HomeMy WebLinkAboutRequest for Intervenor Status [Bay Point Neighborhood, J.Gamas, B.Pittman, G.Bash]Tibbs, Christine H.
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 6:58 AM
To: Tibbs, Christine H.
Cc: Zamora, Olga; Russell, Ken (Commissioner); Mahony, Abigael; barbpit@comcast.net;
Jose E. Gamas; Juan E. Serralles; Julianna Castro
Subject: Request for Qualified Intervener Status - 7/26/18 City Commission / 3801 Biscayne Blvd
& 455 NE 39th St
Attachments: image001 jpg
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Olga Zamora - Director
Hearing Boards Office
City of Miami
Dear Ms Zamora,
The Bay Point Neighborhood (a respresentative of), Jose Gamas, Barbara Pittman and myself Geoffrey Bash of Magnolia
Park neighborhood respectfully request entry into the record for file ID's 1124 & 1125 of the 7/26/18 City Commission
agenda our request for Qualified Intervener status.
We intend to have an attorney represent us regarding the applicant's requests. They are a change to the FLUM and up -
zoning from T4R to T5-0 of the Zoning Atlas.
We should be granted the status of party for reasons not limited to the listed below:
The proposed up -zoning and FLUM change would negatively impact our quality of life as our properties are
directly abutting the subject properties
There are a long list of negative affects to allowing Commercial Use intrusion into our residential neighborhood
directly abutting our homesteads, some more than 100 year old homes.
The proposed project includes conversion of a private 12 foot wide alley which is in no way dedicated to the
public abutting our backyards into a two-way public street. This will bring exhaust fumes and noisy commercial
loading and service vehicles and general traffic in our backyards. Any change to the alleys requires agreement
from all lot holders of Magnolia Park.
The proposed buildings of 292' and 81' will cast shadow over our homes and entire neighborhoods.
The buildings will negatively impact the privacy and diminish our property values.
The NE 38th St and Biscayne Blvd intersection will be further negatively impacted as the access points to the
proposed project are located on a freeway exit ramp for already congested traffic arriving from Miami Beach. This
will also cause more traffic to use the local residential NE 39th St.
Additional negative impacts will be shared at the City Commission hearing.
1
Very kind regards,
Geoffrey Bash
448 NE 39th St
Miami, FL 33137
M: 305.401,9001
Forwarded message
From: Quirke, Amanda L. <alquirke@miamigov,com>
Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: Qualified Interveanor Status
To: Geoffrey Marshall Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Cc: Mendez, Victoria <VMendez@miamigov.com>, Blanton, Sharie <SBIanton@miamigov.com>, Garcia,
Francisco <fgarcia@miamigov.com>, Acosta, Vanessa <vacosta@miamigov.com>, Melendez, Eleazar
<EIMelendez@miamigov.com>, Andres Althabe <andres.althabe@gmail.com>, Ken Pittman
<kendpit@comcast,net>, Jose E. Gamas <jegamas@gmail.com>, Wagner, Timothy
<TimothyWagner@southernwine.com>, Mark Alverez <Mark@markalvarez.com>, Juan E. Serralles
<jserralles@frfirm.com>, ZZZ-ElvisCruz (Zoning) <elviscruz@mac.com>, petersobe <petersobe@aol.com>, ZZZ-
Gachysolares (Zoning) <gachysolares@aol.com>, robert apfel <apfe18563@outlook.com>, Julianna Castro
<julicabe@gmail.com>, William Pena <drpena@return2wellness.com>, Iizziekris <lizziekris@hotmail.com>,
Alex Schapiro <Alex@designdistrict.net>, Min, Barnaby <bmin@miamigov.com>, sarah@hartsell-Iaw,com
<sarah@hartsell-law.com>, robert@hartsell-law.com <robert@hartsell-law.com>, Lorena Ramos
<courtreporting@miamidadereporting.com>, Marc Billings <marc.billings@gmail.com>
Mr. Bash-
i. You can request intervenor status when it is your turn to speak at the hearing.
2. The request can be verbal, and you can submit anything in writing to the Board. Everyone has the right to speak
and submit materials into the record.
3. I would recommend that you state how you would be affected in a manner different than the rest of the citizens of
the City. In other words, why should you be granted the status of a party?
4. I do not know what the Board may ask during the hearing.
Keep in mind that everyone has the right to speak and submit materials into the record. Intervenors can be given
additional presentation time and an opportunity to cross examine witnesses.
i hope this is helpful,
Amanda Quirke Hand
2
Assistant City Attorney
City of Miami Office of the City Attorney
Telephone: (305) 416-1851
Facsimile: (305) 500-5241
alquirke@rniamigov.com
Litigation Assistant: Tana Mickens (305) 416-1820
3
Tibbs, Christine H.
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 7:05 AM
To: Tibbs, Christine H.
Cc: Zamora, Olga; Russell, Ken (Commissioner); Juan E. Serralles; Julianna Castro; Mahony,
Abigael; Jose E. Gamas; ZZZ-ElvisCruz (Zoning); barbpit@comcast.net
Attachments: 2013 Staff Analysis.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Olga Zamora - Director
Hearing Boards Office
City of Miami
Dear Ms Zamora,
I respectfully request the attached document entry into the record for fife ID's 1124 & 1125 of the 7/26/18 City Commission agenda our
request for Qualified Intervener status.
These are the City Planning Staff Review comments of 2013 for FLUM and Zoning Atlas changes.
This staff review was not included in the record for file ID's 1124 and 1125 3801 Biscayne Blvd and 455 NE 39th St previously.
Please confirm the request.
Kind regards,
Geoffrey Bash
M: 305.401.9001
1
File ID:
Title:
Location:
AppTicant(s):
Purpose;.
Planning and Zoning
Department
Recommendation:
Analysis:
Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board:
PZAB.2
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
FACT SHEET
C9-0O8631u1 Quasi -Judicial
A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS
BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACHMENT(S), AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO, 10544, AS AMENDED, THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF
THE MIAMI COMPREHENSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN, PURSUANT TO
SMALL SCALE AMENDMENT PROCEDURES SUBJECT TO §163.3187,
FLORIDA STATUTES, BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE
DES'GNATION OF THE ACREAGE DESCRIBED HEREIN OF REAL
PROPERTIES AT APPROXIMATELY 3801 BISCAYNE BOULEVARD AND 455
NORTHEAST 38TH STREET, MIAMI, FLORIDA, FROM "MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIFAMILY RESiDENTJAL" TO "MEDIUM DENSITY RESTRICTED
COMMERCIAL"; MAKING FINDINGS; DIRECTING TRANSMITTALS TO
AFFECTED AGENCIES; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Approxl-nately 3301 Biscayne Boulevard and 455 NE 38th Street
[Commissioner Marc David Samoff - District 21
Ben Fernandez, Esquire. on behalf of 3801 Biscayne Ltd. and 3801 Biscayne
Corp.
200 S Biscayne Boulevard #850
Miami, FL 33131
(305) 377-6235
This wiri chan,,e the abovA properties from "Mndiiirr: !Density Multifnrnily
Residental" to "Iwledium Density Restricted Commercial".
See supporting documentation,
.'IS FOR FUTURE LAND USE CHANCE REQUEST
Approximately 3801 Biscayne Boulevard
& 455 NE 38 Street
File ID Q9-008631u1
REQUEST
The proposal Is for a change to the Future Land Use Map of the Miami Comprehensive
Neighborhood Plan designation of certain properties from 'Medium Density Multifamily
Residential" to "Medium Density Restricted Commercial'. (A corrplete legal description is on fz4e
at thn Hearing Boards Office),
FUTURE LAND USE
Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Pura (MCNP) Policy L'U-1.6.1 established future land use
categories according to the 2020 Ftrturc Land Use Map and the "interpretation of the Future
Land Use Map?
The "Medium Density Multifamily Residential" future land use category allows residentiat
structures to a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre, subject to the detailed provisions
of the app!cable land development regulations arid the maintenance of required levels of
service for facilities and services induded in the City's adopted concurrency management
requirements. Supporting services such as community -based residential facilities (14 clients or
less, not including drug, alcohol or correctional rehabltitation facilities) will be allowed pursuant
to app5cab a state law—,, community -based residential facilities (15-50 clients) and day care
centers for children and adults may be permissible in suitable Jo .abors.
Permissible uses within medium density multifamily areas also Include commercial activates
that aro intended to serve the retailing and personal services needs of the building or bu]Iding
complex, small scale limitod commercial uses as acressory uses, subject to the detailed
pro•e'.sions of applicable land development regulations and the maintenance of required levels of
service for such uses, places of worship, ;primary and secondary schools, and accessory post-
secondary educations/ facilities.
Proreaviusiat offices, tourist and guest homes, museums, and private clubs or lodges are
allowed only In contributing structures within historic sites or historic districts that have been
designated by the Historical and Environmental Preservation Board and are in suitable itions
within medium density multifamily residential areas, pursuant to applicable land development
regulations and the rnaintenanoe of required levels of service for such uses. Density and
intensity limitations for said uses shall be restricted to those of the contributing stnicture(s).
The 'Medium Density Restricted Commercial" future land use category allows residential
uses (except rescue missions) to a maximum density equivalent to "Medium Density Multifamily
Residential subject to the same limiting conditions; transitory residential facilities such as
hotels and motels. This category also allows general office use, clinics and laboratories,
auditoriums, libraries, conversion facilities, places of worship, and primary and seoondary
schools. Also allowed are commercial activities that generally scree the daily retailing and
service needs of the public, typically requiring easy access by personal auto, and often located
along arterial or collector roadways, which include: general retailing, personal and professional
1
1
services, real estate, banking and other financial services, restaurants, saloons and cafes,
general entertainment facilities, private clubs and recreation facilities, major sports and
exhibition or entertainment facilities and ether commercial activities whose scale and land use
impacts are similar in nature to those uses described abcve. This category also incluces
commercial marinas and living quarters on vessels as permissible.
The nonresidential portions of developrreets within areas designated as 'Medium Density
Restricted Commercial' allow a maximum floor lot ratio (FLR) of 6.0 tunes the net tot area of the
subject property.
DISCUSSION
The subject area consists of two parcels comprising approximately 0.79 acres. The site is
.ocated on the north side of NE 33t Street between Biscayne Boulevard and NE 5th Avenue.
The site and the areas to the north, south, and east are designated 'Medlien Density Multifamily
Residential"; the area to the west along Biscayne Boulevard is designated 'General
Commercial°. The subject site is in the UPPER EAS T SIDE NET area,
ANALYSIS
The Planning Department Is recommending ❑FN:AL of the amendment as presented
based on the fallowing findings:
• KICNP Land Use Goal LU-1(1) encourages a land use pattern that protects and enhances
the quality of fife in the ci;y's residential neighborhoods and (5) promotes the effciant crse
of laird and minimizes land use Conflicts. This amendment will increase conlhots because
the proposed designation will allow for the intrusion of commercial uses into a stable
residential neighborhood. The commercial Lees should be limited to the Commercial
Corridor along Biscayne Boulevard.
e • A land use change at this location may sot a neeatve precedent aid create a "domino
effect" el regards to future land use change appl: ations th-oughout this neighborhood.
lv1CNP Housing Polley HO-1.1.7 states the City ►vll continue to control, through restrictions
in the Ciy's land development regu1atlons, large scale ardllor intensive commercial and
industrial land development which may rhorpitively imp acf ,any residontinr nedrohh,orhood send
will provi10 appropriate transitions between high-rise and low-rise residential developments.
The proposed change will allow for intensive commercial development that is out of context
and may netiatively impact the surrounding residential neighborhood?
• The MCNIe interpretation of the 2020 Future Land Use Map indicates that the "Medium
Density Restricted Commerciar future land uae category allows residental st°uutures ue to
a maximum of 65 revelling units per acre. The amendment does not propose changing the
maximum residential density.
MCNP Lend Use Policy LU"1`1.3 (1) provides for the protection of all areas of the city from
the encroachment of incompatible land uses; and (2) the adverse impacts of future land
uses in adjacent areas that disrupt or degrade public health and safety, The proposed
amendment alkevs for the encroachment of incompatible land uses into a stable residential
area. Commercial uses shored be limited to the ccrnmeroial corridor along Biscay
Boubvard.
2
✓ MCNP Land Use Policy 1.1.1 provides that new developrnont or redevelopment that results
in an increase in donsi y or intensity of land use shell be contingent upon availability of
public faculties and services that meet or exceed the minimum LOS standards adopted in
the Capital Improvements Element. See the attached concurrency analyses.
• Thu analysis is NOT teased on a proposed prc ect. The highest potential use is being
considered.
• The Miami 21 zoning designation currently approved on
Urban. — Restricted' and the proposed designation is T5-O
this parcel is T4-R -- 'Gor.era!
— "Urban Canter — Open".
These findings support tho position that the Future Land Use
neighborhood should NOT be changed.
Map at th!s location and for this
File ID:
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
FACT SHEET
09-3 3 # 63zc 1 Quasi -Judicial
PZAB.3
Title: A RESOLUTION OF THE MIAMI PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS
BOARD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF AN ORDINANCE OF
THE MIAMI CITY COMMISSION, WITH ATTACFiMENT(S), AMENDING THE
ZONING ATLAS OF ORDINANCE NO. 13114, AS AMENDED, BY CHANGING
THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION FROM ""TAR" GENERAL URBAN ZONE -
RESTRICTED TO "T5-O" URBAN CENTER ZONE - OPEN, FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 3801 BISCAYNE
BOULEVARD (T4-R PORTION ONLY) AND 455 NORTHEAST 38TH STREET,
MIAMI, FLORIDA; MAKING FINDINGS; CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Location: Approximately 3801 Biscayne Boulevard and 455 NE 38th Street
[Commissioner Marc David Samoff - District 21
Applicant(s): Ben Fernandez, Esquire, on behalf of 3801 Biscayne Ltd. and 3801 Biscayne
Corp.
200 S Biscayne Boulevard #850
Miami, FL 33131
(305) 377-6235
—Purtxase: This will chancthe Lunir for a „,crtiorruf-tt' bave properties fro .m- T4-R'to—
"T5--0'. item does not include a covenant_
Planning and Zoning
Department
Rt ..vrrrrricndatlon:
I~`
Denial.
Analysis: Se$ supporting documentation.
Planning, Zoning and
Appeals Board: ptem er 18, 2013
ANALYSIS FOR ZONING CHANGE
Approximately 3801 Biscayne Boulevard and 455 NE 38 Street
FILE NO O9-O08c1
Pursuant to Article 5 and Article 7, Section 7.1.2.8 of Ordinance 13114, as amended, the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Mrami, Florida, the subject proposal has been reviewed for an amendment to the Zoning Atlas as fellow:
AootCation requests:
A change to the existing zoning classifications of the acreage domed herein of selected real properties
located at approximately 3801 Biscayne Boulevard and 455 NE 38 Street, Marni, Fhri a, from T4-R'
`General urban — Restrcted' Transect Zone to 'T5-0" 'Urban Center- Open' Transect Zone.
The subject .property .is located within the tipper Eastside NET area and consists of lot 44, 45, 46, and 47 of
Magnolia Park, as described in Exhibit'A' (Compete legal description t on fie with the Fleecing Boards Section).
Review and analysis of the proposed application finds that:
• The subject ctv represents a portion of a Gager parcel designated'T4-R' and 'T6-12-U.
• The eastem port on of the st±sect pares, is des$nated 'T4-R 'General Urban- Restricted Transect Zones`.
• The premed tots for rezoning curronty contain a parking lot serlr:ng a co:men:id/e ice use on the T5-124.
zoned area.
• The parking area represents a legal non-nfcrming use en the T4-R zoned lots.
• The parking lot area immediately abuts residerdal uses to the east and north, which are respectively low rise
multi -family to the east and hole-farnty homes 10 the north.®
• The applIcati o request twelves a rezoning of the aforementioned lots from 'T4-R' to
• Purs.kirt to Article 7, Section 7.1.2-8 (a) (3), the proposed rezoning meets the SII=G'Se4Vizoning requirement
from T4-R to T5-0.
• A grange to T5-0 will allow for enterta rnent establishments, food sere cce estatrltshments, alcohol beverage
prt.v�a:.v orerS46hmwntr_, .�w.l.....t..{y.,} cvmmarclai •asobil hfrMnsfc. Humans! , a cvrnmercia! uses, !xylofiF, iun w, nurrinr
related commercial establishments, open air retail, place of assembly, recreational seabt,stiment, educational
uses, civic uses, except regional activy complex, civic support Uses, except rescue mission and major facility,
sue as hcsaitals and cernete,?es.
s�iltl I4 { establish;l nos'de-dial •a'ee irnme as x
ire east and north of the subtect prer`y. Thus. tie rezoning recuest represents a near commercial ielredoe
within the residential area. The proposed rezoning also would eliminate the existing zoning buffer between the raasiderdal ses that
immediately abuts the parcel en the east and r}orth from the portion of tie parcel occupied corrercial'offce
use, v4tiich the T4-R Transact Zone does not allow.
• 71ie requested zoning designation of T5-0 Is incons-steat with the current Comprehensive t eightxa food Flan
;MCNPj designation of 'M&fh m Density Multifamily Residential' and would require a Future Lard Use Map
(FLUM) arnendrnent to low Density Restricted Commercial'.
Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends denial
of the proposed rezoning as presented. -
Tibbs, Christine H.
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 7:13 AM
To: Tibbs, Christine H.
Cc: Zamora, Olga; ZZZ-ElvisCruz (Zoning); Russell, Ken (Commissioner); Mahony, Abigael;
Jose E. Gamas; Julianna Castro; Juan E. Serralles
Subject: Correction to 2015 Staff Analysis
Attachments: magnolia park platt.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Olga Zamora - Director
Hearing Boards Office
City of Miami
Dear Ms Zamora,
I respectfully request entry into the record for file ID's 1124 & 1125 of the 7/26/18 City Commission agenda.
All references to "NE 5th Ave" in the record for file ID's 1124 & 1125 are NOT correct. What is referred to in the 2015 Staff Analyses as "NE
5th Ave" is actually a PRIVATE ALLEYWAY as stated so in the 2nd Amended Platt of Magnolia Park dated March 1916 (Platt attached
below). This alleyway is in no -way dedicated to the public and may not be modified without consent of ALL lot holders of Magnolia Park.
Referring to this PRIVATE ALLEY as an avenue is deceptive and does not illustrate correctly for our elected officials.
Very kind regards,
Geoffrey Bash
M: 305.401.9001
1
Tibbs, Christine H.
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmaiLcom>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 7:22 AM
To: Tibbs, Christine H.
Cc: Russell, Ken (Commissioner); Mahony, Abigael; Jose E. Gamas; Juan E. Serralles; Julianna
Castro; Veronika Moinian; William Pena; barbpit@comcast.net
Subject: Neighbor's Requests for meeting with Applicant
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Ragged
Olga Zamora - Director
Hearing Boards Office
City of Miami
Dear Ms Zamora,
[ respectfully request entry into the record for file ID's 1124 & 1125 of the 7/26/18 City Commission agenda.
Neighbors have been requesting to meet with the developer in advance of the 7/26/18 Commission hearing to
review the plans and for a updated briefing since we have not formally met with the developer to review
changes to the plans on this matter.
Our e-mail, phone and text messages have gone mostly unanswered with the exception of a being "uninvited"
by partner Mr. Kevin Coy of Pinecrest.
Regards,
Geoffrey Bash
Forwarded message
From: Jose E. Gamas <jegamas@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 8:18 AM
Subject: Meeting with developer to review plans
To: <Ron@recompany.us>
Cc: Barbara Pittman <barbpit@comcast.net>, Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>, Juan Serralles
<JSerralles@frc-law.com>, Julianna Castro <julicabe@gmail.com>, Mahony, Abigael
<amahony@miamigoy.com>, Russell, Ken (Commissioner) <krussell@miamigov.com>, elviscruz
<elviscruz@mac.com>
Dear Mr. Bloomberg:
I hope this email finds you doing well.
I am sending you this email to formally request the opportunity to meet with you to review your updated
plans.
1
believe it has been over two years since the last time we met and I understand that there has been some
revisions to your plans than none of us have had a chance to see.
hope that this meeting is based on the goal of finding common ground to work with.
Also, I would personally appreciate if you would have the courtesy to confirm your intention to either defer or
read the item in the upcoming hearing. It would be ideal if your confirmation can be received in timely manner
so all the neighbors that are planing to attend to this hearing can plan accordingly.
As a business man and developer, I am confident that you can understand that last minute notice of your
intentions either to defer the items or to proceed with the first reading, is something that we all would like not
to see happening.
Looking forward to meet with you and your team.
Regards,
Jose. E. Gamas/President
J.E. Gamas Construction Company
3838 North Bayshore Drive
Miami, Florida 33137
305-892-3540 Office
305-892-5470 Fax
305-992-5210 Cell
jegarnas@gmail.com
Forwarded message
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:02 PM
Subject: 7/26/18 City Commission lst Reading - 3801 Biscayne Blvd & 455 NE 38th St
To: Ben J. Fernandez <bfernandez@brzoninglaw.com>
Cc: Russell, Ken (Commissioner} <krussell@miamigov.com>, Mahony, Abigael <amahony@miamigov.com>, Zamora,
Olga <ozamora@miamigov.com>
Dear Attorney Fernandez,
My property and quality of life are greatly impacted by the up -zoning, proposed new construction and alley
modifications your clients have submitted.
Do you intend to request another deferral or are you planning to finally have the first reading?
I have not met with you or your clients in two years or more as you continue to indefinitely defer the item. Mr.
Bloomberg mentioned a several weeks ago there are some changes to the plans. I have not been presented with those
changes.
As you know, the public are required to speak at 2pm 7/26/18 before seeing your presentation or the changes.
Therefore, it is very important that you have met with and shared your plans with me and anyone else who makes a
request.
2
I respectfully request a meeting with the applicant and/or their respresentative(s) in advance of the next hearing to
include a review of your latest plans.
Mr. Coy has denied my request to review your current plans and Mr. Bloomberg has not responded to my 7/11/18 e-
mail requesting same.
Regards,
Geoffrey Bash
Forwarded message
From: Kevin Coy <yckc@aol.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: 1/26/16 Public Hearing - 3801 Biscayne Bvd & 455 NE 39th St
To: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Bloomberg <Ron@recompany.us>
Mr. Bass,
It is Dr. Coy. After your insults and disingenuous comments at our last meeting, you are no longer welcome. KC
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2018, at 1:05 PM, Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings Mr. Coy,
would like to meet with your group at your earliest convenience regarding 3801 BBLVD and
455 NE 38th St in advance of the 7/26/18 1st Reading at city commission. I'd like to review the
plans your attorney will present and discuss anything new since last I was invited to your
meetings with the neighbors.
Thank you.
Geoffrey Bash
M: 305.401.9001
Forwarded message
From: Geoffrey Bash <geoffreybash@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:52 PM
Subject: City Commission
To: Police Museum <ron@recompany.us>
Hi Ron,
haven't heard back from you and your City Commission hearing is 7/26/18 for 455 NE 39th st. Your 1st
reading.
3
Can we meet to review you current plans and continue our recent conversation at your earliest convenience?
Thanks,
Geoff
4