HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-083265
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26'
27
28
29,
30
31
32
33
8326
0RbINANCE N0,.. , ..
AN'0111DINANC8 AMENDING .ORDINANCE NO. 6871, TIIE
COMPR 8tNSIVE `ZONING ORnINANCE FOR T1 E Ci''Y..01+'
MIAMI, by CHANGING TI1L zONING,C1 SSIFICAT10N;
FOR LOTS, . 8 AND 9 , 1±LOCK "G" AND LOTS 8 AND ' 9 i
BLOCK "t ", 811tcRELL, HAMMOCK UNIT #1: EXT (7-87) ,
LOCATEb AT A475' BRICKEI,L' AV1 NUE, AND TWO VACANT
.LOTS -SOUTHEASTERLY ACROSS .SOUTHEAST . rWENTY-.,
'FIFTt-1 ROAD, PROM R-3 (LOw DFNSiTY MULTIPLE) -
TO 1t-SA (HIGH I)ENSIT? MU1.;TIPLI,)' AND DY t4AICING
TH8 NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT
MAP, MADE A DART.OF THE'SAID ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
BY.REFERt3NCE'AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III,
SBCTION 2.THEREOF;.BY REPEALING ALL OPDINANCES,..
CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CO1 FLICT;
AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY PROVISION.
WHEREAS, the City of Miami Zoning Board at its
meeting of September 9, 1974, Item #8, following an a ver-
tized hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 142-74 by a seven.
to zero vote
reeommonding a 01,1 ge of,,zoning classification`
as hereinafter set forth; anft
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best int.7r-
est of the general welfare of the City of Miamiand its in-
habitants to grant a change in zoning classification, as here-
inafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE,' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
'OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6871, the Compre-
hensive zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the
same is hereby amended by changing the zoning classification
of Lots 8.and 9, Block "G", and Lots 8 and 9, Block "H",
Hrickell Hammock Unit'#1 Ext.
(7-87) , 2475 i3rickell Avenue
citl;l? var •:.it1#: 1Ht. �t
11-" 3 (I1ow 11o•zp1I; i t '; i4u I l i '
n (Hi=111
i; 1 `i;': lr ?(');1l,.
1't51 I
i
and #..F, ift:liE trltl 't.:# '' il''t'? ...,'1.. };•;;. l; i it 1 l; _ 1.t.)ltr!'i'#
II'IclEY' Itlel(iU .a.•13ar'1.. i ti;y 4f:'llifl.tii <.`. t'I,a. 6E4"11
c3esCr pt:i.tTh i11' r,I l i t }: ;:i 1. + > ^:,•..:t.i.t,l; t.h(J.E�c>1,.
llL'.rew t•.11,
SFJC't i011 . 'i't':;f,
:y'rlil s)i?'
er1 C t' 1 1i, c t:)n
Section
or p r 1.s of la
L rty
Cor�.=ni'c3 t,.f.':.t:hi.� ri i.tla.'rc.
to In.. LInC'011:3L1ml 1.t;hGi.1 ft:ttrc:Y':''t
or ,irlvali.diLy F11: fV i
Ordinafl'O; trid
Oi t.I1"
-.tir1 is;
E1:11,
f)c:t.ober
in oont.1ict'
.1 .1 i11;5'71:; -
reasC)1t 11c:
or void
• lr1=: 1 o1:et)
�;1tc�11 }1() Wing
to remaining I)o ti rain of this
ed l.Q hayE? hi:r:m
s
lilt'1r'`t:
Ll3 ONLY
'tic, patt
tri
nc.. .'c.} to
J.0 tit
NAS SI•;i) AND ADOUTEL ON AND V1 'AX., itl;tililj41; 13Y
- 7 at
E ONLY : thi.y____�._... !lay 01
ATTEST:
H.U. SOUTHERN
cart CLERK,
November
MAURI CE A P I RIU
MAYOR
M1AM1 REVIEW
Al b BAtL% fi€ceitiB :..
• Pub hiag batty I*ceps Safuritio, &Milo' and
Loot ftolidoi
Mi' W; hrtde toithiy, F7iriirin.
biA't% t't.ohtoA
toift t.6F ii oF, bAbE:
betote the "ithtfer*igned, Authority per*onatiy Ito•
beBYed Mafthr; brebnie. Who On ooth say* that th,i
* the, V.P., Legal Ads of the Miami Review and,
Deily Record. rs daffy (except Saturday, Sunday end
Legal Holidays) 'newspaper; published at Miami in
Dade County, Florida; that the attached ropy of adver•
' tisement. being a Legal Advertisement or (Notice In
the matter 'of
City cif Miami, 141orida
MOO=.... Q.+..' 8 3 2 6
In the
was published In Said he wspCourt.
aper In the issues f
.....................................
Affiant further says that the slid Miami Revier,
and Daily Record is a newspaper published at bltarni,
in Said Dade County. Florida, and that the slid news•
paper has heretofore been continuously put:fished In
said bade County, Florida, each day (except Saturday.'
Sunday and Legal Holidays) and has been entered n=_
second class mail 'matter et the post office 1i. ,tiarn,.
In said Dade County. Florida, for a period of one year
next preceding the first publication of the attached
copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that
she has neitherpaid not promised any person, firm
or corporation any discount. rebalc. commission or
refund for the purprso of securing this nrivertisem"nt
rot public'tich in the said newspaper
13th
(SEAL)
My Cammissi
r Swo Io and subs ibcd beru,e me till:.
of.. �iovember.:).�A.
Jahot
a Pubtit: Stetts'ut clotda at La:gr,
o xt inaisL �tr,i;.15.)947
t ttfi'ttt MtAiiL
t1►ttt; t'ttt,�� i'� i t.ti fi3A
tt:tiAL'Nttt cix:
Ail I"n'trt�lt�ri- too taut~: fietieb
that en the nth daf ;'tit itfrttrm
hef. 197t the ebiit'mt inii nt the
C'tt3 nt �t#Izfmt. P inH)4i t5dnptod
nit ordinnnre r±nittted—
Aft' t7itfitNA Ci; AMkNI -
tNd OttdtNANC8':v0.. MIL
• `i't t: COMt'ttE:Fti:�igtVF:
ryONTNt�Ottt)INANCK
• THE tett OP 'NttAMf. Rl"
C[#ANCTNrI.,TttF: VONIN(:'
CLASSt1 1CATtOsi .. " F„O [t
LOTS S., AND 9. t3LOCK
„0" ANt) LOTS s -ANt) D.
.t3LOCt{ . " tt t;RtCKt:Lt,
ttAMMMOCk KXT .
0.437).i.00ATt•'i) • AT' 24t5'
' Itittekt:LL'.r11-,ENUt:. Aktt
TWO VACAN-LOTS
SOtiTtiPAST t;RLI`; ACROSS'.
SCiLt1IEAS'r. r W 1 T iV,
,IFTit ROAD 'ttO1t n-
f LOW hF:XStTY MULTtx
PLt:) TO it -+A (MOH DEN,
CITY MUt,':tPL F.) AND 131 '
1tAkt ct -THP. NF:CFSSAttV
CHANCES iX Tit(. 'LONt;•C1
DISTRICT M.\t'. 1tAbt: A
PART OP `FiFE: SAIDOP.t)i
NANCE NO. 6R7t. HY
111i:NcF1 ANf),. 1)t:SCRtr- .
THIN 1N' ART1CI.t: tit.
. SE:t"'CN)N 2:THEREOE; : C3l'
iwitt:At.INr; ALL Ot?ht
:t;.\NC!•:S, COTE SI:CTtoNS.
Ott ('ARTS '1'14t•'RF:UF' Is:'
(•o t iCT: AND CO:;TAiN- .
IN( A :vEtL t3lL1Tt '
whi..,h ter designated Ordinance.
i1. 1). SOtiT11ERN
crr'i C'I_EEE
CITY OF, ML\\II.
ptihlir•ntinn of thi? nutlet, r,tt
Iir- 13th' dayi.f' Nen-Mi :T. 1974.
11°13•\t .314ik6
L 'riG t 1.*
Ali inLetested Will take hctiee that On 'the 7t1%
tote Litt
daY OP t110'011 r, t974 i 0-1e Coroib t 1 of t
Miattti, r1orida adkj ted - an ordih&Ice ent .t1Cct
-AN ORDINANCE wisDlt1GORDIN tCE NO. 671, tr nn
CO2!1PREIILNSIVE BONING ORDENA CE FOR THE CITY , O1
MIAMI BY CHANGING . THE zONINO CLASSIFICATION
FOR LOTS . 8 AND 9, BLOCK " G" AND LOTS 0 At'D 9 ,
BLOCK "1V , i3RICIIEL,L _HAMMOCK UNIT. 4-1 EXT. (7-87) ,,.
LOCATED Al' 2475 fRICKELL ' AVENU , AND TWO VACANT
T SS SOUTHEAST T►�JEi3T`i'�-
,LOTS SOUTHEASTERLY ACROSS
FIFTH ROAD, FROM R-3 (LOW DENSITY. MULTIPLE)
TO. R-5A (HIGH .DENSITY MULTIPLE)• AND BY MARINO
THE. NECESSARY Cf 2\NGES IN THE-_ WI:INO.-DISTRICT
MAP, t1PDE A PART OF THESAID ID ORDINANCE NO; 6871,
I3Y REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III,
SECTION ' 2 THEREOF; BY REPEALING.ALL ORDINANCES,
CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF, IN CONFLICT;
Ai;D ' CONTAINING: A SEVERAI3ILITY PROVISION.
which is designated. Ordinance No. 8326.
H.D. SOUTIIE?N
CITY CLERK
CLTY OF MIAMMI , FLOP.IDA
Honorable City
Attention: M.
City of Miami,.
•
Commission
P, W, Andreas
Florida
Re:
june 201 1974
CHANGE . OF ZONING j RECOMMENDED
2561 S, W. 27th Lane
Lots l and 2," Block 1
SILVER BLUFF BUSINESS CENTER (14,-76)
Applicant: Robert Lee Dykes
Gentlemen:
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of June 17, 1974, Item #8,
following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 95--74
by a 4 to 3 vote recommending Change of Zoning Classification for
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, SILVER BLUFF BUSINESS CENTER (14-76), loca-
ted at 2561 S. W. 27th Lane, from R-1 (One Family). to R-CA (Resi-
dential Office).
One objection was received in the mail.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been pre-
pared by the City Attorney's Office and, submitted for consideration
of the City Commission.
Sincerely,.
David Simpson, Jr.
Executive Secretary
Miami Planning and Zoning Board.
in
Z. M. 43
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: "DENIAL".
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
MEA/cs
9/25/14
'7 4 Ott
r {i
ORDINANCE Nos ..__ g _ _
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING O iDINANC8 NO. 68710 THE,
COMPREI#ENtiVE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR Ti E CITY of
MIAMI, BY CAANdING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION
POR LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCR "G" AND LOTS 8 AND 9,
Bt 0CIL "H" , BRICRELL HAMMOCR UNIT #i EXT (7=87) ,
LOCATED AT 2475 BRIC:KELL AVENUE, AND TWO VACANT
LOTS 8OUT88ASTERLY ACROSS SOUTR8AST TWENTY-
FIFTH ROAD, FROM R-3 (LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE).
TOR -SA (HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE) AND BY MAKING
THE NECESSARY CHANGES IN THE ZONING DISTRICT
MAP, MADE A PART OF THE SAID ORDINANCE MO. 6871,
BY REFERENCE AND DESCRIPTION IN ARTICLE III,
SECTION 2 THEREOF; BY REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES,
CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF. IN CONFLICT;
AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY PROVISION.
WHEREAS, the. City of Miami Zoning Board at its.
meeting of September 9, 1974, Item #8,`following an adver
tized hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 142-74 by a seven
to zero vote, recommending,a changeof zoning classification
as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed advisable in the best inter-
est of the general welfare of the City of Miami and its in-
habitants to grant a change in zoning classification, as here-
inafter set forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 6871, the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance for the City of Miami, be and the
by
same is herebyamended changing the zoning classification
of Lots 8 and 9, Block "G", and Lots 8 and 9, Block "H",
Brickell Hammock Unit #1 Ext.
(7-87), 2475 Brickell Avenue
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
OCT 1p1971
prim al h'ElpIr tNO,..,'„
,,,r*
Ana R . .,,,.,i,,,
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12.
13
14
18 '.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
dhd Vaeaht lots southeasterly across
g.g. 25th toad, from`
11-3 (tow. behsity Multiple) to 1t5A (High behsity Multiple)
and . by Makihc the necessary chances in the tohing district
map made a part of said Ordinance No. 66/1 by reference and
description in Article III, section 2 thereof.
Section 2. That all laws or parts of laws.in conflict
herewith, be and the same are hereby tepealed insofar as
they are in conflict.
Section 3. If any section, sentence, clause, phrase,
or word ofthis Ordinance is for any reason held or declared
to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding
or invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of, this.
Ordinance; and it shall be construed to have been the intent
of the Commission of the City of Miami to pass this Ordinance
without such unconstitutional, invalid, or inoperative part.
therein: and the remainder of this Ordinance, after the ex-
clusion of such part or parts shall be deemed and held to
be valid as if such parts had not been included therein.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 1OTH
day of OCTOBER , 1974.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND ,FINAL READING BY
TITLE ONLY this 7 day of /► V' 1974.'
ATTEST:
CITY, CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
. n P•:, ;�.�
MICHEL EA ANDERSON, Assistant City Attorney
MAYOR
APPROVEDF0 AND CORRECTNESS:
, LLOYD, City Atto
1bhbrable City Doti issiiin
Attetttiph. Mt. P. W. Andrews
City of Miami, Florida
Re CHAtiat OI ZON/M ,RECOMMENDEb
'2475 Brickell AVehue and two Vacant
lots SE'ly across Sete' 25th fond
Lots 8 & 9, Block"G", and
Lots8 & 9, ` B1ock''H",
BRICKELL HAMMOCK UNIT #1 EXT
Applicant: Fenix Construction Corp.
Gentlemen:
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of September 9, 1974, Item
#8, following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 142-74
by s 7 to 0 vote recommending Change, of Toning Classification on Lots.
8 & 9, Block "G", and Lots 8 & 9, Block "H", BRICKELL HAMMOCH UNIT
#1 EXT (7-87), located at 2475 Brickell Avenue and two vacant lots
southeasterly across S.E. 25th Road, from R-3 (Low Density Multiple)
to R-5A (High Density Multiple).
One objection was received in the mail.
An ORDINANCE to provide for this Change of Zoning has been prepared
by the City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the
City Commission.
Sincerely,
David Simpso , Jr I Director
Department of Administration
Planning and Zoning Boards
cm
Z. M. 37
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: "APPROVAL".
Tentative City Commission Date: October 10, 1974.
2475 BRICKELL AVF; Ot ; t m wwG T. too'TS_, :iLa Ad oSS 'r4 cJ
ROAD ...._. ��� ir? ��
S. E. 25TH y Lots
�{ .i� �y }y
a it ' and Lots t3 ahc 'e , bleidk 'itt" 0
Lots 8 and 9 ► Bloc:c G ►
SRICKELL tIP 1MOCK tfNlata 41 KXT t 7. ft 1 g
Change of 2onihq Classification Oh above btOpertiea f rein
R--1 (trw DehOity Multiple) to R- 5t\ (ttith benSitY 4ultihld) ,
Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of Hearing,
and administered oath to all persons tc ttifyinq at this hearing.
PLAT NING DtPARTMi NT RECC.`1MENB TtON : "APPROVAL"
The. Department study of the I3i•icke 1 Avenue Ai6-6 in.1970
resulted in recommendations to rezone the subject properties
from R-3 to R-5A.
nr. Mean: Staff?
:ir, Dooney: Mr; Chairman. In 1970► the Planning Department
reoue5terl this Board to . .. . the recommendations on tr , Brickell
Wr nuc 7:re:." The property in question tonight, in whica a request
Cr l' change of zoning from R-3 to R-5\ has been reviewers, they are
in accordance with our recommendations in 1070,they are in accord-
ance with the Board's motion at that time, and were held at the Com-
mission level.
Tonight, the applicants are requesting a change on their own
init:iativr=,-we have evaluated the application, and maintain our recom-
mendation •t. that time. We are recommending approval of the applica-
tion for change of zoning.
Ir.. Dean: All right, sir, state your name and address for the
Psr-cord.
10i
s
rz T� ciro: My name is Antonio Teijeiro, the address is 4500 ,
.tQet:. Can you hear me? That is 4500 S. J. 7th Street, and
; Antonio Teijeiro.
an: All right► , sir?
ve : My name is George Love, I am a Consulting Engineer,
0; '1)1c c;cl by 'ir: Teijeiro.
~T~ . Dean; Are you the owner of the property?
,�. Toi jeiro: Yes, sir.
r, ncan A11 right. You have heard the Staff's recommendation?
tr. Toi.jr!irot To be honest with you, I didn't realize, and I
ticlri't ho r what he said.
!.ilan: He said they are in favor, they are approving the
application.
Mr. Teijeiro: Fine.
:Ir. Dean: All right, do you have anything to say?
Teijeiro: Just to give you my thanks.
Ars. Hanna: May I ask a question, please, sir? There is a road
a;oinq through the two pieces of property. What' is planned I mean,
how is that going to be utilized?
rtr, 'reijuiro: We have the floor plans here, in case you want
to 'sire tI:ein As separate sites„
Mr. ,\ifonso: l have a question from the Department,
, ma n .
:Ir. Jean: Is there any opposition?
people questioned, r from their seats in the audience.)
(Three
!4r. Chair-
-29- Oeptember 9 , 1974 Item # s
DO6hW 'this M;attet Was tdferietl to this Board ih 1,061
It WAS the i?lahhihq De'par'tteht's teoo Mefdatioh to re26 ie thesd tWo
properties to tt=5A. This bOatd aplirOVed that red6ffiMe tclati6h, ih 1 7t)
The redohimetidatiohS Were sub fitted to the City CoMifiissioti, Ahd action
Was defetted.at that tithe:
This Was a blanket toning recommendation, oti the Routh Side Of
I3ricke ll , Avenue, for I1i57. AOhing •
#tr. Dean: Okay, now in order tO satisfy these ieople, *.:iould
you mind telling us, what you Want to put there'?
Mr. Love: This is a •)roject, eleven Stories, and it Will :pit
in the middle of a tract of land, which starts at nrickell Avenue,
and runs four hundred feet towards the hay. The building will sit
auprodcimately in the middle. The lots that are recn.testing tetonincl
will have no structure on them, at all, as seen by this perspective..
With your permission, I, will snow this to you, and then, to these
people here.'
firs. iiasila: I 'live down the street, I want to know what's going
on.
Mr.' Alfonso: How many units?.
Mr. Lover Eighty-seven units.
Mr. Alfonso: How many? Eighty-seven?
nr.'Silverman: iiow many lots do you'have, total?
*1r. Love: I think it's four lots, , yes . PJo,. six lots,
sorry.
Mr. Silverman: Show it to the neighbors.
Mrs. Basila:
now, sir?
1r. Love: It is on the other corner, on the east side, yes.
'tr. Simpson: The chancre in zoning includes the property cohere.
the r4rickel.l Inn is. This proposal is on the Southeasterly side.
Mrs. Basila: Fine. I know where I am now.
Mr. Simpson: Between 25th, and the Flyover.
firs. Basila: Fine, I understand that now.
would like to know what is geeing on.
Dean: All right, Tir. Simpson,. "Mr. Alfonso has
I am
anti
s one of the sites where the i3rickell Inn, is
:lr. Alfonso: From Mr. Dooney. The Department.
r. Dean': Mr. Dooney, go ahead.
I live in that area,
a question.
:lr. ,Alfonso: I want to know what is goingg to happen, on Lots
7, 6, both sides? If they come for a change of zoning, will the
Department be in favor of that? To where, to what portion of
ririckell is the Department in favor of the change of Zoning?
lr, Dooney; All of the rest of the property on the South .tide
of 13ri ckell Avenue is zoned R-5%1.
Mr, ,Alfonso
'lr, Dooney;
Mr, Alfonso:
Mr, Pooney;
•presently zoned,
This will complete the entire area into tt-5A, yes,
That doesn't mean across the street?
no, it doe's not, liverything on the North Side is
�3qr $eptemhcr 9, 1974 Item #8
R-r 3A, for recommendation . fb . R=- Ilk.
*tr. Alfonso: nkay
Mk. Dan.., Would you tnihti coming up tothe mite► if v'u wit
to tAlk, and put your name ind addt=ess ihto the Redotd, bleaSe?
Ht. Silverman: '1y question, sir, ie, hoW tnahy t9.3rkind snacee
do you have?
Mt. Love: We have the required dumber of shades. ping 1 nicht
add, that this building has a very tihusiial feature, which is the thine
that .lose Hilton did, across the .street, at erickell TWehty- `iVe, We
have all of our parking concealed, and below grade. There will be no
parking vieible, for : our tenants, he have adequate perking, in accord-
ance with the requirements, on the Around floor, which would be in
effect:, the basement. We are able to do that, because the average
heir:ht of that land is around eightaen or nineteen feet, tn'i we
can have a very Mice underground parking garage.
Vith eccess, not on erickell, lout on 25th Road.
'tr.Dean: A11 right, wir, now if that concludes your presenta-
tion r we i.11 go to the opposition.
*la:. . elcor: by name is Oscar relcor, I am the President of
Brickei.l Twenty -Five Condominium Association, a unit of 37aoartments.
I h.?vo spoken to most of the people " in that condominium, and
they have indicated and told me that I am authorized to speak for
them, in opposition to the change. of : this zoning.
eIona other things that was presented to me by the unit owners
at l3ri .':" '_ 1 'Twenty -rive," is that when they purchased into that condo -
mini ue s thee had questioned the, uses of the property around , it, and
they ``er^ aware of the current zoning. And, if a change of zoning
comes nne , which is like three years, after they purchased the prop-
erty,
; t:.' , been stated in number of cases, that have come before the
Courts, t:h't: prospective purchasers of property would have little con-
fidence in nominal standards ancl, would hesitate to purchase in the
zoned aria where the zoning meant little in view of arbitrary free and
easy grants of variances and changes in zoning.
,step, these' people bought these units, knowing the current zoning,
and expecting it to remain that tray. And without having ary indication
other, than what the Board gives, or the technicians representing indicate
that they are in favor of the change of zoning.
`I'hi. s isn't quite clear to the people who have purchased property.
Now, in the same 25th load, there are two other apartment houses,
they're both rentals, and all these three, the condominium, . and the two
other apartment houses, are very nice buildings, and they all have
underground parking. And the law of average parkins underground and
above ground is at least a hundred and fifty per cent of the number of
units in any one building. Which is to say that each apartment ha', ene
and one-half spaces of either undergrounds or above parking, not using
the street.
you should go down 25th Road. most any eveninct, you'll find that
the cars are parked on the lawns, and at the end of 75th Road, there is
a wide turnaround, which is needed for ambulances and fire trucks, and
there is " parking there, and the police do come down and regularly put
tickets on them, but they block up the emergency exits.
Clow, the gentleman states th,et they arty going to have plenty of
underground parking, this is fine, But the parking, right now, is over-
burdened. And eighty-seven units more, regardless of how many they have
underground, they're going to have guests, and as had been indicated
three and four cars, it can be a tremencdous, overburdening of the
facilities there. Plus the fact that there are other apartments going
up on i3ricke3.1 lVenuie r
-31- September 1974 Item to
biit, 1 must . cone back to the tit5iht that the rihit otahet§ told me
that when they purchased these properties, they didn't ekOect the change
of toning like that. And We don't feel that it quite fair for the
.oninq cotfissioh to arbitrarily sad , 'Weal, they've bought this
property, and nett they aiaht to uniform ti:e toning', but this is
after the fact. thank you, very much.
t•tr. beans A11 right, 6ii dustmoment. Staff? you had
better go back to the brickell Avenue study, back in 1170, when we
all had Staff to go through there, And come up with the i rickeli
Avenue Study, that tar. Silverman is so hard on during that time,
trying to unify the Zoning oh all, oh both aides of the street,
Ahd 1 think you've got to dwell on that a little bit, Where they can
understand what vote meant, when you were talking, about back to 197o.
Dooneyt If I might, in 1969 and prior, the board requostecl
the planning Department to undertake, a study of the brickell Avenue
Area) from the . Miami River down to S . W. 26th (toad.
For a period of approximately. one year, the Staff involved
itself in a study of this area. In . 1970, tie - with the public hearing
process, provided our recommendations to tl. Zoning. Board, of which
of the people that were on that board are presently hero, tonight.
The plan for the South i3rickell Avenue Area callc-:i for rezoning
of everything on the. South Side of Rrickell Avenue to t,-5A, and on the
North Fide, to R-3A.
The recommendation was presented to the Hoard, the recommendation
was based upon Traffic Studies from the Department of Transportation,
of Metropolitan Dade County; on the part of our own Public Works Depart-
ment. We looked at the factors of community facilities and services,
that would be able to accommodate this kind of a development, in all
cases, it was determined that our recommendations were innronriate.
This Board, at that tine, accepted our recommendations, ant
motioned that approval be granted on a plan for tt-5A z,ming on the
South Side of I3rickell Avenue, on which these two properties are a
part of, and R-3A zoning on the Uorth Side.
It was submitted to the City Commission, and the City Commission
took partial action upon that zoning recommendation. The matter still
stands at Commission level, as far as we understand it. Even the
applicants are before us as individual property owners, requesting the
change in zoning. We find that the change is in accord with the plan.
The plan is not arbitrary, it's not capricious, rind have the opportunity
to be presented to the public, we feel that it is a good plan, and we
are recommending approval tonight, on the application before us.
t4r. Dean: Sir, did that sorta explain a little more to you?
Come up to the mike, please.
Felcor: Yes, I understood that, the first time, and he
repeated it. But I also then have the opportunity, I guess, to
repeat that I represent thirty-seven property owners, net rentals.
Is this going to he a condominium, or a rental? I don't ow.
Mr. Love: A condominium.
Mr. Felcor: As the representation, as the representative of;
these thirty-seven unit owners, I wish to reiterate that I am stronclr.
opposed, for each of these unit owners to the change, because 1 belive
that it is arbitrary. These people bought these properties, with the
understanding that t'te zoning was going to remain that way, and it's
an arbitrary change.
fir. Dean: But I think the first thing I want you to get clear,
is that that part of the properties was not changed, and it still
sets at the Commission level, Now, this would either have the Com-
mission take position on it at that level., So, one way or another,
you know that that parcel of prouery is going to remain, or be uniform
according to plan.
September 9, 1974 Item '#
!At. relcor: t jUst hope that My otiiedtioht as a
of these people will be heardby. 'clw cot*viissiehs
Mr. Mean: It Will, yeti will receive t`ie sattie
Mr. Fe lcor : Thank you,
Is those somethinci you wish to say, sirs
Mr. Love: Mr. Mean, with your Permission, I t,ioula like to rebut
a few of the remarks.
First, 1 might point out that I. livel oh 25th Road ail during
the time that these buildings that he speaks about, Was tinder consttud
tion. I lived at- 130 S. 1 ..25th qoacl, for many years, and that property
is on nook 5, and Evart of 4, of 8lock 11. `21y property adjoins Viscaya
Towers. I was the engineer of ttecctrcl for Viscaya Towers, and I'm well
aware of the parking problem I, personally, have Called the toliceman
several times, wher, people part:erl, and completely blocked my driveway,
and it was the only Way I could get out. And I have had many Cars
pulled away from my driveway. I am in complete agreement with every
remark he ' made about parking.
But, the toot cause of this narking is the fact that S. S. 25th
Road, let's face it, is a placeforaffluent people. Many, many of
them have two cars,: and quite a few have three. And, there's not
space available, for example, in Viscaya Towers, to take all of the
cars. The extra cars of any particular renter, or owner, for that
matter, in the case of Brickell Twenty -Five, they park in the streets.
And anytime anybody throws a party, they park in the median strip, anti
the Policemen look the other way, because the parking is very, . very
tight, in than. area •
`ur, project, and I' might point- out, if Viscaya Towers
.1,1:, ; har eal f et the cars exposed, I3rickell Twenty -rive is also
t} r Bay Towers at the end has tnore than half of their cars
nepoe d , or, -! eet a few of theme are concealed in a smai . underground
lot, t'k n different approach here, because we're .!ronting on
Bt i,*el , .we ,- mccaled all of , the parking, every bit of the parking
is c'.rnecalcd f:rtom view, and the only time you' 11 see anythingon the
surface ..T l.r:e ine and unloading, and the trash trucks, and that's
about i.i..
we th i nr: that we have a very fine approach to the problem, and
we're bound to this design, and we - we are certainly in accord with
the recommendations of the Staff. Thank you.
J!l.l.nl'. Thank you very much. :111 right, we will close the
public. tearing portion of the meeting, and have discussion among
Board ..h'mbers . fir. Silverman?
Silverman: 'Ir.. Ch.-airman. I was on the Board during the
period of time that this area was studied, it was studied in great
crreat 1ept'1 , over many, many months. The problem . was not with the
Study, the problem was that the developers were not happy with the
Study, they were unhappy with the rezoning, and as each projectcame.
in, they requested variances. Now, these people that have lived here,
live in the condominiums were not there, but the developer that built
that building came in for variances, and the other developers came in
for variances, and the variances from the zoning Ordinance were nrantctcl.
And that's why we have problems over there. It wasn't that the i,-5A
eoning was improper. The Problem was: that variances from the Ordinance
',ere granted.
:Jow, the ,applicant this evening, all he is asking for is the same
zoning as everybody else. There is nothing wreee with that. Ile's not
a ►kinu for any variances, He's willing to build under the Ordinance,
whci.h is a lot more than we could say for lir, 'Milton, end some of the
other developers Mr, Iloilo regue.sted variances, I rememberthat,
Mr, Milton had variances, 1 thin!;, almost every building or. 25th Road
was ;built with a variance, And T. was strongly opposed to the .variances,
T was not opposed to the rezoning, l don't thin14 that there is anything
-33- S ,Member 9, 1974 Item #8
Mr
ret3 `rdo 1ta iVu
sot^t of A tii tied.
„,- �.tiii
wrong with the uniforiti -5�1 euotl] T1tj ► 1 think that, A tithber�
ioW, to deny this application, What elleryoody else has, i teallrI
think is unfair. t ati its favor of the ap ilidatiiiti: ,end I ate ih
favor of the Staff redbtntnehdatibh.
Mr, tort: ,'take your 'notion.
tr. Dean: A'111 right?
7+ts. Va.-,i1a: I just Want to ask a question, just to clarify
itt my mind. I un not opposed to the toning, at stime, either. ica
And t1Il�j':'r:itaP'l very' well what you're saying, Jerry.
jUst want
to understand at the very beginning,. I said we have ' two pieces of
property, with a road in the middle, What are we talkinci about?
These two applications coming in under one - what it; that?
'.1r. Simpson,: it's under separate ownership, ln, order to
unify the zoni.no on the easterly side” of I;rickell Avenue -
f3a� i i 3 Well, , thisis what I. want to understand.
st F itn:s4on: The two properties, the two or three property
• :ner';' have joi.nec1 t:ogether in one application, for the R-5t ._
The it,a;:t*r -kre not attached in any way.
:.1rs. ieyila: believe ine, sir, it is confusing,' until it is
thank you.
All right, the Chair is ready for a motion.
Johnson: I will move.
7rrlrt All right, Reverend Johnson moves.
L m n: Second.
i-1 :_ Seconded by Mr. Jerry Silverman. Under discussion?
,� r+ 7I1,_; ;.,;tb,°:,<two ask a question, would you come right over?
':;;;y;tp+ltt: In 1970, when this Study was made
'r, n4.n:i: {,-33-ve your name and address, please.
hontp on: 'ty name is Thompson, Kenneth R., 144 S. E. 25.th
Road, Aild+r t:Ment 8'32. y And I, along with Ir. Felcor, I am Treasurer of
the I4ric}'ail Twenty -Five :association.
in 1)70, when this Study was made, all of Dade County was under
Stud,, ,at t:,h.?. time, T beleivn. The traffic, and the number of units
owned, wore entirely different. lun I correct?
Mr. fcan : ' lr . Simpson?
Mr. Silverman: Special Study for 13rickell.
Mr. Thompson: Well, these Special Studies, was this meant that
you aou11 put high density - in other words, we have thirty-seven
families, in cappr.oximately this same space, that this particular vari-
ance is for eighty-seven families.
9r. Silverman This is not a variance. It is a change of zoning.
Mr. Thompson: it's .a change of zoning, but now you.. can load into,
a certain area so much, like that monstority that's up the street from
us, but: it's on the North Side, You know, solid concrete. If that's
what we want, that's what we'll get.
But, I can't see how .we're" going to be able to fix, not the
parking, but the entrance to an ` from this particular property, as
well as all of our properties, to handle the traffic i•n and out,
expecially et seven and eight o' ciocl; in the morning, and the normal
hours at night.
-34- September 9, 1974 Item 10
Ate Alfohst t ' if t may, '•1t. dhaif'Manl Let die ac dte§s thig
htlemah. Mott li*e hOW in the 11-5 tohing, that is where you live
h' w, You ate afta:.d that o i & opposed to five th high tile toning,
it does not ailoW to pu+t a Single family, but you ate iivihcf ill
thisis there you are, living tibia* YOU have tr live Where you bought,
you bought a condbMitlittt there, that's the ionint4 theta, Ra,54
mr. Thompson With good tilahninrfi, do you have to have one big
concrete monster after another
Mr. "Llfonsa. That is the toning nova.
Mr. Thompson: I think there should be some Mastet Ptah for
Esthetic Qualities, as well, or, isn't that a part of the American
Way of Life any. more?
Is everything commercial? In other words, first in, last out?
Mr. Silverman: All you're saying is, that the developer of
your building ► and the developer,: along 25th Road didn't do such a
hot job, that they overbuilt on the land. And I. agree '4ith everything
that you say! I voted against all of those variances, avery single one
that came along, on 25th Road..
The fact of life is, they were approved, and the buildings are
up, and your developer, and Mr. Rollo, and a coupld of others, all
built with variances. This man is not asking to vary from the law.
This is not a variance.
All he is saying is, 'give me the same zoning as Everybody else
on Drickell Avenue has, don't give me any more, don't give me anything
less, I just want the same zoning, I am not asking you to vary from
it, I am not asking to build more units than permitted', which is what
your developer did, 'I'm not asking to put a bigger building than I
could, or, less parking than I could',which is what your developer
did.
lie says, 'I'll comply with the law. I am not asking ,to vary
one bit.- Just give me the same zoning as that you have, and every-'
:body -ease has.' I really don't think that he's asking for too much.
;:ow, if he came up, and said, 'I want to build more units.'
��
Or, I want to. vary from the parking.' Then, I woula'he opposed to
them, just as 1 was to Mr.. Tilton, and everybody else up anddown'25th
But, as long as he's not asking to vary from the law, as long
as he's willing to comply with the law, I can't he opposed to it.
Felcor: Well, I - well, I
'ir. Dean: A11 right, just a moment. now, I just wanted to let
him be heard. You may call the roll, 'lr. Simpson.
' tr. Simpson: The motion on Item 48 is to recommend.
one objection was received in the mail.
(Continued on Next Page)
-35- September 9,'1974 Item.40
ReVetihc th 1ifisoh o`f fercia this foil WifitJ reSoiutio i f arid nicivoct
its adoption!
RE8oL ]`I ION RECoMENJ7IWP CHANdt Or 20N/Nd
Cr,ASSIPICATION ON LOTS 8' 1M D 9, ELOCX "C," f
AND LOTS 8 AND 9, 43tOCk "tt" , :t3R1CKCtL ttAttMfC1�
UNIT #1. 1;XT I-87 , LOCATED AT 247 ERICRELL
AVt L U1 , AND 2 VACANT LOTS, SOUTttEP STURLY ACROSS
S. R. 25Ttl ROAD: i t1 tt--3 (Loci bEN8IT/ }•1UL IPLV,)
ro 1t..5A,:, (t11Cf Dt NSITY MULTIPLE)
Ripon being seconded by tars. Silverman, this refioiution wA
passed anct adopted by the follo:,tinc vote:
1VYtS: Messrs. Alfonso, port, Johnson, ' Silverman, Dean.
' Mmes. Basiia, Callahan.
NAYI;S : None.
Mr. Simpson:
Mr. Teijeiro:
Unanimous.
Thank you.,
1.974 Item 43