The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAnalysis and MapsPlace Holder City of Miami Planning Department STAFF ANALYSIS FOR A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Staff Analysis Report No. PZ-24-17606 Location 151 NW 60 ST and 145 NW 60 ST Area 1.13 acres Commission District District 5 — Commissioner Christine King Commissioner District Office Little Haiti D5 Office Existing FLU Designation Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities and Duplex Residential Proposed FLU Designation Low Density Restricted Commercial Applicant Raider Road LLC Applicant Representative Melissa Tapanes Llahues mtapanes(a�brzoninglaw.com Planner Kathryn Angleton, AICP, Principal Planner Recommendation Denial REQUEST Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ('MCNP"), Raider Road LLC ("the Applicant") is requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") of the MCNP to change the designation of the property at 151 NW 60 Street and 145 NW 60 Street ("the Property") from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Restricted Commercial". The proposed amendment contains approximately 1.13 acres. Small-scale comprehensive plan amendments are those that involve less than 50 acres of property and are subject to the Small -Scale Review Process, as set forth in Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes. Concurrently, the Applicant is requesting a change to the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas as a companion item (ePlan ID PZ-24-17607). The companion application seeks to change the Property's zoning designation from CI (Civic Institutional Transect Zone) to T4-L (General Urban Transect Zone — Limited). The Property is legally described in the attached Exhibit "A". The table below summarizes the request. The table below summarizes the proposed changes. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 1 Place Holder Summary of the Existing and Proposed FLU Designations and Zoning Designations # Folio Address FLUM Designation M21 Zoning Existing Proposed Existing Proposed 1 0131130520270 151 NW 60 ST Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation & Utilities Low Density Restricted Commercial CI T4-L 2 0131130520280 145 NW 60 ST Duplex Residential Low Density Restricted Commercial T3-O T4-L The Property is located along the north side of NW 60 Street and east of NW 1 Place. The Property consists of two parcels with an approximate area of 1.13 acres. The aerial image below shows the site, outlined in red, and the immediately surrounding context. Aerial Photo of Subiect Site File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 2 Place Holder EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Property in this request consists of two different existing FLU designations. The portion of the Property located at 151 NW 60 Street has an existing FLU designation of "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities", and the other portion of the Property located at 145 NW 60 Street has an existing FLU designation of "Duplex Residential." Both existing Future Land Use designations are described below. MAJOR INSTITUTIONA, PUBLIC FACILITIES, TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITIES The portion of the Property located at 151 NW 60 Street has an existing FLU of Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities. The primary intent of this land use classification is to allow land uses and activities that provide important services to the public. Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation facilities and public utilities, and general commercial activities intended to serve the needs of the public. Residential facilities are allowed up to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or if applicable the least intense abutting/adjacent residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting conditions. Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" allow nonresidential uses such as commercial and office to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designation "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Health/Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central Business District allow a maximum FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL The portion of the Property located at 145 NW 60 Street has an existing FLU designation of Duplex Residential. The primary intent of this land use classification is to allow development of duplex, or two, dwelling units on a lot. Areas designated as "Duplex Residential" allow residential structures of up to two dwelling units each to a maximum density of 18 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Community based residential facilities (14 clients or less, not including drug, alcohol, or correctional rehabilitation facilities) also shall be allowed pursuant to applicable state law. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 3 Place Holder Places of worship, primary and second schools, child day care centers and adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within duplex residential areas. Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable locations within duplex residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing structure(s). PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The request proposes a new Future Land Use designation of Low Density Restricted Commercial, which has the following definition: Areas designated as "Low Density Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Low Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools." Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Low Density Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 3.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. The maps below show the existing and proposed future land use designations for the subject property. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 4 Place Holder Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Designations for the Subject Property Z�U NW 62ND ST estricted Duplex; Residential NW6ISTST- NW 60TH=TER NNW 59TH- rEI Median Density Multifamily Residential -NW 60TH S Above: Existing Future Land Use Map NW 59TH- iTiER NW 62ND ST Restrict---. 0 alInIUMAM Duplex - Residential a' NW61STST- NW 60TH=T,ER Low Dens ty Restricted Commerc aI Mediun Density Multifamily Residen ial NW 60TH-ST- Above: Proposed Future Land Use Map NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT The Property is in the Little Haiti neighborhood. It is right across the street from Miami Edison Senior High School, which was rated an A -school by Miami -Dade County Public Schools (MDCPS) in 2024. The Property is also served by Toussaint Louverture Elementary School, which was rated a B-school by MDCPS in 2024 and is less than a half mile away. Lemon City Park and Athalie Range Park both serve the Property and are approximately 0.4 and 0.5 miles away respectively. The Property is served by Routes 2 and 62 of Metrobus. Route 2 provides connectivity to Downtown Miami and NE 84 Street by way of NW 2 Avenue. Route 62 provides connectivity to Hialeah and Biscayne Blvd by way of NW 62 Street. DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Planning staff used the Subject Property's Census Tract to retrieve data from the US Census Bureau and Esri's Community Analyst. The Subject Property's tract is Census Tract 20.03, which is bounded by NW 62 Street to the north, Miami Avenue to the east, NW 54 Street to the south, and 1-95 to the west for approximately 204 acres. Staff took the 2020 Decennial Census counts for Census Tract 20.03 and the City of Miami and Esri's Time Series data to gather the 2024 data for the same data points. Below is a table showing the basic demographic information for each. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 5 Place Holder Census Tract 20.03 City of Miami Data Point 2020 Population 3,453 Households 1,299 Housing Units 1,447 2024 2020 2024 3,323 442,241 456,742 1,278 187,379 198,583 1,414 212,146 227,004 The data revealed a decline in population, households, and housing units for Census Tract 20.03 since 2020. On the other hand, the City of Miami is observing gains in all three data points since 2020. GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS: FUTURE LAND USE INVENTORY Staff used geographic information systems (GIS) to determine the composition of FLU designations within a quarter -mile radius of the Subject Property ("Study Area"). Staff analyzed the data against the distribution of FLU designations citywide, which can be seen in the table below. The top two Future Land Use designations citywide are highlighted in green, and the top two FLU designations for the Study Area are highlighted in blue. Both the Study Area and citywide share one of their top three FLU designations, "Restricted Commercial." Since this designation is in both geographies' top three, it is highlighted in purple in the table below. Comparison of FLU Designations in Study Area FLU Designation Acres Single Fam. Res 5.17 Duplex Res. 71.94 Restricted Com. 25.84 Major PUB, FAC 23.82 26.13 Recreation 2.33 General Com. 0.00 Med D. Rest Com 0.00 Light Industrial 0.00 Industrial 0.00 Conservation 0.00 High D. MF Res. 0.00 CBD 0.00 Low D. Rest Com 0.00 Low D. MF Res 0.00 Total 155.23 0/0 3.3% 46.3% 16.6% 15.3% 16.8% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.00% Study Area & Citywide Citywide Acres 6,172.13 3,934.65 3,856.15 2,080.95 1,418.52 1,332.79 1,000.25 869.38 506.15 449.64 330.14 222.72 199.13 143.93 54.72 22,571.27 27.35% 17.43% 17.08% 9.22% 6.28% 5.90% 4.43% 3.85% 2.24% 1.99% 1.46% 0.99% 0.88% 0.64% 0.24% 100.00% It is true for both the Study Area and citywide that residential uses dominate their Future Land Use Maps. However, the residential makeup of the Study Area is denser and accounts for a File ID # PZ-24-17606 - Page 6 Place Holder greater share of all FLU designations than citywide. Approximately 52.3-percent (52.3%) of all land in the City has a Future Land Use designation that is strictly residential: "Single - Family Residential", "Duplex Residential", "Medium Density Multifamily Residential", "High Density Multifamily Residential", and "Low Density Multifamily Residential". The Study Area's share of strictly residential FLU designations is two-thirds (66%). Nearly one-third of all land citywide has a FLU designation of "Single -Family Residential," however, there only 3.3-percent (3.3%) of land in the Study Area has that designation. All of the "Restricted Commercial" land in the Study Area is located along the commercial corridors of NW 2 Avenue and NW 62 Street. GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS: EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY Staff used GIS to determine the composition of existing land uses within the Study Area. Existing land uses are assigned by the Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser and are tied to current land use classifications used by the Florida Department of Revenue. This analysis sheds light on the actual uses of all developed property within the Study Area. The table below shows the distribution of existing land uses by both parcel count (unique folio numbers) and acres. Existing Land Uses within 1/4 Mile of Subject Property Existing Land Use Single -Family Residential Duplex Residential Vacant Land Multifamily Commercial Misc Institutional Industrial Parking Lot Total Parcels 218 37.46% 196 33.68% 70 12.03% 52 8.93% 23 3.95% 12 2.06% 6 1.03% 3 0.52% 2 0.34% 582 100.00% Acres 0/0 29.09 25.55% 26.78 23.52% 11.63 10.22% 9.94 8.73% 5.65 4.97% 2.72 2.39% 27.22 23.90% 0.35 0.31 % 0.46 0.40% 113.85 100.00% The Study Area is saturated with residential uses both by parcel count and acreage. Duplex and Single -Family account for over 70 percent (70%) of all folios and nearly half (49%) of all non -right- of-way land in the Study Area. An interesting observation is that Institutional uses account for only one percent (1%) of parcels by just under 24 percent (24%) of all non -right-of-way land in the Study Area. Going back to the neighborhood context portion of this report, Miami Edison Senior High and Toussaint Louverture Elementary are under a half mile from the Subject Property. The map on the next page shows the existing land uses as colored dots overlaid on top of the FLUM of the Study Area. While Toussaint Louverture is within a half mile, it is not captured in the quarter - mile Study Area; it is just southeast of the recreational parcel that can be seen in the southeast corner of the quarter -mile radius (just outside the radius). That recreational parcel represents Lemon City Park, which was also noted in the neighborhood context section earlier in the report. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 7 Edison Senior High and Lemon City Park together account for 25 of the 27.22 acres of existing Institutional uses in the Study Area. EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY JN16167H_STJ NW_65I H:ST i Ti,ir - ,,,, _ �1 �NW 6 1—.4TH ST ♦ a' Ur Q , - I p ♦O Z CC ♦ Et ♦ z z • 4 [ L� —NW62NE' ST NW=60TH ST I IRI+IF1 NW-59TH{T.'.ER� •00 oo• 101 z ti • NW.. 1M NI et 2 O —Single Fam..Reslp• [=7N] 11 0 0 0 1 r O O O 0 07 O JO • o ao • o F-o 0 633DST . o 0 •• CM ao • O • ?ol0Z0 zo • 0 0 estrled Com 0 ¢ • , 0 NW_59TH S Ito •o, • • •I —N W_6 H_ST • 00 • 0 • •,O O Ol•l•l•E1 0 0 O • • 0 • 0 0000000 000 • 0 O • 00 000 ° ° zz AIM/IJ F r.RTH CS • • • • • 0 e0 0 0 0 00.000 NW61STST ®• • of01 NW-60TH TER 0 0•o•orl plei=Res? • Io • Q_NW65TI nNE -=6:5TH ST jr z • o fr � NEI- �� TRI TER=Z- \ t 'NE 64TH ST •_ a rn- 113 -NW 64TH_ST • • ( o Uo dOQ 0 0 0 • 0 • ki vw. ca0000a • 0 0 00 0 0 0 II ooO° 161°00• 0 0 0 0 �••O c[00000•A IL Med NW 59TH ST . boa • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 00 o•o•o•• NW 60TST T 0 0 0 0 • Res.14 A••o D. MF 0 0 -w oZ• I d N 2NOjS•T- •o•o _ NE 60TH-ST= f•lo • 000• •Itap LI •,ol•0000 o o' NE_59TH=TTTRIII L 000 0 0 0'�i o olo o••O♦ ��EoIo�o7 oo00.O • ooa oo'oo> cn_▪ NW_ 58TH ST I- 00 00 0 z O • o o• NW 57TH S. 0000001+i • Existing Land Uses • commercial O Single -Family • Industrial • Duplex • Institutional • Multifamily • Misc • 0 0 0 • 0 • • Oi 0 0 0 o Parking Lot O Vacant Land • NE:59TH ST Recreation/ • • ♦ ♦ NE 58T I -SI 00 0 • 0 ► �— NE57--TH ST r 1/4 Mile Study Area Q Subject Property Parcels I I fIIIIIIIII II [III ur j 250 500 1,000 Feet __ I _ Il! I IilI1 III I Il rIIilIn T„ NE 54TH S. AI E Place Holder By parcel count, vacant land is the third -largest component at over 12 percent (12%). The nearly 12 acres of vacant land is spread across all FLU designations. It is worth analyzing the distribution of vacant land by parcel and acres across all FLU designations since a notable share of land in the Study Area is vacant. The table below provides this breakdown. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 8 Place Holder Vacant Land by FLU Designation in the Study Area Parcels Acres FLU Designation Duplex Res. 37 52.9% 4.89 42.1% Restricted Com. 19 27.1% 3.98 34.2% Med D. MF Res. 12 17.1 % 2.44 21.0% Major PUB, FAC 1 1.4% 0.30 2.6% Recreation 1 1.4% 0.02 0.1% Total 70 100.0% 11.63 100.0% "Duplex Residential" and "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" together account for 63.1 percent (63.1%) of all land in the Study Area. Given this information, it is logical for vacant land to be highly concentrated in those two FLU designations. "Restricted Commercial" also has a high share of all vacant land in the Study Area, which also accounted for a large share of all FLU designations in the Study Area. Going back to the FLU inventory from earlier in the report, we can compare the acreage of vacant land by FLU designation against those FLU designation totals to determine how much of each FLU designation is vacant. It is important to note that the FLU inventory includes right-of-way (ROW) whereas the existing land use inventory does not; existing land use inventory utilizes lot size recorded by the Property Appraiser. This means the proportion of vacant land for each FLU designation is actually higher. "Duplex Residential" accounts for 71.94 acres, of which 4.89 acres are vacant, which equates to a minimum of 6.8 percent (6.8%) vacancy by acreage. Approximately 3.98 acres of vacant land has a FLU designation of "Restricted Commercial," which accounts for 25.84 acres throughout the Study Area; this equates to a minimum vacancy of 15.41 percent (15.41%) by acreage. Approximately 2.44 acres of vacant land has a FLU designation of "Medium Density Multifamily Residential," which accounts for 26.13 acres of the Study Area; this equates to a minimum vacancy of 9.34 percent (9.34%) by acreage. Looking back at the demographic analysis section, Census Tract 20.03, which overlaps with the quarter -mile Study Area, has observed declining population, households, and housing units since 2020, which is consistent with the findings from the existing land use inventory as it pertains to vacant land. Having this context, one can conclude that the existing FLUM of the Study Area may require some adjustments to facilitate appropriate development and better serve the residents. CONCURRENCY ANALYSES The Planning Department tested levels of service as required for this application. The Levels of Service (LOS) testing is based on a potential decrease in the population of 303 residents. Schools On June 14, 2024, Miami -Dade County Public Schools submitted its findings that it had tested the proposed change of land use and zoning and found that the school system has sufficient capacity to serve the application. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 9 Place Holder 'ecreation and Open Space The MCNP requires a 10-minute %-mile barrier -free walk to a park entrance to meet public Levels of Service (LOS). The Planning Department conducted an analysis in GIS to test the LOS for this proposal and found that with the potential decrease in population, it does meet LOS standards. Potable Water The MCNP LOS standard for potable water service is 97.54 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). Consumption is assumed to be approximately 10,362 GPCD by residential uses; however, LOS standards do not take into consideration the consumption of non-residential use. Sanitary Sewer Transmission The MCNP LOS standard for Sanitary Sewer is 122 GPCD. The MCNP does not require testing of this County service. Solid Waste Collection The City's LOS standard for Solid Waste is to maintain a capacity sufficient to accommodate waste flows for a minimum of five years. Solid Waste capacity shall be in place to serve new development and redevelopment no later than the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent. The Franchise Agreement the City maintains provides flexibility to address fluctuations in solid waste production. Transportatior The MCNP has updated its LOS standards for the City with the most recent update of the Transportation Element. In the June 2024 concurrency review for this application, the Department of Resilience & Public Works (RPW) acknowledged that there could be a potential decrease of 163 daily trips, an increase of 16 AM peak hour trips, and an increase of 9 PM peak hour trips. RPW noted a traffic study may be required at time of redevelopment. Storm Surge & Coastal High Hazard Area The MCNP requires all future land use changes to residential categories within Miami -Dade County's Storm Surge Planning Zones A through E meet one of three criteria: a) A no greater than 16-hour level of service for out of county hurricane evacuation is maintained for a category 5 storm; b) A no greater than 12-hour evacuation time to shelter is maintained for a category 5 storm and shelter space is expected to accommodate the residents of the development contemplated by the proposed comprehensive plan amendment; or c) Appropriate mitigation is provided that shall satisfy subparagraphs a) and b) above. Appropriate mitigation shall include, without limitation, payment of money, contribution of land, and construction of hurricane shelters and transportation facilities. Required mitigation shall not exceed the amount required for the development to accommodate File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 10 Place Holder impacts reasonably attributable to the development. The City and applicant for the plan amendment shall enter into a binding agreement to memorialize this mitigation plan. Below is a map of the Subject Property and its location within the Coastal High Hazard Area and Miami -Dade County Storm Surge Planning Zones. 9 �' U z NW-62ND ST- r I I Parcels Q Subject Property Coastal High Hazard Area goin.ie City Boundary Storm Surge Planning Zones Al A B C D E 0 z NW 59TH TER NW-6 .ST-ST 1 NW 60TH ST NW. __60TH TER NW 59TH ST ?L it The Subject Property is not in the Coastal High Hazard Area or any of Miami -Dade County's Storm Surge Planning Zones A through E. Concurrency is not required File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 11 Place Holder COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS The following is an analysis of the application relative to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the MCNP. Criteria 1 Policy LU-1.6.4: "Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Map by the Planning Department shall require a Level of Service (LOS) review and a finding from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment shall not result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards described in Policy CI-1.2.3, and shall not be in conflict with any element of the MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning considerations, the Planning Department shall forward a recommended action on said amendment to the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, which shall then forward its recommendation to the City Commission." Analysis 1 Staff analyzed the proposed amendment for concurrency. An application for School Concurrency analysis was submitted to Miami -Dade County Public Schools. The proposed amendment was found to have sufficient capacity available to serve the application. Staff analyzed Recreation and Open Space using GIS and determined the application does meet LOS standards. Staff analyzed Potable Water and Storm Sewer and found the proposed amendment meets LOS standards for both. The Department of Resilience & Public Works analyzed the application for Transportation LOS and found that the proposed amendment to Restricted Commercial would result in a decrease of 163 daily trips and 16 AM Peak Hour trips and 9 PM Peak Hour trips. The Property is not in the Coastal High Hazard Area or any of Miami -Dade County's Storm Surge Planning Zones. Concurrency for hurricane evacuation and shelter capacity is not required. All concurrency analyses are seen attached separately. See Attachment 1. Finding 1 Staff finds the proposed amendment consistent with Policy LU-1.6.4. Criteria 2 Policy CM-4.1.2: "Continue to direct population away from the Coastal High Hazard Area, which is defined by the areas below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line, as established by a Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized surge model pursuant to Section 163.3187(2)(h) F.S., as depicted on the CHHA map in Appendix CM-1. The City File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 12 Place Holder shall regularly update Appendix CM-1 as new data is made available. As a member city of the Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact (SFRCCC), the City uses the SFRCCC's Unified Sea Level Rise Projection to create additional long-range inundation risk analyses. All updates shall include at least two planning horizons for shorter -term and longer -term planning efforts. (See maps CM-3 and CM-4 in Appendix CM-1.)" Analysis 2 The proposed amendment would decrease the permitted density of the Subject Property from 150 to 36 dwelling units per acre. The Subject Property, marked with the red star, is not located in the Coastal High Hazard Area as seen in the map below. Map CM-2: Coastal High Hazard Area O Coastal High Hazard Area' Q City Boundary 'As defined m Coastal Management Element Policy CM-4 1 2 2 r.lries G 1,._..I.'. 1 ♦ • rn s NeiNer u : z w a F,' arm Il— Finding 2 Staff finds the proposed amendment consistent with Policy CM-4.1.2. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 13 Place Holder Criteria 3 Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map: "Low Density Restricted Commercial. ..Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible." Analysis 3 The Subject Property is located along NW 60 Street and NW 1 Place where it abuts Edison Senior High School to the west. In the Transportation Appendix of the MCNP, Map TR-2 identifies major thoroughfares by functional classification; these classifications include local — urban, major collector — urban, minor arterial — urban, other principal arterial — urban, principal arterial freeway and expressway — urban, principal arterial interstate — urban, and highway. Neither NW 60 Street nor NW 1 Place are identified by these classifications on Map TR- 2. Below is a snippet of Map TR-2 with a red circle marking an approximation of the Property's location. The full-size Map TR-2 can be seen as Exhibit B attached to this report. 0 I Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification 11616) I'r�_ B \ � �- i w+r s* ,sr we=. �rer m m a - zW y -.-- wmoV JI F I ,, t < l 0 �, 14 Alan TR-2 hijor 1YoroaRblxres bB Functiunnl (la.srfiratlnx l-xeltr ,;,, OF ,, r B35,-.ate L — .1. c - �— B2 caws Sr 1 _�_s • POWSS m.n..-... D .r• li a or s a 1'!' Legend e" INoeai-uman Mayor COlkCor-U,ban Minor Merui Urban Other Pnnepal Menal-Urban N anncmprav�ayF7.7 �a e uman I/�/ Pnncps nnenai Imerslam uroan /�/ wgr,waY a ' . ,■ , i 1 eO , Si as* � . s wz+ +# \ l S II e Y .xo • an .., J f' '`� O City of Mam. . - Mles :1NTB Finding 3 Staff finds the proposed amendment inconsistent with the Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map. Criteria 4 Policy LU-1.1.3: "The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or natural or man-made amenities; (3) transportation policies that divide or fragment established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public open space, environment, and ecology. Strategies to further protect existing File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 14 Place Holder neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements shall be incorporated into the City's land development regulations." Analysis 4 The applicant proposes to amend the FLUM of the MCNP of the Property from "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Restricted Commercial." The current FLU allows uses that are necessary in providing adequate infrastructure services to the community such as utilities and educational facilities. The proposed FLU designation allows a mixture of residential and nonresidential uses that were explored in Criteria 3 of this section. Some of those uses like major sports and exhibition facilities and saloons and cafes are inherently incompatible with the surrounding area, which has a FLU designation of "Duplex Residential" and some "Medium Density Multifamily Residential." The types of nonresidential activities are seen as an encroachment of incompatible land uses. This is especially supported by the fact that the Property's two street frontages, NW 60 Street and NW 1 Place, are not arterials as discussed in Criteria 3 of this section. The nonresidential uses would be more appropriate on NW 2 Avenue or NW 62 Street, which are a few blocks away from the Subject Property. Staff believes a more appropriate FLU designation for the Property would be "Low Density Multifamily Residential" as this would prevent the potential for encroachment of incompatible land uses. "Low Density Multifamily Residential", which corresponds to T4-R (General Urban Transect Zone — Restricted), would also act as a buffer and transition from the CI (Civic Institutional Transect Zone) to the west and the T3-O (Sub -Urban Transect Zone — Open) to the east. Finding 4 Staff finds the proposed amendment inconsistent with Policy LU-1.1.3. Criteria 5 Policy LU-1.3.1: "The City shall continue to provide incentives for commercial redevelopment and new construction in designated Neighborhood Development Zones (NDZ), the Brownfield Redevelopment Area, Commercial Business Corridors, Opportunity Zones, and other targeted areas. Such commercial redevelopment and new construction shall be conducted in accordance with neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives. Such incentives may be offered through the building facade treatment program, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and other redevelopment assistance programs." Analysis 5 The Subject Property is located in Census Tract 20.03, which is a qualified Opportunity Zone as seen below in a snipped from Miami -Dade County's report from the Office of the Commission Auditor titled "2019 Benefits and Challenges of Opportunity Zones." The full page of the map can be seen in Exhibit C — Opportunity Zones attached to the end of this report. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 15 Place Holder 31 Audrey M. Edmonson - 3 • r .n • uwi.Yxw_ ♦ aw I • g' • Fk.W !UC.w tiro - Earlier in this report, staff observed a decline in population, households, and housing units in Census Tract 20.03, whereas the City of Miami as a whole saw gains in population, households, and housing units. Declining housing stock and population are some demographic characteristics of economically distressed areas. In the existing land use inventory section of this report, staff observed a decent share of vacant parcels within the quarter -mile Study Area. Vacancies are one of many characteristics that are associated with economically distressed areas, which are the foundation of Opportunity Zones. The table below shows vacant parcels distributed by their associated Future Land Use designations both in parcel (unique folio) counts and by acreage. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 16 Place Holder Vacant Land by FLU Designation in the Study Area Parcels Acres FLU Designation Duplex Res. 37 52.9% 4.89 42.1% Restricted Com. 19 27.1% 3.98 34.2% Med D. MF Res. 12 17.1% 2.44 21.0% Major PUB, FAC 1 1.4% 0.30 2.6% Recreation 1 1.4% 0.02 0.1 % Total 70 100.0% 11.63 100.0% While the majority of parcels and acres that are vacant in the Study Area have a FLU designation of "Duplex Residential", over one-third of the vacant land acres in the Study Area have an existing FLU designation of "Restricted Commercial." These "Restricted Commercial" areas are found along the major thoroughfares of NW/NE 62 Street and NW 2 Avenue. These corridors are zoned T5-O and T5- L respectively. Under the "Restricted Commercial" designation, these corridors could be rezoned to T6-8 (Urban Core Transect Zone). The incidence of vacancies in the "Restricted Commercial" corridors indicates the land development regulations may be posing a barrier to redevelopment. Staff believes the Planning Department should consider studying these corridors for potential rezones with extensive community outreach. While Policy LU-1.3.1 specifies "commercial redevelopment", it also calls for new construction to be done "in accordance with neighborhood design and development standards" as they are adopted in the land development regulations (Miami 21) and other initiatives. The immediate surrounding area has had its T3-O (Sub -Urban Transect Zone — open) since Miami 21 was adopted under Ordinance 13114 in 2010. The area, with the exception of the property located at 115 NW 60 Street, was also zoned R-2 under the previous zoning code, Ordinance 11000 (seen attached as Exhibit D — Sheet 13 Ordinance 11000), which was adopted in 1990; 115 NW 60 Street was zoned R-3. The surrounding neighborhood has had residential zoning since at least 1990, with the exception of the public schools to the west. This means the introduction of nonresidential uses, such as commercial uses, are incompatible with the neighborhood design. Additionally, the incident of vacancies in the "Restricted Commercial" corridors of NW/NE 60 Street and NW 2 Avenue also indicate a potential lack of demand for commercial uses in this area. As stated before, the T5-L (Urban Center Transect Zone — Limited) and T5-O (Urban Center Transect Zone — Open) could be acting as barriers to redevelopment of the vacant parcels along these major thoroughfares, it is important to remember that the majority of vacant land is found among the "Duplex Residential" land instead of the "Restricted Commercial" land. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 17 Place Holder Given the potential for encroachment of incompatible land uses with the introduction of commercial uses, staff believes the proposed amendment to "Low Density Restricted Commercial" is not appropriate. However, given the fact that Census Tract 22.03 is a qualified Opportunity Zone and many vacancies have been observed with the quarter -mile Study Area, staff believes there is merit in amending the FLUM of the Property from "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Multifamily Residential." This would facilitate redevelopment to a density higher than the surrounding "Duplex Residential" and lower than the "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" acting as a transition in density and intensity between the two different FLU designations. Finding 5 Staff finds the proposed amendment is inconsistent due to the existing residential neighborhood but finds an amendment to "Low Density Multifamily Residential" would be more appropriate and consistent with Policy LU-1.3.1. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION Based on the analysis of the area context and the goals, objectives, and policies of the MCNP, the request to amend the FLUM by changing the designation of the Property located at 151 NW 60 Street from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and 145 NW 60 Street from "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Restricted Commercial", staff finds the request is not justified based on the inconsistency between the Interpretation of the Future Land Use Map for "Low Density Restricted Commercial" and the Property's location not fronting an arterial and the encroachment of incompatible land uses in a longstanding residential neighborhood. Staff believes there is merit in amending the FLUM of the Property to a different FLU designation based on the ability to meet all required Levels of Service standards for various concurrencies, the observed vacancies, and the Property's location in a qualified Opportunity Zone. Staff recommends amending the Future Land Use Map of the Property from "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Multifamily Residential" instead of the requested "Low Density Restricted Commercial." Staff believes "Low Density Multifamily Residential" is more appropriate due to its residential nature and that it would create a transition between the "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" to the west and the "Duplex Residential" to the east. File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 18 Place Holder Based on the above background information, the Planning Department recommends Denial of the request to amend the FLUM of the Property located 151 NW 60 Street from "Major Use, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" and 145 NW 60 Street from "Duplex Residential" to "Low Density Restricted Commercial." Staff believes a more appropriate FLU designation would be "Low Density Multifamily Residential." DocuSigned by: 06W4L JtaW Davi • now Planning Director DocuSigned by: SfulA x 3H/bLAUbAh 44b... Sevanne gtelner, CNU-A Assistant Director DocuSigned by: k.44ryA An#. kVi'ry A,g,ngieton, AICP Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A — Legal Description Exhibit B — Map TR-2 Exhibit C — Opportunity Zones Exhibit D — Sheet 13 Ordinance 11000 Attachment 1 — Concurrency Analyses File ID # PZ-24-17606 — Page 19 EXHIBIT A SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY SE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY ADDRESS: 151 NW 60 STREET, MIAMI, FL 33127 FOLIO: 01-3113-052-0270 ABBREVIATIONS: CENTERLINE P.B. PLAT BOOK P.G. PAGE 5Q. FT. SQUARE FEET SEC. SECTION TWP. RGE. FT. U.E. ROCKMOOR PAKK TRACT P.5. 4 PG. 90 c LOCATION MAP SCALE = N.T.S. TOWNSHIP RANGE FEET UTILITY EASEMENT SURVEYOR' S NOTES: I . NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY JOHN IBARRA ASSOCIATES, INC. 2. THIS SKETCH IS BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY: ThI5 "SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION" OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON, HAS RECENTLY BEEN SURVEYED AND DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J- 17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. 1 0Digitally signed by / JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 BY: V 10:38:43 -05'00' 01/15/2024 V JOHN IBARRA (DATE) PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO.: 5204 STATE OF FLORIDA SHEET 1 OF 2. NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1 THRU 2 DRAWN BY: YNV DATE: 01/15/2024 SCALE: NONE SURVEY NO: 24-000119 SHEET: 1 OF 2 JOHN IBARRA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professional Land Surveyors & Mappers W W W.IBARRALANDSURVEYORS.COM 777 N.W. 72nd AVENUE SUITE 3025 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 PH: (305) 262-0400 FAX : (305) 262-0401 3725 DEL PRADO BLVD. 5. SUITE B CAPE CORAL, FL 33904 PH: (239) 540-2660 FAX: (239) 540-2664 ONN IBA RR I No,204 O: 'ATE of 113 LA4as LB#7806 Digitally signed by JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 10:40:25 -05'00' SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY SE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA N W 61st STREET _ I �N 50' TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY �N j cn n o 122.73' 25.0 5.0' CO 00 CO 4 .Y 00 m ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT 50.00' ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT 5.0' ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT 25.0' 173.97' N.W. 60th STREET 5.00' i 50' TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LIMIT OF PLAT LOT 8 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 2 OF ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDER IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 190 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 42,150.56 SQUARE FEET. SHEET 2 OF 2. NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1 THRU 2. DRAWN BY: YNV DATE: 01/15/2024 SCALE: 1"=60' SURVEY NO: 24-000119 SHEET: 2 OF 2 JOHN IBARRA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professional Land Surveyors & Mappers W W W.IBARRALANDSURVEYORS.COM 777 N.W. 72nd AVENUE SUITE 3025 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 PH: (305) 262-0400 FAX : (305) 262-0401 3725 DEL PRADO BLVD. 5. SUITE B CAPE CORAL, FL 33904 PH: (239) 540-2660 FAX: (239) 540-2664 WAWA'? BA'? ft' NO 2O o 4NAL LAN08 LB#7806 Digitally signed by JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 10:39:31 -05'00' SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY SE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPERTY ADDRESS: 145 NW 60 STREET, MIAMI, FL 33127 FOLIO: 01-3113-052-0280 ABBREVIATIONS: CENTERLINE P.B. PLAT BOOK P.G. PAGE 5Q. FT. SQUARE FEET SEC. SECTION TWP. RGE. FT. U.E. LOCATION MAP SCALE = N.T.S. TOWNSHIP RANGE FEET UTILITY EASEMENT SURVEYOR' S NOTES: I . NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY JOHN IBARRA ASSOCIATES, INC. 2. THIS SKETCH 15 BASED ON INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CLIENT OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY: THIS "SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION" OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON, HAS RECENTLY BEEN SURVEYED AND DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND COMPLIES WITH THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J- 17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PURSUANT TO 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. BY: Digitally signed by JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 10:25:20 -05'00' 01/15/2024 JOHN IBARRA (DATE) PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO.: 5204 STATE OF FLORIDA SHEET 1 OF 2. NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1 THRU 2 DRAWN BY: YNV DATE: 01/15/2024 SCALE: NONE SURVEY NO: 24-000118 SHEET: 1 OF 2 JOHN IBARRA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professional Land Surveyors & Mappers W W W.IBARRALANDSURVEYORS.COM 777 N.W. 72nd AVENUE SUITE 3025 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 PH: (305) 262-0400 FAX : (305) 262-0401 3725 DEL PRADO BLVD. 5. SUITE B CAPE CORAL, FL 33904 PH: (239) 540-2660 FAX: (239) 540-2664 NN IBA RR9 NO 204 O A % 0NFL LA5 LB#7806 Digitally signed by JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 10:26:55 -05'00' LOT-7 BLOCK-2 LOT- 12 BLOCK-2 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY SE 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA LOT-6 BLOCK-2 50.00' r O tV ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT LOT-13 BLOCK-2 ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT LOT-5 BLOCK-2 LOT - 14 BLOCK-2 'et ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT 50.00' LIMIT OF PLAT N.W. 60th STREET 50' TOTAL RIGHT-OF-WAY !V Ul Ls 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13, IN BLOCK 2, OF ROCKMOOR PARK TRACT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDER IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 190 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 7,109.93 SQUARE FEET. SHEET 2 OF 2. NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 1 THRU 2. DRAWN BY: YNV DATE: 01/15/2024 SCALE: 1"=30' SURVEY NO: 24-000118 SHEET: 2 OF 2 JOHN IBARRA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professional Land Surveyors & Mappers W W W.IBARRALANDSURVEYORS.COM 777 N.W. 72nd AVENUE SUITE 3025 MIAMI, FLORIDA 33126 PH: (305) 262-0400 FAX : (305) 262-0401 3725 DEL PRADO BLVD. 5. SUITE B CAPE CORAL, FL 33904 PH: (239) 540-2660 FAX: (239) 540-2664 'pNN IBARR9 O A � O �N4L LP LB#7806 Digitally signed by JOHN A IBARRA Date: 2024.01.17 10:25:45 -05'00' Fee 0 2,000 NW14ST NW 6 ST NW 12 ST Legend C1 /\/ Local - Urban /\/ Major Collector - Urban Minor Arterial - Urban /\r/ Other Principal Arterial - Urban ^/ Principal Arterial Freeway and Expressway - Urban "/ Principal Arterial Interstate - Urban /\/ Highway F-1 City of Miami SW 64 ST EXHIBIT B - MAP TR-2 Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification (2016) W FLAGLER ST SW 8 ST Go z z n SW24 ST a N NE 87 ST NW 79 ST NW 71 ST z NW 62 ST 61 NW 54 ST MIN 46 ST NW36•ST SW 1 ST SW-75T - -- DOWNTOWN MIAMI (See area enlargement) Map TR-2 Major Thoroughfares by Functional Classification (2016) :INTB EXHIBIT C COMMISSION DISTRICT 3 OPPORTUNITY ZONES Selected 2010 Census Tracts 27 EXHIBIT D - SHEET 13 ORDINANCE 11000 Zoning R-1 R•3 MI RA S-S ME cw, - c,, PR II. SS !I'd 5E31 OZI SD." ME S. soo 7", sn5 • soo so,e, SE37 S-rm: sne - SO-11 in SO•13 SC,•14 FM S614 1 • 90-15 els so-1,3 00-101 VIOL 80-13.2 rier. son eitp of Miami Zoning !Li :3 777 Mas In. a City Clerk This is to certify that Po is Page 13 cf the Official Zoning Atlas reference to and adopted by reference Ordinance 11000 as amended, of the City of Miami Florida, adopted March d 1990 Prepared by. informaton Technology Department Sou Di . P ing Department See Appe Ix for Arnondmends EZI S8•27.1 NC0.1 NCO-2 (See Map) 1.63 8E102..,3 (S. MaP) SPaciA Ove,ley (See .D) Padesinan Pathway EXP RT I/12 NM% W+E 031+13311.1,.. AusustS3d, 200.4 kip 25, 3006 IRNs moml•ear IMM MR =Iamb MI., INEEMN MIMEMInit 69TH ST 1 1 at..a , NW 67T., ?s, NW 65TH Si 17: 1 111 1111 44 '21 11111 11 516L,56TH ST mommtlinrard. 111111lin EU mow rr 111111 I ,11.111 i 5N!=11fil501" E WHIM fiiill 111111 11111111 NW 59'11151 NE 59TH ST 111- 7'1 11 'RN NA' MIN MINN NE /1ST ST „.•.IMME.MMIII r1'A 11 11 1_ =zi1.m11r1111 84 E-ll 1111 11111111111111 1.-21111 IIIIilhIIIIlllllhIllII 03) .rmiummuumm 18 1111111111111111111sousuronse rum umunisoouam uuuH PP"<__MMIMIM_MM M 11 1 iiii111111111111 69 In MIME MIME MIME MOM 1111 n•es 1•119 6300 1 HST TST 650680 IIIII MN so SM-F." S611 ST 90801001 DUNI IN,L,M11111 111111111111.. nail' ME411i111 cth NI =EN se,Nimuso at , ;car mim m m u M O — MaN =.I.oENnINEeOmmWimmtAmin C-uns• zm mE teN gu.'mllip mu ' i lmi,,,,lidtzI..a M. =mme 990I, rM iII , I 1l, INrFmIiiaMmmmMPalmiI=INIIICuEPIIk,; 1,s,ama:MM ama9IEMMeI ti;•m m =ai21Mmn M I I MM M• n ..Mme. . Msp e_r r smLin_ori ' M .WnMmippii MN M N212,910 1,1.9 1111111111111111111"" :211111111111111111111 04- 1-- =nil "Will re is EN so mg, EN MP" Ilis 1 1 r 11111;1111mlli1111:11111101 imii. 1 1 1 - , 1 111111 IIIIIII MEM .1111. allq.1111 11111.11 III _111111111111111 11 imiSIMPI1111111111 111111111 1111111L ST MI 1111 1111 I ME 1 VrA111 Em 141 .--amme-rm mM mmo moan m e;aamMmml'i lOmaIlarIeM mlaI alamti o ,ThMU1y1M1 ll ia eo E H HP 76IESSTHST NE 59TH ST 'NEStais 1i E imr s a r441150,0 -eralri, 0 10 10 NE taTil SO-29 II 1111.110-1.— 00iiIMA. 'pi 111111111.11111 ATTACHMENT 1 - CONCURRENCY ANALYSES CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROJECT DETAILS Project Dox Number: Date: Applicant: PZ-24-17606 1/26/2024 Raider Road LLC Address: 151 NW 60 ST Boundary Streets: North: NW 61 ST South: NW 60 ST Existing Future Land Use Designation: Residential Density: 0.97 acres @ Assumed Population Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Residential Density 0.97 acres @ Assumed Population with Increase East: NW 1 AV West NW 1 PL Major Inst., Public Fac., Transport. & Util. DU/acre t4S DUs 407 Persons 150 Low Density Restricted Commercial DU/acre 34 DUs 95 Persons 36 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION Commission District Office WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin Moratorium? Drainage Subcatchment Basin Little Haiti D5 Office Basin 0048 NO E2 RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Future Land Use Goal LU-1 Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3, a-g Transportation Objective TR-1.6 Transportation Objective TR-1.7 CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Increase in Population: -312 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Test Result: PASS POTABLE WATER Level of Service standard: 92.05 GCPD Transmission potential with FLUM change 8,745 Policy PW-1.2.1 Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change Concurrency Test Result: OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Level of Service standard: 141 GPCD Policy SS-1.3.1 Excess capacity: See Note 1 below. Concurrency Test Result: WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration system before change On -site Exfiltration system after change On -site Concurrency Test Result: OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Level of Service standard: Sufficient capacity to accommodate 5 year min waste flows Policy SW-1.1.1 Concurrency Test Result: See Notes TRANSPORTATION Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7 Concurrency Test Result: SEE NOTES NOTES Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. The Level of Service for Solid Waste was amended with the 2022 EAR and moved away from a per unit metric to a committment to maintaining capacity to acommodate waste flows for a minimum of five years. The City of Miami requires sufficient Solid Waste capacity to be in place for new development and redevelopment no later than issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its funcitonal equivalent. Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed through the Interpretation of the 2035/2045 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROJECT DETAILS Project Dox Number: Date: Applicant: PZ-24-17606 1/26/2024 Raider Road LLC Address: 145 NW 60 ST Boundary Streets: North: NW 61 ST East: South: NW 60 ST West Existing Future Land Use Designation: Duplex Residential Residential Density: 0.16 acres @ 18 DU/acre Assumed Population 5 Persons NW 1 AV NW 1 PL 2 DUs Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Restricted Commercial Residential Density 0.16 acres @ 36 DU/acre 5 DUs Assumed Population with Increase 14 Persons NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION Commission District Office WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin Moratorium? Drainage Subcatchment Basin Little Haiti D5 Office Basin 0048 NO E2 RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Future Land Use Goal LU-1 Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3, a-g Transportation Objective TR-1.6 Transportation Objective TR-1.7 CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Increase in Population: 9 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Test Result: PASS POTABLE WATER Level of Service standard: 92.05 GCPD Transmission potential with FLUM change 1,289 Policy PW-1.2.1 Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change Concurrency Test Result: OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Level of Service standard: 141 GPCD Policy SS-1.3.1 Excess capacity: See Note 1 below. Concurrency Test Result: WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration system before change On -site Exfiltration system after change On -site Concurrency Test Result: OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Level of Service standard: Sufficient capacity to accommodate 5 year min waste flows Policy SW-1.1.1 Concurrency Test Result: See Notes TRANSPORTATION Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7 Concurrency Test Result: SEE NOTES NOTES Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. The Level of Service for Solid Waste was amended with the 2022 EAR and moved away from a per unit metric to a committment to maintaining capacity to acommodate waste flows for a minimum of five years. The City of Miami requires sufficient Solid Waste capacity to be in place for new development and redevelopment no later than issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its funcitonal equivalent. Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed through the Interpretation of the 2035/2045 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations. Angleton, Kathryn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: RODRIGUEZ, IVAN M <IRodrigu@dadeschools.net> Friday, June 14, 2024 8:36 AM Emily Batter Concurrency Management; Simon, Nathaly; Ellis, Jacqueline; Angleton, Kathryn; Garcia, Jeannette C. Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410 Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410.pdf CAUTION: This is an email from an external source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410 Folio No.: 0131130520270, 0131130520280 Dear Applicant, Pursuant to State Statutes and the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, the above -referenced application was reviewed for compliance with Public School Concurrency. Accordingly, enclosed please find the School District's Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review). As noted in the Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review), the proposed development would yield a maximum residential density of 20 multifamily residential units, which generate 2 students, 2 at the elementary, 0 at the middle and 0 at the senior high school level. At this time, all school levels have sufficient capacity available to serve the application. Remember that a final determination of Public School Concurrency and capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent, notwithstanding any additional information that may surface after further departmental research. As such, this analysis does not constitute a Public School Concurrency approval. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 305-995-7285. Best regards, Ivan M. Rodriguez, Director Facilities Planning 1450 NE 2 Ave., Suite 523 Miami, Florida 33132 305.995.4501 1 Concurrency Management System (CMS) Miami -Dade County Public Schools Miami -Dade County Public Schools Concurrency Management System Preliminary Concurrency Analysis MDCPS Application Number: PH0124041200410 Local Government (LG): Miami Date Application Received: 4/12/2024 3:18:35 PM LG Application Number: PZ-24-17606 Type of Application: Public Hearing Sub Type: Land Use Applicant's Name: Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) Address/Location: 151 NW 60 ST Master Folio Number: 0131130520270 Additional Folio Number(s): 0131130520280, PROPOSED # OF UNITS 20 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS: 0 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS: 0 MULTIFAMILY UNITS: 20 Mil CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS CSA1' il Net Available Seats LOS Id Facility Name Capacity Required Seats Taken Met Source Type 3051 TOUSSAINT L'OUVERTURE ELEMENTARY 201 2 2 YES Current CSA 6361 JOSE DE DIEGO MIDDLE 0 0 0 YES Current CSA 7301 MIAMI EDISON SENIOR 702 0 0 YES Current CSA ADJACENT SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS *An Im.act reduction of 33.180/0 included for charter and magnet schools Schools of Choice). MDCPS has conducted a preliminary public school concurrency review of this application; please see results above. A final determination of public school concurrency and capacity reservation will be made at the time of approval of plat, site plan or functional equivalent. THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY APPROVAL. 1450 NE 2 Avenue, Room 525, Miami, Florida 33132 / 305-995-7285 / concurrency@dadeschools.net Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Level of Servic PZ-24-17606 z z CI W� NW 59TH TER 1■. NW 62NDTST4-- z 111_ rCity Boundary ID Subject Parcels 1-1 Parcels ▪ City -Owned Park j♦ 0.25 Mile Walking Distance 0.25 to 0.5 Mile Walking Distance IPSO ion z 0) NW 61ST ST NW 61ST ST 11111111111111 111111,1111111111111 �rniirr NW 60TH ST NW 59TH ST NW 60TH TER z 111 0 125 250 500 Feet 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Created by: City of Miami Planning Department Date created: January 31, 2024 N:\Planning\G IS\Concurrency W E WGI TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM Collin Worth DATE: June 25, 2024 Transportation Project Manager FILE: PZ-24-17606 SUBJECT: Transportation Concurrency Analysis REFERENCES: FROM: Ravali Kosaraju, WGI ENCLOSURES: Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the applications for the project located at 145 NW 60 St and 151 NW 60 St, the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip generation was calculated. The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in a decrease of 163 daily trips and an increase of 16 AM trips. Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine the impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment, a traffic study may be required. The traffic study should include traffic mitigation if significant impacts to operating levels of service are identified. EXISTING TRIP GENERATION Daily ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) 11 222 146 DU 50% 50% 332 332 663 332 332 663 332 332 663 Single -Family Attached Housing 11 215 3 DU 50% 50% -14 -14 -28 -14 -14 -28 -14 -14 -28 318 318 635 318 318 635 318 318 635 PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION Daily ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 50% 50% 118 118 236 118 118 236 118 118 236 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 26% 74% 61 175 236 61 175 236 61 175 236 179 293 472 179 293 472 179 293 472 -138 -25 -163 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics EXISTING TRIP GENERATION PM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) 11 222 146 DU 61% 39% 37 24 61 37 24 61 37 24 61 Single -Family Attached Housing 11 215 3 DU 50% 50% 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 38 25 63 38 25 63 38 25 63 PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION PM Peak ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 62% 38% 22 14 36 22 14 36 22 14 36 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 26% 74% 9 27 36 9 27 36 9 27 36 32 40 72 32 40 72 31 41 72 -7 16 9 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics EXISTING TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) 11 222 146 DU 23% 77% 12 39 51 12 39 51 12 39 51 Single -Family Attached Housing 11 215 3 DU 50% 50% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 40 52 12 40 52 12 40 52 PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION AM Peak ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Directional Distribution Baseline Trips External Vehicle Trips Net New External Trips Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 26% 74% 9 25 34 9 25 34 9 25 34 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU 26% 74% 9 25 34 9 25 34 9 25 34 18 50 68 18 50 68 18 50 68 5 11 16 STORM SURGE & CHHA LEVEL OF SERVICE EPLAN ID: PZ-24-17606 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ADDRESS(ES): 151 & 145 NW 60 ST 0 z N z -NW-59TH-TER N W-62 N D-ST— Parcels Q Subject Property ✓ Coastal High Hazard Area �III.LL 111.E City Boundary Storm Surge Planning Zones A B C N W-61 ST--ST NW-60TH-ST NW-60TH-TER NW-59TH-ST z 0 125 250 500 Feet W E Created by: City of Miami Planning Department Date created: November 26, 2024 N:\Planning\G IS\Concurrency CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROJECT DETAILS Project Dox Number: Date: Applicant: PZ-24-17606 1/26/2024 Raider Road LLC Address: 151 NW 60 ST Boundary Streets: North: NW 61 ST South: NW 60 ST Existing Future Land Use Designation: Residential Density: 0.97 acres @ Assumed Population Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Residential Density 0.97 acres @ Assumed Population with Increase East: West NW 1 AV NW 1 PL Major Inst., Public Fac., Transport. & Util. DU/acre 145 DUs 407 Persons 150 Low Density Restricted Commercial DU/acre 34 DUs 95 Persons 36 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION Commission District Office WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin Moratorium? Drainage Subcatchment Basin Little Haiti D5 Office Basin 0048 NO E2 RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Future Land Use Goal LU-1 Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3, a-g Transportation Objective TR-1.6 Transportation Objective TR-1.7 CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Increase in Population: -312 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Test Result: PASS POTABLE WATER Level of Service standard: 97.54 GCPD Transmission potential with FLUM change 9,266 Policy PW-1.2.1 Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change Concurrency Test Result: OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Level of Service standard: 122 GPCD Policy SS-1.3.1 Excess capacity: See Note 1 below. Concurrency Test Result: WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration system before change On -site Exfiltration system after change On -site Concurrency Test Result: OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Level of Service standard: Sufficient capacity to accommodate 5 year min waste flows Policy SW-1.1.1 Concurrency Test Result: See Notes TRANSPORTATION Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7 Concurrency Test Result: SEE NOTES NOTES Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. The Level of Service for Solid Waste was amended with the 2022 EAR and moved away from a per unit metric to a committment to maintaining capacity to acommodate waste flows for a minimum of five years. The City of Miami requires sufficient Solid Waste capacity to be in place for new development and redevelopment no later than issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its funcitonal equivalent. Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed through the Interpretation of the 2035/2045 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations. Transportation Concurrency is addressed in a separate memorandum provided by the Office of Capital Improvements. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROJECT DETAILS Project Dox Number: Date: Applicant: PZ-24-17606 1/26/2024 Raider Road LLC Address: 145 NW 60 ST Boundary Streets: North: NW 61 ST East: NW 1 AV South: NW 60 ST West NW 1 PL Existing Future Land Use Designation: Duplex Residential Residential Density: 0.16 acres @ 18 DU/acre Assumed Population 5 Persons 2 DUs Proposed Future Land Use Designation: Low Density Restricted Commercial Residential Density 0.16 acres @ 36 DU/acre 5 DUs Assumed Population with Increase 14 Persons NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION Commission District Office WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin Moratorium? Drainage Subcatchment Basin Little Haiti D5 Office Basin 0048 NO E2 RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Future Land Use Goal LU-1 Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3, a-g Transportation Objective TR-1.6 Transportation Objective TR-1.7 CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS Increase in Population: 9 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Test Result: PASS POTABLE WATER Level of Service standard: 97.54 GCPD Transmission potential with FLUM change 1,366 Policy PW-1.2.1 Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change Concurrency Test Result: OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Level of Service standard: 122 GPCD Policy SS-1.3.1 Excess capacity: See Note 1 below. Concurrency Test Result: WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration system before change On -site Exfiltration system after change On -site Concurrency Test Result: OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Level of Service standard: Sufficient capacity to accommodate 5 year min waste flows Policy SW-1.1.1 Concurrency Test Result: See Notes TRANSPORTATION Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7 Concurrency Test Result: SEE NOTES NOTES Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. The Level of Service for Solid Waste was amended with the 2022 EAR and moved away from a per unit metric to a committment to maintaining capacity to acommodate waste flows for a minimum of five years. The City of Miami requires sufficient Solid Waste capacity to be in place for new development and redevelopment no later than issuance of a certificate of occupancy or its funcitonal equivalent. Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed through the Interpretation of the 2035/2045 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations. Transportation Concurrency is addressed in a separate memorandum provided by the Office of Capital Improvements. Concurrency Management System (CMS) Miami -Dade County Public Schools Miami -Dade County Public Schools Concurrency Management System Preliminary Concurrency Analysis MDCPS Application Number: PH0124041200410 Local Government (LG): Miami Date Application Received: 4/12/2024 3:18:35 PM LG Application Number: PZ-24-17606 Type of Application: Public Hearing Sub Type: Land Use Applicant's Name: Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) Address/Location: 151 NW 60 ST Master Folio Number: 0131130520270 Additional Folio Number(s): 0131130520280, PROPOSED # OF UNITS 20 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED UNITS: 0 SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED UNITS: 0 MULTIFAMILY UNITS: 20 CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS 1 Facility Name Net Available Seats Seats Taken LOS Capacity Required Met 3051 TOUSSAINT L'OUVERTURE ELEMENTARY 201 2 2 YES Current CSA 6361 JOSE DE DIEGO MIDDLE 0 0 0 YES Current CSA 7301 MIAMI EDISON SENIOR 702 0 0 YES Current CSA ADJACENT SERVICE AREA SCHOOLS *An Impact reduction of 33.18% included for charter and magnet schools (Schools of Choice). MDCPS has conducted a preliminary public school concurrency review of this application; please see results above. A final determination of public school concurrency and capacity reservation will be made at the time of approval of plat, site plan or functional equivalent. THIS ANALYSIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY APPROVAL. 1450 NE 2 Avenue, Room 525, Miami, Florida 33132 / 305-995-7285 / concurrency@dadeschools.net Angleton, Kathryn From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: RODRIGUEZ, IVAN M <IRodrigu@dadeschools.net> Friday, June 14, 2024 8:36 AM Emily Balter Concurrency Management; Simon, Nathaly; Ellis, Jacqueline; Angleton, Kathryn; Garcia, Jeannette C. Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410 Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410.pdf CAUTION: This is an email from an external source. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Raider Road LLC (PZ-24-17606) PH0124041200410 Folio No.: 0131130520270, 0131130520280 Dear Applicant, Pursuant to State Statutes and the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, the above -referenced application was reviewed for compliance with Public School Concurrency. Accordingly, enclosed please find the School District's Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review). As noted in the Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review), the proposed development would yield a maximum residential density of 20 multifamily residential units, which generate 2 students, 2 at the elementary, 0 at the middle and 0 at the senior high school level. At this time, all school levels have sufficient capacity available to serve the application. Remember that a final determination of Public School Concurrency and capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent, notwithstanding any additional information that may surface after further departmental research. As such, this analysis does not constitute a Public School Concurrency approval. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 305-995-7285. Best regards, Ivan M. Rodriguez, Director Facilities Planning 1450 NE 2 Ave., Suite 523 Miami, Florida 33132 305.995.4501 1 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Level of Servic PZ-24-17606 i •• I1- NW z I II U n ›. I L NW 62ND ST- !m.R City Boundary Q Subject Parcels I —I Parcels En City -Owned Park Al 0.25 Mile Walking Distance 0.25 to 0.5 Mile Walking Distance run Milan NW 1STST z 7-1 11111111 NW 60TH ST NW 59TH ST NW 60TH TER z D zl NEEN1-- MINIM 0 125 250 500 Feet I I I 1 1 1 1 1 Created by: City of Miami Planning Department Date created: January 31, 2024 N:\Planning\G IS\Concurrency W S WGI TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM Collin Worth DATE: June 25, 2024 Transportation Project Manager FILE: PZ-24-17606 SUBJECT: Transportation Concurrency Analysis REFERENCES: FROM: Ravali Kosaraju, WGI ENCLOSURES: Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the applications for the project located at 145 NW 60 St and 151 NW 60 St, the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip generation was calculated. The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in a decrease of 163 daily trips and an increase of 16 AM trips. Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine the impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment, a traffic study may be required. The traffic study should include traffic mitigation if significant impacts to operating levels of service are identified. ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code EXISTING TRIP GENERATION Daily Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) Single -Family Attached Housing 11 222 146 DU 11 215 3 DU 50°/a 50°/a 332 332 663 332 332 663 332 332 663 50°/a 50°/a -14 -14 -28 -14 -14 -28 -14 -14 -28 318 318 635 318 318 635 318 318 635 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU PROPOSEDTRIP GENERATION Daily Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips n Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 50°/a 50°/a 118 118 236 118 118 236 118 118 236 26°/a 74°/a 61 175 236 61 175 236 61 175 236 179 293 472 179 293 472 179 293 472 -138 -25 -163 Land Use ITE Trip Generation Characteristics EXISTING TRIP GENERATION PM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) Single -Family Attached Housing 11 222 146 DU 11 215 3 DU 61°/a 39°/a 37 24 61 37 24 61 37 24 61 50°/a 50°/a 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 38 25 63 38 25 63 38 25 63 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU PROPOSEDTRIP GENERATION PM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 62% 38°/a 22 14 36 22 14 36 22 14 36 26°/a 74°/a 9 27 36 9 27 36 9 27 36 32 40 72 32 40 72 31 41 72 -7 16 9 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code EXISTING TRIP GENERATION AM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips Scale ITE Units In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (High -Rise) Single -Family Attached Housing 11 222 146 DU 11 215 3 DU 23°/a 77°/a 12 39 51 12 39 51 12 39 51 50°/a 50°/a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 40 52 12 40 52 12 40 52 ITE Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use ITE Edition ITE Code Scale ITE Units Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 11 220 35 DU PROPOSEDTRIP GENERATION AM Peak Directional Distribution Baseline Trips ExternalVehicle Trips Net New ExternalTrips In Out In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 26°/a 74°/a 9 25 34 9 25 34 9 25 34 26°/a 74°/a 9 25 34 9 25 34 9 25 34 18 50 68 18 50 68 18 50 68 5 11 16 AERIAL EPLAN ID: PZ-24-17606 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ADDRESS(ES): 145 and 151 NW 60 ST 0 125 250 1 1 1 1 -1- 1 500 Feet i I Gvim/,° ° Ti RN NJ SY V— b cffiTh rQ 1 RN CI .87 07 FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) EPLAN ID: PZ-24-17606 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ADDRESS(ES): 145 and 151 NW 60 ST 0 125 250 500 Feet i NW 59TH-- DER --NW62ND ST 1- U H co z Restricted Commercial 0_ z NW 60TH TER NW 60TH S= Medium Dens Multifamily Residential ity NW 59TH ST FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) EPLAN ID: PZ-24-17606 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ADDRESS(ES): 145 and 151 NW 60 ST 0 125 250 500 Feet i z NW 59TH-- DER a_ H z --NW-62ND ST Low Density Restricted Commercial 1- U H co z Restricted ed Commercial NW 61ST ST Duplex - Residential Medium Density Multifamily Residential NW 59TH ST J 0 J NW 60TH TER NW 60TH S=