HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-75-00062
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30.
31
32
33
34
35
36
MEA
1/3/15
RESOLUTION NO. _-_
75-6
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A PETITION FOR A
PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT (PAD) ON TENTATIVE
PLAT #918 -. "EDISON PLAZA", LOCATED AT
APPROXIMATELY 5500 N.W. 2ND AVENUE, FOR A
HUD PROJECT FOR THE ELDERLY, CONSISTING OF 80
UNITS/AS PER ORDINANCE NO, 6871, ARTICLE XXI-1,
SUBJECT TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING
DEPARTMENT, ZONED R-2 (TWO FAMILY), C-4
(GENERAL COMMERCIAL) AND C-5 (LIBERAL COMMERCIAL),
PROPOSED TO BE REZONED R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE).
WHEREAS, the Miami Zoning Board at its meeting
of December 2, 1974, Item #9(c), following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZB 200-74 by a 7 to 0 vote
recommending approval for the application of a Planned Area
Development (PAD) as hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it advisable
in the best interest of the general welfare of the City of Miami
and its inhabitants to grant the petition for the application
of a Planned Area Development (PAD);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The petition for a Planned Area
Development (PAD) on Tentative Plat #918 - "EDISON PLAZA",
located at approximately 5500 N.W. 2nd Avenue, for a HUD
project for the elderly, consisting of 80 units. as per
Ordinance No. 6871, ARTICLE XXI-1, subject to site plan
approval by the Planning Department, zoned R-2 (Two Family),
C-4 (General Commercial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial), proposed
to be rezoned R-4 (Medium Density Multiple) be and the same
is hereby granted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9 day of
JANUARY
1975.
"DO CUMEN f INDEX
ITEM NO, _ //
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
n n: 9 1y75
RE.?OLUTWn
REMARKS: ...
1
4
s
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
H. D. SOUTHERN
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
VO... :i.r._ .•.
MICHEL En ANDERSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CO RECTNESS:
)i14-
S. LLOYD
CITY ATTORNEY
MAURI CE A. EERRE
MAYOR
'7 r i"% i ! : .'
2. r� �»
ifU
Honorable City Commission
Attention: Mr. P. W. Andrew
City of Miami, Florida
Gentlemen:
l rxa
December 10, 19 4
Res PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT-
RECOMMENDED
Approximately 5500 N.W. 2nd Avenue
Tentative Plat #918
"EDISON PLAZA"
Applicant: Dade County Dept. of HUD
The Miami Zoning Board, at its meeting of December 2, 1974, Item #9(c),
following an advertised Hearing, adopted Resolution No. ZY 200-74 by
a 7 to 0 vote Recommending petition for the application of a Planned
Area Development (PAD) on Tentative Plat #918 - "EDISON PLAZA", located
at approximately 5500 N.W. 2nd Avenue, for a HUD project for the elderly,
consisting of 80 units as per Ordinance No. 6871, ARTICLE XXI-1, subject
to site plan approval by the Planning Department; zoned R-2 (Two Family),
C-4 (General Commercial) and C-5 (Liberal Commercial), proposed to be
rezoned R-4 (Medium Density Multiple).
Two objections were received in the mail.
A RESOLUTION to provide for the above has been prepared by the City
Attorney's office and submitted for consideration of the City Commission.
J ncerely,
David Simpson, J ., Dixctor
Department of Administration
Planning and Zoning Boards
cm
Z. M. 13
Attached: Minutes
cc: Law Department
NOTE: Planning Department recommendation: "APPROVAL".
Tentative City Commission date: January 9, 1975.
1
Petition for the rf i cial Vacation - i_on and closure of
.
(a) Street approximately 10' west of N,i.. 2nd Avenue, in apyorC7_�!`
.,r
ancc wit': Tentative Plat. 4911, "rDI:>oN PLAZA„. 4,
APPRO:;I:1. TELY 5500 I; 2N1; AVENUEy�
Tentative Plat f9 1;3 , .-rIDI ;:1t! PLAZA" .
(h) Change of ;'oning Clatlsif ic,ation of above property frnni
R-2 (Trio r ami ly ); C-4 (General Commercial) ; and C-5
(Liberal Commercial; to R-4 Wediutn Density Multiple) .
an-1,
and,
(c) Petition For the application of a Planned Area Development:
(PAD) on above sites, for a HUD Project for the Elderly,
consisting of 80-units as per ()rdinance No. 6171,
ARTICLI; X.XI-1; zoned R-2 (Two Family) ; c-4 (General Commer-
cial); and C-5 (Liberal commercial); proposed to be rezoned
R- 4 ,
Secretary filed proof of publication of Legal Notice of hearing,
and administered oath to all persons testifying at thiF hearing.
1)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: "APPROVAL"
SUBJECT TO THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS BEIrn RFVIEWFD AND
APPROVED BY THE URBAN bEVELOP741 NT REVIEW BOARD PRIOR TO
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, It is the intent of ARTICLE XXI-1
Planned Area Development to pormit as a "Conditional Use"
suitable developments that will promote economical and
efficient land use, an imp::oved level of amenities and
development in harmony with their surrounding. The Plan-
ning Department finds this project to h0 appropriate in
satisfying these objectives and recommencs its APPROVAL,
concurrent with request for zoning change and vacation and
closure of street.
The proposed project is in accord with development objective:;
of the Edison Park Neighborhood Development Program Area (IIDP42) .
The need for housing for the elderly has been demonstrate'i for
this area. The project has been reviewed and approved by the
Edison Park (NDP) Project Area Committee and the City of 'liami
Urban Development Review Board.
PAI) FINDINGS AND RECOMMMENDATIONS: HUD Project Fla. 5-57
E'r d on Plaz��", PAD FINDINcGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 'IEMo Dated
November 1, 1974. As follows.
PAD FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EDISON PLAZ1'1 -- Tentative Plat #915, FLA. 5- 57 Elderly Housing,
Approximately 5500 N. W. 2nd Avenue.
PROJECT SUITAI3ILITY
The proposed project is in accord with development objectives
of the Edison Park Neighborhood Development Program Area (NDI' g2).
The need for housing for the elderly has been demonstrated for
this area. The project has been reviewed and approved by the
Edison Park (NAP) Project Area Committee and the City of Miami
Urban Development Review Board.
LOCATION
A. Relation to tiajor Transportation Facilities
The project is adequately served by the abutting street
systems.
B. Relation to Public Utilities, Facilities and Oervices
The Plat and Street Committee have reVli wed they tentativn
plat and have established that necessary public utilities
are available to service the project. Additional require-
ments such as easements or utility relocation will have
to be provided prior to final plat acceptance in addition
to the approval of the official vacation and closure of
N, W. i'ith Street, appro)cimately 160' west of N. W. 2nd
Avenue.-45- December 2, 1974 Itor.i ',I'a
C 4 Site,. Character. and Surrounding Deve 1orment Relationship:;
The site is suita:Ao for c=evelot ment and will he compatihle
With proposed nlans for surrounding property including
Htrti owned lots programmed for family 'sousing.
The site contains approximately 91,040 square feet (200
acres) excluding area to be added from proposed street
closure and less the area required for public) dedication
for a cul-de-sac on N. W. 55th Street. In addition, the
site is immediately adjacent to HHUD? property on A. W. 35th
Street comprising 21,300 square feet (0.49 acres) and in
close proximity to HUD property on N. W. 56th Street com-
prising 107,400 square feet (2.47 acres), all of which is
scheduled for development as low-income family housing.
The applicant has submitted that a major portion of the.
open space located on the northern edge of the site will
be commonly shared by both the site occupants and the resi-
dents of the neighborhood for recreational purposes.
Based on the unique locational and supportive circumstances
of IIUD properties within the neighborhood and the suitability
of the Edison Park Area for new housing development, the
sub -minimum PAD site is recommended.
D. Conformity with Applicable Zoning Regulations
The ap ant's project s being submitted for a change in
zoning classification from C-4 (General Commercial) and
C-5 (Liberal Commercial) to PAD R-4 (Plannec, Area Develop-
ment, :tedium Density Multiple Family ltesider,tial) . The
proposed use, density, floor area ratio, yard areas and
usable open space of the project will conform to the R-4
Zoning District. The project is for apartment development
housing the elderly.
The project is not in :onformity with the R-4 parking require-
ments and the minimum dwelling -unit floor area for one (1)
bedroom apartments.
The Department therefore recommends a change of zoning and
the following deviations from the R-4 zoning District iteguta-
tions.
Parking
Te-project accommodates parking for 45 automobiles, or
0.56 spaces per dwelling unit. A waiver of development. in (!;ir:)
requested for. 75 parking spaces. In light of the proposed
tenancy of the project, public housing for the elder17, am!
the applicant's ability to provide all of the required part-
ing on the site if needed at a future date, the waiver and
provisions of parking as proposed, is deemed appropriate.
Minimum Floor Area for One (1) Bedroom Unit
The project includes provisions for 51 efficienty units at
400 square feet per unit and 29, one (1) bedroom units at
500 square feet per unit.
The deviation from a minimum floor area of 550 square feet
for one (1) bedroom units is deemed appropriate based on thco
tenancy of the units.
E. Maintenance of Common Open Space
The applicant has submitted that the common open :.price and
recreational facilities will be maintained by the project
owners, bade County Department of Housing and Urban !)nvelrr -
xnent.
F. Evidence of Unified Control
The applL7-ant has shown evidence of unified ownership of the
subject property identified as Tentative Plat #91R, "Ediqm1
Plaza".
C. Conformity with A11 f'1jplicable PJU) Provisions
It is the intent of ARTICLE XXI- Planned Area Development
to permit as a "Conditional Use" suitable developments that
-46- December 2, 1974 .Lteni #9
will nrnmote ncnneriic,a1 and efficient land use, an ir.;)rr've,-I
level of amenities and lrvrlopment in hormnnv with thri.t
surrounding. The Planning ;)op;artmr.nt finer; thi!: preje' t
to be appropriate in ti n fy inq these nb jeeti.vrs, and
recommends its APPROVAL, ,concurrent with request for
zoning Change and v.ac tiOn and closure of street, .` UI1JE''T
TO THE I"T;IAI, I,A! r)SCAPi•`. PLAUS i3EIt1C', Rl'Vtfl J1'L) 11PIi.) APPPOV1 D
BY THE URi3,\;I DI V1 LOPi.0 T REVIEW BOARD PRIOR To PROJEC r
CONSTRUCTION,
Fla. 5-57BN ?)tti1,LOPMMENT REVIEW BOARD: PAD Approval - :IUD Project;
URBAN
t t dated
Fla, 5-5f3 Ildcrly and Family. '.�•.' r�
October 21, 1974.
The Urban Development Review Board, at its meet ine-r c f .
October. 16, 1974, evaluated plans, submitted for planned
area development by the Dade County Department el l:ru^i•r'e
and Urban Development, identified as ^lea. -57, Edison
Plaza, Fla. 5-58, Elderly, and Fla. 5-58, Pr?r.r.ii'nl c;ardenr;,
The Board in granting approval of the pr.njeet bmir ;i'ns
expressed considerable concern for the United bur'tctets
allocated for landscaping. In addition the Hoard directed
the project architect to resubmit prior to project construe
tion copies of detailed landscape plans which specify types.
sizes and location of plant materials and trees.
Mr. Dean: All right, on Item #9. Swear in all of those wishing
to testify, - are they the same people, nr. Simpson? All right, btaff?
Mr. Dooney: This will be the third Planned Area Development
submission before you this evening. Like the two former pr.ojectr;,
Mr. Chairman, this project has been subjected to Citizen's Review,
it has been screened by the Urban Development Review Hoard, evaluated
in conjunction with plans that have earlier been prepared for the
Edison Park Neighborhood Development Project Area.
And as such, we find that it meets all of the standards of tho
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and recommend that you 'approve it ,is
presented this evening, subject to the evaluation of final 1andscaies
plans, by the Urban Development Review Board.
You do have our November 1st Memorandum, and I think this; will
highlight most of the comments that I could make. Thank you.
Mr. Dean: Thank you very much. State your nape and address
for the Record.
Mr. Rhodes: Vann Rhodes, with HUD. Mr. Chairman. We stand
on the recommendation of the Planning Department, and we are fortunate
in having a representative of the PAC, tonight, to speak for the PAC,
tirs. Annette Eisenberg. The architect is here, to answer any question:
that you all might have.
Mr. Dean: Okay, if there should be anv. Idr. Silverman.
Mr. Silverman: Yes, Mr. Rhodes? Could I go back to this
first item? How big were the units in the first one, are they the
same size? I notice, these are only 400 feet, efficienty units.
Mr. Rhodes: That's normal for one person, efficiency unit,
and five hundred and fifty for one -bedroom. Sometimes, the way it:
works out, they can be a little bit larger, but they can't be any
smaller, because that's the Code.
Mr, Silverman: This says, "twenty-nine, one bedrooms at five
hundred feet.
Mr. Rhodes: That's a mistake,
Mr, Silverman; They're five fifty?
Mr. Rhodes: They have to be, yes, sir, According to Code,
Mr, Silverman! Okay. The efficiencies are four hundred, and
47� December 2, 1974 Item 40
1
the cane bedrooms ate five fifty?
Mr. Rhodes: Unless, the architect has a better figure than
that.
Mt. Dean: Sir? You have to get to the rmike. How about
coining to the mike, and giving your name and address for the Record.
The Architect: I am . ., hrchitect, 2946 South Bayshore
Drive, Miami.
The efficiencies, they are 403 square feet, and the one -bedroom
apartment, they are five hundred and fifty-three square feet.
Mr. Dears: A11 right, does that answer?
Mr. Silverman: Yes, thank you.
?4r. Dean: A11 right. Is there anyone in opposition to this
applicacion? There being none, we will close the public hearing,
and have discussion among the Board. None. I am ready for a motion.
Rev. Johnson: I will move ##9, "a" for approval.
Mr. Dean: All right, moved by Reverend Johnson, on #9,
Mr. Alfonso: Second.
,t
a .
Mr. Dean: Seconded by lr. Alfonso. Under discussion? Being
none, call the roll.
Mr. Simpson: The motion on Item #9, "a", is to recommend.
Two objections were received in the mail.
Reverend Johnson offered the following resolution, and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. ZS-198-74
RESOLUTION TO RECOI1END OFFICIAL VACATION AND
CLOSURE OF N. W. 55TIi STREET, APPROXIMATELY
140' WEST OF N. W. 2ND AVENUE, IN ACCORDANCE
WITH TENTATIVE PLAT #918, "EDISON PLAZA".
Upon being seconded by Mr. Alfonso, this resolution was
passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Alfonso, Gort, Johnson, Silverman, Dean.
Mmes. Basila, Callahan.
NAYES: None.
Mr. Dean: On #9, "b".
Mr. Alfonso: So move.
Mrs. Callahan: Second.
Mr. Dean: Moved by Mr. Alfonso, seconder by Mrs. Callahan.
Under discussion? Being none, call the roll.
Mr. Simpson: The motion on P, "b", is to recommend.
(Continued on Next Pacje)
-48- Decenber 2, 1974 Jtc'.i 19
ttr Alfonso offered the following resolution, and move('
its adoption:
RESOLUTION 'I'). ZP-199-74
RESOLU`PIO:i TO 't1C0;11 END CH:VVxi, oF IONI 1(`,
CLASSII'IC \TON OF TENTATIVE PLAT 491S,
"LDISON PLAZA", AT APPROXIMATELY 5500
N. W. 21a) AVENUE; FROM R (TWO FAMILY),
C-4 (GENERAL COnf11:RCIz L) , AND C-5 (LIBERAL
COMMERCIAL), , to R-4 (MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE).
Upon beingseconded by Mrs. Callahan, this resolution was
passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs. Alfonso, (ort, Johnson, Silverman, Dean.
Imes. t3asila, Callahan.
NAYES: None.
Mr. Simpson: Unanimous.
Mr. Dean: On #9, "c".
Mr. Silverman: So move.
Rev. Johnson: Second.
Mr. Dean: Moved by P1r. Silverman, seconded by 1;overend Johnson.
Under discussion? Being none, call the roll.
Mr. Simpson: This would be the proper place to make it subject
to the site plan approval by the Planning Department.
to -
1r. Silverman: Yes.
Mr. Dean: Yes.
Mr. Simpson: The motion on 09, "c", is to recommend, ';ub j""ct
(Continued on Next Page)
-4 9 Pecernber 2 , 1974 I gent
Mr, Silverman offered the following resolution, and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. ZB-200-74
RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND PLANNED AREA
DEVELOPMENT (PAD) , ON TENTATIVE PLAT #918,
"EDISON PLAZA", AT APPROXIMATELY 5500 Id, N.
2ND AVENUE; FOR A THUD PROJECT FOR THE ELDERLY,
CONSISTING OF 80-UNITS AS PER ORDINANCE
N0, 6871, ARTICLE XXI-1; AND SUBJECT TO SITE
PLAN REVIEW BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT;
ZONED R-2 (TWO FAMILY) , C-4 (GENERAL COM-
MERCIAL) , AND C-5 (LIBERAL COMMERCIAL) ;
PROPOSED TO BE REZONED R-4.
Upon being seconded by Reverend Johnson, this resolution was
passed and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Messrs, Alfonso, Gort, Johnson, Silverman, Dean.
Mmes. Basila, Callahan.
NAYES: None.
Mr. Simpson: Unanimous.
Mr. Dean: Thank you, very much, for coming.
Mr. Rhodes: Thank you.
-50- necember 2, 1974 .Mom tt `1