Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Maji Ramos-Letter to CommissionersRE: FR.4 and PZ.12- Resiliency for density Dear Commissioners, Submitted into the puel record for item(s) i2- 4- 2.12 on 1 - -Z City Clerk As you are aware I've been a Miami realtor since 1993, 2nd gen realtor, Miami native and sustainability ambassador. I am protecting our property values, our economy and our future in the face of climate change. I am pro smart comprehensive growth but this is neither. WHY RESIDENTS ASK COMMISSIONERS TO VOTE NO ON FR.4 & PZ.12 1. NO INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT This ordinance creates a new Resilience Trust Fund without: • an independent auditor • financial oversight • a public -facing transparency dashboard • safeguards against transfer into the general fund Miami Forever Bond oversight was removed in a similar way, and residents still lack clear accounting. 2. BROAD, EXPANDABLE PRECEDENT Although marketed as "Edgewater -only," the mechanism becomes part of Chapter 62. This allows it to be replicated across T4—T6 areas citywide with a simple ordinance. No neighborhood is protected from future expansion. �11,a1 VAAAN9S' - LQ- Q- Oi o& S 3. NO INFRASTRUCTURE OR CAPACITY ANALYSIS Before increasing density, the City has not provided: • updated stormwater capacity data Subnettad into the pulitic record for itein(s) M. 1 t22. 12- • sewer load analysis on 1 t -Zo -ZS • City Ctertz • traffic/concurrency evaluation • emergency response capacity review • flooding vulnerability review • infrastructure funding plan 4. DOES NOT ADDRESS AFFORDABILITY Miami's affordability crisis is driven by: • wage mismatch • investor speculation • insurance escalation • loss of older housing • lack of deep subsidies Doubling density does not fix these issues. 5. REAL RESILIENCE REQUIRES: • independent oversight • data -driven planning • updated infrastructure analysis • transparent public reporting • strengthened tree protections (Chapter 17) • protections for naturally affordable units Subrtsittad Cite the pu'aljc record for ite ms �(+ 2-i t_ on — = Q • City Clef& Residents ask Commissioners to VOTE NO until a transparent, audited, infrastructure -supported resilience plan is brought forward. QUESTIONS: 1. Where is the independent audit requirement? Why was financial oversight explicitly excluded? 2. Where is the public transparency dashboard? Who will track deposits, expenditures, and project delivery? Independent Committee and not City Manager. 3. What safeguards prevent the fund from being merged into the general fund? This has happened before — what prevents it here? 4. What prevents the City Manager from redirecting funds to non -resilience uses? What are the constraints? 5. Where is the concurrency analysis? Has the City evaluated stormwater, sewer capacity, traffic load, school capacity, emergency response impacts? 6. What infrastructure upgrades must exist before density increases? Has that been documented or modeled? Subrattttid into the pu'alic record for i.c s) . LI 4 PI.12 on \ 1-20-- Z-S . City Cle'lc 7. What prevents this density tool from being applied citywide? Show the explicit legal language that blocks expansion to T4, T5, T6. 8. What protections exist for older, naturally affordable apartments that may be demolished as a result of increased development pressure? 9. How does this plan address affordability when the drivers are wages, speculation, and insurance —not unit count? 10. Who benefits financially? Has anyone evaluated developer profit margins under the proposed bonus structure? Ci(Mp�� [1(�II�.E Commtk l brc= �l( �f��M��� 1JN� •1?CAe �� /<<IZoS, l 59�� 404-1kMg►t1yzS specu y, en►aA5 Sze. b &r-teP4"b I A rf f� up A D r- 044 S `p se0- 0 Maji Ramos, Building value through resilience... Maji Synergy I Maji Sold 305-519-7940 IMajiSynergy@gmail.com https: / /linktr.ee/MajiSynergy Morningside Resident since 2002 I Miami Realtor since 1993 2nd Generation Realtor I Resiliency Ambassador