The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutM-76-0544DOWNTOWN D1110111.01D14111,11r AUTHORITY 1816010 !l19CA rNE ?MR / M1Aimll, fkD 1MA 33131 / TEL MS) IMAM MI K. D. southern, City Clerk City of Miami FROM, Angus C. Smith Veliistent Director DOWNTOWN DEVEL MENT AUTHORITY sUBJECTt City of Miami Commendation Resolution DAM June ?, 19?6 Mayor Ferre hes requested that we submit this list to receive a commendation from the City of Miami for assistance in the 1976 legislative session. The following names end organisations represent the chief movers and supporters of House Joint Resolu- tion No. 3982 and Senate Joint Resolution No. 1301 and should be included on the City of Miami Resolution of Commendation. This list hes been reviewed by Rick Sisser, lobbyist for the City of Miami, and found to be complete in his opinion. SUM SENATORS I Dempsy J. Barron, President Jack cordon Robert D. Graham George Firestone Lew Brantley Kenneth M. Myers Kenneth A. Plante NON-LEGISLI'.TORS: Rick Sisser Pat Tornillo John Lanahsn Frank Friedmann STATE REPRESENTATIVES: Donald L. Tucker, Speaker John Forbes Dick Clerk Harold Dyer Bill James Gwen Margolis Rey Mattox Clyde H. Hagler Alan S. Becker Thomas L. Hazouri Nancy Harrington Paul B. Steinberg Carl Ogden ORGANIZATIONS & LEGISLATIVE BODIES: Dade County Legislative Delegation Florida Downtown Development Association, Inc. Florida State Chamber of Commerce Associated Industries of Florida United Teachers of Dade Florida Education Association United ACSsdd CCs Honorable Maurice A. Ferre Mayor of the City of Miami bOwfTOWN PEOPLE MOVER STUDY Rt1»f5HtP ANALYSIS PACT SHEET Total Estimated Riders For Preferred DPM Alternative: 15,200 (Work) ?0,.300 (Non -Work) 45,100 (Total) Travel Time Savings (Preferred DPM Alternative vs. Walking): 10 Minutes Per Trip or 7800 Person -Hours Per Day Effect of Removing 2 Downtown Rapid Transit Stations and "Substituting" The Preferred DPM Alternatives 58,400 Persons Affected 0f These, 30,800 Persons Would Save An Average of 11 Minutes Per Trip • 27,600 Persons Would Lose An Average of 3 Minutes Per Trip Net Time Savings: 4 Minutes or 3900 Person -Hours Per ray Effect On Ridership of Alternative Average Station Spacing: Preferred DPM Alternative (1400' Spacing): 45,500 Longer Spacing Alternative (2200' Spacing): 38,700 Shorter Spacing Alternative (1000' Spacing): 51,500 Minimum Spacing Alternative ( 500' Spacing): 61,000* Effect on DPM Ridership 0f Shifting North -South Leg From NE 2nd Avenue To Biscayne Boulevard: * EXTRAPOLATED Preferred Alternative (NE 2nd Ave): 45,500 Riders "Biscayne Boulevard" Alternatives 41,000 Riders Net Loss of 4500 Riders or 10 Percent of Total Ridership The Downtown ACtion Committee's s hir 0mmittee on the reople mover system presents this report c. gtoterrtent of reconr'emistion. Firht, the committee would like to t,,,ite thiF opportunity to eofttmeni Dr. John >>yer and o1.l the able stff meatier^ for aeeemblinp the _reports and st8tistiCe necessary to r^kP the People k over ^ reRlity for 't,itani ^ id Dhde o'int,y. The cOomittee was very impressed with the thoyoua,h tr,3ni.1er in which the poss— ibilities for this q'rstatr Ne?^.e revie',v?d nt :'v. '`;star =:1c1 t'te st-!ff. Gener7;t1l,y, the corrtr;ittse is in :caord with the reeclr;r,etlded routing and station placement sith only a :"ew re.'ery tions. le feel ti-.t flexibility s ioald `;t 0,:'iit;i ed to lcoo,,it';Ai 1te 11aar developments tht riaef'ice as the await of pah1, o I'tnow1.edIe of this s,,►stem and the `:11l r :p .ci tr-insi.t `3eccln', the committee h'is some reserv,;tion :-tbou t tae :loath leg P;' the route due to coM.=t:^t:,,t cr of +h, o a.: it ,n1. ineered to C! ztGe the 1,.5r,gl, ;:1 i?''t'7 ;. JYP`3. r'ti' ir' , we tll,: t)'^;t111eN of 700c1S to .3 •C.' f 'ont 1 ri`. 't'i€ . ird.ti[i -1 4 e i'^C1rtt.'"tt.! .t' opi e in fi t'.1:`:.n ; tL' i.:)^ 11 .'e •)I Lti^e e ..tiJ .' :i' .),yeltem, the eorrrd tee n e jot; 1 '; '. t.F:i t ": th :Z' .A' .t'� l .et ')y the oi.ty ,,d e;'t't::ty te :i.'!.. to c L r • 1. 4itrolv.e itself 'v`.th 0'111:=itljrr the !:Ytaltln ! f:t...,se t t : s iir:ctui'e, it is pier, t, r. to t :pt 'Ci t 'e r ii,' Jc1 for tji,}r. .tii itf? the for_.'' . rr. °.1 .s ;,-.'ti + , ^`' ct c'.,,t. '11 over.+ 1i 1)ln : ;i ,t 1)crocnt s c n fnrtj.(?ov nor ''rcr, • - t3 .':. ('^re e t 'o T� nt curvitte. h = f'i.�'C;ti or C;..r't".t t i.f..E:..'�rPrt �.C?ft�it3 for the r. tcr'tra .ne,-•sPr. . ror 0 : i1.1 rur.'?ie9 .11 uf tt- f e to .;ce .T which r' 4� 'F: !•e. K' . • .oi:.i t1. tiP.; �.l . , we WillWill�,io.. .. �'.i Lty:, the governmeh la pec for to r-:: r%l ore ^ ircnu.s to r:e1 ieve the r. t tchlr fr f►lr'c s. evellfioi. nstrperson , '`. ec ,. r i rperion A MOTION CF THE CITY COMMISSION Off' THE CITY OF MAI, FLORIDA, CONPtRM/NG THE JOINT AGREEMENT AND PROJECT PROPOSAL i3ETNEN THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ON THE GENERAL FINANCIAL PLAN AS PRIMARILY ADOPTED BY CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 76-617 (ATTACHED HERETO) AND THE PROPOSED ROUTE ALIGNMENT INCLUDING STATION LOCATIONS FAR THE DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEOPLE MOVER PROJECT AS PR/MARILY ADOPTED BY CITY COMMISSION RESOLUTION 076-616 (ATTACHED HERETO) AND AS FURTHER MODIFIED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 25, 1976, AND FURTHER AGREEING TO THE 2•STAGE IMPLEMENTATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PEOPLE MOVER PROJECT AS FOLLOWS: A. STAGE 1 CALLING POR CONSTRUCTION OF 3.3 MILES INCLUDING THE ENTIRE SYSTEM PLAN LESS .4 MILES WHICH IS THE EAST -WEST PORTION OF THE LOOP AT NORTH 5TH STREET LINKING THE NORTH -SOUTH ALIGNMENT WITH THE GOVERNMENT CENTER STATION, AT A TOTAL PROPOSED CAPITAL COST OF $73,839,000 OF WHICH THE URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WOULD FUND $58,110,000, THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DADE COUNTY WOULD UTILIZE FEDERAL URBAN SYSTEM FUNDS TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE MIAMI RIVER BRIDGE STRUCTURE IN THE AMOUNT OF $950,000, THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WOULD CONTRIBUTE $7,389,000, METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY WOULD CONTRIBUTE $3,695,000, THE CITY OF MIAMI WOULD CONTRIBUTE $2,217,000 AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR WOULD CONTRIBUTE $1,478,000: B. STAGE 2 CALLING FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR THE AFORESAID .4 MILES AT A TOTAL PROPOSED CAPITAL COST OF $9.4 MILLION, OF WHICH U.M.T.A. WOULD FUND $7,520,000, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WOULD CONTRIBUTE $940,000, METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY WOULD CONTRIBUTE $470,000, THE CITY OF MIAMI WOULD CONTRIBUTE $202,000 AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR WOULD CONTRIBUTE $186,000, WIZN THE TOTAL PROPOSED CAPITAL COST OF BOTH STAGES OF THE PROJECT PROPOSAL AMOUNTING TO P3,239,0001 AND IMOD 0 POI TM ININNZIOtON us Dior 0 OM% TO =SAN NAlla TANDSPONTAITON hortniviverm, v. $. INVAITNNNT O' TAADEPOATATIOIf. ►ABB6'D AND ADOPT= TRU 25th day of Jun, 1975. CITY CLERK 2, H. D. SOUTHERN, Clerk of the City of Miami, Florida do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of Motion No. adopted by the Miami City Commission on the 25th day of .Tune, 1976.