HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-75-0914I,I `_3OLUi l,r4 Nu. 7 -914
A PI SOLUTION Al_l(l_ATI'v6 S3,r#?5.07;!? rPn`., TH
SP= C EA[ 9SEIGATI '; f ,PIT ! Irl.,P0.; *Nr �) < li iii
Flit) - I11Li.LOCAt7i ".r:<<<.'!'yi In THE CONVENTION
c,.NtEG, rrn,rCTr TO r,lT P E.,rY AVAILABLE co
iNt.
BE IT P,L.SO1_VED BY THE CO•1" ISSIO."I OF THE CITY OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The sicl of S3,025,000 is hereby allocated from
the Special Obligation Capital Irproverent Bond Fund - Unallocated Account
to the Convention Center Project to supplement available construction funds.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26 day of SEPTEMBER
1975.
APPFO/ED AS TO FOR7'.1 AND CORRECTNESS:
0,,� r
tlhn S. t I oyd City Attorney
p t.
ATTEST: H, D. SOUTHERN
CITY CLERK
MAURICE A, FERRE
MAYOR
fr
elfY Of' !`:A+A,, fLOFilt)11
INttif•tP~FICE MLMORANDUM
tttn
Honorable Members of
the City Commission
P. W. Andrews
City Manager
t 1if
SEP 2 b 1971
Consultant Recommendation:
Miami Convention hall
As directed by Commission Resolution # 7 5- i 12 of July
31, 1975, the administration has evaluated the pro-
fessional qualification:: of design teams considered
capable of providing, professional services for then
design, preparation of contract documents, and con-
struction supervision of the :Miami Convention Ball.
Based on this evacuation, three design teams are
recommended and ranked in order of preference,
based on their qualifications to undertake this project.
It is requested that the Commission authorize the
administration to begin fee /scope of services nego-
tiations with the first -ranked firm.
BACKGROUND
The Miami Convention Hall will be located on a 5-acre site on the banks of
the Miami River at 5. E. 4 Street and S. E. 2 Avenue. The construction
budget is $9, 5 million (including fees) and will require an additional $1 million
for equipping the facility. It is visualized as a functional facility to serve the
needs of regional conventions and will further the City's objectivies of fostering
Downtown as the vital center of the City and region, of further enhancing our
important tourist industry and of immediately bolstering local construction
acti vity.
CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
As directed by the City Commission, invitations to render professional services
were sent to approximately 360 local architectural firms on August 12, 1975n
A public notice was also advertised in local newspapers. The solicitation from
the City asked potential respondents to form design teams, including a complete
array of design professionals, capable of delivering a completed facility ready
for occupancy in approximately two years
Page 1 of 3
flonorable Members'
the City Commission
EP 2 1975
Thirty-two letters ,Pf interest were received from design teams and have been
reviewed by the Selection Committee, which was appointed by the City Manager,
in accordance with procedures and criteria set forth by the Florida Consultants'
Competitive Negotiation on Act of 1973. The Selection Committee was impressed
with the quality of the material presented and the professional competence
represented by the design teams. All of the design teams emphasized a local
lead architectural firm. Based on capability-; ability and adequacy of personnel;
pest record and experience and location; nine design teams were judged to more
closely meet the criteria to undertake this assignment.
The Selection Cotntnitte•e personally interviewed all nittt' design teams on
September 17, 1975. Criteria utilized in the interviews included the ability
of professional personne'l;pastperf. rrean'e; willingness to meet time and
budget requirement.,; location; recent, current and projected work loads of
the teams and the volume of work previously awarded to the team members.
The recommendation of the Selection Committee was primarily based on three
Considerations: a) the demonstrated experience of the team in designing
convention or related facilities; b► the capability of the local lead architectural
firm of the design team to design the convention facility: and c) the ability of
the team to meet time and budget constraints. The Committee's recommenda-
tion was submitted to the City Manager who conducted additional interviews on
Wednesday, September 2.1, 1975, which were concluded at 6:00 P. M. that day.
RECOMMEN DA TION
The City Manager requests authorization to commence fee/scope of service
negotiations with the architectural firm and associated members of his design
team in the order listed:
1. Morris Lapidus, associated with Steward and Skinner
Carr Smith and Associates (Engineers)
Sasnett Engineering
C. Basch (Construction Management)
Harry Draper, Francis Vickers (Convention Management)
Travel Consultants, Inc.
Charles Boner (Acoustics)
2. Ferendino, Grafton, Spillist Candela Associates, with Ronald
Frazier Associates
Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates (Landscape)
Kent Associates (Convention Management)
Bolt, Berenak and Newman (Acoustics)
3. Connell/Metcalf & Eddy
David Scully Associates (I.- dscape)
Page 2 of
Honorable Members of the Cite Commission
Louis C. Owen (Conve.,, ►r n'Management)
Ectinotnic Research Ass-r iatr.s
Other c'c'yign trains jttdtiteerl to meet the criteria to undertake this+ assignmertt are
listed in alphabetical order as followst
Ch-irles Associates, Inc., associated with Welton Becket and
Associates anrl t).avirl Cabarrocas
11. .t. itcfss AFseeiates 4%:►.gineersi
Teri l'.tl:ter Group t(AtiriscapeI
William I.. E'innin (Convention ;Management)
Steven T. L.owelt (Food Service)
George Thomas Howard Associates (Audio -Visual)
Hatcher. 7eigler, Gunn_ & Associates. associated with Finch lleer
Architects and Engineers and iiorroto and I.ee
H. J. Ross (Engineers)
Walter Taft Bradshaw and Associates (Landscape)
Friis and Moltke (Interior Design)
Pancoast Architects and ►iouterselBorrellilA1baisa Associates with ARCOH
DeZarrage and Donnel, Inc. (Structural)
David Volkert (Mechanical and Electrical)
}tows, F ettlehut and Pirich I Landscape)
J. A. Condon (Construction Management)
Hammer, Slier and George (Economics)
Warren Travers (Traffic)
Jaffe (Acoustics)
Evans and Hillman (Lighting)
Rader and Associates, associated with Welton Becket and Associates
Walter Taft Bradshaw (Landscaping)
Smith. Vorach, Havet, Haynie Partnership. associated with Vincent Kting
Partnership
Stressau, Smith and Steward ( Landscape)
Watson, Deutschman, Kruse, i..von
Jonathan Seymour (Landscape)
Page 3 of 3
1
il.CARR SMITH ASSO.
lITRIptITURAL ENGIN€EfiG
IVIL ENGINEERING
'TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
• •
1 CASNETT ENGINEERtNO
ELETRICAL ENGINEERiNG
MECPANICAL ENGINEERING
CITY COMMISSION
AND
CITY ADMINISTRATION
E A M
L S
I1AOD D. STEwARD • Acitcpqit
MOWN' LAPIDUS •ATICHITECT
CT
JAMES E. GARLAND ARCHITECT
PROJECT DiRECTOR
JERRY STEWARD
COORDINATOR
JOSEPH FARM'S ARCHITECT
WARREN WUERTZ ARCHITECT
E . ALEX MARTIN ARCHITECT
WINSTON GARNER PE.
LEONARD GLAZER •
JOHN SASNETT PE.
JAMES VOSS LANCSCAPE A.
DAVID PLUMMER PE. -
TRAFFIC ENG.
CITY ST
OWNER DESIGNATED
SPECIAL ADVISORS
•
. •
• *I if-
/ • ".-, 44•47:".. t :10
10R.CHAPLES
BONER •
frusTics
v-
MC. BASCH
COST ANALYSIS
CONST. MANAGEMENT
FOR PRE•PuNCHAaNG
•
• . k • • .•
ARRY DRAPER
coNveNrioN HALL
MANAGER
•••
FRANCIS VICKERS
CONVENTION MALL
MANAGER
t•I •
•4.111111••••
I • • •
TRAVEL
CONSULTANTS, NC.
USER 7
1:•it."11!"11.1."4%
ti . /4460
'• • 4' 4i
9 1 ,,
• *
• • •
•• • •