Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Submittal-Albert Dotson-Presentation Regarding RFP
Why Virginia Key LLC? Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 City Clerk ':neatest Financial Return to the City • CBRE did the math: VKLLC's proposal provides nearly $100 million more revenue to the City than BMP's — net present value of $14 million more (13% higher) • Once the project is completed, VKLLC will generate—$585,000 per year in additional real estate taxes and $1,000,000 per year in additional rent as compared to current revenues--includinq the extra $100KImonth Full Compliance with the RFP and the Virginia Key Master Plan • VKLLC development adheres to the goals and requirements of the Virginia Key Master Plan = same uses, size, height, and location as in Master Plan. • Unlike BMP, Virginia Key LLC's development has no monolithic structures, based its in -water slips on existing depths (no dredging for megayachts), and adheres to the City's 50-foot setback from the bayfront. a Plan includes an uninterrupted baywalk (2600 feet); a public boat and kayak launch; small-scale marine retail; two restaurants (casual and upscale); 600 covered parking spaces; 162 wet slips (slip mix and location based on existing depths); 750 dry slips with Aerodocks automatic storage (46% more density smaller building for same number of slips) • State-of-the-art sustainability measures (solar panels, rainwater capture, reclaimed water, Florida Clean Marina designation) and designed to address sea level rise (can accommodate storm surges of up to 15.5 feet). Most Experienced Team —By Far • Virginia Key LLC is a partnership of the top two marina developers and operators on the east coast, RCI and Suntex. RCI and Suntex currently operate a total of 46 marinas, including 17 in Florida. • In the first RFP, RCI and Suntex were ranked first and second —both ahead of the incumbent operator. • In the current RFP, Virginia Key LLC was again ranked first ahead of the incumbent operator and was ranked first by 6 of the 7 committee members. Clean Process with a Clear Result • The RFP was reviewed by the Virginia Key Advisory Board, the Waterfront Advisory Board, and the Sea level Rise Committee, and was reviewed and approved by the City Commission. • The City appointed a seven -member expert evaluation committee with no conflicts of interest, and Virginia Key LLC was the clear winner in every single scoring category- • The decision of the committee and manager has been upheld by an independent hearing examiner, the Circuit Court, and the Third District Court of Appeal. L 5 L5 - 5 C)M1q. qtAi4\ - i e (n\9p,\-\tl IN 1 CITY OF MIAM1. FLORIDA INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM D: Honorable Mayor and Miami DATE: May 15, 2019 City Commissioners FROM: Emilia T City M SUBJEC I Updated Responsibility Review of Virginia Key, LLC; RFP No. 16-17-011 REFERENCES: N/A ENCLOSURES: Virginia Key Marina RFP 16-17-011 Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC Allegations Virginia Key, LLC responses The City of Miami issued Request for Proposals # 16-17-011 ("RFP") for the development and lease of a City -owned waterfront property located in Virginia Key ("Virginia Key Marina"). The Selection Committee, and thereafter the City Manager, made a recommendation for the selection of the top - ranked bidder Virginia Key, LLC ("VK"). The second -ranked bidder (Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC or "BMP") filed a bid protest, which was heard by a qualified hearing officer, and denied. The hearing officer affirmed the award recommendation, finding that "each proposer was treated fairly and equally in accordance with the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, Florida Statutes, and the RFP" and "that the RFP process was not conducted in an arbitrary or capricious manner." Thereafter, the hearing officer's decision was appealed to the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, who also agreed with the hearing officer and denied the complaint. BMP then appealed to the Third District Court of Appeals, who affirmed the Circuit Court and issued and opinion that similarly held in favor of the City. Finally, BMP did not timely file an appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. Notwithstanding the above, after the Third District Court of Appeals denied BMP's appeal, BMP submitted various correspondences to the Office of the City Attorney, City administration, and City Commission, arguing that VK was a non -responsible bidder. Additionally, the City received various correspondence disputing these allegations from VK. Both the allegations and corresponding responses are enclosed hereto for your reference. After reviewing the allegations and responses, the Department of Real Estate and Asset Management, with the assistance of the Department of Procurement and the Office of the City Attorney, conducted an updated in-depth review of the top -ranked proposer's responsibility, including, but not limited to: • updated background checks; • conflicts review; • updated reference checks; and • publicly -noticed Responsibility Review Meeting Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY The RFP provides the criteria by which a proposer's responsibility will be determined in Section 11.6.1 The language provides that the City has reasonable discretion to deem a proposer non -responsible for the various criteria provided therein. In making this determination, the City would give "due consideration of all relevant extenuating circumstances, including, without limitation, the Proposer's culpability, overall record of performance, etc." Importantly, the RFP specifies this responsibility determination would be based on the Proposer, its members and principals. While BMP attempts to argue that the use of the word member in this context includes the members of the development team, the City's intention was to use the word member to encapsulate other titles similar to principals (i.e., managing members and limited members in Limited Liability Companies); this is evident based on the various provisions of the RFP relating to responsibility, such as the background check requirement which required proposers to submit consent forms for the Proposing entity and all of the proposing entity's principals in order for the City to conduct background and credit checks of the relevant entities and individuals. Importantly, these provisions concerning responsibility were applicable to the Proposer, but not to the development team or subcontractors. 1 "G. Responsive/Responsible Proposers Subject to City of Miami Code Sections 18-95 and 18-107, the City shall have reasonable discretion to deem any Proposal non -responsive and/or Proposer non -responsible (with due consideration of all relevant extenuating circumstances, including, without limitation, the Proposers culpability, overall record of performance, etc.) based on whether the Proposer or any of its members has any actual or constructive knowledge that Proposer or any of its members: i) are in arrears to the City for any debt or obligation; ii) have any uncured defaults or have failed to perform under the terms of any agreement or contract with the City or other government entity within the past ten (10) years; iiij are in default under any agreement or contract with the City or other government agency or entity on the date and time the proposal is due; iv) have caused fines, penalties, fees or similar impositions to be levied against the City or any other governmental entity or agency; v) have any past, present or on -going litigation or adversarial administrative proceedings with the City or other government agency or entity; vi) have filed and not prevailed in frivolous lawsuits, as that term is defined by Section 57.105 of the Florida Statutes as determined by a final order of the court; vii) have past, present, or pending involuntary: bankruptcies, liquidations, assignments for the benefit of creditors, receiverships, dissolutions, actions involving fraudulent transfers, foreclosures, or similar actions within the past seven (7) years on projects or businesses they have owned, operated, or controlled a majority interest (i.e., ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of the entity stock or shares); vlii) have been found liable by any legal or administrative entity via any proceedings for environmental damage, contamination or any other environmental liability; ix) have failed to disclose involvement as a party, third party, or intervenor in any legal or administrative proceedings concerning environmental damage, contamination or any other environmental liabilities, whether found liable or otherwise; x) have been debarred by any public agency or been placed in the convicted vendors list pursuant to Florida Statute Section 287.133 or a similar law, rule, or regulation; xi) have failed to disclose any of the above; or 'di) are otherwise determined to be non -responsible as defined by the City of Miami Procurement ordinance, including, without limitation, Sections 18-73 and 18-95 of the City Code, and by the laws of the State of Florida. Similarly, any Proposer, or its principal(s) that is determined by a court, hearing officer, or other regulatory agency of competent jurisdiction (and all due process of law has been exhausted) to be liable for causing damage (by their own actions) to the City, its agencies or instrumentalities, directly or indirectly, shall be immediately responsible for payment of the judgment or fines. If the Proposer or its principal does not pay the judgment or fines, within thirty (30) days after the date of the City's written notice (which shall not be effective until after due process of law has been exhausted), either during the solicitation process or anytime during the term of any agreement awarded pursuant to this Solicitation, the City shall have discretion to Immediately disqualify the Proposer and terminate any agreement entered into pursuant to this RFP, with no other cure rights. In such event, the City shall immediately own any improvements built on the Property, with no responsibility, financial or otherwise, to the Proposer." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The City of Miami Procurement Ordinance, codified as Chapter 18, Article III, of the City of Miami Code also provides Section 18-95 entitled "Determination of Responsibility" which affords guidance to the factors to be evaluated in determining the responsibility of a bidder or proposer.2 ALLEGATIONS The following is a summary of the allegations submitted on behalf of BMP as well as the review and determination as to each argument, as supported by the findings obtained from the updated responsibility review. Shoreline Foundation, inc. Shoreline Foundation, Inc. ("Shoreline") was included in VK's proposal as a member of the proposed Development Team for dock and foundation construction. After VK's submittal of the proposal, Shoreline pled guilty to defrauding the U.S. Coast Guard. In short, 8MP argues that VK is not a responsible proposer because Shoreline was included in VK's proposal, Shoreline pled guilty to defrauding the U.S. Coast Guard, and VK did not advise the City of Shoreline's guilty plea. Shoreline is included in the proposal as part of the proposed Development Team but is neither the Proposer nor a principal thereof. As noted above, the RFP specifies that the City shall have reasonable discretion to deem any Proposer non -responsible based on the actions of the Proposer, its members and principals_ The language does not specify the same for development team members. In fact, the RFP provides for background checks of the "proposing entity and its principals" but does not mention background checks of subcontractors. The PEP further provides that any principals included in Appendix 3 may not be substituted or withdrawn unless authorized by the City Manager in writing; the same restriction is not included for the development team or any contractors, engineers, etc. During the Responsibility Review Meeting, VK confirmed not only that Shoreline was not a principal, but also that VK was capable and willing to either self -perform the proposed work, or hire the appropriate contractor at the appropriate time in consultation with the City. Additionally, as noted above, the language in the RFP provides that the determination of responsibility will be made "with due consideration of all relevant extenuating circumstances, including, without limitation, the Proposer's culpability, overall record of performance, etc." It would be unreasonable to reject Proposer as non -responsible for the subsequent actions of a potential subcontractor. Sec. 18-95. - Determination of responsibility. (c) Factors to be considered in determining responsibility of prospective contractual parties shall include but not be limited to: (1) Availability of appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility, and personnel resources and expertise, or the ability to obtain them, to meet all contractual requirements; (2) A satisfactory record of performance; (3) A satisfactory record of integrity; (4) Qualified legal standing to contract with the city; and (5) Compliance in supplying all requested information connected with the inquiry concerning responsibility.... (e) The prospective contractual party shall provide any information requested by the chief procurement officer or purchasing agent concerning responsibility. If such contractual party fails to provide the requested information, the determination of responsibility may be made upon available information or the prospective contractual party may be found nonresponsible. The prospective contractual party may demonstrate the availability of necessary financial, equipment, facility, and personnel resources by submitting (1) Evidence that the contractual party possesses such necessary resources; (2) Acceptable plans to subcontract for such necessary resources; or (3) A documented commitment for, or explicit arrangement with, satisfactory sources to provide such necessary resources. (Ord. No. 12271, § 2, 8-22-02; Ord. No. 13379, § 2, 4-25-13). CU 0 CU H re LLl U U A proposer must have some form of flexibility in selecting its subcontractors for a project such as this, which is not a simple construction bid, but rather, a project involving planning, design, permitting, construction, operation, a leasehold interest, and numerous other factors that will result in a project that will occur in multiple phases over many years. So long as there are no issues with the responsibility of Proposer or proposer's principals, and the selected subcontractors that will ultimately perform the work for the project possess the requisite qualifications and are legally permitted to perform, there should be no disqualification.' C � U Applicable administrative and civil case law decisions further support that the evaluation of w y OZ responsibility is applicable to the proposing entity that will be in privity of contract with the City, and ri not the subcontractors.4 = v m L ,y o Technomarine Group -o o BMP next alleges that Technomarine Group ("Technomarine") was proposed by VK to develop the a, automated dry stack storage system, and that Technomarine was: administratively dissolved by the State of Florida for failure to file its annual report; lost multi -million -dollar judgements; defaulted on public contracts; was subject to a civil action by the City of Pahokee; and was subject to threated eviction proceedings for lack of rent payments. Technomarine was not listed in any of the appendices as a member of the Proposer, the business team, or the development team. The Proposal does include mention of Technomarine in two attachments (including a resume and a design and budget proposal from Aero-Docks). According to Virginia Key, LLC, the inclusion of Technomarine was a clerical error (due to Technomarine's previous involvement, which was contemplated in the submittal for the original RFP 12-14-077). However, VK confirmed that Technomarine was not intended to serve in any capacity for the project. These statements are also consistent with the contents of the proposal, and particularly with Appendix 5 (Development Team form), which identifies Aero-Docks as a Development Team member but not Technomarine. As previously noted, even if Technomarine was intended to be a subcontractor in the RFP, the determination of responsibility is relevant only as to VK, not as to the subcontractors originally included in the proposal. Under even the most stringent standard of review, the mistaken mention of a former subcontractor in backup documentation is an immaterial or minor irregularity. The City has expressly reserved the 3 See Unisys Corp. v. Dept.of Business& Prof. Reg., Case No.94-3251BID at *7 (Fla. DOAH 1994) (upholding award, finding the RFP did not prohibit substituting subcontractors, and noting that based on the industry, it would have been self- defeating for the competitive bid process to require that all vendors be prepared to fully perform an the date of submitting proposals). "See American Auto Logistics, LP v. 1f5, 117 Fed. Ct. 137 (2014) (upholding award notwithstanding that proposer agreed to subcontract with debarred subcontractors since it terminated discussions after knowing of the actual debarment and subcontractors were not debarred at time of procurement award); Active Deployment Systems B-404875 (Comp. Gen. 2011) (upholding award and finding that proposed debarment of subcontractors did not render proposer non - responsible because the solicitation did not require proposer to list subcontractors and proposer confirmed it would not utilize subcontractors that were debarred or proposed to be debarred); Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. AHCA, Case No. 95- 3635BID (Fla. DOAH 1995) (upholding contract award and finding the prime contractor and surety were financially sound, and had the required financial stability to meet performance obligations despite failures in subcontractor's financial audit); See Also West Construction, Inc. v. Florida Blacktop, Inc., 88 So. 3d 301 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (finding that the inclusion of a subcontractor's bid within the prime contractor's bid did not create a contractual relationship between the subcontractor and contractor, and therefore contractor was not required to use subcontractor). ability to waive immaterial or minor irregularities in Section II.E. of the RFP. Additionally, Florida case law recognizes the right to waive minor irregularities.5 Automated Dry Stack Design Finally, BMP argues VK is not a responsible proposer because VK's counsel made materially false statements to the selection committee concerning Aero-Dock's involvement in the automated dry storage facility in Port Marina, Ft. Lauderdale. VK counters that there were no intentional or material misrepresentations and that the statements made were to specifically distinguish the design at Port Marina as inferior to the patented design to be used by Aero-Docks. VK also points out that during the selection committee evaluation meeting, the City's marinas expert, Jeff Carson from CBRE, made statements likening the dry storage facilities proposed by BMP and VK to each other, thereby diminishing any argument that VK benefited during the evaluation. Based on a review of the transcript, it appears that counsel's statements are inconsistent with each other, which provides a clear indication of the lack of intent to make any misrepresentations, and further provides evidence that such statements actually may have impacted VK's score negatively. On the one hand, the statements provide that the Aero-Docks design was used in Port Marina, which is contrary to the information provided on the Port Marina website and statements made by Maff- Stack. On the other hand, however, the transcript also includes statements distinguishing the design at Port Marina as inferior and subject to failure. When read together, this appears to be a statement of innocent confusion of a technical matter on the part of counsel. During the responsibility review meeting, VK noted again that the statements were taken out of context and confirmed that Aero-Docks does have the necessary patents for the automated dry storage technology (and in fact the patent holder, Richard Lydle, was present and brought copies of the original patents to display). Additionally, there is no question regarding the statements made by Proposer in their proposal in support of their experience with automated boat storage facilities, including that the owner of patent no. 8,596,946 and 2014/0154034 is Richard Lydle of Aero-Docks, and that Ben 5tinchcomb, a member of their team, has operational experience with automated facilities_ VK also further supported their capability and capacity to perform by noting that they are currently in the process of building two other automated dry storage facilities, and that the members of VK have 5,000 dry stacks throughout the country. A Proposer should not be deemed non -responsible for a statement that was not intentionally meant to mislead, and which ultimately had either no effect or a potential negative effect on their score. At worst, the statement regarding Aero-Docks was simply a misstatement that can be waived as a minor irregularity.6 VK's capacity to design, construct, and operate the dry storage facility is evidenced by their patents, experience, partnerships, and continuing efforts with automated dry storage facilities. These foregoing facts are determinative in the responsibility review. Robinson Elec. Co., Inc. v. Dade County. 417 So. 2d 1032 (Fla 3rd DCA 1982) (holding that submission of cashier's check instead of bid bond did not constitute a material variance because the purpose of competitive bidding was to secure the lowest responsible offer and county could waive minor irregularities in effectuating that purpose); Tropahest Foods, Inc. v. State of Florida. Department of General Services, 493 So. 2d 50, 52 (Fla. lst DCA 1986) (finding that irregularities can be waived as minor if the irregularity "does not affect the price of the bid, or give the bidder an advantage or benefit not enjoyed by other bidders or does not adversely impact the interests of the agency.'). 65ee Tropahest Foods, Inc. v. State of Florida Department of General Services, 493 50. 2d 50, 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Robinson Elec. Co., Inc. v. Dade County. 417 So. 2d 1032 (Fla 3rd DCA 1982). .0 0_ a) 0 c -0 m y E ui record for items) c 0 DETERMINATION Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11f2019 , City Clerk The City is tasked with determining whether Virginia Key, LLC is a responsible proposer capable of performing the requirements of the RFP. This determination is not applicable to the potential subcontractors. Based on all the pertinent facts, including, but not limited to, a review of the allegations, responses, and the information acquired from the updated responsibility review, it is apparent that Virginia Key, LLC is a responsible proposer, capable of completing the project to the City's satisfaction. With due consideration of all relevant circumstances, it is evident that VK continues to have the capacity, capability, integrity and reliability to provide the City with assurances of good faith and performance to implement the project as required. Additionally, under the applicable legal precedence, there is competent and substantial evidence to find VK responsible, and the City has wide discretion in making that determination.' Please allow this to serve as a ratification of the recommendation that the City Commission proceed with the award to Virginia Key, LLC as the top -ranked responsive and responsible bidder for the Virginia Key Marina RFP. cc: Joseph Napoli, Deputy City Manager Fernando Casamayor, Assistant City Manager Victoria Mendez, City Attorney Annie Perez, Director of Procurement e's Daniel Rotenberg, Director of Real Estate and Asset Management 7"In Florida ... a public body has wide discretion in soliciting and accepting bids for public improvements and its decision, when based on an honest exercise of this discretion, will not be overturned by a court even if it may appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree." Liberty Ctv. v. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, inc., 42150. 2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1982). "(T]he existing and clearly established principle of law inclines toward judicial deference in public agency competitive bidding disputes when the agency has exercised it discretion absent illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct." Biscayne Marine Partners LLC v. City of Miami, No. 3018-2061, 2019 WL 575327, at *4 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2019), See also Department of Transportation v. Grove -Watkins Constructors, 530 5o. 2d 912 (Fla. 1988)• William A. Berbusse Jr. v. North Broward Hospital District, 117 so. 2d 550, 551, (Fla 2nd DCA 19601; City of Pensacola v. Kirby. 47 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1950). 2 r_ Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 an 07/11/2019 , City Clerk C 1 eCi4ff MIAMI °DAY WEER OFTHORSOAY.RFRIl4, 2014 A Sin,yrrjrir Voice in an Evolving CiA W'NYW.NFRNJTOOAI (W&COM $4.00 MJAJ\./nr 1 'ODAY tlwuni Today pLblished 2C4.O S. Cx1e Highway, Suds 1O0, PAarnl, F1ada 33133 T6eFha a 1:O5J 356.2E83 Vacillation raises cost of public -private deals to taxpayers I ucithlcd municipal infrastructure deals ran trig- g.er fester- ing invisible costs. We're not targetitt rushed no -bid giveaways, like the City of Miami's pending lease of the filet- �ftefe..I Lewis recce fiolf' Course for a massive development, The cost of those .andotux is visible toad except the curn- tissinncrs who give them. We're fov:issing here on hidden costs: a government -initiated deal that drags on and on as firms try to meet shifting. expectations. Like. build ing st skyscraper on a sand hill. there is no business foundistion. A classic vatic of vacillating. on a city -initiated project with private firsts, took its latest twist Iasi week when Coral Gables decided • if you call it decision - to stall three more years on a project it started in 1998. The aim µ:is to turn two shoddy. inad- equate and outdated downtown garages over to top developers to rebuild and expand. with the companies. not the city. paying to add parking and paying the city aswell Air other uses onits land. 'the char wins for taxpayers would have been more parkin_• at no city cost plus payments to Coral Gables' coffers and a far better -looking. more efficient and alrsenity-tiltcddowntown. Tier city set out that goal in 19+18. Last week_ it decided to do the job itself on one garage and not to touch the outer for at Ieast three years_ then maybe let someone else do In the interim. city staff has v.asted untold hours, elected officials have de- bated die plan to death - Miami Today has reported on twists and turns mot: than 20 times - residents have waited 21 years for added parking. and the city has lost out as cash and taxes from the developers. Add to these losses another long - lingering drain: at least five companies worked to win the right to a job that the city suddenly pulled off the t:ibic fur ut least the next three years while it dithers about doing the work itself. Btu matching the work of developers is no easy city task. Government woe: costs more than lit the private sector. not because government is bad but birause it seldom has s ta ft' experts that companies do, and because government plays under very different rules on the job_ including higher pay kveIs and even more red tape. Many government projects spread business arnung small providers, mirinr- itysupplicrsand its many colninuuitics well-connected people. Each hiring decision eats up time and money. far more than in industry. _limy city actions also require commission votes, which introduce :t different dynastic. as 23 yearn of dithering shows. Gothe other side of the table. think about what indecisiveness did to com- panies that oter the years tried to win ayaine with constantly ch.tiiging dead- line?, always with new municipal rules and Sven different city goals, As Commissioner Vince Latta s.-tid dsrisrr a 2016 debate on the garages, "I like to keep my options open" That rhilikina led to change after change. A decade ago an outside developer told Miami Today that even answering is government request for proposals cost 520.O00 to 55O,0O0 win or lone. surely more today. Our hest count is that Coral Gables requested garagesuarages proposals or interest Early developer plans farGables Garage4. three times, and in its most recent itera- tion got five contenders. A first cut led to four well-known local proposers, then In Iwo. and finally a choice of one - the W. Allen Morris Co. working with the Related Gruup. a stellar pair. The city chose the team in 2016. Then ncgotiations began. They went on and on up to last week. when the city commission sang "Let's call the whole thin^ off." For those negotiations. Mr. 1lorric said_ Isis teas changed plans ?- threes - last year his count was I8, so changes most have been fast :end furious. Whatever the tally_ every city twist and turn regnrcd spending by first Inc companies. then four. then two.and then the final teas. not only for plans but to bring tawyets and lobbyists to city meetings, often to get juts another de- ferral. Thai :ttl probabiv cost companies multiple milliofus. Be certain that every business that deals with Coral Gables will build such finite dithering costs into every future bid. They'd be crazy not to. Coral Gables isn't .none. This hap- pens at county hall and in other cities. and hits you and me in higher taws to make up for extra govcrnment payments because bidders make up for needless govemment-caused expenses iripublie- priv,11 deals. "People have been scared otT front getting involved in the city" because of perceived obstacles to development. Commissioner Lao tinted during a de- bate on the garages .is he sought another change. Lookingat the track record. can you blame any company for being wary? A frustrated Mayor Raul Viides- Fau1i_ hoping for a final vote on the gg. irages. asked city staffers in March 2018 -What's the hold-up•1 if you can't present a project to the city commission then w•c will Took for an alternative_ but do something. - Focusing an what vacillating meant to thedev elopers as several cum missioners sought to cut building heights and review deal terms once again with yet another two -month delay - the north since the team :ecmi ugly won the job in 2016 Mr. Valdes-Fau1i asked in November -'Hare we made di. -se people waste years and hundreds of thousands ot'doltars for us to come up with new criteria today?" Last weeks non -decision answered his quesrion7 21 years too hoe_ the city went back to the drawing board to figure out what it wants to do. The develop- ers'eost ofthatdecades-tong waste w•ilI ratchet up fissure city bids. The garages plan offered a great deal that earned taxpayers stoney and im- proved Coral Gables Not doing it well surely be morn costly in the years ahead. httos://www.miamitodayepaber.com/ Miami-Today-04042019-e-Edition/6/ 3 !Iit of 4Tiami Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk FRANC'I5 SUAREZ EMILIO T. GONZALEZ. PIO. ) MI wor ���� r�E' � Citt Manager • „1i R• , fIl ,l May 1. 2019 Via Certified Mail (Return Receipt Requested) 7018 3090 0000 565 l 7899 Via E-Mail (Delivery and Read Receipt Requested) am@rinitnarina.com Mr. Aabad R. Melwani President Rickenbacker Marina, Inc, 3301 Rickenbacker Causeway Miami. Florida 33149 Re: Non-Cornpliance with Resolution No. R-18-0569 Mr. Melwani. As you are aware, the City Commission passed Resolution No. R-I8-0569 indefinitely deferring t rther action on the Notice to Vacate issued to Rickenbacker Marina, Inc. ("RMI"), subject to RMI's continued payment of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per month in addition to RMI's monthly holdover rent. The Department of Real Estate and Asset Management has specifically and repeatedly requested proof of payment for the months of March and April, but has been ignored. As RM1 is a holdover tenant, the City is entitled to remove RMI from the subject property without cause. If RMI does not immediately provide proof of payment for the additional amounts owed, the City will pursue all available remedies, including the termination of RMI's holdover tenancy and the removal of RMI from the City's property. Nothing in this correspondence shall be construed to waive, modify, or abridge any of the City's rights or remedies provided by law, equity, or the terns of all applicable agreements; the City expressly reserves all rights, defenses, and remedies available. Respectfully, Daniel Rotenberg. Director Real Estate & Asset Management City of Miami DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE AND ASSET MANAGEMEN1 444 S.W. 2°d Avcnuc. 3'a Floor. Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 416-1450 Fax: [305) 416-2156 Enclosure Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk cc: Wilfredo Gort, District 1 Commissioner. Ken Russell, District 2 Commissioner. Joe enrollo, District 3 Commissioner, Manolo Reyes, District 4 Commissioner, Keon Hardemon, District 5 Commissioner, Francis Suarez. Mayor, Emilia T. Gonzalez, Ph.D., City Manager, Victoria Mendez, Esq., City Attorney David B, Haber, Haber Slade. P.A. Miguel A. De Grandy, Rolland & Knight. LLP Page Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.Z on 07 11 2QT9 City Clerk City of Miami Legislation Resolution: R-18-0569 City Hall 3500 Pan American ❑rive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com File Number: 5121 Final Action Date: 12/13/2018 A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION INDEFINITELY DEFERRING FURTHER ACTION ON THE "NOTICE TO VACATE" SENT TO RICKENBACKER MARINA, INC, ("RMI") SUBJECT TO RMI PAYING TO THE CITY AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000.00) PER MONTH IN ADDITION TO RMI'S MONTHLY HOLDOVER RENT. WHEREAS, the City of Miami ("City") is the owner of that certain waterfront marine facility and submerged lands located generally at 3301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Virginia Key, Miami, Florida ("Property"); and WHEREAS, Rickenbacker Marina Inc. ("RMI") is a holdover tenant of the subject Property on a month to month basis per the Settlement Agreement and Release between the City and RMI, dated September 22, 2015 ("Settlement Agreement"); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No, 18-0397, adopted on September 13, 2018 the City Commission directed the City Administration to issue a fifteen (15) day "Notice to Vacate" the Property to RMI; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 18-0430, adopted on September 27, 2018, the City Commission stayed the "Notice to Vacate" until the December 13, 2018, City Commission meeting in consideration of payments of additional holdover rent of three hundred fifty thousand dollars ($350,000.00) received from RMI; and WHEREAS, the City anticipates, expects, and believes that RM I will be timely paying one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) each month, in additional holdover rent. as long as they remain on the Property as a holdover tenant pursuant to the Settlement Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMISSION ❑F THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA: Section 1. The recitals and findings contained in the Preamble to this Resolution are adopted by reference and incorporated as if fully set forth in this Section. Section 2. The City Commission hereby indefinitely defers further action regarding the fifteen (15) day "Notice to Vacate" sent by the City to RMI dated September 14, 2018 as long as RMI is timely paying an amount equal to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) each month in addition to RMI's monthly rent and is not otherwise in violation of the Settlement Agreement: provided, however, that the City Commission may take up this matter at any time. City of Miami Page 1 of2 File ID 5121 (Revision:) Printed an: 2/28/2019 File ID: 5121 Enactment Number: R-18.0569 Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and signature of the Mayor.' APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: dez, ity itor ey 12/3/2018 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 8711112019 , City Clerk If the Mayor does not sign this Resolution, it shall become effective at the end of ten (10) calendar days from the date it was passed and adopted. If the Mayor vetoes this Resolution, it shall become effective immediately upon override of the veto by the City Commission, City of Miami Page 2 of 2 Fite ID.• 5121 (Revision:) Printed on: 2/28/2019 From Miguel.deGrandv@hklaw,com'Mieuel,deGrandy@hklaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 4:29 PM To: Lorenzo, Jacqueline (ilorenzo@miamiway.com>; am@rmimarina.Corn Cc: Rotenberg, Daniel cDRotenberg@miam1gov.com>; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael <RSuarez- Rivasjmiamieov.com>; michael.!lorentePllorenteheckler.com; Velez, Pablo cpvelez@miamigov.corn>; Greco, John A. ciaereco@miamigoni.com7; Mendez, Victoria <VMendez@miamigov.com>; Richard.Perez[hklaw.com Subject: RE: Draft Amendment to Settlement Agreement Ms. Lorenzo, Submitted into the pullic ? Q r record f ite (s) \ t nG on ll f 1)/i' City Clerk Your e-mail was referred to me by Mr. Meiwani for response. 8y this email we confirm the understanding that the deferred item of RFP award is scheduled for the 12/13 meeting. As you know Rickenbacker Marina Inc agreed to make additional payments as set forth by its legal counsel in an open, public commission meeting, and we have honored and will continue to honor those commitments_ To my knowledge, the additional new terms set forth in the proposed draft settlement agreement were not discussed or negotiated_ We therefore see no need for an Amendment to the Settlement Agreement which would modify other Settlement Agreement provisions by including terms that were not a part of those discussions. If you have any questions or need to discuss this further, please feel free to have your City Attorney contact me directly. Sincerely Miguel De Grandy Miguel De Grandy I Holland S Knight Partner Holland & Knight LLP 701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3300 I Miami, FL 33131 Phone 305.789.7535 I Fax 305,789.7799 miguel,degrandy@hklaw.com www.hklaw.com - (5, 5\0 .'\ \- Lk\ (4)1/4V\v_ru e ► 04.� Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk uc \A``nty‘ Mtil\- 5i' � (v1Iv1T ! t time \ . Submitted into the public From: Lorenzo, Jacqueline [mailto:ilorenzoC miamiov.comj Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 3:37 PM To: Aabad Melwani <am@rmimarina.com> Cc: Rotenberg, Daniel <DRotenbergPmiamiov.com>; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael <RSuarez- Rivas@miamiRov.com>; de Grandy, Miguel A (MIA - X27535) ‹Miguel.deGrandy@hklaw.coma; Michael Llorente Cmichael.Ilorente@llorenteheckler.com>; Velez, Pablo <pvelez@miamigov.com>, Greco, John A, <jagrecor mlamigov.com>; Mendez, Victoria rVMendezpmiamieov.com> Subject: RE: Draft Amendment to Settlement Agreement importance: High record f ite'}�(s on lt1 t31 City Clerk Mr. Melwani, As a follow up to the below email, please note that the Office of the City Attorney has made a few minor revisions to the document. Attached please find the latest version. Please execute the attached an behalf of Rickenbacker Marina, Inc., and provide us with the executed document no later than November 19, 2018. Thank you. Regards, Jo e ..eaxe.o p Property Management Specialist Department of Real Estate & Asset Management City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 P: (305) 416-1425 F: {305) 400-5197 E: o re n zo (Mm is m igov. com Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07 11 2U19 City Clerk Submitted into the public (`, record fof ite(s) Z , 5 City Clerk From: Lorenzo, Jacqueline Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 11:00 AM To: 'Aabad Melwani' ‹am@rmimarina.com> Cc: Rotenberg, Daniel EDRotenberg@miamigov.com>; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael <RSuarez- Rivas@miami ov.com>; `Miguel.deGrandy@hklaw.com' cMiguel,deGrandy@hklaw.com>; 'Michael Llorente'(michael.11arente@Ilorenteheckler.com>; Velez, Pablo <pvelez(miamigov.com>; Greco, John A. .jagreco@miamiRov.coma Subject: RE: Draft Amendment to Settlement Agreement Importance: High Good morning Aabad, I am writing to follow up on this item. Please note this item is scheduled to go back to City Commission on December 13, 2018 and we have not heard back from you or your representatives, Thank you. Regards, pacgadeae Zale ri Property Management Specialist Department of Real Estate & Asset Management City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Miami, Florida 33130 P: (305) 416-1426 F: (305) 400-5197 E: ilorenzo@miamigov.com Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on Q7 T1 Zp19 City Clerk . From: Lorenzo, Jacqueline Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 3:27 PM To: 'Aabad Melwani' (am@ rmimarina,com> Cc: Rotenberg, Daniel cDRotenberg@miamigov.com>; Suarez -Rivas, Rafael <RSuarez- Rivasemiamigov.com>;'Miguel.deGrandy@hklaw.com' <Migguel.deGrandyrhklaw.com7; 'Michael Llorente'<michael.ilorente@Ilorenteheckier.com> Subject: Draft Amendment to Settlement Agreement Good afternoon Aa bad, hope you are well. Attached please find a draft of the Amendment to Settlement Agreement. Please review and advise if you have any questions. Thank you. Regards, 2acgaze6te . 7e4 a Property Management Specialist Department of Real Estate & Asset Management City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Avenue, 3rd Floor Submitted into the public record fo ite (s on f City Clerk Miarni, Florida 33130 P: (305) 416-1426 F: (305) 400-5197 E: ilorenzo@miamigov.com NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP ("H&K"), and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence, If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co -counsel or retained expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents In confidence in order to preserve the attorney - client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE 1 on 07 17 201g City Clerk ■ • OW SETTLEMENT AGREEIV[ENT AND RJiLEASE, This Settlement Agreement and Release (hereinafter "Agreement") is entered into this 22 day of September , 2015, by and between Rickenbacker Marina, Inc., its successors, assigns, trustees, heirs and beneficiaries ("RM1 ), and the City of Miami ("City") (hereinafter RMI and City shall be collectively referred to as the "Parties"). I. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City is the owner of that certain waterfront marine facility and submerged lands at Virginia Key, Miami, Florida ("Subject Property"); WHEREAS, Rickenbacker currently leases the Subject Property from the City, pursuant to those Lease Documents executed between the Parties (i.e. - - the original Lease dated July 8, 1977, executed with R.ickenbacker's predecessor, Marina Biscayne, Inc.; First Amendment to Lease dated July 1, 2009; Second Amended to Lease dated January 14, 20I1; and Third Amendment to Lease dated May 4, 2011) (hereinafter "Lease Documents"); WHEREAS, Rickenbacker performed certain improvements to the Subject Property in or around 2010, including the installation of a walkway along the retaining wall which stabilizes the shoreline at the Subject Property ("Walkway"); however, the Walkway was built fine (5) feet wide instead of the eleven (11) foot width originally planned for and permitted; WHEREAS, on or about March 28, 2013, the City declared Rickenbacker in default of the' Lease Documents due to the size of the Walkway, which default Rickenbaeker has disputed and continues to dispute (hereinafter "Alleged Walkway Default"); WHEREAS, on or about July 18, 2013, the City again declared Rickenbacker in default of the Lease Documents, this time due to Rickenbacker's refusal to remit payment of $2 Million to the City ("Parking Payment") towards the construction of a new parking facility ("New Parking Facility"), after the City's demand pursuant to Paragraph 1 of the Second Amendment (the "Alleged Parking Payment Default"), which Alleged Parking Payment Default Rickenbacker has disputed and continues to dispute; WHEREAS, on or about June 19, 2013, Rickenbacker initiated a lawsuit against the City in the Circuit Court in and for Miami -Dade County, Florida, styled Rickenbacker Marina, Inc. v, City of'Mianti, Case No. 2013-021970 CA 40 (the "Lawsuit"), which Lawsuit currently alleges claims for declaratory relief and injunctive relief pertaining to the Alleged Walkway Default and the Alleged Parking Payment Default (hereinafter collectively the "Alleged Defaults") declared by the City against Rickenbacker; WHEREAS, on or about November 15, 2013, the City countersued Rickenbacker (the "Counterclaim") (the Lawsuit and Counterclaim shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Action"), which Counterclaim currently alleges claims for declaratory relief and breach of contract in relation to the Alleged Parking Payment Default; 1 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on t77 Zl 2019 City Clerk . WHEREAS, pursuant to the Lease Documents, the term of Rickenbacker's Lease for the Subject Property expires on or about July 7, 2016 ("Lease Expiration Date"); WHEREAS, to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and uncertainties of litigation, the Parties wish to amicably resolve the claims set forth in the Action, and any and all claims which were, could have been, and/or should have been asserted by any Party in the Action; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and confessed, the Parties agree to the following terms and conditions in full and complete resolution of the Action styled Rickenbacker Marina, Inc. vs. City of Miami, Miami -Dade Circuit Court case no. 13-02I970 CA 01, and all matters related thereto, H. TERMS I. Recitals. The Parties hereby agree and acknowledge that the Recitals set forth above and incorporated herein are true and correct. 2. Settlement Terms, A. Rickenbacker shall pay to the City a total of $750,000.00, in the following manner; i. A lump sum payment of $500,000.00 shall be deposited in escrow by Rickenbacker to the law firm of Haber & Slade, P.A.'s escrow account (hereinafter "HSPA Escrow Account" and "HSPA Escrow Funds") within seven (7) days of execution of this Agreement by Rickenbacker, and HSPA shall release said HSPA Escrow Funds to the City within ten (10) days of both the execution of this Agreement by City and approval of the City Commission as described at Paragraph 2(D) below; ii. Installment payments of $25,000.00 per month to the City for ten (10) months, with each installment payment to be made on the first of each month, and with the first of the ten (10) installment payments to be made on the first of the month immediately following the month in which Rickenbacker makes the lump sum payment described at Paragraph 2(A)(i) above; iii. All payments contemplated herein shall be made via check from Rickenbacker to the I-ISPA Escrow Funds, which can be paid via wire transfer or check; and iv. Regardless of any contrary term contained in the Lease Documents, Rickenbacker may become a holdover tenant at will alter the Lease Expiration Date on a month to month basis to the extent permitted by law (hereinafter "Holdover Tenant"), pursuant to the same monthly rental terms (monthly rent and percentage rent) as are contained in the Lease Documents (i.e.—no double rent, simply continuation of the same rental amounts which Rickenbacker has 2 • • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk been paying) (hereinafter "Holdover Rent"), which holdover tenancy, so long as it is permitted by law, shall continue until the successful bidder/new tenant takes possession of the Subject Property, after any and all objections to the Bid and award, including appeals, have been fully and finally resolved (hereinafter the "Holdover Tenancy Period"); B. As of the date of execution of this Agreement by the Parties and approval of the City Commission as described at Paragraph 2(D) below, all claims of default by the City under the Lease Documents, including the Alleged Defaults, shall be considered vacated, removed and of no further force and effect, with such removal of claims of default to further include the following terms and conditions: i, Removal/release of any and all issues relating to the Walkway width, including finalization and close out of the pemiit(s) related to the Walkway and a retraction of the Notice of Default issued by the City in relation to the Walkway; ii. Retraction by the City of its $2 Million demand for the Parking Payment and the Notice of Default in relation to same; Waiver/release by the City of any and all past and/or currently existing alleged or non -alleged defaults of the Lease Documents, except that the City does not release or waive any ongoing obligations under the Lease Documents or the law subsequent to the date of this Agreement, including but not limited to environmental contamination and/or the obligations of RMI to deliver the premises in good and usable condition under Paragraph 17 of the Lease, as amended; however, the City is not currently aware of any violations by RMI of its obligations under the Lease Documents at this time, other than those alleged defaults specifically referenced herein; iv. Rickenbaeker shall be considered a tenant in good standing under the Lease Documents, and nothing contained in the Lawsuit or this Agreeinent, once executed and approved by the City Commission and signed by the City shall be a bar or prohibition on Tenant or representatives of Tenant from submitting bids on future contracts with the City nor shall Tenant be considered to owe any monies to the City other than those amounts required by this Agreement, and shall not be considered. "non -responsible" under City Code Section 18-95 so long as Rickenbaeker is in compliance with the terms of its payments under this Agreement and its other ongoing obligations under the Lease Documents; C. All Parties involved in the Action shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with any matter relating to this Action; D. The City shall present the teens of this Agreement to the City Commission for approval at the first City Commission meeting taking place in September, 2015. Should the City fail to submit this Agreement for Commission approval before the date that bids are due pursuant to the RFP, or should the City Commission fail to approve this Agreement in • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on _ 07/11/2019 , City Clerk its substantial form (minor changes/revisions excluded), this Agreement shall be considered null and void, and HSPA shall be entitled to release the HSPA Escrow Funds (i.e. - - the S500,000.00) back to Rickenbacker; E. Within ten (10) days of receipt of the initial lump sum payment made by Rickenbacker pursuant to Paragraph 2(A)(ii) above, the Parties' counsels shall jointly execute and file a Stipulation for Dismissal of All Claims in this Action with Prejudice ("Stipulation"), pursuant to which Stipulation the Court will retain jurisdiction to -enforce the teens of this Settlement Agreement; and F. While this Agreement is pending approval by the City Commission, the Parties shall execute and file a Joint Motion for Stay of all Discovery with the Court in the Action and seek to obtain an Order granting same. In addition, Rickenbacker shall file a Notice of Cancellation of the Depositions currently scheduled for August and September 2015, including but not limited to all current and former City employees previously scheduled for deposition, and Commissioner Marc Sarnoff 3. Breach of Agreement. In the event that either of the Parties fails to fulfill its obligations as stated in this Agreement, that Party shall be in Default. As a result of a Default by either Party under this Agreement, the other Party shall be entitled to pursue any and all recovery efforts, which shall include but not be limited to the filing of a Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and/or Motion for Default of Settlement Agreement with the Court, upon the expiration of a five (5) day grace period with notice via e-mail to the Parties through their respective counsel(s) as set forth below in Paragraph 8. 4. Mutual Releases. Upon execution of this -Agreement by the Parties and approval of this Agreement by the City Commission, the following shall be effective: A. Citv's Release to Rickenbacker. Except for the rights, duties and obligations of the Rickenbacker created under this Agreement, the City, for itself and its predecessors, agents, attorneys, directors, officers, members, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, trustees, bankruptcy trustees, personal representatives, beneficiaries, devisees, and Iegatees (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "City Releasors"), hereby releases and forever discharges Rickenbacker and each of its respective subsidiaries, predecessors, agents, managers, attorneys, directors, officers, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, trustees, bankruptcy trustees, personal representatives, beneficiaries, devisees, and legatees (hereinafter referred to as the "Rickenbacker Releasees"), whether past, present or future, jointly and severally, eland from any and all debts, claims, potential claims, demands, actions, causes of action, potential causes of action, rights, obligations, damages, attorney's fees, costs, and liabilities of any and every kind or nature whatsoever, in law or in equity, past, present, or future, known or unknown, -direct or indirect, asserted or unasserted, fixed or contingent, whether contemplated or not, whether based on a tort, contract, contribution, indemnification, or any other type of recovery, and whether for compensatory, consequential, incidental, statutory, punitive, or other damages, which the City Releasors have, may have or had related to, arising out of, or in connection with the Action, past or present asserted or 4 • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk unasserted breaches of the Lease Documents, Walkway, and/or Parking Payment including, without limitation, any matter that was raised, could have been, or should have been raised by the City Releasors in this Action, whether known or unknown, occurring prior to and up until the date of the execution of this Agreement, provided, however, that this Release by the City Releasors does not release any ongoing obligations of Rickenbacker contained in the Lease Documents. B. Rickenbacker's Release to City, Except for the rights, duties and obligations of the City created under this Agreement, Rickenbacker, for itself and its predecessors, agents, attorneys; directors, officers, members, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, trustees, bankruptcy trustees, personal representatives, beneficiaries, devisees, and legatees (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Rickenbacker Releasors") hereby releases and forever discharges the City and each of its respective subsidiaries, predecessors, agents, attorneys, directors, officers, employees, affiliates, successors, assigns, trustees, bankruptcy trustees, personal representatives, beneficiaries, devisees, and legatees (hereinafter referred to as the "City Releasees") whether past, present or future, jointly and severally, of and from any and all debts, claims, potential claims, demands, actions, causes of action, potential causes of action, rights, obligations, damages, attorney's fees, costs, and liabilities of any and every kind or nature whatsoever, in law or in equity, past, present, or future, known or unknown, direct or indirect, asserted or unasserted, fixed or contingent, whether contemplated or not, whether based on a tort, contract, contribution, inderni ification, or any other type of recovery, and whether for compensatory, consequential, incidental, statutory, punitive, or other damages, which the Rickenbacker Releasors have, may have or had related to, arising out of, or in connection with the Action, past or present -asserted or unasserted breaches of the Lease Documents, and/or any alleged wrongful acts or conduct of the City including, without limitation, any matter that was raised, could have been, or should have been raised by the Rickenbacker Releasers in this Action, whether known or unknown, occurring prior to and up until the date of the execution of this Agreement; provided, however, that this Release by the Rickenbacker Releasors does not release any ongoing obligations of the City contained in the Lease Documents. 5. No Admission of Liability. Each Party expressly recognizes that this Agreement shall not in any way be construed as an admission by any Party hereto of any unlawful or wrongful acts or omissions whatsoever with respect to the Action. This Agreement shall not be admissible in any proceeding as evidence of any admission by any Party hereto of any violation of any law or regulation or wrongful act or omission. This Agreement may, however, be introduced as evidence in anyproceedingto enforce this Agreement. 6. Non -Assignability or Transferability Of Claims. Each Party hereby warrants, declares, and represents that no part of any asserted or assertable claims has been assigned or transferred, and that each Party has full, exclusive, and unencumbered right, title, and interest in and to such asserted or assertable claims. 7. Governing Law and Venue Selection. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida should it become necessary for any party hereto to engage in litigation to 5 • Submitted into the pubic record for item(s) pE.3 on 07 11 2019 City Clerk enforce the terms of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is being entered into in Miami -Dade County, Florida and that the jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall exist in Circuit Court in. Miami -Dade County, Florida. The Parties choose as their venue on any such actionllitigation the State of Florida Circuit Count, in and for the EIeventh judicial Circuit, Miami -Dade County. 8. Notices, Except where this Agreement expressly provides otherwise, all notices and other coma u.nications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given (a) on the earlier of the date received or three business days after delivery, if sent by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested); (b) when delivered, if delivered personally; (c) on the next business day, if sent by overnight mail or overnight courier; (d) on the same day, if sent via e-mail. If any party is represented by counsel (whether or not named in this Agreement), any notice given by such counsel for such party shall be fully effective as if given by such party. Any notice shall be given to the recipient at these addresses (or at such other addresses as shall be specified by written notice given in accordance with this provision): To Rickenbacker: Rickenbacker Marina, Inc, c/o Aabad Melwani 3301 Rickenbacker Cswy. Key Biscayne, FL 33149 E-mail: am@nnimarina.com With a copy to: David B. Haber, Esq. Haber Slade, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 1205 Miami, FL 33131 E-mail: dhaber@dhaberlaw,com To City of Miami: Daniel T. Alfonso City Manager Miami Riverside Center 444 SW 2" a Avenue, le Floor Miami, FL 33130 With a copy to: Victoria Mendez, Esq. City Attorney Miami Riverside Center 444 S.W. 2na Avenue, Suite 945 Miami, FL 33130 E-mail: VMendez@miamigov.com 6 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 9. Miscellaneous. The Parties further agree as follows: a. No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be considered valid unless in writing and signed by the party giving such waiver, and no such waiver shall be deemed a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature. b. Each Party hereto shall cooperate, shall ,take such further action and shall execute and deliver such further documents as may be reasonably requested by any other party in order to carry out the provisions and purposes of this Agreement. c. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall be deemed one=original, d. In the event any teens or provision of this Agreement be determined by appropriate judicial authority to be illegal or otherwise invalid, such provision shall be given its nearest legal meaning or be construed as such deleted as such authority determines, and the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed to be in full force and effect. 10. Knowing and Voluntary. The Parties acknowledge and represent that they have carefully read and fully understand all of the provisions, terns and conditions of this Agreement and have reviewed this Agreement with their respective counsel. The Parties further acknowledge and represent that they have entered into this Agreement freely, knowingly and without coercion and based on their own judgment, 11. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, their personal representatives, successors, and assigns. 12, Interpretation, The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that: (a) in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement, they have each had the opportunity to consult with counsel of their choice; (b) each of their counsels has had an opportunity to contribute to the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement; and (c) the principle of construing a document most strictly against its drafter shall not apply with respect to the interpretation of this Agreement 13. Entire Agreement, This Agreement constitutes the complete understanding between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements, both oral and written, between the Parties with respect to such subject matter. This Agreement may not be modified in any way unless by written instrument signed by each of the Parties. 14. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. AS A MATERIAL TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT, EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES, AND THEREFORE EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY 7 • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY OF THE AGREEMENTS DELIVERED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY. TFIIS WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL SHALL BE BINDING ON THE PARTIES' PERMITTED SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: (A) NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE SUCH WAIVER; (B) IT UNDERSTANDS AND HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF SUCH WAIVER; AND (C) IT MANSSUCH WAIVER VOLUNTARILY. 15. No Disability. Each Party fully declares that as signatory to this Agreement, he or she does not suffer from any mental or physical disability which would disable him or her from executing this Agreement and that he or she has had the benefit of advice from his or her counsel. 16. Authority to Execute. The Parties represent and warrant that the individuals executing this Agreement on each Party's behalf have the full authority to do so. [SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW] 8 • • Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 , on 07/11/2019 _, City Clerk Acknowledged, agreed, and accepted this /5 day of IK2O15:. RICKENBACKER MAR-INNC. By: /2 4' Title: 2'5/djA1174 STATE OF FLORIDA. COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE The foregoing i strument vas acknowledged before the; this /5� of 51,4$j,6 , , A 20 K, by did, G-f as auentative elffication, and Rickenhacker Marina, Inc., Who has produced who .did take an oath. NOT y Co • . rized repr hY, as ide P LIC -scion Expir aAVIER ARRITQLA Notary Pnhlke - Sfato of Flo►fda. Cammisslan FF 197132 My Comm. Explres May 23, 2n19 c. Kn.,0Ind_ though Naffonal Notary Assn. 9 • N.— •w. — _ -., _- Is - —ti. ATTEST: Approved as to Form and Correctness: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADS CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA By: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this e2q day of ekr 1010r , 2015, by Da Ce ] AI S0 as City Manager, and SQeAo( `C anblz"-x , as City Clerk, of City of Miami, a Florida municipal corporation. They are personally known to me or have produced as identification and did/did not take an oath. print name to '•' (Welk PERE2 = r MY CO/MISSION i FF 9005O3 EXPIRES' August 2, 2019 gvnded ThN Nee PkeiicUnderwniers Serial Number Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE,1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 5 RECEIVED Bilzin Surnberg Sy 111nres of T1,f111 a1h, Fab 13, 2019 DOCKETED Z!jirb 1Ditrtct Court of Ztppcat State of Florida Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-2061 Lower Tribunal No. 17-335 Biscayne Marine Partners LLC, Petitioner, vs. City of Miami, Florida and Virginia Key, LLC, Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami -Dade County, Appellate Division, John W, Thornton, Jr., Mavel Ruiz and Marcia Del Rey, Judges. Holland & Knight LLP, and Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr., Ilene L. Pabian and Daniel P. Hanlon, for petitioner. Victoria Mendez, City Attorney, and John A. Greco, Deputy City Attorney; Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Albert E. Dotson, Jr., Eileen Ball Mehta, Eric Singer and Elise Holtzman Gerson, for respondents. Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. SCALES, J. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Petitioner Biscayne Marine Partners LLC ("Biscayne Marine") bid unsuccessfully on a solicitation issued by Respondent City of Miami (the "City"). The City had sought proposals for the redevelopment and lease of waterfront property at Virginia Key. When the City Manager recommended that the City Commission award a competing bid, Biscayne Marine fled a timely bid protest. An administrative hearing officer affirmed the recommendation to award the bid to Biscayne Marine's competitor, Virginia Key, LLC ("VKLLC"). Biscayne Marine filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the appellate division of the Miami -Dade County Circuit Court. After the Circuit Court denied Biscayne Marine's petition, Biscayne Marine sought second -tier certiorari review in this Court. For the reasons stated below, we deny Biscayne Marine's petition. I. History A. City 's Request For Proposals ("RFP') On February 17, 2017, the City issued RFP No. 16-17-6 ] 1 seeking proposals for the redevelopment and long-term lease of approximately 26.65 acres of waterfront property (the "Property") at Virginia Key, which is located in Miami, Florida. During the bidding process, the City issued five addenda to the RFP. The City anticipated that the winning bidder would redevelop and lease the Property, and then operate a marina, a boatyard, wet slips, a dry storage facility and a restaurant on the site, 2 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The RFP described the Property as consisting of three parcels. On a boundary survey contained as an exhibit to the RFP, and as appended to this opinion as an exhibit, a rectangular portion of Parcel 3 is labeled "NOT A PART." This rectangular portion has dimensions of approximately 51 feet by 441 feet. It is owned by the City. Abutting it to the south and located within the right-of-way of the Rickenbacker Causeway is a second, separate rectangular parcel owned by Miami - Dade County (the "County Land"). At the time of the issuance of the RFP, the County Land had been deeded by the County to the City for the purpose of constructing a parking garage. Initially, bidders had the option to use this County Land in order to provide required parking. On May 5, 2017, however, during the RFP process, the County advised the City that it would exercise a right of reverter for the County Land in order to expand the Rickenbacker Causeway. Accordingly, the City issued Addendum 5 to the RFP in which the City removed the County Land from the portion of the Property anticipated for parking use.' ' There appears to be confusion whether the County Land was included within the portion of Parcel 3 labeled "NOT A PART." The City emphatically maintains that the County Land is separate from the City's NOT A PART rectangle. Both the opinion of the Circuit Court and the certiorari petition to this Court identify the County Land as included in the NOT A PART rectangle. Paragraph 11 of the RFP also suggests the same: "A municipal parking garage is intended to be built outside the Property in the area labeled on the survey as NOT A PART.'" The City subsequently deleted this sentence in Addendum 5, and specified that the winning bidder would have to provide parking within the footprint of the Property. The precise location of the County Land is not particularly relevant to our decision. 3 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1. on 27 11 2U19 City Clerk On May 24, 2017, the City received the proposals of three bidders, Biscayne Marine, VKLLC and GCM Contracting Solutions, Inc. All three bidders made some degree of use of the NOT A PART rectangle. VKLLC used the NOT A PART rectangle to propose 1 I I dry storage slips. Biscayne Marine used the NOT A PART rectangle for vehicular access and circulation (and, apparently, to take advantage of existing parking). GCM used it partially for boat storage and partially for parking. Clearly, of the three bids, VKLLC's proposed use would make the most significant impact on the NOT A PART rectangle. On June 15, 2017, the City Manager, based on rankings of the City's Evaluation Committee, issued a recommendation to the City Commission to award the bid to top -ranked VKLLC. On June 27, 2017, Biscayne Marine filed a formal bid protest with the City. In pertinent part, Biscayne Marine's bid protest maintained that VKLLC's bid was non -responsive because, in proposing to use the NOT A PART rectangle for dry storage slips, VKLLC proposed a commercial development purpose that was outside of the project's defined boundaries, and thus, constituted a material deviation from the RFP.2 B. The Decision of the Hearing Officer 2 Biscayne Marine's bid protest also raised several issues related to the financial viability of VKLLC's bid. The record discloses that VKLLC intervened in the bid protest proceedings and alleged that Biscayne Marine's bid was non -responsive, and therefore, that Biscayne Marine lacked standing to prosecute its bid protest. None of these issues is before us in the instant petition for writ of certiorari. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk On July 20, 2017, a City -appointed hearing officer heard Biscayne Marine's bid protest and, on August 8, 2017, entered an order denying the bid protest and affirming the recommendation of the City Manager to award the bid to VKLLC. Finding that all three bidders had proposed a use for the NOT A PART rectangle in their bids, the hearing officer declined to weigh the relative merits of the different types of proposed uses. He accepted the City's view that the RFP had not prohibited the use of the NOT A PART rectangle.3 The Hearing Officer noted that Addendum 5, which the City issued after the County removed the County Land from the RFP process, did not clarify the meaning of the NOT A PART label. After Addendum 5, which altered the development area of the RFP to exclude the County Land, the NOT A PART rectangle remained subject to different interpretations. Nevertheless, the Hearing Officer deferred to the City's "reasonable" interpretation of a surveyor's notation. The Hearing Officer went on to find, as follows: Giving the argument of counsel for Biscayne Marine as much deference, latitude and credibility that can be given, but I must still, as a matter of law defer to the judgment of the City in determining certain crucial factors. One of these factors relates to materiality. If the use of the NOT A PART parcel was not allowed, then the City had the ability 3 The City employee who managed the RFP process testified that "NOT A PART" was a surveyor's notation that meant the rectangle was not a part of the survey. Accordingly, she testified, the NOT A PART rectangle was available for use in an RFP response. Indeed, all bidders proposed using the NOT A PART rectangle, and the City deemed none of the RFP responses to be non -responsive. The Hearing Officer found that each bidder benefited from its own interpretation and each was treated equally by the City. 5 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk to determine whether that made a difference to the outcome and whether the deviation was material. C. The Circuit Court's First -Tier Certiorari Review Biscayne Marine challenged the Hearing Officer's order by timely filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Miami -Dade County Circuit Court's Appellate Division. On September 11, 2018, the Circuit Court rendered a detailed, fourteen -page opinion denying Biscayne Marine's petition. The Circuit Court found that the Hearing Officer afforded the parties due process, did not depart from the essential requirements of law, and based his factual findings on competent substantial evidence. Specifically, the Circuit Court observed, as the Hearing Officer had done, that the NOT A PART parcel meant different things to the City, Biscayne Marine and VKLLC. It held that the Hearing Officer was correct in deferring to the City's interpretation of the NOT A PART label appearing on the RFP's survey. It held that "[s]uch deference to the City's interpretation of the [NOT A PART] parcel does not constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law." In support of its deference to the City's interpretation, the Circuit Court found that the City's "interpretation does not demonstrate discrimination between bidders, nor does it present a fatal lack of specificity or an impermissible alteration of a material provision required by the RFP." 6 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The Circuit Court also affirmed the Hearing Officer's deference to the City's analysis of the competing proposals and the resulting determination (via the City's Evaluation Committee) that both Biscayne Marine and VKLLC's proposals were responsive in that each used the NOT A PART parcel in their respective bids. To support its conclusions in this regard, the Circuit Court cited to Florida's policy of deferring to governmental decisions in competitive bidding situations when, as here, there is no "finding of illegality, fraud, oppression, or misconduct," citing to Department of Transportation v. Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So, 2d 912, 913 (Fla, 1988). D. Biscayne Marine's Argument on Second -Tier Certiorari Review Biscayne Marine then filed its petition with this Court seeking second -tier certiorari review of the Circuit Court's decision. Biscayne Marine's petition presents a narrow issue regarding the deference that both the Hearing Officer and the Circuit Court afforded to the City. Essentially Biscayne Marine asserts that, rather than deferring to the City as to whether VKLLC's bid constituted a material deviation from the RFP, the Hearing Officer and the Circuit Court should have made their own, independent determinations on this issue, and their failure to conduct such an independent inquiry resulted in a departure from the essential requirements of law. IL Analysis 7 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Our review on second -tier certiorari is extremely limited. We address only whether the decision of the Circuit Court departed from the essential requirements of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice; and specifically, whether the Circuit Court applied the correct law and afforded the parties procedural due process. Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 62 So. 3d 1086, 1092 (Fla. 2010) ("[A] district court should exercise its discretion to grant review only when the lower tribunal has violated a clearly established principle of Iaw resulting in a miscarriage of justice."); DMB Inv. Tr. v. Islamorada Vill. Of Islands, 225 So. 3d 312, 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017). Hence, we restrict our inquiry to precisely what "clearly established principle of law" the Circuit Court allegedly violated. Biscayne Marine asserts that the Hearing Officer and the Circuit Court were required to undertake an independent review of whether, in its bid response, VKLLC's proposed commercial use of the NOT A PART rectangle constituted a material deviation from the City's bid specifications. Therefore, Biscayne Marine asserts, the "clearly established principle of law" is that, for a bid protest, either a court or a hearing officer must perform an analysis — independent of the public procuring agency — of whether a material deviation from bid specifications has occurred.` A public agency may not accept a bid that materially deviates from the agency's RFP specifications. Air Support Servs. Int'1, Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cry., 614 So. 2d 583, 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). 8 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11J2O19 , City Clerk To support this assertion, Biscayne Marine cites several casess that, Biscayne Marine argues, articulate a principle of law forbidding courts or hearing officers from deferring to the procuring agency the question of whether a bid response materially varies from the procurement document. Our reading of these cases, however, reveals no such holding, much less the articulation of such a deference prohibition as an established principle of law. Indeed, in one of the cases cited by Biscayne Marine, our Florida Supreme Court describes a public agency's discretion — as well as a court's role — in awarding public bids: "In Florida ... a public body has wide discretion in soliciting and accepting bids for public improvements and its decision, when based on an honest exercise of this discretion, will not be overturned by a court even if it may appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree." Liberty Cty., 421 So. 2d at 507. The holding of the Liberty County case — as with the other four cases cited by Biscayne Marine, see supra — does not focus on the role of the trial court in reviewing the bid. Consequently, no principle of law is clearly established in these cases as to any obligation of the trial court (and, by analogy, an administrative 'Liberty Cty. v. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So. 2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1982); Air Support Servs. Intl., Inc. v. Metro. Dade Cty., 614 So. 2d 583, 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Robinson Elec. Co., Inc. v. Dade Cty., 417 So. 2d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Glatstein v. City of Miami, 399 So. 2d 1005, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); and Harry Pepper & Assocs. v. City of Cape Coral, 352 So. 2d 1190, 1192-93 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). 9 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk hearing officer) to decide or to defer. If anything, the existing and clearly established principle of law inclines toward judicial deference in public agency competitive bidding disputes when the agency has exercised it discretion absent illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct. Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So. 2d at 913. Because Biscayne Marine has failed to show that the Circuit Court departed from the essential requirements of law, we deny Biscayne Marine's petition for second -tier certiorari. Petition denied. 10 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Cierk EXHIBIT §11 MpT R rA.1 (rr srV rJCNr L+. ,. ar64) 3a ripl4 s..r 120;:tr: •: y: •e 'w wr+r. rjg t• i C$� .e�ei: WY rV ` d��� wnn �7R d y PARCEL 4— w ���,,r -' _ BOUNDARY SURVEY :. ,mo• sr 3s air,» i w 5 Et .Z.K BISCAYNE BAY Lro.m err v w.r r.rr i ra.s" d -coa xu l ww L__ PARCEL 3 \ .1.• 1z \ I fl w n y r. A:AIrF' mar---� �ii .K�• .rw6 n YnM1 �R is ii raiey� RRCKE rBACKER CAUSEWAY (CRANDON BOULEVARD) - MP 0'1 ij >w bib — - i CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA BISCAYNE MARINE PARTNERS, LLC. Petitioner, v. RECEIVED Sumberg By +remimz ai 3;44 pm, A1+q 08, 2077 DOCKETED Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk In re: RFP No. 16-17-011 --Lease and CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, Development of Virginia Key Respondent, and VIRGINIA KEY. LLC, Intervenor, 1 CORRECTED FINAL ORDER ON THE BID PROTEST FILED BY BISCAYNE MARINE PARTNERS RELATED TO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 16-17-011 This matter came before this Hearing Officer for administrative proceeding on July 20, 2017, pursuant to the Bid Protest of Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC (Biscayne Marine). Biscayne Marine protests the June 15, 2017 recommendation of the City Manager to award the bid for Request for Proposal 16-17-011 (RFP) to Virginia Key, LLC (Virginia Key). The hearing (Hearing) was held pursuant to Section 18-104 of the Code of the City of Miami (City Code). Biscayne Marine timely filed its Bid Protest. Virginia Key tiled a Motion to Intervene and said Motion was granted. Virginia Key was treated for all purposes as a party to these proceedings. Further, Judicial Notice is taken of the applicable Sections of the City Code, specifically Section 18-104, as requested by the City of Miami in their Request for Judicial Notice. City Code Section J8-104(a)(2) provides that "[t]he written protest shall state with particularity the specific facts and law upon which the protest of the solicitation or the award is based and shall include all pertinent documents and evidence...." Moreover, "no facts, No challenges were made to filing of the Bid Protest and no objections were raised to the Motion to Intervene. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk grounds, documentation or evidence not contained in Biscayne Marine's submission to the Chief Procurement Officer at the time of filing the protest shall be permitted in the consideration of the written protest." There has been no challenge to the adequacy of the Bid Protest or that it does not meet the requirements of the City Code. The parties also submitted an agreed upon list of exhibits comprising of five (5) separate volumes. which were attached as exhibits to the transcript of the proceedings and were admitted into evidence. In addition to the agreed upon exhibits, the parties also provided a list of documents which were not agreed upon. After hearing argument of counsel regarding the admissibility of each the documents and a review and consideration of the documents, some but not all of the additional documents were admitted at the hearing as additional exhibits.' The question related to the admissibility of the Affidavit of John Cardello is worthy of mention. Biscayne Marine contends that it inadvertently submitted an unsigned version of Mr, Cardelio's Affidavit with its Bid Protest and now seeks to have the signed version made a part of the proceedings. Virginia Key asserts that to allow Biscayne Marine to include the signed version of the Affidavit would effectively be allowing Biscayne Marine to untimely file the Affidavit. Transcript at page 22. Without addressing the question of timeliness, the City Code allows for the consideration of all relevant evidence and the Hearing Officer may require written summaries, affidavits, proffers or other documents...." City of Miami Code, Section 18-104(b)(4)(c). The City Code Inc first page of Virginia Key's Exhibit B, the Army Corps. Of Engineers Decision Document Nationwide Permit 35, was initially admitted, but at the close of the proceedings was excluded in its entirety, the entirety of Virginia Key's Exhibit C, GCM Contracting Solutions, lnc.'s Proposal in Response to RFP No. 16-17-011 was admitted. Biscayne Marine's disputed Exhibit A, the June 1, 2017 e-mail correspondence with Jeff Carson; Exhibit B, the May 10, 2017 letter from Robert Christoph; Exhibit C. the May 3, 2017 e-mail correspondence with Pablo Velez; Exhibit D. the June 6, 2017 e-mail correspondence with Jacqueline Lorenzo; and Exhibit E. the signed affidavit of Jonathan Cardello, were admitted into evidence subject to relevance to the claims specifically raised in Biscayne Marine's written protest. Page 2 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk does not require the placement of any particular evidentiary weight on one type of submission over the other. Even if admitted as a proffer of what Mr. Calderon might have said. Virginia Key concedes that there is no substantive difference between the signed and unsigned versions of the Affidavit. As such, since there is no disagreement that the unsigned Affidavit was filed timely its use in these proceedings shall be given the weight authorized under the City Code and as such admitted in these proceedings. This same analysis applies to the manner and method of the presentation of the Bid Protest of Biscayne Marine. Biscayne Marine's presentation consisted of their counsel going through documents and exhibits to the RFP submissions and presenting argument as to why the documents as a whole justified Biscayne Marine's position that Virginia Key should not have been awarded the bid. Virginia Key asserts that the unsworn statements of counsel for Biscayne Marine should be afforded very little or no evidentiary weight, In support of its position Virginia Key cites Leon Shaffer ColnickAdv,, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So. 2d 1015, 1 d 15-17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) ("the practice we wish to see terminated is that of attorneys making unsworn statements of fact at hearings which trial courts may consider as establishing facts.... Trial judges cannot rely upon these unsworn statements as the basis for making factual determinations...") and Sabina v. Dhalia Corp., 650 So. 2d 96, 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) ("a trial court cannot make a factual determination based on an attorney's unsworn statements and is precluded from considering as fact, unproven statements documented only by an attorney.") (internal citations onnitted). In other circumstances, the argument of Virginia Key may have merit to the point of being dispositive of the matter. However, given the latitude and specific directives of the City Code, the proffers of counsel shall be considered equal to all other relevant evidence in terms of admissibility and as in all cases, it will be weighed accordingly, City of Miami Code, Section 18- Page 3 of22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 104(b)(4)(c). In the event, the proffers of counsel conflict with testimonial or documentary evidence, then as the fact finder and final arbiter, this Hearing Officer can make decisions accordingly giving due weight to all of the information presented regardless of the form it is received. Biscayne Marine was represented by Miguel De Grandy, Esq. and Daniel Hanlon, Esq. of Holland and Knight as well as Michael Llorente, Esq. and Diana Mendez, Esq. of LLorente and Heckler. Virginia Key was represented by Albert Dotson, Esq, Carter McDowell, Esq., Jessica Kramer, Esq., and Eric Singer, Esq, of Bilzin, Sumberg, The City of Miami was represented by Rafael Suarez -Rivas. Esq. and Pablo Velez, Esq. Virginia Key presented the testimony of Jacqueline Lorenzo, Property Management Specialist at the City of Miami Department of Real Estate and Asset Management and Mark Johnson, licensed surveyor at Schwebke-Shiskin & Associates. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The City of Miami (the "City") issued Request for Proposal No. 16-17-001 for Lease of City Owned Waterfront Property for MarinalRestaurants/Ship's Store Uses. The RFP sought development proposals for the long-term lease and development of the Virginia Key Marina. The RFP was issued through the City's Department of Real Estate and Asset Management (DREAM). Submissions under the RFP were originally due on May 17, 2017. The deadline for submissions was extended for an additional six (6) days to May 24, 2017. DREAM issued five (5) separate addenda which became a part of the RFP that either clarified or modified parts of the RFP. Page 4 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . an 07/11/2019 , City Clerk In response to the RFP. ❑REAM received proposals from the following firms: Virginia Key, LLC ("Virginia Key'); Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC ("Biscayne Marine") and GCM Contracting Solutions, Inc. ("GCM").3 Virginia Key and Biscayne Marine made oral presentations to the Selection Committee on June 12, 2017. Agreed Exhibit 13. Each proposer was given equal time to make their presentations. The Selection Committee then met on June 14, 2017 where it evaluated the proposals, deliberated, and voted in accordance with the Evaluation Criteria set forth in the RFP. RFP at Pages 31-32. On June 15, 2017, City Manager Daniel Alfonso issued a Recommendation of Award to award the bid to Virginia Key. On June 27, 2017, Biscayne Marine timely filed a protest to the Manager's Recommendation. On July 20. 2017 a hearing on the Bid Protest was held. The Bid Protest raises several issues. however some of them are outside of the scope of this Hearing Officer's authority to address. Succinctly put, the issues related to the inadequacy of Virginia Key's Financial Analysis and the understatement of its costs are substantive in nature and the Evaluation Committee in making its determination as to whether the submission in this regard is sufficient is not appropriately disturbed by this Hearing Officer. Beyond that, there was insufficient evidence to support these assertions and the proffer of counsel was inadequate to provide a basis to disturb the Evaluation Committee's decisions on these points. ] am not in a position to substantively determine whether these assertions are true or not, and importantly, nor should 1 be. I will not engage in the exercise of analyzing the Bid Responses to determine whether or not the math is correct. One of the directives given to the City by the City of Miami Commission 3GCvf Contracting Solutions was the third ranked bidder and did not participate in the Bid Protest. Page 5 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11j2019 , City Clerk with regard to this RFP, was to appoint an Evaluation Committee to determine the quantitative and qualitative nature of the proposer's bids. Except for raising questions regarding the speed in which the Evaluation Committee performed its tasks, nothing in the Bid Protest questions whether the Evaluation Committee did or did not have the technical and professional expertise to evaluate and rank the proposers. As such, to the extent that these issues form an independent basis for the Bid Protest by Biscayne Marine, they are denied. For Virginia I<ey, this knife cuts both ways. The issue of whether Biscayne Marine's proposal was non -responsive because they proposed dredging beyond the depth requirements set forth in the RFP is similarly left to the Evaluation Committee. If the proposed dredging is indeed outside of the parameters of the RFP, no competent evidence was presented to show why, or if this deviation was material and fatal to the submission of Biscayne Marine. The discussion in the transcript of the June 14, 2017 Evaluation Committee meeting is informative. However, after the discussion, the Evaluation Committee moved forward in ranking Biscayne Marine and the City determined that the Biscayne Marine bid was responsive. The individuals with the so called "expertise" who were on the committee ranked the proposals on their merits, which included the assessment of the dredging component of the Bid Response. If the Bid Response was deficient then the scores would reflect that appropriately. To the extent that this argument forms an independent basis for Virginia Key seeking to have Biscayne Marine deemed non -responsive, it is denied. Jacqueline Lorenzo, the individual managing the RFP for the City, testified that the City Code requires that DREAM handle procurements involving real estate. Transcript at page 192, Ms. Lorenzo explained the difference between Invitation to Bid (ITS) and a RFP. Ms. Lorenzo testified that while an ITB was price driven, a RFP process is driven by various factors, aside from price. as set forth in the RFP. Ms. Lorenzo further testified that the purpose of Addendum Page 6 of 22 Submitted into the public record for itemjs) RL.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk No. 5 was to remove the County Land from the RFP, due to Miami -Dade County formally notifying the City that it was exercising its reverter clause and taking back the County land. There was much discussion over addendum 5 and what impact it had on the ability of a proposer to use the NOT A PART parcel. Addendum 5 did not specifically refer to the NOT A PART parcel. After Addendum No. 5 was issued, the deadline for submissions was extended six (6) days to May 24, 2017. No proposers submitted any questions or requests for clarifications concerning the NOT A PART parcel prior to or after the issuance of Addendum No. 5. Ms. Lorenzo also testified that her interpretation of Addendum 5 was that the words "NOT A PART" as shown on the survey attached to the RFP were simply a notation or note concerning the parcel not being a part of the Survey. Virginia Key's proposal utilized the NOT A PART parcel for dry dock storage and parking Biscayne Marine's proposal utilized the NOT A PART parcel for access to its parking. ❑oes the utilization of the NOT A PART parcel render a proposer's bid non -responsive and does the manner which the NOT A PART parcel was utilized by Biscayne Marine constitutes a use which would render its bid non -compliant with the language of the RFP and therefore make them a sinner on equal footing with Virginia Key? Virginia Key and the City both argue that essentially Biscayne Marine's use of the NOT A PART parcel incorporates that use into the proposed Development Plan of Biscayne Marine. Biscayne Marine asserts that since the NOT A PART parcel already has parking and the road through the land is a public right of way, using it to allow access to the entrance of its parking lot is not an incorporation of the land into its ❑evelopment Plans, but rather the use of an existing resource. Both the City and Virginia Key contend that Biscayne Marine also incorporates the NOT A PART parcel into its Bid Response to supplement its parking numbers. Biscayne Marine asserts that it complied with the parking ratio with its current plan. Page 7 or22 Submitted into the public record for ltem(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk RESPONSIVENESS OF BISCAYNE MARINE The entirety of the issues that relate to the responsiveness of both Biscayne Marine are at the heart of this matter. Virginia Key asserts that the Biscayne Marine bid is non- responsive. Indeed. Virginia Key takes the position that Biscayne Marine has no standing to protest the Bid outcome as a result of Biscayne Marine's failure to submit a responsive hid. Interestingly, the City, who is tasked with the function of making the threshold determination of responsiveness found both bids to be responsive and affirmed that position at the Hearing. Transcript at 16. It would be difficult to now assert that Biscayne Marine is not a responsive bidder. If the failures of Biscayne Marine's Bid asserted by Virginia Key are taken as true, l am not in a position to assume that the City did not also recognize these failures and found whatever defects there were in the Biscayne Marine Bid to be defects that were waivable irregularities, indeed. the testimony of Jacqueline Lorenzo seems to indicate that very thing. To the point where the City gave Biscayne Marine credit for parking spaces not specifically a part of the Biscayne Marine parking calculation in order to credit Biscayne Marine with the appropriate number of parking spaces and comply with the parking formula in the RFP.5 The City's determination that Biscayne Marine was responsive is entitled to great deference. A position supported by Virginia Key in their Response to the Bid Protest where they cite to the law in Florida supporting the position. Florida courts have held that: Given the wide latitude of decision -making enjoyed by public agencies, a hearing officer's role in reviewing administrative actions is limited. A court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the agency. 'See Hearing Transcript at page 211—Testimony of Jacqueline Lorenzo. Page 8 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Intercontinental Properties a DHRS, 606 So. 2d 380, 381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)6 The City's responsiveness checklist prepared by DREAM after the proposers had submitted their bids contained was admitted into evidence. This checklist is diapositive of what the City was thinking at the time of the evaluation of the Bids and nothing has been offered to provide any basis to conclude otherwise.? However, a determination of responsiveness can go beyond simply assessing whether or not a bidder complied with each and every minimum requirement of the RFP in their submission. It can also be a determination by the City or any contracting authority that any irregularities with a proposer's Bid Response are immaterial and waivable. This would render a proposer responsive despite defects in their bid. The City placed the ordinary and standard waiver language in the RFP, reserving unto itself the right to waive any defects or irregularities in a proposer's Bid Response. I only address the responsiveness issue with respect to Biscayne Marine at this point, since it is a threshold issue to its standing to bring this Bid Protest. if Biscayne Marine were to be found non -responsive, then there would be no need for any further analysis of any remaining issues. I agree with the status of the law as stated by Counsel for Virginia Key, it is the law in Florida that a party protesting an award to another proposer must show that the protestor's own proposal does not suffer from the same deficiency that the protestor alleges in the recommended proposal. Sunshine Towing, Inc. v. Dep' of Trans.. Case No. 06-2451 BI❑ at 11140 (Fla. DOAH 'Counsel for Biscayne Marine has seen fit to quote an opinion of this Hearing Officer in support of the deference required to be given to a contracting authority. See Miami -Dade Cn(y fh•'g Examiner Op. July 28, 2016 (Dauthir, .1.) ("1 must give a great degree of deference to the decisions made by the County in making its determinations regarding an award of a bid"). 'Counsel for Biscayne Marine has suggested that the lack of any handwritten notations related to the parking calculations on the Biscayne Marine checklist prepared by the City to determine whether a bid is responsive suggests that the City found their parking in compliance with the RFP. l decline to take that leap and make that assumption. The document says what it says. Or in this case doesn't say what it doesn't say. Page 9 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Nov. 27, 2006) (finding. petitioner lacked standing to challenge awardee's alleged failure to disclose information when petitioner also failed to disclose same information): Anchor Towing, Inc. v. Delft. of Trans., Case No. 04-1447BID at ¶87 (Fla. DOAH Oct. 29, 2004) (where both protesting party and recommended proposer failed to comply with the organizational format set forth by the RFP and failed to fully disclose litigation history, the protesting party did not have standing to protest the intended award to the low bidder); see also Intercontinental Props. v: DHRS, 606 So. 2d 380, 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In other words, one party cannot complain that the other party sins better than they do. Before I can make a finding that the bids suffer from the "same" defect, I must first make a finding that there is indeed a defect to find. in this matter, the meaning and impact of the use of the NOT A PART parcel must be determined before the issue of whether the Biscayne Marine bid suffers from the same "defect" can be determined. STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review in these matters sets a high bar for any protestor of an RFP. See, Dept of Transp. v. Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So. 2d 912, 913 (Fla. I988) (holding that "a public body has wide discretion in soliciting and accepting bids for public improvements and its decision, when based on an honest exercise of this discretion, will not be overturned by a court even if it may appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree."j; Liberty County v. Baxter s Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So. 2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1982) (emphasis added); Culpepper v. Moore, 40 So. 2d 366 (F1a.1949); lilliann A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc. v. North Broward Hospital Dist., 117 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). To this point, add the language of the City Code which states in relevant part "the hearing officer shall determine whether procedural due process has been afforded, whether the substantial requirements of law have been observed and whether the decision was arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion, or unsupported by Page 10 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk substantial evidence as a whole. Substantial evidence means relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." City Code Section 18-104(b)(4)(d). USE OF THE "NOT A PART" PARCEL 1 am persuaded that each proposer in some way "utilized" the NOT A PART parcel as a part of each of the parties' Bid Responses. Whether it merely was using it as a public right of way so the public can access the parking garage or whether it contemplated the building of a structure to store boats. Et was used. Merriam -Webster Dictionary defines the word -utilize as " to make use of Merriam Webster Dictionary 2014 edition. Use is defined as — "to put or bring something into action; the act or practice of employing something; the benefit in law of one or more persons; specifically: the benefits of profit or property established in one other than the legal possessor". Webster's Dictionary, Orr' Edition. I am in agreement with counsel for Biscayne Marine that words, even in the legal context. should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. Florida case law also informs that words in official documents should be given their plain meaning. See Dows v Nike. Inc., 846 So. 2d 595, 601 (Fla. 4th MCA 2003) ("It is fundamental that where a contract is clear and unambiguous in its terms, the court may not give those terms any meaning beyond the plain meaning of the words contained therein"), Biscayne Marine argues that it "utilized" the NOT A PART parcel because Biscayne Marine's traffic flow plan included having vehicular traffic transit through an MPA Surface parking lot to enter the MPA Covered Parking lot, Biscayne Marine further argues that the only requirement in the RFP was that a traffic flow plan be submitted, The content and the quality of the Plan is a scoring decision, not a question of responsiveness. In this regard, Biscayne Marine has a point and it is a point apparently conceded by the City by finding Biscayne Marine responsive. This concedes that Biscayne Marine met the technical submission requirements, including the Traffic Plan and parking ratios. Page 11 of22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk However, this point begs the question of the use or utilization of the NOT A PART parcel in meeting the RFP's requirement of submitting a traffic flow plan and meeting the parking ratios was an act to deem Biscayne Marine itself as non -responsive. See Intercontinental Properties v Dept of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 606 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) . The RFP called for a proposal for the "development" of Virginia Key. Under Florida law the word development is defined several times in various statutes. The definition given in Miami 21, the City's development code is aligned with the numerous Florida statutory definitions. Miami 21 provides that "development" shall include the "demolition of a structure." § 1.2. Section 13-5 of the City Code (impact fees) also defines "development" by reference to 380.04. § 13-5, City Code of Ordinances (2017). The parties have argued vigorously over whether Biscayne Marine, in order to can-y out its development plan, would be required to demolish an existing structure on the NOT A PART parcel. According to the testimony of Mark Johnson the structure is indeed located on the property, but the Miami -Dade County Property Appraiser website shows the structure outside of the property's boundary lines. Mr. Johnson testified that the Property Appraiser website is often inaccurate at depicting the actual boundaries of a property. Florida Statute, Section 380.04 states as follows: (2) The following activities or uses shall be taken for the purposes of this chapter to involve "development," as defined in this section: (e) Demolition of a structure. (4) "Development," as designated in an ordinance, rule, or development permit includes all other development customarily associated with it unless otherwise specified. When appropriate to the context, "development" refers to the act of developing or to the result of development. Reference to any specific operation is not intended to mean that the operation or activity, when part of other Page 12of22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Cleric operations or activities, is not development. Reference to particular operations is not intended to limit the generality of subsection (1)•8 Similarly, the City Code's tree protection ordinance, 17-1, et seq, defines "development activity" to include demolition: Development activity: The carrying out of any building construction that requires issuance of a permit by the city, including without limitation building construction, additions (including but not limited to additions of carports, pools, decks, fences, driveways. and parking lots), modifications, demolition, or making any material alteration to the use or exterior appearance of any structure. (emphasis added). At the end of the day, I am persuaded that the structure is indeed a part of the NOT A PART parcel and would need to be demolished in order for Biscayne Marine to implement its Traffic Plan, I find the testimony of Mark Johnson to be persuasive, competent and relevant and it supports the assertion that there is a structure would need to be demolished. However, it is not dispositive of the issue of utilization of the NOT A PART parcel. It is tempting to engage in a comparison between the two different types of uses of the NOT A PART parcel and weigh then against one another. However, that is a substantive analysis not appropriate for this proceeding. Drawing such a distinction is not supported by the law and l am not permitted to do any analysis of the "degree" of the alleged deviation. See Phil's Expert Tree Serv., Inc. v. lrnward Cnty Sch. Bd., Case No. 06-4499BID (Fla. DOAH Mar. 19, 2007) ("Although this deviation is not identical to the one that makes Innovative's bid nonresponsive, it reflects a non-conformance to the same special condition respecting qualifications and hence . .. is sufficiently similar to the defect in Innovative's bid to be $See also Section 163.3221, Florida Statutes (2017); Section 163.3164, Florida Statutes (20171; Section 288.975, Florida Statutes (2017): and Section 343.922, Florida Statutes (2017). These statutes all incorporate the meaning of development in Section 380.04, Florida Statutes. Page 13 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk considered the '`same deficiency" for purposes oFapplying the rule laid down in Intercontinental Properties."). The City may choose to emphasize or de-emphasize certain aspects of the RFP, without that determination being in violation of existing procurement law. The standard in this regard is the equal treatment of all bidders. City of Sweetwater -14 Solo Const, Corp.. 823 So. 2d 798, 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) ("While a public authority has wide discretion in award of contracts for public works on competitive bids, such discretion must be exercised based upon clearly defined criteria, and may not be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously"); see also Liberty County v Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc„ 421 So. 2d 505 (Fla. 1982). Jacqueline Lorenzo testified that Biscayne Marine's proposed parking did not account for 14,000 square feet of additional retail space, which would generate a need for additional parking spaces. Transcript at 211. However, Ms. Lorenzo stated that Biscayne Marine was credited with the approximately 71 spaces located on the NOT A PART parcel as identified in Biscayne Marine's proposed plans. Biscayne Marine showed 489 spaces in their proposal, add to that the 71 spaces in the "Existing Parking" and it equals 560 total spaces. The City had calculated that Biscayne Marine needed 529 parking spaces for its proposed development and thus concluded that Biscayne Marine complied with the RFP's parking requirement. Transcript at 211, Had the City prohibited the use of the NOT A PART parcel then, at least in the City's view, the Biscayne Marine proposal would have been properly deemed non -responsive for failure to provide sufficient parking. Indeed, Ms. Lorenzo explained that the reason why she did not deem Biscayne Marine non -responsive for providing only 489 parking spaces is because she credited BMP with the parking on the NOT A PART parcel. Transcript al 225. Page 14 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . an 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The RFP required that proposers provide a sufficient number of parking spaces to support their proposed developments, as calculated pursuant to a specified Parking Formula. A reduction in parking automatically requires a reduction in revenue -generating uses, and a failure to provide the required number of parking spaces would therefore yield an unfair competitive advantage, as a proposer could provide more revenue -generating uses, and at a lower cost, than proposers that complied with the parking requirement. Transcript at 225. Ms. Lorenzo explained that the Parking Formula forces proposers to make a trade-off between parking spaces and revenue -producing space. The Parking Formula required 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space, and if only 4 spaces were provided, then only 1,000 feet of retail space can be constructed. if a proposer instead wants to provide 2,000 square feet of retail, then it must find room on the site for another 4 parking spaces and so on. This RFP appears to demand that trade off. Deviating from the Parking Formula would thus permit a proposer to build more retail space than otherwise permitted, and thereby generate more revenue. The Parking Formula is therefore clearly a material requirement of the RFP. There is precedent in Florida for a proposal being deemed non -responsive for failure to provide the required amount of parking. Weinberg v. Dept of Jarvenile Justice, Case No. 95- 1736B1D, ¶ 30-32 (Fla. DOAH June 15. 1995) (upholding agency's determination that petitioner's failure to meet the solicitation's parking requirements rendered it non -responsive); see also Procacci Commercial Realty v. Dept of Health and Rehab. Srvs., Case No. 95-1759, ¶ 7 (Fla. DOAH July 7, 1995) (holding that the solicitation's parking requirements was "an important and material provision of the lease"). These cases are not applicable here. There is no challenge by the agency seeking to find Biscayne Marine non -responsive. Page 15 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk [ will not engage in any speculation as to what the City may or may not have done if the existing parking on the NOT A PART parcel was not available to be calculated into the parking ratio in order to make Biscayne Marine compliant. Biscayne Marine has asserted that it was in compliance without the City's inclusion of the additional spaces from the existing parking. Further. I will not engage in the exercise of attempting to determine which party is correct in this regard. However, it is clear that the City, believing that Biscayne Marine needed credit for parking spaces located on the NOT A PART parcel. RUSTY PELICAN LEASE The RFP also required that the Bid Responses account for an existing [ease between the City and the Rusty Pelican restaurant (Rusty Pelican lease). The Bid Response would need to provide for 220 parking spaces in conformity the lease agreement, A copy of the lease was attached to the RFP. The Rusty Pelican lease requires that the 220 spaces must be accessible from within the marina site, without traveling on the adjacent public right-of-way, the Rickenbacker Causeway, RFP at 64. The evidence indicates that the alternate entrance to the parking area in Biscayne Marine's Development Plan, would not satisfy the provisions of the lease with regard to the Rusty Pelican parking spaces. Ms. Lorenzo's testimony made it clear that without the NOT A PART parcel the only access to the property would be through the alternate entrance that seems to require that the only access t❑ the Rusty Pelican parking spaces within Biscayne Marine's parking would need to be accessed through the use of the Rickenbacker Causeway. Transcript at 216. I leave it to the City to determine whether that alternate access would comport with the requirements of the Rusty Pelican lease, but the City does not appear to be holding the use of the NOT A PART parcel Page 16 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk against Biscayne Marine. Ms, Lorenzo testified that Biscayne Marine's proposed access and circulation plans, through its Main Entrance and vehicular circulation through the NOT A PART parcel. was considered by the City and the Evaluation Committee as part of its scoring in connection with the design scoring criterion. Transcript at 218. Biscayne Marine's argument that Virginia Key improperly used the NOT A PART parcel only stands if i find that they themselves did not use the property. When I was a child and i would cut through my neighbor's yard to get to the park, it was rightly said that 1 "used" the neighbor's yard as a shortcut. When Biscayne Marine designed the entrance to their parking requiring the public to travel through the NOT A PART parcel, it is rightly said that they are using the NOT A PART parcel to meet the requirements of the RFP. Employing the plain and ordinary meaning of the word "use'', Biscayne Marine is using the NOT A PART parcel. Indeed, the use of the NOT A PART parcel seems essential to at least one very specific aspect of the RFP, allowing Biscayne Marine to comply with the terms of the Rusty Pelican lease, For Biscayne Marine. this NOT A PART parcel is affecting their bid in at least three separate ways. 1) whether by intention or not, whether needed or not, the City uses the existing parking on the NOT A PART parcel to help calculate the number of parking spaces for Biscayne Marine comply with the parking ratio's; 2) it is a component of their traffic circulation plan and is required for access to their parking garage; and 3) it assists them in complying with the requirements of the Rusty Pelican lease. Use is as much about the benefit gained as it is about the level of activity. The benefits to using the NOT A PART parcel by Biscayne Marine are real and substantial. Page 17 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk ADDENDUM 5 Instead of bringing clarity to the upheaval caused by the removal of the County land. Addendum 5 apparently caused more confusion. This confusion or misunderstanding may have been present prior to the issuance of Addendum 5 9. Biscayne Marine apparently understood that the portion of land owned by the City labeled NOT A PART" was land unavailable for a proposer to use. The City, according to Ms. Lorenzo thought of it merely as a surveyors note. Virginia Key believed that although the land was not a part of the surveyed land, this land, which is wholly owned by the City, was always available to be included in the Development Plans. The words "NOT A PART" have been included on the survey attached to the RFP from the very beginning of the RFP process. We now come to the questions no one really asked throughout the entire RFP process. What do those words mean? Not a part of what? Biscayne Marine argues that they mean that this portion of land that is not identified either by folio number or by name as part of the Property, is excluded from the development. The City, reacting to the removal of the County property issued Addendum 5 and amended the language of the RFP as follows: Proposers shall have the options list below regarding be required to construct the parking for the Project solely within the footprint of the Property as shown in Exhibit "A", which does not include the parcel previously conveyed to the City by the county by deed recorded in Official Records' Book 28636. Page 366. 9There is nothing to indicate that the issuance of Addendum 5 brought the parties to think of the NOT A PART parcel as they did, respectively. It may have only altered how they used it, Page 18 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The County property was always intended to be a parking facility. Indeed, it was a restriction in the Deed. The County Land portion was conveyed to the City of Miami with a right of reverter that if a municipal parking garage construction did not commence within a certain time, Miami -Dade County could exercise their right of reverter, Agreed Exhibit 1. The County did that very thing. The language of Addendum 5 did indeed change the parameters of the development area. l have no reason to doubt counsel for Biscayne Marine when he informs that Biscayne Marine had to scramble to make adjustments. Each proposer had to adjust to this new reality of the County land not being available for use. It is noted that none of the proposers inquired about the use of the NOT A PART parcel during the solicitation process either before or after Addendum No, 5 was issued. At some level that makes sense. Everybody believed they knew exactly what it meant. Ms. Lorenzo testified that the City thought the notation was a surveyor's note. I am not in a position to challenge that assumption. Biscayne Marine has asserted that this explanation is a belated attempt to justify the City's actions. Maybe it is, but absent something more than the record, testimony and argument before me, 1 must defer to the City's position and explanation. To the extent that the RFP and Addendum No, 5 are subject to two possible interpretations, my inquiry is limited to whether the City's interpretation is a reasonable one. The City's interpretation is not necessarily the only interpretation or even the best interpretation, but nonetheless it is reasonable. Toshiba Bus. Solutions, Inc., v. Broward Carty. Sch. Bd, Case No. I4-53O0BID, If 57 (Fla. ❑OAH August l 1, 20l5). ° 10Section 18-104 of the City Code also mandates a finding of "reasonableness" .. Page 19 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk While everyone may have believed they understood, it is clear that this was not the case. However. since no proposer questioned the City to gain any clarity, the proposers were left to assume they were making the right choice. "if the dispute in a protest challenging a proposed award turns on the interpretation of an ambiguous, vague, or unreasonable specification. which could have been corrected or clarified prior to acceptance of the bids or proposals ... , and if the agency has acted thereafter in accordance with a permissible interpretation of the specification (i.e., one that is not clearly erroneous), then the agency's intended action should be upheld ...." Toshiba Bus. Solutions at fi 57. Giving the argument of counsel for Biscayne Marine as much deference, latitude and credibility that can be given, but I must still, as a matter of law defer to the judgment of the City in determining certain crucial factors. One of these factors relates to materiality. If the use of the NOT A PART parcel was not allowed. then the City had the ability to determine whether that made a difference to the outcome and whether the deviation was material. Material variances have been defined as variances that give one proposer a substantial advantage over other proposers and restrict competition. Tropabest Foods. Inc. v State, Dept. of General Services, 493 So. 2d 50 (Fla. lst DCA 1986). Non -material variances, on the other hand, are those that do not affect price, give one proposer an advantage or benefit not enjoyed by other proposers, or adversely affects the interests of the agency. Id. If both Biscayne Marine and Virginia Key used the NOT A PART parcel, even without a clear understanding as to whether it was allowed under the RFP, then neither has gained the type of advantage contemplated under existing procurement law. This is particularly true where the City treated both bidders equally regardless of type of use of the NOT A PART parcel. Absent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct in recommending the award of the contract, the City has discretion to award the contract to Virginia Key. See Libertir Page 20 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk County 421 So. 2d at 507 (Fla. 1982): Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So. 2d at 913 (noting that "the hearing officer's sole responsibility is to ascertain whether the [public] agency acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, or dishonestly"). I give no weight to the argument, that everyone knew the NOT A PART parcel was fair game since they all used it. The idea that an action gets legitimacy because "everybody was wrong together " fails in all respects. However, in the procurement context, if the contracting authority treats all of the parties who got it wrong equally, shortcomings can be accounted for and forgiven. CONCLUSION 1 find that each proposer was treated fairly and equally in accordance with the City of Miami Code of Ordinances, Florida Statutes, and the RFP. 1 conclude that the RFP process was not conducted in an arbitrary or capricious manner and each party to the Bid Protest was afforded their opportunity to present their case in the manner prescribed by law. Having reviewed the protest, responses and exhibits thereto, having heard the testimony and observed the demeanor and credibility of the witnesses, having reviewed the materials introduced into evidence during the administrative hearing, having heard argument of counsel it is found that the recommendation made by the Selection Committee that Virginia Key LLC is the highest ranked responsive and responsible proposer eligible to be considered for the award is upheld. 1. I hereby AFFIRM the City Manager's Award Recommendation. made to the City Commission, for RFP No. 1 b-17-011, holding that Virginia Key, LLC is the highest - ranked responsive. responsible proposer for the said RFP, and entitled to the award of the contract. Page 21 of 22 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , city Clerk 2. Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC's protest on the grounds stated in its formal protest of June 27, 2017 is hereby DENIED. 3. Any other issues raised in the Bid Protest as to the non -responsiveness of Virginia Key are similarly denied and although not discussed herein have been thoroughly contemplated and considered. DONE AND ENTERED this 8th day of August, 2017 in Miami, Florida, _/s/Marc Anthony Douth it_ MARC ANTHONY DOUTHIT, ESQ. 6625 Miami Lakes Drive, 3rd Floor, Miami Lakes, Florida 33014 Telephone: (305) 401-1029 Fax: (305) 503-9633 juryaward124@gmail.com Hearing Officer Page 22 of 22 7 Page 1 of 12 RECEIVED Bilzin Sumberg ay frainFrtrz ffi 1 a:21 TRI. Aug FIT. 201 e DOCKETED NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE RE -HEARING MOTION._ AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. BISCAYNE MARINE PARTNERS, LLC, Petitioner, V. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA and VIRGINIA KEY, LLC, Respondents. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAM1-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO.: 17-335-AP-01 LOWER CASE: In re: RFP No. 16-17-011 Lease and Development of Virginia Key and Bid Protest Opinion filed: 3-V Lr 'O ^ , 2018. uiJJ3'.i uJ3 0311J On Petition for Writ of Certiorari of a Final Order on a Bid Protest Filed by Biscayne Marine Partners LLC, In re: City of Miami Request for Proposal No. 16-17-011 David B. Haber, Esq. and Lauren S. Fallick, Esq., of Haber Slade P.A., for Petitioner, Biscaync Marine Partners, LLC Eileen Ball Mehta, Esq., of Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, for Respondent, Virginia Key, LLC Forest L, Andrew, Assistant City Attorney, for Respondent, City of Miami, Florida Before: THORNTON, RUIZ, and DEL REY, JJ. RUIZ, J. z9/'8 iIANN19 'CI VANVL /7-?Al*ht4ter When it comes to competitive bidding and procurement requirements, clear rules and defined procedures matter. They promote legitimacy, increase transparency, and ensure predictability. In this case, Petitioner, Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC ("Biscayne"), contends that Respondents, City of Miami, Florida ("City") and Virginia Key, LLC ("Virginia Key"), failed to follow the rules. But Respondents did no such thing. Virginia Key won the bid, and a Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2,miam i-dadeclerk.eom/ocs/V iewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZi 1i ih°/%2bg... 8/1 /2018 Page 2 of 12 quasi-judicial review of the City's bid process affirmed the award upon concluding that it complied with the essential requirements of law, and was supported by competent substantial evidence. Said review also ensured that all participants were afforded due process. Consequently, Petitioner is not entitled to certiorari relief. BACKGROUND On September 1, 2017, Biscayne filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari ("Petition"), seeking to quash a Hearing Officer's quasi-judicial decision entitled "Final Order on the Bid Protest Filed by Biscayne Marine Partners Related to Request for Proposal No. 16-17-011" ("Order"). The Order affirmed the recommendation of the City Manager to award Virginia Key a contract for the development and lease of the Virginia Key Marina pursuant to Request for Proposal 16-17-011 ("RFP"). The RFP sought, in pertinent part, as follows: ...responsive proposals from qualified Proposers willing to plan, redesign, construct, renovate, redevelop, lease, manage and operate a mixed -use waterfront facility including, but not limited to, a marina, boatyard, dock master's office, ships store, dry storage, wet slip docks, and at least one restaurant (the "Project"). The location for the Project was 3301, 3605, 3501, 3311, & 3511 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, shown respectively as Parcels 1, 2, and 3 on a survey included in the RFP ("Property"). The Property consisted of approximately twenty-seven (27) acres. The main area of contention is a rectangular parcel of land, approximately 51 feet by 441 feet in size, located and abutting, but outside of the northern boundary for the Rickenbacker Causeway. On the survey attached to the RFP, this parcel contains the notation "NOT A PART" ("NAP Parcel"). The NAP Parcel was actually comprised of two parcels: (1) a parcel owned by the City, which is a paved parking lot managed by the Miami Parking Authority ("MPA"); and (2) a parcel owned by Miami -Dade County ("County"), which at the time the RFP was issued, Page 2 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2. miami-dad.eclerlc.com/ocs/ViewerHT.ML5.aspx?QS=B 6%2f9EwnZlIi ih%2bg... 8/1/2018 Page 3 of 12 was deeded by the County to the City on the condition that an MPA garage be constructed on it subject to restrictions. Two addenda were made to the RFP which are relevant to the instant Petition: Addendum 4 and Addendum 5. On April 19, 2017, the City issued Addendum 4, which provided that proposers could construct a unified development over and inclusive of the MPA garage, so long as the uses incorporated in the MPA garage complied with all applicable deed restrictions. Because certain conditions were not met, this parcel reverted to the County. On May 5, 2017, the City issued Addendum 5, which revised: (1) Section III.A.II of the RFP regarding development of the parking garage; (2) Section III.C.8 of the RFP regarding the Estimated Timetable; and (3) Section IV.0 of the RFP regarding Receipt of Responses. The proposal submission time was extended to May 24, 2017. Addendum 5 also revised Section III.A.11 of the RFP, stating in relevant part: Proposers shall be required to construct the parking for the Project solely within the footprint of the Property as shown in Exhibit "A", which does not include the parcel previously conveyed to the City by the County Deed recorded in Official Records Book 28636 Page 3666. Further, references to the NAP Parcel were deleted from the RFP. The City received proposals from Biscayne, Virginia Key, and GCM Contracting Solutions, Inc. ("GCM"). The procurement and evaluation process was handled by the Department of Real Estate Asset Management ("DREAM") for the City. On June 12, 2017, an Evaluation Committee comprised of seven members with technical expertise in procurement, environment, finance, marina management, planning and zoning, and the Virginia Key master plan heard presentations from all three proposers. Each proposer was given equal time to present their proposals. Page 3 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerlc.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlliih%2bg... 8/1/2018 Page 4 of 12 On June 14, 2017, the Evaluation Committee convened to evaluate the three proposals. Based upon a detailed evaluation matrix, the Evaluation Committee ranked Virginia Key first, Biscayne second, and GCM third. On June 15, 2017, the City Manager approved the ranking and evaluation of the Evaluation Committee, and recommended Virginia Key for the award of the lease and development agreement. On June 27, 2017, Biscayne filed a formal bid protest.' On July 20, 2017, a hearing was convened on the bid protest before a Hearing Officer, who was randomly selected and appointed by the City Manager. The Hearing Officer had more than twenty-two (22) years of experience dealing with bid protests, and the hearing was convened pursuant to § 18-104 of the City of Miami Code ("City Code"). The Hearing Officer was presented with an agreed upon list of exhibits comprising five (5) separate volumes, which were admitted into evidence. The Hearing Officer was also presented with an additional list of documents that were not agreed upon, but after hearing argument of counsel, certain additional documents were admitted as exhibits. Each party was allotted two hours for their presentation for a total of six hours. Additional time was allowed for objections. Rather than presenting witnesses, Biscayne's presentation consisted of argument by counsel, as well as the presentation of documents and exhibits, which were treated by the Hearing Officer as equal to all other relevant evidence in terms of admissibility pursuant to § 18-104(b)(4)(c) of the City Code. The City presentedthe testimony of Jacqueline Lorenzo ("Lorenzo"), the DREAM Project manager, and Mark Johnson, a licensed surveyor. Virginia Key filed a motion to intervene, which was granted, and it was treated as a party for all purposes. GCM was not part of the bid protest. Page 4 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.rniami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlliih%2bg... 8/ 1 /2018 Page 5 of 12 On August 4, 2017, the Hearing Officer emailed an unsigned version of the Order containing detailed factual findings and conclusions of law to various City employees and officials. On August 5, 2017, the unsigned Order was forwarded to additional employees and officials, including an Assistant City Attorney who forwarded the Order to counsel for Biscayne and Virginia Key. On August 7, 2017, the parties were formally served with an executed copy of the Order signed by the Hearing Officer. The Order denied Biscayne's bid protest and affirmed the recommendation made in favor of Virginia Key. Biscayne's Petition followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW Where, as inthe instant case, a party is entitled as a matter of right to seek review in the circuit court from administrative action, the Court must determine: (1) whether procedural due process was afforded; (2) whether the administrative findings and judgment are supported by competent substantial evidence; and (3) whether the essential requirements of law have been observed. Dusseau v. Metropolitan Dade Cnty., 794 So. 2d 1270, 1274 (Fla. 2001); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Dania, 761 So. 2d 1089, 1092 (Fla. 2000); Bd. of Cnty. Com 'rs of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469, 474 (Fla. 1993). On first -tier certiorari review, the circuit court should not re -weigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the local government authority. Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1275-76; Florida Power, 761 So. 2d at 1093. ANALYSIS Biscayne claims that the Hearing Officer's affirmance of the award recommendation departed from the essential requirements of law, and is not supported by competent substantial evidence. In support of this position, Biscayne posits that two key issues were incorrectly addressed by the Hearing Officer: (i) "the RFP is defective because it is ambiguous as to a material, if not the most material specification —what land can be developed, managed, and Page 5 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlliih%2bg... 8/1/2018 Page 6 of 12 operated for this lucrative 75-year lease" and (ii) Virginia Key's "proposed development on the 'NOT A PART' parcel is a non-waivable material deviation from the RFP," thereby rendering Virginia Key's proposal "non -responsive." Petition at p. 19. In addition to these two points, Biscayne also maintains that certiorari relief is necessary because due process was not afforded in the bid proceedings below. However, none of the aforementioned arguments warrant certiorari relief. I. The Hearing Officer complied with the essential requirements of law and the Order is supported by competent substantial evidence. "The departure from the essential requirements of the law necessary for the issuance of a writ of certiorari is something more than a simple legal error." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003) (citing Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So. 2d 679, 682 (Fla. 2000)). As explained by the Florida Supreme Court, certiorari review should only be granted when there has been a violation of a clearly established principal of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice: The required "departure from the essential requirements of the law" means something far beyond legal error. It means an inherent illegality or irregularity, an abuse of judicial power, an act of judicial tyranny perpetrated with disregard of procedural requirements, resulting in gross miscarriage of justice. The writ of certiorari properly issues to correct essential illegality but not legal error. Haines City Comm. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523, 528 (Fla. 1995) (citation omitted). Here, a review of the Order indicates that the Hearing Officer clearly understood his limited role in reviewing the award to Virginia Key, and carefully analyzed the record below pursuant to the standard of review established by the City Code. See City Code § 18-104(b)(4)(d) ("[T]he hearing officer shall determine whether procedural due process has been afforded, whether substantial requirements of law have been observed, and whether the decision was arbitrary, Page 6 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerH.TML5.aspx?QS= B6%2f9EwnZlli ih%2bg... 8/1 /2018 Page 7 of 12 capricious and an abuse of discretion, or unsupported by substantial evidence as a whole. Substantial evidence means relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion."). In Florida, there is a strong policy to defer to public agencies' decisions in competitive bidding situations. See Dep't of Transp. v. Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So. 2d 912, 913 (Fla. 1998); Liberty Cnty. v. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So. 2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1982) ("[A] public body has wide discretion in soliciting and accepting bids for public improvements . and its decision, when based on an honest exercise of this discretion, will not be overtumed by a court even if itmay appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree."); Intercontinental Props., Inc. v. State Dept. of Health and Rehab. Servs., 606 So. 2d 380, 381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (noting the judicial role in reviewing administrative action is a limited one). In. fact, "judicial intervention to prevent the rejection of a bid should occur only when the purpose or effect of the rejection is to defeat the object and integrity of competitive bidding." Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913 (emphasis added); see also Gulf Real Props., Inc. v. Dep't of Health and Rehabilitative Servs., 687 So. 2d 1336, 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (holding public body's rejection of all bids "must stand absent a showing that the `purpose or effect of the rejection is to defeat the object and integrity of competitive bidding.") (quoting Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913). Further, a hearing officer is required to uphold an agency's honest exercise of discretion, "absent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression, or misconduct." Id. at 914; see also Miami - Dade Cnty. v. Church & Tower, 715 So. 2d 1084, 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (emphasizing the measure of discretion vested in a public agency in competitive bidding situations pursuant to Page 7 of 12 1 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B 6%2f9EwnZl l iih %2bg... 8/ 1 /2018 Page 8 of 12 Liberty County, as well as the strong judicial deference accorded to agency decisions with respect to competitively bid contracts under Groves -Watkins). Here, the Hearing Officer correctly recognized the aforementioned limitations under Florida law, and properly deferred to the expertise of the City's Evaluation Committee on numerous issues raised in the bid protest. Noting that nothing in the bid protest questioned the technical and professional expertise possessed by the Evaluation Committee to rank the proposers, the Hearing Officer properly declined to second-guess the quantitative and qualitative analysis employed by the Evaluation Committee to review the proposers' bids. Arguments advanced by Biscayne that Virginia Key's proposal was non -responsive due to dredging depth violations or the inadequacy of Virginia Key's financial analysis —issues reviewed by the Evaluation Committee —were correctly left undisturbed by the Hearing Officer and denied as independent bases for the bid protest. See Order at pp. 5-6. This brings us to the two primary defects alleged by Biscayne as the basis for their Petition. is The RFP does not contain an ambiguous material specification. In determining the interpretation of the term "NOT A PART" as it relates to the RFP, the Hearing Officer correctly adopted the City's interpretation of the term and its impact on the evaluation of the proposals. Specifically, the Hearing Officer deferred to Lorenzo's testimony that the purpose of Addendum No. 5 was to remove County land from the RFP, due to the County formally notifying the City that it was exercising its reverter clause and taldng back the land previously deeded to the City for the purpose of constructing an MPA parking garage. The Hearing Officer also recognized Lorenzo's interpretation that the words "NOT A PART" simply consisted of a notation on the survey designed to inform prospective proposers that the parcel should not be considered part of the survey. Such deference to the City's interpretation does not Page 8 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miarni-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlliih%2bg... 8/1/2018 Page 9 of 12 constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law; on the contrary, a city's "administrative interpretation is entitled to judicial deference as long as it is within the range of possible permissible interpretations." Paloumbis v. City of Miami Beach, 840 So. 2d 297, 298- 99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (footnote omitted); see also Bd of Trustees of the Infernal Improvement Trust Fund v. Levy, 656 So. 2d 1359, 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) ("If an agency's interpretation of its governing statutes is one of several permissible interpretations, it must be upheld, despite the existence of reasonable alternatives."). The Hearing Officer further noted that no proposers submitted any questions or requests for clarification concerning the "NOT A PART' notation either prior to, or after the issuance of, Addendum No. 5. Additionally, the Property to be developed is clearly shown on the survey attached to the RFP,as Parcels 1, 2, and 3. The NAP Parcel (as its own name indicates) was not part of Parcels I, 2, or 3. In fact, the folio number for the NAP Parcel was not included in the folio numbers in the RFP for the defined Property. And Addendum 5 clearly states that "Proposers shall be required to construct the parking for the Project solely within the footprint of the Property...." Accordingly, there can be no finding of ambiguity, and the Hearing Officer complied with the essential requirements of the law in deferring to the City's interpretation. IL Virginia Key's proposal is responsive. In determining whether Virginia Key's proposal is non -responsive due to their use of the NAP Parcel —which Biscayne maintains is a non-waivable material deviation from the RFP— deference must once again be accorded to the Hearing Officer. In his Order, the Hearing Officer found "that each proposer in some way `utilized' the NOT A PART parcel as a part of each parties' Bid Responses." Order at p. 11. He concluded that Virginia Key's proposal utilized the NAP parcel for dry dock storage, while Biscayne utilized the NAP parcel for access to the Page 9 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miarni-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlli ih%2bg... 8/1 /2018 Page 10 of 12 proposed project and for parking. Id. The Hearing Officer reasoned that before finding that both bids suffered from the same defect, i.e., utilization of the NAP parcel, he had to first make a finding that such utilization constituted a defect in each proposal. In analyzing the presence of a defect in each proposal, the Hearing Officer appropriately deferred to the City's determination that the proposals submitted by Biscayne and Virginia Key were deemed responsive by the Evaluation Committee. See Order at p. 8. The Hearing Officer further noted that the City had reserved the right under its RFP to waive irregularities or technicalities in a proposal. See Tropabest Foods, Inc. v. State, Dept. of General Servs., 493 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (explaining that not every deviation from an invitation to bid is material; "Mt is only material if it gives the bidder a substantial advantage over the other bidders and thereby restricts or stifles competition.") (citing Robinson Electrical Co., Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 417 So. 2d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)). The Hearing Officer also noted that neither proposer had obtained an advantage via the NAP Parcel: If both Biscayne Marine AND Virginia Key used the NOT A PART parcel, even without a clear understanding as to whether it was allowed under the RFP, then neither has gained the type of advantage contemplated under existing procurement law. This is particularly true where the City treated both bidders equally regardless of type of use of the NOT A PART parcel. Opinion at p. 20. The Hearing Officer further stated that while "tempting to engage in a comparison between the two different types of utilizations" of the NAP Parcel, such substantive analysis would inappropriately second-guess the Evaluation Committee, which had been charged with scoring the content and quality of the proposals. Ultimately, Florida law defines competent substantial evidence as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Duval Utility Page 10of12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZll i ih%2bg... 8/1 /2018 Page 11 of 12 Co. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 380 So. 2d 1028, 1031 (Fla. 1980); see also Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1274 ("Competent substantial evidence is tantamount to legally sufficient evidence."). In this instance, the Hearing Officer was presented with a series of exhibits comprising five (5) separate volumes, including, but not limited to, the Proposals, numerous emails and letters, a transcript of the June 12, 2017 Selection Committee hearing, the June 14, 2017 Selection Committee deliberation meeting, transcripts of the Final Hearing, the RFP checklist, and numerous affidavits from various zoning professionals. Additional documents were also admitted at the bid protest hearing as exhibits. The Hearing Officer also heard the testimony of Lorenzo, the DREAM Project Manager, and Mark Johnson, a licensed surveyor. It cannot be said that the Hearing Officer lacked competent substantial evidence in affirming the recommendation made in favor of Virginia Key, and he correctly held that "[albsent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct in recommending the award of the contract, the City has discretion to award the contract to Virginia Key." Order at p. 20 (citing Liberty County, 421 So. 2d at 507; Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913). II. Petitioner was afforded due process. Generally, a quasi-judicial hearing meets basic due process requirements if the parties are provided notice of the hearing and an opportunity to be heard, which includes the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses. Jennings v. Dade Cnty., 589 So. 2d 1337, 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Quasi-judicial decision -makers must provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before taking actions which affect the interests of the parties before them. Mesa v. City of Miami Nuisance Abatement Bd., 673 So. 2d 500, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Here, there is little question that Biscayne received notice and a hearing. Additionally, Biscayne Page 11 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.rniami-dadeclerk.com/ocs/ViewerHTML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZ!Ii ih%2bg... 8/.1 /2018 Page 12 of 12 also had the opportunity to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be informed of all the facts analyzed and addressed by the Hearing Officer. Further, there is no competent substantial evidence to substantiate Biscayne's claim that the Hearing Officer and the City engaged in "undeniable collusion" with regard to an email chain addressing the filing of the Order. This Court's review of the lengthy email chain cited by Biscayne as evidence of improper ex parte communications reveals that the emails involve non - substantive administrative matters involving service, the filing date, and the rendition date of the Order. Communications "regarding purely administrative, non -substantive matters" are not improper. See Nudel v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, 52 So. 3d 692, 694-95 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Accordingly, the bid process in this case did not suffer from procedural due process violations. CONCLUSION The Circuit Court —acting in its appellate capacity —is not authorized to weigh or reweigh conflicting evidence or substitute its own judgment in place of the agency in quasi- judicial proceedings. See Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1275-76; see also Netz v. Jacksonville Sherriff's Office, City of Jacksonville, 668 So. 2d 235, 236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Absent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression, or misconduct, the Hearing Officer was required to uphold the City's honest exercise of discretion. See Graves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913. Biscayne has failed to demonstrate that the City's action was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or that the recommended award to Virginia Key is illegal, oppressive, collusive, fraudulent, or unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is hereby DENIED. THORNTON and DEL REY, JJ., concur Page 12 of 12 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www2.miami-dadeclerk,corn/ocs/ViewerHT.ML5.aspx?QS=B6%2f9EwnZlliih%2bg... 8/1/2018 8 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE RE -HEARING MOTION, AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. BISCAYNE MARINE PARTNERS, LLC, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA and VIRGINIA KEY, LLC, Respondents. Opinion filed: September ! I , 2018. RECEIVED Bilzin Sumberg By Mores at 10:51 am, Sep 13, 2010 DOCKETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO.: 17-335 AP 01 LOWER CASE: In re: RFP No. 16-17-011 Lease and Development of Virginia Key and Bid Protest On Petition for Writ of Certiorari of a Final Order on a Bid Protest Filed by Biscayne Marine Partners LLC, In re: City of Miami Request for Proposal No. 16-17-011 Rodolfo Sorondo, Jr., Esq. of Holland & Knight LLP, and David B. Haber, Esq. and Lauren S. Fallick, Esq., of Haber Slade P.A., for Petitioner, Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC Eileen Ball Mehta, Esq., of Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, for Respondent, Virginia Key, LLC Forest L. Andrew, Assistant City Attorney, for Respondent, City of Miami, Florida etprA Before: THORNTON, RUIZ, and DEL REY, JJ. RUIZ, J. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION This cause is before us on Petitioner's, Biscayne Marine Partners, LLC ("Biscayne"), Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification and Correction of Opinion filed July 30, 2018. We deny the Motion for Rehearing and grant the Motion for Clarification. Accordingly, the opinion issued on July 30, 2018 is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk When it comes to competitive bidding and procurement requirements, clear rules and defined procedures matter. They promote legitimacy, increase transparency, and ensure predictability. The instant case deals with a bid process that was far from perfect, giving rise to a bid protest and extensive quasi-judicial review by a hearing officer. This Court is thus charged, on first tier certiorari review of the hearing officer's decision, to decide whether procedural due process was accorded, whether the essential requirements of law were observed, and whether the hearing officer's factual findings are supported by competent substantial evidence. As explained herein, we find that the hearing officer's decision satisfies the safeguards applicable to first tier review, and deny Petitoner's request for certioriari relief. BACKGROUND On September I, 2017, Biscayne filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari ("Petition"), seeking to quash a hearing officer's quasi-judicial decision entitled "Final Order on the Bid Protest Filed by Biscayne Marine Partners Related to Request for Proposal No. 16-17-011" ("Order"). The Order affirmed the recommendation of the City Manager for the City of Miami, Florida ("City") to award Respondent, Virginia Key, LLC ("Virginia Key"), a contract for the development and lease of the Virginia Key Marina pursuant to Request for Proposal 16-17-011 ("RFP"). The RFP sought, in pertinent part, as follows: [R]esponsive proposals from qualified Proposers willing to plan, redesign, construct, renovate, redevelop, lease, manage and operate a mixed -use waterfront facility including, but not limited to, a marina, boatyard, dock master's office, ships store, dry storage, wet slip docks, and at least one restaurant (the "Project"). The location for the Project was 3301, 3605, 3501, 3311, & 3511 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, shown respectively as Parcels 1, 2, and 3 on a survey included in the RFP ("Property"). The Property consisted of approximately twenty-seven (27) acres. Page 2 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The main area of contention is a rectangular parcel of land, approximately 51 feet by 441 feet in size, located and abutting, but outside of the northern boundary for the Rickenbacker Causeway. On the survey attached to the RFP, this parcel contains the notation "NOT A PART" ("NAP Parcel"). The NAP Parcel was actually comprised of two parcels: (1) a parcel owned by the City, which is a paved parking lot managed by the Miami Parking Authority ("MPA"); and (2) a parcel owned by Miami -Dade County ("County"), which at the time the RFP was issued, was deeded by the County to the City on the condition that an MPA garage be constructed on it subject to restrictions. Two addenda were made to the RFP which are relevant to the instant Petition: Addendum 4 and Addendum 5. On April 19, 2017, the City issued Addendum 4, which provided that proposers could construct a unified development over and inclusive of the MPA garage, so long as the uses incorporated in the MPA garage complied with all applicable deed restrictions. Because certain conditions were not met, this parcel reverted to the County. On May 5, 2017, the City issued Addendum 5, which revised: (1) Section III.A.II of the RFP regarding development of the parking garage; (2) Section III.C.8 of the RFP regarding the Estimated Timetable; and (3) Section IV.0 of the RFP regarding Receipt of Responses. The proposal submission time was extended to May 24, 2017. Addendum 5 also revised Section III.A.11 of the RFP, stating, in pertinent part, as follows: Proposers shall be required to construct the parking for the Project solely within the footprint of the Property as shown in Exhibit "A", which does not include the parcel previously conveyed to the City by the County Deed recorded in Official Records Book 28636 Page 3666. Further, references to the NAP Parcel were deleted from the RFP. The City received proposals from Biscayne, Virginia Key, and GCM Contracting Solutions, Inc. ("GCM"). The procurement and evaluation process was handled by the Page 3 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Department of Real Estate Asset Management ("DREAM") for the City. On June 12, 2017, an Evaluation Committee comprised of seven members with technical expertise in procurement, environment, finance, marina management, planning and zoning, and the Virginia Key master plan heard presentations from all three proposers. Each proposer was given equal time to present their proposals. On June 14, 2017, the Evaluation Committee convened to evaluate the three proposals. Based upon a detailed evaluation matrix, the Evaluation Committee ranked Virginia Key first, Biscayne second, and GCM third. On June 15, 2017, the City Manager approved the ranking and evaluation of the Evaluation Committee, and recommended Virginia Key for the award of the lease and development agreement. On June 27, 2017, Biscayne filed a formal bid protest.' On July 20, 2017, a hearing was convened on the bid protest before a hearing officer, who was randomly selected and appointed by the City Manager. The hearing officer had more than twenty-two (22) years of experience dealing with bid protests, and the hearing was convened pursuant to § 18-104 of the City of Miami Code ("City Code"). He was presented with an agreed upon list of exhibits comprising five (5) separate volumes, which were admitted into evidence. The hearing officer was also presented with an additional list of documents that were not agreed upon, but after hearing argument of counsel, certain additional documents were admitted as exhibits. Each party was allotted two hours for their presentation for a total of six hours. Additional time was allowed for objections. Rather than presenting witnesses, Biscayne's presentation consisted of argument by counsel, as well as the presentation of documents and exhibits, which were treated by the hearing officer as equal to all other relevant evidence in Virginia Key filed a motion to intervene, which was granted, and it was treated as a party for all purposes. GCM was not part of the bid protest. Page 4 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk terms of admissibility pursuant to § 18-104(b)(4)(c) of the City Code. The City presented the testimony of Jacqueline Lorenzo ("Lorenzo"), the DREAM Project manager, and Mark Johnson, a licensed surveyor. On August 4, 2017, the hearing officer emailed an unsigned version of the Order containing detailed factual findings and conclusions of law to various City employees and officials. On August 5, 2017, the unsigned Order was forwarded to additional employees and officials, including an Assistant City Attorney who forwarded the Order to counsel for Biscayne and Virginia Key. On August 7, 2017, the parties were formally served with an executed copy of the Order signed by the hearing officer. The Order denied Biscayne's bid protest and affirmed the recommendation made in favor of Virginia Key. Biscayne's Petition followed. STANDARD OF REVIEW Where, as in the instant case, a party is entitled as a matter of right to seek review in the circuit court from administrative action, the Court must determine: (1) whether procedural due process was afforded; (2) whether the administrative findings and judgment are supported by competent substantial evidence; and (3) whether the essential requirements of law have been observed. Dusseau v. Metropolitan Dade Cnty., 794 So. 2d 1270, 1274 (Fla. 2001); Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Dania, 761 So. 2d 1089, 1092 (Fla. 2000); Bd. of Cnry. Com'rs of Brevard Cnry. v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469, 474 (Fla. 1993). On first tier certiorari review, the circuit court should not re -weigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the local government authority. Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1275-76; Fla. Power, 761 So. 2d at 1093. ANALYSIS Biscayne claims that the hearing officer's affirmance of the award recommendation departed from the essential requirements of law, and is not supported by competent substantial evidence. In support of this position, Biscayne posits that two key issues were incorrectly Page 5 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk addressed by the hearing officer: (i) "the RFP is defective because it is ambiguous as to a material, if not the most material specification —what land can be developed, managed, and operated for this lucrative 75-year lease" and (ii) Virginia Key's "proposed development on the 'NOT A PART' parcel is a non-waivable material deviation from the RFP," thereby rendering Virginia Key's proposal "non -responsive." Petition at p. 19. In addition to these two points, Biscayne also maintains that certiorari relief is necessary because due process was not afforded in the bid proceedings below. However, none of the aforementioned arguments warrant certiorari relief. I. The hearing officer complied with the essential requirements of law and the Order is supported by competent substantial evidence. "The departure from the essential requirements of the law necessary for the issuance of a writ of certiorari is something more than a simple legal error." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So. 2d 885, 889 (Fla. 2003) (citing Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So. 2d 679, 682 (Fla. 2000)) (emphasis added). As explained by the Florida Supreme Court, certiorari review should only be granted when there has been a violation of a clearly established principal of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice: The required "departure from the essential requirements of the law" means something far beyond legal error. It means an inherent illegality or irregularity, an abuse of judicial power, an act of judicial tyranny perpetrated with disregard of procedural requirements, resulting in gross miscarriage of justice. The writ of certiorari properly issues to correct essential illegality but not legal error. Haines City Comm. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523, 528 (Fla. 1995) (citation omitted). Here, a review of the Order indicates that the hearing officer clearly understood his limited role in reviewing the award to Virginia Key, and carefully analyzed the record below pursuant to the standard of review established by the City Code. See City Code § 18-104(b)(4)(d) ("[T]he Page 6 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk L hearing officer shall determine whether procedural due process has been afforded, whether substantial requirements of law have been observed, and whether the decision was arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion, or unsupported by substantial evidence as a whole. Substantial evidence means relevant evidence as a reasonable person might accept as adequate to support a conclusion."). In Florida, there is a strong policy to defer to public agencies' decisions in competitive bidding situations. See Dep't of Transp. v. Groves -Watkins Constructors, 530 So. 2d 912, 913 (Fla. 1998); Liberty Cnty. v. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So. 2d 505, 507 (Fla. 1982) ("[A] public body has wide discretion in soliciting and accepting bids for public improvements and its decision, when based on an honest exercise of this discretion, will not be overturned by a court even if it may appear erroneous and even if reasonable persons may disagree."); Intercontinental Props., Inc. v. State Dept. of Health and Rehab. Servs., 606 So. 2d 380, 381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (noting the judicial role in reviewing administrative action is a limited one). In fact, "judicial intervention to prevent the rejection of a bid should occur only when the purpose or effect of the rejection is to defeat the object and integrity of competitive bidding." Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913 (emphasis added); see also Gulf Real Props., Inc. v. Dep't of Health & Rehab. Servs., 687 So. 2d 1336, 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (holding public body's rejection of all bids "must stand absent a showing that the `purpose or effect of the rejection is to defeat the object and integrity of competitive bidding.") (quoting Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913). Further, a hearing officer is required to uphold an agency's honest exercise of discretion, "absent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression, or misconduct." Id. at 914; see also Miami - Dade Cnty. v. Church & Tower, 715 So. 2d 1084, 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (emphasizing the measure of discretion vested in a public agency in competitive bidding situations pursuant to Page7of14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Liberty County, as well as the strong judicial deference accorded to agency decisions with respect to competitively bid contracts under Groves -Watkins). Here, the hearing officer correctly recognized the aforementioned limitations under Florida law, and properly deferred to the expertise of the City's Evaluation Committee on numerous issues raised in the bid protest. Noting that nothing in the bid protest questioned the technical and professional expertise possessed by the Evaluation Committee to rank the proposers, the hearing officer properly declined to second-guess the quantitative and qualitative analysis employed by the Evaluation Committee to review the proposers' bids. Arguments advanced by Biscayne that Virginia Key's proposal was non -responsive due to dredging depth violations or the inadequacy of Virginia Key's financial analysis —issues reviewed by the Evaluation Committee —were correctly left undisturbed by the hearing officer and denied as independent bases for the bid protest. See Order at pp. 5-6. This brings us to the two primary defects alleged by Biscayne as the basis for their Petition: (i) the hearing officer incorrectly relied on the City's interpretation of the NAP Parcel, which Biscayne maintains is a non-waivable material deviation from the RFP; and (ii) Virginia Key's bid is non -responsive due to its use of the NAP Parcel, and must therefore be disregarded. i. The hearing officer correctly deferred to the City's interpretation of the NAP ParceL In his Order, the hearing officer noted the "confusion or misunderstanding" created by the NAP Parcel, which purportedly meant different things to the City, Biscayne, and Virginia Key. Order at p. 18 ("The words 'NOT A PART' have been included on the survey attached to the RFP from the very beginning of the RFP process. We now come to the questions no one really asked throughout the entire process. What do those words mean? Not a part of what?"). In fact, it is clear the hearing officer found the presence of an ambiguity in the RFP. Id. at p. 19 ("While everyone may have believed they understood [what the NAP parcel notation meant], it Page 8 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk is clear that this was not the case. However, since no proposer questioned the City to gain any clarity, the proposers were left to assume they were making the right choice."). Faced with this ambiguity, the hearing officer adopted the City's interpretation of the term and its impact on the evaluation of the proposals. See id. ("To the extent that the RFP and Addendum No. 5 are subject to two possible interpretations, my inquiry is limited to whether the City's interpretation is a reasonable one. The City's reasonable interpretation is not necessarily the only interpretation or even the best interpretation."). Specifically, the hearing officer deferred to Lorenzo's testimony that the purpose of Addendum No. 5 was to remove County land from the RFP, due to the County formally notifying the City that it was exercising its reverter clause and taking back the land previously deeded to the City for the purpose of constructing an MPA parking garage. See id. The hearing officer also recognized Lorenzo's interpretation that the words "NOT A PART" simply consisted of a notation on the survey designed to inform prospective proposers that the parcel should not be considered part of the survey. Id. In finding the NAP Parcel ambiguous and deferring to the City's reasonable interpretation, the hearing officer also appropriately deferred to the City's determination that the NAP Parcel constituted a "nonmaterial variance" of the RFP because it did not affect price or "give one proposer an advantage of benefit" over the other: I must still as a matter of law defer to the judgment of the City in determining certain crucial factors. One of these factors relates to materiality. If the use of the NOT A PART parcel was not allowed, then the City had the ability to determine whether that made a different in the outcome and whether the deviation was material. If both Biscayne Marine and Virginia Key used the NOT A PART parcel, even without a clear understanding as to whether it was allowed under the RFP, then neither has gained the type of advantage contemplated under existing procurement law. This is Page 9 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk particularly true where the City treated both bidders equally regardless of type of use of the NOT A PART parcel. Opinion at p. 20 (citations omitted). Here, noting that a government agency has the right to waive any minor irregularities in an otherwise valid bid, the hearing officer appropriately deferred to the judgment of the City regarding the nonmaterial nature of the NAP Parcel. See Tropabest Foods, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Gen. Servs., 493 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (explaining that not every deviation from an invitation to bid is material; "[i]t is only material if it gives the bidder a substantial advantage over the other bidders and thereby restricts or stifles competition.") (citing Robinson Elec. Co., Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 417 So. 2d 1032, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)); Harry Pepper c& Assoc., Inc. v. City of Cape Coral, 352 So. 2d 1190, 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) ("The test for measuring whether a deviation in a bid is sufficiently material to destroy its competitive character is whether the variation affects the amount of the bid by giving the bidder an advantage or benefit not enjoyed by the other bidders."). Faced with ambiguity surrounding the NAP Parcel —and recognizing that the City had deemed this particular bid criteria non -material in nature —the hearing officer was permitted to rely on the City's reasonable interpretation of the term. Such deference by the hearing officer to the City's interpretation of the NAP parcel does not constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law. On the contrary; a city's "administrative interpretation is entitled to judicial deference as long as it is within the range of possible permissible interpretations." Paloumbis v. City of Miami Beach, 840 So. 2d 297, 298-99 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (footnote omitted); see also Bd of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Levy, 656 So. 2d 1359, 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) ("If an agency's interpretation of its governing statutes is one of several permissible interpretations, it must be upheld, despite the existence of reasonable alternatives."); Shamrock v. Shamrock, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 169 So. 3d 1253, 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) Page 10 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk (generally, a reviewing court should defer to the interpretation given a statute or ordinance by the agency responsible for its administration). Moreover, said interpretation does not demonstrate discrimination between bidders, nor does it present a fatal lack of specificity or an impermissible alteration of a material provision required by the RFP. See City of Sweetwater v. Solo Const. Corp., 823 So. 2d 798, 801-02 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding competitive bidding statutes are enacted for protection of the public; the public authority may not arbitrarily or capriciously discriminate between bidders, or make the award on the basis of personal preference) (citing to Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade Cnty., 383 So. 2d 662, 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)). Consequently, the hearing officer did not depart from the essential requirements of law by deferring to the City and ultimately adopting their interpretation of the NAP Parcel. See Clay Cnty. v. Kendale Land Dev., Inc., 969 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding a ruling constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law when it amounts to a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice). ii. The hearing officer correctly deferred to the City's determination regarding the responsiveness of Virginia Key's proposal. In determining whether Virginia Key's proposal is non -responsive due to its use of the NAP Parcel, deference must once again be accorded to the hearing officer and his proper reliance on the City's analysis of competing proposals. Specifically, the hearing officer correctly looked to the City's determination that the proposals submitted by Biscayne and Virginia Key were deemed responsive by the Evaluation Committee. See Order at p. 8. The hearing officer further noted that the City had reserved the right under its RFP to waive irregularities or technicalities in a proposal, and neither proposer had obtained an advantage via the NAP Parcel. See Opinion at p. 20 (citing Tropabest, 493 So. 2d at 51). In fact, as explained by the hearing officer, "each Page 11 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk proposer in some way `utilized' the NOT A PART parcel as a part of each parties' Bid Responses." Order at p. 11. Virginia Key's proposal utilized the NAP parcel for dry dock storage, while Biscayne utilized the NAP parcel for access to the proposed project and for parking. Id. And while "tempting to engage in a comparison between the two different types of utilizations" of the NAP Parcel, such substantive analysis would inappropriately second-guess the Evaluation Committee, which had been charged with scoring the content and quality of the proposals. In deferring to the City regarding the responsiveness of Virginia Key's proposal, it is also important to note that the hearing officer was presented with competent substantial evidence. Florida law defines competent substantial evidence as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Duval Utility Co. v. Fla. Public Serv. Comm'n, 380 So. 2d 1028, 1031 (Fla. 1980); see also Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1274 ("Competent substantial evidence is tantamount to legally sufficient evidence."); see also Wiggins v. Fla. Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 209 So. 3d 1165, 1171 (Fla. 2017) ("[T]his Court has further concluded that when determining whether the administrative decision was founded on competent, substantial evidence, the circuit court may only look for facts in the record that support the agency fact -finder's conclusions."); Dep 't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Hirtzel, 163 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ("The circuit court applies the incorrect law when it reweighs evidence and ignores evidence that supports the hearing officer's decision.") (citations omitted). Here, the hearing officer was presented with a series of exhibits comprising five (5) separate volumes, including, but not limited to, the Proposals, numerous emails and letters, a transcript of the June 12, 2017 Selection Committee hearing, the June 14, 2017 Selection Committee deliberation meeting, transcripts of the Final Hearing, the RFP checklist, and Page 12 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk numerous affidavits from various zoning professionals. Additional documents were also admitted at the bid protest hearing as exhibits. The hearing officer also heard the testimony of Lorenzo, the DREAM Project Manager, and Mark Johnson, a licensed surveyor. Therefore, it cannot be said that the hearing officer lacked competent substantial evidence in affirming the recommendation made in favor of Virginia Key. Moreover, he correctly held that "[a]bsent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression or misconduct in recommending the award of the contract, the City has discretion to award the contract to Virginia Key." Order at p. 20 (citing Liberty Cnty., 421 So. 2d at 507; Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913). II. Petitioner was afforded due process. Generally, a quasi-judicial hearing meets basic due process requirements if the parties are provided notice of the hearing and an opportunity to be heard, which includes the opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses. Jennings v. Dade Cnty., 589 So. 2d 1337, 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Quasi-judicial decision -makers must provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before taking actions which affect the interests of the parties before them. Mesa v. City of Miami Nuisance Abatement Bd., 673 So. 2d 500, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). Here, there is little question that Biscayne received notice and a hearing. Additionally, Biscayne also had the opportunity to present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and be informed of all the facts analyzed and addressed by the hearing officer. Further, there is no competent substantial evidence to substantiate Biscayne's claim that the hearing officer and the City engaged in "undeniable collusion" with regard to an email chain addressing the filing of the Order. This Court's review of the lengthy email chain cited by Biscayne as evidence of improper ex parte communications reveals that the emails involve non - substantive administrative matters involving service, the filing date, and the rendition date of the Order. Communications "regarding purely administrative, non -substantive matters" are not Page 13 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk improper. See Nudel v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, 52 So. 3d 692, 694-95 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Accordingly, the bid process in this case did not suffer from procedural due process violations. CONCLUSION This Court is not authorized to weigh or reweigh conflicting evidence presented during the bid protest hearing below, or substitute its own judgment for that of the hearing officer. See Dusseau, 794 So. 2d at 1275-76; see also Netz v. Jacksonville Sherriff's Office, City of Jacksonville, 668 So. 2d 235, 236 (Fla. lst DCA 1996). Absent a finding of illegality, fraud, oppression, or misconduct, the hearing officer was required to uphold the City's honest exercise of discretion. See Groves -Watkins, 530 So. 2d at 913. Biscayne has failed to demonstrate that the City's action was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, or that the recommended award to Virginia Key is illegal, oppressive, collusive, fraudulent, or unsupported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is hereby DENIED. THORNTON and DEL REY, JJ., concur Page 14 of 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 9 1ZT Bilzin Sumberg March 29, 2019 Jacqueline Lorenzo, Property Management Specialist Department of Real Estate Asset Management City of Miami 444 SW 2nd Ave., 3rd Floor Miami, FL 33130 Re: Damian Calabrese / The Truth Behind BMP's Principal Dear Ms. Lorenzo, Albert E. Dotson, Jr, Esq. Tel 30.5-350.24.11 adaLf,owZbikin.00121 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk As a reminder, the principal of Biscayne Marine Partners (''BMP"), the alter -ego of the current marina operator at Virginia Key, is mired in bankruptcy and scandal in his native Argentina. For your convenience, a copy of our prior letter discussing Mr. Calabrese's problems is attached behind tab 1. At the February 28 Commission meeting, Commissioner Carollo asked me whether Damian Calabrese's bankruptcy was corporate or personal. I mentioned that we had only just learned of the 'natter, but that the bankruptcy appeared to be corporate in nature. The purpose of this letter is to clarify that, upon further investigation, Mr. Calabrese's legal troubles are personal in nature as well: • Mr. Calabrese appears to be the subject of three active criminal proceedines in Argentina, each for a different type of fraud. All three criminal cases are currently in the investigative stage, with prosecutors and case numbers assigned, (See attached screenshot from Rosario court system behind tab 2.) • Mr. Calabrese has reportedly bounced at least 38 checks, totaline 2 million pesos. (See attached credit report behind tab 3.) As you know, BMP continues to attack Virginia Key LLC, which is a joint venture between the two most successful marina developers and operators in Florida. These hollow attacks are based solely on the conduct of a than that is not even a part of Virginia Key LLC nor a contractor that Virginia Key LLC is obligated to use. And yet BMP's own principal renders BMP "non -responsible" and thus ineligible for any award from the City of Miami. The irony cannot be overstated. Sincerely, Albert E. Dotson, Jr. Enclosures MIAMI 6298203,1 74183/46889 13i;7in 5umbert0 Baena Nice & Axelrod LLP 11450 Brickell Avenue, 23re, Floor. Miami. Florida :33131-3456 Tel 365.374,7580 Fa.;',: 305,374,7593 I bzcnin Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 1 March 1,2019 Via Hand Deli very The Hon. Ken Russell, Chairman The Hon, Wilfredo Gort, Vice -Chairman The Hon. Joe Carollo, District 3 The Hon, Mano!o Reyes, District 4 The Hon. Keon Hardemon, District 5 City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Mi.°, FL 33133 ,f404Bilzin Sumberg Athol E Aims, Jr, £ Tel 113-3504411 ,4-14-4vaajA:1:4,Lcfmt Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Re: Virginia key Marina / Damian Calabrese's Bankruptcy Is Not a Needle in the aystack: it's the Haystack. Dear Honorable Commissioners: As you blow, this firm represents Virginia Key LLC, the twice -recommended proposer for the redevelopment of the Virginia Key marina. As you also know, the City's holdover tenant at the marina, Rickenbaeker Marina, Inc. ("Rickenbacker") and its alter -ego, Biscayne Marine Partners ("nmP-)4 continues to enjoy the benefit of a bizarre settlement agreement, which purports te permit Rickenbacker to extend its lease (which expired in 2016) for as long as it continues to appeal Virginia Key LLC's victory. For Rickenbaeker, that settlement agreement has truly been a gift that keeps on giving. Despite haying lost before tivo election committees, an independent hearing examiner, three circuit court judges (twice), and three Third DCA judges, Rickenbaeker continues to profit from the City's property—eand predictably continues to come forward with more and more bid protests. As we expiained at the February 28 Commission meeting, Damian Calabrese, one of only three principals of BMP, is currently mired in scandal in Argentina, including accusations of fraud, and his company recently filed for bankruptcy. Incredibly, the very proiect that BMP hailed as Mr. Calabrese's relevant experience (the Tifon Water Planet) is at the center oldie reported scandal and the bankruptcy. Attached are some of the references to Mr. Calabrese and the Tifon Water Pianet project in BMP's proposal, However, the attached news artides from Argentina report that: C2. Mi. BEY; Ken Ruvezi„ Chairman Unit Ahami Ciey e'llmtnissiener, Mir* I 2W 4 2 ° .43zin Sumberg Mr: Calabrese and his company Villanova S.A. wrote more than a million dollars in bad cheeks, accumulated $12 million in debt, and bave been accused of defrauding 3,000 investors of more than $30 million in connection with the project. • Mr. Calabrese was criminally denounced for fraud land prohibited from making further sales in his project. • Mr. Calabrese's company, Villanova S.A., has filed for bankruptcy, The importance of Mr. Calabrese and his project, Tifon %%later Planet, 10 BMP's proposal cannot be overstated. BMP's proposal is littered with references to this project , d Mr. Calabrese, who is one of only three principals of BMP (along with Aabad Melwani and Diego Ardid). En BNIP's own words: Mr. Calabrese founded Tifon Water Planet in 2011 with the goal of designing, building, and operating the world's most innovative automated boat storage and facilities, currently providing for 1500 automated dry slips. Ma Calabrese's involvement earns Marina PARC Miami the profound distinction of being the only proposer that has designed, built, and is currently operating two successful state of the art automated boat storage facilities. Given this distinction, it should follow that Marina PARC Miami is the proposer most qualified and capable in providing for a state of the art automated boat storage facility on this uninely situatfr3d site on Virginia Key. For a glimpse into the future, please visit: littp://wwvatifonwaterplanet.comi and access the flash drive included with this submittal. This is not a minor or insignificant issue. This is not a manufactured controversy about a subcontractor that a proposer is not required to use. These articles are about alleged fraud by a principal. NtiAMI 62584791 74I143146889 Sine rely, Albert E. Dotson, Jr. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Uuarderla nAutica fue a concurs° ;per© armpan p:ira satir a Dote Page I of 3 Judiciales 24.05.2018 12:59.1 Faente: Punts) Biz Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Desarrollo en problemas Guarderia nautica fue a concurso pero aria plan para salir a flote Afronta compromises impagos por al menos $ 12 M, s ei 4 de julio se podr6n verificar creditos. La firma Villanova SA, que pilotea el desarrollo de la guarderia neitica Ill& de Tigre afronta una convocatoria de acreedores par una deuda de al menos $ 12 M. littps://puntobiz.cormar/noticialival/11786 1 NaLs/109/guarderia-nautica-fue-a.concurso-pe... 212712019 Uuarcteria ziatnwte u CO111°41'50 1Jero firma pan para salir a low Pap 2 of 3 El procedimiento judicia es la consecuencia de un pedido de quiebra presented° en Buenos Aires, que se traslad6 a los tribunales de Rosario porque la firma esta asentada en Granadero Ratgorria. La jueza Veronica Gotileb, que tiene a su cargo el expediente, fij6 el 4 de jutio como fecha Write para la presentacian del pedido de verificaci6n de creditos ante to sindicatura. La guarderie Tirol/ Water Planet Tigre fue lanzada en 2013 como una iniciative del grupo desarroliador rosarino MOR, como secueta de la exitosa colocacion con b fr!SR19 mama en Granadero Baigorria, un emprendimiento que responde a otra razOn social y nofigura en este convocatoria de acreedores. AJ igual que en Balgorria, el diseno de la guarderia tuvo el respaldo del estudio italiano Pininfarina, especializado en disefios de alta gama. Emplazado el proyecto sobre el flo Lujran, despleg6 su oferta para atbergar fttera del agua y bajo tech° unas 4.000 embercaciones, empties superficies destinadas a estacionamiento, se.rvicios gaslronOmicos, area comerciat, Lounge VtP, vestuarios y servicio mecanico, EI grupo desarrollador det proyecto tigrense, encabezado por el empresarto rosarino Damian Calabrese, tropez6 con inconvenientes financieros: acumut6 unos $ 12 M en deudas con acreedores -entre etios la Afip- y emitio cheques pier $1.12 M que fueron rechazados, entre septiernbre de 2016 y octubre de 2017. Consulted° por Punto biz, Calabrese relat6 que 'situacien de crisis sobrevino ct.ando el proyecto o estaba consolidado, estaba mucho menos maduro que el de Baigorria y eso nos perjudicorr. Para &ranter los problemas que sufrieron varies de sus proyectos, Calabrese avanzo el afto eased° con to reestructuracien de su desarrolladora MOR, arse& con inversores u a fifinnula para daft continuidad a tos fideicomisos de tas torres Cordon y Aerealis en Rosario y tambian liens un plan para que Titan Tigre pueda seguir adelante. la idea es salir de la situacion ilagando a un erre& con tos acreedores, diversificando ef proyecto, sumando un proyecto inmobiierio y agregando el aporte de nuevos socioe, destaco. La jueza Gotlieb e puso (eche del 2 de febrero de 2019 para que la empresa con r,'ursada tittps://pun tobiz.corn.ar/noticias/v a WI 11861 /va Ls/1099'guarderia-nautica-fue-a-conc u rso-pc... 2/27/2019 U 0 0 E 0 cc) cc record for item(s) s_ OJ 0 0 cn %-1 0 IN %-1 N 0 %-1 0 Dertuncian i empresa rosarma por megaestafa de $30 milIoRe Page 1 of 4 fatrto "k•cv.,•••m,„o.L.- 1.1 o E42.121.,raalAW 11) ipa.);1.-** Oth-******,,t9.1144143110441,c • Vj.2, ttlijcistinauft,Vownwcitmriatan el • SlEilli`M.R.111MlitAXtectEia • Isktdot e--,9,-,,sloralemetravntonottoto.rarona7cal*141 Ntmlyat Z:-,Nw.11,,,,w6tatzkaaffflartakissem17024.0 tef=1.15t41 Denurician a e r sarina *or megaestafa de $30 millonos (ht s:ftwww.cunadelanotiala.com/7 0-413eGoi) Pot Cuna ds la iSfebseio, 20ra aPoUlte ado gm U122122 fittfp1PwW00.SWItiterwcia. cooltu-0. Suntan rona de 3 m1foe darn rarados per lift 71gra, gm pacta qua a pm lantana comer la guarded/ Daunts tram grand* dal pots panorama bunco. Una penman nlearferat lice a riondada pos sale& a Ws da 3.0® pewees en mils dela° mBlecnee, ba0 la promo ta sit I:engin& of amyl*, natio* Imparlarda do la Argentine. El grareego donde vae:drag fa mormsniaala! nem atranderado !taco rats** lb Anna se pntionftr an command* avatars -a La comae/VA en watt Coo ea Vannes EA. gut al ftitr222 hat* al 201r ata protsidide por Damian Catabrage. Este crampronarte C.1 aulaa tarrillen klegraba al Megan* de Puerto Ratan, donde Are denundado penal/rent ce Kr aside egraffifida pot sag* contercrarratando totes, pate a quo reigla una maid/ Midst qua In treparEa, A as* kragor 1000 a Intros dela dmanuitadora Mo4 qua el afio pasann blab on paracesa da mile 'natio al tlejar eagles arnprarainilemasInniabigarfos fee= ta TWO Card1r1 y la Aragia) ago arta, rninefras 00 afros tam guanterla n1raSca ran de Grants/era Elterrla elgeletrran a /fano eamamento feta. En ante oaso,jordo a las Informs nos do *slot rayedaa, soma la cortautrecran do crarta mega guarderla Mutsu an 'Ogre, gut supussaamento pardon* can 11 naves pang emboreadonto dealt letekl bola 27 Oat entama do argrato y inOntiaregi alogttantoo.paseo comrade!, antra atras corm:fades Agana con la eloapa gum Est dab* qun el gate& am/antra a cargo dal taccarscnia estu0o Itallarro Pinball/gm. Oman Lfridpitita rIxlio an tonna En ornbarga pass quo an ortunriata qua la obra etteria lormlnada en to CotaSdad pea 2017, a dla de Pay ota 2* ariallaa tint do la* steam https://www.c unadelario tic ia.corni?p=138601 EninvOsta Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk bla rti -1 Lot ere' 'lie,. nut coodron altos at al WOO tiTatirttlit_prt A •I'vyrie.curistt lanOtkitCV g*16031% febroto1011 14 RAI No hay Comentorkkra Cona it Onraikla Rasta, programa gut ea Mie de tames a otantot de 1 a a horst pm fle WOX 81,0 de Rotado, eel/loofa a Marlin llitern. Saaatadrra Gonna! dal Siodicalo Aquilino de Dogmas Particuttnes, Strodonat RosaSADOP)y Meows drIonto Term del Club Arleen) ,V Lisu.th thiliwiNewraxusithatticiLenipn 0.119M * Can* H0d1/4 TV 2/27/2019 ficaunciar a ein?resa rosariria por tnegaestafa cc SR! rnEIories Ilan 2 of 4 Patronta;las por et ociado Poem D'AM. Itawloados present von una quertAa crintrial acusanclo e aaniais'rodankroldlotonia. dess`a de tondos y bode ewes at 6reCtOrti do Vlanciro, Tensmos petradas de vie so twan mast% $30 relonsa para Enos goo nada Stain due ear con al ernprandaVera- a do Tigre, cora um $ena de proireolos rmao•oArios en Parente, mar el kstrada. Ea Wing° con Via 0:MVO, CrAfiflit CO quo taco 'ontalgencla amitu para Ella& a vas 3 con personas qua conffarca Oft !a forma 1131Fitittd, a aorta tit ta anomie put3i4dad con b q natiorabo ati proyeclo Pore tesibasc:On so ar7aed todavla eras dias atria. nanault4 snow se pros:rola a clammy, presonl5vo do aoreadolos csodia.n.ratcaa do Tare dat.Lea alcoropetante, so &NA at cash a Is Juseela Penal arIna, dande astil esentada is a Weil& la MA concuizo ea ci colatda da ia eJafe tornaron pale, la usoton pars col eau, VIZ constnryatori prornerdo y tura pftn at ramose, cuesont, Undo% (Vs Roam)) Curia do to tinfola Ctintsititios Cetradoto Lot COMS11214,0411thel corradas.i iiscritir COMatitVos ova. txtmes hams eorrol Copyttlyd Cana de ta No Tat/aside Coma.tos Reserandes, httpsillwww.cunadelanoticia.comilp=13.8601 fittreolkovir:= - Com tio. „ • , iPlitribMiSncsAnati6041.22,413 , Crt tatnalIttlx.vor.tu 121.)210,?, '1 clz-Allwit 21.412,PottiA4 111414//) 24 Matta 229 1: 1 MI I No hay Cornaniadoe Erwin echo, per eeora, tar escutleAss naanlee easolorates) entre tar que se do OscanI res Ion' (peronismo, Cantliotaas PrOW1316:46g9 qua itstataitt tit) slotos —nada nildaoss Erabonandor par* las eiecolones PAS del rionctian 211 de atilt, Ca si WOB veintena sedrt las grldas Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk DenLneiana eropresa rosarina por rnegaestafra de S30 mil tones Page 3 of it Submitted into the public record for item (s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Ltalth eaVER.Ve..4141,10,4mitle-18. Grrg' WAS= ittkpatrusSztfirtitAt Irgrospimeforse trtotrattr_rogaw maitre 1,4cfaorwww.,..\44,41.. v,r$4.044,olle-„butartv iamb 01 tab:am Dia 3A5 Miele bay Cualanlatles Ya rat; pea pera qua les...aware: tlia lea* aa Pa Alpsatina, al lade go las =maims ODicas a tul pan desk auteaidade 4serthua aSlalegalas. Futtaru eure el Meade wren** y zet3 stiNtiw.a, a macula el ciudadana argentine sa transformer& en et *We K,. pealatultenles a Maus r1-1 Lett Mas jeltaimmu.auntaiLonesich.aamrt le1494121 leosuto canted 071 miteilmoo et Insane futonets evia Sett df Mayo fatimthorw.eunactrimelials.catut it.ttl Sal 2a febsate 2019 $PMN�hay Caierraarles • •, itar2L3-'4 SitAlightS-13 lavzt ittlairktc1=r4-WiVArAtiatti 26 Kona 20.19 ;4. A,F,1 bay Comeniadea • NeweCis Ohl Fop °PM, V./W.014We de tialaS.2811181.111i2 ftitRritoncokusleunlAtans12 Il."1,1$$51 28 lelgaaa 2019 1244 AM IVO hay uemellailes • ehml_rt .1N/11,u, Okla/ ao Nadir fle htips://www.conade!anoticia.comPp=138601 2/27/2019 Denuncian empresn rosolina por megaestara tie $30 rnories Page 4 of 4 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk htips://wwwennadelanotioin.com''p=138601 kyiAut attbcps...vtne..or tb_Alisakl_I coma v. MIN 25 tebero 2016 525AM No tay COMentlea7a 2/27/2019 a 2/27i211-19 ea,alin Official de la Pi'eveir;a de Sar Fe Re70,Y-ay Afgerdina Boletin Oficial Santa Fe, mierroles 27 de rebrero de 2019 Boletin .7. -rex:11 comp ex i itl". 1,,,, Provincia de Santa Fe JUZGADO DE PRINIERA INSTANCIA Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por dispcWciOn del Sr. Juez de Distrito Civil y comerdal de la 12a. Nomei- *n de Rosario, se hace saber que en au?os AYMO. IGNACIO riformaan (CUIJ. 21.02882286-8), merfiante decreto de team 22108/17 se tiene per prornovida to presente action de deciaradtri do simple ausencia del Sr. Ignacio Aymo, DNI. N° 30.629.211, que se trarnitara por vie del pic) sumarisimo. Citese y emplacese 31 presente ausente por edictos qua se publicaran por cinch dies en (34 SOLETiN OFICIAL para que comparezca o estar a derectio. Rosario, 07 de Septiembre de 2017, Dee. Agustina Hipp, Secretaria. $ 45 334285 Fell 14 Por disposielen de4 Sr. Juez de Prielere lnstancia de Distrito ee Its Civil y Comercial de la 1Gma. Neminacidn do Rosario, Dr. Eduardo °refire Secretaria de la Dra Carla Gussonl Porrez. er autos caratutedor ZUFIBRiGGEN, LUIS ALBERTO scAusencia con pr "On de tallecimiento (Expte. CUIJ 21-02882205-4), se ha or* e ado char al ausente Luis A93er10 Zurbdggen (L)N? 23.142.704), a fin que comparezca a este Tribunal a tamer intervenciOn, bajo aperdbimientos de dectararse 31 rallecimiento presuerildo si no se presentare en juiclo, conforme lo normado per el art, 88 del CCyC. Publiquense edictos citatorios en et SOLETIN OFICIAL y Hall de Triturates una vez por mes, durente Gels meses. Rosario. 04 de Agosto de 2017. Or. Silvio Pasot6, Prosecrelatio, 245 330769 Feb. 14 Por clisposicion de la Srta. Juez del Juz,gado de Prirnera Instancia de DistritoCM y Comercial de la 11° Nomnacr d Rosario. Ora. Delia Giles y Secretaria del autorizante, se hace saber que en autos caratutados INGENIAR SRL siConturso preventive- hoy Ouiebra, CUL) Nro, 21- 02884032-9, par Resolucion NC 13 de fecha 02/0212018 se ha dispuesto: Declarer ia quiebra de INGENIAR S.R.L, CUIT N° 30-71190143-0, con domicilio s • I en cane Paraguay 527 Rank, Alta de la chided de Rosario, Inscripta en el Regstro Piitilico de Camerae de la ekMad de Rosario id Tomo 162, Folio 12979 Nfertera 873 de recta 06/06/2011, y se ha q. cotro tees hdps:Ewifingsantata.v0,arilloikitiiviiiai,ver.pholsectiori. 14-02-2018echafotac.titnd 1/25' 2fie72111 Bet3tin CilSal de to Pluv;ncia do Santa Fe - Rep4,3 ftr gentma constar que a presente medida ha side solicitada pot- la Ora, Rexene Knafel, por la pate actora. Reserveteen Secretarla a docurnentacion acompanada. Prey'', a todo tramita acompaieee copla certlecade del poder trivoced° o certfiqUese a agregada a ex,osefiente Manilleste 0 prefesional su situacidn trente al IVA y aeomparie constancla de inscripiciOn en la ARP. Fdo.: Dr. Marcelo Ramon Der& Cluez) Dra, Patricia N. Glencross (Sec.). Reearie, 6 de Oiclembre de 2017. Dra. Accinelk Secretaria. $ 33 346949 FeL 14 Feb. 16 Pr disPrisidein de la Sea Juezi de Primera irtstarvia en o CMy Comenlat de Le ilrits. Notate:Ma de Freetto. Dra. Venfeace Godeb y en autos' "Vlit.ANOVA SA tConurso PirMero.ftte. CUL121-02849767-8„ se nate saber quo por Sententia kr& 2793 de tails 27. de ddetTibre de 2917 se he deStetido abet) et comes° preateltve de ~OVA SA. MD. 30- 71245921-9. con We MI en ode Jost Hernandez 1636 y doMkfret letple en deli Santa Fe 1214, in, of atehos de Rased& Mdre*, la designed& de tochas de verettietto dal Ono de eerdicedon y Ia desferiadde de prestinlatiOn de ke Worries individual y general haste tette el *deo at -We et taro y des dams y borate- de tandem tuttleride saber edemas *le et peed* de thedu -stet:laid yta atetteolcia infortetaltia se rtlaren optelunaniefeat per auto tep*ado, deblendo putaktele derma de ley en el BOUTIN °MIN_ y Dade "El Fdrittleel. Aernismo por rgeselluclon tiro, 32 de tectes 1 de feeler° de 2018 se tweed t4 putdo de la 'sentence. tiro. 2703/17 y en su lugar se cederld /Am a ta Excma. Gathers de froehtetteiet per que prorieda el 'Settee de Stream el clue perteneceed a la kite de is categode "Er, tertettpantrehda of presents *0 legal de un peqUeno cencurso (art. 288 MO.). Antbas eesolueiones &etch females porta Dra. Verertica Gotta* Wen) - Dr. Lucas Wince& (Sepeetallo).$ecretattee 6de Febreto de 2018. Dr. Moecset, Secralado, *166 346948 NI. .14 Fib. 20 Se hace saber que el Juzgado de Pnmera Instancia de la 15° NerninaciOn de Arroyo Seco, denim de los autos caratulados: •MUNICIPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECO c/CONSTRUCCIONES MILES E INDUSTRIALES S.R.L. siAptemiee Expire No 644116, he dieted° la sigulente resoluciOn: No 2076. Arroyo Seco, 1210912017, Neste._ Resuelvre 1- Actrnitirta y, en consecuencla, dada curso. 2- Autorizar fa participatiOn del tetrad() actuante, slant° a la esceitura de mandato general que exhibe y se la devuelve. 3- Aceptar el damicillo ad kern constituido. 4- Imprimir a este process el tramite previsto en la ley 5066 de esta provincla. 5- Atento encontrar en forma et Mute que se agrega, ordenar el = ergo peticionado por la suma de $1.687,95.-en concepto de capital, con mas Ia suma de S843,97.- esernados provisoriamente por intereses y costes. Dicho embargo laden podra efectivizarse una vez !Mimed() de pago al deudor (interpretacion arrnonica art 7 y 11. L5066 y arts. 452 y 460, CPC). Habida cuenta de que et embargo se Ilea peticionado sobre un bien inmueble- to que se efectivlza direelarnente en el Registro de la Propledad respective-, intimese previamente al page al deudor, qulen debera see notificado su dornicilio (ad. 27, L5066), 6- Citar de remate at r pare que oponga excepcide legillma en el termato de oche dies, bale apercibimiento Se Ileverse adelente to ejecucien si no lo !Velem. 7- Citar a la demandade por edictos, que deberan publIcarse en el I3OLETIN OFICIAL por el tannin° y bait apercibimientos de ley. 8- Apticar a este procoso la https://thvow.santafe.onbaribeletinaliciativer,p47setxion=14-02-2018ecktos2cAtml Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk n. Stock Syrnboi, if Pubkiy Traded: Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk CorporateStructure: patems,s ttsltiiarls, anti affIiates, as apcaitisi .COMPANY l'Iroposer's Principals: 1. AA3ADRELWANii DIEGO AROiCi 4, 5 CAVAN CALAthiESE 6. Ary oriricipais included on this Sjbmissior Form may not be substitutet or withdrawn from participation eiter the Submission Vale urress the City Manager specifically autrior'izes in writing a recoest substtutioo intividual(s; Authorized to Negotiate and Sign on Proposer's Behalf: AAA D R. MELX.AN, 1CHARD PEREZ, ESQ. 1. Brief Company History: Corpany tot-mm.1 io serve as proposln en in reponse to tneCty Of '!i3-17-01.1 JJBIANfarine .PARC. Miami? See Executive Summary', Expe-iience aro QuaIiiricalinnsi, Resumes 2 A Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk APPENDIX 4. 13USi NESS ICAM EXPERIUNCE fiORMS atenibel ,,/.1e/v eniines4 t;?i, Maktr.5:04pefl afft: iti,lifty;-!*SL etc aaam: int./tilleat the 4=1/_:,tvi thellit-el%e; 4:4./i1/4.. /hceni liNtattrant &1mv. Lat k;isttarat. Matitta Aregiust__ Cevtimatir. say.. 1:431A.Tiant4 z/iniiat 4,f Sa..!;;:et kopie or etre, lef-,*-V...; Atfith c-Itets /2 nixeasary: fvf efetelf OlOrther Of ernify tp.,/e/1 sitno41 ititad;c,: fO Name °AMA AN Citi BRES , ; j itqaairo,A; cra,!-m-rriya t4:7.3,, 14ii. `r.;Afr.,rtir:4 v,AGLIADAS GATI?1,2:14:2:1,111 V 1 3, ; PR,: Ni C.PAL • aMER1DiA „LcFFCETGWE 44, ROSARV. ARGO/Tin/1i eLANY4172 COASTAt ; 0241GPIRRIA. ARGENT:P/4 Fft rwIeevroo tactusA 1twAbs Mind Venni finsnant ON MIER PLANET Lav/g40:±/P-74T-A- BUSNiCtS A flES DEVEI-OnR I.t1 PRESEN7i. s=frig./. 'WAN ./ eAfA -OneR*TOR- — s. GOSTA tour:HARD Nante Role 1 I. a, ARCitt-TECT 2. CIEVELOPifi OPERA-C,/ R. ARCKT-ECT 4. RR'rk rarz/P , 5 ARCHTECT OEME-1.02E-R ARCKTIECT ...13EVELCZER-- PRE.i YEARS 2 YEARS s_ 2018TO PRESEA1 i1. 2. 3. S. MARINA PL. BOalVaft; COM iSI rst mobOe apet;;:at,ori to offer on -demand marine concierge services, cotineang boat owneis ro oc veirrtiect and reliabie marine service professionals. Reciproceiy. xiarine SerViCe protesSOnaiS crin and Ket their Pit&caltons and caoahtrties on the Boatraitl.corn ofloi. extendrig The erizredieerieuriai reach into local econDmies. As a Stanch boat-safetv advocate vitt h stione ties to Ns community, Mt Metwani serves es a board men -icier of the Moe co Ouroueris Foundation, an proanizatiori founded followind a boatind accident dueno the. 2006 Core: is Day festivities uti Miami and wnose mission is teat:rind szite boating practices_ Mr, M&wi3,so serves as a vdehleer board member !Or a variety of :dud; CiVC anct charitanie Diego Ardid Mr. Art:lid is Co -President of Key eona1, inc., a &versed rea estate and deveopirere company founded and i teat c..ideered in the City of Miam:. The writ:tarty has an extemoiary, four -decade liteci( feed:id et levet riC;r=ng its many capabilities, du1"CatiOnS arid experience across a wicie yty of CO(? opportunities, tnciudind tranne, hospitality, office, teali, Mixed -use and resioenlia orceets. Dravyinp upon his architecturai no deveopment experiences, Jose Ardid founded Key International n the late '1970s. Si rice 2004, D iegc and InlooArdid have managed Me company's operations, significantly grown its property portfolo end greatry expanded its &versified business lines: Key internatonai inas completed ithore than $4 billion worth of reat-estate transactions the rnae_ile, riesdentral rental tifiCUdirie market rate and dovemment subsidized housin4, nospitaiity and office ihoustnesTre comnany has developeci more thar 10 Jion souate feet of property, end manages a best -in -class condorilnium sales platform that has sole more than $5 bon wo of oropenies to domestic and a broad range of international clients. Today, Key International and its related companies are respected leaders in bringina to market art array of frs!:-.class projects throughout the southeastern United States and Europe, with most located al010, rioticle's coastline from St Augustine arourict to Tamp/St. Petersburd. Damian Calabrese M. Calabrese Is the Founder and Chief Archf.ect of Desarollo IVOR, a obat company. headoartered ir Argenrtiria, with ova 15 years of design, planning, and development exPerlence, 4 Calabrese founded To rt Water. Planet in 2011 with the goal of desionino, ard operating the works most .irirovatiye automated boat storage and facilities, curren1ly providing for 1500 automated dry sr los. Mr, Calabrese's involvement, earns Muria PAC he profound distinction o - beinui tine oniy proposer that hes designed. NIA, and is currently operatine two successful state ot the art automated boat storage facties. Given this dstindtion, A shoa!d follow tha-.1. na PAC Miami is the proposer most odalIfied Virginia Key Ma a RP No Ifi17-011 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk MAPiN I a fiartit, Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk and capabte in providing for a state dthe al automated boat storaoe faci.ity on this kwilpuely situated, site ori ViroOta Key For a c*Tnse Into the f-titure, Neese visit: ;'11173:,,www. Vonwaterp4inet,corni anci access tne N-3Y tnaleeci tre;t,i ti•15; Marina PARC Miami Marina PARC Ntia,ti 1:.-SPrincipalsanci team Merribers have established steringrepJlations throupt meir aoility to sku: y idenffy $nC nteczrate aij phases of complex dieveopments to create PleaWriefui: waterer -pm Oeslinations. As a rest_it, many of their bay aid ocear.front, projects are among tine os desi if' the .eisneo.tive markets Marina PARC Miami has assemoiee ewgli-c,tiliber team of experts to decisAiely execute ell aspects of the project, including permitting, design, financing, development and operation of ati facties, with a caretu phasing pan tbalw delver each cornponent ln a logical and fonctiona! sequence and at: the eariiest possiOle momenli possiblei The team has more tl'tan 35 years' oT extensive exberence paftnerind -AGO qovernmental enCties anti on pubic owne0irMOS!. Cemons1.-aled by Rickenbacker Mar ria'S excellent tenancy on a poopi, of ti.te pfolect site.; The teani also possesses a demonstrated tiack record of developing siqnificant„ watertiont pidiects subiect, riciicti historic breserVailliOn guideiTheS, such as the landmark Ecen Roc Hoe i in Miami Beach Manna PARC Miami's general contractor wi0 be Moss Construction Manadement, wciin the past 1-0 years has completed more than $1 bi'iion worm of projects, for Key Internat,onal alone, encomoassino more than 5.3 miliiion square feet of marina, offIce, hospital am re space_ Business and Development Team: The lei:wire/3 orcanizaliona ChEirt, orrs. reS lzmes. qua rC relevant expenence narratives for the following Business and Development Team Members are encosed, MANAGEMENT Bi,scaVe Marine_ Rtrt7iP55. Aabaci Esq CMM Rickertinac.ker Mwina, and Manager &Atlas Maire Paaners LWC Diego Ardid, Co -President of Key iwe!hational, ir Damian Calabrese, Founder and Cniet Architect of Desara:to MORTTifor DESIGN AND ENGINEERING Stantec Archlteoure.li,ic, Jonathan Cardeto, Senior Pci at Miami Office Aoftana Jaecermari, Structural Enditleet a tkarrii Utice 102 Virginia Key Marina RF4i1 16.17.011 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Damian Cal Principal I Biscayne Marine Partners I.LC Education Arquitectura, 1999, Facultad de Arquitectura, Planeamiento y Diseiio tiniversidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina Overview I Experience Mr. Calabrese has an outstanding track record as a developer and manager in real estate projects of significant magnitude and significance. I le founded the company MOR Arquitectura SRL (DESARROLLO MOR) IS years ago, led today by a group of more than 50 outstanding professionals committed to identifying opportunities, planning, building, communicating and commercializing innovative real estate developments. MOR Florida LLC I Founder After receiving offers to establish TifOn's facilities in multiple cities throughout South America, Europe and Asia, the team led by the architect Calabrese has decided to associate itself with the outstanding entrepreneurs from the local community, funding a new venture MOR Florida LLC and joining Biscayne Marine Partners LLC, flesarrollo MOR I Founder As CEO of the company, Mr. Calabrese has consolidated a progressive expertise in the management of teams oriented in traditional development. This expertise is reflected by the construction of more than 15 buildings of various use and many gated communities, an intense task resulting in the marketable development of more than 16,800,000 sq. ft. real estate including httpt/iwvAvtifonwaterplanet.com Gavia S.A. (Tiffin Baigorria) I President As developer of the brand Tiffin, Mr. Calabrese now chairs Gavin, the company that drives the services of the I.vatersport facility. Tifon Baigorria progresses with its construction in stages, with a projected final capacity of 3,000 vessels. It is currently operating with more than 1,000 boats being stored in dry rack boat slips. In addition to serving as headquarters, Tiffin Baigorria has developed an active role in organizing civic and educational events for the boating and cultural populations of the general community. Villanova S.A. (Tirol' Tigre) I President The success of this first facility led Mr. Calabrese to form and preside over Villanova, a new company formed to build and manage the second facility, Tiffin Tigre. Located in Tigre, close to Buenos Aires (capital of Argentina), this city is regarded as the most important of venues for the boating community in the country Projected to have a capacity to store more than 5,000 dry vessels and provide the same level of ancillary services as in Rosario, Ti ran Tigre commence operations as ofianuary 2016. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 2 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 3 R!ESGOONUNE Fr'C`h�G 3 ff?C':Cf t r f 3 CALABRESE DAMIAN 2a-23049960-3 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Fero brwttde rte. Sin ecthiSNI eesiirst. rtSE II INAreuar (tto SO Nide det t v'tl mat Sacs E m g De cumykrueNo m+aat cast a i!r3uiatas sob Iet3/e En10s alines 1s t3refesie n ogee. [an dle40 err de Persdaa 1,6td cs frtcrieudes Par feltade feeds,. lteg6tre 1nfo3i5in 161601+i:teyarta y/a aersas peolcsdt* Para este CUIT/COIL/CDI MI es postale determineringresos. Este CUIT/CUILICDI curnpte adecuadamente sus Conrpromisos rt nes. ED Este deudor permanece en situacl6n 1 desde 01/2018 (14 mesas) El es la SituacIdu eon CENCOSUD SA por SG9.000,00 el 01/2019 Mies la Situation con MUTUAL DE SOCIOS DE to ASOC. M7DICA par S36.000,00 el 12/2018 Este CUM/COIL/COI re/Ostia more en el cumpllmlento de sus obligee ones en Eig es la pear Situation en Ins utdmos 24 meses is es la SltuatiOn con BANCO MACRO A haste el 11/2017 ED cheques de Persona Jurldica rechazadas por falta de rondos NO RECUPERADOS pot $2.018.288,69 En cheques de persona jurtdice rechazados por faits de fondos RECUPERADOS par $91.000 0D slstema flnanciero en Este CUIT/CUUICDI regIstra lnfonnacl6n)udlclal relevada yet edlctos publtcados. ED Vet los comptementos-Edktos per documents' y/o qukios par documents` as uit1mos 15 mesas. Este lnrorme 31002500 ioe procesado el 14/03/201919:49 por solid ddelusuarlo allende ztesde le direcddn IP200.80.145.99 DATOS DE EXISTENCIA CIV1CA YJURIDICA APELLIDO Y NOMBRE: CALABRESE DAMIAN COIL: 20.23049980-3 DOC U MENTO: 23.049.980 SEXO: MASCUUNO CLASE; 1973 FECHA DE NACIMIENTO: 19/05/1973 DOMICILIOS DOMICILIO CIVICO 2017: PJE TRIUNVIRATO 659, ROSARIO SEC 10A SARNIENTO, 5ANTA FE DOMICILIO FISCAL 2019: JOSE H:RNANDEZ 1639. ROSARIO, SAP/TAPE ACTIVIDADES ACTIVIDAD 1; FORMULARIO 883, SERVICIOS DE ASESORAMIENTO. DIRECCION Y GESTION EMPRESARJAL REALIZADOS POR INTEGPAMTES DE LOS ORGANOS OE ADMINISTRACION Y/0 FISCALUZACION EN SOCIEDADES AN0NIMAS (702091) ACTIVIDAD 2: FORMUiARJO 883, SERVICIOS OE AROUITECTURA E INGENIERIAY SERVICIOS CONEXOS DE ASESORAMIENTO TECNICO N,C,P, (7110091 ACTIVIDAD 3; FORMULARIO 883, SERVICIOS EMPRESARIALES N.C.P, (829900) ACTIVIDAD 4; FORMULARIO 150, SERVICIOS DE ARC/LUTECIUM E INGEHIERIA Y SERVICIOS CONEXOS DE A5E-SOMMIE/TTO TECNICO N.C.F, (742109) ACTIVIDAD S: FORMULPR'O 150. SERVICIOS DE ASESORAMIENTO, DIRECCION Y GESTION EMPRESARLAL REAIJZADOS ROR INTEGP NTES DE CUERPOS DE DIRECCION EN SOCIEDADES EXCEPTO LAS ANONIMAS (741402) HOM6NIMOS APELLIDO Y NOMBRE CALABRESE DAMIAN DOMICILIO CORRIENTES 5943, CIUDAO AUTONOMA DE BUENOS AIRES, CAPITA/FEDERAL CALABRESE DAMIAN EDUARDO CALABRESE DAMIAN HUGO CONSTANT GRAL L N MANSILIA 3451, C(UDAD AVTONOMA DE BUENOS a,RFG r*pn-A, csnveM CULT % 20-14077316-7 % 20.53401339.7 % 20-23102030.7 CALABRESE DAMIAN NICOLAS CMAIDIESE DAMIAN PABLO JOSE CUOAS 3460, CIUDAD AUTONOMA DE BUENOS. AIRES, % 20-27658009.0 CAPITAL FEDERAL ACHAVAL 4665, LANUS, BUMS AIRES % 20-27636321-7 FUEnfiE ACK., ASSES . . INFOREAACKITI COMPLEt4EPITAILIA . - DOMICILE° FISCAL EN LINEA DEN0MINACIoN CALABRESE MOAN DOMICILIOS HISTORICOS DOMICILIO ANTERIOR: TRIUNVIRATO 658, ROSARIO. SANTA fE OTROS DOMICILIOS oECLATUID054 HERNANDEZ 1638. ROSARIO. SANTA FE DOMICILIO FISCAL HISTORIC° 03)2019: JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638,ROSANO. SANTA FE PERSONAS RELACIONADAS DENOMINACION ADNENISTRADORA DE PUERTO ROI nAN BARRIO CERRADO SA ALVAREZ PATRICE) DANIEL FIDEICOMISO DE DIVERSION TUCUM F(DEICOMISO TORE CARDON ROSARIO GANDA 5 A NOR Al SRL OODONE ALEJANDRO PUERTO ROWAN 5 A SCOIAN ADRIAN HUGO SILBERGLETT CHRISTIAN ESTEBAN VIUANOVA 5 A LASSAGA ALEJANDRO SOLARI MARIA SOLEDAD BERTOLANO HECTOR PAUL FURNO SOIAJUAN PABLO LLODRA GERMAN MAXIMILIAN° MIESI ESTEFANIA COSTANZA NOGUEROL ALEJO ROBERT faximaisula ZACCARD1 EMILIO TELEFONOS EN BASE AL NOMBRE GUI* TELEFONO 2015 (0341) 425-9629 2011 (0341) 48543755 2011 (0341)4854246 2011 (0341) 425-9629 2011 (0341) 444-8460 2005 (0341) 4854755 TITULAR CAIABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN 1-41 daRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN BUSOUEDA DE TELETONOS EN BASE AL NOMBRE AMPUPDA EN °IRAS LOCAUDADES. TELEFONOS EN BASE AL DOMICILIO FISCAL GUM TELEFONO TITULAR 2015 e(olu 4717-3268 CASTILLO ESTELA SEAT DOMICILIO JOSE HERNANDEZ ISM, ROSARIO, SANTA FE, CP: 2000 PARENTESCO CUIT RELACION BCRA % 30-70892650-3 RELACION OCRA % 20.301387047-3 LS RELACION BCRA % 30-71164803-4 el RELACION BCRA % 30-71004410-1 la MACON BCRA % 30-71143408.8 la RELACION BCRA % 3049940552-3 el RELACION BCRA % 20-11565713-0 RELACION BCRA % 33-70360527-9 el REIACION 8CRA % 20-23044722-3 fa RELACION BCRA % 20-23123447.1 el RELACION BUM % 30.71245021-9 121 RELACION BCRA SOCIETARIA % 20-14729570-8 fa RELACION BCRA SOCIETARIA % 27-26538367-5 SOCIETARIA $20-10726105-3 el SOCIETARIA % 20-26375702-6 al SOCIETARIA % 23-23761103-9 S OC I EMMA % 27-30685420.3 13 SOCIE7ARIA % 20-20298950-113 SOCIETARIA % 20,24479022-5 CS SOCIETARIA q 20-23472361-3 la OOMICILIO DORREGO MANUEL 1973 DORREGO MANUEL, ROSARIO, SANTA FE M DORREGO 1973 09 A, ROSARIO, SANTA FE COCHABAMBA 1153, ROSARIO, SANTA FE GRALj UROUIZA 1539, ROSARIO, SANTA FE COCHABAMBA 1153, ROSAMO, SANTA FE M DORREGO 1973. ROSARIO, SANTA f DOMICILIO JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 JOSE HERNANDEZ, ItOSARIO, SANTA FE OTROS TILER/ NOS EN BASE ALHOMBRE EN LINEA GUIA TELEFONO TITULAR DOMICILIO 2019 2019 2019 (0341) 455-3994 (0341) 453-2268 (0341) 455-1230 rAl ABRESE DAMIAN ri ABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN TELtFONOS EN SASE AL curt- 0.94,4 VNOS111, 111.1 JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638, ROSARIO, SANTA FE J HERNANDEZ 1638, ROSARY), SANTA FE J HERNTNDEZ 1638. ROSARIO, SANTA FE liari11•00.40 tea Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk WVFM Idi-E4'lu 2015 (0341)4259628 2012 (0341) 485-4296 2011 (0341) 444-B46O 2011 (0345)435.0755 5/0 (0341) 455 3934 tit UtAt6 CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN uvmwtt,+V DORREGO MANUEL 1973 DOAAEGO MANUEL, ROSARIO, SANTA FE COCH(ABAMBA 01153 SARMIENTO GRAL DARTOLOME METRE PASCO, ROSARIO, SANTA FE COCHABAMBA 1153, ROSAR10, SANTA FE M DORREGO 1973 09 A ROSARIO, SANTA FE SIN DAT05, CORONEL ARNOLD, SANTA FE FUENTE: AFIP, A}1SES. 8CRA. COLS TELEf ONICAS ORES DE ACTIV1DAD CONSTANCIA DE JNSCRIPC16N DERE RESPONDER REQUEPINIENfOS FEM3IENrES INFORMACION FISCAL HISTORICA INFORMACION SOBRE LA COND(CION TRIBUTARIA HISTORICA MONOTR(EUTO H - BASTA $ 1.151.OE6,58 ANUAlE3 t- HASTA 11,35,2,553,24 ANUALES I - RASTA $1.352.503,24 ARMIES ( - HASTA $1.352,5O3,24 ANUALFS F - HASTA $ 690439,95 ANUAIES NO FINSCRIP70 ACTIVIDAD LOCACIONES DE SERA/100 LOCACIONES DE3EA 1CIO LOCACIONES DE SERMICIO LOCACIONES DE SERVICIO LOCACIONES DE SERVICIO GANANCIAS IVA EMPLEADOR FECHADESDEYHASTA NO NO NO ACTLVO ACTWVO ACTIVO ASEGURADORAS DE RIESGOS DETRADAJO APE W DO Y NOMB RE: CALABRESE DAMIAN AFILIADO A EXPERTA ALIT COMO EMPLEA40R DE PERSONAL DE CASAS PARTICULARES FECHADE ACTUALIZACION, 27/02/2019 NO NO NO NO NO NO ESTA SECCION FUE PROCESADA POLL NUESTRGS OPERADORES EL CIA 14/03/2019 CON EL CODIGO 1N47JV6'. NO N0 NO NO NO NO 25/06/2011-12/0512012 21/05f2012 - 25/08/2012 15/11/2012 - 03/04/2014 22106/2014 - 03/01/2017 18/04/2017 -, 2610612017 27/O6R017 - 30/12/2017 FUEN1E. AM. ARS ES, PA,L0, S FT, 5 5 N. >±lNI#aTEB1© UAL MAH.10 IFToICADORES DE VERIF CACI(IH LABOR/4L BENEFICIAR10S DEL SISTEMA 13ACIONAi, it1: SALVO YOORA5 SOCIALES tACONSULTA NO REGIS-18A DATOS GENEMOOS PARA ESE CUIT. ESTA SECCION FUE PROCE.ACA POR NUESTROS OPERADDRES EL DIA 14/03/2019 C INFDR/4ACION F1l4ANCIERA CENTRAL DE INFO RMAC(ON DEL DCRA EN L(NEA ULTIMA INFORMACIDN DISPONRILE EL CODIGO.413078" FUE197E: AFIP, ANS ES, IAF65, APROSS.1OM IPAUS DENOMINACIDN DEL DEUDOR CALABRESE DAMIAN CALABRESE DAMIAN TOTAL EHT)DAD CENCOSUD SA PERIODO 01/2019 MUTUAL DE SOCIOS DE IA ASOC. M1 12/2018 DICA SPIV1C,7' POR Eri78LY16 CAL 65.7% sa Lunar atm ICAO. mom* * 1 34.3% SIT MONTO 69,000,00 36,000,00 105.000,00 DIAS OBSERVACIONES ATRASO 0 0 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk SITUACION: 1•NORMALJCUI4PL(MIENTO NORMAL, 11-NORMAUCON GARANTIAPREFER(DAA. 2•CON SEGUIMIENTO ESPECL4LJCUMPLIMIENTO DNADECUADO, 3-CON PROBLEMAS/CUMPLIMIENTO DEFICIENTE, 4-CON ALTO RIESGO DE INSOLVENC NDE DIFICIL. AECUPERAC)ON, 5•IRAECUPERARLE, 6-IRRECUPEPABLE POR DISPOSIC(ON T£CNICA, 005ERVACtONES: {A) REFINANCIACIONES, (8) RECATEGORIZACION OBUGATOR1A, (C) SMJACION JURIDICA (CONCORDATOS JUOIVALES 0 EXTRAJUDICIALES, CONCURS° PREV TWO, GESTION )1.101cIAL 0QUIEBRA). (D) IRRECUPERABLE POR DISPOSICION TECNICA 141STORLA 24 MESES . BASE DE OATOS EXTERNA ADMINISTRADA POR SCRA FECHA MUTUAL DE SOC1OS str BANCO SIT CENCOSUD SIT CM II SIT DE LA ASOC. M7DICA MACRO 8 SA FALA8 ELLA A SA 01/2019 1212018 11/2018 10/2018 09/2018 asnala 07/2018 06/2010 ospoia 0412018 03/2018 02/2018 01/2018 12/2017 1112017 10/2017 09/2017 08/2017 07/2031 06/2017 05/2017 04/2017 03/2017 02/2017 0,00 36.000.00 30.000.00 32.000,00 23.000,00 0,00 32,000,00 41.000,00 43.000,00 44.000,00 44.000,00 48.000,00 42.000,00 24,000.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 BMA - COMUNICACION 'A" 6325 NIA 0,00 N/A 69.000,00 1=1 0,00 N/A En 0,00 WA 0,00 N/A 0.00 WA 0,00 N/A 63.000,00 0:1 0,00 N/A ED 0,00 WA 65.000.00 M 0,00 N/A (1) I -I U 3 0,00 N/A 69,000,08 RN 0,00 WA .-`12 u.i >- a-. NIA 0.00 N/A 71.000,00 C:1 0,00 UM :Ei r‘ •,-; = ,...., En 0.01) N/A 7L000,00 1:21 0,00 N/A C. 173 0.00 Nth79.000.00C3 0,00LU . 'Tic CTI .-I C3 0,00 N/A 82.000,00 E3 0,00 WA' .2c Ea) c),,,i 1:::1 DA) N/A 78.000.00 C3 52.000,00 El ED 0.00 NIA 69.000,00 C3 0.00 Nia -CS cu (%73-- I -I 1=3 0.00 N/A 81,000,00 1:23 0,00 N/A 4-, 4-, N C:) 1=1 0,00 WA 75.000,00 ED 0,00 N/A E 8 =I 14.000,00 78.000.1)0 El i 0,00 WA = cp C N/A 13.000,00 JT 90.000,00 in " o C:3 0,00 NIA NIA 13,000,00 86.000,00 El ROO NIA NIA 12.000,00 89.000.00 C3 0,00 N/A ti/A 11.000,00 fl 82.000.00 ED 0,00 N/A N/A 4.000,00 J 94.000,00 CD 0,00 N/A NIA 2.500.00 90,000,00 C3 0,00 NIA NIA 1.100,00 73.000,00 ED 0,00 WA N/A 72.800,00 106.000.00 r:1 0,00 WA N/A 85.300,00 QJ 190.800,00 ED 0,90 WA WA 72.900,00 DJsz.um,cio ED (Loa NIA ESTE VIEU00R PERMANECE EN SITUACION 3 (NORMAL) DESDE: 01/2018 MESES SIN MORA; 14 FRIMERA INFORMACION EN EL SISTEMA FULANCIERO (COSE): 00/7008 CENTRAL DE DEUDO RES DEL SCRA, ULTIMA INFO WACO N ARCHIVO Al. 01/2019 FECHA ACTUALIZACIDN ULTIMO CD: 31/01/2019 ENTIDAD PERIOD° SIT MONTO C/GARPREF C/CGARPREF S/GARPREF S/CGAPPREF PREV MESES 085. a14cosua SA 1/2919 M 69.000 0 0 0 0 0 24 - MUTUAL DE LA ASOC 12/2010 C:1 36.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 . MEI3CA siTuActott 1-noRmAutumpum6wo NORMAL. 2-CON SEGUIMIEUTO ESPECIALICUMPUMIENTO INADECUADO. 3-CON PAOBLEMAS/CLIMPLMENTO DEFIC1ENTE, 4-CON ALTO RIESGO DE INSOLVENCINDE CAROL RECUPERACION, 5•IRRECUPERABLE, 6-IRRECUPEPABLE POR C4SPOSICION TECNICA OBSERVACKMES: (A) RERNANCIACIONES, RECATEGORLZACION OBUGATORIA. (C) SITUACION JURIDICA (CONCORDATOS AJOICIALES 0 EXTRAJUDICIALES, CONCURS° PREVENTIVO, GEST)ON JUDICIAL 0 OU(EEIRA). (D) IRRECUPERARLE POR DISFOSICIONTECNICA LAS DEUDAS INFORMAOAS COMO (0) RECATEGORIZACION OBLIGATORIA. NO INDICAN NECESAR/AMENTE LA EX/STE-NC/A DE MORA CON LA ENTIDAD INFORMANTE y SON RESULTADO OE EXIGENCIAS OEL BCRA CON LAS ENTIDADE5 A TRAVES DE LA NORMA-TA/ACNE LOS UNE MESES: INDICADOR OE LA CANTIDAD DE MESES TRANSCURRIDOS DES DE LA PR1MERA SITUACION 3 0 MAYOR CENTRAL DE DEUDORES DEL BCRA, 111ST6R1C0 RESUMEN DE DEUDA SEGUN ENTIDAD FECHA CENCOSUD SIT MACRO SIT MUTUAL DE LA ASOC SIT OTRAS TOTAL SA ME DICA DO 04/2017 106.000.00 ED 72.800,00 E:3 0.00 178.800,00 01t2017 72.800,00 C3 1.100.01) CD 0.00 73.900,00 06/2017 89.500.00 CD 2.500,00 E23 0.00 92.100,00 97/2017 94.000.00 ED 4.000,00 M 0.00 98.4100,00 08/2017 82.000,00 CD 11.000,00 C:1 0,00 93,000,00 119/2017 89,020.00 (Ti 12.000on m (Lori intoon.on 10/2017 11/2017 12/2017 01/2010 02/2018 03/2018 04/2018 05/2018 06/2018 07/2018 09/2018 10/2018 11/2018 12/2018 01/2013 FECHA 04/2017 05/2017 06/2017 07/2017 00/2017 86.000,00 90.000,00 78.000,00 75.000.00 81,000.00 60,000.00 78,300,00 32.000,00 79.000,00 71,000.00 69.000,00 65.000,00 63.000,00 61000.00 099019009B9909E 13.000,00 13.000,00 14.000,00 1:Z3 D 12.0110.00 42,0E10,00 43.000,00 44.000,00 44,000,40 43.000.00 42,000,00 32,000,00 23.000,00 32.000,00 30.000,00 36.000,00 GMEEMBEIBOBEI 0,00 99.000,00 0,00 103.000,00 0,00 104.000,00 0,00 117,000,00 0,00 129.000.00 0.00 113.000,00 52,000,130 174,000,00 0,00 125.000.00 0,00 121.000,00 0,00 103,000.00 0 OD 92.000,00 0,00 97.000,00 0,00 93.000,00 0,00 36,000,00 0,00 69.000,00 C640 FAL.43ELL4 SU" Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 09/2017 10/2017 11/2017 12/2017 01/2018 0212028 03/2018 04/2018 52.000,00 LEI 05/201a 06/201.8 0702018 09/2018 10/2018 1312013 12/2015 01/2019 RESUMEN DE DEUDA SECIIN SFTUACION PERIOD() Sri 51T2 SIT 3 04/2017 106.000.00 72.800.00 05/2017 73.900,00 06/2017 92.100.00 0712017 95.000,00 08/2017 82.000,00 11.000,00 09/2017 69.000,00 12.000.00 10/2017 86,000,00 13.000,00 11/2017 90,000,00 12/2017 90,000,00 01/2018 117.000,00 02/2018 129.000,00 03/2018 113.000,00 04/2018 174.000,00 05/2018 125.000,00 06/2018 101.000,00 07/2018 103,000,00 09/2018 92.000,00 10/2018 97.000,00 11/2010 93.000,00 12/2033 36.000,00 01/2010 69,000,00 SIT 4 517" 5 13.000,00 14.000,00 sr!' 6 'TOTAL 173.800.00 73,900.00 92.100,00 93,000,00 93.000,00 101.000,00 99.000,00 103.000,00 104.000,00 117.000.00 129.000,00 113.000,00 174,000,00 125.000,00 121.000.00 103.000,00 92.000,00 97,000,00 93.000.00 36.000,00 64.000,00 • SITUACION: 1-NORMAL/CLIMPLIMENTO NORMAL. 2-CON SEGUIMIENTO ESPECIAL/CURPIJMIENTO INADECUADO. 3-CON PROBLERAS/CUMPUMIENTO DEFICIENTE, 4-CON ALTO FUESGO DE INSOLVENCIAIDE DIFICIL RECUPERACtON, 5-IRRECUPERABLE, 6-IRRECUPERABLE POR DISPOSICION TICNICA 51N GATOS INDICA Qua El. BANCO CENTRAL NO IIA NFORMADO EL MONTO DE LA DEUDA. (AS SITUACIONES 0 SON PRESENTADAS COMO 1 A LOS EFECTOS DE MANTENER UN CRITERIO PARA LA EVALUACION DEL HISTORIC°, FUENTE: SOPORTE PROVISTO POR EL BCRA, rIO El CC OBSERVACIONES: (A) REFIN)NCIACIONES, (8) RECATEGORLZACION oauata-ortiA (c) SITUACION JURIDICA (CONCOROATOS JUDICIALES 0 EXTRAIUDICIALES, CONCURSO PREvEN7NO, GESTION JUDICIAL 0 GUIEBRAL IRRECUPERABLE POR DISPOSICION TECNICA 0_ LAS DEUDAS INFORMLIA5 COMO (8) RECATEGORIZACION OBLISKTORIA. NO INDICAN NECESARIAMENTE JAEXLSTENCIA DE MORA CON LA ENTIOAD _c al INFORMANTS Y SON RESULTADO DE EXIGENCIAS DEL I3CRA CON LAS ENTIOADES A TRAVES DE IA NORMATIVA QUE LOS LINE. NOTAL EL PI SIGNIFICA QUE EL DATO PROVIENE DEL SMO ViE13 DE BCRAY NO DEL SOPORTE OPTIC° DEL KRA. CENTRAL DE DEUDORES DEL BCP,A. GRAFICO HISTORIC° DE DEUDA EVOLLICION OEUOA 8/ NONT0 ULT1)103 12 HEMS 200.000 150.000 100.000 50.000 0 CO CO tO CO g " 1,1 ei ,c4 Ca 3 to et 0 ID a -I 0 41 .-4 CENTRAL DE CHEQUES RECHAZADOS DEL EICRA, SOPORTE OPTIC° »,,...— CHEQUES RECHAZADOS EN CUENTAS DE PERSONASJURIDICAS _.....— FECHA ULTIMO CD; 23/02/2019 FECHA ULTIMA ACTUAL 17ACION, 13103/2010 NW, FECHA DEL RECHAZO MONTO CAUSAL FECHA DE PASO DE FECHA DE PAGO REVISION PR. JUD. CHEQUE CHEQUE MULTA . •• 64608193 2U11/2017 20.000.00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 01/02/2018 NO No FONDOS 64608192 20/10/2017 xakao.00 s IN NO REGISTRA PAGO 01/02/2018 P40 NO FONOOS 64608191 22/09/2017 20.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 10/10/2017 NO NO FONDOS 56314795 14/08/2017 13.000,00 SIN 12/12/2017 10/10/2017 NO NO FONDOS 56314794 09108/2017 13.000,00 SIN 12/12/2017 10/10/2017 NO NO FONDOS 56314793 11/07/2017 13.000,00 SIN 12/12/2017 28/07/2017 NO NO FONDOS 64E08199 01/06'2017 15.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 17/07/2017 No NO • FONDOS 64608201 01106/2017 15.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 17/07/2017 NO NO FONDOS 64608200 01/0E/2017 15,000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 17/07/2017 NO NO FONDOS 64608202 01/06/2017 15.000,00 'SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 17/07/2017 No NO FONDOS 56314792 23/05/2017 13.000.00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 28/07/2017 NO NO FONDOS 56314791 12/04/2017 13.000,00 SIN 12/1212017 28/07/2017 NO NO FONDOS 21501719 16103/2017 64.789.48 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 10/04/2017 110 NO FONDOS 56314790 13/03/2011 13.000,00 SIN 17J22/2017 10/04(2017 NO NO FONDOS 21501718 immor 64.789.48 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 10/04/2017 NO NO fONDOS 21501446 15/02/2017 37.542.15 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGo 10/04/2017 NO NO FONDOS 56314789 /4/02/2017 13.000,00 SIN 12/12f2017 10/04/2017 NO NO FONDOS 49134129 23/01/2017 9,90.000.00 5IN ND REGISTRA PAGO 21/02/2017 NO NO FONDOS a 21501480 01111/2016 9.360,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 02/11/2016 NO NO FONDOS 21501453 31/10/2016 50.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 07J11/2016 NO NO FONDOS 21501452 26113/2016 S0.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 27/10/2016 NO NO FONDOS 21501450 20)10/2016 50.000.60 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 27,00/2016 NO NO TONDOS 21501449 16/10/2016 50,000,00 SIN HO REGISTRA PAGO 19/10/2016 NO NO FONDOS 21501448 1300/2016 50.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 14110/2016 NO NO FONDOS 764921 11/1012016 50.000,00 SIN NO PEGISTRA PAGO 22/11/2016 NU NO FONDOS 768209 07/10/204.6 50.000.00 SIN NO REG/STRA PAGO 22/11/2016 NC; NO FONDOS 21501414 21/04/2016 30.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 28/09/2016 NO No FONINDS 764680 21/09/2016 50.000,00 SIN 110 REGISTPA PAGO 23/09/2016 NO NO FONDOS 21501391 21/09/2016 13.500.00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 28/09/2016 140 NO FONDOS 21501459 20/09/2016 8.543,20 SIN NO REGISTT1A PAGO 26/09/2016 NO NO FONDOS RESUMEN OE CHEQUES RECHAZADOS — - CAUSAL SIN FONDOS CANTIOAD MONTo 38 2.109.288,51 PIJEKTfl BCRA INFolu4Acto JuDIcIAL BOSQUEDA.DEJUICIOS Y MOOS — . FECHA: 18/1212012 PROVINCIA; SA NTAFE ROL: PRESIDENTE - EDICT° SOCIETARIO DOCUMENTO SOC4 RAZON SOCIAL VR1ANOVA SA COMM° SOC.: JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 LOCALIDAD SOC.: ROSARIO PROVINVA SOC.: SANTA FE TITULO: ESTATUTO TWO DE PUBUCACION: SOCIEDAD ANONIMA CAP. SOCIAL: 12000000 FECHA DE CON511TUC/ON: 20120813? VILLANOVA S.A. ESTATUTO EL SIL JUEZ EN PRIMERA INSTANCIA EN LO CIVIL Y COMUCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, FM. DE SANTA FE, A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMERCIo, MACE SABER DE ACUERDO A LOS DISpuESTO EN EL ARTICULO 10' DE IA LEY 19450, QUE A LOS 13 DIAS DEL NIES OE AGOSTO DE 2012, LOS SRES: DAMIAN CALABRESE, NACIDO EL 19 OE JUNCO DE 1973. DE NACIONALLIDAD ARGENTIN°. OE ESTADO CIVIL CASADO, EN PRIMULAS NUPCIAS CON MARIA CANDELA ZARCO PEREZ, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO, DOMICILIADO EN TRIUNVIRATO 658 DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENTO NACIONAL OE IDENTIOAD Na 23.049.980. 0' 20-23049980-3, OE AFELLIDO MATERNO MUROZ; ALEJANDRO IASSAGA, NACIDO EL 2 OE OICIEMBRE OE 1962, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN°, DE ESTADO CIVIL CAS/.DO, EN PRIMERAS NUPCIAS CON PATRICIA MONICA ACOSTA MEDINA, 0E PROFESION COMERCIAMTE, DOMICILLACX) EN BV. ORONO 849 PISO 8VO, DEPTO, 707 DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENTO NACIONAL DE IDENTIOAD NR0.14,729.570. NRO. 20-14,729.570-8, DE APELLIDO MATERNO cApT0LE; GERMAN U_ODRA, NACIDO EL 16 DE JULZO DE 1974, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN°, DE ESTADO CIVIL DIVOROADO, OE PROFESION COMEICIANTE, DoMICRIADO EN CALLE JOSE INGENIEROS N' 1485 DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD NRO, 22.761.103, C.U.1.1., NRO. 23- 23761103.9, DE APELUDO MATERNO FERNANDEZ, HABILES PARA CONTRATAR. CONVIENEN LA CONSTITUCION DE UNA SOCIECLAD ANONIMA. QUE GIRARA Birgo LA DENOMINACION TVILLANOVA S,A.? FECHA INSTRUMENTO DE CONVITTUCIONL 13 DE AGOSTO DE 2012 SEDE SOCIALPSE HERNANDEZ 1638 DORM° LEGAL CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVO4CIA DE SANTA FE, REPUBLICA ARGENTINA FECHA DE CIERRE DE EJEFCICIO: 30 DE JUNIO DE CADA ANO, 08JETO SOCIAL:. DEDICAR5E POR CUEHTA PROPLA, I)E TERCEROS 0 EN PARI1CIPACION CON TERCEROS A: 1.- tA CONSTRUCCION INSTALACION, ADMINISTRACION Y ExPLOTACION EN INMUEBLE PROPIO DE UN PARDUE NAUTICO Y/0 GUARDERIA HAUTICA 170 AFINES, PAFVL tA PRESTACION DE SERACIOS DE GUARDA 00 LANCHAS DEPOFfITVAS Y EMBAXACIONES Y SEWICE05 COMPLEMENTAMOS, 2.- IA ORGANIZACION DE UN SISTEMA QUE PERMITA tA ADMINISTRACION Y GERENCIAMIENTO UNIFICADO Y CENTRAUZADO DEL USO Y GOCE, ARRENDAMIENTO, PERMANENTE Y/0 TEMPORAFLIO DE LAS CAMAS NAUTICAS POR PARTE ne LOS ACCIONISTAS Y/0 TEPCF,ROS. CESIONA11105 DE ESTOS DERECHOS. ESTE SISTEMA DE GERENCIAMIENTO SERA UNICO Y CELL/GATOR° PARA TODOS LOS ACCIOMSTAS Y/0 TERCEROS. 3.- INSTAIACION 7 EXPLOTACION DE RESTAURANT, BAR, CONFITERIA Y PIZZERIA, SALON DE FIESTAS CON EXPEN010 OE BEBIDAS Y SERVICIOS AFINES. PLAZO DE DURACION: tA bUf4ACION SERA DE NOVENTAY NUEVE {99) ANDS A CONTAR DE LA FECHA DE SU INSCRIPCiON EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° OE COMERCIO. CAPITAL SOCIN..: EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE RJA EN LASUMA DE PESOS DOGE MP1ONES ($ 12.000.000) REPRESENTADO POR UN MILLON DOSCIENTOS MIL (1.200.000) ACCIONES DE INEZ PESOS ($ 10) DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION, ADMINISTRACION: LA ADMINISTRACION ESTARA A CARGO OE UN DIRECTOR* COMPUESTO POR EL NUMERO OE MIEMOROS QUE DETERMINE LA ASAMBLEA ENTRE UN MINIM° DE TRES Y UM MAXIMO IDE CINCO, QUIENES DURARAN TRES EXPCICIOS EN SUS FUNCIONES, tA ASAMBLEA PUEDE DESIGNAR SUPLENTES EN IGUAL NUMERO QUE LOS TITULARES Y FOR EL MISMO PUkZO, CON EL FIN DE LLENAR LAS VACANTES QUE SE PRODUJERAN EN EL ORDEN DE SU ELECCION. LA ASAMBLEA 0 LOS EARECTORES EN LA PRIMERA SESION, 0E8EN DESIGNAR UN PRESI0614TE Y UN MCEPRESIDENTE, EN EL CASO DE UN DIRECTORIO PWRAL, Y ESTE ULTIMO REEMPLAZ A AL PRIMER° EN fArn DF 91I'F0VI. fl IINPFDt}.4PUrn 1 iv; SDP. PArrFC nHF Por8FF.F14 Al nfarrYnain Nn A09(#401 PI raltnn nF PRFCIDFUTP n VIr F4,11 PF IDPAITP nur 21501443 18/01/2017 50.000,00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 27/01/2017 NO NO FONDOS i 56314787 16/12/2016 13.000.00 SIN 12112/2017 27(1212016 NC, NO " a) I fONDOS U 21501434 14/12/2016 50.000,00 SIN NO REGISTPAPAGO 27/12/2016 NO •.... u 71. WI >. FONDOS 21501437 14112/2016 50.000,60 SIN NO FtEGISTRA RAG° 29/1 1 = i-) 21501458 14,11/2016 55.306,61 SIN FONDOS NO REGISTRA FAG° 2772;0166 NO NO No. o_ *-L 1-7). Cfl NO _c .......... FONDOS 0 E 0 21501509 NO REGISTRA PAGO MO NO c 4:12 r‘i 01/11/201E 7,260,00 SIN 4-, FONDOS 01111/2016 ._ -a 21501424 01111/2016 50.000.00 SIN NO REGISTRA PAGO 02/11/2016 NO NO 4-, FoNnos 21501504 E 01/11/2016 14.197.7? SIN NO REGISTRA PACO 02/11/2016 NO NO _0 0 u FONDOS V) 1.... 0 a EJETCIA EL REEMPLAZAUO, SALVO QUE NO EXISTA OTRO DIRECTOR TITULAR PARA A5UMIRLO. ANTE IA AUSENCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DE ALOUNO DE LOS SUPLENTES, EL SINDICO DESIGNARA El. REEMPLAZANTE, SIEMPRE Y CUANDO AFECTE EL QUORUM, Y CONVOCARA A ASAMBLEA GENERAL ORDINAMA DENTRO DE LOS 30 DIAS SIGUIENTES DE ACAEODO EL HECHT/. EL DIRECTORIO FUNCIONA CON LA PRESENCIA DE LA MAYORtA ABSOLUTA DE SUS MIEMBROS Y RESUELVEN POR P44YORLA DE L05 VOTOS PRESENTES. LA ASAMBLEA FJJA LA REMUNERACION DEL DIRECTORIO, CONFORME ARTICULO 261 DE LA LEY 19,550.7 REPRESENTACION LEGAL: LE CORRE5PON0E AL PRESIDENTE 0 AL VICE-PRESIDENTE, EN CASO DE RENUNCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL PRIMERO, DETERMINACION DEL NUMERO 06 DIRECTORES Y DESIGNACION: POR UNANIMIDAD SE DETERMINA EN TRES (3) EL NUMERO DE DIRECTORES TITULARES, CONFORME LO DISPUESTO POP, EL ARTICULO 9N0. DEL ESTATUTO SOCIAL. PRECEDIENDOSE A LA DESIGNACION DEL PRIMER DIRECTOMO, QUE ESTARA INTEGRADO POR DAMIAN CAIABRESE COMO DIRECTOR TIPRAR, CON EL CARGO DE PRESIDENTE, ASIMISMO SE DESIGNA A ALEJANDRO LASSAUA, COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR, CON EL CARGO DE VICEPRESIDENTE Y A GERMAN MAXIMUJANO LLODRA COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR, CON EL CARGO DE VOCAL, OUIENES OE ACUERDO A LAS MISMAS Disp0SEc13oNE5 DURARAN TRES EJERCLEJOS EN SUS CARGOS. TODO W CUM. ES APROBADO POR UNAMMIDAD. LOS SENORES D06CTORE5 7TFULARES, PRESENTEE 611 ESTE ACTO, MANIFIESTAN SU ACEPTACION AL CARGO PARA EL QUE EVERON OESIGNADOS, FIRI,M:x) AL PIE DEL NISEI° eN PRUEBA DE CONFORMICAD. SE FEA ADEMAS EL DOMICIU0 ESPECIAL DE LOS SENORES DIRECTORES TITULARES, EN UN TODO 06 ACUERDO CON LO CESPUESTO Et/ EL ARTICULO 256 IN FINE DE LA LEY 19.550, EN TRRINVIRATO NRO. 658 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. PCIA. DE SANTA FE, EN CALLE OY. ORONO 849 PISO 8° °PTO. ?Ea DE RoSARB), PCIA. DE SANTA FE I' EN CALLS JOSE INGENIEROS No 1485 DE RoSARIO, PCIA. OE SANTA FE, RESPECTIVAMENTE, F1SCALEZACION: LA FISCAUZACION ESTARA A CARGO DE UN SINDICO TITULAR DES(GNADO POR LA ASAMBLEA. OWEN OURARA TRES CIERCICIOS EN Sus FUNCIONES. SIENDO REELEGIBLE, TAMBIEN DEBERA DESIGNARSE UN SINDICO SUPLENTE PARA EL SUPUESTO DE LA AUSENCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL INDIC° TITULAR, HASTA COMPLETAR EL PERICIDO. DESIGNACION DEL SINDICO: POR UNANIMIDAD SE DESIGNA 41. 5R. MAXINE ONO ROBERE, NACIDO EL 20 DE FEEIRERO DE 1975, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGEALTINCE DE ESTADO CIVIL SOLTERO, DE PROFESION COMTADOR PUBLIC°, DOMICILIADO EN ZAINO 2523 DE R05A8.I0, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE MENTON) 24.479.022, C.0,1.71 20.24479022-5, DE APELLIDO MATERNO POZZE COMO SINDICO TITULAR y A tA SRI& ESTEEANIA, COSTANZA MUSS. NAcIDA EL 16 DE NAIL DE 1984, DE NActoNALIDAD ARGENTINA. DE. ESTADO CIVIL SOLTERA DE PROFESION CONTADORA. COMICILIADA Et/ PELLEGRINI No 1936. 8150 3 DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL bE 1004110A0 30.685.420. C.U.I.T. 27- 30685420-3. DE APEWDO MATERNO PONS, COMO SINDICO SUPLENTE. EL SR. SINDICO TITULAR Y SUPLENTE PRESENTES EN ESTE ACTO. MAME-1E57AM SU ACEPTACION AL CARGO PARA EL CUAL HAN SILX) DESIGNADOS, FIR/4MM° AL PIE EN PRUEBA DE CONFORMUDAD ¥ FIJAN 1301312100 EN CAI LF ZAINO 2523 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSAREO EL siNDICO TITULAR Y cauF PELLEGRUE NRO, 1936, FESO 3 DE LI) CIUDAD DE ROSARIO EL SINDICO SUPLENTE. $ zap 187717 DiC. 18 FECHA: 20/10/2015 PROVE/CUE SANTAFE ROL: PRESIDENTE EVICT° SOCIETARIO DOCUMENT° SOE.: RAZON SOCIAL; ADINNISTRADORA DEPUEREO ROLOAN BARPM CERIUM SA. DOMICR10 SOC.L LOCALIDAD SOCE SANTA FE PROVINCIA SOC.: SANTA FE TMILO: DESIGNACION DE AUTONOMIES 7380 PUBLICACION: SOCIEDAD ANONIMA CAP. SOCIAL: EECHA DE COliSTITIUCION: ? ADNINISTRADOIM DE PUERTO ROLDAN BARRIO CERAM° S.A. DESIGNACION OE AUTORICIADES EL SENOR JUEZ DE 1 a INSTANCIA EN LO CIVIL Y COMERCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PCIA. DE SANTA FE, A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEICIO, tiACE SABER EN ASAMBLEA GENERAL ORDINARIA Y EXTPAORDINARIA F 'SENA 23/12/2014 Y 15/0912015, LOS ACCIONISTAS DE ADEUMSTRADORA DE PUERTO ROLDAN BAPRIO CERN= S.A. KAN RESUELTO LA SIGUIENTE INTEGRAL -ION DEL DIEECTORIO: DIRECTOR TITULAR Y PRES11)EIVE DEL DIRECTORIO: DAMIAN CALABRESE, 0,13.1. No 23.049.980, CUD' N° 20- E3049980-3.. CON DomiCRIO EN cALLE GLIEMes 2047 - 16 A DE ROSARIO. DIRECTOR TITULAR Y InCEPAESIDENTE ()EL DIRECTOR*: HECTOR RAUL BENI-OLAND. DNA 13.725.105. UAL 20-10726105,3. CON DoMICILIO EN cALLE COLON 1270, plso 2 DE ROSARIO. DIRECTOR TITULAR Y TESORERO DEL DIPECTORIO: EMIUD ZACCARDI, D.N.I. 23.472.381, CULT 20-23472381-3, CON DOMICILIO EN CALLE OEL. LAG° 107 DE PUERTO ROLDA.N - ROLDAN. DIRECTORES SI/PLEA/TES: JUAN PABLO EOSIN° SUM DOLL 26.375.702, CUIL 20-263757024, CON DOMIC0.10 EN CALLE IA LUNIA. NOTE 87 DE PUERTO ROWAN - ROMAN; ALM NOGLIEROL, 0.131. 20.298,950, CULL 20402989504. CON DOWER) EN EL LOTE 102 DE PUERTO ROLDAN ROLIDAN Y GERMAN MAXIMILIAN() LLODRA, DILL 23 7E1.103. COL 23-761103-9, DOMICILIADO EN r6I 18 JOSE INGENIEROS IP` 1485 DE ROSARIO. $ 48 274444 OCT. 20 FECHA: 27/10/2015 PROVNICIA: SANTAFE ROL; PRESIDENTE • EDICT° SOCIETARIO DOCUMENT° SO2.: RAZON SOCIAL.: 74111 ARIOURECTURA S.A. D0MICIU0 SOC.: LOcALIDAD SOC,: RosARID PROVINCIA SOC,: SANTA FE TRIM TRANSFORMACION DE S.R.L. (135,4.7180 DE PUBLICACION: SOCIEDAD DE RESPONSABILIDAD UMITADA CAR SOCIAL: 50000E0 FECHA CONSTRUCION: 7 MOR ARCARTECTURA S.R.L TRANSFORMACION EN SOOEDAD ANONIMA AUMENTO DE CAPITAL EN CUMPLIKENTO A LO DISPUESTO NA EL ARTICULO 77°, PUNTO 4., lir INC. 0) y 50 DE LA LET DE sOcieDADES COMErciALEs. No 19.550, SE HACE SABER DE IA TRANSFORMACION DE MOR ArtolifrECTuRA CUTO CONTRATO socLN., SE MAMA INSCRWTO EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMER= DE ROSARIO EN SECCION CONTRATOS AL TOMO 156, FOLIO 22.878, N° 1812 EN FECHA I DE NOVIEMORE 21105 Y MoDINC.ACIONES INSCMPTAS EN: A) CONTRATOS Al. TOMO 157, FOUO 18.120, N° 1403 EN FECHA 28 DE AGOSTO DE NOE; B) C.ONTRITE05 AL 70130 162. FOLIO 10.696, ti• 729 EN FECHA 17 DE MAYO LIE 2011; C) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 162, FOUO 17.537, /I° 1170 EN FECHA 20 DE /ULM OE 2011 Y 0) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 165, FOLIO 20878, N' 1301 EN FECHA 25 DE AOOSTO DE 2015, EN SOCIEDAD ANONIMA 'NOR AROUTTECTURE SOCIEDAD ANONIMA° Y AUMENTO DE CAPITAL SEGUE ACUERCO DE TRANSFORMACION DE FECHA 29 DE ENERO DE 2015. 1) DATOS DE LOS SOCIOS: DAMIAN CALAERESE. NACIDD EL 19 DE jUNIO DE 1973, TITULAR D.N.L N° 21049.980. EMT N' 20-23.049.980-3, DE NACIONALIOND AAGENTINO, DONICILIADO EN EN IF DORREGO 1973 PLSO 9 -A• 06 ROSARio, DE EsTACO CPAL CASADO. DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO Y LA SRA. MARLA SOLEDAD 501.443, NACIDA EL 7.2 DE FEBRERO OE 1978, ITILEAR DAL N* 26.538.367, CUTE te 27-26538367-5, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTINA. DOMICILLADA EN CALLE BRowN 821 DE GRANADERO SAIGORREA, DE ESTADO avti CASAIIA, OE PROFESION ARQUITECTA. LAS CONYUGES DE LOS SOCIOS PRESTARON EL ASENTIMIENTO CONYUGAL A LA TRANSFOMACION DE LA SOCIEDAD. 2) FECHA DEL INSTRUMENTO DE TRANSFORMACION. CAMEO° DE DEN0MINAcION 7 AUMENTO DE CAPITAL: 29 DIAS DEL MES DE ENERO DE 2015. 3) DENOMINACION:. "MOR ARQUITECTURA S.A.' CONTINUADORA POP. TRANSFORMACION "NOR ARQUITECTURA S.R.L.° 4) CADMICILM LEGAL: CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANIA FE. 5) SEDE SOCIAL: JOSE NERNANDia 1638, 6) °WET° SOCIAL: LA SOCIEDAD TENCRA FOR 08JET0: 1) EJECUCION, DIRECCION Y ADMINISTMCION DE EROYECTOS Y OBRAS CIVILES, HIORAULKAS, PORTUARLAS, SANITARIAS, ELECTRICAS, URBANIIACIONES, PAVIMENTO5 Y EDIFICIOS, INCWSO DESTINADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HOR/ZONTAL, CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS, VIVIENDAS, TALLERS, puENTEs. SEAN ELLOS 8UBL1C05 0 PRIVADOS; REFACCION 0 DEMOUCION DE 00PAS ENUMERADAS: CONSTRUCCION,REPARACION DE EDERCIOS VE TOME TIPO. 2) COMPRA Y VENTA DE MAIERIALES PARA LA CONSTRUCCION, ASI miSm0 PODRA IMPORTAR 0 EXPORIAR LOS 836855 SENALADOS EN ESTE PUNTO. 3) MILNISTRACION Y VENTA DE PROPIDEADES. 4) OTORGAR AVALES Y GARANTIAS ASI COMO CONSTITUIRSE EN COMLICORA SOUDARIA, USA. UANA Y PFUNCIPAL PAGADORA DE OBUGACIONES DE TEFICEROS. 7) PLAZO DE DURACION: IA DURACION SERA 06 NOVENTA Y NUEVE (99) ANOS A CONTAR DESDE LA fECIM DE SU INSCRIPCION ORIGINAL EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMEICIO, ES DECIR, LA SOCIEDAD TENDRA UNA VIGENCIA DE 99 AIDS CONTAD05 DESDE LA INSCRIPC/ON EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMEICIO AL TOMO 156, FOUO 22.878, No 1812 EN FECHA 01/11/2005„ 52 DEc(4 HASTA EL 01/11/2104, 8) CAPITAL SOCIAL: EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FEA EN IA Sum DE PESOS C)NCO MELONES ($ 5.000.000) REp RES ENTADO POR 5E100.000 /COOKS DE UN PESO IS 1) DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION Y UN (1) VOTO POR ACCION. EL CAprrAi.SociAL PUEDE SER AUMENTADO POR DECISION DE LA ASAMBLEA ORDINmuft, RASTA EL DUINTUPLo DE Su MoNTO. CONFORME EL ARTICULO 188 DE LA LEY 19.550. ADMINEsTRACION: LA ADMINISTRACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CARGO DE UN [ERECTOR* CONPUESTO POR EL NUMERO DE MIEMBROS QUE DETERMINE LA ASAMBLEA 6137136 UN miNEMO De UNO Y UN MAXIMO OE TRES, oulENEs DURARAN TRES E1E82I6IOS EN SUS FUNCIONES. EN EL MISMO ACTO SE DETERMINO EN DOS (2) EL NUMERO DIRECTORES TITULARF-S Y (1) EL NUMERO DE DIRECTORES SUPLENTES, PRECEDIENDOSE A IA DESIGNACION DEL PRIMER DIRECTORIO, QUE ESTARA INTEGRADO POR: DAMIAN C.AtABRESE, CON DOMICILIO E N CALLE DORREGO 1973 P150 9 EA" DE ROSA8)0, COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR CON EL. CAFtGO DE PRESIDENTE: SE DESIGNA A MARIA SOLEDAD SOLARI, CON DOMICILS° EN CALLE BROW/ 821 DE GRANADERO BAIGORRIA CON EL CARGO DE VICE-PRES IDENTE POR ULTIMO, SE DESIGNA. A mA)NmIUANO RORERT, CON DOMIC11.10 EN CALLE MORENO 132 BIS, COMO DIRECTOR SUPLENTE. 10) E1SCALIZACION: De ACUERDO A LO DISPUESTO POR EL ARTICULO 284 DE LA LEY 19.550, MODIFICADA POR LA LEY 22.903 Y POR NO 2674414 sOCIEDAD COmpRENDIDA EN ALGUNO DE Los StiptIESTos DEL ARTICULO 289. SE PRESCINDE DE LA SINDIcATURA, LOS ACCIONISTAS EIEFICERAN EL CCOITPALOR QUE CONFIERE EL ARTICULO 55 DE LA MENCIONADA DISPOSICION LEGAL, 11) REPRESENTACION LEGAL: LA REPRESENTACION LEGAL. DE LA SOCIEDAD, CORRESPONDE AL PRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTORIO Y PARA EL CASO 646 DIRECTORM PWRAL, AL VICE-PRESIDENTE EN CASO DE RENUNC1A, REmOCION 0 1M8EDIMENT0 DEL FEINER°, 0 AUSENCIA TEMPORAL. 12) CIERRE EJERCICIO SOCIAL: EL EIERCICIO CIERRA EL 31 be DICIEMBRE DE cADA Ario, $ 176 274879 OCT. 27 HOVE. EN LOS ALCMS SOLO SE 13480813311.4662831 DE INGRES° A LAS MESAS DE ENTRADA DE LOS DISTINTOS JUZGADOS PROVINCIALES, NACIONALES Y FEDERALFS, NO ES POSIBLE ASEGURAR. QUE LOS MI5E935 sE ENCuENTREN AcTivos 0 CONCWIDOS. POR LO TANTO DEDEN CONSIDERERSE COMO UNA REFERENCIA A YERIFICA.R. EN CASO DE NO NGURAR NUMERO5 DWI Y/0 CUrr INFORMACION DESE TOKARSE COMO UNA REFERENCIA A VERIFICAR. HABIDA CUE/TEA DE LA EXISTENCIA DE HOMONI/40S. 1NFORMACION DE SOCIEDADES NOMBRE: CALABRESE OMAN Lt, cc E cu 0 4- -c:s 0" cu 1,. 3) 0 >- C11 e-i (NI e-I e-I f••• CARGO: GERENTE DOMICILIO: DORREGO N° 1973 9 A SANTA FE SANTA FE RAZOR SOCIAL,: MOR ARQUFTECTURAS,R.L 30709405523 SERE: ZEVALLOS II" 2363 NOVEDAD: CONSTfTUCLFN PUENTE: BOLETIN OFICLAL DE IA PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE CAPITAL 1HICIAL: $50000 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk EDICTO: MOR ARQUITECTURA S.R.L. CONrRATO CONFORME AL ART. 10 DE LA LEY 19550 INTEGRANTES SENOR DAMIAN CALABRESE CASADO CON CANDELA ZAACO PEREZ ARGENTLNO DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO DOMLCILLA00 EN DORREGO N2 1973 9 A DE ESTA CIUDAD NACIDO EL 19 DE JUNTO DE 1473 D,N.1. NQ 23.049.980 Y LA SE00RA PAULA MATlAS EVICH SOLTERA ARGENTINA DE PRQFESION ARQULTECTA DOMICILIO SAN MARTIN 755 DE LA CIUDAD DE 11HEELi.jUUUT DE LA PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE NACIDA EL 28 DE (=IEMBILE DE 1977 D.N.L. NQ 26.203.450. RAZON SOCIAL MOR ARQUITECTURA SAD CONSTITUCION SEGUN CONTRATO A LOS 17 IUAS UEL MIS DE OCTUBRE DE 2001 DOMICILIO EN LA CALLE ZEVALl05 N= 2363 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. OBJETO SOCIAL 1 EJECUCION DtRECCION Y AOMINLSTRACION DE PROYECTOS Y DBRAS CMLES HIDRAUUCAS PORTUARIAS SANTTARIAS ELECTRICAS URBANIZACLONES PAVIMENTOS Y EDIFICIOS INCLUSO DESTINADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS 4 1ENDAS TALLERES PUENTES SEAN ELL05 PUBUCOS 0 PRIVADOS REFACCION 0 DEMOLICION DE OBRAS ENUMENADAS CONSTRUCCiON REPARACION DE EDIFICID$ DE TODO TWO. 2 COMMA Y VENTA DE MATERIALES PARA LA CONST1 UCC10N ASIMISMO PODRA IMPORTAR 0 EXPORTAR LOS DIENES SENALA00S EN ESTE PUNTO, 3 ADMINISTRACION Y VENTA DE PROPIEDADES. OURACION DMZ Mos. CAPITAL SOCIAL. PESOS CINCUENTA MIL $ 50.000 . ADMINI$TRACION Y REPRESENTACION ESTARA A CARGO DEL GERENTE SOCIOS D NO. USARAN SUS PROPIAS FIRMAS HAHIENDO SIDO DESIGNADO AL SENOR DAMIAN CALABRESE EN CAUDAD OE GERENTE HACLENDO USO DE LA FIRMA PRECEDIOA DE IA RAZON SOCIAL F15rNI>ACION LA HSCALIZACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CARGO DE T0005 Les SOC805, FECHADE CJERRE 31 D1CIEMBRE DE CADAAN0, $ 24 31290 NOV. 4 NOMBRE: CALABRESE DAMIAN CARGO: CEC-ELATE DOMICIL10: DORREGO 1973 PI50 9 OPTO. A ROSARIO SANTA FE RAZON SOCIAL MORE CONSTRUCCIONES SRL 30708091096 N O V E DA3: 140 DI FICAC IO N. ES TAT U TO FUENTE: BOLETIN 3F1I0L OE LA PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE EDICTO: MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R L, MODIFICACION DE CONTPATO POR DISPOSICION DEL JUEZ DE PRIMER& LNSTANCIA DE DISTRITO EN 10 CIVIL Y COMENC & NRO. 1 A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBLIC() DE COMERCIO ORDENESE LA PUBUCACION P0R EL TFPMINO DE UN DIA DEL SMUIERTE AVISO REFERI00 A EN FECHA 28 DIAS DEL MES DE AGOSTO DE 2007 L05 SOCIOS ORIGINARIOS SEBASTAN V .LTER MUt.HAIL. ARGENTIN° DE PROFE510N ARQUITECTO SOLTERO DOMICtLIADO EN CALLE AV. SCM4'kfZER NILO. 9078 DE ROSARIO NACIDO EL 28 DE FERRERO DE 1972 O.N.I. NRO. 22.684.206 Y DAMIAN CALABRESE ARGENT/NO DE P110FE5FON Am/INFECTO CASADO EN PRVA.ERAS NUPCIAS CON CANDELA ZARCO PEREZ DOMICIUADD EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 P150 9 DPTO. A DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO NACIDO EL 19 DE JUNIO DE 1973 D,N.L NILO. 23.049.980 HAN PROCEDIOO A VENDER CEDER Y TRAN5FERIR EL TOTAL DESUS CUOTAS SOCIILLES A FAVOR DE LOS SRES. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI ARGENTINO MAYOR DE EGAD 30LTER0 EMPRESARtO O.N.i, 23.402.596 CON DOMICIUO EN CAL£ AUJUY 120 DE LA LOCAUDAD DE AOLDAN PCIA DE SANTA FE Y EL 5R. DARIO GERMAN FERNANDEZ ARGENTINO FLAVOR DE EDAD SOLTERO EMPRESARIO 0.N.1 29.643.296 CON DOMICIU0 EN CALLE CORRIENTES 298 DE ROSARIO PCIR. DE SANTA FE EN to SIGUIENTE PROPOPOON A EL S0CI0 5EBASTIAN RAISER MUIRAii. CFO0 lA TOTAUDAD DE SUS CUOTAS sociALE5 0 SEA LA CANTtDAO DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS 2500 CUOTAS DE CAPITAL DE PESOS UNO $ 1 CADA UNA ES OEM LA SUM& OE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS $ 2500 AL SR. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI Y EL 50CI9 DAMN CALABRESE CEO)° TAMOIEN LA TOTAUDAO DE SUS CUOTAS 0 SEA LA CANTIDAD DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS 2500 CUOTAS DE CAPITAL DE PESOS UNO $ 1 CADA UNA ES DECIR LA SUM& DE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS $ 2500 AL 5R DARIO GERMAN FERNANDEZ LO QUE TOTALIZARON LAS CINCO MIL 5000 CUOTAS DE PESOS LINO $ 1 CADA UN4 Y UN TOTAL DE PESOS CINCO MIL $ 5.000 DE CAPITAL SOCIAL QUE PA50 INTEGRAMENTE A LOS CESIONARIOS. ASIMISMO 5E HA REVOCADO LA DESLGNACJON DEL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE COMO 50CI0 GERENTE DE LA SOCIEDAD DE MENCION Y SE HA DESIGNA00 AL SR. EDUARDO A.LEJANDRO CONTI COMO NUEVO 50C10 GERENTE. $ 3610180 OCT. 1 PUENTE: aOLET1NES OFICtALES, MESAS DE ENTRAI?A b1L PODERLUOICIAL. ,VIP II"L'FORINACION ADICJONiAL MARCAS DENOMINACION DE LA MARCA A AGUADAS NUMERO DE ACTA FECHA DE PRESENTACION TIPO CLASE RESOLUCION 2912090 30/04/2009 MIXrA 36 DENOMINACION DE LA MARCA: MOR DETALIES + AinplfarVap{INdormes/opraonesfmarcaVdescargar/29.12090) NUMERO OE ACTA 2912091 2912092 2912093 2912094 FECHA DE PRESENTACION 30/04/2009 30/04/2009 30/04/2009 30/04/2009 TIPO CLASE MtXTA 16 MIXTA 36 MIXTA 37 MIXTA 42 RESOLUCION CONCEDIDA CONCEDIDA CONCEDIDA DETALLES + Arnpllar (rapl/Informes/opciones/marcasldeReargar/2412091) + Ampliar (/aplAnformes/opclones/marcas/descaAgar/29120921 + Ampllar (/apl/informes/opciones/marcas/4es cargar12912093) +Ampllar (/apf/Informes/opclanes/marcas/dos cargar/2412094) FUENTE: AMP. DAMS PRONANILI5TIC05 PRAVISTOS POR 5 CAVAGE, ONCCA.. INP4, MAR, ENARGAS, ADMINIS MACiON TRIBUTARIA MENDOZA {1RA9.1C10N.RRf S9NAL REGISTRO GENERAL FECHA 08/03/2019 7.6:41:13 20/12/2018 13:26:35 04/051201813:26:10 07/12/2017 17:22:12 15/11/2017 08:55:15 16/06/2017 17:20:19 06/01/2017 1553:54 01/12/2016 10:58:35 DE CONSULTAS CONSULTANTE VERGARA IATINI Y MAGNI AGRUPACION PROFESIONAI. DE ABOGADOS MARIA MILVA DEL ROSARIO SANCHEZ CANA DE PREV1510N SOCIAL PARA AGRIMEN5ORES AROUI ROMERA ONGAY ROMANO CASTELL8NI IGT33 SA ROMERA ONGAY ROMANO CASTEUANI ESTUDIO JUR7DICO REVOL IAZADA MUTUAL DE MEDICOS 17/03/2016 09:57:35 09/03/2016 16:43:27 13/02/2015 15:51:36 21/1012014 1153:24 09/05/2011 16:1558 06104/2011 182151 12/051201813:00:28 LUXORNEGOC10S (NM081UARE05 SAN CRISTOBAL SMSG SAN CRISTOBAL S MS G SAN CRISTOBAL SMSG SINDICATURA CONCUR5AL EX 8(0 VAZQUEZ SABRINA MAIUA ASOCIACION MUTUAL INDEPENOENCIA LTDA Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk ORMACION AGREGADA POR EL. USUARK ) lAtencioni La information qua Tigura a continuaclbn fire adjuntada par el usuario bajo su estr)cta responsabllidad, Informal Argentina SA no se hate responsable de Is rnl n a. Let dates que adUunt5 el usuar1a al informs ROL satamente serSn Lnciuidos pars su future lmpresl6n o archive, pens no ser;in Intorporadas a los dates del titular del CUR o CULL nl a nuestras bases de dates, Se recuerda que to normative vigente establece el defecho al oivldo par to cual Ns dates antertores a 5 ai(os no deben ser conslderados nl deben IncIdlr en decisions eomerclales. EDICTOS POR DOCUMENT° BOSQUEDA DE EDICTOS POR DOCUMENT° FECRA: 03/12/201R PROVINCIA: SANTA- TIP°: SOCIEDADES EL FIDUCIAR(O PRORROUA El. SENOR DAMIAN CALIBRESE. D.N,L, 23.049.980, DE NACIONALDAD ARGENTIN°. DOMICIUA00 EN CALLE COMM) 1639 4 P1S0 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, DIVORCLADO, DE PROFESION ARQUrTECTO, EN ADELANTE DENOMINADO EL FIDUCIARIO EN EJERCIC)0 DE SUS FUNC(ONES DE CONSERVACION LLAMA PRZRROGAR LA4IGENCIA DEL FIDEICOMlSO TORRE CARDON, UOICADO EN CAKE iTAEJR 54 BI5 DE IA CIUl5tD DE ROSAPIO, A PARTIR DE LA FECHA DE VENCIMIENTO QUE OPERA EL 18 OE DICIEMBRE 2018. ATENDIENDO RAZONES PURAMENTE CONSERVATOPJAA_S DE L4 GESTION, Y ENCONTIlAN00SE EN PLENA EJECUCION EL 08jET0 DEL MISMO Y TENJENDO EN MIRIiS LA NECESIDAD DEC. CUMPUMIENTO, 0ESAR10110 Y CULMINACION DEL OBJETO. CONSIDER11400 LAS TAREAS PROPIAS DE UNA BUENA ADMINISTRACION Y DE UN BUEN GESTOR DE NEGOCIOS. ES QUE SE HA ,*SLIMED° LA NECESIDAD DE PRORROGAR POR EL PLATO LEGAL L05 PLAZOS PACTADOS OIIEGINARIAMENT£, EN 5JN70N(A CON LO PREVISTO POR EL ART. 1660 CCCN, TO60 ELL) SIN LA UiTENC)ON DE MODIFICAR LAS CLAUSULAS DEL FIDEICOM(S0. ASIMISMO OIVffAMOS A LOS ADHEIIENTES Y FLOUCWNTES Y/0 SUS CESIDNARIQS A AT;HERIR ANTES DEL 10,12.2018 A LA PRORROGA DEL CONTRATO DE ODELCOMIS°. HASTA EL PLAZO LEGAL (1663 CCCNI. LA PRESE)TE COMUNICACION 5E EFECTUA 51N PERJUIC(O OE OTRA NOTIFICACION QUE PUIUERA REAUZARSE A FIN DE ANOTICIAR LA DECISION A LOS FIOUCIANTES, BENEFIC1MIOS Y ()WAS SUJETOS VIHCULAOOS AL EMPRENDIMIENTO. A LOS FINES DE EDDA COMUNICACION PARA Y CON L05 FICUC(ANTES. EN RAZON DE HABER MUDADO EL DOMICILE° REAL OPORCUNAMENTE CONSIGNADO ORIGINARIAMENTE, SE ESTABLECE COMO NUEVO DOMEC(L(O LEGAL EL DE Ca11F DORREGO 1639 4 P1S0 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. S 135 375248 DEC, 3 DIG 5 FECHA:21/06/2017 • PROVINCIA: SANTA •TIPO: SOCIEDADES MOR ARQUITECTURA $ P..L TRANSFORMACION EN CUMPUI LENTO A LO DISPUESTO POR EL ARIICULO 77' PUNT° 4°, 10• INC. 9) Y 60 DE LA LEY DE SOCIEDADES COMERCLALES, NRO, 19.550. SE RACE SAAERDE LA TRANSFORMACION DE MORARQUPTECTURA5,R.L.. CUYO CONTRATO SOCIAL SE ENCUENTRA INSCRJPTO EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO OE COMERC(O OE ROSARIO EN SECCION CONTRATOS AL TOMO 156 FOLIO 22.878 N4 1812 EN FECHA 1 DE NOVIL•MBRE DE 2005 Y MOO(FICACIONES INSCRIPTAS EN: A) CONTRA -0S AL TOM° 157 FOLIO 18.120 NE 1403 EN FECHA 28 IX AGOSTO DE 2006; 0) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 162 FOLIO 10.69E FP 729 EN FECHA 17 DE MAYO DE 201I; C) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 162 FOLIO 17.537 N' 1170 EN FECHA 20 I E IL910 DE 2011: D) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 165 EOM) 20078 Nt 1301 EN FECHA 25 DE AGOSTO OE 2015 Y E) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 167 FOLIO 4387 N• 294 EN FECHA 10 DE MARZO DE 2016, EN SOCIEDAD ANONIMA. "MOR ARQUITECTURA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA' Y ALIMENT° DE CAPITAL_ SEGUN ACUERDO OE TRANSFORMACION DE FECHA 29 DE ENERO DE 2015. 1) DATQS DE LOS 5000S: DAMIAN CALABRESE NAC100 EL 19 DE JUNCO OE 1973, TBULAR DNI N4 23.049.980. CUR N4 20- 23.049,980-3, DE NACIONALIDAD ARGENTIN°, DOMIC(UADO EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 PESO 9 "A" DE R05ARL0, DE ESTADO CIVIL CASADO, DE PROFESION 8RQURECTO Y LA SRA. MARIA 50LEOAD SO ARI, NACIDA EL 22 DE FEBRERO DE 1978. TITULAR DER N• 26.538.367, CULT Na 27-26533367.5, OE NACIONASJDAD ARGENTINA, DOII C(UADA EN CALLE BROM 621 DE GRANADERO OAIGORRIA, DE ESTADO EVIL CASADA DE PROFESION ARQURECTA LAS CONYUGES DE LOS SOCIOS PRESTARON EL ASENT1M1ENT0 CONYUGAL A LATRANSFORMACION DE LA SOCIEDAD, 2) FECHA DEL O2STRUMENT0 DE TRANSFQPMACIOM. CAM810 DE DENOMINACION Y ALIMENT() DE CAPITAL: 29 D1AS DEL MES DE ENERO DE 2015 3) DENOMINATION; MOR ARQUITECTURA S,A. CONTINUADORA POR TRANSFORMACION DE MOIL ARQUITECTURA S.R.L. 4) 00MIC(LJ0 LEGAL: CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PRONNCIA DE SANTA FE. 5) SEDE SOCIAL: JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638. 6) OBJETO SOCIAL: LA SOCIEDAD TENOR* POR OBJETO: 1) EJECUCION, DIRECC(ON Y ADMINISTRACION DE PROYECTOS Y °BRAS C(VILES. HIDRAUUCAS. PORTUARWFS. SANITARI S, ELECTRICAS, UROANIZACLONES, FAA/MIENTOS Y EO(F(CIOS, INCU)SO DESTINAE05 A REGIMEN DE PROPIEOAO HORIZONTAL., CONSTRUCCION OE SILOS, VEVIENOAS, TALLERES, PUENTES, SPAN ELMS PURLICOS O PR)VADOS; REFACCION 0 DEMOUC(ON DE QSRAS ENUMERADAS; CONSTRUCCION, REPARATION DE EDIF(CIOS DE T000 WO. SE EXCUITEN TOMS CAS ACTMOADES QUE PUEOAN INCLUIRLA DENTAL) DE LAS PRE545TA5 EN EL ART, 299 INC. 4 Y TODA AQUELLA QUE RECURRAt1 AL AHORRQ DEL PUBUCO.- 2) COMPRA Y YENTA DE MATERIAL.ES PARA LA CONSTRUCCION, A51 MISMO PODRA IMPORTAR 0 ExPORTAR LOS DIENES SENALADOS EN ESTE PUNTO: 3) ADMINISTRACION Y YENTA DE PROPIEOADES, SE EXLUYEN LAS ACTTADADES COMPRENDIDAS E)J L05 ARTS. 1 Y 9 DE LA LEY L3.154: 4) OTORGAR *VALES Y GARANTIAS ASS COMO CONSTI UIRSE EN CODEUDORA SOUDA 1A, USA, LIANA Y PRINCIPAL PAGADOM OE OEL(GACIONES DE TERCEROS. 7) PLAZO DE DURACION: LA DURATION SERA DE NOVENTA Y NUEVE L99) *NOS A CONTAR DESDE LA FECHA OE 5U (NSCRIPCION ORIGINAL EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMERC(°, E5 DECIR, LA SOCIEDAD TENOR* LINA V(GENC(A DE 99 *NOS CONTADOS OE5DE LA INSCRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEPCI0 AL TOMO 156 FOLIO 22,878 N' 1812 EN FECHA 01/1132095, ES DECLR HASTA EL 01/11/2104. 8) CAPITAL SOCIAL: EL CAPITAL. SOCIAL SE FIJA EN LA SUMA DE PESOS CINCO MILLONE5 ($5.000.000.) REPRESENTADO FOR 5.000.000 ACCIONES OE UN PESO ($1: 1 DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION Y UN (I) VOTO POR ACCION, EL CAPITAL SOCIAL PUEDE SER AUMEtTTADO POR DECISION DE LAASAMBLEA ORDINARIA HASTA EL QUINTUPLO DE SU ONTO, CONFORMS EL AR1ECULO 188 DE LA LEY 19550. 9) ADMINISTRAC(ON; LAADhpNISTRACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTARAA CARGO DE UN DIRECTOR/0 COMPUESTO POR EL NUMERO DE MIEMBROS QUE DETERMINE LAASAMOLEA ENTRE UN M911M0 OE UNO Y UN MAXIMO DE. TRES. QU1ENES QUMRAN TRES E)ERC(CI05 EN SUS FUNCIONES. 10) FISCAI (7ACEON: DE ACUERDO A LO D(SPUE5T0 POR EL ARTICULO 284 DE IA LEY 19.550. MOOEFECADA POR IA LEY 22,903 Y POR NO ESTAR LA SOCIEDAD COMPRENDIDA EN ALGUNO DE LOS SUPUE5T05 DEL ARTICULO 299, SE PRESCINDE DE LA SINDICATUPA L05 ACCI0NIS7A5 EJERCERAN EL CONTRALOR QUE CONFIERE EL ART(CU1.0 55 DE LA MENC(ONADA DISP05(CION LEGAL. 11) REPRESENTACION LEGAL: LA REPRESENTACION LEGAL, DE LA SOCIEDAD. CORRESPONDE AL PRESIDENTE DEL D(RECTORIO Y PARA EL CA50 DE DIRECTOR° PLURAL ILL VICE-PRESIDEMTE EN CAS° DE RENUNCIJL REMOCION 0 IMPEOIMENTO DEL PRIMER°, 0 AUSENCLA TEMPORAL 12) CIERRE EJIRCIC10 SOCIAL; EL EJERCIC(0 CIERRA EL 31 OE DIC1EMBRE DE CADA ANO. $ 100 326551 JUN. 21 FEOM: 27/10/2015 • PROVINCIAL SANTA •TIPO(SOCIEDADES DOCUMENT° SOC.: RAZON SOCIAL: NOR ARQUITECTURA S.A. DOMICIUO SOC.: LOCALIOAO SOC.: ROSARIO PROVINCLA SOC.: SANTA FE TITULO: TRANSFORMACION DE S.R.L EN S.A. TIP° DE PUBUCACION: SOCIEDAD DE RE5PON5ABIUDAD UMETADA CAP, SOCIAL: 5000000 FECHA DE CON$TITUCION: 7 MOR ARQUREQTURA S,R.L TRANSFORMACION EN SOCIEDAD ANONIMA AUMENTO DE CAPITAL EN CUMPUMIENTO A LO D15PUE5T0 POR EL ARTECULO 77', PUNT° 4", 10' INC. 8) Y 60 DE LA LEY DE SOCIEDADES COMERCIALES, No 19,550, SE HALE SABER DE LA TPANSFORMACION DE MOR ARQUITECTURA CUY° CONTRAIL) SOCIAL 5E HALL* INSCRIPTQ EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° OE COMEPCI° OE ROSARIO EN SECTION CONTRATOS AL TOMO 156, FOLIO 22.1378, N• 1812 EN FECHA 1 DE NOVIEMORE DE 2005 Y MODIFICACIONES INSC#IPTAS EN: A) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 157, FOLIO 18.120, Li' 1403 EN fECIIA 28 DE AGOSTO DE 2006: 8) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 162. FOLIO 10,696, N° 729 EN FECHA 17 DE MAYO DE 2011; C) CONTPAT05 AL TOMO 152, FOLIO 17.537, N° 1170 EN FECHA 20 DE JULIO DE 2011 Y D) CONTRATOS AL 70M0 165, FOLIO 20878, N• 1301 EN FECHA 25 DE AGOSTO DE 2015, EN SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, MOR ARQUITECTURA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA Y AUMENTO 03 CAPITAL, SEGUN ACUERDO DE TRANSFORMACION DE FECHA 29 DE ENERO OE 2015. I) DAMS DE LOS 50C105: DAMIAN CA1A8RE5E, NAC1D0 EL 19 DE JUM° DE 1973,'TITULAR D.N.C. N' 23.049,980. CULT N' 20-23,049.980.3, DE NAC)ON4UDAD ARGENTINO. DOMICIUADO EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 PI50 9 A DE ROSARIO, DE ESTADO CIVIL CASADO, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO Y LA SRA, MAAUA 50LEDA0 SOLARI, NACIDA EL 22 OE FEORERO DE L978, TITULAR O,N.). N• 26.538.367, CULT N• 27-26538367-5, DE NACIONMIDAD ARGENTINA, OOMIC1L1ADA EN CALLE LLROVIL+1 821 DE GRANADERO BAIGORR:A. DE ESTADO CIVIL CASADA, DE PROFESION ARQUITE.CTA LAS CONYUGES DE LOS SOCIOS PRESTARON EL ASENT)MIENTO CONYUGAI A LA TRANSFORMACION OE LA SOCI80AD, 2) FECHA DEL INSTRUMENTO DE TRANSFORMACION, CAM0I0 DE DENOMINATION Y AUMENTO DE CAPITAL: 29 D(AS DEL MES DE ENERO DE 2015. 3) DENOMINACION: MOIL ARQU(TECTURA S,A. CONTINUADO)tA POR TRANSFORMACION OE MOR ARQUITECTURA S.R.L 4) DOP41U1.10 LEGAL CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. PROVINCIA DE SANTA E. 5) SEDE SOCIAL: JOSE HERNANDEZ 1630. 6) ODJETO SOCIAL: LA SOCIEDAD SENORA POR OBJETO: 1) EJECUCION, DIRECCION Y ADMINISTPAC/ON DE PROYECTOS Y OBRAS MILES, H1CIFLAULICAS, PORTUARIAS, SANITARIAS. ELECTAICAS, URBANIZACIONES, PAVIMENTOS Y EDIFICIOS, =LUSO DESTINADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HORIZONTAL. CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS, VMENDAS, TALLEFLES, PUENTES. SEAN ELLOS PUBLICOS 0 PRIVADOS; REFACCION 0 DEMOUCION DE OBRAS ENUMERADAS: CONSTRUCCIOILREFMACION DE EO)FICIOS DE TODO TIPO. 2) cOmppA Y VENTA DE MATETUALES PARR LA CONSTRUCCION. ASI MISMO PODRA IMPORTAR 0 EXPORTAR LOS BIENES SENALADOS EN ESTE PUNTO, 3) ADMINISTRACFON Y VENTA DE PROPIEDADES. 4) OTORGAR AvALFs y GARANTIAS ASI COMO CONST(TUIRSE EN CODEUDORA SOUDARIA. USA, LIANA Y PRINCIPAL PAGADOPA DE OBLIGACIONES DE TERCEROS. 7) PLAZO DE DURACION: LA OURACION SERA DE NOVENTA Y NUEVE (99) ANOS A CONGUI DESDE LA FECHA DE SU INSCRIPCION ORIGINAL EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMERCIO, ES DECK LA SOCIEDAD TENDRA UNA VIGENCIA DE 99 ANOS CONTADOS DESDE LA INSCRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PUBUCO DE COMERCIO AL TOMO 155, FOUO 22.878, NA 1812 EN FECHA 01/11/2005. ES DEM (-IASSA EL 01/11/2104. 8) CARP-AI...SOCIAL EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE F1JA EN LA SUMA DE PESOS CIRCO MILLONES (S 5.000.000) REPRESENTAG° POR 5.000,000 ACCIONES DE UN PESO ($ 1) DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION Y UN (1) VOTO POR ACCION EL CAPITAL SOCIAL PUEDE SER AUMENTADO POR DECISION DE LA ASAMBLEA ORDINMIA KASTA EL QULHTUPLO DE SU MONT°. CONFORME Et MODULO 19E1 DE LA LEY 19.350. 9) ADVINISTRACION: LA ADMINISTRACION DE LA SOCIEOAD ESTAR,A A CARGO DE UN DIRECTO= COMPUESTO POR EL NUMERO 01 MIEMOROS QUE DETERMINE IA ASAMOLEA ENTRE uN MINIMO DE UNO Y UN MAXIMO DE TRES, QUIENES DURARAN TRES EJEICICIOS EN SUS FUNCIONES. EN EL MISMO ACTO SE DETERMINO EN DOS (2) EL NUMERO DE DIRECTORES ITTULARES Y UNO (1) EL NUMERO OE DIRECTORES SUPLENTES. PRECEOIENDOSE ALA OESIGNACION DEL PRIMER DIRECTOR*, QUE ESTARA INTEGRADO PORI DAMIAN CALABRESE, CON DOMICIU° E N CALLE DORREGO 1973 (501) A DE ROSARIO. COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR CON EL CARGO OE PRESIOENTE; SE DESIGNA A MAMA SOLEDAD SOLARI, CON DOMICIUO EN CALLE BROWN 821 DE GRANACK11.0 BAIGORRIA, COIF EL CARGO DE V10E-PRESIDENTE Y POR ULTIMO, Se DESIGNA A mAXINILIANO ROBERT, CON DOMICREO EN CALLE MORENO 132 BIS, COMO DIRECTOR SUPLENTE. 10) FISFER SZACION: DE ACUERDO A LO D5PUESTO POR EL ARTICULO 234 DE LA LEY 19.550, MOOIEICM1A POR IA LEY 22.403 Y POR NO E5TAR 14 SOCIEDAD COMPRENDIDA EN ALGUNO DE LOS SUPUESTOS DEL ARTICULO 299, SE PRESCINDE OE IA SINDICATURA. LOS AC0E/FIESTAS qv:cm:IAN EL CONTRALOR QUE CONFIERE EL ARncULO 55 OE IA MENCIONADA DISPOSICIDN LEGAL, 11) REPRESENTACION LEGAL: LA REPRESENTACION LEGAL DE IA SOCLEOAD, COMF.SPONDE 41. PRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTORS° Y PARA EL CASO DE DIRECTORIO PLURAL. AL YICE-PRESIDENTE EN CASO DE RENUNCIA. 611400(0140 IMPEOLMENTO DEL PRIMEFLO, 0 A(3SENCIA TEMPORAL 12) CIERRE EJERCK10 SOCIAL: EL EFERCICIO CIERRA EL 31 DE DICEMBRE DE CADA MO. $ 176274879 OCT. 27 FECHA: 27/10/2015 - PROVINCIM SANTA- TWO: SOCIEDADES NOR ARQUITECTURA S.R.L TRANSFORMACION EN SOCIEDAD ANONIMA AUMENTO 01 CAPITAL EN CUMPUMIENTO A 10 DISPUESTO POR EL ARTKULO 77°, PUNTO 4°, 10' INC. 91 Y 50 DE tA LEY DE SOCIEELADES COMEPlial FS, N2 19.550, SE HACE SABER DE IA TRANSFORMACEIN DE MDR ARQUITECTURA S.R.L. CUYO CONTRAS° SOCIAL SE HALLA INSCRIPTO EN EL REG(STRO PUBUCO DE COME)310 DE ROSARIO EN SECCION CONTRATOS AL TOMO 156, FOLIO 22.878, AP 1812 EN FECHA 1 DE NOVIEMEIRE DE 2005 Y MOOIFICACIONES INSCRIPTAS Eh: A) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 157. FOUO 18.120, N' 1403 EN FECHA 28 DE AGOSTO OE 2006, 13) CDNTAATOS AL TOM 162. FOLIO 10.696, At• 729 EN FECHA 17 DE MAYO DE 2011: CONTRATOS AL TOMO 162, FOLIO 17.537. N' 1170 EN FECHA 20 DE JULIO OE 2011 Y 0) CONTRATOS AL TOMO 165, FOLIO 20878, N" 1301 EN FECHA 25 CIE AGOSTO DE 2015, Eti SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, MDR ARQUITECTURA SOC/EDAD ANONIMA Y AUMENTO DE CAPITAL SEGUAI ACUERDO DE TRANSFORMACION DE FECHA 29 DE ENERD OE 2015. 1) DATOS DE LOS SOCIOS: DAMIAN CALABRESE, NAVE* EL 19 DE ItINIO DE 1973, TITULAR D.N.L Ar 23.049.980, CUTS re. 20-23.049.980-3, DE NACIONAL/DAD ARGENTIN°, DONICILIADO EN FA: 36 DORREGO 1973 PISO 9 A OE ROSARIO. DE ESTMO CML CASADO. OE PROFESION ARQUITECTO Y IA SRA. MARIA SOLEDAD SCRAPA NACIFIA EL 22 01 FEBREP,0 DE 1970, TITULAR DOLL N' 26.538.367, CULT Fr 27-26538367-5, DE MACIONALMAD ARGENTINA, DOMICIUADA EN FA/ IF BROWN 821 DE GRANADERO 13A1GOR95A. DE ESTADO MIL CASADA, DE PRE/FE-SALM ARQUITECTA. LAS COTAYUGES DE LOS SOCIOS PRESTARON Et, ASENTIMIENTO CONYUCAL A LA TRAFISFORMACION DE LA SOC(1DAD. 2) FECHA DEL INSTRUMENTO DE TRANSFORMACION CAMBIO DE DENO/A/MVO/I Y AUMENTO DE 0461141 29 DIAS DEL MIS DE ENERO DE 2015. 3) DENOMINACION: MORARQUITECTURA SA. CONSINUADORA POR TRANSFORMACION DE ARQUITECTURA 5.R.L 4) 00MICI30 LEGAL: CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. St 5101 SOCIAL: y3SE HERNANDEZ 1638- 6) 08,1E70 SOCIAL: IA SOCIEDAD TENDRA POR OLLIETO: 1) EJECUCIDN, DIRECCION Y AIR4/NISTRACION DE PROYECTOS y LIBRAS GIMES. HICIRAULICAS, PORTUARLAS, SAN/TARIAS. ELECTIRCAS, URBANMACIONES, PAYINENTOS Y EC/WICK/S, RICILISO OESTIMADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS. VIVIENDAS, TALLERES, FUENTES, SEAN ELLOS PUBLICOS 0 PRIVADOS; REFACCION 0 DEFICEICION DE OBRAS ENUMERADAS: CONSTRUCC1011,REPARACION DE EDIFICE); OE TODO TIPO, 2) COMPRA Y VERSA DE MATERIALES PARA IA CONSTEWCCIOM ASI MISMO PODRA IMPORTAR 0 EXPORTAR LOS BlENES SENALADOS EN ESTE PUNTO. 3) ADMINISTRACION Y VENTA OE PROPIEDADES. 4) OTORGAR AVALES Y 4ARA141356ASI COMO CONSTITUIRSE EN CODEUDORA SOUDARIA, USA, LIANA Y PRINCIPAL PAOMORA DE Oa LIGACIONES DE TERCEROS. 7) PLAZO DE DURACIDIE tA DURACtON SERA OE ItOVENTAY NUEVE (99) ANDS A CONTAR DES DE LA FECHA DE SU INSCRIPC(ON ORIGINAL EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEAU°. ES DEUR. LA SOMME) TEMRA UNA VIGENCLA DE 99 ANOS CONTADOS DESDE LA INSCRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEPCIO AL TOMO 156. FOLIO 22.878.. N 1812 EN FECHA 01/11/2005, ES CMCIR MASSA EL 01/11/2104, 8) CAPITAL SOCIAL: EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FIJA EN IA SUMA OE PESOS CINCO MELONES (S 5408.000) REPRESENTADO POR 5.000,000 ACCIONES DE UN PESO (S 1) DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION Y UN 11) VOTO POR ACCION. EL CAPITAL SOCIAL PUEDE SER AUMENTADO POR DECISION DE LA ASAMBLEA ORMARIA RASTA EL QUIITTUPLO DE SU MOM, CONFORMS EL ARTICLE° 188 DE LA LEY 19.550. 9) ADINNISTRACION: LA ADMINISTRACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTAM A CARGO DE UN DIAECTORIO COMPUESTO POR EL NumERO DE MIEMBROS QUE DETERMINE IA ASAIMLEA ENTRE UN MINIM° DE UNO VON MAXIMO DE TRES. QUIENES DURARAN TRES EJEKICIOS EN SUS FUNC1ONES. EN EL M1SMO ACTO SE DETTERMINO EN DOS (2) El NUMERO DE DIRECTORES TEREATIES Y UNO (1) EL MINER° DE DIRECTORES SUPLENTES, PRECEDIENDOSE A IA CIESIGNACI014 DEL MAIER DIRECTOR*, OUE ESTAM INTEGRADO POTt: DAMIAN CALABRESE. CON DOMICIUO EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 P150 9 A DE ROSARIO. COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR CON EL CARGO DE PRESIDENTE; SE DESIGNA A MARIA SOLEDAD SOLARI, CON DOMICIL* EN ral I F BROW.' 821 DE GRANADERO BAIGORRIA CON EL CARGO DE VICE-PRESIDENTE Y POR ULTIMO, sE OESIGNA A MAXIMUM* ROBERT, CON DOMICIL* EN CALLE MORENO 132 8(5, COMO DIRECTOR SUPLENT0, 10) FISCALIZACION: DE ACUERDO A La DISPUESTO P011 EL AFTICULD 284 DE LA LEY 19,550,, MODIFICADA POR LA LEY 22,903 Y POR NO ESTAR LA SOCIEDAD COMPRENOIDA EN ALGUNO DE LOS SUPUESTOS DEL AFRICULO 299, SE PRESCINDS DE LA SINDICATUILE LOS ACCIONISTAS EJERCERAN EL CONTRALOR QUE CONFIDE EL ARTICULO SS DE IA MENC(ONADA DISPOSKION LEGAL 11) REPRESENTACKJN LEGAL: LA REPRESENTACION LEGAL EIE LA SOCIEDAD, CORRESPONDS AL PRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTOPJO Y PARA El CASO DE DIRECTORIO PLURAL AL VICE-PRESIDENTE EN CASO RENUNCIA, REMOCION 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL PRIMER°, 0 AUSENCIA TEMPORAL 12) CIERRE EJEFICICIO SOCIAL EL EJERCICIO CIERRA EL 31 DE DECIEMBRE DE CADA A140. $ 176 274879 OCT. 27 FECHA: 20/10/2015 - PROVINCIA: SANTA • TWO: SOCIEDADES DOCUMENT° SOC.: PAZ ON SOCIAL: ADMINISTRADDRA DEPUERTO ROWAN BARRIO CERRADO S.A. DOMICIL* SOC.: LOCAUDAD SOC.; SANTA FE PROVINCIA SOC.: SANTA FE TITULO: DESIGNACION OE AUTORIDADES Tipp OE pUBLICACION: SOCIEDAD ANONIMA CAP. SOCIAL FECHA DE CONSTITUCION: ADMINISTRADORA DE pUERFO ROWAN BARRIO CEPAADO 5.4. DESIGNACION DE AUTORIDADES FL SENOR JUEZ DE 1$ INSTANCIA EN LO CML Y COMERCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, (‚CIA. DE SANTA FE, A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBU0E3 DE COMEAU°, RACE SABER EN ASAMBLEA GENERAL ORDINARIA Y EXTRAORDINARIA DE FECALA 23/17./2014 Y 1S/09/2015, LOS ACCEONISTAS DE AORNISTRADORA DE PUERTO ROWAN BARRIO CERRACO S.A. ((AN RESUELTO LA, SIGUIENTE INTEGRACION DEL DIRECTOR*: DIRECTOR TriutAft y PRESIDENTE DEL ERRECTOFt10: DAMLAN CALA3RESE, D.N.I. NI 23.049,980, Curt- N' 20- E3049980-3, CON DOMICIUO EN CALLE GUENES 2047 - 16 A DE ROSARIO. DIRECTOR TITULAR Y VICEPRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTOR*: RECTOR RAUL BERTOLANO, 10.726.105, cUIL 2040726105-3. CON DORICILID EN cALLE COLON 1270. PLSO 2 DE ROSAR/0. DIRECTOR TITULAR Y 70508880 DEL DIRECTOR*: EMIUO ZACCAROI, D.N.I. 23A72,381. CUM 20-23472381.3, con 130MICIU0 EN CALLE 410 DEL LAGO 107 DE PUERIO ROLDAN - ROWAN, DIRECTORES SUPLENTESI JUAN PABLO FURNO SOU. D.N.I. 26.375.702, CUE 20-26375702-6, 0014 DOMICIL* EN CALLE LA LUIVIA LOSE 87 DE PUERTO ROWAN - ROWAN; ALEJO NOGUEROL, 0.N.I, 20.298.950, CUIL 20.20298950.1, CON DOMICILIO EN EL LOSE 102 DE PUERTO ROLDAN - ROWAN Y GERMAN MAXIMIUANO 1.1.0064. UNA 23.761,103, CUIL 23-761103-9. 00MICILIADD EN CALLE JOSE INGENIEROS N' 1485 DE ROSARIO. $ 48 274444 OCT. 20 'ECM: 20/10/2015 - PROVINCIA: SANTA- TIPO: SOCIEDAOES ROMINISTRADORA DE PUERTO ROWAN BARRIO CERFLAJDO DESIGNACION DE AUTORIDADES EL SENOR JUE2 DE 1' INSTANCIA EN LO CML Y COMERCIAL DC LA CIUDAD DE ROsAplo, PCIA, DE SANTA FE, A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMERCIO, HACE SASER EN ASAMBLEA GENERAL ORDINARIA Y EXTRAORDINARIA DE FECHA 23/12/2014 Y 15/09/2015, LOS ACcioNISTAS DE ADMINISTRADORA DE PUERTO ROLDAN BARRIO CERRADO S,A. NAN RESUELTO LA SIGUIENTE INTEGRACION DEL DIRECTORIO: DIRECTOR TITULAR Y PRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTOR*: DAMIAN CALABRESE, D.N.I. AH 23.049.980, MIT N' 20- 23049980-3, CON DOMICIL* EN CALLE GUEMES 2047 - 16 A DE ROSARIO. DIRECTOR TITULAR Y IACEPRESIDENTE DEL DIRECTORIO: HECTOR PAUL EIERTOLANO, D.N.I. 10.726.105, CUE 20-.10726105-3, CON DOMICIL* EN CALLE COLON 1270, FILSO 2 DE ROSAPJO. DIRECTOR 'TITULAR Y TESORERO ISEL DIRECTOR*: EMILIO ZACCARDI, DNA, 23.472.381, CUFT 20-23472381-3, cON DOW= EN CALLE AV. DEL LAG° 107 DE PUERTO ROLOAN - ROWAN. DIRECTORES SUPLENTES: JUAN PABLO FUER) SOLA D.N.I. 26.375.702, CUE 20-26375702-6. CON DOMICILIO EN 041.11 LA LURIA LOSE 87 DE PUERTO ROLOAN ROLOAN; ALEJO NOGUEROL. 20.298.950, CUIL 20-20298950-1, CON DOM101.10 EN B. LOTE 102 DE PUERTO AOLDAN - ROWAN Y GERMAN MAXIMIIJANO LLOORA, 0.14.3, 23,761,103. CUE 23-761103-9, DOMICILIADO EN CAU.E JOSE INGENIEROS Al" 1485 DE ROSARIO. $ 48 274444 OCT, 20 FECHA: 04/07/2013 IPROVINCIA; SANTA • TIPO; SOCIEDAOES AOMINISTRADORA EMPREND1MIENTO BARRIO PAIVADO AGUADAS S.A. ESTATUTO EL SE JUEZ EN PAMELA INSTANCLA EN LO CIVIL Y COMERCULL OE tA CIUDAD OE ROSARIO, PC1A. DE SANTA FE, 408600 DEL REGISTRO PUMICE) 01 coMErack, HALE SABER DE AcuERD0 A LOS DISPUESTO EN EL ARTICULO 10' DE IA u Q. 01) CU E .01 ui Ln E a.) 0 s- 0 CU s- 0 2- ) >- CT) 00 LEY No 19.550, QUE LOS SRES.; MARTIN FERNANDO TONE. NACIOD EL 29 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 1963, TITULAR DNI Ng 16,218.884, CENT 20-16.218.804-5, DE NACIOINADDAD ARGENTIN°, DOMICILLADO EN CALLE URQUIZA 1389 PISO 1* DEPT° 2 DE ROSARIO, DE ESTADO CM DIVORCLADO, DE PROFESION TECNICO ELECTRO MECANICO, QUIEN ACTUA EN EL CARACTER DE FIDUCIARIO DEL FIDE:COMM° iNMOBILIAINO FUMES AGUADAS Y DAMIAN CALABRESE, FLAW° EL 19 DE NNW DE 1973, TITULAR D.N.I. 23.049.9E10. CULT NRO, 20-23,049.980-3. DE NACIONALIOAD ARGENTIN°, DOMICILLADLO EN CALLE JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 DE ROSARIO, DE ESTADO CML CASADO, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO, QUIEN ACTUA EN SU CARACTER DE FIDUCIARIO DEL FIDEICOMISO DE INVERSION BARRIO FUMES AGUADAS, TODAS PERSONAS HAEILLES PAPA CONTRATAR, HAN RESUELTO CONSILIUM UNA ASOCIACION CML SIN FINES DE WCRO BAJO LA FORMA DE SOCIEDAD ANONIMA DUE GIPARA L3140 LA DENOMINACION ADMIMSTRADORA EMPRENDIMIENTO BARRIO PRIVADD AGUADAS S1. FECHA INSTRUMENTO DE CORSI/TUMID 274112012. DOMICN_10 SOCIAL: CIUDAD DE NINES. DEPARTAMENTO ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. REPUBLICA ARGENTINA. DOMMILLO LEGAL JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 DE ROSARIO_ FECHA DE CIERRE DE EIERCICIO: CIERRA EL 31 DE JUDO DE CADA AND, OBJETO SOCIAL LA SOCIEDAD. SIN PEASEGUIR FINES DE WCRO, TIENE POR OBJETO REALIZAR POR 51, POR TEFCERDS 0 ASOCIADA A TEFCEROS A LA ADMINSTRACION, DESARROLLO Y FOMENT() DE LAS ACTENDADES DEPORTIVAS. CULTURALES Y SOCIALES PARA SUS SOCIOS Y TEICEROS 0) LA CONSTRUCCION DE OBRAS CIVILES DE INFRAF_STRUCTURA Y TODD TIPO DE CONSTRUCCIONES RECEFLIDAS A IA PRACTICA DEPORTP/A DEL COMPLEJO URRANISTIC° EMPRENDIMIENTO BARRIO PFUVADO AGUADAS 5,3 C) ADQUERIR EL DOMINIC( DE INENES MUESLIS E INMUEBLES, NECESAMOS PARA SU FUNCIONAMELITO DI LA CONFECCION DEL REGLAMENTO IfE CONSTRUCCION PARA LAS PAFCELAS RESIDENCIALES QUE COMPONEN EL BARRIO PRIVADO, LA APRONACION DE PLANOS Y PROYECTOS DE LAS EDIFICACIONES A REALIZARSE Y EL CONTRALOR DE LOS TRABAJOS A EFECTOS DE QUE SE CUMPLAN LAS PREVISIONES DEL REGLVAENTO E) LA CONFECCIOM DEL REGLAMENTO DE CONVIVENCIA Y DE USO DE LOS ESPACIQS COMUNES F) LA PRESTACION DE LOS SETMCIOS GENERALES Y PARTICULARES EN EL AMBITO DEL DAPPIO PRIVADO G) LA SOCIEDAD SERA TITULAR DE DOMINIO DE LAS PAFCEIAS CORRESPONDIENTES A LDS ESPACIDS OE CIPCULAC/ON, ESRUCIMIENTO, DEPORTN05, CULTURALES Y OTROS DE APROVECHAMIENTO CONON DEL EARR/0 PRIMO AGUADAS. A TAL FIN LA SOCIEDAD TIENE PLENA CAPACIDAD JURLOICA PARA ALNIIWRIR DERECHOS Y REALIZAR TO00 TWO DE ALTOS Y CONTRATOS QUE NO FUERAN PROHIBIDOS POR LA LEY 0 ESTE ESTATUTO. ATENTO A SU OBJETO. LA SOCLEDAD INTEGRA Y CONSTITUTE CON EL SECTOR TLF_SIDENCIAL DE PROPIEDAD PARTICULAR, UN CONJUNTO INESCINDRILE, COMO 2.0 CONCEPTUAL/2A LA ORDENANZA 144/98 DE IA CIUDA.D De FUNES 0 IA QUE LA SUSITTUYA EN EL RITMO. LAS AREAS COMUNES Y LAS AREAS DE VIVIENDA GUARDAN UNA MUTUA E INDISOLUBLE RELACION FUNCLONAL Y JURIDICA, DUE LAS CONVIERTE EN UN TOD° INESCUIDIELE CAPITAL SOCIAL: PESOS VEINTITRES MIL CLIATROCIENTOS ($ 23.400) PLAZO De DURACIDN; NOVENTA Y MEW (99) ANOS CONTADOS A PASTER DE LA FECHA DE SU INSCRIPCION EN EL REGLSTRO PUDUCO OE COLAERCIO. ADMINISTRACLOM ESTA A CARGO DE LIN DIRECTORIO COMPUESTO DEL NUMERO DE MIEMOROS QUE RE LA ASAMBLEA ENTRE UN MUNRO DE UNO Y UN 44/00310 DE CHICO C014 MANDATO POR UN ANO, PUDIENDO SER REELECTOS INDEFINIDAMENTE. LA ASAMBLEA DERE DESIGNAR SUPLENTES EN IGUAL MAYOR NUMERO QUE LOS TMJLARES Y POR EL PLAZO DE UN EJEPCICIO A FIN DE LUNAR LAS VACANTES QUE SE PRODUJERAN, EL4 El. ORDEN DE SU ELECCLON, LOS DIRECTORES EN SU PIUMERA SESION DEBEN DESIGNAR PRESIDENTE Y UN VICEPRESIDENTE, EN SU CASO, ESTE CUM REEMPLAZA AL PRIMER° 646 CASO DE RENUNCIA, AUSENCIA 0 CUALQWER °IRO IMPEDIMENT°, EL DIRECTOFUO FUNCIONA CON LA PRESENCIA OE LA MYOPIA DE SUS MIEMBROS RESUELVE POR MAY0R14 OE VOTOS PRESENTES. EN CASO 116 EMPATE, EL PRESIDENTE DESEMPATARA VOTANDO NUEVAMENTE. LOS DIRECTORES NO PERCEILAAN NINGUN TIPG DE RETRIBUCION POR SUS FUNCIONES COMO TALES. EL DIRECTORIO POLNIA CREAR GERENCIAS PARA EL DESAAROLLO DE LAS ACTA/NIMES ESPECIFICAS DETERMINADAS POR EL MtSMO. RSCALCZACION: DE ACUERDO CON 10 DISPUESTO POPE EL ARTICULO 284 814 FINE DE LA LEY Ng 19.550 Y POR NO ESTAR SOCLEDAD COMPRENDIDA EN NINGLINO DE LOS SUPUESTOS A QUE SE REFIERE EL ARTICULO 299 DE LA MISMA LET, SE PRESCINDE DELA SINDICATURA. LOS ACCIONISTAS EJEACERAN EL DERECHO DE CONTRALOR QUE CONRERE EL ARTICULO 55 DE IA LEY Ng 19,550, POR SI MISMOS. °ANDO POR ALIMENT° DE CAPITAL SOCIAL IA SOCIEDAD QUEDE COMPRENOIDA EN EL ARTICULO 299 DE IA LEY DE SOCIEDA/3ES, EL DERECHO DE INSPECCION E INFORMACION DE LOS ACCIONISTAS ANTEMORMENTE REGLADOS, SERA REEMPLAZ ADO POR UNA Facia D'ACION, LA INESMA ESTARA A CARGO DEL SINDICO TITULAR QUIEN SERA SUPLL00 POR UN SINDICO StIPLENIE, AME OS DES IGLIADDS FOR ASAFABLEA Y DURAPAN EN SUS FONCIONES Litt EJERCICICE, SIN QUE SEA NECESARIA LA RETORMA DEL ESTATUTO. REPRESENTACION LEGAL LA REPRESENTACION LEOAL DE LA SOCIEDAD COARESPONDE AL PRESIOENTE 0 AL VICEPRESIDENTE 244 EIERCICLO DE LAS FUNCIONES DEL PRESMENTE FOR AUSENCIA IMPEDIMENT° DE AQUEL DETERMINACION DEL HUMERI) DIRECTORES Y DESIGNACION DE LOS MISMOS SE RESUELVE INTEGRAR EL PLMER DIRECTOR° CON TRES DIRECTORES TO -MARES Y TRES SUELENTES, REMNANT/0SE COMO DIRECTORES TITULARES A LOS SAES. DAMIAN CALABRESE, CON EL CARGO DE PRESIDENTE'AL SR. JUAN MANUEL GALLARDO. CON EL CARGO I3E VICEPRESIDENTE, A tA SRA. ASTIUD TAUZY, CON EL CARGO DE VOCAL Y EN EL CARACTER DE DIRECTORES SUPLENTES A LOS SAES. ALVARO RAMIRO GARNICA MARLA SOLEDAI3 SOLARI Y AL SR. MAXIM ROBERT. $ 201 2031911UL 4 FECHA: 18/12/2012 PAC/VINCl/4: SANTA - TIPO; SOCIEDADES DOCUMENT° SOC.; RAZOR SOCLAL VILLANOWL S.A. DOMICIIJO SOC.: JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 LOCALIDAD SOC.: ROSARIO PROVILICIA SOC.: SANTA FE TITULCE ESTATUTO TWO 06 PURUCACION: SOCIEDAD AROMA OIR SOCIAL '2000000 FECHA DE CONSTRUCION; 201203137 VILLANOVA S.A. ESTATUTO EL SfL JUEZ EN PIUMERA ENSTANCIA Eff LO MILT CONT:PCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. PCIA. DE SA.MTA FE A CARGO DEL REGISTPO PUBLIC° DE COMEACIO, RACE SABER DE ACUERDO A LOS DISPUESTO EN EL ARTICULO 10' DE LA LEY 3.9.550, QUE A LOS 13 DIAS DEL MPS DE AGOSTO DE 2012, LOS SAES: DAMIAN CALABRESE, NAC030 EL 19 DE JUNTO DE 1973, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN% DE ESTADO CIVIL CASADO, EN PRIMF.RAS NUPCIAS CON MARLA CANDELA ZAPCO PEREZ, DE PROEESION ARQUITECTO. DOMICIUADO EN TRIUNVIRATO 658 DE FLOSARLO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD No 23.049.980, C.U.LT. 20-230499$0-3, OE APELLIDO MATERNO MUNOZ; ALEJANDRO LASSAGA. RAMO EL 2 DE DICIEMBRE DE 1962. 116 NAC/ONAUDAD ARGENTIN°, DE ESTADO CP& CASADO, E8)FAIMERAS 14UPCIAS CON PATRICIA MONICA ACOSTA MEDINA, DE PROFESION COMEPCIANTE, DOMICILIAD° EN EV. ORONO 849 PIS° 8 VO. DEPTO. ?II? DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD NR0.14.729.570, C.U.LT. NRO. 20.14.729,570-8, 06 APELLIDO MATERNO CAPRILE; GERMAN LUIDRA NACIDO EL 16 De JUU0 DE 1974, DE NACIOLIAUDAD ARGENTIN°, DE ESTADO CIVIL DIVOPCIADO, DE PROFESION COMERCIANTE, 0014/CILI4D0 EN CAU-E JOSE INGENIEROS ti' 1485 DE ROSARIO. TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL 02 IDENTIDAD NRO. 23.761.103, CULL, NAO. 23- 23761103-9, DE APELLIDO MATERNO FERNANDEZ, HAWES PARA CONTRATAR, CONVENER IA CONSTRUCTOR DE UNA SOCIEDAD ANDNIMA, (NE OIRA,RA BAJO LA DENOMINACIOLI ?VILLA/LOVA SA.? FECHA INSTRUMENTO DE CONSITTUCL0f4: 13 DE AGOSTO DE 2012 SEDE SOCIAL; JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 COMICILIO LEGAL CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE, REPUBLICA ARGENTINA 22814402 CIERRE De EIE1C100: 30 DE JUNK) DE CADA ANO. OBJETO SOCIAL: DEDICAASE POR CUE.NTA PROPIA, DE TERCEROS 0 EN PART1CIPACION CON TERCEROS A: I, CONSTRUCCION INSTALACION, ADMINISTRACION Y EXPLOTACION EN INN-11E0LE PROMO DE 6188 PAROLEE NAUTICO Y/0 GUAM:LEM NAUTICA WO MINES, PARA IA PRESTACION DE SERVICIOS 06 GUAROA DE LANCHAS DEPORTWAS Y EMBAPCA.CIONES Y SERVICIOS COMPLEMENTARIOS. 2, IA ORGANIZACKIN DE UN SISTEMA QUE PEFLMITA LA 401481415171483014 Y GERENCLAMJENTO UNITICAD° Y CENTRAUZADO DEL USO Y GOCE. ARRENCIAMIENTO, PERMANENTE Y/43 TEMPORARM DE LAS CAMAS NAOTICAS POR PARTE DE LOS ACM/DS/AS YAO TEFCEPEOS, CESIONARIOS CE ESTOS DERECHOS. ESTE SISTEMA DE GERENCIAMENTO SERA URIC° Y OBUGATORIO PARA TODOS LOS ACCIONISTAS Y/0 TEICEROS. 3.- INSTALACION Y EXPLOTACION DE RESTAURANT, BAR. CONNTERIA Y PIZZERIA SALON DE FIESTAS CON EXPENDED DE BEBIDAS Y SERVICLOS AFINES„ PLA20 DE DURACION: LA DURACION SERA DE NOVENTA Y NUEVE (99) AMOS A CONTAR DE LA FECHA DE SU INS CRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PLJBUCO CONEPCIO, CAPITAL SOC/AL; EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FBA EN lASUMA DE PESOS DOCE MILLONES (S 12,00(1,040) REPRESENTADO POR UN MILLON DOSCIENTOS MIL (1.200.000) ACCIONES DE DIEZ PESOS (4 10) OE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACC10N. ADMINISTRACION; LA ADMINISTAACION ESTARA A CARGO DE UN DIRECTOR° COMPUESTO POR EL NUMERO DE MJEMBROS QUE DETERMINE LA ASAMBLEA ENTRE UN MINIMO DE TRES Y UN MAXIMO DE CIRCO, QUIENES DURARAN TRES EgIrICI°5 EN SUS FUNCIONES. LA ASAMBLEA PUEDE DESIGNAR SUPLENTES EN IGUAL NUMERO DUE LOS TITULARES Y FOR EL MISR° PLAZO, CON EL RN DE LLENAR LAS VACANTES QUE SE PRODUJERAN EN EL ORDEN DE SU ELECCIDM LA ASAMOLEA 0 LOS DIRECTORES EN LA PRMERA SESION. OMEN OESIGNAR 1414 PRESIDENTE Y UPI VICEPRESIDENTE, EN EL CASO OE UN DIRECTOELIO PWRAL, Y ESTE ULTIMO REEMP1AZA At. PRIMER° EN CAS° DE AUSENCIA 0 IMPEDIMEND3. L05 SUPLENTES DUE INGRESEN AL DIRECTORIO NO ASUMEN EL CARGO 08 PRESIDENTS 0 VICE-PRESIDENTE QUE EJEPCIA EL REEMPLAZADO, SALVO QUE 120 EXISTA OTRO DIRECTOR TITULAR PARA ASUMIRLD. ANTE IA AUSENCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DE ALGUNO DE LOS SUPLENTES, ELSINDICO DESIDNAFLA EL REEMPLAZ ANTE. SIEMPRE Y CLIANDO AFECTE EL QUORUM, Y CONVOCARA A ASAMBLEA GENERAL ORDINARIA DENTRO DE LOS 30 0145 SIGUIENTES DE ACAECIDD EL HECHO. EL OIRECTOTE0 FUNCIONA CON LA PRESENCIA OE LA MAMMA ABSOLLITA DE SUS MIEMBROS Y RESUELVEN POR MAMMA OE LOS VOTOS PRESENTES. LA ASAMBLEA FIJA LA REMUNERACI01.4 DEL DIRECTDRIO. CONFORME ARTICULO 261 DE LA LEY 19.550.7 FEEPRESENTACION LEGAL: LE CORRESPONDS AL PRESIDENTE 0 AI. VICE-PRESIOENTE, EN CASO DE RENUNCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL PALMER°. DETERMINACIDN DEL ROMERO DE DIRECTORES Y DESIGNACION: POR UNANIMEDAD SE DETERMINA EN TRES (3) EL NUMERO OE DIRECTORES TITULAPES, CONFORME LO DISPUESTO POR EL ARTICULO NO, DEL ESTATUTO SOCIAL PRECEDIENOOSE A LA DESIGNACION DEL PRIMER DIRECTORIO, QUE ESTAPA INTEGRADO POEN DAMIAN CALABRESE COMO DIRECTOR TITULN(. CON EL CARGO DE PRESIDENTE. ASPAISMO SE DESIGFIA A ALEJANDRO LASSAC4, COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR, CON EL CARGO DE VICEPRESIDENTE Y A GERMAN MAXIMILLANO LLODRA COMO DIRECTOR TITULAR, CON EL CARGO DE VOCAL. °INDIES DE ACUFF= A LAS MISMAS DISPOSECIONES DURARAN TRES EJERCICIOS EN SUS CARGOS. TODD LO CUAL ES APROBADO POR UNANIMIDAD. LOS SENORES DIFIELTORES TITULARES. PRESENtrES EN ESTE ACTO, MAMRESTAN SU ACEPTACION AL CARGO PARA EL QUE FUERON DESIGNAD05, FIRMANDO AL PIE DEL WSW) EN PRUEBA DE CONFORMIDAD. SE FIJA ADEMAS EL DOMICIUO ESPECIAL DE LOS SENOFLES OIRECTORES TITULARES. EN UN TOIYN ACUERDO CON LO DISPUESTO EN ELAIRICULO 256 IN FINE DE LA LEY 19.550, EN TRIUNVIRATO NRO, 658 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PCUL DE SANTA FE, EN CALLE Bo. ORONO 849 13150 8' OPT°. 787 DE RDSARLO, Pak DE SANTA 26 Y EN CALLE JOSE MGENIEROS Ng 1405 DE ROSARIO, PCIA. DE SANTA FE, RESPECTIVAMENTE FISCAUZACION: LA FISCAISZ ACI011 ESTARA A CARGO DE UN SINDICO TM.ILAR DESIGNADO 208 LA ASAMELFA QUIEN DUAARA TRES EERCICIOS EN SUS FUNCIONES, SIENDO REELEGIBLE, TAMEN DEBERA DESIGNARSE UN SINDICO SUPLENTE PARA EL SUPUESTO DE LA AUSENCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL SINDICO MAAR, HASTA CDMPLETAR EL PERIOD% DESIGNACION DEL SINDICO: POR UNANhMIDAD SE DESIGNA AL SR. /440IIMMA8)0 ROBERT, NACIDO EL 20 DE fEBRERO DE 1975. DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN°, DE ESTADO CML SOLTERD. DE PROFESION CONTADOR PUBLIC°, DOMICILLADO EN ZAINO 2523 OE IIIISARIA 'min AR C1F1 nnromENTA N8ri08861 02 ommErnan 7,t 470(17) C II T 7047,11170A77, 154 APgi I Inn 1.441F1010 PA77 rnmA NENINDATITI11/111 Y 8) . — 0) -C2 -C 0 CU 4-, 4-, E LL/ cn E CU eNI e-I s- s••• 4— r, Ts a 8 0 FECHA: 13/12/2011 - PRO VINCIA; SANTA - TIPO: SOCIEDADES GAVA S.A. ESTARITO EL $R. JUEZ EN PRWERA INSTANCA EN LO CML Y COMERCIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PCIA. DE SANTA FE, A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUNIC° DE COMEPCIO. HACE SABER DE ACUERDO A LOS DISPUESTO EN EL ARTICULO IN DE LA LEY 19.550. QUE LOS SIES. DAMIAN CALABRESE. NACIDO EL 19 DE JUNK} DE 1973, De NACIONALIDAD ARGENTIN°. DE ESTADO CML CASADO. EN PRIMERAS NUPCIAS CON MARIA CANDELA ZAPCO PEREZ, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO, 00IMICILIADO EN TRIONVERATO 658 DE ROSARIO, TTIULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTEDAD NI) 23.049,980, CUR No 20. 23049980-3 Y ALEJANDRO LASSAGA, NACIDO 51.2 DE INCIEMBRE DE 1962, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN°. DE ESTADO CML CASADO, EN PRIMERAS NUPCIAS CON PATRICIA MONICA ACOSTA MEDINA. DE PROFESION COMEPCIANTE, DOMICIUADO EN BY. ORONO 849 PISO 8 VO. DEPT°. 8 DE ROSANO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTIOAD Ng 14.729,570, CUIT 20.14.729,570.8; }WILES PIRA CON TM. HAN RESUEETO CONSTTTLIR LA SOCIEDAD GAVLA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA FECHA INSTRUMENT° DE CONSTITUCION: 13 DE JULIO 05 2.011. DOMICIUO SOCIAL: ROSARIO. SEDE SOCIAL JOSE HERNANDEZ 1638 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PM. CIE SANTA FE. MET° SOCIAL; IA SOCIEDAD TENDRIL FOR OBJETO DEDICARSE POR CUENTA PROPLA. DE TEPCEROS 0 EN PARTICIPACION CON TEFCEROS A: 1) LA CONSTRUCCION/INSTALACION, ADMINISTRACION Y EXPLOTACION EN INNUEBLE PROPIO DE UN PAROLE wilco Ivo GUARDERLA NADTICA WO AFIHES, PARA LA PRESTACION DE SERVINGS DE GUAVA DE LANCHAS DEPOPTWAS Y EMBAPCACIONES OE CUA/LQUIER TIPO Y GALAN), SEFEACIOS COMPLEMENTARIOS. 2) DESTALACION y EXPLOTACION DE RESTAURANT, BAR, CONFITERAY PLZZERIA, SALON DE FIESTAS CON EXPENDIO DE BELHDAS Y SERVICIOS REINES, PARA EL CUMPLIMIENTO DEL OBJETO INCCADO LA SOCIEDAD TIENE PLENA CAPACII3AD jURIDICA PAM. EJEFCER DERECHOS, CONTRAER OBLIGACIONES Y EIMER TODOS LOS ACIDS QUE NO SEAN PROHIEIDOS POR LAS LEYES 0 ESTE MTATUTO, ADEMAS LA SOCIEDAD ROOM PEAUZAR TOGAS AQUELLAS ACTIVIDADES COMEIVALES FIELATP1AS A FACILITAR EL LOGRO DE SU OBJETO SOCIAL, CAPITAL SOCIAL EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE ETJA EN LA. SUMA DE PESOS QUINIENTOS MIL. ($ 500.000) REPRESENTADO POR QUINISNTAS MIL (509.000) ACCIONES DE UN PESO ($ 1) DE VALOR NOMINAL CADA ACCION. EL CAPITAL SOCLM. SE COMPOSE OE CUATROCIENTOS NOVENTA Y OCHO I4E1. QUINIENTOS (498.500) ACCIONES NOMINATNAS NO EN0OSABL25 ORDINANAS DE UN PESO ($ 11 VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA Y UN VOTO POR ACCION. Y UN MIL QUINIENTAS (1,500) NOMINATNAS No ENDOSAEILES PREFERIDAS OE UN PESO IS 1) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA, SIN DERECHO A VOTO Y RELACIONADAS CON LAS PRESTACIONES ACCESORIAS DESCRIPTAS EN ELM:CIRO 5 DEL ESTATUTO. PLAZO DE OURACION: 99 ANOS. ADMINISTRACION: IAADMINLSTMCION ESTARA A CARGO DE UN DIRECTORIO COMPUESTO POR EL NU/4ERO DE MIEMBROS EWE DETERINNE tA ASAMBLEA ENTRE UN MINIM° DE UNO Y UN MAXIMO DE TRes. QUEUES QUMRAN TRES EJERCIC1OS EN SUS FUNCIONES. LA ASAMBLE-ADEBE DESIGNAR SUPLENTES EN IGUAL NUMERO QUE LOS TITULARES Y POR EL MISMO PLAZ 0, CON EL FIN DE LLENAR LOS VACANTES QUE SE PRODUJERAN EN El ORDEN DE SU ELECCION. SE DESIGN° EL PRIMER DIRECTORR3, EL CU& QUEDO INTEGRADO POR: DAMIAN CALABRE_SE COMO DIRECTOR TITULAIL CON EL CARGO DE PRESIDENTE. Y EL ALEJANDRO LISSAGA. COMO DIRECTOR SUPLENTE, QUIENES DE. ACUERDO A LAS AGSM* DISPOS/CIONES OURARAN TRES EIEPCICIOS EN SUS CARGOS. CL DIRECTOR TITULAR no DONECILIO„ EN UN TOGO DE ACUERDO CON LO DISPUESTO DI EL ARTICULD 256 IN NUE DE IA LEY 19.550, EN TRIUNVIRATO Ng 65/1 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PCIA. DE SANTA FE, Y EL DIRECTOR SUPLENTE EN CALLE 8V, ORONO 849 PISO (LE DPW. 8 DE ROSARIO. FISCAIIRACION: LA FISCALIZACK3N ESTARA A CARCO DE UN SINOICO TITULAR DESIGNADO POR LA kSAMELLEA, QUIEN DURARA TRES EJEECICKIS EN SUS FUNCIONES, SIENDO REELEGIBLE. TAMBIEN DEFIERA DESIGNARSE IJN SINDICO SUPLENTE PARA EL SUPUESTO DE LA AUSENCUL. 0 IMPEDIMEWO DEL swum YrnliAR, HASTA COMPLETAR EL PEFUODO, SE DESIGN° AL SR. MAXIMILIANO ROBEITE. NACIDO EL 2() DE FEBRERO DE 1975, DE NACIONAUDAD ARGENTIN°, OE ESTADO CML SEINER°, DE PROFESION CONTADOR PUBLICO, DOMICHJADO EN ZAINO 2523 OE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD 24.479.022, CULT 20-24479022S, COMO SINDICO TITULAR Y AL SR. GASTON ALBERTO SCAVONE, NACIDO EL 12 DE AMR. DE 1975, DE NACIONALICIAI) ARGENTLNIN DE ESTADO CML SOLTEREL DE pRonsvi CONTADOR, DOI4ICI114020 511 DORREGO Na 1973, PISO 9 A OE ROSARIO, TITULAR DELDOCUMENTO NACIONAL DE IOENTIDAD 24.396.953, CULT 2044396953.1, COMO SINDICO SUPLENTE, EI. SINDICO TITULAR EtIO DOMICIUO EN CALLE ZAINO 2523 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSATI* Y EL SINITIC° SUPLENTE EN /EMI g DORFLEGO Na 1973, PISO 9 A OE LA CIUDAD OE ROSARIO. REPRESENTACION LEGAL: IA REPRESENTACION LEGAL CORRESPONOE Al. PRESIDENTE Y AL ViCE-PRESIDENTE, EN CASO DE RENUNCIA 0 IMPEDIMENT° DEL FIRMER°. FECHA DE CIERRE DE EIERCILOOL 30 OE JUNIO DE CADA ANO. $ 98 154501 DIC, 13 FECHA: 08/02/2011- PROVINCIAL SANTA- TIP(); SOCIEDADES MUNISERVICIOS GASTRONOMICOS S.R.L. CONTRATO I) SOCIOS: EN LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SAIITA FE, A LOS 23 DIAS DEL MES DE NCIEMBRE OE DOS 141. DIEZ. SE REIMER SCATECA S.R.L., SOCIEDAD INSCRIPTA EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEECIO DE ROSARIO, EN FECHA 20 DE LXCIEMBRE DE 2010, AL TO)4C) 161. FOLIO 33572. INNER° 2285. REPRESENTADA POR St/ SOCC) GERENTE, EL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE, D.N.L Na 23,049.980 Y JORGE GUSTAVO ILATCHONDO, ARGENTIN°. COMERCULME, NACIDO EL 14 OE MAYO DE 1979, D.N.I. No 27.290.764. CASADO EN PRIMERAS NUPCIAS CON • CELINA GIMENEZ, CON OOMICILIO ER 04115 GRAL LOPEZ No 680 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. 2) FECHA DEL INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTMICION: EL 23 DE OCIEMBRE OE 2010. 3) DENOMINACION SOCIAL: MULTISERVICIOS (ASTRONOMICOS S.R.L. 4) DOMICIUO: LA SEDE SOCIAL SE ESTABLECE EN CALLE TRILINVIRATO 11a 658 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. PROYINCIA DE SANTA FE. 5) OBJETO SOCIAL LA SOCIEDAD TENDRA FOR 0131E70 DEDICARSE POR CUENTA PROEM 0 DE TEPCEROS, 0 MONACA A TERCEROS. A LA EXPLOTACION INTEGRAL OE NEGOCIOS DEL FLAW) GASTRONOMIC(); RESTAURANTE, BAR Y ROTSERIA, A TAL PIN LA SOCIEDAD ILENE PLENA CAPACIDAD JUNDICA RAM KAMM DERECHOS Y CONTRAER OBLIGACIONES y EIEFCER LOS ACTOS QUE SEAN PROEM/EMS PO0. LAS LEYES 0202 ESTE CONTRATO. 6) PLAZO DE OURACIONL OIEZ (10) ANOS A PARCEL OE LA FECHA DE SU INSCRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PUBLICO DE (OMERCIO, 7) CAPITAL SOCIAL EL CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FIJA EN tA SUMA DE PESOS CIEN 9421 ($ 100.0001. WOWS EN DIEZ Kt 410.000) CUOTAS DE PESOS DMZ ($ 10) CADA UNA, QUE LOS SOCIOS SUSCRIBEN E INTEGRAN DE LA 5 IGLEENTE MANERA: SCATECA S.R.L., SUSCRIBE CNN) MIL (5.000) CUOTAS DE PESOS DIEZ ($ 10) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA QUE REPRESENTA LA SUMA OE PESOS CINCVENTA MIL 50.090) Y JORGE GUSTAVE) (4ILICLIONDO SUSCRIBE CINCO MIL 45.000) CUOTAS DE PESOS INEZ (4 10) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA CRIE REPRESENTA LA SUMA DE PESOS CINCUENTA MIL (5 50.000). 8) ORGANOS DE ADMINISTRACION. DIRECCION r FLSCAUZACION: ESTARA A CARGO OE UND 0 MAS GERENTES„ SOCIOS 0 NO. A TAL FIN USARAN SUS PROMS FIRMAS CON EL ADITAMENTO CIE SOCK) • GERENTE 0 GERENTE, SEGUN EL CASO, PRECENDA DE LA DENOMINACION SOCIAL ACTUANDO EN FORMA INDIVIDUAL, INDISTINIAMENTE Y ALTERNATIVAMENTE CUALESQUIERA DE ELLOS. LOS SOCIOS GERENTES 0 LOS GERENTES REPRESENTARAN A Lk SOCIEDAD ANTE TERCERos, INSTITUCIONES Y/0 REPARTICIONES PUBLICAS 0 PRNADAS, NACIONALES, PROVINCIALES WO MUNICAPALES, LOS SOCIOS.GERENTES 0 LOS GERENTES EN EL CUMPLIMIENTO DE SUS FUNCIONES, PODRAN EFECTUAR Y SUSCRAIIR TWOS LOS ACTOS Y CONTRATOS QL/E SEAN NECESANOS PARA EL DESENVOLVIMIENTO OE LOS NEGOCIOS SOCIALES. sIN LIMITA410N ALGUNA, INCLUIDOS LOS ESPECIFICADJOS EN LOS ANICULOS 782 Y 2881 DEL CONGO MIL Y DECRETO 596S/63 • Alit 9, CON LA UNICA EXCEPCION PRESTAR FIANZAS, OARANTIAS AVALES A FAVOR DE TEPCEROS POR ASUNTOS, OPERAOONES o NEGOCIOS AJENOS A LA SOCIEDAD. LA FISCAU2ACION DE SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CAFIGO DE TOIXIS LOS SOC(OS. 9) FECHA DE CIERRE DEL EJEIC(CIO: EL 30 DE SEPTIEMEIRE OE CADA ANO. 10) GERENCIA SE Resueote DESIGNAA COMO GERENTE AJORGE GUSTAVO HATCHONIXL. $ 34 124324 FEB. 8 FECHA; 2311212010 • PROVINCIA; SANTA - TIPO: SOCIEDADES SCATEC.A S.R.L CONTRATO I) SOCIOS: EN LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE, A LOS 16 DIAS DEL MU DE NOVIENIBRE DE DOS MIL DIEZ, SE REUNEN ROBERTO LEL LAMA/at ARGENTIN°, COMNCIANTE, NACIDO EL 21 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 1953, DN.). Na 30.346.378, SOLTERO, CON DOMICIUO EN CAU.E ESPANA No 3445 DE LA CAJON:I DE ROSARIO • PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE; GASTON ALBERTO SCAVONE„ ARGENTINO, COMEFCIANTE, NAND° EL 12 DE MINI_ DE 1975, UNA. Na 24,3)6,053, SOLTERO, CON DOMICILIO EN 041.1.5 CHACADUCO No 1756 OE LA CIUDAD OE ROSAFIR), PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE DAMIAN CALABRESE, ARGENTINE), COMERCIANTE, NACIDO EL 19 DE JUNIO DE 1973, 0.84.1. No 23.049.980, CASADO EN PRIMERAS NUPCIAS CON MARIA CANDELA ZACCO PEREZ, CON DOMICR.R) EN CALLE nauNvirearo Na 658 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE, 2) FECHA DEL INSTRUMENTO DE CONSTITUCION: EL 16 DE NM/EMI/RE OE 2010. 3) DENOMINACION SOC(AL: SCATECA SAL. 4) DOMECILIO: IA SEDE SOCIAL SE ESTABLECE EN CALLE TRIUNVIRATO Na 658 DE LA CIUDAD OE ROSARIO. PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. 5) MIXT° SOCIAL: LA SOCIEDAD TENDRA FOR OBJETO DEDICARSE POR CUENTA AROMA 0 DE TEPCEROS, 0 ASOCIADA A TERCEROS, A IA EXPLOTACION INTEGRA/. DE NEGOCIOS DEL RA(40 GASTRONOMICO: RESTAURANTE, 8AR Y ROTISEPJA. A TA!. FIN LA SOCIEDADTIENE PLENA CAPACIDADJUNDICA PARA ADQUIRIR DERECHOS Y CONTRAER OFILIGACIONES Y EJEPCER LOS ACTOS QUE NO SEAN PROHIENDOS POR LAS LEYES 0 POR ESTE CONTRATO, 6) PLAZO DE DURACJON: DIEZ 110) ANOS A PARCEL DE LA FECHA OE SU (NSCRIPC)ON EN EL REGISTRO PUBLICO OE GE/MERCED, 7) CAPITAL SOCIAL: El cArn-AL SOCIAL SE FIJA EN LA SUMA DE PESOS CIEN MIL ($ 100.000), DIVIDIDOS EN DIEZ MIL 410.000) CUOTAS DE PESOS DIEZ ($ 10) CADA UNA, OUE LOS SOCIOS SUSCI%IBEN E NIEMAN DE tA SIGUIENTE MANERAL DAMAN CALABRESE, SUSCRIBE SECS MIL (6.000) CUOTAS DE PESOS DIEZ ($ 10) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA OUE PEPRESENTA IA SUMA DE PESOS SESENTA MIL (5 60.000); ROBERTO TETTAMANTI, SUSCRIBE DOS MIL (2.000) CUOTAS De PESOS coez (s 10) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA QUE PEPRESENTA IA SUMA DE PESOS VEINTE MIL a 20.0001Y GASTON ALBERTO scAvoNE, suscram DOS MI1(2.000) CUOTAS DE CAPITAL De PESOS INEZ (5 10) VALOR NOMINAL CADA UNA QUE REARESEUTA LA SUMA DE PESOS VEINTE MIL ($ 20.0003. 8) ORGANOS OE ADMINISTRACION, DIRECCION Y FISCALIZACION: ESTARA A CAAGO DE UNO 0 RAS GERENTES, SOCIOS 0 NO. A TAL FIN USARAN SUS PROPIAS pintos CON EL ANTAMENTO 05 SOCIO GERENTE 0 GERENTE. SEGUN EL CA50, PRECEDIDA DE LA nnonoutergno enrou twirl imunr. FM F1114146 ihananruist uurociurraucurp V 61TVERIATIVA ri CCM IICRL MC CI 1 AC I fIG C flele1C r:COCUrgt A LA SRTA. ESTEFANIA COSTA/42A MILESL NACIDA EL 16 DE ABRIL DE 1984, DE NACIONALIDAD ARGENTINA. OE ESTADO CIVIL SOLTERA. DE pitoFEstoN CONTADORA, DOMICILADA EN peutonna Na 1936, PISO 3 DE ROSARIO, TITULAR DEL DOCUMENT° NACIONAL, DE IDENTIDAD 39.685,420, C.U.I.T. 27 30685420-3, DE APELUDO MATERNO PONS, COMO SOIDICO SUPLENTE. EL SFL SiNDLCO TITULAR Y SUPLENTE PRESENTES EN ESTE ACTO, MANLFIESTAN SU ACEPTACION AL CARGO PARA EL CUAL 14ALY SCA DESIGNADOS, FIRMANDO AOPIE EN PFLUERA DE CONFORMIDAD Y FIJAN DOMICIUO EN CALLE ZAINO 2523 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO EL SINDICO TITULAR Y EN CALLE PELLEGRINI NRO. 1936, PISO 3 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO EL SIND(CO SUPLENTE. $ 200 187717 DIC. 10 CC 0_ a) u LOS GERENTES REPIIESENTARAN A LA SOCIEDAD ANTE TERCER05,+tNSTITUCI0NE5 Y/0 REPARTICIQNES PUfUCAS 0 MEAOA5,4NACIONALES, PROVINCIALES Y/0 MUNICIPALES. LOS SOCIOS GERENTES 0 LOS GERENTES EN EL CUMPUMIENTO DE SUS FUNCIONES, PODRAN EFECTUAR Y 5U5CRIEIR TODOS LOS ACTOS Y CONTRATOS QUE SEAM FIECESARIOS PARR EL DE5ENVOLVIMIENTO DE LOS NEGOCIOS SOCIALES, SIN IJMITACION ALGUNA. INCLUDE/5 L05 ESPECIFICADOS EN LOS ARTICULOS 782 Y 1S81 DEL COMO CIVIL Y DECRETO 5965/63 - ART. 9, CON LA UNICA EXCEPCION DE PRESTAR FIAHZAS, GARANTIAS Y/0 AVALES A FAVOR DE TEPCEROS POR ASUNTOS, OPERACIONES 0 NEGOCIOS AJENOS A LA SOCIEDAD. LA FISCAUZACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CARGO DE TOROS LOS SOCIOS. 9) FECHA DE CIERRE DEL EJERCICI0: EL 30 DE SETIEMBRE DE CADAANO. 10) GERENCIA SE RESUELVE DESIGNAR COMO GERENTE A DAMIAN CALABRESE. $ 45 122193 MAC. 23 FECHA: 04/12/2009 - PROVINCIA: SANTA - TIPO: SOCIEDADES MOR ADMINISTRADORA OE NEGOCIOS S.RL, CONTRATO POR DISPOSICION DEL SR. JUEZ DE 11. INSTANCIA DE DISTRITO, EN LO OWL Y COMERCIAL DE LA 1Q NOMINACION. A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMEIC:IO, DE ROSARIO, EN LOS AUTOS: MOR ADMINISTRAD0RA DE NEGOCIOS S.R.L, S/CONSTITUCION, 5/EXPIE. N2 405411E9. 5E HA 01SPUEST'O PUBLICAR EL SIGUIENTE EDICT°: FECHA DE INSTRUMENTO: 25 DE NOVIEMSRE DE 2009, SOCIOS: DAMIAN CALABRESE, NM ILXI EL 19 DE JUNIO DE 1973, ARGENTIN°, DNI. No 23.040.980, CASADO EN 1' NUPCIAS CON MARIA CANDELA ZAYCO PEREZ, ARQUITECTO, DOMICIWOO EN CALLE DORREGO Nit 1973 92 A DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO; ALVARO RAMIRO GARNICA. NACIDO EL 15 DE JUUO DE 1974, ARGENTIN°, ONI, N4 23.848.708, CASADO EN 1' NUPCIAS CON ANA CAROLINA NIEVA, ARQUITECTO. DOMICIUADO EN CALLE MITRE NQ 1666 10E 6, OE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO Y MAXIMIUM° Sa,00ERT. NACfE° EL 20 DE FEBRERO DE 1975. ARGENTIN°. DNI. No 24.479.022. SOLTERO, CONTADOR PUBLIC°, DOMICILUA.DO EN CALLE ZAINO No 2523, DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. DENOMINACION: MOR ADMINISTRADORA DE NEGOCIOS S,RL. DOMIOUO: JOSE HERNANDEZ NQ 1638. OE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO. DURACION: VE1NT1CINC0 (25) ANOS. A CONTAR DE LA fECHA LSE SU INSCRIPCION EN EL REGISTRO PUBLIC° DE COMET *, ODJETO: LA SOCIEDAD PODRA RFAI MAR TA SEA FOR CUENTA PROPIA 0 DE TERCEROS Y/0 ASOCIAQA A TERCEROS. EN EL PAIS 0 EN EL EXTERIOR LAS SIGUIENTES ACTIVIDADES: A) CONSULTORIA: PRESTACION DE SERVICIOS PROFESIONALES INTERDISCIPLINARI05 DESTINADOS A DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS DE INVERSION, GERENCIAMIENTO, ADMINLSTRACION, ESTUDIOS DE FACTIUWDAD, ESTUOIO DE MEPCADOS, RELEVAMIENTOS. 01AGNOSTIC05, Di5EN0, PLANIFICACIQN. EVAWACION Y ASESOFELEEENTO DE NEGOCIOS EN GENERAL Y 8) MANDATAR3A: EJEILCER MANDATOS. TAREAS OE ADI•RNISTRACION Y CONSULTORIA EN MATERIA INM08IUARIA. EN CIJMPUMIENTO DE SUS FINES, LA SOCIEDAD POORA REALLZA\ TOMS LOS ACTOS T CONTRATOS QUE 5£ RELACIONAN CON SU OBjET°. CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FVJA EN IA SUMA 0E CINCUENTA MIL PESOS ($ 50.000). DIVIDED° EN CINCO MIL (5.000) CUOTAS DE DMZ PESOS ($ 10) CADA UNA. ADMINISTRACENI, DIRECCION, REPRESENTACION: A CARGO DEL 5R. DAMIAN CALABRESE, EN CAUDAD DE SOCIO GERENTE. FISCALIZACION: A CARGO DE TOE/OS LOS SOCIOS. BALANCE GENERAL: LA SOCIEDAD CERRARA SU EJERCICIO EL DIA TREINTA (30) DE JUNIO DE CADA ANC, $ 44 87678 DIC. 4 FECHA 01E10/2007 - PROVINCIAL SANTA -TWO: SOCIEDADES RAZON SOCIAL, MORE CONSTRUCCIONES SRL ED1CT0: MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L MODIFICACION DE CONTRATO FOR DISPOSICION DEL JUEZ DE PRIMEBA'NSTANCIA DE VESTRFTO EN IA CM1. Y COMERCUU- NRO. 1 A CARGO DEL REGISTRO PUBUCO OE COMEPCIO OROENESE LA PUBUCACION POR EL TEIUWNO DE UN (NE DEL SIGUIENTE AVI50 REFERIDO A EN FECHA 28 DIAS DEL MES DE AGOSTO OE 2007 LOS SOCIOS ORIGINAR1)6 SEBASTIAN 1M2TER MLR HALL ARGENTINO DE PROFESION AAQUITECTO SOLTERO DOMICIUADO EN CAI I F AV. SCHNEFT2ER NRO. 9078 DE ROSARIO NACIOO EL 28 DE FEBRERO DE 1972 1331.1 14140. 22.684.206 Y DAMIAN CALABRESE ARGENTIN° DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO CASADO EN PNMERAS NUPCIAS CON CANDELA ZACO PEREZ DOMICIUADO EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 PI50 9 CPT°. A DE LA CIUDAD bE ROSARIO NACIDD EL 19 DEARER) DE 1973 D.N.I, NAO. 23.049.980 HAN PROCEDIOO A VENDER CEDER Y TRANSFERIR EL TOTAL. DE 5U5 CUOTAS SOCIALES A FAVOR DE L05 5RE5, EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI ARGEENTINO MAYOR DE EDAD SOLTERO EMPRE5ARIO D,N.I. 23.402.596 CON DOMICWO EN CALLE JUJUY 120 DE LA LOCAL10A0 DE ROWAN PCIA, DE SANTA FE Y EL SR, DARIO GERMAN FERNANDEZ ARGENTIN° MAYOR DE EDAD SOLTERO EMPRESARIO D.N.L 29.643.286 CON DOMICILIO EN CALLS CORRIENTES 298 DE ROSARIO PCIA DE SANTA FE EN LA SIGUIENTE PROPORCION A EL SOC10 SEBASTIAN YWLTER MULHALL CEDIO LA TOTAUDAD DE SUS CUOTAS SOCIALES 0 SEA LA CANT/DAL/ DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS 2500 CUOTAS D£ CAPITAL OE PESOS UND $ 1 CADA UNA ES DECIR LA SUMA DE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS $ 2500 AL SR. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI Y EL SOCK) DAMIAN CALABRESE CEDES TAMBIEN LA TOTAUDAD DE SUS CUOTAS 0 SEA LA CANEIDAO DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS 2500 CUOTAS DE CAPITAL DE PESOS LINO $ 1 CAOA UNA E5 DECIR LA SUMA DE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS $ 2500 AL 5R DAR10 GERMAN FERNANDEZ LO QUE TOTAUZARON 1A5 CINCO MR- 5000 CUOTAS OE PESOS LINO $ 1 CADA UNA Y UN TOTAL OE PESOS CINCO MIL $ 5.000 DE CAPLL:L SOCLAL QUE PASO INTEGRAMENTE A L05 CESIONAA105. A53M15140 SE HA REVOCADO LA DESIGNACION DEL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE COMO SOC10 GERENTE DE 1A SOCIEDAD DE MENCION Y 5E HA DESIGNADO3 AL SR. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI COMO NUEVO SOCIO GERENTE. $ 36 10180 OCT. 1. APEWDO Y NOMBRE: MULHALL SEBASTIAN PALTER DNI 22684206. CARGO: CEDENTE. DOMICILE): AV. 5CHNEITZER NILO. 9078 ROSAR10 SANTA FE, APELlIDO Y NOMBRE: CALABRESE OAMIAN DN123049980. CARGO: CEDENTE, CON11Cl/0: OORREGO 1973 Pl50 9 DPTO. A ROSARIO SANTA FE. APEWDO Y NOMBRE: PEREZ CANDELA ZAPCO, APEWDO Y NOMBRE: CONTI EDUARDO ALEJANDRO DNI 23402596. CARGO; CESIONARIO. DOMICIUO: AVE 120 NEUQUEN CAPITAL SANTA FE. APEUJDO Y NOMBRE: FERNANDEZ DARIO GERMAN ONE 29643286. CARGO: CESTONARIO. DOMICILE): CORRIENTES 298 ROSARIO SANTA FE. FECI1A: 01/10/2007 PROVINCIA: SANTA - TIP°: SOCIEDADES MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L MODIFICACION DE CONTRATO POR 035605ICION DEL 10E2 DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA DE DISTRITO EN LO COAL 'Y COMEICIAL NRO. 1 A CARGO DEL REGI5TR° PUBLIC° DE COMM*, ORDENESE LA PUBLICACION POR EL TERMING DE UN DIA DEL SIGUIENTE AVi50 REESER° A EN FECHA 28 DIAS CEL MES OE AGOSTO DE 2007 LOS SOCIOS ORIGINARIOS SEBASTIAN µALTER MULHALL, ARGENTIN°, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO. SWIM, DOMICIUADO EN CALLE A4. 5CIMEIrZER NRO, 9078 DE ROSARIO, NACI00 EL 28 DE FEBRERO DE 1972, D.N.L NILO. 22,684.205: Y DAMIAN CALABRESE. MGENTINO. DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO, CASADO EN PRIMULAS NUPCIAS CON CANDELA ZAPCO PEREZ, DOMICIUADO EN CALLE DORREGO 1973 PISQ 9 °PTO. A LSE IA MEAD ICE ROSARIO, NACI00 EL 19 DE JUNTO DE 1973, D.N.I. NRO. 23.049.980. HAN PROCEDI00 A VENDER, CEDER Y TRANSFEIOR EL TOTAL DE 5U5 CUOTAS SOCL4SES. A FAVOR DE LOS SRES. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI, ARGENTITE°, MAYOR DE EDAD, SOLTERO, EMPR85ARI0, O,N,I, 23.402.598, CON DOMICIUO EN CALLE JUJUY 120 DE LA LOCAUDAD DE ROLDAN, PCIA. DE SANTA FE, Y EL SR. DARLIO GERMAN FERNANDEZ. ARGENTIN°. MAYOR DE EDAD, SOLTERO, EMPRESARIO, D.N.1. 29.643.286, CON DOMICIUO EN CALLE CORRIENTES 298 DE ROSARIO, PCUL DE SANTA FE EN LA SIGUIENTE PROPORCION: A) EL SOCIO SEBASTIAN ;6LTER MIILHALL CEDID LA TOTAUDAD DE SUS CUOTAS SOCIALES, 0 SEA LA CANTRIAO DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS (2500) CUOTAS DE CAPITAL DE PESOS 11N0 ($ 1) CADA UNA, ES DECIR to SUMA DE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS IS 2500) AL 511. EDUARDO ALEJANDRO CONTI; Y EL SOCIO DAMIAN CALABRESE CE.010 TAMBIEN LA TOTAUDAD DE SUS CUOTAS, 0 SEA LA CAYTIDAD DE DOS MIL QUINIENTAS (2500) CUOTAS DE CAPITA. DE PESOS UN° ($ 1) CADA UNA. ES DECIR LA SUMA DE DOS MIL QUINIENTOS PESOS ($ 2500) AL SR. DARE) GERMAN FERNANDEZ. 1.0 QUE TOTALIZARON LAS CINCO MIL (5000) CUOTAS DE PESOS UNO ($ 1) CADA UNA Y UN TOTAL. DE PESOS CINCO MIL 1$ 5.000) DE CAPITAL. SOCIAL QUE PASO INTEGRAMENTE A LOS CE510NAR105. AS3MI5M0 SE HA REVOCADO LA DESIGNACION DEL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE COMO SOCIO GERENTE QE IA SOCIEDAD OE MENCION Y SE NA DESIGNADO AL SR. ELYUAR60 ALEJANDRO CONTI COMO NUEVQ 5000 GERENTE. $ 36 10180 OCT. 1 fECHA. 14(03/2006 - PROVINCIA: SANTA. TWO: SOCIEDADES RAZON SOCIAL: MORE CONSTRUCCIONES SRL 30708091096. EDICT°: MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L MODIFICACION DE CONTRATO CONFORMS A ARE 10 OE LA LEY 1,9.550 EN LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO A LOS 26 01A5 DEL MES DE DICIEMBRE DO 2005 EL SENOR PABLO ARIEL IAMI SOLTERO ARGENTIN°. DE PROFESION INGENIEA0 CORNICILIO DORREGO 28 BIS PI50 9 DT°. 8 DO ESTA CIUDAD NACI00 EL 15 FEBRERO DE 1973 D,N,1, N 0 23.242,045 Y EL SENOR SEBASTIAN µALTER MLii1ALL SOLTERO ARGENTINO DE PROFESION ARQUI TECTO DOMICIUADO EN AV. SCHV4EITZER NQ 9078 NAM) EL 28 DE FERRERO DE 1972 D.N.L NQ 22,6E4,206 SOCIOS DE MORE CONSTRUC CLONES S.R.L INSCRIPTA EN CONTRATOS T 0 153 F 0 9976 NE 1055 DE FECIIA 05 DE SETIEMBRE 2002 MOOIFICACIONES 10 155 FQ 23232 N 0 1813 FECHA 3/11/2004 Y EL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE CASADO CON CANDELA ZAFC° PEREZ ARGENTIN° DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO DOMICIUADO EN DORREGO N 0 1973 9 A DE ESTA CIUDAD MCI DO EL 19 DE JUNTO DE 1973 D.N,t. No 23,049.980 TODOS HABILES PARA CONTRATAR DEE DEN CELEBRAR EN ESTE ACTG EL PRESENTE CONTRATO DE CESIOH DE CUOTAS SUJET° ALAS SIGUIENTFS CLAUSULAS Y MODIFICAR EN CONSECUENCIA EL CON TRATO SOCIAL DE MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L COMO SEGUE PRIMER° EL SENOR PABLO MEL LAM VENDE CEDE Y TRAISFIERE A FAVOR DEL SENOR DAAi1AN CALABRESE DOS ML QUINIENTAS 2.500 CUOTA QUO LE PERIENECEN Y REPRESENTAN $ 2.500 PESOS DOS M1L QUINIENTOS DEL CAPITAL SOCIAL DE MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L EN CON SECUENCLI LA CLAUSUTA QUINTA DEL CONTRATO SOCIAL DE MORE CONSTRUCCIONES S.R.L QUEDA REDACTADA COMA SEGUE QUINTA CAPITAL SOCIAL FJ. CAPITAL SOCIAL SE FIJA EN 1A SUMA DE PESOS CINCO MIL 3 5,000 REPRESENTADO POR CINCO MIL CUOTAS 5.000 DE VALOR NOMINAL DE PESOS LINO $ 1 CADA UNA TOTAJMENTE SUSCRIPTAS E 04TE GRADAS POR LOS SOCIOS DE ACUEROO AL SIGUIENTE DETALLE 0A?41.EN CALABRESE El. CURL POSES 2.500 CUOTAS DE PESOS UNO $ 1 CADA UNA AS QUE REPRESENTAN $ 2.500 TOTA MENTE INTEGRADAS Y EL SENOR SEBASTIAN METER MULHALL P05EE 2,500 CUOTAS DE PESOS UNO S 1 CADA UNA LAS QUE ROPRESENTAN $ 2.500 TOTAJ4ENTE INTEGRADAS. NOMB1AMENT0 DE GERENTE AL SR. DAMIAN CALABRESE QUIEN SO OESEMPENARA CONFORMS LO ESTABLECIDO EN LA CIAUSULA SEXTA DEL CONTRATO SOCIAL. EL SR, DAMIAN CALABRESE ACEPTA EL CARGO PAPA EL CURL 5E LO HA NOMBRADO, Y EL SENOR PABLO MEL LAMA RENUNCIA AL CARGO DE GERENTE. 552 4494 MAR.14, CAPITAL WICµ 55000. APEWDO Y NOMBRE: LAMA PABLO ARIEL DNI 23242045. DOMICIUO: DORREGO 28 BIS PISQ 9 CATO. B ROSARIO SANTA FE, APELLJDO Y NOMBRE: MUIHALL. SEBASTIAN µALTER ONJ 22684206. DOMICIUO: A. SCHVIEITZER N' 9078 ROSARIO SANTA FE. APELLIDO Y HOMBRE: CALABRESE DAMUW. FECHA: 04112/2005 - PROVINCIA SANTA -TIP°: SOCIEDADES MAR ARfriRTErT1iRA G A 1 r6I1TRATdl T'ANFn3MF Al 40T lA lF 16 I FY 1QSSf• INTFf:146NTFC• CFN1R f76►1ILN r616RRFCF r6C6M rr3 4 r8h1f1Fi A 76Rff1 CrI E O O N 11 O n -O O O cu U i PEREZ. ARGENT/NO, 00 PROPESION ARQUITECTO. DOMICILLADO EN DORREGO LP" 1973, 9 A. DE ESTA CIUDAD, FLACK* EL 19 De jUNIO VE 1973, D.N.I. NC 23.049.980, Y LA SENORA PAULA MATIASEVICH. SOLTEM, ARGENTIN& OE PROFESION ARQUITECTA, DOMICIL* SAN MARTIN 755 DE LA CLUOAD OE WEED/ALIGHT De LA PROvitictA at SANTA FE, NACIDA EL 28 13E DICIEMBRE DE 1971, D.N.I. N26.203.450, RAZON SOCIAL: MDR ARQUITECTURA SAL CONSTITUCION SEGUN CONTRATO A LOS 17 DiAs DEL MES OE OCTUBRE DE 2005. DOMICIL*: EN LA CALLE EVAII.OS N' 2363 DE LA CIUDAD OE ROSARIO, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE. OBJETO SOCKL: 1) EJECUCIoN, DIRECCION Y ADMINISTRACION DE PROYECTOS Y OBRAS CMLES, HIORAULLEAS, PORTUARIAS, SANITARLAS, ELECTRICAS, URBANIZACLONES. PAVIMEWTOS Y EDIMCIOS, INCWSO DESTINADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HORIZONTAL. CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS, VIVIENDAS, TALI FRES, PUENTES, SEAN ELLOS PUBLICOS 0 PRIVADOS; REFACCLON 0 DEMOUCION DE OBRAS ENUMERADAS; CONSTRUCCION, REPARAC10/1 DE EDIFICIOS DE TODO TIPO. 2) COMMA Y YENTA DE MATERIALES PAM LA CONSTRUCCION, ASIMISNIO PODRA IMPORTAR 0 EXPORTAR LOS BIENES SENAIADOS EN ESTE PWJTO. 3) ADMINISTRAVON Y YENTA DE PROPIEDADES. DURACION: DIEZ ANOS. CAPITAL SOCIAL; PESOS CINCUENTA MIL ($ 50.000). ADMINISTRACION Y REPRESENTACION: ESTARA A CARGO DEL GERENTE SOCIOS 0 NO. USAMN SUS PROPIAG FIRMAS, HABIENDO 5100 DESIGNADO Al. SENOR DAMIAN CALABRESE EN CAliDAD DE GERENTE HACIENDO USO DE LA FIRMA PRECEDIDA DE LA RAZON SOCIAL FISCALIZACION: LA FISCALIZACION DE LA SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CARGO DE T000S LOS SOCIOS. EEO-IA{3E [TARE: 31 DICIEMBRE DE CADA ANO. 524 31290 NOV. 4 FECHA L 04/11/2005 PROVINCIA: SANTA - TIPO: SOCIEDADES RAZON SOCIAL MOR ARQUITECTURA 30709405523. ALTA DE LA SOCIEDAD: 17/1012005. SEDE SOCIAL ZEVALLOS N. 2303. LOCALIDAD: ROSARIO, PROVINCIA: SANTA FE, ECACTO: MOR ARCRINECTURA S.R.L. CONTRATO CONFORME AL ART. 10 DE LA LEY 19550 INTEGRANTES SENOR DAMIAN CALABRESE CASADO CON CANDELA ZAOCO PEREZ ARGENTINE, DE PROFESION ARQUITECTO DOMIEILIADO EN DORREGO Na 1973 9 A DE ESTA CIUDAD NACIDO EL 19 DE JUNIO DE 1973 D.N.I, Ng 21049,980 Y IA SENOPA PAULA MATIASEVICH SOLTERA ARGEFITINA DE PROFESION ARQUITECTA DOMICILIO SAN PATON 755 DE LA CIUDAD DE %KELM/LIGHT DE LA PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE HAMA EL 28 DE DICIEMBRE IDE 1977 DAL Nt, 26.203.450. RAZON SOCIAL MOR ARQUITECTURA S.FLL CONSTITUCION SEGUN CONTRATO A LOS 17 DIAS DEL MES DE OCTUBRE DE 2005. DOMICIL* EN IA CALLE ZEVALL05 Na 2363 DE LA CIUDAD DE ROSARIO PROVINCIA DE SANTA P0. OBJETO SOCIAL 1 EJECUCION DIRECCION Y ADMINISTRACION DE PROYECTOS Y OBRAS CIVILES HIDPAULICAS PORTUARIAS SANITARIAS ELECTRICAS LIRSAMEACIONES PIMENTOS Y EDIFICIOS INCWSO DESTINADOS A REGIMEN DE PROPIEDAD HORIZONTAL CONSTRUCCION DE SILOS 11114ENDAS TALLERES PUENTES SEAN RIDS puaucos 0 PRIVADOS REFAcctori 0 DEMOUCtON DE OORAS ENUMERADAS CONSTRUCCION REMACION DE ED4F1CLOS DE TODD WO, 2 COMPRA Y VENTA DE MATERIALES PARA LA CONSTRUCCION ASIMISMO ?ODRA !MORTAR 0 EXPORIAR LOS DIENES SENALADOS EN ESTE PUNT°, 3 ADMISTRACION Y VENTA IDE PROPIEDADES. OURACION OIEZ ANC'S. CAPITAL SOCIAL PESOS CINCUENTA MIL $ 50.000 . ADMINISTRACION Y REPRESENTACION ESTAM A CARGO DEL GERENTE SOCIOS 0 NO. USMAN SUS PROPLAS MAMAS HADIENDO 5100 DESIGN= AL SENOR DAMIAN CALABRESE En CAUDAL) DE GERENTE HACIENDO USO OE LA FIRMA PRECEDIDA DE LA RAZON SOCIAL- RSCALIZACION 1.4 FISCAUZACION oo tA SOCIEDAD ESTARA A CMG° DE TOWS LOS SOWS, FECHA IDE CIERRE 31 DICIEMBRE DE CADA ANIL $ 24 31290 NOV. 4. CAPITAL INICIALL 550000. APELUDO Y NOMBRE.: CALASRF_SE DAMIAN DM 23049980. CARGO; GERENTE. DOMICIL*: DORREGO N' 1973 9 A SANTA FE SANTA FE, APELUDO Y NOMBRE: MAWS EVICH PAULA DM 36203450. CAAGO: PRESIDENTS. DOMICILIO: SAN MARTIN 755 V,FIEELVSOGHT SANTA FE. RESULTADOS PAPA LA B1)SQUEDA 23049980 EN SANTA FE AGREGADOS POR ALLENDE ELIA/03/2019 ALAS 1849. Este Leanne no supono juldo de valor referente al titular de los dates o a su solvencia Mende respansabBidad exclusive del consuPante la valoracl6n y decision a to clue arribe, el consultente se cornpromete a utillzar la Informaci6n sumlnistrada unicamente para la celebraclOn y evaluacido de negocias, a fin de sontar sort on element° mas de anfiEsIs para operasiones con la persona titular de los datos. a guardar total confidencialldad y re_serva del inforrne solicRado y redbtdo, as1 coma tarobien abstenerSe de divulgar, exhIblr. reproducir y/o transmitlr, grati.dt3 u arterosamenta. La InformaciOn sLamialstrada par Informer Argentina SA a terceras personas a al titular de los datos. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 10 Cf.> Bilzin Sumberg March 1, 2019 Via Hand Delivery The Hon. Ken Russell, Chairman The Hon, Wilfredo Gort, Vice -Chairman The Hon. Joe Carollo, District 3 The Hon. Manolo Reyes, District 4 The Hon. Keon Hardemon, District 5 City ofMiami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 Albert E. Dotson, Jr, Esq. Tel 30i-3SO-2411 asipsonfi.011:111.com Re: Virginia Key Marina / Damian Calabrese's Bankruptcy Is Not a Needle in the Haystack: It's the Haystack. Dear Honorable Commissioners: As you know, this firm represents Virginia Key LLC, the twice-recorrunended proposer for the redevelopment of the Virginia Key marina. As you also know, the City's holdover tenant at the marina, Rickenbacker Marina, Inc. ("Rickenbacker") and its alter -ego, Biscayne Marine Partners ("BMP"), continues to enjoy the benefit of a bizarre settlement agreement, which purports to permit Rickenbacker to extend its lease (which expired in 2016) for as long as it continues to appeal Virginia Key LLC's victory. For Rickenbacker, that settlement agreement has truly been a gift that keeps on giving. Despite having lost before two selection committees, an independent hearing examiner, three circuit court judges (twice), and three Third DCA judges, Rickenbacker continues to profit from the City's property —and predictably continues to come forward with more and more bid protests. As we explained at the February 28 Cortunission meeting, Damian Calabrese, one of only three principals of Emp, is currently mired in scandal in Argentina, including accusations of fraud, and his company recently filed for bankruptcy. Incredibly, the very project that BMP hailed as Mr. Calabrese's relevant experience (the Tifon Water Planet) is at the center of the reported scandal and the bankruptcy. Attached are some of the references to Mr. Calabrese and the Tifon Water Planet project in BMP's proposal, However, the attached news articles from Argentina report that: Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The Hon, Ken Russell, Chairman Hon, Ciry of Miami Ctiy Commissioners March 1, 2019 Page 2 Biizin Sumberg • Mr. Calabrese and his company Villanova S.A. wrote more than a million dollars in bad checks, accumulated $12 million in debt, and have been accused of defrauding 3,000 investors of more than $30 million in connection with the project. • Mr. Calabrese was criminally denounced for fraud and prohibited from making further sales in his project. • Mr. Calabrese's company, Villanova S.A., has filed for bankruptcy. The importance of Mr. Calabrese and his project, Tifon Water Planet, to BMP's proposal cannot be overstated, BMP's proposal is littered with references to this project and Mr. Calabrese. who is one of only three principals of BMP (along with Aabad Melwnni and Diego Ardid). In BMP's own words: Mr. Calabrese founded Tifon Water Planet in 2011 with the goal of designing, building, and operating the world's most innovative automated boat storage and facilities, currently providing for 1500 automated dry slips. Mr. Calabrese's involvement earns Marina PARC Miami the profound distinction of being the only proposer that has designed, built, and is currently operating two successful state of the art automated boat storage facilities. Given this distinction, it should follow that Marina PARC Miami is the proposer most qualified and capable in providing for a state of the art automated boat storage facility on this uniquely situated site on Virginia Key. For a glimpse into the future, please visit: http://www.tifonwaterplanet.corni and access the flash drive included with this submittal. This is not a minor or insignificant issue. This is not a manufactured controversy about a subcontractor that a proposer is not required to use. These articles are about alleged fraud by a principal. Sincerely, Albert E. Dotson, Jr. MIAMI 6258479.2 74183/46889 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 1 Civarderia nautica fue a concurso pero arma plan para salir a note Page 1 of 3 Judiciales 24.05,2018 12:591 Fuente: Panto Biz Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Desarrollo en problems Guarderia nautica fue a concurso pero arma plan para salir a flote Afronta compromisos impagos por al menos $ 12 M, hasta el 4 de julio se podran verificar creditos. La firma Villanova SA, que pilotea el desarrollo de la guarderia naCitica Tifon de Tigre afronta una convocatoria de acreedores por una deuda de al menos $ 12 M. haps ://puntob iz. cam. a enoticiasival/117861/val_sil 09/guarderia-nautica-fue-a-concurso-pe... 2/27/2019 (Juarderia nautica tue a concurs() pero arena plan para salir a flote Page 2 of 3 El procedimiento judicial es la consecuencia de un pedido de quiebra presented° en Buenos Aires, que se traslado a los tribunales de Rosario porque Ia firma esta asentada en Granadero Baigorria. La jueza Ver.&lice Gotlieb, que tiene a su cargo el expediente, fijo el 4 de julio como fecha limite para Ia presentaciOn del pedido de verificacion de creditos ante Ia sindicatura, La guarderia Tifon Water Planet Tigre fue Ianzada en 2013 como una iniciativa del grupo desarrollador rosarino MOR, como secuela de la exitosa colocaciOn con la misma marca en Granadero Baigorria, un ernprendimiento que responde a otra razOn social y no figura en este convocatoria de acreedores. Al igual que en Baigorria, et disello de la guarderfa tuvo el respaido del estudio italiano Pininfarina, especlalizado en disefios de alta gama. Empiazado el proyecto sabre el rio Lujan, desplegO su oferta para atbergar fuera del agua y bajo techo unas 4.000 embarcaciones, empties superficies destinadas a estacionamiento, servicios gestroncimicos, area comercial, Lounge VIP, vestuarios y servicio meanie°. El grupo desarrollador del proyecto tigrense, encabezado por el empresario rosarino Damian Calabrese, tropezO con inconvenientes financieros: acumulo unos $ 12 M en deudas con acreedores -entre ellos la Afip- y emitiO cheques por $1.12 M que fueron rechazados, entre septiembre de 2016 y octubre de 2017. Consultado por Punto blz, Calabrese relatO que "situaciOn de crisis sobrevino cuando el proyecto no estaba consolidado, estaba mucho menos maduro que el de Baigorria y eso nos perjudiccr. Para afrontar los problemas que sufrieron varios de sus proyectos, Calabrese avanzO el atlo pasado con la reestructuraciOn de su desarrolladora MOR, erre& con inversores una fOrmula para darle continuidad a los fideicomisos de tas tones Cardon y Aerealis en Rosario y tambien tiene un plan para que Tifon Tigre puede seguir adelante. "La idea es salir de la situation !legend° a un arreglo con los acreedores, diversificando el proyecto, sumando un proyecto inmobiliario y agregando el aporte de nuevos socios", destacd. La jueza Gotlieb le puso fecha del 2 de febrero de 2019 para que la empresa concursada https://puntobiz.com.ar/noticiasival/117861/vals/109/guarderia-nautica-fue-a-concurso-pe... 2/27/2019 0_ CI) 0 E V) -1 LU cc (cpl E (1.) " 1- (-I 0 .0 - 0 0 0 a) 0 0 Warder-1a miutica fue a coneurso pero arrna plan pars salir a note Page 3 of 3 haga ptiblica su propuesta. punto rtir, Contactarse con Punto Biz / Staff Copyright 2019 puntobize Todos los derechos reservados Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Este sitlo esta protegldo por reCAPTCHA y Google polftica de orb/added y Se aplican Terminos de servicio, https://puntobiz.com.ar/noticias/va1/117861/val_s/109/guarderia.nautica-fue-a-coneurso-pe.„ 2/27/2019 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 2 llenuncian a empresa rosarina por megaestata de $30 mittones Page 1 of 4 0 fhttn: tvorm,cunacielanotfcta eornil 3 {Hans; la Econornlaa inters:/turvrw,cunadalanotic14.9 tmt7cat•7a • Peoortas, Itinnigiwww,eunadefanoftcro,coml?catoiol • Otras NoUriaer(ftuoslrvwnv,eunadeInnotlela,conV7cat,11 • onlniene Ihnowitm v,cuhadelanoticIn.tomt7wt•24j • Entrevistas Ihttncihrwm,cunadalanofleft.eomr7eat'301 • Nosotros finipstihaww,cunadelanodela.eomr?patter id=144141 I6uacar— I Lousear Denuncian a empresa rosarina par megaestafa de $30 millones(https:1/www,cunadelanoticia.com/? p=138601) Par Cone de le Nettle —16febrero,2318PublIcadaen:Localesthltns9ivnrtt,etenadelanotitrs,senter.31 Suman mere de 3 mil tos demnlficados por Tiffin Tigre, un proyocto que se presentaba comp la guarderia nautica ands grander del pals pero quad) trunco. Una empresa rosarina fue denunciada por estafar a (rids de 3.000'personas en mas de 330 millones, bajo la promosa de consiruir et complejo neutico °mas Imponante de Is Argentine. Et predio donde se levantarfa la monumental obra fun ebandonado haco muses y fe firma se present4 en carnanso de acreedares. La campailla en cuesUen es Valanova SA, que al menos hasta el2017era presidida por Damian Calabrese. Este empresario es plan tamblen integraba el directorfo de Puerto Malden, donde fue denundado panetmanta pot eslafa a inhfbido par seguIr comets artzando loses, pese a quo regia una medida judldat que to Impedfa. A ese lugar Regd a travels de le dosarrolladora Mor, qua el ado pasado Inicie un process de adilcamienlo al dejar vados emprenoirnlentas inmobtffados (coma la Torre Carddn y la Arealis) a to deriva, mfenlras que oboe Como la guarderfa nautica Tiffin de Granedero 8aigonia siguteron a dtmo sumamente lento. En este caso, junto a los mismos sodos de estos proyectoa, anund6la conslnacd6n de una mega guarderia nautica en Tlgra, que supuestamanta cantata con 11 naves pars embarcactonea desde jetaskf hasla 27 pies, sbstema de Ingress y monilorea etedrfinlco, paseo comerdal, antra otras comodtdades. Jugando can to chapa que les daba que el diseilo estuviera a cargo del reconoddo estudio Italiano Pinintadna, lagraron un rdpido exito en yentas. Sin embargo pese que se anundaba que la obra eatarfa terminada on su totafded par 2017, a dfa de hay solo se finalize una de ias once naves. https;l/www.cunadelanoticia.com/?p=138601 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk • Entrovtata 4 . Martin l,ucaro; "Hay noel desdramatirst el clasteo rosarino°tntrsrtkv+ysve¢ ad an®ltcla.cot oo160t811l 08 febrero 2019 2:34 PM No hay Comentarios Cuna de la Welkin Radio, programa que se simile de lungs a viemes de 7 a 8 horas par FM WOX 88,3 de Rosario, entrevisl3 a Martin Lucero, Secrolaria General del Sindicato Argentina de Docentes Particulates, Sectional Rosario (SADOP) y Vicepresidenle Tercero del Club Anent] 1.,,j ktosNia ihttas9rwwti3,eun314130atteta.e0rrv7 R.1808151 • Cuna der 1a Notiala 1V 2/27/2019 llenuncian a empresa rosarina por megaestafa de $30 millones Page 2 of 4 as Patrodnados per el abogedc Pedro p'AtlOU, damnlrcados presentaron una queretta criminal acusando de administration freudulanta, desvlo de Condos y lavadode actives a1 directed° de Villanova. •Tenemos pmobas de que se usaron m,s de $30 mitlones para fines qua nada IenEan que ver con el emprundlmiento de Tigre, come una sede de proyectos inmobTarfos en Paiemso•, manlfast6 el tetrado. En dietogo con Via Rosario, D'Aftoll l Jc qua hubo'intellgende (tnantlera• pars estafar a arias 3 mil personas qua confieron en la firma rosadna, a partfr de le enorme public:dad con la que promotionebe au pnoyecto. Pero la situadbn se agravb todavia inns dies atrfis, cuando VlUanovn se preseni6 a concurs° preventive de acreedores y como le dustfda de 'Tigre se dedarb in ompetente, se derivb el case a le ,titstida Penal rosadna, donde ests asentada la empresa. •t.o del concurso es ei caloten de is estate: tumarort la plata, to usaron pars titre Cosa, no construyeron to promeUdo y ahora piden of concerso', west/ono O'Attoll. (Via Rosario) Cuna de to Nogcla Comentarlos Cerredoe Los contented° eaten cnnados. No puede eeaibir camentados en este antrada. Acerb, de Arvas Theme thttptawit vr,oRastheme.eo}p Copyright Cuna de la Natida, Todos los Derechos Reservados. https://wwrv,cunadelanotieia.com/?p=138601 fitkiaasa.en re„ • Cana de le Modal TV Itp;j(gymv,cor�slAPb79 ari • Opinion •; byes escudertae veitenem }us olfo;os Para id claafffeatori4 OM 28 DI abril lettertfr ris a Conadslidadcla,cone7 p riel5rn 24 febrero 2019 1:11 PM) No hey Comentarios Sarin echo, par ahora, las ascuderias (hales etectorales) entre fas qua se destacen las tree 'lop' (peronismo, Cambiemos y Frente Progresista) las qua lnscdbleron SUS p8otos —precandidetos a Gobemador—pars las elecdnnes PASO del doming° 28 de abril, Cast one vetnlene ser8n fas grilles [...j Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Denuncian a empress rosarina par megaestafa de $30 millones Page 3 of 4 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 1-ser Pas ff‘ttosInsms.4-41adflariaticia,comit p.1615771 tnnea7sore,reatet1 • Intraapotthmet C A 82: Mr 3 9 0 I ucia thttpoloaye.yeanseelonollolccemi ri6OSS2) 02 febreto 2019 3:25 PM No hay Comentaries Ye falta poco pats qua inqresernos de Ilene, en la tkrEorntIna, al Inholo do las campallas politicas a fult pare clef* eUtondades on dislintos estanienloo. Felageto sera el mes do arranque y sera ertionces cuande el cludada no anjenlino se transfarmara en el obletlya de prelendientes a cargos y t-i Laer Ms Ifitlosehhayw.eurpadalanottOseenVi paISSM/ • Rosana etntrat • Canalta fraeas6 di! panera rotunda ante Sol de Mayo ihttestiskerew.eunadefineirefaeemq viasagsAnm_alltirr6ilfle.ilb:4164egfiroll 2tra145tretiloel 20191l lNtoohay Comentarios •e (61101:lisivAtotnadefanatiets,eoren 26 febrero 2019 9:48 AM I No hay Comenlerlos • Nowars OM Days 40" • '4 yqjvI 1Woof° de forma conIgntlanta 0.11gIbree, ureggittgma AsialeSsi 28 febfero 2019 1204 AM (No hay Comentados NevmS1's busoe su riding trlunfo del a5e ante San Matto da https://www,conadelanoticia.comNp=138601 2/27/2019 Denuncian a empresa rosarina por megaestafa de $30 millones Page 4 of 4 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk https://www.ctmadelanoticia.corunp=138601 San Aim itittorihwra, eunactelanaktetm9p4 p.1616241 25 lahreco 2019 8125 Ahl I No hay Comaatarios Otto xasariaalaertcoml 2/27/2019 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 3 2/27/2019 Eialetfn Oficial de to Provincia de Santa Fe - RepOblica Argentina constar que la presente medida ha sido solicitada por Ia Dra, Roxana Knafel, por Ia parte actors. Reservese en Secretarfa Ia documentack5n acompatiada. Previo a todo tramite acompanese copia certificada del poder invocado o certifiqUese la agregada al expediente. Manifleste el profesional su situation frente al IVA y acornparle constancia de InscripiciOn en la AFIP. Fdo.: Dr. Marcelo Ramon Bergia (Juez) Dra. Patricia N. Glencross (Sec.). Rosario, 6 de Diciembre de 2017. Dra. Accinelii, Secretaria. $ 33 346949 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk or disposidan de 13 Sra. Jueza de Primera Instancia en lo CMI y Comercial de is 13ra,, tbrilinaciOn de Rosario, Dra; Veronica Gotheb y en autos: VILLAttiOVA:S.A. siConcursci Previte -OW Expte. p.11121-02449787-8, se hate saber que por Seritencia tiro. 2793 de fettle 27 de diciembre de 2017 se ha declared° abierto el COTZtift0 preventivo de Viligniova Nro. 30- 71245921-9. con domicilio real en cage Jos a Hernandez 1838 tdridcille.ligal en dalte Santa Fe 1214, P'3, of. 3, ambos de Rosario, difiriendO la designation delithaSde Ventimiento. plazodeI de vedrita doh y Ia designer& de presentation de los infamies latinficlual y general hasta lake el -sindito acepte el cargo y designs dias y horadoade atencifirt haciendo Saber Waimea que el periods de exclUsividad y la audiencia Infornialiva se fijarari apartanaintinta por auto Sepik -ado, &Agenda publiaarse edictos de ley en el BOLETiN OFICIAL y Dtatio4E1 For -waste. AsirbiSinci por resoluddri- Nro. 32 de fecha 1 de febrero de 2018 se reVatO el punto 2) de. la senletida Nro. 2793/17 y en su lugar se orden6 Molar a la Excnia. Cantata de Apeladdrale Para que prOCENSI at sorted de Siriclica, el que perteriecera a la lista de la tategoria oarteepdhdleddo el presenter al tipo legal de un peduerto concur -ea (ait. Ahtbat resoluciones fueron firMadas por la Dra. Veronica Goliieb (Jueza) -- Dr. Ludae_Menossi (Secrelarto),Setretarla„4 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Menossi, Sedretario,' • $165346948Feb, 14Feb 20 Se hace saber que el Juzgado de PrImera lnstancia de la 15° Nomination de Arroyo Seco, dentro de los autos caratufados: 'MUNICIPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECO c./CONSTRUCCIONES DIMES E INDUSTRIALES S.R.L. s/Apremio° Expte. No 644/16, ha dictado la sigulente resoluciOn: °No 2076. Arroyo Seco, 12/09/2017. Vista... Resuelvo: 1- Admitirla y, en consecuencia, darle curso. 2- Autorizar la partIcipaclein del letrado actuante, atento a la escritura de mandato general que exhlbe y se le devuelve, 3- Aceptar el domicilio ad litem constituido. 4- Imprimir a este proceso el trbmite previsto en la ley 5066 de este provincia. 5- Atento encontrar en forma el tftulo que se agrega, ordenar el embargo peticionado por a suma de $1.687,95,-en concepto de capital, con mas la suma de $843,97.- estimados provisoriamente por intereses y costes. Dicho embargo reeler, podra efectivizarse una vez intimado de pago al deudor (interpretacion armonica art 7 y 11, L5066 y arts. 452 y 460, CPC). Hablda cuenta de que ei embargo se halla peticionado sobre un bien inmueble- lo que se efectiviza directarnente en el Registro de fa Propledad respectivo-, intimese prevlamente al pago al deudor, quten debera ser notificado en su domicilio (art. 27, L5066). 6- Citar de remate al deudor para que oponga excepcidin legitima en el termino de ocho dies, bajo apercibimiento de Ilevarse adeiante la ejecuciOn si no !o hiciere. 7- Citar a la demandada por edictos, que deberan publicarse en el BOLETiN OFICIAL por el termino y bajo apercibimientos de ley. 8- Aplicar a este proceso la hlips://ww.santafe.gob.ar/baletinoficiativer.phrtseccion=14-02-2018edictos2c.html sat Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 4 2/27/2019 [MetIn Oficial de la Provincia de Sania Fe - RepUblica Argentina Botetin Oficial Provincia de Santa Fe Santa Fe, miercotes 27 de febrero de 2019 Boletin > Texto completo Submitted into the public record for item(s) REA. on 02=2L9_, City Clerk JUZGADO DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA Por disposiciOn del Sr. Juez de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 12a. NominaciOn de Rosario, se hace saber que en autos AVIVIO, IGNACIO s/Sumaria InformaciOn (CUIJ. 21.02882265-8), mediante decreto de fecha 22/08/17 se tiene por promovida la presente acclon de declaration de simple ausencia del Sr. Ignacio Aymo, DNI. N° 30.629.211, que se tramitard por via del juicio sumarlsimo. Citese y emplacese al presente ausente por edictos que se publicaran por cinco cites en el BOLETIN OFICIAL pare que comparezca a ester a derecho. Rosario, 07 de Septiembre de 2017. Dra. Agustina Filippini, Secretaria. $ 45 334285 Feb. 14 Por disposiciOn del Sr. Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de le 10ma. Nomination de Rosario, Dr. Eduardo Orono, Secretaria de la Dra. Carla Gussoni Porrez, en autos caratulados: ZURBR1GGEN, LUIS ALBERTO s/Ausencia con presunciOn de fallecimiento (Expte. CUIJ 21-02882205-4), se ha ordenado citar al ausente Luis Alberto Zurbriggen (DNI 23.142.704), a fin que comparezca a este Tribunal a tomer intervenciOn, bajo apercibimientos de declararse el fallecimiento presumido si no se presentare en juicio, conforme lo normado por el art. 88 del CCyC, Publiquense edictos citatorios en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y Hall de Tribunales una vez por mes, durante seis meses. Rosario, 04 de Agosto de 2017. Dr. Silvio Pasotti, Prosecretario. $ 45 330769 Feb. 14 Por disposiciOn de la Srta. Juez del Juzgado de Primera lnstancia de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la ila NominaciOn de Rosario, Dra. Delia Giles y Secretarla del autorizante, se hace saber que en autos caratulados INGENIAR SRL s/Concurso preventivo- hoy Qulebra, CUIJ Nro. 21- °2884032-9; par Resolution N" 13 de fecha 02/02/2018 se ha dispuesto: Declarer la quiebra de INGENIAR SRL, CUIT N° 30-71190143-0, con domicilio social en calle Paraguay 527 Planta Alta de la eluded de Rosario, inscrlpta en el Reglstro Pilblico de Comercio de la cludad de Rosario al Tomo 162, Folio 12979 Numero 873 de fecha 06/06/2011, y se ha fijado coma fecha htlps://www.sanlate,gob,anbotetinoticial/ver.php?seecion=14-02-2018edictos2c.html 1/21 2/27/2019 Boletin Oficial de Ia Provincia de Santa Fe - Repffilica Argentina haste la cual los acreedores podran presenter los pedidos de verificaciones de creditos ante el slndico el die 28 de marzo de 2018; el die 16 de mayo de 2018 pare que a sindicatura presente el informe individual y el dia 29 de junio de 2018 pare que Ia sindicatura presente el informe general Fdo. Dr. S. Gonzalez (Secretario); Dra. D. Giles (Jaw).- Sindico: CPN Fernando Miguel Altare, con domicifio en calle Moreno 1739 PC 3 OF. 1 de la chided de Rosario, TE. 155694590, con horario de atencian de Junes a viernes en el horario de 09 a 16 horas. Dr. Sergio A. Gonzalez, Secretario, SIC 347085 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposicion del Juzgado de 1° Instancia de Distrito N° 17 en lc, Civil y Comerclal de Rosario, se hace saber que en autos ANIONIC ALBERTO JORGE s/Concurso Preventivo, CUIJ 21- 01638238-5, por Resolucion N° 3728 de fecha 18/12/17 se ha ordenado declarer la aperture del concurso preventivo de Alberto Jorge Antonio, D.N.I. N° 13.953,350, categorized° Pequeeo Concurso, con domicilio real en calle 3 de febrero N° 129 , Pisa 8° y con domicilio legal en calle Italia N° 779, P. 2°, of, 5°, ambos de Ia Ciudad de Rosario y por Resolucion N° 3.905 de fecha 29/12/17 se ha ordenado lo sigulente: 1) Fijar el dia 21/03/18 como fecha hasta la cual los acreedores deben presenter sus pedidos de verificacion a Ia sindica Marfa Gabriela Turich con domicilio en cefle Moreno N° 1494, P. 1°, de Ia eluded de Rosario, todos los dies habiles judlciales en el horario de 10:00 a 12:00 hs. y de 16:00 a 20:00 hs.; 2) Flier el die 08/05/18 pare la presentack5n por le Sindicatura del informe individual sobre los creditos, con las exigencies determinadas en el art. 35, 2do. parr, L.C.Q.; 3) Friar el dia 21/06/18 pare la presentacion del informe general por la Sindicatura; 4) Hacer saber que el periodo de exclusividad vencera el die 12/11/18 y le audiencla informative se cefebrara en Ia Sala de Audiencla de este Juzgado el dia 05/11/18 a las 9:00 horas, o al dia siguiente habil, y a Ia misma bora, si la fecha designada resultare feriado o inhabit y 5) Ordenar publicar edictos por el terrnino de fey en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y en el diario juridic° El Forense haciendas° conocer lo aquf resuelto y la ResoluciOn N° 3728/17. Insertese, agreguese copia y hagase saber. Fdo.: Dra. Marfa Silvia Beduin° -Jueza.- Dr. Juan Manuel Conti- Secretario, Secretaria, 06 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Hernan Aguzzi, Prosecretario. $ 165 347077 Feb. 14 Feb, 20 Por disposiciOn del Juzgado de de Distrito N° 17 en lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, se hace saber que en autos ANIONIC LUIS ERNESTO s/Concurso Preventivo, CUIJ 21-01638242-3, por Resolucion N° 3.603 de fecha 05/12/17 se ha ordenado declarer Ia aperture del concurs° preventivo de Luis Ernesto Antonic, D.N.I. N° 12.360.019, con domicilio real en calle Zapiola N° 5320 y con domicilio legal en calle Italia NI ° 779, P. 2°, of. 5°, ambos de la Ciudad de Rosario, categorizado Pequeao Concurs° y por Resolucion N° 3885 de fecha 28/12/17 se ha ordenado lo sigulente: 1) Fijar el dia 21/03/18 como fecha haste la cual los acreedores deben presenter sus pedidos de verificacion a le sfndica Marla Gabriela Turich con domicilio en calle Moreno N° 1494, P. 1°, de la eluded de Rosario, todos los dlas Wiles judiciales en el horarlo de 10:00 a 12:00 hs. y de 18:00 a 20:00 hs,; 2) Fijar el dta 08/05/18 para la presentacion por la Sindicatura del informe Individual sobre los creditos, con las exigencies deterrninadas en el art. 35, 2do. parr. L.C.Q„; 3) Fijar el dia 21/06/18 para la presentacion del informe genera( por la Sindicatura; 4) Hacer saber https://www.santafe.gob.ar/boletinoticialiverplIp?seccion=14-02-2018edictos2c.html 2121 2/27(2019 Bo[Min Oficial de la Provincia de Santa Fe - RepUblica Argentina que el periodo de exclusividad vencera el dia 12/11/18 y la audiencia informative se celebrare en la Sala de Audiencia de este Juzgado el 05/11/18 a las 9:00 horas, o al dia siguiente habil, y a la mIsma hors, si la fecha designada resultare feriado o inhabit y 5) Ordenar publicar edictos por el terming de ley en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y en el diarlo juridic° El Forense haciendose conocer lo aqui resuelto la Resolution N° 3.603. Insertese, agreguese copia y Wass saberFdo,: Dra. Maria Silvia Beduino -Jueza,- Dr, Juan Manuel Conti- Secretario. Secretaria, 06 Febrero de 2018. Dr, Heiman Aguzzi, Prosecretario. $ 165 347074 Feb, 14 Feb. 20 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposiciOn del Juzgado de 1° Instancia de Distrito N° 17 en, lo Civil y Comercial de Rosario, se hace saber que en autos FLEXIGLASS S.R.L. s/ Concurso Preventivo, CU1J 21-02865562-9, por Resolution N° 3772 de fecha 19/12/17 se ha ordenado: Prorrogar el periodo de exclusividad establecido en autos, fijando su vencimiento pare el dfa 12/03/18 y la audiencla Informative para el dia 05/03/18/a [as 10 horas. Publiquense edictos por el terming de de ley el BOLETIN OFICIAL y en el den° juridic° El Forense. Insertese y hagase saber. Fdo.: Dra. Marfa Silvia Beduino - Jueza - Dr. Juan Manuel Conti- Secreted°, Secretaria, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Hernan Aguzzi, Prosecretario. $ 165 347072 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 Por disposicien del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en fo Civil y Comercial de is 18va. NomlnaciOn de Rosario, Secretaria a cargo de la Autorizante, en autos caratulados MARSIU PEDRO GABRIEL ciLAPORTA NESTOR s/Ejecutivo, Expte. 981/2014, se he dispuesto lo siguiente: notificar por edicto la sigulente resolucion: N° 3553 Rosario, 11,12.2017. Resuelvo: Ordenando seguir adelante la ejecuoien contra Laporte Nestor haste tanto el actor se haga integro cobro de is suma rectamada de $19000 con mas los intereses fijados en los considerandos. Imponiendo las costas al demanded° (Art. 251 C.P.C.C). Difiriendo la regulation de honorarios haste tanto se apruebe la Wangle respective. Insertese y hagase saber. Fdo: Dra, Susana Gueiler (Juez), Dra. Myrian Hutjich (Secretaria). Rosario, 01/02/2018. Dr. Jonatan Pierini, Prosecretario. $ 33 347011 Feb. 14 Feb, 16 Por disposicion del Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Circuito de la Cuarta NominaciOn de Rosario se cite y emplaza a comparecer a ester a derecho al Sr. Nicolas Antonio Vilches Flores en los autos caratulados AZUL S.A.T.A. c/DIAZ, JONATAN y Otros s/Danos y perjulcios, CUIJ 21- 00143204-1-, a traves del siguiente decreto: Rosario, 19 de Octubre de 2017. Emplacese al codemandado Nicolas Antonio Vitches Flores por edictos, para que comparezca a ester a derecho dentro del termino de cinco (5) dfas de la Ultima publicaciOn, bajo apercibimiento de declared° en rebeldia, Publiquense los edictos citatorios por tres (3) dias y en la forma proscripta httpa://www.santafe.gob,arit olatinoficialtverphOseccion=14-02-2018edictos2c.htni 3/21 2/27/2019 Bolan Q cial de la Prcvrr c a de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina por el art. 67 del Cedigo Procesal Civil y Cornercial. Firmado: Dr, Alejandro Hector Lanata, Juez, Dra. Marcela Norma Barr°, Secretaria. $ 33 346992 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk El senor Juez de Primers Instancia de Distrito en to Civil y Camercial de la I5ta. Nomination de Rosario. Dr. Carlos E. Cadiemo, Secretaria de la Dra. Maria Eugenia Sapei, hace saber que en los autos caratulados COTAL S.A. s/Quiebra our acreedor, Expte. 638/2007 se ha presentedo informe de distribution parciaF, proyecto de distribution readecuados y se encuentran regulados los honorarios de ley. segOn to dispuesto por el arttcuto 218 y 267 de la LCO. -Dos dins- Sin cargo. Secretarfa. Dra_ Maria Eugenia Sapei, Secretaria. S/C 346982 Feb. 14 Feb. 15 Por disposition Senior Juez Primera Instancia Distrito Civil Camercial Decimosegunda Nomination Rosario, autos CONSORCIO EDIFtCIO ADELA lil cJFISHERTON S.A. s/Ejecutivo, Expte. N° 287/14 (dernandada C.D.I. 30-71021043-4), se hace saber que en la subasta que realizara et Martillero Miguel Angel Mercerat (C.IJ.I.T. 20-17669315-1), el dia 20 de febrero de 2018 alas 17,30 hs., en fa Sala de Remates de la Asociacian de Martilieros de Rosario, del inmueble inscripto al T° 1075, F° 34, N° 392.133, Departamento Rosario P.H., el comprador debera abonar en el acto de remate, ademas del importe a cuenta de precis, el 3°Io del precio de compra en dinero efectivo, en concepto de comision al martillero. Se transcribe et decreto que lo ordena' Rosario, 06 de febrero de 2018. Ampliese et decreto que antecede haciendose saber que el comprador debera abonar en et acto de remate, edemas del importe de cuenta de precio, el 3% de precio de compra en concepto de cornisidn at martinero. Fdo' Dra. Filippini (Secretaria) Se hace saber a efectos legates. Secretaria. Rosario 06 de febrero de 2018. $ 152 347091 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Por disposition del Sr. Juez de Primera lnstancia de Distrito Civil y Conrerciat de la Sexta Nominacibn de Rosario, en autos caratulados: RIOS, CARLOS DANIEL s/Solicitud propia quiebra - hoy Ouiebra, Expte. Nro. 21-02886451-2 se hace saber que se ditto la siguiente Resotucion: N° 4353 Rosario, 21 de Diciembre de 2017 Y Vrstos... Y Considerando... Resuelvc: 1) Senalar el dia 15 de marzo de 2018 Como fecha haste la cue! Fos acreedores deberan presenter al Sindico sus peticiones de vent-ication de creditos.2) Sealer et dia 03 de mayo de 2018 pars la presentaci& por el Sindico del informe Individual y la del 18 de junio de 2018 pars la presentation del Inforrne General. 3) Hacer saber a la sindicatura que en el plaza improrrogable de cinco dfas debera informer sobre la composition del activo del fallido y proposer is forma de liquidation de los bienes. A tales efectos se debera proceder conforms lo regula el Art. 177 y sgtes. de la L C.O. 4) Hacer saber a1 Studica que. cada 10 dias debera Informal- sabre los tramites retativos a la tiquidacion de los bienes. Publiquense edictos de ley en ttllps:U w gsantore.gob.sabots[isolidallver.ptip7seMidn=14-02-2018edic1os2c,hlmI 4 r21 212 /2O1E Belelin °rclal de le i rovincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina of BOLETIN OFICIAL. insertese y hagase saber_ Dra. Maria Belen Bac}ini [Secretaria]; Dr. Nestor Osvaldo Garcia (Juez). Publlquese sin cargo Secretaria, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Fernando Adrian Bitetti. Prosecrtario. 51C 347031 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Cleric Par disposition del Sr. Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de la 18va. Nomination de Rosario, Dra. Susana S. Gueiler (Jueza), Secretaria de fa Dra. Myrian R. Hufjich, dentro de !os autos caratulados DA FONSECA, JUAN CARLOS cIAMAT, CARMEN y Ots. s/Prescripcinn Adquisitiva Expte. N' 1138/2008. se ha dictado la siguiente Resolucidn N° 3737.Rosario, 27 de diciembre de 2017_Y Vistas: Considerando.... Falb: 1.- Haciendo Lugar a la demanda y, en consecuencia, dectarando adquirido por Juan Carlos Da Fonseca DNI N12.525.055-mediante usucapiin en el ano 1990- el derecho de dominio sobre el inmueble ut supra descripto objeto del presenter ordenando otorgarle el tftulo supfetorio sabre e1 misma y librando oficio al Registro General de Rosario a fin de hacer efectivo to aqul resuelto. 2.- Cursense cedulas de notificacian de la presente a la defensora de oficio y Marta del Carmen Massana. Asimismo, publiquense edictos en el BOLETIN OFICIAL. 3.- Costas a is actora. 4.- Honorarios oportunamente Insertese y hagase saber. Dra. Myrian R. Huljicll (Secretaria). Dra_ Susana Silvina Gueilor (Juez). $ 33 347012 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 El Sr. Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en to Civil y Comercial de la 9° Nomination de Rosario, Dr. Gabriel Abed, notifica al Sr. Rojas, Manuel Francisco to declared° en autos: Rosario, 30/06/2016 Por presentada, con dorniciilo procesal admitido, en el caracter invocado a merit❑ del poder que en copia acompana y se agrega, Por iniciada demanda contra et Sr. Rojas Manuel Francisco. por cobro de la suma de $7533,46.- mas intereses y costes, que tramitara por et procedimiento de juicio ejecutivo. Citese y emp[acese a la parte demandada para que comparezca a ester derecho dentro der termino de 3 dias bajo los apercibimientos de ser declared❑ rebefde y de continuer el juicio sin su representation. Ordenn trabar embargo sobre los haberes que percibe el demanded() coma dependiente de Fideicomiso Infinity Italia en el caso que no supere el doble del safari° minima vital mensual en ei 10 % del importe en que exceda este ultimo y en el caso en que la remuneration supere el doble del salaria minima vital mensual en el 20 % det importe que exceda este ultimo, Basta cubrir la suma de $ 7533,46,- con mas la del 50% estimada provisoriamente para intereses y costes. Librese ofc[o al empleador y hagasele saber que debere depositar el importe retenido en cuenta judicial cuya aperture se soliclto al Banco Municipal de Rosario- n" 5094668/3 CBU 0650080103000509466834 Cuit 33- 99918181-9. Hagase constar que la presente medida ha side solicitada por fa Dra. Rosanna knafel, por la parte actora. Reservese en Secretaria la documentation acompariada, dejandose copia digitailzada en eI sistema inf❑rmatico, sin dejar copia en el expediente fisico_ Previo a todo tramite acornpanese copia certificada del poder #avocado o certifiquese la agregada al expediente.- Manifieste el profesianal su situation frente al IVA y acompane constancia de inscription en la AFIP. De rio ser hailado el requerido en el domicilio denunciado, el notificador debere solicitar de quien lo atienda o vecinos si el mismc vive alll; y solo en caso afrmativo procedera a efectuar to notlficacion, bajo apercibimiento de nulidad de to misrna, debiendo hllps:11 w.santare.9b1larlboletinollciauver.php7seccionm14-02-2018edictas2c.111m1 y� 2/27/2019 Solelln R5cia1 de is Provincia de 5an1a Fe - Republica Argenlir is asentar en la diiigencia efectuada !a informacibn obtenida. Se informa a las partes que el presente expediente puede ser consultado en la web http'1/iurix- onliine.justiciasantafe.gov.ar-7782/GE INTERNET!facestinternetllnicio.jspx. con la clave: 3682. Firmado: Dr. Marcelo Ramon Bergia (juez), Dra. Accinelli Veronica (Sec.). Autos: ELECTRONICA MEGATONE S,A. cIROJAS, MANUEL F. s/Ejecutivo_ 03 de Noviernbre de 2017. $ 33 346960 Feb. 141 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City cleric El Sr Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera lnstancia en lo Civil y Comercial de la 9° Nominacion de Rosario, Dr. Gabriel Abad, notifica al Sr. Ramos Sanchez, Silvia Liliana to declaredo en autos: ELECTRONICA MEGATONE S.A. c1RAMOS SANCHEZ SILVIA LILIANA s/Ejecutivo, CUfJ N° 21-02843017-2: Rosario,2810912017 Informedo verhalmente el actuario que la parte demandada no ha compareddo a ester a derecho declaraselo rebelde. Notifiquese par cedula Se informa a las partes que el presente expediente puede ser consultado en la web http:lllurix-online.justiclasantafe.gov.ar77821GE_INTENETIfacesfinternetllnicio.jspx, con la clave: 1041. Firmado' Dr. Gabriel Abad (Juez), Dra. Viviana Guide (Sec.) 07 de Naviembre de 2017. $ 33 346958 Feb. 14 Feb 16 Et Sr. Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en lo Civil y Comercial de la 9° Nomination de Rosario, Dr, Gabriel Abad, notifica at Sr. Galerza. Jimena Marta Soledad fo declarado en autos: ELECTRONICA MEGATONE S.R. c/GALARZA, JIMENA MARTA SOLEDAD slEjecutivo, CUIJ N° 21-02859288-1: Rosario 28/09/2017 lnformado verbalmente el actuario que la parte demandada no ha comparecdo a ester a derecho declaraselo rebelde. Notifiquese par cedula. Se informa a las partes que el presente expediente puede ser consultado en la web http:llfurix-online.justiciasantafe.gay.ar:77821GE INTERNET/faces/ nternetltnicia,jspx, con la clave. 6067.Firmado: Gabriel Abed (Juez). Ora. Viviana Guide (Sec). 06 de Noviembre de 2017 Dra, Veronica A. Accineili, Secretaria, $ 33 346957 Feb_ 14 Feb. 16 El Sr. Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera lnstancia de Circuito de Eiecucion de la 2a Nomination de Rosario, Dr. Jose Luis Sedila, notifica al Sr. Munoz, Lucas Alejandro to declared° en autos: ELECTRONICA MEGATONE S.A. c/MU OZ, LUCAS ALEJANDRO s/Ejecutivo: Rosario, 17/12/2015. Por presentado, domiciliado, en el caracter que express. Por parte, por iniciada demands ejecutiva, cftese y emplacese a la parte demandada a que comparezca a ester a derecho por el termino de 3 dies bajo aperelbimiento de rebeldia y de seguirse el juicio sin su representation. Reservese en Secretarla la documental acompanada, glosandose capia en autos. Trabese embargo, previa reposition -si correspondiere- sobre bienes fibre del ejecutado, siempre que no se tratare de haberes previsionales, haste cubrir la suma de $ 8500.00.- estimada provisoriamente en concepto de capital, intereses y costes, librandose el despacho lrttpsllvnnr /.sanlale.gab.arinolerinaficiallvet.pnp7secckon=14.02-201Bediclns2c.hlmi 2r27f2019 aoletin Oficial de Fa Provincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina correspondiente, con facultades de ley, debiendo la Actora concurrir a la entidad bancaria a los fines de abrir cuenta pars estos autos y a disposict6n de este juzgado y comunicar ei nimero de CBU en el Oficio respective. Manes y Viernes para notifcaciones en la Oficlna. Notifiquese poi cedula. Firrnado: Dra. Ma. Silvia Beduin° (Juez en sups.), Dra. Paula Heltner (Sec.) Expt.3881i2015_- 30 de Qctubre de 2017. Dra. Maria Elvira Longhi, Secretaria. $ 33 346958 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 City Clerk El Sr. Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en to Civil y Comercial de la 11' Nominacion de Rosario, Dra. Delia M. Giles, notifies al Sr. Soiohaga, Victor Hugo y/o Amedo, Walter Daniel to declarado en autos ELECTRDNICA MEGATONE S A. c/SOLOHAGA, VICTOR HUGO ylo ARNEDO, WALTER DANIEL s/Ejecutivor Nro. 2093, Rosario, 20108/2013. Autos y vistos ._. Resueivo Por presentedo, con domicilio ad !item constituido, en el caracter invocado a merito de la copra de poder general acompariada que debera certificar par secretaria. Por iniciada la action que express. Cltese y emplacese a la parte deniandada gars que en le tarrnino de 3 dies comparezca a ester a derecho bajo los apercibimientas de rebeldia. Trabese embargo (en proportion de ley Dcto. 484187) sabre ias remuneraciones que percibe el codemandado comp ernpleado en CONSULTORA MILOS S.R.1 haste cubrir la suma de $ 4609.80 con mas el 30% estimado en concepto de intereses y costes. Llbrense los despachos con las constancias que se peticionan. Reservese en secretaria fa documental acompanada. Notifiquen los empleados auforizados. Mertes y Viernes pars notificaclbn en la oficina. insertese y hagase saber. Firmado. Dra. Delia M. Giles (Alex): Dra. Eliana C_ Gutierrez White (Sec). Expt. 814/2013. Sergio A, Gonzalez, Secretaria. $ 33 346955 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 El Sr. Juez a cargo del juzgado de Prirnera Instancia en 10 Civil de Distrito y Comerciat de la 14ta. Nomination de Rosario, Dr. Marcelo Carlos Mauricio ❑uaglia, notifica al Sr. ESCOBAR, CESAR CARLOS. D.N.I. N° 26.355.655 to declarado en autos- ELECTR6NICA MEGATONE S.A c/ESCOBAR, CESAR CARLOS s/Ejecutivo) N° de Expte. N° 65112014: EI que suscribe, apoderado de la parte actora, EIectronica Megatone S.A. por la presents cedula hace saber a que en el juicio Electranica Megatone S.A. clEscobar, Cesar Carlos s/Ejecutivo (Expte. N° 651 ano: 2014.) el Senor Juez ha ordenado to siguiente.: N° 2648 ROSARIO, 09110/2014. Y Vistos... Y Cansiderendo:.., Resuelvo: Tengase al compareciente por presentada, con dcmicilio legal constituida y por parte. Por iniciada la acci6n que expresa. Citese y emplacese a la parte dernandada para que comparezca a ester a derecho por el terrnino y bajo aperciblmientos de ley Trabese embargo, en proportion de ley, sabre los haberes que perciba la parte demandada del empleador denunciado haste cubrir la suma de S 7970.74 con mas la suma de $ 2391.00 estimado provisariamente para intereses y costas futures, librandose recaudos con facultades y bajo apercibimientos de ley Mertes y viernes pars notificaciones en to Oficina. Para el caso de notificacibn por cedula hagase saber ai oficial notificadar que debera cumpfimentar carrectamente el art. 63 CPCC. y a los fines de preserver el derecho de defense en caso de no encontrar al requerido debera preguntar a los habitantes del dornicilio, o en caso de no encontrar a nadie a los vecinos, si el destinatario efectivamente vive en ese lugar delanrio constancia de haber realized° tat ditigencia y de las respuestas obtenidas. Fecho y de corresponder debera htsps Th 'nv.santafe_gob,arToletino iciauver.php7secdori 14-02-2018edretas2c.htnit 7(2 t 2/27/2019 Bate1in Oficial de 1a Provincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina of+ciarse al Registro Nacionnal de las Personas a fin de que informe el ultim.. Fdo. Dr. Marcelo Carlos Mauricio Ouagiia (Juez). Dra. Analia Suarez Monaco (Sec.). $ 33 346954 Feb. 14 Feb 16 Submitted into the pubic record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposicir5r1 del Sr. Alex de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 12da. Nomination se hate saber que en autos "RlSIGLIONE, ELVIRA ELENA s/Quiebra" (Expte CUIJ• 21-01481970-0), por resoIutorio Na 12 de fecha 05 de febrero de 2018, se ha dictado to siguiente: Resuelvo: 1) Fijar haste el dia 19 de Marzo de 2018 Como fecha tope haste la cunt los acreedores podran presenter los pedidos de verificacidn al sindico, debiendo acampariar los tltulos justificativos de los mismos en los terminos del Art. 32 de la L.C.Q. 2) Fijar el dia 09 de Mayo de 2018 pars que la Sindicatura presence el Informe Individual ante este tribunal y el dia 25 de Junio de 2018 pare la presentation del Informe General (cf. Arts. 35, 39 y 200 L,C_Q.) 3) En caso de existir impugnaciones a los pedidos de ver=1cacion, la Sindicatura, a las fines de ordenar el procedimiento, debera presenter al Tribunal un legajo con cada una de las mismas compuesto de copies del pedid❑ de verification, de la irnpugnacion. de le contestation del impugnedo, si la hubiere, y del respective inforrne individual. 4) Ptibliquese edictos ampliatorios de la resolution de quiebra en el BOLETIN OFICIAL hacienda conocer el nombre y domicilio del Sindico, asl coma su horario de atencion. 5) Insertese y hagase saber. Fdo. Dr. Fabian Seliizia (Juez) - Dra. Agustin() Filippinl (Secretaria). Asimismo se informe que la Sindico designada es fa CPN, Carina Noeml Simonettl, constituyendo domicilio legal en caile Cochabamba 462 de Rosario, can horario de atencion de Lunes a Viernes de 14 a 20 horas. Rosario, 06 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Alejandro Danino, Prosecretario. SIC 348951 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 El Sr, Juez a cargo del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en la Civil y Comercial de la 9na. Nomination de Rosario, D. Gabriel Abad, notifica of Sr. Benitez, Carlos Emiliano to declared() en autos: ELECTRONICA MEGATONE S.A. cIBENITEZ, CARLOS EMILIANO sfEjecutivo CUIJ N` 21-01358031-3): Rosario, 12/08/2008. Y Vstos:... Cores}derando ...Resuelvo: Por presentada, con domicilio procesal admitido, en ei caracter invocado en merit() del poder que en copia acomparia y se agrega, Por iniciade demanda contra el Srla Benitez Carlos Emiiiano, por cobra de la suma de $2938.56.- mas intereses y costas, que traniitare por el procedimiento del juicio ejecutivo. Citese y emplacese a la parte demandada pars que comparezca a eslar derecho dentro del termino de 3 dias bajo los apercibimientos de ser declaredo rebetde y de continuer el juicio sin su representation. Orderia trabar embargo sobres los haberes que percibe la demandada como dependiente de CONSTRUCCIONES TRES S.R.L. en et caso que no supere e! doble del salario minimo vital mensuat en el 10% del importe en que exceda este ultimo y ei caso de que la remuneration supere el doble del satario minimo vital mensuat en el 20% del importe que exceda este ultimo, haste cubrir to sumo de $ 2938.56.- con mas la del 30% estimada provisoriamente pars intereses y costas. LIbrese oficio al enipfeador y hagasele saber que debera depositar el importe retenido en cuenta judicial que debera abrir en el Nuevo Banco de Santa Fe, Sucursaies Tribunales. a hombres de estos autos y a la Orden del juez. Hagase https.Nsm santafe.gob. arlbolatinariclativer.plip7sectionm14-02-2018edictos2c.hlml Ai? 2/27/2019 ttaletin Oficial de la Pravinria de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina constar que la presente medida ha sido solicitada por is Ora. Roxana knafel, por la parte actora. Reservese en Secretaria la documentation acompanada. Previa a toda tramite acompaliese capia certificada del poder invocado o certifiquese la agregade al expediente. Manifieste el profesionat su situation frente al IVA y acomparie constancia de inscriplcion en !a AFIP. Fdo. Dr. Marcelo Haman I3ergla (Juez) ❑ra, Patricia N. Glencross (Sec,), Rosario. 6 de Diciembre de 2017. Dra. Accinelli, Secretaria. $ 33 346949 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposition de la Sra. Jueza de Primera Instancia en to Civil y Comercial de la 13ra. Nomination de Rosario; I7ra, Veronica Gvtlieb y en autos: "VILLANOV.A S.A. s/Concurso Preventive Expte, CIJIJ 21-02849767-6, se hace saber que por Sentencia Nro. 2793 de fecha 27 de diciembre de 2017 se ha declared° abierto el concurso preventivo de Vllanova S.A., C.U.I T. Nro. 30- 71245921.9, con domicilio real en calle Jose Hernandez 1638 y doniicino legal en calle Santa Fe 1214, P°3, of. 3, ambos de Rosario, difiriendo la designacion de fechas de vencimiento del plazo de verification y la designacion de presentation de los informes individual y general haste tanto el srndlca acepte el cargo y designe digs y horarios de atencion, haciendo saber edemas que e1 perrod° de exclusividad y ta audiencia informative se fijaran oportunarnente por auto separado, debiendo publicarse edictos de ley en ei BOLETIN OFICIAL y Diario "El Forense' Asimisrno por resolucian Nro. 32 de techa 1 de febrero de 2018 se revoca el punt❑ 2) de la sentencia Nra. 2793/17 y en su lugar se ordenti ofciar a la Excma. Camara de Apelaciones pars que proceda al sorteo de Sindico, el que pertenecera a la lista de la categoria "B correspondiendo el presente al tipo legal de un pequeiio concurso (art. 288 LC.Q.). Ambas resoluciones fueron firmadas por la Dra. Veronica Gotlieb (Jueza) - Dr. Lucas Menossi (Secretario). Secretaria, 6 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Menossi, Secretaric $ 165 346948 Feb 14 Feb 20 Se hace saber que el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de la 15° Nominacidn de Arroyo Seco, dentro de los autos caratulados- 'MUNICIPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECO c/CONSTRUCCIONES CIVILES E INDIJSTRIALES S.R.L. s/Apremio° Expte, No 644/16, ha dictado la siguiente resolucion: 'No 2076. Arroyo Seco, 12/09/2017. Vista... Resuelvo_ 1- Admitirla y, en cansecuencia, darle curso. 2- Autorizar is participacian del tetrad° actuante, atento a la escritura de mandato general que exhibe y se le devuelve. 3- Aceptar el domicllio ad !item constituido. 4- lmprimir a este proceso et tramite previsto en la ley 5066 de este provincia. 5- Atento encontrar en forma et titulo que se agrega. ardenar el embargo peticionado por la soma de $$1,687,95.-en concepto de capital, con mas la sumo de $843,97.- estimados provisoriamente por intereses y costes_ Qich° embargo recien padre efectivizarse una vez intimado de pago al deudor (interpretation armonica art. 7 y 11, L5066 y arts. 452 y 460, CPC). Habida manta de que el embargo se halla peticionado sobre un bien inmueble- to que se efectiviza directamente en el Registro de la Propiedad respectivo-, intimese previamente al pago al deudor, quien debera ser notificado en su domlcilia (art. 27, L5066). 6- Citar de rernate al deurlar pars que oponga exception legltima en el terrnino de ocho dlas, bajo apercibimienta de Reverse adelante la ejecucion si no le hiciere. 7- Citar a la demandada par edictos, que deberen publicarse en el BOLE1'NN OFICIAL por el termini) y bajo apercibimientos de ley. 8- Aplicar a este proceso la https:llww.y.santafe.got.ar.boleiinafictativer.php7secclon=1a-02.2018edlctas2c.htrnl 9,21 212712019 8aletin Oficial de la provincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina duplicidad de *minas peticionada. Notifiquese por cedula. Insertese y hagase saber." Fdo. Dra Mariana Alvarado, Juez. Fdo. Dra. Mariana Cattani, Secretaria. En tal sentido se cite de remate en fos terminos del art. 7 de la ley 5066 y madificatorias a CONSTRUCC1ONES CIVILES E INDUSTRIALES SF L yto a sus sucesores y/o poseedor yee propietarios y/o terceras y/o quien resulte ser responsables fiscal de las constancias de deuda nro. 9/001068/2016 en concepto de agua y desagues cloacales, tasa municipal consolidad, perteneciente a! Inmueble cuyo N° de partida es 0008804-00, silo en calla Balgorria y Garaghan, de la ciudad de Arroyo Seco, de acuerdo al Certiticado Municipal de deuda impaga emitida par la Municipalidad de Arroyo Seco Secretaria, 26 de Diciembre de 2017. Dra Cattani, Secretaria. SIC 347044 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Se hace saber que el Juzgado de Primera Instancia de la 15' Nominacion de Arroyo Seco, dentro de los autos caratulados "MUNICIPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECO c(COSTtJRELLA LEONARDO y/u Ots. slApremio" Expte. N° 655/16, ha dictado la siguiente resolucien: "N° 2069. Arroyo Seco, 12/09/2017. Vista... Resuelvo 1- Adrnitirla y, en consecuencia, darle curso. 2- Autorizar la participation del letrado actuante, atento !a escritura de rnandato general suscripta por el presentante y que se agrega a los autos. 3- Aceptar et domicilio ad litem constituido, 4- irnprimir a este proceso el-tramite previsto en la ley 5066 de este provincia. 5- Atento encontrar en forma el titulo que se agrega. ordenar el embargo peticionado por la suma de $ 9.049,07- en concepto de capital, con mas la suma de $4.524 - estimados provisonamente por intereses y costas. Dicho embargo reden podra efectivizarse una vez intimado de pago el deudor (interpretation armonica art. 7 y 11, L5066 y arts. 452 y 460 CPC) Habida cuenta de que el embargo se halia peticionado sobre un bien inrnueble- to que se efectiviza directamente en el Registro de la Propledad-, intimese previamente al pago al deudor, quien debera ser notificado en su domicilio (art- 27, L5066). 6- Citar de remate al deudor para que oponga exception legitima en el termino de ocho digs, bajo apercibimiento de Ilevarse adelante la ejecucion si no lo hiciere_ 7- Oiler a la demandada por edictos, que deberan pubiicarse en ei BOLE IN OFICIAL por et termino y bajo apercibimientos de ley. 8- Aplicar a este proceso !a duplicidad de terminas peticionada. Notifiquese pier cedula, lnsertese y hagase saber.' Fdo, Dra, Mariana Alvarado, Juez. Fdo. Dra. Mariana Cattani, Secretaria. En tal sentido se cita de remate en los terminus del art. 7 de la Ley 5066 y modifcatorias al Sr Costurella Leonardo y/o a sus sucesores ylo a quien resulte ser responsables fiscal de to constancia de deuda nro. 3/001336/2015 y 9/001015/2016, en Se hace saber que el Juzaado de Primera Instancia de la 15` Norninacian de Arroyo Seco, dentro de los autos caratulados 'MUNICtPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECD c/AGRORIESMA S.R.L. slApremio" Expte. N" 87S/17. ha dictado to siguiente resolucibn: -N° 2339. Arroyo Seco 30/10/2017. Vista.. Eiesuetvo: 1- Admitirla y, en consecuencia, darle curso. 2- Autorizar la participacien del tetrado actuante, atento a la esaritura de mandato general que en copla suscripta por el presentante se agrega a los autos. 3- Aceptar el domicilio ad !item constituido. 4- Irnprimir a este proceso et tramite previsto en la ley 5066 de este provincia. 5- Atento encontrar en forma el tituto que se agrega, ordenar el embargo peticionada porla suma de 546.363,16.- en concepto de capital, con mas la suma de $13.908,95.- estimados provisoriamente por intereses y costas. Dicho embargo recien padre efectivizarse una vez intimado de pago el deudor (interpretation armenica art. 7 y 11, L5066 y arts. 452 y 460, CPC). Habida cuenta de que el embargo se halia peticionado sobre un biers rodado- to que se efectiviza directamente en et Registro de la Propiedad Automotor respectivo-, intfinese previamente at pago al deudor, quien debera ser notiticado en su domicilio (art. 27. L5066). 6- Citar de remate al deudor pare que oponga excepcion fegitima en ei termino de ocho digs, bajo apercibirniento de Ilevarse adelante to ejecucien si no to hiciere. 1- Citar a la demandada por edictos, que deberan publicarse en el https'lrw. w.santare.gnn arlhnletinnticial/ver.php eaction=t4-02-2a18edictas2c.html 2/27/2019 anletin WW1 de la Peavincia de Santa Fe- Repatica Argentina BOLETIN OFICIAL por el terrnino y bajo apercibimientos de ley. 8- Aplicar a este proceso to duplicidad de terminos peticionada.- Notifiquese por ceduta. lnsertese y hagase saber." Fdo. Ora. Mariana Alvarado, Juez, Fdo. Dra. Mariana Cattanl, Secretarla En tal sentido se city de remate en los terminos del art 7 de la ley 5066 y modificatorias a AGRORIESMA S.R,L. ylo a quien resulte ser responsables fiscal de las constancias de deuda en concept° impuesto de patents unica sabre vehiculo, perteneciente at domino NMS-044-de acuerdo ai Certificado Municipal de deuda impaga emitida par !a Municipaiidad de Arroyo Seco Secretarla 26 de Diciembre de 2017 Dra. Cattanl, Secretarla. S/C 347043 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Se hace saber que el Juzgad❑ de Primera Instancia de la 15° Nominacion de Arroyo Seco, dentro de; los autos caratulados "MUNtCIPALIDAD DE ARROYO SECO c/CUNEO ALCIDES J. s)Apremia- Expte. N' 914/17. ha dictado la sigulente resoluci6n: 'fd° 2425. Arroyo Seco, 21/11/2017. Vista... Resuelvo- 1- Admitirta y, en consecuencia, darle curso. 2- Autorizar la participacidn del letrado actuante, atento a fa escritura de mandato General que en copia suscripta por et presentante se agrega a los autos. 3- Aceptar el domicilio ad iitern constituido. 4- Imprimir a este proceso el tramite previsto en la Ley 5066 de este provincia. 5- Atento encontrat en forrna el titud° que se agrega, ordenar el embargo peticionado por la suma de $14.035,98.-eri concept° de capital. con mas la suma de $$7,017.- estimados provisoriamente por intereses y costes. Dicho embargo recien podra efectivizarse una vez intimado de pago al deudor (interpretation armonice art. 7 y 11, L5066 y arts. 452 y 460, CPC) Habida cuenta de que el embargo se halla petictonado sabre un bien rodado- lo que se efectiviza directamente en el Registry de la Propiedad Autornotor respectivo-, intimese previamente al pago al deudor, quien debera ser notificado en su dornicilio (art. 27, L5066). 6- Citar de remate al deudor pars que oponga exception legitima en el terrnino de ocho digs, bajo apercibimiento de Ilevarse adetante la ejecucion si no to hiciere. 7- Citar a la demandada por edictos, que deberan publlcarse en el Boletin Oficial por et termino y bajo apercibimientos de ley. 8- Aplicar a este proceso la duplicidad de terminos peticionada,- Notifiquese por cedula. insertese y hagase saber." Fdo. Dra. Mariana Alvarado, Juez. Fdo Dra. Mariana Cattani, 5ecretaria. En tal sentido se cita de remate en los terminos del art. 7 de la Ley 5066 y modificatorias al Sr. Cuneo Alcides Juan ylo a sus sucesores ylo poseedor yfo quien resulte ser responsables fiscal de las constancias de deuda en concepto impuesto de patentes unica sabre vehiculo, pertenectente al dominio KJC-147, de acuerdo al Certifcado Municipal de deuda impaga eniitida por la Municipalidad de Arroyo Seca- Secretarla, 26 de Diciembre de 2017. Dra. Cattanl, Secretarla. S/C 347040 Feb, 14 Feb. 16 For disposition del .Juez de Primera lnstancia de Distrito Civil y Comerciat de to 3ra. Nominacian de Rosario, Dr Ezequiel Zabatese vita, llama y errrplaza a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de la senora JUSTA MARIA MUB1LLA, para que comparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos dentro del terrnino de diez dies bajo apercibimientos de ley. Lo que se publica a sus efectos, el BOLETIN OFICIAL, y en el hall de Tribunales. Rosario, Noviembre de 2017. Dra. Cossovich, 5ecretaria. https:rrwnnnv.santare.gcb.arinalelinoFclallver.php7seccionu14-02.2018edtctas2c.htmi t 112.1 2/272019 a oielin Oficial de la Pravincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina $ 45 347027 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por dispasicibn del Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 3era Nomination de Rosario, Dr Ezequiel Zabale, se cite, llama y ernplaza a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de la senora STELLA MARIS NALDINI pars que comparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos dentro del terrine de diez dies bajo apercibimientos de ley. Lo que se publica a sus efectos, el $OLETIN OFICIAL, y en el hall de Tribunales. Rosario, Noviembre de 2017. Dra Cossovich, Secretaria. $ 45 347024 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposition del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en Io Civil y Comercial de la 18va. Nomination de Rosario, Secretaria a cargo de la Autorizanta, serfia dispuesto !lamer a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de REINOSO OLGA (DNI 5.565.697) para que comparezcan dentro del termino de diet dias a hacer valer sus derechos ante este Tribunal. Rosario. 05/02/2018. Dr. Jonatan Perini, Prosecretario. S 45 347015 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposicion del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de la 18va. Nominacidn de Rosario, Secretaria a cargo de la Autorizante, sema dispuesto llamar a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de ROLDAtd ROQUE JOAQUIN ALFREDO (DNI 10.065.583), pars que comparezcan dentro del termino de diez dlas a hacer valer sus derechos ante este Tribunal. Rosario, 05/02/2018. Dr. Jonatan Pierini, Prosecretario. $ 45 347014 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposition del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de la 8va Nominacidn de Rosario, Secretaria a cargo de la Autorizante, se ha dispuesto Ilamar a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de EUGENIO PABLO PACCINI (DNI N° 4.662.217) y DELIA MAIDANA (DM N° 2.384.843) pars que comparezcan dentro del terming de diez dias a hacer valer sus derechos ante este Tribunal, Dr, Pierini, Prosecretario. $ 45 347013 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 https:ihr ww.santale.aab.aribaletinaticialiver.php7seccian=14.02.2018edictas2c.htmt 12i2 r 2)2712019 aciEtln O icial de is i'rovincla de Santa 1•e - Republica Argentina Por disposition del Senor Juez de Pritnera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Cornercial de la lava Nominacion de Rosario, Secretalla a cargo de la Autorizante, se ha dispuesto flamer a los herederes. acreedores y legatarios de GIOVANNI PRIVITERA (DNI N° 93.590.991) pare que comparezcan dentro del termino de diez digs a hacer valer sus cferecl'ios ante este Tribunal. Rosario. 1 de Febrero de 2018, Dr. Pierini, Prosecretario. $ 45 347007 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposition del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en to Civil y Comercial de la 18va Nominacion de Rosario, Secretana a cargo de la Autorizante, se ha dispuesto Ilamar a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de ELSA HAYDEE ROSSO (DNI N° 6.203.409) pars que comparezcan dentro del termino de diez dias a hater valer sus derechos ante este Tribunal. Rosario, 1 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Pierini, Prosecretario. $ 45 347004 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 El Sr Juez de 1 ra. tnstancia de Distrito en to Civil y Camercial de to 10me. Nominack n de Rosario, Dr, Eduardo Orono, Secretaria Dra Carla Gussoni Porrez, llama a los herederos, acreedares y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de dona ALICIA ESTHER CALDERAI (LC 4.284.891) pars que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. A los efectns legates se publican edictos cinco veces en diez dies en el f3OLETf N OFICIAL y se fijan en un espacio habilitado a tai efecto en este Tribunal. conforme lo dispuesto en los arts. 67 y 592 CPCC. 'CALDERA( ALICIA ESTHER sfDeclaratoria de Herederos (Expte. CUI) 21- 02887385-6)' Rosario, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Pasotti, Prosecretario, $ 45 346969 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 El Sr. Juez de Ira. Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Camercial de la 10ma. Nominacion de Rosario, Dr. Eduardo Orono, Secretaria Dra, Carla Gussoni Porrez, llama a los herederos, acreedores y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de don: Roberto Gbrnez (DNI 6.012.479) pars que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. A los efectos legates se publican edictos cinco veces en d'[ez dies en el BOLETNN OFICIAL y se fijan en un espacio habilitado a tal efecto en este Tribunal. conforrne lo dispuesto en los arts, 67 y 592 CPCC "GOMEZ. ROBERTO sJDeclaratoria de Herederos (Expte. CUI! 21-02880624-5). Rosario. 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Pasotti, Prosecretario. $ 45 346968 Feb_ 14 Feb. 27 https:Ihvwwsantafe.gotr.arrboletinoficiallyer.php7seccion=14-02.20 t 8edlctos2chtml 112 ' 2/2702019 Bolelin (Deceit de la Provirtcra de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk El Sr Juez de 1ra. Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de la 10ma. r'Ivrrrtuac.1u1) ue Rosario, Dr. Eduardo ❑ronio. Secretaria Dra, Carla Gussoni Porrez, llama a los herederos, acreedores y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de Don/Dafia. Marcos Cayetano Aroca (DNI 6.741.684) y Maria del Carmen Enriqueta Genttili (DNI 3.765.027) pars que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. A los efectos legates se publican edictos cinco veces en diez dias en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y se fijan en un espacio habilitado a tal efecto en este Tribunal, conforme lo dispuesto en los arts. 67 y 592 CFCC. "AROCA, MARCOS CAYETANO y Giros slDeclaratoria de Herederos (Expte. CIJIJ 21-02888239-1)". Rosario, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Pasotti, Prosecretario. S. 45 345967 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 El Sr, Juez de lera. Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial de la IOma. Nominacidn de Rosario, Dr. Eduardo Orono, Secretaria Ora. Carla Gussoni Porrez, Rama a los herederos, acreedores y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de Don/Dona: SOFIA ANGELA BORZANI (LC 5.504.452), ELENA CAROLINA BORZANI (LC 5.504.469), ROBERTO LUIS BORZANI (DNI 3.687.769) y HERMINIA DAMARIS BORZANI (LC 5.504.451) pare que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valet sus derechos. A los efectos legates se publican edictos cinco veces en diez dins en el BOLET[N ❑FICiAL y se fijan en un espacio habilitado a tal efecto en este Tribunal, conformelo dispuesto en los arts. 67 y 592 CPCC. Borzani, Sofia Angela y Otros slDeclaratoria de herederos (Expte. N° 966/14). Rosario. 01 de Febrero de 2018. Dr. Pasotti, Prasecretario. $ 45 346966 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 El Sr. Juez de lera. Instancia de Distrito en io Civil y Comercial de la IOma. Norninacidn de Rosario, Dr. Eduardo Orono, Secretaria Dra. Carta Gussoni Porrez. (lama a los herederos, acreedores y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de don Alcedo Jose Cesoiari (ONI 5.999.855) para que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. A los efectos legates se publican edictos cinco veces en diez digs en el 6OLET•1N OFICIAL y se fijan en un espacio habilitado a tal efecto en este Tribunal. conforme lo dispuesto en los arts. 67 y 592 CPCC. "CESOLARI, ALCEDO JOSE slDeclaratoria de Herederos (Expte. CLIIJ 21 •02892204- 0)". Rosario, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr, Pasottl, Prosecretario. $ 45 346965 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 El Sr. Juez de lera. Instancia de Distrito en la Civil y Comercial de la 9na Nominacion de Rosario, Dr Gabriel Abed, Secretaria Dra. Veronica Accinelli, llama a los herederos, acreedores y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de Don/Dona. ELIDA PEREYRA (ONI httpr11www,senlafe.gab.arlbeletirtorscleltver.php7seecior,=14-02-2018editte. 2c.hlml :412 2/27/2019 Merin Orrcial de la ProvinCla de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina 5.884.482), para que dentro de treinta dies comparezcan a este tribunal a hacer valor sus derechos. Publiquese edicto en el BOLETIN OFICIAL par el termino de un dia. °PEREYRA ELIDA sfSucescrio (Expte, CU1J 21-02890873-0r. Rosario, 1 de Febrero de 2018. Dra. Accinelli, Secreta ria. 3 45 346964 Feb. 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Sr. Juez de la Ira. Instancia de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 9° Nomination de Rosario, hace saber que el Sr. Alfredo Honorio Guirado (DNI 5.9,89.461) tallecia el dia 24 de agosla de 201E y cite a todos sus herederos, acreedores, legatarios y todos los que se consideren con derecho a los bienes de su patrimonio, para que dentro de treinta dies comparezcan a este tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. Publiquese edicto en el BOLETIN OFICIAL por el termino de un dia. Dra. Veronica A. Accinelli (Expte. N° 21.02875996-4 - GUIRADO ALFREDO s/Declaratoria de herederos). Rosario, 20 de Diciernbre de 2017. Dra Accinelli Secretaria. $ 45 346963 Feb. 14 Por disposition del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia en In Civil y Carnerciat de la 6ta. Nominacibn de Rosario, se cite, llama y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores y iegatarios de HECTOR DIAZ (DNI 5.990.428) para que comparezcan a hacer vater sus derechos dentro del termino y bajo los apercibimientos legales. Lo que se publica a sus efectos en e1 BOLETIN OFtCIAL y Hail de Tribunales. Secretarla, 05 de Febrero de 2018 $ 45 347034 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposicion del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en to Civil y Comercial de la 18va Nomination de Rosario, Secretarla a cargo de la Autorizante, se he dispuesto flamer a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de RUBEN OLMEDO (DNI N' 5.985.215) para que comparezcan dentro del termino de diez dies a hacer valer sus derechos ante este Tribunal. Rosario, 1/02/2018 Prosecretario, Dr Jonatan Pierini. $ 45 347009 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposicion del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia en to Civil y Comercial de la Eta. Norninaclan de Rosario, se cita, llama y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores y tegatarios de MARIA LUJAN JOSEFA STAMBONI (DNI 5.483.895) para que comparezcan a hacer valor sus https://mtrw.santafe.gob.ar/boletinoticiallver.php7section=14-02.2018edictos2c.html 15121 2J2712019 Bslelin Oficial de la Prawncia de Santa Fe - Repiibluua Argentina derechos dentro del termino y bajo los apercibimientos legates. La que se publics a sus efectos en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y Hall de Tribunales. Secretaria, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposlcifn del Seder Juez de Primera lnstancia en to Civil y Comercial de la eta Nominacion de Rosario, se cite, llama y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de ALBERTO ARRIETA (DN' 6.000.682) pars que comparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos dentro del termino y bajo los apercibimientos legates. Lo que se publica a sus efectos en el BOLETiN OFICIAL y Hall de Tribunales. Secretaria, 05 de Febrero de 2018. Dr Fernando Adrian Bitetti, Prosecretario. $ 45 347030 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Por disposicidn del Sr, Juez de Distrito Civil y Ccmercial de la 15a. Nominaci&n de Rosario, se ha dispuesto sitar a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de SUAREZ, HECTOR ANTONI❑ - DNI. N° 07.597,928 - pare que en el termino de 30 dies, se presenten en autos los posibles herederos, acreedores y cualquier otro que se considere con derecho a los bienes dejados par el causante - Publiquense edictas en el BOLETiN OFICIAL y Hall de Tribunales por et termino de un die (Art. 2340 C.C,C,N.)- (Expfe: CU1J: 21-02891423-4).- Rosario, 05 de Febrero de 2018.- Dra. Maria Eugenia Sapei, Secretaria. $ 45 346953 Feb. 14 Por disposicion del Sr. Juez de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 12a. Nomineeidn de Rosario, se ha dispuesto citar a los herederos, acreedores y legatarios de BASTERI, JUAN ALBERTO - DNI. N° 5.959.354 - pars que en el termino de 30 dies, se presenten en autos los posibles herederos, acreedores y cualquier otro que se considers con derecho a los bienes dejados por el causante.- PublIquense edictos en el BOLETIN OFICIAL y Hall de Tribunales por el termino de un dia (Art. 2340 C.C.C.N,)- (Exple CLJIJ: 21-02891423-4).- Rosario. 05 de Febrero de 2018; Dre. Agustina Filippini, Secretaria. $ 45 346952 Feb. 14 FIRMAT hllesllwvtinv.santafe.gob.erlboJelinoriciallver.php75ercion-14-02-2018ediCtas2c,hlr l 16a1 2/27/2019 $Diann Oft al de la Frcvincia de Sania Fe - Republica Argentina JUZGADO CIVIL, COMERCIAL Y DEL TRABAJO Submitted into the public record for itern(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposition de la Senora Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito N° 16 en la Civil, Comercial y Laboral de la ciudad de Firmat, se cite, llama y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores y Iegatarios del causante Don CARLOS ENRIQUE JONES, pars que dentro del termino y bajo apercibimienlos de ley. ccmparezcan a hacer vales sus derechos en los autos caratulados JONES, CARLOS ENRIQUE s/Declaratoria de herederos, Expte 1.803, ano 2017. Lo que se publica a sus efectas en el BOLETiN OFICIAL. Firmal. de 29 de Diciernbre de 2017. Dra. Laura M Berm, Secretaria. $ 45 347017 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 CASILDA JUZGADO CIVIL, COMERCIAL Y DEL TRABAJO Por disposition de la Senora Jueza del Juzgado de Primers Instancia de Distrito Civil Comercial y Laboral N°1 de la Ira. Nominacidn de la ciudad de Casilda, Dra. Clelia Carina Gomez. Secretaria del autorizante Agustin Mario Crosio, se cita y emplaza a los herederos. acreedores y legatarios de la Sra. Vergilli Dioslayuda Quinta para que comparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos dentro por el termino de 30 digs bajo apercibimienlos de ley. Publiquese par el termino de 1 dia. (Autos: VERGILLI DIOSLAYUDA QUINTA s/Sucesi6n, Expte. N" 637/17). Casilda, 01 de Febrero de 2018. Fdo. Agustin Mario Crosio, Secretaria. $ 45 347020 Feb 14 VILLA CONSTITUCI 5N JUZGADO CIVIL, COMERCIAL htlps liwww.santafe.gob,arlholetindficialiver.pnp7seccian=14-Q2-2O18edictos2c.himl 17/21 2/2112019 EArletin Oficial de la Provincia de Santa Fe - Fceput lica Argentina Y DEL TRABAJO Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk El Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Distrito Nro. 14 en to Civil, Comercial y Laboral de la Prirnera Naminacidn, con asiento en la Ciudad de Vila Constitution, Provincia de Santa Fe, a cargo de la Dra. Agueda Orsaria, Secretaria Sudrogante a cargo de la Dra. Melisa Peretti, llama a los herederos, acreadores o legatarios de don Arturo Dario Ciampechini par el termino de treinta dlas. para que comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. Villa Constitution (SF), 23 de Noviembre de 2017. Autos: CIAMPECHINI ARTURO D_ slDeclaratona de herederos - Sucesion, Expte. N° 809/17. bra. Peretti, Secretaria Subrogante. $ 45 343689 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Par disposition del Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Circuit° Nro. 14 de Villa Constitution, a cargo del Sr. Juez Dr. Diogenes Drovetta, dentro de los autos caratulados MUNICIPALIDAD DE VILLA CONSTITUCI5N CNALLES GER6NIMO y Otros slApremi❑ Fiscal, Expte. 908/2017_ se cite al Sr. Geranimo Valles y/o sucesores ylo actual propietario y/o poseedor animus domini del vehlcuIo identificado con el dominlo S076DJT, a fin de que oponga exception legitima dentro del termini() de ocho dins y bajo apercibimiento de Ilevarse adelante la ejecucibn en caso de no hacerlo. Se deja constancia que la publication del presente edict° es sin cargo, en virtud de la Ley 5.06'5 y sus modi icatorias. Uiia Constitution, 02 de Febrero de 2018. Dra. Adriana Silvia Oronao, Secretaria. Samanta Lastorta, Prosecretaria. S)C 346995 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 MELINCUE JUZGADO CIVIL, COMERCIAL Y DEL TRABAJ❑ La senora Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito de la 8va. Nominacibn en to Civil, Comercial y Laboral de Melincue, Dra. Analia M. Irrazebal, Secretaria del Dr. Leandro Carozzo, en los autos caratulados DORTHE, MARTHA LUISA slSucesion (Expte N° 1458/17) llama a los herederos. acreedores y/o legatarios de tvlarthe Luisa Dorthe por diez (10) digs pars que cnmparezcan ante este Tribunal a hacer vafer sus derechos. Mellncue, 27 de Dicsembre de 2017 Dr. Leandro Carozzo, Secretario. tittps•rlmwv.santafe.qob.arlbotelinoficialfver.php7secdon� 14-02.2018ediclas2chtrnl 2+27/2{] 1 Bvletir+ 011cial da to Prowncla tle Santa Fe - Republica Argentina $ 45 346970 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk La senora Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito de la 8va. Nomination en Io Civil, Comercial y Laborat de Metincue, Dra. Analla M. Irrazabal, Secretaria del Dr Leandro Carozzo, en los autos caratulados PICCOLO, Ai'1LUO EUGENIO slSucesion (Expte N' 1457/17) llama a los herederos, acreedores ylo legatarios de ATILIO EUGENIO PICCOLO por diez (10) dies pars que comparezcan ante este Tribunal a hacer valer sus derechos. Melincue, 27 de Diciernbre de 2017. Dr, Leandro Carozzo, Secretario. $ 45 346971 Feb. 14 Feb. 27 VENADO TUERTO JUZGADO CIVIL, COMERCIAL Y DEL TRABAJO Por disposition del Sr. Juez Dr Federico Bertram, a cargo del Juzgado de Distrito Civil y Comercial de la 2da Nomination de la ciudad de Venado Tuerto, Pcia de Santa Fe, Secretaria del Dr. A. Walter Bournot, dentro de los autos CAPARROZ, JULIO OSMAR cJRONDARt, DOMINGO NESTOR y Otro s)Transferencia de vehlcuio, Expte Nro 1382/20126, se ha declaredo rebelde al Sr. Rondari Domingo Nestor LE 6.100.362 y se proseguira el juicio sin su representacidn. Venado Tuerto. 06 de Junio de 2017. Dr. A. Walter Bournot, Secretaria $ 33 347[148 Feb. 14 Feb. 16 Por disposicion del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en lo Civil y Comercial de Distrito de la Segunda Nomtnacion de is ciudad de Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe, a cargo del Dr. Federico Bertram (Juez), Secretaria del Dr. Waiter Bournot, se city y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores o legatarios de don Gerardo Silvio Rossi, pars que en el termino de Ley comparezcan a hacer vaier sus derechos, bajo los apercibimientos de Ley_ Autos ROSSI GERARDO SILVI❑ slSucesion (Expte. 773/2017)- Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe, 29 de Diciernbre de 2017. Firmed() Dr. Federico Bertram (Juez)- Dr. Walter Bournot (Secretario). $ 45 347002 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 htimilwww.santafe.gob.arfholatinoticiaVver.phrseocion=14-02-2a18edicsos2c.html 1fli2 t 2r27120 r9 Bvletin OI cial de la Provmpa da Santa Fe - Republica Argentina Submitted into the public record for itern(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Por disposicion del Juzgado de Primera Instancia en !o Civil y Comercial de Distrito de la Segunda Nominacion de la Ciudad de Venado Tuertc, Santa Fe, a cargo de la Dr. Federico Bertram (Juez), Secretaria del Dr. Wafter Bournot, se cita y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores o legatarios de done Macchione Mena Natalina Teresa / Macchione Mena Natalia Teresa s/Sucesidn, para que en el termino de Ley cornparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos, bajo los apercibimientos de Ley- Autos MACCHIONE MENA NATAL1NA TERESA ! MACCI-#ZONE MENA NATALIA TERESA s/Sucesion (Expte. 872/2017)- Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe 29 de Diciembre de 2017, Firrnado Dr. Federico Bertram (Juez)- Dr. Walter Bournot (Secretario) $ 45 347006 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 For disposicion del Sr. Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial 2da. Nominacion de Venado Tuerto, Dr_ Federico Bertram, et Secretaria gue suscribe cite, [lama y emplaza a herederos, legatarios y acreedores de Hector Pablo Oliva, D.N.I. n° 6.121.797. pars que dentro del termino de ley comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valet sus derechos. Autos OLIVA, HECTOR PABLO s/Sucesion (Exple 611/2017). Venado Tuerto, 2 de Febrero de 2017.- ❑r. Walter Bournot, Secretario. $ 45 347090 Feb 14 Feb. 20 Por disposicon de !a Sra, Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito en lo Civil y Comercial lra. Nominacion de Venado Tuella, Dra. Maria Celeste Rosso, la Secretaria que suscribe cite, llama y ernplaza a herederos, legatarios y acreedores de Maria Esther Garay, L.C. n° 7.557.094 y de Anibal Antonio Uribe, L.E. n° 2.901.264, pare que dentro del termino de ley comparezcan a este Tribunal a hacer valet sus derechos.- Autos URIBE, ANIBAL ANTONIO - GARAY. MARIA ESTHER s/Sucesion (expte 786/2017) - Venado Tuerto, 05 de Febrero de 2017. Dra. Andrea Chaparra. Secretaria. $ 45 347094 Feb 14 Feb. 20 Por disposicion del Senor Juez de Primera Instancia de Distrito Civil y Comercial de !a Segunda Nominacion de la Ciudad de Venado Tuerto, a cargo del Dr. Federico Bertram (Juez), Secretaria del Dr. Waiter Bournot, se cite y emplaza a los herederos, acreedores o fegatarios de Rotta Federico Felix (DNI 6.098,917) pars que en et termino de ley cornparezcan a hacer valer sus derechos bajo apercihimientos de ley. Autos DI FLILVIO MARIA CONCEPCION y ROLDO FEDERICO FELIX s/Declaratoria de herederos (Expte. 978/2016). Venado Tuerto, 22 de Diciembre de 2017 Dr. A. Walter Bournot, Secretario. httpz://wro v.santefe.aeb.aiiboletinoficlal/ver,php?secolon=14-02-2018edictex2c.hlml 20/21 212712019 Bolelin Oficial de la Pravincia de Santa Fe - Republica Argentina $ 45 347008 Feb. 14 Feb. 20 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Gerk R55 / $U5CRlPC1O 4 A NOT1C1A5 f 3` t. m u �; t) i n SANTA FE TEGNOLOGIAS SANTAFE Atencion teiefdnice: 0800-777.0801 Lunes a viernes de 8 a 18 hs 8 Atribucion•Compartirlgual 2.5 Argentina https:Ilwww.sentafe.gab.arinoieiinaciativer.php7section 14-02-2018edidos2c.html 21121 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk TAB 5 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk h, Stock Symbol, if Publicly Traded: I. Corporate; Structure: (include parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates, as applicable) LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Proposer's Principals: AABAD R. MELWANI 4. DIEGO ARDiD 5. 3. DAMIAN CALABRESE 6. Any principals included on this REP Submission Form may not be substituted or withdrawn from participation after the Submission Date unless the City Manager specifically authorizes in writing a request for substitution. k. Individual(s) Authorized to Negotiate and Sign on Proposer's Behalf: AABAD R, MELWANI RICHARD PEREZ, ESQ. 1. Brief Company History: Company formed to serve as proposing entity in reponse to the City Of Miami REP 10-17-011 D/B1A Marina PARC Miami See Executive Summary: Experience and Qualifications; Resumes Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk APPENDIX 4 BUSINESS TEAM EXPERIENCE FORMS 1.0- each niembl.'r of your Business Taint ( i.e.. the Joy persons iui (lived ita the management and operations of the pi -clamed business), plow iisi the name assd rule of the individual in Ilse Project (for example. Prineipni&CEO. Oueralions Manager. RLrslaurnnt Manager. Ketail Manager, Marina Manager, Arrhiteci. Cicneral Contractor, etc.), experience in similar prtljeet., type of prujecls. number of years within such pruje is. and the financial scope of the projt'els. AtlacL a J tiliurtaI sheers if necessary. Resulnr:s fair each member or copse pissed should he attached as well. aredFriduat Name DAMIAN CAIABRESE Rae PRINCIPAL Previans Project(%) Kane T1FON WATER PLANET Proct Type 1 Location 2. TIFON WATER PLANET 1 AUTOMAT Pr Ar 5000 VES EE1. CAPACITY 2. AU I UMA TF it BOA T bin dl.i "Atm Y MOO Vf55EL CAPACFFv 3_ ADUADAS 0j4TED COMMUNITY gMERIDIA 4 CFFFCE TOVi'E S. COSTA BODUCHARD Z• ANNER COASTAL 1, BUENOS AIRES AiiLiL:N 1 LNA 2. ROSARIO. ARGENTINA 3.FLArES.ARGENTIr A 4, ROSARIO. ARGENTIN BAIGORfiIA. ARGENTFN Raker in Prot ARLHTFLC:T DEVELOPER 1. -OPERAri`t3R— ARCHITECT 2, QVELOPER OPERATOR ARCI41ITECT 3.nr11Ft npR ARCHITECT 4• DFAIE nns+s'z ARCHITECT • _DFVFIPPER Name Role 1. 2, 3. 4. 1. 3. 4 1. 2. 3. 4. Ytsrs in project 1. 2011-PRESENT] 2 2015PRESENT 3. 3 YEARS 4. 2 YEARS 5 2016 TO PRESENT 2. 3. A. 5. MARIN A Submitted into the public record for itern(sj RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk XI. EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS PARC Marina PARC Miami combines the extraordinary experience and expertise of Aabad R. Melwani, Diego Ardid, and Damian Calabrese, accomplished leaders in the marine, hospitality, development industries. who are principals of Biscayne Marine Partners LLC, the proposing entity. The demonstrated experience and qualifications of the totality of the Marina PARC Miami team (all enumerated below) vastly exceed all of this procurement's requirements, possessing the financial and management capabilities to design, construct and operate a mixed -use marina project of this size, scope and complexity. More specifically. members of Marina PARC Miami possess more than the required fifteen (15) minimum years' experience directly managing and operating a project of similar size and scope. as well as the required five (5) minimum years' experience of ownership and day-to-day operation of a mixed -use marina of this size and scope. Marina PARC Miami is overwhelmingly comprised of local firms employing many City residents and contractors, and its principals and team members have played leading roles in the development of projects of similar or greater size, complexity and environmental sensitivity, including funding projects as large as $250 million. The principals are. Aabad R. Melwanl, Esq. Mr Melwani, a Certified Marina Manager, is president of Rickenbacker Marina, Inc., which operates on a substantial portion of the project site. He will serve as Manager for Marina PARC Miami, bringing decades of on -site experience, relationships and intimate local knowledge to all of the newly constructed project facilities. A Miami native, marine industry veteran and lifelong boater, Mr. Melwani has a demonstrated allegiance to the highest standards of all aspects of the marine Industry and long has been e strong and vocal proponent of coastal conservation and preservation. Having grown up on the neighboring island of Key Biscayne, with Rickenbacker Marina as his family business, absolutely no one is more keenly familiar with this project site on Virginia Key. He possesses a lifetime's worth of marina and marine experience, and more than 15 years' experience in commercial real estate, owning and managing a real -property portfolio of office, retail and hotel space throughout Florida. With an educational and professional background in real property, land use and environmental law, Mr. Melwani is a member in good standing of the Florida Bar and licensed to practice law in Florida. He became a Certified Marina Manager in 2011 through specialized training and membership with the international Marina Institute and Association of Marina industries. Mr. Melwani founded Atlas Marine Partners LLC in 2011 with the goal of identifying and investing in marine -industry companies. Today, he and Atlas own, develop and manage marinas, including Rickenbacker Manna, Hurricane Cove Marina and Boatyard, and 400 Sunny Isles Marina. Mr Melwani is also a founder, strategic investor and adviser for a portfolio of marine -industry operating companies, including Boatbound.co and Boatyard. Virginia Key Marina REP No. 16.17•011 99 M A P 1 N A Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 . City Clerk PARS corn_ Additional information is provided at www.atlasmarine.co RIckenbacker Marina is a professionally operated, full -service, 568 slip marina and boatyard with 190 wet slips, 378 dry stack slips and storage including some 80 jet skis and personal watercraft. Concierge maintenance and mechanical services, both on -site and remotely, are offered throughout the Greater Miami area. Rickenbacker Marina has been a tenant in good standing with the City of Miami since 1983, and currently pays the City more than $1.2 million In annual rent, triple net, and Inclusive of substantial percentage payments on various revenue streams. During the course of Its 34-year tenancy on Virginia Key, Rickenbacker Marina has hosted and supported numerous charitable events, including many fishing tournaments, free concerts and civic fairs, and has made significant donations to local, national and International philanthropic organizations, including Camillus House, the Chapman Partnership and Glasswing International. in conjunction with the National Marine Manufacturers Association, Rickenbacker Marina has been a site partner for the Miami International Boat Show. For the first time, this year Rickenbacker Marina was also a site sponsor and host to the 21st. Annual Miami Dolphins Foundation Fins Weekend Fishing Tournament benefitting Miami City Year, the Iota} partner of a national service organization providing mentoring and educational support for at risk students. Additional information is provided at www.rmlmarina.com Hurricane Cove Marina is a 150-stip marina and commercial boatyard located on the historic. Miami River. Hurricane Cove offers wet -slips, haul out, dry dock and turn -key maintenance and mechanical services. Atlas Marine Partners assumed management of the distressed Hurricane Cove in June 2013, which had annual gross income of less than $500,000. Two years later, under Atlas management, Hurricane Cove's annual gross income exceeded $2.5 million. 400 Sunny Isles Marina, built and operated in conjunction with Key International, Inc., Is a new innovatively constructed 80 dry slip, 40 wet slip. private marina with rooftop tennis courts, located In the mixed use residential development, 400 Sunny Isles, adjacent to the pristine Oleta River State Park. Residents of the associated development, seeking first class services and amenities, rely run the professional management provided by Mr. Melwani and his professionally trained staff. As an innovator. Mr. Melwani maintains an equity and advisory position in Boatbound. co, the first fully insured and leading "pier to pier" boat rental marketplace. The company makes boat rentals easily accessible to a wide range of consumers nationwide Most boats are idle for much or nearly all of the year, and Boatbound,co provides owners a platform for fully -insured rentals of their vessels. By combining world -class developers, collaborative marketing tools and pioneering industry partnerships (including Brunswick and Boat U.S.), Boatbound.co has created the first and best model adapting the new "sharing economy" to the marine industry, transforming boating as we once knew it. Ast;1s has since divested of its interest in Hurricane Cove 100 Vlrginra Key Marina €tFP No. 16-17-011 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk M A R T Al PARS Boatyard.com is the first mobile application to offer on -demand marine concierge services, connecting boat owners to local, verified and reliable marine service professionals. Reciprocally, marine service professionals can list and market their qualifications and capabilities on the Boatyard.com platform, extending their entrepreneurial reach into local economies. As a staunch boat -safety advocate with strong ties to his community, Mr_ Melwani serves as a board member of the Monica Burguera Foundation, an organization founded following a boating accident during the 2006 Columbus Day Festivities in Miami and whose mission is teaching safe boating practices. Mr. Melwani also serves as a volunteer board member for a variety of local civic and charitable organizations. Diego Ardid Mr. Ardid is Co -President of Key International, Inc., a diversified real estate and development company founded and headquartered in the City of Miami. The company has an exemplary, four -decade track record of leveraging its many capabilities, qualifications and experience across a wide variety of commercial opportunities, including marine, hospitality, office, retail, mixed -use and residential projects. Drawing upon his architectural and development experiences. Jose Ardid founded Key International inthe late 1970s. Since 2004, Diego and InigoArdid have managed the company's operations, significantly grown Its property portfolio and greatly expanded its diversified business lines. Key International has completed more than $4 billion worth of real-estate transactions in the marine, retail. residential rental (including market rate and government - subsidized housing), hospitality and office industries. The company has developed more than 10 million square feet of property. and manages a best -in -class condominium sales ptatform that has sole more than $5 billion worth of properties to domestic and a broad range of international clients. Today, Key International and its related companies are respected leaders in bringing to market an array of first-class projects throughout the southeastern United States and Europe, with most located along Florida's coastline from 5t. Augustine around to Tamp/St. Petersburg. Damian Calabrese Mr Calabrese is the Founder and Chief Architect of Desaroilo MOR, a global company, headquartered in Argentina, with over 15 years of design. planning, and development experience. Mr. Calabrese founded Tifon Water Planet in 2011 with the goal of designing, building, and operating the world's most innovative automated boat storage and facilities, currently providing for 1500 automated dry slips. Mr. Caiabrese's involvement earns Marina PARC Miami the profound distinction of being the only proposer that has designed, built, and is currently operating two successful state of the art automated boat storage facilities. Given this distinction, it should follow that Marina PARC Miami is the proposer most qualified Virginia Key Marina RFP No. 16-17-011 101 M ARINA. PAPC ariuni. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1� on 07/11/2019 City Clerk and capable in providing for a state of the art automated boat storage facility on this uniquely situated site on Virginia Key. For a glimpse into the future, please visit: httpi lwww. tifonwaterplanet.coml and access the flash drive included with this submittal. Marina PARC Miami Marina PARC Miami, its principals and team members have established sterling reputations through their ability to skillfully identify and integrate ail phases of complex developments to create meaningful, waterfront destinations. As a result, many of their bay and oceanfront projects are among the most desired destinations in their respective markets. Marina PARC Miami has assembled a high -caliber team of experts to decisively execute all aspects of the project, including permitting, design, financing, development and operation of art Facilities, with a careful phasing plan that will deliver each component in a logical and functional sequence and at the earliest possible moment possible. The team has more than 35 years' of extensive experience partnering with governmental entities and on publicly owned land, most significantly demonstrated by Rickenbacker Marina's excellent tenancy on a portion of the project site. The team also possesses a demonstrated track record of developing significant, waterfront projects subject to rigid historic preservation guidelines, such as the landmark Eden Roc Hotel in Miami Beach. Manna PARC Miami's general contractor will be Moss Construction Management, which in the past 10 years has completed more than $1 billion worth of projects, for Key International alone, encompassing more than 5.3 million square feet of marina, office, hospital and retail space. Business and Development Team: The required organizational chart, forms. resumes, qualifications, and relevant experience narratives for the following Business and Development Team Members are enclosed. MANAGEMENT Biscayne Marine Partners LLC Aabad R. Melwani, Esq., CMM. President of Rickenbacker Marina. Inc and Manager of Atlas Marine Partners LLC Diego Ardid. Co -President of Key International, Inc. Damian Calabrese, Founder and Chief Architect of Desarollo MOR/Tifon ❑ESIGN AND ENGINEERING Stantec Architecture Inc. Jonathan Cardello, Senior Principal at Miami Office Adriana Jaegerman, Structural Engineer at Miami Office 102 Virginia Key Marina RFP No. 16-17.O11 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk CONSTRUCTION Moss Construction Management Edward Baro, Vice President at Fort Lauderdale office ENVIRONMENTAL Ocean Consulting, LLC Kirk J. Lofgren, President at Miami office www.MancLrove.orq Robert W. Riley, Jr., Founder at Melbourne Beach office LANDSCAPING Raymond Jungles, Inc. Raymond Jungles, FASLA, Founder and President at Miami Office DRY STACK STORAGE MA R I N A PAQ Roof and Rack Products. inc. and Associated Technical Support William H. Roof, President at Boca Raton office Damian Calabrese. Tifon Water Planet and VK Marina LLC at Virginia Key office Camron Ghanem, Vice President of Ace World Companies, Chicago Robert Konerrnan, Regional Director of Rockwell Automation, Inc., Louisville Richard Dahl, Development Director, Control Touch Systems, Louisville WET SLIPS Bellingham Marine Industries Everett Babbit, President and CEO at Bellingham, WA office Kevin Thompson, General Manager at Southeast U.S. Division Office Steve Ryder, Manager of Project Development, Southeast U S. Division Office RESTAURANTS Plan Do See Miami, LLC Hiro Nishida, President at Miami Beach office — fine dining Garda Brothers Seafood. Inc. David Garcia, President at Miami's La Camaronera restaurant - casual dining Virginia Key Marina RFP No. 16.17-011 103 MARINA PAPC ..�� e�Ill�!]►�i1. POWERBOAT DEALERSHIP Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on _ 07/11/2019 , City Clerk intrepid Powerboats, Inc. Ken Clinton, President of Odessa, FL office WATERSPORTS TKS Concessions, LLC dba The Kite Shop Morgan Blittner and Juan Pavan, Co -Founders at Coconut Grove office CHARTERS, TOURS, AND WATER TAXI Sightseeing Tours Management, Inc. Michael Simpson, Owner and Director of Downtown Miami Office VALUATION AND FINANCIAL AND MARKET FEASIBILITY Integra Realty Resources Anthony M. Graziano, MAI, CRE, Chairman at Coral Gables office LEGAL Holland & Knioht LLP Richard A. Perez, Esq., Partner at Miami office, tease and regulatory issues Akerman LLP T. Spencer Crowley III, Partner at Miami office, land -use, zoning, and environmental issues 104 Virginia Key Marina RFP No. 16-17.O 1 Subrnitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on _07/11/2019 , City Clerk } PROPOSER Biscayne Marine Partners LLC D/B/A Marina PARC Miami Atlas Marine Development LLC, Managing Member txenio International LLC I i r Diego Ard,d. Manager 1 Atlas Marine Development LLC Aabad R. Melwani, Esq., CMM, Manager ARCHITECTS Stantec Jonathan W. Cordello, Senior Principal, US Buildings Commercial Sector Leader Ryce Stallings- Principal, Project Architect Elvira Freire Santamaria. Senior Project Manager Andrew Burnett, Associate, Senior Architect Elan Blumberg, Design Manager Desarollo MORiTifon Damian Calabrese, CEO, Chief ArchilecVbesigner M A R I N A PAPG J LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Raymond Jungles, Inc. Raymond Jungles FASLA Benjamin Green, PLA, LEER AP ir ENGINEER Stantec Adnana Jaegerman PE, Principal Structural Engineer CONSTRUCTION Moss Construction Management Ed Sara. Vice President Jason Clark, Project Executive t Alex Rodriguez, Project Manager r Mark. Cummings, Superintendent Iran Syed, Chief Estimator ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Stantec } Dr. Jeff Marcus, Ph.D. Principal Ocean Consulting Kirk Lofgren, President Mangrove.org Bob Riley, Owner/Principal LEGAL COUNSEL Holland and Knight LLP Richard Perez. Esq. Akerman LLP Nelsen Kasdin. Spencer Crowley ACCOUNTING BOO Sanford B. Horwitz CPA r -I 1 VENDORS & TECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Roof and Rack Bill Roof, Owner and President Ace World Industries Camron Ghanemi, Executive Vice President Rockwell Automation Robert B. Konerrnann, Regional Segment Leader/Program Manager Control Touch Dave Cahoe, Director of Engineering Josh Frltzler, Software Engineering Manager Virginia Key Marina REP No. 16-17-011 105 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/1112019 , City Cleric Damian Calabrese Principal Biscayne Marine Partners LLC Education Arquitectura, I999, Facultad de Arquitectura, Planeamiento y Diseno Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Argentina Overview [ Experience Mr. Calabrese has an outstanding track record as a developer and manager in real estate projects of significant magnitude and significance. He founded the company MOR Arquitectura SRL (DES ARROLLO MOR) I5 years ago., led today bye group of more than 50 outstanding professionals committed to identifying opportunities, planning, building, communicating and commercializing innovative real estate developments. MOR Florida LLC Founder After receiving offers to establish Titbit's facilities in multiple cities throughout South America, Europe and Asia, the team led by the architect Calabrese has decided to associate itself with the outstanding entrepreneurs from the local community, funding a new venture MOR Florida LLC and joining Biscayne Marine Partners LLC. Desarrollo MOR Founder As CEO of the company. Mr. Calabrese has consolidated a progressive expertise in the management of teams oriented in traditional development. This expertise is reflected by the construction of more than 15 buildings of various use and many gated communities, an intense task resulting in the marketable development of more than 16,800,000 sq, ft. real estate including hup:llwww.tifonwaterplanet. com Gavia S.A. (Tiffin Baigorria) I President As developer of the brand Tiffin, Mr. Calabrese now chairs Gavia, the company that drives the services of the watersport facility. Tifnn Baigorria progresses with its construction in stages, with a projected final capacity of 3,000 vessels. It is currently operating with more than 1,000 boats being stored in dry rack boat slips. In addition to serving as headquarters, Tiffin Baigorria has developed an active role in organizing civic and educational events for the boating and cultural populations of the general community. Viltanova S.A. (Tiffin Tigre) I President The success of this first facility led Mr. Calabrese to form and preside over Villanova, a new company formed to build and manage the second facility, Tifon Tigre. Located in Tigre, close to Buenos Aires (capital of Argentina), this city is regarded as the most important of venues for the boating community in the country. Projected to have a capacity to store more than 5.000 dry vessels and provide the same level of ancillary services as in Rosario, Tifnn Tigre commence operations as of January 2016. E� BMP Scoring / Impact of Calabrese SCORING GUIDELINES Vi:giniaKele Maritsa RIP 16-17.011 Categories Max Points 100% 75% `.i t1°:1 2 S% OVMALL alGERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS Relevant business and Project team experience in similar proiec la • Team demonstrates relevant past ex}:erien ce on six (6) or more comparable marina redevelopment projects and at least one of tho a projects in the South Florida area_ • F'xm demonstrated experience with successful automated dry storage operation fora minimum. of 3 years. • Team demonstrates relevant past experience on four (4) to five (S] comparable marina redevelopment projects and at least olie of those projects in the South Florida area • Firm demonstrated experience with successful automated ciy storage operation fora minimum of 2 years. • Team demonstrates relevant past experience on two (2) to three (3) comparable marina redevelopment projects and at Ieast one of those projects in the South Florida area. • Firm demonstrated experience with successful automated dry storage operation fora minimum of 1 year. • Team demonstrates relevant past experience on one (1) or less comparable marina redevelopment projects and at !east one of those projects in the South Florida area. • Firm failed to demonstrate experience with successful automated city storage operation. BMP's proposal identified experience with the following marina development projects: ■ Rickenbacker (Melwani) -- 568 slips (190 wet, 378 dry) ■ Hurricane Cove (Melwani) --150 wet slips ■ 400 Sunny Isles Manna (Melwani) -- 120 slips (80 wet, 40 dry) ■ Eden Roc Hotel Marina (Melwani) -- 20 slips ■ Tifon VVater Planet (Calabrese) -- 2 marinas, total 1500 automated dry slips The proposal also explained: "Mr. Calabrese's involvement earns Marina PARC Miami the profound distinction of being the only proposer that has designed, built, and is currently operating two successful state of the art automated boat storage facilities." BMP proposed 582 automated dry slips and 174 wet slips. __xcluding Calabrese's involvement, BMP would have at best experience with one comparable marina (Rickenbacker) and NO automated dry slip involvement. Only Calabrese has experience with automated dry slips and additional marinas of a comparable size. The 3 additional Melwani marinas are significantly smaller than the proposed marina. Eden Roc, for example, has only 20 slips -- versus the 756 proposed. 400 Sunny Isles has only 120, and Hurricane Cove has only 150. The largest of the three, therefore, is less than 20% the size of the proposed marina. Accordingly, without Calabrese, BMP should receive only 25% of the points--i.e., 2 or 3 points out of 10, or up to 21 points total. Instead, BMP received 53 points total (between 5 and 10 points from each evaluator) --a swing of at least 32 points. Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk M I A M 16337292.1 74183/46889 12 Name Title Address Meeting ❑ate Comment Daniel J. Alfonso City Manager 6/23/2016 "Mr. Chairman, we need to negotiate with the bidder that is currently in first place, having resolved the bid protest issue, because we're definitely going to be asking for more rent, et cetera, so we can't wait until the 13th or the 14th to start that negotiation to put something on the agenda, because the agenda deadline is like three days later, so --" Keon Hardemon Commissioner City of Miami Commission 6/23/2016 ' "1 believe that the Manager should be allowed to continue to negotiate with the number one bidder. His negotiation does not give any vested right. All it does is move us closer to having more answers so that we can address the public with what we believe is factual information that should be considered instead of theories about how this project could move forward. And believe that we are wasting our time by not allowing the Manager to negotiate." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 7/20/2016 "I just don't believe there was enough public input. I, as a Commissioner, wasn't here at the time, but I am now, and I would love to be involved in this process to really make sure that the public's voice is heard, that the Master Plan is completely respected." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Comment Phillip Purcell Executive Director, Marine Industry Association of South Florida 7/20/2016 "What you have is a bidder that won, per your process, and what he's looking for is the certainty to continue in that process. So when you have an opportunity to work with an entrepreneur that went through your process, I would urge you to follow through on that process, and let someone invest the monies that procure a lot of jobs that supports our region and our lifestyle." Shawn Adams Vista Court, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "I currently own a marine management company, and I was in the marina industry....l've know the owners of RCI since they moved to Miami...what a great world -class facility [Rickenbacker] would be under their management." Joseph Neber CEO, Contender Boats 1820 Southeast 38th Avenue, Homestead, FL 7/20/2016 "I'm in favor of the RCI Group's RFP...And it is our leaders' responsibility not only to create a very viable economic and safe residential community, but we have to have good, high -quality recreational opportunities...I think the RCI Group has a track record that's proven that they can take these projects not only from start to finish and do it in a professional manner." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Tricc Adams Park Avenue, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "I've been a resident of Coconut Grove for about 60 years now...Everything that RCI has touched has turned to pure gold. Good for the people." Ray Rosner Kendall, FL 7/20/2016 " 1 started docking at Monty's, which became Bayshore Landing, in '99 ... 1 currently reside there ... I think the RCI Group owned it about 11 years, and my experience was a good one.... 1 probably run about 500 charters a year... And the impression and the image that they get of Miami is affected by projects such as these." Anthony Parrish 3444 Main Highway, Suite 7, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "Once it hosted concerts, regattas, triathletes night and day. It's got the best view of Miami of any place in the City. If you go around opposite the Rickenbacker where they do all the photo shoots, you'll see a view of Miami that you've never seen before...if you will just do this, you will win another World Series and your names will be remembered, just like the Commissioners who saved Vizcaya." Neil Preston 7/20/2016 "I've passed this dilapidated facility for years now, and you have a world -class operation in RCI that wants to do a project that is, you know, worthy of the venue in question." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote David Brennan Trapp Avenue, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "I grew up on Biscayne Bay...[M]y father...was head of the Waterfront Board, and the Southern Channel is named after him...I'm here in support of RCI...I think they'll do a great job embracing the waterfront and the accessibility for people that want to use Biscayne Bay." Manuel Hernandez 7/20/2016 "The world knows Miami all too well and is waiting for the latest in technology -based, environmentally friendly marina storage and management services." Christopher Trogner 7/20/2016 "Currently, what you have are two marinas that are greasy, smelly, rundown that absolutely need to be redeveloped and open to the public." Mike Ohana Miami Beach, FL 7/20/2016 "Me and my wife are boaters, and I think it would be a sin to take back this RFP. And 1 think that having a local marine [sic] operator, like RCI, would be one of the best candidates. And I know that you guys are wanting to maybe push this and change it. think that the best thing to do is to keep it and go forward and stop this waste of time of the residents." Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1, . on 07/11/Z019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Javier Gonzalez Vice Chair, Key Biscayne Village Council 3622 Solano Road, Miami, FL 7/20/2016 "-- hopefully, RCI wins it again. They're wonderful people.' That's all I've heard." Dolly Macintyre 409 Vizcaya Avenue, Coral Gables, FL 7/20/2016 "The restoration of the Miami Marine Stadium is essential, and it must get started." Leah Kinnard 9040 Southwest 97th Terrace, Miami, FL 7/20/2016 "I believe in development, and I believe it can be done very well. I'm concerned about over -commercialization of the space, but I think that that can be planned. I think that additional storage can be planned, and I think that -- I'm impressed with the people who know the history of Miami and who can pro -- and are interested in protecting the Marine Stadium. So I would like to see a new RFP that includes many ideas and respects the opportunity that the planners have already put into their proposals. Thank you very much." Ralph Navarro CEO and founder of Florida Yachts International on Monty's in Coconut G rove 2550 South Bayshore Drive, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "...Over 11 years, RCI was the —were the owners of Monty's, and they did nothing but great things for that property. ...I think this project will put us back on the map." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . an 07/11/2o19 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Robert Valdivieso 41 Southeast 5th Street, Miami, FL 7/20/2016 "Development is good. It's great. It has to be well managed. And I see that to do that, we have to have a solid foundation. The foundation is the rules. If you think that the solid is -- foundation is solid, it'll be fine, but if it's not, this is going to get more complicated in the future, so you have to get it right from the very beginning. Thank you." Roger Bernstein 308 Royal Palm Avenue, Coconut Grove, FL 7/20/2016 "We have a gem in the Marine Stadium and the whole basin there, and it's one of the few places where everybody can get access to the water in this area." Christine Rupp Dade Heritage Trust 7/20/2016 "And as we all know, the Marine Stadium and that beautiful basin are community gems. And I believe it was many years ago when Mayor Regalado actually referred to Virginia Key as having the opportunity to become Miami's Central Park. So this really requires a fresh look, because we do believe the process was flawed. We're not here to disparage any of the bidders, and know we're all here to do what's best for Miami, what's best for our residents, and what's best for the future of this beautiful place we call home." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Arva Parks Member of the Preservation Board in Miami -Dade County 1601 South Miami Avenue, Miami, FL 7/20/2016 "My -- I've been a boater my entire life; owned boats; been involved in Biscayne Bay. I care about the boating industry, I care about boating, but 1 also care about historic and environmental preservation. And one thing that has not been mentioned is the Marine Stadium and the basin were listed by you as historic, so this should go -- The Marine Stadium had [sic] international attention right now." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 1218/2016 "What we're doing now with Virginia Key Marina ... is actually a really good process, and I know it takes a little longer, but it is more public, and more thorough, and new ideas come about." Wayne Pathman Chair, Sea Level Rise Committee 1/4/2017 "1' m all in favor of the idea of developing something really significant there. I also am in favor of the idea of developing, as we are tasked, something that is resilient for the future." Pete Gomez Member, Sea Level Rise Committee 1/4/2017 "And I say if we don' t do something we're going to miss an opportunity, like he said, to develop an iconic place on Virginia Key and somebody else might take advantage of it and we could be losing a lot of revenue by the boaters and the visitors that are going to come to that area." Submitted into the public record for items) RE. L . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Steven Wernick Chair, City of Miami Waterfront Advisory Board 2501 Swanson Avenue, Miami, FL 1/10/2017 "The Department of Real Estate and Asset Management did a wonderful job on the RFP." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 1/12/2017 "Thank you, Mr. Rotenberg and Mr. Manager, for bringing this back, and for the outreach that you've been doing with the Virginia Key Advisory Board and the community. This has generated a lot of feedback, which is exactly what we wanted in this case. It is my goal to get this RFP on the November ballot." Steven Wernick Chair, City of Miami Waterfront Advisory Board 2501 Swanson Avenue, Miami, FL 1/12/2017 "We were presented with it at a stage prior to the Request for Proposals going out. There was a thorough presentation, and our board recommended to move forward with the issuance of the RFP, with some input. We appreciated the City Administration bringing that to us." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 2/9/2017 "i believe we can get this done today, and I feel responsible to help push it forward today, because I was a good part of the combined effort here to put the brakes on, take a look at it, make sure the public was involved, make sure the Virginia Key Advisory Board was involved, make sure we fully understood what the RFP was before it goes out, and that's what we believe, as elected, the public is interested in." Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Tomas Regalado Mayor of Miami City of Miami 2/9/2017 "I'm also here on support of RE.1, the RFP (Request for Proposals) for the Virginia Key Marina. As you know, this Commission has been very diligent in supporting the renovation of the Miami Marine Stadium." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 2/9/2017 "I'm very thankful to the Administration for their patience over these past several months, and their involvement with the public and us, to bring back what we have now. It's not the same animal we had before; over 100 recommended changes from the public, many of which have been taken into account in this. I'm confident that we can move forward and get this done by November; it's tight. It's possible; the odds are against us, but it's possible, and the future of the Marine Stadium depends on it." RFP, as approved by Commission 2/9/2017 "Create a vibrant recreational marina and restaurant destination." RFP, as approved by Commission 2/9/2017 "The Successful Proposer shall be expected to provide ... restaurant and bar ... ship's store ... additional ancillary facilities and components ... consistent with the Virginia Key Master Plan." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . an 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 9/1/2017 "I think we've done a lot of good work to get this process right, and I believe we are in that process. We've seen some very good proposals. We've revamped the RFP. We've hit the "reset" button, and I think we are doing it correctly." Joe Carollo Commissioner City of Miami Commission 9/13/18 "The bottom line is, what we can't have is an individual laughing as he goes to the bank with our resident's money. This can't happen. It's been happening for over a year and a half. And by just deferring, deferring, deferring, nothing gets done." Kean Hardemon Commissioner City of Miami Commission 9/13/18 "So unless — if there's no appeal [to the Florida Supreme Court] then we award this thing and then move on." Ken Russell Commissioner City of Miami Commission 5/9/2019 "Now that we are losing Ultra, I want to make sure that revenue from development planned for Virginia Key Beach goes to support the Virginia Key Park Trust and the redevelopment of Miami Marine Stadium. For example, we are about to approve the development at the Virginia Key Marina. I want to see us finally begin moving forward with the Virginia Key Master Plan." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07111/2019 , City Clerk Name Title Address Meeting Date Quote Willy Gort Commissioner City of Miami Commission 5/9/2019 "What is going on with the Miami Marine Stadium? Do we have a plan? Are we after funds? What stage are we in? If there is anyways that we can help personally with people we know, or people in state government, or federal government then let me know. That is a venue that should be refurbished." Willy Gort Commissioner City of Miami Commission 5/23/2019 "It's ridiculous the way we function sometimes in this City. People don't want to win the contract because of ability to perform, they want to win it by destroying II Manolo Reyes Commissioner City of Miami Commission 5/23/2019 "Shame on you! Whoever did this, shame on you!" Keon Hardemon Commissioner City of Miami Commission 6/13/2019 "We've kicked this can down the road several times... now it's completely ready to be heard. 1 don't understand the need for another continuance." Manolo Reyes Commissioner City of Miami Commission 6/13/2019 "I know the sooner we finalize the deal, the better it will be for the City of Miami. I don't want to leave any door open." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Name Willy Gort Title Commissioner Address City of Miami Commission Meeting Date 6/13/2019 Quote "My understanding is that the city attorney can answer all of the allegations that have taken place and where we are now. My understanding is that they are prepared to address that before us. I just want to make sure that we are aware that we've been going on this for I don't know how many years. In the meantime we are not getting the fair share for what we should be getting from that facility." Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE,1 _ ors _ D711112019 , City Clerk Submitted into the public record foritembA RE1 . on 07/1I/2019 , City Clerk Don't Fall For It Bid Protest vI1 ■ 1;1y rri, of Promised Rent Typo Exaggeration Mud Slinging Current Operator • Protecting the Peoples 4sfets 'It's ridiculous the way we function sometimes in this City. People don't want to win the contract because of ability to perform, they want to win it by destroying ...' Commissioner Gott 5/23/19 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Why Were We Selected? Ranked first overall by the City's expert selection committee Ranked first by 6 of the 7 experts on the committee Ranked first overall in the original RFP for this project Most relevant experience Highest financial return for the City Consistent with the Virginia Key Master Plan Harmonious with natural environment No new dredging Submitted into the public record for itern(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The Requests of The Commission Feasibility study on City development and management of the marina Remove the requirement to add additional wet slips Prohibit new wet slips in the historic basin Require full disclosure of any involvement in any environmental proceedings, ever Require consistency with the Virginia Key Master Plan Virginia Key Advisory Board to review and provide input on the RFP Public to have opportunity to review and comment on draft RFP Commission to review the RFP before it goes out Independent hearing officer to resolve legal issues raised during the procurement process Submitted into the pubic record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk The City's Expert Selection Committee • Committee Members (Voting) Gary Milano (Virginia Key Advisory Board) • Virginia Key Advisory Board Member • Former Program Director, Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management • Master of Science, Marine Biology and Coastal Zone Management Maria D. Carballeira (Procurement Expert) • City of Miami Procurement Department • Miami -Dade County Procurement Management Services • Public procurement official since June 2000 David R. Snow (Planning & Zoning Expert) • City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department, Acting Chief of Urban Design • Oversaw implementation of Virginia Key Waterfront Master Plan • Bachelor of Science in Planning and Urban Development Amado Gonzalex (Environmental and Procurement Expert) • Department of Solid Waste Management, Environmental Affairs Manager • Former Procurement Officer, Miami -Dade County Department of Procurement Management (7 years) • Formerly with Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management (16 years) Jose A. Galan (Real Estate and Financial Expert) • Director of Real Estate Development, Miami -Dade County Internal Services Department • Former Project Executive, General Obligation Bond Program Alyce M. Robertson (Financial and Environmental Expert) • Executive Director, Miami Downtown Development Authority • Former Community Image Manager, Office of the County Manager • Former Assistant Director, Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management • Formerly with Miami -Dade County Office of Management and Budget Penny Cutt (Environmental and Marina Expert) • Senior Associate, Gahagan & Bryant Associates, Project Manager for coastal projects • Broward County Marine Advisory Committee • Pompano Beach Marine Advisory Board • Marine Industries Association of South Florida • Former Biologist, Miami -Dade County Department of Environmental Resources Management • Former Section Chief, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk You Listened, You Reacted, Let's Move Forward You fully vetted the RFP before issuance You listened to the community • You listened to the Virginia Key Advisory Board • You listened to the Waterfront Board • You listened to the stakeholders • You redesigned the RFP • You UNANIMOUSLY approved the RFP to be issued • Unbiased expert selection committee • Objective selection criteria • Secured independent judicial determination Now it is time to act Vote to move forward E KC Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Master plan and Proposed Plan Comparison VIRGINIA KEY HARBOUR MARINE CENTER Boat circulation: • Conceptual master plan has 2 access points to the NW and NE with drawbridges which would interrupt other circulation • Proposal has 3 direct access points for dry docks at NE. plus wet slips at NW Vehicle circulation: •Conceptual master plan has multiple parallel roads. • Proposal minimizes roadways and covers parking and roads beneath buildings Pedestrian circulation: • Proposal minimizes conflict points • Proposal emphasizes waterfront access • • Proposal provides more routes separated from vehicles • Proposal offers 4 connections to the water vs. 1 connection in the master plan Design & Operational Plan: Consistency with Master Plan Principles 92 ns Fs wan They nip_ o rh0n0e n+ oddd10R01 awevIvriIwn n oerldME[f aw m Ono%dayon qnd pwmdnnp wean nn1 04 iru1u10 mown nn the MO.% Hvn ne .1cvpaote0 min 'ne 6n0 P'+ Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk A PROJECT OF THE SAME HEIGHT. SIZE AND LOCATION AS THAT IN THE MASTERPLAN Mdf V onlyste WOO trim. s a a L.I1IMitauu.tatiota * .•sue l--r +a • VI 111 MititoZWILMAtliali 11 ]+ K .11 . 11 1. N 1t A PROJECT WITH NO SHOPPING CENTER. NO OVERBUILDING, NO ENCROACHMENT INTO NATURAL AREAS, AND RESPECTFUL OF CULTURAL AND HISTORIC SITES. VIRGINIA KEY HARBOUR MARINE CENTER Commercial: • -25,000 sqft in Conceptual master plan * 24,000 soft new space • Reoriented to create a main street entry and active waterfront • Long, thin spaces allow only small retailers Boat storage: • 3 dry storage buildings compared to 4 • Direct water access without interfering with pedestrians vs, lagoons and drawbridges 750 Dry slips. 912 total slips. (less than VKMP) Parking: • 300 space garage in mnstPr plan (6 levels) 450 space garage minimum in RFP • Different size, different strategy • Distribute parking across 2 levels vs. one massive building Design & Operational Plan: Consistency with Master Plan Principles 91 n: As s'- �h •++ey on+ w[rfeCl la change rn vdrf!hnnal msriri?r on n performed ynd m Aral e!HIpr nI permdunp uc car. N.+I.n leorireo rhonn en the p+ornw* 4e .nCdpardlec n+lc rr+e forol pvr. Submitted into the pubic record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 • City Clerk The People Say It's Time "I just don't believe there was enough public Input. I, a5 a Commissioner, wasn't here at the time, but I am now, and I would love to be involved in this process to really make sure that the public's voice is heard, that the Master Plan is completely respected." Oanwerubrw Rpu.k 7/20/20EL 'The restoration of the Miami Marine Stadium is essential, and it must gel started," DO, srcn"rwr "I'm in favor of the RCI Group's RFP...And it is our leaden responsibility not only to create a very viable economic and safe residential community, but we have to have good, high -quality recreational opportunities...I think the RCI Group has a track record that's proven that they can take these projects not only from start to finish and do it in a professional manner." les.0J0 near' CEO. Cenrend.r Soon "I currently own a marine management company, and I was in the marina industry ..,.I've know the owners of RCI since they moved to Miami...what a great world -class facility (Rlckenbacker] would be under their management.' Sheen4ale. "I've been a resident of Coconut Grave for about b0 years now...Everything that RCI has touched has turned to pure gold. Good for the people." Trice adorns " I started docking at Monty's, which became Bayshore Landing, In'99... I currently reside there ..- I think the RCI Group owned it about 11 years, and my experience was a good one.... I probably run about 500 charters a year... And the Ito pre%Ion and the Image that they get of Miami is affected by projects such as these ' av1 RP Mr "I grew up on Biscayne Bay...[Mly father...was head of the Waterfront Board, and the Southern Channel is named after him...I'm here in support of RCI...I think they'll do a great job embracing the waterfront and the accessibility for people that want to use Biscayne Bay." Ga. S er..re, "The world knows Mleml all too well and Is welting for the latest in technology -based, environmentally friendly marina storage and management services." 4. "...Oyer 11 years, RCI was the —were the owners of Monty's, and they did nothing but great things for that property...,1 think this project will put us back on the map." Roma9.'or.,CEO and f »d.ra Fhrle neon rir.m.rien.I en Monty's In Cn-.nxr fie.w "I've passed this dilapidated facility for years now, and you have a world -class operation in RCI that wants to do a project that is, you know, worthy of the venue in question." Neff Preston "-- hopefully, RCI wins it again. 'They're wonderful people.' That's all I've heard." fevin Genrek& vie• Chak, Key Drsmyne WMhee C..wKJ "Currently, what you have are two marinas that are greasy, smelly, rundown that absolutely need to be redeveloped and open to the public" C n'n'. er rrepner "I am just glad to see a very public process happening." S "What we're doing now with Virginia Key Marina ... is actually a really good process, and I know it takes a Illtle longer, but It is more public, and more thorough, and new ideas come about" Comayufaml Rw.t.0 l24/2016 "I see a lot coming In line with the Master Plan with this [KEPI, which is greet." Cdnmrswn.r Ru.s.k 12,0/l0re 'The Department of Real Estate and Asset Manejement did a wonderful job on the RFP.' Chet, ./Mu.,: Wensf one Ady.swraoord "Thank you, Mr. Rotenberg and Mr. Manager, far bringing this back, and for the outreach that you've been doing with the Virginia Key Advisory Board and the community. This has generated a lot of feedback, which is exactly what we wanted in this case. It is my goal to get this RFP an the November ballot." Cernrwsvon.• Rufrek +/12/2er2 "Our board recommended approval to move forward with the Issuance of the RFP... and we appreciated the City Administration bringing that to us." Advkary eased "I believe we can get this done today, and I Mei responsible to help push it forward today, because I was a good part of the combined effort here to put the brakes on, take a look at it, make sure the public was Involved, make sure the Virginia Key Advisory Board was involved, make sure we Fully understood what the RFP was before It goes out, and that's what we believe, as elected, the public is interested in." "I'm very thankful to the Administration for their patience over these past several months, and their Involvement with the public and us, to bring back what we have now. It's not the same animal we had before; over 100 recommended changes from the public, many of which have been taken into account in this. I'm Confident that we can move forward and get this done by November; lt's tight. It's possible; the adds are against us, but it's possible, and the future of the Marine Stadium depends on it." Comm rs.an.r Pusperr. = . L t 1] 1� I 'Create a vibrant recreational marina and restaurant destination." aFF up.yr.nv bymm.mrkon 7/Sy.'o17 "The Successful Proposer shall be eapeded to provide .. restaurant and bar ... ship's store ... additional ancillary facilities and components ... consistent with the Virginia Key Master Plan." RFY ., orroved ey Cmnmraren 2/9/26III 'Build new revenue generating boating facilities . - - state of the art dry dock storage ... retail space ... land] restaurants' 1rp,niv Key Mvste.• H'^n "I think we've done a lot of good work to get this process right, and I believe we are in that process. We've seen some very good proposals. We've revamped the RFP. We've hit the "reset" button, and I think we are doing it correctly." C.mmisivet + Russet i.. "The bottom line is, what we can't have is an individual laughing as he goes to the bank with our resident's money. This can't happen. It's been happening for over a year and a half, And by just deferring, deferring, deferring, nothing gets done." 0.nmevwowr comae. t fire 'So unless- if there's no appeal Ito the Florida Supreme Court] then we award this thing and then move on." Cemm,ls"xr.r 1erdxrgn, 11/I VIl "Now that we are losing Ultra, 1 want to make sure that revenue from development planned for Virginia Key Beach goes to support the Virginia Key Park Trust and the redevelopment of Miami Marine Stadium. For example, we are about to approve the development at the Virginia Key Marina. I want to see us finally begin moving forward with the Virginia Key Master Plan " 'it's ridiculous the way we Function sometimes In this City. People don't want to win the contract because of ability to perform, they want to win ft by destroying ..' r.rnm,ur"n.r G.rr. srll'r' 'Shame on your Whoever did this, shame on your' rcmrwssfawr a. WE 5.12.09 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Virginia Key LLC Most Qualified Marina Developer Won Every Court Challenge Residents of the City of Miami Pay to the Order of Ninety-Tw❑ Million Four Hundred Sixteen Thousand Three Hundred Forty -Six $92,416,346 Revenue for Miami Marine Stadium, VA Key Historic Trust, etc. Dollars Memo Authorized Signature 000000526 0000000005 12982 Submitted into the public record for items) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Biscayne Marine Partners Current operator in default Less qualified / Lost at every turn Loss to the Residents of the City of Miami Pay to the Order of Three Million Eight Hundred Forty-three Thousand Four Hundred Fifty $3,843,450 For Lost Revenue & opportunity Cost Memo $3 193,450 Calculated opportunity cost for 3-year delay per DREAM -$600,000 Additional rent ($100K/mo. September through February) $1,250,000 Difference between $2M parking obligation and settlement agreement $750K 000000526 0000000005 12982 Dollars Authorized Signature Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk • Submitted into the public record for itenn(o) RE.% ' on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk 1 Mo►►ing Forward is Fiscally Responsible • The incumbent paid a total of $1,109,292.75 in rent for FY 2016 • Virginia Key LLC will pay $2,200,000.00 per year PLUS 6% of gross revenues • CBRE estimated the percent rent as equaling $438,000 in year 1, $598,000 in year 2, $949,000 in year 3, and well in excess of $1 million per year thereafter The total difference between the incumbent and Virginia Key LLC is $1,528,708 in year one, and more than $2M per year by year 3 • The City commissioned an independent feasibility study, which concluded that that "the initial capital costs combined with the significant downside risk of construction cost over -runs pose an unacceptable level ❑f risk for the City," and that a private operator will increase the financial returns to the City Funding the Marine Stadium Restoration • The City approved (November 2016) the issuance of $45,000,000 in bonds for the restoration ❑f Marine Stadium, which will result in a debt service of approximately $3M per year. • Virginia Key LLC's rent payments will cover all of the City's debt service by year 3, and substantially all from year 1. The incumbent contract results in a $2M/year shortfall. Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . ❑n 07J11/2019 , City Cierk Virginia Key Marina Timeline June 15, 2015 City issues RFP 12-14-077 Amended Proposal Due Date (29 Addenda Issued) March 15, 2016 Oral Presentations March 16, 2016 Evaluation Committee Selects Virginia Key, LLC Manager issues Recommendation April 12, 2016 Losing proposers file bid protests May 10, 2016 Administration recommends denial of bid protests May 26, 2016 First Commission Meeting on Bid Protests June 9, 2016 Second Commission Meeting on Bid Protests July 20, 2016 Commission Rejects all Proposals and provides instructions for new process June 22, 2016 Third Commission Meeting on Bid Pro Total time: 1 year, 1 month iii i i i i i i i June 23, 2016 Fourth Com mission Meeting on Bid Protests/Denies Protests 0 2015 2016 August 15, 2016 Administration Authorizes CBRE to conduct a feasibility study on municipal operation of the marina October 20, 2016 CBRE Issues Consultation Report on Management of Marina November 29, 2016 Virginia Key Advisory Board ("VKAB" j Discussion and Public Comment on New Draft RFP December 8, 2016 Commission Reviews Draft RFP December 13, 2016 Waterfront Advisory Board Reviews Draft RFP December 19, 2016 VKAB Discussion and Public Comment on Draft RFP January 4, 2017 VKAB Discussion and Public Comment on Draft RFP; Sea Level Rise Committee Reviews and Comments on Draft RFP January 10, 2017 Waterfront Advisory Board reviews and comments on Draft RFP January 12, 2017 City Commission Reviews Draft RFP January 24, 2017 VKAB Recommends Changes to Draft RFP February 9, 2017 Commission Reviews and Approves Draft RFP/Reso. R-17-0078 February 17, 2017 City issues RFP 16-17-011 March 16, 2017 Pre -Proposal Conference and Site Visit September 1, 2017 Commission Meeting on Award June12,2017 Oral Presentations June 14,2017 Evaluation Committee Selects Virginia Key, LLC June 15, 2017 Manager Accepts Recommendation of Evaluation Committee June 20, 2017 BMP Files Notice of Intent to File a Protest June 27, 2017 BMP Files Bid Protest July 20, 2017 Bid Protest Hearing Total time: 1 year, 0.5 months i iii i August 7, 2017 Hearing Officer issues Final Order affirming Manager's Recommendatio n • 2016 2017 13 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 . on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk Moving Forward the City is Indemnified N. Indemnification The Successful Proposer shall indemnify, defend (at its sole cost and expense), save, and hold harmless the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, agencies, and instrumentalities from any and all actions, claims, protests, proceedings, causes of action, legal, equitable, regulatory, administrative or otherwise, liability, losses or damages, which the City or its officers, employees, agents or instrumentalities may incur as a result of claims, demands, suits, causes of actions or proceedings of any kind or nature arising out of, relating to or resulting from thc performance, non-performance, or breach of the agreement by the Successful Proposer, including without limitation the Solicitation, evaluation, recommendations) for award, and award of the Lease, the later possession and Tenancy and all activities or omissions thereon, the design and construction of all improvements, betterments, additions and structures, including the maintenance and use thereof, compliance with all applicable laws, codes, rules and regulations and payment of all debts, expenses, costs, and fees that arc the responsibility of the Proposer as they come due. The Foregoing Indemnity, Hold Harmless and Duty to Defend shall include thc Proposer and/or its employees, agents, servants, partners, principals or subcontractors, jointly and severally. The Successful Proposer shall pay all claims and losses in connection therewith, and shall investigate and defend all claims, suits or actions of any kind or nature in the name of the City, where applicable, including appellate proceedings, and shall pay all costs, judgments, and attorney's fees which may be incurred thereon. The Successful Proposer expressly understands and agrees that any insurance protection required by this Solicitation or subsequent agreement, or otherwise provided by the Successful Proposer shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep and save harmless and defend thc City or its officers, officials, employees, agents, agencies, and instrumentalities as herein provided, which duty shall survive the cancellation of the Lease, as may be applicable. Submittal of a Proposal shall constitute voluntary and knowing acknowledgment and acceptance of this Indemnification provision, which will become effective upon submission through selection until such time the Lease is executed, at which point all the indemnifications provided therein shall apply. This Section will obligate the Successful Proposer to intervene, indemnify, hold and save harmless, fully cooperate, defend, and assist (at the option of the City Attorney) in the defense of the City in any protest. 14 Submitted into the public record for item(s) RE.1 on 07/11/2019 , City Clerk