Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Tony Recio-PowerPoint PresentationSubmitted into the public recur for,item(s) on \ City Clerk BUENA .4 VISTA Al ...'S cs.. ..64' iii „le' ,...F. 4.. ,'.,-• .4 N. .r. •"' .. 0.5 NE CA" Awe imr s-9-6 L.13 "te iv ce e- i NE 43. Awe 0 .." 4: BAY POINT .*..' I. NI 4.3.-E Ave . ',.. . 41. NE 41" Ave DESIGN - DISTRICT .1.0 Aae NE 39- Ave MIDTOWN NE 3131.4 Ave 1-195 NE REP Ave EDGEWATER NE 35" Ave 4. PLUSURBIA MAGNOLIA CHANGE OF ZONING TO T6-8-O To Waini Beach JULIA TUTFLE CAUSEWAY 2021 NOVEMBER ois9s L/IfYY)( -709 UcAo 0:11 AY' StAA-7 Submitted into the .iblic recordfor item(s) , on \ Cit Clerk PLANNING ANALYSIS ONE BAY RESIDENCES TOWNHOMES EXIXTING 6 STORIE A MIAMI BAY WATERFRONT ,1410TOWN RESIDENCES [BLUE CONDO i EXISTING 36 STORIES m rs `17,11 60 57D4.'i c _ .11 3801 PROPERTY !— POTENTIAL 213 STORIES • 0 AP' Wa.M.. HAMILTON ON THE BAY EXISTING 27 STORIES POTE1,014.E CO 5 TOMES MCARTHUR PROPER POTENTIAL 2I:) STORIES 4,10 IPT -3e" - 'd -10Prtk- -410 a. DESIGN DISTRICT PROPOSED 36 STORIES Submitted into the recor foi item(s) on App. or,J PP.5171, ffin..9(.5-(0071. MAGNOLIA PARK 1914 PLAT on top of the Buena Vista Plot 1 f_s NORTH DRIVE 4�m I -I. 1 a4 • a 4 81iUVI, 1'.f•� .O Ot 1Vr-74 li1lrlrnUL11R1 0� ;PI IF- • a ▪ =Cg♦r@''�1e gqMl�j4�Y��CD �1�YYR (pp}Qif p•Sb•� i�lG`5C1'O la PS • •. . , • •• ' { •fir anarramaaay .ram• „� , �" ▪ " �• ,.: j. �� •,xt.n ^ r . I:f Submitted into the public, record for items) IA 1 City Clerk on MAGNOLIA PARK 1914 PLAT an top of the Buena Vrsra Plat ie - 7M- 6QIvt —.. +...... T� . - " MIIWilli 4@7 CI I tli I'milIi Mill. - —r . i', IIt11111timumninii '• a: ._ 4. ._ I : I'_` •::y. CCD7OMrM01111LR ►LILT M' 0'14. MAGNO M PARK Submitted into the public recor for item(s) . City leek Submitted into the ,ublie record for, ferns) on MAGNOLIA PARK 1914 PLAT on top• o; the Bieno Visro Piot City lerk ..*".1,41Lsere v It — ‹ .,.. L., • • 7a.iforro • " 510.11110 s Men ‘011ta' • coo 14.411ti P•10•111 il 1 i it. IP • I . i . : —I. ". ''.. • . Pt ::',...... 4 r i sur. F.- .... • LA . • —r • , Submitted into the public reecr forern(s) on City tlerk II I d B SMOIRSIP C • D efini Lel v DIiriig A in ano0A ` D .114giffibia • ) i 4'1"") Submitted into the public recur for item(s) an ,`\Q17 City Clerk no Vista Plat Submitted into the public recorck for "tem(s) on SMART PLAN an top of the Buena Vista Plat The plan is comprehensive, proactive and supports the future population and employment growth anticipated in our region. The goal is to make Miami -Dade County a car -optional community by ensuring that mass -transit options are available everywhere in the County and region. The Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) contains directives to promote urban centers in places where mass transit, roadways, and highway are highly accessible. LU-7 states: "Miami -Dade County shall require all new development and redevelopment in existing and planned transit corridors and urban centers to be planned and designed to promote transitoriented development (TDD), and transit use, which mixes residential, retail, office, open space and public uses in a pedestrian friendly environment that promotes the use of rapid transit services." i City Jerk SMART PLAN on top of the Buena 'Vista Piot The pion is comprehensive, proactive and supports the future population and employment growth anticipated in our region. The goal is to make Miami -Dade County a car -optional community by ensuring that mass -transit options are available everywhere in the County and region. The Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP) contains directives to promote urban centers in places where mass transit, roadways, and highway are highly accessible. LU-7 states: "Miami -Dade County shall require all new development and redevelopment in existing and planned transit corridors and urban centers to be planned and designed to promote transitoriented development (T©D), and transit use, which mixes residential, retail, office, open space and public uses in a pedestrian friendly environment that promotes the use of rapid transit services." wS, yr.sr er Submitted into the ublie tr recgrfor i em(s) 1 5 4- on11,( x`, • City Clerk i', '� P1 i` �ii� .eawiit ti ! 1 - - 1 ti 14 i$E 1 .9 .. ' ^ 6 1Al 1 1,411 1e" .71rwner�ti-s 4 64'1.11ll�l d. maimgAMMI16,11 S. UM Mut -.wit INN MO 6•6111 /1 AUaaliII r4 rJ"3 b r!t A or no a7 ...T al Mil In. 'ET ZIP r4# Mal Tier I-1515, -made SMART Plan ,:corridor Land Use Map Dade Counly rP 1 II ilow Land Use Hob-MWe mew — Bewl iCanlrler menciestations av rkrorut Misr Minds Stele -Fan* 1rm.Feer ft M Maine Hone Parks _ iewmeasee l♦ LowiMuld-:eroRr l♦ MO -Density r AMR14F•City Owned Molq+g - ►sItserel rl.roiar-Lpetla9disi D-keen, WSW 11. Co ,. s+maag Genesee. Sinau s m. Mara Use.BussesslivoSerzx - b,sGW.4na: `mau trier E traction rmwa r Mears es axe tm d use - Isfuaner i1eng:e. Coen —ewe] Corxrpeourrr.'sne or MIAM121 Transit Oriented Development PRINCIPLES: New Development should be structured to reinforce a pattern of Neighborhoods and urban centers, focusing growth at transit nodes rather than along Corridors. (21.3.1 The Crdy - Guiding Principles) PRINCIPLES: Neighborhoods and Urban centers should be compact, pedestrian -oriented and Mixed- Use. Density and Intensity of Use should relate to degree of transit service. (2.1.3.2 The Community - Guldmg Principles) INTENT. Rebuilding the City's commercial Corridors to function as Mixed -Use, transit -oriented, walkable centers for adjacent Residential Neighborhoods (2.1.2 latent) t METROVVL FLrrurcf NETRORAIL METTIOAX}VFJR 6,1* ROOTS HEALTH OZTRICr TOR HEALTH DICTIRCTsrOPZ ruTurm TRAM= 1'2MILE Trougsrr 1u.' MLE PSDESTRIAAI SHED Submitted into the ublic s.c recor for item(s) ' 4- on -,-- City Clerk %ate +e• Oimar Warm 2 Y 703 Dtagrim is nna.n'anRd n tie Office ad AR Ci v C ieie LJ :E 41,1,1 r� C 41ri1 OJ r:L 369) St 1// 11it + io"' / t 11 r1 i ' - i I I 1 a ir Ili II I iti if i L IP IP' 1 1.1-3---' : IJ I � iiilIF _ J�� r P-il rn r 10 * Source: As presented for Design District SAP Amendment o Submitted into the .ub)ic record or it m(s) on City Clerk ■ ExtsTING S PROPOSED ▪ SUS STOR II TROLLEY STOP • UBER PICKUP L. BIKE LADIES 0 b.W5 ON RAMP �` GRADUAL TRANSITION T'r # NU 'T ORIENTED Proposed Gradual f Transitional Zoning Existing Zoning T6-3 1 1 1 1 I" Mk s T6-24 . 1 1 1 1 1 L En DESIGN DISTRICT 36 STORIES T6-8 Submitted into the public recor for "tem(s) 't.,I on \\ ,. City clerk MIAMI 21 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SUCCESSIONAL CI-IANGE EMERGES FROM A VISION OF THE LARGER URBAN CONTEXT AND APPROPRIATE TRANSITIONS ACROSS TRANSECT ZONES. DESIGN DISTRICT 20 STORIES cirl FROM THE M1AM727 CODE VOLUME i L ARPCLE 2. GENERAL PRDVTS ONS. P. 11.7. MAY 19, 2077 Gendle Zoning Increments E 0 T4 TOBAY P+ T I GRADUAL TRANSITION TRANSIT ORIENTED Proposed Gradual / TflncitijnaI inning T6-12 s Existing Zoning DESIGN DISTRICT SAP 36 STORIES 1 1 1 1 T6-12 1 1 1 1 Submitted into the 1putilic record for item(s) ors \\\LS City Clerk MIAMI 21 GUIDING PRINCIPLES T6-8 11.1 73EFPF IERi MAGNOLIA 1 NM MN IMPROVING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND ADJACENT COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS WITH APPROPRIATE TRANSITIONS OF DENSITY AND HEIGHT 1FOLLOWING THE THEORY OF THE TRANSECT. JJ 1 THE M Nff 21 CODE. r LIME01. ARTFCLE2. GENERA! PROVfS! NVS, P. fI.7. MAY 19, 2017, T5 1NTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ANAL YSIS FOR REZONING CRITERIA 3 Are the proposed changes related to adjacent and nearby districts. and within the scale and needs of the neighborhood? IC U ANALYSIS "(...) the change of zoning from T5-R to T6-8-O represents an intrusion of incompatible uses and density within an established low rise residentially zoned area. ]n that. the proposed zoning will allow a litany of commercial uses by - right or through special permit that are currently not allowed coupled with more than doubling the density from 65 units per acre to 150 units per acre." "(...) when one assesses the rezoning within the context of the subject properties located east of Biscayne Boulevard and north of 1-195, the change of zoning disrupts the existing transitional nature of the area. The prevailing transect zones are of a residential character oriented in a cohesive successional pattern that flows from 1-195 northward T 5-R, T4-R, and T3-R. The transect zones respectfully allow low-rise residential, townhome, and single-family without any mixed -use elements". "(...) the proposed T6-8-O will introduce commercial uses within the well - established residential area that constitute an inconsistency with the urban fabric of the area and represents an intrusion of uses incompatible with neighborhood context (... )" STAFF RECITAL The requested rezoning represents an intrusion of higher density and intensity in the area. The change of zoning allots opportunity to produce a development out of scale with the area that adversely impacts traffic conditions Iow-rise and single family characteristic of the area. Staff deems this rezoning request as inappropriate and inconsistent with current urban fabric of the area. Submitted into the public recor for 'tem(s) '5 on �k 1'`: t" City Cerk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS This application considers the realities and dynamics of a changing transit served area as well as the adjacencies to the development already approved and built (T5-12, 24, 36}. The scale of the proposed development is consistent with the conditions of the surrounding districts and will allow this area to continue to transition into a TOO. As shown, there is no well "established Iow-rise residential" in this area. Commercial parking surface lots and mid -rise buildings already exist to the north and by approving this application a better defined transition will be established. The protection of the T3 (Bay Point) occurs at the edge of the neighborhood, north of NE 39th street (5 story Mt1SP). The neighborhood is zoned T4 and T5. Scale transitions should be considered based on the existing and planned development. Not the existing zoning. No Single Family Residential Zoning remains In the area south of Say Point. crrabuac rwa,vsrnav T'.' NS!T OR(EENTED MIRAN Z1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES gisuc63sfoRR.L CHANGE EMERGES FROM A VISION OF THE LARGER URBAN CON CC. ANC APPROPRIATE TRANSITIONS ACROSS. TRANSECT ZONE& aRT,LIICAP,AAC i! ANALYSIS FOR REZONING CRITERIA 4 a Ex The proposed change maintains the same or similar population density pattern and thereby does not increase or overtax the load on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. ANALYSIS The requested rezoning entails significant increase, in the number of units allowed and therefore Iaad on public facilities such as schools, utilities, streets, etc. The change of zoning inflates the density by more than double the existing, density of 65 units per acre to 150 units per acre. STAFF RECITAL The proposed change of zoning constitutes an increase in Density and Intensity within well -established TS Transept Cone_. Therefore, the change of zoning to T6-8-0 is inconsistent with the establish area. Submitted into the public reco for 'Wills)C t"`3 �k on City Jerk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS The existing zoning in the pedestrian shed as drawn from the Miami 21 future TOIL is 90% commercial zoning (including this property). Allowing commercial uses and additional density within pedestrian access to 3 existing Transit Oriented Corridors and a future Transit Station (proposed and shown on previous approved zoning changes) will support ridership. Further. it is consistent with the Miami2l and the Miami Weighborhood Comprehensive Plan (2.1.2 Purpose and Intent. and 2,1.3 TransectPrinciples). And the MCNP's Policy TR-1.1.4 - The City will implement growth strategies that encourage inlil!and redevelopment in order to take advantage of the multimodal transportation options available. thereby reducing the dependency on automobiles for new developments. I! NIL ! tit w� lire i ps RAMP ■. 11 .— 11 —. .a— sk .I ANALYSIS FOR REZONING CRITERIA 5 CRITERIA It is difficult to find other adequate sites in the surrounding area for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. ANALYSIS STAFF RECITAL The subject properties are buildable. Staff Ls unaware of any hardship or conditions that prevent the applicant to be able to design and built a development that complies with Miami 21 Code. The current zoning allows the same building disposition and configuration as the proposed T-6-8-0 with a maximum Height of 5- stories and 65 units per acre. Even though a nonconforming parking lot abuts the subject properties to the north, the current zoning maximum height and density represents ideal transit with the T4-R Transect Zone of the pa reel north of the area of the request. Not granting the rezoning does not entail any limitation to the property owner to fully develop the site under the existing transect code. Submitted into the ublic recorcj fos-tem(s) 3 1- 0 City Clerk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS Built infrastructure around the site makes a 5 story building impracticable due to road improvements that abut this property: a <10 foot retaining wail to the south I-195 and to the west (on -ramp) and and high speed 3 lane traffic off ramp to the north (NE 38th Street), T6-80 would result in a development above a parking podium, elevating habitable uses above the onslaught of traffic_ A TS designation would render the development unfeasible, as habitable uses would only result in a maximum of 2 habitable floors. The T4 designation to the north is inconsistent with the goals of the Miami21 given the existing transit service- Its adjacency to T6-12 also creates a dysfunctional zoning transition. Further existing 5 story development to the north defeats any transitional argument gradually lower in height and density to the T3 neighborhood {Bay Point;. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS CRITERIA 9 Policy LU-1.1.3: 'The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public healfh and safety ... Strategies to further protect existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements will be incorporated into the City's land development regulations." ANALYSIS Staff conducted a site visit to the properties during a weekday afternoon. Staff observed a traffic condition that is not conducive for the introduction of commercial uses to the area_ With commercial, retail, and office uses comes many short in -and - out trips that could create a conflict with the high speed traffic exiting the 1-195 off - ramp onto PIE 38 St. In addition, the traffic pattern around the block does not provide the network flexibility required to increase development capacity for this area. Furthermore. with multiple parks nearby, the area is well suited for the residential character the neighborhood already has. The potential for a completely commercial. retail, or office development would not be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. STAFF RECITAL Staff finds the request inconsistent with Policy LU-1.1.3 Submitted into the p b is recor for item(s) on City erk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS The application proposes to improve the network flexibility providing additional sidewalk width and improving vehicular circulation as well as rerouting traffic to improve circulation for the entire neighborhood and the Design District, The provision of "multiple parks nearby" are a specially strong argument to increase density and intensity in the area. These_ currently underutilized and disconnected, parks can be improved and serve residents better with better connectivity and people around them. Development near these facilities should be encouraged. To ensure Parks and open space in the City of Miami are successful proximity to a variety of uses is paramount to ensure they serve as many people as possible within walking distance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS CRITERIA 2 Policy LU-1.6.9: 'The City's land development regulations will establish mechanisms to mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of new development on existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements." ANALYSIS Based on the physical configuration of the properties. it would not be possible to develop appropriate transitions between the subject properties and their neighbors. The proposed amendment would introduce uses that are incompatible with the immediately abutting properties in a manner that would make transition standards insufficient for mitigating any potential negative impacts. STAFF RECITAL Staff finds the request inconsistent with Policy LU-1.6.9 Submitted into the blic recta for ` em(s) on Vt. City erk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS Policy LU-1.6.9 that protects neighborhoods should be assessed based on the merit of the existing character and wether they are intact to provide a cohesive pattern. In this case, this neighborhood is no fonger a low -scale residential neighborhood and its surroundings create the benchmark to heal its edge conditions. This Policy should also be considered together with: Policy LU-1.1.11: (...) the City will encourage the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity (...) Policy T€i-2.7.6: The City will work with Miami -Dade County to promote the transit- oriented development (TOD) policies found in the Miami -Dade County's Comprehensnre Development Master Plan (CDMP) (...) And Miami Dade County's OBJECTIVE LLI-7• Miami -Dade County shall require all new development and redevelopment in existing and planned transit corridors and urban centers to be planned and designed to promote transit -oriented development (TOD), and transit use, which mixes residential, retail, office, open space and public uses in a safe, pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment that promotes mobility for people of aft ages and abilities ■ r 41 / • f 1•1' ' ' t yi tar" COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS CRITERIA 3 `Z Policy LU-1.6.10: ' The City's land development regulations and policies will allow CC for the provision of safe and convenient an -site traffic flow and vehicle parking and tom.. will provide access by a variety of transportation modes, including pedestrianism, EZ bicycles, automobiles, and transit." U ANALYSIS The proposed amendment is close to a number of transit corridors and a potential fixed rail transit facility in the Midtown area. Higher density, mixed- use development meets the intent of the MCNP as it provides more housing opportunities near dedicated transit. However. the immediate street network of the block is not conducive for absorbing more density than is already allowed, as the network is not permeable. There are restrictive traffic flows, converging with the off-loading traffic from the Julia Tuttle Causeway. STAFF RECITAL Staff finds the request inconsistent with Policy LU-1.9.10 Submitted into the ublic record for item(s) on City Clerk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS This application proposes improvements to traffic around itself to improve existing conditions and mitigate potential future demand. Further, if approved, it will improve walkability and provide a variety of uses accessible by residents in the area. Submitted into the p lie record for item(s) OE City Clerk TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Submitted into the public record for item(s) on ) 0 \ \ 2 j IMMEDIATE AREA City lerk XJr91 urn PROPOSED, MIXED IJSS 36 STORIES 1.2 MILLION SQFT PROJECT MAGNDtT PROPERTY • EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (Resrden+t' concerns) CONCERNS 1. Limited capacity to move traffic north. south and west; combination west/north slows traffic movement. 2. Westbound traffic often crosses double yellow to access on -ramp creating hazardous conditions, 3. Current traffic direction creates hazardous conditions for all traffic attempting to move westbound on 38th Street. 4. Drivers seeking northbound Biscayne Boulevard use alley as a shortcut to circumvent traffic. Submitted into the public recur+: for `tem(s) �- an l City leak S. Drivers seeking northbound Biscayne Boulevard use 39th Street as a shortcut to circumvent traffic. 6. Drivers seeking southbound Biscayne Boulevard use 37th Street as a shortcut to circumvent traffic adding to issues to conflict point #3. 7. Numerous ingress and egress curbs cuts [highlighted in C ] create traffic conflict with incoming speedy trafFc. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (Residents' Concerns) CONCERNS 1. Limited capacity to move traffic north, south and west: combination west/north slows traffic movement. 2. Westbound traffic often crosses double yellowto access on -ramp creating hazardous conditions. 3. Current traffic direction creates hazardous conditions for all traffic attempting to move westbound on 38th Street. 4. Drivers seeking northbound Biscayne Boulevard use alley as a shortcut to circumvent traffic. Submitted into the ublic I recoil or item(s) -�- can t . CityClerk 5. Drivers seeking northbound Biscayne Boulevard use 39th Street as a shortcut to circumvent traffic. 6. Drivers seeking southbound Biscayne Boulevard use 37th Street as a shortcut to circumvent traffic adding to issues to conflict point #3. 7. Numerous ingress and egress curbs cuts [highlighted in ] create traffic conflict with incoming speedy traffic. CONCEPTUAL, TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS 1•'ase MAJOR TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS a RNEWAY ELIMINATED IMMEDIATE TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES 1. Creation of multiple dedicated westbound traffic lanes, including dedicated West, two -tames dedicated North and tow - time dedicated South. 2. Elimination of possibility of crossing median to access on - ramp. 3. Elimination of perpendicular westbound median crossover, 4. Elimination of vehicles seeking shortcut to northbound on 1 l k \-2- Submitted into the ublie recur for items)4 Z City lerk Biscayne Boulevard. S. Elimination of vehicles seeking shortcut to northbound Biscayne Boulevard. 6. Elimination of vehicles seekingsouthbound Biscayne Boulevard shortcut. 7. Overall permanent elimination of multiple curb cuts (ingress and egress) along 38th Street. MAGNOLIA LAND DEDICATION 0 MAIOR TRAFFIC IM MOVEMENTS LAND DEDICATION Submitted into the }public record or it (s) 4 p on 1 \ City C_erk SITE JMPROVEMENTS Donation of ±8 Feet (2,40D 5F approx.) of property to public right-of-way to add lane of traffic, median, and improve circulation around the site. SECTION PHASE 1 (Looking West, Southside property only) Proposed Building Magnolia Development PROPOSED SECTION (Possible future development scenaria].'Conceptual araxingrrencleruag Submitted into the ,ublic record "or It m(s) on i - City Jerk Existing Building 3801 Biscayne Building Submitted into the plic recurs. for 'tern(s) on l City Clerk TRAFFIC ANALYSIS BEFORE Submitted into the p ` he record for'tem(s) on PROPGSEJ PLAN V1EW jlNFO MAT[ON PRaV1DE1? P.TRhYY1( ENGINEER] AFTER City Clerk Capacity Increase AM = 397 Vehicles/hour Capacity Increase PM = 617 Vehicleslhour (32 more cars per cycle 11 19 more carsAl41 peak) 1,270 feet of additional stacking 1 queuing westbound (50 more vehicles per signal cycle) (on NE 38th Street and Biscayne Boulevard) Submitted into the public recorq foritem(s) -3 PROPOSED PLAN VIEW (INFORMATION PROVIDED BY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, City Clerk TRAFFIC IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS CONCEPT I CONCEPT CONCEPT Submitted into the recoar for'tem(s) TABLE la - Concept 1 Trip Generation Summary (Proposed Uses) Magnolia Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Tetat Trips Inbound Outbound Total Trips Inbound Outbound Retail Multifamily (Mid rase) 12,000 220 736 1,003 32 85 19 20 _ `3 65 89 86 45 52 45 34 Subtotal 1,739 117 39 78 175 97 79 Pass -by (Ret--34%) -250 -1 : -6 -4 -30 -15 -15 External Tripe 1,489 106 33 74 145 82 64 Source: ITE TO Generation Adenural (111h Edition) TABLE 1b-Concept2 Trip Generation Summary, (Proposed Uses) Magnolia Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Tripe Inbound Outbound Total Trips Inbound Outbound Rea i General Office 15.01)0 50,000 863 635 38 92 54 23 81 12 15 11 42 104 93 59 52 16 36 52 77 23 Multifamily (Mid Fase) 150 669 Subtotal 2,167 184 116 68 256 104 152 Pass -by (Ret-34%) -293 -13 -8 -5 -35 -18 -18 External Trips 1,874 171 108 63 221 86 134 Sourt:e: ITE Trip Generation Irarruat (17lh Edrtorrj TABLE lc - Concept 3 Trip Generation Summary (Proposed Uses) Magnolia Land Use Size Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total Trips Inbound Outbound Total Trips Inbound Outbound Retail 21.000 25,000 1,116 347 550 47 51 43 28 45 10 ' 9 n 33 132 53 49 66 0 30 66 44 19 General Office Multifamily (Mid Rise) 125 Subtotal 2,013 141 83 58 234 105 129 Pass -by (Ret. 34%) -379 -16 -10 -6 -45 -22 -22 External Trips 1,634 125 73 52 189 83 107 Source: ITE TO Generation It43rruat (11th Edition) Submitted into the iubtic reco . for items ;r 4 0n PROPOSED CONTRIBUTION TO TRAFFIC CAPACITY City ierk T-5-R Development Allowed T6-8-0 Development Allowed Change Traffic trips .Associated With Change Capacity Created by Road Improvements Net Capacity Remaining AM PM AM PM AM PM Residential 90 150 60 22 24 397 617 375 593 Office 0 50,000 50,000 92 93 397 617 305 524 Commercial 0 15,000 15,000 38 104 397 617 359 513 Total Floor Area 241,492 __ 377,331 135,839 152 221 397 617 21S 396 TOTAL: 252 n_ 22! 397 617 245 I 396 T•54t Developrneit Allowed T€43-0 Development Allowed Change Traffic trips Associated With Change Capacity Created by Road Improvements Net Capacity Remaining AM PM AM PM AM PM Residential 90 220 130 46 51 397 617 35! 566 Office 0 0 - 0 0 397 617 397 617 Commercial 0 12,000 12,000 32 89 397 617 365 528 Total Floor Area 241,492 377,331 135,839 78 _ 140 397 617 319 477 TOTAL: 78 140 '397 617 319 477 T•5,R Development Allowed T6-8-0 Development Allowed Change Traffic trips Associated With Change Capacity Created by Road Improvements Net Capacity Remaining A141 PM AM PM AM PM Residential 90 125 35 13 14 397 617 _ 384 603 Office 0 25,000 25,000 _ 5! 53 397 617 346 564 Commercial 0 21,000 21,000 47 132 397 617 350 485 Total Floor Area 241,492 377,331 135,839 111 199 397 617 286 418 TOTAL.711. 199 397 617 418 Submitted into the public Oil record or i ern(s)_49 City Clerk SUMMARY Submitted into the public record or i rn(s) -4-/ City CI - CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARY STAFF RECITAL APPLICANT'S FINDINGS MET? CRITERIA 1 Minimum size: 40K sq ft or 200 ft of frontage Exceeds minimum size (approximately 60k sq ft) YE CRITERIA 2 Successional Zoning Requested T6-6 is successional YES CRITERIA 3 Appropriate scale for neighborhood: relationship to nearby districts Transition between T6-12-1_ and T6-12 DDSAP at 36 stories to west to T5 to east, and from T6-24 to south to commercial parking to north: Property is bounded by three state highways YES CRITERIA 4 sufficient public facilities to meet new demand Stairs own words in their Comprehensive Plan analysis confirms all YES levels of service are met CRITERIA 5 Adequacy of site Three FDOT roads surround property; a parking garage podium is far snore compatible with I-195 elevation (al or above first three stories) than habitable spaces in five -story building YES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT - FUTURE LAND USE MAP STAFF RECITAL Submitted into the record t r.it rrt(s) on 1\ 11 uhlic24_ City Clerk APPLICANT'S FINDINGS MET? CRITERIA 1 Appropriate Transitions/Encroachment of Incompatible uses. Transition between T6-12-L and T6-12 DDSAP with 36 stories to west to TS to east, and from T6-24 to south to commercial parking to north; Addresses traffic mitigation through dedication: commercial parking directly across the street to the north YES CRITERIA 2 Mitigation for adverse impacts Transitions where none currently exist: traffic mitigation YES CRITERIA 3 Traffic flow and variety of transportation modes 'Walking distance from three transit corridors; walking distance from planned drain stop, proposed dedication to advance expansion of NE 38th Street YES CRITERIA 4 Traffic flow and variety of transportation modes Staff Report con5rrns all levels of service are met; Applicant is nevertheless proffering dedication to expand NE 381/' Street YES / GRADUAL TRANSITION TRANSIT ORIENTED f ev. MIAMI 21 GUIDING PRINCIPLES '� IMPROVING THE RELATIONSHIPS/BETWEEN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND ADJACENT COMMERCIAL/ CORRIDORS WITH APPROPRIATE TRANSITIONS OF DENSITY AND HEIGHT FOLLOWING THE ii-HEORY OF THE TRANSECT. ! 1NTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Jai EMAM121 CUD,. o. AR71CLE2, G ERA! PROV1SiONS, P, 11.7. MAY 19, 2017. 1 1 1 1 1 p5 / T6-36 T6-24 MAGNOLLA. T6-12 1 Submitted into the reccrdL for'tem(s) on City r T6-12 Proposed Gradual 1 Transitional Zoning r 1 rtlitC17116:11171 DESIGN DISTRICT SAP I IN Ex sung Zoning Submitted into the pit reccrc for i m(s) on tic City C1 +,pPLUSURBIA 1385 Coral Way, PH 401 1 Miami, FL 33t45 inforg,plusurbia.com 1 +1 305 444 4850 This document was prepared for Magnolia Holdings( die Clairol Tres dooumene was prepared and designed by Plusflrbia Design •C, 2021 PhrsUrbia LLC-881 rights reserve L Same images 1.1sonodh,ain. are not the prawn,. of PlooLhtaa or affixes, andrvf be sutiool to renao copyright W'h mop o Brie,