Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUpdated Staff Analysis (Presented to HEPB on December 3, 2019)City of Miami HEPB Resolution Enactment Number: HEPB-R-19-061 City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com File Number: 6082 Final Action Date:12/3/2019 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD ("HEPB") DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT TO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ON A PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2167 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133, WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICT — 60 AND THE SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE SCENIC TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR. WHEREAS, Coconut Grove Park Holdings, Inc. ("Applicant") applied to the City of Miami ("City") for a Special Certificate of Approval for developmental impact to significant environmental features on a property located at approximately 2167 South Bayshore Drive ("Property"), which is located within Environmental Preservation District - 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, and thus subject to Chapter 17, Article II of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the City Historic Preservation Division reviewed the requested Certificate of Approval for the Property and recommended to the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board ("HEP") approval with conditions of the Special Certificate of Approval, as described in the Staff Analysis attached and incorporated as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the HEPB held a duly noticed public hearing on the Special Certificate of Approval for the Property and reviewed same; and WHEREAS, there was a motion to approve during the public hearing that resulted in a tie vote of the HEPB members, which shall be construed as a denial pursuant to the HEPB Office Rules of Procedure; and WHEREAS, for the reasons stated on the record and as supported by the evidence presented at all hearings in this matter and other evidence in the record, the HEPB denies the requested Special Certificate of Approval for the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The Historic and Environmental Preservation Board ("HEPB") for the reasons stated on the on the record and as supported by the evidence presented at all hearings in this matter and other evidence in the record, denies the requested Special Certificate of Approval for developmental impact to significant environmental features on the Property located at City of Miami Page 1 of 2 File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: 12/17/2019 approximately 2167 South Bayshore Drive ("Property"), which is located within Environmental Preservation District - 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, pursuant to Chapter 17, Article II of the City Code. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. THIS DECISION •IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED IN THE HEARING BOARDS DIVISION WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS. lU. Preservation Officer Date / I STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE ) Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority,\NCt it 9A •IslacinA5 Preservation Officer of the City of Miami, Florida, and acknowledges that s/he executed the foregoing Resolution. SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS n DAY OF 'Dec . , 201 (.1 fect-i'►-"yz AtL.jGvY`2 Print Notary Name Personally know or Produced I.D. Type and number of I.D. produced Did take an oath or Did not take an oath Notary Public State of Florid My Commission Expires: BEATRIZALVAREZ Commission # GG 153775 • _._.Qi Expires November20, 2021 •°FOF p • •'' Bonded Thru Troy Fain Insurance 800385.7019 City of Miami Page 2 of 2 File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: 12/17/2019 nt. City of Miami Planning Department Historic Preservation Division ANALYSIS FOR SPECIAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL APPLICANT: Ethan Wasserman, Greenberg Traurig FILE ID: PZ-19-3159 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2167 S Bayshore Dr ZIP: 33133 NET OFFICE: Coconut Grove HEARING DATE: 12/3/2019 COMMISSION DISTRICT: District 2 (Ken Russell) STATUS: Individually Designated TDR ELIGIBLE: No A. GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Pursuant to Section 17-33 of the City Code of Ordinances, as amended, the Applicant is requesting a Special Certificate of Approval for site improvements at a public parks and recreation site located on a parcel zoned T3-R "Sub -Urban Transect Zone The subject property is an individually designated site, known as Villa Woodbine. It is located in the John T. Peacock Estate and the Coconut Grove Net Area. The site is approximately the third parcel located on the northeast tercile of SW 22 AVE and South Bayshore Dr. (Complete legal description is on file with Hearing Boards) Folio: 0141150100111 Lot Size: Approximately 145,553 sq. ft. B. BACKGROUND: On September 12,1974 the City of Miami passed Ordinance 8301 (Attachment "A"). The Ordinance created a new section of Code allowing for the environmental preservation of areas with extensive tree canopy, scenic routes, unique geological formations and other significant environmental features; and providing for special review procedures and outlining a process for publicly identifying and preserving environmentally significant sites or areas. On April 11th, 1975 the City of Miami passed Resolution 75-370, designating Environmental Preservation District — 60, which contains 2167 S Bayshore Dr. (Attachment "B") On November 17, 1976 the City of Miami passed Resolution 76-955. This Ordinance declared South Bayshore Drive from Alatka Street to 27th Avenue in the Coconut Grove area of Miami as a scenic transportation corridor (Attachment"C") This item came before the Board on September 27th, 2019. The item was continued to allow the applicant time to address City Staffs and the Board Members' concerns with the project,, The applicant has submitted plans -on ~a Landscape -Buffer, a study on the current coral rock system; -a — ---1 viewing platform to enhance the Silver Bluff, and plans for the preservation of Tree #460. C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The subject property is located within Environmental Preservation District — 60, the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, and the John T Peacock Subdivision, Pursuant to Goals NR- 1 and NR-1.3. of the Miami Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan, the City will maintain, preserve, enhance and restore the quality of natural resources within the context of the city's urban environment by reviewing development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features. The Applicant is requesting demolition, restoration, alteration, and new construction. The request is found to be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. D. PHOTOGRAPHS: Current Design Proposed Design: Landscape Plan: SYMBOL LEGEND Q Tree to Relocate Tree to Remain 0 Tree to Remove Tree to Remove (Prohibited Speaes) Free Tree to Remove Fruit Tree to Remain ()Tree protection zone Silver Bluff Detail: ttar:MAKkEt SECTION 2 E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: ZONING Subject Property T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone NCD-3 Surrounding Properties FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION Single -Family Residential Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre NORTH: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential NCD-3 Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre SOUTH: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential NCD-3 Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre EAST: CS: Civic Space Zone Public Parks & Recreation N/A WEST: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential NCD-3 Maximum of 9 all per acre F. ANALYSIS: The following is a review of the request pursuant to Section17-33 of the City Code of Ordinances, The General Information and Comprehensive Plan section of this report is hereby incorporated into the analysis and its corresponding criteria by reference, Analysis: The Applicant is proposing demolition, restoration, alteration, and new construction. The subject property is located within Environmental Preservation District — 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, Environmental preservation districts are geographical areas, parcels or corridors, which have been or may be identified, are established by the city commission as significant natural or manmade attributes in need of preservation and control because of their educational, economic, ecological and environmental importance to the welfare of the general public and the city as a whole. Scenic transportation corridors are those roadways identified by city commission resolution as having a unique landscape, an expansive tree canopy and/or unique landscape features that is of substantial environmental or scenic importance to residents and visitors. The subject property contains environmentally significant features. The significant features of this property, protected by the Environmental Preservation District and the Scenic Transportation Corridor, are the Historic Coral Rock Walls, the Silver Bluff, and the trees. As part of the Applicant's proposed plans they are requesting to remove trees, alter the historic coral rock walls in multiple points on -site and cover the Silver Bluff with a deck overlooking the proposed pool. Historic Coral Rock Walls: There are coral rock walls fronting S. Bayshore Drive and Tigertail Avenue. Sections of the coral rock wall at the entrances will be dismantled and rebuilt to allow for the required visibility triangles. This alteration can be supported by Staff as the alteration is minor and all materials will be reused in the proposed design. Two coral rock walls run through the site. A section of the southern Wall will be demolished to allow for access to the auditorium building, This proposal can be supported by Staff. The application proposes the demolition of a section of the northern coral rock wall. This can be supported by Staff as this is required for vehicular access to the drop-off point. The previous version of this Staff report stated that the plans -proposed the demolition of a further two sections of the coral rock wall to accommodate two projecting sections of the new main building. The applicant has made clear on the plans that this is not occurring, and no portion of the wall will be removed for the main building. The demolition plan indicates that all coral rock removed from walls will be salvaged and reused on -site, Silver Bluff: The Applicant is proposing to place a deck connecting from the proposed auditorium building to the pool, The new deck is depicted as covering the Silver Bluff. The Applicant depicts a cantilevered deck that is to cover the Silver Bluff so that the foundations do no disturb the Silver Bluff. Sec. 17-36 of the City Code of Ordinances, as amended, provides review standards for development activity in environmental preservation districts. These standards state that development should 1. Preserve the natural environmental character of all sites, insofar as practical, by minimizing removal of trees or other significant environmental features. 2. Preserve or enhance existing topography and natural land features wherever possible, 5. Maintain the continuity of Landscape material and spacing characteristic of the surrounding area or scenic corridor. If the development occurs along a designated scenic corridor, the principal natural landscape or manmade elements which form the visual boundaries or enclosing space of the corridor shall be preserved, insofar as possible. Staff finds that the proposed plan to cover the Silver Bluff is in compliance with Sec. 17-36 of the City Code. The applicant proposes to include an educational viewing platform in the cantilevered deck to see the Silver Bluff below. This will enhance the natural features and feature the Silver Bluff as a learning opportunity for future generations. Trees: As seen on plan sheets L-01 and L-02, the applicant is proposing the removal of one - hundred -and -thirteen (109) trees. Each of these meets the criteria to be considered a "Tree" as defined within Sec, 17-2, Of these trees, fifty-two (52) are categorized as a "Prohibited tree species" as defined within Sec.17-2, which must be removed from the site upon development, as mandated by Sec 17-37(b). The remaining trees slated for removal are either listed as being in poor condition, or are located within the footprint of the new development. These reasons are in accordance with Sec. 17-34, Of the proposed removals, twelve (11) meet the criteria to be considered a "Specimen tree", as defined by Sec, 17-2. Excluding any hazardous trees, The Tree Preservation Ordinance, Sec 17-34(b), imposes conditions that permit applicants must consider when developing a site, as it relates to specimen trees 1. The applicant may be required to redesign the project to preserve specimen tree(s) or any other tree determined by the historic and environmental preservation board to be of substantial value due to its species, size, age, form and/or historical significance, provide an alternative plan, when feasible, which shall include the preservation of such tree(s) and design alterations within the scope and intent of the initially proposed plan. 2. Where practical, specimen trees, or any other trees determined by the department to be of substantial value due to its species, size, age, form and/or historical significance, that is proposed for removal shall adhere to acceptable tree relocation specifications. Findings: Consistent G. NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: Code Compliance No Objection Building No Objection NET No Objection Environmental Resources N/A Art in Public Places No Objection H. CONCLUSION: The application has demonstrated compliance with Chapter 17 entitled "Environmental Preservation" of the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, Staff finds the request does comply with all applicable criteria and is found that the proposed site improvements does not adversely affect the natural environment and importance of the subject property. I. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to Section 23-6,2(4) and Section 23-6.2(h)(1) of the City of Miami Code of as amended and the Secretary of Interior Standards, the Planning Department recommends Approval with conditions of the Special Certificate of Approval. 1.) The site shall be developed in accordance with the plans as prepared by RJ Heisenbottle Architects consisting of seventy-one (71) sheets. submitted under PZ-19- 3159, The plans are deemed as being incorporated by reference herein 2.) The Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the_Miami 21 Code, Chapter 17 and Chapter 23 of the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, as amended, 3.) The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of all applicable departments/agencies as part of the City of Miami building permit submittal process. 4,) This Resolution shall be included in the master permit set. 5.) The applicant shall create a Silver Bluff educational viewing platform. 6.) The Applicant shall include the Landscape Buffer as detailed in the updated plan set, The Preservation Office in conjunction with the environmental Resources Chief shall be able to approve non -substantial changes to the Landscape Buffer, 7.) The applicant shall provide a tree disposition / superimposed site plan that depicts the canopy of each specimen sized tree within thirty feet of any proposed development to scale. These same canopies must be drawn in a manner that resembles their respective shapes and dimensions to the greatest reasonable extent. 8.) The applicant shall avoid all construction activity within the tree protection zone of any tree that is to remain. This includes the installation of any underground utility, any grade changes, and / or any soil compaction. If the applicant is to reduce the size of any tree protection zone, the applicant is to perform investigative digging under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist. That same arborist is to provide a supplemental report documenting if the reduction in tree protection zone size is reasonable. 9.) The applicant shall include plan sheet L-05 (Existing Tree Study) as part of the master permit set. 10.)For any specimen tree that cannot be reasonably preserved in its current location, the applicant is to assess which of these trees are an appropriate candidate for relocation. Any good candidate shall be relocated either onsite, or within city owned property within Commission District 2. This may exclude any tree listed as being in poor condition. Warren Adams Historic Preservation Officer II ORDINANCE NO. 1330 Al ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 64, ENTITLED "PROTECTION AND REMOV/J, OF TREES" OF. THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMT, FLORIDA AND ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 64 ENTITLED "ENVIRON- MENTAL PRESERVATION"TO PROVIDE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION OF AREAS WITH EXTENSIVE TREE CANOPY, • SCENIC ROUTES, UNIQUE GEOLOGICAL TCOIATIONS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL.FEATURES; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND OUTLINING A PkOCESE FOR PUBLICLY IDENTIFYING AND PRESERVING ENVIRON- MENTALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES OR AREAS; PROVIDING THAT IF ANY SECTION, CLAUSE OR .SUM -SECTION SHALL BE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IT SHALL NOT AFFECT THE REMAINING PROVISIONS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, this ordinance was proposed by the Planning Advisory Board of the City of Miami, Florida to update Chapter 64 of the City Code, entitled °PROTEcTION AND REMOVAL OF TREES"; and minms, this ordinance will provide for the preservation of areas with extensive tree canopy, scerlic routes, unj.que geological formations and other significant environmental features; 4nd WHEREAS, this ordinance will provide for special review' procedures and outline a process for publicly identifying and preserving environmentally significant sites or areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP MIAMI, FLORIDA! Section 1. An ordinance entitled "ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION OF TREES," is hereby enacted to read as follows; (b) To require the deign and construction of all development activity be executed in manner consistent with the . preservation of trees and other significant environ- mental features to the greateseextent possible. (c) To provide guidelines and review procedures for controlling development activity which may alter, destroy, or be detri- mental to existing trees, significant environmental ,features and scenic areas. • (d) To prOvide the framework end' legal mechanism for publicly identifying and preserving environmentally significant areas or sites: Section 64-3. LpPlicability of Chapter: The terms'and provisions of this Chapter shall apply to real property as follows: (a) All vacant and undeveloped property. (b) All property to be redeveloped. (c) All property where there is to be any addition or alteration. (d) All public or private rights -of -way. (e) The street yard areas of all properties developed with single-family and two-family dwellings and the yard areas of all other developed property (f) All property within a designated environmental preser- vation district. Section 64-4. Environmental Preservation Review Board: (a) There is herebnestablished a Board, to be known as the Environmental Preservation Review Board of the City of Miami, Florida. The Board shall consist of five (5) members, to be appointed in the following manner: (1) One (1) member shall be a registered landscape architect appointed by the City Commission from list prepared by the Florida Chapter, American Society of Landscape Architects. (2) One (1) member shall be a nurseryMan appointed by the City'Commission from a list prepared by the Dade County Chapter, Florida Nurserymen and Growers Association. (3) One (1) member shall be a registered architect appointed by the City Commission from a list prepared by the South Florida Chapter, American Institute of Architects. - 4 - (4) One (1) member shall be a member of ar,.environmental ,organization such as, but not limited to, the Environ- mental Quality Action Committee of the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce, the Beautification Council of South Dade, Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club, Survive, and Tropical Audubon Society; members shall be appointed by the City Commission from lists prepared by, but not limited to, the above. -mentioned organizations. • (5) One (1) member shnll be a lay citizen who is interested in environmental preservation. The member shall be appointed by the City Commission from lists prepared by neighborhood organizations, (6) Two alternate members shall be available at the request on the Board in the absence alternate member shall have pation and voting When servi (b) RBEOl I13ILITIF5: The Environmental Preservation Review Board with the assistance of the Administrative Assistant shall..11e responsible for maintaining a record of uni.cue environ- mentally significant lands or sites within the City of . Miami. The Board shall serve as the quasi-judicial instrument for granting or denying certificates of approval, for tree removal and development activity •wtthin.those areas identified and established as Environmental Preservation Districts under the terms and provisiohs.of.this Chapter. 'Members of -the Board shall. be appointed for a two-year term. A11 members shall serve without c.dmpensation. The Board shalt select from its members a chairman to serve fora one-year term. (d) All:decisions; to approve an application .or to'reverse a • decision of. the Administrative Assistant -require the affirmative v&o of four members. Four members shall Constitute a quorum. • The Hoard shall meet at least once per month with • all meetings open to the public. The.members of the Hoard shall. adopt rules and procedures guiding the .Conduct of. the meetings and attendance policies. Processing. and recording of ail forms, applications; and minutes shall be the responsibility of the Building Department. Members and alternate members of the environmental Preservation. Rtiview Board may be removed for cause by a vote of not less than three members of this City commission. Cause for removal may include excessive absences. (c) h 11 be appointed and s a of the chairman to serve of a regular member. An .full rights of partici- ng on the Hoard. (e) - 5 Section 64-6. ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS: ,Certain geographical areas or sites may be designated as Environmental Preservz.tionDistricts by -action of the City Commission recognizing the need f6r preserv- • ation andprotection of such Areas because.of their :education, economic,.environmental or ecological importance to thewelfare of the general public and the City ofMiami. Environmental_ PreserVation Districts are intended to,provide for preservation and protection Of trees and other significant environmental features and to encourage,clesign and development activity which is sensitive to Ol4 natural landacape.eharacter of the site. Sites with Significant trees and landscape materials may be selected aSiEnvironmental Preservation DiStric':s because they provide important environmental functions for the welfare of the community. which include the following: Stabilizing the soil, preventing erosion and excessive rlIn-off; giving shade and cooling the land; providing protection from forceful winds; using their leaf surfaces to dilute gaseous pollutants and trap and filter out ash, duct and pollen fh the air; absorbing a high percentage 'of carbon dioxide and returning oxygen to the air: alleviating noise pollution; increasing the value or 1property and adding to the natural scenic beauty of the City of Miami, All regulations and review procedures • provided for Environmental Preservation Districts are intended to protect the significant environmental features against needless destruction and to present guidelines which will lead to the continuance and enhancement of those features, While at the same time recognizing individual rights to develop property Which is not ' prejudicial to the public interest. (b) The- following natural or man-made environmental features may be designated as Environmental Preservation Districts when one or more such features are located in a geographical' area or lot. (1) Clusters of trees with extensive tree canopy, natural hammock areas and mangrove areas. Land areas which include one or more clusters of trees which will total 10,000 square feet of tree canopy may be designated Environmental Preservation Districts. Smaller areas or lots may also be designated as Environmental Preservation Districts if the site contains at least one "specimen tree," which is defined as a tree having substantia,1 educational, economic and aesthetic value because of its size, type, age, outstanding characteristics or other professional criteria set forth by the State of Florida Division of Forestry. (2) Exposed geological formations such as natural rock outcroppings; caves, sink -holes, and significant natural topography of the. Coastal Atlantic Ridge. (3 ) Scenic transpottatioj corridors. Those roadway areas which have a unique landscape character, extensive tree canopy, and are.of substantial environmental importange.to the residents of Miami as well as to visitors. Dimensions and extent of scenic transportation corridors shall 'be determined for each sPecific area so designated based upon an analysis of the corridor by qualified professional staff of the appropriate City depart- ments. The boundaries of the scenic transportation corridors may be determined by the following: a) the extent of roadway right-of-way area b) all established yard areas fronting on the transportation corridor; c) significant natural features such as trees, geological features which are not within the right-of-way or street yard area, but are.of value as a part of the scene; di principal natural landscape orman-made ' elements, which form the visual boundary or, enclosing space. of the corridor 6) area from which there is a unique scenic view or vista of historical"or,significant structures or of water bodies such as the Miami River or Biscayne Bay; f) unique botanical features such as rare, exotic and valuable trees or plant life or'examples Of excellent landscape design. (c) PROCEDURE FOR DESIGNATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS: (1) Areas or sites to be considered as Environmental Preservation Districts may be recommended to tbe Planning Advisory Board by privateind'-viduals and organizations, all city departments, the Environ- mental Preservation Review Board and the City Commission. (2) All areas to be considered must be evaluated by the Planning Advisory Board, with the appropriate recommendations conveyed to the 'CityCommission. (3) Notice to Property Owners. A letter or invitation - shall be delivered to the owners of all property within the boundaries of the proposed Environmental Preservation District, with a full explanation of the reasons for the environmental significance of the property, the effect of the proposed classifi- cation and the process by which Environmental 8. !! II 2 a 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Section I. The application of environmental 29 preservation districts to specific parcels of land within an 30 area of the City of Miami beginning at Biscayne Bay and S.W. 27th 31 Avenue extended, north on S.W. 27th Avenue to Bird Road, west 32 on Bird Road to West City Limits, northerly along West City 33 Limits to S.W. 22nd Street (Coral Way), east on S,W. 22nd Street 34 to 5,W, 32nd Road, southeasterly on S.W. nnd Road to South 35 Dixie Highway, easterly on South Dixie Highway to S.W. 26th NSA 4/11/15 RESOLUTION NO. 75-37.0 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS TO SPECIFIC PARCELS OP LAND WITHIN AN AREA OP THE CITY OP MIAMI BEGINNING AT BISCAYNE BAY AND S.W. 27TH AVENUE EXTENDED, NORTH ON S.W. 27TH AVENUE TO BIRD ROAD, WEST ON BIRD ROAD TO WEST CITY LIMITS, NORTHERLY ALONG WEST CITY LIMITS TO S.W. 22ND STREET (CORAL WAY), EAST ON S.W. 22ND STREET TO S.W. 32N6 ROAD, SOUTH- EASTERLY ON S.W. 32ND ROAD TO SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY, EASTERLY ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO S.W. 26TH ROAD,'SOUTHEASTERLY ON S.W. 26TH ROAD TO BISCAYNE BAY, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE BAY TO S.W. 27TH AVENUE EXTENDED, AS PER EXHIBITS "A", "B", "C", "D" AND "E" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 8301; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE BUILDING DIRECTOR TO MARE THE APPROPRIATE DESIGNATIONS ON THE OFFICIAL MAP MAINTAINED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 36 WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its meeting of November 20, 1974, Item No. 3, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No. PAB 52-74 by a 5 to 2 vote recommending the application of Environmental Preservation districts as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the recommenda- tions of the Planning Advisory Board and finds that in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 8301 certain parcels of land should become environmental preservation districts; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: "r* 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ( Road, southeasterly bh S.W. 26th Road to Bisdayne Bay, southwesterly along the Bay to S.W. 2lth AVenue extended, as per Exhibits "A", "8", "C", "D", and "t" attached hereto and made a part hereof all in accordance with Ordinance No. 83011 be and the same is hereby approved. Section 2. The Building Director is hereby authorized and directed to make the appropriate designations on the official map maintained by the Building Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22day of APRIL 1975. `1,11RICF /1. FFRRF /- 18 --ATTE8.2.1 •*- 19 fI 3Sbt11-1.e.R!) CITY LERK 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: MICHEL E. ANDERSON Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: MN S. LLOYD City Attorney MAYOR "DOCUMENT INDEX ITEM 2. • • CITY COMMISSFON MEETING OF APR 2 2 1975 RESCILUDON • REMARKS; . • • • .▪ • i -.:-. L .: ' 1i IL [ . S W 74--;-Li :=1 ri. r- Liiilt 1 -•-t' , j.....P .•,1„_.........5...r...._. ----:TIn i-i yr -,. ....,-- ,, ,...„...-- . „.....„.,,...._, ...1-:,_-__--„ .......„ ...., .„...„ ....,, , 1 ,- ......„. ...„-- .. .........„,„ 9 , :. ....., .,..- ...., .. J .. • • • !?-7-71.• • \ • • 1 I \ • \ • 4 1 ----••••••••••{ 0•/' \\\*\ :•••/ • < • I. t----i - ; . I ...I..- ...... 1 i • t-L...., I i ,,,,,, ,,,,..,._-_„...... •) C--- I I h ,....•... . I I ! " I I Fi..7 . L it I I ill r 1 ro I! 1.1 1 43-6 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 MBA 5/27/76 i RESOLUTXON NO. 76-955 A RESOLUTION DECLARING SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE `ROM AtATKA STREET TO S.W. 27 AVENUE IN THE COCONUT GROVE AREA OF MIAMI AS A SCENIC TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (THEREBY BECOMING AN ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICT) AS PER CHAPTER 64 OF THE MIAMI CITY CODE, AND DIRECT- ING THE PROPER OFFICIAL OF THE BUILDING DEPART- MENT TO INCLUDE SAID PROPERTY ON THE OFFICIAL MAP MAINTAINED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DELINEATING ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS, WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its ..Meeting of September :15, 1976, Item No. 1, following an advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No, PAB 24-76 by a 3 to 3 vote (2 members absent) (a tie vote constitutes a denial) recommended denial of the consideration of designation of the property hereinafter set forth as a scenic transportation corridor; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Planning Advisory Board, the Commission, after careful consideration and due deliberation finds that the property as hereinafter described meets the criteria of a scenic transportation corridor as provided in Chapter 64-6 (b)(3) of the City of Miami Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA; Section 1. South Bayshore Drive from Alatka Street to S.V. 27 AVENUE in the Coconut Grove area of Miami is hereby designated as a scenic transportation corridor (thereby becoming an Environmental Preservation District) as per Chapter 64 of the Miami City Code. Section 2. The proper official of the Building Department be, and he is hereby directed to include said property on the official map maintained by the Building Department delineating Environmental Preservation Districts. "DOCUMENT INDEX t'r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 0 PASgED ANb WPM fhi 27 day et oftom IA76. HAURteE A, VERRE MAY MICHEL E. ANDERSON ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: 3-4171/— FRANK H. WESTON ACTING CITY ATTORNEY 36 2. 11111,:,,R01. 47- moinsammisimmimmisiir