HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and Mapsthis submMal needs to to scheduled bra public hearing
In accordance wllh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applicade decision-maleng body will
review the information at the public hearing to rend era
recommendation or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
City of Miami
Planning Department
STAFF ANALYSIS FOR
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Staff Analysis Report No.
PZ-21-11843
Location
600 SW 63 Av, 610 SW 63 Av, 601 SW 63 Ct, and 615 SW 63
Ct
Area
0.78 ac (34,102 sq ft)
Commission District
4 — Manolo Reyes
Department of Human
Service Neighborhood
Service Center
Flagami
Existing FLU
Designation
Single -Family Residential
Proposed FLU
Designations
Public Parks & Recreation
Applicant
Arthur Noriega V on behalf of the City of Miami
Applicant Representative
Marisol Martinez Salazar
marmartinez@miamigov.com
Planner
Kathryn Angleton, AICP, Planner II
Recommendation
Approval
REQUEST
Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"), Arthur
Noriega acting on behalf of the City of Miami ("the Applicant") is requesting an amendment to
Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") of the MCNP to change the designation
of the property at 600 SW 63 Av, 610 SW 63 Av, 601 SW 63 Ct, and 615 SW 63 Ct ("the Property")
from "Single -Family Residential" to "Public Parks & Recreation". The proposed amendment
contains approximately 0.78 acres. Small-scale comprehensive plan amendments are those that
involve less than 50 acres of property and are subject to the Small -Scale Review Process, as set
forth in Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes.
Concurrently, the Applicant is requesting a change to the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas as a companion
item (ePlan ID PZ-21-11449). The companion application seeks to change the Property's zoning
designation from T3-R (Suburban Transect Zone - Restricted) to CS (Civic Space Zone). The
Property is legally described in the attached Attachment "A". The table below summarizes the
request.
Page 1
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Summary of the Existing and Proposed FLU Designations and Zoning Designations
Address
Folio
FLUM
Existing
FLUM
Proposed
Miami 21
Existing
Miami 21
Proposed
600 SW 63 Ay
0140010056980
Single-
Family Res.
Public Parks
& Rec.
T3-R
CS
610 SW 63 Ay
0140010056990
Single-
Family Res.
Public Parks
& Rec.
T3-R
CS
601 SW 63 Ct
0140010056970
Single-
Family Res.
Public Parks
& Rec.
T3-R
CS
615 SW 63 Ct
0140010057120
Single-
Family Res.
Public Parks
& Rec.
T3-R
CS
The Property is located along the west side of SW 63 Avenue in the Flagami area. The Property
is approximately 0.4 miles southwest of Fairlawn Elementary School. Less than a quarter -mile
(-750') south from the Property are the ending boundary of the City of Miami and the beginning
boundary of the City of West Miami. The Property is also less than two miles east of the Palmetto
Expressway.
Aerial Photo of Subject Site
Page 2
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The Subject Property currently has a Future Land Use Designation of Single -Family Residential.
The primary intent of Single -Family Residential is the allowance of residential development of
the lowest density and intensity. Below is the excerpt from the MCNP that defines the Single -
Family Residential FLU Designation.
Areas designated as "Single Family Residential" allow single family structures of one
dwelling unit each to a maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre, subject to the
detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance
of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted
concurrency management requirements.
Supporting services such as foster homes and family day care homes for children and/or
adults; and community based residential facilities' (6 clients or less, not including drug,
alcohol or correctional rehabilitation facilities also will be allowed pursuant to applicable
state law. Places of worship, primary and secondary schools, child day care centers and
adult day care centers are permissible in suitable locations within single family
residential areas.
Professional offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only in contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have
been designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in
suitable locations within single family residential areas, pursuant to applicable land
development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for such
uses. Density and intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the
contributing structure(s).
A "Community based residential facility" provides room (with or without board), resident
services, and twenty-four hour supervision. Such a facility functions as a single
housekeeping unit. This category includes adult congregate living facilities, facilities for
physically disabled and handicapped persons, for developmentally disabled persons, for
non dangerous mentally ill persons and for dependent children, as licensed by the
Florida Department of Health, and juvenile and adult residential correctional facilities,
including halfway houses, as licensed or approved by an authorized regulatory agency.
The parcels immediately west and south of the Subject Property also have the Single -Family
Residential FLU Designation.
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
The proposed designation of Public Parks & Recreation allows the following:
Page 3
this aubmMal needs to to scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -making body wlll
review the information at the public hearing to render
recommendation or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve open space
and green spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere with
the preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park.
This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and
cultural uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in
parks of one (1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See
related Policy PR-2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses shall be permitted
including but not limited to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds,
canoe trails and launches, small concession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools,
athletic fields, cultural facilities, marine and marina facilities and other facilities supporting
passive and active recreational and cultural uses.
Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for
commercial photography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only
when it is determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger
significant environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.]
The map below show the existing and proposed future land use designations for the subject
property.
Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Designations for the Subject Property
Above: Existing Future Land Use Map
Above: Proposed Future Land Use Map
Page 4
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEX
The Subject Property is located in the Flagami neighborhood and is a short distance from the City
of West Miami, which borders the City of Miami along SW 8 St. Due to the nearness of West
Miami, some of this analysis takes into consideration assets beyond the limits of the City of Miami
as depicted in the map below. The Subject Property is approximately 580 feet north of SW 8 St,
which is a major thoroughfare and commercial corridor. Fronting the south side of SW 8 St, east
of SW 62 Ave, is a Sabor Tropical Supermarket, so residents near the Subject Property are within
walking distance to a major grocery store. There is also a Fresco y Mas approximately 0.7 miles
southwest on SW 8 St and SW 67 Ave, which is roughly a 14-minute walk from the Subject
Property. In addition to these two grocery stores, there is a Walmart Neighborhood Market under
a mile west of the Subject Property off SW 8 St and SW 70 Ave. There are also various restaurants
and commercial establishments along SW 8 St that serve the area.
Fairlawn Elementary School is the only public school within a half -mile radius of the Subject
Property. In addition to public schools, there is one municipal park, West End Park, that is located
within a half -mile of the Subject Property. The half -mile area surrounding the Subject Property
includes Fairlawn Branch Library and Fire Rescue Station 40, which are both Miami -Dade County
services.
The half -mile area around the Subject Property is not served by Metrorail, but is served by Miami -
Dade County's Metrobus, City of Miami's Trolley, and the City of West Miami Shuttle. Five
Metrobus routes serve this area: Routes 7, 8, 11, 51, and 73. Routes 7, 8 and 11 provide service
between Downtown Miami to the east and SW 107 Ave to the west. These routes have multiple
stops including but not limited to Dolphin Mall, Miami International Mall, Mall of the Americas, and
Florida International University. Route 51 also provides connectivity along W Flagler St, however,
Route 51 has limited stops unlike Route 11, and Route 51 also goes further west than Route 11
and terminates at SW 137 Ave instead of SW 107 Ave. Route 73 is the only Metrobus route
providing north and south service. Route 73 connects residents to NW 186 St & NW 173 Ave,
which is near the northern boundary of Miami -Dade County, and Dadeland South Metrorail Station
to the south. The City of Miami's Flagami Trolley Line serves this area and provides a circulator
between Miami Intermodal Center on NW 21 St to the northeast and SW 6 St and Tamiami Canal
Rd to the southwest. This route circulates throughout the Flagami neighborhood. Finally the City
of West Miami's shuttle provides connectivity from the City of West Miami to Miami International
Airport. The map below shows the neighborhood assets within a half -mile of the Subject
Properties.
Page 5
Q Public Schools
O County Libraries
Q City Fire Stations
nCounty Fire Stations
Neighborhood Assets
City Parks
City Parcels
Subject Property
°.1 City Boundary
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
Metrobus
Miami Trolley
West Miami Shuttle
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Page 6
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Planning Department Staff retrieved data from the US Census Bureau's American Community
Survey (ACS) to analyze the sociodemographic of the area surrounding the Subject Property.
Staff utilized the 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and observed various data points for Census
Tract 58.02. The table below shows the various data points for both the Census Tract and City of
Miami.
Summary of Census Data for Subject Census Tract: 12086005802
Topic
Census Tract 58.02
City of Miami
Population
11,727
454,279
Households
3,478
176,777
Avg Household Size
3.37
2.57
Owner -Occupied Housing
57.4%
25.2%
Renter -Occupied Housing
35.5%
59.8%
Vacant Housing Units
7.2%
15.0%
Median Household Income
$48,861
$39,049
Median Home Value
$277,400
$317,700
Median Gross Rent
$1,345
$1,183
0-Vehicle Households
18.3%
18.8%
Census Tract 58.02 is roughly 660 acres (a little over one square mile) and consists of the area
bounded by SW 8 St to the south, W Flagler St to the north, Tamiami Canal to the west, and SW
59 Ave from W Flagler St to SW 5 St and SW 57 Ave from SW 5 St to SW 8 St. Over 11,700
people make up 3,478 households, equating to an average household size of 3.37 persons per
household. The average household size of Census Tract 58.02 is nearly an entire person larger
than the citywide average household size. This is likely a result of the underlying T3-R zoning and
Single -Family Residential FLU designation of the neighborhood. Single-family homes tend to
have more building area and bedrooms, which are supportive of larger households.
One of the most striking differences between Census Tract 58.02 and the rest of the City of Miami
is in owner -occupied households. Only 25.2 percent of all occupied households in the City of
Miami are owner -occupied whereas that figure is more than double in Census Tract 58.02. Vacant
housing units are also more than half that of the rest of the City with only a 7.2 percent vacancy
rate in Census Tract 58.02 versus a 15 percent vacancy rate citywide.
The median household income of Census Tract 58.02 is $48,861, or $9,812 more than the City
of Miami's median household income. While the household income is noticeably higher in this
area, it is still considered lower income for the Miami area by the federal government's standards.
The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development utilizes Area Median Income
(AMI) to determine income levels to qualify for various classifications of affordable and workforce
Page 7
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
housing. The AMI of the Miami area is the same as the median household income
of Miami -Dade County, which is $59,100. Census Tract 58.02's median household income is 82.7
percent of the AMI, which may disqualify households from obtaining workforce or affordable
housing depending on the size of the household.
Another interesting observation from the table above is how the median home value of Census
Tract 58.02 is $40,300 less than citywide, and the median gross rent is $162/month more
expensive than citywide. Typically, areas with a lower median home value will also have a lower
median gross rent. The likely cause of the more expensive rent is zoning. Within Census Tract
58.02, 76.5 percent of all zoned land is zoned T3-O, which restricts development to single-family
housing only. All of Census Tract 58.02 consists of the Flagami neighborhood, which is a
longstanding single-family residential neighborhood, so the zoning is likely appropriate for this
neighborhood.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT: GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS
Future Land Uses
Planning Department staff inventoried the FLU designations of properties within a quarter -mile of
the Subject Property. The distribution of FLU designations of the quarter -mile study area is
markedly different from the distribution of the FLU designations of the entire City. The table below
shows the acreages and shares of each FLU designation for both the study area and the entire
City.
Comparison of FLU Designations in Study Area & Citywide
FLU Designation
Single -Family Residential
Duplex Residential
Restricted Commercial
Major Inst, Public Facil., Transp. & Utilities
Medium Density Multifamily Residential
Public Parks and Recreation
General Commercial
Medium Density Restricted Commercial
Light Industrial
Industrial
Conservation
Central Business District
High Density Multifamily Residential
Low Density Restricted Commercial
Low Density Multifamily Residential
Total
Study Area Citywide
Acres
97.78
0.00
9.56
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110.36
% Acres
88.6%
0.0%
8.7%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
6,177.63
3,994.89
3,790.24
2,108.00
1,440.54
1,320.35
952.71
900.56
515.80
459.67
330.14
199.22
168.89
146.50
54.98
22,560.12
27.4%
17.7%
16.8%
9.3%
6.4%
5.9%
4.2%
4.0%
2.3%
2.0%
1.5%
0.9%
0.7%
0.6%
0.2%
100.0%
Page 8
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Single -Family Residential is the dominant FLU designation for both the Study
Area and Citywide. However, Single -Family Residential accounts for just over 27 percent of all
land in the City, whereas that number is nearly 89 percent for the Study Area. While the City's
land is split among 15 Future Land Use designations, the Study Area consists of only three. The
Study Area is overwhelmingly residential. It is important to note that while the Study Area
encompasses a quarter -mile buffer from the Subject Property, only about 0.17 square miles of
the Study Area have a FLU designation. This is due to the fact the Study Area overlaps with the
City of West Miami as the Subject Property is close to the City of Miami's boundaries.
Existing Land Uses
Planning Department staff conducted analysis of the existing land uses and Future Land Uses
(FLU) within a quarter -mile of the Subject Property using data from the Miami -Dade County
Property Appraiser. Staff analyzed Current Land Use Codes (CLUC) and found that the existing
land uses generally align with their FLU designations.
The table below shows the existing land uses of all the parcels in the quarter -mile study area.
Despite abutting a commercial corridor, the Subject Property is located in an established single-
family residential neighborhood, which explains why the majority of existing land uses are
residential. Nearly 89 percent of existing land uses are single-family residential, which is the same
share of the Single -Family Residential FLU designation for the Study Area. An interesting
observation is that four percent of parcels in the Study Area are duplex residential despite no land
in the Study Area having a FLU of Duplex Residential.
Existing Land Uses within 1/4 Mile
of the Subject Property
Existing Land Use Parcels
Single -Family Residential 400 88.7%
Duplex Residential 18 4.0%
Commercial 16 3.5%
Multifamily — 3+ Units 6 1.3%
Institutional 6 1.3%
Mixed Uses - Residential 1 0.2%
Industrial 1 0.2%
Vacant Land 2 0.4%
Parking Lot 1 0.2%
Total 451 100.0%
The map below visualizes the Existing Land Uses as circles that are color -coded to their
respective existing land uses overlaid onto the FLU designations of the parcels within the quarter -
mile study area. As previously stated, the Existing Land Uses are overall aligned with the FLU
Page 9
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance Vat meLines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
designations of the parcels in the study area. The map below shows how closely
the existing and future land uses align. Note: the Existing Land Uses for the Subject Property are
categorized as institutional. This is because the Subject Property is owned by the City of Miami.
While the ownership makes the land institutional, the actual use of the Subject Property is vacant
land as there are no physical improvements or built structures on the site.
EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
[[ 1 U
hfi
1
Jb-
IOW
1i691.
uniJr
k
k
4
t b ; 5I II
* I
.-1 [
Ati_ h y
j ;WedST ▪ ;• 1 I r *.+Fsf I _
i
Gay og Wesl ll atem
I
.—
MN=
—fi•
MINK
%Added Corn
I -la. rs.w x,.
7.
r
•
•
7
FNa 71r I•1
r— l� r1
rrr gsrM FE
114 Md a Study Area
SUblect PrucsertY
..� Ot1+ Boundary
Existing Land Uses
0 ric c Cabltwl3r e&drnrial
4 Duplex Residennal
• Mulufamilyr- 3+ Units
• al�xtd U. _Rasicharnal
• C rrene cial
• lnstitut' t
• industrial
D Padang Lot
O Vacant Land
Page 10
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
SITE VISIT
Planning Department staff visited the site March 4, 2022. The site visit was conducted between
10:30am and 11:30am, which is likely the reason traffic was light for a weekday. Staff observed
a stable residential neighborhood. Many single-family homes had either been recently renovated
with modernized facades or were visibly undergoing exterior updates. The majority of homes had
cars parked indicating houses are occupied, which is consistent with the area's occupancy rate
of 92.9 percent as indicated in the Sociodemographic Analysis section of this report. Overall, the
neighborhood was quiet with little traffic; however, staff observed a handful of vehicles traveling
at speeds obviously higher than the posted speed limit of 25 mph. Staff noticed a lack of clearly
visible speed limit signs, only spotting one within the few blocks walked. Below are photos taken
by staff from the site visit.
Looking south at the east half of the Property (the fenced in
vacant land). A single-family home can be seen in the
distance, which abuts the Property. A multifamily building can
be seen in the distance.
Looking south at the west half of the Property from SW 6 St.
More multifamily buildings can be seen in the distance. These
front SW 8 St.
Page 11
Looking east at the Property from SW 63 Ct. The Property is
seen on the left, and single-family houses can be seen
abutting to the south fronting SW 63 Ct.
Looking southwest from the roundabout at the intersection of
SW 6 St and SW 63 Ct. The homes front SW 63 Ct, the
roundabout, and SW 6 St. These homes are directly across
SW 63 Ct from the Property. The homes have well -maintained
facades.
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Looking west on SW 63 Ct across the street from the Property.
Single-family homes front the west side of SW 63 Ct. The
home on the left appears to have been updated recently.
Looking north along SW 63 Ave from the intersection at SW 6
St. These single-family homes are across the street from the
Property. The homes on this avenue also had well -maintained
facades, or other renovations in progress.
Page 12
Looking south along SW 63 Ave from the intersection at SW 6
St. The Subject Property can be seen immediately on the right.
Single-family homes line SW 63 Ave and abut the Property.
Standing on SW 8 St looking west. SW 8 St is roughly 500 feet
south of the Subject Property. Multifamily buildings can be
seen fronting SW 8 St. The City of Miami boundary ends in the
center of SW 8 St and the City of West Miami begins on the
south half of SW 8 St.
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Looking west at the Subject Property from SW 63 Ave. The
Subject Property (vacant land on the right) abuts a single-
family house with solar panels.
Standing on SW 8 St looking east. A newer multifamily building
can be seen on the south side of SW 8 St and is in the City of
West Miami. Retail seen on the left side of the photo is in the
City of Miami boundaries.
Concurrency Analysis
The Planning Department tested levels of service as required for this application. The Levels of
Service (LOS) testing is based on a potential increase in population. For this request, residential
density would be eliminated under the proposed FLU designation. Because no residential density
would be generated, the only concurrency testing required is for Transportation.
Schools
Schools concurrency is not required because the request reduces density from 9 du/ac to zero.
Page 13
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Recreation and Open Space
The MCNP requires a 10-minute, %2-mile barrier -free walk to a park entrance to meet public Levels
of Service (LOS). While the Subject Property itself does not require Recreation and Open Space
concurrency testing, Planning Department staff did conduct analysis to determine the number of
housing units that would be served by the Subject Property's proposed FLU change to Public
Parks and Recreation. The Subject Property would provide a park to 1,537 housing units within a
10-minute, barrier -free walk to the park. Of the 1,537 housing units, 1,036 are already served by
two nearby parks: Robert King High Park and West End Park. A total of 501 new housing units
would gain access to a park that currently do not have a park within a 10-minute, barrier -free walk.
Potable Water
Potable Water concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces density from 9
du/ac to zero.
Sanitary Sewer Transmission
Sanitary Sewer Transmission concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces
density from 9 du/ac to zero.
Solid Waste Collection
Solid Waste Collection concurrency testing is not required because the request reduces density
from 9 du/ac to zero.
Transportation
The MCNP has updated its LOS standards for the City with the most recent update of the
Transportation Element. In the December 2020 concurrency review for this application, the Office
of Capital Improvements acknowledged that the proposal would increase daily trips by 2 and 15
additional P.M. peak hour trips. Based on the preliminary analysis for transportation concurrency,
a traffic study may be required at the time of development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The following is an analysis of the application relative to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of
the MCNP.
Criteria 1
Policy LU-1.6.4: "Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has been
deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by the
Planning Department, shall require a level of service (LOS) review and a finding
from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment will not result in a
LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards described in Policy CI-
1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any element of the MCNP. Based on its
evaluation, and on other relevant planning considerations, the Planning
Department will forward a recommended action on said amendment to the
Page 14
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward its recommendation to the City
Commission."
Analysis 1
Schools concurrency is not required because the request reduces density from
9 DU/AC to 0 DU/AC.
Staff analyzed Recreation and Open Space using GIS and determined the
proposal failed to meet LOS standards. Since the Applicant intends to develop
the Property into a park upon a successful Amendment of the FLUM of the
MCNP and rezone, the failed LOS for Recreation and Open Space would be
alleviated.
Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer Transmission, and Solid Waste Collection
concurrency testing are not required because the request reduces the density
from 9 DU/AC to 0 DU/AC.
Staff with Resilience & Public Works analyzed the application for Transportation
LOS and found that 15 PM peak hour trips would be generated by maximum
build -out of the proposed Public Parks and Recreation FLU designation. All
concurrency analyses are attached separately. See Attachment 1.
Finding 1
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.6.4.
Criteria 2
Policy PR-1.1.2: "The City will focus on park land acquisition according to the
following four equal priorities that emerged from community preferences during
the 2007 Parks Master Plan process land with water views and/or water access;
land for `walk -to' parks, including neighborhood parks, in underserved areas of
the City identified in Citywide and NET -area maps in the 2007 Parks Master Plan
and any subsequent updates to these maps; land to expand destination and
community parks; land for expansion or creation of linear park segments.
Information on target priorities and target areas for new parks will be
disseminated to all relevant City departments to enhance the potential for
parkland acquisition in conjunction with infrastructure and other projects. Ideally,
new parks should be at least one-half acre in size, but smaller areas may be
suitable, depending on the surroundings and proposed uses."
Analysis 2
The proposed FLUM amendment from Single -Family Residential to Public Parks
and Recreation is the result of the City of Miami's park land acquisition efforts to
increase park land in underserved areas. Currently, there is no park within a 10-
minute walk from the Subject Property. The nearest municipal park is West End
Park, which is over a quarter -mile northeast. The proposed amendment to the
FLUM for the Property would fill gaps between Robert King High Park and West
End Park's services areas in the Flagami neighborhood. Using GIS, staff
determined the Subject Property would provide a park within a 10-minute,
Page 15
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
barrier -free walk to a total 1,021 residential parcels consisting of 1,537
residential units. Removing the residential parcels and units in the Subject
Property's service area that overlap with the existing service areas of Robert
King High Park and West End Park, the Subject Property would provide a park
to 309 residential parcels consisting of 501 residential units (net new housing
units served). Additionally, the Subject Property would provide an additional park
for the 712 parcels consisting of 1,036 residential units that are currently served
by either Robert King High Park or West Park.
Finding 2
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy PR-1.1.2.
Criteria 3
Policy LU-1.8.3: "The City shall actively participate in the Southeastern Florida
Regional Climate Change Compact and collaborate to increase regional climate
change resiliency by sharing technical expertise, assessing regional
vulnerabilities, advancing agreed upon mitigation and adaptation strategies and
developing joint state and federal legislation policies and programs."
Analysis 3
The Regional Climate Action Plan (RCAP) is the Southeast Florida Regional
Climate Change Compact's plan to guide participants in reducing greenhouse
gas emissions and building climate resilience to mitigate against the future
challenges of climate change.
RCAP has many chapters dedicated to different areas of opportunities for
mitigation including an entire chapter on public health. RCAP's Public Health
chapter includes the following policy: PH-04: Reduce extreme heat exposure to
promote public health. Policy PH-04 offers many solutions, however, the two
most relevant solutions are:
- Increase the urban tree canopy to reduce extreme heat and provide
shade.
- Reduce the urban heat island effect by encouraging and/or requiring
highly reflective paving and roofing materials and/or increasing
vegetation on buildings.
The Applicant's proposal to amend the FLUM of the MCNP from Single -Family
Residential to Public Park and Recreation would work towards reducing urban
heat island effect by reducing the footprint of impervious surfaces in favor of
vegetation and trees. Under the relevant land development regulations, the
zoning transect that corresponds with the proposed FLU designation allows less
impervious surface than the existing zoning transect and its corresponding FLU
designation. A park would assist in reducing urban heat island effect, which
would aid in reducing extreme heat exposure and promoting public health per
policy PH-04 of RCAP.
Finding 3
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.8.3.
Criteria 4
Policy LU-1.3.15: "The City will continue to encourage a development pattern
that enhances existing neighborhoods by developing a balanced mix of uses
Page 16
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wllh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
including areas for employment, shopping, housing, and recreation in close
proximity to each other."
Analysis 4
The Subject Property is located in a single-family residential neighborhood. In
fact, single-family residential accounts for more than 88% of all existing land
uses and FLU designations within a quarter -mile radius of the Subject Property.
Amending the FLUM of the MCNP for the Subject Property from Single -Family
Residential to Public Parks and Recreation would serve two purposes. First, it
would add a new land use within the quarter -mile radius. Second, it would
provide a recreational amenity to the surrounding residential neighborhood.
Residents of the surround residential neighborhood would have a park within
walking and biking distance from their homes where they currently do not.
Amending the FLUM for the Subject Property from Single -Family Residential to
Public Parks and Recreation would enhance the existing neighborhood by
adding a recreational use in close proximity to the existing residential and
commercial uses.
Finding 4
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.3.15.
Criteria 5
Policy LU-1.6.7: "The City will provide adequate opportunity for public comment
regarding zoning changes and variances within neighborhoods."
Analysis 5
As part of their application, the Applicant included a Neighborhood Outreach
report. The Neighborhood Outreach Report was extensive and included copies
of the flyers for the meeting, which were created in both English and Spanish.
The Neighborhood Outreach Report also included images of the presentation
the Applicant provided at the outreach meeting, which took place on July 12,
2021. The Neighborhood Outreach Report also includes a copy of the votes and
comments attendees provided for various park concepts along with photos from
the event and a sign -in sheet. The meeting was very well attended and noticed
before. The entire Neighborhood Outreach Report can be seen in Attachment 3.
Finding 5
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.6.7.
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis of the area context and the goals and objectives of the MCNP, the request
to amend the FLUM by changing the designation for the property located at 600 SW 63 Av, 610
SW 63 Av, 601 SW 63 Ct, and 615 SW 63 Ct ("the Property") from Single -Family Residential to
Public Parks and Recreation, staff finds the request is justified based on the lack of existing
municipal park and recreation space in the immediate area and the support of the community to
create the proposed park as evidenced in the Neighborhood Outreach Report. Amending the
FLUM of the MCNP from Single -Family Residential to Public Parks and Recreation will add
recreation and green space to residents within walking and biking distance that are not currently
served by a park. The proposed amendment will also enhance the existing neighborhood by
Page 17
this aubmtdal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wtlh tlmeLinee set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicable decision -ma Xing body will
review the information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decal on.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
providing a second park option to residents in the area that are currently served
by other parks. Finally, the proposed park would result in a reduction of impervious surface, which
would work towards reduction of urban heat island effect, which can mitigate against extreme
heat exposure and promote better public health.
Based on the above background information, the Planning Department recommends Approval
of the request to amend the FLUM of the Property located at 600 SW 63 Av, 610 SW 63 Av, 601
SW 63 Ct, and 615 SW 63 Ct from Single -Family Residential to Public Parks and Recreation.
Digitally signed by Trone,
Trone,Sue
Sue Date:2022.04.26
14:24:16 -04'00'
Sue Trone, AICP
Chief of Comprehensive Planning
Attachments:
Exhibit A — Legal Description
Attachment 1 — Concurrency Analyses
Attachment 2 — Neighborhood Outreach Report
Page 18
EXHIBIT A
Folio Nos.: 01-4001-005-6970, 01-4001-005-7120, 01-4001-005-6980 and 01-4001-00
DESCRIPTION: Exhibit A
LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 AND LOT 17, BLOCK 33, FAIR LAWN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT TH
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, PAGE 83 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI—DADE COUN
SAID LANDS LYING IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI—DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAIN
SQUARE FEET, (0.78 ACRES) MORE OR LESS.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100\
0)
( IN FEET )
1 INCH = 50 FEET
1J
R=25.00' (C) & (P)
4=66'52'46" (C)
4=65`52' (P)
L=29.18' (C)
50.00
SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
co
oo
C0
BLOCK 24 FAIR LOWN
(PB 8, PG. 83 M.D.C.R.)
R/W
SW 6th STREET
60' RIGHT OF WAY
(P.B. 8, PG. 83, M.D.C.R.)
'w61.26'
R=115.00'
(C) & (P)
4=18°20'04" (C)
4=18'24' (P)
L=36.80' (C) & (P)
R=115.00' 7
(C) & (P) 78))
4=15`50'05" (C)
4=16`04'29" (P)
L=31.78' (C)
L=32.1' (P)
LOT 17
LOT 1
w
0
0
144.24'
0
O
0
o
601 SW 63 COURT,
MIAMI, FL-33144
FOLIO No.:
01-4001-005-6970
O
615 SW 63 COURT,
MIAMI, FL-33144 o
FOLIO No.:
01-4001-005-7120
125.00'
LOT 16
(PB
•
FAIR LAWN
BLOCK 33
8, PG. 83 M.D.C.R.)
0
0
0
0
1
107.78'
R=25.00' (C) & (P)
4=89'32'29" (C)
L=39.07' (C)
LOT 2
600 SW 63 AVENUE,
MIAMI, FL-33144
FOLIO No.:
01-4001-005-6980
610 SW 63 AVENUE,
MIAMI, FL-33144
FOLIO No.:
01-4001-005-6990
122.75
LOT 4
— THIS SKETCH DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
— LANDS SHOWN HEREON LIE WITHIN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 54
SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST.
— LANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR
EASEMENTS, RIGHTS —OF —WAY, OR RESERVATIONS OF
RECORD. SKETCH
LOT 5
Dig itatlysigned
Martin byMartin P
Rossi
Date:
P Rossi 2021.05.07
06:57:53 -04'00'
DESCRIPTION
O
0
1ri
0
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a pubu
In accordance wit timelines set forth in thel
Miami Cotle. The applicable decision -making b
review the infomlaion at the pubbc hearing to
recommendation or afnal decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
30.00 30.00
0
N
O
O
LU
z
LU
co
co
0
0
r2
Q
� M i
Lt
o- •
H
C� co
.
m
ABBREVIATIONS:
O.R.B. — OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
PG. — PAGE
P.B. — PLAT BOOK
M.D.C.R. — MIAMI—DADE COUNTY RECORDS
R — RADIUS
— DELTA ANGLE
— ARC LENGTH
— CENTERLINE
— RIGHT OF WAY LINE
— CALCULATED
— PLAT
..►►111111//,
L
R/W
(C)
(P)
DATE
REVISIONS
DWN. CHK.
DRAWN BY:
LP
CHECKED BY: MR
CERTIFIED TO:
CITY OF MIAMI
FAIR LAWN COMMUNITY PARK
MILLER�EGG
South Florida Office: 5747 N. Andrews Way
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida • 33309-2364
954-436-7000•Fax: 954-436-8664
www.millerlegg.com
hearing
ity of
orb, wIlL
ruler
ww`` �+ /
I HEREBY C R1I YVI- r THIS SKET �'41 ETS
STANDARD Ti5 re �� THE
FLORIDA P G B�
SURVCONSVAD A S�OA�R PROFC)�--IIA �L�
FLORIDor APMAIISTRAT1�L" C PURSUANT TO:t.
SECTIOIS 1/l4027, FLORIDA STATUTES. : •
DATED :6th DAY OP,MAY 21
421 — A.D.
O1• Q.
PR I•
STATE IXRR!
NOT VALID GYf THE !MU
CERTIFI /9
RAISED SEAL OF IIbOA �I
` , RIZ
ORIGINAL
AND MAPPER
6680
PROJECT NO,
20-00132
FILE NO,
SD-1
►
V:\PROJECTS\2020\20-00132 - CI1Y OF MIAMI FAIRLAWN COMMUNITY PARK \ SURVEY \ DWG \20-00132-SD.DWG 5/7/21 by MROSSI
May 18, 2021
Page 9
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM
TO: Sue Trone, AICP DATE: March 14, 20
Chief, Community Planning
FILE: PZ-21-11843
NOTICE
This submittal needs b be scheduled for a public hearing
In accord ancz 'Mt timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde.The applica de decision -making bcdywlll
reWewthe Information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
SUBJECT: Transportation Concurrency
Analysis
REFERENCES: PZAB File ID 21-11843
FROM: Collin Worth ENCLOSURES:
Transportation Analyst
Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the applications for the project
located at 600 SW 63rd Avenue, 610 SW 63rd Avenue, 601 SW 63rd Court, and 615 SW
63rd Court the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip generation was calculated.
The proposed FLR and density have the potential to result in an increase of approximately
two (2) daily trips and 15 P.M. peak hour trips.
Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine the
impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment, a traffic study may be required
based on the specific site plan proposed.
DAILY TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
EXISTING DAILY TRIP GENERATION
,gyp PURL/
..� c yF
Nt \o
NOTICE
ThIs submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
In accordance wtth timelines set forth In the city of
Miami Code. The appdvade decision -malting bodywlll
renew the Information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
BASELINE
TRIPS
MULTIMODAL
REDUCTION
GROSS TRIPS
INTERNAL
CAPTURE
EXTERNAL
VEHICLE TRIPS
PA
CAPTV.
;zR —
E`/i Ew GO RIPS
"
Land Use
ITE
Edition
ITE
Code
Scale
ITE
Units
Percent
In
Out
Total
Percent
MR
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
IC
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
PB
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
G
R
O
U
P
1
1
Single -Family Detached Housing
11
210
7
du
50%
50%
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ITE Land Use Code
Rate or Equation
Total:
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
0.0%
0
44
43
87
210 LN(Y) = 0.92*LN(X)+2.68
PROPOSED DAILY TRIP GENERATION
ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
BASELINE
TRIPS
MULTIMODAL
REDUCTION
GROSS TRIPS
INTERNAL
CAPTURE
EXTERNAL
VEHICLE TRIPS
PASS -BY
CAPTURE
NET NEW
EXTERNAL TRIPS
Land Use
ITE
Edition
ITE
Code
Scale
ITE
Units
Percent
In
Out
Total
Percent
MR
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
IC
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
PB
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
G
R
O
U
P
2
1
Public Park
11
411
0.78
acre
50%
50%
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ITE Land Use Code
Rate or Equation
Total:
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
0.0%
0
45
44
89
411
Y=0.64*(X)+88.46
K:\FTL_TPTO\042258128-WO#28 In-house Support\Correspondence\FLUM\March 2022\TRIP GEN 11_Redevelopment.xlsx: PRINT -DAILY
3/14/2022,12:02 PM
IN
OUT
TOTAL
NET NEW TRIPS
1
1
2
PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
EXISTING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
Q.
,gyp PURL/
..� c yF
o
NOTICE
ThIs submittal needs to be scheduled for a pubic hearing
In accordance wtth timelines set forth In the city of
Miami Code. The appdvade decision -malting bodywlll
renew the Information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
44
V
ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
BASELINE TRIPS
MULTIMODAL
REDUCTION
GROSS TRIPS
INTERNAL
CAPTURE
EXTERNAL
VEHICLE TRIPS
PAS•"
CAPTUR`
Pi E ~ • RIPS
Land Use
ITE
Edition
ITE
Code
Scale
ITE
Units
Percent
In
Out
Total
Percent
MR
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
IC
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
PB
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
G
R
O
U
P
1
1
Single -Family Detached Housing
11
210
7
du
63%
37%
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ITE Land Use Code
Rate or Equation
Total:
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
0.0%
0
5
3
8
210 LN(Y) = 0.94*LN(X)+0.27
PROPOSED WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION
ITE TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS
DIRECTIONAL
DISTRIBUTION
BASELINE
TRIPS
MULTIMODAL
REDUCTION
GROSS TRIPS
INTERNAL
CAPTURE
EXTERNAL
VEHICLE TRIPS
PASS -BY
CAPTURE
NET NEW
EXTERNAL TRIPS
Land Use
ITE
Edition
ITE
Code
Scale
ITE
Units
Percent
In
Out
Total
Percent
MR
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
IC
Trips
In
Out
Total
Percent
PB
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
G
R
O
U
P
2
1
Public Park
11
411
0.78
acre
55%
45%
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ITE Land Use Code
Rate or Equation
Total:
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
0.0%
0
13
10
23
411
Y=0.06'(X)+22.6
K:\FTL_TPTO\042258128-WO#28 In-house Support\Correspondence\FLUM\March 2022\TRIP GEN 11_Redevelopment.xlsx: PRINT -PM PEAK HOUR
3/14/2022,12:02 PM
IN
OUT
TOTAL
NET NEW TRIPS
8
7
15
ATTACHMENT 2
Neighborhood Outreach
ThIs submittal needs b be scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appLIca tie decision-mahing bodywlll
review the information at the pubic hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
The City of Miami did 1 community meeting on July the 12t", 2021 to present the project Fairlawn
Community Park at 600 SW 63 AVE, 610 SW 63 AVE, 601 SW 63 CT and 615 SW 63 CT.
The meeting was advertised through e-blast to 95 recipients 3 times through the list of D4 residents who
have attended other OCI events such as D4 Stormwater Masterplan and The Roads 25MPH Campaign.
500 Flyers were printing for the community meeting. Flyers were given to the D4 Office for distribution in
the community.
Flyers Community Meeting
LrC�VJ
RL
/�/L_R.1LJL_M_3�1� LJ LJ LJ
a
COMMUNITY MEETING
Joins us as we share the design concepts-1
for the new Fairlawn Community Park in
District 4i
MONDAY, JULY 12, 2021
6:00PM
aN(j-11DiXdAYN
600
Please join the City of Mrami, District 4 Commissioner
Manolo Reyes, the Department of Parks & Recreation and
the Office of Capital Improvements (OCJ to share the design
pians for the new Fairlawn Community Park in District 4 in
the C ly of Miami!
*-7r1Dt,sTs,P.7119 7A1.0. ,0,7�±-_,.,r
i.4i4' C�Ea£11G.'^ igiF L.CA+.r�i I- GRQLW43
..YXes:E}p$.kX�sV` et' gIiifii: rAK u.
g's.r,g.Z ti
For additknal Information and
feed back, ',let the Office of Capital
Improvemmrtswcteite, call OM at
(aos) 416-12en n send an email
to: AsleOCIOnniamigov.carn awn
COMMISSIONER
�a� ECJ ace@
REUNION COMUNITARIA
;Unase a nosotros pars presentarles los
conceptos del diseflo del nuevo Parque
Comunitario Fairlawn en el distrito 4!
MONDAY, JULY 12, 2021
6:00PM
La Ciudad de Miami, el Comisionado Menolo Reyes del Distrito 4,
el Deparfemento de Parques y Recreecidn y le Oficine de Capital
!mpravernents {OCf) los invitan a one reunion comuniteris pare
compsrtir intormecidn sabre el plan de! diseno de! nuevo Parque
Comunitario Fairlawn en e! Distrito 4 de le Ciudad de Miami.
UNRAYX,M4 MOM
Cr.;ti-. k: WAS 0fW
Rae rr149 iIbrmic& v0IR, b p4jhe
web: wwxpnemgauan, Office d
Capital Improvement, caftan -teal
equ i p° de edenee eenu n l®rle el
(SO9416-12E0, oenl4 un care°
eleettnca a AnkCClamisnloovcorn
COMiSIONAOO
R� Manolo
nlsaaToay
1'Page
Presentation Community Meeting 07/12/2021
FAIRLAWN COMMUNITY
NOTICE
This submittal needs to loe schedu led for a pubichearing
In accordance votth timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appLlea decision -malting body %WU
ret,lew the information at the pu We hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decision
21 Page
FAI RLAWN COMM AIT' AA.H,rs;
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be' scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appll®de decision -malting body will
roldew the information at the pubec hearing to render e
recommended on or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
After doing the community meetings we received positives comments about the park and some
recommendations about the parking and amenities' location.
• Community meeting took place at the park site_ 600 SW 63" Ave. at 6pm_
• Miller Legg reviewed the 2 concepts with the community explaining the differences between the
two concepts.
• Concept 1 was true to the old-world Spanish layout using axial relationships and node connections.
• Concept 2 had a similar layout for the main entrance, but the rest of the park was laid out more
organically.
• ML reviewed the amenities being proposed for the park.
• Stickers were given out to the community to place on their preferred concept as well as playground
structures and amenities.
• After presentation NIL and the City held a question -and answer session for the community.
• Questions were addressed about the concepts as well as the amenities and their placements within
the park design.
• The community has an issue with speeding cars.
• The neighbor's fence on the South -East of the new proposed Park will be returned to the owners
house for h is use during the construction phase.
• The area on the north-east corner of the park needs to be secured due to multiple accidents
reported by the neighbors.
: Residents brought up concerns about the lack of police activity to monitor the park,
• Residents had concerns about loose dogs in the vicinity of the park.
• Community preference was to have all parking on the southwest corner of the park. They were not
receptive to the on street parking or the amount of required parking spaces per code.
• Suggestions to relocate children's playground area away from the northeast corner for safety
concerns.
* Some liked the idea of playmounds to be included in the play areas in addition to the entrance.
+ Concerns about not having the entire park fenced in were brought up.
• Some want benches.
• Some want the benches to have an arm in the middle to avoid people to sleep on them.
• Safety in the neighborhood due to the addition of the park is a concern.
t Some neighbors proposed to have the park all fenced with times to open a close.
• Commissioner mentioned they are working to obtain the boulevard over 63 CT u nti I Flagler.
• Neighbor asked how many parking spots the park will have, and OCI staff mentioned they will
confirm the exact number and inform later.
t Some neighbor proposed fitness equipment as part of the amenities.
e Police need to have presence around the park, commissioner mentioned they try but we don't have
enough police, however. neighbors mentioned when they call the police they are on site
immediately_
• Some requested 63f° Ct close so that the residence of the building cannot access the neighborhood.
• Resident at 620 SW 63rd Ave. request fencing around the back of his house.
• Include bags for dog waste.
• Concerns about older people and children in conflict with the traffic from the building on 8th Street.
31Page
Community Meeting Boards Results
�p PURL/C
61
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appUcaLie decision -malting body will
revlew Me information at the public hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
PARK CONCEPT SELECTION
• FAIRLAWN LOMAl11NITf PN1M
VOTE NUMBERS
COMMENTS
• Residence liked the layout of of the playground but recom-
mended to adjust the entrance away from the main road.
• Residence Liked the location of the dog parkand how it has
Its own entrance.
• residence recommendedparra➢e parking all be located on
Me dog park side got to review city node to see if pmldog
needs to be all around site or on one side.
• Residence agreed with all the amenities on the image board
35 VOTES
11 VOTES
• Residence liked the mounds on the second concept will like
mounds added to the dog park as well the childrens play-
ground
• Residence did like the second entrance by the playground
to allow
PARK EQUIPMENT SELECTION VOTE NUMBERS
i
•
• s` -••
Option 2-5 years
• Gamethne Vortex: I Vote
• Gameume Bunker Hith O Votes
• landscape Structures Weevos: b Voles
Option 5-12 years
Gamenme Portland: 1 Vote
Game0me Accelerate IL 1 Vole
Landscape Structure Boos: 7 Votes
Playground Mounds Earthen play
• First Colorful mounds seleceted with open space Inside
Focal Art Piece Alternative
Historical Sculpture: 7 Votes
Barth Forms: 1 Vote
Interactive Arb 1 Vote
Interactive Art 2: 1 Vote
Interactive Art 3:7 Votes
Dog Run Play Equipment
Teeter Totter: 3 Votes
Stepping Paws. 0 Votes
Curved Barrel: 0 Votes
Trl Level Jump O Voles
Dog Mounds: 5 Votes
41 Page
44,
I EW COVQ
Pictures Community Meeting 07/12/2021
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be'scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appLIca decision -malting body will
review the information at the pubc hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
51Page
Sign in Sheets Community Meeting 07/12/2021
Fairlawn Community Park
Community Meeting
Monday, July 12, 2021
SIGN -IN SHEET
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be' scheduled fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appll®de decision -malting body will
review the information at the pubic hearing to render a
recommended on or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
Name
Email
Phone
Address
�
f
/
i:A-
.
—120 . 4160- 00
3- (-Z-Vii=j
IAA S,Alkyl
ZScl) eTVioii , awl
005)505-47i7
51i7 S cZ .i „--
,Acy 1 5
4-owis06 e 5 n DA. cowl
CN6) 3Z(,.- [fib
CIL W 24 e#
yU1n% I,„,,, 1•i
vv/ Ul.e.e7oD +'a' God. rem
n ')7 D at2-6 i 0 _
60-1 470 (er { Avew
ycix, ! [ IA- 4i
C {J ,(7 i 1 f r m
(7s6) • r.) — 4y 1c'
4 , d"143 C63r-(( -
7,mr
Name
Email
Phone
Address
IJ,2_tR. dk ,,,rta4
0LLL,,, f k'VN.11yio'Til�-
C' 5- ` .7 4. i
('''I )-"- 6,.2,4s9 ''
cs_..,,, clA
�! {
f la `l ,h.-J' /A
J
I,
�
cr r' 6 de 1 1J �• -Oh
� N41 � 'S7j
30 F !' P-R --i c[ + S
Y
1% .--J.'� b C y' AT'
f L' t
*4 J2, 1L
.4 Z
I .�,%-0#P
3as43i-7
'.2�r 'u/ 7/. .
+.6t l—arrFPI(d!Mfarf(�Crn.�•
I
ALez.usu (0fyl),,la~,ccr,
Gyrea4a'-��}Gl`s—SL�C—
Zb - 4si --1.--)w6
Z; Ste' Cp3 crT
L\za�61~, I11�
61 Page
Name
Email
Phone
PZ-2
I -yam
f
tr v 0_S 9A. 04/
. iC �-1
C(CR�lcioi �a�7aa? , /5i l
[sf • 0 -(- G ,51j=i
nisi'
114.-
,1 I c S-1,-.0, `.�_
Cr iks Z.,u OkIck
7k6 .3 V(1. ! 7 Z_
6.. -r, u s: u-s ci
SaLA del WAIA
& if‘TiLlif f}+IVi►A11lt cow,
roAtiq Cua'vvo
roll( c() Br c-Ik ich..-t
(?) LIS1- 0 _›3f rc
/f I '"1
J/
C r
//714
LtOlZAGdtf' CDkD
19 f
F60•ig/ /7?j74'1r
.df/4//r
(91) - • y._
619',... .y�.t..1
Community Comments/Collected Cards Community Meeting 07/12/2021
COMMENTS
NAME: /2141?J'd cc pr7
COMMENT: ,,' ,'.,eeva {1eGt
1(17s6f c"Irc �2° • 6 I
710 9 em`V
NAM
COMMENT:
�_ —
COMMENTS
04-1
7'Page
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be schedu lee fora pubic hearing
In accordance whh timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The appLIca decision -malting body will
rodew the information at the pubdc hearing to render a
n or a final decision.
1-11843
7/22
AERIAL
EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11843
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT
0
125
250
500 Feet
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth In the City of
Miami Cole. The applicable decision -making body will
reNew the Information at the public hearing to render e
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
11•m•m•in•w115m0m=m•w•ui111m•mMmMm•ui•1w•mMmMImMuSW 8THmmmommpymmwommuiouimmnmmmmminmmimmnitN.pm
ets >
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING)
EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11843
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT
0
125
250
500 Feet
SW 64TH AVE
H
C.)
0
co
cn
SW 6TH ST
1
Medium Density
Restricted
Commercial
y
cid I 1111P 1'11 Restricted
Commercial
SW8TH ST
0
M
This submittal needsto be scheduled fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applicable decision -making body will
renew the information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
SW 62ND CT
1
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED)
EPLAN ID: PZ-21-11843
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
ADDRESSES: 600 SW 63 AV; 610 SW 63 AV; 601 SW 63 T; 615 SW 63 CT
0
125
250
500 Feet
SW 64TH AVE
SW 6TH ST
U
❑
(M
co
Medium Density
Restricted
Commercial
Commercial
SW8THST
w
0
LY
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
in accordance with timeliness set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applicable decision -making body will
renew the lnformaeon at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-21-11843
04/27/22
1
SW 62ND