HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #04 - Discussion ItemJoseph R. Grassie
Cit Manager
.W. Parkins, Director
Office of Community Affairs
Ton i ov b;i 9 : 40
NOV3 f977
r
Agenda Material - Discussion of Social
Services Funding
As you know, on September 24, 1977, this office made a presentation before the
City Commission regarding the Federal Revenue Sharing Evaluation and Recom-
mendation Process. At that time, the Commission was informed that at a later
date, recommendations would be made for funding according to the categorical
approach outlined on September 24, 1977. On November 10, 1977, we would like
to discuss with the City Commission those categorical recommendations and their
overall effect on Social Service programs throughout the City of Miami.
Attached, for your review, as part of the background information, is a capsule
summary of the presentation presented on September 24, 1977.
RWP:mb
Encl.
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
PROCESS REVIEW
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Office of Community Affairs
R.W. Parkins - Director
November 3, 1977
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION „ a, ::: ,,66461
OVERVIEW :,,: ,:i::i4
CATEGORICAL FUNDING HISTORY ,,,.6
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES ,7
ALLOCATED FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES 8
CATEGORIES OF SERVICE PRIORITIES 12
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES BY SERVICE AREA
AMOUNT AND PERCENT OF TOTAL 13
RECOMMENDATIONS 14
11/3/77 (1)
INTRODUCTION
In 1972 the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act was signed into law. The State
and Local Fiscal Assistance Act, or Revenue Sharing, differed from previous federal,.:
funding in that it had "no strings" attached. This was a major departure from the
earlier categorical grant programs.
Since then, over 30 billion federal tax dollars have been returned to more than
38,000 units of local government and spent according to locally determined priorities.
Despite the "no strings" legislative intent, Congress, in renewal hearinas, is looking
closely for 30 billion tax dollars worth of qualitative and quantitative improvements
in the service delivery of local governments.
"If local government fails to persuade the public and Congress that it
can abide by the relatively small number of restrictions and effectively
meet the needs of citizens, the future of Revenue Sharing will be in
serious doubt." (1)
Preliminary analysis of the impact of five years of Revenue Sharing is too diverse
to be conclusive. However, in comparing the City of Miami's allocations for social
services for the poor or aged with other local government expenditures in the same
category, the City of Miami exhibits a leadershin role.
By 1973-74, only 13 of 26 cities surveyed planned to spend an average
(2)
of 5' on social services, as compared to Miami's 20-:.
In 1973, only 12 of 33 cities surveyed had a special nuhlic hearina on
Federal Revenue Sharing. The City of Miami has at least one public
(
3
meeting yearly on Revenue Sharing Allocations.
In another survey in 1974, only 8 of 409 cities had assigned a staff
member to Federal Revenue Sharing. 90 had no full time personnel devoted
to this program area. In addition to on -going staff evaluators, the City
(4)
has a full-time social services coordinator and staff.
The City of Miami this year can further establish its progressive handling of
Revenue Sharing monies in the priority area of social services by:
11/3/77
(2)
Establishing Federal' Reveho - S iAl,fi Q:.pol,: e es to de:l,i neate priority
spending.
Establishing accountability of Federal Revenue Sharing funds by.Program
evaluation and monitoring.
Establishing a linkage with the Community Development Block Grant Program.
These activities should indicate to Congress that Miami is aware of local priorities
and is determined to address them with Revenue Sharing Funds.
Just as there are patterns in spending, there are also Patterns expressed in this
year's requests for funding. In addition to direct social service programs for the
poor and aged, the following trends were identified:
Many Programs reacting to federal budgetary cutbacks or pronram phase
outs were forced to look elsewhere for funding.
Traditional charitable organizations (e.o. Crime Commission, Optimist
Club, Y.M.C.A.) operating on dues and memberships felt the economic pinch
in the private sector and thus approached local government to supplement
their activities.
Numerous existing social service agencies expressed the need for a
transportation ele►nent to reach clients in need of services.
Economic development activities, such as e►nployment or training programs,
market analysis and expansion, etc., were represented in many programs
in response to last year's economic downturn.
Programs that were ineligible activities under the Community Development
Progra►n requested Revenue Sharing Funding consideration.
Youth activities either in sports, counseling or juvenile prevention
programs, showed a marked increase due to the fact that these services are
not being provided by the school system in relationship to apparent demand.
Once again, the evaluation and recom►aendation process necessary for funding of
agencies that have applied for Federal Revenue Sharing Funds (FPS), is upon us. The
11/3/77 (3)
Office of Community Affairs, in an effort to establish guidelines for an objective
-a'nd.effective evaluation, submits this summary of the presentation made on
September'24, 1977. The summary will outline:
An overview of the Evaluation and Recommendation Process
A categorical breakdown of past FRS allocations and how they have addressed
established needs
• Other funding sources and their area of responsibility
▪ Funds allocated by other sources
• Category of service priorities
• Recommendations for allocations by category for the coming fiscal year
* * * * * * * * * * *
(1) International City Management Association, Managing Revenue Sharina in Cities
and Counties, a report prepared by the Management Information Service
(Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, 1973), pag. 1
(2) Patricia W. Blair, General Revenue Sharing in American Cities: First Impressions,
a report prepared by the National Revenue Sharing Project? ashinaton, D.C.:
National Clearinghouse on Revenue Sharing, 1974). pq. 19
(3) Ibid, pg. 4
(4) John C. Murphy, "General Revenue Sharina's Impact on County Government",
Public Administration Review. Vol. 35 (March/April, 1975), pg. 132
11/3/77 (4)
OVERVIEW
In 1974-75, a consortium approach was used to evaluate and recommend .fo_r,'fuhdi.nq
to the City Commission those agencies which best provided social service hroarrs "to
residents of the City of Miami. The consortium was composed of County, United clay
and City Manager's Office renresentatives whose function was to recommend which
agencies would receive Federal Revenue Sharing Funds. It was an ineffective annroach;
however, in that the consortium lacked an effective cleans of evaluatina applications
and funding •was based on personal presentations which encouraged inequities in funding.
A special review team composed of staff from the Office of Community Affairs was
appointed by the City Manager in 1975/76. Their primary coal was to provide an
institutionalized Federal Revenue Sharing process. On -site, evaluations were
instituted and an attempt w•ias made to incorporate Citizen Participation.
For the first time, Office of Community Affairs staff was used on a full-time basis
in 1976/77. The Federal Revenue Sharing application and evaluation process was
refined and Citizen Participation was incorporated through Community Development
Task Forces. Also, socio-economic needs were assessed by target area and secondary
funding priorities were established.
For recommendations for fiscal 1977/73, however, a more formalized process was de-
veloped to incorporate both Federal guidelines and City administrative policy.
The F.R.S. Evaluation Process was done in three phases. Those phases r•,ere: Process
Review and Preparation; Process Implementation; and Evaluation and Recommendation.*
Durina the first phase, the F.R.S. applications were revised and perspective an-
nlicants were notified of the application period. Also. Citizen Participation groups
were met with to further insure adequate public knowledge of the F.R.S. application
and evaluation process.
The second phase, Process Implementation, consisted of checking all incoming applica-
tions for completeness and scheduling agency interviews. Data was compiled on all
applying agencies showing nrevious F.R.S. allocations, administrative/operational
*See appendix A
costs, present F.R.S., requests and other sources
er
11/3/77 (5)
of fundinq. Citizen Participation
recommendations were also solicited. The recommendations disnlayed Citizen Participa-
tion group percentions of priority needs in their target areas.
Evaluation and Recommendation was the third phase of the F.R.S. agency evaluation
process. During this phase, applications were compared to agency and client question-
naires and demographic data from the 1970 census and 1977 sample surveys were
compiled with information from other reviewing agencies, some of which included in-
formation from H.R.S. and Criminal Justice Planning Unit which was used as a re-
ference to assist us in the Evaluation and Recommendation process.
In addition to this, statistical data was used in order to determine what needs
existed and how they were being fulfilled.
S.M.S.A. data from the 1970 Census provided us with seventeen bar charts showing how
the City as a whole and each of the eight target areas ranked in terms of specific
services needed. The charts were incorporated into five categories which are:
health, age, poverty, crime and housino.
The Job Market Analysis and Social Services Survey nrovided us with citizen needs
perceptions through stratified cluster samplings. This nave us citizen priorities
for needs and other General information related to their communities.
The Citizen Participation process consisted of r'eetina with C.D. Task Force groups
in the eight target areas to prioritize categories of service, since direct citizen
contact provides a check on other data sources.
The Citizens Response Center provided citizens with information and referral
as well as requests for service. This information was irrnortant to us in terms of
frequency and types of service inquired about.
::.�-+.n..n wwH:H.r'n�,;:�tiu•�eAvyMLa:Y.n32:1:5.iu�r3 -0st+i,;«=Mx-aN:k�C+':4-0
11/3/77
(6)
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING CATEGORICAL FUNDING HISTORY
The following chart gives a breakdown of the Federal.Revenue Sharing allocations for
the last three fiscal years by:
Category of Service
Fiscal Year
Dollar Amount
Percentage of total funds (below dollar amounts)
Percentage over previous year (in parenthesis)
CATEGORY 74/75 75/76
Day Care Adults $ 99,400.00
6.0c;
$ 99,400.00
6.3°' (+ .3°;)
Day Care Children $ 402,603.00 786,995.97 679,830.00
34.7;:• 47.2", (+ 12.5 ;) 43.3:' (- 3.91
Food Programs 145,000.00 210,400.00 231,440.00
12.5r: 12.6' (+ .11 14.7 ' (+ 2.11
Health Programs 80,000.00 70,500.00 100,000.00
7.0 4.2Y (- 2.8 ) 6.3': (+ 2.11
Counseling Programs 170,051.00 240,700.00 222,098.33
14.6 14.4 (- .2:',) 14.1` (- .31
Employment Programs 75,000.00 21,175.00 22,916.65
6.4 1.3' (- 5.1=') 1.4, (+ .11
Recreation Programs 126,000.00 135,100.00 165,433.32
10.9' 8.1` (- 2.8"") 10.5; (+ 2.41
Transportation Programs 10,000.00 24,300.00 26,730.00
.86 1.,U (+ 1.54') 1.7 (- .3")
Information and Referral 20,000.00 16,667.00 16,500.00
1,7; 1.0", (- .71 1.Cr (no change'
Economic Development 85,000.00 25,000.00 2,083.33
7.3r� 1. 5`', (- 5.81 .137, (- 1.371
Legal Assistance Programs 45,000.00 35,000.00 2,916.00
4.0" 2.1::' (- 1.9') .18„• (- 1.72)
TOTAL $1,158,654.00 $1,665,237.97 $1,569,347.63
*Refers to that portion of the funds used for administration by 0.C.A.
11/3/77 (7).
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES AND THEIR AREAS OF FUNDING RESPONSIBILITIES
This Chart is brokendown by:
Category of Service
- Primarily Responsible
- Secondarily Responsible
Day/Evening Care
- Federal Government
- Dade County
Meals
- Federal Government
- Dade County
Health (including Exceptional Citizens)
- Dade County
- State Health Rehabilitative Services
• Counseling Youth
- Dade County
- State of Florida
Employment Youth
- Federal Government
- State of Florida
, Recreation
- Dade County
- City of Miami
Transportation
- Dade County
- City of Miami
Information and Referral
- Dade County
- City of Miami
Economic Development
- Federal Government
- State of Florida
Legal Services
- Federal Government
- State of Florida
1t/3/77 (8)
AMENCIES ALLOCATED FUNDS FROM OTHER SOURCES
This Chart is brokendown by:
Source of Funding
- Category of Service
- - Agency Receiving Funds
Community Development Funding
- Day Care
-- Centro Mater ($30,000.00)
-- Christian Community Service Agency (S41,840.00)
- Health
- - Dade County Dept. of Human Resources, Residential Homemaker
Services (S35,000.00)
- Counseling
-- Allapattah YMCA Crime Prevention (S10,000.00)
- - United Family and Children's Services Downtown Elderly Services
(S15,000.00)
- Recreation
-- Belafonte Tacolcy (S50,000.00)
- Transportation
- - Action Connnunity Center (S10,000.00)
-- Dade County Impact: Allapattah Elderly Services ($30,000.00)
- Information and Referral
- - Tenant Education Association of Miami;
Coconut Grove (S16,000.00); Model City (S17,591.00)
- Economic Development
-- New Washington Heights C.D. Conference (S100,965.00)
$406,396.00 was allocated to Social Service Agencies with Community Development
Funds for 1977-78.
South Florida C.E.T.A. Consortium
- Day Care
-- Miami Jewish Home and Hospital for the Aged (S30,116) 6 pos. Title VI
ilk 11/3/77 (9)
s Meals
0 0 0
o ry
. .
--JESCA (S130,000) 20 pos. Title VI
-- Little Havana Activities Center,,1 pos. (S10,010.00)
Title VI (S11,970.00); Title 1, 2 pos.
• Health
Industrial. Home• for the Blind (S38,458), 4 pos. Title VI
- -'Coconut Grove Family Clinic (S188,216), Title VI, 9 pos.
-- United Cerebral Palsy.(S20,097), 3 pos., Title VI
- - Village South (S99,549), 9.pos. Title VI
- Counseling
-- J.E.S.C.A. (S368,124), 45 pos., Titie,VI•
- - Jewish Community Centers (S57,405), 8 pos. Title VI
- - Nicky Cruz Outreach (S135,138), 14 pos., Title VI
-- Youth Co -Op (S17,955), 3 pos., Title I (S154,000),,14 pos., Title VI
-- Village South (5105,772), 9 pos., Title VI
-- Edison Little River (S690,675), 60 pos., Title VI, '
- Employment
- - Belafonte Tacolcy Center (550,539.00), 7 pos., Title VI(511,970.00)
2 pos. Title I
- Recreation
- - Girls Club of Greater Miami (S42,752), 6 pos., Title VI
-- St. Luke's Overtown Rec. Center (S23,940), 4 pos., Title I
-- Youth Co-0p,(5211,350), 20 pos., Title VI
-- YMCA (S31,342), 20 pos., Title VI
- Transportation
- - Action Community Center (S80,179), 17 pos., Title VI
- Information and Referral
- - Senior Centers of Dade (S117,862), 12 pos., Title VI
- - Catholic Service Bureau (5409,000), 33 pos., Title VI
-- Borinduen Puerto Rican Opportunity Center (S92,601), 13 pos.
- - Haitian American Community Association of Dade County (S49,000),
5 pos., Title VI
-- Tenant Education Association of Miami (S110,000), 11 pos., Title VI.
-- Miami Bridge (S5,502), 1 nos., Title VI
Legal Services
- - Legal Services of Greater Miami ($112,441), 10 pos., Title VI
S3,325,133.00 was awarded to Social Service Agencies along with 361 positions under
Title VI. S89,775.00 and 11 positions were awarded under Title I.
11/3/77 (10)
Dade County, Dept. of Human Resources
Day Care
-- Edison Little River Pre -School (S32,442.30)
-- Interamerican Church (S119,408.00)
Meals
-- James E. Scott Community Association (S56,000.00)
- Health
- - Belafonte Taculcy (S47,140.00)
-- Borinquen Health Care Center (S84,070.00)
-- Coconut Grove Family Clinic (S100,000.00)
Recreation
o ➢ o ooe
-- Allapattah Branch YMCA (S114,907.05)Q e 0
J u°0 30 f CO o °
Transportation �� �� °° °°
.08 0
- - James E.Scott Community Association (511 ;646.62)
- Informaticn and Referral
-- Dade County School System (5240,000.00)
S887,260.62 was funded to the aforementioned Social Service Agencies by Dade
County Human Resources Department.
Health and Rehabilitative Services
Mental Retardation Program
- Health
o
°
°
°
°
Association for the Development of the Exceptional (5105,750.00)
United Cerebral Palsy ($51,750.00) Child Program; (5146,250.00)
Adul t Program
-- Village South (S196,200.00) Delinquent and Retarded; 5235,440.00)
Emotionally Disturbed Retarded
-- Metatherapy Institute (S31,951.00)
S771,341.00 was allocated to the above agencies for 1977-78 year.
United Way
- Day Care
-- Miami ,Jewish Home and Hospital for the Aged (S195,325.00)
- Meals
-- Little Havana Activities Center (S56,908.00)
-; Health
•
- - Belafonte Tacolcy (S27,477.00)
- - Coconut Grove Family Clinic (S28,941.00)
-.Counseling
- - Senior Centers of Dade County ($140,982.00)
United Way funded S449,633.00 to the above Social Service Agencies for 1976-7°7,
A total of S6,275,330.63 has been allocated to Social Service Agencies from these
sources.
CATEGORIES OF SERVICr �'RIORITIES
11/3/77 (12)
The following is a breakdown of categories of service by its priority according
to staff recommendations and Citizens recommendations
As you can see, there are some differences in the rankings. This is attributed to
the fact that staff takes the absolute priorities of the citizens and tempers them
with data not normally in the possession of the citizens.
Category Staff Rec. Citizens Rec.
Day Care 1 4
Hot Meals 2 3
Health 4 1
Counseling Youth 3 6
Employment Youth 5 2
Recreation 6 7
Transportation 7 5
Information and Referral 8 8
Economic Development 9` 9
Legal Services 10 10
OTHER FUNDING; SOURCES BY SERVICE AREA, AMOUNT AND PER CENT OF TOTAL *
11/3/77
13Y
Service Area
Day/Evening Care
Meals
Health
Counseling
Employment**
Recreation
Transportation
Information and Referral
Economic Development
Legal Services
TOTAL
Amount % of Total
$ 419,015.30 6.6%
134,880.00 2.1%
1,132,446.00 18.0%
183,937.00 2,9%
3,557,818.66 57,0`a
188 ,847.05 3.0%
77,113.62 1.2%
410,308.00 6, 5%
100 ,965.00 1.6°
70 ,000.00
$6,275,330.63 100.Or;
* Service area amounts represent funding sources such as Community Development,
Dade County Human Resources, United Way, H.R.S. Mental Retardation Program,
and South Florida C.E.T.A. Consortium for 1977/78.
** Employment effects all of the categories in that C.E.T.A. slots are represented
by dollars here. The slots are allocated to agencies that provide services in
each category.
11/3/77 (14)
RECOMMENDATIONS
▪ Commission approve of Categorical Funding
The priority categories will receive priority ranking and the agencies
.
will be ranked in priority in categories.
• Existing programs be funded for 1/12
- The review cycle is still in process and recommendations will be
presented by categories of service.
Staff be allowed to solicit agencies where needed
- Where no agency applies to provide a greatly needed service in a
particular area, we would like to solicit proposals from agencies to
provide that service.
• Staff be allowed to make reconnendations to the C.D. Task Forces re-
garding social service projects funded by C.D. Funds
- This will, in essence, provide a coordinated usage of all funds
allocated to social service projects.
a
re.
PECOMME: TD CATEGORICAL FUNDING LIST
ALLAPATTAH
Recreation
COCONUT GROVE
Day/Evening Care
Hot Meals
Health
Recreation
CULMER
Hot Meals
Recreation
Information and Referral
DOWNTOWN
Hot Meals
EDISON LITTLE RIVER
Day Care -Child
Day Care -Adult
LITTLE HAVANA
Hot Meals
Information and Referral
MODEL CITIES
Employment Youth
Recreation
RECOMMENDED
CATEGORY
DOLLAR
AMOUNTS
$ 15,043.00
62,562.50
30,815.34
91,666.67
10,083.34
$195,127.85
$ 28,511.68
62 ,245.71
15,125.00
$105.882.39
$ 7,967.92
$ 22,240.00
91,116.67
$113,356.67
$ 95,816.78
11,794.63
107,611.41
$ 20,981.26
11,000.00
31,981.26
WYNWOOD
Information and Referral $ 22,792.34
CITY WIDE
Day Care
Counseling Youth
Recreation
Transportation
Information and Referral
Office of Community Affairs Administration
RECOMMENDED
CATEGORY
DOLLAR
AMOUNTS
$434,767.22
67,604.17
41,241.67
24,502.50
28,277.64
29,645.05
$601,535.75
GRAND TOTAL $1,186,255.59
�.- FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING > �.
REQUESTS 1977/78
CETA Positions Amount
HtALTH Requested Requested
1) Coconut Grove Family Clinic, Inc. (Coconut Grove) • 6 $187,969.00
2) University of Miami School of Medicine
Dept. of Pediatrics, Div. of Comprehensive Health Care -
Outreach Preventive Health Care Module (Culmer,
Little Havana, Wynwood) 7 107,000.00
3) United Cerebral Palsy Association of Miami, Inc.
Rehabilitation Program for the Multi -Handicap-
ped Citizen (City Wide) 2 22,726.00
4) Haitian American Community Assoc. of Dade County
(HACAD) - Haitian Community Diagnostic Clinic
(Edison Little River) 3 41,500.00
5) Mount Sinai Medical Center - Dept. of Social Work
(City Wide)
6) Latin American Brotherhood Assoc. (Little Havana)
7) Association for the Development of the Exceptional
Health Awareness for the Exceptional People
Located in the City of Miami (City Wide) 0 10,600.00
1 15,340.00
27 248,000.00
8) Village South - Counseling Center for the Hearing
Impaired (City Wide) 2 22,159.00
9) Village South - Drop -In Center for the Ortho-
pedically Handicapped 0 39,541.00
Total 48 $694,835.00
EMPLOYMENT - YOUTH/VOC. REHAB.
1) Belafonte Tacolcy - Youth Vocational Training
and Employment Program (Model City) 2 $ 60,607.00
2) J.E.S.C.A. - Youth Employment Service (Culmer) 6 79,039.00
3) Umbrella, Inc. - Hispanic Vocational Training Program
(Little Havana) 7 126,138.60
4) Industrial Home for the Blind (Little Havana) .3 4,691.00
Total 1'8 $270,475.60
-1-
HOT MEALS PROGRAMS
CETA Positions Amount
Requested Requested
1) James E. Scott Community Assoc., Inc.
J.E.S.C.A. Multi -Purpose Center for the Elderly
(Culmer)
2) James E. Scott Community Assoc., Inc. (Coconut Grove)
J.E.S.C.A. Multi -Purpose Center for the Elderly
3)tittle Havana Activities Center, Inc.
Geriatric Nutrition Program (Little Havana)
4) First United Methodist Church of Miami, Inc.
Community Center Hot Meals Program (Downtown)
5) Little Havana Activities Center (Coconut Grove)
Total
HOUSING/RESIDENTIAL CARE
1
0
0
1) Catholic Service Bureau - Miami Bridge (City Wide) 2
2) Women In Distress (City Wide)
3) Village South - Emergency Shelter for Families
(City Wide) 0
4) Village South - Adult Crisis Intervention (City Wide) 0
5) Village South - Independent Living Facility (City Wide) 0
6) Village South - Transitional Facility (City Wide) 0
7) Village South - Intensive Week -End Experiential
Program (City Wide) 0
Total
0
2
$ 50,544.00
51, 339.00
289,543.00
25,348.98
40,656.00
$457,430.98
$ 35,000.00
18,325.40
58,448.00
98,366.00
54,121.00
59,716.00
40,503.00
$364,479.40
DAY/EVENING CARE
1) City of Miami - Dade County School System
After School Care (City Wide) 0 $200,000.00
2) St. Alban's DayNursery - St. Alban's Family Care
(Coconut Grove) 0 71,663.00
3) Miami Jewish Home and Hospital for the Aged
Douglas Gardens City of Miami Senior Adult Center at
Legion Park (Edison Little River) 0 123,350-J09
4) Haitian American Community Assoc. of Dade County, Inc.
"La Pouponniere" (Edison Little River) 3 63,240.00
5) Allapattah-YMCA Wynwood-After School Care 0 52,180.00
6) Umbrella, Inc. - Day Care Center (Little Havana) 9 112,125.00
(3)
CETA Positions Amount
DAY/EVENING CARE (Cont.) Requested Requested
7) Miami Jewish Home and Hospital for the Aged 0 $114,530.00
City of Miami Senior Adult Day Center #2 (Little Havana)
8) Edison Little River Self -Help Community Council, Inc.
Project Pre -School (Edison Little River) 0 42,350.00
Total 12 $779,938.00
TRANSPORTATION
1) Special Transportation Service (City Wide) 0 $100,000.00
2) Action Community Center, Inc. (Little Havana)
Transportation for the Afed 3 144,963.00
Total 3 $244,963.00
INFORMATION AND REFERRAL
1) Tenant Education Association of Miami (Culmer) 0 $115,509.00
2) Borinquen Health Care Center - Puerto Rican
Opportunity Center (Wynwood) 0 204,771.00
3) Jewish Family and Children's Services - Project Link
(City Wide) 0 21,827.00
4) Miami -Dade Tenant Security (Model City) 0 78,727.56
Total 0 $420,834.56
COUNSELING
1) Youth Co -Op, Inc. Bridge Counseling Program (Youth)
(Little Havana" 3 $118,613.00
2) Nicky Cruz Outreach of Florida, Inc.
Nicky Cruz Outreach for Youth Center (Youth) (Little
Havana) 4 76 ,446.00
3) Stress Control for Police Officer - Miami Police
Dept. (Psychological) (City Wide) 1 60,220.00
4) James E. Scott Community Assoc.- JESCA's Coconut Grove
Youth Streetworker's Program (Youth) (Coconut Grove) 18• 165,760.00
5) AYUDA, INC. - Project Oceano (Psychological)
(Little Havana) 6 189,750.00
6) Metatherapy Institute, Inc. (Psychological) (City Wide) 6 67,925.00
7) Edison Little River Self -Help Community Council, Inc.
Project S.T.O.P.P.P. (Youth) (Edison Little River) 0 12,100.00
8) Edison Little River Self -Help Community Council, Inc.
Project Youth (Youth) (Edison Little River) 0 60,500.00
Total 38 $751,314.00
CETA Positions Amount
LEGAL SERVICES equested Requested
1) Legal Services of Greater Miami - Wynwood Community 4 $ 50,000.00
EDUCATIONAL
1) Dade County School System - Community School
Program (City Wide) 2 $ 70,000.00
2) Interamerican Community Church, Inc.
Childhood Development Center (Allapattah)
Total
13,000.00
$ 83,000.00
CRIME PREVENTION
1) Senior Centers of Dade County, Inc. 3 $195,762.00
The Missing Link - A Crime Prevention Program
(City Wide)
QUALITY OF LIFE
1) City of Miami - Office of Community Affairs Cultural
Experiences Division "New World Workshop: Graphics
and Printing Project" (City Wide) 0 $ 50,000.00
2) Grove House (Coconut Grove) 6 16,400.00
Total 6 $ 66,400.00
RECREATION
1) City of Miami - Parks and Recreation Dept. Programs
for the Handicapped (City Wide) 0 $ 60,100.00
2) Optimist Club of Coconut Grove - Youth Sports Activity
(Coconut Grove) 0 30,500.00
3) Catholic Service Bureau - St. Luke's Educational
Center, Inc. (Culmer) 4 75,000.00
4) Edison Little River Self -Help Community Council, Inc.
Sports Development (Edion Little River) 0 35,000.00
5) YMCA of Greater Miami - Allapattah Community Youth
Project (Allapattah) 0 55,497.00
6) YMCA of Greater Miami - Allapattah Youth Sports Program
(Allapattah) 0 29,375.00
7) Jewish Community Centers of South Florida Project
Neighbor - Development of Neighborhood Senior
Activity Centers (City Wide) 0 37,288.00
8) Metropolitan Dade County, Dept. of Human Resources Re-
creation and Social Services for the Elderly (City Wide) 0 56,000.00
9) Girls Club of Greater Miami (Coconut Grove) 5 49,095.00
Total 9 $427,855.00
GRAND TOTAL 146 $4,807,287.54