HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-0833110
Z1
'12
3.3
14
15
16
11
19
Lis
t)
22
♦, V
26
2
w' N
29
30
34
,ORDINANCE..NO,
AtJ ORtitNANCE At1ENb tNO OttbtNANCC Nd. 5s3 7 t
TtiE: COMRtlEEIL N5 LV .,:ON1tiG. ORDINANCE F OR
'r ii•± CITY Or f11At•1i',, i3Y rttANr,1t'1(': '1'F1t `r'>ONttd“
CE,11SSI.E'ICATION FOR TIE ONI'r'\9Tt:I). PRE'J,PI!:".I"I'\-
CoMmotQLY kNOWN AS "CLAOGUT(V Ot? I3itt t.i ttC%:>>t,•;
.tSt.ANt)" ►t,OCATED AT E3t5CA?Nl:: BA?' Al`' TItE t 1(it_l,.?'u
or 'I'IIL MIPMI RIVER;' PROM R -4. (M1:DtlUtl
bENSI.TY MULTIPLE) TO `ilt: r (,)I7c);;1:b 4.'t.)-1
ISLAND ..DISTRICT) AND` sY MAKTNG TUE NEc'H -
SAttY CHANGES IN THE ZONING. I)I`+TRIC't' MA ,
MADE A PART OF THE SAID OI;DTNANCE NO,' (,811',
13Y 1 EFE1tEr10E AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE 1. t t ,
SECTION 2 'THEREOF; E3Y REPEALING ALL ORDItk••
ANCES, CODE: SECTION, OR PARTS TIiEREOF -
IN CONE?LICT: AND CONTAINING A SEVERAi3TL
ITY i'RoVISION.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Planning Advisory Hoard
at its meeting of July 31, 1974, item #2,
t:i scd
hearing, adopted Resolutiot
No.., PM
Liowing an adver•-
f tiui to three vote, recommending a denial : o f the 1.' i Linn in,i
Dc-Terttnent` S proposal to .change the zoning cl.as.z.t i atlOn
as hereinafter set ;forth; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best interest
of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhab-
itants to giant a change in zoning c1assificat:i.on, as herein.
att.er sot forth.;
NOW, TIEEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY 'I'IIE CO 1M TSS TUN
TIRE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
'Section 1., That Ordinance No. G8?] , Llic compro -
11.nsivc Zeniny Ordinance for the City of Miami, ho .md the
same i.:, 1 r.ol)y :umonded by changing t:ho'zon in.i
t icon i'nr,. the: unplatted property commonly known ;i:, C.Ian 1ht:On
or I3ur.1ingamc Island, located at Biscayne Hay ,it tho month
4
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
22
23
4
5
26
2 "1
283..
29
30
31
32
_ .33
3a
35
1.n1•1.
MAURICE A FERRE
Al A Y O 12
'tho i'ii7m fi'icr=, from R-4 (Mu.1i.ur 11e,+rsit:y tip1).
to the propoaecl 00-1 (0eritral'7slat histdct)t ai•cl b,, ma1, i ti 1
the .necessary rhanclesin t:he. zoning district map
nitttlt
t part of , r?.iid Ordin.atice No, 6 71. by°::r-•ronee and f,:1Hi cy .
tion ih-Arli.Cle III, Section 2.thereof'.
Section 2 That all laws or., pa
:s O r. 1ac•t i rl r
fli.ct 'herewith, 'be and the same are hereby repealed inso-
far as ' they , are in - con E l i c t .
Section 3. If any section, sentence, clause,
phrase,, or word of this ordinance is for any reason hold
or .declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void,
such holding or invalidity shall not affect the remaining
portions of ,this ordinance, and it shall be const:ruead to
have been the intent of the Commission of the City of Mi.tami
to pass
is orda.niallCe t.hocft
OL inopt'rat iv part t:.hei-e'1. and the ,rc mainde of th ; Ordin-
'ante, after the exclusion of such part or parts shall he
deemed and hold to be valid 'as i f ' such parts had 'not been
included therein.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY -TITLE ONLY this 3rd
day of October , 1974.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL MAP 1 W.
BY TITTLE. ONLY this 7th day of . November.
ATTEST:
A.D.. SOUTHERN
CITY CLERIC
MIAMI 'NEVIEW
ANB bAMLY fiire tiB
- PuW, IMM bad, i3celrpi attitt t t# §act at dit
i iamir hatif2 t;dahty, klr tiM.
§tAtt i` PlohlOA
661.114111 6P bAbr«
1104 a the . undersigned autherit bet-4066isy AO
beefed Martha brdbnie, w,hd . bn oath says that eht
s the.: V.P., Legal Ada_ of. the Miami Review land
Deily Recbrd, ,a daily .,(except. Saturday; at
acid
Legal Holidays) Newspaper" published at, Mlarnl in
Dade t;bunty, Florida; that -tire attached cbpy of adver-
tisement, being a legal Advertisethent or Notice In
the Metter of
2i.ty of fi iai?ii f f for da
Res .
olAbtNANC1 No•8881.
In the 5MX . Court.
was published in said Newspaper in the Issues of
Novetriber 18 .19 7 4
Aftient further says that tho said Miami Review,
end Daily, Record Is a newspaper published at Miami,
in seld Dade County, Florida, and that the said hews
paper hes heretofore been continuously published in
said Dade County Florida, each day (except Saturday.'
Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered as
second class mail matter at the post office in Miami,
In said Dade County, Florida,for a period of one year.
hest preceding the first publication of the attached
copy of advertisement; and afhant further says the:.
she has Neither paid nor promised any hereon, firm
of corporation' any discount, rebate, commission or
refund for the purpaso of securing this advertlsem'mt
for publication in the said newspaper.
13t
(SEAL)
My Comri
otn to and su
ay'Nov embe
sue..+:i.
//
.ry4Ptit)h�,ia4i at
Liss eittirthi (c)t1/115' 1'
before ma this. -
tr.19. %h
Ioridt at LarEE
tiof ?Puff~
k chicle(
tltttt i 'fh"e 'ith dray tit-";tet'afii=
bei`. 9.4 th enrfirittsiiltili of the
Ctty :' fif Mien!, '. i~taeldn •eddpted
an okdinhnce ehtitIed ..-.
A: britsi$Afck Ai�lie�vr
I1+1G ,ORb1NA:VCE �tO. 6STh
T 11"E coMP tEHENSIVE
zoNINO 'oltDt`ANWE. FOIL
T1iF: CIT1;.• OFitiAlti, 1iY
CHANGING : TitE . 2oNING
CLASSIFICATION i onTIi1•:
LNPLATTt:D :, PROPERTY -
COMMONLY t{NOWN 'AS
"CLAt.ti lTON' 'Olt. 'ilili3-
LlNGAYtE ,ISLAND",,, LO
CATl:b, At, RtccAYNt: 3 Y
AT THE MOt;Ttl OF.,TIIF:
NI1AJi1 tUVF.R.'i•'ftrtkl
fMEh1ttlt ,; 17ENSi F itttf.-'
T1PL1) TO THE'.
t,OgED r SPD-i tCr•,NTRAL
Ist.,AN1i DISTRIC I AND""
BY "M AK1NCt THE, NECE.S
s.\ttY CHANGES tN
ZONING, DISTRtcT ' MtAP,
' 11.\DE A PART ' Oi{ THE
S.\ID ORDINANCE NO. 6871,'.
BY REFERENCE AND D1.=
SCRIPTION IN ARTICLE:
11i, SECTION - 2, THERE- "
OF: BY Rt:1'FALtNG ALL -
ORDINANCES, C'Oi)E SRC-
'(`IO\',:'OR' PAtRTt'TtitiRE
1 OP IN CONFLICT: AND
CONTAINING A ' SEVER
ABILITY PROVISION:
ahlrh la dealcnated Otdltmnee
j No. k 131.
ti- D. sin'TIIERN
CiTY C:LE at.
CITY OF Nlt.\Mti,
FLORIDA
t',nbt1 "atiim of chi= nntten nn
in,: min day of Nnt•.'ntbr•r, 1974.
. 11/13 \t 114n1
StIPPI,L`.R1F;v 1'ARY IN'FORMATION:
Al PLICA'1'IONPROPOSED SSPL)-1
CEN`CItAI . IS LAND DISTRICT
TO C I..A tIG)I'I'ON 1S1,1�NL)
CITY OF MIAI<.1I PIANNlN(,l llEl'AIt'1'MENT
Otto si•r, I`:i I..
111141111.1.
; s 1\11r4c;
`u ,1
14`,1
f;; •
p'tov idc...14,etvd'wes -boo pvbltc.
ai3: i C1il`t': FC)il 'iII1~a
S.PI)- 1...C'1:iNTIIA I..ISLANb...iti5TillC,T.
Ofzt)INANC E Plt0ViSfPNS
1Y% cif float• r ea. t11tit;1 l,t• residential ,tnd
hotel ttse tSrrtiota `').
I1teretsitci floor atre`al,t•.atto Irtt- tt,t`t'ri resi
cie�ntiatl r.t,ttttrar,rri,il'use'5 (Section 5):
•
Perrfitte(l use; >apttrr.,':,e'tl ,'at' titian of,
apnliratit.)ri (S t t.ion ).
the pyreitAgc of floor arr'at tle'vrtte'rl
io ccttt rnercta1: r•.+fi: oft.c es t.`iectioIt ` 1•
FAR cotititt ;t'rtt ,prat , :;I,:t
network (;Section • lilt, tt
50% of the ditiirict area tntt;;t br &Irvritrrl
to pedestrian open spa(:t• fiat 7 (2)i.
1ri°f„ of the district t as t•t',, taatt'tt he devoted'
to ground levet.perk ,:trt,tn (Ton
. (Sf'rtion 7 '(
ity rtl t
alfit
N1inittiuttt•t►snbit', {,rtt spa, t• ..i;:tlI nrit
Ic ss 1Ivtn 1 2ti ait re:. to: + t h ltt0(1 ltr'rston::
residine in.riistrit•t t,'r'e t,r,it ; •l4t)•''
l: i'qw reef pedestrian. open ..()at •. e ;tt tt r,artn•'
1,eve1'.adjacent to waled root iSeCtirn t.`_)'`
'FAR lion' us for (.ttitl.:vape'tl hay front pttlili,
t•,t..e;toe nt (`*'oliota: r' (tl(.tl).
ni x. lot ttty rags• or prtot•tp,tt ,irrat
tores. (Section. i,1:
1•:xtc'nsive open :•itatr,t• rr((tt'rrt,tt'nt:i
tine 7).
I'AI: bonus for inttrtt.tiive plant tug ,ratrl
design (Sec•tictn '' (i)(d)i.
tlr,wablc'.F!\1. cie'termined only altt
view of tic'votopn ent rtnt (.lil plan
vire)nmt'ntal impact st((tii(•:t, (Sec.
Sec. `., (1)).
Planning, 1)e'partotrnt approval +tl.Iinal.
*I.'vr'topntrnt p1,111:4. t Sei. t i,,rat I (At r I t,
UI3.iPC:;T1v E5
To etic;r)itra1g'' residential 'uses including
hott't 5.
to iprottr?ttc the cicc•c•to'Ptttt'nt of
contained c rttrinnintty hy.alluwing sup-
porting commercial itse-'s.
To encourage. those la nil uqe activities :tnrl
interieitie'v which 'rvill`not'create csccc'.4si�'c'
traffic Congestion' in 2Arickrll Arent.
To promote Open space tnd re',cre.aHotta l
,oppnrtttnitieA for the, rc'!yidenis artd nisi-L•
•
tors tn, tl►c�, island.
c rualc• 0 )0rtnnitit•, tc,r poOltr
r't'r 55 tC, pi rir .4t t i.to bo Vt t•ctot
Tr; p,rutr'ct tiiov:s through Abe i:slatnd and
to ptctttattltt :ti•sthetic v t"'t n t►•tito the
•
1n inland.
To ensure that development will bo tt(
a c, ord ;tiith sound planniut; prineit>lc' ;►ncl.
=itt not overburden Ihe traltit ,
public utility ecological, educational and
public service syst''ems.
tt bttNttA L b1z tt✓
tOMMtttctAll.i t15.t✓
t'A t. = = 2.
t5T, MAX t3ON1 JS 0,4 - O.
2.4- Z;5
DENSITY
600, stl, ft.
PEII' UNIT
OR 1Z UNITS PER ACit E:
► 3 •.� •• 04 • •
• • •
•
• + • �•'a• • • + • . •
• ••is
•: • 6. •• •.
,' • le
4.`►.•• ♦�• t• •
• •• '• • % • •
• • • r• r •+ • +
•''• •• •• t•`
• • •
►.
• •• ►• ••
•••
•'••'• •• '•. ••
•.•. ••1
/ • • • •• • • • • •
/
j •, • • • • •
I: CI3 I'F.;R1\11Ts
R E ;IDEN 1'Il1I.. ()FEW 1E:
F A R
ES'I: MAN.
UONCTS
I) NS1T?-
I.r
O. 7 - O. t
:
600 r1 , it.
PER t °Y1I'1
OR 7Z UNITS PER ACRE'',
It-4 PEIaMtt5'
ti. `.stt) N4tIAoPIONN•t'
V A R
MAX. toNtis4 tj• 1
0 s,1. i t .
PER UN I1.
0I( 58 tt;.1']'S I'E.',R,ACRE
CLAW, Aeir ativ
PROPOSED SPI) I :11 m 1'1'S
:i&F.`;1DENTIAI. COMMI I:C'IA1,
tUSES SUBJECTTi,') APPROVA ,
V A R L 75
MAX. 13ON tIS : 71,
DENSITY
750
l'E:I( i1Nt I,
OR 58 ('NI 1 `i PER AC'R 1':
1 51;1 M M Th: t' S - -.
tit,. 7. UNITS PER ACRE
: 8P07 t ciNTRAL ihLAND bts'ri tct
4
'8St0ES
PLANNING bit PT..
YZF CoMMENDA rION
bIVt,' Lotit',tt`'S
PROPOSA t,
BASE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)
MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA LOT AREA
A LLOWEIi
▪ DEFIN1TtON OF PAR LOT AREA
. RESIDENTIAL 1 EQIII REMEN'I'
LOT AREA PER DWELLING UN17
• FAR BONUS, FOR WATERFRONT
EASEMENT'
PER LINEAL FOOT,
MAXIMUM FAR BONUS
MINIMUM PERIMETER
ELIGIBLE FOR FAR BONUS
1. 75
2. 5
NET
7s,'!:, !''AR
750 sq. ft...
0. 01 FAR/60'
0.5
40%
2.0
�i O
''("2,11,0.SS
651'1, FA It
600 sq. ft.
0.01 t'AR/.0'
1.0
NO MINIM! UM
PUI3LIC EASEMENT
P A N i�f I1�w, A It TMvt mT s
• A MAXIMUM I30N t1S OP 0, 5
t,01 PER60 `'.).
*AT LEAST 40% Or THE P11;RiMETEtt
MUST 13E PUBLIC EASEMENT TO t3E
ELIOIALE P013 ANY IIONUS
• TO AC1-IIE1tE MAX, $ONUS OF 0, 5 AT
LEAST 3000 LINEAL FEET OF I3A YFRONT
PU13LI.0 EASEMENT OR 51% OP TI.IE TOTA1:
ISLAND PERIMETER MUST BE PROVIDED.
S DEVELOPERS PROPOSAL
• A MAXIMUM I3ONUS OF 1.0
(. 01 PER 20 FT. )
• NO MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF PERIMETER
• TO ACHIEVE MAX. BONUS OF 1.0 AT LEAST
2000 LINEAL FEET OF I3A YFRONT Pt' f L.iC
EASEMENT' OR 34% OF THE TOTAL ISLAND
PERIMETER MUST BE PROVIDED.
to,
•0 .'41
C LA"LICIIITONISLANO.
PE`RiMETF;R
5 r?. Ail. 86 LINEAL, FT.
•
'10
f:xtrrit of public
Pa se trient
•
'a
.,
CLAUGIITON ISLAND
PERIMETER =
5932.86 LINEAL FT.
Extent of public
ea sement
• 0.
All ihtefested Will take hoEice that Ot% the 1tfi
clay Of MbVor et, 197,4 f Cite CO=nmissiOh bf tic City of
Mia:,ti, t1otida &lop ed nh otdinaftee entihied
AtI ORDIN \WCi , A?ENDING ' ORDItt NCE t':0 . 6871,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
TIIE CITY OF t•IIAnI, BY CHANGING THE; ZONING;
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE UNt'r r'TTE0 PROPERTY
CO: iMONLY KNOWiv . AS "C LA GIIPON OR BURLINGAME
ISLAND :' ► LOCATED AT. B ISCAY E BAY AT TIII! nouTH
OF THE; MIT\MT RIVER, FROM R-4 . (MEDIUM
DENSITY nULT1PL ) . TO THE; PROPOSED S!'D--1 (CETTR\L' -
ISLAtiD DISTRICT) AND ,13Y MAKING TiIE NE:CES-
SARY CHANGES ' IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP,
MADE A PART OF . THE SAID -ORDINANCE NO. GB71,
BY REFERENCE AND. DESCRIPTION' IN ARTICLE 111,
SECTION 2 THEREOF; 13Y REPEAALING ALL ORDIN-
ANCES, -CODE -SECTION, OR PARTS THEREOF
.IN CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABIL-
ITY PROVISION.
which is designated Ordina;tc
No. 8331.
H.D..SOUTHERN
CITY CLERK
CITY OF aMIAMI, FLORIDA
SUPPLEIt1 EN'1'A It Y IN VOIth1ATION:
APPLICATION OF PIZOPOSI�.,i) SIP-,1
1.. IS1,ANI) DISTRICT
T(.� t`1..! VG! 1't'toN ISI AN1)
CITY OF MIA tii P1 ANNING 111• l'AR'IMEN.['
Uc1r,1wr, ts;.;
1„I�Ilii I'il Hlilil!
1 1.1
1 ...-: .t,.
:-firu.i 'it
IL: ' .1.!..,1
1
EXISTING ZONING.
tt.vdr444414 htilt
li,t�zE .. e lcut v►r
bs tc. spa..
r,44;4,
•
!1'
vAe. wait,
provides ivvewas 'tot. pir tfc_
�I3.tl`C'filt Ii:S FOP tilt
sPI)- I cl3NT.RA
C l'lV C,sS
To eticoura);e resicienti:t1 uses,: including
iotc I9:.
�o'peotnote the development Of'.rt sc ll,
• ethtaihed community by alltnviti3t cili-
,porting cohtrriercial uses,.
To encourage those land use activities ;►nel
intensities which•will not create.exc.:c?,5aivc,
traffic congestion in liri rkell A rra
To promote open space and recreational
opportunities for the residents and
tors to the island.
To create cpportcinitir�::for 1)tlb1,t
access to'pedestrjan baytroni =sre;
To protect c".vs threiigt, the i :l.ctcdl .enci
to prc,ntcctcr aesthetic views from tttc=
mainland.
To ensure that development will be in
aceorei will) sound planning prittc.-ipic's and
will not overburden the existing t r;i ft i c , .
'public Utility: ecologic -al; ecittc.iti>>tt.l1
public service systems,
iC)R b1 AN.C,t iA0V,I..8IO r.S .
`of Elder :t r'a itiust br.. t esidehtial and
heitel tt§t (Section 5)2
Inc reasetl floor nrrta rat in for mixed, resi-
cttcntinl.» rrmtitterciai uses (Section 5).
1'ermittecl, use's apprnved_at titne of
.aOA IratiSection 2.).
1 ,tell tlrc, pet'c entaf*e of flanr'area devoted
to commttercial. rsp: offices (Section 5).
;',FAR contingent upon capacity of traffic.
network (Scctiotl `; (t)(c)}.
5070 of the district area aviust be devoted
to pedestrian open space (Section 7 (2))•
:35% of the district:•areal must be dcvot'rd
tc1 around levrl pedestrian open.,space.
(Section 7 (31)..
Minimum us:tble o 'n. space,, shall not be
less tli:tn .1. 2h acre s for enrh WOO, prrs.ons
residitttj in district (i+•i:tii,tt 7 (.1)).
Iteguired pedestrian open space at ground •
Ievel`adjarrnt to 'waterfront (Section K (2)).
.FAR bonus for l tncl:.caped.hayfront public
easement ment (Section
coax. legit cove -rage of principal' struc-
tutu; (Section h).
Extensive open space requirements (Sec,
lion 7).
FAR, bona fear innovative planning .and
design (Section ' (3)(d)).
Allowable FAIL determined only after re-
view of dcveloprrtent concept plan,and en-:
virountental impact studies (sec, 4 (1),
-Sec-, 5 (1t)•
Planning T)el,arttoent approva1nf tittal
clevelctptitent p1ins (Section -1 () (e)),
I1.:G=1 PEWITS _•
f ESibENTIAL OEpleE
COINAMEACIAL 'USE
PAR _ 2, 0
EST, MAR 11ONLIS = 0, 4 = 0, 5
2,4YZ,5
. t,
t3EN IT? 600 s§DENSITY " 50 84,f
. ft, PER UNITt
PER UNIT
OR. 7Z UNITS PER ACRE C)R 58 ttNl't`S. pit'ACRE
it- PERMITS
RESIDENTIAL DEv .f .61'M ENT
PAR
MAR,: At -NUS
1,0.
0,.1
6 6 - 6 .12 e.a. 4 •
I. ** 6 e . *4: 64 6. 6 6,7117/r.e.b •
lobs
• ♦+
• i • • •* ••
OQO �O 0
n 0 0
Q Co'O n
Cia60 oo D
4-1 O p 4n
• • • •
• •. •. . ♦ .• . •
•
i - ▪ • �7•
•: •wi �'• .. •- •••
• jrz
• •+ • • • i • • • • • • •
•• . • • •• l . • •• •. • • - •
• • • • • •
R-CB PERMITS
RESIDENTIAL, - OFFICE
FAR I.r,
EST. MAX. 0. 7 - O.8
BONUS
DENSITY
2.2-2.3'
. 600 sq. ft...
• ' PER IIN1T
OR 7Z UNITS PER ACIt.E
1
AINP
•
th
PROPOSED S1-'D- 1 1E12MITS: •
RESIDENTIAL. -COMMERCIAL•
( USES SUBJECT TO APPRO\'r'11.)
F A 1R
MAX. BONUS US . 76.
1.75.
5
.r♦
DENSITY 750 bq. it.:
PER UNIT
OR 58 UNITS PER ACRE
c l ON t?S -
ot,, 7 UNITS PER. ACRE
• 8i5L3= 1 CENTRA IS ,A hiL) 1)t5T1t1t1'
PI,ANMINC 't33T:t'T. bEVELO1iE1 ''S
1tE6bMMEN bA T ION I' I2.01?08A L1
ISSUES
111 BASE rtooR AREA RATIO (FA111
MAXIMUM PLOO1t AREA LOT AREA
A 1..I.OWED
DEFINITION OE' E'AR LOT ARIBA
4. ClESI1)ENTIAI.; REOt'1R1.:MENT
5. LOT AREA I'EIt DWELI.ING UNIT.
6. FAR BONUS FOR WATERFRONT'
EASEMENT,
Oft
PER I INEA L FOOT
MAXIMUM FAR BONUS
MINIMUM PERIMETER
ELIGIBLE FOR FAR BONUS
N1rI'
75TA I A R
750 sq, ft.
0.01 FAR/60'
0, 5
40%
2.0
3. 0
(IROSS
'6 5 "b FA R.
600sq. ft.
0. 01 F A R / 2 0'
-1.0
NO MINIM UM
a 4US Cif LA,
EASEMCNT.
I?It _PbSA 1�
+ A - MA tIM UM 1 N U5 OP n,$
(� 01 HI;t 60 Pin) .
OAT LEAST 40%_OP THE PEit1M.tTER.
MUST H PUt LIC EASEMENT To I3E
ELI0113LE Pipit ANY BONUS
•`t'O ACHIEVt✓ MAX, t ONUS OP 0, 5 AT
LEAST 3doQ LI1\treAi. �Er��o�,t3AYt~ttoivT
PUBLIC EASEMENT OR 51%OI+' TIE TOTAL
ISLANb PEt2IMETEa MUST 13E PitOVIb1✓IO,
DEVELOPERS PROPOSAL
• A MAXIMUM BONUS OF 1.0
(.01 PER 20 FT. )
• NO MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF PERIMETER
• TO ACHIEVE MAX. BONUS OF 1.0 AT LEAST
zoo() LINEAL FEET OF BAYI!RONT PUBLIC
CASEMENT OR 3•1 ;o OF THE TOTAL ISLAND
PERIMETER MUST BE PROVIDED.
•
0
•
•
ir
•
•
+,
: %'.
0I4AWUd11TbNi$LANb
Pgrti VIETEI't
5932186 LINEA L IY'T,
'E#tent of otibtie
�ehsht4lr~H�
:4
al
•
•
CLAUCHTON ISLAND
PERIMETER
5932.86 LINEAL FT.
Extent of public
easement
i
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
? .3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34,
35'
MA/fs
9%9J74
ORbINANCE No,
AN oRDINANC8 AMENDING.ORDINANCE No, 681i,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING oRDMNANCE FOR
THE CITY of MIAMI, tY CHANoiNC THE ZoNiNC
CLASSIFICATION FoR THE UNPLATTED PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN As "CLAWHTON oR BURLINOAME
ISLAND")LOCATED AT BISCAYNE.SAY .AT THE MOUTH
OF THE MIAMI RIVER, PROM R-4 (MEDIUM
DENSITY MULTIPLE) TO. THE PROPOSED SPD-1 (CENTRAL
ISLAND. DISTRICT) AND BY MA1ING THE NECES-
SARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP,
MADE; A PART OF THE SAID ORDINANCE NO, 6871i
BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN, ARTICLE III,
SECTION 2.THEREOF; 'BY REPEALING ALL ORDIN-
ANCES, CODE SECTION, OR PARTS THEREOF
IN CONFLICT; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABIL-
IT? PROVISION.
WHEREAS, the Cityof. Miami Planning Advisory Board
at its meeting of July 31, 1974, item #2, following an adver-
tised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 35-74, by a
four to three vote, recommending a denial of the Planning
Department's proposal to change the zoning classification
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best interest
of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its inhab-
itants to grant a change in zoning classification, as herein-
after set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION'
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:..
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6871, the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the
same is hereby amended bychanging the zoning classifica-
tion for the unplatted property commonly known as Claughton
Burlingame Island, located at ..goayne_BaY -at _.the mouth
peer ,/
17
CITY COMMISSION
36 ' i MEETING OF
r D 4 .') 4n7A
1
13
14
15''
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31'
32
33
34
of the Matti RiVef from P 4 (Medium Density M�iltip�e�
to. the proposed Spb(efaittai. Isla icl bist dt); 'and • by taking
the heeessaty dhanges ih the toning.district flap made
a part of said Ordinance No,.68/1 by reference and desctip-
tioh inMrticle III, Section 2 thereof,
Section 2. That all' laws or parts of laws in con-,
flict herewith, be and the same are hereby repealed inso-
far as they are in conflict.
Section 3. 'If -any section, sentence, clause,
phrase, or word of thisordinance is for any reason held
or declared to be.unconstitutional, inoperative, or void,
such holding or invalidity shallnot affect the remaining
portions of this ordinance; and it shall be construed to
have been the intent of the Commission of the City of Miami
to pass this ordinance without such unconstitutional, invalid,
or inoperative part therein; and the remainder of this Ordin-
ance, after the exclusion of such part or parts shall be
deemed and held to be valid as if such parts had not been
included therein.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of 1974.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING
BY TITLE ONLY this y
7 da of /�"� ,. 1974.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
CITY CLERK,
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY;
-. r C-1 e
MICHEL E. ANDERSON, Assistant City Attorney
APpRO A CORECTNBSS:
r'7 O �
LLOYD, City At
Page 2 o€.2