HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-75-0224Honorable Menthers of the
City Commission
ai, t> -..,e
P. W, Andrews
City Manager
NEB 2 0 13?5
•
Motion concerning Proposed I2-CC
(Residential -Office) District: Planning,
Advisory 13oard Public hearing
January 8, 19.3
This memorandum transmits a concern of the Planning
Advisory Board and requests the Commission's deter-
mination of the disposition of the proposed R-CC
District (Residential -Office).
On November 6, 1974, the Planning Advisory Board in public hearing, upon
the recommendation of the Planning Department, recommended a new R-CC
District (Residential -Office), as an amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance to the City Commission (Resolution PAB 79-74).
At the meeting of December 2, 1974, the City Commission deferred considera-
tion of the Planning Advisory Board recommendation concerning a new R-CC
District (Residential -Office) until the properties to which the ne;.v district would
apply were before you.
On January 8, 1975, the Planning Advisory Board in public hearing, considered
the Planning Department's recommendation that the proposed 1:-CC District
(Residential -Office) be applied to certain properties in Coconut Grove. The
Planning Advisory Board took the position that they had insufficient knowledge
of the final provisions of the R-CC District, as it would be approved by the
Commission, and voted to defer the item, as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. PAB 4-75
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DEFERRAL OF THE
APPLICATION OF R-CC ZONING TO THE THREE
DISTRICT AREAS OF S. W. 27th AVENUE, AVIATION
AVENUE AND GRAND AVENUE, AND FURTHER
RECOMMENDING THAT TIIE PROPOSED 11-CC
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE BE ACTED UPON BY TIIE CITY COM-
MISSION AND INCORPORATED AS A PART OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE PRIOR TO
Se-e-
Page 1 of 2
PE8 2 o 075
Honorable i\Eetribers of the City Commission
'I'IIE PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD MAKING A
P.ECOMMENDA'i'ION ON TETE APPLICATION OF
THE R-CC CLASSIFICATION TO SPECIFIC
PROPER TIES,
Further, the Planning Advisory Board passed the following motion:
MOTION:
Motion questioning the procedure of recommending the
application of a district without knowledge of the provi-
sions of the district which is pending approval by the
City Commission and forwarding to the City Commission
a memorandum setting forth the reasons for the Planning
Advisory Board's deferral of the R-CC District as set
forth in Resolution No. PAB 4-75.
This matter was also discussed by the Planning Advisory Board in the meeting
of February 5, 1975, with no resulting action.
In summary, the Planning Advisory Board and City Commission have reached
a stalemate, concerning the R-CC District in which neither body is prepared
to act.
RECOMMENDATION: Ninety (90) days have expired, by which time the City
Commission must act on a Planning, Advisory Board recommendation or it is
considered denied. (Ordinance 8197, Section 13 dated October 4, 1973.)
Therefore the administration recommends that Resolution PAB 79-74 of
November 6, 1974, recommending the proposed R-CC District (Residential -
Office) be returned to. the Planning Advisory Board for further hearings with .
specific instructions as to how the City Commission expects the Planning
Advisory Board to act on new ronirtg districts and the application of the
zoning district to specific parcels of land.
Accordingly, this matter will be scheduled on the March 12, 1975, City
Commission Meeting Agenda.
Page 2 of 2