engagement. o Ms. Monica Diaz stated that Miami -Dade College could serve as a good partner. o Ms. Perdomo stated that the University of Miami could be a good partner to contact. Ms. Farina asked what the next steps were. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that the next step was to move forward with the bike network assessment and analyze policy and state of practice to present at the next meeting. • Mr. Worth thanked the meeting participants for their time. SUBSTITUTED Action Items: • Send a copy of the presentation to Mr. Eli Stiers. L+,'. Agenda 6 Introduction Key Elements Literatur and Project Rev w Timeline SUBSTITUTED Survey Results Interactive Map Feedback/ Next Steps Introduction This plan is an update to the City's 2009 Bicycle Master Plan Focus on developing cost feasible bicycle infrastructure plan for the next 20 years Will identify network connectivity gaps and opportunities to develop a safe, equitable, and accessible bicycle network Review and provide recommendations for f /last ►fir` mile connectivity to transit Improvements will be include ► n City's Capital Improvement Plan as well for the County's Long -Range Transport. '•n Plan SUBSTITUTED Corridor Specific Recommendation Mutt -Purpose =e: • Separated B'ke_a=e • • • • Convent oriel B4e _e•e •••• Other • • • • Buffered/Protected Bike Lane Location Specific Recommendation Bike Perking Needed Bike Share Station Needed Traffic Signal Needed iii. Dffficukto Cross Street or lntersecoon a Sigeage or Markings Needed Mid -Block Crossing or Men e- re`___ ared Barrier or Resviaed Access Public Restroore Feo6ities Needed Other MetroMover Stations LI MetroRail Stations City of Miami Boundary Kimley r))Horn n eU Myra [_.pe.!ence Bvncr Key Elements and Timeline Activity Task 1. Study Administration and Coordination Task 2. Literature Review Task 3. Community Outreach Task 4. Policy Assessment & State of the Practice Task 5. Bicycle Network Assessment Task 6. Develop Project Implementation P Task 7. Develop Final Report sing Plan onth SUBSTITUTED Kimley r))Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler SUBSTITUTED Literature Review Previous bicycle planning initiatives and projects in City of Miami were used to identify r---ntly constructed and planned bicycle infrastructure. Understanding the current bicycle network along ' h prior recommendations will formulate the bicycle network improvements outlined in t plan. Existing and planned bicycle infrastructure was documented in a database a The following documents were reviewed: • TPO SMART Trails Master Plan • TPO Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan • TPO Flagler Trail Master Plan a 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan a Biscayne Green a Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan • The 1-395 Heritage Trail a Commodore Trail a The Underline a Plan Z � 0 der EEE 5JMMS1Ei P#DESERIIX o FLAGLE TRAIL arOni 0 nci*fo 0.P.H GIS mapping a 2009 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan a The Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Wynwood Streetscape Master Plan a City of Miami Traffic Management Master Plan a City of Miami Scooter Pilot Data Kimley r))Horn Jtp c, Meru L_.pe.!unce 9lencr Proposed Bicycle Facilities • 17 Literature review documents • Over 450 proposed bicycle facility projects identified in City of Miami • These projects will be incorporated into the plan and maps 2009 Ciry of Miami Bicycle Masker Plan 2065 lyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 2065 lyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan 2065 lyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Little Hayana Bicycle 8 Pedestrian Mobility Plar. Biocayne Green 2065 Karr) Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Pim 2012 Health EnstrAt Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Elan 1eo 2012 Health District Bicycle and Podostrien Mobility Plar. 72007 dd 2065 lyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Mile flayana Bicycle 5 Pedestrian Mobility Plan Little Hayene Bicycle 9 Pedestrian Mobility Elan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2012 Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plar. 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan Little Hayene Bicycle 9 Pedestrian Mobility Elan 2065 lylierni•Dade Bicycle Pe, n Masker PI Little Hayana Bicycle 8 Pedestrian Mobility Plar. 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan Little Hayene Bicycle 9 Pedestrian Mobility Elan 2012 Health EnstrAt Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Elan (Miami 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan 2065 lyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2012 Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plar. 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan City of Miami Traf I lc Management Master Plan 2012 Health EnstrAt Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility (Miami E 2012 Health EnstrAt Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility (Miami E Little Hanna Bicycle Podostrian Mobility Plan Little Hayana Bicycle 8 Pedestrian Mobility Plar. Mile flayana Bicycle 5 Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 Cite of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan Little Hanna Bicycle Podostrian Mobility Plan 2009 City oF Miami Bicycle Master Plan 2009 Cite of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan 2009 City of Kam Bicycle Mester Plan Mar Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Faoility Improvements Bicycle Faoility Improvements Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Routes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Facility Improvement, Bicycle Lane Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Faoility Improvements Bicycle Faoilities Bicycle Faclity Improvements Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Facilities Bicycle Facilitios Bicycle Faoility Improvements Safe Crossings Safe Crossings Shared.Bse Lane Markings Bicycle Len, Short -Term Bicycle Parking Bicycle Bouleyards Bicycle Len., Bicycle Facility Improvements Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Faoility Improvements Shared -Use Lane Markings Bicycle Lem, Greenway Bicycle Route Shared -Use Paths1Greenways Bicycle Faoility Improvements Short -Term Bicycle Perking Bicycle Lanes Shared.Bse Paths, Green Short -Term Bicycle Parking Neighborhood Connections Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Shadows SeFo Crossings SaFe Crossings Safe Crossings Bicycle Bouleyards Bicycle Lanes Se, Crossings Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lane Shared.Bse Markings North Federal Highway from NE 30th SINLII0 NE560, North Greenway Iron, Loral Way to South Greenway Drive North Greenway Iron, SR-9i2IMV &met to South Greenway Drive North lyliarni Avenue From Width Street to NW 5th Street North Miami Avenue From NW 17th Street to Ma 28th Street North Miami Avenue? NEW .1,1111, iron. NW 56 Street to NW 17th Avow North Miami Avenue? NEW .1,1111, iron. NW 56 Street to NW 17th Street North Michigan ...IL from SR.907 to West dith Street North Ryer Bove et NW Idth AMMO NW 12th Street Northshore Open Spme Beachwal) From 79th Street to Mth Street leth A1,101,PAV Pr, Street dilly• 11th Street.' my 118771 Court from 911.8 27th AVM. tO ith Street 911., 12th Parkway Grunion, rom NW 62nd Street to NW 7. Street 911., 13th Strom Lane From filly• .10th Street to N Street Ned Id Street from NW 7 Ayeme to ...1,1111f 1.1th Maw W.Ves et Street Pled Nth NW North River C.1,1,0 NW 20th Stlf, Plenild et rom NW 22nd Avenue to NW Mth Avenue Bicycle Bouleyards le915th Streelf NW 10th St., fFom NW 16th Avenue to NW 22nd ...IL big de low OFI-Road Bicycle Facility Improy Extend., Sherrow peuement merging., „miler 5 miles of bicycle lanes 6.45 mile bicycle route. Signs and edibility Extends Sharrow payment markings r6. lc, Dedi:,teao.Road Bicycle Faddy Improyernents(U..ed) 77 miles) Protected...red bicycle lanes (Proposed) Bicycle Facility Improyernents (Funded ',Nail. Plan) Dedicated On -Road Bicycle Faddy tr=o srR,P Off -Road Bicycle Facility Improvement, undo]) OmRwd Bicycle Facility Improvements unded) Install a Lide rack at bus stop (Recommended) Install a bde Fee) at bus stop (Recommended OFI-Road Bicycle Facility Improvement Merged Cromwallus and warning sign, e law crosswalk signagA Rectangular Rapid Flashing 1,,[010 ,RI,F13), and Median where feasible(R. Mulled Crosswalks end warning F .,,hlaw crosswalk .i9na9,. enguler Repid Fleshing6wco.:rRR. end Median .,f,9,..A,,,fea.iel,(Re:omm,.,,,) Coneerpor. or me on- gorging spme to bicycle rad, (Recommended) (1 Slmiles)Plew • Priority Signals...Monter:and/or tralFic calming dew,: should he considered at the NW 5.1th and NW 92nd intersection P (Funded Neighborhood Greenway nim:, the number of stops for bicyclists(Recommended) Bicycle Route (Proposed) Add a shared -use path r,miles) on a.,e Bicycle Facility Improvement CAI ..e, Adds Snarrow pavement y:1iv m:) Coneerpor. or me orpstrem gorging spme to bicycle rad, (Recommended) (30 miles) Sliming, Buffered bicycle Wes (both directions) Bicycle Lanes (Proposed) Shp -rows (o,o Merged Cresswalgs end warning signs, :tato law crosswalk signago. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Boacons RREB), end ModienreFugos where Foasiblo(R. Merged Crosswalgs and warning dgns, state law crosswalk dignagA Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon:ORES), and Median reFuges where Feasible (Recommended) Merged Crosswal. and wardng dgns, nate law crosswalk dgnagA Rectangular Rapid Flashing 1,,[010 ,R1,13), and Median where feed.(R.omm,.,d) 0 95 miles) Bicycle Priori, Signals, Actuators ,. . calming dewces should be considered„ the NW,.,hand b.,hs,.aat.«..e o... (.6smiles) Add bicycle lanes Merged Cresswalgs and warning dgno :tato law crosswalk dgnago. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Boacons RREB), and ModienreFugos where Foadblo (Rocommended) Extends Sharrow payment markings fu m] (0 25 miles)P, lanes (Proposed) (o.as mile:) I SUBSTITUTED Kimley Horn JipecI Meru f. pe.!unce evncr tora,lye Ma • Over 50 recomr. rr I SUBSTITUTED r) I primarily ride my bicycle: I SUBSTITUTED Column Ben Ple Map • For pieaswe/as a hobby • For multiple uses (please describe) • To commute to work To conduct errands • To the bus/train station Other response 1 Sort Answers Count Percentage • p'.easure/asa hobby For muhple uses (please descrbe) To commute to work To conduct errands To the bus/train station 144 52 27 18 7 Community Engagement Survey • Identify primary purpose of ride • Favorite place to ride in the City r' (6) Covrtmodory Trail () Downtown Venetian Causeway (2) 1\4:tall-xi (4) YUckerbac er Cause Coconut Gro 1) To Coral Gables (jo) briCkelik (S Anvihere (5) Underline (ri) 57.83% 20.88% t 0.84% 7.23% 2.81 % Kimley r))Horn GjrpecI M©rn t_.pe.!unce Boner SUBSTITUTED Community Engagement Survey • Concerns about riding in the City • Single most important item to improve bik- etwork When riding my bike in the City, I'm most concerned with: • Safety • Connectivity • Other Weather Percentage 86.77% 6.46% 325% 2 78% How can the City of Miami .' e network be improved, mop -de cable • Protected bike lanes • Path connectivity • Other Bicycle storage/parking Other response 1 Sort Answers Count Percentage Protected eke lanes Path curnecuv.ry Other 8i ycle swrage/parking 311 72 40 72.16% 16,71% 9.28% 186% Kimley Horn Epeci hkrrn Upe mince boiler SUBSTITUTED Community Outreach Survey • Should additional resources be used to improv ke infrastructure • Is there adequate bicycle storage/parking ere you need it? Do you feet more of the City's resources should be used to improve bicycle infrastructure? [ninnm Answers CO nt • Yes Percentage Is there proper bicycle sto parking available where you need it? Answers Count Percentage 96.06% No 3.94% Yes Kimley )) Horn Eaceci ik,n sp„n.ine •one, Interactive Bicycle Infrastructure Map • Created to capture public input overlaid on the current bicycle network • City of Miami requests your help to promote and publicize our efforts to i w3 Miami Bicycle Master Plan- Public Engagement Find address or place Abaft Welcome! Your input is needed! This site was developed as a way for the public to provide recommendations and feedback on the types of projects they would like to see Included as part of the City of Miams Bicycle Master Plan. ® To submit a recommendation or comment, click the editing icon in the top left corner of the screen (second icon from the left). I SUBSTITUTED roving bicycle infrastructure! Kimley r))Horn n eu M©rn f_.pe,,once Boner SUBSTITUTED Interactive Map Feedback • Community feedback is essential to the creation of the bicycl: •Ian • Recommendations from the residents of The City of Mia Initial feedback includes: • Dedicated/protected bicycle facilities to prevent c • Connectivity • Underline and 1-395 Heritage Trail • Downtown to 79th Street Causeway • 10th/11th Streets • Baywalk • Increased access to Neighbor ► •od Greenways • Improved signal timings o- :iscayne Boulevard • 29th 30th, 32nd Stre • Secure bicycle par ' g • Scooter parki :. ocks from parking/driving in bike lanes Kimley'r»Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler Next Steps • Bike Network Assessment • Input for prioritizing and ranking • What input does the Committee have? • Policy Assessment & State of Practice • Coordination with Friends Groups • Additional public outreach • Ideas for public outreach? • Next SAC after B. - etwork/Policy Assessment I SUBSTITUTED Or wing Order 0 Map I 0 Munitivaliry,pely a 1[IPM' rreca tons (Point) a 0 Prenam Recommendations lime) A p R,e«elwreStam a [.a'I Gamma, I 0 besemep_mae_roed 202>_m A D Srm(,Helo ark 0 Hybrid Rehmae layer 0 World Imogene Kimley I))Horn npeu Morn ftpenance eoncr I SUBSTITUTED Thank you for your participation Friends of the SUBSTITUTED nderline Meeting February 1, 2022 Friends of the Underline Meeting Summary Tuesday, February 1, 2022 1 11:00 a.m. Microsoft Teams Attendees: City of Miami Collin Worth Kimlev-Horn Adrian Dabkowski Saige Killion FDOT Tiffany Gehrke Friends of The Underline Aaron DeMayo Alex Larmier Carlos Cruz-Casas Eric Barton Kurt Kaminer Meg Daly Patrice Gillespie Smith Roberta Infinite Source Communications Veronica Fernandez Purpose of the presentation: The project team conducted a eeting to provide an update regarding the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan. The meeting ' ovided an opportunity for the project team to field comments, questions, and other consi' -rations from those present. Questions/Comment • Ms. Patrice illespie Smith asked how Mr. Adrian Dabkowski would define a bike boulevar o r. Dabkowski stated that a bike boulevard would consist of sharrow markings supplemented with bike boulevard signage. He stated the team would follow National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidelines. Mr. Dabkowski asked if there was a concern in implementing green -colored pavement in conjunction with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). o Ms. Tiffany Gehrke stated that her main concern is always cut -through traffic at high speeds. She commented that sharrow markings would be following the Florida Green Book, not the FDOT Design Manual (FDM). She noted the team would have to design very slow streets. 1 • Mr. Eric Barton asked what the rationale was for including sharrows in the master plan, as they do not slow down traffic or protect cyclists. o Mr. Dabkowski stated these would be combined with the signage. • Ms. Gehrke stated that true traffic -calming measures would be needed to help slo down motorists. She commented that these measures would need to accompany bike boulevards. • Mr. Kurt Kaminer asked for clarification regarding the definition of bike •.ulevards. o Mr. Dabkowski explained bike boulevards aim to lower traffic olumes, lower speed, and prioritizes travel for cyclists. He stated that NA 0 guidelines show sharrows in addition to signage. He commented the tea was considering adding green pavement markings in addition to the sharrow : nd signage to reinforce the sharing of the road. He stated the bike boulevards would only be implemented on local roadways with lower spe- .s and facility connectivity. • Mr. Kaminer asked whether a bi-directional two -la street with fairly low speeds and connectivity with local neighborhood streets wo d be considered for a bike boulevard, or simply potential narrowing. o Mr. Dabkowski stated the street w• 4 Id be potentially narrowed, and that a bike boulevard would not be propos- . on such a street. • Mr. Kaminer asked whether the te- had contacted FDOT District Four about their success with green -painted sharrs. o Mr. Dabkowski respo ed no; however, it would be something they could certainly do. • Ms. Meg Daly stated t►:t if a signage is required, there is a much deeper problem related to safety. She stres d the importance of an intuitive and safe network. She commented that protected b' lanes was the best solution. She mentioned the problem of stop and start-up bike I. es. • Mr. Aaro' leMayo asked if the map included existing facilities, and whether the team was s gesting the removal of some existing facilities. Mr. Dabkowski commented that the existing facilities were not shown on the map, and that existing facilities were not going to be removed. Mr. DeMayo stated that along the Venetian Causeway— even with semi -protected lanes, signage, and radar— drivers move quite fast. He stated that sharrows would be good for interconnectivity between main streets, but that protected lanes would be key. 2 • Mr. DeMayo was walked through the existing facilities layer of the map. • Mr. Kaminer asked about how the new master plan would address NW 14Street, which has a combination of both buffered bike lanes and unprotected bike lanes. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that the team would take a look at that. o Ms. Gehrke stated that NW 14 Street was included in the FDOT draft bik_ etwork plan. She commented that it would be important to ensure the City of '' iami and FDOT match their efforts. • Mr. Dabkowski stressed that the sharrows are simply one treatment t is being considered for the bike boulevards. He noted sharrows would not b placed throughout the entire city. • Mr. Kaminer suggested including chicanes for traffic -calming easures. o Mr. Dabkowski stated there are several areas in tCity of Miami where chicanes are proposed as future traffic -calming improv- ents in addition to other measures like speed tables, raised intersect'. s and roundabouts. • Mr. Barton asked how the team would ensure e master plan was followed and not forgotten. o Mr. Dabkowski stated the master . an would be readily accessible on the website. He stressed the importance of -.cusing on city facilities, while also working with the other agency partners. o Ms. Gehrke stated FDOT r akes its decisions based upon existing and adopted plans, city resolutions, d support from the Miami -Dade Transportation Organization (TPO). e noted the master plan would impact future FDOT projects. • Ms. Gillespie Smith ted The Underline would be expanding by the end of next year, which will attract •ditional bikers and walkers. She asked if the team was proposing bike lanes over the ► .rth Miami bridge. o Mr. '-rlos Cruz-Casas stressed the importance of protected bike lanes along the b :g • Ms. ► eg Daly asked how the team was proposing to connect the Heritage Trail with The Un:erline. o Mr. Dabkowski stated the team has not yet developed a plan. o Ms. Daly stated that herself and Mr. Worth had discussed 2nd Avenue as a possibility for the connection. She stated that reaching out to the community in Overtown would be important. 3 • Ms. Gillespie Smith asked Ms. Gehrke if adding bike lanes to 7th and 8th Avenue was off the table. o Ms. Gehrke stated the PD&E study concluded a no build, they will be looking a alternative routes and would be happy to meet to discuss further. • Mr. Worth stated the City of Miami was working with Miami -Dade County to cnect The Underline. He stated that a greenway would also be provided to enhance sa ' ty with a direct connection. • Ms. Gillespie Smith asked if there was a goal to get a certain numbe- .f streets with bike facilities. o Mr. Worth stated that the team did not have a target i ' mind. He commented setting targets to demonstrate implementation cou . be useful. o Ms. Gehrke stated that a post -evaluation could b' conducted to confirm that people are feeling comfortable using bike bou ards and that speeds are what they should be. • Mr. Barton thanked Mr. Dabkowski for includi►: the group in the outreach and expressed his support for the plan. Action Items: N/A 4 SUBSTITUTED Plan Z De = ign Team Meeting February 1, 2022 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan Plan Z Meeting Summary Tuesday, February 1, 2022 1 10:00 a.m. Microsoft Teams Attendees: City of Miami Collin Worth Kimley-Horn Adrian Dabkowski Saige Killion Plan Z Bernard Zyscovich Infinite Source Communications Veronica Fernandez Purpose of the presentation: The project team conducted a meeting to update th- ity of Miami on the Bicycle Master Plan. The meeting provided an opportunity for the projec eam to field comments, questions, and other considerations from those present. Questions/Comments: • Mr. Bernard Zyscovich stated th- e is a disconnect between those who ride for pleasure and those who ride for physic, activity. He commented that some riders are resistant to bicycle infrastructure beca they feel it limits their ability to ride when and how they want. He outlined fractur• within the bicycle community and stated that Plan Z was focused on building a s e and independent space for commuter cyclists. • Mr. Zyscovich stat• • that a bicycle -friendly city does not exist. He noted the question in the survey press ted by the project team should include a question asking ""if it was safe, would you co mute?" and added that this might yield a higher percentage of riders who commute. noted he could engage with the City of Miami officials to encourage cycling leadersh.. and stated the importance of showcasing that the community wants to comm e by bicycle. • Adrian Dabkowski asked Mr. Zyscovich if the community would start using dedicated nd protected bike facilities if they were built downtown. Mr. Zyscovich stated absolutely. He noted that conducting a survey and finding commuter riders was important. He mentioned the facilities would attract commuters; however, a safe network for the entire commute would be necessary. 1 • Mr. Dabkowski presented a map that highlights a grid network of bike boulevards (Blvd.) on traffic -calm local streets to protect cyclists in locations where there are no dedicated bike lanes. o Mr. Zyscovich stated that cycling through less traveled streets makes sense for cyclists, specifically on traffic peak -hours. • Mr. Zyscovich asked about streets without signalization and if hazard flashers wo d be utilized o Mr. Dabkowski stated that flashers are an option, but the team woul- ave to investigate further. o Mr. Zyscovich noted that a graphic design may be necessary to . velop the signage and directional information for cyclists. o Mr. Dabkowski agreed and stated the project is incorporati ' : signage that follows the established guidelines from the National Association City Transportation Officials (NACTO). Some guidelines include green -color• . roadway markings. Mr. Dabkowski will confirm if these can be used. • Mr. Zyscovich mentioned the lack of respect from motosts towards bicycle lanes and stated it would be ideal to introduce the process in p ses. He stated the first phase could educate and bring awareness to proper bike lane si age, while the second phase could assist with the increased ridership and eventuall stablish a system. Mr. Zyscovich also highlighted the bicycle lane and pedestrian dy► : mics of Copenhagen, noting that there are three elevations: the street, the bike Ian •, and the sidewalk. • Mr. Zyscovich noted that green paint a . dashed line on the roadway is the best approach for bringing awareness to the designed bike lanes. He stated that motorists should not be traveling at high speeds, such a 0 miles per hour (mph) next to pedestrians and cyclist. • Mr. Zyscovich stated the Ci of Miami could consider different resources to distribute the message to the communi ' He noted that for the bike Blvd., partnering with his non- profit agency and the P . rks Department could be useful. He stated that including bike routes adjacent to p s, schools and supermarkets would promote connectivity. • Mr. Zyscovich s gested breaking the Geographic Information System (GIS) map into layers to bett- target specific audiences. He added that identifying zip codes below the poverty lev• could help alleviate food desserts, noting that the bicycle network could improve obility and economic situations. He explained the freedom that bicycles bring and th- r economic impact. • . Collin Worth asked if Mr. Zyscovich could share the project survey with his network atabase. o Mr. Zyscovich stated yes and asked the team to also send a copy to Grace Perdomo with Transit Alliance. Action Items: Send the survey to Mr. Zyscovich and Transit Alliance. 2 SUBSTITUTED Commodore Trail De gn Team Meeting February 25, 2022 Miami Bicycle Network Public Engagement Map- Commodore Trail Comments *The highlighted/light blue line is the segment related to the comment shown in the pop-up window Public Submitted Comment #1 .-..',-,-;,,•:Z4'.±45-E"-i--0r,z3;4•,,;!.. ;11P-E4C • .',---77-7t • -7 — ';'-' in stlyn•Ardist• • — , - .,..,,,v 2,,,. .. '12,-.•,,,,- . . .10,4V, ,...,'::-4r,:;.: 7. ... ..' . 1! ..• ' - • . ' 'I: . 1.1R @Rail- V:i zc 11 Li _ INI`g Wit ki : il ' : - . ' . ' "4 •.. 3 '1. - 7.1y --:',"-- '•,:' ..- - " '' ,,,:' • -,...", ', • -5, -, WLL -".-Z •:.:. 41! _ see .ed along = - rifled corridor Please describe your recommendation Buffered/Protected Bike Lane The Commodore Trail is,'t much of a trail if it disappears into a sidewalk or a muddy strip of orass. Design concepts already exist + funding sources via the Friends of the Commodore Trail. Should be put into action immediately. 1 SUBSTITUTED Public Submitted Comment #2 .�. -•8W22 deprt =._ s 2 n d sr a: D- qIF L�', q a g"22nd Tar k;aYW+ 'Si effIBluff Public Submitted Recommendation facility you would like see constructed g the identified idor ease describe your ecommendation fast g fitness ers to Key Biscayne existing bike lane. Full time resident 2 SUBSTITUTED Public Submitted Comment #3 Public Submitted Recommendation Setect the type of Buffered/Protected bike facility you Bike Lane would like to see constructed along the identified corridor ''ease describe acommendation What is conn_ e the striped, rotected lanes with parking - protected lanes. Full time resident lease provide the 33134 zip code you reside Zoom to Edit 3 SUBSTITUTED Public Submitted Comment #4 Select the type of bike facility you would like to see constructed along the identified corridor dents and residents use 17 ave through to corla way as us-1 to get to school/work every morning and evening. A fully separated and protected bike lane would make a big difference. 4 Public Submitted Recommendation Select the type of bike facility you would like to see constructed along the identified corridor Please describe your recommendati. at is your connection to the City of Miami Zoom to Edit Public Submitted Comment #5 ?retch of bike ne isn't protected, Protect it and add a protected intersection at Brickell and 2tth. Full time resident SUBSTITUTED 5 SUBSTITUTED Public Submitted Comment #6 Public Submitted Recommendation Se,ea the type o' Buffered/Protected bike faciiity you Bike Lane would I ike to see constructed along the identified corridor Neese describe Connect the your nclerline/M-Path recommendation with the Commodore Trail with quality protected bike infrastructure. Choosing SW 26th as SW 25th is a kilibox. Full time resident ,e' .., ...„..,V" ' ,,- --Fr rc--' `71. ' • - - --. ''.. *;.:',"' ' . -lir ' - -..,........ ..... „ ,...or ' . # , --.- -16-r:- 6 What syour i ZOOM to Edit ** :.,.. .11ri:• • ir -, ,* . L. • '''' -r , . .,. -, d'n 5. 44," Bl i r; 4; C...'1) C t 9,''' : 1 SUBSTITUTED Gac©nurGrove. f'k. •Tcr nis C.cu++rts. -_ , ,<� 191 (l of5) Il. ❑ X Select the type of Buffered/Protected bike facility you Bike Lane would like to see constructed along the dentified corridor Please describe This entire stretch of your the Commodore Trail rocommendaton essentially doesn't exist (unless you count the sidewalk as bike infrastructure; it isn't. This entire stretch should become a parking protected, dual- cvrletrae.k. K- Zoom to Edit Public Submitted Comment #7 • orrlip Ave •r 7 SUBSTITUTED Public Submitted Comment #7 (cont.) -'- rt . y; Earnnut: Grovo MiniPark homati recommendation .. cesn't Zoom to Edlt Tthe+Barnacle d-1-1istorl at P. rk.... co.:n: >awalkas bike -- -::: cture; it isn:. : •e stretc- s beco_ .:_ - cyc.-rac<.Kimley- Horn a ready drew plans for such a design in 2015 + other bike lane concepts have existed for this area since the 1980's. It's about t they're put into action. 8 Public Submitted Comment #8 �f• Public Submitted Recommendation Sefact the type of bike Conventional facility you would like Bike Lane to see constructed along the identified corridor Please describe your Connectivity for recommendation fitness riders to existing bike lanes .Nhat is your onnection to the City of Miami Please provide the zip code you reside in Zoom to Edit SUBSTITUTED ,riitoriL m & Marina.- . 9 Friends of the Comm SUBSTITUTED ore Trail Meeting March 4, 2022 Miami Bicycle Masterplan Friends of Commodore Trail Meeting Summary Friday, March 4, 2022 1 11:30 a.m. Microsoft Teams Attendees: City of Miami Collin Worth Kimley-Horn Adrian Dabkowski Saige Killion Friends of Commodore Trail Hank Sanchez -Resnik Mary Munroe Seabrook Juhi Saigal-Shah Lotte Purkis Infinite Source Communications Alexander Coicou Purpose of the presentation: The project team conducted a meeting to prov .e an update regarding the City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan. The meeting provided an opportunity fthe project team to field comments, questions, and other considerations from those present. Questions/Comments: • Mr. Hank Sanchez-Resni stated the importance of a simple and easy to understand map, which would show the main - commended bike routes. o Mr. Adrian ►. bkowski asked if it would be easier to turn off the map layers and instead go with a reet map. o Mr. Sa ez-Resnik supported this idea. • Ms. Mary ► unroe Seabrook stated that one of the main issues with the Commodore Trail is getting it, indicating that there are very few lighted crosswalks for people to cross safely, espec', ly in the South Grove. Mr. Dabkowski stated that the team would be gathering information from the City, noting that the information would be incorporated into the Master Plan. Ms. Munroe Seabrook asked who would be responsible for the crosswalks. o Mr. Dabkowski commented that it would most likely include base connections, which would then tie into the network the project team is considering. He asked if there was a specific area that needed crosswalks or crossovers for connectivity. • Ms. Munroe Seabrook commented that there are several. She noted that Ingram and Dougl. ' is perfectly set up for connectivity. She mentioned Edgewater and Ingram, as well as Natom. She emphasized the lack of crosswalks in Bay Heights and stated that these intersections ar signalized yet lack the pedestrian and bike connectivity needed to serve the communi • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik stated that there would be considerable overlap between th• Master Plan and the Commodore Trail project, as well as the South Bay Shore Drive projec e commented on good coordination between multiple jurisdictions. He mentioned that th= ew Master Plan should not include sharrows anywhere. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik mentioned the South Grove traffic calming progr m, stating that it was going to present a lot of opportunities for cyclists. • Ms. Juhi Saigal-Shah reiterated the importance of crosswalks . d continuity along the trail. • Ms. Lotte Purkis stated that the priorities of stakeholders , ere connectivity, protected bike lanes, effective crosswalks, quality signage, and safety.: e mentioned popular routes for children, including the Commodore Trail and the Ric, nbacker. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik asked if the new Master PI. would include "armadillos" and whether or not they would become a city-wide device. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that the sepators would be concrete, not armadillos. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik asked if bike lane ill be raised. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that e team is proposing raised bike lanes where they make sense. He mentioned the '' iami Avenue Bridge and the wide sidewalk located there. He stated that they are fo sing on areas that can accommodate raised lanes. • Ms. Munroe Seabrook co ► ented that armadillos over for flexibility when jumping between lanes, while raised curb imit access between car lanes and bike lanes. • Another attendee ted that armadillos might be a possible solution when considering ADA requirements. • Mr. Sanche •esnik noted that the Commodore Trail was a multi -use facility. He noted this distinction n comparison to dedicated and protected bike lanes. • Mr. : nchez-Resnik stated that people park motor vehicles in bike lanes. He said that the new M.. er Plan would have to include a clear and enforceable strategy for keeping people from rking in bike lanes. o An attendee stated that the Carrollton School protects pedestrians by intentionally parking police cars on the trail. • Ms. Saigal-Shah asked about the survey results associated with the Master Plan. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that this data was shared with the City. He noted that the comments were focused on protected bike lanes, traffic calming, and right-of-way. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik noted that using secondary routes can be misleading, especially co . dering that cyclists do not like avoiding busy streets and taking indirect routes. He mentione• problems in Coconut Grove, including sidewalk cafes and street parking. He asked if the publiould be involved in the creation of the Master Plan. o Mr. Dabkowski stated that public workshops were not in the scope, an' it was more focused on public outreach. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik mentioned political redistricting and stressed the i •ortance of a transparent and public -facing process. • Ms. Purkis asked how public outreach is being conducted. She ntioned a multimodal mobility event at the University of Miami. o Mr. Dabkowski said that the team was required to - end three events and would be happy for recommendations. • Mr. Sanchez -Resnik mentioned BikeSafe and the Un' ersity of Miami Medical School. He noted that they had been great partners. o Ms. Purkis stated that they were the or : nizers of the event she discussed above, and she said she would be happy to reac .ut to the organizers. • Ms. Saigal-Shah asked about the safety a• .ects of the Commodore Trail. She wondered if there was going to be a safety assessment r ort. o Mr. Dabkowski said he was •t sure, and would have to reach out to the trail design team. • Mr. Dabkowski thanked the ' -eting participants for their time and input. Action Items N/A City Adm istration Meeting March 16, 2022 4111;,' Agenda itt Introduction Key Elements Literature Co unity and Timeline Review i utreach Policy SUBSTITUTED Network Next Steps Determination Introduction This plan is an update to the City's 2009 Bicycle Master Plan Focus on developing cost feasible bicycle infrastructure plan for the next 20 years Will identify network connectivity gaps and opportunities to develop a safe, equitable, and accessible bicycle network Review and provide recommendations for first/I mile connectivity to transit Improvements will be included in Improvement Plan as well as f Long -Range Transportation an y's Capital he County's SUBSTITUTED Corridor Specific Recommendation Mutt -Purpose =e: • • • • Separated B'ke_a=e • • • • Convent oriel B4e _e,e •••• Other • • • • Buffered/Protected Bike Lane Location Specific Recommendation Bike Perking Needed Bike Share Station Needed Traffic Signal Needed iii. Dffficukto Cross Street or lntersecoon a Sigeage or Markings Needed Mid -Block Crossing or Men e- re`___ ared Barrier or Resviaed Access Public Restroore Feo6ities Needed Other MetroMover Stations MetroRail Stations City of Miami Boundary Kimley r))Horn n eU Myra t pe.!ence Boner Key Elements and Timeline Mo► Activity 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 Task 1. Study Administration and Coordination Task 2. Literature Review Task 3. Community Outreach _. I I I Task 4. Policy Assessment & State of the Practice ' Task 5. Bicycle Network Assessment Task 6. Develop Project Implementation Phasil _ 'Dan Task 7. Develop Final Report Kimley r))Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler Literature Review Previous bicycle planning initiatives and projects in City of Miami were used to identify recen constructed and planned bicycle infrastructure. Understanding the current bicycle network along with for recommendations will formulate the bicycle network improvements outlined in this pl Existing and planned bicycle infrastructure was documented in a database and G apping The following documents were reviewed: • TPO SMART Trails Master Plan • TPO Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan • TPO Flagler Trail Master Plan a 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan a Biscayne Green a Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan • The 1-395 Heritage Trail a Commodore Trail a The Underline • Plan Z '4 FLAGLEI TRAIL' xon,arwao 2009 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan a The Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Wynwood Streetscape Master Plan a City of Miami Traffic Management Master Plan a City of Miami Scooter Pilot Data Kimley 4 Horn E,peci h4„n E,pn',.inco €cane, Proposed Bicycle Facilities • 17 Literature review documents • Over 450 proposed bicycle facility projects identified in City of Miami • These projects will be incorporated into the plan and maps 2009 City of Miami Bioyole Master Plan 2065 Fyliarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 20651Alarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan 20651Alarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Little Ilayana Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Plan Biscayne Green 2065 Karr) Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 20451ArambEtatle Bleyole Pedestrian Master Plan 2012 Health Etistnot Bioyole and Pedestrian Mobility Elan (200i NI 2012 Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan (DOFFS 20651Alarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan Little 5layana Bicycle 5 Pedestrian Mobility Plan Little Hayana Bmysle & Pedestrian Mobility Elan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan 2012 Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan Little Hayana Bmysle & Pedestrian Mobility Elan Little hlayana Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan Little Hayana Bmysle & Pedestrian Mobility Elan 2012 Health Etistnot Bmyole and Pedestrian Mobility Elan (Miami 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan 20651Alarni Bade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan 20451ArambEtatle Bleyole Pedestrian Master Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan 2012 Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan Boy of Marro Traf lc Management Master Plan 2012 Health Etistnot Bmyole and Pedestrian Mobility Elan (Miami 2012 Health Etistnot Bmyole and Pedestrian Mobility Elan (Miami Little Hanna Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Plan Little Ilayana Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Plan Little 5layana Bicycle 5 Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan Little Hanna Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Plan 2009 City oF Harr) Bicycle Master Plan TPO Biagio Trail 2009 City of Iyhami Bmtmle Master Plan 2009 City of Iyhami Bmyole Master Plan North y R.el rem20u&t.eetosAso71 Bicycle Fnellity Improvements North Greenway Iron, Loral Way to South Greene, Drive Bicycle Fnellity Improvements North Greenway Iron, SR-9i2IMV &met to South Greene,. Drive Bmyole Lanes Bmyole Routes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bmyole Lane Bmyole Lanes North Karr) Avenue From NW 12th Street to NW 5th Street Bicycle Fnellity Improvements North Karr) Avenue? NE-Ist .1,1111, iron. NW 56 Street to NW 12th Avenue Bicycle Fneilities North Miami Avenue? NE-Ist .1,1111, iron. NW 56 Street to NW 12th Street Bicycle Fnellity Improvements North Michigan A,1111[ {1011, BOJI[V,Id SR-20) Bmyole Lanes Bmyole Facilities Bicycle Faeilities North Michigan f tom SR.907 to West 4ith Street North Row Ltrive at NW 14th AMMO NW 12th Street North Row Drive at NW 12 th Bicycle Fnellity Improvements Northshore Open Spnee BenchwalL From rath Street to 82th Street Safe Crossings Safe Crossings Shared.Bse Markings Bicycle Lane Short -Term Bicycle Parking Bicycle Bouleyards Bteyele Len., Bioyole Lanes Bicycle Fneility Improvements Shared -Use Lane Markings Bteyele Len., Gteenway Bmyole Route Shared -Use Paths1Greenways Bicycle Fneility Improvements Bmyole Lanes Short -Term Bicycle Parking Neighborhood Connections Bicycle Lane: Bmyole Lanes SaFe Crossings SaFe Crossings Safe Crossings Bmyole Lanes SaFe Crossings Bicycle Lane: Bicycle Lane Shared.Bse Markings NW 11th Menu, I rom NW lIgh Street to NW With Ayenud NW 15th Street NW 11th Menu, rorn 4fith Street to NW 67th Street NW 11th Street rom NW 27th Menu, to NW 22nd Avenue NW 11th Street.' my 14TH Court from NW 27th AVM. to ith Street N1212 f tom NW 71,1,ft to Coral Way NW 12th Pathway Greenway Iron. NW 62nd Street to NW itlo Street NW 12th Street rem NW 13fith Menu, to Telernundo Way NW 12th Court From NW 12th Street to NW 14th Street NW 12th Street Lane From NW 40th Street to NW 46th Street 1.1 Street between NW 22 Aye., and SR 2INW 2i Menu, NW 14 Stteet f tom NW 1..111, to NW MVP. NW 12th Memo O NW 2nd Street NW 14th Menu, A NW ith Street 1.1th Menu, A West ',glen Street NW 14th Street rem NW 22 owe to NW 22th Avenue NW 14th Street rem NW 1,1111,65 NE lOth MOO. OFI-Road Bicycle Facility Improvement FLU unded) OFI-Road Bicycle Facility Improvement FLU unded) 5 miles of bicycle lane: 4.45 mile Lvoyele route. Sign: and wobility Extends Sharrow payment markings 64 miles) Bicycle Facility Improvements (funded YIN 20.1.0 Plan) Dedicated On-Rond Bicycle Fnellity trio SLR,P, Oft -Road Bicycle Facility Improvement Llintundedl Install a bike 1,811,1 bus stop (Recommended) OFI-Road Bicycle Facility Improvement Mailed G.e_.,l,and warning signs, statelaw cre...,l gm RectangularRapid vrRR.e),and Mmen swhere feasible <R.ommen lnrNe. Bicycle Priority Signal,he considered ,tthe NW54thand Nwb2naintersection TIP) Bicycle Facility Improv s (funded YIN 20.1.0 Plan) Extends Sharrow nt markings miles) n,m.athe numb.of stops tor bleyolists,A omme ed, path r,miles) e,a Bicycle Facility Improvement(LI..ed) Center:ion el one on -street palling spnee to bicycle rad, (Recommended) Buffered bicycle lanes (both directions) Shallows (Proposed) Mailed Cresswallw and warning signs, state law ere:swath signage. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons FRREB), and Median reFuges where Feasible (Recommended) retailed Gros:wall, and warning signs, nate law crosswalk signagm Rectangular Rapid Flashing 1,,[010 ,R1,13), and Median where feasible(R.omme.ed) 0 95 miles) Bioyole Ptiority SignalWAstuatorsandlot bolt to calming deemes should be considered at the NW 54th and 64th StILLt inte.e.ono (.63miles) Ad,e,ryola lanes Mailed Cresswallw and warning signs, state law ere:swath signage. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons FRREB), and Median reFugeeteh ommended) Extends Sharrow payment markings r1.4 (0 25 miles)P, lanes (Proposed) (o.as miles) wpayment manioy=0 mile) I SUBSTITUTED Kimley Horn JipecI Meru f. pe.!unce evncr I SUBSTITUTED Community Engagement Survey • Identify primary purpose of ride • Favorite place to ride in the City A Park (6) Covrtmoiclore^rai] (}Dowmown Miami (4) Venetian Causeway (2.) ebaeerCaiasew ral bies (Ja� }e rove -c� �e�t ere (') brickell (S) Underline ("7 I primarily ride my bicycle: Hide table SUBSTITUTED Column Bar Pie Map • For pleasure/as a hobby For multiple uses ° (please describe) • To commute to work To conduct errands • To the bus/train station Other response Empty categories Tj Sort Answers Count Percentage For pleasure/asp hobby For mu ((pie uses (please describe) To commutes° work To conduct errands To the bus/craw station 413 153 62 44 10 60.12% 2227% 9.02% 6.4% 146% Kimley r))Horn apes, More t pernance Boner 502 115 55 73 94% 16.74% 8.15% 1.16% Community Engagement Survey • Concerns about riding in the City • Single most important item to improve bike • -twork When riding my bike in the City, Pre na•:n_G .:hh SUBSTITUTED How can the City of Miami bicycle . vork be improv,1 • Safety • Protected bike lanes • Connectivity • Path connectivity • Other • Other Weather Bicycle storage/parking H.de table Other response _m t,1 careger:es 11 Sort Answers Count Percentage 602 07-63% =annecevrty 48 6.99% Other 2 32% Weather 14 204% ,:... gad sk:� Hide table Other response 1 Sort Answers Count Percentage Protected bike Janes Path cannecevhy Ocher Bicycle storage/parking Kimley 1))Horn rpeci Morn L_.penonce Boner Community Outreach Survey • Should additional resources be used to improve bi, - infrastructure • Is there adequate bicycle storage/parking wh- you need it? Do you feel more of the City's resources should be used to improve bicycle infrastructure? Percentage is there proper bicycle storage/parking a • No . Yes Sort Answers Count Percentage 390 56.77% 291 42.36% Answered: 681 skopped:6 Kimley )) Horn 'seed Lsix.r,ento Eorie, 10 SUBSTITUTED Interactive Bicycle Infrastructure Map • Created to capture public input overlaid on the current bicycle network • City of Miami requests your help to promote and publicize our efforts to impr ing bicycle infrastructure! 3 Miami Bicycle Master Plan- Public Engagement A6wt Welcome! Your input is needed! This site was developed as a way for the public to provide recommendations and feedback on the types of projects they would like to see included as part of the City of Miams Bicycle Master Plan. ® To submit a recommendation or comment, click the editing icon in the top left corner of the screen (second icon from the left). Kimley r))Horn npeu Meru f.xpe,,once eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide • State -of -the -practice solutions aimed at creating complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists. • Design standards and best practices for bicycle facilities, intersection treatments, a bikeway signing and marking. • Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensiti Approach • Strategies for effective network planning for walkable areas and stree guidelines. General principles and considerations regarding bicycle es. • Project for Public Spaces • Initiative promotes great streets as backbone of success . communities, redefining spaces that connect people to where they need to go, while - ancing and supporting the destinations they serves • Bicycle Friendly Businesses • Encourage businesses to be bicycle frie y • 4 criteria: engineering, education, - couragement, and evaluation and planning • Fifteen -Minute Cities • Everyone living in that city access to essential urban services within a 15-minute walk or bike e design WHAT MAKES A g GREAT PLACE? a SEE, foR PUBLIC SPACES SUBSTITUTED SOCIABILITY ACCESSb LINKAGES COMFORT b IMAGE etth▪ . 4y_ Kimley ))Horn E+eeci Lspor,ento bone, Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • US Census Journey to Work Data • Multimodal • Replica • Multimodal data • Publicly available data set that uses US Census, Ian • .se regulations, aggregate mobile location, credit transaction da ., and real estate transaction data • BikeSafe • University of Miami KiDZ Neuroscienc: enter initiative focus on bicycle safety for children ages 10 to 14. • Mission to prevent pediatric yclists hit -by -car through education, promote physical activity, and adv. -: e for safer cycling environments. I SUBSTITUTED Miami, FL Mode Split Trip volume - this geography, typical weekday Week of -g 23, 2021 to the week of Feb 28, 2022 Change Data 4 Selections 1.0rs Feb 28, 2022 Private Auto 880k 750k�� Transit 58k 50Ok 250k Auto Passenger 200k Other 5.8k • 4S Sep 2021 Oct 2021 Nov 2021 Dec 2021 Jan 2022 Feb 2022 Mar 2022 Private Auto • Transit • Auto Passenger Other Kimley ») Horn E,peci n4„n L,pnr,ence belie, SUBSTITUTED Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Control Measures (TCM) • TDM/TCM strategies improve transportation system effici cy by reducing single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips and provide an env .nment to improve, enhance, and encourage multimodal. • These strategies can provide cost-effective me ods to build capacity in a transportation system by expanding the pa cipation of residents in alternative modes of transportation. • These strategies can be implement as part of the land development process for specific sites and by e City of Miami. rdlultimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies Kimley r))Horn npe4 I Meru t_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Mobility Fee • Would increase funds for capital improvement projects to improve infrastructure and create new transportation facilities to decrease SOV trips • The City of Miami Beach's implemented a mobility fee to fund mobility improvements. Developments are funding mechanisms to support ca•• .1 expenses and transportation facility improvements. • Complete Streets • Miami -Dade Complete Streets Design Guidel' - es • Repurpose public streets right-of-wa o all modes of travel (i.e., transit, bicycle, and w. ng) to promote sustainability, health, and safet •f the community. • FDOT's Context Classification • Eight (8) categories th. .ccount for adjacent land uses, roadway connectivi characteristics, and socioeconomic c , acteristics. • Determines t widths, ty• ' s of facilities needed, and many other feature number of lanes needed, sidewalk I SUBSTITUTED vlultimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies 1 ill 'ilimiiili Ci- Natural CI- 1 C2T- CNR- CSC. 1 C4- CS - Rural Rural "Suburban--' Suburban v Urban U Urban --.. Town Residential Commercial General Center C6. Urban 1\1I11iCy 1 I11 `F/11I npeu Mere C penence rimer Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • New Development Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Strategies • New developments should be required and enforced TDM/TCM plans • Enforcement at time of Certificate of Occupancy issuance • Reduce the impacts of the project traffic on the surrounding roa network • Reduce the reliance on SOV trips and promote multimod- ransportation. • Private developers should consider incorporating strategi- : and methods such as the following: • Creation of an Employee Transportation Coo ; nator position to run the Transportation Control Measures (TCM) p ;:rams. • Subsidized transit passes for employ • Provide secure short-term and I lockers, and lids) • Provide bicycle facilities • adjacent roadway network • Providing a Citibike ion or bike rentals • Wide hallways .ccommodate bicycles -term bicycle parking (bicycle racks, SUBSTITUTED rvlultimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Lancl Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies • Elevators that can accommodate bikes • Bike workroom or shop • Bike washing stations • Bike drop-off/valet service • Secure bicycle parking/bicycle lids • Providing car share Kimley r))Horn xp c, Meru t_.pe.!unce eviler SUBSTITUTED Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Buffered bicycle lanes • Bicycle lanes • Shared use path • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Raised separated bicycle lanes • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized • Signalized • Bicycle Parking • Racks — Short -ter • Lockers, encl• ures, lids — Long-term Kimley r>)Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Low vehicle traffic volume (less than 3,000 vehicles per day (speed limits less than 30 MPH) to give bicycle travel prior' d low speeds • Priority is provided by signs pavement markings, and .ffic calming treatments to discourage trips by vehicles. • Bicycle boulevards tend to be perceived as sa - and more pleasant than routes along busy major roads. • Buffered bicycle lanes • Separate bicycle travel lanes from vehicul ravel lanes with pavement markings creating a buffer. • Typically, seven (7) feet wide incl g three (3) feet of buffer to allow passenger loading and prevent door collisions when a►'.cent on -street parking is present • Bicycle lanes • Provide exclusive sp e for bicyclists next to vehicle travel lanes. Dedicated bike lanes are typically five (5) f wide adjacent to on -street parking. • Shared use pat • Separ. -d from vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier. • - -d by pedestrians, bicyclists, skaters, and runners. M-Path SUBSTITUTED ION .3111 11, 444:15_ Bike Boulevard Buffered Bicycle Lane on SW 1" Street Bicycle Lane on W Flagler Street, west of NW 19th Avenue Kimley »> Horn h4„n _.pnnc.ne €ohe, Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Located within or directly adjacent to the ro. •way • Physically separated from motor vehicl- raffic with a vertical element: a curb, bollards, ' on -street parking. • One-way cycle tracks are ty• ally eight (8) feet and two-way cycle tracks ar- pically 11 feet. • Raised separated bicyc - anes • Raised separated b'- cle lanes use grade separation either at sidewalk grade ► an intermediate grade to give the cyclist further separation SUBSTITUTED Protected Bicycle Lanes Raised separated Bicycle Lanes Kimley r))Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized Limited Access • Right -turn only from the minor street to the major street. • Use center median (peanut) on the major street as a median refuge island for bicy movements. • Portion of the raised center median is removed in order to accommodate b' icles through the median, while prohibiting vehicles. • The preferred width of median refuge islands is a minimum of 10 f-- . However, the minimum width can be as narrow as 6 feet wide. • Unsignalized Full Access • Pavement markings are provided across the intersects - to indicate the path of bicyclist. • Provide a clear path and boundary between thrmovement bicyclists and through or turning vehicles in the adjacent lane. • Crossing markings with green color are t► most impactful to make vehicle aware of bicycle • Signalized • Bike boxes: a designated area an intersection approach in advance of the stop bar pavement marking. • This provides bicyclist ith a safe and visible way to get motorist attention and alert them of the bicyclist duri a red signal phase. • Requires "No n on Red" operation to prevent vehicles from crossing the bike box where exclusive ri -turn lanes are not provided. SUBSTITUTED Median Refuge Island Source: Small Town and Rural Design Guide.com Typical Crossing Markings Source: Nacto.org Bike Box Source: Nacto.org Kimley r))Horn tp c, Meru t_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Bicycle Parking • To facilitate first- last- mile connectivity to transit viable and reliable, secure bicycle parking is essential at transit stations. • Short-term parking that needs to be convenient and easy to use • Long-term parking needs to be secure and sheltered. If bicyclist is parking for two (2) or more hours they will prefer security and shelter above the convenience and eas . short-term parking. • Implement Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), •' cle parking: • Under Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) monitor • Well -lit area • Cordoned -off from the rest of the transit facility with one-w , in and one-way out, and next to a building structure. • Four (4) principles to CPTED including: • Surveillance: people are seen and can be seen • Access Management: users are passively . ected to a specific place, while restricting non- users • Territorial: ownership of an area i .efined by clear boundaries • Facility Quality: well maintai : and high quality environments attract users and aid surveillance. I SUBSTITUTED POST b RING Short -Term Bicycle Racks Source: apbp.org BIKE LOCKERS S WE LTEREO SEC LIR E ENCLOSURE Long -Term Bicycle Parking Source: apbp.org Secure Bike Parking used by Miami -Dade Transit Source: bikelid.com Kimley ») Horn E,.oeci h4„n E.pn.,.inco belie, Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • First- last- mile connectivity to transit • Right-of-way considerations • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods • On -street parking/vehicles parking bicycle lanes • Pedestrian Priority Zones Fuld address or pace I SUBSTITUTED Kimley r))Horn Jrpe4I M, ru ✓<;pe,,orce Etcher I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • Focus on local streets with existing or proposed traffic calm! : provided • Connecting on local streets that have signals at arterials/ : ectors • Connecting on local streets that have median separa s at arterials/collectors • Creating initial grid by providing a quality facility • Reinforcing grid and provide additional conne vity • First- last- mi e connectiv o transit • Quality and secure bi e parking at transit facilities • High ridership loc. ons (over 100 daily boardings and alightings) Kimley ») Horn E.peci h4„n E.pn',.inco €cane, I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Right-of-way considerations • 50-foot ROW Context Sensitive • Local Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Boulevard • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 33' o Assumes any reconstruction would require 6' sidewalks • 50'- 33' = 17' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 0' remaining • One -Way Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Lanes • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 5' sidewalk + 5'sidewalk = 3 • 50'- 30' = 20' — 7.5' on -street parking — 7.5' on -street -par g = 5' bike lane 60-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" ewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 27' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street p- ing = 10' remaining • Therefore, 5' bike lanes + 5' bike Ian 70-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' avel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 37' remaining • 8'6" + 8'6" on -street ► : rking = 16' remaining • Therefore, 8' + 8' e-way protected bicycle lanes or 11' two-way protected bicycle lanes Kimley r))Horn JipecI Meru t pe.!unce eviler I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhood • Providing connectivity to activity centers • Schools, Parks, grocery stores • On -street parking/vehicles parking in bicycle la • Recommend protected bicycle lanes • Do not remove on -street parking for bicycle es as vehicle will still park in the bike lanes C>TIMILSIT • Pedestrian Priority Zone • Little Havana • (Miami River to the north, SW 22nd Avenue to the west) • Prioritize pedestrians a ► . access to transit over other modes 691) Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW • Maintaining clear sidewalk . h for pedestrian travel, aligning curb ramps with sidewalks, requiring crosswalk at all intersections, increasing pedestrian cro . ng times beyond the minimum, reducing travel lane widths, providing shade for sidewalks, reducing speed limits, and elim ' .ting right -turn -on -red in dense pedestrian corridors Kimley r))Horn Gjcpe[I M©r• t_.pe.!unce 6encr Next Steps • Prioritize Network Improvements • Final Report • Additional public outreach • Ideas for public outreach? or God Cord r SUBSTITUTED Or wing Order 0 Map MunicIP+liy,pely •I[I. Pie+rnn reca mass (valor) 0 Previa. Recommendation ILne) +[.+'14reemrrys 0 beaemep_mae_road 202>_m . � Streat,Odelorook Hybrid Rtlamee lam 0 Worb Imagvy Kimley ())Horn np.ci Morn ftpe.ivnce eoncr I SUBSTITUTED 1/' Thank you for your participation SUBSTITUTED Study Advisory C % mmittee Meeting March 30, 2022 x Agenda EZ3 Key Elements and Timeline Update trIttrt Community Outreach Network Determination Next Steps 1 • Key Elements and Timeline Activity Task 1. Study Administration and Coordination Task 2. Literature Review Task 3. Community Outreach Task 4. Policy Assessment & State of the Practice Task 5. Bicycle Network Assessment Task 6. Develop Project Implementation Phasi Task 7. Develop Final Report Plan SUBSTITUTED 0 Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Bettor. Community Outreach • Held meetings with "friends groups" • Underline • Commodore Trail • Plan Z • Provided survey and interactive websit program • Nearly 700 surveys completed • Approximately 250 sugges ' • ns on interactive map • Ideas for other outrea SUBSTITUTED formation to BikeSafe Community Engagement Survey • Identify primary purpose of ride • Favorite place to ride in the City A. Park (6) Commodore Trail (9Down) Venetian Causeway (2.) Wickeribacker o coralGables (ta) Coconut Grove `� Bri ekell (i) rtyw ll ere (5) Underline (7) 1 primarily ride my bicycle: Hide table I SUBSTITUTED V Column Bar pie Map • For pleasure/as a hobby For multiple uses (▪ please describe) • To commute to work To conduct errands • To the bus/train station Other response Empty categories Tl Sort Answers Count Percentage For pleasure/as a hobby For multiple uses (please describe) To commute to work To conduct errands To the bus/train station 413 153 62 44 10 60.12% 22.27% 9.02% 6.4% 1.46% Kimley>»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. 5 Community Engagement Survey • Concerns about riding in the City • Single most important item to improve bike n = ork Whin ri I Answers Safe:, Connectivity Other Weather • Safety • Connectivity • Other Weather Other response - categories 11 Sort Count 602 87 63% 48 6.99% 3.2% 14 2.04% Answered: 686 Skipped: 1 I SUBSTITUTED V • Protected bike lanes • Path connectivity • Other Bicycle storage/parking Hide table .:0 Other response z _ ' 1 Sort Answers Count Percentage Protected bike lens Path connectivity Other Bicycle storage/parking 508 115 56 73.94% 16.74% 8.15% 1.16% Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Community Outreach Survey • Should additional resources be used to improve bi r - infrastructure • Is there adequate bicycle storage/parking wh - - you need it? Do you feel more of the City's resources should be used to improve bicycle infrastructure? _otumn ear Pie Map ty categorie- 1 Sort Percentage 97.09% 2.91% Answered: 687 Skipped: 0 Is there proper bicycle storage/parking ay.' ..le where you need it? Column Bar Pie Map • No • Yes Ernoti catecoroes i 1. Sort Answers Count Percentage 390 291 56.77% 42.36% Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 7 I SUBSTITUTED V Interactive Bicycle Infrastructure Map • Created to capture public input overlaid on the current bicycle network • City of Miami requests your help to promote and publicize our efforts to impr► ing bicycle infrastructure! mi Bicycle Master Plan- Public Engagement — •• + Frndaddr Key tt^e N\ h mi � ais' B Welcome' Your input is needed! This site was developed as a way for the public to provide recommendations and feedback on the types of projects they would like to see included as part of the City of Miami's Bicycle Master Plan. ® To submit a recommendation or comment, click the editing icon in the top left corner of the screen (second icon from the left). Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide • State -of -the -practice solutions aimed at creating complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists. • Design standards and best practices for bicycle facilities, intersection treatments, a bikeway signing and marking. • Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensiti Approach • Strategies for effective network planning for walkable areas and stree guidelines. General principles and considerations regarding bicycle es. • Project for Public Spaces • Initiative promotes great streets as backbone of success . communities, redefining spaces that connect people to where they need to go, while - ancing and supporting the destinations they serves • Bicycle Friendly Businesses • Encourage businesses to be bicycle frie • 4 criteria: engineering, education, - couragement, and evaluation and planning • Fifteen -Minute Cities • Everyone living in that city access to essential urban services within a 15-minute walk or bike I SUBSTITUTED V e design WHAT MAKES A g GREAT PLACE? lPUBLIC SPACES Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Bettor. Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • US Census Journey to Work Data • Multimodal • Replica • Multimodal data • Publicly available data set that uses US Census, Ian• .se regulations, aggregate mobile location, credit transaction d. ., and real estate transaction data • BikeSafe • University of Miami KiDZ Neuroscienc: enter initiative focus on bicycle safety for children ages 10 to 14. • Mission to prevent pediatric •' yclists hit -by -car through education, promote physical activity, and adv.: e for safer cycling environments. Miami, FL Mode Split Trip volume I SUBSTITUTED V his geography, typical weekday Week of g 23, 2021 to the week of Feb 28, 2022 1.0m 500k 250k Change Data 4 Selections Feb 28, 2022� Private Auto 880k 58k Auto Passenger 200k Other 5.8k • Sep 2021 Oct 2021 Nov 2021 Dec 2021 Jan 2022 Feb 2022 Mar 2022 Private Auto • Transit • Auto Passenger Other Kimley »Horn Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Control Measures (TCM) • TDM/TCM strategies improve transportation system effici single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips and provide an env .n improve, enhance, and encourage multimodal. • These strategies can provide cost-effective me ods to build capacity in a transportation system by expanding the pa cipation of residents in alternative modes of transportation. • These strategies can be implement I SUBSTITUTED V �lultimodal Transportation cy by reducing ment to as part of the land development process for specific sites and by e City of Miami. TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets 111 TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies Kimley>»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. 11 I SUBSTITUTED V Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Mobility Fee • Would increase funds for capital improvement projects to improve infrastructure and create new transportation facilities to decrease SOV trips • The City of Miami Beach's implemented a mobility fee to fund mobility improvements. Developments are funding mechanisms to support ca•• .1 expenses and transportation facility improvements. • Complete Streets • Miami -Dade Complete Streets Design Guidel'- -s • Repurpose public streets right-of-wa o all modes of travel (i.e., transit, bicycle, and w. ng) to promote sustainability, health, and safet of the community. • FDOT's Context Classification • Eight (8) categories th. .ccount for adjacent land uses, roadway connectivi characteristics, and socioeconomic c 'acteristics. • Determines t widths, ty• s of facilities needed, and many other feature number of lanes needed, sidewalk vlultimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies a- C1- / C2- /. C2T- C3R- I C3C- C4- � S- \ Natural Rural Rural �Suburban� v Suburban Urban Urban Urban Town Residential Commercial General Center Core min i iiCy 'fi I IUI 1 1 Expect More. Experience Better 12 I SUBSTITUTED V Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • New Development Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Strategies • New developments should be required and enforced TDM/TCM plans • Enforcement at time of Certificate of Occupancy issuance • Reduce the impacts of the project traffic on the surrounding roa ay network • Reduce the reliance on SOV trips and promote multimod- ransportation. • Private developers should consider incorporating strategi - : and methods such as the following: • Creation of an Employee Transportation Coo ; nator position to run the • Transportation Control Measures (TCM) p ':rams. • Subsidized transit passes for employ- • Provide secure short-term and I lockers, and lids) • Provide bicycle facilities • adjacent roadway network • -term bicycle parking (bicycle racks, • Providing a Citibike ion or bike rentals • Wide hallways • • • • ccommodate bicycles • vlultimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets Ai 11 TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies Elevators that can accommodate bikes Bike workroom or shop Bike washing stations Bike drop-off/valet service Secure bicycle parking/bicycle lids Providing car share Kimley)»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. 13 Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Buffered bicycle lanes • Bicycle lanes • Shared use path • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized • Signalized • Bicycle Parking • Racks —Short -ter • Lockers, enclo res, lids — Long-term I SUBSTITUTED V Kimley>»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. I SUBSTITUTED V Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Low vehicle traffic volume (less than 3,000 vehicles per day) d low speeds (speed limits less than 30 MPH) to give bicycle travel prior' • Priority is provided by signs pavement markings, and .ffic calming treatments to discourage trips by vehicles. • Bicycle boulevards tend to be perceived as sa and more pleasant than routes along busy major roads. • Buffered bicycle lanes • Separate bicycle travel lanes from vehicu ravel lanes with pavement markings creating a buffer. • Typically, seven (7) feet wide incl ' g three (3) feet of buffer to allow passenger loading and prevent door collisions when a►'.cent on -street parking is present • Bicycle lanes • Provide exclusive sp e for bicyclists next to vehicle travel lanes. Dedicated bike lanes are typically five (5) f wide adjacent to on -street parking. • Shared use pat • Separd from vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier. • d by pedestrians, bicyclists, skaters, and runners. M-Path gni ACE Bike Boulevard Buffered Bicycle Lane on SW 1" Street Bicycle Lane on W Flagler Street, west of NW 19th Avenue Kimley>>>Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Located within or directly adjacent to the ro- •way • Physically separated from motor vehicl- raffic with a vertical element: a curb, bollards, ► on -street parking. • One-way cycle tracks are ty• ally eight (8) feet and two-way cycle tracks ar- pically 11 feet. SUBSTITUTED Protected Bicycle Lanes Kimley)>I-Iorn Expect More Experience Better. 16 6 Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized Limited Access • Right -turn only from the minor street to the major street. • Use center median (peanut) on the major street as a median refuge island for bicy movements. • Portion of the raised center median is removed in order to accommodate b' cles through the median, while prohibiting vehicles. • The preferred width of median refuge islands is a minimum of 10 f- - . However, the minimum width can be as narrow as 6 feet wide. • Unsignalized Full Access • Pavement markings are provided across the intersects ' to indicate the path of bicyclist. • Provide a clear path and boundary between thrmovement bicyclists and through or turning vehicles in the adjacent lane. • Crossing markings with green color are t► most impactful to make vehicle aware of bicycle • Signalized • Bike boxes: a designated area an intersection approach in advance of the stop bar pavement marking. • This provides bicyclist ith a safe and visible way to get motorist attention and alert them of the bicyclist duri - : a red signal phase. • Requires "No n on Red" operation to prevent vehicles from crossing the bike box where exclusive ri -turn lanes are not provided. I SUBSTITUTED V Median Refuge Island Source: Small Town and Rural Design Guide.com Typical Crossing Markings Source: Nacto.org 111114 %'r cc Bike Box Source: Nacto.org Kimley>>)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 6 Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Bicycle Parking • To facilitate first- last- mile connectivity to transit viable and reliable, secure bicycle parking is essential at transit stations. • Short-term parking that needs to be convenient and easy to use • Long-term parking needs to be secure and sheltered. If bicyclist is parking for two (2) or more hours they will prefer security and shelter above the convenience and eas . short-term parking. • Implement Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), •' cle parking: • Under Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) monitor • Well -lit area • Cordoned -off from the rest of the transit facility with one-w- - in and one-way out, and next to a building structure. • Four (4) principles to CPTED including: • Surveillance: people are seen and can be seen • Access Management: users are passively . ected to a specific place, while restricting non- users • Territorial: ownership of an area i efined by clear boundaries • Facility Quality: well maintai : and high quality environments attract users and aid surveillance. I SUBSTITUTED V POST b RING CORRAL Short -Term Bicycle Racks Source: apbp.org EIKE LOCKERS SHELTERED SECURE ENCLOSURE Long -Term Bicycle Parking Source: apbp.org Secure Bike Parking used by Miami -Dade Transit Source: bikelid.com Kim!ey>>>Horn Expect More Experience Better Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • First- last- mile connectivity to transit • Right-of-way considerations • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods • On -street parking/vehicles parking bicycle lanes • Pedestrian Priority Zones I SUBSTITUTED V Kimley>»Horn Expect More. Experience Bettor. 19 I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • Focus on local streets with existing or proposed traffic calming pro • Connecting on local streets that have signals at arterials/collec : s • Connecting on local streets that have median separators at . terials/collectors • Creating initial grid by providing a quality facility • Reinforcing grid and provide additional connectivit • First- last- mile connectiv to transit • Quality and secure bi e parking at transit facilities • High ridership loc. ons (over 100 daily boardings and alightings) Kimley»>Horn Expect More. Experience Bettor. Network Determination • Right-of-way considerations 50-foot ROW Context Sensitive • Local Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 33' o Assumes any reconstruction would require 6' sidewalks • 50'- 33' = 17' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 0' remaining • One -Way Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Lanes • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 5' sidewalk + 5'sidewalk = 3 • 50'- 30' = 20' — 7.5' on -street parking — 7.5' on -street -pa g = 5' bike lane Bike Boulevard 60-foot ROW SUBSTITUTED • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" •.ewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 27' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street • , ing = 10' remaining • Therefore, 5' bike lanes + 5' bike Ian 70-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 1!' ravel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 37' remaining • 8'6" + 8'6" on-stree :. rking = 16' remaining • Therefore, 8' + 8' • ne-way protected bicycle lanes or 11' two-way protected bicycle lanes Kimley>»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods • Providing connectivity to activity centers • Schools, Parks, grocery stores • On -street parking/vehicles parking in bicycle lanes • Do not remove on -street parking for bicycle lanes as v icle will still park in the bike lanes • Recommend protected bicycle lanes as right-o 1 ay allows ,-.neoesmiw • Pedestrian Priority Zone • Little Havana • (Miami River to the north, SW ' Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW 22nd Avenue to the west) • Prioritize pedestrians a - access to transit over other modes • Maintaining clear sidewalk for pedestrian travel, aligning curb ramps with sidewalks, requiring crosswalk at all intersections, increasing pedestrian cro g times beyond the minimum, reducing travel lane widths, providing shade for sidewalks, reducing speed limits, and eliminating right-t -on-red in dense pedestrian corridors Kimley)»Horn Expect Mora. Experience Better. Next Steps • Prioritize Network Improvements • Final Report • Coordination with Friends Groups • Additional public outreach • Ideas for public outreach? EGA Ozz] tea 414 a mea SUBSTITUTED Drawing Order Map • 0 Murvdpalty_poly •Ij Previous Recommendations (Perot) 0 • o Prempna Recommendations • O✓ Bicycle _Facilities • 0 Greenwaya • ❑ Isesem a_route_roae mztBa • ❑ s.reer_Herwo. 0 Hybrid Reference layer Qj World Imagery Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Bettor. I SUBSTITUTED Thank you for your participation Bicycle and Pe • - strian Advisory ommittee Meeting May 10, 2022 Agenda itt Introduction Key Elements Literature Com ► d nity and Timeline Review P treach Policy SUBSTITUTED Network Next Steps Determination Introduction This plan is an update to the City's 2009 Bicycle Master Plan Focus on developing cost feasible bicycle infrastructure plan for the next 20 years Will identify network connectivity gaps and opportunities to develop a safe, equitable, and accessible bicycle network Review and provide recommendations for first/la mile connectivity to transit Improvements will be included in C f s Capital Improvement Plan as well as for e County's Long -Range Transportation Corridor Specific Recommendation Mutt -Purpose =e: • • Separated B'ke_a=e • • • • Conventional B4e _e,e ••••Other • • • • Buffered/Protected Bike Lane Location Specific Recommendation Bike Perking Needed Bike Share Station Needed Traffic Signal Needed iii. Dffficukto Cross Street or lntersecoon a Sigeage or Markings Needed Mid -Block Crossing or Men e- re`___ .ee red Barrier or Resviaed Access Public Restroore Feoiities Needed Other MetroMover Stations MetroRail Stations City of Miami Boundary Kimley r))Horn oat, Morn t pe.!ence Boner I SUBSTITUTED Key Elements and Timeline Mon Activity 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 Task 1. Study Administration and CoordinationRI= I Task 2. Literature Review M Task 3. Community OutreachAM I Task 4. Policy Assessment & State of the Practice Task 5. Bicycle Network Assessment '. Task 6. Develop Project Implementation Phasun: an ... �■ �� Task 7. Develop Final Report Kimley r))Horn Jipe4I Meru t pe.!unce eviler I SUBSTITUTED Literature Review Previous bicycle planning initiatives and projects in City of Miami were used to identify recentl onstructed and planned bicycle infrastructure. Understanding the current bicycle network along with • ••r recommendations will formulate the bicycle network improvements outlined in this pla Existing and planned bicycle infrastructure was documented in a database and GIS apping The following documents were reviewed: • TPO SMART Trails Master Plan • TPO Protected Bike Lanes Master Plan • TPO Flagler Trail Master Plan a 2045 Miami -Dade Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan a Biscayne Green a Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan • The 1-395 Heritage Trail a Commodore Trail a The Underline a Plan Z FLAGLEI TRAIL 009 City of Miami Bicycle Master Plan a The Health District Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Overtown/Wynwood Bicycle Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Little Havana Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility Plan a The Wynwood Streetscape Master Plan a City of Miami Traffic Management Master Plan a City of Miami Scooter Pilot Data Kimley ») Horn E,peci h4„n E,pn',.inco €cane, Proposed Bicycle Facilities • 17 Literature review documents • Over 450 proposed bicycle facility projects identified in City of Miami • These projects will be incorporated into the plan and maps PO 2012 Health Dintrict Bicycle and Pedentrian Mobility Plan 2000 City oF Miami Bicycle Manter Plan Little Hasana Bicycle & Pedentnan Mobility Elan Little Hasa, Bicycle Pedentrian Mobility Plan 2000 City oF Miami Bicycle Manter Plan Little Hasana Bicycle & Pedentnan Mobility Elan 2012 Health Liintnct Bicycle and Pedentnan Mobility Elan Ma 2000 City oF Miami Bicycle Manter Plan 2000 City of lelomi Bicycle Manter Plan 2012 Health Dintrict Bicycle and Pedentrian Mobility Plan 2000 City oF Miami Bicycle Manter Plan Coy of Miami Trof lc Management Man, Plan 2012 Health Liintnct Bicycle and Pedentnan Mobility Elan (114rami E 2012 Health Liintnct Bicycle and Pedentnan Mobility Elan (114rami E Little Hosana Bicycle & Peels:Rion Mobility Plan Little Hasa, Bicycle & Pedentrian Mobility Plan Little Hasa, Bicycle 5 PedentHan Mobility Plan 2000 City of lelomi Bicycle Monter Plan Little Hanna Bicycle & Peels:Rion Mobility Plan 2000 City oF Miami Bicycle Manter Plan TPO Flog, Trail 2000 City of lelomi Bicycle Monter Plan Short -Term Bicycle Parking Bicycle Soule...eh, Breyele Con, Bicycle Facility Improvement: Bicycle Lane: Shared-Une Lane Machin, Breyele Con, Bicycle Route Bicycle Lane: Short -Term Bicycle Parking Neighborhood Connection: Bicycle Can, Bicycle Lane: So, Orenningn Safe Cronningn Bicycle Bouleser, Bicycle Lane: So, Orenningn Bicycle Lan, Bicycle Lane Shareddeine LW, Marking: Bicycle Bouleser, Nor from 20u&t.eetokAso71 North Daynhore Einee from NE17th Terrace , NE 21, Street PI...Federal Highway from NE 30th Street IQ NE 54th SU. North Greene, NI. Iron, Loral Way to South Creenway OH, North Greene, NI. Iron, SR-9i2IMV &met to South Creenway Eri, North lellarniAYWIL from NE 14th St.. to NE 20th Street North lellarniAYWIL from NE 20th St.. to NE 84th AV... North lellarro P.,nue From Width Street to NW 5th Street North Karr) P.,nue From NW 17th Street to Nod 29th Street North NE AVM. fFom NW SIA .F.t Is Nod 17th AY... North Karr) P.,nuel NE int A.M. iron. NW 56 Street to Nod lith d.,nue North Karr) P.,nuel NE int A.M. iron. NW 56 Street to Nod lith Street North Michigan A.1111[ {1,11, Cade Boulevard to SR-607 North Michigan AY... from SR.007 Is Went 4ith Street North Rwer Einee at NW 14th AMP., NW 12th Street North Riser Ori, at NW lith Men., NW 14tO Street Northnhore Open Spoee Sew, al) From rath Street to Bith Street Nod lOth MOM Fla., Street Nod Ilth Men, corn Nod 46th Street to NW 67th Street Nod Ilth Street.' nie 14,1 Court from NW 27th Pm,. to Nod ith Street 011,12 AY... from NW ft Is Coral Way Nod 12th Pathway Creenway I rem NW 62nd Street to NW Street Nod 12th Street rem NW 136th Men, to Telernundo fiday Nod 13th Court From Nod 12th Street to NW 14th Street Nod 13th Street Lone From Nod 40th &tree to NW 46th Street Nod 14 Street from NW 1 AV... Is Nod 7 MVP, Nod 14th Men, 6 Nod Ith Street Nod 14th A.M... NW North River DIY W 20th StIfft Nod 14th Street rem NW 22, AY Nod Sith P.,nue Nod 14th Street rem NW Ith to NE lOth A.10. 2.20 mile(219 On Road re P �.tn(G. ed) mark., „mh�r 5 mile: ol bicycle Ian, 4.45 mile bicycle route. Sign: and wobility Extern, Sharrow payment marking: rk.mike) Dedi:eteao.Road Bicycle Foch, Improsernentn(U..ed) Bicycle Facility Impreeerner, (funded YIN 20.1.0 Plan) Dedicated On -Road Bicycle Faclity trio SLR,P, Off -Re, Bicycle Facility Impro,ment lOinfunhed1 Entall hi, re, at bun :top (Recommended] OFI-Rood Bicycle Facility Impro,ment ,RI,F13, and Median where f eonible(R. mmkea cro,.wa, end warnioy,y ..walk,Rectangular Rapid re.hroyeeaon:66RM, end median refuge. whore fw,ba(Recommended) OS Censer:ion el one on-ntreet parking npaee to bic don (Recommended) (1 Sloilen) New Bicycle Priority Signal:6,w rnd,r Ralik calming .71Rn:horrid. connidered at the NW 54th and NW 62ndinternection Bicycle Facility Improeementn (Fun., IP) Dedicated On.Road Bicycle Fa,. ro,mentn (Unfunded) Bicycle Facility Impreeerner, ed YIN 20.1.0 Plan) Extern, Sharrow paseme FAR, Neighborhood G ay , mrm.ethe number of o t:(Recommended) Bicycle Rout pone, path r,mdn, Oil- Facility Impro,ment(G..ed) Ad, &harrow pavement marking: roc, (Recommended) Buffered bicycle lonen(both direction, Bicycle Lan, (Proponed) Sharrown CRRE6). and Median reFugen where Fecnible(R. ORES),e ele(R. MacNeil CroRwal, and warning nig, cam law cronnwalk nigno, Rectangular Roy, Flanhing ,R1,13), and Median where Fe,.(R.omme.ed) twto,n a:calming ,ew ereda, the NW,.rhand b.rhs,.eetnte..e.on.. (.63mhe: Add bicycle ane: con:walk nignogs..:,aRr6)and Media. reFugen whereFec.iea(Re:mme. Extern, Sharrow payment er.4 (0 25 milen)Protectedebulleredlone: (Propene, Easement ma.ae9:nmile, I SUBSTITUTED Kimley Horn JipecI Meru f. pe.!unce evncr MITNItrIt ted over 90 surve .,,47.-....7:, .. pr, 4--_1.-.} veme ..c._ ,14'. W - - 141 t v....;r r.'• d14r,ia4,.P,0, ,-v..,i o,4,.rV,i,b,;•.:4_,41. ,.....,r:., 2- r . '-.,.',f,,o,,.axf :-,- - •-A j ,,r. . :yv , ' t,.4. . I .' J1 .--- A 0 rr I SUBSTITUTED "2 Ali I primarily ride my bicycle: Hide table Column Bar Pie Map • For pleasure/as a hobby For multiple uses ° (please describe) • To commute to work To conduct errands • To the bus/train station Other response Empty categories Ti Sort Answers Count Percentage For pleasurelas a hobby For mu ((pie uses (please describe) To commutes° work To conduct errands To the bus/dew station 413 153 62 44 10 Community Engagement Survey • Identify primary purpose of ride • Favorite place to ride in the City )ark (6) Covritrioar ^rai] (}Dowmown Venetian Causeway (2.) 1\4:tall-xi (4) e backer Caias rah Gables �a� Of -c° �eOt ere () brickell (S) Underline ("7 60.12% 2227% 9.02% 6.4% 146% Kimley r))Horn npe[I Morn L_.penonce Boner Community Engagement Survey • Concerns about riding in the City • Single most important item to improve bike work When riding my bike in the City, I'm neith. H!de table Answers Count Percentage 602 07-63% =annemay 48 6.99% Other 3 2% Weather How can the City of Miami bicycle n> ork be i mprovee% • Safety • Protected bike lanes • Connectivity • Path connectivity • Other • Other Weather Bicycle storage/parking Omer .e=pon;- l Sort 14 204% H datable Other resoonse 1 Sort Answers Count Percentage Protected bike Janet Path cannecevhy thher Bicycle storage/parking 500 115 55 73 94% 16.74% 8.15% t.1d% Kimley ))Horn enpecI Morn L_.penvnce Better Community Outreach Survey • Should additional resources be used to improve e infrastructure • Is there adequate bicycle storage/parking w - e you need it? Do you feel more of the City's resources should be used to improve bicycle infrastructure? 667 20 -oiumn Beg P�e Map, Is there proper bicycle storage/parkin. , i!able where you need it? • No • Yes categories Tj Sort bide table = 1 Sort Percentage 97.09% 390 5677% 2.91% 291 42.36% Answered: 687 Skipped: 0 Answered: 681 Skrpped: r. Ans.vers Count Percentage Kimley r))Horn 'nrperI More f_xpenonce Boner Interactive Bicycle Infrastructure Map • Created to capture public input overlaid on the current bicycle network • City of Miami requests your help to promote and publicize our efforts to im w3 Miami Bicycle Master Plan- Public Engagement Find address or place Abs Welcome! Your input is needed! This site was developed as a way for the public to provide recommendations and feedback on the types of projects they would like to see Included as part of the City of Miams Bicycle Master Plan. ® To submit a recommendation or comment, click the editing icon in the top left corner of the screen (second icon from the left). ay tons SS d ds I SUBSTITUTED ving bicycle infrastructure! Kimley r))Horn npeu Meru ✓<;pe,,once Etcher Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide • State -of -the -practice solutions aimed at creating complete streets that are safe and enjoyable for bicyclists. • Design standards and best practices for bicycle facilities, intersection treatments bikeway signing and marking. • Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensi ' ie Approach • Strategies for effective network planning for walkable areas and str guidelines. General principles and considerations regarding bicyc • Project for Public Spaces • Initiative promotes great streets as backbone of succe ul communities, redefining spaces that connect people to where they need to go, whit- -nhancing and supporting the destinations they serves • Bicycle Friendly Businesses • Encourage businesses to be bicycle fri dly sidedesign WHAT MAKES A GREAT PLACE? anes. • 4 criteria: engineering, educatio ncouragement, and evaluation and planning • Fifteen -Minute Cities PUBLIC • Everyone living in that cit .s access to essential urban services within a 15-minute walk or bike spaces SUBSTITUTED Urban ir B1k slOri Guido Kimley »)Horn Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Resources • US Census Journey to Work Data • Multimodal • Replica • Multimodal data • Publicly available data set that uses US Census, la use regulations, aggregate mobile location, credit transaction • a, and real estate transaction data • BikeSafe • University of Miami KiDZ Neuroscie for children ages 10 to 14. • Mission to prevent pediatri .'cyclists hit -by -car through education, promote physical activity, and ad ate for safer cycling environments. Center initiative focus on bicycle safety Miami, FL Mode Sp Trip volu I SUBSTITUTED in this geography, typical weekday Week Aug 23, 2021 to the week of Feb 28, 2022 Change Data 4 Selections 1.0rs Feb 28, 2022 Private Auto 880k 750k�� Transit 58G 50Ok 250k Auto Passenger 200k Other 5.8k • 4S Sep 2021 Oct 2021 Nov 2021 Dec 2021 Jan 2022 Feb 2022 Mar 2022 Private Auto 1. Transit 1. Auto Passenger Other Kimley ») Horn E,peci h4„n L,pn',rnce Crane, Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation Control Measures (TCM) • TDM/TCM strategies improve transportation system effi '-ncy by reducing single occupant vehicle (SOV) trips and provide an e onment to improve, enhance, and encourage multimodal. • These strategies can provide cost-effective m ods to build capacity in a transportation system by expanding the p. icipation of residents in alternative modes of transportation. • These strategies can be impleme -d as part of the land development process for specific sites and b e City of Miami. SUBSTITUTED Multimodal Transportation TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies Kimley r))Horn npe4 I Meru t_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • Mobility Fee • Would increase funds for capital improvement projects to improve infrastructure and create new transportation facilities to decrease SOV trip • The City of Miami Beach's implemented a mobility fee to fund mobility improvements. Developments are funding mechanisms to support c.. tal expenses and transportation facility improvements. • Complete Streets • Miami -Dade Complete Streets Design Guid- ' es • Repurpose public streets right-of-w. 1 to all modes of travel (i.e., transit, bicycle, and w ing) to promote sustainability, health, and safe - of the community. • FDOT's Context Classification • Eight (8) categories t account for adjacent land uses, roadway connectiv characteristics, and socioeconomic-.racteristics. • Determines e number of lanes needed, sidewalk widths, t es of facilities needed, and many other featur SUBSTITUTED TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies 1 ill 'd II . i i i 1 i Ci- Natural CI- 1 C2T- CNR- CSC. 1 C4- CS - Rural Rural "Suburban--' Suburban v Urban Urban --.. Town Residential Commercial General Center C6. Urban RIB I 111C y `F/ 1 I111 1 I npeci Mere C penance Boner Policy Review and State of the Practice • Policy Strategies • New Development Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Strategies • New developments should be required and enforced TDM/TCM plans • Enforcement at time of Certificate of Occupancy issuance • Reduce the impacts of the project traffic on the surrounding ro •way network • Reduce the reliance on SOV trips and promote multimo- . transportation. • Private developers should consider incorporating stratey' s and methods such as the following: • Creation of an Employee Transportation Co' dinator position to run the Transportation Control Measures (TCM) • ograms. • Subsidized transit passes for emplo • Provide secure short-term and g-term bicycle parking (bicycle racks, lockers, and lids) • Provide bicycle facilitie adjacent roadway network • Providing a Citibik- . ation or bike rentals • Wide hallway • accommodate bicycles SUBSTITUTED TDM/TCM Municipal Mobility Fees Complete Streets TDM/TCM Land Development Projects TDM/TCM Strategies • Elevators that can accommodate bikes • Bike workroom or shop • Bike washing stations • Bike drop-off/valet service • Secure bicycle parking/bicycle lids • Providing car share Kimley r))Horn xp c, Meru t_.pe.!unce eviler SUBSTITUTED Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Buffered bicycle lanes • Bicycle lanes • Shared use path • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Raised separated bicycle lanes • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized • Signalized • Bicycle Parking • Racks — Short-t • Lockers, en .sures, lids — Long-term Kimley r>)Horn npe4I Meru L_.pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • On -Roadway Facilities • Bike Boulevard • Low vehicle traffic volume (less than 3,000 vehicles per da . nd low speeds (speed limits less than 30 MPH) to give bicycle travel pri• y. • Priority is provided by signs pavement markings, an raffic calming treatments to discourage trips by vehicles. • Bicycle boulevards tend to be perceived as s -r and more pleasant than routes along busy major roads. • Buffered bicycle lanes • Separate bicycle travel lanes from vehi -r travel lanes with pavement markings creating a buffer. • Typically, seven (7) feet wide in . • ing three (3) feet of buffer to allow passenger loading and prevent door collisions whe :jacent on -street parking is present • Bicycle lanes • Provide exclusive -ce for bicyclists next to vehicle travel lanes. Dedicated bike lanes are typically five (5 "-et wide adjacent to on -street parking. • Shared use p • Seped from vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier. sed by pedestrians, bicyclists, skaters, and runners. M-Path Bike Boulevard Buffered Bicycle Lane on SW 1" Street Bicycle Lane on W Flagler Street, west of NW 19th Avenue Kimley »> Horn h4„n _.pnnc.ne €ohe, Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Separated Facilities • Protected bicycle lanes • Located within or directly adjacent to the r•:dway • Physically separated from motor vehic traffic with a vertical element: a curb, bollards •r on -street parking. • One-way cycle tracks are t • ically eight (8) feet and two-way cycle tracks a - ypically 11 feet. • Raised separated bicy - lanes • Raised separated - cycle lanes use grade separation either at sidewalk grad: •ran intermediate grade to give the cyclist further separatio I SUBSTITUTED Protected Bicycle Lanes Raised separated Bicycle Lanes Kimley r))Horn npe4I Meru t pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Intersection Treatments • Unsignalized Limited Access • Right -turn only from the minor street to the major street. • Use center median (peanut) on the major street as a median refuge island for bi movements. • Portion of the raised center median is removed in order to accommodat the median, while prohibiting vehicles. • The preferred width of median refuge islands is a minimum of 10 -et. However, the minimum width can be as narrow as 6 feet wide. • Unsignalized Full Access • Pavement markings are provided across the interse on to indicate the path of bicyclist. • Provide a clear path and boundary between t -.ugh movement bicyclists and through or turning vehicles in the adjacent lane. • Crossing markings with green color ar- e most impactful to make vehicle aware of bicycle • Signalized • Bike boxes: a designated ar= , on an intersection approach in advance of the stop bar pavement marking. • This provides bicycl with a safe and visible way to get motorist attention and alert them of the bicyclist d g a red signal phase. cycles through • Requires " urn on Red" operation to prevent vehicles from crossing the bike box where exclusive :ht-turn lanes are not provided. I SUBSTITUTED Median Refuge Island Source: Small Town and Rural Design Guide.com Typical Crossing Markings Source: Nacto.org Bike Box Source: Nacto.org Kimley r))Horn JipeOO Meru f. pe.!unce eviler Policy Review and State of the Practice • State of the Practice • Bicycle Parking • To facilitate first- last- mile connectivity to transit viable and reliable, secure bicycle parking is essential at transit stations. • Short-term parking that needs to be convenient and easy to use • Long-term parking needs to be secure and sheltered. If bicyclist is parking for two (2) or more hours they will prefer security and shelter above the convenience and parking. • Implement Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) . cycle parking: • Under Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) monitor • Well -lit area • Cordoned -off from the rest of the transit facility with one- - .y in and one-way out, and next to a building structure. • Four (4) principles to CPTED including: • Surveillance: people are seen and can be se • Access Management: users are passivel .irected to a specific place, while restricting non- users • Territorial: ownership of an are. " defined by clear boundaries of short-term • Facility Quality: well mainted and high quality environments attract users and aid surveillance. to I SUBSTITUTED oU PORTS RING COR RILL Short -Term Bicycle Racks Source: apbp.org BIKE LOCKERS SWELTERED SECURE ENCLOSURE Long -Term Bicycle Parking Source: apbp.org Secure Bike Parking used by Miami -Dade Transit Source: bikelid.com Kimley ») Horn E,.oeci h4„n E.pn.,.inie ReSe, I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • First- last- mile connectivity to transit • Right-of-way considerations • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoods • On -street parking/vehicles parking bicycle lanes • Pedestrian Priority Zones https://maps.kimley- horn.com/portal/apes/w- ;.ppviewer/index.html?id=d230b3b536b4430288ccb8769d6648ad Kimley r))Horn Jipe4I Meru t pe.!unce eviler I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Creating a grid throughout the City • Focus on local streets with existing or proposed traffic calm' ► : provided • Connecting on local streets that have signals at arterials ollectors • Connecting on local streets that have median separ. •rs at arterials/collectors • Creating initial grid by providing a quality facility • Reinforcing grid and provide additional conn ivity • First- last- mi e connect' y o transit • Quality and secure b'- cle parking at transit facilities • High ridership to . ions (over 100 daily boardings and alightings) Kimley ») Horn E.peci h4„n E.pn',.inco €cane, I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Right-of-way considerations • 50-foot ROW Context Sensitive • Local Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = • • Bike Boulevard • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 33' o Assumes any reconstruction would require 6' sidewalks • 50'- 33' = 17' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street parking = 0' remaining • One -Way Streets in Residential Neighborhoods = Bike Lanes • 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 5' sidewalk + 5'sidewalk = • 50'- 30' = 20' — 7.5' on -street parking — 7.5' on-street-p. ing = 5' bike lane 60-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + 10' travel lane + 6'6" dewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 27' remaining • 8'6" on -street parking + 8'6" on -street - . rking = 10' remaining • Therefore, 5' bike lanes + 5' bike la 70-foot ROW • 33' = 10' travel lane + ' travel lane + 6'6" sidewalk + 6'6" sidewalk = 37' remaining • 8'6" + 8'6" on-stre- •arking = 16' remaining • Therefore, 8' + :' . ne-way protected bicycle lanes or 11' two-way protected bicycle lanes Kimley r))Horn JipecI Meru t pe.!unce eviler 24 I SUBSTITUTED Network Determination • Equitable bike network distribution through neighborhoo • Providing connectivity to activity centers • Schools, Parks, grocery stores • On -street parking/vehicles parking in bicycle la • Recommend protected bicycle lanes • Do not remove on -street parking for bicycl- .nes as vehicle will still park in the bike lanes o� • Pedestrian Priority Zone • Little Havana • (Miami River to the north, S 22nd Avenue to the west) • Prioritize pedestrians - d access to transit over other modes Cab th Street to the south, SW 2nd Avenue to the east, and SW • Maintaining clear sidewal Width for pedestrian travel, aligning curb ramps with sidewalks, requiring crosswalk at all intersections, increasing pedestrian c sing times beyond the minimum, reducing travel lane widths, providing shade for sidewalks, reducing speed limits, and elir ating right -turn -on -red in dense pedestrian corridors Kimley r))Horn Gjcpe[I M©r• t_.pe.!unce 6encr https://maps.kimley- horn.com/portal/apps/webap pviewer/index.html?id =d230b 3b536b4430288ccb8769d6 8ad Bicycle Network Recommendations _ — Protected Bicycle Lanes _ = Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary A rse 973 8747 incar Cnrnorc 9691 Hialeah NW 36th St Miami International Airport x.1 W 74h 5- 968 ti ,'968 - I^ I I 24tn St 976 yW 5n4 986 South Miami 934 6 any puZE MN NW 95th St z C ` Kir WP� L•-L'i--•'I— IL — `1 Al aparta 1121 = r LJ 0 t —r II ---� I -r `=1H C 1 .& -- --- _ c: FCC CI _4—� --� 1 t— FI Q 1 I �1 C — —1 r.+.11 953 C.. —!— f® `j': v -. reed 2.Y/. —L1�O _ �' O 7 .�N nth 5[ �Q r.0 Al 1 I r, 0 MI51,9( {to C) a J * p' r r poi I-- r I-61-r J SUBSTITUTED Coral Gabl ee Biscayne Gas Aquatic Preserve North Bay Village 90� Miami Beach Y+rgi ma Key Park Crandon P, rlc co a A v n Bird Rd c re c Bird Rd Ponce de Leon 91 a r Blue Rd dee Rd nso Ade Coral Gables Industrial SW 28th St I 1 "9hf1,1ytrt7/ere"l 1 nu$Grove I 1 L _ r t a 1 � 'Florida Ave Ocea Hei • 1 / IWiIIVam Ave // `• / y I. g\yb • J I Charles Ave / c 1^ 1 1 The Barnacle ° — Historic State er Key �'¢ - /' — _ — 1� Park nit Islands ea'. Logue' Ave Park 1 1 / Crawford Ave I / I I / „ _ — i ——ReinciencRaeT j I I / I 1 / I V/ I EI Prado Blvd 1 `0 1 0 1.. I — R rklAre— - — + — — ¢ View- r hts,' JCL ▪ 4 of / v a T. A a Hardee Rd 1' 1 I 1 1 • —a Sunrise Harbor / SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes - — Bicycle lanes — — Biryde Boulevard Q Bicyde Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary A I j Hial at 0 Minn I Mi2.n, F a r J Kev RicraL . _ _ µ -s POW-3rd st —a- ro ro r 1 W Flair St 1 15W 2nd Ter .— — iw-4thit— — L — — t 3 a a I a p " ra t6th 5t Bicycle Network Recommendations - - Protected Bicycle Lanes - Shared-U a Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard Q Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary u Mian ni KPu fitGfl z 1 I a � 1 NW 1st St 1 ® 1 968 SW Ind St SW 3rd St SW 4tNst — n e 'f ro 1 1 1 r® r SWi2nd St 1 SW 3rd St 1 NW 1st St 1 1 A 1 1 ri, SW9thSt I r i 1 sw 1 at St 1 I 1 1 L____—_+--__—_ m 1 1 SW11 hTer III 1 I I SW 1 th St 51 J. 1 1 T swa4sacj- L `' — 11�W1 r T3th fat— — 1 — 1 SW 1 [h St I SW 14 I , SW 15th St 1 1 Shena door c. 1 5, 1 1 N0 1 1 SW 16th Ter 1 1 c I SW17th5t ---4 I 1—___— .... rl+5[ 1 1 1 I SW 181h 511 --{� J 5pt1 tom--- 3 i- -,1 _ _ _ — sw• 14trrst- — — 1 1 1 1 1 1 - SW 2Oth St 1 i 1 t 1 1 SW 21.t St y 1 `a r`�— —1 1 SW 21s[Ter t 1 I 1 1 1 1 5 sW 22nd ref Silver Bluff 1 1 - " -sw-23fel-5t - Estates - r - -j - . 1 i S - f - —5Mv 23 M. %. 1 1 Valencia AveN 1 Almeria Ave 1 SW 23rd Ter SW 2�th St a SW 24[h St tuv SW 24th St I m I S SW 25th St I B- '�i'gi`ts i The Pines 1 I A �.. r--" n i Q 1---J r / / --dsx262h5t--- __irrzvthsr— —t- —— �/ /� 1 SW 2fichL % i sw z7[h st 11 I % 1 NW 1st St 1 1t- IdlewtdPark � I 1837 SW 4th St N 7 ro SUBSTITUTED 1 N 1 -1 50-it, 5t )nce de Leon 61 L 1 1 a/a r r -,---1 as sW 2ath st / 1 as / a i 1 a / .r Je a a Oced view 5P 1 / 5 • t uai I,rr, .co k `� 1 NW 15t St 1 1 1 I — 1_ '! 1 I t I *' ' 1 1 I +' r 1 — — ^sm. �dr5r -4— -yet- - T.,- — — _— z m - II n -----i ➢ - - - 4 i 1 1 0! I _ L a I _j_—__ _1� 1 SW9thst I t to -#_-` 1 5W 16[ 5t I SW 10th 5; -•-__ I ---� --}--Sut�110frSt - - - - I I SW 11 hTer I \�./ -- . 1 SW 1 th 5t 1 SW 12th St / A. 972 —1 1 - —r—sw�acasl—— \ !! \ —�vv+3tnit---'�— sw 1 rnst t 1 \ ! \\ r St I ` Shena doal1 I !!! \\ s� •—•11 I I I !/ 1Q 1 SW 16th Ter1 _.J__, I / \\f5P 1 5w 17th St --Z 1 - \ st 1 I I 1 t I SW 21.t St 1 I 1 SW 21st Ter NW 1st St [dlewild Park 1837 S1114th St I � J r 1 a SW zpth st 1 '° h st h L SW2n1 St 1 t SW 3r0 5t f 1 I '. �. . I !! I 1 ! _^ �Sx pVe \ ! 1 S! 1 I Noble Island neacrT I d SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes — — Shared -Ilse Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes ^ 8icyde Lanes &cycle Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities >U City of Miami Boundary e 0 —� He uie B--c Virginia . Lummus Island MacArthur Cs"'xl Antarctica Way Virginia Key Virgil A1A Al A Fisher Island Bicycle Network Recommendations - — Protected Bicycle Lanes - Shared.use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes -- Bicycle Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary A oHialtah v ie,nl r Sou Minn Kev Riar.r A Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared,ose Path -� Buffered Bicycle Lanes = Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard V Bicycle Parking Existing. Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary A 0 Hialf 0 M Mian it ni J KPV RicraL SW 12 h St Nay Park 97` Park 81Pa NW 21st St NW 14th St NW lath Sr NW 8th 5t L Flagler Park Plaza SW 2nd St us 5W 4th St sw 5th St Grand Canal Dr any 475L MN sauei ssa,ldx3 oiiewled NW 12th St [8261 2 SW 8th St 19691 W Flagler St NW 7th St Winona Park Miami Airport Industrial Park any AuZL MN Flagler 5 1 ss I s 1 / 1 /��---L� any 4189 MN SUBSTITUTED NW 22nd Sc. NW 12th St Nay 7th St NW 2th 5t i a� NW end St 1 I ,ram- v, 1 s p a I a P $$ rn z > m N 3 D y n ° I S i 1 Alameda Blue Lago Lake Joanne 14 J \ I� - --ter -�. SW 12th St 0 Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes — — SharedrLJse Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes -.. - Bicycle Lanes Bicycle Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary A 7n! Flagler 5 V 12th 5t 5oul,n.,, Mian c ll� J International Airport Ny1, 7Brh Sr 81oe Lagoon Dr Loke Joanne 19591 rl�l 1w 7th St -yy� r 1 u 1 1 z z z ra — - --r,--w�+�pst�--0 --- � S rD Glide Lake Officer Carlos 5 Stureville go Blue Lagoon Lake N Service Rd a ry 836. SUBSTITUTED NW 21st St 2 3. a Intern. al 1° Lin. iami 953] NW 14th St D 0 NW 12th St Z 5 r Kw gic,�y1 < 1 1 ..... ▪ 1 Nwnd St i I I I 1 1 1 1 96B I W Flag St I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I ISW 2nd Ter 1 I 'z I 1 -- I I . 1 I N — I— — ivfaeh3t— — — — a } a Ti 1 O. 3 3 1 • 5W Sth St rKo I a o 1 SW 6th St1 1 a ea z 19 S c ` I m I I 1959� SW 7dh St I 1 �eA ro I Alameda Venetia Ave n o a > Milan Ave SW 1 6th St 7amora Ave z 5 NW 1st 5 e Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes — — Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — — Biryde Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary 21st St Hera, ational LL.nks 1,1sann NW 14th St pMtY_- 1 25 • ® i-Nwr35t+'Sr NW 36[h 5t I NW 34th St 1 z ➢ NW 34th St * a z g @ I NW 33rd St * f° f w — MW-3tnd-6t- - NW31st St �D NM31st 11St 1 A 3 NW 30th St NW 30th SS I I NW 29th St NW 29th Si I - 1 1 Palmer 1 Lake1 NW 26th St NW 26th St 1 4'NW2,thSt I I �s 1 L — — �tw i!31d 5r" 04 I NW 22nd St R,` I i NW 12th 5t SUBSTITUTED Pinewood Park NW 2 rh I NWy19th Ter` 1 NW 19th St I I NW 18th Ter 1{ Delaware • I NW 18th St 1 { I - — 4N yf }itYrSt — IOW 16th Ter 1 INW 16th St 1 1 z J n r0 I NW 21st Ter NW 31st Ter 1 z I NW 21st St !J IIW 20th'. 1 z I * D A hlw +5th?t. — — ♦ ➢ NW*7th St) ♦ i —1° Ni,,,, r 1 ♦ Nor I 1 ♦ I I rh R, I I S. I I z LPr o1 I I -- —— — — —N{"H *hit---4— N 1 z = n ' A i Kr 9 1 t . r r i I z i NW 9th S1 { a I I NWI7[h St !c ▪ 1 1 zz 1 1 1 - 1 v 1 z I.I ^ A I z ➢ z `a INN/4`e 4th 5f f6 r_ — a y m `� w. 5-I a i I m _^. r, 1 1? I 1 I I NW 1st St I I NW 1st St I I I 1 ‘no clarsl r St In ® . Y NW 9thSt NW 7th 5t NW 5th St 2 m ' NW kith St ➢ 1 4 m NW 1st St I 1 NW 31th t El • 1 ~ 1 NW13Sth5 W"34t♦t St i 1�9W 34th st i 11 1W 34th St. z I m I I I IW 33rd S[ --- 1 p a-Si-i —I t— — — —— i--f----- 11 1 Pinewood Park NW 2ith Ter 1 1 ----7--yity.p9t+r5! -I- .--T-- 1 1 --I-- NW 25th St Nw 2th St Mlw asrei mt.- 1 1 NW 22nd St I I I 1 NW 21st Ter 1 z I NW21st St ,__.-1 IIW 2B.M S. 1 1 `o I a IN 4$eh151 —1 NW 47th St 1 C ` 1 r 1• t I 1 0 • Rig I Pr D' NW 9th St NW 7th St NW 211st st wood Perk! NE 21th NE 2 , SUBSTITUTED Bicycle Network Recommendations Protected Bicycle Lanes — — Shared -Use Path Buffered Bicycle Lanes • Bicycle Lanes &icycle Bodes,-• 0 Bicycle •: g Existin• -I cycle Facilities ity of Miami Boundary Sov I I m 1 Ka 1 1 F d 1 n 1. I � I 1 r I a M1, I 1 5 1 43 N. 11 Lh SO 1 1 —T 1 1 1 1 1 __.I _ .-N — W4)tlrS! — — I t Fr=-dom ewer NW 7th St -tea ever 886 533.---.NW40-9t-- Jackson Memorial Hospital SW 2n i St Miar Childr Muse Charter 1 Sunset NE 2 th St Islands NE 21th St NE 22+ st. II z 1 7 a 1 c 1 i a T�L_ Jo I m 1 z 0. IBIS o° N 1 Island p a d 1 f. I � - 0 - Miami Children's Ar Museum Hvbvsc Charter Sch. SUBSTITUTED 17th Bicycle Network Recommendations — — Protected Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — eicyde lanes — Bicycle Boulevard 0 Bogle Parkkng Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary Bicycle Network Recommendations — Protected Bicycle Lanes - Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes - Biryde Boulevard 0 Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary NW 54th SI NW 46th St NW 75th St NW 78th St z NW 74th 5t NW 7/th Si NW 76th 5t NW 72nd 51 SUBSTITUTED NMJ•1 1 . u.snr. — —1 I Gwen Cherry NW 1Oth St 1 1 Park 1 Z 1 z I z `� NW , 8th Ter 1 "'L NW 6 th s h St > 1 .1'NW 67IN th 51 s NW 65[h St 1 o y m NW 651h St 1 W 6 th 5[ 1 1— NW bath St _ _ 1 ^ 1 Edison Ce— Vte I i© NW 62nA St a NW 62nd St 1 m Heights NW 60th St I. Glenwood NW 62nd S[ erty Square 1 3 -i — y pth St 1 A 5 ith Ter Z 1 I • 1 z I I.9W 57tII St L------1Mw-5+kh-6r 1 Y ^---- w z 1 NW 55th TAr 1 il 1 S 1 i. +1y455thr9t + I I co Model cities NMI E4th St{ 1 1 NW 59th St a ni NW 46th St r ^ ^ — — NW 45th 5[ 1 1 3 1 1 1 I 1 1 NW 44th St NW allyd St Allapattahi NW 43rd St i1 1 _ y — _ 1 1 1 % I 1.. 1 NW 41st5t S ♦ 1 NW 41st St Earlingtnn 1 j yy.ggty-,r Heights Metro 1 Rail Station — PeW3911T5r n NW 38th o1 1 NW 37th St 4 el I 1 25 S _ I I -NW 36t14.5t NW 35th 5t o z 3 ` 1 NW 34th St NW135th I 1 —44r I I 1 I 34th St - 1 1 L (— Edison Center 1 H 3rr r NW135th Si - 1 I I I wood Perk.' 0 1 1 I e 1 1 I I m a NE ('7th St NE f6ti St INE 75th St I NE 74th St 1 1 I NE 73rd St m NE 61kh St a 1 Baysho • NE 72nd St NE 70th St Belle Meade Island SUBSTITUTED Bicyde Network Recommendations - — Protetted Bicycle Lanes Shared -Use Path — Buffered Bicycle lanes — — Bicycle Lanes — �, Bicycle Boulav 0 Bicycle ': g Exist' n• •I cycle Facilities liy of Miami Boundary Sou N1ian J Kov Riscv Bicycle Network Recommendations +� — Protected Bicycle Lanes - Shared -Use Path — — Buffered Bicycle Lanes — — Bicycle Lanes a, _ Bicycle Boulevard Q Bicycle Parking Existing Bicycle Facilities City of Miami Boundary NW 11 sth St NW 91st St El Portal ° 3rd St ... NE 115th S Biscayne Park NE 111th St NE 110th Ter Q NE 103rd St Miami Shores NE 99th St NE 98th St NE 97th St NE 94th NE d 92nd St NE 915t St NE 90th St NE 89th St NE 88th St NE 87th St NE 86th St NE 107th St NE 107 th si Miami Shores Golf Course NE 83rd St trt r0 - -tuttre 1v'er 1 NE 78 St NE rth 5t NE i6tftTI"St E 75th St ` NE 74th St a 1 { NE 73rd 5t sr Z Belle Meade Island SUBSTITUTED NE 105th St NE 104th Si Pelican Harbor Marina Next Steps • Finalize Network Improvement Prioritization • Final Report • Additional public outreach or - I SUBSTITUTED Drawing Order .QMae . L Munia.palitypdy . �j vmuus. Recommendation tarot) 0 . [�',MOUS Recommendations (La) . o likyci. . A 0 b¢vnap rou rea42021pa . 0 SneetNeiwrk HAnd Rd —owe Lay, 0 woad Image, I SUBSTITUTED ..' ' ="111' riir an WM ' • - ',WI. , i . i • . IR rli ..1.1 -..11 • A 'it.. MM. 1.1 I ' ' -.....• ....— =-=-_;,..---, re i 'IE. MIII.,. • AM !, r -im,-"tair ..--,-. ,-,--- - Thank you for your participation App dix B D ailed Bicycle Network Analysis I SUBSTITUT Facility SVV/NVV 19th Avenue To NVV 3rd Street From US-1 Bicycle Facility Type Protected Bicycle Lanes Notes 8 ft Protected Bicycle Lanes on both sides of the roadway. Reduce travel lanes e minimum width. Mark lanes at minimum widths to implement 8ft protected bike lanes NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 71st Street NVV 58th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 8 ft Protected Bicycle Lanes on both sides of the roadway. Implement pr. ted bicycle lanes in the existing grass buffer on the side of the on -street parking closest to th- - dewalk. Additionally, reduce the width of the existing on -street parking. Intersections may nee..-parate treatment to fit the protected bicycle lanes into the roadway N Federdal Highway NE 54th Street NE 36th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on west side of th- .. dway, closest to the FEC Railroad). Implementation involves converting existing perpen.. . ar on -street parking to parallel on -street parking. Additionally, construct the protected bi lanes into the existing on -street parking/swale NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 57th Street NW 38th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 8 ft Protected Bicycle Lanes on both sides . e roadway. Intersections may need separate treatment to fit the protected bicycle lanes into th- ..dway SVV 25th Road SVV 9th Avenue SVV 1st Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 8 ft Protected Bicycle Lanes on bot es of the roadway. Reduce width of the median, travel lanes, and on -street parking to implem- .rotected bicycle lanes NVV 1st Place NVV 21st Street NVV 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane .-way on west side of the roadway). Remove one travel lane on NB one-way to implement pr. ed bicycle lanes. Existing on -street parking to remain NVV 71st Street NVV 12th Avenue NVV 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle . e (two-way on south side of the roadway). Reduce width of on -street parking to 8ft par. ane and shift travel lanes north. Implement protected bicycle lanes into the existing on-str. .arking/swale space SE 1st Avenue SE 1st Street Se 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protec - .:icycle Lane (two-way on east side of the roadway) replacing designated right-tum lane NVV 11th Street NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft • .tected Bicycle Lane (two-way on south side of the existing grass buffer/swale). NVV 27th 'nue to NVV 23rd Avenue site of previous safety study. Reduce width of existing on -street .arking/swale on south side of the roadway and convert perpendicular parking to parallel on -street parking NVV 39th Street NVV 10th Avenue NVV 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Remove one travel lane on the one-way road NVV 5th Court NVV 67th Street NVV 62nd Street Protected Bicycle -s 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on east side of the roadway) Section: Two 10ft travel lanes, protected bicycle lanes (11ft), sidewalk (6ft) SVV 16th Avenue SVV 1st Street SW 8th Street Protect-• .cycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway) Section: Sidewalk (6ft), protected bicycle lanes (11ft), on -street parking (8ft), one 11ft travel lane, on -street parking (8ft), sidewalk (6ft). Install pavement markings for one 11ft travel lane and 8ft on -street parking bays (no existing pavement markings) NE 2nd Avenue NE 17th Street NE 17th Street rotected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Remove grass strip on east side of the roadway to construct protected bicycle lanes NW 71st Street NE 4th Avenue-95 Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on south side of the roadway). Reduce width of existing on - street parking on both sides of the roadway and convert perpendicular parking to parallel on -street parking. The recommendation also involves shifting the travel lanes north and building the protected bicycle lanes into the existing on -street parking on the south side of the roadway SVV 23rd Avenue SVV 16th Street SVV 27th S -t Protected Bicycle Lanes 8ft Protected Bicycle Lane on both sides of the roadway Section: Sidewalk (6ft), protected bike lane (8ft), two 11ft travel lanes, protected bike lane (8ft), sidewalk (6ft). Repurpose the existing 8ft grass buffer/informal parking space on both sides of the roadway to implement the protected bicycle lanes NVV 29th Avenue NVV 15th Street W 7th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 8ft Protected Bicycle Lane on both sides of the roadway Section: Sidewalk (6ft), protected bike lane (8ft), parallel on -street parking (8ft), two 11ft travel lanes, protected bike lane (8ft), parallel on -street parking (8ft), sidewalk (6ft). Implementation involves converting existing perpendicular on -street parking to parallel on -street parking SVV 7th Avenue NVV 4th Street SVV 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Remove lane between SVV 4th and SVV 4th St to implement the protected bicycle lanes NVV 23rd Street NVV 19th Avenue NVV 22nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on north side of the roadway) NW 40th Street NVV 10th Av . - NW 18th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on south side of the roadway). Coordinate ROW with Miami - Dade Transit to implement path adjacent to existing metrorail NW 3rd Street NVV 3 Avenue NVV 37th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Reduce width of the existing on - street parking to incorporate the protected bicycle lanes SVV 63rd Court Tamiami Canal Road SVV 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 8 ft Protected Bicycle Lanes on both sides of the roadway Section: Sidewalk (6ft), on -street parking (8ft), protected bike lane (8ft), travel lanes, protected bike lane (8ft), on -street parking (8ft), sidewalk (6ft); Reduce width of existing swales on both sides of road to implement protected bicycle lanes NVV 6th Avenue NVV 47th Street NVV 40th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway) NE 17th Street NE 2nd Avenue N Miami Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane on south side of the roadway. Repurpose one lane on the one-way road to implemnent the protected bicycle lanes NVV 36th Avenue NVV 20th Street NVV 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Reduce the width of the existing on -street parking to incorporate the protected bicycle lanes I SUBSTITUT Facility NVV 3rd Street To NVV 57th Avenue From Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Facility Type Protected Bicycle Lanes Notes T 11ft Protected Bicycle Lane (two-way on one side of the roadway). Remove on-- -et/swale parking to implement protected bike lanes SW 49th Avenue SVV 4th Street SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 8ft Protected Bicycle Lane on both sides of the roadway Section: Side, (6ft), grass buffer (2ft) on - street parking lane (8ft), protected bike lane (8ft), two 11ft travel la. ., protected bike lane (8ft), on - street parking lane (8ft), grass buffer (2ft), sidewalk (6ft). Redu idth of swale space (currently used for informal parking) on both sides of the roadway to imple . bicycle lanes and on -street parking NE 4th Avenue NE 24th Street NE 22nd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes Biscayne Boulevard NE 87th Street NE 6th Street Shared -Use Path Construct a minimum 8ft, preferred 10ft shared-u - .. th into the existing sidewalk space. Existing sidewalk is approximately 15ft wide in most ar . of the corridor. Convert sidewalk on either side of Biscayne Blvd to a shared -use path with d : irection lane markings and a buffer from the roadway. Additionally, install official bicycle rout- .ns on corridor. Plan Z Shared -Use Path SVV 13th Avenue SVV 8th Street SVV 3rd Avenue Shared -Use Path Expand current sidewalk/path i...y of Pigs park to 10ft Commodore Trail Rickenbacker Causeway N Prospect Drive Shared -Use Path Commodore Trail SVV 6th Street SVV 5th Avenue SVV 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 15 ft shared -use facilit the south side, separated from the roadway. Shared -use path Section: Sidewalk, on-stree ing, one lane through, on -street parking, 15ft shared -use path (sidewalk width included) NVV 12th Avenue NVV 37th Street NVV 14th Street Shared -Use Path Implement . ared-use path into the area underneath the Metrorail raised line; Path can wind through • edian space, or on either side of the median beneath the tracks SVV 19th Street SVV 12th Avenue SVV 32nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 8ft sr -d use path on south side SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street SE 6th Street Shared -Use Path ared use path on on east side. Expand sidewalk out until SE 1st Avenue. ROVV thins at SE 1st. Remove right turn lane at SE 2nd Street and SE 1st Avenue to implement two way cycle track. Shift roadway north at SVV 3rd Street from S Miami Avenue to SE 1st Avenue to fit the shared use path Brickell Bay Drive SE 14th Street SE 15th Road Shared -Use Path Remove on -street parking on the east side to replace the parking lane with a 10-12ft shared -use path. Additionally, parking will shift to the west side of the roadway as bulb -out style parking Ludlam Trail N of VV Flagler Street SVV 8th Street Shared -Use Path NVV 3rd Avenue NVV 29th Avenue NVV 25th Street Shared -Us- ' : h VVynwood streetscape plan notes this segment as a VVoonerf; street that doesnt have curbs and prioritizes peds NVV 6th Avenue NVV 35th Street NVV 21st Terrace S - :-Use Path Predicated on FDOT allowing their ROVV to be used for pedestrian -only boulevard; OR use a shared- use path on west side. Match the cross-section in VVynwood Streetscape Master Plan of the edge park concept in VVynwood Streetscape plan NVV 1st Avenue NVV 29th Street NVV 25th Street Shared -Use Path VVynwood streetscape plan notes this segment as a VVoonerf; street that doesnt have curbs and prioritizes peds SVV 6th Street SVV 27th Avenue SVV 35th Avenue Shared -Use Path Shared -use path Section: Sidewalk (6ft), on-street/swale parking (7ft), two 11ft travel lanes, on- street/swale parking (7ft), shared -use path. Reduce width of on street parking. Build into existing on - street parking from the sidewalk to create shared -use path NE 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard Ne 2nd Ave Shared -Use Path Implement a 12ft shared -use path down middle median. Keep palm trees on either side of median, remove trees in the middle to construct a 12ft-wide shared use path connecting NE 2nd Ave and Biscayne Blvd NVV 12th Avenue NVV 62nd Street NVV . Street Shared -Use Path VViden the existing path to 10ft to create a shared -use path NVV 35th Court NVV 11th Street 7th Street Shared -Use Path VViden path in median to implement a shared use path. Segment provides a connection to bike facility to the south SVV 17th Street SVV 12th Avenue SVV 21 st Avenue Shared -Use Path Build an 8ft shared -use path into the existing 10ft grass buffer on the south side. Roadway section between the curbs will not change build path into 10ft grass strip NE 4th Avenue NE 50th Street NE 42nd Street Shared -Use Path 8 ft paved shared use path on east side of the roadway NE 23rd Street NE 4t enue Biscayne Boulevard Shared -Use Path 8 ft shared -use path. VViden the sidewalk to 8ft on the north side of NE 23rd Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 4th Avenue and widen the sidewalk to 8ft on the west side of NE 4th Avenue between NE 23rd Street and NE 23rd Terrace. These sections currently include standard sidewalks at the right-of-way line with large utility/planting strips between the sidewalk and the back of curb. Based upon a field review, the only apparent items in conflict with the proposed widening are one (1) small street tree, one (1) street light pole, one (1) utility box, one (1) utility pole, and parking signage. These conflicting items should be removed/relocated with the exception of the utility pole/box which is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of NE 4th Avenue and NE 23rd Terrace. SVV 7th Avenue SVV 11th Street SVV 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path Convert one side of parking to on -street shared -use path NE 4th Avenue NE 54th Street NE 50th Street Shared -Use Path NE 22nd Street Biscayne Boulevard NE 2nd Avenue Shared -Use Path NE 4th Avenue NE 23rd Terrace NE 23rd Street Shared -Use Path I SUBSTITUT Facility To From Bicycle Facility Type Buffered Bicycle Lanes Notes County to determine feasibility of recommendation. 7ft buffered bicycle lane S-.- .n: Sidewalk (6ft) on north side, parking lane, buffered bike lane (7ft), two travel lanes, buffer=..icycle lane (7ft), on - street parking, sidewalk (6ft). ROW expands to allow for the implement.. of buffered bicycle lanes. South side of the roadway will need to be reconstructed to impleme e lanes NW 46th Street NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 17th Avenue SVV 23rd Street SVV 27th Avenue SVV 37th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 7-8 ft buffered bike lanes on both sides of the road. Protected bi - :nes are not recommended due to the significant amount of driveways within the segment NVV 28th Street NVV 8th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes Two 8ft buffered bike lanes or 11ft two-way protected bik-. :ck on one side. On -street parking widths should be reduced. On -street parking should also be • erted to parallel parking SVV 1st Street SVV South River Drive SVV 24th Avenue Bicycle Lanes FDOT to determine feasibility of recommendatio, ree-lane, one-way road with on -street parking on both sides of the roadway. Use VV Flagler ' -et bicycle lanes should be used as a go-by NVV 79th Street Bayshore Drive NVV 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes FDOT to determine feasibility of reco . -ndation. Reduce travel lanes to 10ft to provide a 5ft bike lane in the eastbound direction. R. ay Section: 4 travel lanes- 3 EB, 1 VVB. Segment requires modifying or removing on-stre . . rking for a 4 ft bike lane from Biscayne Blvd to 8th Court NE 11th Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lane Section: Sid : k (5ft), on -street parking (7.5ft), bike lane (5ft), 10ft travel lanes, on - street parking (7.5ft), . . - alk (5ft). Identified as a previous project to construct bike lanes SVV 16th Avenue SVV 8th Street S Dixie Highway Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes. Se. -nt connects SVV 8th Street to Underline and to Marlins Park. Explore the conversion to . e-way roadway SVV 8th Street SVV 5th Avenue SVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes FDOT to d= ine feasibility of recommendation. Three -lane one-way roadway with on -street parkin. .oth sides. Remove one lane of on -street parking for 7ft buffered bike lane SVV 37th Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5 ft •. - lanes. Remove one northbound travel lane (NB is free -flow). Segment connects to US-1 and cle Boulevard to the south NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue NVV 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes ity project will reduce number of lanes to implement bike lanes S Miami Avenue SVV 9th Street SVV 10th Street Bicycle Lanes Remove 8 on -street parking spaces on east side to accomodate bike lanes NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes Resemble bike lanes on segment west of this segment; 5 ft bike lane Section: Sidewalk (5ft), on - street parking (7.5ft), bike lane (5ft), 10ft travel lanes, on -street parking (7.5ft), sidewalk (5ft) NVV 5th Avenue NVV 36th Street NVV 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes Remove travel lane in each direction to fit 5 ft bike lanes S Bayshore Drive SVV 32nd Road Halissee Street Bicycle Lanes DTPVV recommendation to connect to Commodore Trail NE 29th Street east of NE 4th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Lar . S Miami Avenue SVV 14th Terrace SW 15th Road Bicycl= :nes Modify median to accomodate bike lanes NE 1st Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 -cle Lanes 5ft bike lane on east side of roadway. Continue existing section from bike lane facilities to the south Brickell Bay Drive SE 8th Street SE 12th Street Bicycle Lanes Two way cycle track replacing existing on -street parking. Remove on -street parking on both sides or eliminate a travel lane to implement the two-way cycle track NVV 6th Street NVV 3rd Avenue NVV 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes both sides Section: Sidewalk (5ft), on -street parking (7.5ft), bike lane (5ft), 10ft travel lanes, on -street parking (7.5ft), sidewalk (5ft). To note- 6th Street is a one-way pair with NVV 5th Street NE 15th Street Venetian Causeway Herald Plaza Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes next to sidewalk on both sides of the street, which will be protected by on -street parking N Miami Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lane on west side of roadway. Conitnue existing section from bike lane facilities to the south SVV 32nd Avenue SVV 11th Street 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes Reduce lane widths, swales, and on -street parking to implement bike lanes. Segment borders multiple parks and Caballero Rivero Little Habana NE 4th Avenue NE 71st Street NE 62nd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes both sides Section: Sidewalk (5ft), bike lane, on -street parking (10ft), two -through lanes (10ft each), on -street parking (10ft), bike lane, sidewalk NVV 17th Street NVV 3rd Avenue NVV 9th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes. Reduce lane widths to implement bike lanes SE 15th Road Brickell Bay Drive Brickell Avenue Bicycle Lanes NVV 5th Avenue NVV 3rd Avenue NVV 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes Space next to on -street parking will be converted to bike lane NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 79th Str NVV 71st Street Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes SVV 22nd Avenue S Highway Overbrook Street Bicycle Lanes Northbound direction bike lane. Southbound direction implement sharrow because of on -street parking obstruction. As an alternative- create pockets of on -street parking built into the utility area instead of a dedicated parking lane, which would create the space needed for bike lanes on both sides NE 29th Street NVV 7th Avenue NVV 18th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes, which will be a continuation of the project to east of 7th Avenue NVV 14th Street NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 36th Avenue Bicycle Lanes VViden shoulder markings to incorporate bike lanes into roadway. Proposal aligns with previous Traffic Management Master Plan. Section: 11 ft travel lanes, 7 ft buffered bike lanes, 12 ft parking each side, 5 ft sidewalk NVV 71st Street 1-95 NVV 17th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes on both sides Tamiami Canal Road NVV 7th Street VV Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes Section: Sidewalk, on -street parking, bike lane, through traffic, bike lane, on -street parking, sidewalk. Consider reducing the wide swale on the west side of the roadway to accomodate the bike lanes. I SUBSTITUT Facility SVV 21st Road To SVV 11th Street From SVV 1st Avenue Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Lanes Notes Repurpose informal on -street parking to bike lane(s). The large swale area is al apable of supporting bike lanes NVV 35th Avenue NVV 7th Street VV Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 100 feet ROVV. Implement bike lanes into the roadway Herald Plaza NE 15th Street NE 14th Street Bicycle Lanes SVV 62nd Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SVV 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes. Remove parking near utility poles because on- parking will need to shift into grass strips to accommodate bike lanes. Section: Sidewalk, • reet parking (replaces grass strip), bike lane, travel lanes, bike lane, sidewalk NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 38th Street NVV 28th Street Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes on both sides of the road. Decrease • idth of on street parking on both sides. Section: Sidewalk, on -street parking, bike lane, .ugh lanes, bike lane, on -street parking, sidewalk NVV 25th Avenue NVV 36th Street NVV 28th Street Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bicycle lanes. Decrease the width of o• eet parking and expand build lanes into the grass buffer Coral Gate Drive SVV 21st Street SVV 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes NE 4th Avenue NE 60th Street NE 54th Street Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes both sides. Co angled parking to parallel on -street parking NVV 5th Avenue NVV 54th Street NVV 40th Street Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes Section: Sid : k, grass strip, bike lane, on -street parking, through lanes. Consider reducing the median o .ss strip to fit the 5 ft lanes SVV 66th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SVV 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 5ft bike lanes built .• . existing on -street parking space, which requires a shift to parallel on -street parking; Very w swales on either side of roadway that can be repurposed and pavement can be widened to ruct a bike lane SVV 4th Street SVV 60th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Lanes 5ft bik es Section; Sidewalk, on -street parking, bike lane, through lanes, bike lane, on -street par., sidewalk; Change on -street parking type to parallel parking by reducing parking lane width NE 81st Street Biscayne Boulevard NE 4th Place Bicycle Lanes •n-street 5 ft bike lanes NVV 14th Avenue NVV 71st Street NVV 67th Street Bicycle Lanes 5 ft bike lanes north of NVV 67th St and bike boulevard south of NVV 67th street. Change on -street parking type to parallel parking, construct bike lanes into grass strip. Bicycle lanes will be protected by parking NVV 32nd Street NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 5ft bicycle lanes Section: Sidewalk, grass utility strip, 5 ft bike lane, parallel parking, through lanes, on street parking, bike lane, grass strip, sidewalk; Not a protected facility because of frequent driveways SVV 21st Street SVV 32nd Avenue Coral Gate Drive Bicycle L. • . Provides an alternative to cycling on Coral Way NE 2nd Street Biscayne Boulevard N Miami Avenue Bicycl- . oulevard NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV North River Drive B • e Boulevard NVV 32nd Street E Coast Avenue NVV 23rd Avenue : icycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 11th Terrace NVV 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard NE 8th Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV 7th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard SVV 11th Street SVV 1st Court SVV 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 3rd Street NVV South River Drive NVV 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 10th Avenue NVV 71st Street NVV 20th Str-.- Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to Jackson Memorial Hospital at south end NVV 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV 1st ' -nue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 3rd Street S . Street Bicycle Boulevard Upgrades existing sharrows to Bicycle Boulevard (signage, markings, identified route) SVV 12th Street Brickell Plaza 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard SVV 17th Avenue S Dixie Highway S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard Connects to Bayshore Drive and Commodore Trail Alatka Street S Dixie Highway S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard Create opening to US-1 on north end to allow bicyclists to pass -through SVV 4th Street SVV 4th Avenue SVV 31st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility SE 3rd Street S Biscayne Boulevar• SE 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 75th Street NE 3rd Place NVV 8th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the long-term SVV 5th Avenue VV Flagler S SVV 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to transit stop and connects to multiple bicycle facilities SVV 23rd Avenue NVV 4tr .reef SVV 16th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to proposed bike lanes south of segment and passes many parks and activity centers SVV 10th Street ami Avenue SVV 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 14th Avenue VV 67th Street NVV 50th Street Bicycle Boulevard Section: 5 ft bike lanes north of NVV 67th St and Bicycle Boulevard south of NVV 67th street SVV 23rd Street SVV 32nd Road SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to Vizcaya station. Informal on -street parking and 5' grass strip on both sides of roadway. NE 27th Street NE 5th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROW constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility SVV 10th Street SVV 1st Court SVV 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard SE 10th Street Brickell Avenue Brickell Plaza Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to MetroMover station SVV 37th Avenue Grand Avenue Main Highway Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 16th Avenue NVV 7th Street SVV 1st Street Bicycle Boulevard I SUBSTITUT Facility SW 13th Street To SVV 10th Avenue From SVV 32nd Avenue Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard Notes T Explore repurposing the unmarked, paved, and informal on -street parking to bi - .ne in the long- term. Explore possibility of one-way pair w/SVV 14th or 12th SVV 22nd Avenue SVV 8th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 11th Street NVV 27th Avenue NVV 33rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 27th to 23rd is the site of previous safety study. Explore repurposin. - swale space to implement a bike lane in the long-term Brickell Bay Drive SE 12th Street SE 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the g-term SVV 11th Street SVV 15th Road SVV 16th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment provides additional bicycle infrastructure near , 8th Street SE 2nd Avenue S Biscayne Boulevard S Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 35th Street NVV 12th Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to Allapattah metrorail statio.. d is close to multiple transit stops SVV 32nd Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a . . cated bicycle facility. The corridor is the location of a recent safety study NE 14th Street Herald Plaza N Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard Day Avenue SVV 27th Avenue SVV 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit impleme on of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 17th Street NVV 29th Avenue NVV 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit impl-• -ntation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 3rd Street NVV 22nd Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment provides a co tion from proposed alley -bicycle lane to NVV 22nd Avenue, which is near Citrus Grove Middle ' ool NVV 49th Street NE 2nd Avenue NVV 6th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraint it implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to multiple bike facilities SVV 26th Street SVV 22nd Avenue SVV 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segme - . ovides a connection between Coral Gables and planned bicycle lanes on SVV 22nd Ave SVV 36th Avenue SVV 27th Street SVV 22nd Street Bicycle Boulevard S ent connects to other proposed bicycle lane on north end and a school at south end NVV 23rd Street N Miami Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 21st Street N Miami Avenue NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard SVV 10th Street SVV 16th Avenue SVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment passes by schools and provides alternative route from SVV 8th Street NVV 28th Street NVV 17th Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 3rd Avenue NVV 11th Street NVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard SVV 60th Avenue NVV 7th Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulev- Segment connects to West End park NVV 60th Street NE 2nd Avenue NVV 6th Street Bicycle Bo and SE 5th Street S Miami Avenue S Miami Avenue Bicycl- .ulevard Segment connects to Miami Avenue bridge SVV 29th Avenue VV Flagler Street SVV 20th Street - le Boulevard Explore repurposing the swale space to implement a bike lane in the long-term. Segment connects to landmark at north end NVV 67th Street NE 4th Avenue NVV 5th Court Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to school and Little Haiti Park NE 3rd Avenue E Flagler Street SE 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 64th Street NE 2nd Avenue NW 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to parks on both ends of segment NVV 12th Street NVV 1st Place NVV 4th Avenu Bicycle Boulevard NVV 27th Court NVV 7th Street VV Flagler -et Bicycle Boulevard NVV 6th Avenue NVV 54th Street NVV 47 -venue Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the long-term NVV 17th Street NVV 1st Avenue N . d Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Halissee Street S Dixie Highway .:ayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard Create opening to US-1 on north end to allow bicyclists to pass -through NVV 13th Street NVV 1st Place NVV 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 33rd Avenue NVV 11th Street SVV 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the long-term SVV 17th Street SVV 21st Avenue SVV 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 5th Court NVV 60th Street NVV 54th Street Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 25th Avenue NVV 28th Stree NVV 18th Terrace Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 25th Avenue NVV 38th S NVV 36th Street Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility SVV 4th Street SVV 42. •venue SVV 60th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility SVV 22nd Avenue Ov' . ook Street S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 53rd Street E 2nd Avenue NVV 6th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Connection under 1-95 and to other areas of significance (Miami Ave, 2nd Ave, FEC Rail). Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the Tong -term NVV 71 st Street Biscayne Boulevard NVV 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to multiple N-S bike lanes facilities throughout corridor. Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the Tong -term SVV 6th Street S Miami Avenue S Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to The Underline and provides connection to S Miami Avenue bridge. A riverwalk/greenway is planned with new development in the area NVV 18th Avenue NVV 23rd Street NVV 15th Street Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parking to bike lane in the Tong -term, or widen sidewalk to accomodate 10' mixed use path Carter Street US-1 Day Avenue Bicycle Boulevard I SUBSTITUT Facility NVV 4th Street To NVV 45th Avenue From NVV 53rd Avenue Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard Notes Segment connects to Flagler Memorial Park. Explore repurposing the on-stree .' ing to bike lane in the long-term NVV 15th Avenue NVV 50th Street NVV 40th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 15th Avenue NVV 62nd Street NVV 50th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment provides connection/bike infrastructure between two bike - routes NVV 47th Avenue NVV 7th Street SVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment provides continuous route for multiple blocks. Swale • . e is occupied by large shade trees and is not recommended to remove them for a bike facility SVV 43rd Avenue NVV 11th Street SVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard Plaza Street Day Avenue Franklin Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NE 60th Street NE 4th Avenue NE 2nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 29th Avenue NVV 17th Street NVV 15th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 18th Avenue NVV 36th Street NVV 28th Street Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on -street parki . o bike lane in the long-term, or widen sidewalk to accomodate 10' mixed use path NVV 3rd Street NVV 38th Court NVV 47th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit impleme. ion of a dedicated bicycle facility Tamiami Canal Road VV Flagler Street SVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the sw. pace on the west side of the roadway to implement a bike lane in the long-term SVV 72nd Avenue VV Flagler Street SVV 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposinswale space on the west side of the roadway to implement a bike lane in the long-term Shipping Avenue SVV 27th Avenue Plaza Street Bicycle Boulevard SVV 32nd Avenue SVV 6th Street SVV 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 64th Street NVV 7th Avenue NVV 12th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Seg . t connects to trail/path along NVV 12th Avenue NVV 23rd Street NVV 22nd Avenue NVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard . ent connects to high ridership transit stop. Explore decreasing lane widths and landscape buffer .n both sides of the roadway to implement a bike lane in the long-term. NVV 55th Street NVV 7th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Allows an alternative to 54th for multimodal travel NVV 23rd Street NVV 12th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to high ridership transit stop. Explore decreasing lane widths and landscape buffer on both sides of the roadway to implement a bike lane in the long-term. NVV 5th Street NVV 55th Court Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on-street/grass parking to bike lane in the long-term NVV 57th Street NE 4th Avenue NVV 2nd Avenue Bicycle Boulev ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to multiple other bicycle facilities and passes next to school NVV 42nd Street N Miami Avenue NVV 6th Avenue Bicycle '. levard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Existing on -street parking on both sides of road NVV 42nd Streeet NE 2nd Avenue N Miami Avenue cle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Existing on -street parking on both sides of road. Segment connects to multiple bike facilities Overbrook Street SVV 22nd Avenue SVV 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Open closed roadway section at 26th Avenue for bicycles to pass -through NVV 22nd Street NVV 3rd Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects proposed bike lanes on NVV 3 Ave to lanes on NVV 5 Ave. New development proposed for lot directly north NVV 60th Street NVV 9th Avenue NVV 17th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to crosswalk by school on west, and will connect to park on west end NVV 27th Street N Miami Avenue NVV 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to railroad crossing NVV 3rd Street NVV 53rd Avenue NW 57th A e Bicycle Boulevard Explore repurposing the on-street/grass parking to bike lane in the long-term. Segment connects to Flagler Memorial Park NVV 18th Street NVV 14th Avenue NVV 1• , venue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 17th Street/NVV 16th Street Nw 12th Avenue . 15th Street Road Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to other proposed facilities, Jackson Memorial Hospital, and Metrorail center NVV 13th Avenue NVV 14th Street NVV 12th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 53rd Street NVV 14th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Connects to alley -bike lanes. On -street parking on both sides- consider expanding sidedwalks and reducing lane widths without taking away parking to provide bike lanes in the long-term NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 7th Street NVV 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 19th Avenue NVV 58th Street NVV 40th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to multiple schools and metro station NVV 23rd Avenue NVV 28th Str-- NVV 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility SVV 56th Avenue VV Fla. - treet SVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to parks on south and north ends. ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility Secoffee Street/Espanola Drive/Tigertail Avenue a Street SVV 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Community feedback identified opposition to Bicycle Boulevard on Tigertail Avenue, this is the proposed alternative route SE 32nd Road SVV Miami Court Brickell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects Commodore Trail to Metrorail Station NVV 63rd Street NVV 15th Avenue NVV 17th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects to proposed bike lanes to the east NVV 3rd Street NVV 30th Avenue NVV 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility, but explore lane reduction and on -street parking repurposing to construct bike lanes. Segment connects to school and proposed bike lanes to west Poinciana Avenue Main Highway SVV 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. One -lane each direction maintains lower speeds. Many Traffic Calming elements proposed within the segment NVV 30th Avenue NVV 4th Street NVV 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard I SUBSTITUT Facility To From Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard Notes Nw 4th Street NVV 28th Avenue NVV 30th Avenue NVV 6th Street NVV 27th Avenue NVV 33rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NE 81st Street N Bayshore Drive Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard Franklin Avenue Plaza Street SW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard SVV 7th Street SVV 27th Avenue SW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle - ty. Segment connects to existing bike lanes east of SVV 27 Ave NVV 46th Street NVV 17th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated . cle facility NVV 8th Avenue NVV 29th Street NVV 28th Street Bicycle Boulevard NVV 25th Street N Miami Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 26th Street NVV 10th Avenue NVV 12th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment provides an alternative route for - red -use path under metrorail to connect to another facility SVV 52nd Avenue VV Flagler Street SVV 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard Evaluate possibilities for bicycle la. . o be implemented in the long-term within this segment by repurposing on -street parking NVV 30th Avenue NVV 17th Street NVV 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard Evaluate possibilities for bi. e lanes to be implemented in the long-term within this segment NVV 6th Street NVV 45th Avenue NVV 49th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 9th Avenue NVV 61st Street NVV 60th Street Bicycle Boulevard Segment connects . park NVV 56th Street NVV 7th Avenu NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Segment conn to a park and school on the westem portion of the segment. There is a signalized crossing o NE 71st Street NE 10th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard Need to struct cut -through that connects east part of 71st Ave to Biscayne Blvd to continue the pro..- .-d facility NVV 51 st Avenue NVV 7th Street VV Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard '' , constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. On -street parking is heavily tilized Loquat Avenue SVV 37th Avenue SVV 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 49th Avenue NVV 6th Street SVV 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NE 81st Street NE 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NE 5th Avenue NE 81st Street NE 79th Street Bicycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 41 st Street NVV 18th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bicycle Boul-. d ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility. Segment connects to proposed bike track south on NVV 40th and leads into MetroRail station to the west NVV 56th Street NVV 2nd Avenue NVV 6th Avenue Bicycle ' . levard Provides connection to proposed bike lane facilities NVV 16th Terrace NVV 15th Avenue NVV 19th Avenue Bic - Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility NVV 13th Avenue NVV 12th Street NVV 11th Street ycle Boulevard ROVV constraints limit implementation of a dedicated bicycle facility Park Avenue SVV 37th Avenue SVV 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard NVV 32nd Avenue NVV 20th Street NVV 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard Evaluate possibilities for bicycle lanes to be implemented in the long-term within this segment NE 6th Court NE 77th Street NE 72nd Terrace Bicycle Boulevard Charles Terrace SVV 37th Avenue Jefferson Street Bicycle Boulevard Opechee Drive Halissee Street Espanola Drive Bicycle Boulevard La Playa Boulevard Poinciana Avenue Kiaora Stre-. Bicycle Boulevard NVV 52nd Street NVV 7th Avenue NVV 1 venue Bicycle Boulevard Bicyclists to continue through the back lot of the commercial center west of the line, after following the neighborhood routes further west of the commercial center NVV 19th Avenue NVV 18th Street orth River Drive Bicycle Boulevard Swanson Avenue Overbrook Street , viation Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Increase bicycle access by opening the close-out at Bird and Aviation, leading into Swanson Justice Road Loquat Avenue Poinciana Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Brighton Road Woodridge Road City of Miami Boundary Bicycle Boulevard Woodridge Road Braganza Avenue Brighton Avenue Bicycle Boulevard Braganza Avenue Kiaora Street Woodridge Road Bicycle Boulevard Kiaora Street Braganza Av-.- - La Playa Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard Battersea Road SVV 37th - ue SVV 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard I SUBSTITUT Facility Biscayne Boulevard To NE 87th Street From NE 6th Street Bicycle Facility Type Shared -Use Path �oritization Total 96 SW 1st Street SW South River Drive SW 24th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 84 Plan Z Shared -Use Path 83 NW 79th Street Bayshore Drive NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 80 SW 13th Avenue SW 8th Street SW 3rd Avenue Shared -Use Path 78 Commodore Trail Rickenbacker Causeway N Prospect Drive Shared -Use Path 77 SW/NW 19th Avenue NW 3rd Street US-1 Protected Bicycle Lanes 76 NE 11th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 76 SW 6th Street SW 5th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Shared -Use Path 72 NE 2nd Street Biscayne Boulevard N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 71 NW 2nd Avenue NW 71 st Street NW 58th Street Protected Bicycle L - 71 N Federdal Highway NE 54th Street NE 36th Street Protected Bicycl- - nes 71 NE 3rd Street Biscayne Boulevard NW North River Drive Bicycle Boul= =rd 70 SW 16th Avenue SW 8th Street S Dixie Highway Bicycle -s 70 SW 8th Street SW 5th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicy anes 70 SW 37th Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue B.' e Lanes 70 NW 12th Avenue NW 37th Street NW 14th Street ared-Use Path 69 NW 2nd Avenue NW 57th Street NW 38th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 67 NE 29th Street N Miami Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 67 S Miami Avenue SW 9th Street SW 10th Street Bicycle Lanes 67 SW 25th Road SW 9th Avenue SW 1st Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 66 NW 10th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 65 NW 32nd Street E Coast Avenue NW 23rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 2nd Avenue NW 11th Terrace NW 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard 64 NW 5th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 64 NW 1st Place NW 21st Street NW 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 63 SW 19th Street SW 12th Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 63 NE 8th Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 62 SW 11th Street SW 1st Court SW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 62 SE 1st Avenue SE 3rd Street SE 6th Stre-. Shared -Use Path 62 S Bayshore Drive SW 32nd Road Halissee - eet Bicycle Lanes 61 NE 29th Street east of NE 4th Avenue N Mi Avenue Bicycle Lanes 61 S Miami Avenue SW 14th Terrace S 5th Road Bicycle Lanes 61 NW 3rd Street NW South River Drive 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 10th Avenue NW 71st Street NW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 60 NW 1st Street Biscayne Boulevard NW 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 60 NE 1st Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 Bicycle Lanes 60 Brickell Bay Drive SE 8th Street SE 12th Street Bicycle Lanes 60 NW 71st Street NW 12th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 59 NW 6th Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 59 NE 15th Street Venetian Causeway Herald Plaza Bicycle Lanes 59 NW 2nd Avenue NW 3rd Street SW 1st Street Bicycle Boulevard 58 SW 12th Street Brickell Plaza SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 58 N Miami Avenue NE 17th Street 1-395 Bicycle Lanes 58 SW 17th Avenue S Dixie Highway S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard 57 SW 32nd Avenue SW 11th Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 57 Brickell Bay Drive SE 14th Str-.- SE 15th Road Shared -Use Path 57 Alatka Street S Dixie way S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard 55 SE 1st Avenue SE 1 - - reet Se 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 NW 11th Street 3rd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 55 Ludlam Trail of W Flagler Street SW 8th Street Shared -Use Path 55 SW 4th Street SW 4th Avenue SW 31st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 54 SE 3rd Street S Biscayne Boulevard SE 1st Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 54 NW 39th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 54 NW 75th Street NE 3rd Place NW 8th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 53 NW 46th Street NW 2nd Avenue NW 17th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 53 NE 4th Avenue NE 71st Street NE 62nd Avenue Bicycle Lanes 53 SW 5th Avenue W Flagler Street SW 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 SW 23rd Avenue NW 4th Street SW 16th Street Bicycle Boulevard 52 I SUBSTITUT Facility SW 10th Street To S Miami Avenue From SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard �oritization Total 52 NW 17th Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 9th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 5th Court NW 67th Street NW 62nd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 52 NW 3rd Avenue NW 29th Avenue NW 25th Street Shared -Use Path 52 NW 14th Avenue NW 67th Street NW 50th Street Bicycle Boulevard 51 SW 23rd Street SW 32nd Road SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 51 SE 15th Road Brickell Bay Drive Brickell Avenue Bicycle Lanes 51 NE 27th Street NE 5th Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 50 SW 10th Street SW 1st Court SW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 50 NW 6th Avenue NW 35th Street NW 21st Terrace Shared -Use Path 50 SE 10th Street Brickell Avenue Brickell Plaza Bicycle Boulevard 49 SW 37th Avenue Grand Avenue Main Highway Bicycle Bouleva 49 NW 16th Avenue NW 7th Street SW 1st Street Bicycle Boul= =rd 49 NW 5th Avenue NW 3rd Avenue NW 7th Avenue Bicycle -s 49 NW 2nd Avenue NW 79th Street NW 71st Street Bicyc anes 49 SW 16th Avenue SW 1st Street SW 8th Street P - -cted Bicycle Lanes 49 SW 13th Street SW 10th Avenue SW 32nd Avenue . icycle Boulevard 48 SW 22nd Avenue SW 8th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard 48 NW 11th Street NW 27th Avenue NW 33rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 48 Brickell Bay Drive SE 12th Street SE 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard 48 NE 2nd Avenue NE 17th Street NE 17th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 SW 22nd Avenue S Dixie Highway Overbrook Street Bicycle Lanes 48 NW 71 st Street NE 4th Avenue 1-95 Protected Bicycle Lanes 48 NW 1st Avenue NW 29th Street NW 25th Street Shared -Use Path 48 SW 11th Street SW 15th Road SW 16th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 47 SE 2nd Avenue S Biscayne Boulevard S Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 47 SW 23rd Street SW 27th Avenue SW 37th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 47 NW 35th Street NW 12th Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 46 SW 32nd Avenue S Dixie Highway Grand Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 46 NE 14th Street Herald Plaza N Bayshore r e Bicycle Boulevard 46 NE 29th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 18th enue Bicycle Lanes 46 SW 23rd Avenue SW 16th Street SW Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 46 NW 28th Street NW 8th Avenue 7th Avenue Buffered Bicycle Lanes 46 Day Avenue SW 27th Avenue 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 45 NW 17th Street NW 29th Avenue NW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 45 NW 29th Avenue NW 15th Street NW 7th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 SW 7th Avenue NW 4th Street SW 4th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 45 SW 6th Avenue SW 27th Avenue SW 35th Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 NE 17th Street Biscayne Boulevard Ne 2nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 45 NW 3rd Street NW 22nd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 44 NW 49th Street NE 2nd Avenue NW 6th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 44 SW 26th Street SW 22nd Avenue SW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 43 SW 36th Avenue SW 27th Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Boulevard 43 NW 23rd Street N Miami Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 43 NW 14th Street NW 23rd Avenue NW 36th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 43 NW 23rd Street NW 19th Avenu- NW 22nd Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 43 NW 21st Street N Miami Av- .- NW 3rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 42 NW 12th Avenue NW 62n. • reet NW 67th Street Shared -Use Path 42 NW 71 st Street 1-95 NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 41 NW 35th Court 1th Street NW 7th Street Shared -Use Path 41 SW 10th Street - 16th Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 NW 28th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 40 NW 3rd Avenue NW 11th Street NW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 40 Tamiami Canal Road NW 7th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 40 SW 60th Avenue NW 7th Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 NW 60th Street NE 2nd Avenue NW 6th Street Bicycle Boulevard 39 SE 5th Street S Miami Avenue S Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 39 SW 21st Road SW 11th Street SW 1st Avenue Bicycle Lanes 39 NW 35th Avenue NW 7th Street W Flagler Street Bicycle Lanes 39 I SUBSTITUT Facility Herald Plaza To NE 15th Street From NE 14th Street Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Lanes �oritization Total 39 SW 29th Avenue W Flagler Street SW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 38 NW 67th Street NE 4th Avenue NW 5th Court Bicycle Boulevard 38 NE 3rd Avenue E Flagler Street SE 3rd Street Bicycle Boulevard 38 NW 40th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 18th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lanes 38 SW 62nd Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 23rd Avenue NW 38th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle Lanes 38 NW 64th Street NE 2nd Avenue NW 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 37 NW 12th Street NW 1st Place NW 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 37 NW 3rd Street NW 32nd Avenue NW 37th Avenue Protected Bicycle Lane 37 SW 63rd Court Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle L - 37 NW 6th Avenue NW 47th Street NW 40th Street Protected Bicycl- - nes 37 NE 17th Street NE 2nd Avenue N Miami Avenue Protected Bi e Lanes 37 NW 25th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle -s 37 NW 27th Court NW 7th Street W Flagler Street Bicyc coulevard 36 NW 6th Avenue NW 54th Street NW 47th Avenue B- e Boulevard 36 NW 17th Street NW 1st Avenue NW 3rd Avenue . icycle Boulevard 36 Halissee Street S Dixie Highway S Bayshore Drive Bicycle Boulevard 36 NW 13th Street NW 1st Place NW 4th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 36 Coral Gate Drive SW 21st Street SW 22nd Street Bicycle Lanes 36 NW 33rd Avenue NW 11th Street SW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 35 SW 17th Street SW 21st Avenue SW 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 35 NW 5th Court NW 60th Street NW 54th Street Bicycle Boulevard 35 NW 25th Avenue NW 28th Street NW 18th Terrace Bicycle Boulevard 35 NW 25th Avenue NW 38th Street NW 36th Street Bicycle Boulevard 35 NE 4th Avenue NE 60th Street NE 54th Street Bicycle Lanes 35 NW 36th Avenue NW 20th Street NW 14th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 35 SW 4th Street SW 42nd Avenue SW 60th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 34 SW 17th Street SW 12th Avenue SW 21st Avenu Shared -Use Path 34 NE 4th Avenue NE 50th Street NE 42nd St: Shared -Use Path 34 SW 22nd Avenue Overbrook Street S Baysh. give Bicycle Boulevard 33 NW 53rd Street NE 2nd Avenue NW • ,venue Bicycle Boulevard 33 NW 71st Street Biscayne Boulevard th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 33 SW 6th Street S Miami Avenue . Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 33 NW 18th Avenue NW 23rd Street NW 15th Street Bicycle Boulevard 33 Carter Street US-1 Day Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 33 NE 23rd Street NE 4th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Shared -Use Path 33 NW 4th Street NW 45th Avenue NW 53rd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 32 NW 15th Avenue NW 50th Street NW 40th Street Bicycle Boulevard 32 NW 15th Avenue NW 62nd Street NW 50th Street Bicycle Boulevard 32 NW 47th Avenue NW 7th Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 32 SW 43rd Avenue NW 11th Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 32 Plaza Street Day Avenue Franklin Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 32 NE 60th Street NE 4th Avenue NE 2nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 32 NW 29th Avenue NW 17th Street NW 15th Street Bicycle Boulevard 32 NW 18th Avenue NW 36th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle Boulevard 31 NW 3rd Street NW 38th Co NW 47th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 31 Tamiami Canal Road W Flagl- - reet SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 31 SW 72nd Avenue W FI- -r Street SW 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard 31 Shipping Avenue S 7th Avenue Plaza Street Bicycle Boulevard 31 SW 32nd Avenue - 6th Street SW 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard 31 NW 64th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 12th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 31 NW 23rd Street NW 22nd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 31 NW 5th Avenue NW 54th Street NW 40th Street Bicycle Lanes 31 NW 3rd Street NW 57th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Protected Bicycle Lanes 31 NW 55th Street NW 7th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 30 NW 23rd Street NW 12th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 30 NW 5th Street NW 55th Court Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Boulevard 30 NW 57th Street NE 4th Avenue NW 2nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 30 I SUBSTITUT Facility NW 42nd Street To N Miami Avenue From NW 6th Avenue Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard �oritization Total 30 NW 42nd Streeet NE 2nd Avenue N Miami Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 30 Overbrook Street SW 22nd Avenue SW 27th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 30 SW 66th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road SW 8th Street Bicycle Lanes 30 SW 7th Avenue SW 11th Street SW 12th Avenue Shared -Use Path 30 NW 22nd Street NW 3rd Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 29 NW 60th Street NW 9th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 29 NW 27th Street N Miami Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 29 SW 4th Street SW 60th Avenue Tamiami Canal Road Bicycle Lanes 29 NE 4th Avenue NE 54th Street NE 50th Street Shared -Use Path 29 NW 3rd Street NW 53rd Avenue NW 57th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 28 NW 18th Street NW 14th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Bouleva 28 NW 17th Street/NW 16th Street Nw 12th Avenue NW 15th Street Road Bicycle Boul =rd 28 NW 13th Avenue NW 14th Street NW 12th Street Bicycle z.. evard 28 NW 53rd Street NW 14th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicy :oulevard 27 NW 23rd Avenue NW 7th Street NW 4th Street B.' e Boulevard 27 NW 19th Avenue NW 58th Street NW 40th Street . icycle Boulevard 27 NW 23rd Avenue NW 28th Street NW 20th Street Bicycle Boulevard 27 NE 81st Street Biscayne Boulevard NE 4th Place Bicycle Lanes 27 NE 22nd Street Biscayne Boulevard NE 2nd Avenue Shared -Use Path 27 SW 49th Avenue SW 4th Street SW 8th Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 27 SW 56th Avenue W Flagler Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 26 Secoffee Street/Espanola Drive/Tigertail Avenue Alatka Street SW 22nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 26 SE 32nd Road SW Miami Court Brickell Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 26 NW 14th Avenue NW 71st Street NW 67th Street Bicycle Lanes 26 NE 4th Avenue NE 24th Street NE 22nd Street Protected Bicycle Lanes 26 NW 63rd Street NW 15th Avenue NW 17th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 25 NW 3rd Street NW 30th Avenue NW 32nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 25 Poinciana Avenue Main Highway SW 42nd Aven - Bicycle Boulevard 25 NW 30th Avenue NW 4th Street NW 3rd Stre- Bicycle Boulevard 25 Nw 4th Street NW 28th Avenue NW 30th enue Bicycle Boulevard 25 NW 6th Street NW 27th Avenue NW . Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 25 NE 81st Street N Bayshore Drive B- - yne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 25 Franklin Avenue Plaza Street 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 25 SW 7th Street SW 27th Avenue SW 37th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 24 NW 46th Street NW 17th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 24 NW 8th Avenue NW 29th Street NW 28th Street Bicycle Boulevard 24 NW 25th Street N Miami Avenue NW 5th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 24 NW 26th Street NW 10th Avenue NW 12th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 23 NE 4th Avenue NE 23rd Terrace NE 23rd Street Shared -Use Path 23 NW 32nd Street NW 23rd Avenue NW 27th Avenue Bicycle Lanes 23 SW 52nd Avenue W Flagler Street SW 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard 22 NW 30th Avenue NW 17th Street NW 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard 22 NW 6th Street NW 45th Avenue NW 49th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 22 NW 9th Avenue NW 61st Street NW 60th Street Bicycle Boulevard 22 NW 56th Street NW 7th Avenu NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 22 NE 71st Street NE 10th Av-.- . - Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 22 NW 51st Avenue NW 7th et W Flagler Street Bicycle Boulevard 21 Loquat Avenue SW Avenue SW 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 21 SW 21st Street S 2nd Avenue Coral Gate Drive Bicycle Lanes 21 NW 49th Avenue 6th Street SW 4th Street Bicycle Boulevard 20 NE 81st Street NE 7th Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard 20 NE 5th Avenue NE 81st Street NE 79th Street Bicycle Boulevard 20 NW 41st Street NW 18th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 20 NW 56th Street NW 2nd Avenue NW 6th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 20 NW 16th Terrace NW 15th Avenue NW 19th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 20 NW 13th Avenue NW 12th Street NW 11th Street Bicycle Boulevard 20 Park Avenue SW 37th Avenue SW 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 20 NW 32nd Avenue NW 20th Street NW 14th Street Bicycle Boulevard 19 I SUBSTITUT Facility NE 6th Court To NE 77th Street From NE 72nd Terrace Bicycle Facility Type Bicycle Boulevard F oritization Total 19 Charles Terrace SW 37th Avenue Jefferson Street Bicycle Boulevard 18 Opechee Drive Halissee Street Espanola Drive Bicycle Boulevard 18 La Playa Boulevard Poinciana Avenue Kiaora Street Bicycle Boulevard 17 NW 52nd Street NW 7th Avenue NW 11th Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 16 NW 19th Avenue NW 18th Street NW North River Drive Bicycle Boulevard 16 Swanson Avenue Overbrook Street Aviation Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 14 Justice Road Loquat Avenue Poinciana Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 13 Brighton Road Woodridge Road City of Miami Boundary Bicycle Boulevard 12 Woodridge Road Braganza Avenue Brighton Avenue Bicycle Boulevard 12 Braganza Avenue Kiaora Street Woodridge Road Bicycle Boulevard 12 Kiaora Street Braganza Avenue La Playa Boulevard Bicycle Bouleva 12 Battersea Road SW 37th Avenue SW 42nd Avenue Bicycle Boul =rd 12 SUBSTITUTED