Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1926-07-15 MinutesEE s ma MMUS OP PHI 1EElt' /B0 at TRI BOARD OP 204.141401011 0! TOR CITY OW MOO. FLORIDA. Oa this 16th day of July, A. D. 1968, the Commissions of the City of tiiord. ?'.Lerida. SOS at the City Fell in Reid City. pursuant to anadjournment taker Jtn1.7 14tb, 19l4, es a ]Ward of Icgaalisation. Chairmen E. 0. Routh (Palled the meeting to •ar at 3:00 o'olook P. 11. end on roll dell the following remfbers were present: i. 0. ROi@'A J. E. LUIni in J. R. OILMAI J. B. OHM. ABORNTt 0. D. Limn JROTION 0P J. it. iiup i W. J. 8. %ulnas appeared before the board and filed the following written objee• tics: ltlawi. Ploride. 00.9 13, 1926. City Commissioners, realisation Board. IEiasi , Florida. Dear dire:. Upon investigation 1 find that my house and Lot. R. 135 Let 1, Edgewater ferrsos bus been assessed 226,120. The tax on Im- provements ;8500 remains the same as Lest year add is reasonable. But the tax on Lot $16,660 Is unreasonably high, being 4 end times the assessed valve lest year whioh was $5400. There is absolutely no vAla reason for this as the property Is not worth * Cent more than was before the Dona. It is true it was sold during the las at a very high figure- 7—hut the money bee not been paid end the property has rows book on our hands. Those prices ware purely srtifioiel end should never have in- flusnoed the assessor in his satinets of veluea. In se mocb as three apartment houses and one residence have sprung up on thta little street within a year end ssseseabie property hea inoreased many fold throughout the oity, we had every reason to expect that our taxes would be decreased instead of quardupling. In this oanneotion I wish to add that the oaunty has more than doubled on this property and therefore it means that after living here twelve years I am required to pay an amount in taxes equivalent to $66 e month rent for my own house. Very truly yours, (Higned) J. H. .CIRAM OIJIIITIOI 0P CLARBBCH M. BOOR; The following written objection of Mr. Claxenoe M. Busob was received: limai.Besob, Fla.. July 16, 1926. Board of Squaliaation, ¥iami . Gentlemen: - In reference to aanessm:ent of lots in the subdivision known as neon Jaointo and Trion' in Sedition 8-54-41. I beg to cell attention to the loot that lots in the subdivision of Sunny Groves on LeJeuae Road, a main north and south thoroughfare, are assessed at not exceeding 01E00, while in Triers) which lies to the west of bunny droves, end is not on a main traveled street they run as high as 91480. In Kooks 1 end 10 of teen Jaointo the 85 foot lots tee- ing on Mendoza street are assessed at ;600 for oorners and $450 for inside lots. as compered to 151000 for Inside 50 foot lots end es high as $1460 for ooreers in the other Blooke. In view of the above I feel that the valuations in Can Jacinto and Tritons should be reduced and trust that you oen see your way olear to do •o. Thanking you in advance for anything you may be able to do in the matter, 1 am Yours very truly, (Signed) CI.AR NOE M. BU 0B By P. P. Hay. 2PJ3OTLOII 0r 1E0. 4. PILL005. The following written ob;eotion of Lir. •aeo. W. ?Moon wee rsoeived: Miami, Florida, July 15, 1916. To Hon. City Coneieeianers. Gentlemen: I wieb to protest very strong on the raise in valuation l sivrlrllommmIMII egi i r 1 i 1 1 tr; 44 July 15, 1926. o i of Lot 8, Block 16, Kirkland Height* Addition, hiving been reload fro* $160 to '3,000. Entirely out ,Jf reason and not wort% it or would not sell for %bat being an inside lot with no paved street or Sidewalks. Only s white road in front of it. Nespeotfully, fnigned) GEO. W. PILLOW, Also received wee the following written protest of Mr. Geo. 0. PilloOfts Nlami. Florid., July 15, 1926. To Board of Iqualization, for City of Miami. Gentlemen: I wish to protest against the raise in valnetion of my property on N3 23rd street being the West 76 feet of Lot 1, "NANCY ?MACK", hiving been reifted from #6000 to $15000. Entirely too muob of a raise. It would not sell for over $20,000 if that. It is vacant. Respentfully, (digned) ONO. e. ?MOON apricTior 07 ME3. IDA PILLOON: Tbe fallowing objeotion of Mrs. Id* ?Moon wee resolved: ACTION BY Florida, July 15, 1926. To the Ron. City Commiesionere se Board of Xquelirtetlon. Miami, Florida. Gentlemen: - wish to protest against the raise in valuatiom of my pro- perty being the Wont 75 feet of Lot 3, Blook 2, Edgewater AdditiOM, having been raised from 26600 to #17100, this is entirely too mush of • raise, jut figure what tto tax will amount to making our house too expensive to live in amounting to about 975.00 a so. to live in my own hourse for taxes alone. The extreme amount should not be over 010.000. oespeotfully submitted, feigned' MHo. IDA ?MOON THE BOAND ON PHOTKoTo FILED: Protest of E. B. Chrietiansen: The oral protest of O.. B. Christiansen against the assessment of the osseesor on Lot 17, "BAY BREHoll", wan considered and the Board decided that the said es.- sessment of the oreeonor on «aid property oso !net sod oquitable end the Board leolinad to reduoe same. protest of J. t. Ohristianeen: The orul protest of J. T. Christiansen ogainst the enrosament of the Asseesor on Lot 4, "Ene/ATER TKtRACO, and on Lot 3 and Neat 5 feet of Lot 2, "EDGEWATER TORRACE" woo c oehlored and the Board decided that the said esseeemonts of the Asoessor were ,lust end equitable and the Boerd deolined to reduos said cswerre- ments or any port of EMMA. Protest of Harriett Christiansen: The oral protest of Harriett Christiansen end Mrs. m. C. Hahn against the ease's- ment of the Aseeeeor on Lots 6 and 7, "EDGE4ATEli TRACE", was oonsidered and the Board decided that the eold assessment of the Assessor on said property wee pest and equitable and the Board declined to reduoe some. ?roteet of John Livingston: The oral protest of John B. Livingston on Lot 3, Block 2, "oAN JOsE ADDITION" the sold assoe,ment of the Assessor on the Board deolined to reduoe sorra. against the assessment of the assessor oonsidered and the Board decided that said property was just and equitable and Protest of 1700. N. Filloon: The writton protest of 5oo. t. Filloon against the assw7amenteof the Assessor on the oet 76 foot of Lot 1, "NANCY Tel-MAU," end on Lot 8, Block 16, ETHICLAND HrGHTS, was oonsidered and the Board 4eoided thot the said aesesements of the Assessor on sold property wore just and equitable and the Board deolined to re- does same or auy port of same. Protest of Ida Filloon: Tbe written protest of Ids Pilloon egeivot the 'resentment of the Assessor on the Neat 75 foot of Lot 3, Block 2, "3DGEWATER". was considered and the Board decided that the said assessment of the Asseseor on said property was just and equitable end the Board deolined to reduce some. 11. IS MM MM mm 1 1 ■ 1 1 Dielnrq'.j*Q,n1.71.4e.HM�`te1.l`Y,W. '?t,^•n.wty •.• potest of J. H. piinlinit The written protest of J. O. Mulaan spinet tbe Siasesassnt of the .ssessor on the wart 105 feet of Lot 1, '"EB0'NeidZ$ 1111NA0E0, wee considered and the Board Molded that the said a ssesameot of the ee0000or c*A Mid property was Poet sad equitable end. the Bosrd deolined to redone sans. PrQtast of wiliiem witoher•: The written protest of wilit©m witoher against the saseasment of the Assessor on Lots 6, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. Block 10 B. Lowrance $si;ata, wale considered end the Board decided that the s,sseseaont of the *sweeper on said property was just and equitable and the Board declined to reduce same. PF9test of Dr. B, B. O'Ye110 , The oral protest of Dr. B. B. O'Kelley against the assessment of the assessor on Lot 11, Blouk 2, Memi south, was o onsidored by the Board and the Baird de- cided that the seasasrnent of the Assessor on °aid, property was just and equit- able end tho Board doollned to rodeos aWe. Protest of C. M. Buaoh: The written protest of C. Li. 8ueob against the a ssesamenta of the Assessor on Lots in the subdivision known as San Joelnto and Triena in Section 8-54-41, was oonaidered by the Board end the Board deoi dad that the assessments of the enamor on said property were just and equitable and the Board declined to re- duoe same or any part of sage. :retest of Modern Investment Co; The written protest of Modern Investment Company agai net the assessments of the •eaeseor on Lots 23 anti 24, Block L. Borth 75 feet, Orange Perk, was oonaidered and the Board dooided to reduoe the assessment of the Aeseaeor on the improve- ments altos tad on !Borth 75 feet of Lots 23 and 24, Block 2, Orange park from ;6750 to 113,000; and the written protest of said Modern Investment Company against the eeeese:rano of the ♦ssessor on improvements on aoutb 75 feet of the above lots wee oonsiderer3 and the Board deoided to cancel the assessment of the •ssessor of 0400 for improvements on sold south 75 feat of said lots. retest of Ploride East Coast Railway Co: The written protest of Florida Seat Collet :tei lwey Company against the assess- ments of the saseseor on the properties of the jai d Railway Company located with- in the corporate limits of the City of Miami wee oonaidered by the Boerd am! the Board decided to reduce the ineeeament of the •aeeaeor ;4,964.400.00 to 01,501,884.00. :retest of Plorids Zest Coast Hotel Co; The written protest of Florida Zest Coast Hotel (:ompany against the aaeee ment of the assessor on the properties of the said Hotel Company located within the corporate limits of the City of liiami wee om•idered by the Board and the Board decided to reduce tbe assessment of the •ssessor *gallant the golf Coors* pro- perty of said Hotel Company from •535,000.00 to $330.000.00, yrotaet of J. w. watton; The written protest of J. s. Nstaon against the aeaassmsnt of the Assessor on property known as "RAT8OD 5(aJOR". was considered era the Board bai dad to re- does the assessment of the .ssessor against the said property from 1*00,180. to 0100,000. Pretest of J. A. Dann: Mr. J. a. Dann appeared and filed written protest as follows: Miami, ?levies, July 16, 1956. Board of Equalisation, City Hall, Hunt. Florida. (iestls►me n: - Attached herewith is a list of lots which I desire to be reduced for the various reasons stat- ed therein. Tours reepeotfully, (signed) J. a. pal( thereupon the Board promptly considered tbe protest against the assessment* of the •ssessor on tbe properties set out in the list sttaobed to the protest of Mr. Mon and the following notion taken: 1 16, 1924. lb. board availed to rodeo' tha •ssa.esint ••iqstOst tie properties is $reddoak's Subdivision So. 4 and tba sass wars raa>raaa as fol1O s T8'�Eo 16, insluslvs, sod 19 to 28, inalusiva, 29 $0 31 38 58 to 42, inolusiv.. 48 to 49, inclusive. ! j u to 227, inclusive, 88 30 el ab 38 $4 86 $88 to 49. inalasivs. gol 8 ". 14. inolusive. 15 16 {LOOK 6: 5 to 8, inclusive, 9 10 11 Rao * $ trolls $1*80 oasis E400 2800 1800 1400 1000 1000 oil from: 1100 1100 1800 1100 1000 1100 1200 1000 koduood from: 1100 1200 $1250 1000 1600 1600 8200 ILL 9600 slob 800 800 800 800 600 800 $ 500 600 800 600 500 500 T00 500 500 800 $600 500 600 500 500 Tbs Board dsoided to reaaas the assessment against 10 sera! or 37 1090 known es "FIBS I t*LB°' from $45 , 600 to $20 , 000. Zbe Board deoided to reduoe the assessment against Lot 6. Block 66 boutb. from 43,000 to S1,560. The Board deolined to reduce the assessment of the 18 Valentine subdivision and declined to the reduce the or on .Boutb 25 feet of Lot 10, and the North 25 feet of Assessor on Lots 14 and assessment of the .seess- Lo t 16. Blook 65 month. }7i24L *DTIPS 09 BOARD; And the Hoard of Bqueliration having oonaidered every written objeotion filed with it in respect to any aeseasmeats, as well se hasvi'g considered ell other objeotione fil- ed with it or Trade to it and no further ob eotieve having been made or preeented to said Board by any person, hie agent or attorney. oonaidering himself aggrieved, and having upon its own motion made a careful examination a.* the General assessment Moll for the purpose of inareseing or dminiebing valuations therein end for furnishing names of persons and description of property improperly omitted from said no11, and fixing the values of said property, and of oorreoting errors and supplying the defi- ciencies found therein, has deduced from said Moil 53.865.366.00 from the valuation ar the taxable :reel. Eetate made by the a®eeesor, and has determined the aggregate value of each taxable Beal ::atete to be V63,651.134; and the total value of the tax- able Personal Property to be 15.997,257; and the t,:,tel value of Property exempt from taxation to be 027,593,730.U0; and no further business appearing befare the said Board, the Board does eaoortain and find that the assessment of property as town by the General aeseserent ?oil submitted by the *seoarear end as revised by and determined by the Board of Equalization, is just and correct aro shall be, and is hereby, approv- ed and o0iisidered final. AD.7012I41$ter : No further business appearing before the Board of Bqualitetiom, on motion duly made end seoonded, the meeting was adjourned ainedis. rfxsrri': n i n I I1l111 11111111111 uu a 11111111I1111III I111IIIUI Irl III11111IilII IeIINIlIUuIII IPPII! IIIIIIIIIM■IIIIIIIIIII