HomeMy WebLinkAboutSubmittal - Christine Rupp - Letter regarding Wood Frame HomesThe following email was submitted into the public record by Christine Rupp during
the October 11, 2018 City Commission Meeting in connection with the planning
and zoning files listed below.
PZ.1/4659
PZ.2/4657
PZ.4/4643
PZ.5/4644
PZ.6/4645
PZ.7/4660
PZ.8/4661
PZ.9/4640
PZ.10/4662
PZ.11/4641
PZ.12/4642
PZ.13/4639
PZ.14/4638
PZ.15/4637
Submitted into the public
record for item(s)
PZ.l&PZ.3and PZ.4-PZ.l5
on1O/l1/2O1Q,City Clerk
hRICA
0
ONSKTLTNG
October |0,20L8
City of ianni
City ()oonobxiou
}500Pan American Drive
KE: Appeal ofHUB Resolution R,l8-0j0
[ocu|Dcoigoutiono[ihe"Wood FrunncVeolucukoResidences ofCoconut Grove Village
West Multiple Property Desigifation"
Dear Members of the Miami City Commission,
|unnwriting indefense ofdbelandmark designation o[ibepropudicminciudcdinUhe^^Wood
Frame Vernacular Residences ofCoconut, Grove Village West Multiple Property Druigoudnu."
The proposed historic district contains vornocu|ur-sty\c houses associated with the uoca`o historic
and coniiuucd settlement by black Bahamians, Southern /\Gcan'/\nocricons,and their decedents.
The structures included within the district form ucobcsivo unit and represent shared history as
well as representing a distinct bUilding typOlOgy unlike other buildings developed within the
gn:uterMianzi-Oadu County context. The Multiple Property Designation fhnnn1 is based on the
national standard set forth by Q.S. Department o[the Interior and regulated hythe National Park
Service, and the buildings contained within the boundaries ofthe proposed district meet the
national criteria for inclusion, Decades ofprior precedent have established the legal standing for
historic preservation ordinances, including the dcxignutinn of properties within historic district
ornmultiple property designation at the \mua| level. Further, more recent research supports the
economic benefits o[historic designation.
The local City ofMiami Multiple Property Designation process reflects the standards established
under the Secretary oFtile Interior for inclusion oil tile National Register ofHistoric Mucco. The
nu\Iona ||y-reoogoized Multiple Property Documentation Form (NP0 |O'90O'b)nominates groups
o[rc|uted significant properties based oil the (heoucs,trends, and patterns ofhis1ory shared by the
properties.' Multiple property listings may arise from historic contexts identified in the Federal,
U.S, Department ofthe Interior, "How to Coniplete the National Registcr Multiple Property DOCUnientation
Forni," Notional Rcgislei- Bulletin (Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, 1999), 2.
v—`{? Uucu\1oLzOw(�.w$ocz|Nc
a;—.~~m�l
Submitted into the public
record for itemb\
PZ.1&9Z.2and PZ.4-PZ.1S
onlD/21/3O18'City Clerk
State, or local planning proccss.2 Multiple Property Documentation is used to nominate and
register thernatically-relatd historic properties simultaneously or to establish the registration
requirements for properties that may be norninated in the future.3 As a management tool, the
dbcnuu1ic approach can furnish uoscodo| in[brnuuiinn for historic preservation planning because it
evaluates properties oil a comparative basis within a given geographical area and can be used to
establish preservation priorities based oil historical aignificmncc.4
The Mo|\ip|c Property Dcyigouhoo often establishes historic districts. /\historic district is
defined by the by the U.S. Department oflntcrior, National [lark. Set -vice as an area that
^`puuxcosesa significant concentration, linkage, orContinuity o[sites, buildings, structures, or
objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development."5 A district derives
its importance from being aUnified entity, despite containing awide variety of
resources. Districts can reflect one principal activity, orcan encompass several interrelated
activities. Buildings within udistrict can lack individual distinction orarchitectural significance,
but as egroup mdU retain enough integrity to qualify for designation. /\ district must hc o
definable geographic area; however, udistrict can also be composed oftwo mmore deOmhb
significant uzoox arporo\rd by nonsignificant urrox.a/\m with individual rnuno,zca, o historic
district can be Found to have significance in at least one offOmr urcuo: are associated with events
that made osignificant contribution 0nthe broad patterns Oil' Our history; are associated with tile
|ivcuo[xigniOcontpersoosluoorpoui;cmbndvthedistnciivcchoroctcrixdoso[u\ypc,pcdod.or
nucibud of construction, orthat represent the work nfnmaster, orthat possess high artistic
values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack
individual distinction; orhave yielded ormay be |ikc|y(oyield, in6bnnudon important in history
orp,chiutory.rThese national regulations are dbtu incorporated into the |000| ordinances
established at the couniy and city level and while local historic district rcgu|uUnoy vary
throughout the United 8(otcu, most incorporate tile regulation ofalterations, demolitions, and
new construction permits within the official houndaricooFdho district.:
Since the establishment ofthe Historic Sites Act of 1935, a legal precedent to designate and
protect sites and buildings ol.'significancc was set. With the National Register ofFlistoric Places,
created uopart o[ibe Nuiiouu| ||io\orioo| Preservation Act of"
|96b, uno1inno||y-rccoguized
system was oci in place. This syxtcnn cmtuh|iaboa o framework for state and local agencies to
zJbi].6.
`ibid,2.
"ihkLZ.
,PunickYKAodosunJUuSmdofdoNmivnx\RcQimc,oyHbwrbPhcc.'RuwmDcfincCoognrcs for Historic
Pmponicx,-National Rogb.mrUu8Mv ed. Rebecca H.Sb6mpmu(WbshioX/ou,DI.:O.3.Department vfthe
Interior, National Park Service, revised 2O02)part i\!
«ihiJ,PnrtIV.
r ihid,Part U.
8 Dianne Pierce O'Brien, "Measuring tile Full Economic Impacts of Local Historic District Designations," (master's
v-0EmcuMuux0N[0mumJINc
Submitted into the public
record for hem/d
PZ.18^PZ.2and PZ/l-PZ.15
on1O/l1/2O18'City Clerk
designate and set policies toprotect uhcuo[ui iOcanccv/khindhebovvornunicioo|hics.Wkhin
tile first decade, the legality ofboth the national and i000| preservation ordinances were tested.
0vrnvhc|ooing|y, tbc courts sided with the preservation agencies finding that preservation, like
other zoning nncuxurcm, do not constitute aiaking and that iav/o and policies for historic
preservation reflect the priorities of a democratic society. They restrict things deerned harmful
and seek to promote ucd000 that are viewed as hcusDcin|. Historic preservation |uvva reflect
decision bypolicy makers that oUoheritage, whether national or local, is significant and should
hrpreserved for future gcncrakioos.»
Tbcnnn-profiichuritythn1VvvorduodcnanogcdSoi|o,o`Suu8lLorbor,aNcvvyorkCi1y
Landmarks Historic District, wanted the landmark status revoked c|minuio& it was aburdship and
ununconstitutional taking. 'The Board ofTruotccxbecame one o{tile firotentities tooppose
landmark designation and publicly question the legality of tile property's regulation by the New
York City Lundnou,kx Preservation Cononuiasion, citing that designation vvon|d interfere with tile
profitability of tile designated property. /\tfirst, the New York 8tu\u Snprcnuc Court ruled in
March o[|987that designation nfthe buildings constituted un "unlawful taking n[property
withoUtjUSt compensation" (RUstees of Sailors' Snug Harbor v. Platt, New York Supreme Court.,
5]Misc. 2d933,28ON.\iS.Zd75(l967)).However, the court nfnppca|areversed the previous
ycur`« original decision finding that the designation of tile property was not considered atoking
(.Sei|orx'Snug Harbor v,Platt, 2YApp. Div. 2d376,288N.\[S2d.3|4(|s1l}cp't|9hQ))./oThc
appeals Court dc1conincd that landmark preservation laws closely resemble zoning ordinances in
that they cnnnti\uhonuUy rcgu|uic rcui property and are to protect the gcoc,a| vvc|furc of
coououuuidcx.// Following the ruling, an editorial in TAeyVnit }hrk 77muve1o(od: "There is no
longer any doubt that the concept nfpreservation is riot. only in the poh|ic interest but is u
�
decisive factor in[bcquality ofthe envuvnnoeu\."12
Additionally, denying the highest and best use of a property for the owner does riot result in a
taking so long no the property owner retains viable use of tile property, as determined by U.S.
Supreme Court Case Penn Central 'Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U,S, 104(1978).]o
this case, it was dcicrrniuod that tile designation of Grand Central 'Terminal as uNcvv York City
Landmark did not interfere with the building continuing to operate as atrain terminal and was
therefore still a profitable business, despite tile owner's desire to construct a new tower on the
site, 'The building, which was inpoor condition at the time ofdcsigoa<ion_ could s\U| retain its
intended use, and while the constrUCtIon of a new tower inay have resulted in higher returns for
"TimmhyMcLendon, ct al, `^Conoibu/ions"fHistoric Preservation wVe0ualkyofLifehoFlorida,"Kaiurr/i|le:
OoivcnhyofFlorida, November 200O>.7.
`^^8ui|orx'SuogRurhor,"New >o,kPreservation Ai -chive yri#ax/.Lus\modified I0\6.hup://"v`,vypnp»rg/
p,coemmioo-hismg/mi|oo'mog'bmhot�/
/` Mary Spearing, ^^LoodmskPreservation: The Problem o{the Tax -Exempt 0~nrr,^hooA'onOrhunlm°Jox,ou(
\bi3 on. | article 6(l974): 125'126
'2^Sui|nro'Snug Hu,hor,-New B,r6y,mar"o//ovJohivey,ojeu/.Last modified 20l6.hup:0www.nypup.o�P,/
pmse,vodon-himv,y/mi|om',nog'ho,tvr/
m—�>�mcu]�ouum[omuHx�G
9'u4'651'1447 |u
to|�om��omm�uux��—�
Submitted into the public
record for hem/s>
on 10111/2018, City Clerk
the owner, they offered noevidence that they were incapable of making oprofit offo[the
existing, landmarked, structure. The transfer of development rights from the air space above
Grand Central leunhnu| continues to provide additional profits for the building forty ycuo |uicr,
and the rehabilitated building draws thousands of commuters and tourists to the site daily.
Recent research aimed at determining the economic irnpocis u[preservation have fbondthak
hix1ndcprouervu1iouisgnodfbr|oou(euonornicuandpropedyovvnero./3F/nondbis|orgcuod
growing body o[research, the positive impact ofhistoric preservation onthe economy has been
documented in six broad areas: l)jobs, 2) property values, 3) heritage tourism, 4> environmental
impact, 5) social impact, and 6) downtown revitalization. 14 Historic preservation is one ofthe
highestjob-generating economic development options available and across the country a one -
million -dollar investment. iupreservation generates more jobs than the same investment in
leading industries or new construction.15 For property owners, a key factor for designation is the
docuoncnhcd property vu|uc ioorcoxc for rcuidcnhoi properties after they become part o[o local
historic district. In Philadelphia, houses in local historic districts command upncnoiuno of22.5Y6
over comparable properties not in historic diotricts.m In ,I small historic district in North Little
Rock, Arkansas, houses are worth on average $3 1,000 more than comparable houses not in the
district-, resulting In annual additional revenues for the County of $40,000, for the city of $50,000,
and $200,000 for the school district. 17
Beyond increasing [ionic values, creating.jobs, and increasing tax revenues, historic preservation
drives heritage tourism. Historic preservation provides the setting, the history, the persona, and
the traditions for heritage k`uh9n�heritage \omioonprovides the Opportunity to educate, en.JOYI
and appreciate hiatoricpncxcrvuhon.m in 2007, heritage tourists in Florida spent an cahmuicd
$4]3 billion and 40.7%o[all U.S. visitors to Florida reported visiting u historic site during their
uk0.wio2004,nearly 8Omillion tourists visited Florida and brought more than $57billion iothe
Florida economy. (}fthoxu,9.2Y6identified visiting historic sites and museums authe primary
purpose for their visit, with another 3% Identifying local cuku,u| cvcoAn and festivals as their
major aCtiVitieS.21) Within the United S<a\co` international heritage visitors stay hougcr, visit more
op\oc,Bcouooico."MeaSUI-ingthe ConnomicoofPmmnutiuo: Recent Fiodhgs ^(WoubhgmnDC: Advisory
Couoci|for Historic Preservation, June Z0U). i
wihid, L
oDonovan V.Kypkrmu."Economics podHistoric Yrosopu\i"n.~Forum Jb,onu and Forum /�om(Yashiogmn.
D[:National Trust hmrHistoric Preservation, December ZV|5).hops//(omm.ouvingp|oces.vrg/conncct/coomuohy'
h*mc/Uhmrydocomroto/vicwdocumro'?
DocmuoutKxy~01472coc'22ob'4ffc-90n2'8577c1oi5d66&CommonityKcy7---00000000'0000'0000'0000'800000000
000&mb|ihmrydncumcou
11,Ploco2cnnnmics,3.
n ibid. 3.
Timothy McLendon, et al, 7.
mPlmcoOconumico, 4.
20]Imothy Yddcmo,, et a], 21.
���EmcuMouomCowmDJINc
Submitted into the public
record for item(s)
PZ.1&PZ.2and PZ.4-PZ.15
on1O/l1/2O18'City Clerk
places, and spend nnorc per day than other tourists. 2.6 noiUk/o more international tourists °ixbnd
uhistoric place than went to an amusement park; 4] million more than went to the beach; four
tinies as many than went to a casirio. For every international visitor who played golf, |4visited w
historic placc.z/ In Fernandina 8cack. FL the city ,cm|izcd that the historic resources represented
u basis on which build u0ouriuuo industry and the basis for desirable economic development
ou\cnnncs. With u total of over 330 buildings in two key historic districts, the town has become
tourist destination leading to a rapid rise in property values and increasc tax revenUe.22
According to Florida 8UUocs, ^\bo rich and unique heritage o[historic properties inthis state,
representing more than l0,00Oyears ofhuoiouprcscnce, is an important legacy \obevalued and
conserved for present and future generations. The destruction of these nonrenewable historical
resources will engender a significant loss to tile state's quality of life, economy, and Cultural
cnvinnuonenL-z3l'hc\ondnourkduoignnLiono[1hcpcopoUicxiuc|udcdinibo^^WoodFrannc
Vernacular Residences ofCocooutGrove Village West Multiple Property Designation"
rcprcaroto ucohenivc historic district that is consistent with the o:gu|u\ioux ouUincd by the
Secretary ofthe Interior and national best practices. The thernatically-cohesive nomination
would create a. historic district that Would protect the rare typology found in Coconut Grove
Village West, Further, the multiple property format kind landmark designation in general have
been upheld in all levels o[oourtsacross the Doitcd Sin\cx, including the Q.S. Soprcnoc Court.
Arid ultimately, landmark designation is economically hsocficiu| for both the propcdy owner, and
the |oou| municipalities. /\sthe research cited here demonstrates, those contributions are
measurable, positive, and significant tnulocal econoouY.z 11
Thank you for Your consideration,
ChcoMoUnn
Preservation aric
Jrba
.1lanning Consult
o face Bcoovmics.5.
z2Timothy McLendon, o|al, 12.
o20l8Florida Statues, Title IV0Public Lands and Property, Chapter 267Historical ReSOUrces'2606lHistoric
properties; state policy, responsibilities, Ia.
21P\occ6convmics`9.
nr+�T'KxA MoUum(,-]om,L/umu
1-44RICA
OLLON
ONSULTING
Submitted into the public
record for item(s)
PZ.1&PZ.2 and PZ.4-PZ.15
on 10/11/2018, City Clerk
QUALIFICATIONS
WORK EXPERIENCE
Erica Motion Consulting October 2017-present
Preservation and Urban Planning Consultant
• Provides preservation and urban planning services including cultural resource surveys, historic
properties documentation, archival research., significance assessments, cultural landscape reports, and
State, and National Register nominations.
Combines experience working on preservation and urban planning projects in New York City, Albania,
Myan.mar, and Trinidad and Tobago to provide a global approach to cultural heritage challenges.
AKRE' July 2015-present
Architectural Historian and Planner
• Led three -borough survey for the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic
Preservation (OPRHP) to identify and document historic resources. Responsibilities included
budgeting; coordinating and managing a team of internal employees, seasonal interns, and external
consultants; establishing a workflow; and building and maintaining databases.
• Managed urban design and historic and cultural resource project tasks related to Environmental Impact
Statements (EIS) and Environmental .Assessment Statements (f:F.,AS).
• Analyzed and identified potential impacts to historic resources pursuant to Section 106 of the National.
.Historic Preservation Act: reviews and section 1.4.09 of the New York State Parks, Recreation, and
Historic 'Preservation La.w
Collaborated withgraphic designers and GIS specialists to develop a process for the visual
communication of large-scale projects on .urban design.
• .1stablished a process for standardized documentation. for New. York State Department of
Transportation (1.).TE) and New York City Department of Design and Construction (I)DC) Section
106 projects.
Cultural Heritage without Borders Albania
Harriman Pepsico Research Fellow
• Recipient of competitive fellowship from the 'f.larrirnan Institute at Columbia University to work .with
an international non-profit whose work .uses preservation to build collaborative relationships,
understanding, and work toward reconciliation following conflict.
• Led a team of five people us conducting an onsite survey of the prison site, geolocating key buildings
and work sites, and documenting, current conditions through photographs and measured drawings..
• Developed a strategic plan for the preservation and adaptive reuse of a work camp prison site including
precedent research and .forrnal site documentation,
Columbia University in the City of New York August 2013-May 2015
Teaching Assistant
• Served as .the teaching assistant to the 'Preservation and Planning Studios,
• Aided 15-20 students in surveying and identifying architectural resources in the Yorkville neighborhood
of .Manhattan and in identifying key community gathering spaces surrounding a potential development
site in Brooklyn.
• Assisted the head of the department and .professors in creating presentations and organizing lectures.
Greenwich Village Society of Historic Preservation June 2013-August 2013
Research Intern
• Researched and authored building descriptions with current conditionassessments in the East Village
neighborhood of Manhattan.
• Attended community board meetings and Landrnark Preservation Commission hearings on behalf of
the Director of Preservation...Authored statements and provided testimony at Landmark Preservation
(...;ornmission hearings.
June 2014-August 2014
WERICA
MOLLON
ONSULTING
Submitted into the public
record for item(s)
PZ.1&PZ.2 and PZ.4-PZ.15
on 10/11/2018, City Clerk
EDUCATION
M.S., Historic Preservation and M.S. Urban Planning, Columbia Uwvcrsity, New York, NY, 2015
M.B.A., University of North Florida, jacksonville, FL, 2011
B.A., Fine Art, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, GA, 2002
PAPERS AND PUBLICATIONS
Colu.mbia. University
"Guiding Sustainable Development in East Port of ,paIn. Joint reportwith Inter -American Development
Bank, 2014.
``Yangoon, Myanmar at a Turning Point." joint report with World Monument Fund, 2015.
"Measuring t:he Impacts of Preservation on Disadvantaged Communities." .Master's Thesis, 2015.
Cultural Heritage without Borders, Spa c Dialog
"Spac in Context." (..)tober 3, 2014.
"Building Conservation: Reconstruct, Rehabilitate, or Ruination?" October 7, 2014.
"Great Visitor Experiences Make (;reat Museums." October 10, 201.4.
"Education and Outreach: The Heart: of the Museum." October 16, 2014..
"Museums: Fundraising, and Organizational Structures." October 29, 2014.
Docomomo US
"Mid -Century Modern Schools in Manhattan." Sept. 17, 2013.
Greenwich Village Society for Ilistoric 'Preservation, Off The Grid
"From Swill Milk to Swell Milk; One Building That Shouldn't be Put Out to 'Pasteur."' june 28, 20 1.3.
"No Need for a Mock UN at One .f."'last: 'Village .Elementary School," july 5, 2013.
"Lost Theaters of the 'East Villa.ge: Loew's Avenue B." Aug. 16, 2013.
PRESENTATIONS
Presenter, "New Voices in Preservation: The Next: 50 Years," New York State Preservation Conference, May
5-7, 2016, Albany and Troy, NY
CERTIFICATIONS AND MEMBERSHIPS
Meets Secretary of interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural Hisairians (36 (7FR Part
61, Appendix A)
.American 'Planning Association (A:PA)
Preservation :Alumni
CATR)NS
Submitted into the public
^ ^_-�_-.''`
�� recordm, /`cmp/
'
Pz.1&PZ.2and PZ/-P3.15
`on1O/1 City Clerk
Erica MoUonisxpreservation and urban planning consu|ianiwith five years experience in
working inthe industry. Ms. MnUonholds on M.S. in Historic Preservation and oo M.S. in Urban
Planning from Columbia University. She has experience preparing Environmental Impact
Statements (B|S) arid Environmental Assessment Statements (EAS)arid ioperforming analyses
pursuant to Section |06ofthe Nuiiouo| Rixtoriu Preservation Act (o identify and assess potential
impacts to historic resources. She specializes in historic ponpc,<ica, urban design and aesthetics,
arid land use analysis, with experience in Cultural resource field surveys, archival research, and
significance nmoounncntn, Before beginning tier own consulting business, Ms. Molinuvvocked fbr
o Nev/York Ciiy-based environmental planning 6nn arid participated in pvcocrvu1iun planning
projects in Myanroor,/\|bonim, arid Trinidad arid Tobago.