HomeMy WebLinkAboutM-76-0886CITY OF MIAMI. FLORIDA
IN?Elq-CiFFICE MEMORANDUM
45teph f. GraSsie
t y Manager
Charles L. CruIptoh
assistant City Manager
DALE. OCT 5 re tII_1:
Third Year (1977-78) Community
Development Program
ht:FE RENCE8:
ENGLOSU ES:
mikaoalairamor
City Commission Agenda
October 14, 1976
The purpose of this memorandum is to enable the City Commission
to establish policies for the third year Community Development
Program, specifically in the areas of housing, target area al-
tocations, social services and economic development.
.This action will enable staff to provide technical assistance
bo residente of the CD target areas within the parameters estab-
lished by the Commission,, as well as providing a planning structure.:
'to maximize the impact of CD funds.
Crlclosed find the following information:
I.e. Alternative Budget proposals for third year CD funds.
Explanation of funding priorities,
:A.detailed explanation of the questions raised on hoti .f
by the City Commission.
der the alternate budget proposals, we have offered three alter
atives for Commission consideration:
`Alternative A -- Would provide funds in the
.land acquisition for housing, resulting in t
..approximately 320 units.
:This aiternativc: would give target areas an amount similar to what
they received during the second year program, in addition to land
acquisition funds which will be programmed within target areas to
some extent.
Alternative B --- Provides for $1.5 million in funding for land ac-
quiei.tion fur ho�7ing which would support approximately 160 units.
,Target areas vcui3 receive approximately $2 million more in funding
tiley received last year.
i tcrri��..iv_ C -- Shows no funding for land acquisition for housing
n,d.woalt? hav' 3c rious implication in that no funds would be available
'Support_ t;l'^ dousing Bond Issue passed by the residents of the City
i.s estimated -that to support 10.00,units of housing, acqui.Otion
lclid W211 l:un o or $9 million,
/v /I.i t�rii1.
N)
amount of $3 million for
he ability to construct
tyMatYager
is reuomfnehded that the CurhMissioh be requested to approve
tethative A which provides for a reasonable amount of money
.to support the housing Band Issue and still gives adequate fund-.
itg to target. areas.
This recommendation assumes participation by Dade County in the
housing program. (Because Dade County is still in the budget
process, final dollar figures are not available. Dade County
has funded the total amount allowable under Federal law in the
City of Miami under CD in past years).
Approval of Alternative A will insure the success of the Housing
Bond Issue and will provide an orderly approach to third year
CD funding.
d Adquisition for Housing
4.Approximate number of
units resulting
L. Target Area Allocation
,-Social Services
10% of Target Area
Allocation
Air tiVs1A:,.1V. Ati_i0 . PROPO5At6
A.
3,000,000
320
4,634,000
1, s00, 000
160
6,134,000
(403,000) (633,000) (763,000)
0
0
,834,000
200,000 200,000 300,000
3. ttonomic Development 'C.
600#OOb 500,000 500,000
4. City-Wide�'zojects ,���`��v��«(,, ,`,r+;`�";:<,�,,_:
y� .700 000
560,000 660,00
5'. Contingencies `~. r�'nJ���<ly;�;;,��;';': '-"' ';�,'
Administration
(Includes assistance
to other City
Departments)
TOTAL GRANT
r~oun'�Y top participate artici. ate in land acquisition program.
a iding not known at this time. See Attachment A.
600,000
;:9,694,000
PXp1rAt3Arto't or'_ Fd:3bIWG ?r,tbR T>:1J5',
dhd a.0q iitition for Housing
bhe of the primary goals of the Community Development ptograifr &S didatlY -
tpelled out by Federal guidelines, is to remove blight and use ufidetdtii°ra
lied and vacant land in building better neighborhoods. The purchase of
land for housing with CD funds ie a valid and necessary activity in aohiet=,
ing this objective.
Since available public lands are presently inadquate to meet forthcoming
Federal housing subsidies for low and moderate income persons, it will be
necessary to allocate CD funds for land acquisition purposes. In addition,
the land to be acquired will directly complement and bring into fruition
the $25 million Housing Bond Issue passed by City of Miami residents.
Using recent, typical land acquisition costs within the City of Miami for
family and elderly public projects, an average, per unit land cost of
$9,300 was developed (see Attachment B). Although land costs vary greatly,
this average figure ($9,300) can be used as a Measuring stick to estimate
the necessary dollar allocations given desired production goals.
The alternative budget proposals show the approximate number of units that
Could be accommodated with land acquisition allocations ranging from $0 to
$3,000,000.
Target Area Allocation
Residential Target Areas - It is recommended that funds be distributed to
residential target areas using a formula allocation based on 21 urban in-
dicators from the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. These indicators
include income, household characteristics, employment, housing condition
and assorted socio-economic indices. Use of this type
lts
in an equitable distribution of funds to areas which are all in need of
assistance.
Downtown Target Area - As use of the urban indicator formula results in
a low level of funding for the Downtown Target Area, and as infrastructure
improvements in this area could result in private sector development activ-
ity, it is recommended that a discretionary fund be set aside to fund viable
downtown projects. This fund will be sufficient to allow the City to under-
take projects which will have significant impact on the redevelopment of
downtown.
Social Service Funding - It is recommended, following the direction of
the Commission as expressed during the second program year, the funding
of social service programs in Community Development target areas in an
amount up to 10% of their total allocations if:
The social service program is related to ongoing Com-
munity Development physical improvement activity.
There are no other funds available as evidenced by
appropriate turndowns of funding requests.
The program is located within a Ce:~unity Development
target area and serves only residents therein.
the db ptogtam is designed fOr physical itproVeteht of heighbOthoods,
this level of funding, combined With the proVision of social serVidet
tregft Federal eVenue Sharing fUhds, is deemed adequate,
teonOMic Development
These funds will provide for staff and related expenses necessary tito the
establishment of this ptogram. Program ditector and staff will develop
and implement an Economic Development Plan for the City, that will pursue
dual objectives: 1) local and neighborhood commercial revitalization and
2) special projects that will stimulate international investments in the
Miami area.
It should be noted that Community Development funds can only finance the
local portion of the Economic Development program, i.e., those activities
that will benefit low income residents of blighted neighborhoods. The
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development recommends the use of
Economic Development Administration funds for broad scale revitalization
efforts.
4, City -Wide Projects C)
Several Community Development activities address needs that exist on a
multiple target area basis. Specific projects identified thus far are:
• Tree Planting Program - It is recommended that the City
start a tree planting project in those areas that severe-
ly lack greenery in Greater Miami. A distance of 40 feet
between trees has been recognized as the standard because
this spacing lends itself to a more serene environment.
Third year CD funds can begin this program.
Demolition of Deteriorated Structures - Approximately 150-
250 unsafe and deteriorated structures can be demolished
in the City. This will help remove extremely dilapidated
buildings that invite blight into a neighborhood.
Removal of Architectural Barriers to Handicapped - It is
'estimated that one out of every ten persons in the City of
Miami has limited mobility due to a temporary or permanent
physical handicap. The City's expanding population of older
persons is increasing the number of citizens with limited
mobility every year. Funds will be made available to make
selected City -owned buildings accessible to the handicapped.
Contingencies/Local Option
To be used as source of funds for unforeseen costs resulting from the execution
the Community Development program. Possible areas for such costs are;
kelodation costs associated with land adeldititielh tot
housing sites
Unforeseen increases in costs for such projects as StrOdt
iMprovements, etc.
• Special studies or consultant services,
Additional funding for second year projects.
4 Matching funds for other Federal grants.
• Additional funds for City Bond Program projects (parka
for people, etc.).
6 Administration
This amount includes funding of CD staff, assistance to other City DepartMents
for the execution of CD projects and general operating expenses. This figure
represents 6% of the Cityls 8ntitlement funds, which is below the national
average of 8.9%.
rt4-k ti 4i41
oil toUptHOUSt
h�ii44N1, i-L.OhlbA 3313t
'Mt.! StO-5111
a.
tt . Dena Spillman.
Adtinittrator
Community Development
City of Miami
Office of the City Manager
5298 Mary Street #1
Miami, Florida 33133
1M'1;04,4A., '4.4.0. 1 .)t. ; M Il i Y� trASN.M4 f;f.&
Dear Dena:
I have received your letter of September 13 requesting an
early county allocation of housing land acquisition funds for
support of Section 8 housing in the City of Miami out of Dade's
Community Development allocation for the third CD fiscal year.
Since the County's third year CD planning process differs some-
what from that of the City of Miami, I would like to explain
why we cannot at this time allocate any third year CD funds for
Specific activities.
In our third fiscal year planning, we have established two
parallel planning processes. At the countywide level, we invited
Concept papers at an advertised public meeting on September 1,
held jointly with you. We are analyzing the concept papers
received and, with the assistance of the County Department Head
CD Advisory Committee, we will work with project sponsors to
submit a full proposal on October 5, the final public meeting
on Countywide projects.
At the target area level we are working with neighborhood
residents in local public meetings to develop plans for their
areas by November.
Luring* December, we will review all of the project proposals
from the two parallel planning processes and develop staff recotr►-
mends+:ions, with the aid of our Department Head CD Advisory
CoraritL:tre. After follow-up discussions with you and the City of
iiiale%h, we make final staff recommendations in January to the
County Manager. We will then conduct a final round of neighbor --
hood public meetings the same month to receive public reaction.
orrice Or COUNTY MANAGER •
September 16, 1976
i
t
r •
Donn gpillmttn
nootembtr 16, 1976
rage Two
Atterr• differences are reconciled, A draft application
will ubli be
tubflitted to our board of County Comm
tearing and Commission action.
Following this process, the earliest date wedo canoestablish
for staff recommendation is December, 97
6. We to
establish allocations or set asidesfor
andirecommendations
:we have had the benefit of citizen opportunity for participa-
tion in order. to allow the public maximum
tion and input,
We are hopeful that our planning timetable will not adversely
affect your schedule for oor`erationrd year
exhibited bylanning and
ourthat
twoecan
officeour
continue the excellent cooperation 3.s in full support of .I
to date. Please know that Dade County
City housing bond issue and will do all possible to assure its
continued success.
Sincerely,
Sergio Pereira, Coordinator
Office of Community Development
•
prepareas a response to key housing questions
e following memo was p held
urin and following the City Of Miami's Commission meeting
xtaised d g
a , September 9, 1976. The information presented herein was
on Thursday, and
prepared
in coordination with Dade County's Department of Housing
Urban Development using the most recent available data.
SinCe the passing
of the Housing bond Issue and the initial Federal
Development
of 500 Section 8 units, the Office of Community
allocation resent
finis Little HUD have been attempting tc assess the potential of P
)and future
housing opportunities within the City. Some 15 sites haye
been tentatively selected and submitted to HUD's Jacksonville Area Office.
rioritized
Yn addition, over 60 sites are presently being studied and p
forthcoming Federal allocations.
to achieve latitude of choice in in addition to unit size and
:Prototypical land and construction costs, p what the Housing
project design have been prepared to better understand
Bond Issue is providing and the additional funds that will be needed to
achieve its goals.
'Specifically,
the following topics provide detailed answers to the cues-
axons raised:
The initia
l 500 units. On May 18, 1976, Federal HUD made available
£ands to subsidize 500 Section 8 new construction units. The following
ble provides the distribution of this initial allocation.
s
meeting
map,
are distributed
Site # pho tireOdowh ==
tatvet. (eta. ) type of Stall Large Handi wx--
Ar9A (To 1'40) WAtitA struchure tiderly FaMily FaMily capped ;g_—
_
Culter (51. NW 5 & 6 Sts. and townhouse
NW 4 4 5 Ayes,
CulMer 62 NW 5 St./NW 6 Ave. Hi.,Rise
Culter 01 NW 19 St./5 Ave. Townhouse
Allapattah 04 NW 17 & 18 St/ Hia,Pise
NW 9 Ave.
Model Cities 05 NW 12 Ave./58 St, Duple
Little
Havana
06 SW 1 St./9 Ave. • Hi -Rise
Coconut 07 bay Ave. to Percival Townhouse,
Grove to Oak, east of Doug- Duplex & single
las Rd. Family
TOTAL
18
54
100
100
These sites, with their proposed densities and household types, have been
submitted to Federal HUD for. their approval. A response is expected within
a month.
2. Other sites submitted for preliminary Federal approval. In addition to
the sites for the initial 500 units, 9 parcels capable of housing approximatel
278 households have been submitted to HUD for their preliminary approval. The
City and Little HUD have already received a positive Federal response as to
the appropriateness of these sites for housing. The sites were submitted
prior to any Federal allocations in order to accelerate the site selection
process once new subsidies are announced by the Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
lhese additional sites, which are shown in the attached
in the following way. See Attachment A),
2
rr
iv'1"1':; iia'_':.': A
ite # Type of
`,fer S1Ze Existing Proposed Housing Proposed I.roi.'sed Estimated
Map Location (Acres) Zoning Zoning (Proposed) it of Units Density Total Cost
3 i cst of NW 2 Ave.,/ i3/Acre $ 120, OOQ
47-48 Sts. 0.92 C-4/R-2 R-2 Family12: .-...
: 9 East of NW 2 Ave/
52-53 Sts. 0.98 c-2/B-2 R 2 Family 14 14/Acre $ 80,000
10 West of NW 2 Ave.,/ 11.5/Acre $ 114,000
52-53 Sts. 1.38 C-2/8-2 R 2 family 16
-NW Corner 1 Ave.
44 St.
.82 t 2 R 2 Family 12 14/Acre $ 61,850
,.
� t
2 SE Corner 1 Ave,/46 St. _ .33 Family 12/Acre $ 35,000
-2 fi t y
3 Approx. 131 thru 2ipprox. p/ cze $ 275,000
163/NW 77 St. r -3 : Fam11y '
4 Nursery bounded
by NW 15 Ave.
18 St. Rd. & NW Approx.
ly & 19 Sts. r- 5 R-3
15 SW 17 Ave/SW 4 St. 1.2 ]-4./C-4 R-4'
1. 534-564 SW 1 St. 1-32-4fC-1'_.4
S 13.93
Sstimated Cost per ArAcre- - 144.438
7,237 ; m
Estimated Cost per ",Unit -
10/Acre $ 500,000
-58/Acre $ 294,615
58/Acre $ 531,550
$2,012,015
n�li�Ftiiilui�4ilGr:i4�i6ifialill�solilif�+YLi9'itf�gji��,6dei�suea,�±r�t�^ri i��r
* p041ytypes„0f....nst uctu.f,es_,,..buil.t.. by,.,Dad_e..,_Co_unt.y,`_s,w=HU . This sectibn
iS depicted by graphical material representing the types of projects that
haVe been recently developed by Little HUD. Included are site and unit
plans, schematic drawings of different projects and photographs of:some.of
the most recent developments. As can be seen, the graphics portray both
hi'rise elderly units and low-rise townhouse structures for family households
4. Typical size and square footage of.family and elderly units. The proto-
typical square footage for different household types is as follows:
A) For elderly units, using Jack Orr Plaza (Project 5-41)
as an example:
Efficiencies -- 400 Sq. Ft.
1 Bedroom -- 550 Sq. Ft.
For family units, using the Goulds Townhouse Development
(project 5-40) as an example:
2 Bedrooms
-- 3 Bedrooms
4 Bedrooms
-- 680 Sq. Ft.
--1140 Sq. Ft.
--1370 Sq. Ft,
rpical acquisition and construction costs for previous developments
the City of Miami.
A) acquisition costs. Section 2 estimated the acquisition costs for
those sites which have been tentatively submitted and approved by..the-De-
,pArtment of Housing and Urban Development. The estimated acquisition
.cost (including relocation when necessary) was set at $144,438 peracre
-i.diile the per unit cost was estimated at $7,237. Using these figures, the
acquisition of sites accommodating 1000 units will run over seven (7)
million dollars.
In addition, acquisition costs are now presented for sites which have
Pent11 acquired by Little iIUD...-.(Sce Attachment D),
been
‘F4
'
Project
Culmer village
Culmer Project (5-49)
IAison Park
Project 15-56)
'Type of
Housing
Family
Family
Family
Elderly
Coconut 'Grov4 vsamilY s
Elderlyl .$1,120,000
ATTACHMENT B
Cost per Cost per
Acquisition Cost # of Acres # of Units Acre Unit
$1,140,000 8 Approx. 85 $143,750 $ 13,500
$1,640,000
$ 480,000
'
13.86 151 $118,326 $10,850
112 $127,660 $ 4,300
($3,900-elderly)
($5,000-family
$165,926
$ 9,000
($ 7,180-elderly)
($16,750-family)
t eri be sash, the acquisition east§ very greatly depending en
tip: 2bhing, present use and future possibilities
Per Uhit cost for elderly and family units implies
the loca-
of the site. The average
a total land acquisition
coat Of over nine (9) million dollars for 1000 housing units.
0) Construction Costs. The following projects are
construction costs for units
it ale
built by Little
Project (5-49) in Culmer.
151 Family townhouses of 2,3,4 & 5
bedrooms in 13.86 acres.
e Average construction cost per unit
e Gross square footage
.. Dwelling Construction $3,065,797
s With site improvements = $ 642,523
Project (5-60) in South Miami
58 Family townhouses of 2,3,4 & 5
bedrooms in 6.57 acres.
- Average construction cost per unit.
- Gross square footage
- Dwelling construction = $1,328,676
- With site improvements = $ 249,324
Coconut Grove Elderly Project.
• 100 Elderly units in a Hi -rise
structure
Dwelling constructions costs,in-
cluding site improvements
HUD.
Proposed "Dade (8-1)" Section 8 Project
- 175 Elderly units in a Hi -rise
structure
Approximate gross square footage
Dwelling Construction = $2,371,200
With site improvements _ $ 405,600
examples of average
▪ $ 24,060.O0
• $177,072 .00
+� $ 17.24/sq.ft.
• $ 20.85/aq.ft.
$ 26,347.00
• $ 70,376.00
= $ 18.88/sq. ft.
$ 22.42/sq.ft.
$101,000.00/sq.ft.
$ 23.50/sq.ft.
$ 27.50/sq.ft.
construction costs do not include architects fees, dwelling equipment,
Counsel, project maintenance equipment interest during construction etc.
1 these additional costs will add approximately another $10 per square £c,
f new construction projects.
Selection of the sites for the initial 500 units.
The letter from the
li ted States Department of Housing and Urban Development notifying the City
6 e
the County of their subsidy allocation for S O units arrived with a
ab day deadline. Within this time the reCipienta of the alleeation had
tC submit proposals showing the sites to be used in addition to demonstrat-
ing control over these sitee. The ma)ority of the selected parcels were
already under the ownership of Little HUD. Land had to be purchased in
only two of the sites. But, the purchase of these sites had already been
planned and discussed with city officials and funding was readily available.
The residents of the target areas where the land was to be purchased had
already been informed. Control+ therefore, could be easily demonstrated.
As such, the City and Little HUD had to proceed with those sites that were
available or could be 'readily obtained within the 35 day deadline. Other
Mites (see section 2) were discussed and presented as possible alternatives
one of the Culver sites which City personnel felt might overimpact the
rea. Unfortunately, the money to purchase these properties was not avail--
ble within the specified time frame. The alternative locations were,
tleverth•eless, submitted for HUD approval as possible housing sites for
future subsidies.
Most of the land owned by Dade County HUD has been consumed. Future sub-
%ay allocations will require the purchase of housing sites. The.City of
ani, in keeping with the goals of the Housing Bond Issue, should make
that land (or funds to buy land) is readily available to effectively
pond to any future subsidy allocations.
Ar;l.icable Federal law on occupancy. Housing constructed under the
Issue within the City of Miami cannot be restricted to Miami residents
Under Federal law. The occupants of these units will therefore be selected
;' x.ou+ Dade County's HUD public housing list.
, • '4.
* *
.•t
4,
l•,..
IhstIti 40.•
v1,p4,4 wit
f:F.GIC.44 IV
141141.1t1114 IPS:011
PtethIrttSup. N.
Attiee..6.tik 30300
gt I Nit.,14
Mdivin J. Adarob
Executive Director
Dade Count Dfla
1401 V.W. 7th Street
Miami, Florida 33125
Dear Mr. Adamc:
6
Subject' Amended Not
7129-0028
f;:JACKtOliVIL LI ta•Ai).
PPIINSUI1 rLA7A
661 ItIVI:FISWE AlCSUF.
JACK&ONVILlt, FLORioA 32204
:14Nt 16, 1976
E.VC.LuPtAtEr•iT
toll. 07 1;005
ification of §Und Availability
Dy this letter we hereby amend the. eubject Notification to
Fund o available:
V1,859,286.00
Sub-AllocaVden ard oC mito:
0101/02
Elderly
Fa;aily
Larce Family
:474,rfl 774.0)
62,45.00
C622,c6o.o0
250 Unite
150 Units
1001/hits
fler#6, Iliket.:! to,
4644in
read'
4hocerain3.1y the deadline date for receipt 'of preliminary propos:0.s
is extended to 35 daya from the date of this Notification. In addi-
tion, the bedroom diotribativn reflected in :the Developerspacket
should be doubled for each cate3ory.
Should :Nu have any questions, please contact use
Sincerely,
I \
!•
I
• ,
B. \.. Bur;'xirk.
Area Director 1
cc:
honorable nanrice A. Ferro
Yazior of the City.of Xiomi
P. 0. Box 330-708
Miami, Vlorida 33133
•
• •
• ,
I 4
*, •
.•,
11 .,..;,!,.,!,1
:i1.;i''..f.Y1
• °.'
.C•4.,ralLiali.:17[. • ',..f
I'
1 •'•,, • .1k-•' I;
'6 .6. • •
66•646 A.: • .66. 11!1:41: 6 fa& .. Oil i
rc; ti.ra.kg. tr,,,teli 111' :Tr/ • V2.0'61;1211:::1::
1401 N.W 7th Street
brj2 2,50 - Riverside Station
1illan4 Florida 33135
6494,521
Department of
HOUSING & UR13AN DEVELOPMENT '
t
OP= OF DIRECTOR
Charles Crumpton,
Ats't. City Manager for
Community Deveropment,
City of iaii,., '
P. O. Box 330708,
Miami, Florida 33133
Dear.Mr. Crumpton:
This replies to your letter of June
units of Section 8 housing.
As I indicated to your staff, wo arc concerned that if we
fail to submit projets for 500 units of housin-g to HUD by
its Juno 22 deadline, We might lose some of the units..
Therefore, we are:submitting projects for all of the sites.
We estimate that it will take HUD four to six weeks to re-
view and act upon our proposals.. During t'his time we and
you can review alternative sites to the six acres located
along NW.Sth and Gth Streets. If feasible alternative sites..
are available, it is my judgment that there would be no Fed- •
eral problems in changing the site.!'
We will develop some plans which show mixed residential and
commercial uses for the commercially zoned land along NW
19th Street. We would then wralt to discuss with you the
financial implications and how these could be handled.
•
14 concerning the SOO
Sincerely,
r1
Melvin J. Adams
11
,, •
. •
rr
Detailed 'Matrix
(Staf ) Evaluation
4
Survel,
HExzet rost
Location of Pos-
sible Site
ate
°appropriate
Site
Appropriate
Eminent
&orlin
Willing
Ipwrier
Onwer
Ownership
Zoning
--Water & Sewage
Estimated Cost
Estimated Size -Appropriate
2
Stop -
Back to 1
Staff Recommends
Site
1Proceectri,
mission stating'
Disapproval
Site
Inappropriate
Site
Federal
Site
Approval
(L
Disapproval
IApproval
Stop -
Sack to 1
Proceed with Visual
Site --Inspection
--______-__
--____-__--_-
Citizen Presenta-
tion t input
Proceed to Cour
With Seller's
Agreement
Trial (usually
By Jury)
Judge Decides
Settlement
pocuTs2ntation of
Appraisal s Neces-
sity of acouisition
3
Strong
Opposition
0 or Little
Opposition
Money Paid t
tRCegistry of
ourts____.
-I_ j- ----.---1• _
Paid I- iltie Acuirelf
-J to f',2,3iitryL
of Cc.,Irts .
Staff Re-
views allin
Site
Appropriate
Too
High
Price
Appropriate
Back to t
Proceed with
Si te
Site
,appropriate
• - ----
tSite
Appropriate.
Proceed with
Site.
Back to 1
12
Map Site Inspection
` e ta; le.d 'Matrix(Staff) Ewa1.uati:ant
4
Unit Survey
Exact tort of
1;.'i 0fl t i on
IRe l ncation
rocation of Pos
sate Site
•
•
Ownership
Zoning
Water & Sewage
Estimated Cost
Estimated Size
-2.
Site Stop -
inappropriate Back to
Site
Appropriate
•
Eminent
Domain
Willing
Owne r
Staff Recommends
Site
Unwilling
Onwer
6
Proceed to Com-I
mission stating
Disapproval
County
Commission
Site
Inappropriate
Site
Appropriate
Federal
Site
Approval
6
Stop -
3ack to 1
Proceed with
Site
Citizen Presenta-
tion & input
Disapproval}
Proceed to Court
With Seller's
Agreement
Trial (usually
By Jury)
Back to
1 Judge Decides
Settlement
•
Visual
Inspection
3
Strong
Opposition
No or little
Opposition
ffocurentat ion of
--=Appra sal S Neces-
sity of acquisition
Appraisal
Conducted
2 Ind.
appraisers
9
Site
Inappropriate
Stop -
Fack to 1
Proceed with
,Site
Site
Appropriate
Staff Re-
views again
Site
Appropriate
Price
Appropriate
!Money Paid to
Registry of
Courts
Site
Inappropriate
Proceed
cud J\ rds — � or.-v P,.i ItO L
Back. to
!Title Acquired1
12