HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-76-1082RESOLUTION NO• 76 1082 _
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
UPEND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000 FOR THE
PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF A TELEPHONE
?1ANCHISE VOTER EDUCATION ADVERTISEMENT,
RE IT RESOLVED $Y THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIbA:
Section 1. The City Manager be and he is hereby
authorized to expend an amount not to exceed $3,000 for the
purpose of defraying the cost of a telephone franchise voter
education advertisement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18 day of NOVEMBER
19766
AT ST •
L H G. ONGIE
CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
JOSE B. ALVAREZ
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
A''P' •VED AS 0 CAM AND CO
GE F.
CITY ATTO
MAURICE A. FERRE
r
MAYOR
"DOCUMENT INDEX
ITEM NO.
CITY COMMISSION
COMMISSION
MEETING OF
NOV 1 8 1976
RESOLUTIOc. �O. �(;• %;;,
REMARKS:
T 1.? 0 " ' • • .71 •I 7:
t't:AtICEt1S
tueSday (tOmorrew) itever,rer 231 1ti76
VOters of nerd ere b.,ing as%ed to ratify a tranthjse altc:emAnt
tWedh the City and Southern Bell Telet_hsse Cottpafty which allows th.
telephone Company to place its tacilitiez it the public streets and
highways of the City. A'feature of this ftanchise would increase
the fee paid to the City from the present 1% to lt beginning ilaritary 1,
1S77.
/ft order to clarify the issues regarding the proposed franchise
agreeertt between City of t.tiani and 8Out'nern brAl Telephone COmpafty,
the f011owing information is providt,d t iami VOters.
All irii. registered voters rlee t.'7, vote.
All Pt1in' pLc j.will h.-2 oi:z.
This election it, reqt:ittt bl
The ot
,ts Well
!rh
tt1
'tcer.)t for: theSe*
c
proved
The City will rc!c'o:;: v f mon th . 3 il i e 1ephOr... e
-,:service charges in the:City of Miami or appr0ximate1::-
$1.6 '1'A:1:increase of *1 raillion.over
y - :L 1c tc th . )
wIll the City ult.this ctone::7
sWer: The City hcs inclvdei t'r.ese funds in the general
operating hudgut reven.4,-. ir.:;o:Ae for the year 1976-77
to continue to provi!e City services.
happen if the voters d:1,vt. anrove this fritnehi::C:
swcr; sinco p.ppro:.:irutelyY cf the City budget i.rovid-s
for salary ar.e. w:Jges, it ir cortuin th,it
serviccs will 1‘,7. cut eriloyc,es3 itr. off.
The Ci Ly are Cr:curty 2 have to' 1ot 0 th-_
frattcl,if,e 4:11.:, election.
11.tis pr.f,,vt nio-i
JA„yR
„poo.res the r.4:.;taiiIi1-45. f.eP tz'
DYtbo eve:e l'biN would bpgt% 1-
)0.1nuary 1977. .ht the t,im;?.4 tit' 1;',pdc.!ral
ty 45:he net cost
:!custotu.,r with thtel7ore, vo:1
tb 17.1 :144y Pr 4,1,32 por year,
ampipmems
5. to-r: tbuid the franchir fee art irol2rty
'4'°itwt t Appro:. i.-,e eiy ,444 r..i 1 L _. ? d be requited tt5 ptot:uc 2
$1.6 pillion ih thr: 197-. - cu:y =t a: ap:proxinafe.ty
$11, 10 pot year on a $30,'.!): hoe ho^ steac
1
hit; fee at_,o Lc ch-_~'gr- -
Etter: fifes, the rates charged fOr b•: fiitess Shbhes art
higher and, theteEore, will pal a greater aftbunt
of franchise fees.
14116 will hot have to pay the tra: cr't15e tee?
Answer: Any y pro, erty owner c>z` citi±e'i Who
telephone bills
j4ill the franchise fee be C:'.•-r
installation charges?
Answer: O.
--Pa 3- a for
hot
,:-s4:anbe call.'s or
IT
IDW
MMW
MMW
MMWei
mmm
BMW