HomeMy WebLinkAboutHEPB (6082) ResolutionCity of Miami
HEPB Resolution
Enactment Number: HEPB-R-19-061
City Hall
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, FL 33133
www.miamigov.com
File Number: 6082
Final Action Date:12/3/2019
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PRESERVATION BOARD ("HEPB") DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT TO SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES ON A PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY
2167 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133, WITHIN THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICT — 60 AND THE SOUTH BAYSHORE
DRIVE SCENIC TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR.
WHEREAS, Convent of the Sacred Heart of Miami, Inc. ("Applicant") applied to the City
of Miami ("City") for a Special Certificate of Approval for developmental impact to significant
environmental features on a property located at approximately 2167 South Bayshore Drive
("Property"), which is located within Environmental Preservation District - 60 and the South
Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, and thus subject to Chapter 17, Article II of the
City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Historic Preservation Division reviewed the requested Certificate of
Approval for the Property and recommended to the Historic and Environmental Preservation
Board ("HEPB") approval with conditions of the Special Certificate of Approval, as described in
the Staff Analysis attached and incorporated as Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the HEPB held a duly noticed public hearing on the Special Certificate of
Approval for the Property and reviewed same; and
WHEREAS, there was a motion to approve during the public hearing that resulted in a
tie vote of the HEPB members, which shall be construed as a denial pursuant to the HEPB
Office Rules of Procedure; and
WHEREAS, for the reasons stated on the record and as supported by the evidence
presented at all hearings in this matter and other evidence in the record, the HEPB denies the
requested Special Certificate of Approval for the Property;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL
PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are
adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section.
Section 2. The Historic and Environmental Preservation Board ("HEPB") for the reasons
stated on the on the record and as supported by the evidence presented at all hearings in this
matter and other evidence in the record, denies the requested Special Certificate of Approval for
developmental impact to significant environmental features on the Property located at
City of Miami Page 1 of 2 File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: ?/7/2020
approximately 2167 South Bayshore Drive ("Property"), which is located within Environmental
Preservation District - 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor,
pursuant to Chapter 17, Article II of the City Code.
Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
THIS DECISION IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED IN THE HEARING BOARDS
DIVISION WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS.
1 /7/2o2p
Preservation OFicer Date
STATE OF FLORIDA )
COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority,WIC(Yr' f . CAMS Preservation Officer of the City of Miami,
Florida, and acknowledges that s/he executed the foregoing Resolution.
SWORN AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS "7 DAY OF Jan , 20&)
1') mar-ez-
Print Notary Name
Personally know or Produced I.D.
Type and number of I.D. produced
Did take an oath or Did not take an oath
Notary Public State of Florid
My Commission Expires:
BEATRIZALVAREZ
*• GG :4
Commission # GG 153775
=5:„N' 1'4 Expires November 20, 2021
Bonded Thru Troy Fain Insurance 808-385-7019
City of Miami Page 2 of 2 File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: 1/7/2020
City of Miami
Planning Department
Historic Preservation Division
ANALYSIS FOR SPECIAL
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
APPLICANT: Ethan Wasserman, Greenberg Traurig FILE ID: PZ-19-3159
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2167 S Bayshore Dr ZIP: 33133
NET OFFICE: Coconut Grove HEARING DATE: 12/3/2019
COMMISSION DISTRICT: District 2 (Ken Russell)
STATUS: Individually Designated TDR ELIGIBLE: No
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: Pursuant to Section 17-33 of the City Code of Ordinances, as amended, the Applicant
is requesting a Special Certificate of Approval for site improvements at a public parks and
recreation site located on a parcel zoned T3-R "Sub -Urban Transect Zone
The subject property is an individually designated site, known as Vita Woodbine. It is located in the
John T. Peacock Estate and the Coconut Grove Net Area. The site is approximately the third parcel
located on the northeast tercile of SW 22 AVE and South Bayshore Dr. (Complete legal description
is on file with Hearing Boards)
Folio: 0141150100111
Lot Size: Approximately 145,553 sq. ft.
B. BACKGROUND:
On September 12, 1974 the City of Miami passed Ordinance 8301 (Attachment "A"). The Ordinance
created a new section of Code allowing for the environmental preservation of areas with extensive
tree canopy, scenic routes, unique geological formations and other significant environmental
features; and providing for special review procedures and outlining a process for publicly identifying
and preserving environmentally significant sites or areas.
On April 11th, 1975 the City of Miami passed Resolution 75-370, designating Environmental
Preservation District -- 60, which contains 2167 S Bayshore Dr. (Attachment "B")
On November 17,1976 the City of Miami passed Resolution 76-955. This Ordinance declared South
Bayshore Drive from Alatka Street to 27th Avenue in the Coconut Grove area of Miami as a scenic
transportation corridor (Attachment "C')
This item came before the Board on September 27th, 2019. The item was continued to allow the
applicant time to address City Staff's and .the Board Members' concerns with the project. The
applicant has submitted plans on a--Landscape-Buffer a study on the current coral rock system ,a
viewing platform to enhance the Silver Bluff, and plans for the preservation of Tree #460.
C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The subject property is located within Environmental Preservation District — 60, the South Bayshore
Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor, and the John T Peacock Subdivision. Pursuant to Goals NR-
1 and NR-1.3. of the Miami Neighborhood Comprehensive Plan, the City will maintain, preserve,
enhance and restore the quality of natural resources within the context of the city's urban
environment by reviewing development and redevelopment to determine any adverse impacts on
adjacent areas with significant native vegetative features.
The Applicant is requesting demolition, restoration, alteration, and new construction. The request is
found to be in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan.
D. PHOTOGRAPHS:
Current Design
u-sar w Ee7.4'
om, v"aK.w,a�>,�
xs . .a. m ua c evvn.a m. �.x-css
Proposed Design:
NOM
Landscape Plan:
SYMBOL LEGEND
Treo le Retocete
• Tree to Remain
Tree to Remove
Tree to Remove {Prohibited Spume)
Fruit Tree to Ramove
Trutt Tree to Remain
()Tree Tree protection zone
Silver Bluff Detail:
E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
ZONING
Subject Property
T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone
NCD-3
Surrounding Properties
FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
Single -Family Residential
Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre
NORTH: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential
NCD-3 Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre
SOUTH: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential
NCD-3 Maximum of 9 D,U. per acre
EAST: CS: Civic Space Zone Public Parks & Recreation
N/A
WEST: T3-R: Sub -Urban Transect Zone Single -Family Residential
NCD-3 Maximum of 9 D.U. per acre
F. ANALYSIS:
The following is a review of the request pursuant to Section17-33 of the City Code of Ordinances. The
General Information and Comprehensive Plan section of this report is hereby incorporated into the
analysis and its corresponding criteria by reference.
Analysis: The Applicant is proposing demolition, restoration, alteration, and new construction. The
subject property is located within Environmental Preservation District — 60 and the South
Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor,
Environmental preservation districts are geographical areas, parcels or corridors, which
have been or may be identified, are established by the city commission as significant natural
or manmade attributes in need of preservation and control because of their educational,
economic, ecological and environmental importance to the welfare of the general public and
the city as a whole. Scenic transportation corridors are those roadways identified by city
commission resolution as having a unique landscape, an expansive tree canopy and/or
unique landscape features that is of substantial environmental or scenic importance to
residents and visitors. The subject property contains environmentally significant features.
The significant features of this property, protected by the Environmental Preservation District
and the Scenic Transportation Corridor, are the Historic Coral Rock Walls, the Silver Bluff,
and the trees.
As part of the Applicant's proposed plans they are requesting to remove trees, alter the
historic coral rock walls in multiple points on -site and cover the Silver Bluff with a deck
overlooking the proposed pool.
Historic Coral Rock Walls:
There are coral rock walls fronting S. Bayshore Drive and Tigertail Avenue. Sections of the
coral rock wall at the entrances will be dismantled and rebuilt to allow for the required
visibility triangles. This alteration can be supported by Staff as the alteration is minor and all
materials will be reused in the proposed design.
Two coral rock walls run through the site. A section of the southern wall will be demolished
to allow for access to the auditorium building. This proposal can be supported by Staff,
The application proposes the demolition of a section of the northern coral rock wall. This can
be supported by Staff as this is required for vehicular access to the drop-off point. The
previous version of this Staff report stated that the plans -proposed the demolition of a further
two sections of the coral rock wall to accommodate two projecting sections of the new main
building. The applicant has made clear on the plans that this is not occurring, and no portion
of the wall will be removed for the main building.
The demolition plan indicates that all coral rock removed from walls will be salvaged and
reused on -site.
Silver Bluff:
The Applicant is proposing to place a deck connecting from the proposed auditorium building
to the pool. The new deck is depicted as covering the Silver Bluff, The Applicant depicts a
cantilevered deck that is to cover the Silver Bluff so that the foundations do no disturb the
Silver Bluff.
Sec, 17-36 of the City Code of Ordinances, as amended, provides review standards for
development activity in environmental preservation districts. These standards state that
development should
1. Preserve the natural environmental character of all sites, insofar as practical, by
minimizing removal of trees or other significant environmental features.
2. Preserve or enhance existing topography and natural land features wherever
possible,
5. Maintain the continuity of landscape material and spacing characteristic of the
surrounding area or scenic corridor, If the development occurs along a designated
scenic corridor, the principal natural landscape or manmade elements which form
the visual boundaries or enclosing space of the corridor shall be preserved, insofar
as possible.
Staff finds that the proposed plan to cover the Silver Bluff is in compliance with Sec, 17-36
of the City Code. The applicant proposes to include an educational viewing platform in the
cantilevered deck to see the Silver Bluff below. This will enhance the natural features and
feature the Silver Bluff as a learning opportunity for future generations.
Trees:
As seen on plan sheets L-01 and L-02, the applicant is proposing the removal of one -
hundred -and -thirteen (109) trees, Each of these meets the criteria to be considered a "Tree"
as defined within Sec, 17-2. Of these trees, fifty-two (52) are categorized as a "Prohibited
tree species" as defined within Sec,17-2, which must be removed from the site upon
development, as mandated by Sec 17-37(b). The remaining trees slated for removal are
either listed as being in poor condition, or are located within the footprint of the new
development. These reasons are in accordance with Sec. 17-34,
Of the proposed removals, twelve (11) meet the criteria to be considered a "Specimen tree",
as defined by Sec. 17-2. Excluding any hazardous trees, The Tree Preservation Ordinance,
Sec 17-34(b), imposes conditions that permit applicants must consider when developing a
site, as it relates to specimen trees
1. The applicant may be required to redesign the project to preserve specimen tree(s)
or any other tree determined by the historic and environmental preservation board
to be of substantial value due to its species, size, age, form and/or historical
significance, provide an alternative plan, when feasible, which shall include the
preservation of such tree(s) and design alterations within the scope and intent of the
initially proposed plan.
2, Where practical, specimen trees, or any other trees determined by the department
to be of substantial value due to its species, size, age, form and/or historical
significance, that is proposed for removal shall adhere to acceptable tree relocation
specifications.
Findings: Consistent
G. NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES:
Code Compliance No Objection
Building No Objection
NET No Objection
Environmental Resources N/A
Art in Public Places No Objection
H. CONCLUSION:
The application has demonstrated compliance with Chapter 17 entitled "Environmental Preservation"
of the City of Miami Code of Ordinances. Staff finds the request does comply with all applicable
criteria and is found that the proposed site improvements does not adversely affect the natural
environment and importance of the subject property.
I. RECOMMENDATION:
Pursuant to Section 23-6.2(4) and Section 23-6.2(h)(1) of the City of Miami Code of as amended and
the Secretary of Interior Standards, the Planning Department recommends Approval with
conditions of the Special Certificate of Approval.
1.) The site shall be developed in accordance with the plans as prepared by RJ
Heisenbottle Architects consisting of seventy-one (71) sheets. submitted under PZ-19-
3159. The plans are deemed as being incorporated by reference herein
2.) The Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of the_Miami 21 Code, Chapter
17 and Chapter 23 of the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, as amended.
3,) The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of all applicable departments/agencies
as part of the City of Miami building permit submittal process.
4.) This Resolution shall be included in the master permit set.
5.) The applicant shall create a Silver Bluff educational viewing platform.
6.) The Applicant shall include the Landscape Buffer as detailed in the updated plan set,
The Preservation Office in conjunction with the environmental Resources Chief shall be
able to approve non -substantial changes to the Landscape Buffer,
7.) The applicant shall provide a tree disposition / superimposed site plan that depicts the
canopy of each specimen sized tree within thirty feet of any proposed development to
scale. These same canopies must be drawn in a manner that resembles their
respective shapes and dimensions to the greatest reasonable extent.
8.) The applicant shall avoid all construction activity within the tree protection zone of any
tree that is to remain. This includes the installation of any underground utility, any grade
changes, and / or any soil compaction. If the applicant is to reduce the size of any tree
protection zone, the applicant is to perform investigative digging under the supervision of
an ISA Certified Arborist. That same arborist is to provide a supplemental report
documenting if the reduction in tree protection zone size is reasonable.
9.) The applicant shall include plan sheet L-05 (Existing Tree Study) as part of the master
permit set.
10.) For any specimen tree that cannot be reasonably preserved in its current location, the
applicant is to assess which of these trees are an appropriate candidate for relocation.
Any good candidate shall be relocated either onsite, or within city owned property within
Commission District 2. This may exclude any tree listed as being in poor condition.
Warren Adams
Historic Preservation Officer
11
II
ORDINANCE NO. 83(4
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 64, ENTITLED
"PROTECTION AND REMOVT,L OF TREES" OF THE
CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA AND
ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 64 ENTITLED 'ENVIRON-
MENTAL PRESERVATION"TO PROVIDE FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION OF AREAS tIXTH
EXTENSIVE TREE CANOPY, SCENIC ROUTES, UNIQUE
GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS AND OTHER SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL
REVIEW PROCEDURES AND OUTLINING A PROCESS FOR
PUBLICLY IDENTIFYING AND PRESERVING ENVIRON-
MENTALLY SIGNIFICANT SITES OR AREAS; PROVIDING
THAT IF ANY SECTION, CLAUSE OR SUB -SECTION .
SHALL'BE DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IT SHALL •
NOT AFFECT THE REMAINING PROVISIONS; REPEALING
ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH.
•
WHEREAS, this ordinance was proposed by the Planning
Advisory Board of the City of Miami, Florida to update Chapter 64
of the City Cede, entitled °PROTEcTION AND REMOVAL OF TREES";
and
WHEREAS, this ordinance will provide for the preservation
Of areas with extensive tree canopy, scenic routes, unique,
geological formations and other significant environmental features.;
And
WHEREAS, this ordinance will provide for special review
procedures and outline a process for publicly identifying and
preserving environmentally significant sites or areas;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA! •
Section 1. An ordinance entitled "ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION
OF TREES," is hereby enacted to read as follows;
-.1-
(b) To require the de:Sign and construction of all development
• activity be executed in manner consistent with the
preservation of trees and other significant environ-
mental features to the greateseextent possible.
. (c) To provide guidelines and review procedures for controlling
development activity which may alter, destroy, or be detri-
• mental to existing trees, significant environmental
_features and scenic areas.
• [(5) To prOvide the framework and legal mechanism for publicly
identifying and preserving environmentally significant
areas or sites:
Section 64-3. hpplicability of Chaptert
The terms -and provisions of this Chapter shall
property as follows:
apply
to real
(a) All vacant and undeveloped property.
(b) All property to be redeveloped.
(c) All property where there is to be any addition or
alteration.
(d) All public or private rights -of -way.
(e) The street yard areas of all properties developed with
single-family and two-family dwellings and the yard areas
of all other developed property
(f) All property within a designated environmentat preser-
vation district.
Section 64-4. Environmental Preservation Review Board:
(a) There is hereby a Board, to be known as the
Environmental Preservation Review Board of the CitN, of
Mlami, Florida. The Board shall consist. of fiVe (5)
members, to be appointed in the following manner:
(1) One (1) member shall be a registered Landscape
architect appointed by the City Commission from a
list prepared by the Florida Chapter, American
Society of Landscape Architects.
(2) One (1) member shall he a nurseryMan appointed by
the City'Commission from a list prepared by the
Dade County Chapter, Florida Nurserymen and Growers
Association.
(3) One (1) member shall be a registered architect
appointed by the City Commission from a list
prepared by the South Florida Chapter, American
Institute of Architects.
- 4,-
(4) One (1) member shall be a member of ar,environmental
,organization such as, but not limited to, the Environ-
mental Quality Action Committee of the Greater -Miami
Chamber of Commerce, the Beautification Council of
South Dade, Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club,
SurviVe, and Tropical Audubcn Society; members shall
be appointed by the City Commission from lists
prepared by:, but not limited to, the above -mentioned
organizations.
(5) One (1) member shall be a .lay citizen who is interested
in environmental preservation. The member shall be
appointed by the City Commission from lists prepared
by neighborhood organizations,
(6) Two alternate members shall be appOinted and shall
be available at the request of the chairman to serve
on the Board in the absence of a regular member. An
alternate member shall have full rights of partici-
pation and voting when serving on the Board.
(b) RESPOOSIBILTTIESA
• The Environmental Preservation Review Board with the
• assistance of the Administrative Assistant shall,be
, . responsible for maintaining 4 record of onicue enviton-
• mentally significant lands or sites within the City Of
•Miami, The Board shall serve as the quasi-judiCial instrument
•. for granting or denying certificates of -approval for tree
removal and deVelopment activity within.those areas
- identified and established as Environmental Preservation
Districtsunder the term a and provisiohp.ot this Chapter.
(c)
Members of -the Board sha.11 be appointed for a two-year
• terM, All members shall serve Without cOmpensation.._
The Board shall select from its meMbers.a Chairman to
aerve .fors one-year term.
(d). :All decisiOnS to approve an application or.toreverse a
deciaibh dE the Administrative Assistant'require the
affirmative vote of four members. Four Members shall
Constitute a quorum.
•
The boardShall meet at least once per month with
. •
all meetings open to the public. The.members Of the
board shall, adopt rules and procedures guiding the
conductofthe meetings and attendance policies.
(f) Processing,and recording of all forMs,-. applications,
And minutes Shall be the responsibility of tbe Building
bepartment.
Menibers and alternate members of the Environmental
Preservation Review Board may be removed for cause by
a vote of not less than three members of the City
Commission, Cause for removal may include excessive
absences.
(e)
(g)
*5*
Section 64-6.• ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS:
,(a) ,Certain geographical areas or sites may be designated
as Environmental Preservation.Districts byaction of
the City Commission recognizing the need for preserv- •
• ation and protection of -such Areas because.of their
education, economic,'environmental or ecological
importance to thewelfare of the general public and
the City ofMiami, Environmental. Preservation Districts
are intended to,provide for preservation and protection
Of trees and other significant environmental features
and to encourage:design anddeVelopment activity which
is sensitive to fhe natural landacape .pharacter of the
site. Sites with Significant trees and landscape materials
may be selected abiEnvironmental Preservation DiStriczs
because they provide important environmental functions for
the welfare ot the community Which include the following:
Stabilizing the soil, preventing erosion and excessive
rUn-offt giving shade and cooling the land; providing
protection from forceful wind's; using their leaf surfaces
to dilute gaseous pollutants and trap and filter out ash,
dust and.pollen in the air; absorbing a high percentage
'of carbon dioxide and returning oxygen to the airl
alleviating noise pollution; increasing the value of
Property and adding to the natural scenic beauty of
. the City of Miami. All regulations and review procedures •
provided for Environmental Preservation Districts are
intended to protect the significant environmental features
against needless destruction and to present guidelines
which will lead to the continuance and enhancement of
those features, while at the same time recognizing
individual rights to develop property Which is not '
prejudicial to the public interest.
(b). The following natural or man-made environmental features
may be designated as Environmental Preservation Districts
when one or more such features are located in a geographical'
area or lot.
(1) Clusters of trees with extensive tree canopy, natural
hammock areas and mangrove areas. Land areas which
include one or more clusters of trees which will
total 10,000 square feet of tree canopy may be
designated Environmental Preservation Districts.
Smaller areas or lots may also be designated as
Environmental Preservation Districts if the site
contains at least one "specimen tree," which is
defined as a tree having substantia,1 educational,
economic and aesthetic value because of its size,
type, age, outstanding characteristics or other
professional criteria set forth by the State of
Florida Division of Forestry.
(2) Exposed geological formations such as natural rock
outcroppings; caves, sink -holes, and significant
natural topography of the Coastal Atlantic Ridge.
(c)
(3)
•
Scenic transpor1:atio.3 corridors. Those roadway
areas which have a unique landscape character,.
extensive tree canopy, and are.of substantial
environmental importance.to the residents of
Miami as well as to visitors. Dimensions and
extent of scenic transpertationcorridors shall.
'be determined for each specific area so designated
based upon an analysis of the corridor by qualified
professional staff of the appropriate City depart-
ments'. The boundaries of the scenic transportation
corridors may be determined by the following:
a) the extent of roadway right-of-way area;•
b) all established yard areas fronting on the
transportation corridor;
c) significant natural features such
geological features which are not
right-of-way or street yard area,
value as a part of the scene; .
as trees,
within the
but are.ot
d) principal natural lindscape orman-made
• elements, which form, the visual boundary or
enclosing space. of the corridor;
6) area. from which there is a unique scenic
view or vista of historical or significant
structures or of water bodies such as the
Miami River or Biscayne Bay;
f) unique botanical features such as rare, exotic
and valuable. trees or plant life orexamples
of excellent landscape design.
PROCEDURE FOR DESIGNATION OF ENVIRONMENTAUPRESERVATION
DISTRICTS:
(1) Areas or sites to be considered as Environmental
Preservation Districts may be recommended to tbe
Planning Advisory Board by privateind'-viduals and
organizations, all city departments, the Environ-
mental Preservation Review Board and the City
Commission.
(2)
(3)
All areas to be considered must be evaluated by
the Planning Advisory Board, with the appropriate
recommendations conveyed to the City.Commission.
Notide to Property Owners. A letter or invitation -
shall be delivered to the owners of all property
within the boundaries of the proppsed Environmental
Preservation District, with a full explanation of
the reasons for the environmental significance of
the property, the effect of the proposed classifi-
cation and the process by which Environmental
0
- 8
it
11
2
a
4
a
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MA
4/11/75
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OP
ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS TO
SPECIFIC PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN AN AREA OP
THE CITY OP MIAMI BEGINNING AT BISCAYNE BAY
AND S.W. 27TH AVENUE EXTENDED, NORTH ON S.W.
27TH AVENUE TO BIRD ROAD, WEST ON BIRD ROAD
TO WEST CITY LIMITS, NORTHERLY ALONG WEST CITY
LIMITS TO S,W. 22ND STREET (CORAL WAY), EAST
ON S.W. 22ND STREET TO S.W. 32ND ROAD, SOUTH-
EASTERLY ON S.W. 32ND ROAD TO SOUTH DIXIE
HIGHWAY, EASTERLY ON SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO
S.W. 26TH ROAD,'SOUTHEASTERLY ON S,W. 26TH
ROAD TO BISCAYNE BAY, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE
BAY TO S.W, 27TH AVENUE EXTENDED, AS PER
EXHIBITS "A", "B", "C", "D" AND "E" ATTACHED
HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ALL IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ORDINANCE NO. 8301; AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE BUILDING DIRECTOR TO MAKE THE
APPROPRIATE DESIGNATIONS ON THE OFFICIAL MAP
MAINTAINED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
17 WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board, at its
18 meeting of November 20, 1974, Item No. 3, following an
19 advertised hearing, adopted Resolution No, PAB 52-74 by a
20 5 to 2 vote recommending the application of Environmental
21 Preservation districts as hereinafter set forth; and
22 WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the recommenda-
23 tions of the Planning Advisory Board and finds that in
24 accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 8301 certain
25 parcels of land should become environmental preservation districts;
26 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION
27 OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
28 Section 1. The application of environmental
29 preservation districts to specific parcels of land within an
30 area of the City of Miami beginning at Biscayne Bay and S.W. 27th
31 Avenue extended, north on S.W. 27th Avenue to Bird Road, west
32 on Bird Road to West City Limits, northerly along West City
33 Limits to S.W. 22nd Street (Coral Way), east on S.W. 22nd Street
34 to S,W, 32nd Road, southeasterly on S.W. 32nd goad to onth
35 Dixie Highway, easterly on South pixie Highway to $,W, 26th
36
Mar
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
(
Road, southeasterly on S.W. 26th Road to BisCayne Bay,
southwesterly along the Bay to S.W. 27th Avenue extended, ag
pet Ehibits "A", "8", "C", "D", and "E" attached hereto and
made a part hereof all in accordance with Ordinance No. 8301,
be and the same is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Building Director is hereby
authorized and directed to make the appropriate designations
on the official map maintained by the Building Department.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22day of APRIL
1975.
"VRICF A. FFRRF
f_ /
ATTEST
CI T L8RK
PREPARED AND APPROVED BY:
MICHEL E. ANDERSON
Assistant City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
etwodititt--u.L4A.H7e,
3HN S. LLOYD
City Attorney
MAYOR
'DOCUMENT INDEX
ITEM
2,
CITY COMMISSION
MEETING OF
APR 2 2 1975
.•
RREE:ALRuKs7 ''' ' ...
• i . ..:•-:—.' L •
..,......-1_i_i •
7 17
-:----p--I_LI. ._,I.._ _
s , .,,._ .,.y.r
. . ; - • - r 1
- i , ti--1 , [
.....L.i.ut 1 1 i
I I L
• -:'; -i7.5 !t 14. , L.,•3 „„ 5...r.
FITT:
.,..-.--- . .-- ..,• ..-
...`
„.--- 1 _,..-- -----':
.,--. 1:„.---1,,........„t.\ -- •--..-:-:'-c-
'
.. :
.. • • 1 •,,,—.1.....,.............,
- -- s, •.,-,-,• v•,1,..n
-----' 1
•
1 '1,••
•-•
.„!.\
, I
— N \
• `••••
\.\\
1.
7
s2=,
Tt
t
43 -6 .
',•••
1(
!1
1
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
MEA
9/27/76
RESOLUTION NO.
•
16-955
A RESOLUTION DECLARING SOUTH BAYSHO1E DRIVE
Vital ALATKA STREET TO S.H. 27 AVENUE IN THE
COCONUT GROVE AREA OF MIAMI AS A SCENIC
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR (THEREBY BECOMING AN
ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICT) AS PER
CHAPTER 64 OF THE MIAMI CITY CODE, AND DIRECT"
ING THE PROPER OFFICIAL OF THE BUILDING DEPART-
MENT TO INCLUDE SAID PROPERTY ON THE OFFICIAL
MAP MAINTAINED BY TRE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DELINEATING ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION DISTRICTS.
WHEREAS, the Miami Planning Advisory Board at its
Meeting of September 15, 1976, Item No. 1, following an advertised
hearing, adopted Resolution No, PAB 24-76 by a 3 to 3 vote
(2 members absent) (a tie vote constitutes a denial) recommended
denial of the consideration of designation of the property
hereinafter set forth as a scenic transportation corridor; and
WHEREAS, notwithstanding the recommendation of the
Planning Advisory Board, the Commission, after careful
consideration and dub deliberation finds that the property as
hereinafter described meets the criteria of a scenic transportation
corridor as provided in Chapter 64-6 (10)(3) of the City of Miami
Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. South Bayshore Drive from Alatka Street to
S.W. 27 AVENUE in the Coconut Grove area of Miami is hereby
designated as a scenic transportation corridor (thereby
becoming an Environmental Preservation District) as per Chapter
64 of the Miami City Code.
Section 2. The proper official of the Building
Department be, and he is hereby directed to include said
property on the official map maintained by the Building Department
delineating Environmental Preservation Districts.
"DOCUMENT. INDEX
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
PA8g0 AND ADOPTMD thin /7 day of OdT082A
MOVE A. FERR8
MAYOR
-TY \ .
MICHEL E. ANDERSON
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS:
FRANK H. WESTON
ACTING CITY ATTORNEY
,A,461
35
36 2.
ineaii%I"�r�o *
6,
le Number: 6082
City of Miami
HEPB Resolution
Enactm
umber: HEPB-R-19-061
City Hall
3500 Pan American D
Miami, FL 33133
www.miamigov.com
Final Action
A A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI URIC AND ENVIRONMENTA
PR 1 y,, RVATION BOARD ("HEPB") DENYI ` N APPLICATION FOR A SP
CERT, ATE OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELO TAL IMPACT TO SIGNIFIC
ENVIRO $MENTAL FEATURES ON A PROPERT e ATED AT APPROXIMATE
216 UTH BAYSHORE DRIVE, MIAMI, FLO . Via. 33133, WITHIN THE
ENVIRONM AL PRESERVATION DISTRICT — 60 A HE SOUTH BAYSHORE
RIVE SCENIC TRANSPORTATION CO 'OR.
WHEREAS, Cut Grove Park Holdings, Inc. ("Applicant") apto the City of Miami
(City) for a Special Ce ,gpte of Approval for developmental impact to u cant
environmental features on �, operty located at approximately 2167 South :.hore Drive
("Property"), which is locate • °�hin Environmental Preservation District - 60 : i -he South
Bayshore Drive Scenic Transp Lion Corridor, and thus subject to Chapter 17, le 11 of the
City Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Historic ervation Division reviewed the requested Cer
oval for the Property and recomm ° =-d to the Historic and Environmental Preservafi
Bo("HEP") approval with conditions o Special Certificate of Approval, as described
the ��, Analysis attached and incorporat- Exhibit "A"; and
e of
REAS, the HEPB held a duly noti ``.ublic hearing on the Special Certificate of
Approval fo Property and reviewed same; a
WHER 'y there was a motion to approve dthe public hearing that resulted in a
tie vote of the HE embers, which shall be constru v a denial pursuant to the HEPB
Office Rules of Proc" re; and
WHEREAS, for ' seasons stated on the record an •''1 .upported by the evidence
presented at all hearings i 's matter and other evidence in .a ecord, the HEPB denies the
requested Special Certificate®pproval for the Property;
NOW, THEREFORE, B ktESOLVED BY THE HISTORI► 3: D ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVATION BOARD OF TH•;'TY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The recitals and fin. g ® contained in the Preamble to t esolution are
adop wd .y reference and incorporated fully set forth in this Section
S n 2. The Historic and Environ '# al Preservation Board ("HEPB")
stated on t the record and as supported e evidence presented at all he
matter and oevidence in the record, denies requested Special Certificate o
developmentalact to significant environmenta -atures on the Property located a
City of Miami
Page 1 of 2
e reasons
in this
oval for
File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: 12117/2019
Pre
purse
ximately 2167 South K�
ation District - 60 an
to Chapter 17, Article
THISD
ervation
hore Drive ("Property
South Bayshore Drive
the City Code.
3. This Resolution s
ION IS FINAL UNL
Y>a. DIVISION
cer
STATE ORIDA )
COUNTY IAMI-DADE )
Personally ap
Florida, and ack
before me, the undersigned au
ges that s/he executed the fore
'ch is located within Env`; a ental
is Transportation Corri
ecome effective imme
SWORN AND SUBSv., D BEFORE ME THIS DA
Print Notary Name
Personally know or P
Type and number of I.D. produced
d take an oath or Did no
City of Miami
..L
d I.D.
an oath
upon adoption.
APPEALED IN THE '.:RING BOARDS
N TEN (10) DAYS.
,201
ation Officer of the City of Miami,
Notary Pubte of Florid
My Commissio ires:
BEATRIZALVAREZ
,$ Commission II (3G 153776"
spires November 20, 2021
d Tiro Troy Fain Insurance 8004
Page 2 of 2 ' : File ID: 6082 (Revision:) Printed On: 12/17/2019
CITY OF MIAMI
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Olga Zamora, Chief of Hearing Boards
FROM: Amber L. Ketterer, Assistant City Attorney
DATE: January 9, 2020
RE: Resolution No. HEPB-R-19-061 — Resolution denying an application for a
Special Certificate of Approval for developmental impact to significant
environmental features on a property located at approximately 2167 South
Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33133, within the environmental preservation
district — 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation Corridor.
File No. 6082
At its December 5, 2019 meeting, the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board
("HEPB") considered the above -referenced agenda item, HEPB.2, an application for a Special
Certificate of Approval for developmental impact to significant environmental features on a
property located at approximately 2167 South Bayshore Drive, Miami, Florida 33133, within the
environmental preservation district — 60 and the South Bayshore Drive Scenic Transportation
Corridor.
The Resolution inadvertently included the property owner, Coconut Grove Park
Holdings, Inc., as the applicant's name. The Resolution should have reflected the applicant's
name as the Convent of the Sacred Heart of Miami, Inc., which is the entity under contract to
purchase the property from the owner who applied for the Certificate of Approval. The
Resolution has been updated to include the correct applicant's name.