The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSubmittal-Public Comments Submitted Online for the February 26, 2026 City Commission MeetingFebruary 26, 2026-Online Public Comments -Miami City Commission Meeting Online Public Comment Report for February 26, 2026, Regular City Commission Meeting February 26, 2026 1:14 PM MST Public Comment motero@miamigov.com First Last Street Agend Nam Nam Addre a Item e e ss PZ. 1 #1870 775 9 Shar Voss NE Closur 72nd e - on eller Terrac 6443 e Biscay ne Blvd Deb by Lask y Public Comment Recor ded Date Do not approve the developer's request to obtain NE 64th terrace, close it, and use it as part of the apartment complex development. The City of Miami should value protecting Feb the neighborhood character and scale. This development is already slated to be much 25 Larger than anything the Upper East Side has, and quite frankly this should never have 2026 been allowed to happen. It's very disappointing that the increase in size was allowed. But 1:26p as to the street closure, the public wilt not benefit from a street closure that makes m accessing Legion Park and the community center more difficult. Especially in Light of the MST huge increase in traffic the area wilt see thanks to this bloated apartment complex. I am against closing the street for the benefit of the Acre developers. I agree to keep 64th Terrace, this one way (would be nice if it could become 2way) street for the taxpayers PZ. 1 public usage as an alternative flow to enter Legion Park and not clog up the short 63rd 666 #1870 Street traffic flow which is all ready used by the existing developments on the north east & NE 9 south side. The developer should have designed their own Loading area to be within the 68th Closur property they all ready own! Let them revise their design! They have pushed their overly Street e - Large design and now at the end want to take this street to be their own which I could see Miami 6443 was their strategy to begin with! Legion Park has all ready become minimized by the other FL Biscay developer. They should not be able to take our public street. The density they wilt be 33238 ne adding, which does not adhere to the Miami 21 Law, to our neighborhood traffic situation Blvd wilt impact even a bigger nightmare than we are currently experiencing. PLEASE VOTE NO and keep some respect for the neighbors quality of Life, the quality of the neighborhood, the community and the environment .t(� Feb 23 2026 4:20p m MST I am asking you to please vote no to grant this developer NE 64th Terrace. By doing so, PZ. 1 you are enabling a two square block building with 337 units which means more cars in an 436 #1870 already compromised Biscayne Btvd. There are few cut throughs on Biscayne Btvd unlike Feb NE 9 other communities where traffic can move through an area. It wilt be a grid Lock on 24 Mari Gon 77th Closur Biscayne Btvd if this goes through. Please Listen to your constituents. They spoke Loud and 2026 zate Street e - clear on the January 28 Town halt meeting, which had a substantial turn out (50+) a z Rd, 6443 residents who were opposed to this Large development. Only 4-5 expressed a preference 5:06p m Apt Biscay for the vacation. The constituents were promised that 64th Terrace would not be vacated. MST 10 ne Here we are siding with the wishes of the developer without any proper communication to Blvd the community of why this change happened. Only comment was that our commissioner was misinformed. What deaf happened behind close doors? We have a right to know. Deb Stan 830 PZ. 1 You are voting today on PZ 1, which would vacate NE 64th Terrace — a public street that Feb orah der NE 74 #1870 provides access to the Upper Eastside's historic Legion Park and community center, both 25 Street 9 welt -Loved and used by the community. Street vacations are not symbolic. They create 2026 Miami Closur substantial value. This street is 13,791 square feet. At roughly $100 per square foot, that's 6:18p FL e - about $1.4 million in Land value atone. If folded into a six -story project, it could yield more m 33138 6443 than 80,000 square feet of additional development capacity. What is that worth? No one MST Biscay has publicly calculated it. The same is true of the upzoning from T5-R to T6-8. What is the ne economic benefit to the developer? Again, no public analysis. The cash contribution has Blvd also shifted — from $200,000 for park improvements in the September 2024 PZAB packet, 18983 Submittal -Public Comments Submitted Online for the February 26, 2026 City Commission Meeting First Last Street Nam Nam Addre e e ss Agend a Item PZ. 1 #1870 9 Shar Voss 775 Closur NE 72 e - on eller Terr 6443 Biscay ne Blvd PZ. 1 436 #1870 NE 9 Gon 77th Closur Mari zale Street e - a z Rd, 6443 Apt Biscay 10 ne Blvd to, only a month later, before the City Commission, $500,000 payable to the District office pa,,LitstEs}yitenfubstitution, bundled with other items and approved without discussion. And nov after residents voiced objections and concerns, to $1 million, again to the District office. If the amount and purpose keep changing, what oversight will there be? What accountability? And why are only three adjacent neighborhoods designated for cash benefits, when others — including mine — use the park and will equally bear the traffic and other impacts? What criteria were involved in establishing these thresholds? No one knows because they were never publicly vetted or discussed. Before vacating public and and granting significant development value, you must conduct transparent due diligence on what is being given and received. Please ensure that analysis is completed before allowing this project to move forward. N/A N/A End of Report Recor ded Date Feb 26 2026 8:17a m MST Feb 26 2026 8:17a m MST