HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-78-0336RESOLUTION NO. 73 a 3 36
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXPEND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $45,000.00 FOR
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH
THE JAMES L. KNIGHT INTERNATIONAL CENTER
PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASCERTAINING THE
FEASIBILITY OF UTILIZING MAT -TYPE FOUNDATIONS
WITH CONSEQUENT COST SAVINGS AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT
WITH LANGAN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.,
FOR SUCH SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS.
WHEREAS, the City has entered into Agreement with MIAMI
CENTER ASSOCIATES, LTD., (DEVELOPER) and MIAMI CENTER ASSOCIATES,
INC. (CONSTRUCTION MANAGER) by Resolutions No. 77-820, dated
19 October 1977, and No. 78-74, as amended, dated 24 January
1978, to provide, among other things, construction management
services for the James L. Knight International Center
(PROJECT); and
WHEREAS, the CONSTRUCTION MANAGER recommended that
further subsurface investigations be conducted to determine the
feasibility of employing mat -type foundations instead of pile
type foundations as a cost savings item in the construction of
the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the funds are provided under the City of Miami
Capital Improvement Program for the City of Miami/James L. Knight
International Center; and
WHEREAS, the firm of Langan Engineering Associates, Inc.,
submitted its proposal No. J-787, dated 2 May 1978, in response
to the City's solicitations for specialized subsurface investiga-
tions; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends acceptance of said
proposals;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THEE COMMISSION OF THE
i'OCU.MENTINDEX
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
ITEM N `M.. L2.. ., r;;
Section 1. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
expend an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 from available funds,
as enumerated on the above -mentioned Agreements, for the subsurface
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
MAY 1 9 1978
no - : .1
IMAM
investigations; and
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to
enter into at Agreement with Langan Engineering Associates, Inc,,
whereby the firm will provide subsurface investigations and
related work in accordance with its Proposals No. J-787, subject
to ratification by this Commission at a later date.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 19 day of MAY , 1978
MAURICE A. FERRE,
MAURICE A. FERRE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
(:;;;::
47/ (521
L H NGIE, CITY CLERK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
-1 V C�
TERRY . 11111.41
ASSISTANT C TY ATTORN
APPRO S TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
G'IRGE F. KNOX,
CITY ATTORNEY
2-
78-336
Joseph R. Grassie
City Manager
V ,James J i' Gonnol ly
i/Project�irector
Convention Center
May 9, 1978
James La Knight International Center
soils and Foundation Investigations
Enclosed are proposals from Langan Engineering Associates; Inc., and Dames & Moore,
to provide consulting geotechnical services for the above referenced project.
Both firms have had experience with investigating subsurface conditions of high
rise structures in the Miami and South Florida area whereby foundations were
constructed on mats instead of pilings and consequently the owners realized
savings in the order of $500,000 or more.
Both Morris Kaufmann and I reviewed both proposals and recommend that the City
enter into an Agreement with Langan Engineering Associates, Inc., to provide the
necessary consulting services. While both firms are highly qualified to provide
the expected services, it was our opinion that Langan's proposal would result in
a lower cost and also accomplish the work in a shorter period of time.
The attached Resolution authorizes the City to expend funds from available funding
sources in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 for this investigation work and
authorizes the City Manager to negotiate an Agreement with Langan that will be
ratified later.
Enclosures: 1. Proposals from each firm
2. Draft Resolution
r78-336
I kik 3
t...L,Z4,= LANOAN ENOINLCItING ASSc CLAfi S, INC.
2 May 1.978
C-787
Morris I. Kaufmann
City of Miami, Florida
Office of the City Manager
3500 Pan American Drive
P.O. F3ox 330708
Miami, Florida 33133
Re: Proposal for Consulting Engineering Services
Miami Convention Center
Dear mr. Kaufmann:
We are pleased to submitt this proposal for consulting geo-
technical engineering services for the proposed Miami Convention
Center. The Convention Center is to be located North of the Miami
River and East of Interstate Highway 95. We understand it will
include an exhibition hall, ball room, auditoriums, and an L shaped
12 to 14 story hotel above the convention center.
The following gives descriptions for the three phases of the
work identified in your 26 April 1978 letter, together with our
estimates of cost.
Phase 1-Analysis of Existing Soil Test Data
Existing soil test data is understood to consist of the logs
of 30 to 40 borings drilled to depths of 70 to 80 ft below ground
surface. We have examined the Logs of five of these borings and
have been informed they are reprc3entative of conditions found in
•'v 07013 i 1201) 4 2-< _CO
-2-
the other borings. Split :spoon samples were taken and Standard
Penetration 'DestS were Made at 1,5 ft to 5 ft depth intervals in
each boring. The togs show NX site cores wete taken between Depths
of 48 ft and 55 Et in four of the borings. The materials are
described as Silica Sand, titnesand and Limestone. Analysis of
these data will include preparation of geologic profiles showing
the subsurface materials and results of the Standard Penetration
Tests. The samples will be examined and if necessary, mechanical
analyses will be :made. The data will be evaluated with respect
to the density, thickness and uniformity of the sand and limestone
layers. Particular attention will be given to the location, sizes,
and patterns of loose sand pockets and voids that may be present
within the limestone hecause of the proximity of the site to the
Miami River. In addition, the locations of the borings with respect
to planned shear wall and column locations will also be evaluated.
The subsurface conditions at other sites in the Miami area
including Omni International Miami Complex, will be compared with
the conditions at the Convention Center and the extent of additional
investigation will be determined.
Phase 2 - Additional Soil Test
?ased on t:he results of ' ase 1, :e will develop a program
of additional investigation. In addition, it is our intention to
have discussions qith the e,t:ruc:tural engineer concerning the :,I.irmer
in :alch the l'ui ldings are Lo be connected and :but one another.
At this time we anticipate the additional investigation will include
check-orings with S:'."i; lard 7eneLr:':ticn Tests and Static Cene :'f:ne-
f:ration :)rt;be b. For estie.ating purp".os we have :s:'Ui.?d
L. NGAN
-3-
f�'
borings and twenty static cone penetration probes will be made.
The boring would be drilled to about sixty feet ih the area of the
proposed hotel and in other areas whore existing data indicate
uncertain or marginal conditions. The major portion of the static
cone tests would also be made iti the hotel area. They would be
made to depths of 40 to 50 ft. The Static Cone Penetration Probes
will give an essentially continuous profile of cone resistance in
t/ft2 versus depth. This type of data gives a direct indication
of the strength and compressibility of the underlying ;material.
We have a considerable amount of static cone penetration data from
other Miami area projects that would be used in evaluating the
results obtained at the convention center site.
Phase 3 - Mat Foundation Feasibility Study
We would evaluate the feasibility of supporting the hotel
structure on a mat foundation. In addition, we would examine the
possibility of supporting the other structures on shallow spread
or strip footings. The study would utilize the results of the
subsurface investigation and our experience with other mat supported
high rise structures and foundation conditions in the Miami area.
We would determine whether or not preloading would be required.
Other high rise structures in the Miami area have been constructed
on mat foundations without preloading, however, there has been
measurable total and differential settlements of significant magnitude.
This study would consider the interaction of the different
structures within the Convention Center Complex, the magnitudes
LANGAN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC
and locations of potential total and differential settlements, and
the amount and type of site preparation that may be needed. if
a ;flat foundation proves feasible we would estahlish t:h? modulus
of subgrc,de reaction needed to determine the .sat thickness and the
moments and shear forces in the mat.
The results of our study would be transmitted in the form of
a report of our analysis of the subsurface data, our conclusion
concerning appropriate foundation systems for the center, and appro-
priate design criteria for computerized design of mat foundations
and/or shallow foundations.
Estimated Fees
Our fee is haseed on the Schedule of Fees in Attachment A.
Our current estimate of the man days and costs for each phase of
work is as shown in Attachment B. The estimate totals $26,000.
.:e would also anticipate there would be additional fees for
consultation with the structural engineer during the foundation
design phase. Our Pxper fence has been that our engineers may be
needed to assist in the computer input and analysis, or our
work may be limited to review of design details. We would also
need to prepare technical specifications for any Ipecial site pre prat'.-)r
procedures. Thus we anticipate an additional $2,000 to $6,000 in
fees subsequent to Phase 3.
Schedule
We estimate the Phase 1 ,:irk will require 2 weeks. s. The 2
�'�1.d 1-quire 3 `:.o 4 eeks, aud :hale ,e 3, 2 we.2%s with n r!r l.tp
-5-
of Phase 2 by 1 week. Thus the total time for out final
report would be 8 weeks after authori2ation4 buring this period
we would keep you advised of out findings and preliminary foundation
designs could be rude with related cost studies.
She Look forward to participating in this project and welcome
the opportunity to discuss this proposal with you at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
LANGAN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
BFL/DJL:cr
Bernard F.
Langan, P.E.
a (1 -/
1 _
/rv
Dennis J. Le,-lry, P .E.
L. 'JGAN 1:NC:;,i LP. NG ASSOC:AI ES, if.0
S(`I i1-D1-iLE 01= 1=11-TS
Dfr'ctive !January 1978
Engineering and InTection Services
The fee for profe.sional staff is hosed on their payroll costs multiplied by 2,5
to 3.0 depending on the sire and complexity of the project. Unless indicated to the
contrary multiplier of 2.5 will be used. Payroll rests include salary end benefits, The
payroll costs for the various categories of pt_rso:inel are es follows:
Senior Project Engineer $ ?6.f0/hr.
Project Engineer ?0.00/hr.
Assistant Project Engineer 3,50/hr.
Senior Staff Engineer 2.00/hr.
Staff Engineer 1.00/hr.
Assistant Engineer/Engineering Technician 0.00/hr.
Senior Inspector 0.00/hr.
Design Draftsmen 0.00/hr.
Inspector 8.80/hr.
Draftsmen 8.80/hr.
Typing 6.00/hr.
2. Laboratory Tests
11.
Laboratory i:'sting will he billed (it unit rotes d;'7v_nc-ling on the type of test.
A schedule of unit prices for standard laboratory tests is available upon request.
Special Field Equipment
Special field equipment such as nuclear densometers, Toad test equipment,
surveying equipment, etc. will be pilled on a daily rote.
Subcontract !terns
Subcontracted work such as borings, lest pits, report reproduction, surveying,
etc. will he billed at rost plus 10 n.
5. I1Xr)(nses
All expenses incurred by us such ors: cur rlMenge, special supplies, long distance
cornrnunic(rtions, travel, rind subsistence will he L:Ilar(ied at cost phis 10 v.
INVOICES I f=D 1,"MO;NI-I 1l_Y d Jt) Al- l7 DUE_ WI 11 ;IN 30 DAYS.
t r.c;rryirlg chnrge of 1`.�:, per month will he (i(lc!ed to ell outstc,ncling invoices.
,TEACH EN P 3
1STI!•it'CED COSTS
c r,OTEC11;,1TcAL t;?7CTN ERtI1c SERVIcr]8
Mt7.ii CONVENTION tiENTP,A
PhaSE 1
Senior Project Engineer 2 lays @ $520/day = $ 1040
Staff Engineer 6 days @ $220/day = 1320
Draftsman 3 r'ays @ $176/day = 528
Subtotal $ 2338
Phase 2
Senior Project Engineer 2 days @ $520/day = $ 1040
Project Engineer 4 days @ $400/day = 1600
S-.nior In.pector 15 days @ $200/day = 3000
Draftsman 3 days @ $176/day = 528
Travel, Subsistence, etc. 1500
Subtotal $ 7668
Subcontractor Cost
Static Cone Penetrometer Probes 900 1.f.
2.$3. 50/ft = $ 3150
Borings 240 1.f. @ $6.00/ft = 1440
Mobilization = 400
Subtotal $ 4990
Phase 3
Senior 2roject ".ng i,;:?er 10 .'.;ys $520/day $ 5200
Project Engineer 5 day.; @ $400/day = 2000
Staff Ent iner 12 $22O ay = ".610
Dr.-� t....,�,n 2 '. ys 3 ; 1. ; :,/,i:�y = 52
qubtot:31
Tot'1 ti•.lt A Ccst
$1 0l 92
$257?8
April 25, 1.978
City of Miami
65 S,W. First Street
Miami, Florida 33130
Attention: Mr, Morris I. Kaufmann
Assistant to the City Manager
Proposal
Foundation Investigation
Proposed Convention Center and Hotel
James I. Knight International Center
Miami, Florida
City of Miami
___________ _ _
Gentlemen:
As you requested, we submit this proposal to perform a foundation
investigation for a convention center and hi -rise hotel proposed to be
constructed on a parcel north of the Miami River and west of Brickell
Avenue. The convention center will cover an area about 200 feet by
300 feet, to a height of about 60 feet; the hotel will be an "L".shaped
structure, wi th each wing about 120 feet long and with its apex at the
south end of the complex, planned to be about 12-14 stories over the
convention center. A program of subsurface investigations is in progress
and indicates a shallow soil cover (about 5 feet) over Miami 0olite and
other coralline limestone formations.
The purpose of our investination would he to explore the feasibility
of supporting the proposed facilities on a mat foundation(s), and, if
so, to recor.;;nend design criteria for same and to estimate settlement
behavior thereof. We would then also provide recommendations regarding
the soils aspects of construction and design details of the work, including
dewatering/waterproofirig, earthwork, and the like.
To accomplish the purpose outlined above, we propose the following
scope of work:
1. To drill 6 borings, to depths of 100 feet, within the area of
the proposed hotel foundation, and 5 borings to depths of 50
feet within the remaining convention center area. The
City of Miami
.pri 1 25, 1978
Pane Two
approximate location of these proposed borings is 'shown on
the attached plan,
Past experience with drilling techniques in the materials en-
countered at the site indicates that the ':t.andtird sampling
techniques (i .F?. , ....`Muting a split spoon by hemmer, or small
diameter rock coring) produce severe distuchance of their
skeletal structure. In order to assure that the samples
obtained From the borings are enuinely representative of
the actual subsurface conditions, .'e propose to drill into
the coral i ine lii::estane for %,tion(s) .rith a lar''e diameter
core barrel and to obtain, thereby, an essentially undisturbed
sample of the materials. Past e}.per'iLnce indicates that
larce diameter core recovery may be in the r;lnne of
75 to 90 percent, and that the materials will be a very porous
coral l i ne l iestone honeycombed with small voids (on the
order of inch to 1 inch diameter) containing some loose
coral l i ne sands. The limestone is ;expected to be a very low
density rock, but will p roh. bly have an unconfined compressive
strength of . 0 p0'.inds per square inch or more.
2. To perform laboratory trysts on selected cores to assess the
strength ;and co:; pressi bi l i ty of the undisturbed materials. It
is pro` -,able that the data i''jm the strength tests would
e utilized t0 essess 1,oth `,_r:. e ters (strength and cU':'ii)ress-
i bi l i ty ), h nas:: uch as eonventi c'nal CQhsol i dati on testing For
soils would be ir'practical for the ❑iaterials anticipated.
3. To perform engineering analyses that would yield the technical
basis for our estimates of allowable hearing pressure and
u l ti; a to settlement, as well as our recommendations for the
dowiterinq/r:-lterproofing system and other soils related
aspects of the project. We propose to consider such
analytical nI; thndologies as may he appropriate in estimating
settlei:;ents including_ elastic vlethods, c{ilpirir_al methods, and
the Finite [1:.,nt
4. To prepare a report ';'.immari z i rig our work and presenting our
conclusion and recou;:endations.
e e(ol l !coin .;iir field ..t:r k .:1 ".(illl :::0 ..ee;.5 of receipt of ;our
!Tiff f ii'':i_ll n (i ,;i plc .d, old 'i Le Hat the rigid .:»lr•h;
,i"d ,n C to 7 i:S. :iltlld Crt ,lni.'.f UI' ,'or: t0 ..void int: r-
frlri!ic ,lien .r(: -il,}`11c:i tii;ltion rr`.,.. in ;irr''lress, 'Tut
a 1 �/ r .byVother�1 {1
. h:>re .�t.1 i� t�.c no ,rr:l a, ,: u;r:d that or an, Tiff ,:Hoff;
(e ,.Qlllli t i Toll: !Ito' !il'1 11 .!17 i 1:11; „'!li ..i re r. :c'?scar'y t0 .void
'i ,''r' .ri l ill :I 0i -•tilt :tl our
City of Miami
April 25, 1978
Page Three
laboratory and engineering studies within 3 weeks of completion of the
field exploration, and would submit a draft of our final report to you
two Creeks after completion of the engineering studies. Our final report
would be submitted within two weeks of receipt of your comments.
We propose that our fee for this work be based upon the attached
Schedule of Charges and General Conditions. We estimate, on this basis,
that total charges for all services, including subcontracted drilling
(using Warren George of Hoboken, 'te►•. Jersey, although we could make
arrangements to utilize the services of local drilling contractors if
these are available) would be about 55,000 to 60,000 dollars. We
request you authorize the sum of 60,000 dollars as a maximum not to
be exceeded without a change in conditions and without your written
permission.
We look forward to being of service to you on this interesting
and challenging project. If you have any question, please call us.
Yours very truly,
DAMES & M iOORE
Carl W. Ga rbe
Partner
Attachments: Plan
Schedule of Charges
ENE
..(HEIL LE OF ( II \ \ND (-2ENE R ( ()4It. • IONS
D siAi ADA
rite compen•ation to Dorm..., N. `ainoto for our toolt:‘,1••t:ols..tvit I r.e•I Ily the dk. merits,
\%hielf are Lornputed ‘et forth
Pi:RSONNEL. C1i)11(;13
Charges for etarl.v,e;:c are ‘rt,;.uteil Iota' thret • :las lof our 11v t•Ao f,:•.c-half. The
total ditect •..ilarN cost •••'iall he a •.,Itti to the t f ,,t1 a tl.plk..11 antni.i1 pr,..seff as
ri dyer:ire liourI tate) plus 30 i-.:rcent 1--ame1 L roll I i t ti t t o L•rtiphiymvnt.
leave. ‘a.:ations, etc. the time of a p tItTIV1 7.71 r7.7'.I.:77I'd ‘-'7 711,7;17 Int 1:7777;1'1 Olt: ;717.7.17..:1 i 1.1711p.7.1 :It an 17 77 i'71‘.711 1.111Ing
rate.
Iht 30 ,r11,1.1)et.- n'it fa.t•ir ; d :••••::,nel tka ,ari in file t•:irt.....1 S tc, For
1...,.it-ortne,i by ;•••,•ra,,nnei ,•tit In otiacr •.:,i,rmrs, it 71r1 17112 •;771717777".71.7 I.:TP.111, ;7.11,1 in
111-•en wo,i‘le the . • :7-;,:‘,;“,' l'!;!
for Ori, .11 ; •• 711.
nine .rent either loc..11 17 t;tet.n.t1t.• 1.ro,1.••t t tz.r.ci i.t•T t'•-• •••T C.1:• For or Ltn,,...; t!!,•
',..hedtrie;••titert ir. a :tras.linurn tt.4t4e1.71 ;'• ;1,0..
EQUIPMENT CHARGES
Computer ,ontrol of Fr. C.7SIS 1';_7 ./1 I.i1t.'41 1.25 per e.ich of harge1/4. Ofhor Darnz.s& \lc,ore
equipmerit. .A01 tI lL noted in the
OTHER SERVICES \ND SUPPLIES
Ch,:r•j:es ,;: f:., '!;;11.;,,nt .:!•:`.:; y 1) 7\17 77 'It', .7;171 .1172. .;'77.7I,I1,1111:-.1:11.
111.1i ell`.117111.INIY ink:Mit:71 7;71 7 71: 1;7 7! 111.11 7;77.7I.I71711177...t11.7 . 7.1;7*7117...7.1
Cost i'1111; 11771 •0•.•tcent 7ntInl..11.11111,
.171I.1 r71I.tic.
(-W.; ;AU% If ;1;••n.•rtt, ..t !..4!‘or.
Spv: :al ••••'.;!:• t“ • •
1•:!%11„
BILLING
St:tterrtents 1•,-..tret1 ..;•,.r: ,.!;1•,..•••• xrreett.
tn,%.resf P.:- per rionth ;,..: :•‘,„„•.,,,,,•• It.. ; ; ;•• ;, ..;; ;1;1;He 04111 ; .!...11`10 tin ,tnIk ,i;p1,1111tS 11(11 r ,,,thin 30
r.imont 1,..t• . • h•-T ..rid !LI: to it:. WI:7717.1 ..:-.7711I11,, oths..t ist
177 1:T1'! '11 011 Ali : :-. PR'7.777.
In thC c1,111 I ('',tit 177111.777.1, 17:1711" 7.1 7 a 17 '1/4;70. !711;II It' ; :10'1 11 \kV 0,, r‘t• to ,•,-,.:1;,1:,•1,11.,n,INses
.ind Ole 177.1.7..,7411 . 7:i `, 7;1 ,•7 77, ; .7711. 771771..•IC.1 17'76 71, 11,•,,••••••,ity to ilotcct our ;1,0c-tonal 1..;‘,11:ttiort. to
• oatilete thk- fie. 1, , TA I t!,, IC(11 in .In .771,17.1:7,1 gall I& '\,..•,•d Tfol.",•,•nt „1
all t itarrek 111.Mit',1 tl ,t tL: ;`;` ;;it; W.111..11 ,i1`, I,. ;100 '.1"1;;;.s.
ilate% an: ,134‘n.
RRAN T1' ,VN1) 1.1 111_1 1 Y
& 11(0)re !!t ‘t•rt- :•;T:tt'i-,10(1, '••••I'litri the •-•,•! otir 1t.nt, 0.1th Olt,'
tio4‘"•11111),'", 111(1 • 'tfit',`1.'11th.:' Th„! rt;.t.,t,• 1.1•011! 7,t1L-,1,11 1:: mit. ,t; • ; ttro)ion, \ pie^,eit ott
ITIorthed,1% At • ,;a: tk, I I; I/1 17 !wit,.
()lr It} •.1 t,, ; :•, •: cr• • 1".• :1: •
' t,, st • • ' ' : ' 'T• ,• ! - :.• •1:
r.11 CR,: • • ..!?;• .• * :* •.: .1 !,/itt, • I . int
ett"t. ..'••• .; t ; • :.• • • •••! : .77;;7; ; Ito .1 74:III 77.7.7; ! .71. it: 77 I" 7(101
1.."4t.; •r...ter 1.7 77.7 • ; 17.11 17. t.7 I.; 7; 7,-; '77-;I. 177 III 7 ; 7 7;7;7777'7 .1: '7. 717;., 17' 77-' 7441.
7s•II.1.7 07177 1.; 1:;` n 7.;"';77 1 ..'71; ; ;7;7 777771,7.: 'Hi III • •!.. !
n iOn ; *:"1 •••• t •
In •1t ; • , : •:.
; • rt. o .1 : ' ' • • ., -1
I -.• • ,•'! 1
/—
C/
f.HLL LE OF (1111:OES V,:1) (A.NERAL
m "Ails 4,..; ADA
The compery Atoll to Dames t‘... .1not,.. for ,•ur „•:Nkj.t,, trtea;olted hy the f;11.o..,•11;
ate Lontrote..13s ‘ct forth i.elow.
C11,\IGES
Charges for etooloyo..,. ate ...roputeti Luv n111 p;..t.t;;;r...111y
total direct cost ;II 1!,.: `,j11:1 0;111.11 to nt.!1u.t it.tYtttli t.t.,t ..•;;;;;;;1 et! rin t arir.11:11 ha:is :tn:1 expteNsed as
fl avetaite hotitly ; ttel flits ?() percent of to , over toll1 o.es, ;;;.,;;!.;:h.t.; in, ;dent to emplornynt, holi(lays.
ick
leave. a.-atiorts, etc. l3h t:'I fa partner tar re!....;!0.1 „.;;.;;•011:ant :i;...N..tt.;;I I.% OW ,..!,.1!1!.0(1 :11 an :1•••-•',..",1ki
rate.
the :10 tor i•• for 1.; tt;:•tt) :••• t!.I.• St
'Antk i,erformed ;;; 'i t.in ot!..;; .;•111 lry ,q't 1:7{..•rtts lj•Cjiar
locaticin,
witsisie th.etiuiState•;., ...al 1 '' t. . ,,
d
ork :it •1,11
rime ‘rvnt in eitlh;r local ot ;;; C."; ;it.; ;•.; .0 C..; tor !an.:
k...twer. a ma ;mum ti.e.;: i•,;•.:1•• i•nt 14:1:L;(1e.
EQUIP\II:NT C11. \ ROES
Computer ..tmtrol ot ;•to.loct :AM h. ;;;Ilet.! at .1 :ate kit I .25 eat:11 `,5() of 2•il, ...1;;;14...e,. 0:her 1);;;11s
equipment. If 1...ed. ;;•11.1 at tit: ; ;les rh0ett trt the .1ppenlitx.
OTIIER SLIZVI(:1:S ANI) Si:1'111.11:S
fcr -•••.:rvaies. f.•,;!it le, not ,..:;!;;;..;;..1 t), .ny t.t
;lot ett.h.ottartiy ith.111 red ;;;;1 • ;:s....;..!;or;;.,. ate ;, t‘;;Ios.vs.
Co.t isltv. In ;,•.•;.....rit •:;;; ;saw •.:!•.i,•71•!!On. !.
••1••••-nt ;:•;••.". , ;;;;;;;nt. !.11;or.
Svc: tal
asel;:o.is.
131L1_ING
St:iternentswdl h nul :0:11 ;IA:" • ^no
t.q. 11: per rionth it;0; ;:, • ....tor.:t. , ..;: 7 0,t11 Ole On Iltit V.1111111
;Tient :1:;...-.ter tint tt. . • ; •‘.t ch.;;; to th n.-2;1 t;,! attoine's tvo. t.tlet•
tr....iirrt•d1r; ; ott .! Jilt. ;
In t1 runt ..; 7'. ool to • :1.01 ,.t i, r‘.11. the ri;;itt to s.1.11 anal‘...es
.tnd rt r••.`.It !JJ 1,0 t s I 1•
, olniqt.te tt.porl ,7:1 %%Pik i ti •j tte. t , t,t ltw,,•••,1 tttlt 11 01,110W' not to \,
,,11(nite• In. Itrit'd up to 1,1,..,1,,ty 1,1 I! 0 .1, „.,ii 111,.lis Is•tjol) 01
Itates ale ,Ahlect Itt.!ps.e :1;•,0; ;.••;0-1.
\'.ARRINTN' ,\ND 1.1 Mi11.111'
ines N1()0IT 1!!,i1 V.1711,n ';'11;:s oil: I -1.7.11!‘, ,...11}1 the 1:•',1.11
ill.)1141.1:'iti10, tld. t ; 7, 1..---.1‘,11 •.! %, 1Lint?. • :-!,-.:.!11,1t!oll, t‘:
l'tClIle1I n!,..tidc,1 .!1 ; r!,,11
()or 11.11,11tt tki the i'!;...nt t; r ;:•-•;•. ; '•;:1 t:, ; ;.; •.•! :•.: •!.t. (7; .it ....! I..;
•••shR it .:*ai 1:. t:i • : •'• ••• tj • !' • .•
i•Ci;11 tj •!:-• • ' • :T, • ; I , ; ,% • .• • • ,
..ny etior. ..; •;;; • : : .; : tte.: to a 1,1t1 !,• s • •;11"
t! ' 'lit it !;•. 1;::. 7•,
': t ! ;•!••••::,..,;:t: I.:I it 1i. 1j 1•tt '
• tt‘ttit:t.t 11,11 (11 4 •117 .117 t „ „. • ‘..; • :.• :Nor.
In It,. ..• ,! • ; • . . ; ; !' . 1 7 •
• o :• :1 .' ; '; •!,
**********************************************#
* *
* *
• The original from which this microfilm
* was taken was awfully poor.
*
* This Is
the best photograph we
* could obtain. *
M•m•on,
MOMMIM
=Mt
MEM
MMINIMPC
a
SCHEDULE OF 1.11I1Rc;r:.S - APPENDIX
q
FOUIPr ll_NT
AUTOMOTIVE
\'chicle, her hour (111:1\imlitn of S hr,iirl j,'r day) S '-.00
\lilealte. per mile S .17
SOIL
Soil s: npfln equipment. hN r ,hi0 hOulr S 3 00
Soil sample rin,s and ii,nt;tiners. per sample S 2.00
Soil compaction control equipment. p r .!.ift hour S 1 . c
LABORATORY
Sod. Water and bi(ilieg,iipin .111 p:'C .';!l j'1l,\ :'c', p,. t' hourS S.00
•
I)\ ndmic F..stiri!' 1'+j1;1i11i1:Ilt :\ 11l I l' clw,i::i ;i ;, jlliri`d
DIVING
S(1'13.\ cdi%it1„ j t ;ij'..'r ; day Ittl-I.110
REPORT PREPARATION
1Vord p .r hour S 3.00
1•t.'xt f'ditin ! I t,liii,ln,•nt. j,: r hour `. 10.00
In Ilou',e IZ�prr.,itt ii,n. ii. r �}1 ct c .10
ENGINEERING
('tl;n utcr hill: ;Ind i)iller i'\'li'.'� I'1:'t i,i 'tl (',\ i,i1!-.. !1i!+rti .. III I, ,, .tt .t phis 5' .
'i., 1.�cd s
lirmin:ds. j'lt,tt.'r. loin)... And ''t,li,hiiier i1". {{.'ti •.\ phis 15 l';c';'1'ains and
the use of 1).tuii\
h1. i ... :...1
FIELD
I I .1 ' 1' F.1'. 1 •' R I
**4c>'t*>Y**x*4c*i,'t*it>'c>'c*'atic4c4c*******dc*4tdc9cxpYd:::x*:t:k*x9 **#
*
The original from which this microfilm
* was taken was awfully poor. x.
This is the best photograph we
* could obtain. x.
**********************c>**********************4
I LVIof V/t�
4
D
ca
w
J
L
V
t
V
1
Cl
t
t..�l. yam....~ `r
O
c e.
*************************** i:q ,#*#%****
'The eriginal from which this mlc 'bfi11:
* Was taken was awfully poor,
This isk�:the best pbotagrapWe..�
CQu1dobtain.,
$t************************#* ******.**,******,****#,