HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-75-0385•
P!! ,)',1f'r("', ). 75-385
;:'. ..;
( )!i', C). rI'J!'. ! 1•.
'!'l.)'i't1t.,
0 ")? , i0 . 00 ,
C..l'f.•i 'L:.) (•�t� ,'�'I:.:�l_�'t,
iJ.r.�lLl i•:AC'_CEEOIT COP.PO't'.lC).',
J:..0`' �:...._C):. S i•:.....:, i,11T_ '.). '
a 1,1 i:G AN;) I):CC:''!.l l:t_ CITY' 11AliGit L•.
r t "J r CT r t r (r, L-, , f S ;) ) " ! r: \' T r't
��t..i i'_ L,..!: 1L.,� i.It.,CtL� �JT..':; T.)...'.�.'ii�, !,.! TO
:ISSUE PURCHASE O RU ;a5 FO ':' iT ; s'oui Ci• NT;
ALI,O,.A!. (.!-C FUNDS t''O., riArliS PURPOSE U,:it.', }.•110; THE
POLICE UEA1;QCiaz?r2Ft S C_':? E E?RF,ir,; ;T.1O :
FACILITIES BONDS-, rALLOCATING
$1. 5 , 000 .00 FOR CITY" F02.CFS, TO COVER EXTRA
COSTS FOR DEVELOPMENT, INSTALLATION O AND
C:iEC < OUT 07 THE PROTECTIVE SYSTEN .
• s , hPublic •� r Ereceived
WHEREAS, pursuant to �`<c,:_?_c•_ h:i.ca..i �):.I+••c.:
on February y 18, 1975 ):or. the .ril r•. ? r 0f,,•rC.!., J) ,.: R'i i.IE ; :i PROTECTION
i..i,_ TtON
SYSTEM in the 400 N.
}nd T+v gnu ; and
1•ri1=AS r
Cray
W is C:'t:`'?1 i i ::. 1-_
Ai)T
Burns lei enat .).
Burn
s
J oh rt::, ort
I-1 i d i' :I.0 :
$03,5.rt
2.0:7 70'4:.
325,c 1_5
342 ,1:22
37<<,G22
r ` ,r,r,
639,800
*23'-)
_i.J.)
i90
,3/)
235,797
203,070
2 0.,27U
415,728.50
513,525
Lnbor
,_
I�st.�r!:a�.ec; i;rin�
miintenao.ce
98,329
89,0_I8
.l.:; 3,3S?
:1.30,3 52
051;:iil
: !_/.ii,27 J
the_ t, `'1 'r L c• v, - - i.+ ,1; C,-. 1: ' it z) i' .:i C! ,' tot,: 11 con tract
1?l t)1._ �� 1C. ii,� Qrrr. a't"., �i...);iC;c:�l., „2C.. __i.''t_}.l. C, -
iii' ±..c' .: r` o 1 2 / 5 , 7 0L: r:c)i/� � , i. t. 't rl !fl ✓%') ':i l : l t i.. iVt:• �) i.'c Lo ' it :l
m•_Li:t(Lei1G�ri'..•'e training co!.! C•'=;,7:s, t'c;c hrti:'. 1. T;'.::!i:l:. .!.:. , Z!r i first
:c :)1:LC::.....'ni: :i;:r•'Ls arc an ..:':cl:L t ! :) 1 _.I. r2% 090 . c!Tetc.en 'a
are ' :3'_ n i.:).z:._ , th•.. actual total , 7r .
CITY COMMISSI.ON
MEETING OF
APR 2 21975
RESOj.UT►ON NQ..,/.73p.o5r
REMARKS:
•
and
WHEREAS, the foregoing six (6) bids were carefully
reviewed by the Stanford Research Institute and the Miami Police
Department who, with the concurrence of the City Manager, .
decided that the bid submitted from WACKENHUT CORPORATION
was the most advantageous bid received; and
WHEREAS, time is of the essence in acquiring this
critical component of the new building which is to insure the
safety of personnel as well as to protect essential communications
and computer activities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The bid received from WACKENHUT CORPORATION
for furnishing a Protection System for the Miami Police Depart-
ment be, and is hereby, accepted at a price of $275,704.00, plus
$22,000.00 to cover the cost of training courses, technical
manuals and first year's replacement parts for a total contract
price of $ 297 , 704.00 .
Section 2. The additional amount of $15,000.00 is
hereby allocated for City Forces, to cover extra costs for
development, installation and check out of the Protective System.
Section 3. The City Manager be, and he is hereby,
authorized to enter. into a contract with WACKENHUT CORPORATION
for the implementation of the Protection System.
Section 4, The City Manager be, and he is hereby,
authorized and directed to instruct the Purchasing Department
to issue Purchase Orders for this equipment; allocating funds
for this purpose from the Police Headquarters and Crime
Prevention Facilities Bonds,
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of APRI1.
1975.
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
1 �
Mikele Carter
Assistant City Attorney
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
11
Lrdohn S. Lloyd - City Attorney
r.
,111'
75-385
t ' f 1
; • • ;
:•., ••.s.
12•••,1
••• • •::•••.,
Piz:LC!: 0
;•,;)
OF T!:,
1‘,111 Cf'!7•,"
PLIf:CA5L-02, TO
FuNos pa.;
ItEAD-)LIARTES
FACILITIES 130TY71;. FURTI:',7.: ALLOCATING
$15,000.00 I.3 CITY F!.(2:T.•:S, TO COY:A!
CO::.;TS FO:). DV7,L01.?N!...!..NT, INSTALLATION 2\i..1)
CNECK OUT 07 TUE P1LOT.CTIV2, SYSTE2.
WEICAS, pwrF:x.AtIL. 'co hi(1-1 recciw10
on Febt-uctry 1S, 1975 vaot:wiroa
sysTIA in "),-“:
folIoi:j 116.;
• ?
379,02?
;.; , 3 f.
c_! , 00
!".. • • ;
. _
(J 0
235797
203)(;70
2r,0,270
415,723.50
513,525
mr..4ntc,..aao.ct.1
Co
.12 f , 275
thc! 1)riclui7; of ;f
0!.!:.); a "1oL,t1 contr,Lct
pf *27,70f:; 1:1‘ op:.!eatur. ari:J
,c;v1 f.:1•:•;:;L
p:trt•:.; aa f;inc:o Octrlt
tiv• Oc:/,7(.1q.
"DOCUMENT INDEX
ITEM
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
APR 2 2 1975
RESOLUTION NO..
REMARKS:
•
and
WHEREAS, the foregoing six (6) bids were carefully
reviewed by the Stanford Research Institute and the Miami Police
Department who, with the concurrence of the City Manager,
decided that the bid submitted from WACKENHUT CORPORATION
was the most advantageous bid received; and
WHEREAS, time is of the essence in acquiring this
critical component of the new building which is to insure the
safety of personnel as well as to protect essential communications
and computer activities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The bid received from WACKENHUT CORPORATION
for furnishing a Protection System for the Miami Police Depart-
ment be, and is hereby, accepted at a price of $275,704.00, plus
$22,000.00 to cover the cost of training courses, technical
manuals and first year's replacement parts for a total contract
price of $ 297 , 704.00 .
Section 2. The additional amount of $15,000.00 is
hereby allocated for City Forces, to cover extra costs for
development, installation and check out of the Protective System.
Section 3. The City Manager be, and he is hereby,
authorized to enter into a contract with WACKENHUT CORPORATION
for the implementation of the Protection System.
2
Section 4. The City Manager be, and he is hereby,
authorized and directed to instruct the Purchasing Department
to issue Purchase Orders for this equipment; allocating funds
for this purpose from the Police Headquarters and Crime
Prevention Facilities Bonds.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22 day of APRIL
1975.
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
(Al
Miele Carter
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
%, 'John S. Lloyd - City Attorney
' a4
H. D. , UTHERN
City Clerk
A
CiTY or tm t.N11, �LoRth
INTER-OPFIC! MEMORANDUM
rr• r;•t:
Mr, P. W. Andreas
City Mana ter
J
W. f: , Bailey/V.
Di rector of-f--tnan e
n
bATE:
April 1' y 1975
duoJEcr: Request for hesolution and
Award of Pi d for the "'i aini
Police Oer<,rtment Protect
rrEEEttrAcEll.:-
S System
.4.
rvr,�oruint
On 30 January 1975, the advertisement for hi ds for the fli ami
Police Penrtrtilent Protection System (''P,W) ,:as issued. 0n
18 February 1n75. a bidders conference was held in the
Community !;el ati ons Conference room of the "i aH Police
Department. .The bids were ohrned by the City clerk on
17 ''arch 1975.
ion
II The !1i ani Police leoartmen t recommends that the a''ar,+ of hies for
the !tFOPS he to Yackenhut Corporation, 1742 !!. fir. (;n r,v^nuo
Miami, Florida 33126. The rationale for thi recommendation
is listed below.
III The followinc is certain pertinent information in sur,1r;ary form:
1.
1•' h y
H o w funded
When
„ Where
• / / t. ry
t one time purchase e F R '''rote.ct i On
system for tho new !Jinni Pet i ce
Department bui 1 di nn which is newunder construction.
Funds are to be allocated fromthe
Police Headquarters and Cririe Pre-
vention Facilities Bonds.
The Protection System rust he acruired,
installed and checked out by March
1976, when the newPolice building is
expected to he ready for occunancy.
Since the Protection SysLem is a ver"
comnl ex and technical subject and only
11 months remains between now and
occunancv of the new building, time is
of the essence.
The system is to he installed in the new
Miami Police nenartment huildine at 400
N. W. 2nd Avenue.
i',t•!, Andrews, City tian,iger
How used
Yearly contract
-2- April 11, 1975
The Protection System is a critical
component of the new building, I-t: is
a perinent system which performs a
unique function 211 hours a day, 365
days a year to safeguard the personnel
within that building as well as to pro-
tect essential communications and
computer activities.
The Protection System is. a one tirne
purchase with a - manor. yearly maintenance
cost.
IV The MPDPS is surunari ed below:
In the construction plans for the new Police Department building
certain provisions were made concerning facility protection -
These provisions included such things as enhanced lighting;
building site enclosure; and strengthening of so;;le interior and
exterior walls and related entry points to protect against forced
entry. Also, included were the mechanical and el_ectrica.l. features
necessary to support an access control system to })e installed et a
later date by a separate contractor ,killed in such systems. The
access control" system, described below, is to serve two objectives:
1.. fissure public convenience in conducting
business within the Police Department;
2. And, at the same trine, safeguard critical
areas and activities within the Department.
The technical planning and design of the protection system was
being done by Stanford Research Institute as required under their
Third Phase Agreement with the City of i•ii un:'L. Careful coordina-
tion was maintained between SRI, Pancoast Architects, and Depart-
mental personnel in the development of the system with Depart-
mental personnel identifying the needs and SRI developing the
protection system to meet those needs.
The Miami Modern Police Department (MMPD) base facility pro--
tection system is essentially an access control system. it is
founded on the concept that all ingress and egress into and
out of critical areas in the new facility will bc' continuously
monitored and strictly controlled.
Under the concept, the monitoring and access control processes
will be accomplished by an optimum mix of human attendants and
supporting electronic systems in which full-time surveillance
P.t.!, Andrews, City t•lanacier -3- April. 11, 1975
of critical areas and control of access to "these areas will be
accomplished by electronic devices and systems with high orders
of sen;:i.ti.vity, selectivity, and reliability. The devices and
systems will report alarm_,, equipment: malfunctions, end
variances in established procedures to the human attendants
who c,il]provide all o:f the non -routine judgements and decisions, as
well as :initiate responses to alarms and malfunctions, monitor the
completion of the responses, and make any necessary modifications
in t:he response actions as they proceed.
The electronic protection system comprises two major
elements:
An overal.l surveillance and protective system
that provides a continuous overview of the
status of physical protection for the. new
building and certain critical activities
occurring within it.
A multi -zoned access cont?.'o1 system, keyed to
the overall protective system, which provides
selective controlover the times and points
of access to tite various critical areas within
t:he new building.
This system is configured on the premise that the various
areas and the activities that arc perfo''med in them re-
quire .four general levels of protection as follows:
High Security (H1SL'C) : Areas and activities, the
compromise or physical destruction of which would
probably make the Department unable to continue
effective operations in providing critical
service to the City of Miami such as dispatch and
communication:.:. Certain critical stored items such
as narcotics and highly sensitive inforina't_'_on
would also be given this level of protection.
Medium Security (I•IEDS!C) : Areas and associated
activities, the compromise or physical destruction
of which could seriously degrade the effectiveness
or delay the ability of the. I)epartm`nt to respoIld
to calls for assistance or to maintain acceptable
lever., of law and order in the community. Examples
are the prisoner processing and records section
areas, and the data processing and computer pro-
grammer rooms. "'--
P, tl, Andrews, City Manager it -
April 115 1975
Mirtiltturlt Security (l1IlJSEC) : Areas and associated
act1Vltics in whici, general NiIPD operations are
conducted, the compromise or physical destruction
of which could jeopardize or at least inhibit the
effective fulfillment of the Department's primary
roles of maintaining law and order in the City of
Miami, These areas generally include all of the
office areas not.specifically dealing with the public,
as well as the pistol range and the employee locker
and gymnasium areas.
Public Access : Areas, and activities that are designed
to servo the public directly and require personal
interface between the publics and mem!)ers of the
Department.
The basic surveillance a.nd protect.Lc'n system is comprised of
a variety of intrusion sensors, door "open", , "closed" status
switches:;, "holdup" or "duress" alarm initiators, fire andl smoke
sensors, V1S11).1C and audible alarms, e''cnt-r:'ec'crding devices,
remote control devices, and associated rhemory and logic to
enable personnel in .L}1,` Socu.:':i ry Control Center (SCC), which will
be located in the communications -dispatch area, to maintain a
constant awareness of event:; and thl: �'.ats in and around the new
facility, and to coordinate and con l t'olval' i.c t:y o:J forces
responding do perturbations in the general protection envelope
of the building.
All of the sensors will be connected to a master console and
system logic in the SCC, and they will continuously report
their status: "secure" or "a3.c3"In" . Status changes will be
recorded on a teleprinter, together with stored instructions
regarding the appropriate response.
Response to alarms and other emergencies, discovered and evaluated
in the SCC, will be carried out by calling on selected of `-ice'_.'::
who arc normally :in the building and who will be able co move
quickly to the scene of the attack or other.' emergency that ma.y
occur on their floor or the one above or below where tiv y are
normally located.
The access control system is based on individualemployee cards
which serve as keys to the doors of protected areas. Each such
area or room will have a card reader on the lower security side
of the entrance, connected to the access control system master
console and system memory and logic, located in the SCC.
P , Id, Andrews , City Manager
Apr'.L1. 11, 1975
Each Department staff member will be issued a card -key :i.n which
ch
is i.nv:Lsibl.y .i_mbeddrld a unique employee number and data concern-
ing areas and times of access permitted the staff member,
If the correct card -key is inserted ini:o the card reader, the
system memory will command the appropriate el.ecLr'orne?chaIll.cal
door bolt to release and permit the employee to enter the pro-
tected area. imposters will be rejected and an, Alarm initiated,
For areas requiring greater protection, the card -reading process
will be supplemented by . the staff member, i s insertion of a
unique personal identification number (PIN) into a keyboard on
the card reader.
Using the access control system console, SCC operators can
invalidate Lost cards and th,-)sQ belonging to stat f members who
are terminated, ; and change staff rn inber area -and -time -access
authorizations.
Both the overall security system console and .logic' and the
access control system console and logic are expected to be
computer -compatible sr) That: the security function can be
broadened and enhanced by mean:: of direct interface and
appropriate sof twcn c programming g if this should become
desirable.
V Bid responses were recc .:Ted fro:n the following firms:
American District Telegraph Co. (A])T) of Atlanta,
Georgia
Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc. (Burns)
of South Windsor, Connecticut
Gray Security Services, Inc. (Gray) of Miami
Johnson Controls, l nc . (Johnson) of f:l.waul.ee ,
Wisconsin (bid received fx'tn L Miamibranch office)
Wackenhut: Electronics, Incorporated (Wackenhut) of
Miami, Florida
Wells Fargo Alarm Services (Wells Fargo) , I.1iami.
Office.
The bids submitted by the above firms have been intensively
reviewed by the Stanford Research Institute and representatives
of the Miami Police Department. As a result of this review
P.W. Andrew.5, City ,MnariOr
the following information
_6_ April 11 1.975
is presented:
The total .1)14 prices of the f:Lr'rns
in the table below:
Company
Gray
Wackenhut
ADT
Burns Alternate
Burns
Wells Fargo
Johnson
submitting bids are
Total Bid Price Materials
$293,514
297,704*
325,815
342,422
379,622
556,388.50
639,800
$239,490
199,375
235,797
209,070
240,270
415,728.50
513,525
Labor
$ S4,024
98,329
89,018
133,352
139,352
1405660
1265275
Estimated
Annual
Maintenance.
tr,720
4,000
7,416
Not given
Not given
38,000
60,000
*In the pricing of its prop,:)sal, Wackenhut quotes a "total contract
price" of $275,704; howevr, it then says that the orator and
maintenance training courses, technical manuals, and first year's
replaent parts are an additional $22,000. Since these elements
are essential, th-actual total price becomes f;297,704.
tot,:l bid price each firm submitted was only 031Q criteria in the
review pracess. Four criteria, to include py,ice, formed the basis
for the evaluation of the bids (Sec Appendix 1 for evaluation factors).
The table below ranks the various bidders on the basis of each criteria:
Price
Gray
Wackenhut
ADT
Burns
Wells fargo
Johnson
Major Evaluation
Understanding
of WIPD
Requirements
Wackenhut
Wells Fargo
Gray
Burns
ADT
JohnE„on
Criteria
Experience
on Similar
Projects
Wackenhut
Wells Fargo
Burns
ADT
Johnson
Gray
When the six bids are ranked on the basis of the four
awarded grading points the results are as follows:
Wackenhut
BurnS
Wells Fargo
556 points
411 points
381 points
(Maximum possible
ADT
Gray
Johnson
score: 620)
Technical
Excellonce
Proposal
Wackenhut
Wells Ye..174o
Bupns
ADT
Grdy
Johnson
criteria and
367 points
299 points
186 paints
P.W. Andrews; City r1anagin4
April 1] , 1975
VI The Miami Police Depar-'tnlent recommend1S tlwt the award of bid
for the Miami Police Department Protection Service be to
Wackenhut: Corporation. This recommendation is predicated upon
two major poi.Trts:
A. Although Wackenhut is EA,191 higher than Cray, the
Wackenhut bid on the banis of an overall evaluation
is 145 points hir,lier than the nearest contender and
257 points higher than Cray, further:', referring to
they table ranking the bidders on the basis of all four
major criteria Wackenhut is second UI7Cle1"' price; first
with respect to under:3tundiing Miami. Police Department
requirements; fist 10 respond to e::j. ricnci. on similar
projects and first with respect to the technical excel-
lence of the proposal.
Cray, on the other hand, is first only under price;
third with respect to understanding Miami Police
Department r:'cqul.reI',: n1 n; sixth with respect to c::per i-
encce on similar projects and fifth with respect: to
technical excellence ef the proposal. •
The fhc specifications which were issued by the Miami Police
to which the bidders were to r enpo;id required
that each bidden provide an annual Ina in Lcnance cont.
Referring to the table on bid prices .l1 can be noted
that the unriuni maintenance f::i ;urea quoted by Cray is
$1G 20, whereas the annual maintenance cost quoted by
Wackenhut enhut in $ 4 , 000 . in the first year alone of oper-
ation the Miami Police Department would recover the
$4 , 0t?0 difference in initial price of the Protection
System and save $8,000 additional as compared to Cray
in terms of the annual ma Lntcnancc cost. Over a period
of years, the Police Department wnuld save a. significant
amount of money by accep l:1n ; the Wackenhut bid over the
Gray hid.
Vil. The Miami Police Department; recommends that the award of bid
be to Wackenhut Corporation contingent upon the formalization
and signing of an agreement by the Wackenhut Corporation and
the City of Miami; and further that the City Manager be authorized
to sign such an agreement. As a separate part of the bid award
resolution, it is recommended that the City CoI?lmission allocate
$15,000 (1,% of the: bid price) for the City Manager to utilize .on
a contingency basis for changes that play be necessary during the
development, installation,.and chock out of the Protective System.
APPENDIX I
l
EVALUATION OF BIDS IN TUNS Of
PRINCIPAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS
As a means for evaluating the various bids on a quasi --quantitative -
basis, fourteen principalsystem components were isolated, and two
important price considerations were identified. Next, the 16 items
were given relative weights. Thi;.. was believed necessary to accord
proper importance to certain system elements and price factors some
of which lie at the heart of the utility to the MMI'D of any system
that may be proposed.
For example, with a generally fixed budget, price could become
very important, particularly if the bid price greatly exceeds the
budget, as occur:ced in two and pos:;ibiy three cases. Therefore, this
factor was g1.ven 'i.he most weight: Within the sy: tcm, certain
components were considered to be so interdependent and so inextri-
cably woven into the basic concept that no one of these critical
components could be readily replaced by an alternate without major over-
haul of the others or of the entire proposal concept. These components
--
were accorded a weighting factor of. 3. Still other components and one
pricing factor were considered to be important but Inif ht possibly be
modified without r.ajor detriment to the system design. These were
accorded a weighting factor of 2. Finally, a number of system compo-
nents were either essentially "stand alones"' or, a variety of readily.
available device;; of equivalent quality and capabilities could be
substituted without modifying the system. These received a weighting
factor of 1.
Following is a listing of the components and price factors,
together with their assigned weighting factors:
Infrared Sensors
Magnetic Tape Transaction Recorder :1.
Clock 1
_ Point -to -Point Intercom 1
Master Control Intercom 1
•
Relative Weight
8
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
Component or Factor.
Total Price
CPU
Access Control
Annunciator Panels
Console
Readout or I/O Device
UPS
EPA
Estimated Annual Maintenance
CCTV 1
Microwave Sensors . 7.
:l.
Following the establishment of the sixteen ca LcgoJ''cs and their
relative weight each of the six bjd;; ware placed in terms of: simple
rank within each category (best, next best, and so on) .
Re._:o{ t1J.:%..111g that :in 3C)iit( categor i c s 1one ba.cl might 1)'.' very much
better then the one ilnmediaLely below it in 'tie simple ranking, a
sC.i].r of value was .+dopted (0 to 20) and the various bidders were
award: d ci value: from within this scale in each category.
Table One de:plots the ranking and the scale values awarded to
the various bidder's in each category. Note that in the caste of
total price, both Johnson and Wells Fargo were given low scores be-
cause their bids were so far above the budgeted *275,000 to $300,000.
Fina7.ly , the scores .t'ro:r Table One were mul tipi:I ed by the
weighting factor for each category and the results recorded as shown
in Table Two.
MINN IIIiuII� _. _
•
Tab t e One
PAN<i.'.G OF BIDS IN TERMS 0: MAJOR SYSTEM COMPONENTS
(including the assignment of :'elatit'e value eights oa a scale of 0-20)
TotalPrtce
n
n
6
L
•.a r-�
.-+
p x
0
t/)
•
r
G .M
:.: 7
0
'
Maa Tape
Recorder/
Reader-
t
Q
C k
cI Ld
G?JtY :
15
WACK-
20
J.
�t'AC K-
20
WACK
18
J.
:.AC .
20
a-.
`.IACK
20
j.
WACK
20
t
BURNS
19
JACK
19
I
ACT
18
±
WACI.Z
20
WACK
20
4
WACK.
20
WACK
20
- Y
WELLS
' 15
WELLS
18
WACK
14
Bu'u+S�
19
BURNS
18
ADT
16
ADT
18
W L.�aS
15
GRAY
18
WELLS.A2T 1 r'.ACK
18 14 i 17
BURNS.
18
GRAY
18
'BURNS
18
WELLS
16
: W CK
14
WACK
17
8
WELLST
16
WELLS
16
BURNS
15
JCS
17
BURNS
14
WELLS
17
!ATT
GRAY GRAY • GI -All �J0-NS
11 2 1 16
17
JOHNS
17
ADT
14
ADT'
10
BURNS R1sJ
13
LJRitS.
Ifs
BURNS
5
ADT
14
GRAY
6
J0...;S
14
WELLS
15
GRAY
13
BURNS
6
WACK
` 10
,.ELLS I :BLLS
1 I 14
G yAr '
16
BURNS
15
WELLS
13
GRAY
4
GRAY
12
GRAY
15
:.:ELLS
1
JOHNS
5
ADT
5
GRAY
12
BURNS
14
ADT
?2
ADT
14
ADTt
5
JOHNS ' URNS
0 1 13
WELLS''',
14
WELLS
14
GRAY
12
BURNS
2
ADT
5
ADT
14'
JOHNS
• 0
GRAY
0''
JOHNS
0
WELL
10
GRAY
0
JOHNS
11
JOHNS
5
t
JOHNS`
0
I3UR S I JOHNS
0" ; 12
t
ADT,
13
ADT
12
JOHNS
0
JOHNS
0
JOHNS T
0
-,
JOHNS
0
Not mentioned ;n bid
Mentioned but not adequately described
t
Excellent --equals or exceeds specifications
i � I
Table Two
WEIGHTED VALUES OF BIDS IN TERMS 0? MAJOR SYSTEM COMPONENTS
w
ii
i-+
;-.
Access Control
au4
ri c:
U:•
ElI
c `N
Console
Read Out!
Pi(T/CR1'
t,
'7,.�
•,-s --4r
1
C 3
r
1 ?
U r L�
• ..--4•06
ri
CJ u
^.0
1.4 c
'.Dl �cd
cC W 0.
.!.40
O
' ,--t
O
p.. 0
u
I a)G:
4 : .1
i-
0-4
F . H
:.) p
c?.
CL`, 4-k
i-1.
v4
iAC:,
63
'AC
60
•AC{
54
v.•C'
60
.AC�
-
40
'1G{.
40
,BURNS ttW;C:
S j
!Ci
ADT I TAC^
18 { ^_^
WACK
20
;ACI
20
WACK
20
WELLS
15
,...;ELLs
18
WA CK
5c
BURNS
37
BURNS
54
ADT
_
48
ADT
54
TELLS
30
GRAY
J
36
.•:T S
_i.�
35
' ,r)T
t.:
2r
WACK I B PN^
s ��_._��
17 18
GRAY
G,.:.
3
BURNS
18
WELLS
16
WACK ,'
14
WACK
17
AL'T
32
WELL
48
WELLS
48
B . S
45
JOHNS
51
BURNS
28
WELLS
.34
GRAY I GRAYGRAY [JOHNS HNS JOHNS
22 1 4 16 I 17 17
ADT
14
ADT
10
BURNS
.' 13
BURNS
16
BURNS
20
ADT
42
GRAY
18
J0: S
42
WELLS
1 45
GRAY
26
BURNS
32
i
..:,+C. + :% 1T S WELLS ii GRAY b Rt S
2D I 2 14 1 IC 15
WELLS
13
GRAY
4
GRAY
12
GRAY
15
WELLS
4
JOHNS
15
ADT
15
GRAY
35
BURS
42
ADT
24
ADT
28
ADT I JOHNS BURS
10 ij 0 13
WELL WELLS
I 14 14
GRAY
12 ' :
BURNS
2
ADT
:5 t
ADT
14
,iC :•:S
0
GT.
0*
JOHNS
0{
WELLS
30
GAY
0
JOH S JCH S
22 10
JC:'.::S I BU7NS JG::'Iz 1 ADT r"CDs. J0th S
�� V
1 0' w2 1_ 12 0
JOHNS
0
JOHNS
y
0' t
JOHNS
wic
Not mentioned in bid
tXenticne;i but not adequately described
*Excellent --equals or exceeds specifications
c:11
lask
INtegtated Protection System
DATE E,IDS REtL:WED
Police Dept.
BIDDER
VPL OF SECL,RiTY AM6U.Nr;
1975
ACCOk.':
_
Wackenhut
A.D.T.
Gray Security
Johnson Controls
Wells Fargo Alarm Systems
- 1 /
Buriys Electronic ecurity ervices Inc.
6 e A e 1.(7.
ubove described check:,
ye
I
1 :
• CCOUNTING D11/1$1,QN
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
REQUISITION FOR
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
L
r) DEPTIDIV Police
) ACCOUNT CODE si 03
BID No, 74-75-63 DATE 1/24/7s
PREPARED BY Vern PHONE
CODE
ITEM DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE'
A M T.
DTE
ie
QUANTITY 1415NNENTS ObiAntaNT
REQUiritMENTO PON .-_-_MONTWO
-4,
...A. CO rrie 0 frit
0
rrar
AI 0 S6
e kr, -4
Ad.,.
t...... -p
co 0 0
CO .441. kr1 110,
Or ek
41
DATE
DATE
DATE DATE," DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT
Integrated Protection
SYStfh
TOTAL
EST !MATED COST :
CONTRACTUAL:
INCIDENTAL :
TOTAL
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
s 21.1
$
S 221.; ,001.00
AFPROVED Btr-
BIDS TO BE SECURED FOR
Interlrated Protection System
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF:
rolicc
ADVERTISE ON
BIDS TO BE RECEIVED ON
DIRECTOR OF ISSUING DEPARTMENT
1,olice I -.c.; 1 i t %ratd I3ut. c,
To be filled in by
EXPENDITURE CONTROL:
PROJECT CODE
. /
FUNDS AVAILABLE. FOR PROJECT INVOLVED /
EXPENDITURE CONTROLLER
AD CODE -)
COPIES TO: Purchasing (Org.) — City Manager — City Clerk —Expenditure Control — Issuing Department — Other Affected Department
FORM NO 1043 REV.
WHITE GREEN PINK CANARY BLUE GOLDENROD
74
a4
Legal Advertisement
aid lio, 74-75-63
Sealed bids will be received by the Ci ty Manager
and City Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida no
later than
10;00 o'clock A.'1. '.'arch 3, 1975
for furnishing an integrated nrntartinn s;►stc;.;
for the City of Miami Police Denartrnent
in accordance with detailed specifications avail-
able upon request at the office of the Purchasing
Agent, City Hall, Dinner Key, 3500 Pan American
Drive, i'ii ami , tel 445-4745.
City of Miami, Florida
P.W. Andrews, City Manager
ADDENDUM NO. 2
City of Miami Florida Integrated Police
De.partment Protection System
1. So much of Addendum Number One that relates to the date for submission
of bids is modified to read as follows:
"The formal bid No. 74-75-63 is due at the Office of the City Clerk,
City Hall. Dinner Key, 3500 Pan American Drive, P.O. Box 330708,
Miami. Florida, 33133 at 10:00 o'clock, March 17, 1975."
2. Paragraph ii H 3 a(t.), on:P age 59 of the functional and technical
specifications for an integrated. protection, system for the Miami Police
Department, dated 16 January l975, is amended by adding the following:
"The access control hardware, the electromechanical bolts, and the
gate open, closed status switches shall be of heavy duty construction
and capable of withstanding severe weather conditions normally occur-
ring in Miami. Close coordination with the building and/or garage
contractor is required in outfitting these gates with the specified security
hardware."
3. Paragraph II H 3 a(3) beginning on page 59 is amended to read as follows:
"A double -panelled, swinging vehicle power gate shall be installed by
others at the north entrance to the outdoor parking lot for entry from
Northwest Fifth Street. This gate shall be controlled from the SCC
and from a post -mounted switch placed near the gate in the parking lot.
The open, close control switches in the SCC and in the parking lot shall
be ir. ':..11ed by the protection; ti:r. cco,lrac:lor as part of there spec
ificatio:is. This requires close coordination with the building contractor.
In this regard, the building contractor will supply the heavy duty, high
current switching device(s) needed for activating the open, close motor(s)
or other driving mechanisms. The protection system contractor shall
supply basic activation switches 7_ny ". c r .211 y 1 clay: to control.
the main gate -leaf activating devices; and, in doing so will provide basic
switches and/or relays with sufficient capacity and freedom from arcing
to ensure dependable operation for the life of the gate activation devices.
The protection system contractor will provide electromechanical, dead -
bolt type gate locking mechanisms to lock the gate leaves in the closed
"Zero -crossing" switching devices desirable but not mandatory
r
ADDENDUM NO, 2
Page Two
position. He shall coordinate with the building contractor in the design
and installation of these devices. These locking mechanisms shall
interface with the gate open, close function and the release -engage action
of the bolts shall be coordinated with the bask open, close switches.
This element of the power gate systeri shalt also be designed and installed
by the protection system contractor in cooperation with the building
contractor. The exterior switch shall be operated by a high security
key (Medeco or similar). A gale open, closed status switch shall be
installed on both panels of the gate by the protection system contractor
in cooperation with the building contractor. These switches shall have
Class III annunciation in the SCC. The protection system contractor
shall also provide a weather proof red warning light at a suitable place
inside the gate -fence structure at driver's eye level (for automobiles
and motorcycles). This light shall flash while the gates are being opened
and closed.
4. Item E, Paragraph 5b on page 2-5 of the General Information to Bidders
is amended as follows:
Delete: "Double -panelled, power operated north gate."
Add: " N Basic gate. leaf activating switches, electromechanical dead
bolts, gate open, closed status switches, and interface to
release and engage electromechanical dead bolts"
" u Flashing red warning light"
"Pedestrian bete electromechanical. locksets and gate open, close
s t,:' Luz s i t.,..1, ... ,, r'
5. Paragraph I C 4 k on pag,e 6 is deleted
6. Paragraph II B, last sentence on page 27 is amended to read:
"The system also includes burglary protection, emergency and assistance
alarms, and other devices such as power operated exterior gates (provided
by others) required for the total security system."