Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-74-1217MSC/s 11/6/74 ORDINANCE NO. AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 8318; PROVIDING FOR AN ADJUSTMENT IN THE PENSIONS OF AI,L BENEFICIARIES OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIRE- MENT SYSTEM AND THE MIAMI CITY GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN EFFECTIVE AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1974; PROVIDING AS..OF SUCH DATE THAT EACH BENEFICIARY'S PENSION BENEFIT SHALL BE INCREASED BY AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT DETERMINED BY INCREASING THE PENSION BENEFIT BY ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE ORIGINAL BENEFIT FOR EACH YEAR SINCE THE RESPECTIVE DATE OF RETIREMENT FOR EACH BENEFICIARY; PROVIDING THAT THE AMOUNT OF EACH SUCH INCREASE SHALL BE ADDED TO THE PRESENT PENSION BENEFIT AND THE RESULTING AMOUNT SHALL HENCEFORTH BE PAYABLE ON A MONTHLY BASIS; FURTHER PROVIDING THAT FOR PURPOSES OF APPLYING THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 7798, ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 25, 1969, PERTAINING TO VARIABLE UNITS OF RETIREMENT INCOME, THE ADJUSTED PENSION AS HEREINABOVE DETERMINED SHALL BE USED AS A BASE MONTHLY RETIREMENT ALLOWANCE FOR THE COMPUTATION OF BENEFIT CHANGES, IF ANY, WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF CHANGE IN THE VALUE OF VARIABLE UNITS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES, CODE SECTIONS, OR PARTS THEREOF IN CON- FLICT INSOFAR AS THEY ARE IN CONFLICT; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY PROVISION. WHEREAS, the maintenance of a loyal force of city employees is essential to the order and well being of the citizens of this municipality; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has constantly expressed its concern for city employees and the problems faced by these employees; and WHEREAS, it is only through genuine and continuing consideration for the city employee before and after his or her retirement that the city is able to achieve a high retention level of city employees on its work force; and WHEREAS, the sums received by beneficiaries of the Miami City Employees' Retirement System and of the Miami City General Employees' Retirement Plan have previously been adjusted for the purpose of recognizing a steady and sizeable cost of living increase that has taken place since the date said "; CC,! ENT INDEX ITEM N4._.-- 44•44/ • 61°17 'rIIilirrllMlrli IMwuliU beneficiaries became a beneficiary; and WHEREAS, the suss presently being paid to beneficiaries, because of the increase that has taken place in the cost of luting since the last previous adjustment in pension benefits, are totally inadequate to provide the compensation earned by the retired employees; and WHEREAS, this continuing concern was expressed in Resolution No. 73-491, passed and adopted by the City Commission on June 28, 1973, whereby provisions were made for including an amount sufficient for the increase herein provided in the budget for fiscal year 1973-74; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. Effective as of October 1, 1974, the pensions of all beneficiaries of the Miami City Employees' Retirement System and of the Miami City General Employees' Retirement Plan shall be adjusted bo proVide that? ale bfasuch diteuehcfla .benefitiarphs pensionibe;afipeshidli benitCteabedlblrwannaggnegdtbyamount determined by increasing the pension benefit by one percent (196) of the original benefit for each year since the respective date of retirement for each beneficiary. The amount of each such increase shall be added to the present pension benefit, and the resulting amount shall henceforth be payable on a monthly basis. Section 2. For purposes of applying the ordinance provision of Ordinance No. 7798, adopted September 25, 1969, pertaining to variable units of retirement income, the adjusted pension benefit as hereinabove determined shall be used as the base monthly retirement allowance for the computation of benefit changes, if any, which arise by reason of change in the value of variable units. "SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS FOLLOW" 2. si u Section 3. Ordinandelts *ftlli.gtid IL1le'ihein laWliftitietbarts Vgrailffl h}nbOoniaittehe Litho ber®bgi tho a igaobarebt ibp a1 it ins044tleetthey are in conflict. Section 4. If any section, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding or invalidity shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been the intent of the Commission of the City of Miami to pass this Ordinance without such unconsti- t.. tutional, invalid, or inoperative part therein; and the remainder of this Ordinance after the exclusion of such part or parts shall be deemed and held to be valid as if such parts had not been, included therein. Section 5. That the requirement of reading this Ordinance on two separate days is hereby dispensed with by a vote of not less than four -fifths of the Members of the Commission. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 1974. ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK PREPARED AND :PROVED BY: -1)r/-4- 1 S MIKELE S. CARTER Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Jom S. LLOYD City Attorney 7 7_,:tTIi/E LfL1�f'..J► bw„N!S FOLLOWS,