Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CC 1975-10-21 Discussion Items & Motions
1 AAA F•: 3O ...' FEDERAL REVENUE S AK i :c - S F:ti': ; t'.LS Pt rL TC ti::AR r:In a i •.,r« CITY EAL . �t:`..�:.R Kr: O tOP,77. 1975 theft' pro rains. At 11-.f o • .7,7 : .- • . a thirty minute pericLi will be reservr`cl for c:.:uSsic:. c :.:. ;101 ;. ograms . Actor Community 0,..---4%: 1 ...._ inc. e cringuen f eaytn Cart- .1 • tt ,t 1/ .i tt 10''C..ti-:o1 i. Sergi is ' t, 13:3:) A.M. !iert1t11 ."n:. rhar:;.lcy .F ,.:. rto nic ir. ()n?crtunl :r..nspart.it :on ✓St. t :1t' towr fact<.. fair. cc:. .1`.51r : .IT SC SS:0% ✓tocorut (;rove Cares. Inc, etoccs:(.: Grove Fani1 Clinic �. Coconut ^rove Optimist Club Community Action - Research iv Community Television of So. Fla. ,,Asite Commission /Cuban Nat'l Planning Council v 1etroj o: itan Dade County VDnde County School Board ,t 44 1 t • ?Ar,G AM *-Coconut c;rove After School Operat ion Handshake :rpae t After School Care Connunit; Schools CCU:»'.iESION SC::SS:::': 4. x tt fs * 111 iCR C4:= — N .S stse. P4=4gY Sapp L-- /.+ ssonMr" rdw..rd McCray •- 'aarue.: Mendota Ge r;w Dooley Ole Daniel Sul: iv:m «w'. 4e=.. Mar1. ir.r►�t)c, ; i s .' ;'a so 1` At t:.l' en:: a. :our 9:j". :Z. _,. ;.. C:.. electro:. .. t!t' turned on, from t%u t; r zialh r preser.ration. t;.U, snc:aicer wil tta': , Sry e s i y AGENCY Edison-.. tt a River golf Help «gm Ccmmu,n i t y Council T 1r* , t r r F+# 11 Ir .,`ramizy ChilJrer's Scrvic s I !nter:ti:tic~a: :enter, :nc. 1enta i • • .41116.100 rr of Commerc: S e'_"v: ce o klr....sa e loychoir C.or:.; Society iMi.aor:y Cantractcr's Assoc. # :no.:tv Labor Affairs eNieNr .': w:. 2utrei.ch j8t . A: Tan' ' Day Care �✓. Srr.icr Centers of :lace County Street Comm. 'ev. Corp. d::cct:or. Assoc. cf Miumi ,security Assce. �a•e ?re-Schee.: ' ' Sr„r .i : ,„.. h `ra.,e ;tee:::c,•:.-,c:t' r .r.s c:°atio:. will virf Servico 7arily .)`Iv ''arli fhb' ,n.Fir is F :t. .'ur rese Senior Center t:o;' Meals Progrwr. e Ye.:: S`- .:c` A;,r e--s . -.clear. Cent:_.. ` • ." . . •. r : 1. .�'.4 ♦ 1 ,• O: P { o - u::t DISMSSICN ?ro ran cc'.,W.SS:o. D:SC js.F.:C\ : i► it!li c * Moses Mess Tames II. S*:i ,) r"'" 4•1 S. 1Room't .terry Rich art -A r +Ew 47,�.. # • 17-4,, e-e. of feu: m:rrL:es, t:: . e :-.ccIronic light \:z.yor :'ur .eL. on,:" :m `. ,..:* zinc earn s7eaii,e ' .'.rive one .7'.,.. f:.' to ;anc....Mt,J Es/her psMeser. at;.cn. 5:30 P.M. AGENCY United Cerebral Palsy rban 1,er.gue i/.m.C.A. • I • I I PROGVN :(ENCSEV:ATIVE Fki::s 73r1r; C-Lzir. Coman,. Tr- John :ionin 0' Ty Pariker a" . le' Y2:.. aafae; . .4 • . Note; At the end of four minutes ;ile red .7.-lectronic light ia front c,f 4h, ne turned on, from t114: tire. ei.ch 6pe4ker will ivwe ove nine his/her presouat inn. F:30 41. • FEDtkAL REVENUt SHARV:c - SOCIAL SERVICES PUSLIC CARING CITY I:ALL - OlNER 'KEY )CO! 2:. 1975 :1,171:7C• Re . on 7_7 ij t hc^ : requests :or Cit" Funds. ; I 4 • 4 • • 17 4. • : -.- .ipeak c cf tlicir programs. AttC c) a thirty m:nute wrio will be rescry:d for clis:.!t;ssicn of 705: C:01 programs. Actin- C:;mmunl:v Centvr C. 7.:ringuen Health Cdr.:n. - 11 r • r '7.77 7 i If tr ti ServIce '3uroau la:30 A.M. fo .! COMXIFSICN Cocac.ut Grove Cares, Inc. Coconue Grove Family Clini Coconut Crave Optimise Club Cr-unity Action - Research Community Television of So. Fla. Crime Commission Cuban Nat': Planning Council Metropolitan Dade County Dade Cuunty School Board 'I.^ A.'. !ical.th Cnit Nurs narmicy ?ucrto "Aican Opportunit.i jm: St. Luko's Ovrlwn Aco. ?AOGIZAil Coconut Grove After School Operation Handshake :mpace After SchapCare 11"; 4. , ,ommun..6.Schools COST:; DISs:; !CR «2NC:i " 1 :* • ••: ' . , • :cnzz !,rz: iNosalyr, .7c,r.son rIrr`SrVT"'"TV7: Poggy Sapp Maries jac&son rdward McCray Manuel Mendora (.cor4. :)noley Sulilvin :izca!_ac 7%m.? otc; At tlIc eat: c. ,eu W.! Wened on, !'rem that tLr L.44 spa'swr m.4!.;.t‘.! ;o his/her pre 1:1S P.M. AGENCY distsr.•i.iti c> iiivc•r .eiC1f' }Help Community Council .1 „ gamily-'.f13rc}r,'s Servic: I lternat: iona i :enter, inc. c: Nien r,a: health t . 1. . , . ♦ .'1 . .+ . . Cc 'mere Se:sv: cc s of Cron: cf tlroater ♦.lt'.ie 1aa>i•a.I/a. Acti%,:tics ..e,atc> ACL.CY `t:.. •Chi 1 Mia.t . C%Qr Society M .:or: ty Contractor's Assoc. :a:ror Affairs NLc.I.y Cruz , St. A: l:{; ' s #wy Care Seri? c.r Centers of Dade County &2 Street r Corp.Comm. i1�'V , 4. ':e.iar„ _.c'.,,cwt :or: Assoc. c: T::i:.^: .ic"curl':y Assoc. 5:' P•-S4,,M i r Cc, Sp:r : i ..)eve:o."Ce It :.: nr.t;'cr:a` i .D ..r Se?vice t'a mi .)ay Car. for ♦t;fiar:ts nnd s Mu.:. - i'urnose Senior Center ,.ot e a a s rrogram `.'r.c,.. Em::c7men: Ser‘lccs Strectwor"Kerr; ... is i ... .\merI car: Cera : ctric n ROCTAM hot :cais Program -Cvv.:SSION Dn:`sC}. S:n i r ::arcs.: c . :i scn:'.a.r t Moses Noss .'arcs Smi:: Daniel S. Roi:>:in Sallie W4:ner CIori: iiarr:s Jerry iCiCh KC'‘ . Thoc:tcr : +'• :a:^ end of I L mmutes. i :.' rec C':ootrCn!c 1:`g'!'1; in fr.. • i # . J4 : urneG on,:'rcri *.:',a.t z. : " 8:'4 cn :. r::; i to .yp ``II �..,.. a..r. s�oaer �. .. zanc;4•.t l2 �-.5! Al :irosen:a;i7.~♦ ♦4w 1:1! AGENCY t:disor.Y...tt e Rivvr Sc1'` Help Cotrjtu;.ity Council •i i /, 1 1. - Chh i 1 d ens' s Se r vi c: . Interniai i -nai :.enter, :pc. 0: Miam:`C.cmii: ice'.• 4enr n1 iea'.ih ...'.: .. .am...E'r o: C.eia.".ere. Se ces of Creia:. cf f. gazer 3nycho:: M:wm: i';:orr.. Society Mi::ori:yContractor's Assoc. Minority ..ahor Affairs ` • : ^tr L IL s:. X: ,on' s Day Care Sen±c.r Centers of Dude County 6: Street ..0'.At:',. l.ev. Corp. '.e'.n.3::: :tt:;4ot for Assoc. c Security Assoc. .,..r..aaa. yr, 'rz.-School Onne y Mi.a,`..i Trade :fie}'..'ate,'.: n!: . [,;i: Sit: n iit:�I;'. ie-cc. Service . Tarn. .)ay Can. -to'. .r.-!'ants r.. piers Sl:i:: - i'ur rose Senior Center i..7.st Meals .'r ogr<::;. . ca. "T; : c7rent Se re i c: s Stractwor er :.. .',.mer_:ar Centel n +OCRA '.:gals Program MY:,T, S.SI N D S4...1SS I CN air .airr.r.ri1Wftior ..c:.ic• ; rdwiC. 377R::S `TA :v: 'a.:: 7iser,Ilart r\ Moses Moss •':itr s B . St; ne.ni l S. Rom:in "+.^...:E Wa: ner Cori a. ii:,rr: s Jerry me 1 . i'h: t: i crt: ., Cs:. ,,sun ..t ":.:L" : .d of r:L:: i::Ti.:C'!+, t. :eeciro l' ' 'light in r - �i1. T7: ::Ire e4.. on,, :rcr: that ic:.c each spoaser w :: nave cat,. . .I:::t To :3aC,.:vt 1`i .liner Sri,sen:.i:::.. • 513P. P.M. AGENCY_ United Cerebral Palmy Irian Leo.p.o Y.M.C.A. Co-.: CriSS1.7-S PROGRAM REPR:.Si..NTATIVE Yew F.k:::s 5aeCr: Yoat Prot 7:er,a!0:: CLti:Len, Comm. Rel. Teen,e ::;:SG-,'SS:.Y ANL ;.;...CLATIoN John ifor,in Pariker :; 3o.t!7ir. Not; At the end of four minutes the red electronic light in front of thc• Mayor w;,1 'oc turned on, from that time each sleeker will have one minute to ;or.614d.. his/her presentation. A RESt T1ON OF THE COMMISSION OF THE ' Y OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, ADOPTING POLICY GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUA- TION OF FUNDING REQUESTS FOR CITY OF MIAMI FEDERAL REVENUE SNARING SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, recognizes that limited funds exist for distribution to Social Service programs from City of Miami Federal Revenue Sharing funds, and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Cormission of the City of Miami, Florida, to be responsive to the needs of the City of Miami's citizens and provide policy guidelines to ensure the cunsidcration c' Miami citizen's needs; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. That persons, groups, agencies ur corporations requesting Social Service funding from City of Miami Federal Revenue Sharing funds be advised that the Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, has established policy guidelines as a means to ensure an equitable review of proposals, and distribu- tion of available funds. Section 2. That the Commission of the City cif Miami, Florida, adopts the following policy guidelines as criteria for evaluating City of Miami Social Service Federal Revenue Sharing Proposals: A. Policy: In recognition of the limited funds available, the City shall strive to select programs which will result in the maximum benefits to residents of the City of Miami only,from the investment dollar. 8. Policy: In recognition of the City's concern for citizen desires and opinions, the City shall select programs with which a maximum number of City of Miami residents can benefit. C. Policy: In recognition of the importance of full program funding the City shall provide partial funding only in cases where it would not affect the success of that program. #1. Policy: In recognition of the concern for social and economic problems, the City shall strive to provide for a cross-section of citizen needs through a mixture of programs as identified and supported by concerned citizens. E. Policy: In recognition of the difficult task of determining funding levels for social service programs, the City shall institute a formal schedule that encompasses the entire Federal Revenue Sharing cycle with strict enforcement of all deadlines. F. Policy: In recognition of the Federal regulations pertaining to the use of Revenue Sharing - Social Service funds, the City, as printery recipient, shall strictly monitor, enforce and make accountable all secondary recipients by contractual agreement. G. Policy: In recognition of the desire to prevent organizations from realizing a profit from delivering social services, the City shall only contract with non-profit, charitable organizations, registered with the State of Florida. ■ Policy: In reeognition of tyre limited funds eva11a11e, only those programs that present evidence of exhausting all avenues of funding and where the City of Miami would not be the primary source of funding, shall be considered. 1. Policy: It shall be the intent of the City of Miami to bulk and/or fleet purchase office equipment and/or vehicles rather than allocate funds to agencies for rental, lease or purchase of said office equipment and/or vehicles. Further, title to any office equipment and/or vehicles shall ES101040,eg4tit the City of Miami ,*4 $i a Cori tH hor• N tw n o TNN owis9f4AL J. Policy: In recognition of the adoption of these above policies, all CoNt44Cr. previous resolutions pertaininn to Federal Revenue Sharing -Social Service program allocations shall be considered null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED this APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY Amer t EY day of , 1975. ATTEST: NOTE: THIS RESOi.UTIO? IS IN DRAFT FORM AND HAS NOT BFEN ADOPTED BY THE �"' CITY COMMISSION. IT IS A STAFF RECOlMEIIOTON ONLY. •^ ♦ a� • o. • • • . .. , i . r r-* _' '• •,� ,,� �r// `., J /V' i `t. 'h.••- V� I i• ♦ \4$. . �1 fir• •• •a •.. i 4, k • *6, felr IX.f-'6 • ♦ ♦ • • • • . tr-! C r� .i........ - to i ' f S I\ 0.411'1C •> • / .. ♦ i t ••/ • tl4kt��i , .• i, 1` • 1 {,14` 1 r„ i I t 4. t. ,N).,Lc.,. 4 Si 4. 4. 41 fir` Is(' /t t/I'.. r �GI� ]� .1Z' �✓ 77� G• t- C! a 4' • ram# 416 . b' - woe i4. It a, .: •. r a l c L AVM ..'i'.y . ws.4.-''' •i.':. • i.. it t? . 4..„.„, ,%, y % '-fir.`."- ' 7 r .. 7_r . f. I. ,. `t..... ' ..`.'' I.'"S T. �,r•- • 4 j-1 rrj : ._ _•1 i V ..rC4 br_ .i/(tx�. . • A ♦ f. At.1. r3t•A eip a � w % w Y' . J a r #� s. +• ,_f ? L ,SLt 7 V t - , .. / L• • I Z. 1 • I 4 ♦ f t k • . e fLyL • i • 1,. �.... c` ..,� Nripr�MA'r Y w• 4 ,..,,�.i. ff r rr I:1 • • • r • . • •1 1 I , — . • L • - A. ;��� limor %. I 1 {. .'r • ♦ 7 • L .a '%'4 ♦/ •.t f. f1,....6101) .r l P.....- • 4_ •- + t1#Xrt -t +.r o. . •' *'w r(.,- :A..., G, „.^' mod./`+• 1 _e .. AI • ..L . i • ; LrLi .� . • , .t ;,...: ivblip •4.' 1 ♦ rto -Ar • r • ' / Ii it M 4 • vitt' tit t- rr ref. •� w • �� ss • jf • r /' r If �; , ( fir. 1c1 r► . ', •• rri +t it4+.4"' J / i �1-ct L 1( 7 .r t,.-.- , et-ci,. i '%r f 4/C • 39 i � r ci „� I ) '•.r 4,1 i•. / • /. 2 s• 1 .�' (4 las f if' • • 1 et ft I�►'+—�� -J> ! • ✓'. + • i y. • At r f / /t . .. • /t / t L l • • • ' • • • 1 # • .,Rp • / 4 t. ♦ .w . 1 • +. t. ♦ ►.1 ... . t v • ;MIN iON4' fie C�<• t - / , 1(r ti • /i. k't • • 'l, t4. .4 ft S ta. f : v /•. • , r (�ecf., ''''4f/ R t7 . s c r f t 7 ei ...)'la. { / CI / . 4 •1. �•,41.• j wy '•'10 -. 1�h ' 0_ • `"••:- r �.. . c t } • J+ r( • ✓' J. r• • .... <y. ,.. ti 'fist :.L.. ,L.ta'- .�•�6tr� L�1 ..- 4 1 i • l )• , 11 t '-4! is ,1- • 1 •• • 1 IMO Pt 1b AAA& I f, . .06+'«� '1 Mi. 'Ft a .4 p y `1 • $ • • r w sue. ... .- ... 4.. r • r • • r _. • ' , • «1111, �.. ....- : .-.era. ♦ ,••• .. • z Mayor Ferret I would recommend, Mr. Andrews; obviously with all the questions that have arisen out of this I would recommend that --there are just too many unanswered questions -- you are going to have to go get staff and go back into these things and come back with some more definitive answers. I tape you do it soon. As won as you are ready we will call • special City Commission meeting and finalice on it, and hopefully as soon as you can. Mr. Plummer: Mr. Mayor, my concern --and i as sure it is the saws with Mrs. Gordon --that it is all well and good, but me do have on -going programs. Mayor Perrot Me will have to keep on funding those. Mr. Plummer: I want to make sure that the Ranger has the latitude in the motion that was made last week to continue those on -going programs until we do make a decision, even if it does -- and we realise --take away from the actual total, but we have got to fund those on -going programs. Mrs. Gordon: was that motion a time certain? Mr. Plummer: Does that give you the latitude that you need, or do you want another motion? Mayor Ferrel Put a certain time limitation, because we can't keep on doing this forever. Mrs. Gordon: eb. I don't know whether the previous motion had a time certain. Mr. Andrews: The previous one was limit of the prior year's funding, so that is about over. to one -twenty-fourth weeks, or a little Kr. Plummer: Do You need a new motion, Mr. Manager? Mrs. Gordon: 'Pass better make a thirty -day motion. Mr. Andrews: Y+ss. Mt. Plummer: I will slake such a motion: that those programs that are on funding presently be funded until the conclusion of these hearings. Mayor !'errs: Ib more than thirty days. Mt. P 1tmer: No more than--- Mts. Gordon: Thirty days. Not moss the second it. Nt. Lloyds An additional thirty days? Mr. P lumsers An additional thirty delays. Mrs. Gordon: axiom. thirty days. i'11 Mayor Ferrel Naxious. 1 hops we can come back to this way before then. Thereupon the motion was adopted unasimously without comsat. Mayor Porte: t would recommend. Mr. Andrews: obviously wl t:h ail tilt, !jue3 t ; (DtI : 1,141 [. t 1 t t17 ... 1 ltir,u 1d recommend ttlat--there are just to;. UflJ.1.: •�-L.i ctucA.;t ions-- you are going to have to go get staff and go back into these things and come back with some more difinitive answers. 2 hope you do it soon. As soon as you are ready we will Ball a special City Commission meeting and finalise on its and hopefully as won ae you can. Mr. Plummer: Mr. Mayor. say concern --and i am sure it is the same with Mrs. Gordon --that it is all well and good, but we do have on -going programs. Mayor Ferrel We will have to keep on funding those. Mr. Plummer: I want to make sure that the Manager has the latitude in the motion that was made last week to continue those on -going programs until we do make a decision. even if it does -- and we realise --take away from the actual total, but we have got to fund those on -going programs. Mrs. Gordon: Was that motion a time certain? Mr. Plummer: Does that give you the latitude that you need. or do you want another motion? Mayor Ferre: Put a certain time limitation, because we can't keep on doing this forever. Mrs. Gordon: Ob. I don't know whether the previous motion had a time certain. Mr. Andrews: The previous one was limited to one -twenty-fourth of the prior year's funding, so that is about two weeks, or a little over. Mr. Plummer: Do you need a taew motion. Mr. Manager? Mrs. Gordon: Yes= better make a thirty -day motion. Mr. Andrews: Yes. Mr. Plummer: I will make such a motions that those programs that are on funding presently be funded until the conclusion of these hearings. Mayor Perms Ma more than thirty days. Mr. Plusrmere No more than-- Mts. Oordons Thirty days. Mot more than thirty days. I'll second it. Mr. Lloyds An additional thirty days? Mr. Plummer: An additional thirty y days. Mrs. Cordons Noxious. Mayor Peres s Naxlmsuea. I hope we can come back to this way before then. Thereupon the motion was adopted unanimously without comment. Mayor Ferro: r would recomri nd, Mr. Andrews obviously with 031 :-h' clue:?tints (•,!' ref thi 1 would recommend thnt—there are just too curly uti,-ir, :E`.tvayou -- you are going to have to go get staff and qo back into these things and come back with some more difinitive answers. i hope you do it soon. As soon as you are ready we will call a special City Commission meeting and finalise on it; and teopefully as soon as you can. Mr. Plummer: Mr. Mayor, my concern --and I am sure it is the same with Mrs. cordon --that it Is all well and gond , but we do have on -going programs. Mayor Perrot Me will have to keep on funding those. Mr. Plummer: i want to make sure that the Manager has the latitude in the notion that was made last week to continue those on -going programs until we do make a decision, even if it does -- and we realise --take away from the actual total, but we have got to fund those on -going programs. Mrs, Gordon: Was that motion a time certain? Mr. Plummer: Does that give you the latitude that you need. or do you want another motion? Mayor Ferro: Put a certain time limitation, because we can't keep on doing this forever. Mrs. Cordons tab, I don't know whether the previous motion had a tine certain. Mr. Andrews: Ths previous one was limited to one -twenty-fourth of the prior year's funding, so that is about two weeks, or a little over. Mr. Plummets Do you need a new motion, Mr. Manager? Mrs. Gordon: Yeas better make a thirty -day motion. Mr. Andrews: Yes. Mr. Plummer: I will make such a motions that those programs that are on funding presently be funded until the conclusion of these hearings. Mayor rerres N2 more than thirty days. Mr. Plummer: No more than -- Mrs. Oordons thirty days. Mot more than thirty days. I'll second it. Mr. Lloyds An additional thirty days? Mr. Plummer: An additional thirty days. Mrs. Gordon: Mvtiaie. Mayor recess Maximum. i hopo we can come back to this way berm then. The es thus motion was adopted unanimously without avrrsnt. Mayor Ferrer I wmid recommend, Mr. Andrews; obviously with o11 qur.3tioil: 1 iii1rt! r.'S ' 11i_:; 7 would recommend that —there are ju3t too r;1,:.tiy you are going to have to go get staff and go back .into these things and come back with some more difinitivs answers. t hope you do it soon. As soon as you are ready we will call a special City Commission meeting and finalise on its and hopefully as soon as you can. Mr. PlUMMert Mr. Mayor. my concern --and I am ours it is the same with Mrs. Gordon that it is a31 well and .good, but we do have on -going programs. Mayor !'errs: Me will have to keep on funding those. Mr. Plummer: 1 want to make sure that the Manager has the latitude in the motion that was made last week to continue those on -going programs until we do make a decision. even if it does -- and we realise --take away from the actual total, but we have got to fund those on -going programs. Mrs. Gordon: was that motion a time certain? Mr. Plummer: Does that give you the latitude that you need. or do you want another motion? Mayor Perrot Put a certain time limitation. because we can't keep on doing this forever. Mrs. Gordon: ID. i don't know whether the previous motion had a time certain. Mr. Andrews: The previous one was limited to one -twenty-fourth of the prior year's funding. so that is about two weak:. or a little our. Mr. Plummer: Do you need a new motion, Mr. Manager? Mrs. Gordon: Yes; better aak* a thirty -day motion. Mr. Andrews: Yes. Mr. Plummer: i will make such a motion: that those programs that are on funding presently be funded until the conclusion of these hearings. Mayor Torre: NO more than thirty days. Nr. Plummer: No more than --- Mrs. Gordon: 'thirty days. Not more than thirty days. I'll second it. Mr. Lloyds An additional thirty days? Mr. Plummer% An additional thirty days. Mrs. Gordon: Mvrimmsm. Mayor Perres Na*im um. I I. we can come back to this way belbre then. Thereupon the motion was adopted unanimously without comment. AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: Cuban National Planning; counr11 °V RALt. A V I RAC; E IRATINCILLIJ ftc: iu ed Funding: $ 174,1i)`,.0o ferottimended r"unC ng: ;, 9 Grit :ria 1. ADprnpriateness of IProvam a. Eligibility of Pro ram_ b. Demtiokraphic Need h le . program Ininlementatiot a. Identification of Program Objectives t Staff Cornmento Does not pr„v;de direct 4 ,, i l services Not provided by sgent, v b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. I~.ffectiveness of Service a. identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up No direct client: No direct c_1:c'nt•; 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client h. Staff/Client Ratio r. Administration .-� c'58.04 4 1 : 300 i. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility L. Budhet • d. Application None provided Ratinj Scale Total 24 r 14 = overall average rating {abov ) 5= Excellent 2 = Poor 4= Very Good 1= Very Poor 3 = Good X = Not Applicable I` AG NCY/PROGRAM TITI.b: Cubr n National P l ann i ny, council Rciuc' ted Funding: $ 1; L shi ttpn Cr1t lia 1. Apprn,prlatene5Pei of 13roiram a. Eligibi1Etvof I-3 oyram b. Demo . ra ®hic Need OVERALL AVI•:RAC;E iZ:\ TI Ratin I2ecomrnentled Y tltttitti�i: Staff Con-,rt nts_ Does not pro': 1 de direct !,o i .,1 sctVicec Not provided by agency 2. E'roYram ,ant terentatior. a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 2 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up 1 No direct client No direst (I ent 4. Efficiency of Service Deiiverx a. Cost per Client h. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration I:3OC) 3. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site rr Facility c, Budget d. Application None provided Ratinj Scale 5= F tcellent 4= Very Good 3= Good Total 2 r Pour 1: Very Poor X = Not Applicable 24 4- 14 = overall average rating (above) 13` DA1?E u(AIM 1' i.it' SCHO01, (Comfhuntty Schools) The community School program is planned as .a mrans of creatirw Ar . i. community in which the � choc t may gcrve as the mutt i•Metvice the -clock, round-the-ve-.ir centit' fcr r* k rr rttr rio t, Oduc,aat . enrichment ,annd%�a varietyrf s��c;a�l !,ur:ices. Request - $/9,00() for 1 1. ~1 i,; .i 1 STAFF NARRATIVE This program provides benlit to the community at a very reasor,•,t'.: , ,�. ►,:;;r,;r,:. Many low-income and elderly citizens take advantage of the broad sccr,_ �f ,,F ► vices offered by their community school, in their neighborhood, fnr costs and little inconvenience. Four community schools are funded in the City's General Operating F:uaclet. ;i.e. Allapattah Jr. Nigh, Ada Merritt Jr. High, Miami Edison f,qh,. 5noker T. Wasninrton Jr. High). These Revenue Sharing funds 11 *'r`vi''a r'i'-0 additional community schools: - Little River Elementary - Silver bluff Elementary - Riverside Elementary - Prir,ary ''C" - Shadowlawn Elementary - Fairlawn Elementary - Dunbar Elerrer. ary - Miami Northwestern Sr. Nigh - Kinloch Park Jr. High RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $63,000 139 AG fCY /PROG TIT i ALL AVERAGE RATING' 2 I f r 1 Requested Pw dtngt $ 19,noo.n© A�propriatenc s s of Program a. Eligibility of Pro_gram b. Demoraphtc Need 3 1. Proirtm Imptetnentation a. Identification of Program Ob, ectives 3 b. Realistic Coal Setting c. Methodolo 3 Reco'und►ft Educat Program 1 1 1 ..f 3. Effectiv►enese of Service a. Identification of Client's Nee s b. Client Follow-up None 0 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client 4 i $3.95 assuninp. it b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration i ,ont a- N0 staffing infor.'miti,,n prm% t ;1 it 1 1 7 1 1 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. f3ud i t.t 3 2 d. APplicatioa 1 J 4 Refused to supply budget data requested by steff Matins Scale 5= Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Good To 2 Poor 1a Very Poor X= Not Applicable 37 fr 14 = overall average rating (above) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 REGOMMENDATIONS furmtup PEcomiNnktioNs summAPY As stated io the budget 14",SVIP, S1,499,C7 has bPpn pronw,ni t, r Revenue Sharing -Social Services, Frn! this atnount, tracted leaving $962.160 availaHe , ',ervice I, those funded in 1974-1(rh. lhe 1', broken down c.C:1 $303,000 for thP City's 'Child iv Cary' prnqratY, $ 99,400 for the v. i,7 Flderly Cap4)"rt $ 45,100 for the Cite' "h,:0;itApped" ,wwitams $ 22,500 for the i'rouran C ' S 15,330 for !la; -tin t.ut.her Park PrOjt?Lt S 51,932 for 1/24 allocei n to 1974-T funded ocr-1. $537,262 total The balance a4ailable, S962,160. for further funding of social H: iS outlined on the followir,; page. Fund in the amount of S31,160 nave remaineu unallocated so that (cmission will have some i;-xliiity in estutilkhing the f E 1 Service programs. We (Aigoest these fund be re -distributed te .tyr Federal Revenue Sharin Lategories to enable the City to fund t wort.hvic 1 programs not ellgible for funding under "Social Services for Po(); 141'9,4-1' 1 1 1 L f 101,1-110 100,001 1OL Yco,90'2 2,4 ?.€ ?.r.; •V!, 47f. pitic.Y-PROGRAM, . _ . Borinquen Health Care Center $ 0 S258.23b IMental Health Program Catholic Service tureau "Ii.ir ; :'t ! , -t,n,flr', St. Luke's Overtowo Po„ rocon,;t (Irove After School oconut Grove Family OW( fade Co. F,,chol Hoard Aftrr ')fh -7 Community T no, I ,dison-Little River S.H.C.C. - Pre -School Program S:)orts Develooment Project Youth Legal Services of Grlater ii Latin American Office Wynwood Office .ittle ilavana Activities t. Alt,an's Day Care CetAel terilnt !,ication Assoc it 4.ritec Cerebral Palsy - ',,:lrning Env. (-op. Unallncae(!. Eands 1 1 r I j.iltjno 4 • wf • t t{ r% f 1rr",1 1 X ' } f' r • . 1t ' 143 L P(11',K..),,,, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Agenc cwhe, 1,1 t Eighteeti Fiqht vitm t y- tw( ett,' t L pair,of Agenc ie".; Wle ' t'Q t -- Tee tyllewr • f iffyqu s P; TYPeWr 0CfiCP d3tes should t he .) rsen t • nr.i . +t. - ,..1 • 4r (.7tAlr.1,171-.i. P t j7R- 79 t, • -„, •,r,t tO • , . . s • — Thi ,P1,..4.'s ;'4 • dOer1C I eS . ; 60 day period teither seer vc fLirid activities. 145 .� 1. ;rtVPL.C� AF'1 ?:,;,,t ). III'. :.VAi_l'.A; cif (.U£. IV. 720PriSED E:'f. %'l. kL: CN 1 e V.C[ V. PPOPf)SED Pril I Y PC O1 UTIQ'1 T VI. PLANNED ;;�:E_ kc.f r��. s L Y MIAMI 1 Flini.,RAL. REVENUE `ItAitiNt: REQVEST FOR FUNDINC, (0v VIA vlEw} APPLICANT NAME: I (Si .)nsor Atzencyl PPOCRAM TITLE: per .Ipplication, WILING ADDRFSS: 41111.411100. 061111.4., 31:1E: S.PE OF APPLICATIUN: MIMI% Jr .40i. - I 1 IlAT 'ostma t-kuttl no later than .11.ne 1 2, 1975) A PLli.ATION NO. ;cc. u:•.• only) - • Ada— ...a.. all.•01.411114•••• CONIII\IjATION ' N DING PREVIC 'S I F. R. S. .."'UNDING At TI40:, I': ED NI'MBER & TYPE OU HIS PROGRAM; 70TAI Elderly r 1 1 1 I": PE (LE SERVICE PROVIDED: Colin se lint, Health - 0! 11 City -Wide Other (Specify) I gal are Recreation if aksl.., !topic,: . tit amio• Employment Nom. •• APAN.1••••.4%* ••••••••/•0.01e• (.ther (Specify) T'..PED NAME TtTLE SI clNATCRE OF Al; II-10).1I1 Er: P. El E ..011010111..00. ••••••••••••....down. 9110 1. SOCIAL SE:R% (.;P, PROGRAMS APPLiCAT1 • VOR 197; - 107,, ilr.vrNur s 11A I prZ(.1pr).4"i) ['ROG); ( I (4- 11.1110.11 R1.7 SIIAR LNG" I'. ,fltpoik,, rain ant! servic•e(s) tc be provided with .010111616.1161.410111, 4.11111.0. ficEcrl't,e and Tiantify the cornrnunity's needs that will b4.. !net Ly proposed program._ ..........1.111.011.0111111101.111•414111P .4111111. ii. ORGANIZATION 1. Legal narnr rat ot'tinit. 2. rr r Zf (' I'e.`1,1ir 3kinr, 4. if ;i'fi' 6. . _. r• :•._; ni:•ati•)n, provide a statern- t r>f t r of arintinistration, appc intrnent re....rivt.ci, etc. (Placer Separate r,. 41 .-*41C1 s :f r?F•sc rihc ate t;,, ., •. n. <. _; arc: cfc - rite ir. detail, coordinating activities s; ard servicets'! provides by your 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SVCIA L SYR' ICI". PROCIFIAMS APPLiCATION FOR 1 97 in-NrNt•r, st-IARINo t't'NDS f?I .11A1I r. SHAPENC1' 07Cis 1 1. f,t)c,n,sN, air! service(s) te-• 1)t. provided with tirs .0110111061.10.11.4.1. mmaraimo t' aria (viantify the community's needs that .1.11111.01..... .410111.11040. mrmarmr. Li.., '-:r• ii:'ti_: .+i i;t'ilt fig .,l.;t`a v•of r211ti :iJ.2tt' tt1 S!`rye G_)ring ►}.�. =�P; ir.i for =.r�.)ch tn. tre• r!lt.t.ttrd. allar. OM. .art' t).•t 'i'c '1,'it.", tirn tt'C{ •)C"' il;` )ihoo(i, r('Iigiu:1) st'ttlt:rneft, rtllil ci: ..4, itus, .. ret:Cir or political affiliation? t'v :ir it tttc,fS. .. ME...,. ll a' • rt. i- .rYt ; hr and ser%icets) provided by ti „iir r4anizat,� : . L t ii• ► GANiZArivt • Lela! narnr ot nrt1nizatini 2. Addrr'F -,1 car+ r� �iratinr. ,• • ? 4. if atfi3 1*. it`s :7 ..-_ • -a` _ani:'ati'.)n, provide a statetn nt of • , t?•,1 of administration, appc :nttnent -r >it r. ; rig: ra etc. (Place c • Separate re ,u r, c 'f so. car scribt. 6. a<' : ate ti'.o ��,•• n;ie:, dr.=i d(•s •rii)e in detail, coordiaatim• activities n;,•h r,c pr -_:ar.,s, and servicc.(s; provide( by your • E'er .i: •i1 ''..,:t L:31".i'r an(`thi r �: �:t ��'•'[ PRC,C E;>SiNC Dyvelop a "clay; chart. showitiv how a bereii.•iary moves thrratig i You.. proF.ritr:; at ci : E r:ir:E and indicate li11i ae,es w th (itht•r orgar;?. ati ms. IV. HIS' 1. vow., i` hol itict) rpo tat i'd'' a ot if•t firni.fr.at 3. ! !..it4t 1)v pr L ! 1 ais sur% re0711- ., ;ht. V. 111..5ZXI'•r 1. Plrast` att;l, h .• i,,,, Intl . 1l,i?' .• ::trn. it' ?:1‘ ••in:fir atn, ronstitutlf.)tI atnd Ir' S 1 :• i" ;lSC Ftl vt tr. ''.1' var. -ice: ,.arr it;vt :"•,r the ainr• :nt of :►H 'r, ti'tr or positioi:, and salary. rnai t-:evt"lllt• Servi( e in rt': tax status. r;� •' •L r-:ir.p` acil;:ls:5i•):' to services of r., ' (cs. 1 t[1r) jt. 3. Art, 1). ..11! t,- 1)o y c.1- a r,•. r ,.r. • 1. v r:.(.:,;i)o.snin feec`' it so, ‘811.i' \Vnat. otA i t . i:l . if` a r;'. , , r. It .116:1. la! !i!1!);'ort'' (F-how incortie by source: or pay for services, and other 1 0. tk I ?. T. *Id cniort Fund Fur(1 (Thkile ,• tis • 1 t t nclos• orl Bodge ••• t .)t est of my knowledge the .oregoing tu r,•!:rt• •ittin uf the facts. I furtl.er under- : 4. ind th:lt z no \I! Ill thls proposal will be ause for •VtthriT;t ' a \:: 1.--: ogri ro talc: 1....L.14 !!!4 !..1 1 ....... ..«..,.... ,lcro Categoric:; •1d!T1itlI st!'ati �It F rirl.t„ �� ,.r i'r-- ot.,1 I. Intro( tua1 ,. ,c rt I cF ' >r12trooLtae3 I". i .xed R" Sundry atl:, :i ll .!_,qL ip r,�e:at pub-Tot3i t, . N w tt .'...'t ,. i '�.: ,tic l�l iter. i`�' 'O'• t�. AlT . atc'r, ► t;,,�sg i t;hii cy::11T.C(1a,es 1�. Oth= r 1 �t �e ad4itio is i i. j 1 1 } :• r-C;:'.r �;' t ity i i Non -City of! of Non-Cityo • 2 I, :1( 4 rt)i2 .mil' : do 11 ]:"1.,')l,a<'L. t. be O i1y) t ,}C:i i...i f Mt\ [.iC.,`. P, deed 13`id�i r" 7 -=..+�....... t�•t:t) t � `� - f h 1''" roc' ra i 1Z e Lint' Ite n (ateVorier ,, •. i 1 r(;, City ' r iarpi !iha rlrie f',Uii(i2 _ At_ 'grsonne1: Staff Adminhitration /!. i' ririxt Benefit., E ih-Total C oftractt ai Senn( ,?St. • c ornmoditie s F. I fixed At Sundry_ :a riic` ils . 'j t j / k quip1m nt t3. t ther (iprc.)fy t i 40' ?Atilt itina 3iit'Ft if 1. ;-0.:h-Total O!,c1 iCli P ,•tle 1,. State a-. • •.t•'. .'.; , • V. 1' .,r(t_aa*ed t• ..!} '.�. .T1,; • 1 rrojet •ed I914-1 Program Income: I stimr led 1975-76 P ru c r; in Ir. c orne : Rt'Ct)r',ineneie'd Funding t_Ofii, c> rat: Only) t f: :tt•r at'.,' Quarter 3rc1 QuartcrJ 4th Quart 3 1 1 1 1 Wt, hay.- tistA.,1 hetf.,w, incluthid tn tho or tt.i, Sections I, ' 1. A. it: direct (.0,11.1 lir- • thor,t. ti,ployet 3L in • - !rr'l 'ill oth.or orrmloyees such r''.1(it'z,thtSuppot, thc EN. Frill -„, „ Cirnpensn. ...r111)(:t1:',.;t ,.) : t ,.t..it. '‘,t1 D. t...i,ntro ,-- • . Al , Light • ' • ,••;rik;1 L ( fin :11‘itt' :••• /1!•.' r •• 174. .? c• • ' . • •rvi‘.-t2 s 4 f, f • 7' ' jr.int. :.tt ;otfl• ract. :..)ificos or Li id ynt - 1,1•Leicatits k Vititor Oil Surgical iupplies ItIntor F"ue) Office Supplies P•c:per Stock - Printing Rt-production Supplios PI tyground S'uppiii. Rpait Parts fetv Supplieb Expenabh Ioo1s Shop Si'ippheiiV;:,:! • Tirt.s Tutit- ;•••,. 1 C.t5LUt In &tttfl' I .operty Insurarn - IV- • Frm-iittris Co ri :4' ( I • • 4 •; .. r • ; 1 — • • • ;,•-• o•t• • 11,1rii".• .4 r t VI 44 A t. 1..4 -1-•:-•• t • • tS c ••-• tttiction • • •••••......g. t-: ' A ii•), by ). • • r , -1! yt-1. . •-:•• the Allocatvi, 17.,: t•l•o - . Lens, Allownnees Inv v sti gn• ic)ti Expert se Pr .)pet•tv Taxes I t11,1 s 1:riuipipent, New Ati...ottiotive F:quiurrient, New - Of nt, New Fir roi.i.:Iirk• Equipment, New - Ntilhint'S el...linrnf-p.t, New Cntrouurication Automotive Trade in trAffein urniture - Trade In - 1 r t•iv In k.omtnunicat;till - Trade • la' here. year 1q74-75. in -ale , • f t'„. that was officially llocated ..• "Cblited • -••,•• ibent or bills mcurreu but yJer approved buriget-#., 1:st the remainder of the St ctirni • Li • .-s• t•rs to ninnies not obligated for 1974-7E: Lahti ••• t r!-E•ynaiticter of year 1974-7.3. It you viadn • ,,,ur.o c. Section I, writ Sectiot11. , • . SerAton infOrtnaticm ••eque,.. stt d ,1 r prOpOSOci bkIdgrt for J97 -76 for City cf Mi i 12,it ral vvenii, rir,L f,131/16. Aldo indicate, on t e lines provided your prop..-0,11 Pn raw In t orilt, if any, and your t ALIMated 1'175-76 rural' Ir., .)1 r-t Section IV ittfor:tvet r ,auc t.t tt1 on). - 4,...a.t4„.(1 sted s .ction infortll 3°31 ,` , • b; . • . ) rv,kart,.rs of 975-7t,. t tiii 1 1'3.‘ 3 : tot flinti brokn Date: Orqanitatinn: inerviewer:_ 111 1, How many clients is. thc Frogram dc,,',;ned et servP? Mt* many n4hdve .'ecf,i4e1 vow to d€t tP1s yPar? 3. How many c.11 0 /cur 4. From your r •hfivo r1C4 11ditonll Cl lent-, would i-frr, yr. sofvr.. if Cr ri.toiirdtd? C.• How nany nI I r" daY:weeir/mOnth.year, and why? 6. What is t' - co,:t o 1. Wnat is Do prospeCj-t2 t. of the proyam: ony voy to receive the services 10. Flow oes the romp.ritv yr psocrdm? Do vu have an outre-vn progrart.7 11. Do you provide rnfcrfi; tr-v(7.p'; /01 clients? If yes, how many referrals th,..fits per daytweeK/mnnth and tr w"t anpni.$.n? 12. In WFA fa,i 1 y involver, in 13, Doe:, y-,if pr e he/she has su cessfully COtt•PletPO, r t y cons it f? 14 Do c I it:rt r‘,1, :? ient : v t r cess? 13. 1 4 1r kinat. • • • orhi L r,tr . , dkjpnr- les? r eivices after rikihg rri service serie alencte, 22 : • t ro'f.,t+ or five year ,A en -Idea of' .0hat r , t rer.- • i • - tirogt-ati,? 1 1 1 1 1 1 " t t,f, prrnr; •, Pri n 1,,;1 fu11owe the Sri i it to yours in this Nit' other aq nci w t, y !I n t :' r 7 1 1 1 1 EVALI'. I .t • ' 1 1. Appropriate a. f:.:1:li1).10..y__)t Pr:1. • • s t. uc'Li I progro.rti ..! . e • mfci.1 » no di .3s. init. it 1. t). 1 pri.-0.7,1-A111 or pr r ra, a. iticriti;: • - degre define.: .i..yi ;-' 1 1 L.qtalF, a: • .4 • c. • t; a' . rt 0 has terz t - .4 • 4, F.ilicien . 111 - • sd, ; • pare.-e. c'• f.h • 1)1-0:-.)fl,,,,•ri ;- iaretit • • nistr c t ion •,-)taff Qualclitai ;ns . degree to which propo,cd staff is qualified to opt'ate the progr Sitt• or cleizrce of ad,nuacy of fai.-• lay or site to widerteiko 3roLtrarn Eervices and avaiIaliility to targOt vopulation. . Vticiget dt arcto which budget request is Appa :•ently adequate in !Wilt of 'tatt 1 objectives. '• APPI:Catjon H'!iree to which ipplicant providt,r1 andde.quate proq,rarr; propo al. ■ i 111 111 111 ,. 111 111 A RE S(1L1(T IW. t1( t LOl 1DA, TION Of F !(PI%'r REM(! '71141!((, WHEREAS, the City (t'rl. that limited tunas City of Miami Fed rs 1 ''f wHFRLAS, it thr, irrr-r.• Florida, to be respt,n.,;,,, provide >c) l i t. y u;; ii i nt needs; %OW, TNr.Rtt'►Fi FLORIDA: Section i . That « , social Service fundino f. advised milt the Co po f l i y :1'.. 1f=1 Jistribution :)t Ser t ion '. That the fol 1 owin;z ,,rrl i.. v ,�•,, c� i(tl ,ervice Feder•ai Po1 icy. ;rr re( r hall Strio, 4( benefits to tnr dollar. R. Policy: In rec it in ' and opinion, t:?e number of , ity of !!!;:!I ■ 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1i IR 11 111 C. fo1 icv1 in ro ognit ?ovr .,* ti,r+ ',," 1 the City shall provide partial ttrhdm: enk it not effect the su(k e, rot th.it ;.00qr,rr!r. D. Policy: In t'trctictnit Igor rot tho r„rrr 0,A1 !HI problems, the City shallstrive to pro0:1te for i citizen needs through a mirture et trror,rarts as idnr;r ported by concerned citizens, E. Policy: In r'ecogni?irrn of the difficult tall, o levels for social service programs. the City :hall in schedule that f'nco;;ipasc,eS the entire Federal ''r ',i),: l�' with strict enforceronnt of ,oil deariline;. F. Pol icy: In recognit icrr rf the federal regulation use of Revenue Sharing - Social service funds. the recipient. shall strictly monitor, enforce and r,:r1 secondary recipients by contractual agreement, 0. Policy: In recognition of the desire to prevent cr-..!de'. realizing a profit from delivering social services. only contract with nnn-tirnfit. charitable organi:atit. with the State of ilorida, H. Pol icy: In r'e, r,i tion of the adoption of these akr,w, previous resolutions pertaining to Federal Ievenur Service program allocations shall be considered null PASS:[) AtJt) ADGPTf !t t.hi , dery of APPROVED AS TO F0?tt A D LEGALITY: CITY A1TOR'; ATTEST: r.T`-(7 ■ 1 1 4(!4A(r Wt 44, 6 if 75- GENERAL REVENUE SHARING PLANNED USE REPORT sew., Aevenut $PI em cr ,votes teelee* fund, d.tart', to Intel Red item etmorrtmt.Ms 'rhos sent, or'Out gnvotn' t$ p sn ,t t r. stied to encoute%e erteten Oerhtt0tron ,n $11terleetithe gout poorneteet dectteoe en hc* the money sem be Spbltt NDte Art, tempu.. a et atecrtmdent•N m the ,tee et Moo* Was Mee Is owe, to trtf Of3rtNtrMithr , rlto brit, of alveoli (t1A, ,. Weill.. WC. !Otte. t • t �, t j !' ; .: NtMED Eft!'ENO1tU1tt! t4NttCtPAtrNG A GE` pie pEYEhuE A caftOQQAlt! letCJt0ltet, te: GPENVING r !a ',NtENONt$ 4(1&1 Don : 4 2c0_ C ?5,000‘4s 1, lcc)000 1 Putt •L SmIty t4� A'M,Mt'stt. fe• tttt.©ti e 14.1 tpttitt0a i wtit,ti • Moto*. • tt• *u fEtienpi Oi M b eteet1OA e lte$14 ONO Gait 1L G0vt to IOWWAfter• t1 tot,at, Eyft.orrot•t Is Is • .c:t,CCM • GE.ttCOViSi. t '•ry;C _r..,3esetht S a 5 $ Q00.000 SO, 000 S 100 000 j • VW* %tfec•q, 1t t•'4 S !$ $ /1t l.Aa ti , PAYMENT OR Me t$ $4,•.4 PtQ'so 1 •17S o4. •, a. t1fi,.E'SOSSr0Ptt,ti? iEU 010$CO* 1'tOuMhGSES•t ACCOUNt NO. ! _. 3 t; f ♦.11 .. '4 1 t iI Fri 1 . C1.10 , �'• r ,;,rasa f•LM 1;141 _ IU/,rlilui+lt,.,dhelt!ledJt(,detleeu il,,,Ubdt�1/A/ tDt Submit repetea fee furl f teeratetnew t+bw J+V%Y 1. 1975 S 7, ? s, '' n I ,„4 lab' e—Pt'aseP•.t },4a City te..,...,�.. Manager - A tor et a,i ,,port the r; eve0Ort,np doe., m.eett. the Wen* Doi• wrote" it City; Manazert(t Office, City Hall, h -ni, iL E' 4SSt.PANCES ,12•6e, en ow,.,ct,on ttl t ,twat No ffeetav ct 04 • •esd•r • .-.et the no- et aP„" c,. -n erne "—Or tteture" etc4,•#ma9i ,•ed .- P,•• t •-t 7 ty is ,00ctl veto Nt ttoephee w:M tv t••s re: , r1 4e.etn•!+e-• •. I. rttP1+• 1 :^t tt^y, ,,lief."! to"OI'L ttei.14/€2.441here.. b,t'itu,t 01 C',tlbfettn.ve �N.ctl P. tt . Ancirev: s, City 1:anager C,,,'t 2' ., t,• AQENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: etimr Corrnission OVERALL AVERAGE RATING s Recommended Fund). $ 0 Rc luestp 1 'wtding: $ 25,nno.0() EvkivatlopG.eit ltatiny. 1. Appropriateness of Proiram a. Eliiibilittr of i'rotram b. Detnoaranhic Need Staff Cottame Provides; no direct social services to poor and elderly -Educational program Not. established by agency 1 2. i'roiram Implementation 1 a. Identification of Program Objectives 1 1 • 14 b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology None outlined . Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs 1 ' None b. Client Follow-up N,.n, 4. Efficiency of Service Delivary a. Cost per Client • b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration w 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Dudiet d. Alication 2 2 No information provided Ratini Scale 5= Excellent 4s Very Good 3s Good Total 2= Poor 1- Very Poor X= Not Applicable 17 i- l 1 r overall average ra to (above 11 1 UNITED CERI.L RAL PAI.SV A: SN or M1AMI INC, 1 1 1 1 1 1 w w w • (Exterior Se n:;ory Learning Environment) The fundinrequest• <i will ht construct. .in "Exterior Sensory Le rnint, i.n, irunr.ent" for handicapped children. This would be a tint-1irit• i xpense, as all dusign work has been completed .tnr'. t :. f i of will he provid..d hy United Cerebral Pals:. Tht bc►:;o i b clients of the Crippirct Cni f trt r,` r Svc itt. y. Request- $25, 000 for 1975-76 Funding 197-i5 - c 0 STAFF RRA I VE Excellent program combining haniica;> development within a recreational environment. One-time funding. thus no rcncern for long-time funding needs. Other agencies have committed f;;n'iir'. an-:11 planning has already teen accomplished. RECOMMENDED FUNDING t S25,000 119 AGENCY/PROGRAM TIT LEt OVERALL AVERAG RATING itll ttyd cPr r l Ps►lnv / ttericir Si naoty t,o rningEnv_ironment itc luestet1 "finding: $ 250( 0 lircanirnendt+r i'und►ns: a 25,0f(l.f0 1 1. Appropriateness of Program a. Eligibility at Projram b. eemolraDhtc Need 1 rairnentati�r. a. identification of program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology intents Combines rocreat tonal prr+t±ratn with services to handicapped 1 } 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up 5 it 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost L'er Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration X 4 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications IR b. Site or Facility • c:. Budget d. Aeplication • • Ratin$ Scale 5= F.yccelleot 4= Very Good 3: Good Total i Zs Poor 1s Very Poor Xs Not Applicable 4 • 4 3 Si r *- 12 = overall average rating (above) 1 e6.0 1t 1 1 11 1 1 en FAMILY 45A CHILDRENSERVIC Family & Children's Services, through a traveler's aid function will provide th 1lIjn services io iravult•rs who come into the Nimi eounselin, , contiict. with families or friend; in ho:w AsiAance in planning to return home, help in Incatin and community resnurcvs,limitod (I.crycacy linanci.t; nsi:riLancu, and protection Request - $50,000 for 1475-Th runding 1974-75 STArr NARRATIVE "Direct financial aid" i not an eligible area for funding. under Federal Revenue Sharing guidelines. Staff determined that the agency does provide a most worthwhile service in a very profes- sional manner - but, the ineligibility of the request causes a conclusion of denial for funding. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 12i r it 4CY/PR Zueeted Funding, 1 TITLC. 50,000.00 AaDreDrtst n.ss of Pr a. b. t3stnoa eats Need 2. Pr rate Implementation a. Identification of Program Oblectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology at OVERALL AVCRACC RA n+ded 'uncl�nat 3.2 ineligible due to direct payment to +•1 lcnts 3. effectiveness of Service a. !,iencification of Client' = :Lteec:s b. Client i ollr:u -u, • s. ;ice of Se rvic .',�:rti:+i*trativH ur_cri ;nr .3, S7...fi Cualificatio. s b. Scte or Facility ♦ C ;_i Ci r i. . ry. Application . ttin6 Scale •,= Excellent Vey; Good 2= Poor Is Very Poor X= Not Applicahl a, overall avcragc rating (abovsl • • tAiTCRNA ONAL CFNTF1t INC. (Miami radc rirvr opnnc•nt progr.an) .1 110 Mr This program will utilise elderly and youth to assist in pro- moting Miami as a major international trade and cultural cen- ter. Attempts made will be to bring together the international and local business community to increase significantly the quality and quantity of Miami's economic and cultural lit •. Also plan to establish a "Free Trade Zone" within the City of Miarui. Request- $1476150 for 1975-76 Funding 1974-75 S 0 STAFF NARRATIVE Despite staff support of this program, it falls under the category of economic development activities and thus would not provide a social service to poor or elderly residents. We recommend that the City be- come a member of this organization and that linkage be established with the Community Development staff. RECOMMENDED FUNDING s $ 0 11- 3 AGENCY/P*OC A t TITLE* Rureter) l:'' OVEltALt. AV i1AGE RATING Recommended 'undtngt $ 0 21 1 11 s overall average rating (above) 144 L. Asearopetatoneas of Pro earn a. Eititbtlji,► gt Pre�jeatn b. Demost ►tc teed • • • 1 2. Protram Implementation a. identification of Program Oblectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. MethodololY 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs; b. Client Follow -is 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration Provides no direct social services to poor and elderly No clients No clients No clients • S. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualiitcation. b. Site or Fa Mel c. Bud&et d. Application Ratio$` Sct►a Ss Occelleat 4= Very Good 3= Good Total Zs Poor Is Very Poor Xs Not Applicable 1 t • i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i LATtN C1lAMitll Of a 3 This program is designed to determine the a ►ort potential of Latin businesses located in the greater Miami area. This will be accomplished by conducting a detailed study of each and every business which manufactures, wholesales and r.i* ils a good or service, with foreign market potential, All findings will subsequently be published. Request - $151 ,100 for 1975-76 Funding 1974-75 - S 0 STAFF NARRATIVE This program is essentially an economic development activity. They would not provide any social service to the community. It is suggested that this survey could be included in the scope of services provided by a Chamber of Commerce and that university interns or manpower people could assist in the research. RECOMMENDED FUNDING • $ 1 a 1 tN1 il3ROCRAM TITLE: Lat in -, 0. (•,,n;-, ,•t? Evaluation Grit,. r 1. Appropriateness of i)rogram a. E1igLbtlity ofProgram h. D rripsrakhic Nrerl 1 OVERALL AVE:RACE RATINCILL1.1 Recnrhrrientieri F-tindtng: 10 0 SConimntst Provides no direct social services 2. 13ros„rarn irni)lerile.ntatic)ti a. Identification c.,f Program Objective s c. N1,!the;.!oiogv Settini; 3 ). }..:ff,:ctivetiess (.4 Service a. identification of ClientNeeds 2 b. Client Folio,.s.- -up None provided 4. ior.c.v of Sy r vico Delivery a. Cc,st -,er Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. A rirninist ratiLa- 4- $302.20 1:33 ;'. F1CtiOnS QualifiLz“ion:i b. Site or Aup!ication conflicting information provided Rcitism Scale 6 2 E.:xcellent 4-- Vory Good 3.- Total 0 2= Poor lg Very Poor X Not 'Applicable 14 overallaverage rsttng (alloy* 12u !,!lNOPtT1' CnNTRAC` OPS ASSN,. INT. Thi!: multi -phasic proposal intends tc licit) minority contractors to aerate bid, loans and bonds; to maintain accurate records; to sharpen apprnis.al Skills; to assist in designing construction p1nns;to prrtnotp their capa- hitity via public rc,:ations and t::c'c'.ia; ,and to provide other substantial supporting services. Request w $137,000 for 1975-76 Funding 1974-75 - c 0 NAPRATI`JE There is strong reason to s;rpport this ornani2ation's activities and objectives, within the context of the recognized need for inclusion of minorities in the economic development opportunities in South Florida. Fnding would be more appropriate; however, from Economic Development funds, in that servicesproviaed do not meet the present eligibility guidelines: CHAPTER I OF TITLE XXXI ''...Entitlement funds... may be used only for priority ex •er.Aitv—es. As used in this part, the term 'priority expenditures' means: ...(vii) Social Services for the poor or aped:" !§ 51.?1) RECOMMENDED FUNDING s $ 0 147 AGENCY/PROGRAM ?MA: t$ cont ract 'rs Assort/Ai tt Reiuested Funding: $ 137,00r).00 OVERALL AV} RAG li.\'rt:Nc .4 Recomrnetided F und►r ho > �► ;•haft Comments is e of Pro turn a. Elislbtlity of Prrooaram b. Demographic Need 4_ Does not provide direct ,oci;il services to poor or elderly • Pro4ram Implementation a. Identification of Program Ob'ectivea_�__ b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-u 4. efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration $267. 54 assumingr i lr,` ; i.l.tS 2 � 1:233 assuming 3300 rllent 3 5. Administrative Functions a. Stafl Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. i3udgct d. Application 3 contradir.tory salary int or' it ion Rzti g Scale 5= Rxcellent 4= Very Good 3= Good Total 2 x Poor 1= Very Poor Xs; Not Applicable 14 s overall average rating (above) e • MINORITV LABOR AFrAIRS The pro ram will train, 1 1 c sr, and i 1 ace minor it y train,c, in lci, ; such Os ulectrical, p 1 IH1)1 , rItit or i rtt ing , .7, . Requust- $1.17,886 for 1971-7F1 runilIngt 1974-7. STAFF NARRATIVE The service provided competes with services rendered by the of‘;rp Vocational and Adult Education Division of the School Board. C:iry.,rt administrative capabilities have not produced licensed trade rerson from existing courses. Miami residents. Services are provided to primarily non -it. RECOMMENDED FUNDING w $ 0 CV ALL. AVERACt 1tATING I 1'71 AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: flora!, Labor Affairs It+t Urated i ;ending: $ 1 i 7,M ,.fln mended 1: unuing: 0 v i t lria IatLflIStaff Comments 1. Appropriatenese of Proarann a. li_,,,_ibt itys,af,F raaram 3 Redundant - Dade Co. S, h,,01 toard provides this service b. Demographic Need l ,41 Z. Program Implementation No measurable k;,,a1s. a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodolo '_. 41 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery 1 $943.0q 1:25 Incapable of perfcrt ink; required tasks a. Cost per Client h. Staff/Client Ratio 3 c. Administration 1 1 . �. Administrative Functions 1 !Ann�E►x i s:t ant A. Staff Oualificatiotis b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application Ratio* Scale Total 2 5 5=� Excellent 2= Poor 4= Very Good 1= Very Poor 3= Good X= Not Applicable Unreal.tsttc tr 14 = overall average rating iabov.) 130 1 11RBAN LEA(1'E: (New Skills Rank) Will match unt'mplove'd dud antler-tmpley 'I, -k.illt'ti proteksi.'n.a1 rlinorit ieF; with emplovets who are unable to t ind qualified persons or oars tarn: i 1 1 int; to train minority protessit'nui!-;. :- rvit es t,, include counseling, new career orientation testing, and tt,imau ?t l t it,ns for This program is affili.itod . .t.t; t1AN:ariouul Request - $75,000.00 f both orploveo e-.:41 '' er. rbin League. Funding 197:4-7 i t00.no A NARRATIVE This program provided a success rate in FY 1974-75 through job placement of 150 minority professionals. Service is limited, however, to placing primarily skilled professional minority persons, with no stated impact to the poor or elderly. The organization does deserve support in its approach toward Improving placement opportunities for skilled professional minorities, but under the present eligit1ity cWdel Ines, funding cannot be provide t' frog Social -Services Federal Revenue i,indinc. CHAPTER 1 OF TITLE X'XI - Entitlement funds... may be used only for priority expenditures. As used in this part, the tern': 'priority expenditures' means:... (vii) Social Services for the poor or aged;" (i 51.31) This organization will receive other support from: State of Florida ..$22,196.00 Dade County 20,000.00 Contributions 15,000.00 $57,196.00 Further, job placement activities are currently addressed by Manpower (C.E.T.A., Title VI) and the Florida State Employment Services. RECOMMENDED FUNDING ' $ 0 131 AO ENC'Y / PR MAM TITLE: Rep :eaten 'tsttdih OVERALL AV;RAC; RATING,,1 Recommended Funding: $ 0 75000.00 of Program a. FltaibtlttY of Prrn, jrann..+- b. Demographic Need Z. Program Implementation a. Identification of Program o�bjectives .11 b. Re tstic Goal Setting • 3 c. Methodoloiv 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Neods` b. Client Follow-up 3 staff Con,r:r►ents Not limited to root and elderly Not demonstrated by agency 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff /Client Ratio c. Administration $150.00 assuming 50n Hit -:its as stated 1:63 assuming 500 clients as stated Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility r. I3udge d. tion 7 Ratinj Scale 5s Zecellent 4= Very Good Good Total - 41 2- Poor 1= Very Poor X = Not Applicable 14 r overall average rates tabours 13 i ACTION t+t Thti _C : iTt7.1 A program basically designed for the Spanish speaking eldierly of thy tittle Havana, Wynwood and Coconut c;rove areas. The program is designed to provide, tranapnttAt cm to any person in nerd c f it. This is to include: senior nitirt:n•� in need of transportation to health rc rter, ;•r,vernm. nt offices, shopping c cr:tcrc, etc, and transportation for youth on field trips and to other recreational ,rugs. Request - $150,326 for 1975--76 tundittg 1974-75 510,n00.00 STAFF NARRATIVE This proposal is essentially an attempt to re -start a program that was inoperative 1 during the prior funding ►eriod, Funds allocated during FY 1974-7e, for this agency, were not utilized until the last month of the fiscal year ashen a new management group assunea responsibility for the program. Funds, in :,eptei:tber of 1975, were used to purchase one 15 passenger maxi -van. The agency proposes pro- viding the following services for 4,800 clients in the "Little Havana" area: • Information and Referral • Transportation - to government and health centers • for shopping assistance - for field traps - as a back-up for transportation to existing hat lurch programs • Educatir,nal, and recreational programs Services proposed are redundant in that all of the stated needs are presently addressed, within the same c:eographic area, by Little Havana Activities Center, funded by the City of Miami Social - Services funds. It is recommended that no fun,.ir ; be provided, due to the foregoi+e, and because any new funding provided to tnis program would cause an implied need for future funding commitments. This program should be permitted to phase -out at this time. The 15 passenger maxi -van presently held by this agency, should be recovered by the City and re- addressed to functioning programs. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = S 0 133 • i r i 1 1 1 AGENCY/PROGRAM TtTL OVERALL AVEkA( RA I iNC', ReTin ted I"undiri im) iiecOmt enui.d Evalustt©A Cr i 1. Apprnpriatences of l'r()e ratrl a. Elise:Wily of Pro tarn b. Demo sranhtc Need . Program to jemrntation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goat Setting c• Methodology I.I Staff Cat) 3Y,onts i'.!,,-e'ntt r I; _ rt :t I... Redundant s('ry i (1})loot 1yes an, .assistance Vague None prnvid, 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Ntet? b. Client Follow•up 1 4. T:fficiency of Service Ih'1ivor, a. Costyer C:iie :fit b. Staff/Client Patio e. Adrninistrati n S31.32 1Iid not heco::-t• opt provided 1--o: 19 Administrative i'uncti.)r a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c . I3uctiet d. Application 1 Rattan Scale 5= EICcells ot 4= Very Good 3= Good Total 24 fir-14 r overall ave✓ragt. rating (above) 2= Poor 1= Very Poor X= Not Applicable 134 .'A�'KSi,N `'l~" NIRTA1. HOSPITAT. [tN' Pi S1'i'i' oi M1ri`'1 , St fool nl. nro1rT%r 8, i f • 1 1 1 The funds regile�ted are fry- (1) the 1easin.' of three Maxi-vAl;-, f of one year and (2) hit''tprw:'He the ne t`' S nt tinn MerVieet for clients. This will take it passible frt tttcn t tr s. cial agencies and obtain iir'c'r;e'd suo. ict•s. Request - $5 i, 789 for 1(.47 76 F Indic.>• 1 "- This program nrr.vides an ambitious array of mental health cr,! r ,~,•-r t oriented services. '`'' `'.t.r11 `e vice ,irpa, i? ro ti'F., cl ;! ;, ;,, outside of the City While a need for transport,3tihr is a future probability, all phases of t►r, program'_ activities dry, s'; 11 in a testing mode. The prooram r rr:,t.i'.e• states that inter-coor-iin..it?,-:r activities have been difficult in tt•a tr. varied segments of the Ta`,krt.�' Health Projram have rrrv,;; rt :.i ferir„ rates. ' ? df'.eney was unr?}?uLdirit. !dta fri?i t:Jt the .:ata available i,, ,.-a+f.� ,� '�, f, r. c 1 5 i +,�,1 _ � ball 1 d �cin. ,.rov.,. � sno..'r quisition of the !,eeti S. i i Services funds. . Division of Mental e,ealth State of Florida . to rst,ertatier vehicles wit ^.c t Total S124.ofo.O^ 107,GOO.Cc1 42,000.00 S273,000.00 (minimum) PECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 1 U5 a •`;t"� '',1 :" r'k TA1, 1105PTTAl. tit31�E��.;r�, +,t•P1 r' T%ir i i f i • 1 1 1 Me the ftinAs retplez:t e!i arc f r r (1) t t,e ted�. inn of three M.i 1-VAr: r. , :1 of one +rear and (?) hir:!:E• 1!r'' ;ri'.'t`rr` t the tion gervteeg for rlients. This will make it po+:sihle fnr thr• t s;;,ctat agencies and obtain MP ,(edi fic'r+'irc- . Request - S56,789 for 1(+7t,- (, f,''.ui., T i' r This program prrviries an are bi t ious array of mental health er.,1 r t r-r i + i oriented servines. outside of the City of fc3 .,f ricf? ,trt3a. 7 }Y t While a need for transportation is a future probability, all phases cf thp nrorrarn's activities iro 1 in a teeA.irl mode. The procrar r orr )t i.e states that inter-coor-iinatirn activities have been difficult it tt varied secments of thr Mr,.,',r,:, y' •'rn `1 Health Program have r,rrtF.;�i`- ferir.. rates. �i^iienc� WdS instil ;�,;F'1 a t l',t th.' 'dtc fr''' r oC, t1t the at available ir:lir,. ` erall fund' t)einr "cquisition of the neeed t+rnsncrtatior v'e► icle5 Sr7,t_, !l Services funos. • flivision of Mental real th! . State of F loridd L.E.A.A. $124,010.0 107,G00.0r 42,000.00 Total $273,000.00 (rnin imm.,r!) PECOMMENDEI FUNDING $ 0 Li* ■ AGENCY/PROGRAM TM, E: OVERALL AVE tAVIE PATING of M./Community Mental Hoalth-Tran „c?rtition Rtlut'stt't1 1 hiding: ;h, 7F4`4 •il() Recommended F +:rich n z :.+:,'� r, .1 1 1 1 v 1 1 1 1 1 1 Evaluation Crit 1. Aidpr©pristenea _nL Fy(Ltrarn a. Eligibility of Program b. b. Demographic Need_ 4 Staff C. (3 to a nt s 2. Program 1milernentatrion a. Identification of I'rog ram Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Niethodolo,)jy 4 3. Effectiveness of Service a. identification of Client's Need s b. Client Follow-up 3 4. Efficiency. of Ser': ick, Deli :•ery a. Cust perClient b. Staff /Client Ratio c. Administration ,. A1ministrative 1 unctions a. Staff Qualificat io v; b. Site or Facility c. fiuciet d. Application t 1:750 4 X Ratinj Scale 5= Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Good otal 41 f 13 = overall averag. rating (above) Pooz- 1- Very Poor X � Not Applicable 136 MAN co,14;c7T 1 1 The Miami brAnch of the Cuban National Planning Council origin1tve! 1;1tt; an It.f..W. research grant funded in 1972. the litepan1c protessional,i the membership will attempt t, tr:}•:ide tecLnical essistancc' to r+; f",Y,•Vi " ' 2n local community orpani?;1t iors in identifying services pri:.rlt ior. � will .also make efforts tr .,, ..;r0 lunch , for .programs rinc' prtn'1 i t t'o 1• 11 in a coordinating rule ir, tLt. Latin: =•otrrruuity in t+iami. .l",,: 1 111 111 1 1 i will participate on the i~•h i c . st). 1k7, for the possessing a concentration f,f :;punish -"speaking residents. Request — $174,105 for 1975-76 Funding I974-7S STAFF "NARRATIVE The principal', associated with this program include persons with the rf)vonn expertise necessary to assist local organizations. This request, however, provides no direct social services, and fails t<. the eligibility guidelines 'or Social Services Federal Revenue Fundino: Chanter I of l ;*"lF '=.K?i i : Fntitlement funds... may be used only for ;~,~;c,r-ity c per,ditures. As used in this part, the tern, ` ricrit :±xperditures' means:.. (vii Social Service `.r the poor or aged;" (S 51.31) r'.r'.her, the proposal f3' i.'1 to tat' i st: or identity the corTirt,; r}: for this service. The hi,dciPt a"realistic in that in excess is to be directed to payroll costs. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 1:,37 AGENCIVPROGRAM TITLE: St_.).1ints Day Nurse•ryPatt('. rit:„ R(' vested runding: $ f)).00(,.‘10 OVERALL AVE AGE KATI e .lecontmentled €5 000.00 1 val itric 1. pf . meant a. Eligibility of Program_ h. Dentogsaptic_Need grarn iilernentattifl 1 1 1 Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic r;oal NletiloC.ololwy 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's 1.\;e0d:, b. Client rollow-up AmoillmaaasoNo. 4. .:,iciencv of Seri'... )clive;.-: CoLf uer nt St:ill/Client Ratio •Administrant)... 1 A:inunistrative Functions a. Staq Qualifications b. Site or Facility d. Application Staff Cotill itatins Scale 5= l;;xcellent 4. Very Good 3:: otai 2= Poor 1.-4 Very Poor X= Not A?olica.bl, ;" ; overall average rating (abov41) (otTINII (i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WI I 1 provide sport s pt ; =ft t ht. CrOVU at.V;16 i n ; r t, • ,,t v,tt, i 1 supervised actiVities, OlAt • , t, p it"t i it ion in activities as they s.=nior high srhool. Request - S80,000 for This program is an existing addresses a community need, !--=Lit. e perience necessary to adminiVer ir cr1 ere not maintained, services were rnt 1 iitItz, ;.-J! -f iai -idents, and an outreach program was rti). c710',S SnDUld be absorbed bi the Optimistsc' P r: 1.411 9`i • (11( ()NI 1 ( I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Will provide sports pi,)y:ramK :, to, , fl, ' Ili t 114' Coconut Crow area. Purpoo n supervised activities, tIllt 111:1 .H.ir pArti.-ipAtion in activities as the," :Ind senior high school. Request - $80,000 for This program is an existing :c.ti:iLy "h:it acId.-esses a community need, this (irciiii7,1`..r a:, 10`' deotiY.,,I,,jd the ex- perience necessary to administer u ir iit-(!,:crds were not maintained, services were nr.;t r2,,idents, and an outreach program wa rt Osfs should be absorbed by the Optimists" or v u't cy-r`Htor';. PV:(iM!.41%[:) - 1 AOZNC' / dings TITI.Et 80.000.00 1. Appropriateness of Pros am a. E1i*LbiliV of Program_ b. Demographic Need ©VERA2..1.. AV IiACM RATIN Recrinerr f?rdt:r+ Vt.inchttgi' ¶ 0 1.7 rir,r ' iuMAle participants 1 1 'roair& I Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client k ollow .up 1 1 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration • ::± ! ir,' orm:ir icon provided C '.. r S. 1 7°} h:ut not supplied •r: ,at rcguested by the 1 1 1 S. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. liud,tt d. Appiicatiosn Ratins Scales 5: k xcellent 4= Very Good 3= Good ' Non, pr,,,-:lrc 1- LJ Total overall average rating (abow) Z = Poor 1s Very Poor X= Not Applicable .5. ,000 Is sriw iuled for Bicentennial proo:- !s 9ki a 1 ALL0FUs iNC 1 A program designed specifically to ducat tonal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 status of youth by encouraeinc,tb return to stilt:WI or college. The program will t.uok.nLra,e Jow. youth and make attempts to identify 1-1.-11;lin a :;tudent dropping out of schools Indivi6uat counscHu, wi,1 urge pool hall and street corner dwellc.r to bk,c1.3i., ,t:,v,r.,. Request- $67,132 for 1975-7f rHT1 0 sTAFI Very doubtful as to whether this objectives. The application was incomplete an, ,-fe,( : rit aqfncy personnel proved fruitless. procrIn RECOMMENDED FUNDING . ' MCOMPliSh stated S C 9t. l 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ro(:()NrT GRcTr. 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 A proposed family health clinic provtdiny inf<int nnd maternity care, psyaGlogirol counseling, genont; r. J:H :-.--.rt.,1!ction on A limited basis. Services will be provided fn cor!nhnity Building. The Dade Countv 7wpartment ( Miami will provide some 4tiff tn the1 mentioned services. z!,e rfliversity rf the Above Request $119,904 for 1077,-: ! '- Toe current proposal requests .f*J7 7ehind the schedule proposed it 1973. Concery irvlementation was expressed by the Comprehersive Health flmr,;!,-. 5-,,th Florida in a June, 1973, letter stating, The ..1'fT F'7:uricil)... also recommended that the Coconut Gror1 i docision about its future direction... (Proqrd7 the cl'lic was not providing the ry ';974-75 ($130,000.00. me as those proposed `or FY • Obste:rics • Officc • Pediatric', • General mecAcine • Dentdl • Community e 1975, rq in the The City of Miami has provided the ti.rTh 1974-75 funding, consequently, funds are recommended for 197'1-:t'i condlitor that the funds be used for direct medical sta7'f fcr (ictu,,.1 medical Services. PECOMMPri7 - 101 r AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE:: a trove Fsmilv clinic Rtluested Funding: $ a AVERACF.: RATING 5r),noo.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1. Appropriateness_ of Program a. klligibility of Prograni, b. Demographic Need 2. Program Irrkpletrientation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service a. identification of Client's 13. Client Follow.up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio Administration 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application 1 Rating Scale 5.: Excellent Very Good Good Tcital1 4 . 2 Poor 1g Very Poor Not Applicable Staff Corn ents k•livery t-in-exi!ztent hohi!ld schedule nrit iti?*(1 iients as stated • - average rating labov•I 102 L 61 1 1 1 1 LEGEND M1OEL C'TIES EDisoN f'.'t I.: u7 7LE RIVER 3 A, L AP4,7 .104 ,•• %OM) 1 CENTRAL 7 LiTTLE CDC E XV ft t'a-t•-•-"*.• •,4 • • - ''- S 04 • .. iti"' • i ' t,.- • . . ; ''S C.Z • -, • 4 , # " rz 002 • . * I • - , cii 4 ...,„.4,:.........„-.0::,..... ‘ , . . •-•-- . 'X "*."- . • , . .. ...t .. - • • .,. • 1:•.- 1 • • • , Il qt.• - 014r i .. • ' 56 .....00. .....,• ev..* ,0P•,.. . .5 '. .:•C% ,•., - ,.'... .:•.._, . . " .clA..r0.;.I'.i".-,1'l"1?I.t1s,a......,.I.4 "4t•1i; .:,t.,4 a •1 *r •1:3•r,t `1..i •12.r.0of".. . t .4.' .57-' 1_ ...1..•t., ,,..'_ "..• .1• . , . .• .-•.„,., , *. 4, ,.(..•.,/.-144 -..,..•t„ ) ••'r ' .• 440.,. ' •t .C . 4•• .a 0•..•'. •4... ' .,.:;t;1TRt i ,, •'2' ,:1. t. ••.. • 04 -r. 1 t% ; r , l *..,. , •-• I -1.- I • • tii,:,. t . - ' tt ...-• 31" ;P.?: • /7 • • • .„,,...... • • ,...?? \ • '":" i 77 t• to ?• ..•-•.` 4. ; /7" 0,:.;.!..$,.1 re / i • % l!'t,-4.. --...e. ,1 ., ..• t • ...., 1-4 1.16! ., rifroal. .;*J :‘,.4 /* 04 ' •,..' t' . A ' , .t. , • ..,e 71 .... •,, ; -.."."'"-•-..............Q., COMMUNITY 7viri,._:Tr%':::7-; -74:c4cILT ;AREAS • , „ I . • T), 4, 103 1 CITY WIDE AND MUL:i-i.:Ak6LT IDENTIEIED CRITICAL NEEDS: CITY 1=LCVY 1. Child Care Programs %orr• Housing Programs Norf. 2. Cultural Programs .Jmuflity Action and Research - '.-eration Handshake ..,hanrel 2 Fioychoir Ct,orr:I. Society Elderly Programs To. Dept. of Human Resources - :71rilct Program Recreational Programs Youth Programs School Board - ;I:ter School Program IDENTIFIB CRITICAL NEEDS: MULII-Tr,V,L1 1. Crime Prevention Progr3ms f'rime Commission Health Programs tnited Cerebral Palsy Economic Programs and Children's Service itcrnational Center -Miami 7racle 7evelopment Program Htti '-..arTiber of '7ommerce Ccritractors Association Llbor Affairs Leue-New Sills Bank "Transportation or ce.-nity Center, Inc. iar.'scrl Memo. ospital - :ommurity ',1ental Health - 7nsportation Unit flTHER PROGRAMS NOT A1)D9.ESSINr, Cuban National Planning Council Dade County School Board - Community Scnools 104 a COMMUNI TY ACTIW, A.;0 "..: 1,1.1 i '0;(. • -.Ai- (Ope ra t ion 11,1s, A program (iv s igned t i y,p ci;h,iii:; and " An s" through i or to••,:. i , %• ; .t spec ot the progr imwi 11 d L i I i th C I, , I ., / 1 le r t, 1 a t: ions. Thu prorr am is ;pcc: t : , t I it y and in•provo int orr ia ; • Roguost- $27,900 to, 1 r '37Alr kkPT ity • An excellent broad-ba5ed ad,1ress a commu- nity relations prob1ei'.Try witn ;-edcral Revenue Sharing funds, however.tease ',non el i gi bi 1 i ty. Staff would indicate strry, •',olr':es, but cannot recomniend funding fro'" Funds. In addition, this nrogrvi w ;1 '.-,;(17ve " ro,-! the Department Education for 10 ha to adc.ress this problem area. RETCOMMENUP FMDING ;;- $ 105 ACENCl commit /PROGRAM TITLE: OVERALL AV 1 RACIt RATING Llaj 1 tinn :Intl krsenrch/(lp1rait hill !lan sh:Akt, 1 ai luesteri Funding: $ 27,90ri.o Luation Crl_teris 1. Appropriateness of Pre tr r a. Eliitibility of Pru.ra yi b, Demographic,Need i 1 1 1 1 . 1'tc Stara Innnle5rnvntatis._1n a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Coal Setting c. IvIethocioloint R c •n rncnndt:'i Funding: n getvices re) poor or prny,rAm ;,,,,,ts(;c, btlntt i(iaries is unrealistic 3. Effectiveness of Servict a. Identification of Client's Need:, b. Client Folio -up 1 1 1 4. Effict ncy of Service Delivery .,. Cost,per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration j-q,WO clients as stated i. ng 300,000 clients as stated 1 1 1 1 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualtfic tion:5 b. Site or Facility c, Buugct d. Application Ra tin j Scale 5= Excellent 4= Very Good 3 Good Total i 2= Poor lz Very Poor X= Not Applicable .11 ;r I ; = overall average rattan (above) lOo a CoMMUNITY TFtE1Th 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Channel Program will provide Maintenance. lrr! n cervices prograr-. ming to allow increased disscrination iYic 1-1-,r.:Ati,,n to thy residents of south Florida. Request - $6.500 for 1975-7 ST ir i-Inoiny.. in 1974-75 -s5,ono The return for the dollar invnsthh 4 .r tbti excellent, and certainly Wthir the best interests of '!';oyernrnt In re rrrne. Program objectiveS, administrative capeAlitie7, Ird w:era7I va7uc; rutstanding. However, since it is impossible to restrict the 17,enefits of cormunity television to the poor or elderly - as Stipulated in the r,rdthq category of social services - funding for this service is no eir furF'jt, requests from Channel 2 should be given consideraUrr n;;prPral Operating Budget under SpeLi71 Community Progra.s. RECOMMENDED r,!NDING - ft quested Fundingi $ 6,500.00 atf. tornateness of l'rpg a. Eliltibitittof j2rogram h. bernoyra.phic Need Program Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Gcai Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service: CRAW. AVERAGE RATING ,Zecomrnetnth d Funding: $ 0 'h t s n(1t nn'vIde direct social services t t . .and elderly a. Identification of Client s Nc&H b. Client Follow-up 1 1 1 4. Efficiency of Service DelivPry a. Costper Client b. Staff/Client Ratiu c. Administration • 1 1 1 1 1 Administrative Function 4. itafi Qualifications h. Site or Facility c. l3uclkiet d. Application _Rating Scale 5: Excellent 4= Very Good 3- Good Total 2= Poor 1: Very Poor X= Not Applicable 3 1 r overall average rat il*g (above lob 1. Niit;1.1 BOYCH01 The MiAMi Rovchoir WAs tornled in 1968 A pilot pr,,teet: under the auspices of the niviAon Art- o: th. University of Miami, School ot Music. It ,11 idt.ptndunt status due to the Univer-.it\ u.. c..1:tr. int.,. With tht lunds requested t,ixty ;1 vt 1 op t h v r si.:al h i 1 i t. it v 1 h.1 gani t ton. Request- $29,300 for 1975-7(, v this (:n.iint. 1976-7'1 5 0 This program provides a cultural service to the c(xc,Jnity. It does not exist to deliver social services. Clientele conc-1 T1: rembershio only. This program should seek fundio9 "frCvl the !16riL!.1 fine Arts Council or the National Endowment for the Arts. TY.ro!Jlh 01.i" recc.-rcndations. this organiza- tion received assistance fro thr Of Community Afrs. They have been ad':1 • renedr-11 !",:mce in the City's Little Havana :ommunity Center. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = 105 AOENOY/PROD TIT Et OVERALL AVENA MT/NOW.' Ikt lue. steel t'unding $ :" , i(n.ao riatenesa of Program Recr,mmf.nded Funding: 'b d a. E1ig tbiiity ©f Program _ t). De ottra;'rovided by Agency 2. f'rotrany Implementation a. Identification of Program C7b}ectivess b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Neeci b. Client Follow-up • 4. aciPncy of Service DeiivAry a. Cost per Client : I ?'.. b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 1 1 Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. I3u,,�et d. Application Ratiet Scale 5= Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Gr,oe, Total 2= Poor i= Very Poor X= Not Applicable overall average rating (abovw) 130 M AMI CHORAL Stlt:lt:'i•t With the' funds re ucstu, till orf.ani,:,it ion plans to enlarge its membership by takint _rt 1s'W-ii�c c r,iric rs who could not ordinarily afford tic port icipato. 'ih' proram will enrich the Citr's cultural rnyirvflr.'. n: ikr _': choral performances, accompanied by nn lkkqucst- $2,300 for 1975-• +F rundin4-. 1974-75 - S 0 c TArr NA;; This program provides a cultural service to community. It does not exist to deliver social services. This t;r•cnran ° hauld seek funding from the Florida in Art", C nurk i t t;r the National } nnowrnent for the Arts. RECOMMENDED FUNDING 4 $ 0 lit AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE atni Choral Sooty Rt. luested rundingt $ 2, 300.00 Evaluation Criteria 1.APProDriateness of Proarattl a. aka b. Demographic Need__ OVERALL AVERAGE RATINOLIj Ret.:0:nn)entivri Fundinott $ 0 Rating 2. ProAram Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Gcal Setting, c. Metitodolcqa ••••ilkon. Not provided by Agency 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Nor1( 4 .ficiency of Ser?ice J.. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Rattr, .ninstrat.on 1 A..‘Imintstrative i.unctions a. Stall Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. huciet Ratillg Scale 7.15ta"441 overall average ratios (above) fbccellent Z Poor ‘'ery Good. 1g Vary Poor 3,-- Good X. Not Applicable 1141 DADy (..:2UNTY 1)F.'ilRi'MliNI 01 HI !oav, rp( S ttprRti DIVisioN (7Mpnct frorlr' Program will provide !nen1F; tor -,onicr the&n r Mt tit at three sites: Temple T%rapl. Ovcintown 1,4ykroat -1 cer!.or. (urer Com- muniLy Corter. The procram w!ll h- rincillary ,nrvicf,s. :)equest 121,660.74 for nrr.cl.-a:7- • • • , • ••• • • - • • . . • fjodin -!*Y:ens of the City of ftis i rlade County governrIental a7,erry. friowe,..nr, and is rce1vinrt the following supnort: ;:e(leral Reverus. Sh;Irirn-ate County. - Florida Statc ''.1,Pot. of rorri:,nit.,, ffairs Jince this ,S 6 Cotarty adrinorr,(1 clolA 36rSdP nding from Dage currj RECOMMENDED FUNDINf; 11 j AGE:NC-N.,' PROGRAM E.:: 11 4*Nvaluatn Critt.ria . 1 ELIE t°:1 . • r;,Lrarr• 1".1411110, •••••• *.• rolir .41 ' • r,ci1inr. .; t 1.i ot.1.(.•it-t•tr, • a .!* ! • : , ‘• -ttc, Facititi • I 13, ,! k • . et ' — —4 ..--,-- • 1 • • •-•••- Itatirt; Lt Excolleut 4- Very Good Ci• Poor Very Poor 'A- Not Applicable Tot711 OVERAi 1 ‘V1.:11AGE RATING 33 ea. (.:on,trierits fr 14 overall average rating (a in) 1' • PA1T CoUNTY PUBLIC H401 (After crhr,t11 clre) IN1H r( r dren a ge 5".14 `.•;11vv: 11,`, ir, r.eorge Washlwe.tor L.At-er :r. Pi S7;1F - 5200,000 (7!vri (7) curdinr: is rrnrx'er,Oel 197-7€ as •nr thr 1V4-75 period. Rsing w1Hnitratj.,o tr,tnirci costs d be absorbeb by th School Board fut,(!irrl -ads t)c, vucht froF Ftera1 or State funds. Senof ar-) low-incore worki nn parents, v:i31 r -7riruc r sr)rvico ....rcvidPd thus far. prcnY”.mrp FMMG Sn0,00.1 115. Ai tt:NCV/PROD AM Lt•. _ Scho, I ... At te r y, t;,„ t (tiro OV RALL, AVERAC,1 RATING 1t° llit' teri funding' +', ( ttderi i•ttnc: : 2n0,000.O( Evaluation Criteria 1. Appro riatet►ras of F'r,1A. rrz a. Eligibility of i?rt)yrani i:. Dertno ;rap,hic Ntt ciy 2. Pro$ran ini,plemt'_ntatzr)r. a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Clual Settit tiepin 4 3. Eaft•ctivt.!nrss c Service a. identification of Client's '::(1- Client t'ofow-up “,11i.t •,,1,1 in; rrn:;, in clients • Ei.`- iency o: Sc r vi c,. I:)e i t. C,>st pc~ Cii:.nt t�. Staff/Client Ratio . A dirntni .rat.inn :i .. Ac:mix:istrativt' l.rctio^s a. staff Quaiifications b. Site or Facility c. i3aciget d. Ap lication 7] t Not pr'dud Ratirgi Scale 5= Excellent 4- Very Good 3= Good Total 2 = Poor i- Very Poor X= Not Applicable 3t i- 14 = overall average rating (above) 11ti a t'P I t •( )kr." 1• Itw ptmjdm will ciirL-entti!,- qp,,n tc .o-onse t lit Interest ;Ina oonpurntion of citi7on,... in A -rint• proventton et:otts. ReqUest - $25,000 for 19'i5-76 rundinv 1(474.75 Siti,ofio sTrr ;n addition to an LEAA orint rontriblitions ($26,107). this program ru:eives frro:, the city of Miami f,eneral Operating Budget uner Special Comirl,r,it additiona1 f!..ndinq is neederl to achieve the desired oblertives as stated. RECOMMENDED FUNDING - S 0 1 1 i 2 7 CAMMIC SERVIC/ BrB,2•A. . (MIAMI Bridge) A crisis intervention renter for runawav , driv week, 24 hours a day. Services will inc:,1 ,rt pv care, and counseling for youth 1-1: , r , MI:. for up to 25 clients per day. Facility ' .cr;Itc Request S50,000 for 1975-76 STAFF %AVATIVE Overall, this program is effi • • vice delivery. Minor irinrnv,?;'ens intensive client follow-up and ,r: supervision. Staff has indicdte, tt,e Recommended funding - $23,01-i0 operating funds of the Cathclic RECOMMENDEr, FIND;NG r $27,,007J ‹,Ay • ;44Y' 75 AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: 1-Yr. cat-11014C 5pry2 !a./St. Lukuss Pequemted t'unding: $ 50,00f).00 OVERALL. AVERAGE kATINC t •n . on On 1. ADDropriateneps of Prplirati, a, kuiiillity21.erogram b. Demographic Need 2. program It 21Pmentatt, a. Identification of rty4ram 04jecti 1.T s b. aralistic Cnal Soffit). c. 3.Effecti.,eness Ser Identajcatior of C.ienti.- b. Clif•rit _1:n11°w-up 1, 1 4. EffIcioncy of Scr,-/ce Cost per Cheri b. Staff /Client RiLti,; c. Aciministratior. a• .10.11.‘1110.1..• -1 5. AdmInistraii,,e functions a. Staff Qualif:ications b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application Rotina Sudo 5. Excollost 4. Vory Good 3. Good Total Zs Poor le Very Poor Xs Not Applicable •••••••••mom• trients •,,nt .1•1•••••••• 1. . t i = nverall i.verage rating (above) 1 7 6, AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: OVERALI, AVERAGE 1;ATINC-1 Sotv.jiut./St. Luku. Kun- fir • ' 1,0t)(1.f)n Requested Funding: $ 90,0m()(' • optit s of l'ro 1 a. ElixiOility of IDr(_.)10.411:1 ' h. )ernotrAphic Need Program It.plernentati,z.n a. identification of 1-roz,rarn Objectives b. Acalistic 1 c. M.,.thorioloizy 3. Effecti .-enc st, Sort irt a . catior of C* lent! b. Clivrit 1.-6110w-up 1 4. rff,ciericv Scr,'ice a. Cost per b. Staff 1 c, Acirninistration 1.1111111.11 5. Anistraii Yunctioris a. Staff Quaiii)icatiom; b. Site or Facility c. audiet d. Application -40 1 : • ril!..rents t r 1 . t Retina Seal? Total _ :44 i 1-1 4 = overall .;.vera6e rating (above) 511 Eitcallent Zs Poor / 4* Very Good Is Very Poor 3* Good Xs Not Applicable • 7 6. • •, h y.0 • r! fits01 ISb i-1 ',:EGENO. 1 14.1C,DEL CITIES I; EDISON PA4K/LITTLE RIVER WY*J MOOD 5 C,:L v E PARK tS CENTRAL LITTLE t AVAN4 COCONUT G+ OvE 1► 1 i' its •�4 �. ".i l;, Jei. it .• • { i'rf •' t `sue . :• • s j COMMUNITY rJr 't'tl .'PMFAI .N� ;,;t T �i►it.::`:3 77 7 V V TARGET AREA n7 LITTLE HAVANA WEN:T.1F1tDCRITICAL NEEDS I. Youth N.ograms Recreation Program 2. Child Care Programs Economic Programs Housing Program.. %no- :711'errinnal .tl(;e1 3. Elderly Programs iY 'r1VaT'a Activitios Center Cultural Programs 0.. . v0 A. - Intorndti9hal Lral Foondofion rroqram OTHER PROGRAMS NOT ADDRESSING AN IDEN7IFIED CRIT:CA1 %HP: Legal Services of Grea1r - Latin !.,.!ricanff Nicky Cruz Outreach, Inc. 18b. YMCA or GREATER MIA:".1-!NTERNATLONAL BRANCH (Cuban Tt,vn8gv Luadorship Ocvciopat) This wtii be a program of physical litnuss. ilorts and tvader- ship tor Cuban tpenagvr. Activiti, wili c 1 ti phv,ical tests, physical conditinv, particIpation. muntary activitics, !Op 1.(441,1in oaJ baskotbail ac ad y • Reg 11C $2,6,320 for 197) I - Program design appears to 1?7,T.,; ht'rf?, would cause a start-up oe a nrocrr7 Hnium of 7, \rears of future funding requirements. k-ctual nroorail; desicln • goals, and the basic Obective f:Ironnsal tc riy ieviop a new program. Program should be included v.ithh fr,ir;eviork of the MA'S operational activities - b!At, nut. ;!xde C:.ty Social Service Revenue hiarinr! ‘',.7:f( additt7nrc (1) staff person for seventy-three 7.3) clerts is H Poor roto for providinn leadership training. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 79 1 AGENCY/PROGRAM 'TITLE: OVERALL AVERAGE R ATINGLILLU Y.MAC.A. /International Brnnci- /Cuban Teen we iender9hir 1)evelopr,ettt- - ticeltiesteri 1.tindirig! 28432n." _Evaluation Crit l..Appropriateness of Pro.grarn a. Eligibility of Program b. Demographic Need 2. Projira.t-ri Itn-lementation a. Identification of Frngran Objectives t. Iteaiistic So`tIri.g. C. Meth.01j'ic 1 V 411.10.10.- 3. Effectivenesa 'if a. Identification Service of Client's ee b. Client Follow-up 4. r:ciev of Serice Cost nerCienL Staff/Client Rat-1n c. Administration srentle.i r'unciines: j Staff Comment `k re- rt t 11.11 pr :tgrar) , ;11:err,.' V 7. Auministrative l'unctiorr. a. Staff Qua,lifications b. Site or Facility' c. LudAct d. Application Ratan g Scale 5= Exceileot 4:-- ery Good Cwo-1 To 2: Poor := Very Poor X Not Applic,iblt. t 1 No iol) di..scriptiorJ, • 1 28 ;-14 overall average rating (*bowel 80 21 Yorrit cc -or •Itx 1 Will provide peer guidance deigned to prw:cnt 17-cascd dvf.::netional 1,ehavior in pre -delinquent. problematic, Spant!qh (r.11.;, and qocial work students from Miami n -ale torrinnit ccilegf t(. :is neer =ovinselors for a group of junior high vt-Ainter:;, i t;,t, I !.'1( Request S210,300 for 1975- F'In,!1:-Ig This program received its 4.nit Th std-u5 tiAndil•7 City of Miami on October 21sc., 19:4. attracted support frcm th 37run;ty fl7! 7:thPr ',ctd-c,.:1 Y7) that the intent of the City's initial fundir ras bnry 1 Youth CO-OP, Inc. has secured a S6S,.:',0C.03 coomitler,t has City of Miami Social Service furviini7 sh(71 te r th Ycuth Co -Op. Inc., might secure 211 fundirc SurPOrt l'rf7)m other sc,-705. This reduction process should begin with this fisca RUCOMMPOED FT.DI%G S50,00 ••• 81 AGENCY/PROGRAM T/T r::0:011.44 OVERALL AVNRAGE RATING LL,fj) Rvitiested Funding: $ 210, 1()0,00 (-)11.nlende<1 1. Cr t 1. Appropriateness of Program a. Visibility of Program b. Def Need 1 Prorarn Involementation a. Identification of 173r)graii: 1 Objectives c. Iviethodology 1,. Realistic (.1oal Settinfi.) staff Conirntflte s-01 H,r derly 3. Effectiveness of Servicv b. Client Follow-up a. Identification of Client's Needs 1 4. Ef.iciency of ServiceDiive a. Co-t per Client b. Staff/Client Rati:, c. Administration t! ;Wencv -.1•••••••100.0••• Administrative Functions 4. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility 13uoget d. Application i'n re;1 i.-;t Rating Scale 5z Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Good Iota 2= Poor I= Very Poor X= Not Applicable 34 ir overall average rating (above) 82 1 1 1 1 1 1 t TILE_ HAVI,NNA AC IVI ciiN1 E !:( Will provide octal servfeet: to !;vtliflr r li t' tittle Havntin arca. Services to Include: ()ducat -ton. counsel in. t fly(' days 8 week at four centers, health scroon!rw, art(! rvfcrrnl. and outreach. Request - $2,34720.76 for - , ••• • - 1 •4, rt.% , - _ Staff recommends funding based upon te sar'. :rovido 19.7!:-.7f-. 4 at $145,000.00. While ar expansion servccs 1qh re Je:Ar8b1e, the recomendation is based in '-±e SOcifil Service fund'; Fey^ . continuing and expanding operation kNithout rec;c:nition Of Fn irnlied obligation to provide futLre S442,881.00 is rTovi,le( 'o ft,s ,Fcl-ar tron., other sources 1:7 - S371,20 7PdeNi • 70 ,r1r]. t - 3Z,,SOC 4ay - RECOmMLNCED FUNDING = S14F.,000 A CNCY/PROGRAIvl OVERALL AVV:RACIE A .tN t t le 4,71*.tana Activit es Center/Geriatric %ntriti.,11 10-1th-siert Twitting: $ 27 70 . iket: )111.11.,n(lori Hintling: 14r1,00(),On Vvaluation Cri,mta I. Amattlyze822 oLEL.c21LLrri a. Eligibility of Projtram h. .mog raphic Need Ratin 2. Program Impleroentat'xc a. Identification of Prot:ram Objectives b. Realistic Crial Settin c. Mothocl)loy 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivory a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 5. Aorninistrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site cr Facility e• Duo d. Application Ratin4 Scale 5 Excellent 4= Very Good 3, Good 4 (14 Total 2..z. Poor 1= Very Poor X Not Applicable ') 3 itaff Comment ;r1.. = ci‘,•erall average rating (a ire) 84 20. N . - i •„!,, (cubon n 1 t ri 1 :oundo'f-n) Will provi 14r for rent l• ' r f 1 2 mon t 1.1,4 for act i t =, Request - $4,000 tor 14=,, This organization adliticnal funds would he re(;,,o!',-,te:..; ,r regoested S9,000 tniyvjr - the C.,.;ban Cultural Fr.)::ndati. • Afluiu Pr, ( ,:f-:)(1"t.y transactin and would therefore lack account,:tHHt.,. •T, r(.'t In addition, this program is recreational in n6Th lo! idera1 Revenue Sharing catcr.,/ F 1DI*; i!; 1 0. 0. 26, 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . t . A . (robin (1titoril WI 1 ;rvi1 t or rent t to Ht , ' t „ r of !2 rnflthr for t Foundrit Regoest SQ4o00 t,tr .. .... organization It ,t. a&Iiticnal funds would be ,r 7 i,r requested S9,000 thic, yf-,Ar .2t1t (..,inc; t no the L.:ban Cultural 4fl1 t s id tnr *:r,msactinn and would therefore lack accOunti. '1;rilinc; in addition, this program is recreation31 in FEderal Revenue Sharing caterj ' ' 1!-„ • ' • 't ;!1 ',,,ECOMMENC:ED - 5 85 AGENCY/ ROGRAMTlTLE international !ftrtMchiCIIn 0VgRALL AVERAO RATIN 1.1.11j cut !i!rol Fonncint inn 1tveirunding: titviLn*!: 'is. 0 • 1 1 1 1 A ito riatetam a • ZligOility at Program b. Demovaphic Need Program Irwl(!mentati,,n a. Identification of i'r,Igram Oblectives_ b. Realistic Goal Setti%; c. Metliodoly 1 1 1 1 1 • If.ffectiveness of Service a. hientification of Client' b. Client Follow-up 1 4. Eff'..ciency of Servic,.! ner Client b. Staff .'Client Raticp c. Administration D. Adminilstrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c:. Budget d. ,‘9plication Ratins Scale 5= Excellent 4 Very Good 3= Good 2= Poor I= Very Poor X= Not Applicable I i -;tafi Comments 1-• i toct s• ,services tt) •t r ()%ft.ra.11 average rating labovol 86 srRvIcrc, ',PEATY 1 1 1 1 1 V (tatIn AMerfron created by the Dade County !.tr At ,rtlm';v Yrrw.r:qn,ttir in lune, 1966. This agency wi71 tfl In -re rf.sldehts in the Little Hsvana Request 55,000 Ir - During 1974-75 1,1.51 Li! -tie va w.unaMc, 'n (14'-rd 1Prol counsel carve to this acnLy 7i7,istncr is anticipated to incres(7: f.hk jr,;;-,rirr':xi;ratP1, CLI:3",1 t. iS eSsential that our S.x.n1h-.4,p,,..yirc,i ',6v0 the legal System.. To continue ii(t1r:?S0n(1 •Cit r Yiami should match the partial funding rY RECOMMENDED FUNDING . $55400 87 AGENCY/PROGRAM ".TLC:: OVE.RALL AV :RACE RATING i. `i liervac;c,y < nteat;c r .tjt.. 4 met it 111, f" t ti It'. test E nding: $ ;',,�of).(m e.va1u, tlon Crlteria Aggziatialui...____tess of F rolirram a. ILiiaibility of Pruyran b. Dernogra►phtc Need 1 1 1 1 1 1 Program In pietticntat: nn a. Identification of I'rc4:rate Objectives b. Realistic Coal 5.3et .in,; c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness r)f Service a. Identification of Client' f, b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service :),?iivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration Ratin Staff rnrnent 5. Adminiatrative Functi or s a. Staff qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget (1. Application i Ratios Scale Totai i ir's • overall average rating (above) 5= £ccallent 2= Poor 4= Very Good 1= Very Poor 88 3- Good X= Not Applicable. two 12. wii1 provile a druvt.h t 1 itt i u Spanish yommuulty. Request - 5A14,2$7.S'1 tc,, This pregram is w. 711 c:•; Nicky Cru2, Inc., whose siec.:' "lhe purrJoses... prOgraM of tctol I personal enceunt,7r and religious %irk'Y 7 It is not licensed by th‘, clients last year vitm 6 further advise thi7, Dade ,n,y 1 RECO",l'AINnn . 1: iu with Ole AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE.: Nicky ern? Outreach OVERALL AVERACik; RATING Fundirig: $ t Wr Xvaluation ctLa I. fionroPriatIn_ s of Przigt4rn a. Eligibility of Pro/ram b. Demographic Need Rating 2. program Implementrition a. Identification of Provrain Objectives b. Realistic Goal 'ttifl tt c. Methodology _1 3. Effectiveness or Service a. identification of Clienti!, b. Client Follow-up 4. 7.1"..ic...icrtcy. of Se ric TAtliver., C.t per Client: h. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration Adrninictrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications h. Site or Facility_ fiuciget d. Applicaton Ratint Scale Excellent 4.= Very Good C;ood ota.:. Pour lz Very ?or Not Applical, r 1! ale 4 .')taft Cotrtrierita t at ion prograit by staff not rating (above) 96 ',seas r 593P ItiS. 01 se • Ir LGEND MODEL C1TtES EDISON / rrt.E. 3 At. t.t.ATTA)* v P*NOCO 5 CULMER RAG1K y CENTRAL HAVANA COCC*C.IT GROVE 1 it st% ft( vER 4 • •IF 4 ligt4:111' 7 114 -6 t! " " , • I • •‘' *.‘ If s • 4') :4 I' joie .7•4 It 4.41 ,L 0.44 41" COMMUM T • \ •• • eiR 7 "*. 4 ) fl») 91 1 IARGEI AREA #8 - COCONUT GROVE IDENTIFIED CR1tIC4 _HEEDS AGi Ni":Y 1. Housing Programs ;c n 2. Child Care Programs t: >nut i:rove after- Schonl Pay, Care Center Recreation Programsco( _nut Grove Optimist Club Youth Programs , 1 rc . Economic Programs �•�'� Elderly Programs OTHER PROGRAMS NOT ADDRESSING AN n i; - %Lr : Coconut Grove Family Clinic c0C0NU1 (;ROVE AFFEi: st.Hooi nor This progtat will provide a ne-tc-on tt. 1 It tilletween volunteer helpers and children from GeotmtWamhinoon car,..er FleftarY Aunior High Sehools, 1 tor a minimum of 1 hour per ,."'tv. i t vis ,!;,71d hy t tt Dade Counv School Roard an,1 im 1,,c6tee, Prograll will provide "success" experience- !,f hest ani artistic. endeavorS. Request - $5,500 for 1-:- 7T:nd;ni, 1 STATri: The proora planto provide staff to cliont-, is an 1 excellent approach. City stat -;e,ou.. weakness in that the volunteers were not alwois rt ,-;nd thC actual ratio was more realistically 1:10. rixt,hc,r, no -oa1 e4'ort at (7.1inn follow-up were observed. It is recommended that fundin pf hi (4.s.ed • folunteers will ri,m s±h7stic credit basis * Hnut-S ef operaton FrOc).1 ,-, minimum of two hours per day per client • Improved client follw-up Inrough determration rt WhY 3 child does not appear and where that child i located 1 1 • More accurate and cprprehersive rcerd keeinq Staff further recommends that furd- for n?Xt conditioned upon the foregoing improvements in service delivery. RECOMMENDED FUNDING - $5,000 9' ACZNCV /PROGRAM TITLE: Cccot"ftit crnve Aftrr Sci,00l Hour- OVERALL AVE AGE RATING 1t!'j' (3tf"Ci l'tifttiiil : + n:lt�t�ttded FtUnritng: :15 000.00 v luation Criteria . f ropriateness of Frograrn a. I liiibilitof Prvjirarn b. I eniograph r Need 2. Program Irt,plement.., a. Identification +/f j'r Objectives b. 1. ,alistic :r,a: : fti:a. c. th do _gy i. i:ffectiveness v' Se.r .c Identification of b. Client Folk w- p 1. _tfi: is n�.i• o a. Cit :)t r irlii '1t Li/Client c. rat.un Olm Staff Cotnmet'ft• :tt d,7 not. sh(q... 1 Aorrinistrativc i•unct:c.r. . :Safi Qualifications b. Ste or Facility c. c:. :\i ii.cation Ccnflisting information l:atinn Scale i= Kxcellcnt .I= cry c, jQf 3- 1..; ,(.(1 Tot4: 1 Very Poor X- Not Appli cab c ' overall average rating {above) 9di AG NC/PROGRAM TITLE: Cocotttit Aftt'r Ft' ';`tt! Ti OVERALL AV ;i At3ffi: RATING 1 ni 1t,r-yti'(I l unlink: ;. ; ,n,'Itt :•,tit::.r� nrit•ri I ut►ritti 7,0t�C1.{tt) itiatiott +triter• rt� _riateness of 1'rnslr a. Ealitlib,iiity of I-'rt,gr tti b. Demographic Need w. o_gt`ain In lertle•nt.xt i a. Identification of i'r Objf c"tiAte s b. 1(:'a list.ic c. ',Iethedor laiCCt::'t'I7l'3S •i: :�. Idt'ntificatiun h. Client Follow-up 1 ::,tfi: ie >2t. r c. . a. C'..7; t r `lit `t'tff!Client !this staff co t it�t', h'. rtE�nt 1:I�it,'f't`i illtt f}lit{u; r 7. Aorr;inistratie'c I'unct:C;r:S ,t, Staff Qualifice.tions b. Site or Ficility 4• • Zi EJi eatiOti Rating Scale a: Excellent 41, Very 6'10. cnf1icting information Total t t,.:oi• 1- Very Poor Not Applicable rwerall average rating (above) 94 AI 1,1%!; ' • "A`. t AT VW prov id t;av c;Trs to rhildrk.n, .a ;os ' XX Tit10 TV -A `undinf;. Request - This prn'1ra.^ 'ras a 1rcr, amount o` sought to i tress e (;r,Ive area ,1 i for fcdern1 •*(i5,Cltlf substantial ,.i ; 4, has innovatively rar iy Day Care, began as a pilot progr�!:1 .,r c•,,;•' provides for salaries for substitute mothers (10) t3 art' fc,► t: of wr!6—inr. parents (50+) in their own homes. On site irate, ,, ;r-`NC and a ;or .c:rnc:d with the +, -+ req eStc-,^.' ths idtho'ut. -n ii:7rease RECO'rML ►;: F F:!%n: Nr, , , ? 1:1 •; e '", n,e , tc be comfortable cri'cren. The funds :arefcia1 service, 95 a 1 1 1 STAFF NARRVIa 1 1 YMCA ALPPATTAH BRANCH (Tatftage 11.1...Ethnic Leadurshir Dcvcicp-unt) The funds requested will pny !or A ,itait pr i of managing a youth oritnnted rccru,tion I, 300 boys and girls i,etticen thu ag wi A .„ • ,1 participate in this "Ait,.,rnocn Drop-:r. !-,c(.rt1,-m! Request. '7,905 for 1975-76 Fund in - MID There is doubt that one staff t-Jerson can irmart or Ship attributes in 300 youthful participants. %o f.;nd;nci i,r-ecorrcen in that an existing After School Recreational Prenro!.: PT1r4-hs clientele. t-4 RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 t A011:14C it /PROGRAM TITL E: OVERALL AVERAGE RATING 1 2-6 Y.M$C,A• Afl.pmth Branrhilri-ethnic -teenage Leadership Development &Pitt/Med Fla/IMAM $ 7,405.00 Re commended Fundln,: Protrrn Demographic Need Z. Prnigrant Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Settin/ c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service • a. Identificatinr of Client's Needs! b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility 5 .1 c. Budget d. Application Rating Scale, Total Ss Excellent Zs Poor 4= Very Good ls VeryPoo: 3gc Good Xit Not Applicable 4 1 If t 4 7 Nol; ptovidod overall average rating (above) 4 6 116. v PC MCA ALLAVATlAti iM (Tr imEt.hn ic cownun xi tat; titr) The venter will publish a C,11:7 attempt to enhance cnn un i a t i 1 volved in our society, rhos= H Blacks, Latin Ariericans, and :11,r 12,, will also sponsor and such as crime, non-suppor areas of concern. Request.. $I6,470 for 197")-76 STAFF31, t t. --------- The program does not provid fcr diret 11r elderly. A number of other aC!er;Cie7;-- munity relations issue. Based ,c4-, not recommended for this progra-r. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 4"/ a AetNCY/PROGRAM TZTL. OVERALI, AVERAGE RA FIN° —uthnie Commuttltv Rriat Ions Cvnter 411001.16 Rcluctited riutdingt $ 16,471.00 ry fC onrtatensis of Proiram a. Kflzibtlttv ofProjram b. Demo/1%2W Need Prot rim Implementation a. Identification of Program Oblective s b. Realistic Goal Setting, c. Methodoloiy T1 Cr' ; r) 4. 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's b. Client Follow-up Needs 4. Efficiency of Service Deliver,y a. Cost Der Client am.dirdor.r. b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration I 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. liud/et d. Appli ciitton 3 Rating Scale 5i Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Good Total t 2= Poor I= Very Poor X= Not Applicable 1 ; 4V1 ra4r r'r-rtinZ (,aoove) 48 --WED 1 MODEL WAS ; ICOIS044 PARK /LITTLE NiVEN 141,LAPATTA14 *INWOOD 6 CUOAER PARA sC.ENTNAL • LAME 4404444A A COCONUT **OA • fib II +5 • a 0+ r 1 s. calk(' r t• s• , 1 1 4 4P5a*J7c- COCA DEVELOPMENT 7:-.C4GET r• A • 1 1' 48 t TARGET AREA ka - WYNWOCD IDENTIFIED CRITICAL NEEDS 1. Child Care Programs %on,, Economic Programs iufS Aide ,rvo Elderly Programs Health Programs , r: ortor - Housing Programs or'rt' Transportation Programs :�; • i r,.;,;,., F♦ l *} reAr' Tramc}rtinr, .Jflit 2. Crime Prevention Programs „cr,f> Drug Counseling Programs Legal Counseling Programs ^;:, ;1 d Recreation Programs %ci"C' Youth Programs OTHER PROGRAMS NOT ADDRESSING AN IDENTIFIED CRIT:CAL NEE:: Borinquen Health Care Center - Puerto Rican Oppertoni tv froclraru Ylami 2 BoRiugLEN HEALTH CARL CEN.;!.k t. (Food Staiv Unit .:)tlic} The funding request will pry Office to he staffed t,y the Wynwood area and rvt. 18,000, including adjacent Request • $13,500 for 1975-76 STAFF Wr;V"-P:1 This agency did not provide suffrier.t office. If it can be determine' that that this office be provided in r-(.- Neighborhood facility. Note shoull Flse be a continuing program and shoulfl source of funding for Food .'tamo RECOMMENDED FUNDNG w 0 41.rs,N%$7 51 • 1 AODICY/PROORAM T1TLt: nriti2n M.C.C. /Food Stamp unit ,)f'ice Petpaested Funding: $13, c0().('M OV?kALL AV ACPRA'i 1' itecor-r.ftlended runtitt,..:: • Aaoropriatenes5 of Prograrr, bilit 01 P 0 rarn 4 h. Demo ? ,,,•! i,••;lcd by Is ••••••••••••..•Y Z. Program Implementation a. Identification cf P-(ii4ran: Objectives b. Realistic Goal S4ir..,211. c. Methodolog,y 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identificatim ot Client's Nt,e(..is' b. Client Follow-up 11 r ROW /OW 4. Efficiency of 'Service 1-'),'Ilyt a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration b. Administrative Functic...:, 4. sttif Qualifications X b. Site or Facility 2 c. riudet Application $C.7'; ,OG Existing of f ice at No indication that insufficient 31r• 7 -•-• 4)! Rating Scala Ss ascollent 4= Verr Good 3= Goot; Total ! Zs Poor Is Very Poor .• Xs Not Applicatle do !t''''•ar."17 f• 9 r overall average r r 0 BORINQUI.,N A pr r.Im clusiii,n( cl Purt Rican pot)ull! wsci:. up so ; of mentingl'ul emp I nu r s s t i n pr $69,,,92 I 0- ..... 4. •e olTr7ror: (.;i1r!nq - Liridsey Hopkins .tor la=4;1;4. A 3SNCY/P1t iORAIV2 TITLE; rt 11,C,C.%NurMes Aide Tr it n Unit OVERALL AVCRACk: RAflNO 1 quested Funding/ $ h9, 92,00 t 1 vabI*tion ;Mgr a +ro ruts ;s o ♦. Eligibility of Pro ram h. Ike mot raphi c Need Ratif4 Recorimencicri Funding: i', ucot iona: i i i i r 2. Program Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting Effectiveness of Service a. Identification c: Client's Neec'si b. Client ,Follow up r r 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost2er Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration i cQr�o.a:; .:2 (rot it^C�1. 1►1`. inst�'tictors) only -_ of 5u,it.t-t itt >ilc-i fair instructional ^'te'riai • S. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications 3 b. Site or sctlity c. Buda ,011101 d. Applicatien Too ccn,estc'u for training: site Could hc ric cCt p i itihcci .at such less cost !lilting S, e • 38 Accelltat 4= Very Good 3r Good Total s Poor Is Very Poor Xs Not Applicable r 14 : overall average rat g (above: 54 $O*1NQU N HEALTH CARE cF:NTE.R.,_.INr. (Mental Health Unit) i i i i i i i r r r The program will provide thorough r:,t nt.r l ht :11 th st_ ry i L e r, in an effort to combat psy'cholo,,ic.11 c i.;1 „r C 'tli llct . 1h program Will also enhance efl,,,ti&nal well-being throe h ct•ti`,uI- tation and counselin by. 3 C "?j!l tt C,.,t pl :t'nt i t l',i l:lc clinical psychologists. Si.rvic.t s : i :l ?,, individuals of the iivnvc,od arc•.. ,t c!,113 b, 1p. Request + $258,236 for 197rr-76 STAFF NARRATIVE It is felt that there is a definite need for trlis kind of prat:rar Of the Six proposals Submitted by Borinquen Health Care Center,, Inc., totaling $552,005.00, this program complements the nr-ooin,n activities of this clinic. To supplement the existinc; servict'c, oroOdeci by Community Mental Health's Puerto Rican Team, we recor.:rend `.+rt following funding distributicr: . Psychologists (2; c1^, l;l {;, . Special Education Teacher (1) Funding should support this program for first years ,tart. -I.;) oily Participants should he rcq ired to pay for services c)n a slidir o-t�,o scale. RE Ct1M E#DED FUNDING • $50.000 (1 AGENCY/PROORAh+! TIT Et . Fisen U,C.c. /Mental Health unit OVERALL AV RACI. RATING gated ending: $ 25t , 236.0o Iterorntr,endc.Onn &7Iiu&tian Crtter , Rat 1. AEAroDrtatenese of Protram a. Fltilbilitr cal Proiir�►m,�„ h. Depotra}ghic Need 2. Proiraarn implementation a. Identification of Program Objertives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology tafi Comm Not I i^-ittod Ilt,or And , ;der1y 3. ifectiver►ess of Service 1 a. Identiflcaticn of Client's Needs' b. Client Follow-up 3 • 4. Irificiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Chant b. Staft/Client Ratio c. Admintstra►tior. S30. 3c' 1:507 • 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Fatality c. bidet d. Applicattop 2 3 Would requir.' continuous; funding 2 Ratio Scale 5s ECcel1.nt 4= Very Good 3 Good Total Z. Poor le Very Poor XsNot Applicable 3 *14 overall average rating (rabc vel 56 BORIN UEN HEALTH CARP CENTER OC. P11..dr_F—tcY • • • • The program will pro du mk,divaLion ,ttid ot,ht,r ;Atdicitl supplies at wholesale cost c 1• r t 1: ;1 justifiable, to it leo,J f,5(1() pdtit tit iiwy:Iwood and other adjacent cotrvtnitis. Request $82,749 for l'6.5-.:76 STA The concern, with this progr,Im..1 the f, to absorb the overall cost 'Fe,' the sefJ)n% J1r, into their regular budget. This service is :-.Jrovie t ackson Memorial Hospital for patients that cannot affo- le Pi.rhase the medication. If the demographic need can be established. then Jackson Memorial Hospital should expand its services rathec tha start a new program by an agency with no experience in this area. 'r1;!V"..iAlt! RECOMMENDED FUNDING - 0 , ■ CY/MOOMM TITLE' fis Requested Funding: $ ti2. 769.00 OVERALL. AVE AGE RATING Can Recortii"'inendeci F uncl►n4: i i i i anaw►tlon C rite ri 1. tiro tram a. il�ttbilitx of program b. 13enyosra»hlc Need Comments :;etvici s not limited to poor and olderiv Not ,!,1 i ,.iicd by !orcv. 2. Program Irsplementation a. identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting; c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service a. derntificatioh of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up i 4. fficit'ncv of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration µ 2 • $12. ? dssu,;ing 1P,o0n (dents as stated :: 32F) assuming 18,000 clients as stated 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff 9uislifications b. Site or Facility c. 8t}dtet d. Appltcat}on 2 Unrealistic in accord with stated intent 2 liatinj Scale s Dgcsllent 4. Very Good 31: Good Zs Poor le Very Poor Xs Not Applicable Total din 3' i- 14 s oversa average rating (above) 5 t LOftII1QUEN. tAtTIL CARE CENTEll INC Transport .0. ion) This program is designed to pr,)vi,It; tr,In'AporidLiuncrvici for the Wynwood re s.....c4A nts to!-7,;, 1,»k tor ,iparLicnis, receive medical at tent ion ;and hop Request. $50,046 for 1975-76 und Inc; 1(17- 0 STAFF NARRAT:VE 1 Agency applying intends to pass through fundin to a SOCOndry reCipiQnt. lrOverall needs not clearly established, and intent appears to prOViGP a supplemental bus service without adequate methodology. Budget net 1 realistic with benefits stated. 0 • OP RECOMMENDED FUNDING $ 0 c. Bud AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: totift wet 146C.C6/Trnnsportntion Unit Requested Funding: $ 50,046.0n ADDroatiatenes 9 of Progtam a. Eligibility of 1:212sizfrLi b. pemos_raphic Need OVERALL AVERAGE, RATING Recommended F-unding: 2, Program Irnigernentation a. Identification of Progran-. Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Ivlethodologx No activit'.' 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Neeris b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration r 1,C00 clients as stated provi,lcd "Ancianos i]ncant0" 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications 2 b. Site or Fact X 1 i et L d. lication Drivers sholW, be volunteers or employees of this agency Rating Scats 58, Cacellent 4s Very Good 3= Good Total 2= Poor 1= Very Poor X= Not Applicable 26 v 13 t-• overall average rat n ove) 6u LE;AI, sFkv1cr:S 01 +;RF:AVEK II,'�=;1 (Wynwood Branch) ) Program will providP trgat assistance to low income rr sidet,tw cat the Wynwood area. Request - $56,436 for 1975-7 Fund ini! in 19; a-775 C ( STAG"'' "1ARRA7 EVE Legal Services, such as family law. ten1n4 1Pga' `' preierCitinn, and welfare and consumer complaints, will he ro tr (tee, l: t 1c.•;t- nco::T r-c o►1!.s of Wynwood. This branch rendered legal actancr to 1 9 lients in 1 74-15. The $25,000 in City of Miami - FRS tunr..s will r;„tch Stag ti4n s nt. SM.700 to maintain this essential service. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $25,000 •e 61 At3 4CY/PROG TITLE: Rc pleated Funding: $ 56,436.00 QVP ALL AVEItAC1 itATM° 2.9 Of fire. Recommend Funding: $ 25,OOt) 1. ADDEQDriattne Program a. E1ia&biliy of Prot am j b. pemoaraahlc Need__ iIrients i i i 2. Program Implementation a. Identification of Program objectives b. Realistic Coal Setting c. Methodology Effectiveness of Service 1 j b. Client Follow-up• } 1 r ( a. ;identification of Client's Needs 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff /Client Ratio c. Administration i-sur ink 9o0 clients as stated :: u assuming 160 clients as stated 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qual1ftcations b. Site or Facility c. Budget d.Application Ratinj Scale Ss kteelleet 41; Very Good 3. Good Total Z= Poor 1s Very Poor Xs Not Applicable 40 r 14 • overall average ratting (above) 62 t' • BORINnVFN hi' At TH CAltE 1::C MeTto Rican Oppot tun iLy ct.) This program will f iOti t o r . , o r Puerto Rican or other Spaniiii• n&i.'i ui1S a in or near the Wynwoud 1t tion And referral servic.k.—; t i tt 1-tt i popu- lation to the larger soci, t-Act, location that is ctnLr1it. ov knowledgable community ru: Request- $77,58 2 for 1975-7 $ 0 al. Afr !tIkPATIVF Essentially a community organization, and - while ter o br value in providing a means for community '71,t-tir,nal (0.n) - ihi)ac t ot funding should more properly adorers4idarE's dic.soc4i,:es, (Jr pr_o_g!ams submitted by community orqannticn c prnviCe 'the noeded social services. RECOMMENDED FUNDING =- 0 A NCY /PROGRAM TITLE: u li.C.c./Puerto Ric:1r orr. 'r" Requested Funding: 77,582.0o o ten OVEIAL.L AVRAGE 1AT1NGL1.81 Rec. ,n ed FudinM $ Rating tt a. Kikbilijx of Feroiral-n h. Dernolcaphic Need 1. a 2. Pro/ram Implementation a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Settin dir,ct social :,ervices to cIttilte progrlm c. Mothodoltsy •••••• WM..m4.. Tents =uttrea 1 i stir goal Not vagite unfocused 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Idcntifieation cq Client's Nee::: b. Client Follow-ti 4. rfficiency of Service Dvr - a. Cost per Client 11. b. Staff/Client Ratio ,t4 c. Administration 4.3jnq 18,300 clients as stated 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or FacUttv e. Bluth:et d. Apzlicr.tion lketinE Scale Total 2/' i- 13 7 overs/1 average rattnrating (above, 5: Excellent 2c Poor 4$ Very Good la Very Poc,r 3,- Cod X: Not Ap;lic31:.., 4.- 64 fir Co2 LEGEND: 1 MODEL CIT:ES EDiSON PAR,(,/LITTLE RAVER 3 ALLAPATTAH WYNROOD 9 CULMER PARR •5 CENTRAL 7 LITTLE HAVANA • COCONUT GROVE r. tf N Ca •i •7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREAS 65 i i i i i i i i i 4$ TARGET ARIAS - CuiMER PARR: IDENTIFIED CR T1CAL NEEDS AGENCY 1. Child Care Programs "lone Housing Programs tenant E:d,cation Association of Miami . Economic Programs None Elderly Programs ';enor centers of Dade County Recreational Programs % ne Youth Programs None 3. Cultural Programs 0 cane Legal Counsrlinq Programs None Transportation Programs None 66 Tt•:NA:f i:l)l'CA'1'1nN ,AFr1r'iAl i ' 11" "sia`'i (A'AM) Program is designed to improve and further the le Al, i,t iral and ee'onUttric tights of all tenants, particularly 1,1w in :i11 :al r ide lev,at advocacy, social services rut errals, t1 >t;- in re—e rl'il ,in intermit itttl, and will negotiate with landlords r:11C. -*en' ' 21 r' the tenant. i'l'.AA.w1 is basically .a tenint :_ r :ni..,it is ,. ited in the r7vertovn area. Request * S34,476 for i47.-76 STA r' $20,000 funding is recommended nase'i ;r:_.Ctr tsl i shments to date: the publication ano distributio! of is te=orit ,-,e",tiSietter, prevention of tenant evictions, and enlistment of ? g? ho:,s inn n i is in a door-to-door campaign. The on -site intern iw wi t h i r?'ict`i. i' `e _en Arai and Culmer neighborhoods demonstrated th; ;r; cdu'..atinq and organi:ing tenants to irnprove 'Their y T $. ,000 ad- ditional funding ievel will more adE'� .ia .eI { ;.re s `h„? , ,5r(l families re- siding in deficient housing by host nt; fire tenagt way- shops and establish- ing a tenant's hot line. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = S20,000 67 ACENCY/3ROGRAW1 TITLE: Tenant Education Assn. di Miami Ftcpirst.Fri ruindirig; $ 34,476.0n t 0 Criteria 1. Aaprooriateness of Proikratz2 as &jgIbLLjty [Pi OVERALL AVE AO 1tATINOL2:21 b. Damosraphic Need Vt. °sitar?), Implcl,rneniation a. Identification of Prograr; Objectives b. tkcalistic Goa :itting c. Metbodol• 1 3. Effectiveness of Servict.‘ IderitifictIon of Client's INi-tccisi b. Client Follow-up i(ccornrrivncied Funding: 4) 20,0omo Staff Conrnents az* r ire needed 4. Efficiency of Service Dc.iver- a. Cost per Client Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration Administrative Functi•ir.s a,. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Fa,cility d. ARplication ;;.;uminf,,; 5,500 clients as stated 8500 clients as stated 3 Ratins Scale Total 1 46 5= Excellent 4:= Poor 4= Very Good I= Very Poor 3= Good X= Not Applicable 14 overal average rating (abeint) 68 104 ag••......suarwsist SEN 10it E 14. ,114 I. "i" 0 1 1 1 1 1 • • (Ht 'Mt •ti- l'r•r This program plans on (t.;11‘ii program that will proviA, thru Friday. In additio:i t include nutriti,:n counseling, community rout , and recreation, lei,ure P• Bethel A.M.E. Church. Request- $118,198 for 197H- P14 h‘t p. 1 w t !!ondav ,..,i4catiOn S 0 Despite the need for ttls nL ndinq as the Little Havana - rvals in the Central Miami of tnis organization fee]s : ' . would not be operaticn,ill•,, ,An"N4.,%4F1W,Wetr RECOMMENDED FUNDING $ 0 6s AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: ce_ttets oi OVERALL. AVERAGE RATING Lij...1 Reluested Funding: $ tion t $ ram a. Eligibility of Program h. bernotrathict Need itating 2. Program Implementation a. Identification of Prr)gram. Objnctivos b. Realistic Goal Setting, c. Methodology •,; 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Need b. Client Follow-up 11. 4. Efficiency of Servicz.. Delivrry a. Costper Client 1 b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility d. Apelication 0 4 4 ' a . Staff. C,ottIrtient itatio4 Scale Total kccelleat 22: Poor 4r. Very Good 1: Very Pocr 3= Good X Not Applicable ,,vera.11 average. rating (*boys) 70 4 1 win FSt � I:GENO t MODEI.. CITIES ' EDISON PARK/LITTLE f7.vER 3 ALLARATTA$ 1 *YNWOOD CULMER PAR[ CENTRAL LITTLE HAVANA COCONUT GROVE r ii It;'rt !?� ~ r� 24 - •' Qi C: 4, assistireariat.. .a . • r ,. 4 ..,,.,�• _ e..e. COMMUNITY DEVE CDM`N; • I 7i 1 11 TARGE! AREA t rf1 1 10ENTIf1p cRutch Ntos 1 1. Economic Programs •,,ni. Elderly Programs 1 Housing Programs 1 Drug Counseling Programs 1 Health Programs 2. Child Care Programs Crime Prevention Programs Recreational Programs L. flvi,:rtc,wn Recreation OTHER PROGRAMS NOT ADORESSIN 111 Catholic Service Bureau - Midr ..)1,u 1 1 7`' a. • 1 1 1 1 1 1 t -,41e,2'141,t 1 1 1 CA'r1101.If, SFr, A' `,;( ($t. Luke's 0vertown Recrention rellter) Will provide education, informstien vid r t vcter !-esittotion, counseling, homemaking, healtil, cow;umer reoteation and cultural programs. Pacility is located at 1401 N. Mi;imi r jn.w11. operate seven days a week. Request - $100,000 for 197-76 1 1 7Z7fitc Reduction in funding is 11 $100,000 worth of benefits had to#:,r, S,decificany, activities are unstructured an re.cPcar nuidance from staff. Record maintenance i1": ;1,q,rca, ndccumented. Unproductive services rrrvilcc ;;(7. tle eliminated, thus strengthening programs 4,.ha =,ohston'y is reduced in recpgritior thar RECOMMMED FUNDINC Y'e fat7ilitv rent-frer. AGENCY tImaIDORAIVI TITLE: OVERALL AVERAGE RATIN v rt own Recrenton (ter -- Requated Funding: $ 1n0tnno,00 50,000.no EvaltsatitinSrUirla 1 rfl a. Milt2WW.rogram__ h. Dernotr!Thic Need Ratinji 1 . roiram Implementation a. Identification of Program Objsstive s b. Realistic Goal Settink,1 c:. Metkiociology 3. Effectiveness Servlcc a. Identification of Client', Nee(... b. Client Follow-up 4. T-:fficic.ncy of Sorvice a. Cost per Client h. Statf/Client Ratio c. Administration Staff Comments 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b, Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application Rating Scale 5= Excellent 4= Very Good 3= Good t•*.;'• - Total zs poor Is Vary Poor X= Not Applicablf. 3 Nont overc.11 average rating (above AC; 1:7,4N C MOO RAM t`rr T.. E: el. OVERALL AVERAGE RATING L J:2.1 1 1 41. 1 1 1 1 1 1 riesterl Pundirid,: EVilluation Crag tir, at init. 1. Apnctpti/iteneam o f Pr?.grarn a. pliability of Protram h. Demographic Neeri Program Irnpleitlewatl(in a. Identification ran Objectivets I). RehliAtic Metitodo14y 3. 'r.7,1f,...tQt.iven(!sQ4 a. Identification of (1.4-1t',-, - I). Client Follov.•-•..ap _ • . --A - • ^ - • _ 4. 1,4fi c: Sc r ner St;iti 'Client ci m initrative Fonions el. statf Qualifications h. :iite or Facility c. Bodiet 1. Application Ratiry Fbccelleat 4= Very Good CoJri Pool Wtry Poor X Not Applicalie Staff c'otrtnents _j it(i t p(lor 4 ' 4- Tot,t1 i Tig int onr,it 1. •ti pr‘At 1Liv(i 14 overall average rating (above) 14 r r i r in, •1;:, place t';c!It i it I. r it. iL. r '. reti- . I'1; • 1 ' rl 'un'! th; • 15 1 1 PROGRANI .1.1"; tAnt lir 1•! 1,•11 OVERALL AVERACE; i NG I r T Evaluation Criteria 1 l:at;riji..1 1 I. Appropriateness. of }-irograrn 1 , 1 1 (i. ..t:liAibiliq of :)ein ,gr321.1i( 0111.11.06... : ryisrair, •.11..tilt.nt,it1‘an idorti.tici4.•tion Objpctives h1i3&(.10a: ..;‘tlirc Eft...J-tiveness 1. _ . . (,f 11-nt .111.101.0. ;. .f'c t)f I • .'.'!11,latii.-t• z••, •+10.'.f Qqaiiticaticri44 t. .71ite. 4.4r Facility 0.1•ii!et. 21.011(1t.ri i• iti'l(t+ It. ( .)r) rnents ••' •i:' t • • "t t• , , it , !•,t ,t! !:, wirc.t1 ,,:11 1 i, in! l'at.•ti-t.it. r.,tit.1.-!-;tt 1 by :,tat r iCitlnia Seale Tula& 4J 1 = overall a,verag. rating (abovt , Excellent Poor ry Good i: Very Poor X - Not. Appti...a,t)I.:- (.‘"01.It 1) 1,)))p :It 1s.k ct ) Cad i t 1 t t- ,i))) ii• • 1. t t rrovidv t. h p ri c t j., , I' 1. )), t t))) 1 : 1:11 t i.tct) - t 1 "".1.2,1:‘'Itit li, ) 111,1u‘Ilt. pr“it ins t r t t i. . 1 li L 1 t I ' • n%i ! V, 4C W`!dhl (Ale,t'; t, ,,cr.,It.',,,t_c•i•k It ileta ; S t t., • 1) tVe t "t ),) ) ' . , • • • , ". fll'.01"0r, "irpc4Pr funds navy - • ; (1(;)' rt ; i )1r, t i ,' r,•), R.t.fiiMMINDEP FUND0 AGENCY/PM/GRAN-I "1- 1 1 1 lc, 41111. IkeTae.fletiFutt Eyalitation.,Ciriter latit2.E I 1. Apprppriatenees of PrAirar-1 : "4,:jiitibility t),C ran OVERALL, AVERAtiE TING .(•(' b. Dertlograjohic Nt 4- 2 • roran itis)letri,. a. 1dcntiftcattc1 Ot1, Obices*iVet4 t). ReaP,-tte. 4. EttectiVerieSs a, lcientificatiwn vf •I.V'Ut° 4 b. Client Follou 4. Ticierty f Si - t;r:Ft h. Staff/Client Adn.inistrati,m A:iministrative Functi rc a. Staff Qtaiilificatirns 5. Site or Facility fittdglit .1. Application 11 1 I 1.1 Otal ; • RatismScale S Pccellent 4? Very Good Good Poar 1;-. Very Pnor X.,z, Not Applicable n-wntleriIt1kz• 1 : ; Staff ( ()n,rri..nts (rrerall averathi• rating (above) 1 h >>u is t it • it, "t• . �n't!:,1 'it. r;t; ? 1:t 2 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 AC; 17:N C PROCTIA.1 "7 I "I" E: ;.i.• .'t • , 1'" fliLt1 : , ,•• val:iation Criteria 1. Appropriatenec,F a. Fail,it)i.lity of 1.)efr•ogyaphir N.: -1 1-ust.raill 1111'4, III, . Identificati.:In 01v.sctivoFt t • • '4. 3. Efiectiv.:nt:s--• a. *t)„ F011ck 4.r:s:fir...:.ncy ofSr to.r . Atinlinibtratir,r 5. ik-4-111”2a,tivt a. Staff QuislifIcati. ,n; b. Site or Facilitl (!. Atri•ication • , 4 —1 34! T • r;%cellent 4= Very Good ; .RALL AVERAGE RA ILNK:t Staff Cothrnehts 44411404 Noe..• 1,..• thin.. City 1 i i i-orlf j ict averaie rating (above) SC() ') A ,- • „ . _ . ("'tli 6r t i'.1t.t l. i.t •I -, 1r6r•.11.) T!1, p n., ,.; r ,r. vi I I. 1,, ..• ;.I0 h• .. i ,:. e tut- r I ••..• r• e s itt t. -It N.W. 2.`.+1 I: Si. il, ' , , , •,, , W 1. I p C, I 11 • : k..) I. a ti Wii r t• 1 1e • „ t - 9 j 1 7 iy • •1•*: t•a•li•"1.) ' '03 ' ••• (!ri f• , Center . no t-erii,': - tt: '41,1 tit 2(.-'!•*‘• t 4 .. AOCNCYIPRQGRAY TITLE! Rt Tttisted rtatiding: !, , OVERALL AVERACiE RATING 14.'t t!t,414: Prrs.r.itr 1 1 &valuation Crkellit 1. Apribppristentss fPjranr a. Eligibitity of t!rogratn bi bemoiraphic Need Program IrtvIvroerit2ti(.0 a. Identification lf Pro41.0:. Obj_t+ctives Realistic Goal r. Methodology 1 3. 1ffectiwness o a. Identificatin of t• ' b. Client Follow-up • 4. Efficiency of Servic, a. Cost per Client 1 b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Athiiinistration administrative Fuorti:rir, a. Staff Quatificationl, b. Site or Facility . Budget ch Application t--- 4 4'1'4 t ' : io tffConrnc'nt Rating Scale 5= Excellent 4= V,,ry Good 3-, Good 2,- Poor ir Very }-oor X Not Applicable - twera.:I averagt rating tabove) 22 ”IICA i 1 1 The program Will provtkie cH*11 I:. to Senior Cttittcns of ti,, community services alsr !I #- t• through outreach Methololv. in economic flanagement, !1-! Requost S50"7 for This program 5(.,rves tho are not primarily Citi of J.E.S.C.A. provides thc,_ this program would be United Way. This would ;! yearly funding. Based 1. I ki:COmPLN'fi.:; • t 7 1 •• . , i AGENCY/PROGRAM 7ITLl : Y,irI.C.A. - Carver Branch/S. n, ,r. Re'iueeted Ftiitidingt $ 5tl, clh - . ft ion. Criteria 1. Appropriateness of prograin a. Eligibility of Program,_.... b. Demographi_r Need 1 1 1 1 1 Projram implementation a. Identification of r'rogra Objective.* b. Realistic Goal Sfttin4 Methodoloty 3. Effectiveness of Service' a. Identificatiet of (lit nt' b. Client Follow-up p 4. Efficiency of Service a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration :i. Administrative Functir ns a. Staff qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budiet d. Application Ratio Scale_ Su Excel eat 2: Pour 4= Very Good it Very Po,)r 4% Good X= Not A .p3i. yt,;. OVERALL AEliAGE RAfi'iNC`, .� ..R P at1r, Total 1 T . .V' tnu nt :: rating (above) 211 911. JAMES 1, SCOTT (ts-cffendcr ery t A program designed to aid ex-oficndc,- include housing 00..90 daywith assistance in ftndtnp perminf-,' of social services. Request $70,161 for STAFF - ...t The program is operational at tt-s to continue operation (S149,00C) fro:- Modo The budget submitted was unreahstic; a5 4p11 tH.T ,-voci1 tx-offender needs are presentl/ rei Rehabilitation Program. This ;rogr:iit7', A non -City of Miami residents. RECOMMENDS FUND:NG - $ 25 :YtPit RAM TITLE: elect OVERALL AVERAGE R.•rt, a Repuested i'undingt $ 70,161.00 b. De t ojrhlc Need G Reenninnended Not T:at:t . t i.o,? 2. Program Implementation a. Identification of Program Obi ective s b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 3. Effectiveness of Service {1 a. Identification of Client's Nccds# b. Client Follow-up 1 2 t 4. yEfficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio 2 c. Administration 2 $487.23 �Yt 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget 2 d. APpltcatton t.';treaI ist it .end c . ntr.id ry Rath*, Scale 3= Excellent 4' Very Good 3' Good ZfarNitAk Total Z9 I- 13 = overall average rating (above) 2 s Poor 1R Viry Poor X Not Applicable 26 JAMES E SCOTT CO,V,TNI-I- AS$ 4006.10 d..111 411110.406011.6. .— (Core Agency) The funds requested will ht1p Lo t functions of J.E.S.C.A. To rtct tho organization and to help maintain i. 14v1 ot They anticipate employing a bookkeeper. Request.. $19,134for 19;5-76 STAFF j The staff can not substantiate funding admihistrao (.6;ts They are receiving $192,150 from Lmited Way for the operation.; tr existing programs. In addition, the clientele would rrirlarili of non -City of Miami residents of !ode l Citios. RECOMMENDED FUNDING S 0 • 1 JAMES E SCOTT COUNII ASS, (COre Agency) 1 The funds requested will hclp (pdod t!et. functions of 3.E.S.C.A. To rect t wint: organization and to help maintain Lhi ot They anticipate employing a cicric:11-t.ypi, _ i : bookkeeper. Request.. $19,134 for 19;5-76 1 1 • The staff can not substantiate funding admihistrati4.r They are receiving $192,150 from (Jolted Way for theopen)tions ot: 0 existing programs. In addition, the c—entei(? would prilj, (T non -City of Miami residents of Yodel Cities. RECOMMENDED FuNDING $ 0 tCY /PROGRAM TITIa Wi .S.C.A. /Core A encc' OVERALL AVNRAGE 1(A 11`G 1 Re ;grated F'uttdingt $ 19.134.00 tvaltutlon Crite ria 1. ADDroDriateness af' Program a. EliaibjI tv of program b. Demographic Need_ _ LL Ratings__ 2. Proaratn implementation_ a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Settinn c. Method©lo¢y v*untllr.4: Staff Con ,merits 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs & b. Client Follow• -up -4 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 4 f 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budet d. Application 3 Rating Scale 5= excellent 4= Very Good 33 Gond Total 2= Poor 1= Very Poor X= Not Applicable 12 = overall average rating (above) 2b SI TY Sf.CM,STULT oN!,41Nir.' (Dt. Martin Luther Kin,i MAY.. AftHix •;1„0-f.; This organieation I .8 the communit7-l-as4.d r;;otYirlt!n,.; .;;;ncv I, t ,:evC,-;,•-r,t of hr. Martin Luther King Bauievard ind ; ' provide: citizen participation in dp,T1c,im,,nz the citizenry and the city; a center 0: intorr,; , r for area residents. Request$67,000 for 1975-76 * The funding provided in FY 1974-7:'. thele;i funds for the African Square project Clartio Luther r7:t1.• 11.;„ • .',7 •.21t1,7, STAFF N?RATE This program results from a re-oroaniz3tion th Ur. Boulevard Development Corporation, and is ro (TPr.r..r(71 t" • ' , t t ' The proposal is for the creation L:f new 3,.-iminn-ti0r • elc-;sy will primarily be to act as "coordirltors- for• ra!•• • Information tnd assistance - related to property acculsltlor - related to relocation prot!eris - in planning and design • , Participation ir planninle g an impment0f aticn - Dr. Martin Luther King Boulevard - African Square Park Of the funding requested, 100would he directed toward &d,-inisIrLv, cc. - and would cause an implied expectation for future cuncpr, This organization should seek funding fror Community Dey2.1-5-': - *- the City and County. RECOMMENDED FUNDMG = $ 0 AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLES OVERALL, AVCIAG; 62nd. St. (:tnmrunity bevy Cori,./M.i .K. Blvd. - .\iw rsrr lue nd F'Wfdings $ 67,00n. �n t: ,;I •r! , i 1 ._i • Criteria ',steno's of Program a. EI1atbiltty of Projram b. Demographic Need. 2. Prosram Implementation a. Identification of Program Objective s b. Realistic. Goal Setting c. Methodology 1 Ratite i 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's_ Needs 1 b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost ,per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio -r- c. Administration 9 5., Administrative Functions a. Staff 9uslifications b. Site or Facility c. Budge. d. Application 1 .pin llernt s Rating '-‘le 5= Dicce11 d= Very G(ud 3= Good 2= Poor Is Very Poor X g Not Applicable Total j r - overall zvr►ra;. rating (above) 3U 1 1 1 1 %EOEND: �1 MODEL ClTrES '. EDISON PARK/LITTLE RIVER 3 ALLAPATTAM •, wrNwOOD $ Cu.MER MAK ft CENTRAL r LIME NAVANA COCONUT G OVE if COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET 31 '10141.111111111•111_ 1 1 1 1 • • tARGET AREA *2 ISOPARK/L170. P.NR tDtNT1ftED CRITICAL NEEDS 1. Economic Programs Health Programs '4( Mousing Programs Recreation Programs 2. Child Care Programs Crime Prevention Programs Elderly Programs ',ore Youth Programs 7.1.; .," ;: tfl c . . iirY1 7rOPCT. • 4:'"''"ommil4111111Mommommommimmmmmow----------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r tr EDIs it' HELP_ coVni',".ITV coi N.-7:ft_ TN( (Sports Development Program) Will train low-inc000 youngsters, ages nino thrur11 in :it sports, such as ultimo and golf, with physical ochicotion rerreaticn instructors and located in City park facilities. Request S75,1100 for 1975-76 STAFF NAPRA7:'.T. This program involved 350 young people in varied sports for a total cost per child cf S28.57. Recommended .erdi!- serving 400 young people at a cost of S50.00 per c:r17d. l'Cre in cost per child allowance would permit acquisition cf equipment and participant insurance, as well as a small e(pans:ion of Etlf , foflow3: • Personnel • S10,000 • Equipment S 1,0C)C.1-, • Participant Insurance- S 4,000.0C • Administrative Over- head $ 6,000.00 ;. The program emphasizes fundamental skill development and good and de-emphasizes competition. Further, the program provides an orcrized approach for channeling youthful energies into worthwhile iursuits. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $20,000 A CY/PA00 TITL OVERALL A t RACig RATING ti )!tM Deve:r, nt Prc1gratt► es d Pleading: $ 75,ono,00 Rec,)Mtnetided l'u dln.t: ,n() a. ,Eliatbility of Program ? ?lrii:lc? in, lyric r, r� i� h.t:•t iri7,1:1tS b. Demographic Need +roiram Implementation a. Identification of Program. Objective • b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology .J c aw•,,., i b% 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Went fication of Client's Needs b. Client Fot1ow•up 4. Efficiency of Service. Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. %pplicatioa 2 Unreal ist is pities Sole Ss Excellent 4s Very Good 3s Good Total Zs Poor 1s Very Poor X= Not Applicable 32 i- = overa►il averagv rating (above) rD7SOR-1.1TTLE RIVPPSELPfliEtr Cr,TYTNITY cflr i!, (Pre -School Day c,-,r() Will provide day care services to chrtil, families in the Edison -tittle Slyer nrc..,. Hours are from 7110 a.M. to 3:00 p.m. Request - $172,000 for 1975-76 STAFF.NARATIY This program provided services tc twenty -ore ci,i;dr,- recommended funding level would permit a cortir,,atin i VC, r. of service is not recommended, in that othr, chil- -r. pi - 4 N.E. 3rd. Ave. and 61 st. Street, and 2nci z,P. In providing funoing, the followinu co,-i', c, 'r: the FY 1975-76 contract: • Development of a sllOira fP, -,,;t . • Expansion of hours of c,:ertich • Implementation of child ;',ve'le7)erlt of child's progress Funding for periods following F-Y 1975-7 shol cessful implementation of the foregoing conditions. RECOMMENDED FUNDING - ItAfb n-1411004'-' H;C- AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE: 1 j OVERALL. AVERAGE IiATINC ! 2. is cm=Lfttlt River S.H.C.C./Pie>Schonl Program Rtvuested Funding! $ 172,000.00 1. Aopronrtateness of Protrarn a. Sdirctbttit rt of Protit b. Demolraahtc Need Protr&tn Implementation a. Identification of Program. Ob'ectives b. Realistic Goal Setting a c. Methodolo, t Rec° dinend•A I�.1r�r,�r.: �� ,;rwir,.t)i) 3. Effectiveness of Service a. I entificatibn of Client's Need s i b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiecx of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 5. Administrative Functions AL. Staff Qualification b. Site or Facility c. 8udset d. Application Unreali Itata` Scale Total 3f, 3s Excellent Z i Poor 4s Very Good 1= Very Poor 3= Good X= Not Applicable 2. overall average. rating (above ati , A (Projprt This program proposes to reach young perSOnr tf° 1 1 .11'd 7 as individuals and within vagrant gro,T, nnl ws.1 persons isolated from the mainstream of ,.cni:tr,!c•Hyo through group and Otewlo-Ote tOUtiselinr The area of emphasis will be within thi.-• Request - $73,000 for 1975-7h Benefits to date from previous $19,9nn arn --t - vide any indication as to 4nitia' success. The program provided by this agency, and tst-: drc,4,41r7 ,sr provided, show a redundancy with the Edisnn ttti:,er ' Council's own Project Re -Entry (funded h tlan;,:orer. -o * (funded by City of Miami Social Sc,rvirms Consequently, thi:. program should to Pe-Entry. RECOMMENCED rND:NG S A3ENCY/PROGRAM T1TL: OV RALL. AVERAGE RA .NG L2 0 Bison -Little diver S.M.C,C.1E'ro'e(, (.; .n.P.i'.P. Re Vestt i 'finding: $ 75,flflo.Of tit.aff A DroDrtataness_of Pro ram a. Eligibility of Program_ b, Demographic Need 1 1 1 1 1 WOO. - 2. Pro/ram Impletnentatian a. Identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology w-- 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Ne:ce =1 b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service !Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 1 S. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application ExcvS,i1'1' Rating Scale 5= Excellent 4 = Very Good 3= Good Total 2 2= Poor 1= Very Poor X= Not Applicable j itti ;vtyra:I ave rai rating (above) 38 9d. EJUSC/i-1.jr11...E11vF';;; ; A ' • ',A (Yout hI cc A prevention program designed to ilp citieens, Will provide information and reor areas of employment, education, oco:11r,!c Request - $75, 00 for 1975-76 • : ST;FF This program is not presently and applicable agency and the,efcre Source. The staff saw little evidence rP' activities, other than the Mini-govc,rn!7ert • vention programs are excellent in :nncep4, constructive and structured aC!'iVitirS. P is based on: - elimination of one non-predwItivc .arf Dositinn - establishment of sliding - cee snlo to genet-44., reduction of unrealistic e)penses ;telernrne, 4i' ,t" travel, and administrative overhead - consolidation of all youth services (S.7.0.t7.D..7'., and Project Youth) Future funding should be conditional upon eviderce of A" service delivery. RECOMMENDED FUNDING $50.000 38 AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLEteM Reiuested Funding: $ 70no.on Evaluation Grants ADDrobriateness of Program a. Eligibility of Proiparn b. ,Pemoiputatic Need OVERALL AVERAGE RATING LJ •, 2. law lam Implementation a. Identification of Program Objective b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology . Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's iNeeest 1 b. Client Follow-up 1 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration .`-iteff Cori;m-nts irnii MOO ...' ' • ; (t r 5. Administrative Functions a. Staff Qualifications b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. Application 3 1 Rating Scale Total -34 1 f 14 7 ovor:.11 avcragt rating (above) Sx Excellent 2x Poor 4= Very Good IX Very Poor 3= Good X= Not Applicable -'" . , • 1 1 1 1 IENO MODEL CITIES 11:0ISON PARK /uTTLE etivE4 $ ALLAPATTAN 4 iremN*000 4ULMER ?Mest 4peiNTNAL 1 iTTLE tem*Na • COCONUT GROVE 7 r 1 a t i SS w 3 01 1004 Ile CO 1r 1:132 II 1 t' 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREAS 000 0.0.000 7,00400, 7 1' I' 3 3 4 11. ' j 4 / ... --........ ... 1. 0.. 1, \ 7 0 k ... t 'it / kik 90. 4', • '..... • 41 TARGET AREA *1 - ALLAPATTAH IDENTIFIED CRITICAL NEED§. 1. Mousing Programs Youth Programs Y I ar;fV.t:th Prolr,:r sh 2. Child Care Programs Cultural Programs M. - ; -.r ');r. k017,1tions Elderly Programs Yne Health Programs A.c.qe VA. 18a. YMCA-i'LLAPATTAH BRi.ViCH (After School Youth In collaboration with Cmmunitv Mt,nt;11 1tIttAi t.ryte: the YMCA proposes to reach 100 lot./..i! • • ;,1 projects or elsewhere in the neihborht,o,1 the children will ho involved in r:ructuri. viied by a group iendor• Behavior ot r i.pdnt - be monitored by a psychiatic soe1.21 worker wit1, treatment being offored by Cnviunity ;:enLai Request- $72,637 for 1975-76 1 STAFF NARRAT:VE 1 Present funding levels, in conjunction with Community Mental Health Team, do rot nr.cossit tr,0 )(7, funding. The funds requested wouln be picsid (Community Mental Health) and would not !_vcviiie (?ss71 accountability. This counseling activity existing After School Recreation Program. RECOMMENDED FUNDING = $ 0 r AGENCY/PROGRAM TITLE, ©VERAL� Y.M.f.A. Alla atah %ranch • After Schonl Youth Progr AVRHAG; ATING t 3, 1,1 WNW Reluested Funding: $ 72,E+37.v0 ADronriateness of Proirarn a. o1 Program b. Demotraphic.1aed Recommended Fund►ntg: a Z. Program Implementation a. identification of Program Objectives b. Realistic Goal Setting c. Methodology 4 3. Effectiveness of Service a. Identification of Client's Needs b. Client Follow-up 4. Efficiency of Service Delivery a. Cost per Client b. Staff/Client Ratio c. Administration 5 „� 1:7 3 1 1 S. Administrative Functions a. Staff 4Wleltftuitions 2 b. Site or Facility c. Budget d. 5 2 4DPUcaf[oa 3 Staff no:led that the :LP, 3n8 clients served during 1Y74-7 5 were served at a cost per client of only $2.93; therefore, 1975-7E; per client cost:: are extremely high. satin Scats i'. Ss teeltsoM 4s Very Good 3s Good Total t= Poor 1e Very Poor Xe Not Applicable 44 f- 14 = overall average rating (above) 44 L ERV rRs'SOCIAPROGREV RNS GITY MANAGER'S OFFIC6 CITY OF MIAMI.TLOIDA 197 SEPTEMBER ` 1 on i J *hi • t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ii,or it,jC r,i tii' .'r1 p 1 • 0 • • •1 ) r 4 , 1.e 4 : . t. , t. 141 • 4, : *.*. .ith1 •I . '5" 1.4 '44t14:4 p 1 • • • 1 1 • • • • • • INTRODUCTION 1*1 `-• t ' • .1 , • • : r.:r • r ' ' • 1(.44(‘1 iP 4,4 t 4 ,'‘ • le;),irt! t -.: • • : . • • ,• ;,, , . • • 9 • . "r'i • 4 • 111 s: ! • .4:1 ' 0 , . . , • , ,, . :. i • 1 -', r t-r:i i•..,;: ,,. ,...„ . .. • : I 1 ' ;r. • :„ • ' 1-1 1 : • , -,,-,..,' - ,rt r. --: • : • ;.•-•: . , • • • , •:., : :. ; i : . ••,..., • • • 0 a 1 ••, I ;,, 1..• ' f " : • t ; .,1 • ,• • • • !I ',.. •r; 4 t j.•S ' t,r) t :11 1 1 $ • • V i lnri ;t•--; t t'..ii ; y } t.+,ie. ""In '1• f t •r y 1 • }• r, (`C1:11 Sf + [4t S(1('iA1 CF?t'•.'i(- tl";e rvf' iserhicv f • • • • 0 • s•r;' • Y r. ( ri3 r (fir; • t.: �� :y;1 • )' i str • ••1h t • ir. 40t.,,r•: ',r•h, Ig��71f`�E'� r'Fr,Ur,tf?'t • '411 It. it!'to) Car, l' �:1, , hcil•7�'r1. ,i. • • • • 0 1 METHODOLOGY • t i, • tsr• • k‘• ; • ,• • , Way s 1r • UP ;".11 I' . • f*,,e pr e'.i•••• • :* ;di t•t•okic , !kit. • •,• 7 ..„•, Ile ;." fi( "••••• tHr.,4r.•1 t•• !N", „;t1',1 4 p SI • or • • t*C:). .1 I r" :t" '7. it • 4., ".t1. 1 iiy • • t • ; r . ;,„; •1.• ' istre' 0 .! „••.; ,;-••• v. r* ‘;'.‘• (tr. V tit "r 1tin, " . • „ • i)f c.,, ;•• .1%. (% '91111111111mmilmnr - p 1 • 0 so • • • • ... t, • • ; • • ' ,`• • ! '1. tn'• ".' • r y.„0,: • ' • t •t: - ; t i s • • • EVAL.UAT IONS • • • • • • • • • • • V,; t t+ A.-t1v:lot t j r ',on Assc • . "L • rr' 31 j i • A:1(:fus. in( ?. t r�rir�,�;,�•r r!(�a i t.h wir; r(Iio1 '01,i,r, S tsar•".,i(y K`car Op,, t • ''6i';t? i t'. :i�, t c?1`7 ,3r1i Itt}At` \' t,l (lilrt i t' i i`lli i IPPt?rfrANi1 fir'( 1 ine b) FA-Ofenle, ery � c; ,-eH ly Day Carr `o s tie, iR 1 Crafi+0r':k G; :MCA • ;1 �t �'•1O^ • C,J4tr. `*-•c:'1age • • r; • 1g. • • • • w.... .......1----• s. • cCG;►:; r ,:,PC', F • w s!a 6! 0$ • 63 CI i - - H rt r t ?CGS 69 Y� hrt t' d COM Murf E T Y DEVELOPMENT TARGET AREAS IP 11 TARGET AREA • mr,DEL CIT:iS • • • • ;;1iNIIFIED CRITICAL WRY; Fecteat-wr Proc drIK ... AGENCY Ln11:, c,irc Pror.“-an- iTograa,s. . t';0;! How jr1 Programi,t ',ecuri!y ‘oti;h irotiraps 4 • • . • • • • • • . ..... . • Prograws..... ...... . ........ yo6tr Hrpinvp.pw. Services ano. .Ath !-strret- werKers NOT ' :77`f,t !ZED: .r .A. Ex•• - • ' ''r 7S.:.A. f-nt Ywals Pro(lralll - Frogrlr (i.�' 11y !it 1 . t' r' • it 1 1Ct :. ,! • , ,t .. 1 1 it . C ! t 1 t tT 11 t i IS