Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-75-05093500 Pen AYSgricen brivb $, O. to* 3307L58 MiA�1I, 'tLO:. A 33i33 Mr. R. Ray Goode County Manager Metropolitan Dade County Room 911, Courthouse Miami, Florida 33150 Dear Mr. Goode: The Metropolitan Dade County Commission, on April 2, 1975, adopted on First Reading an ordinance which will delete the residency and geo- graphical requirements on membership on the Metropolitan Dade County Library Advisory Board. It is our understanding that a public hearing before the Metropolitan Dade County Commission on this ordinance will occur on May 21, 1975. I have researched the background from the City records relating to City of Miami representation on the Library Board at the time the City of Miami's library facilities were transferred, and I have obtained the opinion of the Miami City Attorney as to the legality of the proposed residency and geographical distribution change. A copy of the City Attorney's opinion is attached for your information. Also attached is a copy of your memorandum dated August 17, 1971, to the County Attor- ney which requested the original ordinance provisions relative to member- ship residency and geographical distribution. You will note this memo- randum confirms that these membership requirements were a part of the City -County negotiations. The proposed ordinance change eliminating the City of Miami representation on the Metropolitan Dade County's Public Library Advisory Board is a breach of the agreement between the City of Miami and Metropolitan Dade Mrs IL lay Goode County for the transfer of library facilities. 1 suggest that if the County ‘v shes to pursue the amendment of the Metropolitan Code concerning the rnernbersh p requirements for the Metropolitan bade County Library Advisory $oard, the justification for such a change be presented to the City of M arni. t requestthat no further action on this proposed change be taken unless the concurrence of the Mani City Cotntnissi.on is obtained, Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Members of the City Commission City Attorney Sincerely) P. W. Andrews City Manager Page 2 of 2 city bt= fmtANJI, F'Lt+RlbA iNtE t tFi=1a1r MtMtt4ANi 'hill t to. u p: ,W1. Andrews City Mattager John . Lloy44 ((littone ie May , .9 5 1 IL . MIA ,5 1 , 'u i ci Library Ai Vit' ylipag4 MftiOrthi0 i EFEREN::ES your memo 4/18/15• ENCLOSURES Zit your .Memoranduttt dated April 18, 1975, subject as above, yrsl requested a legal opinion as to the legality of the proposed unilateral action by the Board of County Commissioners, deleting the geographical distribution requirements of the Library Board membership, in light of the representations that were trade to the City of Miami in the transfer agreement which was attached to your memorandum. It appears that in addition to a breach of the transfer agreement the contemplated legislation by the Board of County Commissioners would violate the constitutional prohibition against the impairment, of obligations of contracts. Both the United States Constitution and the State Constitution forbid such impairments in express terms. Laws or ordinances which modify, abrogate or annul con tracts and affect adversely rights vested thereunder, impair contract obligations. The general rule is that a contract takes its character and accedes its obligation from the law in force at the time and place that it is made, and the rights acquired under it cannot be affected materially by a subsequent repeal or change of the law. Mcquillian Municipal Corporations, Section 19.42, Page 503. The only exception to the foregoing prohibition occurs in cases where ordinances are duly enacted under the police power and designed specifically to protect the safety and welfare of the public. The instant ordinance does not purport to have such a design. JSL • GFK: b3c cc; Honorable Members of the City Commission PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: f J�, Gorge F. 1:i".r, Jr. Assistant city Attorney I t):lor:i.hi_e ;:Ltuirt OUnt:r A totnt'y <<a k`I{' Dordt. .i Count tit_n �;bz' , • b t t tt;! J t. f .t,i- tl 1.6 y • 5`415b f.ticte.;t for Or ditl::nte Chc.tgiflzt County/t Pubfie Libt°arg td is of=j 1k .rd (Article X :I1; tOd hf :etrOolitati t t1 tbu i°t2) Boned on :''_dirtit2istr.eitivc discussions %rith the City of 'V.ia,li, and that Ci ty's; Pesolution Bo. 42709, adopted Jul;; 22, 1971, concerning the pending transfer Of the !Miami Department o; Libraries to the County, effective November 1, 1971, it uould be Appreciated if fcu would prepare aft appropriate ordinance for consideration by the Board at the August 31, 1971, meeting, amending Artit.le XXIt of the. Code, relating to the Public Library Advisory Board, as follows: 1. Provide for a 9 member Board with 5 of said members being residents of municipalities served by the County library system and 4 members being residents of the unincorporated areas. Of the 5 City residents, 3 shall be.: members of the City or Miami's Library Board,. nominated by the City of c?iaai Commission. This is generally in accordance ;rith Recommendation No. 7 of the Courtty's Public Library Paster Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners on May 29, 199. • The Ch :ir;.ian of the Board for the period of Uoverher I, 1971,' throuch October 31, 1972, ' ::ha11 be one of the City Library Board members,_ anpoi cited pursuant to Paragraph 1-above. 3. C:l:,r.ce itt required Quorum to majority of members. Chunj;cs to be effective iEovemb_r 1, 1971. Rt%G<: TV' : ig cc: Mr. L. Reese, City Mar, a5er, City c± 1'iiazr Mr. Edw_'_rd..0 Sintz, Director, i•iia i Public Library Mr. Williams Darcy, Administrative Assistant f'r. Richard Levine, Ch tir m-tn, Dade County Public Libras, :i AdvioTT