HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-081682
1
2
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
• 28
29
30
31
32
33
14
ORDINANCE NO. 8168
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
THE CCNPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE AREA INCLUDING THE
N 250' OF THE S 450' OF LOT 1, AND THE
N 195' OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2,MARCELLUS DEARBORN
SUB (B-26) , LOCATED SOUTH OF S. W. 19TH
STREET ON THE WEST SIDE OF S. W. 17TH
AVENUE, FROM R-1 (ONE -FAMILY) AND R-4
(MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-3A (LOW
DENSITY APARTMENT) DISTRICT* AND BY MAKING
THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING
DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE
NO. 6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN
ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF; AND BY
REPEALING ALL LAWS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board of the City
of Miami, at its meeting held on April 23, 1973, passed and
adopted by a 8 to 1 vote its Resolution No. 73-100,
recommending granting a change in zoning classification,
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best interest
of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants
to grant a change in zoning classification, as hereinafter
set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the
area including the N 250' of the S 450' of Lot 1, and the
N 195' of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB (B-26),
located south of S. N. 19th Street on the west side of S. W.
17th Avenue, from R-1 (One -Family) and R-4 (Medium Density
Multiple) to It-3A (Low Density Apartment) District; and
-1_
a
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1S
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
by making the necessary changes in the zoning district map
shade a part of said Ordinance No • 6871 by reference and
description in Article III, Section 2, thereof.
Section 2. That all laws, or parts of laws, in
conflict herewith, be and the same are hereby repealed
insofar as the above described land is involved.
Section 3. It is declared to be the legislative
intent of this body that if any section, subsection, sentence,
phrase or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the
remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected.
PASSED on first reading by title only this 24 day
of May , 1973.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on second and final reading by
title only this 14th day of June , 1973.
MAURICE FERRE
Attest:
MAYOR
H.D. SOUTHERN
-2_
City Clerk
36
4 '4'i
th
v'91c F10�-:::
Hoigfable City
Attention: Mr
City of Miami,
Gentlemen:
eify of
Commission
. M. L. Reese
Florida
'2
we e
May 7, 1973
Re: AREA HEARING - CHANGE OF ZONING
RECOMMENDED
The Area including the N 250' of the
S 450' of Lot 1, and the N 195' of
Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN
SUB (B-26)
South of S. W. 19th Street on the
west side of S. W. 17th Avenue
The Applicant, Mr. Francisco Martinez requested a Change of Zoning
Classification from R-2 (Two -Family) to R-3 (Low Density Multiple)
for a portion of the above legally described property. The Planning
Board DENIED this request. Upon Appeal to the City Commission and
upon the suggestion of the Planning Department this property was
subjected to an AREA HEARING (See Planning Department Memo dated
March 20, 1973).
The Miami Planning Board, at its meeting of April 23, 1973, Item
#8, following an advertised Hearing adopted Resolution No. 73-100
by an 8 to 1 vote recommending Change of Zoning Classification for
the Area including the N 250' of the S 450' of Lot 1, and the N 195'
of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB (B-26), located south of
S. W. 19th Street on the west side of S. W. 17th Avenue, from R-1
(One -Family) and R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) to R-3A (Low Density
Apartment).
Six objections were received in the mail.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been prepared
by the City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the
City Commission.
mm
Z. M. 39
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
(Sincere
David Simpson, Jr.
Miami Planning and Zoning Bo410; 4p
Executive Secretary
ar
01A)
3 /‘
!r
CITY OP MIAMI, FLORIDA .
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Planing Board Meeting
3/26/73 Item #16
?Oi Honorable Mombera of the
City Commisalog
►ROM' M. L, Reetie
City Manager
DAT(' r'Lie
•ueJEcr' Change of Zoning Application
MARCI LLUS D ARBORN SUBDIVISION
R[F[Ri;MCGU' City Commission Resolution 73-131,
iNGLOBUAGif ebruary 22, 1973
At the City Commission meeting of February 22, 1973, tho City Commission by
Resolution 73-131, deferred consideration of an application for chang.a of zoning
of the north ',,.feet of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCI:LLUS Db:.ARBORN SUBDIVISION',
fr - to R-3, pending investia tiou by the director of the Planning Department
of the advisability of creating an 13-3A district to encompass said property. The
following is a report of the findinga of the Planning Department on the above atatod
matter.
i
j 4Z-0 R :COMMi.1iDATION:
It is recommended that the petitioned change of zoning be referred back to tho
Planning and Zoning Board to consider an R-3A zoning application on the subject
proporty and the proporty c` a north of the aubjcct property doscribod as the
north 195 foot of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCi:LLUS D ARBORN SU.3DIVISION, Vila
rocommendation for an R-3A classification on the subject property would provide.
a uniform R-3A district with the inclusion of the proporty presently zoned R-4
to the north of the subject property, and would be more compatible with the sur-
rounding low density residential area.
ANALYSIS:
A land uuo survey of the properties fronting along S. W. 17th Avenuo between
S. 1 . 3th Street and 5. W. 22nd S►:•.:et, wan performed and with the oxception
of tho exiutina commercial coning at they tntersectiorui of 8th Street and 2Zed
Street, the lend use 1s predominantly single family and duplex us go. This
predominant land use la of substantial reality and is a bound low density resi-
dential character. In the immediate vicinity of tho subject property, two new
apartment atructuros have been constructed o:: a site that was zoned 11-4 on
July 8. 1965. South of tho subject property, a telephone substation has been
constructed under the public utilitios provisions of the Carnprebcneivo Zoning
Page 1 of 2
Honorable Members of the City Commission
Ordinance. As the subject property lies between these two development„ :.
a change of zoning classification to a uae other than R-2 is appropriate,
As the existing land use is predominantly low density residential, avid()
from the two aforementioned developments, an R-3A zoning c1a►esificaticn
would be more appropriate than an R-3 or R-r zoning classification.
i7-3A zoning classification does require site plan approval and a density
somewhat lees than the densities permitted by an 11-3 or an 1 -4 zonir:U
classification. Therefore, the R-3A is more compatible with the overall
character of the subject area.
Au a change of zoning on just the subject property does tend to reflect a
spot zoning; application similar to the spot zoningapplication of 17-4 t ist-
ing to the north of the subject property, it is recommended that both pro-
perties be zoned to the R-3A classification.
'Page 2of2
/ 9 i:?,
8. AREA HEARING
Public Heafing to consider a Change of Zoning Classificatioyc1
for the area including the N 250' of the S 450' of Lot 1, and %%
the N 195' of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB (B-26), 'y
located south of S. W. 19th Street on the west side of S. W. CY+
17th Avenue, from R-1 (One Family) and R-4 (Medium Density
Multiple) to R-3A (Low Density Apartment).
Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of Hearing,
and administered oath to all persons testifying at this hearing.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: "MEMORANDUM TO THE
CITY COMMISSION OF MARCH 22,-1973"
It is recommended that the petiticned change of zoning be
referred back to the Planning and Zoning Board to consider
an R-3A zoning application on the subject property and the
property due north of the subject property described as the
north 195 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB-
DIVISION. This recommendation for an R-3A classification
on the subject property would provide a uniform R-3A
district with the inclusion of the property presently
zoned R-4 to the north of the subject property, and would
be more compatible with the surrounding low density
residential area.
Mr. Simpson: Mr. Chairman, for a little background on this
particular item, you will recall that the property with the 'X' on
it was before this Board for a Change of Zoning from R-2 to R-3. This
Board recommended a Denial of this application and on Appeal to the
City Commission, Mr. Acton of the Planning Department - the Director
of the Planning Department, when questioned, indicated that possibly
he would consider an R-3A development on the property including the
area directly to the north of it.
This was then, by resolution of the City Commission, referring
it back to this Board for this advertised public hearing.
Mr. Martinez: All right.
Mr. Simpson: Are any of the owners of the property here tonight?
Only one? Well, the R-4 presently is developed with, except for the
northwest corner of the R-4 property that's all developed.
Mr. Martinez: Everyone was notified that we had a public
hearing in this area?
Mr. Simpson: Yes, sir. We even - our office, because of the
enlarged area even developed additional lists for this. I'm sure the
gentleman whose property was up originally has something to comment
on.
Mr. Martinez: Okay, let's have the public hearing.
Mr. F. Martinez: Ladies and Gentlemen, my name is Francisco
Martinez, Jr. I represent my father who owns Marcellus Dearborn
property, the one who have the cross there.
As you can see, we are surrounded by R-4 and then to the south
we have the Telephone Company which is a public building and now they
just made an additional floor. That's something else, we've been
growing commercially lately, and the traffic have been increased.
That zone is not considered anymore as a zone with small
buildings. It has been growing. In the south, next to Coral Way
there have been a bank which they just built and they have some other
commercial building that they are building around the area.
What I am trying to say is not a quiet zone anymore. It has
heavy traffic, and that's what I wanted to say.
-39- April 23, 1973 Item #8
um
Mr. Martinez: Thank you, Mr. Martinez.
All right, is the Department going to make a recommendation
on this area, or what?
Mr. McLean: The Planning Department has submitted a written
recommendation on this item, by memorandum to the City Commission
of February 22nd.
The recommendation, to capsule it again, for the Board, the
Department recommends a uniform zoning of R-3A on the property shown
on the map. The Department feels that it would provide a uniform
R-3A zoning district and it would also be more compatible and con-
dusive to the existing low density residential area.
Mr. Gort : I would like to ask the Department if it has taken
into consideration, if they know about the project on 17th Avenue.
The street is going to be widened, I understand, within three or four
years.
Mr. McLean: Yes, these factors were all taken into con-
sideration.
Mr. Martinez: All right, Mr. Silverman.
Mr. Silverman: Mr. Martinez, how long do you own the property,
you and your father?
Mr. F. Martinez: For about six - five years. Actually, we
exchanged one piece of land. Half of the Telephone Company belonged
to us and we exchanged it; so we own the whole square - the whole lot.
Mr. Silverman: You owned the property five years? The reason
is because this property has been up before this Board several
for rezoning. It's always been you?
I ask
times
you?
Mr. F. Martinez: Yes.
Mr. Silverman: There's been a parade of different faces.
Mr. F. Martinez: There have been men that have represented me.
Mr. Silverman: Well, I remember Jerry Canner, was he representing
Dick Lyons and Jerry Canner?
Mr. F. Martinez: No. Who?
Mr. Silverman: Canner, C-A-N-N-E-R.
Mr. F. Martinez: No. The last one who represented me was
Mr. Davidson.
Mr. Silverman: Yes, I recall him; there was someone else at
one time.
Mr. F. Martinez: It was an architect, Mr. Lastra, who
represented me one time and I represent myself twice already.
Mr.
property.
zoning, so
sense.
Martinez: The only question I have to this is the R-4
They're going to take the R-4 and turn it into an R-3A
that property, that man there; I don't know if that makes
Mr. F. Martinez: May I say somethinn?
Mr. Martinez:
Yes, go ahead.
Mr. F. Martinez: I asked - appealed for R-3 and I am, I mean
I just accepted R-3A, I mean. As you can see I am next to an R-4
and I have next to me a Telephone Company which is a big, huge building.
-40- April 23, 1973 Item #8
4
Mr. Martinez: My argument is not with your property, it's the
property lower from you which is R-4. To roll -back that man and zone
it to R-3A, it's not yes, Mr. Alfonso?
Mr. Alfonso: The R-4 property is developed already, is that
right? So if that's rolled -back in zoning, we're not going to anything
to him. Nothing to the R-4, it's already developed.
The main thing is, I want to establish here tonight, what is
the difference between P.U.D. and the R-3A, how many unit difference;
I want to hear that from the Department.
Mr. Martinez: Mr. Whipple.
Mr. Simpson: What did you say, the P.U.D. under...
Mr. Martinez: Yes, under Planned Unit Development
R-3A, what's the difference in actual units he can get in
Mr. Simpson: The density in the R-3A district, one
per 1,800 square feet; and a P.U.D. in the R-2 district is
for each 3,000 square feet. R-3A is a little more density
R-2, P.U.D..
and under
there.
unit
one unit
than the
Mr. Alfonso: But on P.U.D. you get the benefit of - waiving
of setbacks because it will be a package deal, is that right?
Mr. Simpson: Possibility.
Mr. Martinez; Yes, Mr. Dean.
Mr. Dean: I'm ready to vote.
Mr. Silverman: Well, I'm not quite ready.
Mr. Martinez: Well, I don't believe in rolling back people's
zoning after they've been assessed and paying taxes on what they got;
they build property. We have, along 17th Avenue we have a lot of
commercial property that was built there a long time ago; there's
people who want to make parking lots on those properties, and they
can't do it because it's zoned R-1 and yet we have commercial. We
have grocery stores and we have all that kind of situation up in
that 17th Avenue.
And I don't want to sit on this Board and make the same mistake
tonight that was made many years ago and have a situation 20 years from
now - rolling back an R-4.
Mr. Silverman: That part doesn't bother me, it may bother
you. The owner of the R-4 property has been notified, he has not
sought to come down and object, the building is already there. I don't
think it's going to affect him unless the building burns down. He's
not here.
What does bother me is that the Staff has consistently
recommended that the requests for changes of zoning be denied. This
property has been up at least three times that I recall. I have
consistently supported the Staff. The Staff recommended the Telephone
Company, I supported the Staff and the Telephone Company is there
now.
Now, it appears that the Staff has changed their mind because
of the phone company and because of the R-4 building and it makes me
feel - either I don't know what I'm doing or - there's got to be a
better reason why I keep voting with the Staff and they change their
minds. And I want something in the record to substantiate why the
recommendation has changed. Is it because of the phone company?
Because the next time the Telephone Company or Florida Power and Light
comes up, I don't think we can just give them what they want if it's
going to change the entire neighborhood; and we have one coming up
pretty soon for the Florida Power and Light. That's why I raised this
subject. I'd like to hear from the Staff, why they changed their
opinion.
-41- April 23, 1973 Item #8
tilf
Mr. Whipple: Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board, as you might
know, the recommendation of the Planning Board went on to the Cornrnission
and the item covered, I believe, a minimum of two, probably three,
hearings, and during this process the Commission was not particularly
happy with going ahead and changing the zoning to the petitioned R-4
or R-3 and they felt and requested the Staff to consider what alternatives
would be availfble.
This was the alternative that we submitted to them; they had
asked us for a specific alternative, what could be done, and this
was our recommendation. Our recommendation for R-3 was based only
upon the fact that the property - R-3A, I'm sorry - include the
property to the north even though it was predominantly developed
at this time.
If you will
approach. It is a
with, and, on this
back to this Board
, I would suggest that this is a compromise -type
solution which we were requested to come up
basis, the City Commission had recommended it
for consideration.
Mr. Silverman: Is this the recommendation for us
Do you recommend that we adopt the R-3A zoning?
Mr. Whipple: Yes, sir, we do.
this evening?
Mr. Silverman: I'll move according to the Planning Staff's
recommendation.
Mr. Martinez: Mrs. Fernandez.
Mrs. Fernandez: I'm sorry, I want to say for the record that
I agree with you and I believe that the change to R-3A will not
make any harm to this section, Mr. Silverman; contrary to what
Mr. Chairman believes, I believe that the R-4 north and the telephone
station to the south, I don't see how it's possible to develop an
R-1 construction, a single family unit ir.. this area.
Mr. Martinez: You didn't understand what I said. Further
down, north from this property there is R-1 along 17th Avenue and
you have commercial property that was zoned a long time ago. Now,
under this public hearing that we're holding here we are going to
change the zoning of and R-4, which has been developed according
to the R-4 Ordinance what is permitted, and, in other words, that
piece of property is going to be Grandfathered in; and we're going
to have a situation 10 or 20 years from now that we have further
up down the line in the R-1.
Mrs. Fernandez: Your changing the nature and character
of the area area - changed - I don't see why there is going to be
any change in the district.
Mrs. McGraner: Mr. Simpson, I know that petitions for
denial or recommendation are sent out from your office; it seems
strange that these people are not here if they had been notified,
and you have nothing to overcome that I know.
Mr. Simpson: Mrs. McGraner, I can't answer that.
Mr. Martinez: Okay, I have a motion to grant to rezone to
R-3A. Discussion on the motion. Call the Roll.
Mr. Simpson: The motion is to recommend R-3A.
Six objections were received in the mail.
Mr. Silverman offered the following resolution, and moved
its adoption:
-42- April 23, 1973
Item #8
RESOLUTION NO. 73=100
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CHANGE OF ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE AREA INCLUDING THE
N 250' OF THE S 450' OF LOT 1, AND THE
N 195' OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN
SUB (B-26), LOCATED SOUTH OF S. W. 19TH
STREET ON THE WEST SIDE OF Si W. 17TH AVENUE,
FROM R-1 (ONE FAMILY) AND R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE) TO R-3A (LOW DENSITY APARTMENT).
Upon being seconded by Mr. Dean, this resolution was passed
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Alfonso, Dean, Gort, Johnson, Silverman.
Mmes. Callahan, Fernandez, McGraner.
NAYES: Mr. Martinez.
Mr. Simpson: The motion carries, eight to one.
-43- April 23, 1973 Item #8
MIAMI REVIEW '-
AND DAILY RECORD
Published Daily except Saturday. Sunday and
Legal Holidays
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADS
Before the undersigned authority personally ap-
peared Martha Drobnle, who on oath says that the
Is the V.P., Legal Ads of the Miami Review end
Daily Record, a daily (except Saturday, Sunday and
Legal Holidays) newspaper, published et Miami In
Dade County Florida; that the attached copy of adver•
tisement, being a Legal Advertisement or Notice In
the matter of Adoption of Ordinance
No. 8168
city of Iiiana,, 1'],.grida
ite: Change of Zoning
nplAltCL7.LU5 l)i:Aitl3Oitti SU1311,
etc.
in the a{ X Court,
was published In said newspaper In the Issues of
June 19, 1973
Affiant further says that the said Miami Review
and Daily Record Is a newspaper published at Miami,
in said Dade County, Florida, and that the said news-
paper has heretofore been continuously published in
said Dade County Florida, each day (except Saturday,
Sunday end Legal Holidays) and has been entered as
second cuss mail matter at the post office in Miami,
in said Dade County, Florida for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of the attached
copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that
she has neither peid nor promised any person, firm
or corporation any dlscou ebate, commission or
refund for the purpos„ •_ " phis advertisement
for publication In t
Swor
19th de of;
(SEAL)
My Commission expires September
subscribed bolo
June
•Marione
�tibtie, Stetelb
Ida at Large.
1, 1973.
(VI' OF MIAmr,
DADE ('Ot'\TF, F'L()itIf1A
SOTI('F:
• ll latc'Psted win tak.• notice
It•.^f n t!,o 14rh ri. , nt June,
1271. the Cnmm!ssinn of the City
f 'fitt)t!1. F l,r! 1+) adopted an
r.rdinance entitled AN ORDINANCE AMEND-
ING ORDINANCE NO, 6g71,
T II E C OMPRII:HENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
THE CITY OF' MIIAMI. BY
CHA;\GING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
AREA INCLUDING THE
N 2'9' Or THE S 4541' OF
LOT 1. AND THE N 195'
OF LOT 1. ELOCK 2. 31AR-
C! Li,I'S r' 7 AT W)RN SUP.
iB-2e) L^ ATED SOUTH
OF SW 19TH STREET ON
THE WEST SIDE OF SW
17TH AVENUE. FROM R-1
(ONE FAMIiI.Y1 AND R-4
rMEDIL'SM DENSITY MULTI-
PLI•:) TO R-IA (LOW DEN-
SITY APARTMENT) DIS-
TRICT: .AND BY M.tEINO
TIIE NF.,^rS 1RY CHANGES
IN THE 7.-,X:NG DISTRICT
M )P 'TADT. .A FART OF
s.‘in •"^.DTNAN"E NO, 4E71
RY R7.1.7rIEN'7
ANT) DE.-
�C A^.TTCT.E
III. Sr("TT; .' _ T"7RFOF.
AND EY T:i:`1i:)T"'": %LT,
LAWS IN CONFLICT
I-IEREWITH
which Is designated Ordinance
No. SIRS.
II. D. SOUTHF,RN
CITY CLERK
CITY nt'
MIAMI. FLORIDA
PtIblI'at1 n of thtc ❑retire on
thr 12th rlay of ;tone, 1973.
Ad. NA. 606:11
2
3
4
5
6
7
•
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
411i9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
RHT/cc
5/14/73
ORDINANCE NO.
'' ' its I, t r _ - 1' — ►,) l ! t'
2/64),-,3 3 6. 3?
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
THE CITY OF MIAMI, BY CHANGING THE ZONING
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE AREA INCLUDING THE
N 250' OF THE S 450' OF LOT 1, AND THE
N 195' OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2,MARCELLUS DEARBORN
SUB (B-26) , LOCATED SOUTH OF S. W. 19TH
STREET ON THE WEST SIDE OF S. W. 17TH
AVENUE, FROM R-1 (ONE -FAMILY) AND R-4
(MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO R-3A (LOW
DENSITY APARTMENT) DISTRICT; AND BY MAKING
THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING
DISTRICT MAP MADE A PART OF SAID ORDINANCE
NO. 6871 BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN
ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, THEREOF; AND BY
REPEALING ALL LAWS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board of the City
of Miami, at its meeting held on April 23, 1973, passed and
adopted by a 8 to 1 vote its Resolution No. 73-100,
recommending granting a change in zoning classification,
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best interest
of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhabitants
to grant a change in zoning classification, as hereinafter
set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6871, the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the same is
hereby amended by changing the zoning classification of the
area including the N 250' of the S 450' of Lot 1, and the
N 195' of Lot 1, Block 2, MARCELLUS DEARBORN SUB (B-26),
located south of S. W. 19th Street on the west side of S. W.
17th Avenue, from R-1 (One -Family) and R-4 (Medium Density
Multiple) to R-3A (Low Density Apartment) Di4rtftbfCi3g'itviiSSIO ,
MEETING OF
MAY 2 41973
t,i;.lrha,•tct NO.
177.P,t74
Znd
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
li9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
4.0
31
32
33
34
35
36
by making the necessary changes in the zoning district map
made a part of said Ordinance No. 6871 by reference and
description in Article III, Section 2, thereof.
Section 2. That all laws, or parts of laws, in
conflict herewith, be and the same are hereby repealed
insofar as the above described land is involved.
Section 3. It is declared to be the legislative
intent of this body that if any section, subsection, sentence,
phrase or provision of this Ordinance is held invalid, the
remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected.
PASSED on first reading by title only this V day
of 4001 , 1973.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on second and final reading by
title only this L.day of , 1973.
/4/ 4a,1_i gOS•24,0
MAYOR
es
.6 44412o.„
•
.162,3,0('
City Clerk
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
R. f-iarris Turner
AWstant City Attorney
REVIEWED BY:
John S. Lloyd
Asst. Director of Law
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
Alan H. Rothstein
City Attorney
-2-