HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-084046
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
A
4/i6
ORDINANCE N0 -8404
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 64 OP THE
CODE OP THE CITY oP MIAMI, PLoRIDA,
(ORDINANCE NO, 8,301) 1 PRoV/IDINd PoR
Mot1FiCATIoN8 To: (1) WAIVE PERMITTING
REQUIREMENTS Fo1 TREE REMOVAL NECESSAW VoR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE oft 00oD HUSBANDRY,
(2) PROVIDE
THAT THE CITY MAY. BEAR THE COST OF' TRANSPLANT-
IMO TREES WITHIN THE CITY, AND (3) SIMPLIFY -
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING ALL
oRDINANCES0 CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN
CONFLICT INSOFAR AS THEY, ARE IN CONFLICT; AND
CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY PROVISION,.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at, its,
Meeting of April 2, 1975, Item No. A, following an advertised
hearing, adopted. Resolution No. PAB 30-75 by a 4 to Q vote (3
16
members absent) recommending amendments to Chapter 64 of the
17 Miami City Code entitled Environmental Preservation (Ordinance
18 No. 8301) as hereinafter set forth; and
19 WHEREAS, the Commission deems it advisable and in
20 the best interest of the City of Miami and its inhabitants to
21 amend said ordinance as hereinafter set forth;
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION
23 I OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
24
25
26'
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Section 1. That Chapter 64 of the Code of the
City of Miami, Florida, (Ordinance No. 8301) be, and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
1/ Words ricken through shall be deleted, Underscored words
constitute the amendment proposed, Remaining provisions
are now ineffect and remain unchanged,
36
Asand earsgrapb (2) a title as
A tree surrey prepared by a *gat iatere�i land §ufveyar.
�h) � � airi suf
C ahs�, al tit, location et all Altting
�
trews up es the buildakie area andt a yi�rd aseea of :V
the entire. site. Tree information
ar
in legend fors and shall contain tli6 tiatt�+abi2e ana thelocation of all trees and landscape fe met �3e�t
site. Od a. of �: a� ,leas t:�ln t'1tr 4 ( )
e•dee�.�
may o
y ed as el a, with the .exception t? at
arty tree. 'itli a trttnk. diameterdsix inches et tibrt
best be ,, editieadesignated.
lly-. desig
areas on VA i develc� rent activity or.
�Cii large-site-thi�lt�i
� `.,
tree, removal is to occur. on only portion. or
the t* -4 urea... . • :we . ghat? .. P�tett de. tkt�sd.. toOrtitt:et
01 the- site, which will not be aNf: cte v theti velot-.
tt1ent at the rettoval ar ti`t!?t
assistant shall detertzittte the §Ot tp�i�' extent .df the
•
tree susvew.
Section 64-5. - AND CONDITIONS voR TREZ .RLIMV L CRZT'LRIA
(b) (2) as.
�olLc wsr
I f ' im cactical...to- relocate a tree- which
(b) must bP-.
(2) . it• is�. ram., or, the s its ;- the City may require that the
ed. and reolatted on City -owned rOb"rt"
tree ba' • resso'v
at. the Citv's a epenss.
Section 64-17 -EXClinTONS
Add new paragraphs (d) and (e): as follows:
d For all rooe within- the City when the_ removal or
i i relocation of a trees is necessary for 1and3cnoe•
maintenance or ordinary c ardenina and involves no
develooneet; activity on the subs ct site. the
ap,ol.ic-atiort reuvirements in Section 64 8 verrnittinc
procedures in Section 64-7 and, the fees in Section F4-1t
shall be waived by the Administrative Assistantto the
Environmental Preserration Review Board. All ` con-
siderations under tlli't caraarach shall be initiated by
the orooertY owner. The Administrative Assistant
shallmake an on Site inspection and render ' a prorrot
decision within three. workinc days. Any relocation:'
or real of a tree shall be consistent with intent
of the chanter and the standards and criteria set forth
4 5edti fi 2: A11 ordihah es code eedtiofis, tit
6 parts thereof ih cohfliot herewith, ihsOifar as they are ih
6 conflict, are hereby repealed.
Section . If any sedtioh, sentehce, clause, phrase,
or word of this ordinance is for any reason held on declared
to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holdingor
10 invalidity shall not affect the temaihing portions of this
11 Ordinance, and it shall be construed to have been the intent
12 of the Commission of the City of Miami to pass this ordinance
13 without such unconstitutional, invalid, or inoperative part
14 therein, and the remainder ofthis ordinance, after the
15 exclusion of such part or parts shall be deemed and held to be
. 16
17
18
19 •
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-.29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
1
valid as if such parts had not been included therein
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this
day of ' APRIL 1975.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING BY
TITLE ONLY this 22 day of hy
CITY CLE
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
MICHEL E. ANDERSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
S . LLOYD
CITY ATTORNEY,
, 1975.
MAURICE A. FERRE
MAYOR
HOhorabie City Co iiisaion
Attention: Mr, P. W Andrews
City of Miami, Plorida
Gentlemen:
The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of April 2, 1975,
Item #A, following, an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No.
PAB 30-75 by a 4 to 0 vote (3 members absent) Recommending adoption
of amendments to Chapter 64 of the Miami City Code entitled Environ-
mental Preservation (Ordinance 8301)., providing for modifications
that would: (1) waive permitting requirements for tree removal
necessary for landscape maintenance or good husbandry;. (2) exempt
certain undesirable trees; (3) provide that the City may bear the
cost of transplanting trees within the City; (4) simplify applica-
tion requirements as set forth in the Planning Department recommenda-
tions shown on Pages 2 and 3 of the attached minutes.
An Ordinance to provide for this Amendment has been prepared by the
City Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City
Commission.,
April 8,:1975
re: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 64 Off` THE
MIAMI CITY CODE .. RECOMMENDED.
Environmental Preservation
(Ordinance 8301)
Initiated by Planning Department
cm
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
Planning Dept.
City Commission Tentative date:
j
nc
David Simpson, 3r., ector
Department,. of Adminis ration
Planning and Zoning Boards
April 22, 1975.
to Iloriorable Meril5ers of the
City Commission
eJ`ry of MiAt.'Pr, F LbtRibA
tNTE t-bfit`1 t MEMOkAhibtiM
*i 5
lien.' #7, City Com issiori Agend
May 2g, 1975
Ft1.Fel, i?ENCE5:
In accordance with the City Cott ndssion's request that a determination be tnade
whether certain major trees located in the proposed buildable area could be
relocated, a field inspection of the site by the City's landscape inspector resulted
in these findings:
All major trees located in the proposed building area including seventy
inch (70") ficus, and twenty-four inch (24") oak together with several
fruit trees could be relocated, provided suitable time (approximately
90 to 120 days) for root pruning and branch shearing is accomplished.
Since relocation is expected at this tirne when tree growth is greatest,
watering of the relocated trees should be continuous to further assure
their life expectancy.