Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnalysis and MapsCITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY PLANNING DIVISION Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff Analysis File ID 4458 Applicant Magic City Properties I, LLC; Magic City Properties II, LLC; Magic City Properties IV, LLC; Magic City Properties V; Magic City Properties VI, LLC; Magic City Properties VII, LLC; Magic City Properties X, LLC; Magic City Properties XI, LLC; Magic City Properties XIV, LLC; Magic City Properties XV, LLC; Magic City Properties XVIII, LLC; Magic City Properties XXII, LLC; Dragon Global Miami Real Estate Investments, LLC; Area 61, LLC; Altam Enterprises, LLC; R- Venture Corp; Christian Kolm; Imperial Capital Group, LLC; and Lemon City Group, LLC. Location 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, and 288 NE 61 ST; 401, 300, and 415 NE 62 ST; 334, 350, and 370 NE 60 ST; AND 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, and 5952 NE 4 AVE, and 6001 NE 2 AVE, Miami, FL Commission District District 5 — Commissioner Keon Hardemon NET District Little Haiti Size Approximately 16.08 acres Planner Sue Trone, AICP Request Pursuant to Policy LU-1.6.4 of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan (MCNP), The above listed Applicants, collectively referred to as MCD Miami, LLC, are requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 10544, the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the MCNP to 31 properties for a total of approximately 16.08 acres. The proposed amendment is subject to the Expedited Review Process as established in Section 163.3184(3) and (5), Florida Statutes. The property at 6001 NE 2 Avenue has an existing Future Land Use (FLU) designation that is split between "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" and "Restricted Commercial"; the existing FLU designation of the remaining properties is "Light Industrial". The Applicant is requesting a change from these existing FLU designations to "Restricted Commercial". Concurrently, the Applicant (collectively referred to as "MCD Miami, LLC) is requesting a change to the Miami 21 Zoning Atlas as a companion item. The request is being submitted through the Special Area Plan ("SAP") process. The companion application 1 (File ID No. 4459) seeks to change the Miami 21 Zoning designations T5-O (5 parcels) and D1 (33 parcels) to new designations "Magic City SAP/MCID-1", "Magic City SAP/MCID-2", "Magic City SAP/T5-O", "Magic City SAP/D1". The Neighborhood The proposed FLUM amendment is located in the Little Haiti neighborhood. Specifically, the properties are located in the eastern portion of Little Haiti, which is characterized by a large concentration of industrial and light industrial properties situated between the Florida East Coast railroad and NE 2 Avenue. The larger Little Haiti neighborhood is defined as the area shown in Map 1 on the next page. Immediately northwest of the properties is the Little Haiti Soccer Park. This is an important park for the neighborhood. It is the largest public park in Little Haiti and is used widely by the community. Other public parks in the area include Eaton Park, immediately to the east of the properties, and Legion Park, which is located between Biscayne Boulevard and Biscayne Bay, to the east of the properties. Legion Park is also used by many community members, who utilize its diverse array of park facilities. Another central community asset, the Little Haiti Cultural Complex, is located directly south of the properties. The Little Haiti Cultural Complex is a multi- purpose, city -owned community center with a wide range of facility types. The community hosts many events through the complex, including local markets, music and theater performances, and community meetings. The mission of the Little Haiti Cultural Complex is "to present and preserve Afro -Caribbean cultures, inspire the next generation of leaders and leverage arts and culture as tools for transformation and community building." The Florida East Coast (FEC) railroad bounds the properties on the east side. The privately owned railroad recently began operating a daily passenger service between Downtown Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and West Palm Beach, with the ultimate goal of going on to Orlando. Local agencies are currently in the planning stage for local passenger service through South Florida, with potential stations being considered in Downtown Miami, around Midtown Miami, and around NE 79 Street. To the west, across NE 2 Avenue, is the Notre Dame d'Haiti Catholic Church. The church, which seats almost 1,400 parishioners, is another important institution in the neighborhood. Palm Grove, a designated Historic District, is to the east of the FEC railroad. That neighborhood is known for its lush, residential character, with an eclectic mix of architectural styles. Most of the styles in the neighborhood are representative of the 1920's through the 1950's. 2 Transit facilities in the neighborhood consist of regular bus service along NE 2 Avenue, with three bus lines running north and south. NE 62 Street has one bus line running east and west, directly through the properties. Map 1: The Little Haiti neighborhood as defined in Ordinance 16-00965, outlined in yellow. The subject site for the FLUM amendment is outlined in red. 3 Existing and Proposed Future Land Use Designations Thirty of the 31 parcels that are subject of this comprehensive plan amendment have a FLU designation of Light Industrial and one parcel has a split FLU designation of Medium Density Restricted Commercial and Restricted Commercial. Attachment A of this report includes a table that summarizes the current FLU designations, proposed FLU designations, and, because this comprehensive plan amendment is accompanied by a rezone application through the SAP process, the table includes the zoning changes that are requested in concert with the changes to the FLUM. The Existing FLUM is available in Attachment B. Existing FLU Designation: Light Industrial The majority of this request is to change the comprehensive plan by amending the FLUM with regard to the City's inventory of Light Industrial land. The primary intent of this land use classification is to allow mixed use development within this land use classification, and further, to facilitate the ability of developing a mixed occupancy within a unit in which more than one type of use is provided under Live/Work or Work/Live zoning districts of the City's land development regulations. Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow all activities included in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General Commercial" designations, as well as wholesaling and distribution activities that generally serve the needs of other businesses; generally require on and off loading facilities; and benefit from close proximity to general commercial areas. These commercial activities (beyond those permitted in the "Restricted Commercial" and "General Commercial" designations) include retailing of second hand items, new and used vehicle sales, parking lots and garages, wholesaling, warehousing, light manufacturing and assembly and other activities whose scale of operation and land use impacts are similar to those uses described above. This category also allows commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels for transients. This land use category shall not permit storing, packaging, handling, processing or distribution of explosive, flammable or otherwise hazardous materials; scrap yards; and health clinics. The hazard level of an activity shall be one of the determining factors as to whether that activity shall be permissible within a Light Industrial district; the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations shall prohibit high-level hazard activities within live/work developments. Areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow residential uses to a maximum density of 36 dwelling units per acre, and the nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Light Industrial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 10.0 times the net lot area of the subject property Affordable housing developments that are certified by the City as having a complete application for development as of the effective date of the proposed Land Development Regulations shall be permitted with densities up to 150 dwelling units per acre but must obtain all building permits by December 17, 2012, at which time any rights herein to building permits shall expire. 4 All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Existing FLU Designation: Medium Density Restricted Commercial One parcel subject to this request at 6001 NE 2 Avenue is partially designated as Medium Density Restricted Commercial. Areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Medium Density Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Proposed FLU Designation: Restricted Commercial The Applicant proposes to change all 31 parcels to Restricted Commercial. Areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow residential uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "High Density Multifamily Residential" subject to the same limiting conditions and a finding by the Planning Director that the proposed site's proximity to other residentially zoned property makes it a logical extension or continuation of existing residential development and that adequate services and amenities exist in the adjacent area to accommodate the needs of potential residents; transitory residential facilities such as hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use; clinics and laboratories, auditoriums, libraries, convention facilities, places of worship, and primary and secondary schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally serve the daily retailing and service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes, general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and exhibition or entertainment facilities and other commercial activities whose scale and land use impacts are similar in nature to those uses described above. This category also includes commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible. The nonresidential portions of developments within areas designated as "Restricted Commercial" allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 7.0 times the net lot area of the subject property; such FLR may be increased upon compliance with the detailed 5 provisions of the applicable land development regulations; however, may not exceed a total FLR of 11.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Edgewater Area allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 17.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. Properties designated as "Restricted Commercial" in the Urban Central Business District and Buena Vista Yards Regional Activity Center allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 37.0 times the net lot area of the subject property. All such uses and mixes of uses shall be subject to the detailed provisions of the applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of service for facilities and services included in the City's adopted concurrency management requirements. Nonresidential floor area is the floor area that supports nonresidential uses within the inside perimeter of the outside walls of the building including hallways, stairs, closets, thickness of walls, columns and other features, and parking and loading areas, and excluding only open air corridors, porches, balconies and roof areas. The proposed FLUM for this application is available in Attachment C. The Site in Context: FLU Designations in A 1/4-Mile Study Area To understand the site in context, a 1/4-mile study area from the edge of the parcels of the subject parcels of this comprehensive plan amendment was created. The study area measures 284.4 acres and contains 12 different FLU designations within it. The largest FLU designations within the study area are: Major Institutional (27.3 acres); Medium Density Multifamily Residential (31.3 acres); Duplex Residential (45.7 acres); Restricted Commercial (49.1 acres); and Light Industrial (50.2 acres). While the study area has similar quantities of the following designations as the City overall —Low Density Restricted Commercial, Low Density Multifamily Residential, General Commercial, Duplex Residential, and Restricted Commercial; there is a remarkable difference in two FLU designations —Single Family — Residential (28 percent of the City is made up of this FLU designation but the study area only has 5 percent of this type of land) and Light Industrial (the City only 2 percent of this type of land but in the study area there is 50 percent). The table below summarizes the distributions of FLU designations throughout the study area. 6 FLU Inventory for the 1/4-Mile Study Area: Magic City Innovation District SAP Study Area FLU Designation Low Density Restricted Commercial Low Density Multifamily Residential General Commercial Single Family- Residential Medium Density Restricted Commercial Industrial Public Parks and Recreation Major Inst, Public Facilities, Transp And Medium Density Multifamily Residential Duplex - Residential Restricted Commercial Light Industrial Other TOTAL Study Area Study Area Land Area %, Acreage Study Area 0.38 0% 1.86 1% 8.50 3% 13.48 5% 16.07 6% 18.76 7% 21.69 8% 27.33 10% 31.26 11% 45.66 16% 49.14 17% 50.22 18% N/A* N/A* 284.35 100% Citywide Citywide Land Area %, Acreage Citywide 143.89 1% 39.17 0% 944.64 4% 6197.27 28% 895.99 4% 459.33 2% 1315.45 6% 2103.39 9% 1486.94 7% 4001.93 18% 3735.67 17% 533.83 2% 652.14 3% 22509.64 100% * "Other" FLU designations include designations throughout the city that are not captured withi n the 1/4-mi le study area. Within the City of Miami, 62 percent of the land is designated Single Family — Residential (28 percent), Duplex — Residential (18 percent) and Restricted Commercial (17 percent). The remaining 12 FLU designations make up the remaining 38 percent of the City's land area. Of that remaining 38 percent of land, less than 5 percent is designated either Light Industrial or Industrial. Given the reality of this land use schema, the study area is remarkable in that 35 percent of the land within it (99 acres or 35 percent of the study area) are designated for intense uses with a Light Industrial designation or Restricted Commercial. The map below depicts the FLU designations within the study area. b70TH ST m 4W89TH:T NE 69TH ST i NE 69TH ST NE 69TH ST NE o9TH ST N .TH ST - NE68TH TER I.- NE 68TH ST NW BBTH £T NE 68TH ST w N�IT' '7 w NE 88 T g, G NE66-HST / q •• NW 6iTH-T E85T4£- i z 6357H3 64TH TEE ,__.- �J p }q �� x 57 T-1 5 F71111��i w Y z �_Megm w ` � x Z NE 63ft0 E 53R ST Mega City Study Area Cl FLUM PerceI, ® CI), NE 63RD z NE 52NI5 S _._IA % g. � _ 1/4-Mlle Study Area Future Land Use NW 62ND s ,, 7 Designations IJ, , { , NE � ST Pobnc Peeks end Recreation YwetsT - e/J./,'J.x smgl FaewN Residential it fiery f rr % NE e9'}{ 5T —^•;� OTH ST • Duel • Residential r z NE6OTH ST E3;E%i Low Density Multifamily Residential • N, 59TH TER NE 59THTER • _. TH ST Medwm Density Multeamlly N 58TH ST 1 Readentlal Low Denny Restricted NW 58TH ix TH ST Commercial Meawm Denny Restudied —Cc T E 58131 S f .mar al _ Restricted Commemal ' VW 57TH T 3 [ $7 7 T 'MR �ealeBe� - General Commmcal Maid Inetltdosnal, Public MI Transportation and G C V w ad.. S g co NE 55 Lphl industrial z NE 55T9IST MIIndustrial About the map Given that FLU designations within the City of Miami are scarce, the study area for this application is remarkable for its abundance of Light Industrial and Industrial FLU 7 Low- and Moderate -Incomes within the 1/4-Mile Study Area To study income within the study area Census Block Group data from the 2010 Census was used. Within the %-mile study area, nearly 80 percent of the land area is described by the 2010 Census as between 70 and 100 percent low to moderate income. The Area Median Income (AMI) is a statistic determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This statistic is established for the entirety of Miami -Dade County. Currently, AMI is set at $52,300. Based on this AMI for the County, income limits for low - to -moderate income are $26,150 (low) and $41,840 (moderate). Based on these parameters, the map below indicates that most of the study area is populated by individuals with rather low incomes. Magic City 114-Mile Study Area: % Low/Mod Income Individuals by Census Block Group W 69TH ST NE 69TH ST a1 MEW NE 69TH ST x NE 69TH ST---,.' W 68TH TER NE 59TH TER a Z NE 68TH ST r W 68TH 5T NE 68TH ST c o . n a '` 6.1 z NE 67T!-!ST ECM NW66TH ST •• z U NE 64THTE' NE 63RD TER R y NE 63R6ST z 1111 NE 63RD 5T_ NE 63RD ST 62ND NE 62NDTERIME` ST r I rr r0, , !Mini NE BOTH TER UNNAMED NE BOTH ST NE 60TH ST NE 50TH ST 2 F W 60TH ST ■ NE BOTH ST I NE 59TH TER s �'.� LowlMod Income % W 59TH ST - 70.1%-80% 80.1%-90% W 58TH SIT O ` NE 68TH ST IIIIII, Q0°� ENE 68TH ST` r I 6--.NE90.1%-1 ZEMEDINx� NE 57TH ST Magic City Study Area MaMa®ic City ELUM Parcels ' 5 1 1 dlgMI PL IS AV K rA 2 ■ NE 65TH TER NE 55TH TER Q.05 0.1 ' Q.2 Miles i I Little Haiti in More Detail: The Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment For richer understanding of the local area, the Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment (2015) provides more detail about the conditions of the community. The study area does not overlap with that of the study area created by Planning Department staff for the current application; however, with the study's observations are germane to this comprehensive plan amendment application because of the proximity of the proposal to the Little Haiti Needs Assessment's ("Needs Assessment") study area to the Magic City proposal site. The Needs Assessment focuses on seven Census Tracts (which occupy nearly the same geography as that of the boundary of the Little Haiti neighborhood, depicted in 8 Map 1, on page 3), taking data from the American Community Survey (ACS) providing 5- year estimates from 2009-2013. The study finds that Little Haiti's population was 74.5 percent Black/African American and 20.5 percent Hispanic compared to the City of Miami which has approximately a 16.3 percent Black/African American and 70.0 percent Hispanic population. Haitian ancestry for the Little Haitian neighborhood is estimated at between 35 and 76 percent, depending on Census Tract. There are 9,600 households in Little Haiti with married couples in 22 percent of families. Seventeen percent of families are headed by female heads -of -households with children present. Nonfamily households account for 42 percent of the area. The table below summarizes these observations. Family Household Types in Little Haiti Household Type Percentag Family Households 58% Married -Couple Households 22% Female households, no husband present, child 17% Grandparents, living with children 10% Nonfamily Households 42% Reproduced from Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment While the %-mile study area establishes that the immediate vicinity of the Magic City SAP area is surrounded by neighborhoods with low- and moderate -incomes, the Needs Assessment reveals that the extent of the population with low and very -low incomes is even more profound throughout the Little Haiti neighborhood. Forty-seven percent of the individuals who live in Little Haiti live in poverty and the majority of households have incomes under $10,000. Children suffer disproportionately: 64.6 percent of related children under 18 are found to be below the poverty level while 40.3 percent of people over 65 live with the same means. The graph below is reproduced from the Assessment, and it summarizes a breakdown on Little Haiti incomes. t CO ro CC CC E 0 Little Haiti Household Income Levels, 2009-2013 Less than $10,000 $10, 000-$14,999 $15,000-$24,999 $25,000-$34,999 $35,000-49,999 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,999 150,000-199,999 200,000 or more 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% LH Community Members 9 The Magic City Innovation District and the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan According to the Letter of Intent that accompanies this application, the Magic City Innovation District Special Area Plan will be a unique and unparalleled mixed -use campus focused on local entrepreneurship and innovation in technology, the arts and entertainment, sustainability and resiliency, health and wellness. The proposed SAP includes a development program which will create an integrated urban campus of residential, commercial office, research and entertainment uses built around a grand pedestrian promenade civic space at the center of the project. The following features of the Application draw the attention of the Community Planning Division for closer review: 1. Characterization of the SAP as an "Innovation District"; 2. Characterization of the SAP as "resilient" and as "improving resiliency"; and 3. Income levels for residents at stabilization in the Economic Impact Analysis; 1. Characterization of the SAP as an "Innovation District" The Brookings Institute has extensively researched innovation districts and describes them in the following way: Innovation districts facilitate the creation and commercialization of new ideas and support metropolitan economies by growing jobs in ways that leverage their distinct economic attributes. These districts build on and revalue the intrinsic qualities of cities: proximity, density, authenticity, and vibrant places. Given the proximity of many districts to low-income neighborhoods and the large number of sub -baccalaureate jobs many provide, their intentional development can be a tool to help connect disadvantaged populations to employment and educational opportunities. (Brookings Institute, 2018) Along these lines, Brookings offers 12 principles guiding innovation districts based on its research with Projects for Public Spaces (PPS): 1. The clustering of innovative sectors and research strengths is the backbone of innovation districts. 2. For innovation districts, convergence —the melding of disparate sectors and disciplines —is king. 3. Districts are supercharged by a diversity of institutions, companies, and start-ups. 4. Connectivity and proximity are the underpinnings of strong district ecosystems. 5. Innovation districts need a range of strategies —large and small moves, long-term and immediate. 6. Programming is paramount. 7. Social interactions between workers —essential to collaboration, learning, and inspiration —occur in concentrated "hot spots." 8. Make innovation visible and public. 9. Embed the values of diversity and inclusion in all visions, goals, and strategies. 10. Get ahead of affordability issues. 10 11. Innovative finance is fundamental to catalyzing growth. 12. Long-term success demands a collaborative approach to governance. (Brookings Institute, 2018, p. 15) In addition to these principles, there is guidance for land use and land development for planning. Namely, for cities with strong and growing economies, the authors of the report caution against across-the-board rezoning for increasing density, proximity, and mixing of uses due to the effect such zoning changes have on land prices. The report suggests that the best zoning solutions in strong markets is to "keep base zoning low with uses limited to producer -type activity, but then permit extra density or more profitable residential, retail, and commercial uses through ... discretionary zoning process[es]." (Brookings Institute, 2018, pp. 77-78) 2. Characterization of the SAP as "resilient" and as "improving resiliency." The City of Miami is a member of the 100 Resilient Cities coalition and among the executive staff members in the City is its Chief Resilience Officer who oversees the Office of Resilience and Sustainability. 100 Resilient Cities defines "Resilience" in the following way: [T]he capacity of individuals, communities, institutions, businesses, and systems within a city to survive, adapt, and grow, no matter what kinds of chronic stresses and acute shocks they experience. Shocks are typically considered single event disasters, such as fires, earthquakes, and floods. Stresses are factors that pressure a city on a daily or reoccurring basis, such as chronic food and water shortages, an overtaxed transportation system, endemic violence or high unemployment. City resilience is about making a city better, in both good times and bad, for the benefit of all its citizens, particularly the poor and vulnerable. (100 Resilient Cities, 2018) In the Letter of Intent, the Applicant points out that the proposed SAP is located on "a high coastal ridge [that] will help to protect the Magic City SAP campus from flooding and potential future sea level issues." There is no disputing that the location has an advantageous elevation for the City of Miami. The regulating plan and letter establish the developer's intent to contribute to walkability, a linear civic space through the project, and redevelopment of an area of the city that is currently suffering from disinvestment; however, in the context of resilience as it is understood by the City of Miami, the current review is unclear as to how the proposed SAP might leverage its location, proximity to the community in Little Haiti, desire to innovate, and the mission to fortify the City against acute and chronic shocks to "make the city a better place" as suggested by 100 Resilient Cities, in particular for the immediate community of Little Haiti. 3. Data for income levels for residents at stabilization in the Economic Impact Analysis The Economic Impact Analysis analyzes a number of factors of the Magic City development and assesses the economic impact it will have during construction and upon stabilization. It provides some marginal contemplation to fiscal benefits of the project, though no fiscal impact is provided—i.e. impacts due to rezoning that are 11 realized as a cost to the city in increased emergency services by fire or police, increased costs to infrastructure due to increased demand on water, sewer, roads, transit, etc. With regard to the analysis's review of the residential development, it assumes that the proposed SAP will build 2,630 units and, upon stabilization, it will realize 95 percent occupancy. The economic benefits derived from the project assume that 100 percent of dwelling units will be occupied by households with incomes of $75,000 per year. A summary of the conclusions of the study are as follow: 1. The project is estimated to be phased over 10 years. Through this phasing, there will be an estimated 930 short term construction jobs on average. The study estimates that this will create more than $500 million in short term construction wages and expenditure aggregated during this period, including an estimated $24 million in permit and impact fees. 2. The study estimates $188 million in annual marginal expenditures from residents, hotel visitors, retail patrons, and office tenants upon stabilized operations. 3. The study estimates that the project will generate more than $27 million in ad valorem taxes upon stabilized operations, $1.3 million in Hotel Bed Tax Revenue, and $4.0 million in sales taxes. 4. The study estimates that the development will create 11,680 direct and indirect full-time jobs and approximately $640 million in direct and indirect wages annually related to building employment and operating expenditures. Commentary According to a study by Miami -Dade County's Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, the top 5 employment categories in 2014 were retail salespersons (employment - 47,760), registered nurses (employment — 29,960), cashiers (employment — 24,130), customer service representatives (employment — 22,770), and food preparation and serving workers (employment — 21,710) (Planning Research Section, 2014). Employment data for 2016 from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) shows that the employment sectors with the greatest number of employees in Miami Dade County also pay wages that are below the City median income ($31,6421). The bar graph below summarizes this data. 1 Source: This is the estimate of Area Median Income for the City of Miami according to the Census Bureau, the American Community Survey, 2012-2016, with a margin of error of $499. 12 MIAMI AREA EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYMENT SECTOR 209,320 200,000 ' 150,000 U1 G1 148,800 ■ Below Median Income ■ Above Median Income 0 108,640 Q 100,000 90,730 W 69,440 61,200 54,460 50,000 43,280 4J,14n-4)1nn 39,8 90.39;370 I I I I I31603190211hi z1 0..11510,1 I] 0.1 .0 3.s10 2,050 0 — p8S `p38 p38 pC p38 p38 ai ti ar a a 4 a a ,a ,Q ,e ,c,c' ,Q ,c ,c ,c ,ca d4 ° 1. p cc 6 ¢ 6 c� 6 6 ¢ pp 6 y¢ 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 •0` O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 pQ�6 ) ¢`ayb °yrp¢a to pcs .�0 Q¢a �6pc �` • cacp¢ �¢F¢c a�pc ��a 5 Q°� ¢Fa\a ��a ��5c ,4$ �tC� S ecc 5 4 P ` b `i ¢ t 4 Qc° ,a¢ vc aca 0} acb t¢ 'p �`+' ba �& a a` ap bay cq,' c¢' ¢`' er acb t¢ ys� 38 5Q 5° b`` 5° 01 ice Sa acb5e, acb �pc` Qcac �tac ¢cao Qp a°�, e ca\Ga 0¢\ tacb b Jt¢ac \acb z �, ems. pb . ac oc a` cb pc' a° d¢ wta ea° $¢ 'ccc Gp<,Q F� co Pt` a ,C�i bpi J` 0 Employment Sectors 8 3a P3 Miami has many claims to fame, one of which is that the area has the greatest income disparity between those with the highest income and those with the lowest income. The measure of income disparity is known as the Gini coefficient, and at the moment, the Gini coefficient measure for Miami shows that the spread between the highest wage earners and the lowest wage earners was the greatest of any other city of 250,000 people, having grown 16.8 percent from 2014 to 2015. As of 2014, it was reported that Brazil had a lower Gini coefficient than Miami -Dade County (Planning Research Section). "Miami -Dade now has more jobs than it had in 2007,' Kevin Greiner, senior fellow at the Florida International University Metropolitan Center told Bloomberg. The problem is that the quality, and the wages, and the income of those jobs created have been significantly lower than they were in the past,- (Teproff, 2016). Lester, Kaza, and Kirk (2014) observe that approximately one-third of the nation's small manufacturing establishments (defined as manufacturers that hire fewer than 20 people) are located in the ten largest cities. Urban areas are still considered to be competitive locations for goods -producing firms; location in center cities provides these firms access to large markets, key transportation infrastructure, pools of skilled labor, specialized suppliers, while also providing jobs for lesser educated laborers (p.295-297). Moreover, jobs around production, design, and repair offer average annual wages that are 22.9 percent higher than the average private sector job jobs that often do not require an advanced degree (p.297). Manufacturing employment grew by 729,000 jobs since the start of the recovery as of 2014 (296). For cities like Miami, FL, these "manufacturers" are more and more referred to as "makers" and dense urban areas are ideal locations for the "Maker Movement", if the right policies are in place (Wolf -Powers, 2017). 13 Nevertheless, the ideals of "industrial chic" have become a popular urban aesthetic. The demand for the conversion of older, industrial sites into commercial, residential, or mixed -use land is well documented (Leigh, 2012; Chapple, 2015). In their research, Leigh and Hoelzel (2012) studied the loss of industrial land in seven large cities in the United States. The average loss of industrial land is approximately 15 percent. While heavy commercial uses capture many of the activities that industrial land offer, the "messy" uses allowed in industrial —uses that often allow users an edge in income —are prohibited. The table below is reproduced from the article, summarizing the researchers' observations. Loss of Industrial Land to Rezoning in Select U.S. Cities* Cities Industrial Land Lost (Acres) % Lost Years Atlanta, GA 800 12 2004-2009 Minneapolis -St. Paul, MN 1,812 18 1990-2005 New York, NY 1,797 14 2002-2007 Philadelphia, PA 1,645 8 1990-2008 Portland, OR 489 2 1991-2001 San Francisco, CA 1,276 46 1990-2008 San Jose, CA 1,470 9 1990-2009 * This table is excerpted from Leigh & Hoelzel (2012, p. 94). Karen Chapple states that the decision to open up industrial uses to mixtures of uses is general grounded in an understanding of business dynamics. Instead, planners typically make land use and rezoning decisions about industrial land as a reaction to requests of developers (Chapple, The Highest and Best Use? Urban Industrial Land and Job Creation. 2014, p. 1). Decisions about managing industrial land within an overall land use inventory requires careful, thoughtful planning in the post-industrial era. Eradication of industrial uses from urban areas amounts to an urban typology with those uses on a city's periphery, increasing vehicle miles driven for the urban industrial workforce and the transportation providers that support those industries and workers (p. 216-217). This is a missed opportunity for transit (Leigh, 2012, pp. 88, 94). Los Angeles has capitalized on transit and industrial land uses by creating a Transit -Oriented Development policy for its light industrial sector (Hull, 2015). Moreover, with the growth of the Maker Movement, cities are looking to incubate "makers" within their urban cores. In The Maker Movement and Urban Economic Development, the authors share the following statistics about the 95 maker firms they studied in New York, Chicago, and Portland, OR: - All but two had 25 or fewer employees (20 percent had more than 10 employees); - 76 percent of firms export products outside their regions; - 40 percent sell products nationally; and - 37 percent sell products internationally. (Wolf -Powers, 2017, p. 370) Contemporary, urban industrial enterprises often operate as sole proprietorships, meaning information about them is not picked up by business databases like Reference 14 USA or Dun and Bradstreet or conventional employment statistics (Wolf -Powers, 2017, p. 366). Chapple points out that, in recent decades, about 45 percent of net new jobs have come from firms with fewer than 20 employees. Moreover, more than half of net new jobs come from existing firms that expand, and much of that expansion is enabled by the flexible space that is best accommodated by industrial spaces. In fact, industrial zones are more likely to host expansion of firms at a rate of four times the rate of commercial zones and nine times the rate of residential zones (Chapple, 2015, p. 215). Concurrency Concurrency was tested for public facilities. Except for transportation, all tests for concurrency passed. The Applicant will be required to address transportation at the time of SAP permit subject to Transportation policy TR-1.3.3. Please see Attachment D for the Concurrency Management Analyses. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria Criteria 1: Objective LU-1.2: Promote, facilitate, and catalyze the redevelopment and revitalization of blighted, declining or threatened residential, commercial and industrial areas through a variety of public, private, and public -private redevelopment initiatives and revitalization programs including, where appropriate, historic designations. Analysis 1: The Applicant proposes to restore the DuPuis Medical Office and Drugstore. Finding 1: Staff finds the restoration of the DuPuis site consistent with the MCNP. Criteria 2: Objective LU-1.3: The City will continue to encourage commercial, office and industrial development within existing commercial, office and industrial areas; increase the utilization and enhance the physical character and appearance of existing buildings; encourage the development of well -designed, mixed -use neighborhoods that provide for a variety of uses within a walkable area in accordance with neighborhood design and development standards adopted as a result of the amendments to the City's land development regulations and other initiatives; and concentrate new commercial and industrial activity in areas where the capacity of existing public facilities can meet or exceed the minimum standards for Level of Service (LOS) adopted in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE). Analysis 2: The proposed MCID SAP is anticipated to develop primarily residential, retail, hotel and office uses based on the Economic Impact Study. The extent to which these uses will concentrate new industrial activity in the local area where capacity exists to accommodate these uses is unclear. Finding 2: Inasmuch as Objective LU-1.3 can address the need to preservation of industrial uses which support producer -type employment sectors that earn above median wages, staff finds the application inconsistent with this Objective. Finding 3: Policy LU-1.1.3: The City's zoning ordinance provides for protection of all areas of the city from: (1) the encroachment of incompatible land uses; (2) the adverse impacts of future land uses in adjacent areas 15 that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, or natural or man- made amenities; (3) transportation policies that divide or fragment established neighborhoods; and (4) degradation of public open space, environment, and ecology. Strategies to further protect existing neighborhoods through the development of appropriate transition standards and buffering requirements will be incorporated into the City's land development regulations. Analysis 3: The current application represents the change of approximately 15+- acres of Light Industrially -designated land to Restricted Commercial on the FLUM. Finding 3: Based on the net loss of Light Industrial land from the FLUM staff finds the application inconsistent as an encroachment of Restricted Commercial land into the Light Industrial FLU designation. Criteria 4: - Objective LU-4.1: By 2023, five percent (5%) of the new housing stock to be built will be reserved for mixed income developments, as described in the applicable land development regulations. - Objective LU-4.2: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land development regulations, will be reserved for housing low-income elderly households. - Objective LU-4.3: By 2023, forty percent (40%) of the housing stock built under affordable and attainable mixed -income programs, as described in the applicable land development regulations, will be reserved for workforce housing. Analysis 4: The Little Haiti community is a community with need for solutions to ease cost burden to housing. The current application is requesting a sizable increase in density, but the Economic Impact Analysis estimates that 100 percent of residents living in 2,630 dwelling units will have household incomes of $75,000. Finding 4: Staff finds this inconsistent. Criteria 5: Goal HO-1: Increase the supply of safe, affordable and sanitary housing for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income households (in accordance with the current standards and regulations of HUD and the State of Florida) and the elderly by alleviating shortages of extremely low, very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing, rehabilitating older homes, maintaining, and revitalizing residential neighborhoods in order to meet the needs of all income groups. Analysis 5: The need for affordable housing throughout the City of Miami and, especially in the Little Haiti community is well -documented. Finding 5: Inconsistent. Criteria 6: Goal HO-2: Achieve a livable city center with a variety of urban housing types for persons of all income levels in a walkable, mixed - use, urban environment. Analysis 6: The proposed SAP includes a plan that is walkable and hospitable to multiple modes of transportation. The Economic Impact Analysis purports that residents will fall within income ranges of $55,000- 16 $75,000 even though the analysis assumes all residents will earn $75,000. Finding 6: Staff finds the walkability concept of the SAP consistent; however, the Applicant must more carefully contemplate the affordability component to the residential program. Criteria 7: Policy HO-2.1.2: The City will continue to revise residential zoning district regulations to provide greater flexibility for the design and development of a variety of contemporary housing types and mixed - use developments with the application of new higher density zoning in accordance with neighborhood specific design and development standards that might be adopted as a result of amendments to the City's land development regulations and other neighborhood planning initiatives. Analysis 7: The Applicant has provided some flexibility in the concept of how residential development can be provided in the MCID. The project is a truly mixed -use project and residents can realize the ability to live, work, and play in a single, walkable space. Finding 7: Consistent. Criteria 8: Policy TR-1.1.1: As an Urban Infill Area (UIA) and/or a Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area (TCEA) established by Miami -Dade County, Laws and Regulations, and illustrated in Appendix TR-1, Map TR-13.1, of the Data and Analysis, the City will encourage the concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity with the goal of enhancing the livability of residential neighborhoods, supporting economic development, and the viability of commercial areas. Infill development on vacant parcels, adaptive reuse of underutilized land and structures, redevelopment of substandard sites, downtown revitalization, and development projects that promote public transportation will be heavily encouraged. (See Policy LU-1.1.11.) Analysis 8: The proposed MCID SAP site is within a transit corridor on NE 2 Avenue. Access to commuter rail service on the FEC Railway is anticipated to become reality in the near future. The SAP concept seeks to redevelop the site that has been idle. Finding 8: Criteria 8 seeks intensification of development around centers of activity. Without clarification from the Applicant, office, retail, hotel, and residential uses describe a departure from the nature of uses in the area currently and the uses that maximize the utility of the Light Industrial FLU designation. Staff finds this consistent inasmuch as the Applicant seeks to redevelop the subject parcels. At the same time, this finding is cognizant of the threat this application poses to the diminishing inventory of Light Industrial Land in Miami. Criteria 9: Policy TR-1.1.3: Through application of the provisions of its land development regulations, the City will encourage residential development near large employment centers in order to minimize commutes within the City and investigate opportunities for mixed -use developments. Analysis 9: The proposed MCID SAP presents a development program that is mixed use with an increase of density. Finding 9: Consistent 17 Criteria 10: Policy TR-1.1.4: The City will implement growth strategies that encourage infill and redevelopment in order to take advantage of the multimodal transportation options available, thereby reducing the dependency on automobiles for new developments. Analysis 10: The proposed MCID SAP does present infill redevelopment to take advantage of transit, in particular the transit corridor on NE 2 Avenue. Finding 10: Consistent. Criteria 11: Policy TR-1.5.2: The City will require all new developments to implement transportation control measures in an effort to promote a general reduction in vehicular traffic by increasing auto occupancy and transit ridership. These measures can include, but not be limited to, parking management and ridesharing programs to promote carpooling, vanpooling, car sharing and use of hybrid or electric vehicles, transit discount and fare subsidy programs, transit fare tax incentive programs, car charging stations, flexible work hours, compressed work weeks, telecommuting programs, the construction of on- site transit shelters, transit amenities, transit stops, transit drop-off locations or pull-out bays, bicycle storage facilities, bicycle share programs, and park -and -ride lots. (See Policy TR-1.2.7.) Analysis 11: The Applicant's focus on addressing the proposed MCID SAP's impact on the road network has been on the proximity of the project to transit and the design of Civic Type Space that runs through the project. The Civic Type Space is a feature of Miami 21 that qualifies as a public benefit in exchange for which an SAP application can derive bonus development rights, known as FLR. The Applicant has drawn attention to the Civic Space that runs through the interior of the Magic City district as a feature that will, in part, enhance bicycle infrastructure. Staff does not disagree that the Civic Space will be an improved amenity for bicycling; however, MCNP Policy TR-1.5.2 requires Transportation Control Measures (TCM) that go further to reduce vehicular congestion. Finding 11: Given the level of detail required in SAP submittals and the opportunity for public improvements that SAPs afford the City, staff find the application inconsistent with this criteria. Criteria 12: Policy TR-2.2.9: The City will consider the income, age, ability, and vehicle ownership patterns of populations throughout the city when developing transportation systems and facilities improvements so that all residents, especially those most in need, have access to a wide range of affordable travel options. Analysis 12: The proposed MCID SAP is expected to meet the needs of residents whose incomes are projected to fall within the range of $55,000- $75,000 (noting the Economic Impact Study runs its analysis assuming 100% of residents have household incomes of $75,000). Transportation needs are expected to include personal automobile, bicycle, and some transit. Data reviewed for this analysis does not suggest that there is a flaw in concluding the needs for this demographic. Nevertheless, the Development Agreement includes commitments of the Applicant to hire up to 20 percent of its construction workforce from communities with high poverty rates within 18 the City and County for this project which anticipates a 10-year build out. Finding 12: A review of the proposed MCID SAP suggests that there may be more opportunity for transportation improvements that can be inclusive of members of the community with various incomes, abilities, etc. that can be easily addressed with creative TCMs. Staff finds this inconsistent. Criteria 13: Objective PR-1.5: Ensure that future development and redevelopment pay an equitable, proportional share of the cost of public open space and recreational facilities required to maintain adopted LOS standards. Analysis 13: The proposed MCID SAP creates a Civic Type space within the development. The intent is for this space to be publicly accessible, but maintained and operated privately. Access is proposed to open to the public daily, 8 AM to 9 PM. The proposed Development Agreement proposes a "park impact fee credit against a residential component of the SAP pursuant to Chapter 13 of the City Code, the Developer shall at such time be given a credit against the then -due park impact fees in the ascertainable amount of the Developer's expenditures on the construction of the Public Open Space as of the date such park impact fees are assessed by the City; provided that any expenses incurred by the Developer in the construction of Public Open Space which are credited against the City's park impact fee assessed on a residential component of the SAP shall not be counted towards any future credit against park impact fees assessed on a subsequent residential component of the SAP." Impact fees are intended to mitigate a specific impact. The developer is using the 3.8 acres of Civic Type Space as a public benefit —a policy in Miami 21. Through that public benefit, in return, the Developer can build extra FLR, which is anticipated in the MCID SAP proposal. At the same time, the Developer proposes to be forgiven any park impact fees. Finding 13: The rationale behind affording the developer a development bonus (extra FLR) plus park impact fee credits does not support the provision of public parks and the fiscal soundness necessary to that end. Staff finds this proposal from the Development Agreement inconsistent with the MCNP. Criteria 14: Objective CI-1.2: Ensure through the City's land development regulations that development orders authorizing new development or redevelopment that results in an increase in the density or intensity of land use shall be contingent upon the availability of public facilities and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards for sanitary sewer, solid waste, stormwater, potable water, adequate water supply, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities, and that land use map changes maintain the financial feasibility of the MCNP. (See Coastal Management Objective CM-1.4 or Educational Objective EDU-1.2.) 19 Analysis 14: Staff has reviewed the Concurrency Management System for minimum LOS standards. Finding 14: Consistent. 20 Conclusions The City of Miami will benefit from thoughtful redevelopment that is resilient. In this way, redevelopment must be equitable, sensitive to ecological realities of this area, innovative, and context -sensitive. A phased development will contribute to the economy over time in ways not always understood at the outset; it will equally have fiscal impacts that are difficult to ascertain until the impacts are realized. Staff has genuine concerns about the current proposal under the goals, objectives, and policies of the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan. A quickly diminishing inventory of FLU designations that support activities that have potential to provide the most diverse opportunities for incomes that are above the median income is a grave concern of the Planning Department. The current application meets minimum Levels of Service requirements as established in the MCNP. Staff is optimistic that the Applicant can reflect on contemporary discourse on innovation districts. Staff further hopes that the Applicant can improve how the application addresses issues of equity: recognizing the number of households in Little Haiti with incomes of $10,000 while the Economic Impact Analysis estimates the household income of all residents within the proposed SAP will be $75,000. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of this comprehensive plan amendment with the understanding that it is a companion item to a rezoning which ties to a development agreement, subject to further modification based on staff analyses and continued community input. quelin ief, Land CP evelopment 21 Works Cited 100 Resilient Cities. (2018, July 6). Frequently Asked Questions About 100 Resilient Cities. Retrieved from 100 Reslient Cities: http://www.100resilientcities.org/100RC-FAQ/#/-_/ Brookings Institute. (2018, July 6). Innovation Districts. Retrieved from Brookings Institute: https://www.brookings.edu/innovation-districts/ Chapple, K. (2015). The Challenge of Mixing Uses and the Secret Sauce of Urban Industrial Land. In K. Chapple, Planning Sustainable cities and Regions: Towards More Equitable Development (pp. 207-222). New York: Routledge. Flechas, J. (2018, June 21). Little Haiti residents fear being pushed out. They're pushing back on big developments. Read more here: https://www. miamiheraId. com/latest-news/artic1e213459079. html#storylink=cpy. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from Miami Herald: https://www.miamiherald.com/latest- news/article213459079.html Hull, C. (2015, April 8). Preserinv Industrial Land Near Transit Lines in Los Angeles County. Retrieved February 9, 2018, from http://eco- rapid.org/Project/studies_reports/Eco- Rapid_Transit_Presentation_I ndustrial_Lands_4.8.15.pdf Leigh, N. G. (2012, February 9). Smart Growth's Blind Side. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(1), 87-103. Planning Research Section. (2014). Mlami-Dade County's Wages at a Glance. Miami: Department of Regulatory and Economic Resrouces. Planning Research Section. (n.d.). Miami -Dade CountyAt-A-Glance. Retrieved February 2018, 2018, from https://www.miamidade.gov/planning/library/reports/at-a- glance/2014-income-inequality.pdf Q-Q Research Consultants. (2015). Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment. Miami. Teproff, C. (2016, October 5). Miami's No. 1, Its Prize? The Biggest Gap between Rich and Poor. Retrieved July 3, 2018, from Miami Herald: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami- dade/article106325122.html Wolf -Powers, L. D. (2017). The Maker Movement and Urban Economic Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(4), 365-376. 22 ATTACHMENT A Magic City Innovation District Parcels Requiring FLUM Change to "Restricted Commercial" Address Folio Current FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation 240 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0160 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 6001 NE 2nd Avenue 01-3218-015-0210 Split between Medium Density Restricted Commercial & Restricted Commercial All (100%) Restricted Commercial 352 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0060 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 372 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0080 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 382 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0190 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 6300 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-020-0330 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 401 NE 62nd Street 01-3218-014-0030 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 300 NE 62nd Street 01-3218-015-0770 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 301 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0771 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 320 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0030 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 270 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0200 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 334 NE 60th Street 01-3218-016-0140 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 350 NE 60th Street 01-3218-016-0150 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 250 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0180 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 262 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0170 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 6380 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-020-0321 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 6301 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-020-0361 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 415 NE 62nd Street 01-3218-047-0010 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 365 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0730 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 298 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0100 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 300 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0010 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 310 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0020 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 340 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0040 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 371 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0720 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 6350 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-020-0320 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 353 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0740 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 288 NE 61st Street 01-3218-022-0090 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 370 NE 60th Street 01-3218-016-0180 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 5972 & 5974 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-089-0010; 01-3218-089-0020 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial 5952 NE 4th Avenue 01-3218-016-0200 Light Industrial Restricted Commercial Magic City Innovation District Parcels Not Requiring FLUM Change Address Folio Current FLUM Designation Proposed FLUM Designation 6041 NE 2nd Avenue 01-3218-015-0140 Restricted Commercial Same 228 NE 61st Street 01-3218-015-0150 Restricted Commercial Same 200 NE 62nd Street 01-3218-066-0010 Restricted Commercial Same 6200 NE 4th Court 01-3218-024-0200 Light Industrial Same 6210 NE 4th Court 01-3218-024-0180 Light Industrial Same 296 NE 60th Street 01-3218-016-0100 Light Industrial Same 270 NE 60th Street 01-3218-016-0070 Light Industrial Same ATTACHMENT B Medium FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) File ID: 4458 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Density Restricted - Commercial NE 65TH ST, Duplex Residential —NE 64TH ST 11111 NE 63RD TER Medium D nsity Multifamily, Residential 1I JI NE 63RDST NE 62ND hiiv , Industrial 0 zf- N w z NE 65TH ST� Restricted Commercial Light - Industrial - Public Parks and Recreation NE 67TH ST z m w 0 w< 0 z W64THJ TER E Medium -Density Restricted Commercial -NE 62ND ST 46- Z� .> N w�Q w 0 z z� NE 61ST,ST !' Major Inst, Facilities, Transp And Medium Density Multifamily Residential Inst, Public Facilities,ITransp And - IDuplex -lo _ Residential N Medium Density Restricted Commercial Medium 0 250 500 I I I Density Restricted _Commercial FIB 1,000 Feet Public Parks and Recreation I � III Public Facilities, Transp And ,0 w z Light Industr al NE 65TH ST 1 ID111 uplez 1 Residential IIJ NE 64TH ST— 1-,w w�Q z NE 63RD ST Multifamily Rene d tial J Med um Density II l�. .NE 62ND STe' .NE 61ST ST Light Industrial w wQ z J NE 59TH ST General Commercial Duplex - (Residential NE 58TH Commercial I I I I \ Restricted — Commercial F Pub Public Parks and - Recreation Low Density Multifamily Residential Single Family Residential Medium -Density Multifamily Residential Restricted Ell,NE 58TH STD ow ADDRESSES: 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, 288 NE 61 ST, 401, 300, AND 415 NE 62 ST, 334, 350, AND 370 NE 60 ST 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, AND 5952 NE 4 AV AND 6001 NE 2 AV ATTACHMENT C Du lex z Duplex] PE 64TH = Residential TER FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) File ID: 4458 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NE 65TH ST=o w z iII i NE 64TH ST— I 1 _Medium DeLnsity Multifamily i-�E63RD � TER Residential I I I JI�� NE 63RD ST-u) ,CNI Lz NE 62N TER NE 62ND ST Major Inst, Facilities, Transp And Medium Density Multifamily Residential Major Inst, Public Faci� (Transp And— Light - Industrial - Public Parks and Recreation Restricted Commercial NE 61ST,ST NE 60TH ST (Restricted Commercial Lill ight Industrial NE 59TH ST N 0 250 500 1 i I Medium Density Restricted Commercial 1IIIIIIII 1,000 Feet NE 67TH ST Light Industrial Duplex - Residential NE 58TH Major Inst, Public Facilities, NE 65TH ST Light Industrial 1D111 uplez -1 Residential IIJ NE 64TH ST— =ii �,w > Medium Density Multifamily _l Residential I.I 1 NE 62ND ST NE 61ST ST 0W w�Q Mediumnensity Multifamily Residential 1111 Restricted — Commercial ?�1 I Pub Parks and- Z, Recreation Restricted Commercial 1111111 Low Density Multifamily Residential ` Single Family Residential -NE 58TH STOMP - ADDRESSES: 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, 288 NE 61 ST, 401, 300, AND 415 NE 62 ST, 334, 350, AND 370 NE 60 ST 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, AND 5952 NE 4 AV AND 6001 NE 2 AV Proposal No. Date: 4458 7/18/18 ATTACHMENT D1 Concurrency Management Analysis City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department Impact of Proposed Amendment to Future Land Use Map AMENDMENT INFORMATION Applicant: MCD Miami, LLC Address: 6001 NE 2 AV Boundary Streets: North: South: Proposed Change: From: Medium Density Restricted Commercial To: Restricted Commercial Existing Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 5.0000 acres @ 65 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential NE 61 ST East: NE 4 CT NE 60 ST West: NE 2 AV Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 5.0000 acres @ 150 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Net Increment With Proposed Change: Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips Planning District County Wastewater Collection Zone Drainage Subcatchment Basin Solid Waste Collection Route Transportation Corridor Name 325 211 750 398 1,092 425 186 Little Haiti Basin 0044 D1 104 NE 62 ST DU's DU's RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Land Use Goal LU-1 Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Land Use Policy 1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 a - g (See attachment 1) CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Population Increment, Residents 1,092 MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (defined as 1/2 mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Checkoff OK POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, 92.05 g/r/d Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 1,092 100,542 >2% above demand >2% above demand OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, 141 g/r/d Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 1,092 154,007 See Note 1. See Note 1. WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration System Before Change Exfiltration System After Change Concurrency Checkoff On -site On -site OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Population Increment, Residents Solid Waste Generation, 1.28tons/resident/yl Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 1,092 1,398 800 (598) OK TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Population Increment, Residents Peak -Hour Person -Trip Generation LOS Before Change LOS After Change Concurrency Checkoff 1,092 186 F F OK NOTES: Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (WASA) Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS Population increment is assumed to be all new residents. Peak -period trip generation is based on ITE Trip Generation, 5th Edition at 1.4 ppv average occupancy for private passenger vehicles. Transportation Corridor capacities and LOS are from Table PT-2(R1), Transportation Corridors report. Potable water and wastewater transmission capacities are in accordance with Miami -Dade County stated capacities and are assumed correct. Service connections to water and sewer mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new connections are to be installed at owner's expense. Recreation/Open Space acreage requirements are assumed with proposed change made. ATTACHMENT D2 Proposal No. Date: 4458 7/18/18 Concurrency Management Analysis City of Miami Planning & Zoning Department Impact of Proposed Amendment to Future Land Use Map AMENDMENT INFORMATION Applicant: MCD Miami, LLC Address: See Exhibit "A", attached to the legislation for the full list and legal description of the affected properties Boundary Streets: North: NE 67 ST South: NE 59 TER East: West: Proposed Change: From: Light Industrial To: Restricted Commercial Existing Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 11.0800 acres @ 36 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Proposed Designation, Maximum Land Use Intensity Residential 11.0800 acres @ 150 DU/acre Peak Hour Person -Trip Generation, Residential Net Increment With Proposed Change: Population Dwelling Units Peak Hour Person -Trips Planning District County Wastewater Collection Zone Drainage Subcatchment Basin Solid Waste Collection Route Transportation Corridor Name NE 4 CT NE 2 AV 399 299 1,662 881 3,246 1,263 582 Little Haiti Basin 0044 D1 104 NE 62 ST DU's D U's RELEVANT MCNP GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES Land Use Goal LU-1 Land Use Objective LU-1.1 Land Use Policy 1.1.1 Capital Improvements Goal CI-1 Capital Improvements Objective CI-1.2 Capital Improvements Policy 1.2.3 a - g (See attachment 1) CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE Population Increment, Residents 3,246 MCNP Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Policy PR1.1.4 requires a 10-minute (defined as 1/2 mile) barrier -free walk to a park entrance. Concurrency Checkoff OK POTABLE WATER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, 92.05 g/r/d Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 3,246 298,814 >2% above demand >2% above demand OK SANITARY SEWER TRANSMISSION Population Increment, Residents Transmission Requirement, 141 g/r/d Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 3,246 457,717 See Note 1. See Note 1. WASD Permit Required STORM SEWER CAPACITY Exfiltration System Before Change Exfiltration System After Change Concurrency Checkoff On -site On -site OK SOLID WASTE COLLECTION Population Increment, Residents Solid Waste Generation, 1.28tons/resident/yl Excess Capacity Before Change Excess Capacity After Change Concurrency Checkoff 3,246 4,155 800 (3,355) OK TRAFFIC CIRCULATION Population Increment, Residents Peak -Hour Person -Trip Generation LOS Before Change LOS After Change Concurrency Checkoff 3,246 582 F F OK NOTES: Permit for sanitary sewer connection must be issued by Miami -Dade Water and Sewer Authority Department (WASA) Excess capacity, if any, is currently not known. ASSUMPTIONS AND COMMENTS Population increment is assumed to be all new residents. Peak -period trip generation is based on ITE Trip Generation, 5th Edition at 1.4 ppv average occupancy for private passenger vehicles. Transportation Corridor capacities and LOS are from Table PT-2(R1), Transportation Corridors report. Potable water and wastewater transmission capacities are in accordance with Miami -Dade County stated capacities and are assumed correct. Service connections to water and sewer mains are assumed to be of adequate size; if not, new connections are to be installed at owner's expense. Recreation/Open Space acreage requirements are assumed with proposed change made. N 0 250 500 1 i I AERIAL FILE ID: 4458 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1,000 Feet ADDRESSES: 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, 288 NE 61 ST, 401, 300, AND 415 NE 62 ST, 334, 350, AND 370 NE 60 ST 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, AND 5952 NE 4 AV AND 6001 NE 2 AV Medium FUTURE LAND USE MAP (EXISTING) File ID: 4458 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Density Restricted - Commercial NE 65TH ST, Duplex Residential —NE 64TH ST 11111 NE 63RD TER Medium D nsity Multifamily, Residential 1I JI NE 63RDST NE 62ND hiiv , Industrial 0 zf- N w z NE 65TH ST� Restricted Commercial Light - Industrial - Public Parks and Recreation NE 67TH ST z m w 0 w< 0 z W64THJ TER E Medium -Density Restricted Commercial -NE 62ND ST 46- Z� .> N w�Q w 0 z z� NE 61ST,ST !' Major Inst, Facilities, Transp And Medium Density Multifamily Residential Inst, Public Facilities,ITransp And - IDuplex -lo _ Residential N Medium Density Restricted Commercial Medium 0 250 500 I I I Density Restricted _Commercial FIB 1,000 Feet Public Parks and Recreation I � III Public Facilities, Transp And ,0 w z Light Industr al NE 65TH ST 1 ID111 uplez 1 Residential IIJ NE 64TH ST— 1-,w w�Q z NE 63RD ST Multifamily Rene d tial J Med um Density II l�. .NE 62ND STe' .NE 61ST ST Light Industrial w wQ z J NE 59TH ST General Commercial Duplex - (Residential NE 58TH Commercial I I I I \ Restricted — Commercial F Pub Public Parks and - Recreation Low Density Multifamily Residential Single Family Residential Medium -Density Multifamily Residential Restricted Ell,NE 58TH STD ow ADDRESSES: 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, 288 NE 61 ST, 401, 300, AND 415 NE 62 ST, 334, 350, AND 370 NE 60 ST 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, AND 5952 NE 4 AV AND 6001 NE 2 AV Du lex z Duplex] PE 64TH = Residential TER FUTURE LAND USE MAP (PROPOSED) File ID: 4458 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT NE 65TH ST=o w z iII i NE 64TH ST- I 1 _Medium Density Multifamily i-�E63RD � TER Residential I I I JI�� NE 63RD ST—u) ,CNI Lz NE 62N TER NE 62ND ST Major Inst, Facilities, Transp And Light - Industrial - Public Parks and Recreation Restricted Commercial NE 61ST,ST NE 60TH ST Medium Density Multifamily Residential Major Inst, Public Facilities,cfransp And— NE 60TH ST Restricted _ Commercial LiPli ight Industrial NE 59TH ST-- N 0 250 500 1 i I Medium Density Restricted Commercial 1IIIIIIII 1,000 Feet NE 67TH ST Light Industrial Duplex - Residential NE 58TH Major Inst, Public Facilities, NE 65TH ST Light Industrial 1D111 uplez -1 Residential IIJ NE 64TH ST- =ii �,w > Medium Density Multifamily _l Residential I.I 1 NE 62ND ST NE 61ST ST 0W w�Q Mediumnensity Multifamily Residential 1111 Restricted — Commercial ?�1 I Pub Parks and- Z, Recreation Restricted Commercial 1111111 Low Density Multifamily Residential ` Single Family Residential -NE 58TH STOMP - ADDRESSES: 240, 352, 372, 382, 301, 320, 270, 250, 262, 365, 298, 300, 310, 340, 371, 353, 288 NE 61 ST, 401, 300, AND 415 NE 62 ST, 334, 350, AND 370 NE 60 ST 6300, 6380, 6301, 6350, 5972, 5974, AND 5952 NE 4 AV AND 6001 NE 2 AV