Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppeal DocumentsSubmit an Appeal to the City Commission, PZAB, or HEPB Submitted on Receipt number Related form version 18 June 2025, 9:48am 183 19 Submitting your Appeal to the City Commission, PZAB, or HEPB On what date was either the administrative decision/interpretation issued, the CU revocation or denial letter dated, or the resolution rendered? (click calendar icon). 06/04/2025 I Proof of payment for appeal, noticing, and advertising fees? Did you pay your fees, if applicable? Yes Please upload a copy of the payment receipt showing full Transaction Statement Order Confirmation 06-18-25 pdf payment of fees associated with the appeal. Your information What is your name or the name of your law firm representing W. Tucker Gibbs, P.A. as authorized representative? Please provide your email. tucker@wtgibbs.com Please provide your phone number? 305-448-8486 or 305-788-2720 (cell) What is the administrative decision/interpretation number or PZAB Resolution No. 25-030 the resolution number you are appealing? All of your documents shall become a public record. Please upload all of your required documents as detailed online. A summary list of the documents you need to submit is the following: 1) Appeal Letter 2) Proof of Lobbyist Registration (if applicable) 3) Corporate Resolution from Board of Directors (if applicable) 4) Other pertinent documents, i.e. Disclosure to Support or Withhold Objection, Power of Attorney, etc. Digital Signature and Submission Lobbyist Registration 06-18-25.pdf Appeal Letter 06-18-25.pdf Transaction Statement Order Confirmation 06-18-25.pdf Please type your full name here and sign below. W. Tucker Gibbs Using your mouse or finger, please provide your digital signature. Your digital signature verifies your submission.* *The signature must be that of the individual 1 of 2 "signing" this document electronically or be made with the full knowledge and permission of the individual; otherwise, it constitutes forgery under s. 831.06, F.S. The individual signing this document affirms that the statements and information stated herein are true. ****I hereby certify that the information supplied does not qualify for the exemptions contained in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. I hereby certify that the information indicated in this appeal submission is true and accurate, and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effects as if made under oath; that I am authorized to execute this appeal submission as required by State, County, and Municipal laws.. Link to signature 2of2 City of Miami PZAB Resolution Enactment Number: PZAB-R-25-030 City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com File ID: 17466 Date Rendered: 6/13/2025 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD GRANTING, WITH CONDITIONS, THE APPEAL FILED BY MARK GRAFTON, ESQUIRE, ON BEHALF OF 4055 POINCIANA AVE, LLC ("APPELLANT"), OF THE DECISION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S DENIAL OF WARRANT NO. PZ-23-17396 PURSUANT TO APPENDIX A, SECTION A.3.6(G)(1), AND ARTICLE 7, SECTIONS 7.1.1.2 AND 7.1.2.4 OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED, ("MIAMI 21 CODE") TO DIMINISH A LOT/BUILDING SITE TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MORE THAN ONE (1) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A PARCEL ZONED "T3-R," SUB -URBAN TRANSECT ZONE — RESTRICTED WITH THE "NCD-3," COCONUT GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT OVERLAY, LOCATED AT 4055 POINCIANA AVENUE, MIAMI, FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, 4055 Poinciana Ave, LLC ("Applicant" or "Appellant") applied for a Warrant to diminish a lot/building site for the property located at 4055 Poinciana Avenue, Miami, Florida ("Property") pursuant to Appendix A, Section 3.6.g.1 of Ordinance No. 13114, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami, Florida, as amended, ("Miami 21 Code"), WHEREAS, Appendix A, Section 3.6.g.1 of the Miami 21 Code, titled "Lots and Building Sites," provides that "[w]herever an existing single-family residence or lawful accessory building(s) or structure(s) is located on one or more platted lots or portions thereof, such lots shall thereafter constitute only one building site and no permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one single-family residence except by Warrant. Such structures shall include but not be limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, walls, and fences or other at grade or above ground improvements. No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant, subject to the criteria specified in Article 4, Table 12 Design Review Criteria"; and WHEREAS, Section 7.1.2.4.b.3 of the Miami 21 Code indicates for Warrants "[a]pprovals shall be granted when the application complies with all applicable regulations; conditional approvals shall be issued when the applications require conditions in order to be found in compliance with all applicable regulations; denials of applications shall be issued if after conditions and safeguards have been considered, the application still fails to comply with all applicable regulations"; and WHEREAS, Section 7.1.2.4.c of the Miami 21 Code indicates that "[a]s appropriate to the nature of the Warrant involved and the particular circumstances of the case, the following criteria shall apply to a Warrant application. The application shall be reviewed for compliance with this Code. The review shall consider the intent of the Transect, the guiding principles of the Date Rendered: 6/13/2025 City of Miami Page 1 of 4 File ID: 17466 (Revision:) Printed On: 6/13/2025 Miami 21 Code, and the manner in which the proposed Use will operate given its specific location and proximity to less intense Uses. The review shall also apply Article 4, Table 12, Design Review Criteria, as applicable"; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2025, the City of Miami ("City") Planning Department denied Warrant No. PZ-23-17396 pursuant to Appendix A, Section 3.6.g.1 of the Miami 21 Code to diminish a lot/building site to allow for the construction of more than one (1) single-family residence on a parcel zoned "T3-R," Sub -Urban Transect Zone — Restricted with the "NCD-3," Coconut Grove Neighborhood Conservation District overlay for the Property for the reasons indicated in the analysis contained in the denial of Warrant No. PZ-23-17396; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of three (3) platted Lots — Lots, 2, and 3, and in 1947, a single-family residential structure was constructed on Lots 1, 2, and 3 establishing a unified building site of approximately 21,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the unified building site is consistent with the immediate neighborhood as more than half of the building sites exceed their original platted size of 7,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that the proposal was consistent with the requirements of the T3-R, Sub -Urban Transect Zone - Restricted; and WHEREAS, the intent of the NCD-3 overlay is to protect the low -density residential and dominant tree canopy characteristics of Coconut Grove and to prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height; and WHREAS, the Planning Department found the proposal was inconsistent with and did not align with the intent of the Neighborhood Conservation District-3 (NCD-3) overlay to protect the low -density residential character of Coconut Grove and to prevent the intrusion of additional density, uses, and height; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that the proposal was inconsistent with the average Lot size and historic development pattern of the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that pursuant to the Guiding Principles of the Miami 21 Code, the proposal was inconsistent with the principle that architecture and landscape design should grow from local climate, topography, history, and building practice; and was inconsistent with the principle that preservation and renewal of historic resources should be facilitated to affirm the continuity of the community; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that the proposal would increase the overall residential density in the area by two (2) additional dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that the Warrant request to diminish the existing building site by reverting to the three (3) originally platted Lots of approximately 7,000 square feet each is inconsistent with the context along Poinciana Avenue between Justison Road and Solana Road where building sites have an average Lot size of 11,712 square feet and, therefore, the request did not comply with Article 4, Table 12 of the Miami 21 Code concerning the urban form criteria; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department analyzed the size of parcels within a quarter -mile radius of the subject building site and found that the average Lot size was 9,300 square feet; City of Miami Page 2 of 4 File ID: 17466 (Revision:) Printed On: 6/13/2025 and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that the proposed building sites of 7,000 square feet each will be disproportional to the existing neighborhood's building site composition and context; and WHEREAS, the Department of Planning found that the reversion of the building site into the three (3) separate building sites is out of character for the area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that pursuant to Goal LU-1 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"), the project does not advance the goal to maintain a land use pattern that protects and enhances the quality of life in Miami's distinct neighborhoods and diverse communities; and does not advance the goal to maintain a land use pattern that supports the efficient use of land and encourages compact design while protecting and enhancing residential areas within neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department found that pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.9 of the MCNP, the project does not advance the goal to mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of new development on existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements; and WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, Mark Grafton, Esquire, on behalf of the Appellant filed an appeal to the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board ("PZAB") of the denial of Warrant No. PZ- 23-17396 with the Office of Hearing Boards; and WHEREAS, as detailed in the Appellant's appeal, the Appellant contends that the Warrant application is consistent with the applicable criteria of the Miami 21 Code; and WHEREAS, the Appellant indicated that that the proposed diminishment of the building site of 21,000 square feet by reverting to the three (3) originally platted Lots of 7,000 square feet each meets the requirements set forth in the T3-R, Sub -Urban Transect Zone - Restricted and the provisions of the NCD-3 overlay of the Miami 21 Code; and WHEREAS, the Appellant indicated that the proposed diminishment is proportional to the existing neighborhood's building site composition and context; and WHEREAS, the Appellant indicated that the proposed diminishment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Miami 21 Code; and WHEREAS, the Appellant indicated that the proposed diminishment lessens the Intensity of development; and WHEREAS, the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board ("PZAB") held a public hearing on the appeal of the determination by the Planning Department to review the determination de novo; and WHEREAS, the PZAB heard testimony and evidence regarding the proposed building site diminishment; and WHEREAS, the PZAB reviewed and considered the testimony and evidence and evaluated the Warrant request under the applicable criteria of the Miami 21 Code, including but City of Miami Page 3 of 4 File ID: 17466 (Revision:) Printed On: 6/13/2025 not limited to Appendix A of the Miami 21 Code as well as Article 4, Table 12 of the Miami 21 Code; and WHEREAS, after due notice and an opportunity to be heard has been afforded to all parties and members of the public, based on the testimony and evidence presented, and for the reasons stated on the record, the PZAB found competent substantial evidence in the record to grant the appeal of Warrant No. PZ-23-17396, with two additional conditions on the Warrant: to provide 40% Green Space per Lot and to provide a minimum of 18 trees over the 3 lots; and reverse the denial of Warrant No. PZ-23-17396; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board ("PZAB") hereby grants the appeal of Warrant No. PZ-23-17396, with two conditions on the Warrant: 1) to provide 40% Green Space per Lot and 2)to provide a minimum of 18 trees over the 3 lots; and thereby reverses the decision of the City's Planning Department to deny the Warrant No. PZ-23-17396. Section 3. If any section, part of a section, paragraph, clause, phrase, or word of this Resolution is declared invalid, the remaining provisions of this Resolution shall not be affected. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective fifteen (15) days upon its adoption. THIS DECISION IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED IN THE HEARING BOARDS DIVISION WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. Reviewed and Approved: David Snow City of Miami Page 4 of 4 File ID: 17466 (Revision:) Printed On: 6/13/2025 APP h;AL L N;TT N;R W. TUCKER GIBBS, P.A. June 18, 2025 Olga Zamora Hearing Boards Office City of Miami 444 S.W. Second Avenue, Miami, Florida 33130 ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. BOX 1050 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 TELEPHONE (305) 448-8486 EMAIL tucker@wtgibbs.com 3rd Floor Re: Appeal to the Miami City Commission of the Planning Zoning and Appeals Board's Grant of an Appeal of 4055 Poinciana Ave, LLC, of the Decision of the City of Miami Planning Department to Deny Warrant No. PZ-23-17396. Dear Ms. Zamora: I represent Alexandra P. Lumpkin, who lives at and owns property located at 4066 Poinciana Avenue, immediately to the south of and abutting 4055 Poinciana Avenue, the subject of City of Miami Warrant No. PZ-23-17396 and PZAB Resolution No. 25-030. Pursuant to the provisions set forth in Appendix A.3 Coconut Grove Neighborhood Conservation District NCD-3 ("NCD- 3"), Ms. Lumpkin hereby appeals the decision of the Planning Zoning and Appeals Board ("PZAB"), 1) to grant the applicant's request to split a 21,000 square -foot building site into three 7,000 square -foot sites, and 2) to place conditions on this approval that are contrary to NCD-3 development regulations. The PZAB's decision to grant the warrant was based primarily on provisions in the Miami 21 Zoning Code ("Miami 21")that are not applicable to the property owner's application for a warrant for a diminution of lot size within the NCD-3 overlay district. 1.The PZAB failed to review this matter as set forth in the NCD-3 provisions of Miami 21. Section 3.6 of the NCD-3 regulations explains that the district is "intended to protect low density residential and dominant tree canopy and prevent additional density and height." That section also states: Page 1 of 4 "All T-3 single-family residential zoning regulations shall apply in the ...NCD-3 Single - Family Residential District except as modified below [section 3.6 a-k]. If any such requireminnts conflict, NCD-3 requirements shall apply." (emphasis added.) The PZAB failed to apply the required NCD-3 regulations when it approved the diminution of the 21,000-square-foot building site at 4055 Poinciana Avenue and placed conditions on that approval that were contrary to NCD-3 development regulations. 2 NCD-3 section 3.6.g is the basis of the applicant's warrant request before the PZAB. However, that section says: "No building sites in existence prior to September 24, 2005 shall be diminished in size except by Warrant, subject to the criteria specified in Article 4, Table 12 Design Review Criteria The applicant provided no support for its reliance on Miami-21 provisions not in Article 4, Table 12. Therefore, those provisions fail to address the appropriate standards for a warrant for diminution of a building site. The PZAB's reliance on the applicant's arguments led it to side-step the required NCD-3 regulations when it granted the applicant's request. The applicant referred to the following three criteria in Article 4, Table 12 for its argument that the request for the diminution of the existing building site meets design review requirements. a. The applicant argued that the diminution of a 78- year-old building site met the requirement to "[r]einforce and enhance the Neighborhood pattern and scale of lots, blocks and open spaces." However, the city's professional planning staff found that "...the proposed diminishment of the [building site] is not found to reinforce the existing pattern and scale of the surrounding block." The staff based Page 2 of 4 its finding on a study of single-family residential lots within a quarter -mile radius of the 4055 Poinciana building site. The study found that the average size of the residential properties within that area is 9,300 square feet. This shows that the three proposed 7,000 square -foot sites are smaller than the neighborhood average. According to the study, the proposed 7,000 square foot sites also are smaller than the average size of lots on the block surrounding 4055 Poinciana, which are approximately 11,712 square -feet in size. Therefore, the city's professional staff determined: "The proposal does not reinforce the spatial characteristics or development pattern of the Neighborhood." b. The applicant stated that its request for reducing a 21,000 square -foot site to three 7,000 square -foot sites would "Ensure development is contextually sensitive to historical and cultural assets that contribute to the Neighborhood character." City staff noted: 'the intent of NCD-3 states the character of Coconut Grove is 'derived from... its unique property sizes and shapes...' The request to diminish the existing [building site] is inconsistent with Article 4, Table 12 and the intent of NCD-3 to preserve the character of Coconut Grove's residential Neighborhoods." c. The applicant clams that it meets the requirement to "Minimize the impact of Parking and Loading on the public realm and adjacent properties through its determination that "there is no loading for the three propose building sites and that "Parking is intended to be contained on site for each of the three sites. According to the staff analysis: "Although the Property is vacant, the site has historically contained one Single -Family Residence. The proposed Lot Diminishment would result in an increase in vehicular activity resulting from the two (2) additional Dwelling Units, resulting in additional conflict points for pedestrians." Page 3 of 4 For all the reasons set forth above, the PZAB's approval of the applicant's request for the diminishment of a 21,000 square - foot building site is contrary to the governing regulations regarding such requests in the NCD-3 District. Even if the applicant were correct in its reliance on non- NCD-3 provisions, the city staff's thorough review and analysis of the applicant's warrant request provide the competent substantial evidence necessary to support its conclusion that the PZAB's decision to grant the warrant to replace a 21,000 square -foot building site with three 7,000 square -foot lots "fails to meet the applicable design criteria Additionally, the PZAB failed to apply the correct law and base its decision on competent substantial evidence when it granted the applicant's warrant request and placed conditions that are contrary to NCD-3 development regulations. Therefore, Ms. Lumpkin, through this letter, appeals the PZAB's grant of Warrant No. PZ-23-17396 including conditions. Affirming that decision would allow more density and traffic into an NCD-3-protected single-family neighborhood. She requests that the Miami City Commission grant this appeal and reverse the PZAB decision to allow the diminution of the property at 4055 Poinciana Avenue. Sincerely, daCkMgak, W. Tucker Gibbs cc: Alexandra P. Lumpkin Page 4 of 4 LOBBYIST REGISTRATION Note: Annual Registration Expires on 12/31/2025 CITY OF MIAMI LOBBYIST REGISTRATION FORM (1) Lobbyist Name: Business Phone: Instructions: Please complete all sections of this form and submit the completed form, with the applicable fee(s), to the Office of the City Clerk. If you need more space to complete a section, use a separate sheet(s) of paper. If you have nothing to report in a particular section, you must type or print "None" or "N/A" in that section. IF ANY SECTION IS LEFT BLANK, THE FORM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Important: It is the responsibility of the lobbyist to ensure that ALL active lobbyist registration forms, including active lobbyist registration forms submitted in previous years, remain up* dly. 6'1 g/35 w 721c Kcv2 ,� L� 'g 'f fc (Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial) Email: -h.i6keire. cA)/- abhr. Business Address (include Zip Code): 3RR 3c c)71 PIA 611 'i' 7 ✓h�Anti�� rL.3/3 • (2) Principal Represented: /I �j(Aki,Di - LC) M►oK() (3) (Name of corporation, partnership, trust, etc., you are representing) Business Address (include Zip Code): Le6(a(6 mipro� P4- 33133 Are you the Principal of the corporation, partnership, trust, etc.? YES E NO Ft(you must check YES or NO) NOTE: Principal means the person, firm, corporation, or other entity that performs lobbying activity on behalf of itself or that has designated, employed, or retained a lobbyist to lobby on its behalf. The term ".principal" also includes the person, firm, corporation, or other entity receiving the benefit of the lobbying effort and on whose behalf the lobbyist is lobbying, even if the lobbyist is retained. engaged, or employed by a third -party for such purposes. IF YOU PROVIDED INFORMATION IN SECTION 2 ABOVE, PLEASE REVIEW THIS SECTION CAREFULLY. If a lobbyist represents a corporation, partnership or trust, the lobbyist must disclose the name and business address of the chief officer, partner or beneficiary of the corporation, partnership or trust, and the names and addresses of all persons holding, directly or indirectly, at least five percent (5%) ownership interest in said corporation, partnership or trust. Attach separate sheet if needed. If this section is not applicable you must type or print "None" or "N/A". N`/p (4) Specific issue associated with lobbying. Describe with as much detail as is practical. Attach a separate sheet if needed. If you are using this form for your Annual Registration, please write "Annual Registration" and the year that you are registering for (ex: Annual Registration 2025). U.'i �l�tisi ► P �. _ /OS‹ P©l k A.I>a Ave- S'I4 FF A/vAsJ 1,C avar kre. Pa -2.3-03436 Page 1 of 2 Office of the City Clerk, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, FL 33133 / Phone: (305) 250-5361 / Email: clerks@miamigov.com CM-LRF (Rev. 12/2024) (5) Lobbyists shall be required to state the existence of any direct or indirect business association, partnership, or financial relationship with the Mayor, any member of the City Commission, any member of a City board, the City Manager or a member of the City staff before whom he/she lobbies or intends to lobby. Attach separate sheet if needed. If this section is not applicable you must type or print "None" or "N/A". Lobbyists, as defined in City Code Section 2-653, shall pay an annual registration fee of $525.00, plus $105.00 for each principal represented for each issue lobbied on behalf of any one principal. Each issue associated with lobbying shall be described with as much detail as is practical. The City Clerk, or the City Clerk's designee, shall reject any registration statement that does not provide a clear description of the specific issue on which such lobbyist has been retained to lobby or if any section of this form is left blank. Regardless of the date of the annual registration, all lobbyists' annual registrations shall expire December 31 of each calendar year and shall be renewed on a calendar year basis. Each lobbyist shall, within sixty (60) days after registering as a lobbyist, submit to the Office of the City Clerk a certificate of completion of an ethics course offered by the Miami -Dade County Commission on Ethics & Public Trust ("Ethics Commission"). Lobbyists who have completed the initial ethics course mandated by the preceding sentence and have continuously registered as a lobbyist thereafter shall be required to complete a refresher ethics course offered by the Ethics Commission every two (2) years. Each lobbyist who has completed a refresher ethics course shall submit a certificate of completion within sixty (60) days after registering as a lobbyist. Lobbyists shall file amendments to their registration forms within fifteen (15) days of anyhan of information required to be set forth on their registration forms. (Miami -Dade County Code Section 2-11.1( (3) Each lobbyist shall file a form with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after ceasing all ralkin principal. (Miami -Dade County Code Section 2-11.1(s)(3)(i)) s with a I do solemnly swear that all of the foregoing facts are true and correct, and I have read om iliar ith the provisions contained in Chapter 2, Article VI, Sections 2-651 through 2-658 of the Miami - Cot , as Mended, and Miami -Dade County Code Section 2-11.1(s). STATE OF i ! ©'i) JO\ COUNTY OF R1 q rn ct _ (K! ature of Lobbyist Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me by means ofUphysical presence or_o, e1no)arization, this 1 day z of 0 f e2D , by (1J C C onth) Year Signature of Notary Public P-rsonally Known: OR Produced Identification: Type of Identification Produced: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: e of person making s Name of i':: a r, -. d or —Stamped — , *RY PU ••.•/43•• (NOTARY?Aij MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 10-27-2027 CM-LRF (Rev. 12/2024) Page 2 of 2 TRANSACTION STATFMHIMH and ORDER CONFIRMATION #177804605 T 411-tami BUILDING DEPARTMENT Transaction Statement Financial Transaction ID: 1198365 Transaction Date: Jun 17 2025 12:58PM Permit Number: FEE SUMMARY W. Tucker Gibbs, Esq. obo Alexandra P. Lu (Appealing PZAB-25-030) (305)448-8486 Fee Category Fee Code Fee Description Quantity Unit Type Amount HEARING BOARDS - PUBLIC HEARING MS-228 PUBLIC HEARING - ADVERTISING 1.0000 UNITS $1,500.00 HEARING BOARDS - PUBLIC HEARING MS-241 PUBLIC HEARING - MEETING MAIL NOTICE - APPLICANT/APPEALLANT 4.5000 DOLLARS $4.50 HEARING BOARDS - PUBLIC HEARING MS-443 PUBLIC HEARING - ONE PROPERTY POSTING 1.0000 UNITS $200.00 Total: $1,704.50 Rev. Jul/02/2012 Generated on Jun/17/2025 12:57 PM W. Tucker Gibbs From: Sent: To: Subject: No Reply - City of Miami <noreply+city-of-miami-fl@paydici.com> Wednesday, June 18, 2025 9:18 AM W. Tucker Gibbs City of Miami :: Order Receipt r rder onfir ation #177 04605 Your payment of $1704.50 to City of Miami has been processed on June 18, 2025. Transaction ID Installment 1198365 Balance Due Total: Payment Method: '`*** **** '*** 1006 (echeck) Amount $1,704.50 $1,704.50 Please be advised there is a 14-day system hold on all online and in person check payments from the date of the receipt. Your payment is pending approval by your banking institution. If your financial institution rejects the payment, for any reason, you will be contacted. You will need to � m provide a new payment plus any penalties, Please note that the payment date will then bethe date ofthis new payment. |fyou have questions regarding your account, please contact City ofMiami. Login to view account history, download statements and save payment preferences: Thank you, City ofMiami 305-416-1570 Need login help? Please do not respond to this email as it isnot monitored regularly. For billing questions or general issues, pleasecontact your service provider directly. Click here tounsvbnc,ibefrom ecHUnotifications I� X 2