Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal-Public Comments Submitted Online for the July 9, 2020 Virtual City Commission Meeting( Qm"rrY7�'Mee,. j Public C U u.0 11 9, 2020 1111:00 AM MDT ".Il.. Public Comment motero@mia migov.com Ittaree samuel II art I'd Iran Latimore r Street Ar:Wrens 937 n.w. 55th street Agenda ttern RE. 2 7487 Establish Special Revenue - 2020-2021 Victims of Crime Act Vfi d:: irruirruc-uI I oppose the over $500,000 grant for victim service to the miami police department. I do not believe this type of program should not be housed in a paramilitary styled organization like a police department.PoLice should be focused on preventing crime through protecting and serving. PREVENTI NG burglaries, robberies, violent crimes, rapes and other criminal activities. Victim Advocate programs should be housed hosed in SAO offices, City of Miami Human Services Department with mutually defined responsibilities. These programs are Less threatening environments, and understand from the top down the impact of victimization on the mental and physical health of crime victims.My opposition to Victim Advocate program being housed in, or supervised by MPD has nothing to do with the job performance of Chief CoLine. or his management team. Chief CoLine, and his staff, especially Assistant Chiefs Gause and MoraLes, have been very responsive to the Model Cities 7636 Submittal -Public Comments Submitted Online for the July 9, 2020 Virtual City Commission Meeting u "ur;11IN,Varroe ;eu-c 11 Vfi d: orruirroenIIl community. MPD's efforts to suppress criminal. activity in our neighborhoods are commendable. Effective policing of a community that has historically been marginalized by Institutional. Racism and overt and subtle discrimination, is not an easy job. Policing is a hard and often thankless job. In the case of this grant, it puts MPD in the possible position of having to provide victim services to citizens who may have become victims due to illegal., improper, or deliberate acts of a police officer. This potential. conflict of interest is not fair to the citizen, the City of Miami, the police department, or the police officer. Accepting the grant $ but housing the program in a more neutral. environment with agreed upon duties. Let the police protect and serve! Professor Samuel. Latimore, Major (Retired) DI. 1 7569 Discussion Yoca Arditi-Rocha 540 Brickel.l. Key drive - USACE Back Bay N/A CSRM Study Webinar u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Yoca Arditi-Rocha 540 Brickell key drive DI. 1 7569 Discussion - USACE Back Bay CSRM Study Webinar The Army Corps recently released a proposal that combines elevating properties and a range of grey infrastructure (seawalls, flood gates, etc) but, largely leaves out green infrastructure solutions (nature - based) like mangrove/coral reef restoration, does not address other climate related issues like increasing sunny day flooding and does not consider the impact of the projects on water quality in Biscayne Bay, for example, due to pumping storm water or altering flow. As a Brickell property owner, I am also concerned about the Brickell floodwalt placed on Biscayne Bay which wilt undoubtedly cause unacceptable impacts to habitat, recreation, viewscapes, and wildlife. This 5- million-dollar band -aid plan it's too harmful to the environment, creates equity problems, exposes certain areas to increased flood risk, and does not address — and perhaps worsens — chronic flooding from sea level rise. While I applaud the effort and acknowledgement of storm surge risk, we must find a more holistic -and inclusive - approach to deal with the effects of rising seas, intensified storms, equity disparities, and climatic change we are experiencing in our city. Thank you Steven Adkins 1756 N Bayshore Dr. RE. 8 7599 LGBTQ Good morning 37G Miami, FL Businesses Honorable Mayor and Commissioners; u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: llatlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro nruuiruuen11l Today you will be making many important decisions and among them regards the inclusion of an often excluded segment of our population...LGBTQ owned businesses. The national annual GDP of the LGBTQ business market exceeds $1.7 trillion, which would rank as the 10th largest economy in the world. The estimated annual LGBTQ spend in Miami -Dade County exceeds $8 billion and represents over 250,000 self - identified voting citizens aged 18+. As mu college Jonathan Lovitz from our National LGBT Chamber has laid out for you, this policy you will hopefully pass will do the following: • Offer recognition of the city's LGBT business community— which adds more than $1.7 TRILLION to the national economy • Clearly state the City of Miami is "open for business" with every diverse community, Leading to an uptick in business creation, growth, and new jobs in Miami • Establishes a list of viable contractors for the city and other municipal partners to utilize when searching for top quality, diverse - owned businesses to support • Establish a new pipeline of employers and job creators in the region who wilt now be eligible for grants, education, scholarships, etc only open to certified minority business owners We urge your passage of this item before you. Steven Adkins, u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: /latlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro nruuiruuen11l Stephen RE. 1 7404 Keppel 3411 Oak Avenue Settlement - 3384 Day Avenue President/CEO Miami -Dade Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce Lack of code enforcement in Village West is a pressing issue. The house at 3374 Day Ave. whose roof nearly touches the house next to it, is in dear violation of the requirement that houses be five feet from the property Line. A message needs to be sent to developers that they need to follow the rules just like everyone else. Samantha Morejon 12010 sw 105 DI. 1 7569 Discussion To whom this may terrace, Miami, FL, - USACE Back Bay concern, Building 33186 CSRM Study Webinar Miami's resilience to storm and flood damage is of utmost importance. Our community is dependent on the resources provided by the Bay through tourism, food, and our very own livelihoods. This proposal brings me many concerns, I don't believe that it considers the routine flooding that Miami generally goes through, the high impacting weather events that we frequently experience, or nature based solutions through living shorelines, mangrove or coral reef restoration. Mangroves and reefs act as a buffer zone from storms, filter pollution, provide nurseries for our fisheries and serve as niches for varying aspects of biodiversity, and offer recreational and tourist areas.These areas are vital to the well-being of both u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: llatlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro Vfi ; Cdruuiruuen11 coastal communities and the nation as a whole. A known detriment to water quality are old and Leaky septic tanks that fail as sea level rises; over 108,000 units have failed in Miami -Dade County in recent years. This proposal should aim to improve of our wastewater treatment plants, and convert septic systems to sewer. Furthermore, the proposal of grey infrastructure such as flood gates and sea walls threaten the environment with routine flooding and can exacerbate the impacts of sea level rise. The Miami community, stakeholders, and experts have also led initiatives such as Resilient305 to reduce the risks and impacts left by storms. I recommend that USACE considers what is currently working, and utilize the investment towards natural solutions that would benefit both the environment and above all, our community. Please consider these changes to your proposal. We are all Looking for the best for our community, but we can't forget the impact that we are leaving on our environment. Research shows that Biscayne Bay is suffering, and if we Lose our Bay, we lose our fisheries, tourism, food, and the livelihoods that our community depends on. Thank you for your time and consideration, Samantha Morejon u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Patrick Rynne Patricia 2600 SW 26th St., Miami FL, 33133 My name is Patrick Rynne, I am a board member on the Climate Resilience Committee. I'd like to comment on the US Army Corp of Engineer's back bay study, currently open for public comment. This is a massive project that affects all of Miami and I am concerned that the timing of the BC. 8 6957 Climate pandemic has made Resilience it difficult for the Committee public and elected officials to review it thoroughly. A 30-day extension for public comment has just been granted per request of the county (deadline August 20), but I think more time is needed. I urge the commission to push for an additional 30 day extension so that this item is given the careful attention and scrutiny it requires. This constitutes an egregious overdevelopment of the property that ruins the residential RE. 1 7404 character of the Murphy 3615 Loquat Avenue Settlement - 3384 historic Coconut Day Avenue Grove neighborhood. Please vote no on the settlement. They must be held accountable. Thank you. u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Orlando Gonzales My name is Orlando Gonzales. I'm the executive director of Safeguarding American Vales for Everyone. I support the resolution DIRECTING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO REVISE THE CITY'S PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES TO SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZE AND 180 NE 29th St Apt RE. 8 7599 LGBTQ IDENTIFY CERTIFIED 230 Businesses LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER QUESTIONING/QUE ER OWNED BUSINESSES (" LGBTQ"). Our city's ability to account for doing business with the LGBTQ community wilt help attract conventions and business opportunities that wilt increase our revenue base and promote inclusivity in the community. u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. 0 Collins 19985 NE 6th Ct, Miami FL 33179 DI. 1 7569 Discussion - USACE Back Bay CSRM Study Webinar Dear Commissioners, I am very concerned about this proposal for several reasons: 1. this proposal does not consider the source of the climate crisis, chronic flooding, or nature - based solutions like mangrove or coral reef restoration. Rather it has a very narrow scope and ONLY looks at storm surge which is it one of the issues plaguing our community. 2. I am concerned that High -value properties are more likely to benefit from the suggested protection features, often at the expense of historically vulnerable communities. 3. This study realty presents an opportunity to invest billions into resilience -building for Miami that is holistic, inclusive, and realistic to be climate -ready. 4. I am concerned the community has not been adequately informed and even though the public comment period has been pushed back, more outreach is needed to get a broader perspective. Thank you for considering my comments on this issue. u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Natalie Rivas 330 74st Miami Beach 33141 I am concerned that this proposal does not adequately consider the source of the climate crisis, chronic flooding, or nature - based solutions like mangrove or coral reef restoration. We need a more holistic approach instead of spending $5B on a band aid solution. The proposal combines elevating properties and a DI. 1 7569 Discussion range of grey - USACE Back Bay infrastructure CSRM Study Webinar (seawalls, flood gates, etc) but, largely leaves out green infrastructure solutions (nature - based) like mangrove/coral reef restoration, does not address other climate -related issues Like increasing sea Level. rise & chronic flooding, and does not address the bigger elephant in the room: the climate crisis! u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. 3613 Loquat Avenue RE. 1 7404 Margaret Fronefield Settlement - 3384 Miami, FL 3313: Day Avenue A picture may say a thousand words but these only need two. BIG MISTAKE. Or maybe "embarrassing" is a better word? Who let this happen? This is about as egregious as it get when it comes to code violation in the city, and there have been some doozies. No enforcement, no accountability. The same story, over and over. When will it stop? Who will stand up and do what is right? Or are you all still cowering, and behind what? It's plain to see. You are allowing decimation of the most historic Land in Miami. Shall we wait until it's all bulldozed and has become one big townhouse? Or just Let builders knowingly run into the neighbors' homes? Do what is right...after SOOO much has gone wrong here. Vote NO on the settlement. Lauren Paulet 8976 NW 169th St, DI. 1 7569 Discussion Honorable Miami, FL 33018 - USACE Back Bay Commissioners, Good CSRM Study Webinar Morning! My name is Lauren Paulet and I am a resident of Miami at 8976 NW 169th Street. I am also a BA Candidate for Environmental Studies at Johns Hopkins University. I am worried about the prospects of my future as a Miami resident. In an ideal world, I wilt have the option to settle down in this magical city and continue residing here with my family for the foreseeable future. How our city proceeds with resiliency planning is, therefore, of the utmost importance to u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 Agencla d: orruirroenIIl me. I appreciate your consideration of a plan that will invest billions of dollars into sea level rise solutions for our community, however, I am concerned that this proposal does not adequately consider routine flooding, environmental justice, or nature -based solutions like mangrove or coral reef restoration. I am a firm believer in ecological design principles, which try to integrate urban planning with natural processes instead of imposing man-made structures on a complex system. There are several Locations in Miami where living shorelines of gray - green infrastructure can be implemented, including Jose Marti park, Virginia Key and Greynolds Park, to name a few. Furthermore, I believe that our resiliency planning should always recognize how sea level rise affects economically and socially vulnerable communities in Miami. Commissioners, I hope that you wilt recommend a more equitable distribution of this $4.6 billion investment to support and protect underresourced communities. Thank you for your time. Kendall Young 2101 BrickeltAve DI. 1 7569 Discussion Hello, my name is #2402 Miami, FL - USACE Back Bay Kendall Young. I am 33129 CSRM Study Webinar a resident of Miami and writing in regards to agenda item DI.1: The Army Corps of Engineers Back Bay Coastal Storm Risk Feasibility study. The US Army Corps of Engineers' proposal to build a 35 ft wall u "ur;11 I I rro llm inru ;all: llatlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro Vfi ; Cdruuiruuen11 along the Brickelt waterfront is not a sustainable solution to the problems this City is facing. This proposal does not adequately consider routine flooding, environmental justice, or nature -based solutions like mangrove or coral reef restoration. Nature and nature - based investments that are supported by the community would provide multiple bottom -line benefits to our community and environment, and this plan largely omits these beneficial investments. It also misses dear opportunities for risk minimization by overlooking sewage treatment plants and other critical infrastructure from the proposal. In addition, this study also includes unacceptable environmental harm, particularly to Biscayne Bay. This County needs an action plan that benefits the environment and our community white reducing storm surge risk. The proposed budget of $4.6 billion should be invested into stakeholder -led or community- based initiatives, such as Resitient305, or others who have identified strategies for reducing storm surge risk. Fortifications for our wastewater treatment plants, septic to sewer conversion for Little River and Arch Creek, stormwater retention and filtration, coral restoration, and living shorelines should be included in the proposed resiliency plan. I recommend u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: /latlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro nruuiruuen11l that the Army Corps utilizes the solutions that have been vetted by the community, stakeholders, and experts before pursuing this proposal. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kendall Young RE. 1 7404 Katrina Daniel 4085 Battersea Rd Settlement - 3384 N/A Day Avenue Katrina RE. 1 7404 Daniel 4085 Battersea Rd Settlement - 3384 Day Avenue I respectfully ask that the commissioners REFUSE to settle. This will just ensure that zoning violations will occur even more than they do now. The Grove is becoming Kendal with its boring box like houses and lack of trees. No entity moves to enforce zoning laws The city does some " for shoW' maneuvers -like disallowing gravel or pavers on right of way. But when it comes to allowing - or Looking the other way when developers cut down old oak trees - or they poison them and claim they died. And the City and the commissioners do....nothing. u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. J ulieta Good morning Honorable Commissioners, The proposal brought forth by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers addresses important solutions to storm surge like elevating properties and using sea wafts, but I am very concerned because the proposal does not include nature -based solutions like mangrove/coral reef restoration, does not address other climate -related issues Like increasing sea level rise and sunny - day flooding unrelated to storm surge, and does not address the looming climate crisis. For this reason, I ask you to tell the Army Corps that $5 billion dollars DI. 1 7569 Discussion is too much money Rodrigo 2103 Coral Way - USACE Back Bay for a band -aid CSRM Study Webinar approach. In order to be a resilient county, we need a holistic approach that is efficient and non- invasive to our natural environment. Moreover, I am concerned the community has not been adequately informed on this plan and more virtual community educational outreach events are needed, hosted in multiple Languages to be as inclusive as possible. As Commissioners, I know that you all have the County's best interest at heart, and this proposal brought forth by the Army Corps is insufficient and ineffective. I thank you for your time and attention to my public comment. Jonathan Lovitz 1331 F St NW 900 RE. 8 7599 LGBTQ Among the important Washington DC, Businesses issues you wilt hear a IIISIlarroe 20004 Street Address Agent tteriru 11,tuthris Cdruuiruueff today is the recognition of certified LGBT-owned businesses in the Miami Beach region. If passed, Miami Beach will become the 25th large city in America to enact this kind of important, job -creating economic empowerment initiative. The national and local team members here hope to help you understand how vital and also how risk -free such an ordinance is — as demonstrated regionally by your colleagues in Tampa, Orlando, and Orange County, FL who have all passed identically framed resolutions. To be dear, this resolution — DOES: - Offer recognition of the city's LGBT business community — which adds more than $1.7 TRILLION to the national economy -Clearly state Miami Beach is "open for business" with every diverse community, leading to an uptick in business creation, growth, and new jobs in Miami Beach - Establishes a list of viable contractors for the city and other municipal partners to utilize when searching for top quality, diverse - owned businesses to support -Establish a new pipeline of employers and job creators in the region who wilt now be eligible for grants, education, scholarships, etc only open to certified minority business owners DOES NOT: - Offer any kind of preferential treatment or 'set aside' for any community -Cost the city a nickel, as the entire process is u "ur;11 I I rro llm inru ;all: /latlatlire:s ugeu cla III Hrro nruuiruuen11l revenue neutral and free of additional red tape -Conflict with any existing opportunities for any other diverse community in the region The rationale for this policy is simple: Miami Beach's economy cannot achieve its full potential without the full participation of every citizen of Miami Beach. Greater diversity among local suppliers and small business owners encourages greater innovation and competition on city contracts. Greater competition lowers bid prices. Lower bid prices results in millions of dollars in taxpayers savings across Miami Beach that can be reinvested in schools, public safety, and beyond. It's time for Miami Beach, a respected leader in business, diversity, and opportunity, to take its place as one of the most inclusive places for minority - owned business in America. I assure you the growth here among new small businesses wilt astound you. Following the implementation of the California's AB1678 business inclusion Law, there was a dramatic spike in the number certified LGBTBEs in California —resulting in a more than 200% increase in LGBT businesses in the state in the first year. We know that can and wilt happen here in Miami Beach, especially with the support and Leadership of the award -winning Miami - Dade Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce as a key u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: /latlatlir:s ugeu cla I IL Hrro nruuiruuen11l partner. Increasing the Local. tax base of business owners is a huge windfatt for Miami Beach. Additionally, the exposure this opportunity could bring to Miami Beach's LGBT businesses comes at a time when they are still deeply threatened, despite recent wins at the Supreme Court. White SCOTUS did increase protections for employees, entrepreneurs and business owners are still without such basic rights. White Credit/Finance/Mortg age protections are in the Equality Act, LGBT owned businesses seeking investment capital. — especiaLty those recovering from COVID et al.— need the help NOW. There are more than 35 states where it is perfeclly Legal. for a bank/credit union officer to say "we do not ban money to your kind." Florida, sadly, is one of those states. We are excited to soon count the City of Miami Beach among those who believe in the power of inclusion not just as the right thing to do, but also as an economic imperative that benefits every citizen of the city. This city's economy wilt be more inclusive and successfut thanks to your Leadership; Leadership which our communities are seeking more than ever in these uncertain potiticat times. We Look forward to announcing soon that Miami Beach is open for business to everyone who Lives here. ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 Agencla d: orruirroenII Jonathan Lovitz 1331 F. St NW Washington, D.C. 20004 RE. 8 7599 LGBTQ Businesses Good morning Commissioners, Among the important issues you wilt hear today is the recognition of certified LGBT-owned businesses in the Miami region. If passed, Miami wilt become the 25th Large city in America to enact this kind of important, job - creating economic empowerment initiative. Attached is an FAQ guide to help you understand how vital and also how risk -free such an ordinance is— as demonstrated regionaLty by your coLteagues in Tampa, Orlando, and Orange County, FL who have all passed identicaLty framed resolutions. To be dear, this resolution — DOES: - Offer recognition of the city's LGBT business community — which adds more than $1.7 TRILLION to the national economy -Clearly state Miami is "open for business" with every diverse community, Leading to an uptick in business creation, growth, and new jobs in Miami -Establishes a List of viable contractors for the city and other municipal partners to utilize when searching for top quality, diverse - owned businesses to support -Establish a new pipeline of employers and job creators in the region who wilt now be eligible for grants, education, scholarships, etc only open to certified minority business owners DOES NOT: - Offer any kind of preferential treatment u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. or 'set aside' for any community -Cost the city a nickel, as the entire process is revenue neutral and free of additional red tape -Conflict with any existing opportunities for any other diverse community in the region The rationale for this policy is simple: Miami's economy cannot achieve its full potential without the full participation of every citizen of Miami. Greater diversity among local suppliers and small business owners encourages greater innovation and competition on city contracts. Greater competition lowers bid prices. Lower bid prices results in millions of dollars in taxpayers savings across Miami that can be reinvested in schools, public safety, and beyond. It's time for Miami, a respected leader in business, diversity, and opportunity, to take its place as one of the most inclusive places for minority - owned business in America. I assure you the growth here among new small businesses wilt astound you. Following the implementation of the California's AB1678 business inclusion Law, there was a dramatic spike in the number certified LGBTBEs in California —resulting in a more than 200% increase in LGBT businesses in the state in the first year. We know that can and wilt happen here in Miami, especially with the support and Leadership of the award -winning Miami- u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Dade Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce as a key partner. Increasing the Local. tax base of business owners is a huge windfall for Miami. Additionally, the exposure this opportunity could bring to Miami's LGBT businesses comes at a time when they are still deeply threatened, despite recent wins at the Supreme Court. White SCOTUS did increase protections for employees, entrepreneurs and business owners are still without such basic rights. White Credit/Finance/Mortg age protections are in the Equality Act, LGBT owned businesses seeking investment capital. — especially those recovering from COVID et al.— need the help NOW. There are more than 35 states where it is perfectly Legal. for a bank/credit union officer to say "we do not ban money to your kind." Florida, sadly, is one of those states. The LGBT business community is deeply grateful. for your enthusiasm and support for this important measure. Should you have ANY questions, I can be reached directly at rr(Mrr,r r;y()nig r;. ir7 or via my cell; 954.695.5896. Yours in making history, Jonathan Lovitz + Team NGLCC and M DG LCC Jessica Dennis 35 Edgewater Drive DI. 1 7569 Discussion Hello ALL, Thank you Apt 202 Coconut - USACE Back Bay for the opportunity to Grove, FL 33133 CSRM Study Webinar comment on the Back Bay Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. However, this proposal Largely omits u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: llatlatlir:s ugeu cla III Hrro nruuiruuen11l investments in nature and nature -based investments that are supported by the community, and which would provide multiple bottom -line benefits to our community and environment. It also misses dear opportunities for risk minimization by omitting sewage treatment plants and other critical infrastructure from the proposal. Further, it proposes unacceptable environmental harm, particularly to Biscayne Bay, and threatens to make routine flooding from sea level rise worse through structural improvements. Many stakeholder -led initiatives, such as Resilient305, have identified strategies for reducing storm surge risk. We recommend that the Army Corps utilizes the solutions that have been vetted by the community, stakeholders, and experts. There are significant equity concerns raised by this proposal. The proposal, as written, would disrupt communities with flood barriers - creating "winners" and "losers." Furthermore, the cost -benefit analysis favors investments in higher property value areas, which leaves under-resourced communities without crucial storm risk assistance. We ask this proposal be modified to focus on: - Nature and nature - based features like Living shorelines and coral restoration - Fortification of critical infrastructure such as water and wastewater u"ur;11II rro llm inru ;all: llatlatlir:s ugeu cla I IL Hrro nruuiruuen11l JONATHAN LOVITZ 1331 F ST NW Washington DC 20004 RE. 8 7599 LGBTQ Businesses treatment plants - Septic to sewer conversion as a pollution prevention and resiliency measure - Investment in under-resourced communities - Manage stormwater through filtration and retention -focused projects Thank you for your consideration, Jessica Dennis Among the important issues you wilt hear today is the recognition of certified LGBT-owned businesses in the Miami region. If passed, Miami wilt become the 25th Large city in America to enact this kind of important, job - creating economic empowerment initiative. We hope to help you understand how vital and also how risk -free such an ordinance is— as demonstrated regionally by your colleagues in Tampa, Orlando, and Orange County, FL who have all passed identically framed resolutions. To be dear, this resolution — DOES: - Offer recognition of the city's LGBT business community — which adds more than $1.7 TRILLION to the national economy -Clearly state Miami is "open for business" with every diverse community, Leading to an uptick in business creation, growth, and new jobs in Miami -Establishes a List of viable contractors for the city and other municipal partners to utilize when searching for top quality, diverse - owned businesses to u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 Agencla d: orruirroenIIl support -Establish a new pipeline of employers and job creators in the region who will now be eligible for grants, education, scholarships, etc only open to certified minority business owners DOES NOT: - Offer any kind of preferential treatment or 'set aside' for any community -Cost the city a nickel, as the entire process is revenue neutral and free of additional red tape -Conflict with any existing opportunities for any other diverse community in the region The rationale for this policy is simple: Miami's economy cannot achieve its full potential without the full participation of every citizen of Miami. Greater diversity among local suppliers and small business owners encourages greater innovation and competition on city contracts. Greater competition lowers bid prices. Lower bid prices results in millions of dollars in taxpayers savings across Miami that can be reinvested in schools, public safety, and beyond. It's time for Miami, a respected leader in business, diversity, and opportunity, to take its place as one of the most inclusive places for minority - owned business in America. I assure you the growth here among new small businesses wilt astound you. Following the implementation of the California's AB1678 business inclusion Law, there was a dramatic spike in the u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 Agencla d: orruirroenIIl number certified LGBTBEs in California —resulting in a more than 200% increase in LGBT businesses in the state in the first year. We know that can and will happen here in Miami, especially with the support and Leadership of the award -winning Miami - Dade Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce as a key partner. Increasing the local tax base of business owners is a huge windfall for Miami. Additionally, the exposure this opportunity could bring to Miami's LGBT businesses comes at a time when they are still deeply threatened, despite recent wins at the Supreme Court. While SCOTUS did increase protections for employees, entrepreneurs and business owners are still without such basic rights. While Credit/Finance/Mortg age protections are in the Equality Act, LGBT owned businesses seeking investment capital — especially those recovering from COVID et al— need the help NOW. There are more than 35 states where it is perfectly legal for a bank/credit union officer to say "we do not ban money to your kind." Florida, sadly, is one of those states. The LGBT business community is deeply grateful for your enthusiasm and support for this important measure. Should you have ANY questions, I can be reached directly at rr(Mrr,r r;y()nigV r;. irk or via my cell; 954.695.5896. u "ur;11IN,Varroe ;eu-ca Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Hollis Glenn RE. 1 7404 Hawkes 3645 Loquat Ave Settlement - 3384 Day Avenue These buildings should be demolished by the city, the proposed settlement with the defendant should not be made. This is one of many rampant code enforcement infractions that developers are getting away with, ruining the Grove and will ultimately lower home values. Time to work for the constituents, not developers. We must not allow rogue developers to build illegal structures and then have the regulatory arm of our City government throw up their hands and say, "Once RE. 1 7404 concrete is Patron 4050 Ventura ave Settlement - 3384 poured " We mus Day Avenue reinstate sections 2107 & 2108 of the Municpal code so that there would be some accountability. This constrction on Day ave is a perfect example of why this should be done u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. Gabriela DI. 1 7569 Discussion Rodriguez 13862 SW 102 Lane - USACE Back Bay CSRM Study Webinar My name is Gabriela Rodriguez and I am a constituent of District 11 of Miami -Dade County. As we know, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is proposing a $4.6 billion plan to address storm surge risk our country. This proposal does not effectively address the impending climatic impacts such as increasing sea level rise and chronic flooding. It largely ignores beneficial green infrastructure solutions like mangrove and coral reef restoration. By focusing on elevation and grey infrastructure, it inherently fails to address the threat multiplier of all our concerns: the climate crisis. As a result, this proposal is a big waste of money and resources. If anything, it's a big ban -aid for an issue that cannot be patched up. I urge you to not support this proposal and instead invest your time and power into real solutions. Thank you for your time. Frances Colon 453 NE 68 ST, DI. 1 7569 Discussion Dear City of Miami Miami, FL 33138 - USACE Back Bay Commissioners, The CSRM Study Webinar Back Bay Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study presents an opportunity to invest billions in federal money into resilience - building for Miami. However, as written, it is unacceptable for the community: it is too harmful to the environment, creates equity problems, exposes certain areas to increased flood risk, and does not address — or even u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. worsens — routine flooding from sea level rise. Specifically, the plan could disrupt neighborhoods, and has echoes of past projects that harmed communities by building highways through them — such as Overtown. It fails to leverage existing community -based resiliency plans, such as the Urban Land Institute panel, Resitient305, the SE Florida Climate Compact, Miami Forever, and others that we have spent years and taxpayer resources on. For a project that we wilt be on the hook for 35% of, the details on buyouts and use of eminent domain are not available. The cost benefit analysis formula overemphasizes property values and this wilt result in areas with higher property values getting more flood protection. City of Miami Commissioners should recommend that Miami Dade County request the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers modify the proposal to focus on: • Nature and nature - based features like Living shorelines and coral restoration • Fortification of critical infrastructure such as water and wastewater treatment plants • Septic to sewer conversion as a pollution prevention and resiliency measure • Investment in under-resourced communities • Manage stormwater through filtration and retention -focused projects Miami needs a locally preferred plan that supports the community and the u "ur;11IN,Varroe ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. environment while also providing flood risk reduction. Thank you 325 s Biscayne Blvd BC. 10 6330 Code Desiree D'Souza N/A Miami, FL 33131 Enforcement Board Collin SchLadweiler 2103 Coral Way 2nd DI. 1 7569 Discussion Dear City of Miami Floor Miami, FL - USACE Back Bay Commissioners: 33145 CSRM Study Webinar Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Back Bay Coastal Storm Risk Management Feasibility Study. This study represents a significant and important occasion to address the large investments necessary to address storm surge and other climate change - related risks to the Miami -Dade community. However, this proposal lacks investments in nature -based approaches that are supported by the community, and which would provide multiple bottom -line benefits to our community and environment. It also misses dear opportunities for risk minimization by omitting sewage treatment plants and other critical infrastructure from the proposal. Further, it proposes unacceptable environmental harm, particularly to Biscayne Bay, and threatens to make routine flooding from sea Level. rise worse through structural improvements. There are significant equity concerns raised by this proposal. The proposal, as written, would disrupt communities with flood barriers - creating "winners" and "Losers." Furthermore, the u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. cost -benefit analysis favors investments in higher property value areas, which leaves under-resourced communities without crucial storm risk assistance. As a city encompassing so many cultures and backgrounds, I hope you take the time to reflect where you decide to invest funding. We ask this proposal be modified to focus on: -Nature and nature -based features like living shorelines and coral restoration - Fortification of critical infrastructure such as water and wastewater treatment plants - Septic to sewer conversion as a pollution prevention and resiliency measure -I nvestment in under-resourced communities Thank you for your consideration, Collin u "ur;11IN,Varroe ^ II: ['lame SII:recrll: slaaaaires,3 ;eu cla Iteriru Vfi d:orruirroen11l. AMY CLEMENT 1766 Opechee Dr DI. 1 7569 Discussion - USACE Back Bay CSRM Study Webinar End of Report The US Army Corps study has important implications for our city. Various groups around the city are reviewing the plan and preparing public comments. It is critical that we have adequate time to do this work. The public comment period has coincided exactly with the COVID-19 pandemic, which has significantly slowed our ability to respond. I understand that Miami -Dade county has requested a 30 days extension, but I would encourage the commission to request a longer extension to give our community adequate time for thorough review and comment. I am asking the commission to request a 60-day extension to the public comment period. Amy Clement Professor of Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Chair of the City of Miami Climate Resilience Committee