The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 1922-05-01 MinutesOA day.‘ .- 4.; mat at the tn Wand, 4OotQ adjouyAmetit from 6-.xegtlar Meeting On kpra Seth,%1'9 following: O. D. Leffler, J. S. LuMmus, 0. X. Wiliten, Je ABSENT: None. OERTIVIDG mum OF LIBOTION POE 15,0NDO At this meeting the returns, the oertifieate Of.the Utile the tally sheets and ballots of the special eleation held'On u 1922, having been delivered to the Oity OoMMisatsni 01v'ttO sps0 said date for the following purposes: 1. Shall bonds of the Oity of Miati 8dO�O be issued for the purpose of the exection;e“;10U4/6 building as an addition to the present'Otty 2. Shall bonds of the Oity of Miemi.not eXceeding issued for the purpose of the aocnireitent4fmotOrs ment for the Street Department and asphalt rePaix.1111# for the Street Department? f-§ 3. Shall bonds of the City of Matt not ex -seeding *25,000 be issued for a building for the Fire Department and mo equipment for the Fire Department? 4. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding $2L3,000 issued for construction of and equipment for park 5. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exoeeding 1115,000.1.s. issued for the erection of additional buildings for )10101- - tal purposes and equipment therefor? - 6. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding issued for the erection ment thereof? of oomfort stations.and the,-00: 7. Shail bonds of the City of Miami not eiseeding tmo,000 be' issued for the purpose of dredging and bor of the City of Miami? deepeniag-thelaar B. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not eceeding$3,rv, issued for the erection of an incinerator bulidiht City of Miami? • 9. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding,440.2;. issued for the erection of a garbage disposal - trucks and equipment for such garbage disposal? 10. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceedtag1110900,. issued for the erection of building and pur012880Of;.JX for the operation of sewage disposal? 12. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not excee4tmg4W, , issued for the erection and construction of 0,:xtd-Gr', the Miami River at Southwest Second .Avenue AeG 11. Shall bonds of the City of MiaMi not elcceeding:44000,..,... issued for the construction of sewers? And thereupon the City Commission did oanvasa ther.8044,eleeettOn.fr' tify that the same are in every respect as toUogpt Mat Qfl , on the said ballots: •, 1. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exoesSi*g for the purpose of a municipal building as an additt0a. city hall? . V;;;; the issuance of said bondsThat on the queatiall: there were 194 votes oast FOR the iseuanoe of said bia44.. , 2. Shall bonde of the City of Miami not-4X0ee, for the purpose of the acquirement of motor. a4t»Ue Department and asphalt repair plant for the etreat ...::•''.:.,,: there were 227 votes oast FOR the issuance of said.bon, the issuance of said bonds. That on the cues”onjr! 3. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not eXOSS for a building for the Fire Department and ms. Department? there were 225 votes oat FOR the issuance of 817::, the Issuanoe cf said bonds. That on the queggitiOnlOr0. ' 4. shall bonds of the City of Miami not-010W for conetruotion of and equipment for park? there were 222 votes oast FOR the issuance. Ot.sai the 'Banana° of , said bonds. ' - • That on the question proposed on the said ballots:: b. Ao Shall bonds of the Oity of Miami not exceeding 05,000 .be for the ereotion of additional buildings for hospital purposes: a ment therefor? there were 224 votes oast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 61 votes e'sie't AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the question proposed on the said ba2.10 ie: 8. Shall bonds of the Oity of Miami not exceeding $25,000 be issued for the erection of oomfort stations and the equipment thefeef? there were 224 votes oast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 56 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bands. That on the question proposed on the Said hal.letel:. T. Shall bonds of the Oity of Miami not exceeding $ 0;000'be isfted' for the purpose of dredging and deepening the harbor of the Oity Of Mi st :? there were 252 votes oast ?OR the issuance of said bonds and 3/ votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the question proposed on the said ballots: 8. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding $30,000 be iesued for the ereotion of an inoinerator building for the City of Miami? there were 210 votes oast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 66 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the question proposed on the said ballots: 9. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding 020,000 be issued for the ereotion of a garbage disposal plant and truoke and equipment for such garbage disposal? there were 233 votes oast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 49 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the question proposed on the said ballots: 10. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding $100,000 be issued for the erection of building and purchase of machinery for the operation of sewage disposal? there were 226 votee oast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 52 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the question proposed on the said ballots: 11. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding $200,000 be iseued for the construction of sewers there were 24t votes cast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 41 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. That on the iuestion proposed on the said ahots: 12. Shall bonds of the City of Miami not exceeding $100,000 be teemed for the ereotion and construction of a bridge across the Miami :liver at South- west Second Avenue (old Aveifue "G")7 there were 236 votes cast FOR the issuance of said bonds and 61 votes oast AGAINST the issuance of said bonds. It is further certified that one vote was thrown out and not counted on account of being marked on the wrong side or otherwise defaced or spoiled. It is further oertified that the total numb'r of votes east at said election upon the said tyre ve propose:: bond issues were 305 and the City 0ommission finds ,and.per- tifies trat the said eleoticI: was fairly held according to the provisions of the law and that the sail returns of the inspectors and clerk were found to be correct On motion of J. E. Lu clue, se,o..ded by E. 0. Romfh, it is resolved and oOrtifiO4 `b the City Comniiesion that the said $30,0;'0 bond issue for creation of runia . al, boil irg, and the said $'20,000 bond issue for motor equipment and repair plant``' said r,000 bond issue for fire department building and motor equipment, andsaid ,000 bond issue for oonstruotion and equipment for park, and the OW blr_d issue for hospital and equipment and the said $25,000 bond issue foroour st,eticn and equipment and the said $60,000 bond issue for dredging ant dsopen harbor, ar.d the said $30,000 bond issue for erection of incinerator', and the: $;,,0, 000 b: nd issue for garbage disposal plant and trucks and equipment, et. $100,COC bend issue for erection of building and purchase of mach: new posal, and the said $200,.,00 bond issue for construction of sewers, 4 4100,000 bond issue for construction of a bridge aoross the Miami l i'Ve ',,_ recited, were duly voted for and oarried by a majority of the gtai4..#ld..:0 the City of Miami, as required by law at the special eleotion ael.d Be it furth ing the bal placed in t on the o i ty Leffler, ye Ro::i'h, yes. er resolved that the returns of the said inspectors and t lots, tally sheets, oaths of office and certificate of e1' :re said ballot box and that the same besealed and be kept, iJ clerk as custodian thereof. 0n roll call the vote wsa...e.s.' s; J. E. Lurar:us, yes; J. I. Wilefen, yes; J. H. Gilman.,' Motion unanimously oarried STOVE ULL OF t,.2. ,-. LFN COMMUNICATION .P Cornet nioatior_ from S1:utts & Bowen, attorneys for W. B. Allen, in refer phase of store wall, wee reoe:ved and the matter referred to the City" ADJi; i.'1 LU NT At 6:50 p. m., there Laing no further business to come before.the 00 motion duly made and eeo nded, the meeting was adjourned. ATTEST: