HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-75-03112
a
4
6
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
MEA
3/18/75
RESOLUTION NO, 75=311
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF SITE AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF PROPOSED PARK AT
APPROXIMATELY 2800 S,W, 22ND AVENUE, S4' OF. LOT
AND ALL OF LOTS 8 AND 9, weft, SNIPES SUB
(3-107) AS PROVIDED IN ORDINANCE NO. 6871,
ARTICLE XVIII-1, SECTION 4 (1) , StECT TO
ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED ON THE NORTH
AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES AND BICYCLE RACKS
INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PROPERTY
ZONED R-1 (ONE FAMILY), PROPOSED TO BE REZONED
P-R (PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATIONAL) DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its
meeting of February 19, 1975, Item No. 3(b), following an
advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 15-75 by a 5 to
2 vote recommending approval of site and development plan as
per Ordinance No. 6871, Article XVIII-1, Section 4 (1) as
hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable
and in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of
Miami and its inhabitants to grant approval of site and
development plan of proposed park;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The approval of site and development
plan of proposed park at approximately 2800 S.W. 22nd Avenue,
S4' of Lot 7, and all of Lots 8 and 9, W.H. SNIPES SUB as
provided in Ordinance No, 6871, Article XVIII-1, Section 4 (1),
subject to additional landscaping provided on the north and south
property lines and bicycle racks included in the development plan;
property zoned R-1 (One Family), proposed to be rezoned P-R
(Public Park and Recreational) be and the same is hereby granted.
"DOCUMENT INDEX
, ITEM NO.ti ►►
e::`.:.T)NG (jF
�r.
1'
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
1975.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10 day of APqn.
MAURICE A. FEkRI:-",_
MAYOR
H D. SWINE N
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
MICHEL E. ANDERSON
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
JOHN S. LLOYD
City Attorney
2 ,
;tOp .
Ire �q3�,
Honorable City Commission
Attention Mr. P. W. Andrews
City of Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
t mi4 3JfItrihi
February 26, 1975
Re: PUBLIC PARK SITE AND DEVELOPMENT
PLAN - RECOMMENDED
Approximately 2800 SW 22nd Avenue
S4' of Lot 7, and Lots 8 and 9,
W. H. SNIPES SUB (3-107)
Initiated by Planning Department
The Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of February 19, 1975,
Item #3(b), following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No.
PAB 15-75 by a 5 to 2 vote recommending approval of site and development
plan of proposed park at approximately 2800 SW 22nd Avenue, S4' of Lot 7,
and Lots 8 and 9, W. H. SNIPES SUB (3-107), as per Ordinance 6871,
ARTICLE XVIII-1, Section 4 (1), subject to additional landscaping pro-
vided on the north and south property lines and bicycle racks included
in the development plan; property zoned R-1 (One Family), proposed to
be rezoned P-R (Public Park and Recreational).
Twelve objections were received in the mail.
A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City
Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City
Commission.
cm
Z. M. 43
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
y..
David Simpson, Jr.'Director
Department of Administration
Planning and Zoning Boards
ncerely,
4414.
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: "APPROVAL".
Tentative City Commission date: March 27, 1975.
+4,
S (a)
A1PROXI tATELy..2$a.._A, ;s_22NP AVt
S4' of Lot 70 and Witt§ S and 9,
W. N. SNIPES Still (407)
Change of Zoning Classification on the
property from RA. (One Parnily) to p"R
Park and Reereatonal),
1
'
abode
Public V
Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of
and administered oath to all persons testifying at this
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION "APPROVAL"
a. The rezoning of the subject property from R-1
to P-R is in accordance with the provisions of
ARTICLE >VIII (Public Park and Recreation Use -
P-R District) of the City of Miami Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance which is intended to apply to
all City --owned lands that are used for park and
recreational purposes.
t9
f
tlp
Hearing,
Nearing.
b. The proposed development is congruent with the
surrounding neigh2,orhood and will provide a
needed community :Facility for the area.
Mr. Acton: Mr. Jack Luft of the Planning Department staff will
present this Item.
Mr. Luft: At 2800 S. W. 22nd Avenue, we have presently, a
vacant lot that at one time was the site of the City Hall for Silver
Bluff community that existed prior to Miami's incorporating of the
area and subsequently as a fire station. Some two or three years ago
the fire station structure was torn down leaving this site in the
ownership of the City of Miami and until this time, vacant.
The proposal for the property is to develop a playground or a
small park that would be oriented toward a recreational facility for
elementary and pre-school children. The area around this particular
subject property is low -density single-family and is very nearly
completely developed.
There is one new park about a quarter of a mile south of this
present site known as Kennedy Park which is now, and future intentions
are, to retain its passive non -developed use character. Other than
this one park there are presently no existing park facilities east of
27th Avenue. This involves very nearly 50% of the total area of what
is now known as Coconut Grove of well over 2,000 homes. These are all
family dwellings between 27th Avenue and 32nd Road which have a good
many school age children within this area.
The existing site presently has one large banyan tree on it
and several smaller trees and shrubs around the perimeter of the site.
Traffic . . . on 22nd Avenue are now well below the design capacity of
the street,fortunately, We do not anticipate that they will increase
significantly.
The Planning Study for Coconut Grove which was adopted by
the City of Miami Commission 'in principle' on September 21, 1974,
recommended that this site be developed as a play facility in the
fashion that the plans have been drawn up for it. More precisely,
the Plan calls for a tricycle path and a sort of play equipment for
the active play of small children. It does not have what we would call
hard-core facilities; anything that could be construed as recreational
equipment for anything other than elementary or pre-schoo]. children.
-17- February 19, 1975 Item 3 (a)
PAB
The park plan does indicate landscaping around the perimeter of the
site and a fence has been installed along the property line. There
is to be further. a small fence, split rail or something of that
nature along the front of the property to guard against children
perhaps, running into the street,
The Planning Department's recommendation is for approval Of this
proposed park inasmuch as the proposed development is congruent with
the surrounding neighborhood and will provide a much needed community
facility for the area.
We have reviewed the Site Plan and we do recommend approval of
the plan as presented with the following modifications: that further
landscaping be indicated and provided along the perimeters of the
north and south property lines of the park and that bicycle racks be
also provided within the park. We further recommend that the subject
property consistent with its use as a park be rezoned from R-1 to
P-R which is intended to apply to all City owned lands that are used
for park and recreational purposes. Thank you.
Mr. Allen: Ladies and Gentlemen, members of the Planning
Advisory Board, my name is Wayne Allen. I live at 2222 S. W. 27th
Terrace, A, and I am appearing before you this evening in two capacities.
My first and foremost reason for .being here is as Chairman of the
Parks for People program, District 9, City of Miami, and also in my
capacity as Director of the Tigertail Association.
I know the Board is probably very familiar with the operation
of the Parks for People program but I would like to dwell for just a
moment on what that program did and particularly why this park fits
into it.
The City was divided up into various districts and a
Citizens Task Force was established in each district to review the
park program in their particular district, and district #9 encompasses
basically, the Coconut Grove area. The purpose of this Citizens
Task Force was to review the needs for parks in its district and to
make recommendations to the City Commission on the use of parks bond
money which had been passed by a referendum vote of the citizens of
Miami. Now the Task Force for this district had several meetings and
some input from the community on the park requirements in this area.
In addition to that, a Public Hearing was held within Coconut Grove
as was held throughout the City in various districts.
One of the recommendations which came out of this process
was that a children's park be established at this site. There was
interest in the total program, of course, at this Public Hearing, and
I was present at the Public Hearing held in the Grove, and most
interest generated was for this particular park, although there was,
of course, the overall interest in the total park program for Coconut
Grove.
There was a recognition that there did not exist adequate
facilities for children of school age, elementary school age, within
this general area. I'm proud to say that the . . , for this project
to a large extent came from members of the Tigertail Association and
the Board of Directors reviewed it at the request of the members who
were interested in this project and recommended to the Parks for
People program and to the Task Force that it be included in the
recommendations made to the City, and it was.
Now the members of the Tigertail Association who were
February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAB
interested in this went se5 far as draWihq up a plan which 1 have
here this evening and t'd like to show it to you laying cut a childronse
park which provides and takes into consideration various problem
which we foresaw as possibly developing in the area.
The plan calls for parking spaces for six cars because Of the
recognition that while this is a park meant to serve the immediate
surrounding area, there may be some within that area who might want to
drive their vehicles there to transport their children to the park.
A great deal of landscaping is shown on this plan to buffer the
property from surrounding property owners. There is lighting planned
to be established which would provide security during the night-time
hours and in further discussions with the Parks Department, I should
point out there have been some minor modifications to this plan,
where the Parks Department with the Public Works Department wanted to
assure that there would be no problem with security, and that actual
visibility would be maintained as much as possible if this facility
were installed. So I would like to pass this around.
That pretty much surmises my remarks. The Task Force did
unanimously recommend to the City Commission that this project be
included as part of the Parks for People program. It was passed upon,
as Mr. Luft pointed out, as part of the Coconut Grove Master Plan
and the Parks Department has indicated that they are in favor of a
park at this site. I don't know whether there's a representative here
this evening but we have had several discussions with both representatives
of the Tigertail Association and Parks for People District #9 Committee
with the Parks Department in regard to this. Thank you.
Ms. Johnson: My name is Bernice Johnson and I live at
2031 Secoffee Street. I'm a former Director of the Tigertail Civic
Association. At the time that I 'was on the Board of Directors, we
polled the membership both at public meetings and the membership or
people who lived adjacent to this park in the neighborhood to deter-
mine that they would be in favor of such a facility.
I do happen to be the mother of a young child and therefore
I am very anxious to see this type of facility be available in this
neighborhood because there is no park at the present time, there.
Also, historically, this piece of property has always been a center for
community activity. It was originally the old Silver Bluff City Hall.
It was also a fire house and the community is used to the use of that
property in some way that benefits the community. I think it would
be certainly, since we have no parks for small children or elementary
children, school age children in that area, that it would be most
beneficial to have this used as a park. Thank you.
Mrs. Allen: My name is Susanne Allen. I live at 2222
S. W. 27th Terrace, A. I am coming as a mother and a parent of two
small children. I'm not coming on the basis of being a member of any
Association; strictly to say that we need a park in this area for
small children. The nearest parks that we have available are Shenandoah
Park, which if you are familiar with it, is across Coral Way, which is
at least 12 to 15 blocks from this area that they're proposing now.
This means you have to have a car in order to get there. The other
park that is available is Kennedy Park which is a lovely site but it
is strictly for free -play. There are no swings, slides, any of that
type of thing for small children. As a parent I don't allow my four -
and a half year old to run around the block in this type of thing
because in this area there is traffic. People use this route in order
to have a short-cut to get home in cars and what not, So you need an
-19- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
area outside of your own 1aok yard in order to take a child wherry he
dan be amongst other children of his age in a free -play area where he
can have some time alone unsupervised with the idea that the parent is
there or, when your child reaohes the grade of, say, sixth grade you
can say 'go down to the park and play' and not have to worry about
the bay or worry about dare as you might have to at JCennedy,
wish that you would consider this. I know some people in the
area may be opposed on the basis of whether it will be . , area
for people that you wouldn't want - undesirables to be hanging around
this is a park, tricycle paths, this type of thing, is not going to
become kind of a hangs -out for people. As far as litter and cleaning
up - 1 know of someone w;Yo lives in that area of the community and
he's going to be using this park, but 'I will see that my children keep
it clean and I would not be above picking up things if I see them.
So I can assure you that as far as that's concerned, for my own benefit,
it would be kept in a decent, appropriate way for the neighborhood.
Thank you.
Mr. McDermott: My name is John McDermott and I live at
2850 S. W. 22nd Avenue. Up on your chart on the wall, those are lots
13 and 14 of Block 19 which is directly across the street from your
proposed park.
Now I am here because I feel that the City of Miami has gone
to great extent and great expenses to design this park and to plan it
in the best interests of the neighborhood. I believe you all remember
when the fire station was there quite a few years ago and the fire
station was moved over to where it is now on Oak Avenue, there was
talk about selling that property for private residence, single-family
residence, the two lots, and when the talk came out, I believe it
even went to a Hearing for the purpose of selling the property, the
question of the banyan trees came up. So it was taken back and re-
assessed and it was decided that in the best interests of everybody
in the city to try to preserve the banyan trees and this is when they
went into the possiblities of making a park out of it.
Now, the mention has been to the Kennedy Park which is now on
Bayshore Drive. While Kennedy Park has been designed and is being
used right now primarily for adult type of recreation, there's very
little that little children could do there except just run on the
grounds and play there. There are no facilities for them there what-
soever. The park has been designed more for just leisure type passive
entertainment and there is nothing there for the children except for
running.
Those two lots, lots 9 and 8, have been vacant for quite a long
time now and they have been piling up with trash, debris, that people
have thrown into this area and it really looks bad. The possibilities
for selling those lots to individuals to build a house on, would mean
that the lots would stay this way probably for quite a long time to
come with the economic situation the way it is today.
I am here speaking for the lots, and as I stated before, I live
directly across the street and I would be quite influenced by the fact
that a park was there because of my residence. But I want everybody
here to understand that this is going to be a kiddie park. It's not
going to be a tennis court. It's not something that's going to be
used all night long by people; noise corning from it and everything
else. It's a park that primarily will be used during the daytime only;
under supervision by adults and Park people. The children will have
a place to go and I think it will be very nicely done with the
-20- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAS
landscaping and the tree and everything. I do believe it would
enhance the whole property value of everybody that lives in this area,
and for the whole City of Miami also. Thank yoli very much.
Mrs. Rockafellar: Is there anyone else wishing to speak
for this proposal? All tight, we'll hear from those opposed.
Ms. Post: My name is Norma Post. 1 live at 2OE1 Tigertail
Avenue on the corner of Tigertail and Eniathla. Emathla is a street
that runs parallel to 22nd Avenue so it actually is about 100 feet
away from the park, the.proposeci park you might say.
The objections I have to it and that I think a few of the
neighbors might have is in our area at the moment, we find we're in
a very high crime area. People in my neighborhood, just two doors
away from me have been robbed six times. On the other side they have
been robbed five times. I don't want another area in which there's
going to be a haven for these people who are already surveying the
neighborhood pretty carefully; that they can rob early in the morning
when the neighbors, the houses, are fairly close and yet in broad
daylight we're having all of these robberies day after day, the same
houses day after day.
I feel that this park is going to provide another area
where they can come from miles away, park their car, and then they'll
be at liberty to freely survey the area any time they want whether
it's day or night. As far as needing a play area for children, I feel
that in the neighborhood I don't know of any house that doesn't have a
very adequate garden, at least two lots for every house around there.
We're very well separated. I've never seen children playing on the
streets because they all have their own areas. It's a very beautiful
idea to have a park. We have an existing park on Bayshore Drive
extending from Rockerman Canal all the way into the City itself, and
I think the facilities could be made adequately there for the children.
At Emathla there already is a signal light there that people could use
to cross Bayshore Drive.
I feel not only for this reason but I think we're going to
continue to demand, to ask for all kinds of beautiful services,
beautiful parks, beautiful services of every kind, they're very nice to
have but they're becoming very costly and I'm afraid that I'm going to
be priced right out of the neighborhood as far as my taxes are concerned,
and there are a lot of us in the neighborhood that feel that way.
Thank you.
Ms. Wally . I guess I'll have to repeat what this
lady said. I'm Wally . . . I live at 3100 Freeman Street. I've been
living in the Grove for 25 years and I've lived at this present
address for sixteen years.
I really see no reason why children should have to be
transported to this area to play, There aren't any children right in
the immediate vicinity that's #1. #2, Fortunately there aren't any
children that are lacking for play space in the whole area because as
this lady said previously you don't ever see children playing in the
street; not ever. You can ride up and down that whole area there and
there are never any children playing in the street. They all have
backyards, and since we already have a beautiful park down on South
Bayshore Drive, that's never used, it's empty, and already it has a
bicycle path, It would mean just putting in a few facilities for the
children. I don't see why they couldn't enjoy it? It's spacious,
it's beautiful and it's there and I think that would be very good for
them. Thank you.
-21- February 19, 1975 Item 3(n)
FAD
Ms. Champlin: Itim Irene Champlin, if you will look on the
map, we own the whole of Diode to 4 iota. We bought that at spine
expense and built a home to retire to when we finally reaohed the ago
of retiring. Now we feel that the existing park as they have previously
said, should be set tip for these children and let our neighborhood
remain single family. We bought in that area because it was single
fainiiy, and as I said before, we own the 4 iota; we own the whole
block and it will directly affect our home and 1 would like for you to
give consideration for them to put the facilities that they want to put
across the street from my home,down on Bayshore. They've got trees.
Put the facilities that they want to put in our neighborhood down
there. Please think about it. Thank you.
Ms. Matson: My name is Virginia Matson. I live at 1751
Espanola Drive. I grew up in the area where the old fire station was.
There was never a problem with us playing. There was plenty of room;
plenty of yard space. I'm opposed to spending additional funds on this
particular piece of property. I agree with the previous speaker. If
there was not planning for facilities for children in Kennedy Park,
let's add them in. Thank you.
Ms. Dolan: I'm Mrs. Joseph Dolan at 2215 Lincoln Avenue.
I ask, what happened to wainwright Park? There's a beautiful place
there for children to play. There is no trouble for children to get
there. Not like there would be trying to cross 22nd Avenue. 22nd
Avenue is used both by police cars and firemen. They have never learned
any other way up from Bayshore other than coming down Tigertail, they
still use 22nd Avenue at all times and they don't let up on speed
because they are in a hurry. There is an accident at Tigertail and
22nd Avenue on the average of one every four hours, if you'll make a
note of that. The traffic is terrible on 22nd Avenue. Anyway, we
brought this to the attention of the Tigertail Association as Mr. Allen
should remember. We told them then, to check on the amount of traffic
that there was on 22nd Avenue. Plus, as the man across from the park
said, it is a good place. The people were in his yard evidently
watching us at 2215 Lincoln Avenue the day we were robbed. We were
only on our patio, and they cut the screen and came in.
We continually clean up even after the number of children
that do ride their bikes. We don't have sidewalks. It is a very
dangerous neighborhood for children. Thank you.
Mr. Matson: My name is John Matson. I live at 1751
Espanola Drive. This particular park I don't know how much study has
been given to it. There are no sidewalks accessing the park for the
children if they did want to access the park to get there. 22nd
Avenue as has been pointed out as not handling the amount of traffic
that it should. However, it is a main artery and it does handle traffic
and I'm sorry to say the traffic is traveling rather fast - to point
this out - there was a rather very serious accident not more than a
month and a half ago in which a police officer was very seriously
injured answering a call in which he was going, I would say, quite
fast because this is a main artery to get to the area that he needed
to go to.
There is no traffic signal and the whole set-up alone for
the park itself doesn't lend itself right now to this type of thing.
Now I don't know if and how many people say 'how many children are
there in the neighborhood?' I don't know if an impact study to say
'how many children are there in the neighborhood?' Pre-school.? Grade
school type children who would use this park?' We have a facility a
quarter of a mile away and it would seem to me, as a taxpayer, that it
-22- February 19, 1975 Item 3(e)
would be a great deal easier, my burden and every body else'd
burden in the coiunty if We set up the facilities down in a Very,
very, very, large park so these children could use it. Thank you.
Mr. Champlin: My name is He D. Champlin, I live at
2200 Lincoln Avenue and I just want to Voice my opposition to the
park. My home has been rubbed twice in the last 15 days and I'd
like to, if I may, ask your legal counsel if we can control this park
for children. It's discrimination placed against us. Won't you have
to let anyone in this park?
Mrs. Rockafellar: Would you address your questions to the
Board and they will be answered.
Mr. Champlin: Is it possible for discrimination to be
charged against the City - anyone could use the park?
Mrs. Rockafellar: Well this park, as I understand it, is
for pre-school children and children in the elementary school and most
of them will be accompanied by their parents.
Mr. Champlin: I didn't ask that. Legally, can we restrict
it to the 4 to 12 year old children?
Mr. Dannenberg: Mme. Chairman, may I answer that question?
Mrs. Rockafellar: Yes.
Mr. Dannenberg: Sir, if you want to get a group of people
together and put your money in a pot, and build a park yourself, I
think you have the right to restrict anybody you want. But any time
you use the taxpayer's money I think everybody can use the park.
Mr. Champlin: That's right. In other words, we can't
restrict it to 4 to 12 year old children?
Mr. Dannenberg: No sir.
Mr. Champlin: That's what I wanted to know. In other words
it's not for 4 to 12 year old children, it's for everyone. Am I
right?
Mr. Dannenberg: Right.
Mrs. Rockafellar: If there are no other speakers we will
now close the Public Hearing and go into discussion among the Board
members.
Mrs. Alexander: Mme. Chairman, I have a question. I would
like Mr. Anderson to answer that question, please.
Mx. Anderson: Mr. Dannenberg is correct. You cannot
restrict the use of the park to just children. However, the facilities
can be designed - apparently that's what you intend to do - design
the facilities for young children.
Mrs. Alexander; If I may, I have one more question. What
kind of supervision is planned for this mini -park by the Parks Department?
Mr. Luft: The Parks Department, to my knowledge, does not
plansuperintendentpermanently on the site.
to have a ermanentl
Mrs. Alexander-; Thank you.
,.23-
February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAS
Mrs. Rockafeliar: Any other cuestiona?
Mrs. Rernandez Yea. on page 1 of the rebruary 11, 1975
memorandum says that "no active play facilities for prea,schooi or
elementary school age children exist or are proposed within one Mile
of the proposed park". Is any proposed? Is any proposed park in the
vicinity - i mean not only one mile W say two miles?
Mr. Luft: Two miles, I wouldn't know. Now you're getting
up towards S.W Sth Street. Wainwright Park is located on a dead-end
access road adjacent to Rickenbtcker Causeway separated by four -lane
Miami Avenue from the rest of the community and is really totally
inaccessible by anyone except automobiles. Hopefully the new bike
path will allow some access there. There's nothing there either..
Mrs. Fernandez: Kennedy Park has been explained . .
The other question is I suppose you have statistics showing the
percentage of the population according to age groups, children, adults
and so on?
Mr. Luft: Right. The user group for which it's targeted
for is about 15% of the population of which numbers 4,000 and 5,000
in the subject neighborhood if we ascribe to the area between, roughly,
Aviation and 32nd Road as being the target area that is really without
any kind of facilities and is generally thought of as either one or
two neighborhoods. This would put it at several hundreds of individual
children in the target area this park would essentially serve.
Mrs. Fernandez:
. . 15%?
Mr. Luft: Yes, as a population breakdown. As a percentage
of the age groups.
Mrs. Fernandez: Under 12 years of age?
Mr. Luft: I think it's 12 to 14.
Mrs. Lichtenstein: Mr. Luft, is it usual in elementary
parks, this type that are mini -parks, that Parks and Recreation does
not have supervision? Is that usual?
Mr. Luft: Yes. It's not common to have a park superintendent
in an area that does not usually require organized programs. In the
larger parks where you have equipment that is used within the park
where it demands a supervisor to control aa organized program of
activities, this is a normal location for a park superintendent. This
would not be the case in a free -play playground. Normally we would
expect in a vast majority of circumstances that there would be parents
present at the park.
Mr. 8orja: Mme. Chairman, what is the expected cost for
that land acquisition and park there?
Mr. Jim Kay, Department Public Works: About $50,000,
Mr. Luft: The City already owns the property.
Mr. 8orja; The City owns the property?
Mr. Luft; Oh yes, we've owned it for a long time,
-24- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAB
Mr. Smith: Because 1 feel that what we're trying to
accomplish here 3.8 the use of parks for children because I feel that
this facility could be set up in the present park oat Bayshore Drive,
1 know it may take a light change in order for the children to get
across Bayshore Drive to the park. %* en this cotes up, 1 just like to
let you know that 1 will have to vote against it.
Mr. Dannenberq: Mme. chairman, you know, if makes me feel
bad that every time we have something about Coconut Grove I tend to
get a little mad with the Department because it seems that everything
almost that is planned is planned for Coconut Grove. Now the City of
Miami extends all the way down to 79th Street, and when t say every-
thing, I don't want to get caught in this because there have been
other things planned in other areas of the city. But we're talking
about parks for children; we're talking about a type of activities
that lend themselves to the people. Everything seems to end up in
Coconut Grove. I have nothing against Coconut Grove. The only thing
that I'm for is that I believe that there are other parts of this City
and there are other children in this City that also need parks.
Now let me tell you something. This is unfair to other
children. I want to know what parks are being planned in Liberty City.
I want to know what parks are being planned in Brownsville; in the
Central Negro district; in the Northeast section of downtown; in the
Little Havana area; in the black areas of Coconut Grove and the Puerto
Rican community. When 1' know that and if it is evenly distributed and
evenly divided then I think I would agree with it. Plus, an idea has
been brought up here which I think is very good. You have a fantastic
park over here called Kennedy Park. Why can't a piece of that park
be given to the children of this area? This I cannot understand; and
this doesn't mean that I agree for the park to be over there because
since the City owns the property over there it doesn't cost that
much money either. But my concern is that there are other parts in
this City of Miami that needs parks and I think other children in this
City have a right also to share In the taxpayer's money that comes from
all the citizens of the whole City of Miami and I will vote "NO".
Mrs. Rockafellar: Mr. Dannenberg, I too, like Mr. Allen,
was chairman of the Parks for People in the Northeast area. Now to
answer your question on the parks. There are parks allocated for every
section of the City of Miami. They were included in the bonds for
Parks for People in the bond issue that was passed and every citizen
in this City is going to pay part of that bond issue whether you're
for the parks or whether you're against the parks. In answer to
your question as to "why is everything for Coconut Grove?" we have
passed the Comprehensive Plan for Coconut Grove, now we must go back
and pick up the pieces - that the Ordinances that were in this Plan -
to pass them just as we will in the Northeast, Little Havana and every
other area as this Comprehensive Plan progresses.
Now I know of two or three parks, small parks for tots,
that are going into the Northeast area. There hasn't been a thing
done on them; they haven't come before this Board yet because that
area is not completed and that is true of the other areas as we go
into them. So everything is not being spent on Coconut Grove. They
are getting their share the same as the other areas in the City are
getting their share.
Mr. Dannenberg;me. Chairman, I understand that. My
question is then let's set, our priorities correctly. Coconut Grove
is not one of the areas that need the most help in this City. There
are other areas that need parks more and if the bond issue has been
-25- February 19, 1975 Item 3 (a)
PAlB
at
passed and maybe we already did the work on the Coconut Grove
Comprehensive Plan, let's get to work on the other ones so we can help
the other parts of the city and not just simply concentrate On one
area that doesn't really need itl 1 understand what you're saying.
All I'm saying is that I'd like to help some Other parts of this City
too.
Mrs. %ockafellar: May I continue that for just a moment`
Mr. Dannenberg. In this bond for Parks for People, there was so much
money set aside for each area. Now that money is going to be spent in
that area. Now whether we okay the park in Coconut Grove first, or a
park in another area first, it's not going to bother that money and I
think Mr. Alien, you probably have a list of the expenditures for the
various parks? I don't have mine with me, but I do know that these
various Task Forces, the one that Mr. Allen was on, the one that Marion
.., was on - I think there were nine or eleven, if I remember right -
different districts - and there was no money withheld from any area
for parks. There are parks like the Legion Park which was designated
as a Senior Citizens Park. Right in the area we have two more parks
for children. Up farther in the Northeast around 84th Street, there's
another park going in. It's going to be a "tot" park. We haven't got
to that yet. But nevertheless, the money is there and that's what it's
going to be used for.
Mrs. Fernandez: Mme. Chairman, as an answer to Mr.
Dannenberg, we have this Item in front of us as we have this Item next
to this in front of us today as part of the Comprehensive Plan for
Coconut Grove. So a long time from now we're going to hear about
Coconut Grove. I agree with you, we seem to be working only with
Coconut Grove, but it isn't taking the time or the effort, let's hope,
on the part of the Planning Department away from other areas of the
City. I don't think this money will have to be diverted or taken away
from other areas of the City of Miami. I'm looking forward to the
day they come with projects for parks in the Latin community _ Little
Havana and so on, and I'm sure they're working very hard on that.
But now, we're working on Coconut Grove. The only question
I have for the Department is that the question about taxes has been
mentioned here - that property taxes will be increased because of
the presence of the park?
Mrs. Rockafellar: No, it comes out of the bond issue.
Mrs. Fernandez: I know it comes out of the bond issue and
it sound logical for me to use that as an argument. Well, I think
all the questions in my mind have been answered. Taxes, users, and
it's also part of the Coconut Grove Master Plan. We have had several
workshops and Public Hearings on this Item so I'm ready to vote.
Mr. Smith: Mme. Chairman,
Mrs. Rockafellar:(to individual in audience) The Public
Hearing has been closed.
Mrs. Fernandez: Mine. Chairman, I will ask her a question.
Ms. Land: My name is Ann Land and I really do resent very
much a lot of things that you had to say about Coconut Grove. Number
1. do you know of any city in the south that has ever been divided
where a railroad track took you from the black to the white? . it
happens to say that we believe in Coconut Grove. The colored people in
Coconut Grove, I don't like to refer to them as blacks- they are
-26- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAB
colored people to me, They are the nicest people that you have ever
met in your life and they have a right to stand up because they have
been here before you g
Mrs, Rockafellar: Mts. Land, I'm going to have to ask you
to conclude this because this is not to the point of parks and also
the fact that we have closed the public hearing and we'd like to get
on With the discussion among the members. We're only talking about the
park now in Coconut Grove.
Mrs. Land: Well that has to do with the black people as
well as the white people.
Mrs. Rockafellar: The black people are also considered as
well as the white people, Mrs. Land.
Mrs. Land: I think this is something we should understand.
Mrs. Rockafellar: We do. we do, and.we're going to have
to conclude this because we want to get on with the Public Hearing,
and thank you. Mr. Smith?
Mr. Smith: So, to get back to your question. The fact
that when the bond issue was presented, it was presented in 1973 dollars
I think. Or 1972 dollars when they were making the estimates of
what money they would need in order to either renovate the parks or
build new parks. The procedure is to use money - because when they
present a park as Mr. Luft said - for $50,000, no one really knows
what that park is going to cost until it's built. You know, it can be
$50,000 but it can also cost $51,000.
Mr. Kay: We had an exact figure on that. I gave an
original estimate of $50,000. Bids have actually been taken on this
job, it's advanced this far, it's $55,000 -
Mr. Smith: These are not costs . . . where the builder
has the right to come back to the City for additional money if it
costs more than estimated?
Mr. Kay: No. These are based on unit costs and this was
the lowest bidder.
Mr. Smith: Yes, but even the bids that you have now in
1975 does not reflect the price that the City had estimated would cost
when they decided to raise the money. It's higher than what they had
estimated in 1973.
Mr. Kay: You're right there. You're correct there but
when the park gets built, this is what the contractor will be paid.
Mr. Smith: Yes, but what I'm talking about - out of this
money - for instance they had a plan set aside say, for $50,000 for
Coconut Grove, and they build a park in Coconut Grove that cost, say,
$100,000. Now, maybe they had $100,000 set aside for let's say, the
northern section of Miami, the additional overrun would have to come
out of this money because the bond has a limit. So if we set a
priority of taking care of everything in one area, when that area is
completed, there might not be any money left over from the bond issue!
Mr. Kay; Well, that hasn't been the case so far. 1 think
it would be valuable information if next time, just for the Board's
information Z brought down a cost breakdown of all the monies being
February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAD
ark
•
spent Citywide for parks and 1 think you would find that the monies
are beings evenly distributed ih all the areas. 1 will bring those
figures neXt time for the Board.
Mrs. Bookafel:'ar : Mr, Smith, they also told us that if
we wanted something else in the park that we've already spent our
money. Period. We can't take it from one section into another.
Mr. Smith: Well this is what I want to make sure of.
Mrs. Rockafellar: Are there any more questions? If not,
we'll entertain a motion.
zoning
Lot 7,
Mrs. Alexander: Mme. Chairman, I move that we change the
classification on approximately 2800 S. W. 21thd Avenue, S4' of
and Lots 8 and 9, W. H. Snipes Sub (3-107) from R-1 to P-R.
a second?
Mrs. Rockafellar: There's a motion on the floor. Is there
Mrs. Lichtenstein: I second.
Mrs. Alexander: I would like to speak to my motion if I
may. All things taken into consideration, I've seen some of these
mini -parks in other areas at the bottom of - Morningside for example,
and the Coconut Grove area which is much further away. They're
delightful little places where children do come with their families
and I feel that this has been approved in principle by the Commission.
It's been approved in principle, more than principle by many of the
Associations. The neighbor who lives directly across the streetis
in favor of it and for these reasons I move this motion.
Mr. Borja: Mme. Chairman May I ask Mrs. Alexander a
question?
Mrs. Rockafellar: Yes.
Mr. Borja: Mrs. Alexander, you're trying to make two
motions, one just to change the zoning, and then consider the second
part of the Item?
request
Mrs. Alexander: I'm sorry. I forgot to add that, and
for approval of site and plan development.
Mr. Acton: No. That's (b) part of th. Item. That's
separate.
Mrs. Rockafellar: Yes, that has to be separate. Mr.
Acton will you call the roll please?
Twelve objections were received in the mail.
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
-28- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
a
Mrs. Alexander offered the folio in/ resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION . NO,. __PA8 ..14-7. 5
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING CHANGE Or ZONING
CLASSIFICATION ON APPROXIMATELY 2800 S. W.
22ND AVENUE, S4' OF LOT 7, AND LOTS 8 AND 9,
W. H. SNIPES ,SUB (3-107) FROM R-1 (ONE FAMILY)
to P-R (PUBLIC PARK AND RECREATIONAL).
Upon being seconded by Mrs. Lichtenstein, this resolution
was passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Mmes. Alexander, Fernandez*, Lichtenstein
Rockafellar
Mr. Borja**
NAYES: Messrs. Dannenberg, Smith
Mr. Acton: Resolution passes 5 - 2.
At roll call:
* Mrs. Fernandez: I'm all for Parks for People.
** Mr. Borja: On this, I will vote Yes.
-29- February 19, 1975 Item 3(a)
PAD
1(b)
Request for approval of site and development
plan of proposed park at above site as per
Ordinance . GA71, ARTICLE XVIZI41, Section 4 (i)
property mned Rai (Coe Panniiy) , proposed to
be re2onea P-R (public Park and Recreational).
Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of Rearing,
and administered oath to all persons testifying at this Rearing.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION .__"APPROVAL"
The Planning Department has reviewed the site plan and
recommends approval with the following modifications:
Further landscaping with other plant material should be
provided along the north and south property lines to
buffer the park visually and acoustically from adjoining
homes. Bicycle racks should also be provided.
Mrs. Alexander: Mme. Chairman may I ask a question?
because under the consideration here it says 'further landscaping'
and the last sentence 'Bicycle racks should also be provided'.
How many? And for what reason? This is what I would like to know
because we're talking about a kiddie park.
Mr. Luft: Many of the families in the area do travel
by bicycle with child seats on the bicycle and it is more or less a
popular mode of transport and I would think that if we could encourage
transportation by bicycle with a child's seat, or however, rather than
by automobile or if it's necessary to do that, then I think we should.
Mrs. Alexander: Thank you Mr. Luft.
Mrs. Fernandez: Mme. Chairman, are those bicycle
racks included inside of the park?
Mr. Luft: Yes.
Mrs. Fernandez: Or lead into the park?
Mr. Luft: They would be adjacent to the entrance.
Mrs. Rockafeallar: Mr. Acton, I have a question on
(b). Is that a Public Hearing for the public to decide or is that
just an ordinance by the Board?
Mr. Acton: It requires action by this Board.
Mrs. Fernandez: Mme. Chairman, I'm ready for a motion.
Mrs. Lichtenstein: Mr. Luft I'd like to ask you about
what the Tigertail Association suggested concerning the landscaping.
Would this landscaping go along the north and south end of the property?
say where,
your motion?
Mr. Luft: That's our recommendation.
Mr. Lichtenstein: You said landscaping, but you didn't
Mr. Luft: I said on the north and south side,
Mrs, Rockafellar; Mrs, Fernandez, are you ready with
-Q- February 19, 1975 Item (b)
TWelVe ObjeCtiftS Were received in the mail,
Mtg. Pernandet offered the followinq resolution and mewed its
adoption:
RESOLUTION_NO, PAS 15-15,
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL 0? SITS AND
DEVSLOPMENT PLAN OP PROPOSED PAM AT APPRoX/MATtLY
2800 S. W. 22ND AVtNUE, S4, OP tor 7, AND LOTS
8 AND 9, W. H. SN1PEs SOH (3-107) AS PER ORDINANCE
6871, ARTICLE xVIII-1, SECTION 4(1): PROPERTY ZONED
R-1 (ON 8 FAMILY), PROPOSED TO BE REZONED P-R (PUBLIC
PARK AND RECREATIONAL) SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL
LANDSCAPING PROVIDED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY
LINES AND BICYCLE RACKS INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN.
Mrs. Alexander: I second the motion.
Mrs. Rockafellar: There's a motion on the floor by Mrs.
Fernandez, seconded by Mrs. Alexander. Will you call the roll please?
AYES: Mmes. Alexander, Fernandez, Lichtenstein,
Rockafellar
Mr. Borja
NAYES: Messrs. Dannenberg, Smith
Mr. Acton: Resolution passes 5 - 2.
-31- February 19, 1975 Item 3(b)
PAB
The faildwing tidePtgeled OPPOSE
(A) Change 26Mtlig eitisttfiesttori �h OPoperlyt appresxtrhatety 2800 South,*
Wag 22rd Avenue g4' of Lot / and Lots 8 and -§0 W. He Snipes Sub (8,6101)
from (ore tartlets') to Pai.R (publie parks and recreatiOnal)
and
(B) Disapproval of above shown site for a development plan of proposed park
as per ordinance 6871 Article XV1114 Section 4--(1): Property toned R-,1 (one
family) proposed to be rezoned P....11 (public park and recreation).
NAME ADDRESS LOT NO e BLOCK SUBMVISION
tAk
''11••/2, 1
)/ t4" tif41.'jr 4/6t,rzi,i) FY? — 11'
N't
1,/t 1 /•() ("/"' / 1-11
.
/ • . / 1 // ( )- cL_7:1 1 (
)1.
• / •
/
1.•
i7 41- j
I /
_
;•••
••=.1441 (4' 7 .
.,1 pi ./ • -/ • 1 6.? 1/1/1.1. /11/11>A3
LI xi 44_ r"..•
, 6-10P7- P44T to/ft
i 4( &Army -to 13404,./t N /$cAyve-
r 4.4,, IPS 'S"6
I
.1? •
'1
1.
I
•
c
'It
.17 q 67
• ,
r
•
1..(1/t•'•
•
• ,
•
.4.
. ..
,
r -)
1
Ii A l
, -,-- ,
.s,..yz.. 1.. ,,, 4...'e/ el /. •-•41r-,... — , ....' i ; ' 4 /.4./(-, ilt
( ,
: .
• '•-•
.
/
tiel-t ( / i / (
h_p_t .
'i 7i /e) tile
. 41.4.41,4
2- I t• • . (.; • •
•
•
NAME ANDRESS
7 i,.,,., , . //1.f. L._..p.r. 4...,..(7,)•1/ ..--I Ili. ...:";? 14 /c.
1
C/...
A- 4 ete c4/, ;,.- 7 5 f ..(1. 27
) - '
• ,
1 ,,'• .i /
1 il .T
. • /
) )
P4' '
' / ••1
•r• -7-1.*** ,••••
The following undereigneo Pe8E
(A) Change of 2e•rittig elastifitattoh oh pr,opet,tyt approx(rriate1y 2806 South •
west 22nd Avenue 84° of Lot ? and Lott e and 0) W, H, Snipes Sub (3,40?)
from Ptml or family) to P-R (publid parks and recreational)
and
(a) Disapproval of above she site for a development plan of proposed park
as per ordinance 6871 Article XV111,61 Section Property zoned Fk-.1 (one
family) proposed to be re2oried P (public park and recreation),
LOT NO, BLOCK SueDiViSION
tit
I) I e./k/ re k •
• fe . -
A__k
4.4 • f,
•
t . /
1. rf 1. ,1
c ‘‘.
(-07-- 2-3 -2-54 41J/41/('‹
2-7 tie' S LC) 2-- 2-- A 4/1L: ii," 72.. Lei ic "1-017/76ii
,/,,-7* / • 1 t 7- ..* t— i c-)
e..•'1/4 /•---- i - -) .
:4 / 6• ;?. 7 N
'.7 1 - J---- .--0-„j. r-ty. •:-...0' ill.--
Lat.17., /P) i•
, .
,7 ,..i.".7 t ..t`....c -i i_ ..,,{:.'/'
- ,
'11 --4„. ..s.-;.f / /-5- 7' /e,' i _ /5'0- ri t
...„7,:."
• -4_7"
/te..;
•
'7
) •'
'1.--
FI
.'. ,
A'
7'7
_
4.,.•7 •
t
k.
• /
I 4 • ( • ft 14-etc. -42-.
I •
1/4„. - • r /1/4, • 2_
••••••=1.6
• .t.,/
2 /7;'
2 14+.
1.;
• ^s \V; e..\,c7-( / .1-7--(:;. <- fp, c,
. •
•
•
' err
• 14.
'
• I ,
,• . . ..- • '. -•` S '''',
/._•• I • 7 'r .., •:.3 ../-4,
• f• ... ".../ ' , • , ',.
..... '
•• i t t.._ •1:.
t-/
P
b(7/1) '11
/1/ 4
Zer!) /, 1.63
Si 'k
"J.,/...L..
e .:, ez4v1.
.,1‘.1 4/ iftr.e a. /F-07-
L O't
Or
The following undersigned OPPOSE
(A) change of Zoning classification oh property: approximately 2800 South.,
West 22nd Avenue S4' of Lot 7 and Lots 8 and 9) W# He Snipes Sub (3.407)
from Pti4 (one faMily) to PR (public parks and recreational)
and
(13) Disapproval of above shown site for a development plan of proposed park
as per ordinance 6871 Article XVIII'4 Section 4-.(1): Property zoned R.1 (one
family) proposed to be rezoned P-R (public park and recreation).
NAME ADDRESS
tit) /)q )7) ((._
•
•
LOT NO, BLOCK SUBDIVISION
2-LP( )
•
•
. '
4 / 2,- "13 -tfl Pi 5 Oh
•
The following undersigned OPPOSE
(A) Change of 2ohitig classification oh property: approximately 28b0 South..
west 22nd Avenue S41 of Lot 7 and Lots 8 and 9, W. H. Snipes Sub (3.40?)
from FR.4 (one family) to 041 (public parks and recreat(onal)
and
(B) Disapproval of above shoWri site for a development plan of omposed park
as per ordinance 6871 Article XVIII-I Section 4,-(l): Property 2oned R..4 (one
family) proposed to be rezoned P..-R (public park and recreation).
NAME
ADDRESS
•
LOT NO. BLOCK SUBDIVISION
-70
- ,
.••• s e
/ /
/,1
• I ,
4 /7.
. •
•
/./ i
-
4.* '. ....,>....2.
t
) ......----
s•-. --7
fN Ill I
i 7 /
.......-- I —N. / i IL f.
.__f,.__ s...., i /
, . ," i
L.- .. ' ,
i 1 .
i i
I • A. c . -.. , )
. ,
, . ' ‘,-Z:-.kdk' \ N,\.t_........T7>;,._ .., ,... 0_,..,...-.....c:
k
L
5
t
7 t- 11 ..3-kiret---
•
•
The following undersigned pPEOS„El
(A) Change of zoning -classification oh property: appmximately 2.800 Southe.
Wett 22nd Avenue S4* of Lot 7 and Las 8 and 9) W H • Shies Sub (3.407)
from Mal (ohe family) to ft'a•R (public parks and recreat(onal)
and
(8) Disapproval of above shoWh site for a developrheht plan of proposed park
as per ordinance 6871 Article Section 4a-(1): Property zoned Ra4 (ot
family) proposed to be rezoned PR (public park and recreation).
NAME ADDRESS
2-12 el /
7 ) 3 1
.2 1 ri Jr'
6 66
LOT NO 6 BLOCK SUBDIVISION
_ _
if / t
ri 2 • •
3 t I LiAZ
LL
ifk:/••• • A-- LS...AA...,
."2
7
6(54 .
' )
t' 4 - • 1-CL- /4%4.' •
1, /to
CAA'-‘ % (
6'
/' • . 11.
t, — A, ' /
'I ii-cy) . J1
AI
• •J. .•
•
D1/0(
,
7
4.612A/i• fcet cefe
•-t4. / ;
2 /// .-Ai
1 / 1c 7/. 4 /'d'
/ 2.01z 4- 2 job.. /41rckt%
i\t,,. )4,A:14, k kt,,,A.., -Lilo F44,4v4ic,... Lo-Fic.-iiii- *-•./._a_41,..,...1).tr. T70..
I e .1'6 - At': /..i-
i S' (-4, . il . s AI i (7E ,;,-,..,‘,
1)7)-N--) '----:— C 1- s ...AA..., -:- if k_i '\ t -- Ng,
7 i S' ....z3)...._1,\ tl,, \:\ . -4-\el -
l'" ---11-' Ai 1 41{ . „t4,-ai,4_, 43 / Y Al lad i 1 1. -44/ r 4240tt 414(2, (41 a_
1_,-.4 a,k....'r ii e• r
•
4 .• of 11. 4 /
A ' "I.
I 1:
IL*
Cs^. •
4
E S/17„11 9(2/ • AI 2 e
2 .2. 9
/t M f•-• /41 4.//11 TL
St-
/0 I FI
Tow.v e 9A;
Nt.„?' ,
W/.20 TY a
2,nr 7 0 OF A1.141 z
07\0 E 2:443,y b
E V 0 2- /Ire I/1G OW 4,1A ire047eir
.2,2
• /1/1 / A M1 r//:
a (-2 4.2 75--;;'/:/ /-/,.71Z e A/' /4 A D D C.S7t Z,?)/-*
/, ZE'SS 14/.2J Ft 4"/ c xe; #2erw
w r- A t.t.)/ E.,t'S' 01 74D I•e)7.1.
oi• .17/1-L-* VA4.
_4 / j
.W L., B u.2 8 PEAR.S0A/ OW, OATa&AR•A
.2.2.247
Ail //1/,1
i-
t,
3.SV
.P t2
/
(.1‘),•,,i A
r-, r)
•
/-7?' g 0 A"/ a/1=-2 or 7
1-yv: 4/›-5; A ),T 4CA-1- ofiz p4z 0770
Ler/ Lot -viz F. ? o 780 ..
ttr_Lti,S 1) SO !up.) z, ...:„%;
? -•1 :
tf. ‘*.,1 1„/ / ,
•
r- • ,??/"s,?
e. s-
Z.) • • •
• • - '
,:)" A 4\:;"
74
F7' ",z
e.7,i1,14 ADD 404.-io? 71/lit,
-1,e) g
7o Sw Rae.
/vl 3 -3j3_3
A..to/ SA' e2s
S t.
.7
-70Cr AGWIeJ J . Redd;, ilQ/w••- V
2/o
S w z 7
V
`%M Fitt, 33 f 33
g -\- - N\ F c r r r 1"
315; , Sex a,v
—
i
Il z-,3 sw x 1s 'Si-.
iI M F 33133
3/4 j 0.hk V. C)Ine .Jr.
sw
!" 1 F 33133
. / //
h G f-
A�y� .zof—P•6
S ice.. Lbt-.2t
Jo/--2774.29.nc�
tl
LI 3a
_)3 4'3if
• 1-491"-r 3S' +v 2 7 S'h c .
to
A // �� IA
11 / /1- " // " o ls--- i /
Oi' .N-C-�° y�r'"
L210 // „ hi. iv !'9'-e
1
/4, 413— F/a .
iI ,
.7a/o /vlor-Zr a-
il ,
11
'' M/'
i
`'/
Cfl�s-/a-oOr7 Mnras�-tf_
g/a.
eI
1 /1.5" _ /0 .. 00 1N WoDA' r. f f d' W i/i;dked
., 213/ S . 7 i L,, e
33 / 3_3
4{/,!_lc-010I
TfDcKeriyi4+ 4i1 f s`1" 62 2
I// Gb ly
L a f l e.tf 6:0.- s zy Cam-+--
NrL 2 S. s' /,1 o r rr.r
y .j1..'L }9L g. 0?" s 2,.s z.
-h 6PGe C. /V w 7 _90. 9 6-
,fr
.5 Lv t/ 6 0• I/-2- ."et;yv 7--a
*-Aj L LI k*-r 1.2 4 1-7 Ste/
Vo • 0 3 fr. (}'�1' (i" 2-6 I-.
)3 Les.t lti A /I. .0,4 /.
3 k i-
cre.e-o.k fit PI .z -�.-
.BQs NE Cor Lf" ay SE /'7s I2/-
NE-/00 k. 21D.J 1 .
S w r o s: 9 tf ./4 P QR
Less N ! v '" d- w' Ls-- y
J D 11 h 1 .Pe-0.-Goc.k Est: ?b
Lof 2,3 Al W of Ce "'"f%
o�. �.... b 3 3► 2-..28 4.
Slel VMav► M., L B
o ��� to ion Co.#e � f - (-o •
l App lei kitAsc.
i
I /
v'r . T-1-1--6,-,, /9,,,, •
i 1
VIA., kn A S IV. Po n n "'-
, --
;1
30/ 4- ”4-/-11z, St
/Ili it;s..vi 3.?„ il.94. •
; I
9//J--- 2Y- calf '1
ca4-do j,,The.4.2)
VS- 77.d.e 1;JI /
Ai/e1,0,1'
•I
•
11
/1/7 1•741,e1-1. o++
3o IS" E-1,1 a:I-4 /a.
714 F
j//c c-
c et;yne
- ;;' 1:f C Ai t•:35,0• X P.14 6.3 .4
girc.piie
27L JO( C_ •
L.,
r1sTTATloN 2to/ % vv/ 22.Af�j
I✓ r L.� r�/✓:
4//. 3&- t')v/0
. AI osE Avi rt Ay i/v' t vEz y//
31:?o C/1A7Y 4 .4VE
N/,4/l1 F;LA :39/33
- ` - lJ i 1i�/N SN 1 Pb: SuG S?DFt LoTs /) '3 Oka AP N
Lot- 7=' ;MI -VA/ J` E i t 0 K Es r Jry .. D.0
,5-/, r-_:. gr,vd x /7-4
4-1.1$- ay- 002.0
. S /if 12 i'' �'� hVV LUCI L. Iz
. /:3V EPl&71LA Avt _ 'O
kJ' AM f=1.A 33/33
?3-/07 WH SA/ /! Es Su.2 9..ta'rt Lor'1 L.or SizOE
7j' e-2 737SO.
/ t >:? 0)2 /
' D �ot!��✓ bAMi uS 5 W LGAr/ et: 0 ✓.
10 / 7774-?TA/I. A vc
tjlAM1 / L/-, 33/,:t3.
rJG' lY..1t) 7 '/ i' (J .V /V tr l E s Cue e/ 7`/.P.I [.. 47„5j J Ty is &Ea I ll V I t _Or
N '✓✓ C0/2 L oT s eG,rr /2 9, .?. Tt _ 6-EL y 7.s'. zi 1 Ft £WL y '% d'7A-t•
N WL y /33. /7ff 7 7)(55 Lot- Size /0,77 v S,, Ft
1 i, St. 7? CZ EL1 ,' L
2/11 r't. AV/
/✓ 1 r� /� 1 FZ fi
,•,•s'-l07 V✓//
I ;c, Ar of N (,'T?
4.1R5.,r szioPo,?r r!F Li9T$ s z A%4
/ o / - "r ��-r %cr 4 y ,5 4, .E PE' W 10, r
41 DEG- W i?,'oF NW// / 1,- r • 1/V 'Q- girt' N?o / r •pc,ia
Lor , .1 l= /PP q' )./'I
4/I5 -
tiJ .i o ^ .5't?
`-c
li'. ,.i I, .
�:: ,,,
Y '. n.
t.CJ `/)/ h • 6 %J j s
•
;'• L I S S
• (. t' Z "A /„/iS E r1- V`/ L
2 71 •1'. ;''v :2 2, A V v
J A / i El.
•P .,- r
sr L ,Dx/(
W 7 d / 4 •: t' z:
1i///S! fikSe/,/ O/7LJt i fLor',' ? `1 1v)i:-
SIZE //4,490,9 A'/Eo
4//3J i v..&JeeP
C1.,N: re.
v
69.0J. e1"IVi'G'sir
W1 0 ky J [ ��: / zSA j .E L it N
*11,0
e
V>% // S c; I P ' L' a '4? / 0.7'7 ? 'L E.. r C 6? /✓
.; 'i , S ?‘.1 Ft %'i ,r to /`' Vv' Co. &44.1-/7
I o t .S / . r'. ,)-() • • ^ .) .•' X / d' 7
,�
1
L
5f,41-04/ ,•.,•/ Se.' lit/
2 o s .2 A
11/1, I A /C't I fiA
)6)--/b 71/p,FS D of" wttey
// 042 X: SJ'S S-it Ls-t- )6),zk /9' .larsizE i*Rieev.az.,4
7/ /3
/)/? R. OZtS ARSH PArle I C
SW29 2-
A/ rl iv I F2 A
•
•
Avg
6) a- / /77//0 D D PZ o „Vizekrz
/4 LiTS /70,4?st Rz R79 ierSizE 97%57.0‘)X
-R
0 ofsAiy,c(L zs(3,3
. . _
4.-.4 PId7- D '. jNewr1
oz i6
5
Q
3o ro
j /11r 33/3J
''//9/ , f-e/ M. i/a ih
3 o t f k aa-t'& i k ,S'l ,
i
;
1 , 'gm/ , t ">� a la- S-74-
»liiaS
49"73.:4_,c‘:.via-,-•
y/�F .3 .3
Ai; 14, reel
0
7i,.,i raee 3
1
iMJ
i�► c Fa+ is �, �F H-1 .
SW
j isray►,e A.P£3 2,36
Rik
. (raver
P ci �r
M icLei A. A� Y� hJ.
0 7.5-+! £cLi a.-ol A1. >� I/
mr 33133
;,
H(Is' to —o llo'/Lel'°
312_4
s 30
:a\--s it`s
S� ond1 d-W.Mo ret
. \a- Si-. 0
f-441-70
1/
�,
�s-r 271-1
Ss/ N
6-/j,J /00
�/
Lof- //
I/
4 a 7 % .2_ Leff 1,0 / 3 ..5 '" S74,
f 13 Leif w
�j S t .
16
O. c P 3 —
N qt / a 7 ) a r
b/ pvnt{/�ed ,/ off, w. by Li- /
shrei-
N ar
3-/e
4.f 10 31k- .25-.(4-- ,1-1\1
61‘) 40/1--
2'
H
c
gos--etif 67
"rliA-b k#0/ 'POP 6:1.0"1-r
P- °ifs S.
0..÷tt:571—.wes ) s the 4-
1 .7.2o as' 5-0 r
op sat-ci,,e11,41_
1
j
o o -5erl-c,;( Rve
c., lle(rti;ck 4-tv. bier
ql/S.--10- 00 1 4"r Arrrsr C. 73777-
/v1F 73/3_7
:t
17 Tier4-0.:(
F
ooa_:4/2. Prelac cositi.,,
1/05-- ir-
2
te.,41 rft-te
;:e tsoin .4- . -Co So-vi e
/I/lore-is Ja
/11 F
DE
st
Tice apt e poi.... A iv
4- /3 4- 1-1,,4-
Laisi n- 211.113
Oe-0 p1 U e
W �f
7Z-0-7t- k lot" Al IA,
-1; TT* Pe c.ock Plc t -/.1
/')2-7 IA 0 L. LTThb 4-
1 2 0 ft" StiK b f
Be ;64,3 111.10- pl A) 4— 3.
0/1 3- ,
Pe..."‘A Er/:
,51), Ivo Of_ Ally a a
L01—e, 4- / 0
Lo
N 4-
(Rocker #8,17.r P3 Q.7
1-DY- / „Nbf
C e #ffij
.41..r .37/A /
•
ii
1/e71aeJ .SGL.or
ff
1 D� S. 5 hor+r .
Mr
y.1fr." -.,o o' a.wes .
L/l/J-10-
,� .sue
soSr
per. A ' . 6
Krdetihe
fS 1.z4-/3 4- 71.4" 6-of
f 5 ) o // 8/k /9-- LI; h j
Coe-6 6-ro
"rdorZ 07• ,ice ti-e-- - 4 le i=i 44 A.
7 et; lot N.24
bp—
t.J q. /y .71 /2?
6ar18.0.,4
7: Satc,LeI/4-
.� goo l700 ertai/ th-e
y .3 / 3-3
err/s- lo- oo l ''L
c. Hef,,1c% 4-W. b;aI
r, a
i
MF 33/3.3
%///S'.- //- DbJ J cLw iJ. , c f.trJe..
.2.1 , D TT3.e rTa. ( /.e .
PI
�oTT Pe0,- e,oc'< Sf ,gib.2
/UL/ /a o f f J-
.Z o S rR £� o LT 2 1
B e 1;1d 1{. yS f-t 0 h N e- .. / 8
oN S ,
J phh / ETh 'TB 2-/pl.
LX Io T c Nl y 2 a o
Lo c c}- / p o 0 .5 1�
OF LD ,.. Peih a y 3.6
o k N d- 3. l 8 o H S.
cocke
KI !s- I(Nor�orz 73"edlj. ?I- v►./ epos .rlam+Ce 7— or?k
Dce y fr.,
a h.
/iiorr;J Ja..
PB S3- a7
,�/•F /
.13
42
k•' v1. be. EC. /1
/4 1 i/FL/1
00'
St"; tidN
9 ce1i
e
S .1.2 A v4:-
•
/ %.,(1/v PE,S' St Lot / gsS StLOSrizE d
JAN„ ,Coi22siEle CV)Aci
2/7? r/J,F.:1;41.'.. A Vg...
tv/ /h 1=2 A
•..P /1 7 w PEs fi /i S /LyPJi4y 7
:Of/ Of /pt Si2E- . (Ape x Aj--0 •
41 ,?,3)-- 00E/
tr.
TA/i,.:-:; • D LEE ^: VI .PA1-i ic re
/S- 717,2 t4 / 1. A v (.4 1\
/-1; FLA :33 /.2 .
P i././ s 4' P Saa epts / 41/6' 0,./-1 4417-17
• /1/e7-Ar/94 ic b0 4/ ‘, •tf veLy.2r/c1 ore'ea74 /7 Z,>t*
/1LLA/
l.S---70-),5.)-
it 6? ./A o 'hi LEO
• 2 /2 rA A v
F," f:*
t:;.--/d 7 Wij-/ V/1)7: S a //4X.C.4,-/- Zt/7 fw,v7'5'
.1-01" i•Y 4 6r ;7,5 4
of
o(/,-* I
Z)) a
e)- I s-- .5) y
,.• ,
/ / ;7", Ai,
/V, I • •
0
-
' .
)
• le vi.
7) (1 /9
4.441•
1;:. ..y• t st.
I I „
/ r I •••••
0
/ / ? f'4 I:191 4/43. i").")
t r 1/43).6-1 N, ,/ f t A/'frV (>7- /
7.)
e!
. 4 l i 6-7,-a:5' - 0 / •-9 ,.•-9 ty
R. j. /?2F/A/,;•il-i i?_ LT P.4 ‘i/. 0 Z E-47/A
\ .
2. / ;.;L T'•••!%/1 1 4 Ay
I- )0
7-) 4 - A/
r
11
,71,/ Ex 7- 1e 11oDES 'v/.i7//ff
S W.2.2 Ave
fr / A 1/1( r/ A
AM
/2t.O L97` SIZE SO, /5-Z,
1.6 .249- 7-fry'/. /4'41 e0/4 ,;; OD
Azi-Ey Z,Y6 WMDZT zor,Sizx. 2,12dx /4)0
- / '31 "Z61
4--Ay , ert/i'le. / / 47(;irtv//
2,s9/ /-°) 6'
.7
/1
•
/ (A.,/ 4 03/ t3'?
. ZS 4 illnt6 f Of-4-.J
9 - .2 Tf 4,11V
DJ 1 07' I , /
-k L.: .5 7:/! I OA, ?c) „.,..,4 v
c/.%. 02
41 L"
F
2 / / 7LA 1
IV,' - • • • • . /.. .‘ ,
JI•
•
0
.." / 0 3fJw, ,'";/),//7' f A/frvi eom
pc ae A
11). J. ??L'-' T? -,'‘b/il CZ
/ / /%;'.,t;77 / A VE
lk"; ; &e/&&
a /.f."? 7 VI/ I-(' %;/li;
..7.• • /
v 4.;
I •-• ')
• • -•• 1,
t 0 Z9t S zE
VV e 4.)/1/ rrN,
4//6--.77-12z)/e)
g RA/ E 7- Ri/ODEs a-Rz/ve
-22),7 S W•22 Ave
,MfA/v1 RA
Pts9 71A/4/. A'444'. CoAl .,;; A Do lot. "/.-4
AZiL, Lye W)DZT Zp7S/zA- 7.1.4,0vg /do
;•!,--;51 7- (.2.2,41
414 v A/C3Sto/1/
,.,*??/ ft, W,2„-,
1:17
•
/ / J,?/8.?
f I . 4C2
.14 V f
1,4 /* s.4 /4. DJ' Dr 1 2 I: (2
•-•'.
I
a
o
P. SP.41.1 Al .11 tr
2s A z27_7 A //
.22'i9 Ls' VI/
MI FZA '%) .1)
pie ,..%?/--,2
• -11
4r..%
77, v/ ee." /4 1)D Z, N
.Ze/ %",,l'ir/lizzy zy(c' 6' A DJ- zotsizE x 9
S C
ZOt1/4R 7Dill-gLsex OW ADA L
•ao65- /-"ipziAfitA/
M A f;,_: A
_ Z) z- AM D F ¼v sysc
2-47- 6 /1/0f,)/c74 0 t())/(i-- 49/.6724 /429? S1
VERA. A/A7,21LIE. INOD .
/\ 4.1 sr
/4/ ,4/v; I fZ/ ?,3)/tS)3
/fAi*,‘.)DE,(: D ,9F//,':7-V%/ aISC
.1/.2_ ty-
g A
. ,z4
a/ ,
Zw) .-/ fez- •
Lsr 5LX /9
4 D
Lard ./L)'
2. 0 4.71 •1-'7 .41...1..7
,471./r17•-/ 44-V*3721: iir/ve 6.4/4/1k
W42W1'
1 .4.•C
4
ii
)4
•••• •••• •••••• ••• ••• •••• WoO•061r.
0'1
,4\
\
•
•
0
ATA,
Pa AR ./.9:15
9
etr "trot to ••
Honorable Members
of the City Corntnission
rpo .t P. W. Andrews
City Manager
C:, ,, ?' •LOR1DA
1f:'t =R Cyr r t!y�r' t. F:1`01C iANoUN.1
APR 4 1975
,Silver 131uff Park Fire Station
i7 Site
A meeting was held on Tuesday, April 1, 1975, at the
.Department of Parks and Recreation, with the Planning
Department and interested citizens, pertaining to
development of Silver Bluff Park. The topics discussed
were lighting, parking, and perimeter fencing.
General agreement was reached that the security lighting
as designed, is needed and desired. The green vinyl
chain link perimeter fence will suffice, if the proper
landscaping is provided to attain a sound barrier and
deterrent to climbing.
The interior parking should be eliminated, and only
parallel parking provided between the park boundary and
S. W. 22 Avenue. The extra grass area then provided
will be an excellent place to install checker -chess tables.
The attached sketch denotes the modifications to the park
site, as agreed upon by the City representatives and the
citizenry, and is submitted for your consideration.
encl.
cc: Honorable Maurice A. Ferre, Mayor
Honorable J. L. Plummer, Jr., Vice Mayor
Honorable Manolo Reboso
Honorable Theodore R. Gibson
Honorable Rose Gordon
117
•
( ,
)
.„,
44.44.4414,4,44.44,440..4.4
1
t
0
LJ
•
••• -"
; •
: •
;
4
N\r-/ 7 P--
4. .4
t • ;
t. .
;
$
•
- • :.
• •-•
.44,144/444 4744