HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRA-R-22-0049 BackupSOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: James McQueen Date: October 31, 2022
Executive Director, SEOPW CRA
Subject: RFP 21-02 Evaluation
i,
From: Brian Zeltsman, RA ';'� References:
Director of Architecture & Ievelopment,
SEOPW CRA
File:
Enclosures: Selection Committee Scoring Sheets;
Bid Security List
On October 12, 2021, the Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency ("SEOPW CRA")
issued Request for Proposals No. 21-02 ("RFP") for the development of a 1.56-acre assemblage of property within
the Historic Overtown Culture & Entertainment District; between NW 10th and 11th Streets, and between NW 3rd
Avenue and Interstate-95. On December 14, 2021, the SEOPW CRA received the following five (5) responses:
• Good Bread Alley
• Integral — Eviva Overtown
• Jazz Village
• Tacolcy Economic Development Corp. — Legacy Overtown
• TAMI Overtown
On September 20, 2022, a selection committee consisting of: Mr. Erick Gavin, Executive Director, Venture Miami;
Ms. Cheree Gulley, Executive Director, Housing Finance Authority of Miami -Dade County; Ms. Shirley Meadows,
small business owner; Ms. Natalya Sangster, SEOPW CRA; and myself, met at a publicly noticed meeting to
evaluate the proposals.
Pursuant to the procedures outlined in the RFP, the Selection Committee elected to hold a second publicly noticed
meeting for presentations and interview sessions with each of the top 3 ranked Proposers. This meeting took
place on October 25, 2022, and the final ranking of the proposals is as follows:
1. TAMI Overtown
2. Jazz Village
3. Good Bread Alley
4. Integral — Eviva Overtown
5. Tacolcy Economic Development Corp. — Legacy Overtown
Cc: Selection Committee members
Vincent Brown, SEOPW CRA Staff Counsel
BID ITEM:
CITY OF MIAMI OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
BID SECURITY LIST
Request For Proposals For The Development Of A 1. 56 Acre Assemblage Of
Property Within The Historic Overtown Culture & Entertainment District.
BID NUMBER: RFP 21-02
DATE BID OPENED: December 14, 2021 TIME: 11:00 a.m.
BIDDER
BID TOTAL
BID BOND (ER)
AMOUNT
CASHIER'S
CHECK
Good Bread Alley
N/A
N/A
Integral
N/A
N/A
Jazz Village
N/A
N/A
Tacolcy Economic Development Corp.
N/A
N/A
Tami Overtown, LLC
N/A
N/A
I
Perso
On: I of
ceiving Bid(s)
I4 aoai
Toda 's Date
Received (5) bid(s) on behalf:
vircarildt, 42_
Project:
Bid Number:
Interview/Presentation Session
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE
& ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
October, 25, 2022
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Jazz Village
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25 points)
old/
/3
Feasibility of the financing plan and realistic
abillity to complete the project within the
proposed schedule and with the fewestiti
financial contingencies (Max 20 points)
1
O A
/L
Qualification & Experience of Development
Team, including experience(Maxith projects
similar scale & complexity 15points)�J
1 /,"'
/5-
/ r
J
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA Redevelopment
goals and principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
//
1'
11
Attention to the historic and cultural
significance;including communinityybenefits
participation (25 points)
�O
�hI
Total Score (Max 100)
Os
Gil
/5
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
itikc-na1Ci 4 2
Project:
Bid Number:
Interview/Presentation Session
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE
& ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
October, 25, 2022
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Jazz Village
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25 points)
j
. U
? l
Feasibility of the financing plan and realistic
abillity to complete the project within the
proposed schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20 points)
; -5
, -)
y
Qualification & Experience of Development
Team, including experience with projects of
similar scale & complexity (Max 15 points)
!
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA Redevelopment
goals and principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
/ U
f S
j 5
Attention to the historic and cultural
significance;including community benefits
participation (25 points)
d �'
r
Total Score (Max 100)
-7 /
? g
p.�}
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
a J'ct.nc s+e-,-
a�-� 1
titEmpti 2-
Project:
Bid Number:
Interview/Presentation Session
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE
& ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
October, 25, 2022
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Jazz Village
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25 points)
Feasibility of the financing
,2 0
2 3
plan and realistic
abillity to complete the project within the
proposed schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20 points)
Qualification & Experience Development
/5
;
d/
0
of
Team, including experience with projects of
similar scale & complexity (Max 15 points)
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA Redevelopment
7�
i 5
/
e;:._
/
goals and principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
Attention to the historic
i 5
....5
1 5
and cultural
significance;including community benefits
participation (25 points)i
5
I t-
2
Total Score (Max 100)
/
7 T
.2
c/45
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
rl(i( (Ja1�1L
Project:
Bid Number:
Interview/Presentation Session
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE
& ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
October, 25, 2022
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Jazz Village
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25 points)
20
1
24
Feasibility of the financing plan and realistic
abillity to complete the project within the
proposed schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20 points)
13
I
Qualification & Experience of Development
Team, including experience with projects of
similar scale & complexity (Max 15 points)
l�
14
/6
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA Redevelopment
goals and principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
)2_
/
Attention to the historic and cultural
significance;including community benefits
participation (25 points)
23
7-2-),e.),
Total Score (Max 100)
g2—
8
/
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
tileE-rif 4-2
Project:
Bid Number:
Interview/Presentation Session
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN
THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE
& ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
October, 25, 2022
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Jazz Village 9
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25 points)
Feasibility the financing
,,-d
- 5
—.V 5
of plan and realistic
abillity to complete the project within the
proposed schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20 points)cc
Qualification & Experience
L J
6
of Development
Team, including experience with projects of
similar scale & complexity (Max 15 points)
Fulfilment SEOPW
/''
/3
/3
of CRA Redevelopment
goals and principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
Attention to the historic
/fi
/(/
/5
/5
and cultural
significance;including community benefits
participation (25 points)
2D
5 -
:9—
cJ
Total Score (Max 100)
e
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
,wl
44 `Padu64,/.3
fi-V
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
',two/AA 4-1
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz Village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
g '.
,- ,q
, `.) _:-
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20
points)
/ 6
i
1 5
I
1 5
I i
Qualification & Experience of
Development Team, including
experience with projects of similar
scale & complexity (Max 15
points)
i
.3
/ g
% 2
1
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment goals and
principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
I q
) S
/ 9
/ '/
15
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
9 5
d 5
,2 2-
L 0
99
Total Score (max 100)
S S
l i
✓
� +
p y
1 tp
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
9/.9vCa- -
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
WTl
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
/f
11
�
L/
n4
G.
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20
points)
( 4
t/w
t�
/�
`�
�a
Qualification & Experience of
Development Team, including
experience with projects of similar
scale & complexity (Max 15
points)
!l3
(n
t�
14
t )-
'
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment goals and
principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
1
14
2
) 1
j
IL4
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
/J i
t/1
1-
v
!� �
22,
;/
1
Total Score (max 100)
g2
g2
''f
! q
'I/
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
21
VOID r-VgaS
ZZ- oi4'6edw A
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz Village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
n
" d•'.5
f 5
/'L 5
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (jyax 20
a
,
,,,! ,
v
(:3the
�
l
D
points)
Qualification & Experience of
Development Team, including
experience with projects of similar
scale & complexity (Max 15
point)
610
t.5
r 0
r "5
i S
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment goals and
principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 •oints)
0
(b
3 t
/ i„
v
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
`�
CCJJ
3t)
G )
0
2-5
Total Score (max 100)
/OD •
/,5
l (D
(OD •
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
0790/ ga-•
Zeltsman, Brian
From: Zeltsman, Brian
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 12:40 PM
To: Shirley Meadowil
Cc: McQueen, James; Brown, Vincent
Subject: RFP 21-22 scoring sheet
Attachments: Meadows scoring.pdf
Importance: High
Hi Shirley,
There is an error on your scoring sheet that we will need you to address immediately.
Each of the evaluation criteria line items has a maximum point score value (listed in the description). Some of
your marks exceed the maximum allowed for the category. This occurs in more than one line item, and on
more than one proposal's scoring. As a result, the scoring sheet you provided cannot be used.
I am requesting that you provide a new scoring sheet as quickly as possible. Sign and date the new sheet with
the appropriate (today's) date.
I'm attaching the sheet you provided at the meeting for your reference.
Brian Zeltsman, RA
Director of Architecture & Development
Southeast OvertownLPark West
Community Redevelopment Agency
819 NW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor, Miami, FL 33136
Phone: (305) 679-6800 I Direct: (305) 679-6827
1
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz Village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
d'
.-CO
t)
(25
D—S
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20
points)
J// li?
t
D-0
D-�
-it)
Qualification & Experience of
Development Team, including
experience with projects of similar
scale & complexity (Max 15
points)
(/
_
l�
( 5
/ 5
C
15
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment goals and
principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
/
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
5
<�
�/J-
^
C/1
��
----,,
Total Score (max 100)
Qs
q s pc
/6(io Q-r/
(00 'r
(Do Pr -
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
96
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
f/lEorhi4f
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz Village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
(:.,)I
5
i 3
7 2
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20
points)
S
d
�>�1
;20
= :en))
/
'
Qualification & Experience of
Development Team, including
experience with projects of similarI
scale & complexity (Max 15
points)
tt�
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment goals and
principles; and aention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
f--
°>
y
I .)
� L�
)I 7'
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
(�
I D
1 f
Q
/ �J
Q
,--
i' -�"
Total Score (max 100)
T S
1
1 g
4-7
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
9/020/,-2,9)
Project:
Bid Number:
Evaluation Committee Scoring Sheet
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE &
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT.
RFP No. 21-02
tsifa--/ ,
Score Criteria
Good Bread Alley
Integral
Jazz Village
Tacolcy Economic
Development
Corporation
TAMI Overtown
Development Concept (Max 25
points)
2-0
vY^
.
/��
e[ � '
o2
Feasibility of the financing plan
and realistic abillity to complete
the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest
financial contingencies (Max 20
points)
I
I Li
h
p�-1/
Qualification & Experience of
Development am, of similar
ex erience of similar
experiencewithTprojects
scale & complexity (Max 15
points)
1 5
15
) 5-
15
15—
Fulfilment of SEOPW CRA
Redeples; and goalstand
to
principles; and attention to the
Master Plan (Max 15 points)
1 a
12r
�%
1 `"
10
"//�
12_
Attention to the historic and
cultural significance;including
community benefits participation
(25 points)
e
1
I c2-0
1 tY
1 /n
4'
l /�
el--C/
Total Score (max 100)
//�� fie,
YJ ✓
7S
0C
�//
7
9.1_0-
Scored by (print) :
Scored by (sign) :
Date:
Cht-re_X- Crtillcy
#141,
I/ 2-0
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
1.56-ACRE ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
RFP NUMBER
21-02
ISSUE DATE:
October 12, 2021
Non -Mandatory Pre -Submittal Meeting
November 3, 2021, at 11:00am
At:
SEOPW CRA Office
819 NW 2nd Ave., 3rd Floor
Miami, FL 33136
RFP SUBMISSION DATE AND TIME:
No later than
December 14, 2021, at 11:00am
At:
The Office of the City Clerk
City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
DESIGNATED CONTACT
Brian Zeltsman, RA
Director of Architecture and Development
Southeast Overtown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Agency
819 NW 2nd Ave, 3r'd Floor
Miami, Florida 33136
Phone: 305-679-6827
Facsimile: 305-679-3835
Email: bzeltsman@miamigov.com
Website: http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/pages/procurement.html
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Public Notice Pg. 3
SECTION 1
Introduction Pg. 4
SECTION 2
Contents and Format of Submittal Pg. 7
SECTION 3
RFP General Conditions Pg. 11
SECTION 4
Evaluation / Selection Process Pg. 14
SECTION 5
RFP Response Forms Pg. 16
2
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
PUBLIC NOTICE
RFP NO: 21-02
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
SOUTHEAST OVERTOWN/PARK WEST COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR
THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE
HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency ("SEOPW CRA")
pursuant to Florida Statute 163.380(3)(a), is declaring its intent to dispose of its interest in property
owned by the SEOPW CRA located at 345 NW 10th ST, 1016 NW 3rd AVE, 316 NW 11th ST, 324
NW 11th ST, and 334 NW 11th ST, Miami, FL 33136. The SEOPW CRA may sell, lease, or
otherwise transfer the parcels for uses in accordance with the 2018 SEOPW CRA Redevelopment
Plan Update ("Redevelopment Plan"). The SEOPW CRA is seeking proposals from private
developers, or any persons interested in undertaking to develop the property in accordance with
the Redevelopment Plan and the Historic Overtown Culture and Entertainment District Master
Plan ("Master Plan").
Completed responses must be delivered to the City of Miami - City Clerk's Office, 3500 Pan
American Drive, Miami, Florida 33133 no later than 11:00am on December 14, 2021. Any
Responses received after the above date and time or delivered to a different address or location
will not be considered.
The Redevelopment Plan and the Master Plan may be obtained from the SEOPW CRA office at
819 NW 2nd Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami, Florida 33136, or from the SEOPW CRA webpage at:
http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/pages/default.html.
RFP documents may be obtained on or after October 12, 2021, from the SEOPW CRA office at
819 NW 2nd Ave, 3rd Floor, Miami, Florida 33136, or from the SEOPW CRA webpage at:
http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/pages/procurement.html
A non -mandatory pre -submittal meeting will be held at the SEOPW CRA office on November 3,
2021 at 11:00am. It is the sole responsibility of all firms to ensure the receipt of any addendum
and it is recommended that firms periodically check the SEOPW CRA webpage for updates and
the issuance of addenda.
The SEOPW CRA reserves the right to accept any responses deemed to be in the best interest of
the SEOPW CRA, to waive any minor irregularities, omissions, and/or technicalities in any
responses, or to reject any or all responses and to re -advertise for new responses as deemed
necessary by the SEOPW CRA without notice.
For more information, please contact the SEOPW CRA office at (305) 679-6800.
3
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 1
1.0: INTRODUCTION
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
1.1 Invitation
The Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency, ("SEOPW CRA") has
publicly noticed its intent for disposition of real property and is seeking proposals for the
development of a 1.56-acre assemblage of contiguous land parcels within the Historic Overtown
Culture and Entertainment District in Miami, Florida.
1.2 Description of Property
The properties consist of 5 parcels of land ("Property") currently owned by the SEOPW CRA
totaling 67,883 square feet, and further described as follows:
Parcel #
Square Footage
Address
Folio #
Current Zoning
1
40,383
345 NW 10th ST
01-0101-040-1160
T6-8-O
2
5,000
1016 NW 3rd Ave.
01-0101-040-1210
T6-8-O
3
7,500
316 NW 11th ST
01-0101-040-1040
T6-8-L
4
7,500
324 NW 11th ST
01-0101-040-1050
T6-8-L
5
7,500
334 NW 11th ST
01-0101-040-1060
T6-8-L
Improvements: The Property is being offered in its "AS IS, WITH ALL FAULTS" condition.
To any extent required by the City of Miami Zoning Code, the developer of the project shall be
responsible for the plat/re-plat of the development site.
All available information on the referenced property may be obtained from the SEOPW CRA at
819 N.W. 2nd Avenue, Miami, Florida 33136. For further information, please contact Brian
Zeltsman, SEOPW CRA Director of Architecture and Development, at (305) 679-6827 or
bzeltsman@miamigov.com. All interested parties are encouraged to inspect the Property.
4
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
Subject Property
and Surrounding
Context
Property
Location &
Current
Conditions
5
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
1.3 Background
The SEOPW CRA is a public agency formed under Fla. Stat: 163.330 and is responsible for
carrying out community redevelopment activities and projects within the SEOPW CRA
Redevelopment Area. The Property is located within the Historic Overtown Culture and
Entertainment District. All development undertaken by the SEOPW CRA shall be consistent with
the 2018 updated Redevelopment Plan and the Historic Overtown Culture and Entertainment
District Master Plan.
Proposers are encouraged to become familiar with the entire Redevelopment Plan and pay
particular attention to the following sections:
• Section Two: Goals and Principles
• Section Four: Project Area B: Overtown (Cultural and Entertainment District)
The Historic Overtown Culture & Entertainment District, as described in the Redevelopment Plan,
will be instrumental in the ongoing revitalization efforts for the area, and calls for a development
concept that will express the area's unique cultural heritage through venues such as art galleries,
museums, hotels, restaurants, and nightlife activities. In addition, the Redevelopment Plan and the
Master Plan envision retail corridors with diverse, mixed -use facilities that include housing,
rehearsal and performing spaces for artists, and business incubator space.
Proposers are encouraged to become familiar with the entire Master Plan and pay particular
attention to the following sections:
• The Vision
• Design Framework — District Parking
Note: The Master Plan envisions 675 parking spaces for the location included in this RFP. While
the inclusion of public parking is a critical component of a successful RFP response, the allocation
of public parking is not required to meet this amount.
6
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 2
2.0: CONTENTS AND FORMAT OF SUBMITTAL
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
2.1 The Submittal
The goal of this RFP is to select a developer or a development team for the development of the
Property in a manner satisfactory to the local community and the SEOPW CRA. All proposals
must be consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and the Master Plan, both of which are available
at:
http://www.miamicra.com/seopwcra/pages/default.html
The proposals should present a comprehensive, well -articulated development for the Property,
complete with supporting documentation to include a development concept, financing plan,
developer's qualifications and experiences, current and comparable projects, and user
commitments and local community support. To that end, the following provisions shall be
applicable:
1. Cover Page
Show the proposer(s) name, address, telephone number, name of contact person, date, and
the proposal name and RFP number.
2. Table of Contents
Include a clear identification of the material by section and by page number.
3. Letter of Transmittal
Provide a letter which provides a brief history of the proposer's entity, summarizes the key
points of the response and is signed by an officer or employee of the respondent's firm who
is authorized to act on behalf of the entity. Please limit your transmittal letter to 2 pages.
4. Development Concept
The development concept shall include at least the following:
• A detailed description of the project, a site plan, and renderings;
• A demonstration on how the proposer's vision of the Property will create an
economically viable destination that will complement recent economic
development activity in the surrounding area, create jobs, and complement the rich
history of the Overtown community.
• A detailed parking plan, including public parking.
• A timetable for implementation of the project, from the execution date of a
development agreement through project occupancy, including a development
schedule with a timetable for review and approval of design and construction
documents, construction commencement date, occupancy date, and a phasing plan,
if applicable.
7
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
• A proposed transaction structure for the project, i.e., purchase, lease, or ground
lease, specifying the financing structure, such as purchase price, lease payments,
etc.
5. Financing Plan
The financing plan shall include at least the following:
• Project budget/breakdown of all hard and soft costs required to implement project
including, but not limited to: property due diligence tasks, approvals, professional
fees, construction, marketing, legal fees, etc.;
• Sources, amounts, terms, and conditions of financing and proposers' equity
consistent with the project budget. If financing is not completely in place (for the
project or one or more of its components), proposer must provide letters of interest
from financing sources. If necessary, indicate status of fund-raising efforts and
schedule;
• Pro forma cash flow statements, with documentation of assumptions for a 15-year
period;
• Evidence of financing consistent with project budget;
• Evidence of financial capacity of lenders and equity sources; and
• Any public financing assistance that may be required.
The SEOPW CRA may request proposers to submit revised, updated, or a more detailed
financing plan as deemed helpful or relevant, in the sole discretion of the SEOPW CRA,
in evaluating the proposer or any aspect of its proposal.
6. Qualifications and Experience
The proposals shall provide a narrative statement describing all entities responsible for the
development and management of the project, including the following:
• A description of the proposer's qualifications and experience relevant to project
development, design, construction, and management. Include information on all
firms which comprise the proposer and their role in the project, as well as
experience working together on previous projects;
• An organizational chart;
• Demonstrate the experience and ability to successfully complete the project; and
• Identify key staff, including brief resumes that include length of time providing
such services and contact information (including location, phone and e-mail
address). The proposal should indicate each team member's responsibility for
project tasks; and
• Proposer(s) most recent reviewed financial statements including an audited balance
sheet and income statement prepared by an independent Certified Public
Accountant.
8
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
Current Developments & Comparable Projects
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
The proposal shall include a list of current related or relevant projects where the proposer
is either the owner and/or partner. Please list the financial structure of each project
including, but not limited to the public and private contributions. Include photographs of
the developments discussed herein and other developments completed in the past which
are relevant to the scope and scale of this proposed project.
7. Community Benefits
The proposals should address the community benefits to the Redevelopment Area
including, but not limited to the following:
• Coordination and partnerships with local small business;
• Job opportunities for local area residents and businesses to allow them to
participate in the construction of the development and local job fairs prior to the
commencement the project;
• Permanent job opportunities for local residents post -construction, including newly
generated trade and service jobs and local job fairs upon completion of the project;
and
• Opportunities for local subcontractors and professional services during the design
and/or construction of the project.
8. References
The proposals shall include 3 references of which at least 1 shall be from a financial
institution and the others preferably developmental references, all to include addresses,
telephone numbers, and relationships to the proposer(s).
9
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
2.2 Submission Process
Proposer(s) shall submit 1 printed original, 6 printed copies, and 1 copy submitted electronically
on a USB drive storage device, CD or DVD. All submittals must be on 8 1/2" x 11" paper, neatly
typed on one side only, with normal margins, and spacing. Handwritten responses will not be
accepted. Said proposal must be submitted in a labeled and sealed envelope and delivered only to
the following address:
CITY OF MIAMI
The Office of the City Clerk
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Responses must be clearly marked on the outside of the package referencing:
RFP NO. 21-02
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OFA 1.56-ACRE ASSEMBLAGE OF
PROPERTY WITHIN THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN CULTURE & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
Responses are due no later than December 14, 2021, at 11:00 a.m.
Note: Submissions will not be accepted at the SEOPW CRA's office, nor any other location.
Responses received after, the date and time stated in the RFP will not be accepted and shall be
returned unopened to the proposer(s).
10
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 3
3.0: RFP GENERAL CONDITIONS
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
3.1 Additional Information or Clarification
Request for additional information or clarifications must be made in writing to designated contact
of the SEOPW CRA at the location listed on the cover page of this RFP. Proposer(s) may also fax
or email their requests for additional information or clarifications to the attention of the designated
contact. Facsimiles must have a cover sheet that includes the proposer(s) name and the RFP
number.
Any request for additional information or clarification must be received in writing no later than
5:00 PM on December 3, 2021.
The SEOPW CRA will issue responses to inquiries and any other corrections or amendments it
deems necessary in written addenda issued prior to the response submission date. Proposers should
not rely on any representations, statements, or explanations other than those made in this RFQ or
in any written addendum to this RFQ. Where there appears to be conflict between the RFQ and
any addenda issued, the last addendum issued shall prevail.
It is the proposer's responsibility to assure submission and receipt of all addenda. Prior to
submitting the response, the proposer should check the SEOPW CRA webpage, where all addenda
will be posted.
3.2 Changes / Alterations
The proposer(s) may change or withdraw a response at any time prior to the response submission
deadline. All changes or withdrawals shall be in writing. Oral / verbal changes, modifications, or
withdrawals will not be recognized and will be disregarded. Written modifications will not be
accepted after the response submission deadline. Proposer(s) shall not assign or otherwise transfer
their response to another individual or entity.
3.3 Sub -consultants
A sub -consultant is an individual or firm contracted by the proposer or proposer's firm to assist in
the performance of services required under this RFP. Sub -consultants are allowed by the SEOPW
CRA in the performance of the services delineated within this RFP and shall be paid through
proposer or proposer' s firm and not paid directly by the SEOPW CRA. . The proposer must
clearly reflect in its response the major sub -consultants to be utilized in the performance of
required services. The SEOPW CRA retains the right to accept or reject any sub -consultant
proposed in the response of successful proposer(s) or proposed prior to agreement execution. Any
and all liabilities regarding the use of a sub -consultant must be maintained in good standing and
approved by the SEOPW CRA throughout the duration of the agreement. Neither the successful
proposer(s) nor any of its sub -consultants are considered to be employees or agents of the SEOPW
CRA. Failure to list all major sub -consultants and provide the required information may disqualify
any proposed sub -consultants from performing work under this RFP.
11
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
Proposer(s) shall include in their response the requested sub -consultants information and include
all relevant information and include all relevant information required of the proposer(s).
Proposer(s) are expressly prohibited from substituting sub -consultants contained in the response.
Such substitution, for any reason, after receipt of the response, and prior to award by the SEOPW
CRA, shall result in disqualification of the response from further consideration for award.
3.4 Discrepancies, Errors, and Omissions
Any discrepancies, errors, or ambiguities in the RFP should be immediately reported in writing to
the SEOPW CRA. Should it be necessary, the SEOPW CRA will issue an addendum clarifying
such conflicts or ambiguities.
3.5 Disqualification
The SEOPW CRA reserves the right to disqualify responses before or after the submission date,
upon evidence of collusion with intent to defraud or other illegal practices on the part of the
proposer(s).
Any response submitted by a proposer(s) who is in arrears, e.g., money owed or otherwise in debt
by failing to deliver goods or services to the SEOPW CRA (including any agency or depaitinent
of the City of Miami) or where the SEOPW CRA has an open claim against a proposer(s) for
monies owed the SEOPW CRA at the time of proposal submission, will be disqualified and shall
not be considered for award.
Any proposer(s) who submits in its response any information that is determined by the SEOPW
CRA, in its sole opinion, to be substantially inaccurate, misleading, exaggerated, or incorrect, shall
be disqualified from consideration.
3.6 Proposer(s) Expenditures
The proposer(s) understand and agree that any expenditure they make in preparation and submittal
of responses or in the performance of any services requested by the SEOPW CRA in connection
with the responses to this RFP are exclusively at the expense of the proposer(s). The SEOPW
CRA shall not pay or reimburse any expenditure or any other expense incurred by any proposer(s)
in preparation of a response and/or anticipation of a contract award and/or to maintain the approved
status of the successful proposer(s) if an agreement is awarded, and/or administrative or judicial
proceedings resulting from the solicitation process.
3.7 Legal Requirements
This RFP is subject to all applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, ordinances, rules, and
regulations that in any manner affect any of the services covered herein. Lack of knowledge by
the proposer shall in no way be cause for relief from responsibility.
12
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
3.8 Collusion
By submitting a proposal, the proposer certifies that its proposal is made without previous
understanding, agreement, or connection either with any person, firm, or corporation submitting a
proposal for the same services, or with the SEOPW CRA. The proposer certifies that its proposal
is fair, without control, collusion, fraud, or other illegal action. The proposer further certifies that
it is in compliance with the conflict of interest and code of ethics laws. The SEOPW CRA will
investigate all situations where collusion may have occurred and the SEOPW CRA reserves the
right to reject any and all proposal where collusion may have occurred.
3.9 Key Personnel
Subsequent to submission of a proposal and prior to award of an agreement, key personnel, or staff
shall not be changed. Any changes in key personnel will result in the proposal being rejected and
not considered for award.
3.10 SEOPW CRA Reservations
The SEOPW CRA reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to:
(1) Modify, waive, or otherwise vary the terms and conditions of this RFP at any time, including
but not limited to, deadlines for submission and proposal requirements.
(2) Accept the proposal which best serves the interest of the SEOPW CRA. The SEOPW CRA
shall be the sole judge of which submission is in its best interest.
(3) Accept or reject any or all submissions, request resubmissions, and to enter into negotiations
with proposers as warranted.
(4) Negotiate with any or all proposers in order to obtain terms most beneficial to the SEOPW
CRA.
(5) Select one or more proposals to develop the entire site or a portion thereof; or award the
development rights for the site to more than one developer.
(6) Waive irregularities in the responses and determine the nature of any minor irregularities.
(7) Cancel and withdraw this RFP at any time.
3.11 Public Records
Proposer(s) understand that the public shall have access, at all reasonable times, to all
documents and information pertaining to SEOPW CRA contracts, subject to the provisions of
Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and agrees to allow access by the SEOPW CRA and the public
to all documents subject to disclosure under applicable law. Proposer's failure or refusal to
comply with the provision of this section shall result in the immediate cancellation of the
agreement (if awarded) by the SEOPW CRA.
13
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 4.0
4.0: EVALUATION / SELECTION PROCESS
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
Review for Responsiveness
Each proposal will be reviewed to determine if it is responsive to the submission requirements
outlined in the RFP. A "responsive" proposal is one which meets the requirements of the RFP, is
submitted in the format outlined in the RFP, is of timely submission, and has appropriate
signatures/attachments as required on each document.
The procedure for response evaluation and selection is as follows:
1. Receipt of RFP responses.
2. Opening and listing of all proposals received.
3. Preliminary review by SEOPW CRA staff for compliance with the submission
requirements of the RFP, including verification that each proposal includes all documents
required.
4. The SEOPW CRA Executive Director will appoint members to serve on a selection
committee, (the "Selection Committee").
5. At a publicly noticed meeting, the Selection Committee will evaluate each responsive
proposal in accordance with the requirements of this RFP. The Selection Committee will
rank the firms from the most qualified to the least qualified. The Selection Committee, at
its own option of may decide to hold brief presentations and/or interview sessions with all
proposers or the top three (3) firms deemed to be the most qualified.
6. The Selection Committee will forward its recommendation to the SEOPW CRA Executive
Director, listing the proposals in rank order.
7. After considering the recommendation of the Selection Committee, the SEOPW CRA
Executive Director will recommend the SEOPW CRA Board of Commissioners accept the
rankings of the Selection Committee at a publicly noticed meeting, and authorize the
SEOPW CRA Executive Director to enter into negotiation with the top -ranked qualified
firm.
8. Thereafter, the SEOPW CRA Executive Director shall enter into negotiations for a
development agreement ("Agreement") with the top -ranked qualified firm.
9. Upon successful negotiation of an Agreement, the SEOPW CRA Executive Director will
recommend the SEOPW CRA Board of Commissioners award the project to the top -ranked
firm and authorize the SEOPW CRA Executive Director to execute the Agreement.
All SEOPW CRA Board of Commissioners considerations shall be made at a public meeting, as
required by Section 286.011, Florida Statutes. The SEOPW CRA Board of Commissioners shall
have the final decision -making authority concerning the selection of a successful proposal for the
disposition of SEOPW CRA-owned real property or interest therein.
The factors outlined below shall be applied to all eligible proposals. Note: fulfillment of project
goals, quality and sensibility of design, and compatibility with the neighborhood and immediate
14
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
surrounding will be considered when reviewing the proposals. All references will be subject to
appropriate evaluation.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
POINT VALUE
Development Concept
25
Feasibility of the financing plan and realistic ability
to complete the project within the proposed
schedule and with the fewest financial
contingencies
20
Qualifications & experience of development team,
including experience with projects of similar scale
and complexity
15
Fulfillment of SEOPW CRA redevelopment goals
and principles; and attention to the Master Plan
15
Attention to the historic and cultural significance;
including community benefits participation
25
TOTAL POINTS
100
15
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 5
5.0: RFP RESPONSE FORMS
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
5.1. RFP INFORMATION FORM
RFP No. 21-02:
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN
CULTURE & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
I certify that any and all information contained in this RFP is true. I certify that this RFP is made
without prior understanding, agreement, or connections with any corporation, firm or person
submitting a RFP for the same materials, supplies, equipment, or services and is in all respects
fair and without collusion or fraud. I agree to abide by all terms and conditions of the RFP, and
certify that I am authorized to sign for the proposer's firm. Please print the following and sign your
name:
Firm's Name
Principal Business Address
Telephone
Fax
E-mail address
Name
Title
Authorized Signature
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
16
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
SECTION 5
5.0: RFP RESPONSE FORMS
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
5.1a. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF ADDENDUMS FORM
RFP No. 21-02:
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 1.56-ACRE
ASSEMBLAGE OF PROPERTY WITHIN THE HISTORIC OVERTOWN
CULTURE & ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
I acknowledge the receipt and have familiarized myself with all addendums for this RFP, and
certify that I am authorized to sign for the proposer's firm. Any and all addendums can be found
on the SEOPW CRA website by the Response Submission Date. Please print the following and
sign your name:
Firm's Name
Principal Business Address
Telephone
Fax
E-mail address
Name
Title
Authorized Signature
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
17
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
5.2.1 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
(IF CORPORATION)
STATE OF
SS:
COUNTY OF
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a meeting of the Board of Directors of
, a corporation existing under the laws of
the State of held on , 20 , and the following resolution
was duly passed and adopted:
"RESOLVED, that, , as of the Corporation, be and
is hereby authorized to execute the Response dated, 20 , for submission to
the Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency; and this Corporation and the
execution on its behalf thereof, attested by the Secretary of the Corporation, and with the Corporate Seal
affixed, shall be the official act and deed of this Corporation."
I further certify that said resolution is now in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the corporation this
, day of , 20
Secretary:
(SEAL)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
18
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
5.2.2 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
(IF PARTNERSHIP)
STATE OF
SS:
COUNTY OF
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a meeting of the Partners of
, organized and existing under the
laws of the State of , held on 20 , the
following resolution was duly passed and adopted:
"RESOLVED, that, , as of the Partnership, be
and is hereby authorized to execute the Response dated, 20 , for submission to
the Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency, and this Partnership and
execution on its behalf, attested by the
shall be the official act and deed of this Partnership."
I further certify that said resolution is now in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 20
Secretary:
(SEAL)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
19
JEFFREY WATSON
Board Chair
5.2.3 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
(IF JOINT VENTURE)
STATE OF
SS:
COUNTY OF
CORNELIUS SHIVER
Executive Director
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a meeting of the Principals of the
organized and existing under the laws of the State of
held on 20 , the following resolution was duly passed and
adopted:
"RESOLVED, that as
of the Joint
Venture be and is hereby authorized to execute the Response dated, 20 , for
submission to the Southeast Overtown / Park West Community Redevelopment Agency, as an official act
and deed of this Joint Venture."
I further certify that said resolution is now in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this , day of
, 20
Secretary:
(SEAL)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS FOR MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
20
5.2.4 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
(IF INDIVIDUAL)
STATE OF
SS:
COUNTY OF
I HEREBY CERTIFY that as an individual, I
(Name of Individual)
and as a d/b/a (doing business as)
(if applicable)
exist under the laws of the State of Florida.
"RESOLVED, that, as an individual and/or d/b/a (if applicable), is hereby authorized to execute the
Response dated, 20 , for submission to the Southeast Overtown / Park West
Community Redevelopment Agency, as an individual and/or a going business concern with the a fictitious
name, (if applicable) and that my execution thereof, attested by a Notary Public of the
State, shall be the official act and deed of this attestation."
I further certify that said resolution is now in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Notary Public this
day of , 20
NOTARY PUBLIC:
Commission No.:
I personally know the individual/do not know the individual (Please Circle)
Driver's License #
(SEAL)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
21
5.3 DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(a) Authority and requirement to debar and suspend:
After reasonable notice to an actual or prospective contractual party, and after
reasonable opportunity to such party to be heard, the SEOPW CRA shall have the
authority to debar a contractual party for the causes listed below from consideration
for award of SEOPW CRA contracts. The debarment shall be for a period of not fewer
than three (3) years. The SEOPW CRA shall also have the authority to suspend a
Proposer from consideration for award of SEOPW CRA contracts if there is probable
cause for debarment. Pending the debarment determination, the authority to debar
and suspend Proposer shall be exercised in accordance with regulations, which shall
be issued by the SEOPW CRA after approval by the SEOPW CRA Board of
Commissioners.
(b) Causes for debarment or suspension include the following:
1. Conviction for commission of a criminal offense incident to obtaining or attempting
to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or incident to the performance
of such contract or subcontract.
2. Conviction under state or federal statutes of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery,
falsification or destruction of records, receiving stolen property, or any other
offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty.
3. Conviction under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the submission of
bids or responses.
4. Violation of contract provisions, which are regarded by the SEOPW CRA to be
indicative of non -responsibility. Such violation may include failure without good
cause to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of a contract or to
perform within the time limits provided in a contract, provided that failure to perform
caused by acts beyond the control of a party shall not be considered a basis for
debarment or suspension.
5. Debarment or suspension of the contractual party by any federal, state or other
governmental entity.
6. False certification pursuant to paragraph (c) below.
7. Any other cause judged by the SEOPW CRA to be so serious and compelling as
to affect the responsibility of the contractual party performing SEOPW CRA
contracts.
22
(c) Certification:
All contracts for goods and services, sales, and leases by the SEOPW CRA shall
contain a certification that neither the contractual party nor any of its principal owners
or personnel has been convicted of any of the violations set forth above or debarred
or suspended as set forth in paragraph (b) (5).
The undersigned hereby certifies that neither the contractual party nor any of its principal
owners or personnel has been convicted of any of the violations set forth above, or debarred
or suspended as set forth in paragraph (b) (5).
Company Name:
Signature:
Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
23
FORM 'A'
INFORMATION FOR DETERMINING JOINT VENTURE ELIGIBILITY
If the proposer is submitting as a joint venture, please be advised that this form MUST be
completed and the REQUESTED written joint -venture agreement MUST be attached and
submitted.
1. Name of joint venture:
2. Address of joint venture:
3. Telephone number:
4. List the firms/entities/individuals that comprise the joint venture:
5. Identify by name and firm, those individuals (and their titles) who are responsible
for the day-to-day management and policy decision making, including, but not limited to, those
with prime responsibility for:
(a) Financial decisions:
(b) Management decisions, such as:
(i) Estimating:
(ii) Marketing and sales:
(iii) Hiring/firing of management and non -management personnel:
(iv) Purchasing of major items or supplies:
(v) Supervision of field operations:
24
FORM 'A' (Continued)
NOTE: If, after filing this form and before the completion of the joint venture's work on the project,
there is any significant change in the information submitted, the joint venture must inform the
SEOPW CRA in writing.
The following Affidavit was must completed by the principal of each party participating in the joint
venture.
AFFIDAVIT
"The undersigned swears or affirms that the foregoing statements are correct and include all
material information necessary to identify and explain the terms and operation of the joint venture
and the intended participation by each member of the joint venture in the undertaking. Further,
the undersigned covenants and agrees to provide to the Southeast Overtown/Park West
Community Redevelopment Agency, ("SEOPW CRA") current, complete, and accurate
information regarding work performed by the joint venture in connection with the Project and any
proposed changes regarding any member of the joint venture relevant to the joint venture. Any
material misrepresentation will be grounds for terminating the Agreement between the SEOPW
CRA and the joint venture which may be awarded for the project.
Joint Ventures:
Name of Firm/Entity/Individual:
Signature:
Printed Name of Signatory:
Title of Signatory:
Date:
Name of Firm/Entity/Individual:
Signature:
Printed Name of Signatory:
Title of Signatory:
Date:
Name of Firm/Entity/Individual:
Signature:
Printed Name of Signatory:
Title of Signatory:
Date:
FAILURE TO COMPLETE, SIGN, AND RETURN THIS FORM MAY DISQUALIFY YOUR RESPONSE
25