HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Paul Savage-PowerPoint PresentationSubmitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
AMENDMENT TO DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET
SPECIAL AREA PLAN (SAP)
Presentation by:
Rasco, Klock Perez Nieto
On Behalf of MacArthur Properties III, LLC
7Z4
>rith/- AAA S a e-- fowar-PoiA-1- P'n4or)
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
North Site Area
25,008 GSF 10.57 Acres
86 DU's
South Site
. 6,8,31 CST 11.76;
':' - 264 DU's
ac rthur s Si e.is a •utting property, directly
across the street from the Gateway Sites where
36-Story Tower is proposed.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Traffic from the Train Station, Tower A and Tower
B will directly impact the MacArthur Site.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
psavagc@rascoklock.com
"FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN CITY, COUNTY AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW
February 11, 2021
BY EMAIL (CIO Hearing Boards (OZamora@miamigov.com))
Charles Garavaglia, Chair
Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board (PZAB)
City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
Honorable Members
Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board (PZAB)
City of Miami
3500 Pan American Drive
Miami, Florida 33133
PZAB File Id. #8076; February 17, 2021 Agenda Item PZAB.1
Application for Amendment of the Miami Design District Retail Street
Special Area Plan
Request for Recognition of Intevenor Status
Miami 21 defines "Intervenor" as: "a person whose interests in the proceeding are
Idversely affected in a matter greater than those of the general public." §7.1.4.3(d), Miami 21
lode. The governing Code further defines "Abutting" as specifically including properties
situated across the street from the subject property, as follows: "Abutting properties include
properties across a street or alley." §I.2, Miami 21 Code.
While the proposed Design District SAP Amendment seeks to enact many changes that
will impact MacArthur's property (i.e., wholesale density and intensity transfer provisions), most
alarming is the fact that the Tuttle South Site is singled out by the Application to receive a
special height exceedance under the Application that would never be authorized under the
existing Design District SAP or Miami 21. The following Illustration 4 from the Staff Analysis
depicts the Tuttle South Site (outlined in red) and the MacArthur Property (highlighted in
ellow) immediately abutting the East elevation of the Tuttle South Site:
In summary, under all three of the recognized tests: (a) the plain text of Miami 21
defining "Intervenor" and "Abutting"; (b) the "definite interest exceeding the general interest in
community good" test under the Renard decision; and (c) the "not properly enacted" test under
Renard, MacArthur possesses standing to participate as an Intervenor in this proceeding.
Illustration 4: "Gateway Site South" or "Tuttle South"
Regulating Plan Section "3.14.3 Gateway Sites" establishes the criteria r
Site North (illustrated above) to achieve a height of thirty-six (36) stories.
the development to be of exceptional architectural merit (to be determin
Director), to provide a 10,000 square feet Civic Space, to provide public
public outreach before seeking construction permits.
MacArthur Has Intervenor Status
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
MIAMI 21
APRIL 2016 2020
MIAMI 21
APRIL 2016 2020
APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAI;t,
RECtar
ARTICLE 4, TABLE 4 DENSITY. INTENSITY A
T4 - GENERAL Utz-µ
APPENDIX F: MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SAP
REGULATING PLAN
ARTICLE 4, TABLE 4 DENSITY, INTENSITY AND PARKING
:t :==► •►:
:10111C I •
A
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
ND FLACLER HOLDING C
iNs wlMtal neeM b be scheduled
„arihes timelines set I.
Meng fad. de. The applitatle decbbn
eNew me lnkerolbn al The pubic
roCmmeMMlon of a Mg
PZ-20-806
10/05/20
(29202028;1;
?9202028;4
29202028:10
1
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA
AND FL 1CLER HOLDING CROUP, INC., MONTE C.1RL0
Public Package Regulating Plan
Latest Regulating Plan?
Public Package Development Agreement
Latest Development Agreement?
29292^2%; sI
>9202(ti:t_ •
551192641
56264360:1
Critical Record Documents Missing From Public
Agenda Package + No PZAB Materials
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
CITY OF MIAMI
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice to the Public, Subject Property Owner(s) and Owners of Real Estate within 500 Feet
A public hearing will be held before the CITY COMMISSION as follows:
Date: April 22, 2021 Time: 9:00 AM Place: 3500 Pan American Drive
("CITY") TO OVERN THE MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT RETAIL STREET SPECIAL AREA PLAN ("MDDRS SAP") COMPRI
SED
Q,F APPROXIMATELY 22.56 ACRES OF PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF: A) UPDATING THE SAP ENTITIES TO
REFLECT THE LATEST OWNERSHIP; B) ESTABLISH A DENSITY AND INTENSITY TRANSFER PROGRAM; C) UPDATE
REGULATIONS FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SALES; D) MODIFY REVIEW OF REQUIRED CROSS -BLOCK PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTIONS BETWEEN NORTHEAST 38 STREET AND NORTHEAST 39 STREET; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE_ THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE ATTACHED FORM, FOR SAID PURPOSE;
CON'TAIIVING A SEVERABILITYCLAUSE AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
163.3225 Public hearings.—
(1) Before entering into, amending, or revoking a development agreement, a local government shall
conduct at least two public hearings. At the option of the governing body, one of the public hearings
may be held by the local planning agency.
(2)(a) Notice of intent to consider a development agreement shall be advertised approximately 7
days before each public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation and readership in the county
where the local government is located. Notice of intent to consider a development agreement shall
also be mailed to all affected property owners before the first public hearing. The day, time, and place
at which the second public hearing will be held shall be announced at the first public hearing.
b) The notice shalt specify the location of the land subject to the development agreement, the
and shall specify a place where a copy of the proposed agreement can
be obtained.
Development Agreement Notice Does Not Comply With
Florida Statutes
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Traffic flow between the Gateway Sites
and MacArthur Site is integrated, with the
principal Westbound access ramp to 1-19
along our property line.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Street
Any Amendment and Traffic Study Must Include
Traffic To and From Our Site.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
February 1, 2021
Mr. Alex Schapiro
Miami Design District Associates
3841 NE 2' Avenue, Suite 300
Miami, Florida 33137
Re: Miami Design District
Trip Generation Analysis
Dear Mr. Schapiro:
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. has performed a trip generation analysis for the proposed
amendment to the previously approved Miami Design District Special Area Plan (SAP) generally
bounded by NE 43'a Street to the north, NE 38th Street to the south. North Miami Avenue to the west,
and Biscayne Boulevard to the east in mi, Florida. Please note that the Miami Design rict
was previously amended and approved as part of the Miami Design District Special Area Plan
rt3edidme t[affic-.11 gtAnadysts-May.2013..,Ihe„previously„aPproat&SABA endment consisted
of a development program contemplating approximately 1,089,833 square feet of retail space, 161,146
square feet of office space, 52 hotel rooms, 561 multifamily residential units, and 32,267 square feet of
of retail sp
11and1
4 square feet of office space. 1
feet of restaurant space.
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
A trip generation analysis was conducted for the previously approved SAP amendment and the
•ro.osed SAP amendment usin. the Institute of Trans.ortation Engineers' (ITE) Taro Generation
apr .ved SAP amendment, trip generation
calculations were prepared for the P.M. peak hour. Trip generation for the previously approved and
proposed SAP amendment was determined using ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 820 (Shopping Center),
LUC 710 (General Office Building), LUC 310 (Hotel), LUC 220 (Multifamily Housing [Low -Rise]), and
LUC 932 (High Tumover [Sit -Down] Restaurant).
Relies on 2013 Era Traffic Study
Relies on 2013 Era
Development Program
(Because no Study Done Since)
Relies on Unsupported or
---- Now Repealed
"Development Progra
Application Relies on only Trip Generation Analysis that
Bootstraps a 2013 Traffic Study
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Use
Retail Space in Sq. Ft.
Office Space in Sq. Ft.
Restaurant Space
Total Additional Square Feet
Hotel Rooms
Multi Family Residential
Units
Total Additional Units
May 2013 Tr.
Study and
SAP
Amendment
Proposed in
Amendment Per
Trip Generation
Rpt.
l ,089,833lirr
:781,146
32,267
806, ,o
703,644
108,820
rir
52 110
561 724
% Change
Number Change
liali,681 sq. ft.
+288% +522,498 sq. ft.
+237%'-'" +7b,552 sq. ft.
+ 1 12%
+29%
The Trip Generation Analysis Reflects Dramatic
Increases in Square Footage of Office, Hotel
Multifamily Units and Restaurants
+315,369 sq. ft.
+58
+163
221
10
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Existing (to be
demo)
Building Area
(new)
New Net Usable
Area
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL KEYS
_ ._.
TOTAL OFFICE
.— ...
TOTAL RETAIL
.,,,
ADAPTIVE USE
na.
Parking
provided
nr
REQUIRED
PARKING
nu
TOTAL
PARKING
H'rl
PARKING
REQ"D
HI
SURPLUS
PARKING
UNITS
Total
Req d in
aggregate
Units
Total Re 'd
q
in aggregate
I
i Total R 'd
eq
Units
1 in aggregate
Total Req d
Units in
aggregate
Adaptive Use
Spaces
on -site parking
without
discount
with on
street and
adaptive use
AGGREGATE wf
discount Actual
spaces required
225,209 2.699.095 I 1,531,939
561
�►
521
/
1 215.316 I
1,159,372
444
3,308
3,583
&352 2,866
886
ike Parking Required
Development Program in 2013 SAP Amendment &
Traffic Study: 2,699,095 Sq. Ft. of New Buil . t
With 561 Residential Units and 52 Hotel Rooms
143
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Miami Design District Retail Street Special Area Plan
��-iolM
a 9i:.ilk
Cir4 itetti0,1
f 49 :;11.
0
Paccar's 39 and 40 tamovad putsutwnt.
to Thad Arn,ndiueni of SAP
Most Recent DevelopmentSq. Ft.
+ 350,000 = 3,049,095 Total Square Feet (From Existing
Concept Book Sheet A 1.8, Now Set for Repeal)
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
200 Eye Street, S.E.
Washington, D.C.
BEFO
The nationally recognized redevelopment of 200 Eye Street
transformed a vacant industrial property —once home to the
printing operations of The Washington Star and The Washington
Post —into a 325,000 square foot world -class office
property. StonebridgeCarras directed this public/private
partnership for the District of Columbia Department of General
Services, creating an innovative financing structure that enabled the
PROJECT DETAILS
• 325.000 SF of Class A office
building
• 180 spaces of underground
parking
Example of 325,000 Square Feet of Office
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
:ow Many Total New Trigs Based an 2013 Data ±
defined _I Re' eal e Development Pro ram?
8
Table 1: Net New P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation Summary
Development Plan
In
Out
Total
Previously Approved
SAP Amendment
any
069
2,038
Currently Proposed
SAP Amendment
8E4
1,172
2,056
Net Change
-85
103
18
► The Applicant's Trip Generation Analysis
Concludes that only additional trips will be
generated, relying on a 2 d0 Traffic Analysis &
Study, despite additional square feet of
commercial use and additional hotel and
residential units.
15
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
This Amendment Does not Just Allow Density Transfer,
It Repeals the Maximum Caps of the Development
Program, Destroying All Prior Maximum
Concurrency/Load Determinations of Parking,
Permitted Uses By Square Footage, Maximum
Residential Units & Maximum Hotel Units.
implementation phases of design development and construction documents. I`iothing En this Miami
Design District Retail Street SAP, including the save opmen program as set forth on Page
A1.8 of the Concept Book, shall be construed to limit development in cxccs of
grogram.
any one Lot or parcel forming part of this SAP and the procedures set forth in Article 7 of this Miarn
Design District Retail Street SAP,
« acent and non -ad acent .arcels within the SAP
Area which have unutilized density or unutilized FLR_ located within the T6 Urban Core transact
zone ("T6 Properties") may transfer such Remaining Aggregate Density or Remaining AQQreaate
FLR to other T6 Properties within the SAP Area, provided however that each individual project on
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
iner
Miami Design District Retail Street Spe
MIAMI DESIGN DISTRICT SAP AGGREGATE SPREADSHEET
Property Information
SAP Property Numberls) Property Name
Ares Calculations
OPen Space'
Civic space
SAP DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / REQUIREMENTS 50.643 452375
2,3,4,5,6,7 Palm Coon
13.14 1111
16 0,110
15 OP110
50,51 Crty Yew Garage
42,43,44,44 Paradise Plaza
2879,30.31.3133,34 Museum Garage
35,36,24,37•• Bridge Buildings
1H,37•• lade DAMN
25 Mosaic
52,53 Penny lane
19 tsaer
63 Stardust f3St
62.81 Stardust West
11.12 Sweet Bird South
162
1,871
3,486
1,416
1,864
6,190
3.315
933
1,723
411
1,035
328
271
2,188
1,187
11,057
15.723
3,525
1,675
1,355
OTALAPPROVED
26,380
43,33S
EMANING DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS / 2a,263] 2,540
SAP PROPERTY 64
11,097 I 4,049
'Ersess civic space can be counted towards the open space requitement.
pwsuant to sheet 41.9 of the Concept Boot
”Property Number 371s shared between the Br.dge and lade Buildings
The Development Progra
Master Plan in Sheet A _-
the Concept Book is •
The New Con
ricks Only 0
Civic Space
The Applicant Repeals the Development Program
and at the Same Time Relies Upon It for Traffic Data
in the "Trip Generation Analysis"
•
17
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Exception Process for
Exceedance? Gone.
7.1.2.11 Modifications to the Initial Development Program & Redevelopment Credits
1.
However, the Densities and Intensities listed therein may be redistributed to any Lot of
pay i ith th nn n y n♦ o i ct t e n rrea, subject -always -to -tile
per lnte sit I its osect. ensi#fee and
Dist.ct Retail St t C4D d chi
Do 'c d n iti
�'n�" sand Intensities in
aggregate by 10% without need for further administrative review. Any—prepesed
Densities and Intensities specified on page. A1.98 of the Concept-Book-by-more-than-10%,
abject at all times to tho
ing Transect designation of a
particular Lot or parcel.
There is no Regulating Plan Left
O%+
18
Criteria 10: 7.1.2.8.f.2: "A change may be made
Special Area Plan, and in a manner which maintains the goals of the Miami 21 Code to
preserve Neighborhoods and to
Article 4, Table 2 (intentionally deleted)
LOT OCCUPATION
:J
�� t.iS4lf ttw
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
MIAMI 21 TRANSECT ZONES DELETED
MWM Code fl4I dub.
ruMOw the mkmla nel
toonnendatan
PZ-20
10/0
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Criteria 10: 7.1.2.8.f.2: "A change may be made
Special Area Plan, and in a manner which maintains the goals of the Miami 21 Code to
preserve Neighborhoods and to
indings: The proposed amendment does not include a change in the
Future Land Use designation of any property. However, this
changing the development standards for T6 properties;
intensity from site to site, while maintaining the same
currently enabled through the city's public benefit program.
underlying Transect or
amendment does propose
an
and FLR maximums
The proposed
development regulation changes to the "Gateway Site" fit the neighborhood context
while maintaining a proper transition.
Miami 21 SAP Amendment Criteria No. 10: Staff
Report Page 1 1: Inconsistent and Contradictory
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Tapering to Residential
The Design District itself does not feature tall
commercial or residential towers.
21
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
1-195 Provides a demarcation between towers
to the South and mid -rise and single family
residential to the North.
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
The Applicant Asks you to Look Outside of the Design District for Zoning
and Compatible Height (defeating the purpose of the Special Area
Plan), but inside the Design District for Traffic Data (which is based on all
surrounding sources, not just within the SAP)
The Applicant Seeks Height • 40 tibility fro
Outside the SAP, but Considers Traffic Based Upoi
Repealed Development Program of the SAP
23
TOUflC
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
's out of scale with no transition to
nperties South of
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
3.9.h.10:
Flexible allocation of development capacity and Height, n individual
sites within the Special Area Plan, shall be allowed so long as the capacity or Height
distribution does not result in development that is out of Scale or character with the
surrounding area, and provides for appropriate transitions.
Analysis: The proposed amendment proposes changing the development standards for T6
properties; while
maintaining the same height and FLR maximums currently enabled through the city's
public benefit program.
Findings: Consistent.
taff: Transfer Densit A
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Apartment -Hotel" or "Condo -Hotel:" A room, or group of rooms. each oontaininq bathroom and
kitchen facilities, with ingress and egress that may or may not be through a ,common lobby.
intended for rental to transients on a day-to-day, week -to -week, or month -to -month basis, not
intended for use as a. permanent dwelling. An Apartment Hotel' or 'condo Hotel shall be
considered as e s uivalent to o►ne-h:alf '0.50 of .a Dweliin • Unit.
The Applicant Has No Need to Transfer Density
to Gateway Sites: The Amendment Doubles
Density for "Units."
26
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Criteria 9:
7.1.2.8.f.1(a): "The relationship of the proposed amendment to the goals, objectives
and policies of the with appropriate consideration as to
whether the proposed change will further the goals, objectives and policies of the
Page10of13
Comprehensive Plan; the Miami 21 Code; and other city regulatio
and justification for the proposed changes necessary."
designation is proposed as part of the amendment.
MIAMI 21 SAP AMENDMENT CRITERIA NO.
9: STAFF REPORT PAGED 10-1 1:
INCONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
27
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
BUILDING DISPOSITION
a. Lot Area
b. Lot Width
c. Lot Coverage
-1-8 Stones
- Above 8°ti Story
d. Floor Lot Ratio (FLR)
e. Frontage at front Setback
f. Open Space Requirements
g. Density
5,000 s.f. min.
50 ftmin.
93.5% max. SAP aggregate
Bl
15,000 sq. fk max. Floorpiate for
Residential & Lodging
30,000 sq. ft. max. FIoorplate for Office &
8 /30% additional Public Bcncfit 11 via Unutilized FLR
8 / 30% additional Public Benefit
60% min.
6.5% min. SAP
150 du/ac max '
300 Dwelling Units Per Acre in Chart on F.70 of the Regulating is Inconsistent
with the Comprehensive Han Providing for 150 Units
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
The Traffic "Trip Generation" report providing for only 18
additional trips is not a Traffic Impact Analysis & Study, instead
relies on 2013 Study and Repealed Development Program
The Amendment Repeals the Development Program Limits and
increases Restaurant and Hotel Uses by hundreds of thousands
of square feet without adequate traffic analysis
The Amendment violates the Code based Criteria for SAP
Amendment
4 The Amendment rewards past public benefit already used for
prior amendments and approvals
The Amendment violates the Comprehensive Plan
01liI\LII4
Submitted into the public
record for item(s) PZ.10 and PZ.11
on 04-22-2021, City Clerk
Respectfully Continue this Item to allow for a
.--complete updated Traffic Study (that
includes our site with the participation1f our
�W� a you. engineers . _ A ank ou
b� � tl' s