HomeMy WebLinkAboutO-08650ORDINANGf NO, 0.A5 5_10
AN ORDINANCE tMPOS1Nd A SERVICE CHARD
UPON THE DRAM AND/OR LAST ENDOMR
OF ANY CHECtt, DRAFT, OR ORDER HELD 8Y
THE CITY witnn PAYMENT OF SAID INSTRt lENT
HAS 1TEN REFUSED 8Y THE DRAWER= REPEALING
ALL ORbINANCES, CODE SECTIONS OR PARTS PHERFCf
IN CONFLICT, INSOFAR AS THEY ARE IN CONFLICT
AND CONTAIN/NO A SEVERABILITY PROVISION.
BE 1T ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE 'CITY OP
MIAMI, ?LORIDA:
Section 1. At any time the City is in possession
of a check, draft, or order and payment of the same has been
refused by the drawee because of lack of funds or credit, a
service charge for the handling of said instrument is hereby
imposed upon the drawer and/or last endorser of the instrument
not to exceed $5 or 5% of the face amount of the check, draft,
or order.
Section 2. All ordinances, code sections or parts
thereof in conflict herewith, insofar as they are in conflict,
are hereby repealed.
Section 3. if any section, part of section, paragraph,
clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is declared invalid,
the remaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected.
PASSED ON FIRST READING BY TITLE ONLY this 28 day of
► 1977.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING, this
12th day of Mai'
ATTEST;
C:fITY CLERK
PR F 'ARED AND APPR
OVED RY;
1"" + °. _'_._ _
tOKERT`V CLARK EOROE K OK JR;
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY CITY ATiRN Y
1977.
MAURICE A. ?ERRE
".AURICEA�__.FE
MAYOR
MIAMI PICV1 INV
*ND MOLY RiCIDIVD
Pibiblad et* temp swish bah, ad
bpi Milk*
Miaffit• Nee toisty,
root It PARMA
comm or DADE
DOM flt11 MISIPS1/111/11
Manna _Ifftetinla, isle es _ s
rag
11v.P, aum61
llynets attiteDMslaertwuunewli"w7lgleeemle
r
greg"ftetnd*:n
llgReAllrAtiveilsenst on
Neel
es lVaert
c/TY or HtAMt; tAbt MINTY
Ret orditahee N61 Mt()
XXkX
111 COUP;
sin auhirthatt in tam nawapadiar Ifl tite mutts et
May 184 ig77
AillahLturther iteShl that tha mud Miami Paviaw
and batty ReeOrd la ajuhvissoet published at miano,
111 ta16,D6d6 County. Florida, and that the sold newt.
Met hes heratoterd boos ChntInuolialy etiblithed in
bald Dada County, Florida, each day (except Saturday,
Sunday and Legal HOIldays) end hat been entefed es
flatbhd 'Slats mail matte, et the post Office In MIemi.
In aeld Dade County.,,FlOtIdat for a petted al one yast
next Ofetading the Mit Ottotleation, of, the attached
Sony of adverilsiOnentt and afflant further toys that
She haa neither paid not Premised any Sefton, 'fifth
Of„ tOrnbtatlett any diatom* tebate. chttintlettion ths
round lot the nutpOse of ,seOuling thla adVattlflefnent
toP nublItithin In the said newthanet.
r ' CL4t....t...r:e IC'
if, V' •
Vititnittb 6 t fora Inc thit
18th I
day" sin:
1t dlY ,
(SEAU ,'IYak
My commission expireihkure 1, 1971,
44 7 7
.9.0.604.0
1100trt4.
dajat larva.
terfe# • Milli SkereckilltfiIiAlitbk'
110Atitterte
Ali intelltied *ill take nOlita that On the 12i1i eat at MaTi%Int fiti,
City tertimittitift .et Mlami, Piopida adopted the ,atiaMite titled !ft.
dinantS:
bbtNANCP4.96Sb , r
AN OROINANCE iMPOSINO A SERVICE ettAROV WON
THE DRAWER AN Ottort LAST ENOotttER OP ANYtHeeR, •
Art, 0114000ERMELD 11Y 1)4EtitY*Mtitgrkr--
MEM- Or SAIO INStRUMENt HAS 1E04 Rtruseti -BY
tHE bRAWEE; REPEALING ALL ORbINANCES,AODE
SEC11ONS OR PARTS tHEREOP IN CONOLItttANSOPAR
AS ?HEY ARE IN CONPLItt; ANO tONtAININO
SEvERAMLITY PROVISION,
RALPH 6. ONOIE
CITY CLERK
CITY OP MIAMI, -FLORIDA
Publitation of this notice on the It day Ot May, 19//.
M 501111
Qt.(c :tEtul..'r,..5-
a'ie§ dundettot
ireeter 'ui yibante
Pebtuery 284 1977
Penalty Charges 6f.
Cheeks Returned to
Miami
ishdtidred
he City ai
betide statute 832 has been amended. to provide better procedures for prose..
euting bad check Writers. This amendment became effective October 1, 1975
In reviewing the State Statutes, provisions have been made whereby it is
perhiissible to charge $5.00,or 5% of the amount of the check, whichever is
greater, as a collection fee on any check issued whereby said check has been
returned by the bank as being dishonored. Said charges are set up in State
Statutes under 832.07.
In reviewing the costs involved in the collection of said dishonored checks,
although we have not analyzed the exact costs, it has been estimated by
the Accounting Department that approximately 450 checks are returned by the
banks each year, necessitating some sort of action to enforce collection.
In some cases, collection is made by merely making a telephone call. How.
ever, in numerous cases, it requires a physical contact whereby an employee
of the City of Miami will visit the payer and request payment. In other
instances, said checks are presented to the bank of the payer for exchange
for cashier or certified check. Nevertheless a great deal of expense is
involved and the passage of an ordinance requiring a collection charge as
set up in the State Statutes should partially alleviate this expense.
We request an ordinance be prepared granting such authority to the City of
Miami.
Mt irstiln Mai Oita
, vot'/ 12, i
,Paget:
In edditlori to the normal Bost, the requited conttibutlon to 'lid Plan include§ a payment on the
llabllity for tetvlee wktkk has been pet -famed ptt t to the valuation date but which kat not been
-completely paid far: The Nobility, known as the unfunded aoctued liabtltty, is being omortited
fivet 8S years: AM -titillation of the increase to unfunded aecfued ltabtltty due to the proposed
atdinar►ec ($67,146) would be d level dollar drnOunt each year ecjual to $8,8884 When the young=
ett or the six persons reaches ege 68 (thereby ending the deeteases due to trnallet hOtMal Cost), the
ono! Clty cost would be $8,888 for the reniotntng 2 years of the 85 year period:
We riprilogtte for this cOmpl tcated explcnattcn but we feel an explonatton of the patty
i5 neeesscty under the cttcun,stat,ces, please contact us if you have any guestion t
Stneerely youtt,
of
Ott
b}ty�
r'Lt ; Ose 1 h k e6 'C.
1'': Haitager
atiesdtindetb6ft
(rector of Pttehee
OF :!.f:A f s; -Ii.b. .
11�l"ir_i7o re htr- 1 ii,04b14,A
,A=4.
Pebrusry 28, 1077
Penalty Chaos bi§hohored
Cheeks tetutied 't5 the dify of
Miami
Viorida Statute 832 has been attended, to provide better procedures for prose‘
eutitg bad check writers. This amendment became effective October 1, 1975.
In reviewing the State Statutes, provisions have been made whereby it is
permissible to charge $5.00,or 5% of the aMount of the check, whichever is
greater, as a collection fee on any check issued whereby said check has been
returned by the bank as being dishonored. Said charges are set up in State
Statutes under 832.07.
In reviewing the costs involved in the collection of said dishonored checks,
although we have not analyzed the exact costs, it has been estimated by
the Accounting Department that approximately 450 checks are returned by the
banks each year, necessitating some sort of action to enforce collection.
In some cases, collection is made by merely making a telephone call. How-
ever, in numerous cases, it requires a physical contact whereby an employee
of the City of Miami will visit the payer and request payment. In other
instances, said checks are presented to the bank of the payer for exchange
for cashier or certified check. Nevertheless a great deal of expense is
involved and the passage of an ordinance requiring a collection charge as
set up in the State Statutes should partially alleviate this expense.
We request an ordinance be prepared granting such authority to the City of
Miami.