HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and MapsG
0
PUBL,C
City of Miami
Planning Department
STAFF ANALYSIS FOR
A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
.•tog ik
NOTICE
This subrnftN needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision-rna king body will
renew the infomnauon at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decis on.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
VIEW CO'
Staff Analysis Report No.
PZ-19-4165
Applicant
City of Miami, represented by Department of Real Estate and
Asset Management (DREAM)
Location
444 and 460 Southwest 2 Avenue, Miami, FL 33130
Commission District
District 5 — Keon Hardemon
NET District
Downtown-Brickell Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET)
Area
Approximately 3.15 acres (137,125 square feet)
Planner
Elia Sorice, Planner II
Recommendation
Approval
REQUEST
Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan ("MCNP"), the City
of Miami Department of Real Estate and Asset Management (DREAM) ("the Applicant") is
requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") of the
MCNP to change the designation of the properties located at 444 and 460 Southwest 2 Avenue
("the Property") from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" to
"Restricted Commercial". The proposed amendment contains approximately 3.15 Acres. Small-
scale comprehensive plan amendments are those that involve Tess than 10 acres of property and
are subject to the Small -Scale Review Process, as set forth in Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes.
Concurrently, the Applicant is requesting a change to the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas as a companion
item (ePlan PZ-19-2851). The companion application seeks to change the Property's zoning
designation from "Cl" Civic Institution Zone to "T6-36B-O" Urban Core — Open. The Property is
legally described in the attached Exhibit "A".
The Property, which is comprised of two parcels totaling approximately 3.15 acres (137,125
square feet), is located on the west side of SW 2 Avenue between the Miami River and SW 3
Street, and is served by the Downtown-Brickell Neighborhood Enhancement Team (NET).
PUBL,c
O
Q
Map 1: Aerial Photo of Subject Site
EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
.•toga i9�k
NOTICE
This submital needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines Set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision-rna king body will
remew the intomnauon at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decis on.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
V‘‘'
VIEW COB@
The Property has an existing Future Land Use ("FLU") of Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation and Utilities. The MCNP interprets this designation as follows:
"Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities"
allow facilities for federal, state and local government activities, major public or private
health, recreational, cultural, religious or educational activities, and major transportation
facilities and public utilities. Residential facilities ancillary to these uses are allowed up to
a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" or if applicable the
least intense abutting/adjacent residential zoning district, subject to the same limiting
conditions.
Areas designated as "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities
allow nonresidential uses to a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area
of the subject property. Properties designated "Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation and Utilities" in the Health / Civic Center District allow a maximum floor lot
ratio (FLR) of 8.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated
"Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" in the Urban Central
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 2
v^^
o PUBLJc
G
0
a.
Business District allow a maximum FLR of 37.0 times the net lot area
property."
PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
.•toga i9�k
NOTICE
This subrnftN needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timeline, set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision-rna king body will
remew the infomnauon at the public hearing to render a
recommendat on or a final decis on.
.ts`'
FV1EW CO
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
The request proposes to amend the Future Land Use designation to "Restricted Commercial"
which allows:
"Residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to
"High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions
and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other
residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation of
existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities
exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents;
transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also
allows general office use; clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries,
convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools.
Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing
and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal
auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include:
general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and
other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment
facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or
entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land
use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category
also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as
permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as
"Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the
net lot area of the subject property; such FLR may be increased upon
compliance with the detailed provisions of the applicable land development
regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times the net lot area
of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in
the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 17.0 times the net
lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted
Commercial" in the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards
Regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the
net lot area of the subject property.
All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of
the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required
levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted
concurrency management requirements.
Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that supports nonresidential uses
within the inside perimeter of the outside walls of the building including hallways,
stairs, closets, thickness of walls, columns and other features, and parking and
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 3
G
4-
PUBL,c
stow ik
loading areas, and excluding only open air corridors, porches, balconie
roof areas."
Map 2: Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Designations
(Subject Properties are outlined in orange)
Existing FLUM
NOTICE
This subrnftN needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timeline, set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision-rna king body will
remew the infomnauon at the public hearing to render a
recommendat on or a final decis on.
q
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
1EW
•
9x%
40
•
4041116..-4.
Ras
WIL
Nstt.‘*tZ,
\\\
Proposed FLUM
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSETS
The Property is located in a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Area due to its proximity to the
Third Street and Riverwalk Metromover Stations, and the Government Center Metrorail Station.
These stations are within a half -mile distance, or 10-muinite walk from the Property. SW 2 Avenue
is also a City designated Transit Corridor, well served by Miami -Dade County Metro Bus 208 and
City of Miami Trolley "Coral Way" route which take passengers between points in the Downtown
Miami Urban Core and southwestern City of Miami. Although there are no public facilities such as
police or fire protection facilities in the immediate area, the Property has access to a network of
public parks and trails. The Property is within a 10-minute (1/2-mile radius) walk to a park
entrance, and directly connects to the Miami Riverwalk to the north and south. Public schools in
the neighborhood include Frederick Douglass Elementary School, Jose De Diego Middle School,
and Booker T. Washington Senior High.
SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
The Property is part of the US Census Block Group 120860036011. According to the American
Community Survey (ACS), 5-year estimates (2013-2017), the median household income for the
block group is $12,103, which is roughly one-third of the median household income for Miami
($33,999) and about one-fourth of the median household income for Miami -Dade County
($46,338).
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 4
o PUBL,c
G
0
a.
The Census Block Group in which the Property is located has a total of 999 hous
total of 1,055 housing units. The percentage of families living in poverty in this BIo
45.2 percent, which is considerably higher than both the City (18.6 percent) and Cou
percent).
The same ACS 5-year estimate data showed that most households (99.1 percent) in the subject
Block Group rented their homes, as do most households in the Block Groups located to the west
of the Property. The median rent for a unit in the Block Group is $381. Surrounding Block Groups
typically had a median gross rent between $1,010 and $1,962. This information is summarized in
the table below.
.•tog i .
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision -making body will
remew the information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decis on.
v"
EVIEW COS@
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
Table 1: Summa of Census Data for Subject
Topic
Number of Households
Block Group: 120860036011
Data'
999
Number of Housing Units
1,055
Median Household Income
$12,103 (City of Miami: $33,999)
Percent of People under the Poverty Line
45.2%
Percent of Households that rent
99.1
Median Rent
$381 (43.9% Rental cost burdened)
Unemployment Rate
20.8%
GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS: EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
The Planning Department inventoried the Existing Land Uses within the 1/4-mile study area,
identifying a total of 325 addresses. The majority of the study area is occupied by vacant land,
making up approximately 40 percent of the study area. Multifamily Residential is the second -most
common use for addresses within the study area, at approximately 30 percent. The table below
summarizes the existing land uses within the study area.
Table 2: Summary of Census Data for Subject Block Group: 120860036011
Existing Land Use
Number of Addresses % Addresses within
within Study Area Study Area
Single-Family/Duplex 12 3.69%
Multifamily (3 of more units) 96 29.54%
Commercial/Office 47 14.46%
Vacant (Government and Private) 129 39.69%
Other (Institutional, Industrial, etc.) 41 12.62%
Total 325 100%
1 Data was retrieved from the U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 5
GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS: FUTURE LAND USE INVENTORY
The Planning Department inventoried the FLU designations of properties within th
which consisted of approximately 146 acres. Restricted Commercial was the mos
designation, with over 51 percent (approximately 75 acres) of land within the study area
high density and high intensity FLU designation. The next most common designation is Medium
Density Multifamily Residential, which accounts for 18 percent (approximately 22 acres) of land
within the study area. Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities follows, with
15 percent (approximately 22 acres) of the study area comprised of this FLU. The table below
summarizes the inventory of FLU designations for the study area, and compares the study area's
FLU composition with that of the entire City.
This submittal needs to be scheduLed for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applica tie decision-rna king bodywill
renew the inforrnaton at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
Table 3: Comparison of FLU Designations, Citywide and within the Study Area
Citywide
FLU Designation Acreage % Total
Low Density Multifamily Residential 39 0%
Low Density Restricted Commercial 144 1%
High Density Multifamily Residential 165 1%
Central Business District 199 1%
Conservation 289 1%
Industrial 459 2%
Light Industrial 534 2%
Medium Density Restricted Commercial 896 4%
General Commercial 945 4%
Public Parks and Recreation 1,315 6%
Medium Density Multifamily Residential 1,487 7%
Major Institutional, Public Facilities,
Transportation and Utilities 2,103 9%
Restricted Commercial 3,736 17%
Duplex -Residential 4,002 18%
Single Family -Residential 6,197 28%
Study Area
Acreage % Total
O 0.00%
O 0.00%
O 0.00%
3.20 2.19%
O 0.00%
6.67 4.56%
O 0.00%
0.73 0.50%
2.38 1.63%
9.31 6.37%
26.77 18.32%
22.09 15.12%
74.99 51.31%
O 0.arx
O 0.00%
22,510 100% 146.14 100%
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
To better understand the relationship between the existing built environment and the planned,
future land uses, staff mapped and analyzed data from the Miami -Dade County Property
Appraiser over the City's Future Land Use Map within the quarter -mile buffer from the subject
site. The Property Appraiser uses Department of Revenue ("DOR") codes to classify existing land
uses at a single property. These are symbolized below, in Map 3. For the purposes of this
analysis, DOR Codes were recoded into more general categories: Commercial, Multifamily,
Single-family and Duplex, Vacant, and Other (educational, religious, etc.).
In general, the existing land uses fall into categories that are intended and planned for under the
interpretation of the underlying FLU designation. Most notably, however, is the large number of
vacant parcels fronting both sides and the area south of the Miami River. The geospatial analysis
is presented in the map on below.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19— Page 6
Map 3: Existing Land Uses and the FLUM within A Quarter -Mile Study Are
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applica tie decision -making body %ill
renew the inforrnaton at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
Existing Land Use
Commerdal, Office. etc.
Multifamily Residences (3+ units)
f Single -Family and Duplex Residence
* Vacant (Government and Private)
a Other (Institutional, Industrial. etc)
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
Subject Property
Quarter -Mile Study Area
City Parcels
Future Land Use Designation
Public Parks and Recreation
Medium Density Multifamily
Residential
mei Medium Density Restricted
Commercial
- Restricted Commercial
- Central Business District
General Commercial
Major Institutional, Public
�-__ Facilities, Transportation and
Utilities
- Industrial
o 125 250 500 Feet
1 1 1 f 1 I II
DISCUSSION ABOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
The study area is intersected by 1-95 and the Miami River, which establish natural boundaries
between Tess dense areas to the west, and more intensely and densely designated areas to the
east. The study area east of 1-95 is predominately designated Restricted Commercial in the FLUM
and falls within the boundaries Urban Central Business District (UCBD). The study area is also
comprised of several Residential Density Increase Areas (RDIA) which allow areas of higher
Density than what is typically permitted by the underlying FLU, as summarized below:
RDIA Name
Density Permitted
River Quadrant RDIA
500 du/ac
Little Havana RDIA
200 du/ac
Note, also, that the Central Business District FLU designation is within the study area, allowing
1,000 du/ac. The Central Business District is, in part, implemented by the CBD RDIA in Miami 21,
with the MCNP's other RDIAs, in Article 4, Diagram 9. Based on these observations and its
location within a TOD area, the Restricted Commercial FLU allows for the high Density, multi -use
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 7
development that is envisioned in the City's urban core, and supports City policies
transit -oriented development. The proposed amendment to Restricted Commercial
a more cohesive land use pattern in the study area.
CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS
The Planning Department tested levels of service as required for this application. The Levels of
Service (LOS) testing is based on a potential increase in population for this area above the
assumed 4,425 persons. Given that the Property is located in the UCBD and the River Quadrant
RDIA, the existing and proposed FLU permit a maximum Density of up to 500 dwelling units per
acre. The proposed amendment would not result in an increase in residential Density, and
accordingly, would not result in an increase in potential population.
This submittal needs to be schedted fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applica tie decision -making body %ill
renew the inforrnaton at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
Original population: 4,425 people
New population: 4,425 people
Schools
On July 25, 2019, Miami -Dade County Public Schools submitted its findings that it had tested the
proposed change of land use and zoning and found that the middle and senior high school levels
had sufficient capacity to serve the application; however, the elementary school level does not.
At time of redevelopment, mitigation may be required.
Recreation and Open Space
The MCNP requires a 10-minute, 1/2-mile barrier -free walk to a park entrance to meet public
Levels of Service (LOS). The Planning Department conducted an analysis in GIS to test the LOS
for this proposal and found that with the potential increase in population meets LOS standards.
Potable Water
The MCNP LOS standard for potable water service is 92.05 gallons per capita per day (PCPD).
Consumption is assumed to be approximately 407,321 by residential uses. LOS standards do not
take into consideration the consumption of non-residential use.
Sanitary Sewer Transmission
The MCNP LOS standard for Sanitary Sewer is 141 GPCD. The MCNP does not require testing
of this County service.
Solid Waste Collection
The City's LOS standard for Solid Waste is 1.28 tons/resident/year. The Franchise Agreement
the City maintains provides flexibility to address fluctuations in solid waste production.
Transportation
The MCNP has updated its LOS standards for the City with the most recent update of the
Transportation Element. In the August 2019 concurrency review for this application, the Office of
Capital Improvements determined that there are not enough case studies to truly determine the
impact of the site based on the ITE trip generation. Additional information will be needed at the
time of redevelopment, including a traffic study.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 8
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS
The following is an analysis of the application relative to the Goals, Objectives, and
the MCNP.
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applica tie decision -making body %ill
renew the inforrnaton at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
Criteria 1
Policy LU-1.6.4: "Any proposal to amend the City's Zoning Atlas that has
been deemed to require an amendment to the Future Land Use Plan Map by
the Planning Department, shall require a level of service (LOS) review and a
finding from the Planning Department that the proposed amendment will not
result in a LOS that falls below the adopted minimum standards described in
Policy CI-1.2.3, and will not be in conflict with any element of the
MCNP. Based on its evaluation, and on other relevant planning
considerations, the Planning Department will forward a recommended action
on said amendment to the Planning Advisory Board, which will then forward
its recommendation to the City Commission."
Analysis 1
All concurrency analyses are attached separately. See attachment B.
Finding 1 Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.6.4 as City Levels of
Service appear to be able to be met for Recreation and Open Space,
Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer Transmission, and Solid Waste Collection;
however, LOS testing for School and Transportation Concurrency found
potential need for mitigation, depending on the redevelopment of the site.
Pursuant to the Preliminary Analysis provided by the Miami -Dade County
Public Schools, existing elementary school capacity would not serve the
proposed change in land use and zoning. The Office of Capital
Improvements determined that there are not enough case studies to truly
determine the impact of the site based on the ITE trip generation.
Criteria 2 Policy LU-1.1.7: "Land development regulations and policies will allow for the
development and redevelopment of well -designed mixed -use neighborhoods
that provide for the full range of residential, office, live/work spaces,
neighborhood retail, and community facilities in a walkable area and that are
amenable to a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism,
bicycles, automobiles, and mass transit."
Analysis 2
The change in FLU designation of the subject parcels from "Major
Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" to "Restricted
Commercial", will allow for the development of a mixed -use neighborhood with
a full range of residential, office, live/work spaces, and neighborhood retail in
a walkable urban setting. The proposed amendment has the potential to
provide an opportunity for economic development with the potential to create
jobs.
Finding 2
Staff finds the proposed amendment consistent with Policies LU-1.1.7
Criteria 3 Policy LU-1.1.3: "The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all
areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the
adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade
public health and safety, or natural or man-made amenities;...Strategies to
further protect existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate
transition standards and buffering requirements will be incorporated into the
City's land development regulations."
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 9
renew Ccde. The api
Policy LU-1.6.9: "The City's land development regulations will est. Deco men
mechanisms to mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of new dev: %.1►l. PZ
on existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate tr.1fr, 01
standards and buffering requirements." k v
Analysis 3
The proposed FLUM Amendment is located in the Miami River Residential
Density Increase Area (RDIA) and the Urban Central Business District
(UCBD) overlay. Development in this area is subject to a maximum residential
Density of 500 du/ac and a Floor Lot Ratio (FLR) of 37 pursuant to both the
Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation and Utilities and Restricted
Commercial FLU designations. The proposed Amendment to Restricted
Commercial would not result in an increase in Density or development
capacity, rather, a broader mix of residential, commercial, and office uses that
are more appropriate given the adjacent context.
Finding 3
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.1.3 and Policy LU-
1.6.9.
Criteria 4
Policy LU-1.1.10 and Policy HO-1.1.9: "The City's land development
regulations will encourage high -density residential development and
redevelopment in close proximity to Metrorail and Metromover stations."
Analysis 4
Due to its proximity to several Miami -Dade Metrorail and Metromover Stations,
the SW 2 Avenue Transit Corridor, and on -street bicycle infrastructure, the
proposed FLUM Amendment has the potential to create multimodal
connections that would encourage residents to walk, bike, and take public
transportation. The proposed FLUM Amendment is located in the Miami River
Residential Density Increase Area (RDIA) which allows a maximum density up
to 500 du/ac in this area of the City. While the Major Institutional, Public
Facilities, Transportation and Utilities FLU allows Residential uses with a
maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential", these
uses are ancillary to the primary uses envisioned by this land use designation.
The proposed Amendment to Restricted Commercial would allow for a broader
mix of high -density residential development that capitalizes on the Property's
proximity to transportation and supports transit -oriented development goals.
Finding 4
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.1.10 and Policy HO-
1.1.9
Criteria 5
Policy TR-1.1.5: "The City will encourage new development to be structured
to reinforce a pattern of neighborhoods and urban centers by focusing growth
along transit corridors and around transit nodes and centers."
Analysis 5
The proposed FLUM Amendment is located in a city -designated Transit
Oriented Development (TOD) area which, due to its proximity to the Third Street
and Riverwalk Metromover Stations and the Government Center Metrorail
Station, has been identified as an area of targeted growth. The SW 2 Avenue
Transit Corridor is also well served by Miami -Dade County Metro Bus 208 and
City of Miami "Coral Way" Trolley.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 10
10 PUBLic
O 1::,:
•^� O c9c
a NOTICEci
This submittal needs to be scheduLee fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
licatfe decision -making bodywill
n at the public hearing to render a
fation or a final decision.
19-4165
/29/19
Finding 5
review bterereco nnaeLn
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy TR-1.1.5
%II PZ-
A
Criteria 6
Policy LU-1.8.2: "The City shall make the practice of adapting the bui 14 m
environment to the impacts of climate change and sea level rise an integ . REV
component of all planning processes..."
Analysis 6
The subject Property is located directly on the Miami River and portions are
contained in the Coastal High Hazard Area, as defined in Coastal Management
Policy CM-4.1.2. This plans for increased risk of inundation from storm surge.
For the sake of a resiliently designed neighborhood, the redevelopment of
properties in the subject area must address the impacts of sea level rise,
including increased storm surge, more frequent tidal flooding, and increased
extreme heat days.
Simultaneously, this amendment, as infill development around the mass transit
system, would help alleviate further development pressures on sensitive
ecosystems outside the urban core.
Finding 6
Staff finds the request consistent with Policy LU-1.8.2 and strongly
encourages the further development of sustainable and resilient design
standards in this flood vulnerable, but central area.
CONCLUSION
Based on Planning staffs analysis of the neighborhood context and the goals and objectives of
the MCNP, the request to amend the FLUM by changing the designation for the property at 444
and 460 SW 2 Avenue, Miami, FL from "Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Transportation
and Utilities" to "Restricted Commercial" is justified. The "Restricted Commercial" FLU
designation would permit uses allowing the proposed Zoning Change companion item (File ID #
2851) to be compatible to the adjacent designations.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above background information, the Planning Department recommends approval
of the request to amend the designation on the FLUM from "Major Institutional, Public
Facilities, Transportation and Utilities" to "Restricted Commercial" for the property located
at 444 and 460 SW 2 Avenue, Miami, FL.
Sue Trone, Al 4 P
Chief of Comp-hensive Planning
Attachments:
Attachment A — Legal Description
Attachment B — Concurrency Management Analysis
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 11
0Re°P
NOTICE
This submittal needs to be schedted fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the city of
licade decision -making body %ill
n al the public hearing to render a
at on or a final decision.
19-4165
/29/19
ATTACHMENT A
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica tie decision-rnaVine body will
renew the information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
TRACTS 1 AND 2, RIVERSIDE PLAZA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 139, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS PARCEL 120, PROJECT 87100-2611, AS DEEDED TO THE
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PER OFFICIAL RECORDS
BOOK 18293, PAGE 1049, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE
COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID LANDS BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 SOUTH 8742'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 7.60 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE THE NEXT FIVE (5) COURSES FOLLOW THE WEST
LINE OF STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PARCEL 120, AS
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 18293, PAGE 1 049, OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA: 1) SOUTH 00.25'14" EAST, 33.79 FEET, 2)
SOUTH 89'31'43" WEST, 21.24 FEET, 3) SOUTH DD'28' 18" EAST, 74.68 FEET, 4) SOUTH
02' 14'29" EAST, 253. 76 FEET, 5) SOUTH 52'33'38" WEST, 63.86 FEET; THENCE THE NEXT
SEVEN (7) COURSES FOLLOW THE WESTERLY LINES OF SAID TRACTS 1 AND 2: 1)
NORTH 45'38'08" WEST, 189.20 FEET, 2) NORTH 65'00'18" WEST, 12.21 FEET, 3) NORTH
45.38'06" WEST, 67.60 FEET, 4) NORTH 47'54'35" WEST, 87.29 FEET, 5) NORTH 38'51'30"
WEST, 126.84 FEET, 6) NORTH 37'04'12" WEST, 61.50 FEET, 7) NORTH 24'34'53" EAST,
159.98 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 2; THENCE THE NEXT SIX
(6) COURSES FOLLOW THE NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID TRACT 2: 1) NORTH 8743'20"
EAST, 212.85 FEET, 2) SOUTH 02'16'40" EAST, 62.86 FEET, 3) SOUTH 42'05'52" EAST,
51.24 FEET, 4) SOUTH 52'11'56" EAST, 62.50 FEET. 5) SOUTH 83'22'20" EAST. 49.68 FEET.
6) NORTH 87'42'53" EAST, 22.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS LYING AND BEING IN THE CITY OF MIAMI, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
CONTAINING 137125 SQUARE FEET (3.15 ACRES), MORE OR LESS.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 12
ATTACHMENT B
CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING
IMPACT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE MAP
PROJECT DETAILS
Project Dox Number:
Date:
Applicant:
PZ-19-2882
3-Jun-19
City of Miami
Address: 444 & 460 SW 2 AV
Boundary Streets: North: SW 3 ST
South: N/A
Existing Future Land Use Designation:
Residential Density: 3.15(acres
Assumed Population
Proposed Future Land Use Designation:
Residential Density 3.15 acres
Assumed Population with Increase
East: SW 2 AV
West N/A
Major Institutional, Public Facilities, Trans
DU/acre 1575 DUs
4425 Persons
Soot
Restricted Commercial
DU/acre 1575 DUs
4425 Persons
500
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION
NET Area
WASD Sewer Pump Station Basin
Moratorium?
Drainage Subcatchment Basin
Downtown-Brickell
Basin 0001-2
No
Ki
RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
Future Land Use Goal LU-1
Future Land Use Objective LU-1.1
Future Land Use Policy LU-1.1.1
Capital Improvements Goal CI-1.2
Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2
Capital Improvements Policy 12.3, a-g
Transportation Objective TR-1.6
Transportation Objective TR-13
This submittal needs to be schedted fora public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica de decision-rnaVine body will
renew the intorrnaton at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS
Increase in Population: 0
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR-1.1.4 requires
a 10-minute (1/2-mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance.
Concurrency Test Result: OK
POTABLE WATER
Level of Service standard: 92.05 GCPD
Transmission potential with FLUM change 407,321
Policy PW-1.2.1
Excess capacity assumed to be 2% after change
Concurrency Test Result: OK
SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION
Level of Service standard: 141 GPCD
Policy SS-1.3.1
Excess capacity: See Note 1 below.
Concurrency Test Result: WASD Permit Required
STORM SEWER CAPACITY
Exfiltration system before change On-sle
Exfiltration system after change On -site
Concurrency Test Result: OK
SOUD WASTE COLLECTION
Solid waste generation, 1.28 tons/resident/yeas 5,664
Excess capacity before change 800
Excess capacity after change 4,864
Concurrency Test Result: OK
TRANSPORTATION
Level of Service standards in Objectives TR-1.6 and TR-1.7
Concurrency Test Result:
NOTES
Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Department (WASD). Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known
Assumed population with increase is assumed to be all new residents as permitted by the proposed future land use designation's base density ascribed
through the Interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map and associated Correspondence Table. Additional density may potentially be attainable subject to
the detailed provisions of applicable land development regulations.
**Transportation Concurrency is addressed in a separate memorandum provided by the Office of Capital Improvements.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 13
F�SW 5TH ST
360 Feet
Prepared by the City d ►femi
Abe 13, 2019
Leeadac N.
ATTACHMENT B1 (PARK LOS)
SW 7TH
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica tie decision-rnaVine body will
renew the information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
SW 2ND ST
SW 3RD ST
1.1 Subject Property
Park
10-Minute Walk Area (Streets)
—1 Park Service Area
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 14
ATTACHMENT B2: SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PRELIMINARY ANAL
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Cede. The applicade decision -making bodywill
renew the inforrnaton al the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
\ PZ-19-4165
A \\ 08/29/19 w
aMiami -Dade County Public Schools iEw
Superintendent of Schools
Alberto M. Carvalho
July 25, 2019
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mr. Andrew Schimmel
Miami Riverside Center
444 SW 2 Ave. Suite #325
MIAMI, FL 33130-1910
aschimmel miamigov.com
RE: PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
MIAMI RIVERSIDE CENTER- 1
PH0119070200373— LOCATED AT 444 SW 2 AVE
FOLIO NO(s) 0141370380020, 0141370380010
Dear Applicant:
Miami -Dade County School Board
Perla Tabards Hammen, Chair
Dr. Martin Karp, Vice Chair
Dr. Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall
Susie V Castillo
Dr Lawrence S. Feldman
Dr. Steve Gallon 111
Lubby Navarro
Dr Marta Perez
Mari Tere Rojas
Pursuant to State Statutes and the Interlocal Agreements for Public School Facility Planning in Miami -Dade
County, the above -referenced application was reviewed for compliance with Public School Concurrency.
Accordingly, enclosed please find the School Districts Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning
Level Review).
As noted in the Preliminary Concurrency Analysis (Schools Planning Level Review), the proposed development
would yield a maximum residential density of 1575 multifamily units, which generate 117 students; 60
elementary, 29 middle and 28 senior high students. At this time, the middle and senior high school levels have
sufficient capacity available to serve the application. However, the elementary school level does not have
sufficient capacity available to serve the application. A final determination of Public School Concurrency and
capacity reservation will only be made at the time of approval of final plat, site plan or functional equivalent,
notwithstanding any additional information that may surface after further departmental research. As such, this
analysis does not constitute a Public School Concurrency approval.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 305-995-4501.
Best regards,
a
Ivan M. Rodfiguez, R.A.
Director
IMR:ir
Enclosure
L-047
cc: Mr. Victor Alonso, R.A.
Ms. Nathaly Simon
City of Miami
School Concurrency Master File
Planning, Design & Sustainabllity
Ms. Ana Rijo-Conde, Deputy Chief Facilities & Eco-Sustainability Officer
1450 N.E. 2nd Ave. • Suite 525 • Miami, FL 33132
305-995-7285 • 305-995-4760 (FAX) •arijo@dadeschools.net
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 15
ATTACHMENT B3: TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY REVIE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY MEMORANDUM
This submittal needs to be scheduled for a public hearing
in accordance with timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Ccde. The applica tie decision-rnaVine body %ill
renew the information at the public hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
TO: Sue Trone DATE: August 20, 2019
Chief Comprehensive
Planning
FILE:
SUBJECT: Transportation Concurrency
for FLUM amendment
REFERENCES: ePlan File ID 19-4165
FROM: Collin Worth ENCLOSURES:
Transportation Analyst
Based on existing and proposed FLR and density for the application for the project
located at 444 SW 2"° Ave, the maximum potential impact as it relates to trip generation
was calculated. While there are not enough case studies to truly determine the impact
to the site based on the ITE trip generation.
Based on this preliminary analysis, additional information is needed to help determine
the impact of this application. At the time of redevelopment a traffic study will be
required. Included in the traffic study should include ways to mitigate the traffic impacts
generated by the site.
e-Plan ID # PZ-19-- Page 16
AERIAL
ePLAN ID: PZ-19-4165
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
w
0
T.
N
0 125 250 500 Feet
111111111
This submittal needs to be scheduled fora public hearing
In accordance wM1h timelines set forth in the City of
Miami Code. The applicade decision -mating bodywill
renew the information at the pubc hearing to render a
recommendation or a final decision.
PZ-19-4165
08/29/19
ADDRESSES: 444 & 460 SW 2 AV
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING)
ePLAN ID: PZ-19-2882
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
N
0 125 250 500 Feet
111111111
ADDRESSES: 444 & 460 SW 2 AV
SUBJECT PROPERTIES
FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED)
ePLAN ID: PZ-19-2882
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Restricted
Commercial
Public
Parks and
Recreation
N
0 125 250 500 Feet
111111111
Major Inst,
Facilities,
ADDRESSES: 444 & 460 SW 2 AV
SUBJECT PROPERTIES