HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem #04 - Discussion Itemi'�1'; oh Mii1►�ir` PLattioA
Ill ft =Oft 'I? M t�1 S ANbUM
lowad bireotOr
bepartttieht of .Mahagemen_ , 8e ices.
r3A? jii1y :7,'' 1977.
Qt,UJECt
Third Status tepbrt
oh the i.9'i8 btid/eft
NCCC;SURES:.
Fdtsuant.to therequestof;the city Commission that the cityManager
inform theft on a monthly basis of the status of the FY'78 budget,
please find attached a summary explaining the changes that have occurred
since our second status report. Also attached is a recommended schedule
for the Commission's review and approval of the 1978 Budget Estimate.
The assumptions used to compile the third budget status report are the
same as those used in the first and second estimates, with the exception
of a few which will be discussed later. In summary, those assumptions
Which remain the same are as follows: 1) employees who have not
received salary increases in FY'77 will receive a 31% increase, which is
the same increase granted to Police and Fire sworn personnel in FY'77;
2) employees will receive a 5% increase in FY'78, which is the same
increase negotiated for Police and Fire sworn personnel; 3) non -payroll
items will increase by six percent (6%); 4) pensions will increase
according to the requirement of the 1977 actuarial study; 5) reductions
in. Florida Power and Light franchise fees, Federal Revenue Sharing, and
Anticipated Salary Savings; and 6) the millage will be increased from
9.592 to 10 mills.
As of the second status report, the City faced a net increase in appro-
priations of approximately $8.6 million and a net decrease in revenues
Of $1 million, resulting in a $9.6 million budget problem at 9.592 mills
and,$8 million at 10 mills.
'Since the second budget status report, two phenomena have occurred;
namely, a reduction in the projected taxable value and a projected
increase in Countercyclical Revenue Sharing. The original projection
for taxable value assumed a five percent (5%) increase over last year
which would have increased the taxable value from $3,739,711,741 to
$3,926,698,000. However, the certification received from Dade County
on June 30, 1977, reveals that our taxable value only increased by
three and eight -tenths percent (3.8%). The effect of this reduction on
our projections is that the value of a mill will decrease by approxi-
mately $43,000, resulting in a total loss of approximately $430,000 at
'10 mills, (It should be noted, however, that the increase in taxable
value from FY'77 and FY'78 will be approximately $1.3 million).
dOteph Itt ttat§ie
Oh the brighter gide, the United ttateg Congregg hag approVed
•Lich inereaging thnUffl bhibliey available tb ttate and lOdal
,
goVerhMents Uhder the COUhtercyclidal ileVehtie 8hatihg 13rOgraiii and
egtehdihg the program, whioh was due to empire 8eptember 10# 19//f
through fitcal year 1978. Although we ahticipated funding under this
program ih VY,78# we did not anticipate an increase. The projeoted
reVehues resulting from this increase is approxiMately $1 Millioht
The net effect of these chahges On the second budget status report it .
, a reVehue increase of approximately $600#0b0 and a redtictiOh ih ths ' 1
budget Problem from 'approximately $8 Millibn tb $7.4 million.
PAM= CALERDAA fth TH2 rwtrw & xrrhovn or TM MA MET
City Manager will conduct departmental
hudget hearinqt.
hdvertite Federal evenue Sharing public
hearing to be held on 8/22/7/ with City
Manager
3. City Manager conducts public hearing on
Federal Revenue Sharing to permit citizen
participation. (Must be held 7 days before
City Manager presents budget to City
Commission.)
beginning
7/11
4. City Manager's proposed budget will be 8/29
submitted to the City Commission.
5. Advertise City Commission hearing on Federal 9/1
Revenue Sharing along with the intended use
and summary of the proposed budget. (Must
advertise 10 days before City Commission
hearing.)
6. City Commission holds first reading of the
proposed 1977-78 budget and millage rate.
7. City Manager will give an overview of the
proposed 1977-78 budget.
8. City Commission conducts discussion of
proposed budget with department directors.
9. City Commission to conduct public hearing on
proposed uses of Federal Revenue Sharing
Funds.
9/8
1
9/8
•
thdin0
.1122.L.
10. City Manager modifies proposed budget to re- 9/15
flect changes made during Commission discussion
of budget with department heads.
11. City Commission holds formal public hearing
(second reading) on the proposed 1977-78
budget and millage rate, and adopts with
provision to make effective immediately.
12. Approved ordinance establishing the millage
rate will be submitted to the Dade County
Tax Assessor.
1 Regularly scheduled City Commission meeting.
9/22
9/26
2:Not a regularly scheduled City Commission meeting.
till
Anticipated 1teVehties Anticipated keVentiet
at 9s592 Mills at'M92 Minis
2hd Estimate 3rd Estimate bi fekende
t eran nt�nd'
tle)n-Ad V'aiore ►
Ad Valorem
9libtotai
b1ic ty $ `6tiYa 5i I'tiiic
16h-AdVa1%refi
Ad Valorem
Street Lighting Fund
Pension Fund
$52,008060 • nii 8b°,682 :>.
;v42b,954.►_9?i .:.(244, 38i
$72,96t,281 $ 835 944
$ 3,194, 829:,
(134,750)
TOTAL $88,409,330 $89,076,933 $:.667,603:
(Applicable to'10,� tni11`:_'cap). ..
AeVehl $6 eAge
. Ahti.eipated .Ad Valorem reVehUtS at the
Publicity and ' outiem tuha i t porti h of
the §.592 ni.ilage rate are eltpeeted ta
drop as a re -Milt of the CouhtY i s certified
e.atested pia .'uatiOn fcr Miatni beihg ,prop
ected at $3:i 88i ► 67 o which is _etib
atahtiafly lower than the preiit6tit pro.,
jeetibn of $M26,698006�
Aiitic3.peted Ad Valorem revenueS at the Street''
Lighting rtth 'sportion of the S. S92 $Tillage
rate; are expected to drop as a result of; the
Countyis certified assessed valuation for.
Miami being projected at $3,881,367,570 Which
is substantially lower than the previous
projection of $3►926,698;000.
Total; Net 'IteVenue Increase $ . 667,603
r0)t__t'Y J* 77=78
Atltieiliated teVehues A iti'tipated tevehties .
at 5,592 Mills at 9392 411s
2hd estimate _-- 2rxd- 2stimate • biffere6ee
' Noh=Ad Valorem
Ad Valorem
Subtotal
' 8urisin_ Fund
Nor► -Ad Valorem
Ad Valorem
Subtotal
500,000
891►557_
Street Lighting. Fund
Don -Ad Valorem $ 1,200,000.
Ad Valorem 2,018,127
Pension Fund
$`1,200,000
1,994,829
(10,293).
,(23,298
11,537,559 (134,750)
$11,672009 $11`,537,559. $ (134,750)
$88,409,330
$89,076,933 $ 687,603
- ,dew a P--
tektOtie 1564."'010,
Anticipated Ad Vaibrem reVehties at the
deheral 'uiid's portion of the9,592
`i►illage rate are expected to drop as a
result of the CountyOs certified assessed`
Valuation for Miami being projected at
$,881,367i570, which is substantially
lower than the previous projection of
$3,926,698t000.
• Revenue Increase
• Pursuant to verbal communication
from. Marie Israel in Washington, D. C.
Countercyclical;funds are projected at
4)106,672forI'Y '77-78,
(244,738)
090,6.82
. _. Net Revenue' change . - . - $:�, 835,, 944;
I. tension Rund'
A. Revenue beer'
ease :.
1. Anticipated Ad Valorem revenues at the
Pension Fund's portion of the-9.592
milla
gerate are expected expected to drop as a
result of, the County's certified assessed
valuation for Miami being projected at`.
$3,881,367,570 which is substantially
lower than theprevious projection of
$3,926,698,000.
itguenlle 156.0 0 0
i Ati i°c ipated Ad Va1Orem meve rues at t ►e
PUbl city and Touris ► iitid's porti 5fi of
the 9 3 592 miilage mate are empeeted to
)i op as a result of•the County's.eeitified
assessed vaivatioh lot Miami being pro,
•etted at $3,881067,t70 which -is subs
stantially lower than the preVibUS•pro,
;jeetion of $3,926,69$10004
,. Street _, Wahg._" uncl
A,. Reveritie Decrease
1, Anticipated Ad Valorem reVehues-at the Street``
Lighting Rund's portion of the '9,592tniilage
tate`'ate a cpected tO driip as a result :of the
County's certified assessed valtatibn:for`
Miami being projected at.$3,881,367,57° which
is substantially lower than the previous
projection of $3,926,698,000,
T
otal:Net Revenue Increase 667',603
P tii , t , tIttiltEN
2110, l }may! [(y; I iy {{ ''' tg
tUM1MYTRV ,yOr nAmy qq{{MP„.[(1 Ch0PAtA IPNg
e iera1 Ftthd
Publicity ' & Tourist FUnd
Street Lighting,Pttnd
Pension Fund
TOTAL Apprbpriatioti
Applicable to 10'Miil Cap
Approtwiatioh Atiproprihtioh
4nd 'F§Ttititat _ 5rd.. tst ro:te bittPtA t
SW3,5280581 $78>528>581
469>627:'.- 1>4691627
5 55/>288 i 67>2$b'
14,594>689 . :_14,_694,089
$97 949,97,7=, 97,949,9.77
APPAOMA tHANdtg,
ƒKe A
:9¥,01 ge
IV\Ste t Lighting Puna?
ptNt enANGtS
Ge ie al Ftlrit
Publicity & TTou ist
:Street•
Lighting Pui
$81t 044
(1o;21)
(134 60).:.
General" PtincU`,:
Publicity & Tourism Fund
Street Lighting Fund
Pension Fund
III . BUDGET PROBLEM CHANGE - br 'FEPENCE $E1'WEEN REvENUE
CHANGES AND APPROPRIATION `.CHANGES,
$667663,,:
$66'7 , 603'