HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Public Comments Submitted Online for the November 19, 2020 City Commission Meeting/a 177 ° °°°
0VC Ire :� A 9, 2020
P u b Iic Comment
motero@miamigov,com
:IiumTMn�:: .gins::
11"1111 I\l aa u1i
Dani Garri
el do
Rob
Pipe
St: re
Addr
1335
sw
18
stree
1401
SW
17T
H
TE R
RAC
E
. .1hIIc '7177 e) ...� I �M e° °°7h e
A,g
Flea IFIFLII1b11..11C1 C; rnreg,`u.nl::
PZ.
16
8000
Zoni
ng
Text
Com
muni
ty
Sup
port
Facil
ities
BC.
5
6956
Civili
an
I nve
stiga
tive
Pan
el
We have a city in need to additional facilities. I agree with the request to
allow Assisted Living Facilities (Community Support Facilities) in the D1
(Industrial) zoning areas.
My name is Rob Piper, and I reside at 1401 SW 17th Terrace Miami FL
33145. I am writing in support of Item BCS, regarding the appointment of
Gabriel Paez to serve on the City of Miami Civilian Investigative Panel.
Gabriel is an honest, fair and committed individual who will uphold and
enhance the integrity of the Civilian Investigative Panel.
8246 Submittal -Public Comments Submitted Online for the November 19, 2020
City Commission Meeting
, a Wit::
11"1111 I\l aa u1i
Cha
Ana mm
as
St: re
Addr
Age
BC.
5 My name is Ana Chammas and I reside in 6880 SW 49 ST. I am writing in
6956 support of item BC5 for the appointment of Gabriel Paez to serve on the
6880 Civili City of Miami Civilian Investigative Panel. Not only is Gabriel an active
SW an member in our community across district boundaries, but he possesses
49 Inve great integrity and dedication. He is honest, fair and will be a great
ST stiga contribution to any position he is appointed to. Also, I am confident that he
tive will uphold the rules and policies in which the Civilian Investigative Panel is
Pan established upon. Thank you!
el
II Ir Wit:: , Wit::
r I"II'll ONI a an
Terre
11
Fritz
St: re
°t::
Adds'
Age
rn
Mr. Vice Chair & City Commissioners: RE: Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Flagler District BID (FD-BID) requesting WITHDRAWAL of
SR.1 (2099) & PZ.3 (1909) - PUBLIC ART ORDINANCES to be heard on
November 19, 2020 by the Miami City Commission. The Board of Directors
of the Flagler District BID (FD-BID) applauds the City's efforts to increase
the amount of art in public places. Downtown Miami enjoys a wide variety
of public art, voluntarily installed by developers, and the City has been
ranked as one of the top ten cities in the world for public art. HOWEVER,
the Public Art Ordinances (SR.1 #2099 & PZ.3 #1909), in their current
draft, are punitive and will have negative effects on economic viability,
Flagl SR. housing affordability, and development in the Flagler Specialty District and
er 1 throughout Downtown Miami: • acting as a disincentive for investing in art
Distr 2099 because any art commissioned by a private property owner will be subject
ict Ame to review by the City through a City board. • adding an additional
BID nd bureaucratic layer that will stifle the creativity of artists; and increase cost
25 Cod of mandated artworks. As a result, works by local up-and-coming artists
SE e - may not be selected by developers, and these artists will be significantly
2nd Art and unfairly disadvantaged. • subjecting property owners to burdensome
Aven in bonding and insurance requirements • creating unrealistic timelines for
ue, Publi replacement of art by world-renowned artists. increasing a private
#240 c developer's regulatory costs and decreasing the current edge that exists in
Mia Plac Downtown Miami. • proposing an "art tax" that will contribute to the City's
mi, es housing affordability crisis, especially more severe during the current
FL (Pha COVID-19 pandemic. Rather than have burdensome regulations which are
3311 se punitive in nature, proposed ordinances should instead offer incentives that
31 II) reward voluntarily installed public art. The City Commission has indefinitely
deferred Second Reading of the proposed ordinances numerous times over
the last four (4) years as there are significant concerns with the current
drafts and additional outreach is needed THEREFORE, the FD-BID Board
of Directors request that the City Commission WITHDRAW the Public Art
Ordinances (SR.1 #2099 & PZ.3 #1909) from consideration. Board
Members • Dylan Finger, Mana Miami (President/Chair) • Daniel Pena
Giraldi, Stambul USA (Vice President/Vice-Chair) • Sergio Rok, Rok
Enterprises (Secretary) • Gary Ressler, Tilia Properties (Treasurer) • Randy
Alonso, Lost Boy Dry Goods (Director) Please let me know if we can
provide further information. Thank you.
II Ir Wit:: , Wit::
r I"II'll ONI a an
Terre
11
St: re
°t::
Adds'
25
SE
2nd
Aven
ue,
Fritz #240
Mia
mi,
FL
3313
1
Age
rn
SR.
6
8049
Ame
nd
Cod
e-
Cha
pter
36 -
Nois
e
Mr. Vice Chair & Clty Commissioners: RE: Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Flagler District BID (FD-BID) requesting EXCLUSION of
Downtown Miami properties from proposed amendments to Chapter 36,
section 36-4(b) - NOISE ORDINANCE, to be heard on November 19, 2020
by the Miami City Commission. The Board of Directors of the Flagler
District BID (FD-BID) understands that outdoor music after certain night-
time hours can affect the quality of life for residents living in adjacent
properties in neighborhoods throughout the City of Miami. HOWEVER, the
City's Flagler Specialty District and much of Downtown Miami has been
developed as mixed -use, commercial and multi -family residential
properties. Our vibrant Downtown district would suffer significant negative
impacts in both quality of life and economic viability if there were a
restriction on music and noise between the hours of 8pm in the evening to
8am the next morning. THEREFORE, the FD-BID requests that properties
within the Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) District be
EXCLUDED from the proposed amendment provisions. Currently Chapter
36, section 36-4(b) prohibits noise or music plainly audible at a distance of
100 feet from the building, structure, vehicle or premises in which or from
which it is produced. Residents within the Flagler District have successfully
worked with City's Code Compliance Department within this provision to
address noise issues. The current situation may not be perfect, but any
amendment to these provisions affecting the Flagler District should be
proposed only after extensive discussions with our diverse district
stakeholders including residents and business/property owners. Board
Members : • Dylan Finger, Mana Miami (President/Chair) • Daniel Pena
Giraldi, Stambul USA (Vice President/Vice-Chair) • Sergio Rok, Rok
Enterprises (Secretary) • Gary Ressler, Title Properties (Treasurer) • Randy
Alonso, Lost Boy Dry Goods (Director) Please let me know if we can
provide further information. Thank you.
II Ir Wit:: , Wit::
r I"II'll ONI a an
Terre
11
MAR
IA
St: re
°t::
Adds'
Age
rn
Flagl RE.
er 2
Distr 7663
ict Exec
BID ute
25 Joint
SE Agre
Fritz 2nd eme
Ave, nt -
#240 A
Mia Micr
mi, omo
FL bility
3313 Net
1 work
1335
SW
ORT 18
EGA ST
BAR MIA
RIO MI,
S FL
3314
5
PZ.
16
8000
Zoni
ng
Text
Com
muni
ty
Sup
port
Facil
ities
Mr. Vice Chair & City Commissioners: RE: Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Flagler District BID (FD-BID) supporting Resolution RE.2
#7663 (deferred RE.18 from July 23rd Commission Meeting) to be heard
now on November 19, 2020 by the Miami City Commission. The proposed
network of separated or protected micromobility bike lanes connecting
Government Center, Brightline Station, Miami -Dade College, and several
Metromover Stations among other destinations will provide significant
connectivity and economic benefit to the Flagler District and Central
Business District areas of Downtown Miami. FD-BID supports the creation
of separated/protected lanes along the following roadways: • N/S Miami
Ave (County road) • NE/SE 1 Ave (County road) • NW/NE 6 St (City road) •
NW/NE 5 St (City road) Board Members • Dylan Finger, Mana Miami
(President/Chair) • Daniel Pena Giraldi, Stambul USA (Vice President/Vice-
Chair) • Sergio Rok, Rok Enterprises (Secretary) • Gary Ressler, Tilia
Properties (Treasurer) • Randy Alonso, Lost Boy Dry Goods (Director)
Please let me know if we can provide further information. Thank you.
I agree with this request. The city is in need and I approve.
I\l r I"II'll ONI a an
Rac
hel
Hern
a nde
z
Alva r
ez
St re
et
Adds'
Age
a°nda F° a lk 11..11 1 C" ua'na'nE",`walk:
rn
SR.
7334 6
Hard 8049
ing Ame
Ave, nd
apt Cod
8 e-
Mia Cha
mi pter
Beac 36 -
h FL Nois
e
Hello, my name is Rachel Hernandez Alvarez and my address is 7334
Harding Ave apt 8, Miami Beach Florida 33141. I am addressing today
proposed ordinance #8049, second reading #6, that will restrict the hours of
outdoor music in the City of Miami. As a fan of Ball & Chain I am against
any new law that would further restrict or reduce the amount of music on
their patio. Ball & Chain is culturally important to Miami and Little Havana
and as a lover of this iconic venue, I want to be able to dance outside in
our beautiful city. I want to be able to listen to and enjoy music every
night. The City is unfairly withholding the Outdoor Dining Warrant that Ball
& Chain applied for more than one year ago and the City has purposely
not rendered a decision here as it is legally required to do by Code as per
Miami 21. You will hear that businesses with existing warrants are
exempted, yet Ball & Chain's warrant is being held up until this ordinance
passes. If the City moves forward grandfathering in existing businesses,
then Ball and Chain must be grandfathered in because they applied for this
license more than one year ago and because anything else would be
grossly unfair if not illegal. There has been live nighttime music on the
patio of the Ball & Chain since 1935. All I ask is please, don't stop it today.
I urge the commission to not stop the music and vote against ordinance
#8049, second reading #6, and I also urge the commission to let all of the
125 families that depend on Ball & Chain for their livelihood and health
insurance to immediately allow the reopening of Ball & Chain. Thank you
for your time.
II Ir Wit:: , Wit::
r I"II'll ONI a an
St: re
°t::
Adds'
Age
rn
Hello, my name is Daniel Huambachano My address is: 3650 NW 36th ST
APT 613 Miami Florida. I am writing today on proposed ordinance #8049,
second reading #6, that will restrict the hours of outdoor music in the City
of Miami. I am a fan of Ball & Chain. I am against any new law that would
further restrict or reduce the amount of music on their patio. Ball & Chain is
SR. culturally important to Miami and Little Havana and as a lover of Ball &
3650 6 Chain I want to be able to dance outside in our beautiful city. I want to be
nw 8049 able to listen to and enjoy music every night. The City is unfairly
36th Ame withholding the Outdoor Dining Warrant that Ball & Chain applied for more
Hue st nd than one year ago and the City has purposely not rendered a decision here
Dani mba apt Cod as it is legally required to do by Code as per Miami 21. You will hear that
el chan 613 e - businesses with existing warrants are exempted, yet Ball & Chain's warrant
o mia Cha is being held up until this ordinance passes. If The City moves forward in
mi fl pter grandfathering in existing businesses then BALL & CHAIN must be
3314 36 - grandfathered in because they applied for this license more than one year
2 Nois ago and because anything else would be grossly unfair if not illegal. There
e has been live nighttime music on the patio of the Ball & Chain since 1935.
Please, please don't stop it today. I urge the commission to not stop the
music and vote against ordinance #8049, second reading #6, and I also
urge the commission to let all of the 125 families that depend on
Ball&Chain for their Livelihood and health insurance to immediately allow
the reopening of Ball & Chain. Thank you for your time.
II Ir Wit:: , Wit::
r I"II'll ONI a an
St: re
°t::
Adds'
1714
Sery Espa Arbo
ando rza rside
Dr
Age
rn
RE.
2
7663
Exec
ute
Joint
Agre
eme
nt -
A
M icr
omo
bility
Net
work
City of Miami Commission, My name is Servando Esparza and I'm a
Senior Manager for Government Partnerships at Bird, the largest and most
experienced e-scooter operator in the United States. I write in support of
agenda item RE.2, a resolution regarding the development of a
micromobility network. Since the pilot program began on April 1, 2019,
over 1,830,000 e-scooter rides have occurred. During the same time, the
City of Miami has collected over a million dollars in fees from e-scooter
operators for infrastructure, including a micromobility network like the one
proposed here. It is clear Miami residents want e-scooters made available
in the city and that the scooter share program offers significant
environmental and economic benefits for Miami. With over 90,000 Miami -
Dade households without access to a car, it is also an important alternative
transportation option. As Miami's report on dockless scooter share
programs describes, "Scooters may fill a gap within Miami's multimodal
transit system as an alternative to cars to provide short distance and 'last
mile' connections...scooters have the potential to reduce short -distance,
single occupancy vehicle and shared vehicle (e.g. Uber, Lyft) trips, reducing
urban congestion and emissions. Scooters may provide a low cost, eco-
friendly, and flexible mobility option for short trips, particularly when used
in conjunction with other transit means (e.g., metrorail, metromover)." The
development of a micromobility network will provide a safer and easier way
for Miami riders to connect to transit. Bird's rider surveys have uncovered a
strong demand for more and wider protected bike lanes. In fact, a survey
of Bird scooter riders in Miami found that 54% of respondents would ride
scooters more often if there were protected bike lanes on their route.
Experience from several cities shows that bike lanes and other Vision Zero -
related infrastructure investments effectively reduce crash risk for all road
users. Bird supports utilizing the fees collected from the City of Miami
Micromobility program to develop infrastructure that supports
micromobility. With additional infrastructure, cyclists and scooter riders will
safely travel in bike lanes instead of traveling on the sidewalk. The shift of
bike and scooter rides from sidewalks to bike lanes also enhances the
safety of pedestrians on sidewalks. Again, we urge you to support RE.2 as
it demonstrates the commitment to safer city streets, cleaner air and more
accessible mobility options for all residents. Respectfully, Servando
Esparza Government Partnerships Bird
End o report