HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 1917-07-30 Minutesd.ty Atty. Cason: I earto take up the Matter',4;;;,,the e::tensi
Coral Park is Wined by Mr. 'Conrad.,and-ano;the.
and .ia,-.not -An positionto ezeolite
depOggt a ,olty no.te.a.n. the bank Unt41'her*,0'Op 000,,
shaltta o ente.Hb�t1ie city ‘4,As ing the,.Pro
Baypnne has been closed.. Th city is to pay 3,OOO.
Mer6erv.a. real estate agent-,' has a customer for the
to 4500. The Diamond lot in Bayonne, that is tha'W620,
wiil?oost $3200., and the Conrad lot in Coral: Park.'.., .2
the balange of the Diamond lot direct - I trustee-,
the 0,norz4eir might refuse to execute a deed.,',,The p
authOra,,tedo execute the c ity s notes, whiohdate
the fnie ; agreements were secured or tobec.010,,i,‘cie:Oi:.
Moved 4t. Wharton, seconded byl. C. Ronifh, that tlae proper.
autherAted :11e'execute the o ity s six per cent 'motes. Itotion
TAXF,BCOMPIJAINT OF H. SCHEIDEMAN
,
Mr. Scheideman stated that he thought his taxes -*ere:
tax b:Ooks andf comps,rison with propert5nad4ointnghiut ;574:A
assessment it, very reasonable one and Mr. Boheid4an
TAXES ASSESSMENT FOR THE YEAR 1917.
To It Ott, - ;411011,
Floridal«
GentlSzen:
„I beg leave
city 'of Miami, Florida,
honorable bodY.
to report that I have cO;41:p3a;.
for the year 1917, and
T. A. Price,
Assesor
Moved by: E. C.* Romfh, seconded by F. H. Trnartglis._,tirnt
and filad,,and,he tax rolls be received. Qarr
MoV44 by E „AS.' Romfh, seconded by F. H.'Wharton4„tha
'
notide -direeted to be published by Resolution
*uponthe min*e. Motion carried. 'Thp;."#0,
the clerk as ,
(See pae IQ)
gke -
r,„„,„ • :
Is • wcv.v., ,
1,-!`."1 . 4:11fog.t ' • ".." •
AN., • . .
Sworn and AU.
4Wh4?i `�hYeVle(iiSe� �.�5�1a�ii•. ,.
PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH F'E. C RY, 'CO) TY
FROM SEGONA STREET TO`-MIAMI` RIDER •AdD. iONO
WESTERN "LICIT' OF ROYAL PALIL' HOTEL GOU TUS•-:AS
Romfh introduoed the following resolution.!
ESOLIII''IN
Se:aiOa Street and Twelfth Street, in the City of Miami;
a bause of diepdte and litigation between said cit e
ast Coast Railway Company; and
Whereas, both the City of Miami and the '?Ra ;'lwey..t,�
ruoh.o ime and large sums of money in an endeavor to 'b:? 1n
1` . the dispute and litigation; and
Whereas, so long as said controversy remaina_upaett
rights aforesaid are of no commercial value to 'the,Rs,lr•
s�
�Cny benefit to the city of Miami; and
Whereas, in order that said riparian rights may be'.
ermanently improved so as to become commercially useft
the odalwanity and of general municipal benefit tc.the'
'ate -in order that the extension and oonpletion of barb,iCir,
`'develo en:ents maybe continued and to p provide for muzii:o.i,;
,40
€grounds, yacht basins, publio buildings and piers it , is.,',
• emicable settlement between the litigants be reaohed.; `_fin
Whereas, the City of Miami and the Florida East Col
Eby their proper and lawf u1 representatives, have agree
NQw, Therefore, Be It Resolved, By the City Oouie,
That the Internal Improvement Board of the State
he,Feby� earnestly requested to tyke such_action
' ? greeneet' o e'ea : ereby the, C'i: y o
`:,175i.
2 . ..S`
;13JA5,±.,-���,a �'s�,;-.,,a.; 4�Gtii'.kis•t>.�:?`x'"i':.. '`r`i, ,.
t en tile
heahanne1e c; Yi e'''kbattxiee -9I w!;
Be 3t Further Resolved, •That a 14'
o, to Atexnal Itapravemen$;'Boar
Attest.:
City Clerk .
191,7,